Special Local Regulation; Bradenton Area Riverwalk Regatta; Manatee River, Bradenton, FL, 4497-4499 [2015-01620]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 18 / Wednesday, January 28, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
[Docket Number USCG–2014–0905]
boat races and those vessels enforcing
the areas, are prohibited from entering,
transiting through, anchoring in, or
remaining within.
DATES: This rule is effective February 1,
2015. This rule will be enforced
annually on the first Saturday of
February from 11 a.m. to 7:30 p.m.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket USCG–
2014–0905. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Marine Science Technician First
Class Hector I. Fuentes, Sector Saint
Petersburg Waterways Management
Branch, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone
(813) 228–2191, email
Hector.I.Fuentes@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Barbara
Hairston, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
RIN 1625–AA08
Table of Acronyms
Special Local Regulation; Bradenton
Area Riverwalk Regatta; Manatee
River, Bradenton, FL
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
AGENCY:
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is
establishing a special local regulation on
the waters of the Manatee River in
Bradenton, Florida, during the
Bradenton Area Riverwalk Regatta. The
event is scheduled to take place
annually from 11 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. on
the first Saturday of February. The
special local regulation is necessary to
protect the safety of race participants,
participant vessels, spectators, and the
general public on the navigable waters
of the United States during the event.
The special local regulation will restrict
vessel traffic in the waters of the
Manatee River in the vicinity of
Bradenton, Florida. It will establish the
following two areas: Enforcement areas
#1 and #2, where all persons and
vessels, except those persons and
vessels participating in the high speed
The Coast Guard is establishing this
Special Local Regulation on the waters
of the Gulf of Mexico in the vicinity of
Manatee River, Florida during the
Bradenton Riverwalk Regatta. On
November 26, 2014, the Coast Guard
published a notice proposing this final
rule. No comments were received.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. The Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for making this rule
effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register
because immediate action is needed to
minimize potential danger to the public
during this event and the rule will have
minimal impact on the public and
waterway users. The comment period
on this rule ended on December 26,
2014 and the Coast Guard did not have
restoration appeals, the Board will not
consider matters described at 5 U.S.C.
7701(c)(2) in an appeal covered by this
section.
(e) Notice of jurisdictional, timeliness,
and merits elements. The administrative
judge will provide notice to the parties
of the specific jurisdictional, timeliness,
and merits elements that apply in a
particular appeal.
(f) Additional information. For
additional information on IRA appeals,
the reader should consult 5 CFR part
1209. For additional information on
VEOA appeals, the reader should
consult 5 CFR part 1208, subparts A &
C. For additional information on
USERRA appeals, the reader should
consult 5 CFR part 1208, subparts A and
B.
(g) For additional information on
denial of restoration appeals, the reader
should consult 5 CFR part 353, subparts
A and C.
William D. Spencer,
Clerk of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2015–01575 Filed 1–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7400–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
wreier-aviles on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:01 Jan 27, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
4497
sufficient time to publish notice of this
rule. This event has been well
publicized by the City of Bradenton and
local media outlets. Any delay in the
effective date of this rule would be
contrary to the public interest because
this rule is needed to minimize
potential danger to the public during the
Bradenton Riverwalk Regatta and
fireworks display.
B. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the rule is the
Coast Guard’s authority to establish
special local regulations: 33 U.S.C.
1233.
The purpose of the rule is to provide
for the safety of life on navigable waters
of the United States during the
Bradenton Riverwalk Regatta.
C. Comments and Changes to the Final
Rule
The Coast Guard received no
comments related to this event during
the comment period. This rule makes
one change to the proposed regulation.
In the NPRM, the special local
regulation exclusion areas would be
enforced from 11:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
However, the Bradenton Riverwalk
Regatta includes a fireworks display. To
ensure the safety of race participants,
participant vessels, spectators, and the
general public on the navigable waters
of the United States during the
fireworks display, the Coast Guard is
extending the enforcement period for
the special local regulation until 7:30
p.m. Because the fireworks display will
take place in the race area, the
geographic area of the proposed
enforcement zones remains unchanged
in this rule. Additional notice and
opportunity to comment on this change
is unnecessary because extending the
enforcement period a few hours is a
logical outgrowth of the the NPRM. The
fireworks display has always been part
of the schedule of events, publicized by
the City of Bradenton and local media.
Furthermore, the additional impact of
the extended enforcement period is
minimal. The enforcement areas will be
restricted for three extra hours once per
year.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes or
executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
E:\FR\FM\28JAR1.SGM
28JAR1
4498
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 18 / Wednesday, January 28, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders.
2. Impact on Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
the impact of this rule on small entities.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this rule or
any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
wreier-aviles on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:01 Jan 27, 2015
Jkt 235001
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
would not result in such expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule would not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a determination that this
action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(h) of Figure 2–1 of the
Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
■
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This rule is not a ‘‘significant energy
action’’ under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
■
2. Add § 100.722 to read as follows:
§ 100.722 Special Local Regulations;
Bradenton Area Riverwalk Regatta, Manatee
River; Bradenton, FL.
(a) Regulated Areas. The following
regulated areas are established as
special local regulations. All
coordinates are North American Datum
1983.
(1) Enforcement Area #1. All waters of
the Manatee River between the Green
Bridge and the CSX Train Trestle
contained within the following points:
27°30.73′ N, 82°34.37′ W, thence to
position 27°30.73′ N, 82°34.13′ W,
thence to position 27°29.97′ N, 82°34.27′
W, thence to position 27°29.59′ N,
82°34.07′ W, thence back to the original
position, 27°30.73′ N, 82°34.37′ W.
(2) Enforcement Area #2. All waters of
the Manatee River contained within the
following points: 27°30.58′ N, 82°34.62′
W, thence to position 27°30.58′ N,
82°34.43′ W, thence to position
27°30.43′ N, 82°34.43′ W, thence to
E:\FR\FM\28JAR1.SGM
28JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 18 / Wednesday, January 28, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
position 27°30.43′ N, 82°34.62′ W,
thence back to the original position,
27°30.58′ N, 82°34.62′ W.
(b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated
representative’’ means Coast Guard
Patrol Commanders, including Coast
Guard coxswains, petty officers, and
other officers operating Coast Guard
vessels, and Federal, state, and local
officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port St. Petersburg in the
enforcement of the regulated areas.
(c) Regulations. (1) All persons and
vessels are prohibited from entering,
transiting through, anchoring in, or
remaining within the regulated areas
unless an authorized race participant.
(2) Designated representatives may
control vessel traffic throughout the
regulated areas as determined by the
prevailing conditions.
(3) Persons and vessels may request
authorization to enter, transit through,
anchor in, or remain within the
regulated areas by contacting the
Captain of the Port St. Petersburg by
telephone at (727) 824–7506, or a
designated representative via VHF radio
on channel 16. If authorization is
granted by the Captain of the Port St.
Petersburg or a designated
representative, all persons and vessels
receiving such authorization must
comply with the instructions of the
Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or a
designated representative.
(d) Enforcement Date. This section
will be enforced annually from 11 a.m.
to 7:30 p.m. on the first Saturday of
February.
Dated: January 8, 2015.
G.D. Case,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port St. Petersburg.
[FR Doc. 2015–01620 Filed 1–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORATION
Saint Lawrence Seaway Development
Corporation
33 CFR Part 401
[2135–AA36]
Seaway Regulations and Rules:
Periodic Update, Various Categories
Saint Lawrence Seaway
Development Corporation, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
wreier-aviles on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
The Saint Lawrence Seaway
Development Corporation (SLSDC) and
the St. Lawrence Seaway Management
Corporation (SLSMC) of Canada, under
international agreement, jointly publish
and presently administer the St.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:01 Jan 27, 2015
Jkt 235001
The Saint
Lawrence Seaway Development
Corporation (SLSDC) and the St.
Lawrence Seaway Management
Corporation (SLSMC) of Canada, under
international agreement, jointly publish
and presently administer the St.
Lawrence Seaway Regulations and
Rules (Practices and Procedures in
Canada) in their respective jurisdictions.
Under agreement with the SLSMC, the
SLSDC is amending the joint regulations
by updating the Regulations and Rules
in various categories. The changes will
update the following sections of the
Regulations and Rules: Seaway
Navigation, and Radio Communications.
Because these changes to the joint
regulations are either technical
amendments or corrections, the SLSDC
finds that a notice-and-comment period
would be unnecessary and impractical.
The rule will become effective on March
31, 2015 in Canada and in order to
avoid confusion among the users of the
Seaway, the rule will become effective
on the same date in the United States.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Notices
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
Lawrence Seaway Regulations and
Rules (Practices and Procedures in
Canada) in their respective jurisdictions.
Under agreement with the SLSMC, the
SLSDC is amending the joint regulations
by updating the Seaway Regulations and
Rules in various categories. The changes
will update the following sections of the
Regulations and Rules: Seaway
Navigation, and Radio Communications.
Because these changes to the joint
regulations are either technical
amendments or corrections, the SLSDC
finds that a notice-and-comment period
would be unnecessary and impractical.
The rule will become effective on March
31, 2015 in Canada and in order to
avoid confusion among the users of the
Seaway, the rule will become effective
on the same date in the United States.
DATES: The rule will become effective
on March 31, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carrie Mann Lavigne, Chief Counsel,
Saint Lawrence Seaway Development
Corporation, 180 Andrews Street,
Massena, New York 13662; 315/764–
3200.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
4499
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78) or you
may visit https://www.Regulations.gov.
The changes to the joint regulations
are technical amendments or
corrections.
Regulatory Evaluation
This regulation involves a foreign
affairs function of the United States and
therefore Executive Order 12866 does
not apply and evaluation under the
Department of Transportation’s
Regulatory Policies and Procedures is
not required.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Determination
I certify that this regulation will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
The St. Lawrence Seaway Regulations
and Rules primarily relate to
commercial users of the Seaway, the
vast majority of whom are foreign vessel
operators. Therefore, any resulting costs
will be borne mostly by foreign vessels.
Environmental Impact
This regulation does not require an
environmental impact statement under
the National Environmental Policy Act
(49 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.) because it is not
a major federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human
environment.
Federalism
The Corporation has analyzed this
rule under the principles and criteria in
Executive Order 13132, dated August 4,
1999, and has determined that this rule
does not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant a Federalism
Assessment.
Unfunded Mandates
The Corporation has analyzed this
rule under Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104–4, 109 Stat. 48) and determined that
it does not impose unfunded mandates
on State, local, and tribal governments
and the private sector requiring a
written statement of economic and
regulatory alternatives.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This regulation has been analyzed
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 and does not contain new or
modified information collection
requirements subject to the Office of
Management and Budget review.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 401
Hazardous materials transportation,
Navigation (water), Penalties, Radio,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Vessels, Waterways.
E:\FR\FM\28JAR1.SGM
28JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 18 (Wednesday, January 28, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 4497-4499]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01620]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket Number USCG-2014-0905]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulation; Bradenton Area Riverwalk Regatta;
Manatee River, Bradenton, FL
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a special local regulation on
the waters of the Manatee River in Bradenton, Florida, during the
Bradenton Area Riverwalk Regatta. The event is scheduled to take place
annually from 11 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. on the first Saturday of February.
The special local regulation is necessary to protect the safety of race
participants, participant vessels, spectators, and the general public
on the navigable waters of the United States during the event. The
special local regulation will restrict vessel traffic in the waters of
the Manatee River in the vicinity of Bradenton, Florida. It will
establish the following two areas: Enforcement areas #1 and #2, where
all persons and vessels, except those persons and vessels participating
in the high speed boat races and those vessels enforcing the areas, are
prohibited from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or
remaining within.
DATES: This rule is effective February 1, 2015. This rule will be
enforced annually on the first Saturday of February from 11 a.m. to
7:30 p.m.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
USCG-2014-0905. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Marine Science Technician First Class Hector I. Fuentes,
Sector Saint Petersburg Waterways Management Branch, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone (813) 228-2191, email Hector.I.Fuentes@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Barbara
Hairston, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is establishing this Special Local Regulation on
the waters of the Gulf of Mexico in the vicinity of Manatee River,
Florida during the Bradenton Riverwalk Regatta. On November 26, 2014,
the Coast Guard published a notice proposing this final rule. No
comments were received.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. The Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register because immediate action is needed
to minimize potential danger to the public during this event and the
rule will have minimal impact on the public and waterway users. The
comment period on this rule ended on December 26, 2014 and the Coast
Guard did not have sufficient time to publish notice of this rule. This
event has been well publicized by the City of Bradenton and local media
outlets. Any delay in the effective date of this rule would be contrary
to the public interest because this rule is needed to minimize
potential danger to the public during the Bradenton Riverwalk Regatta
and fireworks display.
B. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the rule is the Coast Guard's authority to
establish special local regulations: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
The purpose of the rule is to provide for the safety of life on
navigable waters of the United States during the Bradenton Riverwalk
Regatta.
C. Comments and Changes to the Final Rule
The Coast Guard received no comments related to this event during
the comment period. This rule makes one change to the proposed
regulation. In the NPRM, the special local regulation exclusion areas
would be enforced from 11:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. However, the Bradenton
Riverwalk Regatta includes a fireworks display. To ensure the safety of
race participants, participant vessels, spectators, and the general
public on the navigable waters of the United States during the
fireworks display, the Coast Guard is extending the enforcement period
for the special local regulation until 7:30 p.m. Because the fireworks
display will take place in the race area, the geographic area of the
proposed enforcement zones remains unchanged in this rule. Additional
notice and opportunity to comment on this change is unnecessary because
extending the enforcement period a few hours is a logical outgrowth of
the the NPRM. The fireworks display has always been part of the
schedule of events, publicized by the City of Bradenton and local
media. Furthermore, the additional impact of the extended enforcement
period is minimal. The enforcement areas will be restricted for three
extra hours once per year.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
[[Page 4498]]
Planning and Review, as supplemented by Executive Order 13563,
Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review, and does not require an
assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of
Executive Order 12866 or under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The
Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.
2. Impact on Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered the impact of this rule on small entities. The Coast Guard
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the
Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule would not result
in such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule would not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a
determination that this action is one of a category of actions that do
not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically excluded from further review
under paragraph 34(h) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
0
2. Add Sec. 100.722 to read as follows:
Sec. 100.722 Special Local Regulations; Bradenton Area Riverwalk
Regatta, Manatee River; Bradenton, FL.
(a) Regulated Areas. The following regulated areas are established
as special local regulations. All coordinates are North American Datum
1983.
(1) Enforcement Area #1. All waters of the Manatee River between
the Green Bridge and the CSX Train Trestle contained within the
following points: 27[deg]30.73' N, 82[deg]34.37' W, thence to position
27[deg]30.73' N, 82[deg]34.13' W, thence to position 27[deg]29.97' N,
82[deg]34.27' W, thence to position 27[deg]29.59' N, 82[deg]34.07' W,
thence back to the original position, 27[deg]30.73' N, 82[deg]34.37' W.
(2) Enforcement Area #2. All waters of the Manatee River contained
within the following points: 27[deg]30.58' N, 82[deg]34.62' W, thence
to position 27[deg]30.58' N, 82[deg]34.43' W, thence to position
27[deg]30.43' N, 82[deg]34.43' W, thence to
[[Page 4499]]
position 27[deg]30.43' N, 82[deg]34.62' W, thence back to the original
position, 27[deg]30.58' N, 82[deg]34.62' W.
(b) Definition. The term ``designated representative'' means Coast
Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and
Federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port St. Petersburg in the enforcement of the regulated
areas.
(c) Regulations. (1) All persons and vessels are prohibited from
entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the
regulated areas unless an authorized race participant.
(2) Designated representatives may control vessel traffic
throughout the regulated areas as determined by the prevailing
conditions.
(3) Persons and vessels may request authorization to enter, transit
through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated areas by contacting
the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg by telephone at (727) 824-7506,
or a designated representative via VHF radio on channel 16. If
authorization is granted by the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or a
designated representative, all persons and vessels receiving such
authorization must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the
Port St. Petersburg or a designated representative.
(d) Enforcement Date. This section will be enforced annually from
11 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. on the first Saturday of February.
Dated: January 8, 2015.
G.D. Case,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port St. Petersburg.
[FR Doc. 2015-01620 Filed 1-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P