Georgia: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management Program Revisions, 3888-3891 [2015-01040]
Download as PDF
3888
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 16 / Monday, January 26, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
laboratory and analytical uses shall be
in effect through December 31, 2021,
subject to the restrictions in appendix G
of this subpart, and subject to the
recordkeeping and reporting
requirements at § 82.13(u) through (x).
There is no amount specified for this
exemption.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2015–01295 Filed 1–23–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
[EPA–R04–RCRA–2014–0710; FRL–9921–
90–Region 4]
Georgia: Final Authorization of State
Hazardous Waste Management
Program Revisions
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
Georgia has applied to the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
for final authorization of changes to its
hazardous waste program under the
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA). EPA has determined that
these changes satisfy all requirements
needed to qualify for final authorization,
and is authorizing the State’s changes
through this direct final rule. In the
‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section of today’s
Federal Register, EPA is also publishing
a separate document that serves as the
proposal to authorize these changes.
EPA believes this action is not
controversial and does not expect
comments that oppose it. Unless EPA
receives written comments that oppose
this authorization during the comment
period, the decision to authorize
Georgia’s changes to its hazardous waste
program will take effect. If EPA receives
comments that oppose this action, EPA
will publish a document in the Federal
Register withdrawing today’s direct
final rule before it takes effect, and the
separate document published in today’s
‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section of this
Federal Register will serve as the
proposal to authorize the changes.
DATES: This final authorization will
become effective on March 27, 2015
unless EPA receives adverse written
comment by February 25, 2015. If EPA
receives such comment, EPA will
publish a timely withdrawal of this
direct final rule in the Federal Register
and inform the public that this
authorization will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Jan 23, 2015
Jkt 235001
RCRA–2014–0710, by one of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Email: gleaton.gwen@epa.gov.
• Fax: (404) 562–9964 (prior to
faxing, please notify the EPA contact
listed below).
• Mail: Send written comments to
Gwendolyn Gleaton, Permits and State
Programs Section, RCRA Programs and
Materials Management Branch, RCRA
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Atlanta Federal Center, 61
Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia
30303–8960.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver
your comments to Gwendolyn Gleaton,
Permits and State Programs Section,
RCRA Programs and Materials
Management Branch, RCRA Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth
Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–
8960. Such deliveries are only accepted
during the Regional Office’s normal
hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: EPA must receive your
comments by February 25, 2015. Direct
your comments to Docket ID No. EPA–
R04–RCRA–2014–0710. EPA’s policy is
that all comments received will be
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected through
www.regulations.gov or email. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an email comment directly
to EPA without going through
www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made publicly available on the Internet.
If you submit an electronic comment,
EPA recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. (For additional information
about EPA’s public docket, visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm).
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the www.regulations.gov
index. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically in
www.regulations.gov, or in hard copy.
You may view and copy Georgia’s
application and associated publicly
available materials from 8:00 a.m. to
4:00 p.m. at the following locations:
EPA, Region 4, RCRA Division, Atlanta
Federal Center, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960; telephone
number: (404) 562–8500; and the
Georgia Department of Natural
Resources, Environmental Protection
Division, 2 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive,
Suite 1154 East Tower, Atlanta, Georgia
30334–4910; telephone number: (404)
656–2833. Interested persons wanting to
examine these documents should make
an appointment with the office at least
a week in advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gwendolyn Gleaton, Permits and State
Programs Section, RCRA Programs and
Materials Management Branch, RCRA
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Atlanta Federal Center, 61
Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia
30303–8960; telephone number: (404)
562–8500; fax number: (404) 562–9964;
email address: gleaton.gwen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Why are revisions to State programs
necessary?
States which have received final
authorization from EPA under RCRA
section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must
maintain a hazardous waste program
that is equivalent to, consistent with,
and no less stringent than the Federal
program. As the Federal program
changes, States must change their
programs and ask EPA to authorize the
changes. Changes to State programs may
be necessary when Federal or State
statutory or regulatory authority is
modified or when certain other changes
occur. Most commonly, States must
change their programs because of
changes to EPA’s regulations in 40 Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 124,
260 through 268, 270, 273, and 279.
New Federal requirements and
prohibitions imposed by Federal
E:\FR\FM\26JAR1.SGM
26JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 16 / Monday, January 26, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
regulations that EPA promulgates
pursuant to the Hazardous and Solid
Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA)
take effect in authorized States at the
same time that they take effect in
unauthorized States. Thus, EPA will
implement those requirements and
prohibitions in Georgia, including the
issuance of new permits implementing
those requirements, until the State is
granted authorization to do so.
B. What decisions has EPA made in this
rule?
On September 17, 2012, Georgia
submitted a final complete program
revision application, seeking
authorization of changes to its
hazardous waste program that
correspond to certain Federal rules
promulgated between July 1, 2007 and
June 30, 2011 (also known as RCRA
Clusters XVIII through XXI). EPA
concludes that Georgia’s application to
revise its authorized program meets all
of the statutory and regulatory
requirements established by RCRA, as
set forth in RCRA section 3006(b), 42
U.S.C. 6926(b), and 40 CFR part 271.
Therefore, EPA grants Georgia final
authorization to operate its hazardous
waste program with the changes
described in the authorization
application, and as outlined below in
Section G of this preamble.
Georgia has responsibility for
permitting treatment, storage, and
disposal facilities within its borders and
for carrying out the aspects of the RCRA
program described in its revised
program application, subject to the
limitations of HSWA, as discussed
above.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
C. What is the effect of this
authorization decision?
The effect of this decision is that the
changes described in Georgia’s
authorization application will become
part of the authorized State hazardous
waste program, and will therefore be
federally enforceable. Georgia will
continue to have primary enforcement
authority and responsibility for its State
hazardous waste program. EPA retains
its authorities under RCRA sections
3007, 3008, 3013, and 7003, including
its authority to:
• Conduct inspections, and require
monitoring, tests, analyses or reports;
• Enforce RCRA requirements,
including authorized State program
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Jan 23, 2015
Jkt 235001
requirements, and suspend or revoke
permits; and
• Take enforcement actions regardless
of whether the State has taken its own
actions.
This action does not impose
additional requirements on the
regulated community because the State
regulations for which Georgia is being
authorized by today’s action are already
effective and enforceable requirements
under State law, and are not changed by
today’s action.
D. Why wasn’t there a proposed rule
before today’s rule?
Along with this direct final rule, EPA
is publishing a separate document in the
‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section of today’s
Federal Register that serves as the
proposal to authorize these State
program changes. EPA did not publish
a proposed rule before today because
EPA views this as a routine program
change and does not expect comments
that oppose this approval. EPA is
providing an opportunity for public
comment now, as described in Section
E of this preamble.
E. What happens if EPA receives
comments that oppose this action?
If EPA receives comments that oppose
this authorization, EPA will withdraw
today’s direct final rule by publishing a
document in the Federal Register before
the rule becomes effective. EPA will
base any further decision on the
authorization of the State program
changes on the proposed rule
mentioned in the previous section, after
considering all comments received
during the comment period, and will
address all such comments in a later
final rule. You may not have another
opportunity to comment on these State
program changes. If you want to
comment on this authorization, you
must do so at this time.
If EPA receives comments that oppose
only the authorization of a particular
change to the State hazardous waste
program, EPA will withdraw that part of
today’s direct final rule, but the
authorization of the program changes
that the comments do not oppose will
become effective on the date specified
above. The Federal Register withdrawal
document will specify which part of the
authorization will become effective, and
which part is being withdrawn.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3889
F. What has Georgia previously been
authorized for?
Georgia initially received final
authorization on August 7, 1984,
effective August 21, 1984 (49 FR 31417),
to implement the RCRA hazardous
waste management program. EPA
granted authorization for changes to
Georgia’s program on the following
dates: July 7, 1986, effective September
18, 1986 (51 FR 24549); July 28, 1988,
effective September 26, 1988 (53 FR
28383); July 24, 1990, effective
September 24, 1990 (55 FR 30000);
February 12, 1991, effective April 15,
1991 (56 FR 5656); May 11, 1992,
effective July 10, 1992 (57 FR 20055);
November 25, 1992, effective January
25, 1993 (57 FR 55466); February 26,
1993, effective April 27, 1993 (58 FR
11539); November 16, 1993, effective
January 18, 1994 (58 FR 60388); April
26, 1994, effective June 27, 1994 (59 FR
21664); May 10, 1995, effective July 10,
1995 (60 FR 24790); August 30, 1995,
effective October 30, 1995 (60 FR
45069); March 7, 1996, effective May 6,
1996 (61 FR 9108); September 18, 1998,
effective November 17, 1998 (63 FR
49852); October 14, 1999, effective
December 13, 1999 (64 FR 55629);
November 28, 2000, effective March 30,
2001 (66 FR 8090); July 16, 2002,
effective September 16, 2002 (67 FR
46600); November 19, 2002, effective
January 21, 2003 (67 FR 69690); July 18,
2003, effective September 16, 2003 (68
FR 42605); January 27, 2005, effective
April 20, 2005 (70 FR 12973); April 25,
2006, effective June 26, 2006 (71 FR
23864); and May 2, 2013, effective July
1, 2013 (78 FR 25579).
G. What changes is EPA authorizing
with this action?
On September 17, 2012, Georgia
submitted a final complete program
revision application, seeking
authorization of its changes in
accordance with 40 CFR 271.21. EPA
now makes an immediate final decision,
subject to receipt of written comments
that oppose this action, that Georgia’s
hazardous waste program revisions are
equivalent to, consistent with, and no
less stringent than the Federal program,
and therefore satisfy all of the
requirements necessary to qualify for
final authorization. Therefore, EPA
grants Georgia final authorization for the
following program changes:
E:\FR\FM\26JAR1.SGM
26JAR1
3890
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 16 / Monday, January 26, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Description of Federal requirement
Federal Register date and
page
217—NESHAP: Final Standards for Hazardous Waste
Combustors (Phase I Final Replacement Standards
and Phase II) Amendments.
218—F019 Exemption for Wastewater Treatment
Sludges from Auto Manufacturing Zinc Phosphating
Processes.
220—Academic Laboratories Generator Standards ........
73 FR 18970, 04/08/08 ......
391–3–11–.01(2) and 391–3–11–.10(2)–(3).
73 FR 31756, 06/04/08 ......
391–3–11–.01(2) and 391–3–11–.07(1).
73 FR 72912, 12/01/08 ......
75 FR 79304, 12/20/10 ......
391–3–11–.01(2); 391–3–11–.07(1); and 391–3–11–
.08(1).
391–3–11–.01(2); 391–3–11–.08(1); 391–3–11–.09;
and 391–3–11–.10(1)–(3).
391–3–11–.01(2); 391–3–11–.02(1);, 391–3–11–.07(1);
391–3–11–.08(1); 391–3–11–.09; 391–3–11–.10(1)–
(3); 391–3–11–.11(5)(f); and 391–3–11–.16.
391–3–11–.01(2); 391–3–11–.07(1); and 391–3–11–
.16.
391–3–11–.01(2) and 391–3–11–.08(1).
76 FR 34147, 06/13/11 ......
391–3–11–.01(2) and 391–3–11–.16.
222—OECD Requirements; Export Shipments of Spent
Lead-Acid Batteries.
223—Hazardous Waste Technical Corrections and Clarifications.
75 FR 1236, 01/08/10 ........
225—Removal of Saccharin and Its Salts from the List
of Hazardous Constituents.
226—Academic Laboratories Generator Standards
Technical Corrections.
227—Revision of the Land Disposal Treatment, Standards for Carbamate Wastes.
75 FR 48918, 12/17/10 ......
1 The
Georgia provisions are from the Georgia Rules for Hazardous Waste Management, Chapter 391–3–11, effective as of August 7, 2012.
H. Where are the revised State rules
different from the Federal rules?
There are no State requirements in the
authorized program revisions listed
above that are considered to be more
stringent or broader in scope than the
Federal requirements.
The EPA cannot delegate the import
and export functions at 40 CFR part 262,
subparts E and H, contained in the
OECD Export Rule set forth in 75 FR
1236 (January 8, 2010). Georgia has
adopted these regulations by reference
at Georgia Hazardous Waste
Management Rule 391–3–11–.08(1), and
has properly reserved EPA’s authority
for their implementation at Rule 391–3–
11–.01(2)(a).
I. Who handles permits after the
authorization takes effect?
Georgia will issue permits for all the
provisions for which it is authorized
and will administer the permits it
issues. EPA will continue to administer
any RCRA hazardous waste permits or
portions of permits which EPA issued
prior to the effective date of this
authorization until they expire or are
terminated. EPA will not issue any more
permits or new portions of permits for
the provisions listed in the Table above
after the effective date of this
authorization. EPA will continue to
implement and issue permits for HSWA
requirements for which Georgia is not
authorized.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
75 FR 12989, 03/1/10, 75
FR 31716, 06/04/10.
Analogous State authority 1
J. What is codification and is EPA
codifying Georgia’s hazardous waste
program as authorized in this rule?
Codification is the process of placing
the State’s statutes and regulations that
comprise the State’s authorized
hazardous waste program into the Code
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Jan 23, 2015
Jkt 235001
of Federal Regulations. EPA does this by
referencing the authorized State rules in
40 CFR part 272. EPA is not codifying
the authorization of Georgia’s changes at
this time. However, EPA reserves the
amendment of 40 CFR part 272, subpart
L, for the authorization of Georgia’s
program changes at a later date.
K. Administrative Requirements
The Office of Management and Budget
has exempted this action from the
requirements of Executive Order 12866
(58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), and
therefore this action is not subject to
review by OMB. This action authorizes
State requirements for the purpose of
RCRA section 3006 and imposes no
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law.
Accordingly, I certify that this action
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
action authorizes pre-existing
requirements under State law and does
not impose any additional enforceable
duty beyond that required by State law,
it does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4). For the same
reason, this action also does not
significantly or uniquely affect the
communities of Tribal governments, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action will not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it
merely authorizes State requirements as
part of the State RCRA hazardous waste
program without altering the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established by
RCRA. This action also is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant and it does not
make decisions based on environmental
health or safety risks. This rule is not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001) because it is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
Under RCRA section 3006(b), EPA
grants a State’s application for
authorization as long as the State meets
the criteria required by RCRA. It would
thus be inconsistent with applicable law
for EPA, when it reviews a State
authorization application, to require the
use of any particular voluntary
consensus standard in place of another
standard that otherwise satisfies the
requirements of RCRA. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. As required by
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61
FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing
this rule, EPA has taken the necessary
steps to eliminate drafting errors and
ambiguity, minimize potential litigation,
and provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct. EPA has complied
with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR
8859, March 15, 1988) by examining the
takings implications of the rule in
E:\FR\FM\26JAR1.SGM
26JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 16 / Monday, January 26, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
accordance with the ‘‘Attorney
General’s Supplemental Guidelines for
the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of
Unanticipated Takings’’ issued under
the executive order. This rule does not
impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this document and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication in the Federal Register. A
major rule cannot take effect until 60
days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This
action will be effective March 27, 2015,
unless objections to this authorization
are received.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information,
Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste
transportation, Indian lands,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: This action is issued under the
authority of sections 2002(a), 3006, and
7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as
amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, and
6974(b).
Dated: January 13, 2015.
Heather McTeer Toney,
Regional Administrator Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2015–01040 Filed 1–23–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
42 CFR Part 84
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
[Docket No. CDC–2013–0004; NIOSH–216]
RIN 0920–AA42
Respirator Certification Fees
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, HHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Jan 23, 2015
Jkt 235001
The Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS) is revising the
fee structure currently used by the
National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health (NIOSH), within the
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), to charge respirator
manufacturers for the examination,
inspection, and testing of respirators
which are submitted to NIOSH for the
purpose of creating or modifying a
certificate of approval. Existing
regulations reflect prices for respirator
testing and approval that were
promulgated in 1972, and have not kept
pace with the actual costs of providing
these services that benefit respirator
manufacturers. This final rule is
designed to update the regulations.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
May 26, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rachel Weiss, Program Analyst; 1090
Tusculum Ave., MS: C–46, Cincinnati,
OH 45226; telephone (855) 818–1629
(this is a toll-free number); email
NIOSHregs@cdc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final
rule is designed to establish fees for the
following: (1) Reviewing applications
submitted to NIOSH; (2) issuing a
certificate of approval; (3) modifying a
certificate of approval; (4) maintaining a
certificate of approval; (5) performing
specific, standard laboratory tests which
are requested by applicants; (6)
developing and/or performing novel
tests which are required to evaluate
respirator performance; (7) qualifying
applicant respirator production sites
and quality systems; (8) verifying
quality system performance through
manufacturing site quality audits; (9)
verifying commercially available
respirator performance through product
quality audits; (10) replacing testing
equipment; and (11) providing and
maintaining laboratories and office
space.
The preamble is organized as follows:
SUMMARY:
I. Public Participation
II. Background
III. Summary of Final Rule and Response to
Public Comments
IV. Regulatory Assessment Requirements
A. Executive Order 12866 and Executive
Order 13563
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
C. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
D. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
F. Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice)
G. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
H. Executive Order 13045 (Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks)
I. Executive Order 13211 (Actions
Concerning Regulations That
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3891
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use)
J. Plain Writing Act of 2010
I. Public Participation
Interested persons or organizations
were invited to participate in this
rulemaking by submitting written views,
recommendations, and data. In addition,
HHS invited comments specifically on
the following:
(1) To delay the implementation of
the approval 1 maintenance fee specified
in ‘‘Respirator Certification Fee
Schedule A—Administrative Fees’’ 2
until 4 months after the publication date
of the final rule to allow current
approval holders to adjust their
inventory of old, obsolete, or marginally
profitable certificates of approval. In
particular, HHS invited comments on
whether 4 months after publication of
the final rule allows for a sufficient
amount of time to make such
adjustments; and
(2) One year as the minimum amount
of time for new fees to remain in effect
to provide manufacturers sufficient time
to plan for application submissions and
to determine which approvals to
maintain.
Substantive comments were
submitted by 11 interested parties, both
to the rulemaking docket and during the
public meeting held April 30, 2013.
Commenters included respirator
manufacturers, trade associations, and a
private testing laboratory.
II. Background
Under 42 CFR part 84—Approval of
Respiratory Protective Devices, NIOSH
approves respirators used by workers in
mines and other workplaces for
protection against hazardous
atmospheres. The Mine Safety and
Health Administration (MSHA) and the
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) require U.S.
employers to supply NIOSH-approved
respirators to their employees whenever
the employer requires the use of
respirators. NIOSH currently charges
fees for the examination, inspection,
and testing of such respirators which is
necessary to grant the required
approval. This final rule is designed to
ensure that all approval activities are
covered by appropriate fees, to update
the fees charged, and to create a
1 This fee was improperly referenced as the
‘‘approval’’ maintenance fee when HHS was instead
requesting input on the records maintenance fee. As
discussed below, commenters did offer feedback on
the timing of the records maintenance fee.
2 The final fee schedules have been renamed and
slightly reorganized and will be added to 42 CFR
part 84 as appendices A and B. The fee schedules
appear in full at the end of this document,
following the regulatory text.
E:\FR\FM\26JAR1.SGM
26JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 16 (Monday, January 26, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3888-3891]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01040]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
[EPA-R04-RCRA-2014-0710; FRL-9921-90-Region 4]
Georgia: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management
Program Revisions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Georgia has applied to the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) for final authorization of changes to its hazardous waste program
under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). EPA has
determined that these changes satisfy all requirements needed to
qualify for final authorization, and is authorizing the State's changes
through this direct final rule. In the ``Proposed Rules'' section of
today's Federal Register, EPA is also publishing a separate document
that serves as the proposal to authorize these changes. EPA believes
this action is not controversial and does not expect comments that
oppose it. Unless EPA receives written comments that oppose this
authorization during the comment period, the decision to authorize
Georgia's changes to its hazardous waste program will take effect. If
EPA receives comments that oppose this action, EPA will publish a
document in the Federal Register withdrawing today's direct final rule
before it takes effect, and the separate document published in today's
``Proposed Rules'' section of this Federal Register will serve as the
proposal to authorize the changes.
DATES: This final authorization will become effective on March 27, 2015
unless EPA receives adverse written comment by February 25, 2015. If
EPA receives such comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of this
direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that
this authorization will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
RCRA-2014-0710, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Email: gleaton.gwen@epa.gov.
Fax: (404) 562-9964 (prior to faxing, please notify the
EPA contact listed below).
Mail: Send written comments to Gwendolyn Gleaton, Permits
and State Programs Section, RCRA Programs and Materials Management
Branch, RCRA Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Atlanta
Federal Center, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver your comments to
Gwendolyn Gleaton, Permits and State Programs Section, RCRA Programs
and Materials Management Branch, RCRA Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Such deliveries are only accepted during
the Regional Office's normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: EPA must receive your comments by February 25, 2015.
Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R04-RCRA-2014-0710. EPA's
policy is that all comments received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI), or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or email. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment
directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made publicly available
on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends
that you include your name and other contact information in the body of
your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read
your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. (For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit the EPA Docket Center
homepage at www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm).
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in www.regulations.gov, or in hard copy.
You may view and copy Georgia's application and associated publicly
available materials from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. at the following
locations: EPA, Region 4, RCRA Division, Atlanta Federal Center, 61
Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960; telephone number:
(404) 562-8500; and the Georgia Department of Natural Resources,
Environmental Protection Division, 2 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive,
Suite 1154 East Tower, Atlanta, Georgia 30334-4910; telephone number:
(404) 656-2833. Interested persons wanting to examine these documents
should make an appointment with the office at least a week in advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gwendolyn Gleaton, Permits and State
Programs Section, RCRA Programs and Materials Management Branch, RCRA
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Atlanta Federal Center,
61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960; telephone number:
(404) 562-8500; fax number: (404) 562-9964; email address:
gleaton.gwen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Why are revisions to State programs necessary?
States which have received final authorization from EPA under RCRA
section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must maintain a hazardous waste
program that is equivalent to, consistent with, and no less stringent
than the Federal program. As the Federal program changes, States must
change their programs and ask EPA to authorize the changes. Changes to
State programs may be necessary when Federal or State statutory or
regulatory authority is modified or when certain other changes occur.
Most commonly, States must change their programs because of changes to
EPA's regulations in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 124,
260 through 268, 270, 273, and 279.
New Federal requirements and prohibitions imposed by Federal
[[Page 3889]]
regulations that EPA promulgates pursuant to the Hazardous and Solid
Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA) take effect in authorized States at the
same time that they take effect in unauthorized States. Thus, EPA will
implement those requirements and prohibitions in Georgia, including the
issuance of new permits implementing those requirements, until the
State is granted authorization to do so.
B. What decisions has EPA made in this rule?
On September 17, 2012, Georgia submitted a final complete program
revision application, seeking authorization of changes to its hazardous
waste program that correspond to certain Federal rules promulgated
between July 1, 2007 and June 30, 2011 (also known as RCRA Clusters
XVIII through XXI). EPA concludes that Georgia's application to revise
its authorized program meets all of the statutory and regulatory
requirements established by RCRA, as set forth in RCRA section 3006(b),
42 U.S.C. 6926(b), and 40 CFR part 271. Therefore, EPA grants Georgia
final authorization to operate its hazardous waste program with the
changes described in the authorization application, and as outlined
below in Section G of this preamble.
Georgia has responsibility for permitting treatment, storage, and
disposal facilities within its borders and for carrying out the aspects
of the RCRA program described in its revised program application,
subject to the limitations of HSWA, as discussed above.
C. What is the effect of this authorization decision?
The effect of this decision is that the changes described in
Georgia's authorization application will become part of the authorized
State hazardous waste program, and will therefore be federally
enforceable. Georgia will continue to have primary enforcement
authority and responsibility for its State hazardous waste program. EPA
retains its authorities under RCRA sections 3007, 3008, 3013, and 7003,
including its authority to:
Conduct inspections, and require monitoring, tests,
analyses or reports;
Enforce RCRA requirements, including authorized State
program requirements, and suspend or revoke permits; and
Take enforcement actions regardless of whether the State
has taken its own actions.
This action does not impose additional requirements on the
regulated community because the State regulations for which Georgia is
being authorized by today's action are already effective and
enforceable requirements under State law, and are not changed by
today's action.
D. Why wasn't there a proposed rule before today's rule?
Along with this direct final rule, EPA is publishing a separate
document in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of today's Federal Register
that serves as the proposal to authorize these State program changes.
EPA did not publish a proposed rule before today because EPA views this
as a routine program change and does not expect comments that oppose
this approval. EPA is providing an opportunity for public comment now,
as described in Section E of this preamble.
E. What happens if EPA receives comments that oppose this action?
If EPA receives comments that oppose this authorization, EPA will
withdraw today's direct final rule by publishing a document in the
Federal Register before the rule becomes effective. EPA will base any
further decision on the authorization of the State program changes on
the proposed rule mentioned in the previous section, after considering
all comments received during the comment period, and will address all
such comments in a later final rule. You may not have another
opportunity to comment on these State program changes. If you want to
comment on this authorization, you must do so at this time.
If EPA receives comments that oppose only the authorization of a
particular change to the State hazardous waste program, EPA will
withdraw that part of today's direct final rule, but the authorization
of the program changes that the comments do not oppose will become
effective on the date specified above. The Federal Register withdrawal
document will specify which part of the authorization will become
effective, and which part is being withdrawn.
F. What has Georgia previously been authorized for?
Georgia initially received final authorization on August 7, 1984,
effective August 21, 1984 (49 FR 31417), to implement the RCRA
hazardous waste management program. EPA granted authorization for
changes to Georgia's program on the following dates: July 7, 1986,
effective September 18, 1986 (51 FR 24549); July 28, 1988, effective
September 26, 1988 (53 FR 28383); July 24, 1990, effective September
24, 1990 (55 FR 30000); February 12, 1991, effective April 15, 1991 (56
FR 5656); May 11, 1992, effective July 10, 1992 (57 FR 20055); November
25, 1992, effective January 25, 1993 (57 FR 55466); February 26, 1993,
effective April 27, 1993 (58 FR 11539); November 16, 1993, effective
January 18, 1994 (58 FR 60388); April 26, 1994, effective June 27, 1994
(59 FR 21664); May 10, 1995, effective July 10, 1995 (60 FR 24790);
August 30, 1995, effective October 30, 1995 (60 FR 45069); March 7,
1996, effective May 6, 1996 (61 FR 9108); September 18, 1998, effective
November 17, 1998 (63 FR 49852); October 14, 1999, effective December
13, 1999 (64 FR 55629); November 28, 2000, effective March 30, 2001 (66
FR 8090); July 16, 2002, effective September 16, 2002 (67 FR 46600);
November 19, 2002, effective January 21, 2003 (67 FR 69690); July 18,
2003, effective September 16, 2003 (68 FR 42605); January 27, 2005,
effective April 20, 2005 (70 FR 12973); April 25, 2006, effective June
26, 2006 (71 FR 23864); and May 2, 2013, effective July 1, 2013 (78 FR
25579).
G. What changes is EPA authorizing with this action?
On September 17, 2012, Georgia submitted a final complete program
revision application, seeking authorization of its changes in
accordance with 40 CFR 271.21. EPA now makes an immediate final
decision, subject to receipt of written comments that oppose this
action, that Georgia's hazardous waste program revisions are equivalent
to, consistent with, and no less stringent than the Federal program,
and therefore satisfy all of the requirements necessary to qualify for
final authorization. Therefore, EPA grants Georgia final authorization
for the following program changes:
[[Page 3890]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description of Federal Federal Register Analogous State
requirement date and page authority \1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
217--NESHAP: Final Standards 73 FR 18970, 04/ 391-3-11-.01(2) and
for Hazardous Waste 08/08. 391-3-11-.10(2)-(3).
Combustors (Phase I Final
Replacement Standards and
Phase II) Amendments.
218--F019 Exemption for 73 FR 31756, 06/ 391-3-11-.01(2) and
Wastewater Treatment Sludges 04/08. 391-3-11-.07(1).
from Auto Manufacturing Zinc
Phosphating Processes.
220--Academic Laboratories 73 FR 72912, 12/ 391-3-11-.01(2); 391-
Generator Standards. 01/08. 3-11-.07(1); and 391-
3-11-.08(1).
222--OECD Requirements; Export 75 FR 1236, 01/08/ 391-3-11-.01(2); 391-
Shipments of Spent Lead-Acid 10. 3-11-.08(1); 391-3-
Batteries. 11-.09; and 391-3-11-
.10(1)-(3).
223--Hazardous Waste Technical 75 FR 12989, 03/1/ 391-3-11-.01(2); 391-
Corrections and 10, 75 FR 31716, 3-11-.02(1);, 391-3-
Clarifications. 06/04/10. 11-.07(1); 391-3-11-
.08(1); 391-3-11-
.09; 391-3-11-.10(1)-
(3); 391-3-11-
.11(5)(f); and 391-3-
11-.16.
225--Removal of Saccharin and 75 FR 48918, 12/ 391-3-11-.01(2); 391-
Its Salts from the List of 17/10. 3-11-.07(1); and 391-
Hazardous Constituents. 3-11-.16.
226--Academic Laboratories 75 FR 79304, 12/ 391-3-11-.01(2) and
Generator Standards Technical 20/10. 391-3-11-.08(1).
Corrections.
227--Revision of the Land 76 FR 34147, 06/ 391-3-11-.01(2) and
Disposal Treatment, Standards 13/11. 391-3-11-.16.
for Carbamate Wastes.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Georgia provisions are from the Georgia Rules for Hazardous
Waste Management, Chapter 391-3-11, effective as of August 7, 2012.
H. Where are the revised State rules different from the Federal rules?
There are no State requirements in the authorized program revisions
listed above that are considered to be more stringent or broader in
scope than the Federal requirements.
The EPA cannot delegate the import and export functions at 40 CFR
part 262, subparts E and H, contained in the OECD Export Rule set forth
in 75 FR 1236 (January 8, 2010). Georgia has adopted these regulations
by reference at Georgia Hazardous Waste Management Rule 391-3-
11-.08(1), and has properly reserved EPA's authority for their
implementation at Rule 391-3-11-.01(2)(a).
I. Who handles permits after the authorization takes effect?
Georgia will issue permits for all the provisions for which it is
authorized and will administer the permits it issues. EPA will continue
to administer any RCRA hazardous waste permits or portions of permits
which EPA issued prior to the effective date of this authorization
until they expire or are terminated. EPA will not issue any more
permits or new portions of permits for the provisions listed in the
Table above after the effective date of this authorization. EPA will
continue to implement and issue permits for HSWA requirements for which
Georgia is not authorized.
J. What is codification and is EPA codifying Georgia's hazardous waste
program as authorized in this rule?
Codification is the process of placing the State's statutes and
regulations that comprise the State's authorized hazardous waste
program into the Code of Federal Regulations. EPA does this by
referencing the authorized State rules in 40 CFR part 272. EPA is not
codifying the authorization of Georgia's changes at this time. However,
EPA reserves the amendment of 40 CFR part 272, subpart L, for the
authorization of Georgia's program changes at a later date.
K. Administrative Requirements
The Office of Management and Budget has exempted this action from
the requirements of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4,
1993), and therefore this action is not subject to review by OMB. This
action authorizes State requirements for the purpose of RCRA section
3006 and imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by
State law.
Accordingly, I certify that this action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this action
authorizes pre-existing requirements under State law and does not
impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by State
law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). For the same reason, this
action also does not significantly or uniquely affect the communities
of Tribal governments, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000). This action will not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified
in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it
merely authorizes State requirements as part of the State RCRA
hazardous waste program without altering the relationship or the
distribution of power and responsibilities established by RCRA. This
action also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April
23, 1997), because it is not economically significant and it does not
make decisions based on environmental health or safety risks. This rule
is not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) because it is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
Under RCRA section 3006(b), EPA grants a State's application for
authorization as long as the State meets the criteria required by RCRA.
It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it
reviews a State authorization application, to require the use of any
particular voluntary consensus standard in place of another standard
that otherwise satisfies the requirements of RCRA. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. As required
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996),
in issuing this rule, EPA has taken the necessary steps to eliminate
drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize potential litigation, and
provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct. EPA has complied
with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by examining
the takings implications of the rule in
[[Page 3891]]
accordance with the ``Attorney General's Supplemental Guidelines for
the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings'' issued
under the executive order. This rule does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this document and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This
action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This
action will be effective March 27, 2015, unless objections to this
authorization are received.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information, Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste
transportation, Indian lands, Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: This action is issued under the authority of
sections 2002(a), 3006, and 7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act,
as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, and 6974(b).
Dated: January 13, 2015.
Heather McTeer Toney,
Regional Administrator Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2015-01040 Filed 1-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P