U.S.-India Bilateral Understanding: Additional Revisions to the U.S. Export and Reexport Controls Under the Export Administration Regulations, 3463-3466 [2015-01273]
Download as PDF
3463
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 80, No. 15
Friday, January 23, 2015
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
9 CFR Part 2
[Docket No. APHIS–2011–0003]
RIN 0579–AD57
Animal Welfare; Retail Pet Stores and
Licensing Exemptions; Technical
Amendment
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule; technical
amendment.
AGENCY:
In a final rule published in
the Federal Register on September 18,
2013, and effective on November 18,
2013, we amended the regulations
concerning the definition of retail pet
store and related regulations in order to
ensure that the definition in the
regulations is consistent with the
Animal Welfare Act (AWA), thereby
bringing more pet animals sold at retail
under the protection of the AWA. As
part of that action, we raised from three
to four the maximum number of female
breeding dogs, cats, or certain other
animals that a person can maintain and
be exempted from licensing, as long as
they sell only the offspring of those
animals born and raised on their
premises for pets or exhibition and are
not otherwise required to obtain a
license. In the final rule, we overlooked
raising the number of breeding females
in one provision in the regulations
concerning animal purchases by dealers
and exhibitors. This document corrects
the oversight.
DATES: Effective January 23, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Gerald Rushin, Veterinary Medical
Officer, Animal Care, APHIS, 4700 River
Road Unit 84, Riverdale, MD 20737–
1236; (301) 851–3751.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Jan 22, 2015
Jkt 235001
In a final
rule 1 that was published in the Federal
Register on September 18, 2013 (78 FR
57227–57250, Docket No. APHIS–2011–
0003), and effective on November 18,
2013, we amended the regulations
concerning the definition of retail pet
store and related regulations in order to
ensure that the definition of retail pet
store in the regulations is consistent
with the Animal Welfare Act (AWA),
thereby bringing more pet animals sold
at retail under the protection of the
AWA.
As part of that action, in § 2.1(a)(3) we
changed from three to four the
maximum number of female breeding
dogs or cats that a person can maintain
and be exempted from licensing, so long
as they sell only the offspring of those
animals born and raised on their
premises for pets or exhibition and are
not otherwise required to obtain a
license. In the final rule, we overlooked
raising the number of breeding females
in § 2.132(d) from three to four with
respect to licensing exemption
provisions for persons selling cats, dogs,
or certain other animals to dealers or
exhibitors. This document corrects the
oversight.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 2
Animal welfare, Pets, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Research.
Accordingly, 9 CFR part 2 is amended
as follows:
PART 2—REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 2
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 2131–2159; 7 CFR
2.22, 2.80, and 371.7.
§ 2.132
[Amended]
2. In § 2.132, paragraph (d) is
amended by removing the word ‘‘three’’
and adding the word ‘‘four’’ in its place.
■
Done in Washington, DC, this 16th day of
January 2015.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–01149 Filed 1–22–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
1 To view the rule, supporting analyses, and
comments we received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS2011-0003.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Parts 738, 740, 742, and 758
[Docket No. 130405339–3339–01]
RIN 0694–AF72
U.S.-India Bilateral Understanding:
Additional Revisions to the U.S. Export
and Reexport Controls Under the
Export Administration Regulations
Bureau of Industry and
Security, Commerce.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Final rule.
In this rule, the Bureau of
Industry and Security (BIS) amends the
Export Administration Regulations
(EAR) to further implement the bilateral
understanding between the United
States and India announced by
President Obama and India’s Prime
Minister Singh on November 8, 2010.
On January 25, 2011, BIS published the
first rule in a series of rules to
implement the bilateral understanding
between the two countries. These rules
fulfill the President’s and Prime
Minister’s commitment to work together
to strengthen the global nonproliferation
and export control framework and
further transform our bilateral export
control cooperation to realize the full
potential of the strategic partnership
between the two countries. Specifically,
in this rule, to further implement the
November 8, 2010 bilateral
understanding, BIS removes license
requirements for certain items
controlled for crime control and
regional stability reasons to India. BIS
also makes conforming changes in this
rule.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
This rule is effective January 23,
2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chantal Lakatos, Office of
Nonproliferation and Treaty
Compliance, Bureau of Industry and
Security, Department of Commerce, by
telephone: (202) 482–1739; or by email:
Chantal.Lakatos@bis.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\23JAR1.SGM
23JAR1
3464
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 15 / Friday, January 23, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Background
U.S.-India Bilateral Understanding:
Additional Revisions to the U.S. Export
and Reexport Controls Under the Export
Administration Regulations
On January 25, 2011, the Bureau of
Industry and Security (BIS) published a
final rule, the first in a series of rules,
which amended the Export
Administration Regulations (EAR) to
implement the U.S.-India bilateral
understanding (76 FR 4228, January 25,
2011) (January 25 rule). The January 25
rule and the bilateral understanding
were the result of the November 8, 2010
Joint Statement issued by President
Obama and Prime Minister Singh of
India announcing that they had resolved
to expand and strengthen the U.S.-India
global strategic partnership. (U.S.-India
Joint Statement, November 8, 2010). The
Joint Statement covered a range of
issues, activities, and programs that
reflect the vision of the President and of
India’s Prime Minister. In the Joint
Statement, the leaders reaffirmed that
the U.S.-India strategic partnership is
indispensable for global stability and
prosperity and reaffirmed existing
assurances regarding procurement and
use by India of items subject to the EAR.
In the Joint Statement, recognizing that
India and the United States should play
a leadership role in promoting global
nonproliferation objectives and their
desire to expand high technology
cooperation and trade, the two leaders
committed to work together to
strengthen the global export control
framework and further transform
bilateral export control regulations and
policies. The two nations decided to
take mutual steps to expand U.S.-India
cooperation in civil space, defense and
other high technology sectors.
The United States’ implementation of
the commitment included removing
Indian defense and space related
entities from the Entity List, as well as
realigning India in U.S. export control
regulations. Additionally, the Joint
Statement announced that the United
States ‘‘intends to support India’s full
membership in the four multilateral
export control regimes (Nuclear
Suppliers Group, Missile Technology
Control Regime, Australia Group, and
Wassenaar Arrangement) in a phased
manner, and to consult with regime
members to encourage the evolution of
regime membership criteria . . .
consistent with maintaining the core
principles of these regimes, as the
Government of India takes steps towards
the full adoption of the regimes’ export
control requirements to reflect its
prospective membership, with both
processes moving forward together.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Jan 22, 2015
Jkt 235001
The January 25 rule began the
implementation of those reforms by
revising certain export and reexport
controls for India, including the removal
of nine Indian entities from the Entity
List. In addition, in the January 25 rule,
BIS amended the EAR to remove India
from Country Groups D:2, D:3, and D:4,
and to add India to Country Group A:2
in Supplement No. 1 to Part 740. BIS
also made conforming changes in the
EAR.
In this rule, BIS amends the EAR to
further implement the November 8,
2010 bilateral understanding between
the United States and India.
Specifically, this rule removes India
from Crime Controls (CC) columns 1
and 3, and Regional Stability (RS)
column 2 on the Commerce Country
Chart in Supplement No. 1 to Part 738
of the EAR because the Government of
India has now taken appropriate steps to
ensure that the specific U.S.-origin
items controlled for CC and RS reasons
are not reexported from India without a
license. However, a license requirement
remains for items controlled under
export control classification numbers
(ECCNs) 6A003.b.4.b and 9A515.e for
RS column 2 reasons when destined to
India. BIS also makes conforming
changes in this rule. These changes, like
those in the January 25 rule, are in the
national interest of the United States.
Specific Additional Amendments to the
EAR Further Implementing the U.S.India Bilateral Understanding
Part 738—Commerce Control List
Overview and the Country Chart
BIS amends the EAR to remove the
‘‘X’’ in CC columns 1 and 3 and in RS
column 2 for ‘‘India’’ in Supplement No.
1 to Part 738 of the EAR (Commerce
Country Chart). These actions remove
the license requirement for India for
U.S.—origin items controlled under the
EAR for CC columns 1 and 3 reasons
and for RS column 2 reasons. BIS notes
that the elimination of license
requirements for RS column 2 items to
India does not eliminate license
requirements for items classified under
ECCNs 6A003.b.4.b and 9A515.e.
Part 758—Export Clearance
Requirements
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Conforming Amendments
Section 740.2 (Restrictions on All
License Exceptions) and Supplement 1
to Part 738 (Commerce Country Chart)
As a conforming change to removing
the license requirement for India for
items controlled for CC columns 1 and
3 reasons, BIS also amends section
740.2 of the EAR to add India to
paragraph (a)(4)(i). Inclusion in
paragraph (a)(4)(i) identifies India as
one of the countries or organizations
(i.e., Australia, Japan, New Zealand, or
a NATO (North Atlantic Treaty
Organization) member state) for which
the restrictions on license exceptions
due to license requirements described in
section 742.7 (crime control and
detection) do not apply. This status for
India also broadens the availability of
license exceptions under the EAR for
items exported to India.
BIS also amends the EAR to make a
conforming change by adding a seventh
footnote to Supplement No. 1 to Part
738 to notify exporters of an AES filing
requirement for CC columns 1 and 3
items, and RS column 2 items when
they are intended for export to India.
That footnote also notifies exporters that
the elimination of license requirements
for items controlled for RS column 2
reasons to India does not apply to items
controlled under ECCNs 6A003.b.4.b
and 9A515.e.
Section 742.6 (Regional Stability)
In addition, BIS amends the EAR to
establish a filing requirement in the
Automated Export System (AES) for
items exported to India when those
items fall under an ECCN on the
Commerce Control List in Supplement
No. 1 to Part 774, for which CC columns
1 and 3, and RS column 2 are listed as
reasons for control. Specifically, BIS
amends section 758.1 of the EAR by
PO 00000
adding new paragraph (b)(9) that
requires exporters file an AES record for
items controlled for CC 1 and 3 and RS
2 reasons when such items are for
export to India, regardless of value.
BIS amends section 758.6 by adding
new paragraph (c) requiring a notation
on the invoice, bill of lading, air
waybill, or other export control
document that accompanies the
shipment from its point of origin in the
United States to the ultimate consignee
or end-user in India. The notation will
indicate the ECCNs of items for which
CC columns 1 or 3, or RS column 2
reasons for control are listed, that they
are destined to India, and that
authorization may be required from the
U.S. Department of Commerce for
reexport of the items.
Finally, BIS makes conforming
changes in paragraph (a)(4)(i) of section
742.6 to add India to the list of countries
for which a license is not required for
items controlled for RS column 2
reasons for control, while also pointing
out that a license requirement remains
for items controlled under ECCNs
6A003.b.4.b and 9A515.e for RS column
2 reasons when destined to India.
E:\FR\FM\23JAR1.SGM
23JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 15 / Friday, January 23, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Export Administration Act
Although the Export Administration
Act expired on August 20, 2001, the
President, through Executive Order
13222 of August 17, 2001, 3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 783 (2002), as amended by
Executive Order 13637 of March 8,
2013, 78 FR 16129 (March 13, 2013) and
as extended by the Notice of August 7,
2014, 79 FR 46959 (August 11, 2014),
has continued the Export
Administration Regulations in effect
under the International Emergency
Economic Powers Act. BIS continues to
carry out the provisions of the Export
Administration Act, as appropriate and
to the extent permitted by law, pursuant
to Executive Order 13222, as amended
by Executive Order 13637.
On January 20, 2015, the Under
Secretary of Commerce for Industry and
Security, pursuant to the authority
delegated to him under section 6(n)(2)
of the Export Administration Act,
designated India as an eligible
destination for export and reexport of
items controlled for crime control (CC)
without a license.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Rulemaking Requirements
1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This rule
has been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ although not
economically significant, under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the rule has been reviewed
by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB).
2. Notwithstanding any other
provisions of law, no person is required
to respond to nor be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with a collection
of information, subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.) (PRA), unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid
OMB Control Number. This rule
involves collections of information
subject to the PRA. This collection has
been approved by OMB under control
numbers 0694–0088, ‘‘Simplified
Network Application Processing
System,’’ which includes among other
things license applications and carries a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Jan 22, 2015
Jkt 235001
burden hour estimate of 43.8 minutes
for a manual or electronic application;
and 0694–0122, ‘‘Licensing
Responsibilities and Enforcement,’’
which carries a burden hour estimate of
5 seconds to manually or electronically
complete each required export clearance
document. Total burden hours
associated with the PRA and OMB
control numbers 0694–0088 and 0694–
0122 are not expected to increase as a
result of this rule.
3. This rule does not contain policies
with Federalism implications as that
term is defined under Executive Order
13132.
4. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1), the
provisions of the Administrative
Procedure Act requiring notice of
proposed rulemaking, the opportunity
for public participation, and a delay in
effective date, are inapplicable because
this regulation involves a military or
foreign affairs function of the United
States. (See 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1)). This rule
further implements the phased aspects
of the understanding between the
United States and India reflected in the
November 8, 2010 U.S.-India Joint
Statement and is not discretionary. No
other law requires that a notice of
proposed rulemaking and an
opportunity for public comment be
given for this rule. Because a notice of
proposed rulemaking and an
opportunity for public comment are not
required to be given for this rule by 5
U.S.C. 553, or by any other law, the
analytical requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601
et seq., are not applicable. Accordingly,
no Regulatory Flexibility analysis is
required and none has been prepared.
Notwithstanding these considerations,
BIS welcomes public comments and
will review them on a continuing basis.
List of Subjects
15 CFR Part 738
Exports.
15 CFR Parts 740 and 758
Administrative practice and
procedure, Exports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
15 CFR Part 742
Exports, Terrorism.
Accordingly, parts 738, 740, 742, and
758 of the EAR (15 CFR parts 730–774)
are amended as follows:
PART 738—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 738
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 10 U.S.C. 7420; 10 U.S.C.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3465
7430(e); 22 U.S.C. 287c; 22 U.S.C. 3201 et
seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6004; 30 U.S.C. 185(s), 185(u);
42 U.S.C. 2139a; 42 U.S.C. 6212; 43 U.S.C.
1354; 15 U.S.C. 1824a; 50 U.S.C. app. 5; 22
U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; E.O.
13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p.
228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 783; Notice of August 7, 2014, 79
FR 46959 (August 11, 2014).
2. Amend Supplement No. 1 to part
738 by:
■ a. Removing ‘‘X’’ in columns ‘‘RS 2’’
and ‘‘CC 1 and 3’’ for ‘‘India’’; and
■ b. Adding footnote designation 7 to
‘‘India’’; and
■ c. Adding footnote 7.
The addition reads as follows:
■
Supplement No. 1 to Part 738—
Commerce Country Chart
*
*
*
*
*
§ 758.1(b)(9) for an AES filing
requirement for exports of CC column 1
or 3, or RS column 2 items to India.
Also note that a license is still required
for items controlled under ECCNs
6A003.b.4.b and 9A515.e for RS column
2 reasons when destined to India.
7 See
PART 740—[AMENDED]
3. The authority citation for part 740
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.;
E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp.,
p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 783; Notice of August 7, 2014, 79
FR 46959 (August 11, 2014).
4. Amend § 740.2 by revising
paragraph (a)(4)(i) to read as follows:
■
§ 740.2 Restrictions on all License
Exceptions.
(a) * * *
(4) * * *
(i) Being made to Australia, India,
Japan, New Zealand, or a NATO (North
Atlantic Treaty Organization) member
state (see NATO membership listing in
§ 772.1 of the EAR):
*
*
*
*
*
PART 742—[AMENDED]
5. The authority citation for part 742
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 3201 et seq.;
42 U.S.C. 2139a; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22
U.S.C. 7210; Sec. 1503, Pub. L. 108–11, 117
Stat. 559; E.O. 12058, 43 FR 20947, 3 CFR,
1978 Comp., p. 179; E.O. 12851, 58 FR 33181,
3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 608; E.O. 12938, 59
FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 950; E.O.
13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p.
228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 783; Presidential Determination
2003–23 of May 7, 2003, 68 FR 26459, May
16, 2003; Notice of August 7, 2014, 79 FR
E:\FR\FM\23JAR1.SGM
23JAR1
3466
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 15 / Friday, January 23, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
46959 (August 11, 2014); Notice of November
7, 2014, 79 FR 67035 (November 12, 2014).
6. Amend § 742.6 by revising
paragraph (a)(4)(i) to read as follows:
■
§ 742.6
Regional stability.
(a) * * *
(4) * * *
(i) License requirements applicable to
most RS Column 2 items. As indicated
in the CCL and in RS Column 2 of the
Commerce Country Chart (see
Supplement No. 1 to part 738 of the
EAR), a license is required to any
destination except Australia, India,
Japan, New Zealand, and countries in
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
(NATO) for all items in ECCNs on the
CCL that include RS Column 2 in the
Country Chart column of the ‘‘License
Requirements’’ section. A license
continues to be required for items
controlled under ECCNs 6A003.b.4.b
and 9A515.e for RS Column 2 reasons
when destined to India.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 758—[AMENDED]
7. The authority citation for part 758
continues to read as follows:
■
8. Amend § 758.1 by adding paragraph
(b)(9) to read as follows:
■
§ 758.1 The Electronic Export Information
(EEI) filing to the Automated Export System
(AES).
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(9) For items that fall under ECCNs
that list CC Column 1 and 3 and RS
Column 2 (see Supplement No. 1 to part
738 of the EAR) as reasons for control
and such items are for export, regardless
of value, to India.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. Amend § 758.6 by adding paragraph
(c) to read as follows:
§ 758.6 Destination control statements and
other information furnished to consignees.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
(c) Additional requirement for items
under ECCNs for which CC Column 1 or
3 or RS Column 2 are listed as reasons
for control and are destined to India. In
addition to the DCS as required in
paragraph (a) of this section, the
following information must be printed
on the invoice, bill of lading, air
waybill, or other export control
document that accompanies the
shipment from its point of origin in the
United States to the ultimate consignee
or end-user in India: ‘‘These items are
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Jan 22, 2015
Jkt 235001
Dated: January 20, 2015.
Eric L. Hirschhorn,
Under Secretary for Industry and Security.
[FR Doc. 2015–01273 Filed 1–22–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
16 CFR Chapter II
[Docket No. CPSC–2015–0002]
Notice of Determination Under the
Drywall Safety Act of 2012
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of determination.
AGENCY:
The Consumer Product Safety
Commission (CPSC, or Commission) is
announcing that, pursuant to the
requirements of the Drywall Safety Act
of 2012 (DSA), the Commission has
determined that: ASTM C1396–14a,
‘‘Standard Specification for Gypsum
Board,’’ is a voluntary standard for
drywall manufactured or imported for
use in the United States that limits
sulfur content to a level not associated
with elevated rates of corrosion in the
home; ASTM C1396–14a became
effective less than two years after the
enactment of the DSA; and ASTM
C1396–14a was developed by
Subcommittee C11.01 on Specifications
and Test Methods for Gypsum Products
of ASTM International. Based on these
determinations, the sulfur content limit
in ASTM C1396–14a shall be treated as
a consumer product safety rule
promulgated under the Consumer
Product Safety Act (CPSA). Drywall
manufactured or imported for use in the
United States shall be subject to the
general conformity certification (GCC)
requirements of the CPSA.
DATES: This action becomes effective on
July 22, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rohit Khanna, Office of Hazard
Identification and Reduction, U.S.
Consumer Product Safety Commission,
5 Research Place, Rockville, MD 20850;
telephone (301) 987–2508; email
rkhanna@cpsc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025,
3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of August
7, 2014, 79 FR 46959 (August 11, 2014).
*
classified under Export Control
Classification Number(s) (ECCN(s)) [Fillin the ECCNs for which CC 1 or 3 or RS
2 are listed as reasons for control] and
destined to India. Authorization for
reexport from India may be required
from the U.S. Department of
Commerce.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
I. Background
CPSC began investigating drywall in
2009, after reports from homeowners
that they were seeing corrosion of metal
items inside their homes. According to
homeowners’ reports, the items
primarily involved were electrical
fixtures, appliances, plumbing, and air
conditioner coils. CPSC used the term
‘‘problem drywall’’ to refer to drywall
associated with elevated rates of metal
corrosion. After CPSC’s initial
investigations, CPSC joined with the
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD), the U.S. Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC), and the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) to form the
Federal Interagency Task Force on
Problem Drywall (Task Force).
In the course of this investigation,
samples of problem drywall were
analyzed for chemical content and
emissions. CPSC staff analysis of
chemical content and emissions from
problem drywall determined that
certain brands of drywall produced
around the year 2006 contain elevated
levels of elemental sulfur (octahedral
sulfur, S8) and have elevated emission
factors for hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and
other reactive sulfur gases known to
corrode materials containing copper and
silver. CPSC staff’s analysis of the
technical data also determined that the
presence of elemental sulfur in excess of
10 ppm in drywall is associated with
elevated emission factors for hydrogen
sulfide (H2S) and other reactive sulfur
gases that are known to cause
accelerated corrosion of copper and
silver in homes.
CPSC staff and HUD relied on the
results of this analysis to develop
guidance materials to help homeowners
identify homes with problem drywall
and to correct the problem by removing
and replacing the problem drywall and
certain other components of the home.
These guidance documents are available
on CPSC’s Web site.1
II. The Drywall Safety Act of 2012
On January 14, 2013, the President
signed the Drywall Safety Act of 2012
(DSA) into law. Pub. L. 112–266, 126
Stat. 2437 (2013). The DSA established
1 Identification Guidance for Homes with
Corrosion from Problem Drywall as of March 18,
2011, by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety
Commission and the U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development https://www.cpsc.gov//
PageFiles/115328/IDguidance031811.pdf.
Remediation Guidance for Homes with Corrosion
from Problem Drywall as of March 15, 2013, by the
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission and the
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development https://www.cpsc.gov//Global/
Safety%20Education/Safety-Information-Centers/
Drywall/remediation031513.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\23JAR1.SGM
23JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3463-3466]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01273]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Parts 738, 740, 742, and 758
[Docket No. 130405339-3339-01]
RIN 0694-AF72
U.S.-India Bilateral Understanding: Additional Revisions to the
U.S. Export and Reexport Controls Under the Export Administration
Regulations
AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this rule, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) amends
the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) to further implement the
bilateral understanding between the United States and India announced
by President Obama and India's Prime Minister Singh on November 8,
2010. On January 25, 2011, BIS published the first rule in a series of
rules to implement the bilateral understanding between the two
countries. These rules fulfill the President's and Prime Minister's
commitment to work together to strengthen the global nonproliferation
and export control framework and further transform our bilateral export
control cooperation to realize the full potential of the strategic
partnership between the two countries. Specifically, in this rule, to
further implement the November 8, 2010 bilateral understanding, BIS
removes license requirements for certain items controlled for crime
control and regional stability reasons to India. BIS also makes
conforming changes in this rule.
DATES: This rule is effective January 23, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chantal Lakatos, Office of
Nonproliferation and Treaty Compliance, Bureau of Industry and
Security, Department of Commerce, by telephone: (202) 482-1739; or by
email: Chantal.Lakatos@bis.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 3464]]
Background
U.S.-India Bilateral Understanding: Additional Revisions to the U.S.
Export and Reexport Controls Under the Export Administration
Regulations
On January 25, 2011, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)
published a final rule, the first in a series of rules, which amended
the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) to implement the U.S.-India
bilateral understanding (76 FR 4228, January 25, 2011) (January 25
rule). The January 25 rule and the bilateral understanding were the
result of the November 8, 2010 Joint Statement issued by President
Obama and Prime Minister Singh of India announcing that they had
resolved to expand and strengthen the U.S.-India global strategic
partnership. (U.S.-India Joint Statement, November 8, 2010). The Joint
Statement covered a range of issues, activities, and programs that
reflect the vision of the President and of India's Prime Minister. In
the Joint Statement, the leaders reaffirmed that the U.S.-India
strategic partnership is indispensable for global stability and
prosperity and reaffirmed existing assurances regarding procurement and
use by India of items subject to the EAR. In the Joint Statement,
recognizing that India and the United States should play a leadership
role in promoting global nonproliferation objectives and their desire
to expand high technology cooperation and trade, the two leaders
committed to work together to strengthen the global export control
framework and further transform bilateral export control regulations
and policies. The two nations decided to take mutual steps to expand
U.S.-India cooperation in civil space, defense and other high
technology sectors.
The United States' implementation of the commitment included
removing Indian defense and space related entities from the Entity
List, as well as realigning India in U.S. export control regulations.
Additionally, the Joint Statement announced that the United States
``intends to support India's full membership in the four multilateral
export control regimes (Nuclear Suppliers Group, Missile Technology
Control Regime, Australia Group, and Wassenaar Arrangement) in a phased
manner, and to consult with regime members to encourage the evolution
of regime membership criteria . . . consistent with maintaining the
core principles of these regimes, as the Government of India takes
steps towards the full adoption of the regimes' export control
requirements to reflect its prospective membership, with both processes
moving forward together.'' The January 25 rule began the implementation
of those reforms by revising certain export and reexport controls for
India, including the removal of nine Indian entities from the Entity
List. In addition, in the January 25 rule, BIS amended the EAR to
remove India from Country Groups D:2, D:3, and D:4, and to add India to
Country Group A:2 in Supplement No. 1 to Part 740. BIS also made
conforming changes in the EAR.
In this rule, BIS amends the EAR to further implement the November
8, 2010 bilateral understanding between the United States and India.
Specifically, this rule removes India from Crime Controls (CC) columns
1 and 3, and Regional Stability (RS) column 2 on the Commerce Country
Chart in Supplement No. 1 to Part 738 of the EAR because the Government
of India has now taken appropriate steps to ensure that the specific
U.S.-origin items controlled for CC and RS reasons are not reexported
from India without a license. However, a license requirement remains
for items controlled under export control classification numbers
(ECCNs) 6A003.b.4.b and 9A515.e for RS column 2 reasons when destined
to India. BIS also makes conforming changes in this rule. These
changes, like those in the January 25 rule, are in the national
interest of the United States.
Specific Additional Amendments to the EAR Further Implementing the
U.S.-India Bilateral Understanding
Part 738--Commerce Control List Overview and the Country Chart
BIS amends the EAR to remove the ``X'' in CC columns 1 and 3 and in
RS column 2 for ``India'' in Supplement No. 1 to Part 738 of the EAR
(Commerce Country Chart). These actions remove the license requirement
for India for U.S.--origin items controlled under the EAR for CC
columns 1 and 3 reasons and for RS column 2 reasons. BIS notes that the
elimination of license requirements for RS column 2 items to India does
not eliminate license requirements for items classified under ECCNs
6A003.b.4.b and 9A515.e.
Part 758--Export Clearance Requirements
In addition, BIS amends the EAR to establish a filing requirement
in the Automated Export System (AES) for items exported to India when
those items fall under an ECCN on the Commerce Control List in
Supplement No. 1 to Part 774, for which CC columns 1 and 3, and RS
column 2 are listed as reasons for control. Specifically, BIS amends
section 758.1 of the EAR by adding new paragraph (b)(9) that requires
exporters file an AES record for items controlled for CC 1 and 3 and RS
2 reasons when such items are for export to India, regardless of value.
BIS amends section 758.6 by adding new paragraph (c) requiring a
notation on the invoice, bill of lading, air waybill, or other export
control document that accompanies the shipment from its point of origin
in the United States to the ultimate consignee or end-user in India.
The notation will indicate the ECCNs of items for which CC columns 1 or
3, or RS column 2 reasons for control are listed, that they are
destined to India, and that authorization may be required from the U.S.
Department of Commerce for reexport of the items.
Conforming Amendments
Section 740.2 (Restrictions on All License Exceptions) and Supplement 1
to Part 738 (Commerce Country Chart)
As a conforming change to removing the license requirement for
India for items controlled for CC columns 1 and 3 reasons, BIS also
amends section 740.2 of the EAR to add India to paragraph (a)(4)(i).
Inclusion in paragraph (a)(4)(i) identifies India as one of the
countries or organizations (i.e., Australia, Japan, New Zealand, or a
NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) member state) for which the
restrictions on license exceptions due to license requirements
described in section 742.7 (crime control and detection) do not apply.
This status for India also broadens the availability of license
exceptions under the EAR for items exported to India.
BIS also amends the EAR to make a conforming change by adding a
seventh footnote to Supplement No. 1 to Part 738 to notify exporters of
an AES filing requirement for CC columns 1 and 3 items, and RS column 2
items when they are intended for export to India. That footnote also
notifies exporters that the elimination of license requirements for
items controlled for RS column 2 reasons to India does not apply to
items controlled under ECCNs 6A003.b.4.b and 9A515.e.
Section 742.6 (Regional Stability)
Finally, BIS makes conforming changes in paragraph (a)(4)(i) of
section 742.6 to add India to the list of countries for which a license
is not required for items controlled for RS column 2 reasons for
control, while also pointing out that a license requirement remains for
items controlled under ECCNs 6A003.b.4.b and 9A515.e for RS column 2
reasons when destined to India.
[[Page 3465]]
Export Administration Act
Although the Export Administration Act expired on August 20, 2001,
the President, through Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001, 3 CFR,
2001 Comp., p. 783 (2002), as amended by Executive Order 13637 of March
8, 2013, 78 FR 16129 (March 13, 2013) and as extended by the Notice of
August 7, 2014, 79 FR 46959 (August 11, 2014), has continued the Export
Administration Regulations in effect under the International Emergency
Economic Powers Act. BIS continues to carry out the provisions of the
Export Administration Act, as appropriate and to the extent permitted
by law, pursuant to Executive Order 13222, as amended by Executive
Order 13637.
On January 20, 2015, the Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry
and Security, pursuant to the authority delegated to him under section
6(n)(2) of the Export Administration Act, designated India as an
eligible destination for export and reexport of items controlled for
crime control (CC) without a license.
Rulemaking Requirements
1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has been designated a ``significant regulatory
action,'' although not economically significant, under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the rule has been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
2. Notwithstanding any other provisions of law, no person is
required to respond to nor be subject to a penalty for failure to
comply with a collection of information, subject to the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (PRA),
unless that collection of information displays a currently valid OMB
Control Number. This rule involves collections of information subject
to the PRA. This collection has been approved by OMB under control
numbers 0694-0088, ``Simplified Network Application Processing
System,'' which includes among other things license applications and
carries a burden hour estimate of 43.8 minutes for a manual or
electronic application; and 0694-0122, ``Licensing Responsibilities and
Enforcement,'' which carries a burden hour estimate of 5 seconds to
manually or electronically complete each required export clearance
document. Total burden hours associated with the PRA and OMB control
numbers 0694-0088 and 0694-0122 are not expected to increase as a
result of this rule.
3. This rule does not contain policies with Federalism implications
as that term is defined under Executive Order 13132.
4. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1), the provisions of the
Administrative Procedure Act requiring notice of proposed rulemaking,
the opportunity for public participation, and a delay in effective
date, are inapplicable because this regulation involves a military or
foreign affairs function of the United States. (See 5 U.S.C.
553(a)(1)). This rule further implements the phased aspects of the
understanding between the United States and India reflected in the
November 8, 2010 U.S.-India Joint Statement and is not discretionary.
No other law requires that a notice of proposed rulemaking and an
opportunity for public comment be given for this rule. Because a notice
of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for public comment are not
required to be given for this rule by 5 U.S.C. 553, or by any other
law, the analytical requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq., are not applicable. Accordingly, no Regulatory
Flexibility analysis is required and none has been prepared.
Notwithstanding these considerations, BIS welcomes public comments and
will review them on a continuing basis.
List of Subjects
15 CFR Part 738
Exports.
15 CFR Parts 740 and 758
Administrative practice and procedure, Exports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
15 CFR Part 742
Exports, Terrorism.
Accordingly, parts 738, 740, 742, and 758 of the EAR (15 CFR parts
730-774) are amended as follows:
PART 738--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 738 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
10 U.S.C. 7420; 10 U.S.C. 7430(e); 22 U.S.C. 287c; 22 U.S.C. 3201 et
seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6004; 30 U.S.C. 185(s), 185(u); 42 U.S.C. 2139a; 42
U.S.C. 6212; 43 U.S.C. 1354; 15 U.S.C. 1824a; 50 U.S.C. app. 5; 22
U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR,
1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p.
783; Notice of August 7, 2014, 79 FR 46959 (August 11, 2014).
0
2. Amend Supplement No. 1 to part 738 by:
0
a. Removing ``X'' in columns ``RS 2'' and ``CC 1 and 3'' for ``India'';
and
0
b. Adding footnote designation 7 to ``India''; and
0
c. Adding footnote 7.
The addition reads as follows:
Supplement No. 1 to Part 738--Commerce Country Chart
* * * * *
\7\ See Sec. 758.1(b)(9) for an AES filing requirement for exports
of CC column 1 or 3, or RS column 2 items to India. Also note that a
license is still required for items controlled under ECCNs 6A003.b.4.b
and 9A515.e for RS column 2 reasons when destined to India.
PART 740--[AMENDED]
0
3. The authority citation for part 740 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp.,
p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice
of August 7, 2014, 79 FR 46959 (August 11, 2014).
0
4. Amend Sec. 740.2 by revising paragraph (a)(4)(i) to read as
follows:
Sec. 740.2 Restrictions on all License Exceptions.
(a) * * *
(4) * * *
(i) Being made to Australia, India, Japan, New Zealand, or a NATO
(North Atlantic Treaty Organization) member state (see NATO membership
listing in Sec. 772.1 of the EAR):
* * * * *
PART 742--[AMENDED]
0
5. The authority citation for part 742 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
22 U.S.C. 3201 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 2139a; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22
U.S.C. 7210; Sec. 1503, Pub. L. 108-11, 117 Stat. 559; E.O. 12058,
43 FR 20947, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 179; E.O. 12851, 58 FR 33181, 3
CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 608; E.O. 12938, 59 FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp.,
p. 950; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O.
13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Presidential
Determination 2003-23 of May 7, 2003, 68 FR 26459, May 16, 2003;
Notice of August 7, 2014, 79 FR
[[Page 3466]]
46959 (August 11, 2014); Notice of November 7, 2014, 79 FR 67035
(November 12, 2014).
0
6. Amend Sec. 742.6 by revising paragraph (a)(4)(i) to read as
follows:
Sec. 742.6 Regional stability.
(a) * * *
(4) * * *
(i) License requirements applicable to most RS Column 2 items. As
indicated in the CCL and in RS Column 2 of the Commerce Country Chart
(see Supplement No. 1 to part 738 of the EAR), a license is required to
any destination except Australia, India, Japan, New Zealand, and
countries in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) for all
items in ECCNs on the CCL that include RS Column 2 in the Country Chart
column of the ``License Requirements'' section. A license continues to
be required for items controlled under ECCNs 6A003.b.4.b and 9A515.e
for RS Column 2 reasons when destined to India.
* * * * *
PART 758--[AMENDED]
0
7. The authority citation for part 758 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of August
7, 2014, 79 FR 46959 (August 11, 2014).
0
8. Amend Sec. 758.1 by adding paragraph (b)(9) to read as follows:
Sec. 758.1 The Electronic Export Information (EEI) filing to the
Automated Export System (AES).
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(9) For items that fall under ECCNs that list CC Column 1 and 3 and
RS Column 2 (see Supplement No. 1 to part 738 of the EAR) as reasons
for control and such items are for export, regardless of value, to
India.
* * * * *
0
9. Amend Sec. 758.6 by adding paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 758.6 Destination control statements and other information
furnished to consignees.
* * * * *
(c) Additional requirement for items under ECCNs for which CC
Column 1 or 3 or RS Column 2 are listed as reasons for control and are
destined to India. In addition to the DCS as required in paragraph (a)
of this section, the following information must be printed on the
invoice, bill of lading, air waybill, or other export control document
that accompanies the shipment from its point of origin in the United
States to the ultimate consignee or end-user in India: ``These items
are classified under Export Control Classification Number(s) (ECCN(s))
[Fill-in the ECCNs for which CC 1 or 3 or RS 2 are listed as reasons
for control] and destined to India. Authorization for reexport from
India may be required from the U.S. Department of Commerce.''
Dated: January 20, 2015.
Eric L. Hirschhorn,
Under Secretary for Industry and Security.
[FR Doc. 2015-01273 Filed 1-22-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P