Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of Records, 3624 [2015-01211]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
3624
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 15 / Friday, January 23, 2015 / Notices
communities they protect. The Task Force
will be holding a public meeting to address
the topics of Policy & Oversight and
Technology & Social Media. The meeting
agenda is as follows:
Call to Order
Invited witness testimony on Policy &
Oversight (January 30)
Invited witness testimony on Technology &
Social Media (January 31)
Break
Discussion
The meeting dates are:
1. January 30, 2015 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
Eastern Standard Time, Cincinnati, OH.
2. January 31, 2015 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Eastern Standard Time, Cincinnati, OH.
DATES:
Dated: January 15, 2015.
Ronald L. Davis,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2015–01102 Filed 1–22–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–AT–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[CPCLO Order No. 001–2015]
Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of
Records
Office of Legal Counsel,
Department of Justice.
AGENCY:
Notice of termination of two
systems of records.
ACTION:
Pursuant to the Privacy Act of
1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), the United States
Department of Justice, Office of Legal
Counsel, is terminating the systems of
records entitled ‘‘Office of Legal
Counsel Attorney Assignment Reports,
JUSTICE/OLC–001’’ and ‘‘Office of
Legal Counsel Central File, JUSTICE/
OLC–003.’’ The Department is
eliminating the Attorney Assignment
Reports system because the reports no
longer exist and have been destroyed.
The Department is eliminating the
Central File system because the 5 x 7
card index no longer exists and the
records maintained in the Central File
are not retrieved by the name of
individuals or by other identifying
information assigned to individuals.
Accordingly, the Privacy Act system
of records notices last published in the
Federal Register on September 4, 1985,
50 FR 35878, 35879, are removed from
the Department’s compilation of Privacy
Act systems.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
Dated: January 8, 2015.
Erika Brown Lee,
Chief Privacy and Civil Liberties Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015–01211 Filed 1–22–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–23–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 Jan 22, 2015
Jkt 235001
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
Jose Raul S. Villavicencio, M.D.;
Decision and Order
On June 24, 2013, the Deputy
Assistant Administrator, Office of
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration, issued an Order to
Show Cause to Jose Raul S.
Villavicencio, M.D. (hereinafter,
Registrant), of Parkersburg, West
Virginia. GX 1. The Show Cause Order
proposed the revocation of Registrant’s
DEA Certificate of Registration and
denial of any applications for renewal or
modification of the registration, and any
applications for any other DEA
registration, on the ground that his
continued ‘‘registration would be
inconsistent with the public interest.’’
Id. at 1 (citing 21 U.S.C. 823(f)) and
824(a)(4)).
The Show Cause Order alleged that
Registrant is registered as a practitioner
in Schedules II through V, pursuant to
DEA registration number BV3249643, at
the location of 1909 Dudley Avenue,
Parkersburg, West Virginia, and that his
registration does not expire until May
31, 2016. Id. The Show Cause Order
alleged that Registrant had previously
been registered at 1761 High Street,
Columbus, Ohio, and that on September
27, 2012, the Agency had approved his
request for a change from his previous
registered address. Id. The Show Cause
Order also alleged that Registrant’s DEA
registration authorizes him to dispense
schedule III drugs to patients for
maintenance or detoxification
treatment, and that since July 12, 2007,
Registrant has been authorized to treat
up to one hundred patients, pursuant to
21 U.S.C. 823(g)(2)(A) and (2)(b)(iii). Id.
The Show Cause Order then alleged
that on September 12, 2012, the State
Medical Board of Ohio permanently
revoked Registrant’s medical license
following a hearing. Id. The Show Cause
Order alleged that the Ohio Board’s
Order was based on his failure to
comply with applicable state law
pertaining to the prescribing of schedule
II through IV controlled substances for
chronic pain, and that upon its review
of sixteen (16) patient files, the Board
found that he ‘‘‘failed to maintain
minimal standards applicable to the
administration or selection of drugs’’’
for fourteen (14) of the patients, and that
his ‘‘care of all [sixteen (16)] patients
was ‘a departure from, or the failure to
conform to, minimal standards of care of
similar practitioners,’ in violation’’ of
Ohio Revised Code Sections
4731.22(B)(2) and 4731.22(B)(6). Id. at
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1–2. The Show Cause Order then
alleged that the Ohio Board’s findings
with respect to the sixteen patients
establish that Registrant prescribed
controlled substances without a
legitimate medical purpose and outside
of the usual course of professional
practice in violation of 21 CFR
1306.04(a). Id. at 2.
Next, the Show Cause Order alleged
that a review of data obtained from the
Ohio Automated Rx Reporting System
(OARRS), the state database to which all
Ohio pharmacies are required to report
their dispensings of controlled
substances, showed that on at least five
separate occasions between September
1, 2010 and March 1, 2012, Registrant
was treating over 100 patients with
Suboxone or Subutex prescriptions at a
time. Id. The Show Cause Order thus
alleged that Registrant violated 21
U.S.C. 823(g)(2)(B)(iii) and 21 CFR
1301.28(f). Id.
The Show Cause Order further alleged
that on March 9, 2013, DEA served an
administrative inspection warrant at
Registrant’s registered location seeking
to inspect all of his controlled substance
records pertaining to his prescribing of
Subutex and Suboxone for maintenance
or detoxification treatment. Id. The
Show Cause Order alleged that
Investigators found that Registrant
committed numerous violations of two
DEA regulations, 21 CFR 1304.03(c) and
1306.05(a), including that: (1) On 116
occasions, he ‘‘failed to record dosage
units prescribed’’; (2) on five occasions,
he ‘‘failed to record the date on which
the prescriptions were signed’’; (3) on
three occasions, he ‘‘failed to record the
drug name’’; and (4) on sixteen
occasions, he ‘‘failed to record any
prescription information.’’ Id. (citing 21
CFR 1304.03(c) and 1306.05(a)). The
Order also alleged that Registrant issued
eleven Subutex or Suboxone
prescriptions to patients from a location
at which he was not registered. Id.
(citing 21 U.S.C. 822(e)). Id. at 2.
Finally, the Show Cause Order also
alleged that Registrant had not been
candid in providing material
information in violation of 21 U.S.C.
823(f)(5). Specifically, the Order alleged
that: (1) The Ohio Board found that he
‘‘provided questionable, self-serving
testimony during the hearing’’ in three
respects; (2) that on an application to a
drug distributor, he had falsely stated
that his medical license or registration
had never been subject to ‘‘sanction or
disciplinary action’’; (3) and that during
an inspection by an Investigator for the
West Virginia Board of Medicine,
Registrant had stated that he had not
ordered any drugs for dispensing when
he had done so two days earlier.
E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM
23JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 3624]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01211]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[CPCLO Order No. 001-2015]
Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of Records
AGENCY: Office of Legal Counsel, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Notice of termination of two systems of records.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), the
United States Department of Justice, Office of Legal Counsel, is
terminating the systems of records entitled ``Office of Legal Counsel
Attorney Assignment Reports, JUSTICE/OLC-001'' and ``Office of Legal
Counsel Central File, JUSTICE/OLC-003.'' The Department is eliminating
the Attorney Assignment Reports system because the reports no longer
exist and have been destroyed. The Department is eliminating the
Central File system because the 5 x 7 card index no longer exists and
the records maintained in the Central File are not retrieved by the
name of individuals or by other identifying information assigned to
individuals.
Accordingly, the Privacy Act system of records notices last
published in the Federal Register on September 4, 1985, 50 FR 35878,
35879, are removed from the Department's compilation of Privacy Act
systems.
Dated: January 8, 2015.
Erika Brown Lee,
Chief Privacy and Civil Liberties Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-01211 Filed 1-22-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-23-P
