Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities, Comment Request, 3658-3660 [2015-01167]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
3658
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 15 / Friday, January 23, 2015 / Notices
for licensing can be found online at
https://technology.grc.nasa.gov.
Sumara M. Thompson-King,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2015–01115 Filed 1–22–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510–13–P
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS
ADMINISTRATION
[NARA–2015–023]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA).
ACTION: Second notice of information
collection.
AGENCY:
NARA is giving public notice
that we have submitted to OMB for
approval the information collection
described in this notice. We invite
people to comment on the proposed
information collection, pursuant to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Please submit any comments to
OMB, at the address below, on or before
February 23, 2015 to be assured of
consideration.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Nicholas
A. Fraser, Desk Officer for NARA; by
mail to: Office of Management and
Budget; New Executive Office Building;
Washington, DC 20503; by fax to: 202–
395–5167; or by email to: Nicholas_A._
Fraser@omb.eop.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: You
may request additional information or
copies of the proposed information
collection and supporting statement
from Tamee Fechhelm, by telephone at:
301–837–1694, or by fax at: 301–713–
7409.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–13), NARA invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to comment on proposed
information collections. We published a
notice of proposed collection for this
information collection on October 28,
2014 (79 FR 64219), and received no
comments. We have thus submitted the
described information collection to
OMB for approval.
In response to this notice, comments
and suggestions should address one or
more of the following points: (a)
Whether the proposed information
collection is necessary for NARA’s
proper performance of its functions; (b)
the accuracy of NARA’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed information
collection; (c) ways to enhance the
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 Jan 22, 2015
Jkt 235001
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including
the use of information technology; and
(e) whether small businesses are
affected by this collection. In this
notice, NARA solicits comments
concerning the following information
collection:
Title: Request Pertaining to Military
Records.
OMB number: 3095–0029.
Agency form number: SF 180.
Type of review: Regular.
Affected public: Veterans, their
authorized representatives, state and
local governments, and businesses.
Estimated number of respondents:
1,028,769.
Estimated time per response: 5
minutes.
Frequency of response: On occasion
(when respondents wish to request
information from a military personnel
record).
Estimated total annual burden hours:
85,731 hours.
Abstract: The authority for this
information collection is 36 CFR
1233.18. In accordance with rules
issued by the Department of Defense
(DOD) and Department of Homeland
Security (DHS, U.S. Coast Guard),
NARA’s National Personnel Records
Center (NPRC) administers veterans’
military service records after discharge,
retirement, or death. When veterans and
other authorized individuals request
information from, or copies of,
documents in military service records,
they must provide certain information
about the veteran and the nature of the
request. Federal agencies, military
departments, veterans, veterans’
organizations, and the general public
use Standard Form (SF) 180, Request
Pertaining to Military Records, to
request information from military
service records stored at NPRC. Veterans
and next-of-kin of deceased veterans can
also use eVetRecs (https://
www.archives.gov/research_room/
vetrecs/) to order copies.
Dated: January 15, 2015.
Swarnali Haldar,
Executive for Information Services/CIO.
[FR Doc. 2015–01133 Filed 1–22–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
NATIONAL CAPITAL PLANNING
COMMISSION
Proposed Agency Information
Collection Activities, Comment
Request
National Capital Planning
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed agency information
collection activities, comment request.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA
or Act) and its implementing
regulations, the National Capital
Planning Commission (NCPC or
Commission) hereby announces an
opportunity for public comment on a
proposed Generic Clearance for the
Collection of Qualitative Data for
Planning Initiatives undertaken by the
NCPC. A copy of the draft supporting
statement is available at www.ncpc.gov.
Following review and disposition of
public comments, NCPC will submit
this generic information request to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval, and
additional public comment will be
solicited. Comments submitted in
response to this notice will be
summarized and/or included in the
request for OMB approval. Written
comments will be available for public
review at www.ncpc.gov.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
March 24, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on the proposed rule by either of the
methods listed below.
1. U.S. mail, courier, or hand delivery:
Office of Public Engagement, National
Capital Planning Commission, 401 9th
Street NW., Suite 500, Washington, DC
20004.
2. Electronically: info@ncpc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Director, Office of Public Engagement,
National Capital Planning Commission,
401 9th Street NW., Suite 500,
Washington, DC 20004; info@ncpc.gov,
(202) 482–7200.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal
Agencies must obtain approval from the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for collection of information they
conduct or sponsor. Collection of
information is defined in 44 U.S.C.
3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c) and
includes Agency requests or
requirements that members of the public
submit reports, keep records or provide
information to a third party. Section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)) requires Federal Agencies
to provide a 60 day notice in the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM
23JAN1
3659
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 15 / Friday, January 23, 2015 / Notices
Federal Register concerning each
proposed collection of information
before submitting the collection to OMB
for approval. To comply with this
requirement, NCPC is publishing notice
of the proposed collection of
information set forth in this document.
With respect to the following
collection of information, NCPC invites
comments on these topics: (1) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of NCPC’s functions, including whether
the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of NCPC’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques,
when appropriate, and other forms of
information technology.
Below is a summary of the collection
activities the NCPC will submit for
clearance by OMB as required under the
PRA.
NCPC is the federal government’s
central planning agency for the National
Capital Region. Pursuant to the National
Capital Planning Act (40 U.S.C., §§ 8701
et seq.) NCPC prepares a comprehensive
plan for the National Capital Region;
reviews federal and some District of
Columbia proposed developments,
projects and plans; reviews District
zoning amendments; prepares an annual
Federal Capital Improvements Program
and reviews the District Capital
Improvements Program. To fulfill the
mission established in the National
Capital Planning Act, NCPC needs to
conduct additional planning studies to
inform the activities noted above.
Over the next three years, NCPC
anticipates it will complete an update to
elements of the ‘‘Comprehensive Plan
for the National Capital,’’ including a
new urban design element; update the
parks and open space element and
conduct a study of parks in Washington,
DC; advance an initiative for
Pennsylvania Avenue; conduct regional
climate adaptation and infrastructure
studies; prepare one or more viewshed
studies; study trail proposals; prepare
commemoration studies and plans; and
develop area-specific plans for federal
precincts in the Monumental Core,
including the SW. Ecodistrict and NW.
Rectangle.
Other new initiatives may be
proposed during the next three years.
While NCPC establishes a multi-year
strategic plan and a yearly work
program anticipating major initiatives,
the agency’s work is often shaped by
external factors, including new
Administration directives and the
planning and development decisions of
other federal agencies and local
governments in the region.
To fulfill the agency mission and
consistent with best planning practices,
NCPC’s planning initiatives are
predicated on receiving public input at
all development stages. Public input is
voluntary. The affected public may
include individuals, agencies, and
organizations within the National
Capital Region, as well as national and
even international audiences. Agency
staff may receive requests from the
Commission to solicit public input on
specific topic areas identified as a
planning process unfolds. NCPC’s plans
affect federal and non-federal
properties, regional residents and
workers, federal and local government
agencies, visitors, development
interests, businesses, and civic and
interest-based organizations.
Based on prior experience and current
practice, each initiative collects
qualitative, voluntary public feedback to
inform NCPC in their planning
initiatives. While the specific
information requested from the public
cannot be determined at this time, the
general nature of the collection and
collection tools used are described
below. NCPC will provide more refined
individual estimates of burden in
subsequent notices to OMB.
To offer the public the broadest
possible opportunity to comment, NCPC
may ask the same questions in different
formats: On line, in writing, and
verbally at public meetings and focus
groups. The purpose of collecting public
input is to inform and shape NCPC’s
planning work at the earliest
opportunity. Early in a planning study,
public feedback is used to shape the
direction and scope of the study,
including possible vision and goals,
study alternatives, and anticipated
issues. At later stages, NCPC has often
completed technical studies, and
identified and developed options and
alternatives for policies, physical
development plans, or programs. Public
input helps the agency evaluate the
accuracy and usefulness of studies, and
conveys preferences and responses to
alternatives. Towards the end of a
planning study, NCPC has typically
developed early drafts of plans and
policies and is seeking more detailed
public comments, often on a preferred
plan idea or approach. Public input is
often organized around major plan/
policy topics and key decisions. Public
input helps the agency evaluate the full
range of possible impacts and
understand the preferences of the public
prior to acting on a proposed policy or
plan.
Information collected will be used by
agency staff as they develop policy and
development plans. For some
initiatives, steering committees
comprised of representatives from
federal agencies provide advisory
guidance on agency policy and
development plans. These committees
review and consider public input prior
to providing guidance. The Commission
reviews informal public input,
sometimes provided in summary form,
as well as formally-submitted public
comments as part of their deliberations
and actions on draft and final agency
plans.
NCPC estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED THREE YEAR REPORTING BURDEN
[Footnote]
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Number of
events
Focus Groups ..................................................................
Public Meetings ................................................................
Online comment ...............................................................
Questionnaire ...................................................................
Ideas Competition ............................................................
Design Charrette ..............................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 Jan 22, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Average
number of
respondents/
event
119
57
27
15
5
3
Fmt 4703
15
50
300
100
400
100
Sfmt 4703
Number of
responses
Hours/response
1785
2850
8100
1500
2000
300
E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM
23JAN1
1.5
1
0.5
0.25
.5
1.5
Total hours
2677.5
2850
4050
375
1000
450
3660
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 15 / Friday, January 23, 2015 / Notices
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED THREE YEAR REPORTING BURDEN—Continued
[Footnote]
Number of
events
Total ..........................................................................
Average
number of
respondents/
event
226
Number of
responses
965
15235
Hours/response
..........................
Total hours
11402.5
Footnote: There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection.
The number of respondents to be
included in each new event may vary,
depending on the nature of the material
and the target audience. Table 1
provides examples of the types of
collection tools that may be
administered and estimated burden
levels during the three year period.
Time to read, view or listen to the
subject material is built into the
estimated ‘‘Total Hours.’’
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520.
Dated: January 20, 2015.
Anne R. Schuyler,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2015–01167 Filed 1–22–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7520–01–P
NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE
ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES
National Endowment for the Arts
Arts Advisory Panel Meetings
National Endowment for the
Arts, National Foundation on the Arts
and Humanities.
ACTION: Notice of Meeting.
AGENCY:
Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of
the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(Pub. L. 92–463), as amended, notice is
hereby given that two meetings of the
Arts Advisory Panel to the National
Council on the Arts will be held by
teleconference from the National
Endowment for the Arts, Constitution
Center, 400 7th St. SW., Washington, DC
20506 as follows (all meetings are
Eastern time and ending times are
approximate):
State & Regional (review of National
Services Agreement): This meeting will
be open.
Dates: February 12, 2015 3:00 p.m. to
4:00 p.m.
State & Regional (review of Regional
Arts Organization Partnership
Agreements): This meeting will be open.
Dates: February 12, 2015 4:00 p.m. to
5:00 p.m.
State & Regional (review of Regional
Arts Organization Partnership
Agreements): This meeting will be open.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 Jan 22, 2015
Jkt 235001
Dates: February 18, 2015 3:00 p.m. to
4:00 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Further information with reference to
these meetings can be obtained from Ms.
Andi Mathis, Partnership Division
National Endowment for the Arts,
Washington, DC 20506; mathisa@
arts.gov, or call 202/682–5430.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
closed portions of meetings are for the
purpose of Panel review, discussion,
evaluation, and recommendations on
financial assistance under the National
Foundation on the Arts and the
Humanities Act of 1965, as amended,
including information given in
confidence to the agency. In accordance
with the determination of the Chairman
of February 15, 2012, these sessions will
be closed to the public pursuant to
subsection (c)(6) of section 552b of title
5, United States Code.
Dated: January 20, 2015.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, National Endowment for
the Arts.
[FR Doc. 2015–01126 Filed 1–22–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. IA–14–025–EA; ASLBP No. 14–
932–02–EA–BD01]
James Chaisson; Notice of Atomic
Safety And Licensing Board
Reconstitution
Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.313(c) and
2.321(b), the Atomic Safety and
Licensing Board in the above-captioned
James Chaisson enforcement action
proceeding is hereby reconstituted as
follows: Administrative Judge Michael
M. Gibson (who already is serving as a
Licensing Board member in this case) is
appointed to serve as Chairman; and
Administrative Judge G. Paul Bollwerk,
III is appointed to serve in place of
Administrative Judge Alex S. Karlin.
All correspondence, documents, and
other materials shall continue to be filed
in accordance with the NRC E-Filing
rule. See 10 CFR 2.302 et seq.
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 16th
day of January 2015.
E. Roy Hawkens,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety
and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. 2015–01181 Filed 1–22–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50–327–LR and 50–238–LR;
ASLBP No. 13–927–01–LR–BD01]
Tennessee Valley Authority (Sequoyah
Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2)
Notice of Atomic Safety and Licensing
Board Reconstitution
Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.313(c) and
2.321(b), the Atomic Safety and
Licensing Board in the above-captioned
Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2
license renewal proceeding is hereby
reconstituted by appointing
Administrative Judge Paul S. Ryerson to
serve as Chairman in place of
Administrative Judge Alex S. Karlin,
and by appointing Administrative Judge
Michael F. Kennedy to serve in place of
Administrative Judge Paul B. Abramson.
All correspondence, documents, and
other materials shall continue to be filed
in accordance with the NRC E-Filing
rule. See 10 CFR 2.302 et seq.
Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 16th
day of January 2015.
E. Roy Hawkens,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety
and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. 2015–01179 Filed 1–22–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 52–029–COL and 52–030–COL
ASLBP No. 09–879–04–COL–BD01]
Progress Energy Florida, Inc.; Levy
County Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1
and 2; Notice of Atomic Safety and
Licensing Board Reconstitution
Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.313(c) and
2.321(b), the Atomic Safety and
Licensing Board in the above-captioned
E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM
23JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3658-3660]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01167]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL CAPITAL PLANNING COMMISSION
Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities, Comment
Request
AGENCY: National Capital Planning Commission.
ACTION: Proposed agency information collection activities, comment
request.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA or
Act) and its implementing regulations, the National Capital Planning
Commission (NCPC or Commission) hereby announces an opportunity for
public comment on a proposed Generic Clearance for the Collection of
Qualitative Data for Planning Initiatives undertaken by the NCPC. A
copy of the draft supporting statement is available at www.ncpc.gov.
Following review and disposition of public comments, NCPC will submit
this generic information request to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval, and additional public comment will be
solicited. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be
summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval. Written
comments will be available for public review at www.ncpc.gov.
DATES: Submit comments on or before March 24, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on the proposed rule by either of
the methods listed below.
1. U.S. mail, courier, or hand delivery: Office of Public
Engagement, National Capital Planning Commission, 401 9th Street NW.,
Suite 500, Washington, DC 20004.
2. Electronically: info@ncpc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Director, Office of Public Engagement,
National Capital Planning Commission, 401 9th Street NW., Suite 500,
Washington, DC 20004; info@ncpc.gov, (202) 482-7200.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal
Agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for collection of information they conduct or sponsor. Collection
of information is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c) and
includes Agency requests or requirements that members of the public
submit reports, keep records or provide information to a third party.
Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)) requires
Federal Agencies to provide a 60 day notice in the
[[Page 3659]]
Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information
before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with
this requirement, NCPC is publishing notice of the proposed collection
of information set forth in this document.
With respect to the following collection of information, NCPC
invites comments on these topics: (1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of NCPC's
functions, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of NCPC's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.
Below is a summary of the collection activities the NCPC will
submit for clearance by OMB as required under the PRA.
NCPC is the federal government's central planning agency for the
National Capital Region. Pursuant to the National Capital Planning Act
(40 U.S.C., Sec. Sec. 8701 et seq.) NCPC prepares a comprehensive plan
for the National Capital Region; reviews federal and some District of
Columbia proposed developments, projects and plans; reviews District
zoning amendments; prepares an annual Federal Capital Improvements
Program and reviews the District Capital Improvements Program. To
fulfill the mission established in the National Capital Planning Act,
NCPC needs to conduct additional planning studies to inform the
activities noted above.
Over the next three years, NCPC anticipates it will complete an
update to elements of the ``Comprehensive Plan for the National
Capital,'' including a new urban design element; update the parks and
open space element and conduct a study of parks in Washington, DC;
advance an initiative for Pennsylvania Avenue; conduct regional climate
adaptation and infrastructure studies; prepare one or more viewshed
studies; study trail proposals; prepare commemoration studies and
plans; and develop area-specific plans for federal precincts in the
Monumental Core, including the SW. Ecodistrict and NW. Rectangle.
Other new initiatives may be proposed during the next three years.
While NCPC establishes a multi-year strategic plan and a yearly work
program anticipating major initiatives, the agency's work is often
shaped by external factors, including new Administration directives and
the planning and development decisions of other federal agencies and
local governments in the region.
To fulfill the agency mission and consistent with best planning
practices, NCPC's planning initiatives are predicated on receiving
public input at all development stages. Public input is voluntary. The
affected public may include individuals, agencies, and organizations
within the National Capital Region, as well as national and even
international audiences. Agency staff may receive requests from the
Commission to solicit public input on specific topic areas identified
as a planning process unfolds. NCPC's plans affect federal and non-
federal properties, regional residents and workers, federal and local
government agencies, visitors, development interests, businesses, and
civic and interest-based organizations.
Based on prior experience and current practice, each initiative
collects qualitative, voluntary public feedback to inform NCPC in their
planning initiatives. While the specific information requested from the
public cannot be determined at this time, the general nature of the
collection and collection tools used are described below. NCPC will
provide more refined individual estimates of burden in subsequent
notices to OMB.
To offer the public the broadest possible opportunity to comment,
NCPC may ask the same questions in different formats: On line, in
writing, and verbally at public meetings and focus groups. The purpose
of collecting public input is to inform and shape NCPC's planning work
at the earliest opportunity. Early in a planning study, public feedback
is used to shape the direction and scope of the study, including
possible vision and goals, study alternatives, and anticipated issues.
At later stages, NCPC has often completed technical studies, and
identified and developed options and alternatives for policies,
physical development plans, or programs. Public input helps the agency
evaluate the accuracy and usefulness of studies, and conveys
preferences and responses to alternatives. Towards the end of a
planning study, NCPC has typically developed early drafts of plans and
policies and is seeking more detailed public comments, often on a
preferred plan idea or approach. Public input is often organized around
major plan/policy topics and key decisions. Public input helps the
agency evaluate the full range of possible impacts and understand the
preferences of the public prior to acting on a proposed policy or plan.
Information collected will be used by agency staff as they develop
policy and development plans. For some initiatives, steering committees
comprised of representatives from federal agencies provide advisory
guidance on agency policy and development plans. These committees
review and consider public input prior to providing guidance. The
Commission reviews informal public input, sometimes provided in summary
form, as well as formally-submitted public comments as part of their
deliberations and actions on draft and final agency plans.
NCPC estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:
Table 1--Estimated Three Year Reporting Burden
[Footnote]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average number
Number of of Number of
events respondents/ responses Hours/response Total hours
event
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Focus Groups................... 119 15 1785 1.5 2677.5
Public Meetings................ 57 50 2850 1 2850
Online comment................. 27 300 8100 0.5 4050
Questionnaire.................. 15 100 1500 0.25 375
Ideas Competition.............. 5 400 2000 .5 1000
Design Charrette............... 3 100 300 1.5 450
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 3660]]
Total...................... 226 965 15235 .............. 11402.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Footnote: There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection.
The number of respondents to be included in each new event may
vary, depending on the nature of the material and the target audience.
Table 1 provides examples of the types of collection tools that may be
administered and estimated burden levels during the three year period.
Time to read, view or listen to the subject material is built into the
estimated ``Total Hours.''
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.
Dated: January 20, 2015.
Anne R. Schuyler,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2015-01167 Filed 1-22-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7520-01-P
