Scientific Information Request on Treatments for Fecal Incontinence, 2941-2943 [2015-00764]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 13 / Wednesday, January 21, 2015 / Notices
• For tumor response, no minimum
follow-up
• For harms due to overtreatment or
undertreatment, no minimum followup
• For survival and quality of life, at
least six months minimum follow-up
Hospital Road, Mail Code: R&D 71,
Portland, OR 97239.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ryan McKenna, Telephone: 503–220–
8262 ext. 58653 or Email: SIPS@epcsrc.org.
Setting
The Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality has commissioned the
Evidence-based Practice Centers (EPC)
Programs to complete a review of the
evidence for Treatments for Fecal
Incontinence.
The EPC Program is dedicated to
identifying as many studies as possible
that are relevant to the questions for
each of its reviews. In order to do so, we
are supplementing the usual manual
and electronic database searches of the
literature by requesting information
from the public (e.g., details of studies
conducted). We are looking for studies
that report on Treatments for Fecal
Incontinence, including those that
describe adverse events. The entire
research protocol, including the key
questions, is also available online at:
https://effectivehealthcare.AHRQ.gov/
search-for-guides-reviews-and-reports/
?pageaction=display
product&productID=2013.
This notice is to notify the public that
the EPC Program would find the
following information on Treatments for
Fecal Incontinence (FI) helpful:
• A list of completed studies that
your organization has sponsored for this
indication. In the list, please indicate
whether results are available on
ClinicalTrials.gov along with the
ClinicalTrials.gov trial number.
• For completed studies that do not
have results on ClinicalTrials.gov,
please provide a summary, including
the following elements: study number,
study period, design, methodology,
indication and diagnosis, proper use
instructions, inclusion and exclusion
criteria, primary and secondary
outcomes, baseline characteristics,
number of patients screened/eligible/
enrolled/lost to follow-up/withdrawn/
analyzed, effectiveness/efficacy, and
safety results.
• A list of ongoing studies that your
organization has sponsored for this
indication. In the list, please provide the
ClinicalTrials.gov trial number or, if the
trial is not registered, the protocol for
the study including a study number, the
study period, design, methodology,
indication and diagnosis, proper use
instructions, inclusion and exclusion
criteria, and primary and secondary
outcomes.
• Description of whether the above
studies constitute all Phase II and above
clinical trials sponsored by your
Any setting.
Dated: December 29, 2014.
Richard Kronick,
AHRQ Director.
[FR Doc. 2015–00762 Filed 1–20–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–90–M
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality
Scientific Information Request on
Treatments for Fecal Incontinence
Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality (AHRQ), HHS
ACTION: Request for scientific
information submissions.
AGENCY:
The Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality (AHRQ) is seeking
scientific information submissions from
the public. Scientific information is
being solicited to inform our review of
Treatments for Fecal Incontinence,
which is currently being conducted by
the AHRQ’s Evidence-based Practice
Centers (EPC) Programs. Access to
published and unpublished pertinent
scientific information will improve the
quality of this review. AHRQ is
conducting this systematic review
pursuant to Section 902(a) of the Public
Health Service Act, 42 U.S.C. 299a(a).
DATES: Submission Deadline on or
before February 20, 2015.
ADDRESSES:
Online submissions: https://
effectivehealthcare.AHRQ.gov/
index.cfm/submit-scientific-information
-packets/. Please select the study for
which you are submitting information
from the list to upload your documents.
Email submissions: SIPS@epc-src.org.
Print submissions:
Mailing Address:
Portland VA Research Foundation,
Scientific Resource Center, ATTN:
Scientific Information Packet
Coordinator, PO Box 69539, Portland,
OR 97239.
Shipping Address (FedEx, UPS, etc.):
Portland VA Research Foundation,
Scientific Resource Center, ATTN:
Scientific Information Packet
Coordinator, 3710 SW U.S. Veterans
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:50 Jan 20, 2015
Jkt 235001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2941
organization for this indication and an
index outlining the relevant information
in each submitted file.
Your contribution will be very
beneficial to the EPC Program. The
contents of all submissions will be made
available to the public upon request.
Materials submitted must be publicly
available or can be made public.
Materials that are considered
confidential; marketing materials; study
types not included in the review; or
information on indications not included
in the review cannot be used by the EPC
Program. This is a voluntary request for
information, and all costs for complying
with this request must be borne by the
submitter.
The draft of this review will be posted
on AHRQ’s EPC Program Web site and
available for public comment for a
period of 4 weeks. If you would like to
be notified when the draft is posted,
please sign up for the email list at:
https://effectivehealthcare.AHRQ.gov/
index.cfm/join-the-email-list1/.
The systematic review will answer the
following questions. This information is
provided as background. AHRQ is not
requesting that the public provide
answers to these questions. The entire
research protocol, is available online at:
https://effectivehealthcare.AHRQ.gov/
search-for-quides-reviews-and-reports/
?pageaction=displayproduct&product
ID=2013.
The Key Questions
Key Question 1
What is the comparative effectiveness
of treatments to improve quality of life
and continence and lessen the severity
of FI in affected adults?
Key Question 2
What adverse effects are associated
with specific treatments for adults with
FI?
PICOTS
The PICOTS Framework (Population,
Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes,
Timing, Setting) will be identified for
each key question.
Population
We will include adults with FI and
classify them within the etiologic
categories listed below, and by adult age
groups (geriatric versus other).
Whenever possible, we will examine
treatment effects within etiologic
subgroups of adults, since affected
individuals are highly heterogeneous
and not all treatments are feasible for
specific subgroups. Patients with FI due
to spinal cord injury will be separately
evaluated. Adults with fistulas will be
excluded. The possible associations of
E:\FR\FM\21JAN1.SGM
21JAN1
2942
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 13 / Wednesday, January 21, 2015 / Notices
treatments and etiologic subgroups are
shown in Appendix A of the research
protocol.
Potential Subgroups Include:
• Structural (damage or variants)
Æ Anal sphincter
• Injury (often due to episiotomy):
from muscle damage and/or nerve
damage
• Damage from surgery (for
hemorrhoids or cancer [after anal,
rectal or colon resection]) or
underlying systemic condition
(such as scleroderma)
Æ Pelvic floor
• Weakening (atrophy), prolapse
(pelvic organs, rectal), or stretching
(chronic constipation)
Æ Rectal
• Post-radiation (mainly for prostate
and rectal cancer)
• Rectal filling and storage problems
• Hemorrhoids
• Rectocele
Æ Congenital malformations
(anorectal, anal sphincter)
• Alterations in gastrointestinal motility
or fecal texture (due to conditions or
ingestibles)
Æ Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis,
irritable bowel syndrome
Æ Medications
Æ Autoimmune disorders (such as
systemic lupus erythematosus)
• Neurogenic etiologies
Æ Nerve injury to pelvic floor
Æ Spinal cord injury, spina bifida
Æ Traumatic brain injury
Æ Stroke
Æ Neurodegenerative diseases (such
as multiple sclerosis, multiple
system atrophy, Shy-Drager
syndrome, etc.)
• Multiple
Æ Any combination of above
etiologies
• Unknown
Æ FI etiology(ies) unknown or not
reported
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Interventions
We will include FDA-approved
treatments for FI and FDA-approved
medications used off-label (not
specifically approved for the treatment
of FI) and available for use in the United
States. Interventions that do not require
FDA approval and are used in the
United States will be included. Since a
number of treatments that are not FDAapproved are commonly used in Europe,
the following additional specifications
will apply:
• If the device is FDA approved for an
indication and is used off label for
FI, we will include the studies (e.g.,
rectal irrigation).
• If a device is FDA approved under
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:58 Jan 20, 2015
Jkt 235001
a certain brand name for FI (e.g.,
anal plugs), and there are studies
that compare it to other brands
approved only in Europe, we will
include those studies.
Colostomy, treatments for diarrhea
(not FI), and laxatives used to treat stool
impaction will be excluded.
• Nonsurgical
Æ Functional enhancement therapies
(muscle training/biofeedback/
electrostimulation):
• Pelvic floor muscle training
exercises (PFMT)
• PFMT with biofeedback (using
electrical or ultrasound sensors)
EMG
• PFMT with biofeedback, plus
electrostimulation
Æ Dietary modifications: Fiber,
probiotic supplements, other
Æ Medications: such as
• Antidiarrheal or constipating drugs
(such as loperamide hydrochloride
[e.g., Imodium®], diphenoxylate
plus atropine [e.g., Lomoti1®],
codeine)
• Sphincter function enhancers
(topical phenylepinephrine gel,
sodium valproate)
• Other bowel-affecting drugs:
Anticholinergics (hyoscyamine
sulfate), tricyclic agents
(amitriptyline, imipramine)
Æ Behavior modification
Æ Stool consistency management
Æ Devices: anal plugs
Æ Rectal irrigation
Æ Injections of local biocompatible
tissue-bulking agent (into the anal
canal walls)
• Dextranomer in stabilized sodium
hyaluronate (Solesta®)
• Surgical
Æ Implanted neurostimulation (sacral
nerve stimulators)
Æ Radiofrequency anal sphincter
remodeling (SECCA)—(may be inoffice procedure)
Æ Anal sphincter repair
(sphincteroplasty or muscle
transposition)
Æ Sphincter replacement (artificial
anal sphincter)
Æ Surgical correction of condition
that led to FI (such as rectal
prolapse, hemorrhoids, or rectocele)
• Combined treatments: any
combination
Comparators
All other treatment options, alone or
in combination. Where available, trials
with placebo or sham controls will be
included.
Outcomes
The review will focus on patientimportant outcomes as listed below.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Intermediate outcomes, such as
physiologic measures of sphincter
function (electromyography (EMG)
recruitment, direct EMG [pudendal
nerve terminal motor latency test],
anorectal manometry, defecography,
etc.), will not be examined due to the
lack of correlation with patientimportant outcomes.
Key Question 1 (Final health outcomes)
• Quality of Life (multiple scales, such
as the Fecal Incontinence Quality of
Life [FIQL],25 Gastrointestinal
Quality of Life Index, or the Medical
Outcomes Survey 36-item health
survey (SF–36), others)
• Reduced frequency of incontinence
episodes (bowel diaries, episode
counts, etc.)
• Reduced severity of incontinence
(volume and type of leakage; the use
of coping behaviors): multiple scales
such as the Fecal Incontinence
Severity Index [FISI], Jorge/Wexner
(Cleveland Clinic) Incontinence
Score, Vaizey/St. Mark’s Hospital
incontinence score, Pescatori, Miller
Incontinence Score, and others.
• Urgency
• Emotional and psychological
outcomes (fear, shame,
embarrassment, depression,
humiliation, anger, etc.): FIQL
subscales, Euro-QoL 5D (anxiety/
depression subscale)
• Change (reduction) in coping
behaviors relative to FI management
• Social activity
• Sexual function
Key Question 2 (Adverse effects of
specific treatments)
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Pain: abdominal, other
Worsening of FI (frequency, severity)
Constipation and/or diarrhea
Other gastrointestinal symptoms
(such as cramping, bloating, etc.)
Difficulty evacuating bowels
Headache
Nausea
Change in appetite
Local dermatitis
Surgical complications (infection,
revision surgery, etc.)
Negative emotional/psychological
effects (depression, anger, etc.)
Other adverse effect(s) related to
treatment (skin breakdown, urinary
tract infection, etc.)
Timing
Duration of follow up: Since FI is a
chronic condition, studies with at least
3 months of follow up after treatment
initiation are the main focus of the
review. However, since some
interventions may have only short
follow up (such as medications or
E:\FR\FM\21JAN1.SGM
21JAN1
2943
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 13 / Wednesday, January 21, 2015 / Notices
dietary interventions), we will include
all studies that otherwise meet the
selection criteria to allow us to make
overarching comments about the status
of the FI treatment-outcomes literature
in the final report.
Setting
Any setting (community dwelling,
long-term care, other).
Dated: December 30, 2014.
Richard Kronick,
AHRQ Director.
[FR Doc. 2015–00764 Filed 1–20–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–90–M
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Proposed Information Collection
Activity; Comment Request
Proposed Projects
Title: Performance Measures for
Community-Centered Healthy Marriage,
Pathways to Responsible Fatherhood
and Community-Centered Responsible
Fatherhood Ex-Prisoner Reentry grant
programs.
OMB No.: 0970–0365—Reinstatement
with changes of a previously approved
collection.
Description: The Office of Family
Assistance (OFA), Administration for
Children and Families (ACF), U.S.
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS), intends to request
approval from the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) to renew OMB Form
0970–0365 for the collection of
performance measures from grantees for
the Community-Centered Healthy
Marriage, Pathways to Responsible
Fatherhood and Community-Centered
Responsible Fatherhood Ex-Prisoner
Reentry discretionary grant programs.
The performance measure data obtained
from the grantees will be used by OFA
to report on the overall performance of
these grant programs.
Data will be collected from all 60
Community-Centered Healthy Marriage,
54 Pathways to Responsible Fatherhood
and 5 Community-Centered Responsible
Fatherhood Ex-Prisoner Reentry
grantees in the OFA programs. Grantees
will report on program and participant
outcomes in such areas as participants’
improvement in knowledge skills,
attitudes, and behaviors related to
healthy marriage and responsible
fatherhood. Grantees will be asked to
input data for selected outcomes for
activities funded under the grants.
Grantees will extract data from program
records and will report the data twice
yearly through an on-line data
collection tool. Training and assistance
will be provided to grantees to support
this data collection process.
Respondents: Office of Family
Assistance Funded CommunityCentered Healthy Marriage, Pathways to
Responsible Fatherhood and
Community-Centered Responsible
Fatherhood Ex-Prisoner Reentry
Grantees.
ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES
Number of
responses per
respondent
Number of
respondents
Instrument
Average
burden hours
per response
Total annual
burden hours
110
2
0.8
176
9
2
0.8
14
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours .....................................................
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Performance measure reporting form (for private sector affected public) ......
Performance measure reporting form (for State, local, and tribal government
affected public) .............................................................................................
........................
........................
........................
190
In compliance with the requirements
of Section 506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the
Administration for Children and
Families is soliciting public comment
on the specific aspects of the
information collection described above.
Copies of the proposed collection of
information can be obtained and
comments may be forwarded by writing
to the Administration for Children and
Families, Office of Planning, Research
and Evaluation, 370 L’Enfant
Promenade SW., Washington, DC 20447,
Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer.
Email address: infocollection@
acf.hhs.gov. All requests should be
identified by the title of the information
collection.
The Department specifically requests
comments on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:33 Jan 20, 2015
Jkt 235001
proposed collection of information; (c)
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted
within 60 days of this publication.
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Requirements on
Content and Format of Labeling for
Human Prescription Drug and
Biological Products
Food and Drug Administration,
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the
proposed collection of certain
information by the Agency. Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the
PRA), Federal Agencies are required to
publish notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
SUMMARY:
BILLING CODE 4184–01–P
Fmt 4703
[Docket No. FDA–2008–N–0500]
HHS.
[FR Doc. 2015–00809 Filed 1–20–15; 8:45 am]
Frm 00032
Food and Drug Administration
AGENCY:
Robert Sargis,
Reports Clearance Officer.
PO 00000
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\21JAN1.SGM
21JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 13 (Wednesday, January 21, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2941-2943]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00764]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Scientific Information Request on Treatments for Fecal
Incontinence
AGENCY: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), HHS
ACTION: Request for scientific information submissions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) is
seeking scientific information submissions from the public. Scientific
information is being solicited to inform our review of Treatments for
Fecal Incontinence, which is currently being conducted by the AHRQ's
Evidence-based Practice Centers (EPC) Programs. Access to published and
unpublished pertinent scientific information will improve the quality
of this review. AHRQ is conducting this systematic review pursuant to
Section 902(a) of the Public Health Service Act, 42 U.S.C. 299a(a).
DATES: Submission Deadline on or before February 20, 2015.
ADDRESSES:
Online submissions: https://effectivehealthcare.AHRQ.gov/index.cfm/submit-scientific-information-packets/. Please select the study for
which you are submitting information from the list to upload your
documents.
Email submissions: src.org">SIPS@epc-src.org.
Print submissions:
Mailing Address:
Portland VA Research Foundation, Scientific Resource Center, ATTN:
Scientific Information Packet Coordinator, PO Box 69539, Portland, OR
97239.
Shipping Address (FedEx, UPS, etc.):
Portland VA Research Foundation, Scientific Resource Center, ATTN:
Scientific Information Packet Coordinator, 3710 SW U.S. Veterans
Hospital Road, Mail Code: R&D 71, Portland, OR 97239.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ryan McKenna, Telephone: 503-220-8262
ext. 58653 or Email: src.org">SIPS@epc-src.org.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality has commissioned the
Evidence-based Practice Centers (EPC) Programs to complete a review of
the evidence for Treatments for Fecal Incontinence.
The EPC Program is dedicated to identifying as many studies as
possible that are relevant to the questions for each of its reviews. In
order to do so, we are supplementing the usual manual and electronic
database searches of the literature by requesting information from the
public (e.g., details of studies conducted). We are looking for studies
that report on Treatments for Fecal Incontinence, including those that
describe adverse events. The entire research protocol, including the
key questions, is also available online at: https://effectivehealthcare.AHRQ.gov/search-for-guides-reviews-and-reports/?pageaction=displayproduct&productID=2013.
This notice is to notify the public that the EPC Program would find
the following information on Treatments for Fecal Incontinence (FI)
helpful:
A list of completed studies that your organization has
sponsored for this indication. In the list, please indicate whether
results are available on ClinicalTrials.gov along with the
ClinicalTrials.gov trial number.
For completed studies that do not have results on
ClinicalTrials.gov, please provide a summary, including the following
elements: study number, study period, design, methodology, indication
and diagnosis, proper use instructions, inclusion and exclusion
criteria, primary and secondary outcomes, baseline characteristics,
number of patients screened/eligible/enrolled/lost to follow-up/
withdrawn/analyzed, effectiveness/efficacy, and safety results.
A list of ongoing studies that your organization has
sponsored for this indication. In the list, please provide the
ClinicalTrials.gov trial number or, if the trial is not registered, the
protocol for the study including a study number, the study period,
design, methodology, indication and diagnosis, proper use instructions,
inclusion and exclusion criteria, and primary and secondary outcomes.
Description of whether the above studies constitute all
Phase II and above clinical trials sponsored by your organization for
this indication and an index outlining the relevant information in each
submitted file.
Your contribution will be very beneficial to the EPC Program. The
contents of all submissions will be made available to the public upon
request. Materials submitted must be publicly available or can be made
public. Materials that are considered confidential; marketing
materials; study types not included in the review; or information on
indications not included in the review cannot be used by the EPC
Program. This is a voluntary request for information, and all costs for
complying with this request must be borne by the submitter.
The draft of this review will be posted on AHRQ's EPC Program Web
site and available for public comment for a period of 4 weeks. If you
would like to be notified when the draft is posted, please sign up for
the email list at: https://effectivehealthcare.AHRQ.gov/index.cfm/join-the-email-list1/.
The systematic review will answer the following questions. This
information is provided as background. AHRQ is not requesting that the
public provide answers to these questions. The entire research
protocol, is available online at: https://effectivehealthcare.AHRQ.gov/search-for-quides-reviews-and-reports/?pageaction=displayproduct&productID=2013.
The Key Questions
Key Question 1
What is the comparative effectiveness of treatments to improve
quality of life and continence and lessen the severity of FI in
affected adults?
Key Question 2
What adverse effects are associated with specific treatments for
adults with FI?
PICOTS
The PICOTS Framework (Population, Intervention, Comparator,
Outcomes, Timing, Setting) will be identified for each key question.
Population
We will include adults with FI and classify them within the
etiologic categories listed below, and by adult age groups (geriatric
versus other). Whenever possible, we will examine treatment effects
within etiologic subgroups of adults, since affected individuals are
highly heterogeneous and not all treatments are feasible for specific
subgroups. Patients with FI due to spinal cord injury will be
separately evaluated. Adults with fistulas will be excluded. The
possible associations of
[[Page 2942]]
treatments and etiologic subgroups are shown in Appendix A of the
research protocol.
Potential Subgroups Include:
Structural (damage or variants)
[cir] Anal sphincter
Injury (often due to episiotomy): from muscle damage and/
or nerve damage
Damage from surgery (for hemorrhoids or cancer [after
anal, rectal or colon resection]) or underlying systemic condition
(such as scleroderma)
[cir] Pelvic floor
Weakening (atrophy), prolapse (pelvic organs, rectal), or
stretching (chronic constipation)
[cir] Rectal
Post-radiation (mainly for prostate and rectal cancer)
Rectal filling and storage problems
Hemorrhoids
Rectocele
[cir] Congenital malformations (anorectal, anal sphincter)
Alterations in gastrointestinal motility or fecal texture (due
to conditions or ingestibles)
[cir] Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, irritable bowel syndrome
[cir] Medications
[cir] Autoimmune disorders (such as systemic lupus erythematosus)
Neurogenic etiologies
[cir] Nerve injury to pelvic floor
[cir] Spinal cord injury, spina bifida
[cir] Traumatic brain injury
[cir] Stroke
[cir] Neurodegenerative diseases (such as multiple sclerosis,
multiple system atrophy, Shy-Drager syndrome, etc.)
Multiple
[cir] Any combination of above etiologies
Unknown
[cir] FI etiology(ies) unknown or not reported
Interventions
We will include FDA-approved treatments for FI and FDA-approved
medications used off-label (not specifically approved for the treatment
of FI) and available for use in the United States. Interventions that
do not require FDA approval and are used in the United States will be
included. Since a number of treatments that are not FDA-approved are
commonly used in Europe, the following additional specifications will
apply:
If the device is FDA approved for an indication and is
used off label for FI, we will include the studies (e.g., rectal
irrigation).
If a device is FDA approved under a certain brand name for
FI (e.g., anal plugs), and there are studies that compare it to other
brands approved only in Europe, we will include those studies.
Colostomy, treatments for diarrhea (not FI), and laxatives used to
treat stool impaction will be excluded.
Nonsurgical
[cir] Functional enhancement therapies (muscle training/
biofeedback/electrostimulation):
Pelvic floor muscle training exercises (PFMT)
PFMT with biofeedback (using electrical or ultrasound
sensors) EMG
PFMT with biofeedback, plus electrostimulation
[cir] Dietary modifications: Fiber, probiotic supplements, other
[cir] Medications: such as
Antidiarrheal or constipating drugs (such as loperamide
hydrochloride [e.g., Imodium[supreg]], diphenoxylate plus atropine
[e.g., Lomoti1[supreg]], codeine)
Sphincter function enhancers (topical phenylepinephrine
gel, sodium valproate)
Other bowel-affecting drugs: Anticholinergics (hyoscyamine
sulfate), tricyclic agents (amitriptyline, imipramine)
[cir] Behavior modification
[cir] Stool consistency management
[cir] Devices: anal plugs
[cir] Rectal irrigation
[cir] Injections of local biocompatible tissue-bulking agent (into
the anal canal walls)
Dextranomer in stabilized sodium hyaluronate
(Solesta[supreg])
Surgical
[cir] Implanted neurostimulation (sacral nerve stimulators)
[cir] Radiofrequency anal sphincter remodeling (SECCA)--(may be in-
office procedure)
[cir] Anal sphincter repair (sphincteroplasty or muscle
transposition)
[cir] Sphincter replacement (artificial anal sphincter)
[cir] Surgical correction of condition that led to FI (such as
rectal prolapse, hemorrhoids, or rectocele)
Combined treatments: any combination
Comparators
All other treatment options, alone or in combination. Where
available, trials with placebo or sham controls will be included.
Outcomes
The review will focus on patient-important outcomes as listed
below. Intermediate outcomes, such as physiologic measures of sphincter
function (electromyography (EMG) recruitment, direct EMG [pudendal
nerve terminal motor latency test], anorectal manometry, defecography,
etc.), will not be examined due to the lack of correlation with
patient-important outcomes.
Key Question 1 (Final health outcomes)
Quality of Life (multiple scales, such as the Fecal
Incontinence Quality of Life [FIQL],25 Gastrointestinal Quality of Life
Index, or the Medical Outcomes Survey 36-item health survey (SF-36),
others)
Reduced frequency of incontinence episodes (bowel diaries,
episode counts, etc.)
Reduced severity of incontinence (volume and type of leakage;
the use of coping behaviors): multiple scales such as the Fecal
Incontinence Severity Index [FISI], Jorge/Wexner (Cleveland Clinic)
Incontinence Score, Vaizey/St. Mark's Hospital incontinence score,
Pescatori, Miller Incontinence Score, and others.
Urgency
Emotional and psychological outcomes (fear, shame,
embarrassment, depression, humiliation, anger, etc.): FIQL subscales,
Euro-QoL 5D (anxiety/depression subscale)
Change (reduction) in coping behaviors relative to FI
management
Social activity
Sexual function
Key Question 2 (Adverse effects of specific treatments)
Pain: abdominal, other
Worsening of FI (frequency, severity)
Constipation and/or diarrhea
Other gastrointestinal symptoms (such as cramping, bloating,
etc.)
Difficulty evacuating bowels
Headache
Nausea
Change in appetite
Local dermatitis
Surgical complications (infection, revision surgery, etc.)
Negative emotional/psychological effects (depression, anger,
etc.)
Other adverse effect(s) related to treatment (skin breakdown,
urinary tract infection, etc.)
Timing
Duration of follow up: Since FI is a chronic condition, studies
with at least 3 months of follow up after treatment initiation are the
main focus of the review. However, since some interventions may have
only short follow up (such as medications or
[[Page 2943]]
dietary interventions), we will include all studies that otherwise meet
the selection criteria to allow us to make overarching comments about
the status of the FI treatment-outcomes literature in the final report.
Setting
Any setting (community dwelling, long-term care, other).
Dated: December 30, 2014.
Richard Kronick,
AHRQ Director.
[FR Doc. 2015-00764 Filed 1-20-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M