Offender Tracking Systems Market Survey, 3989-3991 [2015-01235]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 16 / Monday, January 26, 2015 / Notices
Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C.
823(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR
1301.33, the above-named company is
granted registration as a bulk
manufacturer of the basic classes of
controlled substances listed:
Controlled
substance
Schedule
Marihuana (7360) .........................
Tetrahydrocannabinols (7370) .....
Cocaine (9041) .............................
local laws, and reviewing the company’s
background and history.
Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C.
823(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR
1301.33, the above-named company is
granted registration as a bulk
manufacturer of the basic classes of
controlled substances listed:
Controlled substance
I
I
II
Schedule
[Docket No. DEA–392]
Codeine-N-oxide (9053) ...............
I=≥01≥≤Dihydromorphine (9145) ..
Morphine-N-oxide (9307) .............
Amphetamine (1100) ....................
Methylphenidate (1724) ................
Phenylacetone (8501) ..................
Codeine (9050) .............................
Dihydrocodeine (9120) .................
Oxycodone (9143) ........................
Hydromorphone (9150) ................
Hydrocodone (9193) .....................
Morphine (9300) ...........................
Oripavine (9330) ...........................
Thebaine (9333) ...........................
Opium extracts (9610) ..................
Opium fluid extract (9620) ............
Opium tincture (9630) ..................
Opium, powdered (9639) .............
Opium, granulated (9640) ............
Oxymorphone (9652) ...................
Noroxymorphone (9668) ..............
Tapentadol (9780) ........................
Manufacturer of Controlled
Substances Registration: Noramco,
Inc.
The company plans to manufacture
the listed controlled substances in bulk
for distribution to its customers.
The company will manufacture
marihuana and cocaine derivatives for
use by their customers in analytical kits,
reagents, and reference standards as
directed by the National Institute on
Drug Abuse.
Dated: January 9, 2015.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015–01301 Filed 1–23–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
ACTION:
Notice of registration.
Noramco, Inc. applied to be
registered as a manufacturer of certain
basic classes of controlled substances.
The DEA grants Noramco, Inc.
registration as a manufacturer of those
controlled substances.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
By notice dated January 14, 2014, and
published in the Federal Register on
January 22, 2014, 79 FR 3627, Noramco,
Inc., 500 Swedes Landing Road,
Wilmington, Delaware 19801–4417,
applied to be registered as a
manufacturer of certain basic classes of
controlled substances. No comments or
objections were submitted to this notice.
The Drug Enforcement Administration
(DEA) has considered the factors in 21
U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the
registration of Noramco, Inc. to
manufacture the basic classes of
controlled substances is consistent with
the public interest and with United
States obligations under international
treaties, conventions, or protocols in
effect on May 1, 1971. The DEA
investigated the company’s maintenance
of effective controls against diversion by
inspecting and testing the company’s
physical security systems, verifying the
company’s compliance with state and
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:48 Jan 23, 2015
Jkt 235001
I
I
I
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
Dated: January 9, 2015.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015–01303 Filed 1–23–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Office of Justice Programs
[OJP (NIJ) Docket No. 1680]
Offender Tracking Systems Market
Survey
AGENCY:
National Institute of Justice,
DOJ.
Notice of Request for
Information.
ACTION:
The National Institute of
Justice (NIJ) is soliciting information in
relation to the upcoming National
Criminal Justice Research, Test, and
Evaluation Center (NIJ RT&E Center)
‘‘Market Survey of Location-based
Offender Tracking Technologies.’’ This
market survey will be published by NIJ
to assist prospective agencies in their
assessment of relevant information on
commercially available offender
tracking systems (OTS) marketed for use
by the criminal justice community, prior
to making purchasing decisions. The NIJ
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3989
RT&E Center invites comments with
regard to the market survey, including
which categories of information are
appropriate for comparison. Vendors of
such technology are also invited to
provide promotional material (e.g., slick
sheet) and images of the technology
(e.g., a print-quality photograph).
DATES: Responses to this request will be
accepted through 11:59 p.m. Eastern
Time on February 25, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Responses to this request
may be submitted electronically in the
body of or as an attachment to an email
sent to administrator@nijrtecenter.org
with the recommended subject line
‘‘OTS Federal Register Response’’.
Questions and responses may also be
sent by mail (please allow additional
time for processing) to the address:
National Criminal Justice Research, Test
and Evaluation Center, ATTN: OTS
Federal Register Response, Johns
Hopkins University Applied Physics
Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road,
Mail Stop 17N444, Laurel, MD 20723–
6099.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
more information on this request for
information contact Steven Taylor (NIJ
RT&E Center) at (443) 778–9348 or
administrator@nijrtecenter.org. For
more information on the NIJ RT&E
Center, visit https://nij.gov/funding/
awards/Pages/awarddetail.aspx?award=2013-MU-CX-K111
and view the description or contact Jack
Harne, by telephone at 202–616–2911 or
by email at Jack.Harne@usdoj.gov.
Please note that these are not toll-free
telephone numbers.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Information Sought: The NIJ RT&E
Center seeks input to its upcoming
‘‘Market Survey of Location-based
Offender Tracking Technologies.’’ This
technology, consisting of hardware and
software component, is designed to
determine and report at programmed
intervals the geographic location at a
particular time of an individual who is
subject to criminal justice system
supervision. Whether an agency faces a
mandate to track domestic violence or
sex offenders, has a need to more
closely monitor higher risk offenders, or
is looking for confinement alternatives
for low-risk offenders, this technology
can often be a practical tool for
supervising and managing select
individuals.
This market survey will be published
by NIJ to assist prospective agencies in
their assessment of relevant information
on commercially available OTS
marketed for use by the criminal justice
community, prior to making purchasing
decisions. Vendors who respond to this
E:\FR\FM\26JAN1.SGM
26JAN1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
3990
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 16 / Monday, January 26, 2015 / Notices
request for information are invited to
provide general comments with regard
to the market survey for the NIJ RT&E
Center to consider, including which
categories of information are
appropriate for comparison, as well as
promotional material (e.g., slick sheet)
and images of the technology (e.g., a
print-quality photograph).
The NIJ RT&E Center intends to
include, at a minimum, the following
categories of information for each
vendor and OTS model, service, or
product:
1. Vendor Information
a. Name
b. Years your company has been in
business
2. Product Information
a. Types of equipment or products
that are offered (e.g., new, used,
refurbished, leased, etc.)
b. Name and model number (e.g.,
device, monitoring software
application, home monitoring unit,
etc.)
c. Multi-piece or one-piece
configuration
d. Physical dimensions (height X
width X depth, in inches) of device
(with strap, and included battery) or
component
e. Weight (in ounces) of device with
strap and included battery
f. Depth to which device is waterproof
(in feet)
g. Type of tracking (e.g., active,
passive, or hybrid)
h. Location where system stores zone
and schedule information (e.g.,
onboard or monitoring software
application)
i. Location on the body where the
device is worn
j. Battery discharge time (hours of
continuous operation before
needing a charge)
k. Battery shelf life (in months)
l. Battery recharge time (hours
required to fully charge battery after
complete discharge)
m. Battery replacement procedure and
where it must be done (e.g., field or
factory)
n. Availability of supplemental
charger for emergency battery
charging (e.g., hand crank, backup
battery, solar, etc.)
o. Onboard memory storage (quantity
of data that can be stored on device
in number of files/alerts/days
activity)
p. Frequencies on which the device
components operate (cite FCC part
number)
q. Type(s) of technology used to geolocate the offender (e.g., GPS, WiFi,
RF, cellular triangulation, etc.)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:48 Jan 23, 2015
Jkt 235001
r. Mechanism by which data is
transmitted to the monitoring
software (e.g., cellular, WiFi,
landline, etc.)
s. Auxiliary equipment (e.g., car
chargers, emergency chargers,
beacons, etc.)
t. Manufacturer suggested retail price,
without optional features,
accessories or service plans
u. Type and duration of warranty
provided on the device(s) that you
offer (e.g., what is covered in a
standard warranty vs. what is
covered in an optional or extended
warranty)
v. Means and frequency of monitoring
center and monitoring software
application backup
w. Length of time data is retained in
archives (in years)
x. Any additional information not
covered above
3. Usability
a. Types of processes used to ensure
usability of hardware and software
products (e.g., requirements
gathering, observation, task
analysis, interaction design,
usability testing, ergonomics, etc.)
b. Types of data gathered from the
user community (e.g., interviews,
observations during hands-on
training, survey, satisfaction
surveys, repeat customers, etc.) to
evaluate your products, and how
often it is collected
c. Types of user-group meetings and
frequency of their occurrence
d. Types of embedded templates
supported by software (e.g., new
offender, alert types, etc.)
e. Hours of technology support and
location (e.g., telephone or at
agency)
f. Hours of operation of monitoring
center
g. Hours and type of training provided
(e.g., on-site, web-based, prerecorded, play environment etc.)
h. Types of post-training help and
tutorials available
4. Features and Functions
a. Maximum number of tracking
devices that can be concurrently
monitored by the monitoring/
tracking software
b. Number of data points per minute
at which data:
i. Is collected by the device
ii. Is reported to the monitoring
software
c. Type of interoperability embedded
in the design of the data and device
output (e.g., other vendor software,
other vendor devices, data
standards with which the output is
compliant, etc.)
d. Types of alerts (e.g., exclusion zone
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
or schedule violations, strap tamper
or bracelet removal, low battery,
loss of signal, communication
failure, etc.) and way they are
differentiated (e.g., do all alerts
come up ‘‘Alert’’ or ‘‘Cause +
Alert’’)
e. Types of communication alerts to
offenders (e.g., light, vibration, twoway communication, etc.)
f. Single or multiple mechanisms for
tamper detection of device or strap
circumvention
g. Types of acknowledgement by
offender of an alert (e.g., one-way/
two-way communications for
offender, telephone, etc.)
h. Ability to notify/alert victims of
domestic violence
i. Types of mobile monitoring
software applications to transmit
alerts to personnel in the field
j. Types of analytical capabilities to
check tracking (e.g., crime-scene
correlation, offender congregation,
time and duration differentiators,
etc.)
k. Types of real-time monitoring
features (e.g., monitored offender’s
location can be ascertained on
demand)
l. Types of reports that are available
(e.g., standard information
examples, extent that reports are
customizable, inclusion of maps,
etc.)
m. Types of on-demand custom
reports
n. Other unique features not covered
above
5. Performance and Security
a. Average time to install and activate
device (in minutes)
b. Range in performance of locational
accuracy indoor and outdoor (in
feet)
c. False positive (alert generated when
it should not have been) and false
negative (alert was not generated
when it should have been) rates
d. Mean time to failure
e. Minimum data collection rate (e.g.,
once/minute)
f. Minimum number of data storage,
in days, (e.g., seven, ten, or fourteen
days)
g. Mean length of time from alert to
notification
h. Security mechanisms against GPS
or communication channel
jamming, shielding, interception, or
spoofing
i. Data protection mechanism while in
transit and during storage (e.g., SSL,
encryption, password strength, etc.)
j. Types of database change record
maintenance practices for historical
data
k. Mechanism for maintaining
E:\FR\FM\26JAN1.SGM
26JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 16 / Monday, January 26, 2015 / Notices
confidentiality of personally
identifiable information about the
individual being monitored
William J. Sabol,
Acting Director, Bureau of Justice Statistics
and National Institute of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2015–01235 Filed 1–23–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
[Docket No. OSHA–2011–0125]
On-site Consultation Programs;
Extension of the Office of Management
and Budget’s (OMB) Approval of
Information Collection (Paperwork)
Requirements
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Request for public comments.
AGENCY:
OSHA solicits public
comments concerning its proposal to
extend OMB approval of the
information collection requirements
contained in the Standard addressing
On-site Consultation Programs (29 CFR
part 1908).
DATES: Comments must be submitted
(postmarked, sent, or received) by
March 27, 2015.
ADDRESSES:
Electronically: You may submit
comments and attachments
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the
instructions online for submitting
comments.
Facsimile: If your comments,
including attachments, are not longer
than 10 pages you may fax them to the
OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–1648.
Mail, hand delivery, express mail,
messenger, or courier service: When
using this method, you must submit
your comments and attachments to the
OSHA Docket Office, Docket No.
OSHA–2011–0125, Occupational Safety
and Health Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, Room N–2625,
200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20210. Deliveries
(hand, express mail, messenger, and
courier service) are accepted during the
Department of Labor’s and Docket
Office’s normal business hours, 8:15
a.m. to 4:45 p.m., e.t.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the Agency name and the OSHA
docket number (OSHA–2011–0125) for
the Information Collection Request
(ICR). All comments, including any
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:48 Jan 23, 2015
Jkt 235001
personal information you provide, are
placed in the public docket without
change, and may be made available
online at https://www.regulations.gov.
For further information on submitting
comments see the ‘‘Public
Participation’’ heading in the section of
this notice titled SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
Docket: To read or download
comments or other material in the
docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov
or the OSHA Docket Office at the
address above. All documents in the
docket (including this Federal Register
notice) are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index; however,
some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to
read or download from the Web site. All
submissions, including copyrighted
material, are available for inspection
and copying at the OSHA Docket Office.
You may also contact Patrick Showalter
at the address below to obtain a copy of
the ICR.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patrick Showalter, Director, Office of
Small Business Assistance, Directorate
of Cooperative and State Programs,
OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, Room
N–3660, 200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202)
693–2220.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Department of Labor, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent (i.e., employer) burden,
conducts a preclearance process to
provide the public with an opportunity
to comment on proposed and
continuing information collection
requirements in accord with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA–95) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This
program ensures that information is in
the desired format, reporting burden
(time and costs) is minimal, collection
instruments are clearly understood, and
OSHA’s estimate of the information
collection burden is accurate. The
Occupational Safety and Health Act of
1970 (the OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651 et
seq.) authorizes information collection
by employers as necessary or
appropriate for enforcement of the OSH
Act or for developing information
regarding the causes and prevention of
occupational injuries, illnesses, and
accidents (29 U.S.C. 657). The OSH Act
also requires that OSHA obtain such
information with minimum burden
upon employers, especially those
operating small businesses, and to
reduce to the maximum extent feasible
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3991
unnecessary duplication of efforts in
obtaining information (29 U.S.C. 657).
Section 7(c)(1) of the OSH Act
authorizes the Secretary of Labor to,
‘‘with the consent of any State or
political subdivision thereof, accept and
use the services, facilities, and
personnel of any agency of such State or
subdivision with reimbursement.’’
Section 21(c) of the OSH Act authorizes
the Secretary of Labor (Secretary) to,
‘‘consult with and advise employers and
employees . . . as to effective means of
preventing occupational illnesses and
injuries.’’
Additionally, Section 21(d) of the
OSH Act instructs the Secretary to
‘‘establish and support cooperative
agreements with the States under which
employers subject to the Act may
consult with State personnel with
respect to the application of
occupational safety and health
requirements under the Act or under
State plans approved under section 18
of the Act.’’ This gives the Secretary
authority to enter into agreements with
the States to provide on-site
consultation services, and establish
rules under which employers may
qualify for an inspection exemption. To
satisfy the intent of these and other
sections of the OSH Act, OSHA codified
the terms that govern cooperative
agreements between OSHA and State
governments whereby State agencies
provide on-site consultation services to
private employers to assist them in
complying with the requirements of the
OSH Act. The terms were codified as
the Consultation Program regulations
(29 CFR part 1908).
The On-site Consultation Program
regulations specify services to be
provided, and practices and procedures
to be followed by the State On-site
Consultation Programs. Information
collection requirements set forth in the
On-site Consultation Program
regulations are in two categories: State
Responsibilities and Employer
Responsibilities. Eight regulatory
provisions require information
collection activities by the State. The
Federal government provides 90 percent
of the funds for on-site consultation
services delivered by the States, which
result in the information collection.
Four requirements apply to employers
and specify conditions for receiving the
free consultation services.
II. Special Issues for Comment
OSHA has a particular interest in
comments on the following issues:
• Whether the proposed information
collection requirements are necessary
for the proper performance of the
E:\FR\FM\26JAN1.SGM
26JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 16 (Monday, January 26, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3989-3991]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01235]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Office of Justice Programs
[OJP (NIJ) Docket No. 1680]
Offender Tracking Systems Market Survey
AGENCY: National Institute of Justice, DOJ.
ACTION: Notice of Request for Information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Institute of Justice (NIJ) is soliciting
information in relation to the upcoming National Criminal Justice
Research, Test, and Evaluation Center (NIJ RT&E Center) ``Market Survey
of Location-based Offender Tracking Technologies.'' This market survey
will be published by NIJ to assist prospective agencies in their
assessment of relevant information on commercially available offender
tracking systems (OTS) marketed for use by the criminal justice
community, prior to making purchasing decisions. The NIJ RT&E Center
invites comments with regard to the market survey, including which
categories of information are appropriate for comparison. Vendors of
such technology are also invited to provide promotional material (e.g.,
slick sheet) and images of the technology (e.g., a print-quality
photograph).
DATES: Responses to this request will be accepted through 11:59 p.m.
Eastern Time on February 25, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Responses to this request may be submitted electronically in
the body of or as an attachment to an email sent to
administrator@nijrtecenter.org with the recommended subject line ``OTS
Federal Register Response''. Questions and responses may also be sent
by mail (please allow additional time for processing) to the address:
National Criminal Justice Research, Test and Evaluation Center, ATTN:
OTS Federal Register Response, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics
Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, Mail Stop 17N444, Laurel, MD
20723-6099.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For more information on this request
for information contact Steven Taylor (NIJ RT&E Center) at (443) 778-
9348 or administrator@nijrtecenter.org. For more information on the NIJ
RT&E Center, visit https://nij.gov/funding/awards/Pages/award-detail.aspx?award=2013-MU-CX-K111 and view the description or contact
Jack Harne, by telephone at 202-616-2911 or by email at
Jack.Harne@usdoj.gov. Please note that these are not toll-free
telephone numbers.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Information Sought: The NIJ RT&E Center
seeks input to its upcoming ``Market Survey of Location-based Offender
Tracking Technologies.'' This technology, consisting of hardware and
software component, is designed to determine and report at programmed
intervals the geographic location at a particular time of an individual
who is subject to criminal justice system supervision. Whether an
agency faces a mandate to track domestic violence or sex offenders, has
a need to more closely monitor higher risk offenders, or is looking for
confinement alternatives for low-risk offenders, this technology can
often be a practical tool for supervising and managing select
individuals.
This market survey will be published by NIJ to assist prospective
agencies in their assessment of relevant information on commercially
available OTS marketed for use by the criminal justice community, prior
to making purchasing decisions. Vendors who respond to this
[[Page 3990]]
request for information are invited to provide general comments with
regard to the market survey for the NIJ RT&E Center to consider,
including which categories of information are appropriate for
comparison, as well as promotional material (e.g., slick sheet) and
images of the technology (e.g., a print-quality photograph).
The NIJ RT&E Center intends to include, at a minimum, the following
categories of information for each vendor and OTS model, service, or
product:
1. Vendor Information
a. Name
b. Years your company has been in business
2. Product Information
a. Types of equipment or products that are offered (e.g., new,
used, refurbished, leased, etc.)
b. Name and model number (e.g., device, monitoring software
application, home monitoring unit, etc.)
c. Multi-piece or one-piece configuration
d. Physical dimensions (height X width X depth, in inches) of
device (with strap, and included battery) or component
e. Weight (in ounces) of device with strap and included battery
f. Depth to which device is waterproof (in feet)
g. Type of tracking (e.g., active, passive, or hybrid)
h. Location where system stores zone and schedule information
(e.g., onboard or monitoring software application)
i. Location on the body where the device is worn
j. Battery discharge time (hours of continuous operation before
needing a charge)
k. Battery shelf life (in months)
l. Battery recharge time (hours required to fully charge battery
after complete discharge)
m. Battery replacement procedure and where it must be done (e.g.,
field or factory)
n. Availability of supplemental charger for emergency battery
charging (e.g., hand crank, backup battery, solar, etc.)
o. Onboard memory storage (quantity of data that can be stored on
device in number of files/alerts/days activity)
p. Frequencies on which the device components operate (cite FCC
part number)
q. Type(s) of technology used to geo-locate the offender (e.g.,
GPS, WiFi, RF, cellular triangulation, etc.)
r. Mechanism by which data is transmitted to the monitoring
software (e.g., cellular, WiFi, landline, etc.)
s. Auxiliary equipment (e.g., car chargers, emergency chargers,
beacons, etc.)
t. Manufacturer suggested retail price, without optional features,
accessories or service plans
u. Type and duration of warranty provided on the device(s) that you
offer (e.g., what is covered in a standard warranty vs. what is covered
in an optional or extended warranty)
v. Means and frequency of monitoring center and monitoring software
application backup
w. Length of time data is retained in archives (in years)
x. Any additional information not covered above
3. Usability
a. Types of processes used to ensure usability of hardware and
software products (e.g., requirements gathering, observation, task
analysis, interaction design, usability testing, ergonomics, etc.)
b. Types of data gathered from the user community (e.g.,
interviews, observations during hands-on training, survey, satisfaction
surveys, repeat customers, etc.) to evaluate your products, and how
often it is collected
c. Types of user-group meetings and frequency of their occurrence
d. Types of embedded templates supported by software (e.g., new
offender, alert types, etc.)
e. Hours of technology support and location (e.g., telephone or at
agency)
f. Hours of operation of monitoring center
g. Hours and type of training provided (e.g., on-site, web-based,
pre-recorded, play environment etc.)
h. Types of post-training help and tutorials available
4. Features and Functions
a. Maximum number of tracking devices that can be concurrently
monitored by the monitoring/tracking software
b. Number of data points per minute at which data:
i. Is collected by the device
ii. Is reported to the monitoring software
c. Type of interoperability embedded in the design of the data and
device output (e.g., other vendor software, other vendor devices, data
standards with which the output is compliant, etc.)
d. Types of alerts (e.g., exclusion zone or schedule violations,
strap tamper or bracelet removal, low battery, loss of signal,
communication failure, etc.) and way they are differentiated (e.g., do
all alerts come up ``Alert'' or ``Cause + Alert'')
e. Types of communication alerts to offenders (e.g., light,
vibration, two-way communication, etc.)
f. Single or multiple mechanisms for tamper detection of device or
strap circumvention
g. Types of acknowledgement by offender of an alert (e.g., one-way/
two-way communications for offender, telephone, etc.)
h. Ability to notify/alert victims of domestic violence
i. Types of mobile monitoring software applications to transmit
alerts to personnel in the field
j. Types of analytical capabilities to check tracking (e.g., crime-
scene correlation, offender congregation, time and duration
differentiators, etc.)
k. Types of real-time monitoring features (e.g., monitored
offender's location can be ascertained on demand)
l. Types of reports that are available (e.g., standard information
examples, extent that reports are customizable, inclusion of maps,
etc.)
m. Types of on-demand custom reports
n. Other unique features not covered above
5. Performance and Security
a. Average time to install and activate device (in minutes)
b. Range in performance of locational accuracy indoor and outdoor
(in feet)
c. False positive (alert generated when it should not have been)
and false negative (alert was not generated when it should have been)
rates
d. Mean time to failure
e. Minimum data collection rate (e.g., once/minute)
f. Minimum number of data storage, in days, (e.g., seven, ten, or
fourteen days)
g. Mean length of time from alert to notification
h. Security mechanisms against GPS or communication channel
jamming, shielding, interception, or spoofing
i. Data protection mechanism while in transit and during storage
(e.g., SSL, encryption, password strength, etc.)
j. Types of database change record maintenance practices for
historical data
k. Mechanism for maintaining
[[Page 3991]]
confidentiality of personally identifiable information about the
individual being monitored
William J. Sabol,
Acting Director, Bureau of Justice Statistics and National Institute of
Justice.
[FR Doc. 2015-01235 Filed 1-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P