Receipt of Several Pesticide Petitions Filed for Residues of Pesticide Chemicals in or on Various Commodities, 4525-4527 [2015-01603]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 18 / Wednesday, January 28, 2015 / Proposed Rules
• Dr. Glenn Chen, Alaska Regional
Office, Bureau of Indian Affairs;
• Trevor Fox, Alaska Regional Office,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; and
• Steve Kessler and Thomas
Whitford, Alaska Regional Office, U.S.
Forest Service.
Executive Order 13211
This Executive Order requires
agencies to prepare Statements of
Energy Effects when undertaking certain
actions. However, this proposed rule is
not a significant regulatory action under
E.O. 13211, affecting energy supply,
distribution, or use, and no Statement of
Energy Effects is required.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, the Secretaries propose to
amend 36 CFR part 242 and 50 CFR part
100 as set forth below.
Clarity of the Rule
We are required by Executive Orders
12866 and 12988, and by the
Presidential Memorandum of June 1,
1998, to write all rules in plain
language. This means that each rule we
publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address
readers directly;
(c) Use clear language rather than
jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and
sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever
possible.
If you feel that we have not met these
requirements, send us comments by one
of the methods listed in ADDRESSES. To
better help us revise the proposed rule,
your comments should be as specific as
possible.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
shellfish. However, the Board will
provide Federally recognized Tribes and
Alaska Native Corporations an
opportunity to consult on this proposed
rule. Consultation with Alaska Native
Corporations are based on Public Law
108–199, div. H, Sec. 161, Jan. 23, 2004,
118 Stat. 452, as amended by Public
Law 108–447, div. H, title V, Sec. 518,
Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 3267, which
provides that: ‘‘The Director of the
Office of Management and Budget and
all Federal agencies shall hereafter
consult with Alaska Native corporations
on the same basis as Indian tribes under
Executive Order No. 13175.’’
The Secretaries, through the Board,
will provide a variety of opportunities
for consultation: Engaging in dialogue at
the Regional Council meetings; engaging
in dialogue at the Board’s meetings; and
providing input in person, by mail,
email, or phone at any time during the
rulemaking process.
■
Drafting Information
Theo Matuskowitz drafted these
regulations under the guidance of
Eugene R. Peltola, Jr. of the Office of
Subsistence Management, Alaska
Regional Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Anchorage, Alaska. Additional
assistance was provided by:
• Daniel Sharp, Alaska State Office,
Bureau of Land Management;
• Mary McBurney, Alaska Regional
Office, National Park Service;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:34 Jan 27, 2015
Jkt 235001
List of Subjects
36 CFR Part 242
50 CFR Part 100
Administrative practice and
procedure, Alaska, Fish, National
forests, Public lands, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Wildlife.
Proposed Regulation Promulgation
PART—SUBSISTENCE MANAGEMENT
REGULATIONS FOR PUBLIC LANDS IN
ALASKA
1. The authority citation for both 36
CFR part 242 and 50 CFR part 100
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 3, 472, 551, 668dd,
3101–3126; 18 U.S.C. 3551–3586; 43 U.S.C.
1733.
Subpart B—Program Structure
2. In subpart B of 36 CFR part 242 and
50 CFR part 100, § __.15 is revised to
read as follows:
■
Rural determination process.
(a) The Board determines which areas
or communities in Alaska are nonrural.
Current determinations are listed at
§ ___.23.
(b) All other communities and areas
are, therefore, rural.
Sally Jewell,
Secretary of the Interior.
Dated: December 12, 2014.
Beth G. Pendleton,
Regional Forester, USDA-Forest Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–01621 Filed 1–26–15; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P;4310–55–P
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 174 and 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0008; FRL–9921–55]
Receipt of Several Pesticide Petitions
Filed for Residues of Pesticide
Chemicals in or on Various
Commodities
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of filing of petitions and
request for comment.
AGENCY:
Administrative practice and
procedure, Alaska, Fish, National
forests, Public lands, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Wildlife.
§ __.15
4525
Sfmt 4702
This document announces
EPA’s receipt of several initial filings of
pesticide petitions requesting the
establishment or modification of
regulations for residues of pesticide
chemicals in or on various commodities.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before February 27, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by the Docket Identification
(ID) Number and the Pesticide Petition
Number (PP) of interest as shown in the
body of this document, by one of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting
or visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is
available at https://www.epa.gov/
dockets.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert McNally, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (BPPD)
(7511P), main telephone number: (703)
305–7090, email address:
BPPDFRNotices@epa.gov; or Susan
Lewis, Registration Division (RD)
(7505P), main telephone number: (703)
305–7090, email address:
RDFRNotices@epa.gov. The mailing
address for each contact person is:
Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001. As part of the mailing
address, include the contact person’s
E:\FR\FM\28JAP1.SGM
28JAP1
4526
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 18 / Wednesday, January 28, 2015 / Proposed Rules
name, division, and mail code. The
division to contact is listed at the end
of each pesticide petition summary.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
If you have any questions regarding
the applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT for the division listed at the
end of the pesticide petition summary of
interest.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
B. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark
the part or all of the information that
you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD–ROM that
you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD–ROM the specific information that
is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments.
When preparing and submitting your
comments, see the commenting tips at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
comments.html.
3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to
achieve environmental justice, the fair
treatment and meaningful involvement
of any group, including minority and/or
low-income populations, in the
development, implementation, and
enforcement of environmental laws,
regulations, and policies. To help
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:34 Jan 27, 2015
Jkt 235001
address potential environmental justice
issues, EPA seeks information on any
groups or segments of the population
who, as a result of their location,
cultural practices, or other factors, may
have atypical or disproportionately high
and adverse human health impacts or
environmental effects from exposure to
the pesticides discussed in this
document, compared to the general
population.
II. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is announcing its receipt of
several pesticide petitions filed under
section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C.
346a, requesting the establishment or
modification of regulations in 40 CFR
part 174 or part 180 for residues of
pesticide chemicals in or on various
food commodities. EPA is taking public
comment on the requests before
responding to the petitioners. EPA is not
proposing any particular action at this
time. EPA has determined that the
pesticide petitions described in this
document contain the data or
information prescribed in FFDCA
section 408(d)(2), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(2);
however, EPA has not fully evaluated
the sufficiency of the submitted data at
this time or whether the data support
granting of the pesticide petitions. After
considering the public comments, EPA
intends to evaluate whether and what
action may be warranted. Additional
data may be needed before EPA can
make a final determination on these
pesticide petitions.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 180.7(f), a
summary of each of the petitions that
are the subject of this document,
prepared by the petitioner, is included
in a docket EPA has created for each
rulemaking. The docket for each of the
petitions is available at https://
www.regulations.gov.
As specified in FFDCA section
408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), EPA is
publishing notice of the petitions so that
the public has an opportunity to
comment on these requests for the
establishment or modification of
regulations for residues of pesticides in
or on food commodities. Further
information on the petitions may be
obtained through the petition
summaries referenced in this unit.
New Tolerances
1. PP 4E8230. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–
0600). BASF Corporation, 26 Davis Dr.,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709,
requests to establish a tolerance in 40
CFR part 180 for residues of the
insecticide teflubenzuron, in or on
apple at 0.5 parts per million (ppm);
apple, wet pomace at 0.8 ppm; broccoli
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
at 0.2 ppm; cattle, muscle at 0.01 ppm;
cattle, meat byproducts at 0.01 ppm;
cauliflower at 0.01 ppm; citrus oil at 90
ppm; coffee, bean, green at 0.6 ppm;
corn, field at 0.01 ppm; corn, field,
refined oil at 0.02 ppm; egg at 0.01 ppm;
goat, muscle at 0.01 ppm; goat, meat
byproducts at 0.01 ppm; horse, muscle
at 0.01 ppm; horse, meat byproducts at
0.01 ppm; lemon at 0.9 ppm; mango at
1.5 ppm; melon at 0.3 ppm; milk at 0.01
ppm; orange at 0.6 ppm; papaya at 0.4
ppm; pineapple at 0.8 ppm; pork,
muscle at 0.01 ppm; pork, meat
byproducts at 0.01 ppm; poultry, muscle
at 0.01 ppm: Poultry, meat byproducts
at 0.01 ppm; sheep, muscle at 0.01 ppm;
sheep, meat byproducts at 0.01 ppm;
soybean, seed at 0.05 ppm; soybean,
hulls at 0.4 ppm; sugarcane, cane at 0.01
ppm; sunflower, seed at 0.3 ppm;
tomato at 1.5 ppm; and tomato, paste at
5 ppm. High performance liquid
chromatography with tandem mass
spectrometry detection (HPLC–MS/MS)
is used to measure and evaluate the
residues of teflubenzuron for the
proposed uses. Contact: RD.
2. PP 4F8258. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–
0357). E.I. du Pont de Nemours &
Company, 1007 Market St., Wilmington,
DE 19898, requests to establish a
tolerance in 40 CFR part 180 for
residues of the insecticide
cyantraniliprole, in or on artichokes,
globe (import tolerance) at 0.1 parts per
million (ppm); berries, low growing,
except strawberries (crop subgroup 13–
07H) (import tolerance) at 0.08 ppm;
coffee, bean, green (import tolerance) at
0.05 ppm; grapes (import tolerance) at
1.5 ppm; olives (import tolerance) at 1.5
ppm; peanuts at 0.01 ppm; peanut hay
at 3 ppm; pomegranates (import
tolerance) at 0.01 ppm; rice, grain
(import tolerance) at 0.03 ppm;
soybeans, seed at 0.4 ppm; strawberries
at 1.0 ppm; vegetables, foliage of legume
(crop group 7) at 50 ppm; vegetables,
leaves of root and tuber (crop group 2)
at 40 ppm; vegetables, legume, dried
shelled, except soybean (crop subgroup
6C) at 0.9 ppm; vegetables, legume,
edible podded (crop subgroup 6A) at 2
ppm; vegetables, legume, succulent
shelled (crop subgroup 6B) at 0.2 ppm;
vegetables, root, except sugar beet (crop
subgroup 1B) at 0.4 ppm; and tea, dried
(import tolerance) at 30 ppm. Adequate
analytical methodology, high-pressure
liquid chromatography (HPLC) with
electrospray tandem mass spectrometry
(ESI–MS/MS), is available for
enforcement purposes. Contact: RD.
3. PP 4F8320. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–
0890). Syngenta Crop Protection LLC,
P.O. Box 18300, Greensboro, NC 27419,
requests to establish a tolerance in 40
CFR part 180 for residues of the
E:\FR\FM\28JAP1.SGM
28JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 18 / Wednesday, January 28, 2015 / Proposed Rules
insecticide cyantraniliprole, in or on
corn, field and pop, forage at 0.04 parts
per million (ppm); corn, field and pop,
grain at 0.01 ppm; corn, field and pop,
stover at 0.015 ppm; corn, sweet, forage
at 0.02 ppm; corn, sweet, kernel plus
cob with husks removed at 0.01 ppm;
and corn, sweet, stover at 0.08 ppm.
Adequate analytical methodology, highpressure liquid chromatography (HPLC)
with electrospray tandem mass
spectrometry (ESI–MS/MS) detection, is
used to measure and evaluate the
chemical cyantraniliprole. Contact: RD.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Amended Tolerance
1. PP 4F8290. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–
0889). FMC Corporation, 1735 Market
St., Philadelphia, PA 19103, requests to
amend the tolerances in 40 CFR 180.418
for residues of the insecticide, zetacypermethrin, in or on raw agricultural
commodities corn, field, forage from 0.2
parts per million (ppm) to 9.0 ppm;
corn, field, stover from 3.0 ppm to 30.0
ppm; and corn, pop, stover from 3.0
ppm to 30.0 ppm. The Gas
Chromatography with Electron Capture
Detection (GC/ECD) analytical method
is used to measure and evaluate the
residues of zeta-cypermethrin for the
proposed, amended uses. Contact: RD.
New Tolerance Exemptions
1. PP 2F8102. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–
0963). BASF Corporation, 26 Davis Dr.,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709,
requests to establish an exemption from
the requirement of a tolerance in 40 CFR
part 180 for residues of the fungicide
Trichoderma asperelloides strain JM41R
in or on all food commodities. The
petitioner believes no analytical method
is needed because, as proposed, the use
of Trichoderma asperelloides strain
JM41R would not result in residues that
are of toxicological concern. Note: In the
Federal Register of February 21, 2014
(79 FR 9870) (FRL–9904–98), EPA
announced the filing of this petition to
establish an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance for residues
of Trichoderma fertile strain JM41R in
or on all food commodities. Since that
time, the petitioner provided additional
data on the identity of the active
ingredient to EPA. After reviewing these
data, EPA now considers the correct
identity of the active ingredient to be
Trichoderma asperelloides strain JM41R
and not Trichoderma fertile strain
JM41R. In order to give the public an
opportunity to comment on this new
information, EPA is republishing its
receipt of this tolerance exemption
petition filing with an updated and
accurate description. Contact: BPPD.
2. PP 4F8252. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–
0920). Certis USA LLC, 9145 Guilford
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:34 Jan 27, 2015
Jkt 235001
Rd., Suite 175, Columbia, MD 21046,
requests to establish an exemption from
the requirement of a tolerance in 40 CFR
part 180 for residues of the fungicide
Bacillus mycoides isolate J, in or on all
agricultural commodities. The petitioner
believes no analytical method is needed
because an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance is being
sought for any residues and enforcement
of residue levels would not be needed.
Contact: BPPD.
3. PP 4F8271. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–
0919). Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc.,
2121 Second St., Suite B–107, Davis, CA
95618, requests to establish an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance in 40 CFR part 180 for
residues of the nematocide, fungicide,
and insecticide, sterile grain inoculated
with Muscodor albus strain SA–13, in or
on all food commodities. The petitioner
believes no analytical method is needed
because the active ingredient will not be
in direct contact with treated
commodities, has limited survivability
once the nutrient source is exhausted,
and will not result in residues of
toxicological concern. Contact: BPPD.
4. PP 4F8276. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–
0454). Monsanto Company, 800 North
Lindbergh Blvd., St. Louis, MO 63167,
requests to establish an exemption from
the requirement of a tolerance in 40 CFR
part 174 for residues of the plantincorporated protectant, Bacillus
thuringiensis Cry2Ab2 protein, in or on
soybean. The petitioner believes no
analytical method is needed because an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance is being sought. Contact:
BPPD.
5. PP 4F8289. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–
0834). Southern Garden Citrus, 1820
Country Rd. 833, Clewiston, FL 33440,
requests to establish an exemption from
the requirement of a tolerance in 40 CFR
part 174 for residues of defensin
proteins derived from spinach (Spinacia
oleracea L.) and inserted into citrus
plants in order to confer disease
resistance. The petitioner believes no
analytical method is needed because an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance is being sought. Contact:
BPPD.
6. PP IN–10683. (EPA–HQ–OPP–
2014–0176). Exponent, Inc., 1150
Connecticut Ave. NW., Suite 1100,
Washington, DC 20036 (on behalf of
Huntsman Corporation, 8600 Gosling
Rd., The Woodlands, TX 77381),
requests to establish an exemption from
the requirement of a tolerance in 40 CFR
part 180 for residues of di-n-butyl
carbonate (CAS No. 542–52–9) when
used as a pesticide inert ingredient in
pesticide formulations as a solvent
without limits. The petitioner believes
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4527
no analytical method is needed because
an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance is being sought for this inert
ingredient. Contact: RD.
7. PP IN–10770. (EPA–HQ–OPP–
2014–0874). BASF Corporation, 100
Park Ave., Florham Park, NJ 07932,
requests to establish an exemption from
the requirement of a tolerance in 40 CFR
180.960 for residues of 2-propenoic
acid, polymer with ethenyl acetate,
ethenylbenzene, 2-ethylhexyl 2propenoate and ethyl 2-propenoate
(CAS No. 85075–52–1) with a minimum
number average molecular weight (in
amu) of 50,000 Daltons, when used as
a pesticide inert ingredient in pesticide
formulations. The petitioner believes no
analytical method is needed because it
is not relevant based upon the definition
of a low risk polymer under 40 CFR
723.250. Contact: RD.
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a.
Dated: January 20, 2015.
Robert McNally,
Director, Biopesticides and Pollution
Prevention Division, Office of Pesticide
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2015–01603 Filed 1–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0209; FRL–9921–60]
Receipt of a Pesticide Petition Filed for
Residues of Pesticide Chemicals in or
on Various Commodities
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of filing of petition and
request for comment.
AGENCY:
This document announces the
Agency’s receipt of an initial filing of a
pesticide petition requesting the
establishment or modification of
regulations for residues of pesticide
chemicals in or on various commodities.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before February 27, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0209, by
one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28JAP1.SGM
28JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 18 (Wednesday, January 28, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 4525-4527]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01603]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 174 and 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0008; FRL-9921-55]
Receipt of Several Pesticide Petitions Filed for Residues of
Pesticide Chemicals in or on Various Commodities
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of filing of petitions and request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document announces EPA's receipt of several initial
filings of pesticide petitions requesting the establishment or
modification of regulations for residues of pesticide chemicals in or
on various commodities.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 27, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by the Docket
Identification (ID) Number and the Pesticide Petition Number (PP) of
interest as shown in the body of this document, by one of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. Additional
instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert McNally, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (BPPD) (7511P), main telephone number:
(703) 305-7090, email address: BPPDFRNotices@epa.gov; or Susan Lewis,
Registration Division (RD) (7505P), main telephone number: (703) 305-
7090, email address: RDFRNotices@epa.gov. The mailing address for each
contact person is: Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001. As part of the mailing address, include the contact person's
[[Page 4526]]
name, division, and mail code. The division to contact is listed at the
end of each pesticide petition summary.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
[emsp14]Crop production (NAICS code 111).
[emsp14]Animal production (NAICS code 112).
[emsp14]Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
[emsp14]Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this
action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT for the division listed at the end of the
pesticide petition summary of interest.
B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting
your comments, see the commenting tips at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html.
3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to achieve environmental
justice, the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of any group,
including minority and/or low-income populations, in the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies. To help address potential environmental justice issues, EPA
seeks information on any groups or segments of the population who, as a
result of their location, cultural practices, or other factors, may
have atypical or disproportionately high and adverse human health
impacts or environmental effects from exposure to the pesticides
discussed in this document, compared to the general population.
II. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is announcing its receipt of several pesticide petitions filed
under section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA),
21 U.S.C. 346a, requesting the establishment or modification of
regulations in 40 CFR part 174 or part 180 for residues of pesticide
chemicals in or on various food commodities. EPA is taking public
comment on the requests before responding to the petitioners. EPA is
not proposing any particular action at this time. EPA has determined
that the pesticide petitions described in this document contain the
data or information prescribed in FFDCA section 408(d)(2), 21 U.S.C.
346a(d)(2); however, EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency of the
submitted data at this time or whether the data support granting of the
pesticide petitions. After considering the public comments, EPA intends
to evaluate whether and what action may be warranted. Additional data
may be needed before EPA can make a final determination on these
pesticide petitions.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 180.7(f), a summary of each of the petitions
that are the subject of this document, prepared by the petitioner, is
included in a docket EPA has created for each rulemaking. The docket
for each of the petitions is available at https://www.regulations.gov.
As specified in FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), EPA
is publishing notice of the petitions so that the public has an
opportunity to comment on these requests for the establishment or
modification of regulations for residues of pesticides in or on food
commodities. Further information on the petitions may be obtained
through the petition summaries referenced in this unit.
New Tolerances
1. PP 4E8230. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0600). BASF Corporation, 26 Davis
Dr., Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, requests to establish a
tolerance in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of the insecticide
teflubenzuron, in or on apple at 0.5 parts per million (ppm); apple,
wet pomace at 0.8 ppm; broccoli at 0.2 ppm; cattle, muscle at 0.01 ppm;
cattle, meat byproducts at 0.01 ppm; cauliflower at 0.01 ppm; citrus
oil at 90 ppm; coffee, bean, green at 0.6 ppm; corn, field at 0.01 ppm;
corn, field, refined oil at 0.02 ppm; egg at 0.01 ppm; goat, muscle at
0.01 ppm; goat, meat byproducts at 0.01 ppm; horse, muscle at 0.01 ppm;
horse, meat byproducts at 0.01 ppm; lemon at 0.9 ppm; mango at 1.5 ppm;
melon at 0.3 ppm; milk at 0.01 ppm; orange at 0.6 ppm; papaya at 0.4
ppm; pineapple at 0.8 ppm; pork, muscle at 0.01 ppm; pork, meat
byproducts at 0.01 ppm; poultry, muscle at 0.01 ppm: Poultry, meat
byproducts at 0.01 ppm; sheep, muscle at 0.01 ppm; sheep, meat
byproducts at 0.01 ppm; soybean, seed at 0.05 ppm; soybean, hulls at
0.4 ppm; sugarcane, cane at 0.01 ppm; sunflower, seed at 0.3 ppm;
tomato at 1.5 ppm; and tomato, paste at 5 ppm. High performance liquid
chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry detection (HPLC-MS/MS) is
used to measure and evaluate the residues of teflubenzuron for the
proposed uses. Contact: RD.
2. PP 4F8258. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0357). E.I. du Pont de Nemours &
Company, 1007 Market St., Wilmington, DE 19898, requests to establish a
tolerance in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of the insecticide
cyantraniliprole, in or on artichokes, globe (import tolerance) at 0.1
parts per million (ppm); berries, low growing, except strawberries
(crop subgroup 13-07H) (import tolerance) at 0.08 ppm; coffee, bean,
green (import tolerance) at 0.05 ppm; grapes (import tolerance) at 1.5
ppm; olives (import tolerance) at 1.5 ppm; peanuts at 0.01 ppm; peanut
hay at 3 ppm; pomegranates (import tolerance) at 0.01 ppm; rice, grain
(import tolerance) at 0.03 ppm; soybeans, seed at 0.4 ppm; strawberries
at 1.0 ppm; vegetables, foliage of legume (crop group 7) at 50 ppm;
vegetables, leaves of root and tuber (crop group 2) at 40 ppm;
vegetables, legume, dried shelled, except soybean (crop subgroup 6C) at
0.9 ppm; vegetables, legume, edible podded (crop subgroup 6A) at 2 ppm;
vegetables, legume, succulent shelled (crop subgroup 6B) at 0.2 ppm;
vegetables, root, except sugar beet (crop subgroup 1B) at 0.4 ppm; and
tea, dried (import tolerance) at 30 ppm. Adequate analytical
methodology, high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) with
electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS), is available for
enforcement purposes. Contact: RD.
3. PP 4F8320. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0890). Syngenta Crop Protection LLC,
P.O. Box 18300, Greensboro, NC 27419, requests to establish a tolerance
in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of the
[[Page 4527]]
insecticide cyantraniliprole, in or on corn, field and pop, forage at
0.04 parts per million (ppm); corn, field and pop, grain at 0.01 ppm;
corn, field and pop, stover at 0.015 ppm; corn, sweet, forage at 0.02
ppm; corn, sweet, kernel plus cob with husks removed at 0.01 ppm; and
corn, sweet, stover at 0.08 ppm. Adequate analytical methodology, high-
pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) with electrospray tandem mass
spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS) detection, is used to measure and evaluate the
chemical cyantraniliprole. Contact: RD.
Amended Tolerance
1. PP 4F8290. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0889). FMC Corporation, 1735 Market
St., Philadelphia, PA 19103, requests to amend the tolerances in 40 CFR
180.418 for residues of the insecticide, zeta-cypermethrin, in or on
raw agricultural commodities corn, field, forage from 0.2 parts per
million (ppm) to 9.0 ppm; corn, field, stover from 3.0 ppm to 30.0 ppm;
and corn, pop, stover from 3.0 ppm to 30.0 ppm. The Gas Chromatography
with Electron Capture Detection (GC/ECD) analytical method is used to
measure and evaluate the residues of zeta-cypermethrin for the
proposed, amended uses. Contact: RD.
New Tolerance Exemptions
1. PP 2F8102. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0963). BASF Corporation, 26 Davis
Dr., Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, requests to establish an
exemption from the requirement of a tolerance in 40 CFR part 180 for
residues of the fungicide Trichoderma asperelloides strain JM41R in or
on all food commodities. The petitioner believes no analytical method
is needed because, as proposed, the use of Trichoderma asperelloides
strain JM41R would not result in residues that are of toxicological
concern. Note: In the Federal Register of February 21, 2014 (79 FR
9870) (FRL-9904-98), EPA announced the filing of this petition to
establish an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues
of Trichoderma fertile strain JM41R in or on all food commodities.
Since that time, the petitioner provided additional data on the
identity of the active ingredient to EPA. After reviewing these data,
EPA now considers the correct identity of the active ingredient to be
Trichoderma asperelloides strain JM41R and not Trichoderma fertile
strain JM41R. In order to give the public an opportunity to comment on
this new information, EPA is republishing its receipt of this tolerance
exemption petition filing with an updated and accurate description.
Contact: BPPD.
2. PP 4F8252. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0920). Certis USA LLC, 9145 Guilford
Rd., Suite 175, Columbia, MD 21046, requests to establish an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of
the fungicide Bacillus mycoides isolate J, in or on all agricultural
commodities. The petitioner believes no analytical method is needed
because an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is being
sought for any residues and enforcement of residue levels would not be
needed. Contact: BPPD.
3. PP 4F8271. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0919). Marrone Bio Innovations,
Inc., 2121 Second St., Suite B-107, Davis, CA 95618, requests to
establish an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance in 40 CFR
part 180 for residues of the nematocide, fungicide, and insecticide,
sterile grain inoculated with Muscodor albus strain SA-13, in or on all
food commodities. The petitioner believes no analytical method is
needed because the active ingredient will not be in direct contact with
treated commodities, has limited survivability once the nutrient source
is exhausted, and will not result in residues of toxicological concern.
Contact: BPPD.
4. PP 4F8276. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0454). Monsanto Company, 800 North
Lindbergh Blvd., St. Louis, MO 63167, requests to establish an
exemption from the requirement of a tolerance in 40 CFR part 174 for
residues of the plant-incorporated protectant, Bacillus thuringiensis
Cry2Ab2 protein, in or on soybean. The petitioner believes no
analytical method is needed because an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance is being sought. Contact: BPPD.
5. PP 4F8289. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0834). Southern Garden Citrus, 1820
Country Rd. 833, Clewiston, FL 33440, requests to establish an
exemption from the requirement of a tolerance in 40 CFR part 174 for
residues of defensin proteins derived from spinach (Spinacia oleracea
L.) and inserted into citrus plants in order to confer disease
resistance. The petitioner believes no analytical method is needed
because an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is being
sought. Contact: BPPD.
6. PP IN-10683. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0176). Exponent, Inc., 1150
Connecticut Ave. NW., Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20036 (on behalf of
Huntsman Corporation, 8600 Gosling Rd., The Woodlands, TX 77381),
requests to establish an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance
in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of di-n-butyl carbonate (CAS No. 542-
52-9) when used as a pesticide inert ingredient in pesticide
formulations as a solvent without limits. The petitioner believes no
analytical method is needed because an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance is being sought for this inert ingredient. Contact: RD.
7. PP IN-10770. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0874). BASF Corporation, 100 Park
Ave., Florham Park, NJ 07932, requests to establish an exemption from
the requirement of a tolerance in 40 CFR 180.960 for residues of 2-
propenoic acid, polymer with ethenyl acetate, ethenylbenzene, 2-
ethylhexyl 2-propenoate and ethyl 2-propenoate (CAS No. 85075-52-1)
with a minimum number average molecular weight (in amu) of 50,000
Daltons, when used as a pesticide inert ingredient in pesticide
formulations. The petitioner believes no analytical method is needed
because it is not relevant based upon the definition of a low risk
polymer under 40 CFR 723.250. Contact: RD.
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a.
Dated: January 20, 2015.
Robert McNally,
Director, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2015-01603 Filed 1-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P