Environmental Protection Agency Acquisition Regulation (EPAAR); Environmental, Conservation, Occupational Safety, and Drug-Free Workplace, 4211-4216 [2015-01166]
Download as PDF
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 17 / Tuesday, January 27, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
business will be protected so that the
security and confidentiality of the
information is preserved.
(b) Not disclose any PII contained in
any system of records, except as
authorized by The Privacy Act, or other
applicable statute, Executive order,
regulation, or policy. Those willfully
making any unlawful or unauthorized
disclosure, knowing that disclosure is
prohibited, may be subject to criminal
penalties and/or administrative
sanctions.
(c) Report any unauthorized
disclosures of PII from a system of
records to the applicable Privacy point
of contact (POC) for the respective DoD
Component.
(d) Report the maintenance of any
system of records not authorized by this
part to the applicable Privacy POC for
the respective DoD Component.
(e) Minimize the collection of PII to
that which is relevant and necessary to
accomplish a purpose of the DoD.
(f) Not maintain records describing
how any individual exercises rights
guaranteed by the First Amendment,
except:
(1) When specifically authorized by
statute.
(2) When expressly authorized by the
individual that the record is about.
(3) When the record is pertinent to
and within the scope of an authorized
law enforcement activity, including
authorized intelligence or
administrative activities.
(g) Safeguard the privacy of all
individuals and the confidentiality of all
PII.
(h) Limit the availability of records
containing PII to DoD personnel and
DoD contractors who have a need to
know in order to perform their duties.
(i) Prohibit unlawful possession,
collection, or disclosure of PII, whether
or not it is within a system of records.
(j) Ensure that all DoD personnel and
DoD contractors who either have access
to a system of records or develop or
supervise procedures for handling
records in a system of records are aware
of their responsibilities and are properly
trained to safeguard PII being
maintained under the DoD Privacy
Program.
(k) Prepare any required new,
amended, or altered SORN for a given
system of records and submit the SORN
through their DoD Component Privacy
POC to the Chief, DPCLD, for
coordination and submission for
publication in the FR.
(l) Not maintain any official files on
individuals, which are retrieved by the
name of the individual or by some
identifying number, symbol, or other
identifying particular assigned to the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:35 Jan 26, 2015
Jkt 235001
individual, also known as a system of
records, without first ensuring that a
notice has been published in the FR.
Any official who willfully maintains a
system of records without meeting the
publication requirements as prescribed
by this part and The Privacy Act may be
subject to criminal penalties and/or
administrative sanctions.
(m) Maintain all records in a mixed
system of records as if all the records in
such a system are subject to The Privacy
Act.
■ 9. Amend § 310.9 to revise paragraphs
(a) and (b) to read as follows:
§ 310.9 Privacy boards and office,
composition and responsibilities.
(a) The Defense Privacy Board—(1)
Membership. The Board consists of:
(i) Voting members. Representatives
designated by the Secretaries of the
Military Departments and the following
officials or their designees:
(A) The DCMO, who serves as the
chair.
(B) The Chief, DPCLD, who serves as
the Executive Secretary and as a
member.
(C) The Under Secretary of Defense
for Personnel and Readiness.
(D) The Assistant Secretary of Defense
for Health Affairs.
(E) The DoD CIO.
(F) The Director, Defense Manpower
Data Center.
(G) The Director, Executive Services
Directorate, Washington Headquarters
Services (WHS).
(H) The GC DoD.
(I) The Chief of the National Guard
Bureau.
(ii) Non-voting members. Non-voting
members are the Director, Enterprise
Information Technology Services
Directorate (EITSD), WHS; and the
representatives designated by Defense
Agency and DoD Field Activity
directors.
(2) Responsibilities. The Board:
(i) Serves as the primary DoD policy
forum for matters involving the DoD
Privacy Program, meeting as necessary
to address issues of common concern to
ensure that consistent policy is adopted
and followed by the DoD Components.
The Board issues advisory opinions, as
necessary, on the DoD Privacy Program
to promote uniform and consistent
application of 5 U.S.C. 552a, OMB
Circular No. A–130, and this part.
(ii) Establishes and convenes
committees as necessary.
(iii) Establishes working groups
whose membership is composed of DoD
Component privacy officers and others
as necessary.
(b) The Defense Data Integrity
Board—(1) Membership. The Board
consists of:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
4211
(i) The DCMO, who serves as the
chair.
(ii) The Chief, DPCLD, who serves as
the Executive Secretary.
(iii) The representatives designated by
the Secretaries of the Military
Departments; the DoD CIO; the GC DoD;
the Inspector General of the Department
of Defense, who is a non-voting advisory
member; the Director, EITSD; and the
Director, Defense Manpower Data
Center.
(2) Responsibilities. The Board:
(i) Oversees and coordinates,
consistent with the requirements of 5
U.S.C. 552a, OMB Circular No. A–130,
and this part, all computer matching
agreements involving personal records
contained in systems of records
maintained by the DoD Components.
(ii) Reviews and approves all
computer matching agreements between
the DoD and other federal, state, or local
governmental agencies, as well as any
memorandums of understanding, when
the match is internal to the DoD. This
review ensures that, in accordance with
5 U.S.C. 552a, OMB Circular No. A–130,
and this part, appropriate procedural
and due process requirements are
established before engaging in computer
matching activities.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: January 21, 2015.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2015–01262 Filed 1–26–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
48 CFR Parts 1523 and 1552
[EPA–HQ–OARM–2014–0515; FRL–9916–
21–OARM]
Environmental Protection Agency
Acquisition Regulation (EPAAR);
Environmental, Conservation,
Occupational Safety, and Drug-Free
Workplace
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) amends the EPA
Acquisition Regulation (EPAAR) to
address minor non-substantive changes
in three clauses and two related
prescriptions. The direct final rule
updates ‘‘Protection of Human
Subjects’’, ‘‘Care of Laboratory
Animals’’, and ‘‘EPA Green Meetings
and Conferences’’. EPA does not
anticipate any adverse comments.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27JAR1.SGM
27JAR1
4212
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 17 / Tuesday, January 27, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
This rule is effective on March
30, 2015 without further notice, unless
adverse comment is received February
26, 2015. If adverse comment is
received, the EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal of the rule in the Federal
Register.
DATES:
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OARM–2014–0515 by one of the
following methods:
• www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• Email: docket.oei@epa.gov.
• Fax: (202) 566–1753.
• Mail: EPA–HQ–OARM–2014–0515,
OEI Docket, Environmental Protection
Agency, 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460. Please
include a total of three (3) copies.
• Hand Delivery: EPA Docket CenterAttention OEI Docket, EPA West, Room
B102, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20004. Such deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket’s
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OARM–2014–
0515. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or email. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an email comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov your email address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made
available on the Internet. If you submit
an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:35 Jan 26, 2015
Jkt 235001
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://www.
epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Government Property-Contract
Property Administration Docket, EPA/
DC, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington,
DC. The Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744
and the telephone number for the EPA
Docket Center is (202) 566–1752. This
Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m.
to 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Holly Hubbell, Policy, Training, and
Oversight Division, Acquisition Policy
and Training Service Center (3802R),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460; telephone number: 202–564–
1091; email address: hubbell.holly@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
General Information
1. Do not submit Classified Business
Information (CBI) to EPA Web site
https://www.regulations.gov or email.
Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI.
For CBI information in a disk or CD–
ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the
outside of the disk or CD–ROM as CBI,
and then identify electronically within
the disk or CD–ROM the specific
information that is claimed as CBI. In
addition to one complete version of the
comment that includes information
claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment
that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for
inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be
disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments.
When submitting comments, remember
to:
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
• Identify the rulemaking by docket
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number).
• Follow directions—The Agency
may ask you to respond to specific
questions or organize comments by
referencing a Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) Part or section
number.
• Explain why you agree or disagree,
suggest alternatives, and substitute
language for your requested changes.
• Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
• If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
• Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns, and suggest
alternatives.
• Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
3. Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
I. Background
The EPA is revising EPAAR
1552.223–70 Protection of Human
Subjects and 1552.223–72 Care of
Laboratory Animals to update the
clauses with current references and
legislative information. Except for
administrative changes, the clauses
were last updated in 1984 and 2000,
respectively. Prescription 1523.303–72
for EPAAR 1552.223–72 clarifies the
applicability of the clause of care and
use. The revisions to prescription
1523.703–1 Acquisition of
Environmentally Preferable Meeting and
Conference Services updates the
applicability of clause 1552.223–71 EPA
Green Meetings and Conferences. The
revision of EPAAR 1552.223–71
replaces the ‘‘14 questions’’ with more
relevant questions which clarify the
current requirements for
environmentally preferred facilities.
II. Final Rule
This final rule makes the following
changes:
1. Revise prescription EPAAR
1523.303–72 to clarify the applicability
of the clause EPAAR 1552.223–72 Care
of Laboratory Animals.
2. Revise prescription EPAAR
1523.703–1 to clarify the applicability of
clause 1552.223–71 requiring
information about the environmental
preferability features and practices of
lodging and non-lodging oriented
meeting and conference facilities.
E:\FR\FM\27JAR1.SGM
27JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 17 / Tuesday, January 27, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
3. Revise EPAAR 1552.223–70 to
update the legislative and guidance
references and information.
4. Revise EPAAR 1552.223–71 by
replacing the ‘‘14 questions’’ with more
relevant questions that better clarify
essential attributes for environmentally
preferred facilities.
5. Revise EPAAR 1552.223–72 to
update the legislative references and
guidance information.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This action is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under the terms of
Executive Order (EO) 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993) and is therefore
not subject to review under the EO
12866 and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January
21, 2011).
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not impose an
information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. Burden is
defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), as
Amended by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (SBREFA), 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.
The RFA generally requires an agency
to prepare a regulatory flexibility
analysis of any rule subject to notice
and comment rulemaking requirements
under the Administrative Procedure Act
or any other statute; unless the agency
certifies that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Small entities include small businesses,
small organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions. For
purposes of assessing the impact of
today’s final rule on small entities,
‘‘small entity’’ is defined as: (1) A small
business that meets the definition of a
small business found in the Small
Business Act and codified at 13 CFR
121.201; (2) a small governmental
jurisdiction that is a government of a
city, county, town, school district or
special district with a population of less
than 50,000; or (3) a small organization
that is any not-for-profit enterprise
which is independently owned and
operated and is not dominant in its
field. After considering the economic
impacts of this rule on small entities, I
certify that this action will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. In
determining whether a rule has a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:35 Jan 26, 2015
Jkt 235001
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities, the
impact of concern is any significant
adverse economic impact on small
entities, because the primary purpose of
the regulatory flexibility analyses is to
identify and address regulatory
alternatives ‘‘which minimize any
significant economic impact of the
proposed rule on small entities’’ 5
U.S.C. 503 and 604. Thus, an agency
may certify that a rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities if
the rule relieves regulatory burden, or
otherwise has a positive economic effect
on all of the small entities subject to the
rule. This action revises current EPAAR
clauses and will not have a significant
economic impact on substantial number
of small entities. We continue to be
interested in the potential impacts of the
rule on small entities and welcome
comments on issues related to such
impacts.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This action contains no federal
mandates under the provisions of Title
II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (UMRA), 2 U.S.C. 1531–
1538 for State, local, and tribal
governments or the private sector. The
action imposes no enforceable duty on
any State, local or tribal governments or
the private sector. Therefore, this action
is not subject to the requirements of
Sections 202 or 205 of the UMRA. This
action is also not subject to the
requirements of section 203 of UMRA
because it contains no regulatory
requirements that might significantly or
uniquely affect small governments.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism
implications. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132. Thus, Executive
Order 13132 does not apply to this
action. In the spirit of Executive Order
13132, and consistent with EPA policy
to promote communications between
EPA and State and local governments,
EPA specifically solicits comment on
this action from State and local officials.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This action does not have tribal
implications, as specified in Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
4213
2000). Thus, Executive Order 13175
does not apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks
Executive Order 13045, entitled
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health and Safety Risks’’
(62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), applies
to any rule that: (1) Is determined to be
economically significant as defined
under EO 12886, and (2) concerns an
environmental health or safety risk that
may have a proportionate effect on
children. This rule is not subject to EO
13045 because it is not an economically
significant rule as defined by EO 12866,
and because it does not have a
proportionate effect on children.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211 (66 FR 28335 May 22,
2001) because it is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA)
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (‘‘NTTAA’’), Public Law
104–113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note)
directs EPA to use voluntary consensus
standards in its regulatory activities
unless to do so would be inconsistent
with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. Voluntary consensus
standards are technical standards (e.g.,
materials specifications, test methods,
sampling procedures and business
practices) that are developed or adopted
by voluntary consensus standards
bodies. NTTAA directs EPA to provide
Congress, through OMB, explanations
when the Agency decides not to use
available and applicable voluntary
consensus standards. This action does
not involve technical standards.
Therefore, EPA is not considering the
use of any voluntary consensus
standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629
(Feb. 16, 1994) establishes federal
executive policy on environmental
justice. Its main provision directs
federal agencies, to the greatest extent
practicable and permitted by law, to
make environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
E:\FR\FM\27JAR1.SGM
27JAR1
4214
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 17 / Tuesday, January 27, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States. EPA
has determined that this final rule will
not have disproportionately high and
adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority or low-income
populations because it does not affect
the level of protection provided to
human health or the environment in the
general public.
K. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
Agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. Section 804
exempts from section 801 the following
types of rules (1) rules of particular
applicability; (2) rules relating to agency
management or personnel; and (3) rules
of Agency organization, procedure, or
practice that do not substantially affect
the rights or obligations of non-agency
parties. 5 U.S.C. 804(3). EPA is not
required to submit a rule report
regarding today’s action under section
801 because this is a rule of agency
organization, procedure, or practice that
does not substantially affect the rights or
obligations of non-agency parties.
List of Subjects
48 CFR Part 1523
Environmental protection,
Acquisition of environmentally
preferable meeting and conference
services, Care of laboratory animals,
Environmental, conservation,
occupational safety, and drug-free
workplace, Government procurement.
48 CFR Part 1552
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Environmental protection, Care of
laboratory animals, EPA green meetings
and conferences, Protection of human
subjects, Government procurement.
Dated: January 7, 2015.
John R. Bashista,
Director, Office of Acquisition Management.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, Chapter 15 of Title 48 Code
of Federal Regulations, parts 1523 and
1552 are amended as set forth below:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:35 Jan 26, 2015
Jkt 235001
PART 1523—ENVIRONMENTAL,
CONSERVATION, OCCUPATIONAL
SAFETY, AND DRUG-FREE
WORKPLACE
1. The authority citation for part 1523
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Sec. 205(c), 63 Stat. 390, as
amended, 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
2. Revise 1523.303–72 to read as
follows:
■
1523.303–72
animals.
Use and care of laboratory
Contracting officers shall insert the
clause at 1552.223–72, Use and Care of
Laboratory Animals, in all contracts
involving the use of animals in testing,
research or training.
■ 3. Revise 1523.703–1 to read as
follows:
1523.703–1 Acquisition of environmentally
preferable meeting and conference facilities
and services.
(a) Scope. This section establishes the
policy and the procedures for acquiring
environmentally preferable meeting and
conference facilities and services. For
purposes of this section, the term
‘‘contracting officer’’ refers to any EPA
employee with purchasing authority.
For purposes of this section, the terms
‘‘meeting and conference facilities’’ or
‘‘conference facilities’’ refer to any offsite commercial facility which is
purchased for the use of an EPA
conference or event, whether the
purpose of the event is a meeting,
conference, training session, or other
official purpose.
(b) Conference facilities. EPA
conducts government events at facilities
owned and operated by private, thirdparty vendors. These facilities—
(1) May provide conference
participants with lodging, food and
beverage, and other on-site event
support services.
(2) Demonstrate they are
environmentally preferable by their
responses to the 17 questions in
1552.223–71(c) highlighting
environmental performance. These
questions address, among other things,
reducing greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions, the production and disposal
of solid waste, the use of and exposure
to toxic chemicals/materials, and the
depletion of natural resources including
water.
(c) Policy. Contracting officers shall
purchase environmentally preferable
meeting and conference facilities and
services to the greatest extent
practicable. Environmentally preferable
is defined at FAR 2.101 and shall be
considered in all purchases of meeting
and conference facilities and services.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(d) Procedures for micropurchases.
The contracting officer shall request that
potential third party conference facility
vendors respond to the 17 questions in
1552.223–71(c) or language
substantially the same as these
questions, in order to evaluate their
environmental performance.
(e) Procedures for purchases of
conference facilities exceeding the
micropurchase threshold. The
contracting officer shall request that
potential third party conference facility
vendors respond to the 17 questions in
1552.223–71(c) or language
substantially the same as these
questions, in order to evaluate their
environmental performance. The
contracting officer shall notify vendors
that the basis for award will be best
value with price and other factors
considered. Environmental preferability,
as determined by evaluating the
information submitted in response to
the questions and specifications at
1552.223–71(c) or information
submitted in response to substantially
similar questions and specifications,
shall be considered among the other
factors. The contracting officer shall
determine the relative importance of
price and other factors as appropriate to
the acquisition, but in all cases shall
consider environmental preferability as
a significant factor.
(f) Contractor support for meetings
and conferences. A contract, order,
work assignment or purchasing
agreement that includes contractor
support for meeting and conference
planning and logistics must include
requirements to make use of
environmentally preferable meeting and
conference facilities and services. The
contracting officer shall ensure language
is included in the tasking document
work statement that requires the
contractor to use the provisions at
1552.223–71 or language approved by
the contracting officer that is
substantially the same as the provisions,
when soliciting quotes or offers for
meeting and conference services on
behalf of the EPA.
(g) Solicitation provision. The
contracting officer shall insert
provisions or language substantially the
same as the provisions at 1552.223–71
EPA Green Meetings and Conferences,
in solicitations for meeting and
conference services. Contracting officers
issuing an oral solicitation must also use
these provisions, though they may be
provided to the vendor orally or
electronically. Contractors soliciting
quotes or offers for meeting and
conference services on behalf of EPA
shall use the provisions, or language
approved by the contracting officer that
E:\FR\FM\27JAR1.SGM
27JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 17 / Tuesday, January 27, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
4. The authority citation for part 1552
continues to read as follows:
the contractor corrects the noncompliance.
The contracting officer may communicate the
notice of suspension by telephone with
confirmation in writing. If the contractor fails
to complete corrective action within the
period of time designated in the contracting
officer’s written notice of suspension, the
contracting officer may terminate this
contract in whole or in part.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; Sec. 205(c), 63
Stat. 390, as amended, 40 U.S.C. 486(c); and
41 U.S.C. 418b.
(End of clause)
■ 6. Revise 1552.223–71 to read as
follows:
5. Revise 1552.223–70 to read as
follows:
1552.223–71 EPA Green Meetings and
Conferences.
1552.223–70
subjects.
As prescribed in 1523.303–70, insert
the following contract clause when the
contract involves human test subjects.
As prescribed in 1523.703–1, insert
the following provision, or language
substantially the same as the provision,
in solicitations for meetings and
conference facilities.
Protection of Human Subjects March
2015
EPA Green Meetings and Conferences
March 2015
(a) The contractor shall meet all EPA
requirements for studies using human
subjects prior to undertaking any work with
human subjects in accordance with 40 CFR
part 26 and EPA Order 1000.17 A1 Policy
and Procedures on Protection of Human
Research Subjects in EPA Conducted or
Supported Research. Studies involving
intentional exposure of human subjects who
are children or pregnant or nursing women
are prohibited. Requirements regarding
observational studies involving children or
pregnant women and fetuses are referenced
in subparts C and D of 40 CFR part 26.
(b) The contractor’s Institutional Review
Board (IRB) approval must state that the
contractor’s study meets the EPA’s
regulations at 40 CFR part 26 and EPA Order
1000.17 A1. No work involving human
subjects, including recruiting, may be
initiated before the EPA has received a copy
of the contractor’s IRB approval of the project
and the EPA has also issued approval. Where
human subjects are involved in the research,
the contractor must provide evidence of
subsequent IRB reviews, including
amendments or minor protocol changes, as
part of annual reports.
(c) The contractor shall bear full
responsibility for the proper and safe
performance of all work and services
involving the use of human subjects under
this contract and shall ensure that work is
conducted in a proper manner and as safely
as is feasible. The contractor agrees that it has
entered into this contract and will discharge
its obligations, duties, and undertakings and
the work pursuant thereto, whether requiring
professional judgment or otherwise, as an
independent contractor without imputing
liability on the part of the government for the
acts of the contractor, its employees, subcontractors, consultants, heirs, assignees, etc.
(d) If at any time during the performance
of this contract, the contracting officer
determines that the contractor is not in
compliance with any of the requirements
and/or standards stated in above, the
contracting officer may immediately
suspend, in whole or in part, work and
further payments under this contract until
(a) The mission of the EPA is to protect
human health and the environment. As such,
all EPA meetings and conferences will be
staged using as many environmentally
preferable measures as possible.
Environmentally preferable means products
or services that have a lesser or reduced
effect on the environment when compared
with competing products or services that
serve the same purpose.
(b) Potential meeting or conference facility
providers for EPA shall provide information
about the environmentally preferable features
and practices identified by the checklist
contained in paragraph (c) of this section,
addressing sustainability for meeting and
conference facilities including lodging and
non-lodging oriented facilities.
(c) The following list of questions is
provided to assist contracting officers in
evaluating the environmental perferability of
prospective meeting and conference facility
providers. More information about EPA’s
Green Meetings initiative may be found on
the Internet at https://www.epa.gov/oppt/
greenmeetings/.
(1) Does your facility track energy usage
and/or GHG emissions through ENERGY
STAR Portfolio Manager (https://www.
energystar.gov/benchmark) or some other
calculator based on a recognized greenhouse
gas tracking protocol? Y/Nll
(2) If available for your building type, does
your facility currently qualify for the Energy
Star certification for superior energy
performance? Y/N ll, NAll
(3) Does your facility track water use
through ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager or
another equivalent tracking tool and/or
undertake best management practices to
reduce water use in the facility (https://www.
epa.gov/watersense/commercial)? Y/Nll
(4) Do you use landscaping professionals
who are either certified by a WaterSense
recognized program or actively undertake the
WaterSense ‘‘Water-Smart’’ landscaping
design practices (https://www.epa.gov/
watersense/outdoor)? Y/Nll, NAll
(5) Based on the amount of renewable
energy your buildings uses, does (or would)
your facility qualify as a partner under EPA’s
is substantially the same as the
provisions.
PART 1552—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
■
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Protection of human
17:35 Jan 26, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
4215
Green Power Partnership program (https://
www.epa.gov/greenpower/join/
purchase.htm)?
Y/Nll
(6) Do you restrict idling of motor vehicles
in front of your facility, at the loading dock
and elsewhere at your facility? Y/Nll
(7) Does your facility have a default
practice of not changing bedding and towels
unless requested by guests?
Y/Nll, NAll
(8) Does your facility participate in EPA’s
WasteWise (https://www.epa.gov/epawaste/
conserve/smm/wastewise/) and/or Food
Recovery Challenge (https://www.epa.gov/
foodrecoverychallenge/) programs? Y/Nll
(9) Do you divert from landfill at least 50%
of the total solid waste generated at your
facility? Y/Nll
(10) Will your facility be able to divert
from the landfill at least 75% of the total
solid waste expected to be generated during
this conference/event? Y/Nll
(11) Do you divert from landfill at least
50% of the food waste generated at your
facility (through donation, use as animal
feed, recycling, anaerobic digestion, or
composting)? Y/Nll
(12) Will your facility be able to divert
from landfill at least 75% of the food waste
expected to be generated during this
conference/event (through donation, use as
animal feed, recycling, anaerobic digestion,
or composting)?
Y/Nll
(13) Does your facility provide recycling
containers for visitors, guests and staff (paper
and beverage at minimum)? Y/Nll
(14) With respect to any food and beverage
prepared and/or served at your facility, does
at least 50% of it on average meet
sustainability attributes such as: Local,
organic, fair trade, fair labor, antibiotic-free,
etc.? Y/Nll
(15) Will your facility be able to ensure that
at least 75% of the food and beverage
expected to be served during this conference/
event meets sustainability attributes such as:
Local, organic, fair trade, fair labor,
antibiotic-free, etc.? Y/Nll
(16) Does your facility use Design for the
Environment (DfE) cleaning products (https://
www.epa.gov/dfe/), or similar products
meeting other recognized standards for being
‘environmentally preferable’ (https://
www.epa.gov/epp/) or more sustainable? Y/
Nll
(17) Is your facility prepared to document
or demonstrate all of the claims you have
made above? Y/Nll
(d) The contractor shall include any
additional ‘‘Green Meeting’’ information in
their proposal which is believed is pertinent
to better assist us in considering
environmental preferability in selecting our
meeting venue.
7. Revise 1552.223–72 to read as
follows:
■
1552.223–72
animals.
Use and care of laboratory
As prescribed in 1523.303–72, insert
the following clause in all contracts
involving the use of animals in testing,
research or training:
E:\FR\FM\27JAR1.SGM
27JAR1
4216
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 17 / Tuesday, January 27, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Use and Care of Laboratory Animals
March 2015
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
(a) Use of laboratory animals. (1) Before
undertaking performance of any contract
involving the use of laboratory animals, the
contractor shall register with the Secretary of
Agriculture of the United States in
accordance with the Secretary of Agriculture
of the United States in accordance with the
Animal Welfare Act of 1966, as amended
(AWA), codified at 7 U.S.C. 2131 et seq. and
promulgated at 9 CFR parts 1–4. The
contractor shall furnish evidence of such
registration to the contracting officer.
(2) The contractor shall acquire animals
used in research and development programs
from a dealer licensed by the Secretary of
Agriculture, or from exempted sources in
accordance with 9 CFR 2.25–2.28. Animals
shall not be acquired from any random
source Class B dealer.
(3) The contractor may request registration
of his/her facility and a current listing of
licensed dealers from the Regional Office of
the Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service (APHIS), USDA, for the region in
which his/her research facility is located.
The location of the appropriate APHIS
Regional Office as well as information
concerning this program may be obtained at
https://www.aphis.usda.gov/contact_us/.
(b) Care of laboratory animals. (1) In the
care of any live animals used or intended for
use in the performance of this contract, the
contractor shall adhere to:
(i) The standards and practices
incorporated in the Guide for Care and Use
of Laboratory Animals, prepared by the
Institute of Laboratory Animal Research of
the National Research Council of the
National Academies (ILAR/NRC),
(ii) The Animal Welfare Regulations found
in 9 CFR parts 1–4, and
(iii) The National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Public Health Service (PHS) Policy on the
Humane Care and Use of Laboratory
Animals.
(2) In case of conflict between standards,
the higher standard shall be used.
(3) The contractor’s reports on portions of
the contract in which animals were used
shall contain a certificate stating that the
animals were cared for in accordance with
the principles enunciated in the Guide for
Care and Use of Laboratory Animals,
prepared by the ILAR/NRC, and/or in the
Animal Welfare Regulations found in 9 CFR
parts 1–4.
(End of clause)
[FR Doc. 2015–01166 Filed 1–26–15; 8:45 am]
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 131211999–5045–02]
RIN 0648–BD86
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; Coastal
Migratory Pelagic Resources in the
Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Region;
Amendment 20B
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
NMFS issues this final rule to
implement Amendment 20B to the
Fishery Management Plan for the
Coastal Migratory Pelagic Resources
(CMP) in the exclusive economic zone
(EEZ) of the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic
Region (FMP) (Amendment 20B), as
prepared and submitted by the Gulf of
Mexico (Gulf) and South Atlantic
Fishery Management Councils
(Councils). This rule modifies Gulf
migratory group king mackerel trip
limits and fishing years, allows transit
through areas closed to king mackerel
fishing, creates zones and quotas for
Atlantic migratory group king and
Spanish mackerel, modifies the
framework procedures for the FMP,
increases annual catch limits (ACLs)
and annual catch targets (ACTs) for
cobia, and creates an east coast zone and
quotas for Gulf migratory group cobia.
In addition, this rule reorganizes the
description of CMP zones in the
regulations and clarifies that spearguns
and powerheads are allowable gear for
cobia in Federal waters of the South
Atlantic and Mid-Atlantic regions. The
purpose of this rule is to help achieve
optimum yield (OY) for the CMP fishery
while ensuring allocations are fair and
equitable and fishery resources are
utilized efficiently.
DATES: This rule is effective March 1,
2015.
SUMMARY:
Electronic copies of
Amendment 20B, which includes an
environmental assessment, a Regulatory
Flexibility Act analysis, and a regulatory
impact review, may be obtained from
the Southeast Regional Office Web site
at https://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/
sustainable_fisheries/gulf_sa/cmp/
index.html.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan Gerhart, telephone: 727–824–
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:35 Jan 26, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5305, or email: Susan.Gerhart@
noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CMP
fishery in the Gulf and Atlantic is
managed under the FMP. The FMP was
prepared by the Councils and
implemented through regulations at 50
CFR part 622 under the authority of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act).
On October 17, 2014, NMFS
published a notice of availability for
Amendment 20B and requested public
comment (79 FR 62410). On October 31,
2014, NMFS published a proposed rule
for Amendment 20B and requested
public comment (79 FR 64728). The
proposed rule and Amendment 20B
outline the rationale for the actions
contained in this final rule. A summary
of the actions implemented by this final
rule is provided below.
Management Measures Contained in
Amendment 20B and This Final Rule
Amendment 20B and this rule modify
Gulf migratory group king mackerel trip
limits and fishing years, allow transit
through areas closed to king mackerel
fishing, create zones and quotas for
Atlantic migratory group king and
Spanish mackerel, modify the
framework procedures for the FMP,
increase ACLs and ACTs for cobia, and
create an east coast zone and quotas for
Gulf migratory group cobia. The
purpose of this rule is to help achieve
OY for the CMP fishery while ensuring
allocations are fair and equitable and
fishery resources are utilized efficiently.
Gulf Migratory Group King Mackerel
Commercial Hook-and-Line Trip Limits
This final rule removes the Gulf
migratory group king mackerel hookand-line trip limit reduction for the
northern and southern subzones of the
Gulf eastern zone’s Florida west coast
subzone, to allow the harvest of 1,250 lb
(567 kg) per day until the quota for the
subzone has been met or projected to be
met and the respective subzone is
closed to king mackerel harvest.
Gulf Migratory Group Eastern Zone
Northern and Southern Subzone King
Mackerel Fishing Years
This rule changes the Florida west
coast northern subzone fishing year to
October 1 through September 30. The
fishing year for the Florida west coast
southern subzone will remain July 1
through June 30.
Transit Through Areas Closed to King
Mackerel
This rule allows a vessel with a valid
commercial vessel permit for king
E:\FR\FM\27JAR1.SGM
27JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 4211-4216]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01166]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
48 CFR Parts 1523 and 1552
[EPA-HQ-OARM-2014-0515; FRL-9916-21-OARM]
Environmental Protection Agency Acquisition Regulation (EPAAR);
Environmental, Conservation, Occupational Safety, and Drug-Free
Workplace
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) amends the EPA
Acquisition Regulation (EPAAR) to address minor non-substantive changes
in three clauses and two related prescriptions. The direct final rule
updates ``Protection of Human Subjects'', ``Care of Laboratory
Animals'', and ``EPA Green Meetings and Conferences''. EPA does not
anticipate any adverse comments.
[[Page 4212]]
DATES: This rule is effective on March 30, 2015 without further notice,
unless adverse comment is received February 26, 2015. If adverse
comment is received, the EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the
rule in the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OARM-2014-0515 by one of the following methods:
www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
Email: docket.oei@epa.gov.
Fax: (202) 566-1753.
Mail: EPA-HQ-OARM-2014-0515, OEI Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency, 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460. Please include a total of three (3) copies.
Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center-Attention OEI Docket, EPA
West, Room B102, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20004. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OARM-
2014-0515. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://www.regulations.gov or email. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an email comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov your email address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at https://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Government
Property-Contract Property Administration Docket, EPA/DC, EPA West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744 and the telephone number for the EPA
Docket Center is (202) 566-1752. This Docket Facility is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Holly Hubbell, Policy, Training, and
Oversight Division, Acquisition Policy and Training Service Center
(3802R), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: 202-564-1091; email address:
hubbell.holly@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
General Information
1. Do not submit Classified Business Information (CBI) to EPA Web
site https://www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all
of the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a
disk or CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or
CD-ROM as CBI, and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-
ROM the specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other
identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register date and
page number).
Follow directions--The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) Part or section number.
Explain why you agree or disagree, suggest alternatives,
and substitute language for your requested changes.
Describe any assumptions and provide any technical
information and/or data that you used.
If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how
you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and
suggest alternatives.
Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the
use of profanity or personal threats.
3. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline
identified.
I. Background
The EPA is revising EPAAR 1552.223-70 Protection of Human Subjects
and 1552.223-72 Care of Laboratory Animals to update the clauses with
current references and legislative information. Except for
administrative changes, the clauses were last updated in 1984 and 2000,
respectively. Prescription 1523.303-72 for EPAAR 1552.223-72 clarifies
the applicability of the clause of care and use. The revisions to
prescription 1523.703-1 Acquisition of Environmentally Preferable
Meeting and Conference Services updates the applicability of clause
1552.223-71 EPA Green Meetings and Conferences. The revision of EPAAR
1552.223-71 replaces the ``14 questions'' with more relevant questions
which clarify the current requirements for environmentally preferred
facilities.
II. Final Rule
This final rule makes the following changes:
1. Revise prescription EPAAR 1523.303-72 to clarify the
applicability of the clause EPAAR 1552.223-72 Care of Laboratory
Animals.
2. Revise prescription EPAAR 1523.703-1 to clarify the
applicability of clause 1552.223-71 requiring information about the
environmental preferability features and practices of lodging and non-
lodging oriented meeting and conference facilities.
[[Page 4213]]
3. Revise EPAAR 1552.223-70 to update the legislative and guidance
references and information.
4. Revise EPAAR 1552.223-71 by replacing the ``14 questions'' with
more relevant questions that better clarify essential attributes for
environmentally preferred facilities.
5. Revise EPAAR 1552.223-72 to update the legislative references
and guidance information.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the
terms of Executive Order (EO) 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and
is therefore not subject to review under the EO 12866 and 13563 (76 FR
3821, January 21, 2011).
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), as Amended by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), 5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.
The RFA generally requires an agency to prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment
rulemaking requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act or any
other statute; unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Small entities include small businesses, small organizations,
and small governmental jurisdictions. For purposes of assessing the
impact of today's final rule on small entities, ``small entity'' is
defined as: (1) A small business that meets the definition of a small
business found in the Small Business Act and codified at 13 CFR
121.201; (2) a small governmental jurisdiction that is a government of
a city, county, town, school district or special district with a
population of less than 50,000; or (3) a small organization that is any
not-for-profit enterprise which is independently owned and operated and
is not dominant in its field. After considering the economic impacts of
this rule on small entities, I certify that this action will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
In determining whether a rule has a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities, the impact of concern is any
significant adverse economic impact on small entities, because the
primary purpose of the regulatory flexibility analyses is to identify
and address regulatory alternatives ``which minimize any significant
economic impact of the proposed rule on small entities'' 5 U.S.C. 503
and 604. Thus, an agency may certify that a rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
if the rule relieves regulatory burden, or otherwise has a positive
economic effect on all of the small entities subject to the rule. This
action revises current EPAAR clauses and will not have a significant
economic impact on substantial number of small entities. We continue to
be interested in the potential impacts of the rule on small entities
and welcome comments on issues related to such impacts.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This action contains no federal mandates under the provisions of
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), 2 U.S.C.
1531-1538 for State, local, and tribal governments or the private
sector. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any State, local or
tribal governments or the private sector. Therefore, this action is not
subject to the requirements of Sections 202 or 205 of the UMRA. This
action is also not subject to the requirements of section 203 of UMRA
because it contains no regulatory requirements that might significantly
or uniquely affect small governments.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132. Thus, Executive Order 13132 does
not apply to this action. In the spirit of Executive Order 13132, and
consistent with EPA policy to promote communications between EPA and
State and local governments, EPA specifically solicits comment on this
action from State and local officials.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). Thus, Executive
Order 13175 does not apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health and Safety Risks
Executive Order 13045, entitled ``Protection of Children from
Environmental Health and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
applies to any rule that: (1) Is determined to be economically
significant as defined under EO 12886, and (2) concerns an
environmental health or safety risk that may have a proportionate
effect on children. This rule is not subject to EO 13045 because it is
not an economically significant rule as defined by EO 12866, and
because it does not have a proportionate effect on children.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28335
May 22, 2001) because it is not a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA)
Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (``NTTAA''), Public Law 104-113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note)
directs EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in its regulatory
activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., materials specifications, test methods, sampling
procedures and business practices) that are developed or adopted by
voluntary consensus standards bodies. NTTAA directs EPA to provide
Congress, through OMB, explanations when the Agency decides not to use
available and applicable voluntary consensus standards. This action
does not involve technical standards. Therefore, EPA is not considering
the use of any voluntary consensus standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629 (Feb. 16, 1994) establishes
federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision
directs federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission
by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high
[[Page 4214]]
and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income
populations in the United States. EPA has determined that this final
rule will not have disproportionately high and adverse human health or
environmental effects on minority or low-income populations because it
does not affect the level of protection provided to human health or the
environment in the general public.
K. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the Agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. Section 804 exempts from section 801 the following types
of rules (1) rules of particular applicability; (2) rules relating to
agency management or personnel; and (3) rules of Agency organization,
procedure, or practice that do not substantially affect the rights or
obligations of non-agency parties. 5 U.S.C. 804(3). EPA is not required
to submit a rule report regarding today's action under section 801
because this is a rule of agency organization, procedure, or practice
that does not substantially affect the rights or obligations of non-
agency parties.
List of Subjects
48 CFR Part 1523
Environmental protection, Acquisition of environmentally preferable
meeting and conference services, Care of laboratory animals,
Environmental, conservation, occupational safety, and drug-free
workplace, Government procurement.
48 CFR Part 1552
Environmental protection, Care of laboratory animals, EPA green
meetings and conferences, Protection of human subjects, Government
procurement.
Dated: January 7, 2015.
John R. Bashista,
Director, Office of Acquisition Management.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, Chapter 15 of Title 48 Code
of Federal Regulations, parts 1523 and 1552 are amended as set forth
below:
PART 1523--ENVIRONMENTAL, CONSERVATION, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY, AND
DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
0
1. The authority citation for part 1523 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Sec. 205(c), 63 Stat. 390, as amended, 40 U.S.C.
486(c).
0
2. Revise 1523.303-72 to read as follows:
1523.303-72 Use and care of laboratory animals.
Contracting officers shall insert the clause at 1552.223-72, Use
and Care of Laboratory Animals, in all contracts involving the use of
animals in testing, research or training.
0
3. Revise 1523.703-1 to read as follows:
1523.703-1 Acquisition of environmentally preferable meeting and
conference facilities and services.
(a) Scope. This section establishes the policy and the procedures
for acquiring environmentally preferable meeting and conference
facilities and services. For purposes of this section, the term
``contracting officer'' refers to any EPA employee with purchasing
authority. For purposes of this section, the terms ``meeting and
conference facilities'' or ``conference facilities'' refer to any off-
site commercial facility which is purchased for the use of an EPA
conference or event, whether the purpose of the event is a meeting,
conference, training session, or other official purpose.
(b) Conference facilities. EPA conducts government events at
facilities owned and operated by private, third-party vendors. These
facilities--
(1) May provide conference participants with lodging, food and
beverage, and other on-site event support services.
(2) Demonstrate they are environmentally preferable by their
responses to the 17 questions in 1552.223-71(c) highlighting
environmental performance. These questions address, among other things,
reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, the production and disposal of
solid waste, the use of and exposure to toxic chemicals/materials, and
the depletion of natural resources including water.
(c) Policy. Contracting officers shall purchase environmentally
preferable meeting and conference facilities and services to the
greatest extent practicable. Environmentally preferable is defined at
FAR 2.101 and shall be considered in all purchases of meeting and
conference facilities and services.
(d) Procedures for micropurchases. The contracting officer shall
request that potential third party conference facility vendors respond
to the 17 questions in 1552.223-71(c) or language substantially the
same as these questions, in order to evaluate their environmental
performance.
(e) Procedures for purchases of conference facilities exceeding the
micropurchase threshold. The contracting officer shall request that
potential third party conference facility vendors respond to the 17
questions in 1552.223-71(c) or language substantially the same as these
questions, in order to evaluate their environmental performance. The
contracting officer shall notify vendors that the basis for award will
be best value with price and other factors considered. Environmental
preferability, as determined by evaluating the information submitted in
response to the questions and specifications at 1552.223-71(c) or
information submitted in response to substantially similar questions
and specifications, shall be considered among the other factors. The
contracting officer shall determine the relative importance of price
and other factors as appropriate to the acquisition, but in all cases
shall consider environmental preferability as a significant factor.
(f) Contractor support for meetings and conferences. A contract,
order, work assignment or purchasing agreement that includes contractor
support for meeting and conference planning and logistics must include
requirements to make use of environmentally preferable meeting and
conference facilities and services. The contracting officer shall
ensure language is included in the tasking document work statement that
requires the contractor to use the provisions at 1552.223-71 or
language approved by the contracting officer that is substantially the
same as the provisions, when soliciting quotes or offers for meeting
and conference services on behalf of the EPA.
(g) Solicitation provision. The contracting officer shall insert
provisions or language substantially the same as the provisions at
1552.223-71 EPA Green Meetings and Conferences, in solicitations for
meeting and conference services. Contracting officers issuing an oral
solicitation must also use these provisions, though they may be
provided to the vendor orally or electronically. Contractors soliciting
quotes or offers for meeting and conference services on behalf of EPA
shall use the provisions, or language approved by the contracting
officer that
[[Page 4215]]
is substantially the same as the provisions.
PART 1552--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
0
4. The authority citation for part 1552 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; Sec. 205(c), 63 Stat. 390, as amended,
40 U.S.C. 486(c); and 41 U.S.C. 418b.
0
5. Revise 1552.223-70 to read as follows:
1552.223-70 Protection of human subjects.
As prescribed in 1523.303-70, insert the following contract clause
when the contract involves human test subjects.
Protection of Human Subjects March 2015
(a) The contractor shall meet all EPA requirements for studies
using human subjects prior to undertaking any work with human
subjects in accordance with 40 CFR part 26 and EPA Order 1000.17 A1
Policy and Procedures on Protection of Human Research Subjects in
EPA Conducted or Supported Research. Studies involving intentional
exposure of human subjects who are children or pregnant or nursing
women are prohibited. Requirements regarding observational studies
involving children or pregnant women and fetuses are referenced in
subparts C and D of 40 CFR part 26.
(b) The contractor's Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval
must state that the contractor's study meets the EPA's regulations
at 40 CFR part 26 and EPA Order 1000.17 A1. No work involving human
subjects, including recruiting, may be initiated before the EPA has
received a copy of the contractor's IRB approval of the project and
the EPA has also issued approval. Where human subjects are involved
in the research, the contractor must provide evidence of subsequent
IRB reviews, including amendments or minor protocol changes, as part
of annual reports.
(c) The contractor shall bear full responsibility for the proper
and safe performance of all work and services involving the use of
human subjects under this contract and shall ensure that work is
conducted in a proper manner and as safely as is feasible. The
contractor agrees that it has entered into this contract and will
discharge its obligations, duties, and undertakings and the work
pursuant thereto, whether requiring professional judgment or
otherwise, as an independent contractor without imputing liability
on the part of the government for the acts of the contractor, its
employees, sub-contractors, consultants, heirs, assignees, etc.
(d) If at any time during the performance of this contract, the
contracting officer determines that the contractor is not in
compliance with any of the requirements and/or standards stated in
above, the contracting officer may immediately suspend, in whole or
in part, work and further payments under this contract until the
contractor corrects the noncompliance. The contracting officer may
communicate the notice of suspension by telephone with confirmation
in writing. If the contractor fails to complete corrective action
within the period of time designated in the contracting officer's
written notice of suspension, the contracting officer may terminate
this contract in whole or in part.
(End of clause)
0
6. Revise 1552.223-71 to read as follows:
1552.223-71 EPA Green Meetings and Conferences.
As prescribed in 1523.703-1, insert the following provision, or
language substantially the same as the provision, in solicitations for
meetings and conference facilities.
EPA Green Meetings and Conferences March 2015
(a) The mission of the EPA is to protect human health and the
environment. As such, all EPA meetings and conferences will be
staged using as many environmentally preferable measures as
possible. Environmentally preferable means products or services that
have a lesser or reduced effect on the environment when compared
with competing products or services that serve the same purpose.
(b) Potential meeting or conference facility providers for EPA
shall provide information about the environmentally preferable
features and practices identified by the checklist contained in
paragraph (c) of this section, addressing sustainability for meeting
and conference facilities including lodging and non-lodging oriented
facilities.
(c) The following list of questions is provided to assist
contracting officers in evaluating the environmental perferability
of prospective meeting and conference facility providers. More
information about EPA's Green Meetings initiative may be found on
the Internet at https://www.epa.gov/oppt/greenmeetings/.
(1) Does your facility track energy usage and/or GHG emissions
through ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager (https://www.energystar.gov/benchmark) or some other calculator based on a recognized greenhouse
gas tracking protocol? Y/N__
(2) If available for your building type, does your facility
currently qualify for the Energy Star certification for superior
energy performance? Y/N __, NA__
(3) Does your facility track water use through ENERGY STAR
Portfolio Manager or another equivalent tracking tool and/or
undertake best management practices to reduce water use in the
facility (https://www.epa.gov/watersense/commercial)? Y/N__
(4) Do you use landscaping professionals who are either
certified by a WaterSense recognized program or actively undertake
the WaterSense ``Water-Smart'' landscaping design practices (https://www.epa.gov/watersense/outdoor)? Y/N__, NA__
(5) Based on the amount of renewable energy your buildings uses,
does (or would) your facility qualify as a partner under EPA's Green
Power Partnership program (https://www.epa.gov/greenpower/join/purchase.htm)?
Y/N__
(6) Do you restrict idling of motor vehicles in front of your
facility, at the loading dock and elsewhere at your facility? Y/N__
(7) Does your facility have a default practice of not changing
bedding and towels unless requested by guests?
Y/N__, NA__
(8) Does your facility participate in EPA's WasteWise (https://www.epa.gov/epawaste/conserve/smm/wastewise/) and/or Food Recovery
Challenge (https://www.epa.gov/foodrecoverychallenge/) programs? Y/
N__
(9) Do you divert from landfill at least 50% of the total solid
waste generated at your facility? Y/N__
(10) Will your facility be able to divert from the landfill at
least 75% of the total solid waste expected to be generated during
this conference/event? Y/N__
(11) Do you divert from landfill at least 50% of the food waste
generated at your facility (through donation, use as animal feed,
recycling, anaerobic digestion, or composting)? Y/N__
(12) Will your facility be able to divert from landfill at least
75% of the food waste expected to be generated during this
conference/event (through donation, use as animal feed, recycling,
anaerobic digestion, or composting)?
Y/N__
(13) Does your facility provide recycling containers for
visitors, guests and staff (paper and beverage at minimum)? Y/N__
(14) With respect to any food and beverage prepared and/or
served at your facility, does at least 50% of it on average meet
sustainability attributes such as: Local, organic, fair trade, fair
labor, antibiotic-free, etc.? Y/N__
(15) Will your facility be able to ensure that at least 75% of
the food and beverage expected to be served during this conference/
event meets sustainability attributes such as: Local, organic, fair
trade, fair labor, antibiotic-free, etc.? Y/N__
(16) Does your facility use Design for the Environment (DfE)
cleaning products (https://www.epa.gov/dfe/), or similar products
meeting other recognized standards for being `environmentally
preferable' (https://www.epa.gov/epp/) or more sustainable? Y/N__
(17) Is your facility prepared to document or demonstrate all of
the claims you have made above? Y/N__
(d) The contractor shall include any additional ``Green
Meeting'' information in their proposal which is believed is
pertinent to better assist us in considering environmental
preferability in selecting our meeting venue.
0
7. Revise 1552.223-72 to read as follows:
1552.223-72 Use and care of laboratory animals.
As prescribed in 1523.303-72, insert the following clause in all
contracts involving the use of animals in testing, research or
training:
[[Page 4216]]
Use and Care of Laboratory Animals March 2015
(a) Use of laboratory animals. (1) Before undertaking
performance of any contract involving the use of laboratory animals,
the contractor shall register with the Secretary of Agriculture of
the United States in accordance with the Secretary of Agriculture of
the United States in accordance with the Animal Welfare Act of 1966,
as amended (AWA), codified at 7 U.S.C. 2131 et seq. and promulgated
at 9 CFR parts 1-4. The contractor shall furnish evidence of such
registration to the contracting officer.
(2) The contractor shall acquire animals used in research and
development programs from a dealer licensed by the Secretary of
Agriculture, or from exempted sources in accordance with 9 CFR 2.25-
2.28. Animals shall not be acquired from any random source Class B
dealer.
(3) The contractor may request registration of his/her facility
and a current listing of licensed dealers from the Regional Office
of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), USDA, for
the region in which his/her research facility is located. The
location of the appropriate APHIS Regional Office as well as
information concerning this program may be obtained at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/contact_us/.
(b) Care of laboratory animals. (1) In the care of any live
animals used or intended for use in the performance of this
contract, the contractor shall adhere to:
(i) The standards and practices incorporated in the Guide for
Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, prepared by the Institute of
Laboratory Animal Research of the National Research Council of the
National Academies (ILAR/NRC),
(ii) The Animal Welfare Regulations found in 9 CFR parts 1-4,
and
(iii) The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Public Health
Service (PHS) Policy on the Humane Care and Use of Laboratory
Animals.
(2) In case of conflict between standards, the higher standard
shall be used.
(3) The contractor's reports on portions of the contract in
which animals were used shall contain a certificate stating that the
animals were cared for in accordance with the principles enunciated
in the Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, prepared by the
ILAR/NRC, and/or in the Animal Welfare Regulations found in 9 CFR
parts 1-4.
(End of clause)
[FR Doc. 2015-01166 Filed 1-26-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P