Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Coastal Fisheries Cooperative Management Act Provisions; American Lobster Fishery, 2028-2036 [2015-00421]
Download as PDF
2028
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 10 / Thursday, January 15, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
specified in paragraph (a)(5)(i)(D) of this
section, and the Council shall revisit the
AM in a future action. The AM areas
defined below are bounded by the
following coordinates, connected in the
order listed by rhumb lines, unless
otherwise noted. Any vessel issued a
limited access NE multispecies permit
and fishing with trawl gear in the
Atlantic Halibut Trawl Gear AM Area
may only use a haddock separator trawl,
as specified in § 648.85(a)(3)(iii)(A); a
Ruhle trawl, as specified in
§ 648.85(b)(6)(iv)(J)(3); a rope separator
trawl, as specified in § 648.84(e); or any
other gear approved consistent with the
process defined in § 648.85(b)(6). When
in effect, a limited access NE
multispecies permitted vessel with
gillnet or longline gear may not fish or
be in the Atlantic Halibut Fixed Gear
AM Areas, unless transiting with its
gear stowed in accordance with
§ 648.23(b), or such gear was approved
consistent with the process defined in
§ 648.85(b)(6). If a sub-ACL for Atlantic
halibut is allocated to another fishery,
consistent with the process specified at
§ 648.90(a)(4), and there are AMs for
that fishery, the groundfish fishery AM
shall only be implemented if the subACL allocated to the groundfish fishery
is exceeded (i.e., the sector and common
pool catch for a particular stock,
including the common pool’s share of
any overage of the overall ACL caused
by excessive catch by other subcomponents of the fishery pursuant to
§ 648.90(a)(5), exceeds the common pool
sub-ACL) and the overall ACL is also
exceeded.
ATLANTIC HALIBUT TRAWL GEAR AM
AREA
Point
1
2
3
4
...........
...........
...........
...........
N. Latitude
42°00′
42°00′
41°30′
41°30′
...............
...............
...............
...............
W. Longitude
69°20′
68°20′
68°20′
69°20′
ATLANTIC HALIBUT FIXED GEAR AM
AREA 1
Point
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
1
2
3
4
...........
...........
...........
...........
N. Latitude
42°30′
42°30′
42°20′
42°20′
...............
...............
...............
...............
W. Longitude
70°20′
70°15′
70°15′
70°20′
ATLANTIC HALIBUT FIXED GEAR AM
AREA 2
ATLANTIC HALIBUT FIXED GEAR AM
AREA 2—Continued
Point
N. Latitude
3 ...........
4 ...........
43°00′ ...............
43°00′ ...............
N. Latitude
1 ...........
2 ...........
43°10′ ...............
43°10′ ...............
VerDate Sep<11>2014
W. Longitude
69°30′
69°40′
(3) Atlantic wolffish. If NMFS
determines the overall ACL for Atlantic
wolffish is exceeded, as described in
this paragraph (a)(5)(i)(D)(3), by any
amount greater than the management
uncertainty buffer, the applicable AM
areas shall be implemented, as specified
in paragraph (a)(5)(i)(D) of this section.
If the overall ACL is exceeded by more
than 20 percent, the applicable AM
area(s) for the stock shall be
implemented, as specified in paragraph
(a)(5)(i)(D) of this section, and the
Council shall revisit the AM in a future
action. The AM areas defined below are
bounded by the following coordinates,
connected in the order listed by rhumb
lines, unless otherwise noted. Any
vessel issued a limited access NE
multispecies permit and fishing with
trawl gear in the Atlantic Wolffish
Trawl Gear AM Area may only use a
haddock separator trawl, as specified in
§ 648.85(a)(3)(iii)(A); a Ruhle trawl, as
specified in § 648.85(b)(6)(iv)(J)(3); a
rope separator trawl, as specified in
§ 648.84(e); or any other gear approved
consistent with the process defined in
§ 648.85(b)(6). When in effect, a limited
access NE multispecies permitted vessel
with gillnet or longline gear may not
fish or be in the Atlantic Wolffish Fixed
Gear AM Areas, unless transiting with
its gear stowed in accordance with
§ 648.23(b), or such gear was approved
consistent with the process defined in
§ 648.85(b)(6). If a sub-ACL for Atlantic
wolffish is allocated to another fishery,
consistent with the process specified at
§ 648.90(a)(4), and AMs are developed
for that fishery, the groundfish fishery
AM shall only be implemented if the
sub-ACL allocated to the groundfish
fishery is exceeded (i.e., the sector and
common pool catch for a particular
stock, including the common pool’s
share of any overage of the overall ACL
caused by excessive catch by other subcomponents of the fishery pursuant to
§ 648.90(a)(5), exceeds the common pool
sub-ACL) and the overall ACL is also
exceeded.
ATLANTIC WOLFFISH TRAWL GEAR AM
AREA
Point
Point
N. Latitude
1 ...........
2 ...........
3 ...........
42°30′ ...............
42°30′ ...............
42°15′ ...............
W. Longitude
W. Longitude
69°40′
69°30′
13:52 Jan 14, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
ATLANTIC WOLFFISH TRAWL GEAR AM
AREA—Continued
70°30′
70°15′
70°15′
Sfmt 4700
Point
4
5
6
7
8
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
N. Latitude
42°15′
42°10′
42°10′
42°20′
42°20′
W. Longitude
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
70°10′
70°10′
70°20′
70°20′
70°30′
ATLANTIC WOLFFISH FIXED GEAR AM
AREA 1
Point
1
2
3
4
...........
...........
...........
...........
N. Latitude
41°40′
41°40′
41°30′
41°30′
W. Longitude
...............
...............
...............
...............
69°40′
69°30′
69°30′
69°40′
ATLANTIC WOLFFISH FIXED GEAR AM
AREA 2
Point
1
2
3
4
...........
...........
...........
...........
*
*
N. Latitude
42°30′
42°30′
42°20′
42°20′
W. Longitude
...............
...............
...............
...............
*
*
70°20′
70°15′
70°15′
70°20′
*
[FR Doc. 2015–00417 Filed 1–14–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 697
[Docket No. 130705590–5010–03]
RIN 0648–BD45
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Atlantic Coastal Fisheries
Cooperative Management Act
Provisions; American Lobster Fishery
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
Based on Atlantic States
Marine Fisheries Commission
recommendations, we are issuing this
final rule enacting Federal American
lobster regulations for Lobster
Conservation Management Areas 2, 3, 4,
and 5, including trap reductions in
Areas 2 and 3, and broodstock
protection measures in Areas 2, 3, 4,
and 5. These measures are intended to
reduce fishing exploitation and reduce
latent effort in the trap fishery to scale
the fishery to the size of the Southern
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\15JAR1.SGM
15JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 10 / Thursday, January 15, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
New England lobster stock. This action
is necessary to ensure fishery
regulations for the lobster fishery in
Federal waters remain consistent with
the intent of the Atlantic Coastal
Fisheries Cooperative Management Act.
DATES: This rule is effective May 1,
2015, except for the amendments to
§ 697.19 which are effective April 30,
2016.
Copies of the American
Lobster Environmental Assessment/
Regulatory Impact Review/Final
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (EA/
RIR/FRFA) prepared for this regulatory
action are available upon written
request to Peter Burns, Fishery Policy
Analyst, Sustainable Fisheries Division,
NMFS, 55 Great Republic Drive,
Gloucester, MA 01930, telephone (978)
281–9144. The documents also are
available online at https://
www.nero.noaa.gov.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Allison Murphy, Sector Policy Analyst,
(978) 281–9122.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Statutory Authority
These final regulations modify
Federal lobster fishery management
measures in the Exclusive Economic
Zone (EEZ) under the authority of
section 803(b) of the Atlantic Coastal
Fisheries Cooperative Management Act
(Atlantic Coastal Act) (16 U.S.C. 5101 et
seq.), which states that in the absence of
an approved and implemented Fishery
Management Plan under the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens
Act) (16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.) and after
consultation with the appropriate
fishery management council(s), the
Secretary of Commerce may implement
regulations to govern fishing in the EEZ,
from 3 to 200 nautical miles (nm)
offshore. The regulations must be: (1)
Compatible with the effective
implementation of an Interstate Fishery
Management Plan (ISFMP) developed
by the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries
Commission; and (2) consistent with the
National Standards set forth in section
301 of the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
Purpose and Need for Management
The purpose of this final action is to
manage the American lobster fishery in
a manner that maximizes resource
sustainability, recognizing that Federal
management occurs in concert with
state management and that
compatibility between state and Federal
measures is crucial to the overall
success of American lobster
management. To achieve this purpose,
we are responding to recently-approved
state management measures to address
poor stock conditions and persistent
recruitment failure of the Southern New
England (SNE) American lobster stock.
Background
The American lobster fishery is
managed by the Commission under
Amendment 3 to the ISFMP for
American Lobster. Since 1997, the
Commission has coordinated the efforts
of the states and Federal Government
toward sustainable management of the
American lobster fishery. We manage
the portion of the fishery conducted in
Federal waters from 3 to 200 miles
offshore, based on management
recommendations made by the
Commission.
The American lobster management
unit is divided between three lobster
stocks and seven Lobster Conservation
Management Areas. Recent data indicate
that the SNE American lobster stock,
which includes all or part of six Areas,
is at a low level of abundance and is
experiencing persistent recruitment
failure, caused by a combination of
environmental factors and continued
fishing mortality. To address the poor
condition of the SNE stock, the
Commission adopted Addendum XVII
to Amendment 3 of the ISFMP in
February of 2012. The measures in
Addendum XVII are intended to reduce
fishing exploitation to the SNE lobster
stock by 10 percent. To further address
stock rebuilding of the SNE lobster
stock, Addendum XVIII was adopted in
August 2012, to reduce latent effort in
the trap fishery and scale the fishery to
the diminished size of the SNE stock
through a series of annual trap
reductions in Areas 2 and 3. Removing
2029
latent effort through trap reductions will
help scale the fishery to the size of the
resource because fishers will have a
reduced number of traps that better
correlates to the reduced size of the SNE
lobster stock. This, in turn, will reduce
fishing pressure on the SNE stock and
reduce exploitation. It will also present
a leaner, more accurate fishing model,
allowing the Commission to better
manage the stock. Copies of the
Addenda are available on the
Commission’s Web site at: https://
www.asmfc.org.
We published a proposed rule (79 FR
43379; July 25, 2014) seeking comment
on proposed broodstock management
measures and trap reductions and the
timing of trap reductions with the trap
transferability program. A full
discussion of the proposed measures
and need for the action are contained in
the proposed rule and not repeated here.
In the next section, we provide a
summary of those measures that were
approved by the Commission.
Approved Measures
To achieve a 10-percent reduction in
fishing exploitation of the SNE
American lobster stock under
Addendum XVII, the Commission
recommended several effort control
measures for Areas 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 to
protect broodstock and reduce the
amount of American lobsters harvested
from these Areas. These measures were
reviewed by the Commission’s scientific
Technical Committee, which found that
these measures would likely achieve the
desired 10-percent reduction in
exploitation. This rule implements the
Commission’s recommended measures,
including: A minimum carapace length
increase; mandatory v-notching of eggbearing female lobsters; and seasonal
fishery closures. We did not propose
measures recommended by the
Commission for Area 6 (mandatory vnotching and a seasonal closure)
because Area 6 is contained entirely
within state waters and is, therefore,
outside of Federal jurisdiction. Table 1
contains the specific measures, by Area,
adopted by the Commission and
implemented through this action.
TABLE 1—ADDENDUM XVII MANAGEMENT MEASURE CHANGES
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Management measures
Area 2
Area 3
Area 4
V-Notching * .......................
Mandatory for legal-sized
egg-bearing females.
n/a .....................................
n/a .....................................
n/a .....................................
Mandatory for legal-sized
egg-bearing females.
n/a .....................................
February 1–March 31 .......
New Minimum Size ...........
Seasonal Closure ..............
317⁄32 in (8.97 cm) .............
n/a .....................................
Area 5
Mandatory for legal-sized
egg-bearing females.
n/a.
February 1–March 31.
* If v-notching is deemed insufficient to meet the conservation objectives, additional seasonal closures may be adopted by the Commission.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:52 Jan 14, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\15JAR1.SGM
15JAR1
2030
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 10 / Thursday, January 15, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
While the harvest of lobsters from
Areas 4 and 5 is prohibited from
February 1 through March 31 each year,
we will allow additional time to remove
and set gear during the closures. Permit
holders will have a 2-week period (i.e.,
through February 14) to remove all
lobster traps from the water. In addition,
permit holders may begin to set lobster
traps 1 week prior to the end of the area
closure (i.e., March 25).
Under Addendum XVIII, the
Commission approved trap reductions
for Areas 2 and 3, following separate
trap reduction schedules. Consistent
with the Commission’s ISFMP and in
response to the Commission’s
recommendations for complementary
management measures to address the
needs of the SNE stock, we proposed to
reduce qualified Area 2 trap allocations
for Federal lobster permit holders by 25
percent on April 30, 2015, the last day
of fishing year 2014. Area 2 allocations
would then have been reduced by 5
percent at the end of each subsequent
fishing year for 5 years, as prescribed by
the Commission. Similarly, we also
proposed to reduce Area 3 trap
allocations by 5 percent on April 30,
2015. Area 3 allocations would then
have been reduced by 5 percent at the
end of each subsequent fishing year for
4 years, as prescribed by the
Commission. Based on the development
and implementation of related actions
and comments received, which are
discussed in greater detail below, we are
implementing trap reductions one year
later, at 11:59 p.m. on April 30, 2016,
the last day of fishing year 2015. Table
2 includes a schedule of trap reductions,
and the resulting trap allocations based
on an initial trap allocation of 800 traps.
TABLE 2—AREA 2 AND 3 TRAP REDUCTION SCHEDULE AND EXAMPLE ALLOCATIONS
Area 2 reductions
(percent)
Effective year
Fishing Year 2014 (present) ....................................................
End of Fishing Year 2015 (Year 1) .........................................
End of Fishing Year 2016 (Year 2) .........................................
End of Fishing Year 2017 (Year 3) .........................................
End of Fishing Year 2018 (Year 4) .........................................
End of Fishing Year 2019 (Year 5) .........................................
End of Fishing Year 2020 (Year 6) .........................................
Area 2 example
allocation *
NA
25
5
5
5
5
5
Area 3 reductions
(percent)
800
600
570
542
515
490
466
NA
5
5
5
5
5
NA
Area 3 example
allocation *
800
760
722
686
652
620
NA
* After applying the specified reduction, resulting allocations are rounded up to the whole trap.
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Related Actions and Implementation
Order
Based on Commission
recommendations, we recently
published a final rule (79 FR 19015;
April 7, 2014), establishing a limited
access program in two lobster
conservation management areas, Area 2
and the Outer Cape Area, and
implementing a lobster Trap Transfer
Program in Areas 2 and 3, and the Outer
Cape Area. That rule did not set an
effective date for the Trap Transfer
Program because it is dependent upon
the completion and effectiveness of the
Commission’s Lobster Trap Allocation
History (LobsTAH) Database. The
LobsTAH Database, which is a
prerequisite to the transfer program,
remains under development by the
Atlantic Coastal Cooperative Statistic
Program (ACCSP). The ACCSP Director
and Project Manager informed us and
the Commission on August 28, 2014,
that the database will not be ready until
some date later in 2015. Upon receiving
that information, the Commission’s
Lobster Board Chairman concluded that
database delays make reducing traps in
the 2015 fishing year impractical, and
he ultimately recommended
implementing trap reductions in fishing
year 2016.
Because the Trap Transfer Program
may ease economic impacts of trap
reductions and provide added
additional business flexibility, we are
scheduling the trap reductions
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:52 Jan 14, 2015
Jkt 235001
mentioned above to become effective at
the same time as the Trap Transfer
Program, as recommended by the
Commission. Specifically, the trap
reductions will become effective at
11:59 p.m. on April 30, 2016, just ahead
of trap transfers that have been
negotiated and approved during fishing
year 2015, but which will not become
effective until 12:01 a.m. on May 1,
2016. Putting the trap reductions and
trap transfers in this order will make it
clearer that the trap transfers will be
based upon an already reduced trap
allocation, thus ensuring the
Commission’s objectives set forth in
Addendum XVIII. This updated
schedule should also allow sufficient
time to finish development, testing, and
deployment of the LobsTAH Database;
adequately inform and prepare industry
for the implementation of these complex
programs; negotiate trap transfers;
reconcile and approve the proposed
transfers; and process permits and trap
tag orders.
We analyzed the relationship between
trap reductions and trap transfers in our
EA. The analysis confirms that the
effectiveness of the approved trap
reductions is dependent upon and
impacted by the availability of the Trap
Transfer Program and that the timing of
the trap reductions and trap transfer
programs is critical. Specifically, both
industry and the Commission indicated
that a trap transfer program was a
necessary precursor to any trap
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
reduction program so that certain
lobster fishers could potentially replace
their reduced traps with transferred
traps. In order to maintain lobster
business viability, industry and the
Commission sought to have trap
reductions and trap transfers occur
contemporaneously so that businesses
did not have to fish at reduced levels for
an extended time period while waiting
for trap transfers to take effect.
Comments and Responses
The proposed rule solicited comments
through August 25, 2014. We received
two letters, one from the Atlantic
Offshore Lobstermen’s Association and
one from a member of the lobster fishing
industry, in response to the proposed
rule. A summary of the comments and
our responses are provided below.
Comment 1: The Atlantic Offshore
Lobstermen’s Association and a member
of the lobster fishing industry expressed
support for the Area 3 minimum gauge
size changes and trap reductions set
forth in the rule. Both commenters
reminded us that the proposed Area 3
trap reductions represented a second
round of trap reductions in Area 3.
Response: The Lobster Board’s
scientific Technical Committee
recommended that the suite of measures
set forth in the rule, including gauge
restrictions and trap reductions, would
help reduce lobster exploitation and
better scale the fishery to the reduced
size of the SNE lobster stock. Area 3
previously underwent a series of trap
E:\FR\FM\15JAR1.SGM
15JAR1
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 10 / Thursday, January 15, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
reductions beginning in 2007 (72 FR
56935, October 2007), which is a
primary reason why the Lobster Board
did not recommend, and we did not
propose, a heightened trap reduction in
Year 1 similar to what is being proposed
in Area 2.
Comment 2: The Atlantic Offshore
Lobstermen’s Association and a member
of the lobster industry recommended
that the trap reductions should occur at
the same time as the Trap Transfer
Program. The commenters suggested
that the trap reductions, without trap
transfers, could bring certain fishers to
unsustainable allocation levels. Trap
transferability, however, gives industry
the flexibility to adjust to the trap
reductions.
Response: We agree to implement the
trap reductions contemporaneously
with the Trap Transfer Program. We
analyzed the impact of trap reductions
in an EA, where we discussed that the
impacts of trap reductions are difficult
to quantify because, although a
business’s fishing power will increase
with more traps, so too will the costs
associated with maintaining, baiting,
and tending higher trap levels. For those
fishers who do not fish their entire
allocation, the pending trap reductions
may simply remove latent traps that are
not being fished and might have little or
no impact to the fishing operation.
Further, if active traps are cut from a
lobster fisher’s allocation, fishers may
attempt to recoup the loss in fishing
power by fishing the remaining traps
more aggressively, i.e., baiting and
tending them more often. Nevertheless,
for a certain unknown group of fishers—
particularly those fishing at maximum
trap levels—the trap reductions will
involve active traps that will negatively
impact the profitability of the business.
The Trap Transfer Program, however,
will allow impacted lobster fishers to
replenish their allocations by
purchasing allocation from another
lobster fisher. Further, the rule will have
trap transfers take effect immediately
after the trap reductions, thus allowing
impacted fishers to quickly mitigate the
reduction without having to fish at a
reduced level for an extended period of
time.
Comment 3: Both the Atlantic
Offshore Lobstermen’s Association and
the member of the lobster fishery hoped
the rule could take effect in 2015,
although neither wanted the rule to take
effect until the Trap Transfer Program
was in place. The Atlantic Offshore
Lobstermen’s Association thought the
proposed rule needed more specificity
on the implementation timeline.
Response: We agree with the need to
implement this rule expeditiously, but
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:52 Jan 14, 2015
Jkt 235001
not at the expense of the underlying
program. For those measures that can be
implemented more speedily—e.g.
broodstock protection measures and
area closures—this rule does so as of the
start of the next fishing year. As noted
above, trap reductions should be
implemented in conjunction with the
Trap Transfer Program, but the
associated LobsTAH Database has yet to
be completed. Comments from the
ACCSP (the entity building the
database) suggest that the database will
not be ready in time for the 2015 fishing
year. Given the importance of the Trap
Transfer Program, we think it imprudent
to rush things in the first year of the
program. The Lobster Board’s plan is to
test the database in the spring of 2015,
then begin the process of allowing trap
transfers in the summer and fall of 2015
to be effective at the start of the 2016
fishing year, which is when the trap
reductions would also take effect.
Comment 4: The Atlantic Offshore
Lobstermen’s Association suggested that
if the trap reductions begin in 2016
instead of 2015, that we double the
reduction in the first year to make up for
the delay.
Response: We will begin to
implement the trap reductions set forth
in this rule at the start of the 2016
fishing year. Doing so does not create a
delay. Addendum XVIII did not set forth
a specific date for the trap reductions,
but rather simply indicated that the
states and NMFS should implement trap
transfers and trap reduction rules at the
same time. Further, the Lobster Board’s
implementation plan does not
contemplate doubling Area 3 trap
reductions in Year 1 (according to a
September 19, 2014, memorandum from
Lobster Board Chairman, Dan
McKiernan, to the Lobster Board) and
the Board’s Technical Committee has
advanced no scientific reason to do so.
Consistency with the states is crucial,
particularly when traps are to be
transferred (see our Trap Transferability
FEIS dated December 2013). As such,
we will reduce traps at the end of
fishing year 2015, consistent with the
states, as set forth in this rule.
Changes From the Proposed Rule
We made one change from the
proposed rule in this action. Instead of
implementing trap reductions for Areas
2 and 3 on April 30, 2015, for the
reasons described in the preamble and
in response to Comment 3, we are
implementing trap reductions one year
later, at 11:59 p.m. on April 30, 2016,
the last day of fishing year 2015.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2031
Classification
This final rule has been determined to
be not significant for the purposes of
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866.
This final rule does not contain
policies with federalism implications as
defined in E.O. 13132. The approved
measures are based upon the American
Lobster ISFMP that was created by and
is overseen by the states. These
measures are a result of Addenda XVII
and XVIII, which was approved by the
states, recommended by the states
through the Commission for Federal
adoption, and is in place at the state
level. Consequently, NMFS has
consulted with the states in the creation
of the ISFMP, which makes
recommendations for Federal action.
Additionally, these approved measures
would not pre-empt state law and
would do nothing to directly regulate
the states.
This final rule does not contain a
collection of information requirement
subject to review and approval by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA).
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
5 U.S.C. 601–612, requires agencies to
assess the economic impacts of their
proposed regulations on small entities.
The objective of the RFA is to consider
the impacts of a rulemaking on small
entities, and the capacity of those
affected by regulations to bear the direct
and indirect costs of regulation. A Final
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA)
was prepared for this final rule, as
required by section 604 of the RFA. The
FRFA consists of the Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (IRFA), the relevant
portions of the proposed rule describing
the proposed management measures, the
corresponding analysis in the EA
prepared for this action, and the
responses to public comments included
in this final rule. A copy of this analysis
is available from NMFS (see
ADDRESSES).
The Objectives and Legal Basis for the
Action
The objective of this action is to
reduce fishing exploitation and reduce
latent effort in the trap fishery to scale
the fishery to the size of the SNE lobster
stock. The legal basis for the action is
the ISFMP for American lobster and our
statutory authority to manage coastal
fisheries under the Atlantic Coastal
Fisheries Cooperative Management Act
at 16 U.S.C. 5101, et seq.
Summary of Public Comments
No public comments were received
pertaining directly to the economic
effects of this rule.
E:\FR\FM\15JAR1.SGM
15JAR1
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
2032
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 10 / Thursday, January 15, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Description and Estimate of the Number
of Small Entities To Which the Rule
Would Apply
The recent addition of vessel owner
information to the permit data allows us
to better define fishing ‘‘businesses.’’
The vessel ownership data identify all
the individual people who own fishing
vessels. Vessels can be grouped together
according to common owners, which
can then be treated as a fishing business
for purposes of RFA analyses. Revenues
summed across all vessels in the group
and the activities that generate those
revenues form the basis for determining
whether the entity is a large or small
business. Ownership data are available
for those entities potentially impacted
by the action from 2010 onward.
The RFA recognizes and defines three
kinds of small entities: Small
businesses; small organizations; and
small governmental jurisdictions. The
Small Business Administration (SBA)
size standards define whether a
business entity is small and, thus,
eligible for Government programs and
preferences reserved for ‘‘small
business’’ concerns. Size standards have
been established (and recently
modified) for all for-profit economic
activities or industries in the North
American Industry Classification
System (NAICS). Designations of large
and small entities were attached based
on each entity’s 3-year average landings.
When the IRFA was completed, the
threshold for ‘‘large’’ was $5.0 million
for entities landing a plurality of
revenue in shellfish (NAICS 111412).
For entities landing a plurality of
revenue in finfish (NAICS 111411), the
threshold for ‘‘large’’ was $19.0 million.
On June 12, 2014, the Small Business
Administration (SBA) issued an interim
final rule (79 FR 33467; June 12, 2014)
revising the small business size
standards for several industries effective
July 14, 2014. The rule increased the
size standard from $19.0 to $20.5
million for finfish fishing, from $5 to
$5.5 million for shellfish fishing, and
from $7.0 million to $7.5 million for
other marine fishing, for-hire
businesses, and marinas.
The number of directly regulated
entities for purposes of analyzing the
economic impacts and describing those
that are small businesses is selected
based on permits held. Because these
approved regulations apply only to the
businesses which fish in the four areas
managed by the conservation measures
being amended, only those business
entities are evaluated. Business entities
that do not own vessels with directly
regulated permits are not described.
Based on this approach, NMFS
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:52 Jan 14, 2015
Jkt 235001
determined that there are 379 distinct
entities identified that are directly
regulated entities under this action,
those that fished in Areas 2, 3, 4 or 5,
or some combination between June 1,
2011, and May 31, 2012.
When the IRFA was prepared, 373 of
the 379 entities were classified as
‘‘small,’’ while the remaining 6 were
classified as ‘‘large.’’ All six of the large
businesses were designated as shellfish.
Under the updated SBA size standard,
374 of the 379 entities are classified as
‘‘small,’’ while the remaining 5 are
classified as ‘‘large.’’ We have reviewed
the analyses prepared for this action in
light of the new size standards and find
that the number of small entities subject
to this action increased by one. Since
this is not a significant increase, we do
not think that the new size standards
affect the analyses, and therefore are
relying on the analysis previously
conducted for the IRFA in the FRFA.
Until further guidance is provided, for
RFA analyses, business entities are
classified into the SBA defined
categories based on which activity, in
the most recent year, produced the
greatest gross revenue. An advantage of
this approach is that entities are defined
as large or small one time for the
duration of a year, maintaining action to
action consistency. As far as
determining whether a business is large
or small, once its major activity is
determined (based on 2012) the average
total revenue from all activities over the
most recent 3 years (2010–2012) is
applied against the appropriate
threshold.
Of the 373 small entities determined
to be small entities, 180 are considered
a shellfish business, 121 are considered
a finfish business, 3 are considered a
for-hire business, and 69 could not be
identified as either because even though
they had a lobster permit (in Areas 2, 3,
4, or 5), they had no earned revenue
from fishing activity. Because they had
no revenue in the last 3 years, they
would be considered small by default,
but would also be considered as latent
effort.
Many of these ownership entities
maintain diversified harvest portfolios,
obtaining gross sales from many
fisheries and not dependent on any one.
However, not all are equally diversified.
Those that depend most heavily on sales
from harvesting species impacted
directly by the action are most likely to
be affected. By defining dependence as
deriving greater than 50-percent of gross
sales from sales of lobster, we are able
to identify those ownership groups most
likely to be impacted by the approved
regulations. Using this threshold, we
find that of the 373 small regulated
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
entities under this rule, 180 of them are
lobster-dependent.
While considering the number of
affected entities, it is also worth noting
that the vast majority of permit holders
are either dually permitted (i.e., issued
both a Federal and state permit) or
otherwise subject to a state’s lobster
regulations. Accordingly, most all
Federal permit holders will be required
to comply with the approved measures
even if we did not implement them. In
other words, these Federal permit
holders will be obligated to comply with
these measures and responsibilities
attendant to their state permit regardless
of whether these same measures are also
required under their Federal permit.
Reporting, Recordkeeping and Other
Compliance Requirements
This action contains no new
collection-of-information, reporting, or
recordkeeping requirements.
Descriptions of Significant Alternatives
Which Minimize any Significant
Economic Impact of Proposed Action on
Small Entities
Due to the expected high rate of dual
permitting and that the states are
already compliant with broodstock
measures, the majority of Federal
vessels must already abide by these
requirements, and therefore have
already been impacted. For those
vessels not dually permitted, broodstock
measures are expected to have a limited
economic impact to permit holders.
Because the approved regulations are
consistent with Commission
recommendations and current state
regulations, developing alternative
measures would likely create
inconsistencies and regulatory
disconnects with the states and would,
therefore, likely worsen potential
economic impacts. Therefore, no
alternatives to broodstock measures
were considered.
Because the Trap Transfer Program
may ease economic impacts of trap
reductions and provide added
additional business flexibility, we are
implementing trap reductions at the
same time as the Trap Transfer Program,
as recommended by the Commission. In
other words, we have timed the trap
reductions so that fishers will be able to
activate their transferred traps moments
after their allocation is reduced. In this
way, fishers will not have to fish with
reduced traps while waiting for their
transferred traps to become allocated.
This could mitigate the impacts of the
trap reductions because fishers would
be able to transfer traps based on their
reduced allocation, prior to the
reductions becoming effective. They
E:\FR\FM\15JAR1.SGM
15JAR1
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 10 / Thursday, January 15, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
could buy traps before the reductions
take effect and minimize the impacts to
their businesses resulting from the trap
reductions. To further mitigate trap
reductions, a permit holder could also
choose to tend his or her remaining
traps more often in an attempt to harvest
more lobsters and recover income lost
from the trap reductions. When
considered in conjunction with trap
transferability, permit holders
remaining in the fishery may be able to
transfer in traps up to their original trap
cap (i.e., transfer in traps to make up for
traps lost through trap reductions).
Though this will require capital, the
ability to acquire additional traps may
help another set of permit holders
compensate for trap reductions. Finally,
the permit holders who elect to leave
the fishery and transfer out traps will be
compensated immediately by those
fishers purchasing traps.
As discussed in greater detail in the
EA, we considered but rejected several
other trap reduction alternatives for
Lobster Conservation Management
Areas 2 and 3, the only Areas where
trap reductions were considered. For
these management areas, we considered
the following approaches: (1) Where
trap reductions are theoretically
approved 6 months before trap transfers,
(2) where trap reductions are
theoretically approved 6 months after
trap transfers, and (3) where trap
reductions and trap transferability
during a given fishing year, rather than
at the start of a fishing year. Under
either scenario where trap reductions
and trap transfers were approved out-ofsync by 6 months, some permit holders
would be prevented from participating
in the Trap Transfer Program following
trap reductions, resulting in potential
loss of economic opportunity, until
additional traps could be required. For
permit holders whose business model is
predicated on fishing at the trap cap,
they would be forced to fish at reduced
and presumably unprofitable levels for
nearly half the fishing year. Under the
scenario where trap reductions and trap
transfers were during a given fishing
year, a fisher’s financial investment
would be doubled, as a second set of
permits and trap tags would be required,
in addition to the set that was required
to start the fishing year. Because these
alternatives may have increase
economic impacts, they were rejected in
favor of the approved measures, which
minimize any significant economic
impact.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:52 Jan 14, 2015
Jkt 235001
Duplication, Overlap or Conflict With
Other Federal Rules
This action does not duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with any other
Federal Laws.
Small Entity Compliance Guide
Section 212 of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 states that, for each rule or group
of related rules for which an agency is
required to prepare a FRFA, the agency
shall publish one or more guides to
assist small entities in complying with
the rule, and shall designate such
publications as ‘‘small entity
compliance guides.’’ The agency shall
explain the actions a small entity is
required to take to comply with a rule
or group of rules. As part of this
rulemaking process, we will send a
small entity compliance guide to all
Federal permit holders affected by this
action. In addition, copies of this final
rule and guide (i.e., information
bulletin) are available from NMFS (see
ADDRESSES) and at the following Web
site: https://www.nero.noaa.gov/sfd/
sfdmulti.html.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 697
Fisheries, Fishing.
Dated: January 8, 2015.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 697 is amended
as follows:
PART 697—ATLANTIC COASTAL
FISHERIES COOPERATIVE
MANAGEMENT
1. The authority citation for part 697
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 5101 et seq.
2. In § 697.2, in paragraph (a), add the
definitions of ‘‘Federal Area 1 Limited
Access Program,’’ ‘‘Federal Area 2
Limited Access Program,’’ ‘‘Federal
Area 3 Limited Access Program,’’
‘‘Federal Area 4 Limited Access
Program,’’ ‘‘Federal Area 5 Limited
Access Program,’’ and ‘‘Federal Outer
Cape Area Limited Access Program’’ in
alphabetical order to read as follows:
■
§ 697.2
Definitions.
(a) * * *
*
*
*
*
*
Federal Area 1 Limited Access
Program means the limited access
program restricts trap fishing in Area 1
to those Federal lobster permits with
qualified and allocated Area 1 traps, as
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2033
identified in these regulations at
§ 697.4(a)(7)(ii).
Federal Area 2 Limited Access
Program means the limited access
program restricts trap fishing in Area 2
to those Federal lobster permits with
qualified and allocated Area 2 traps, as
identified in these regulations at
§ 697.4(a)(7)(ii).
Federal Area 3 Limited Access
Program means the limited access
program restricts trap fishing in Area 3
to those Federal lobster permits with
qualified and allocated Area 3 traps, as
identified in these regulations at
§ 697.4(a)(7)(ii).
Federal Area 4 Limited Access
Program means the limited access
program restricts trap fishing in Area 4
to those Federal lobster permits with
qualified and allocated Area 4 traps, as
identified in these regulations at
§ 697.4(a)(7)(ii).
Federal Area 5 Limited Access
Program means the limited access
program restricts trap fishing in Area 5
to those Federal lobster permits with
qualified and allocated Area 5 traps, as
identified in these regulations at
§ 697.4(a)(7)(ii).
Federal Outer Cape Area Limited
Access Program means the limited
access program restricts trap fishing in
the Outer Cape Area to those Federal
lobster permits with qualified and
allocated Outer Cape Area traps, as
identified in these regulations at
§ 697.4(a)(7)(ii).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In § 697.7, revise paragraphs
(c)(1)(xxx) and (c)(3)(iii) to read as
follows:
§ 697.7
Prohibitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(xxx) Seasonal closures. The
following areas are closed seasonally to
lobster fishing.
(A) Outer Cape Area seasonal closure.
The Federal waters of the Outer Cape
Area shall be closed to lobster fishing
with traps by Federal lobster permit
holders from February 1 through March
31.
(1) Lobster fishing with traps is
prohibited in the Outer Cape Area
during this seasonal closure. Federal
trap fishers are prohibited from
possessing or landing lobster taken from
the Outer Cape Area during the seasonal
closure.
(2) All lobster traps must be removed
from Outer Cape Area waters before the
start of the seasonal closure and may not
be re-deployed into Outer Cape Area
waters until after the seasonal closure
E:\FR\FM\15JAR1.SGM
15JAR1
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
2034
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 10 / Thursday, January 15, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
ends. Federal trap fishers are prohibited
from setting, hauling, storing,
abandoning, or in any way leaving their
traps in Outer Cape Area waters during
this seasonal closure. Federal lobster
permit holders are prohibited from
possessing or carrying lobster traps
aboard a vessel in Outer Cape Area
waters during this seasonal closure
unless the vessel is transiting through
the Outer Cape Area pursuant to
paragraph (c)(1)(xxx)(A)(4) of this
section.
(3) The Outer Cape Area seasonal
closure relates only to the Outer Cape
Area. The restrictive provisions of
§§ 697.3 and 697.4(a)(7)(v) do not apply
to this closure. Federal lobster permit
holders with an Outer Cape Area
designation and another Lobster
Management Area designation on their
Federal lobster permits would not have
to similarly remove their lobster gear
from the other designated management
areas.
(4) Transiting Outer Cape Area.
Federal lobster permit holders may
possess lobster traps on their vessels in
the Outer Cape Area during the seasonal
closure only if:
(i) The trap gear is stowed; and
(ii) The vessel is transiting the Outer
Cape Area. For the purposes of this
section, transiting shall mean passing
through the Outer Cape Area without
stopping to reach a destination outside
the Outer Cape Area.
(5) The Regional Administrator may
authorize a permit holder or vessel
owner to haul ashore lobster traps from
the Outer Cape Area during the seasonal
closure without having to engage in the
exempted fishing process in § 697.22, if
the permit holder or vessel owner can
establish the following:
(i) That the lobster traps were not able
to be hauled ashore before the seasonal
closure due to incapacity, vessel/
mechanical inoperability, and/or poor
weather; and
(ii) That all lobsters caught in the
subject traps will be immediately
returned to the sea.
(iii) The Regional Administrator may
condition this authorization as
appropriate in order to maintain the
overall integrity of the closure.
(B) Area 4 seasonal closure. The
Federal waters of Area 4 shall be closed
to lobster fishing from February 1
through March 31.
(1) Lobster fishing is prohibited in
Area 4 during this seasonal closure.
Federal lobster permit holders are
prohibited from possessing or landing
lobster taken from Area 4 during the
seasonal closure.
(2) All lobster traps must be removed
from Area 4 waters before the start of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:52 Jan 14, 2015
Jkt 235001
the seasonal closure and may not be redeployed into Area 4 waters until after
the seasonal closure ends. Federal trap
fishers are prohibited from setting,
hauling, storing, abandoning, or in any
way leaving their traps in Area 4 waters
during this seasonal closure. The
following exceptions apply to the Area
4 seasonal closure:
(i) Lobster fishers will have a 2-week
grace period from February 1 to
February 14 to remove all lobster gear
from the closed area. During this grace
period, any hauled trap must not be reset and must be removed from the area.
Any lobsters taken from traps during
this grace period must be returned to the
sea immediately and any Federal lobster
permit holder retrieving Area 4 traps
during this grace period is prohibited
from possessing on board any lobster
regardless of the area from which the
lobster may have been harvested.
(ii) Lobster fishers have a 1-week
grace period from March 24 to March 31
to re-set gear in the closed area. During
this grace period, re-set traps may not be
re-hauled and any Federal lobster
permit holder re-setting Area 4 traps
during this grace period is prohibited
from possessing on board any lobster
regardless of the area from which the
lobster may have been harvested.
(3) Federal lobster permit holders are
prohibited from possessing or carrying
lobster traps aboard a vessel in Area 4
waters during this seasonal closure
unless the vessel is operating subject to
the grace period identified in paragraph
(c)(1)(xxx)(B)(2)(ii) of this section or is
transiting through Area 4 pursuant to
paragraph (c)(1)(xxx)(B)(5) of this
section.
(4) The Area 4 seasonal closure relates
only to Area 4. The restrictive
provisions of §§ 697.3 and 697.4(a)(7)(v)
do not apply to this closure. Federal
lobster permit holders with an Area 4
designation and another Lobster
Management Area designation on their
Federal lobster permits would not have
to similarly remove their lobster gear
from the other designated management
areas.
(5) Transiting Area 4. Federal lobster
permit holders may possess lobster traps
on their vessels in Area 4 during the
seasonal closure only if:
(i) The trap gear is stowed; and
(ii) The vessel is transiting the Area 4.
For the purposes of this section,
transiting shall mean passing through
Area 4 without stopping, to reach a
destination outside Area 4.
(6) The Regional Administrator may
authorize a permit holder or vessel
owner to haul ashore lobster traps from
Area 4 during the seasonal closure
without having to engage in the
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
exempted fishing process in § 697.22, if
the permit holder or vessel owner can
establish the following:
(i) That the lobster traps were not able
to be hauled ashore before the seasonal
closure due to incapacity, vessel/
mechanical inoperability, and/or poor
weather; and
(ii) That all lobsters caught in the
subject traps will be immediately
returned to the sea.
(iii) The Regional Administrator may
condition this authorization as
appropriate in order to maintain the
overall integrity of the closure.
(C) Area 5 seasonal closure. The
Federal waters of Area 5 shall be closed
to lobster fishing from February 1
through March 31.
(1) Lobster fishing is prohibited in
Area 5 during this seasonal closure.
Federal lobster permit holders are
prohibited from possessing or landing
lobster taken from Area 5 during the
seasonal closure.
(2) All lobster traps must be removed
from Area 5 waters before the start of
the seasonal closure and may not be redeployed into Area 5 waters until after
the seasonal closure ends. Federal trap
fishers are prohibited from setting,
hauling, storing, abandoning, or in any
way leaving their traps in Area 5 waters
during this seasonal closure. The
following exceptions apply to the Area
5 seasonal closure:
(i) Lobster fishers will have a 2-week
grace period from February 1 to
February 14 to remove all lobster gear
from the closed area. During this grace
period, any hauled trap must not be reset and must be removed from the area.
Any lobsters taken from traps during
this grace period must be returned to the
sea immediately and any Federal lobster
permit holder retrieving Area 5 traps
during this grace period is prohibited
from possessing on board any lobster
regardless of the area from which the
lobster may have been harvested.
(ii) Lobster fishers have a 1-week
grace period from March 24 to March 31
to re-set gear in the closed area. During
this grace period, re-set traps may not be
re-hauled and any Federal lobster
permit holder re-setting Area 5 traps
during this grace period is prohibited
from possessing on board any lobster
regardless of the area from which the
lobster may have been harvested.
(3) Federal lobster permit holders are
prohibited from possessing or carrying
lobster traps aboard a vessel in Area 5
waters during this seasonal closure
unless the vessel operating subject to
the grace period identified in paragraph
(c)(1)(xxx)(C)(2)(ii) of this section (ii) or
is transiting through Area 5 pursuant to
E:\FR\FM\15JAR1.SGM
15JAR1
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 10 / Thursday, January 15, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
paragraph (c)(1)(xxx)(C)(5) of this
section.
(4) The Area 5 seasonal closure relates
only to Area 5. The restrictive
provisions of §§ 697.3 and 697.4(a)(7)(v)
do not apply to this closure. Federal
lobster permit holders with an Area 5
designation and another Lobster
Management Area designation on their
Federal lobster permits would not have
to similarly remove their lobster gear
from the other designated management
areas.
(5) Transiting Area 5. Federal lobster
permit holders may possess lobster traps
on their vessels in Area 5 during the
seasonal closure only if:
(i) The trap gear is stowed; and
(ii) The vessel is transiting the Area 5.
For the purposes of this section,
transiting shall mean passing through
Area 5 without stopping, to reach a
destination outside Area 5.
(6) The Regional Administrator may
authorize a permit holder or vessel
owner to haul ashore lobster traps from
Area 5 during the seasonal closure
without having to engage in the
exempted fishing process in § 697.22, if
the permit holder or vessel owner can
establish the following:
(i) That the lobster traps were not able
to be hauled ashore before the seasonal
closure due to incapacity, vessel/
mechanical inoperability, and/or poor
weather; and
(ii) That all lobsters caught in the
subject traps will be immediately
returned to the sea.
(iii) The Regional Administrator may
condition this authorization as
appropriate in order to maintain the
overall integrity of the closure.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) * * *
(iii) The possession of egg-bearing
female lobsters in violation of the
requirements set forth in § 697.20(d), vnotched female American lobsters in
violation of the v-notch requirements set
forth in § 697.20(g), American lobsters
that are smaller than the minimum sizes
set forth in § 697.20(a), American
lobsters that are larger than the
maximum carapace sizes set forth in
§ 697.20(b), or lobster parts, possessed at
or prior to the time when the
aforementioned lobsters or parts are
received by a dealer, will be prima facie
evidence that such American lobsters or
parts were taken or imported in
violation of these regulations. A
preponderance of all submitted
evidence that such American lobsters
were harvested by a vessel not holding
a permit under this part and fishing
exclusively within state or foreign
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:52 Jan 14, 2015
Jkt 235001
waters will be sufficient to rebut the
presumption.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. In § 697.19, revise paragraphs (b)
through (k) and add paragraph (l) to
read as follows:
§ 697.19 Trap limits and trap tag
requirements for vessels fishing with
lobster traps.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Area 2 trap limits. The Area 2 trap
limit is 800 traps. Federally permitted
lobster fishing vessels may only fish
with traps that have been previously
qualified and allocated into Area 2 by
the Regional Administrator, as part of
the Federal Area 2 Limited Access
Program. This allocation may be
modified by trap cuts and/or trap
transfers, but in no case shall the
allocation exceed the trap limit.
(c) Area 3 trap limits. The Area 3 trap
limit is 1,945 traps. Federally permitted
lobster fishing vessels may only fish
with traps that have been previously
qualified and allocated into Area 3 by
the Regional Administrator, as part of
the Federal Area 3 Limited Access
Program. This allocation may be
modified by trap cuts and/or trap
transfers, but in no case shall the
allocation exceed the trap limit.
(d) Area 4 trap limits. The Area 4 trap
limit is 1,440 traps. Federally permitted
lobster fishing vessels may only fish
with traps that have been previously
qualified and allocated into Area 4 by
the Regional Administrator, as part of
the Federal Area 4 Limited Access
Program. This allocation may be
modified by trap cuts and/or trap
transfers, but in no case shall the
allocation exceed the trap limit.
(e) Area 5 trap limits. The Area 5 trap
limit is 1,440 traps, unless the vessel is
operating under an Area 5 Trap Waiver
permit issued under § 697.26. Federally
permitted lobster fishing vessels may
only fish with traps that have been
previously qualified and allocated into
Area 5 by the Regional Administrator, as
part of the Federal Area 5 Limited
Access Program. This allocation may be
modified by trap cuts and/or trap
transfers, but in no case shall the
allocation exceed the trap limit.
(f) Outer Cape Area. The Outer Cape
Area trap limit is 800 traps. Federally
permitted lobster fishing vessels may
only fish with traps that have been
previously qualified and allocated into
the Outer Cape Area by the Regional
Administrator, as part of the Federal
Outer Cape Cod Area Limited Access
Program. This allocation may be
modified by trap cuts and/or trap
transfers, but in no case shall the
allocation exceed the trap limit.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2035
(g) Trap cuts. Trap allocations shall be
reduced in the following Areas as set
forth below:
(1) Area 2 allocations shall be reduced
according to the following schedule:
Area 2
reductions
(percent)
Effective year of
trap reduction
April
April
April
April
April
April
30,
30,
30,
30,
30,
30,
2016,
2017,
2018,
2019,
2020,
2021,
11:59
11:59
11:59
11:59
11:59
11:59
p.m.
p.m.
p.m.
p.m.
p.m.
p.m.
....
....
....
....
....
....
25
5
5
5
5
5
(2) Area 3 allocations shall be reduced
according to the following schedule:
Area 3
reductions
(percent)
Effective year of
trap reduction
April
April
April
April
April
30,
30,
30,
30,
30,
2016,
2017,
2018,
2019,
2020,
11:59
11:59
11:59
11:59
11:59
p.m.
p.m.
p.m.
p.m.
p.m.
....
....
....
....
....
5
5
5
5
5
(h) Lobster trap limits for vessels
fishing or authorized to fish in more
than one EEZ management area. A
vessel owner who elects to fish in more
than one EEZ Management Area is
restricted to the lowest trap cap and/or
trap allocation of all the areas
designated on the permit and may not
fish with, deploy in, possess in, or haul
back from any of those elected
management areas more lobster traps
than the lowest number of lobster traps
allocated to that vessel for any one
elected management area.
(i) Conservation equivalent trap limits
in New Hampshire state waters.
Notwithstanding any other provision,
any vessel with a Federal lobster permit
and a New Hampshire Full Commercial
Lobster license may fish up to a
maximum of 1,200 lobster traps in New
Hampshire state waters, to the extent
authorized by New Hampshire lobster
fishery regulations. However, such
vessel may not fish, possess, deploy, or
haul back more than 800 lobster traps in
the Federal waters of EEZ Nearshore
Management Area 1, and may not fish
more than a combined total of 1,200
lobster traps in the Federal and New
Hampshire state waters portions of EEZ
Nearshore Management Area 1.
(j) Trap Tag Requirements for vessels
fishing with lobster traps. All lobster
traps in Federal waters must have a
valid Federal lobster trap tag
permanently attached to the trap bridge
or central cross-member. Federal lobster
permit holders are eligible to receive
Area 1 trap tags only if the Regional
Administrator has qualified the permit
E:\FR\FM\15JAR1.SGM
15JAR1
2036
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 10 / Thursday, January 15, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
to fish in Area 1 as part of the Federal
Area 1 Limited Entry Program. Federal
lobster permit holders are eligible to
receive Area 2, 3, 4, 5, and/or Outer
Cape Area trap tags only if the Regional
Administrator has allocated those traps
as part of the Federal Area 2, 3, 4, 5,
and/or Outer Cape Area Limited Access
Program. Any vessel with a Federal
lobster permit may not possess, deploy,
or haul back lobster traps in any portion
of any lobster management area that do
not have a valid, federally recognized
trap tag permanently attached to the
trap bridge or central cross-member.
(k) Maximum lobster trap tags
authorized for direct purchase. In any
fishing year, the maximum number of
tags authorized for direct purchase by
each permit holder is the applicable trap
limit specified in paragraphs (a) through
(f) of this section plus an additional 10
percent to cover trap loss.
(l) EEZ Management Area 5 trap
waiver exemption. Any vessel issued an
Area 5 Trap Waiver permit under
§ 697.4(p) is exempt from the provisions
of this section.
■ 5. In § 697.20, revise paragraphs (a)(5)
through (8), (b)(5) and (6), (d)(1) and (2),
(g)(3) and (4) and remove paragraphs
(b)(7) and (8) and (g)(5) through (8) to
read as follows:
§ 697.20 Size, harvesting and landing
requirements.
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
(a) * * *
(5) Through April 30, 2015, the
minimum carapace length for all
American lobsters harvested in or from
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:52 Jan 14, 2015
Jkt 235001
the Offshore Management Area 3 is 31⁄2
inches (8.89 cm).
(6) Through April 30, 2015, the
minimum carapace length for all
American lobsters landed, harvested or
possessed by vessels issued a Federal
limited access American lobster permit
fishing in or electing to fish in EEZ
Offshore Management Area 3 is 31⁄2
inches (8.89 cm).
(7) Effective May 1, 2015, the
minimum carapace length for all
American lobsters harvested in or from
the Offshore Management Area 3 is
317⁄32 inches (8.97 cm).
(8) Effective May 1, 2015, the
minimum carapace length for all
American lobsters landed, harvested, or
possessed by vessels issued a Federal
limited access American lobster permit
fishing in or electing to fish in EEZ
Offshore Management Area 3 is 317⁄32
inches (8.97 cm).
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(5) The maximum carapace length for
all American lobster harvested in or
from EEZ Offshore Management Area 3
or the Outer Cape Lobster Management
Area is 63⁄4 inches (17.15 cm).
(6) The maximum carapace length for
all American lobster landed, harvested,
or possessed by vessels issued a Federal
limited access American lobster permit
fishing in or electing to fish in EEZ
Offshore Management Area 3 or the
Outer Cape Lobster Management Area is
63⁄4 inches (17.15 cm).
(d) * * *
(1) Any berried female lobster
harvested in or from the EEZ must be
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
returned to the sea immediately. If any
berried female lobster is harvested in or
from the EEZ Nearshore Management
Areas 1, 2, 4, or 5, or in or from the EEZ
Offshore Management Area 3, north of
42° 30′ North latitude, it must be vnotched before being returned to sea
immediately.
(2) Any berried female lobster
harvested or possessed by a vessel
issued a Federal limited access lobster
permit must be returned to the sea
immediately. If any berried female
lobster is harvested in or from the EEZ
Nearshore Management Areas 1, 2, 4, or
5, or in or from the EEZ Offshore
Management Area 3, north of 42° 30′
North latitude, it must be v-notched
before being returned to sea
immediately.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) * * *
(3) No person may possess any female
lobster possessing a standard v-shaped
notch harvested in or from the EEZ
Nearshore Management Area 2, 4, 5, 6,
Outer Cape Area, or the EEZ Offshore
Management Area 3.
(4) No vessel, owner, or operator
issued a Federal limited access
American lobster permit fishing in or
electing to fish in the EEZ Nearshore
Management Area 2, 4, 5, 6, Outer Cape
Area, or the EEZ Offshore Management
Area 3 may land, harvest or possess any
female lobster possessing a standard vshaped notch.
[FR Doc. 2015–00421 Filed 1–14–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\15JAR1.SGM
15JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 10 (Thursday, January 15, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2028-2036]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00421]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 697
[Docket No. 130705590-5010-03]
RIN 0648-BD45
Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Coastal
Fisheries Cooperative Management Act Provisions; American Lobster
Fishery
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Based on Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission
recommendations, we are issuing this final rule enacting Federal
American lobster regulations for Lobster Conservation Management Areas
2, 3, 4, and 5, including trap reductions in Areas 2 and 3, and
broodstock protection measures in Areas 2, 3, 4, and 5. These measures
are intended to reduce fishing exploitation and reduce latent effort in
the trap fishery to scale the fishery to the size of the Southern
[[Page 2029]]
New England lobster stock. This action is necessary to ensure fishery
regulations for the lobster fishery in Federal waters remain consistent
with the intent of the Atlantic Coastal Fisheries Cooperative
Management Act.
DATES: This rule is effective May 1, 2015, except for the amendments to
Sec. 697.19 which are effective April 30, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the American Lobster Environmental Assessment/
Regulatory Impact Review/Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (EA/RIR/
FRFA) prepared for this regulatory action are available upon written
request to Peter Burns, Fishery Policy Analyst, Sustainable Fisheries
Division, NMFS, 55 Great Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930,
telephone (978) 281-9144. The documents also are available online at
https://www.nero.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Allison Murphy, Sector Policy Analyst,
(978) 281-9122.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Statutory Authority
These final regulations modify Federal lobster fishery management
measures in the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) under the authority of
section 803(b) of the Atlantic Coastal Fisheries Cooperative Management
Act (Atlantic Coastal Act) (16 U.S.C. 5101 et seq.), which states that
in the absence of an approved and implemented Fishery Management Plan
under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act) (16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.) and after consultation
with the appropriate fishery management council(s), the Secretary of
Commerce may implement regulations to govern fishing in the EEZ, from 3
to 200 nautical miles (nm) offshore. The regulations must be: (1)
Compatible with the effective implementation of an Interstate Fishery
Management Plan (ISFMP) developed by the Atlantic States Marine
Fisheries Commission; and (2) consistent with the National Standards
set forth in section 301 of the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
Purpose and Need for Management
The purpose of this final action is to manage the American lobster
fishery in a manner that maximizes resource sustainability, recognizing
that Federal management occurs in concert with state management and
that compatibility between state and Federal measures is crucial to the
overall success of American lobster management. To achieve this
purpose, we are responding to recently-approved state management
measures to address poor stock conditions and persistent recruitment
failure of the Southern New England (SNE) American lobster stock.
Background
The American lobster fishery is managed by the Commission under
Amendment 3 to the ISFMP for American Lobster. Since 1997, the
Commission has coordinated the efforts of the states and Federal
Government toward sustainable management of the American lobster
fishery. We manage the portion of the fishery conducted in Federal
waters from 3 to 200 miles offshore, based on management
recommendations made by the Commission.
The American lobster management unit is divided between three
lobster stocks and seven Lobster Conservation Management Areas. Recent
data indicate that the SNE American lobster stock, which includes all
or part of six Areas, is at a low level of abundance and is
experiencing persistent recruitment failure, caused by a combination of
environmental factors and continued fishing mortality. To address the
poor condition of the SNE stock, the Commission adopted Addendum XVII
to Amendment 3 of the ISFMP in February of 2012. The measures in
Addendum XVII are intended to reduce fishing exploitation to the SNE
lobster stock by 10 percent. To further address stock rebuilding of the
SNE lobster stock, Addendum XVIII was adopted in August 2012, to reduce
latent effort in the trap fishery and scale the fishery to the
diminished size of the SNE stock through a series of annual trap
reductions in Areas 2 and 3. Removing latent effort through trap
reductions will help scale the fishery to the size of the resource
because fishers will have a reduced number of traps that better
correlates to the reduced size of the SNE lobster stock. This, in turn,
will reduce fishing pressure on the SNE stock and reduce exploitation.
It will also present a leaner, more accurate fishing model, allowing
the Commission to better manage the stock. Copies of the Addenda are
available on the Commission's Web site at: https://www.asmfc.org.
We published a proposed rule (79 FR 43379; July 25, 2014) seeking
comment on proposed broodstock management measures and trap reductions
and the timing of trap reductions with the trap transferability
program. A full discussion of the proposed measures and need for the
action are contained in the proposed rule and not repeated here. In the
next section, we provide a summary of those measures that were approved
by the Commission.
Approved Measures
To achieve a 10-percent reduction in fishing exploitation of the
SNE American lobster stock under Addendum XVII, the Commission
recommended several effort control measures for Areas 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6
to protect broodstock and reduce the amount of American lobsters
harvested from these Areas. These measures were reviewed by the
Commission's scientific Technical Committee, which found that these
measures would likely achieve the desired 10-percent reduction in
exploitation. This rule implements the Commission's recommended
measures, including: A minimum carapace length increase; mandatory v-
notching of egg-bearing female lobsters; and seasonal fishery closures.
We did not propose measures recommended by the Commission for Area 6
(mandatory v-notching and a seasonal closure) because Area 6 is
contained entirely within state waters and is, therefore, outside of
Federal jurisdiction. Table 1 contains the specific measures, by Area,
adopted by the Commission and implemented through this action.
Table 1--Addendum XVII Management Measure Changes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Management measures Area 2 Area 3 Area 4 Area 5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
V-Notching *.................... Mandatory for n/a............... Mandatory for Mandatory for
legal-sized egg- legal-sized egg- legal-sized egg-
bearing females. bearing females. bearing females.
New Minimum Size................ n/a............... 3 \17/32\ in (8.97 n/a............... n/a.
cm).
Seasonal Closure................ n/a............... n/a............... February 1-March February 1-March
31. 31.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* If v-notching is deemed insufficient to meet the conservation objectives, additional seasonal closures may be
adopted by the Commission.
[[Page 2030]]
While the harvest of lobsters from Areas 4 and 5 is prohibited from
February 1 through March 31 each year, we will allow additional time to
remove and set gear during the closures. Permit holders will have a 2-
week period (i.e., through February 14) to remove all lobster traps
from the water. In addition, permit holders may begin to set lobster
traps 1 week prior to the end of the area closure (i.e., March 25).
Under Addendum XVIII, the Commission approved trap reductions for
Areas 2 and 3, following separate trap reduction schedules. Consistent
with the Commission's ISFMP and in response to the Commission's
recommendations for complementary management measures to address the
needs of the SNE stock, we proposed to reduce qualified Area 2 trap
allocations for Federal lobster permit holders by 25 percent on April
30, 2015, the last day of fishing year 2014. Area 2 allocations would
then have been reduced by 5 percent at the end of each subsequent
fishing year for 5 years, as prescribed by the Commission. Similarly,
we also proposed to reduce Area 3 trap allocations by 5 percent on
April 30, 2015. Area 3 allocations would then have been reduced by 5
percent at the end of each subsequent fishing year for 4 years, as
prescribed by the Commission. Based on the development and
implementation of related actions and comments received, which are
discussed in greater detail below, we are implementing trap reductions
one year later, at 11:59 p.m. on April 30, 2016, the last day of
fishing year 2015. Table 2 includes a schedule of trap reductions, and
the resulting trap allocations based on an initial trap allocation of
800 traps.
Table 2--Area 2 and 3 Trap Reduction Schedule and Example Allocations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Area 2 reductions Area 2 example Area 3 reductions Area 3 example
Effective year (percent) allocation * (percent) allocation *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fishing Year 2014 (present)......... NA 800 NA 800
End of Fishing Year 2015 (Year 1)... 25 600 5 760
End of Fishing Year 2016 (Year 2)... 5 570 5 722
End of Fishing Year 2017 (Year 3)... 5 542 5 686
End of Fishing Year 2018 (Year 4)... 5 515 5 652
End of Fishing Year 2019 (Year 5)... 5 490 5 620
End of Fishing Year 2020 (Year 6)... 5 466 NA NA
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* After applying the specified reduction, resulting allocations are rounded up to the whole trap.
Related Actions and Implementation Order
Based on Commission recommendations, we recently published a final
rule (79 FR 19015; April 7, 2014), establishing a limited access
program in two lobster conservation management areas, Area 2 and the
Outer Cape Area, and implementing a lobster Trap Transfer Program in
Areas 2 and 3, and the Outer Cape Area. That rule did not set an
effective date for the Trap Transfer Program because it is dependent
upon the completion and effectiveness of the Commission's Lobster Trap
Allocation History (LobsTAH) Database. The LobsTAH Database, which is a
prerequisite to the transfer program, remains under development by the
Atlantic Coastal Cooperative Statistic Program (ACCSP). The ACCSP
Director and Project Manager informed us and the Commission on August
28, 2014, that the database will not be ready until some date later in
2015. Upon receiving that information, the Commission's Lobster Board
Chairman concluded that database delays make reducing traps in the 2015
fishing year impractical, and he ultimately recommended implementing
trap reductions in fishing year 2016.
Because the Trap Transfer Program may ease economic impacts of trap
reductions and provide added additional business flexibility, we are
scheduling the trap reductions mentioned above to become effective at
the same time as the Trap Transfer Program, as recommended by the
Commission. Specifically, the trap reductions will become effective at
11:59 p.m. on April 30, 2016, just ahead of trap transfers that have
been negotiated and approved during fishing year 2015, but which will
not become effective until 12:01 a.m. on May 1, 2016. Putting the trap
reductions and trap transfers in this order will make it clearer that
the trap transfers will be based upon an already reduced trap
allocation, thus ensuring the Commission's objectives set forth in
Addendum XVIII. This updated schedule should also allow sufficient time
to finish development, testing, and deployment of the LobsTAH Database;
adequately inform and prepare industry for the implementation of these
complex programs; negotiate trap transfers; reconcile and approve the
proposed transfers; and process permits and trap tag orders.
We analyzed the relationship between trap reductions and trap
transfers in our EA. The analysis confirms that the effectiveness of
the approved trap reductions is dependent upon and impacted by the
availability of the Trap Transfer Program and that the timing of the
trap reductions and trap transfer programs is critical. Specifically,
both industry and the Commission indicated that a trap transfer program
was a necessary precursor to any trap reduction program so that certain
lobster fishers could potentially replace their reduced traps with
transferred traps. In order to maintain lobster business viability,
industry and the Commission sought to have trap reductions and trap
transfers occur contemporaneously so that businesses did not have to
fish at reduced levels for an extended time period while waiting for
trap transfers to take effect.
Comments and Responses
The proposed rule solicited comments through August 25, 2014. We
received two letters, one from the Atlantic Offshore Lobstermen's
Association and one from a member of the lobster fishing industry, in
response to the proposed rule. A summary of the comments and our
responses are provided below.
Comment 1: The Atlantic Offshore Lobstermen's Association and a
member of the lobster fishing industry expressed support for the Area 3
minimum gauge size changes and trap reductions set forth in the rule.
Both commenters reminded us that the proposed Area 3 trap reductions
represented a second round of trap reductions in Area 3.
Response: The Lobster Board's scientific Technical Committee
recommended that the suite of measures set forth in the rule, including
gauge restrictions and trap reductions, would help reduce lobster
exploitation and better scale the fishery to the reduced size of the
SNE lobster stock. Area 3 previously underwent a series of trap
[[Page 2031]]
reductions beginning in 2007 (72 FR 56935, October 2007), which is a
primary reason why the Lobster Board did not recommend, and we did not
propose, a heightened trap reduction in Year 1 similar to what is being
proposed in Area 2.
Comment 2: The Atlantic Offshore Lobstermen's Association and a
member of the lobster industry recommended that the trap reductions
should occur at the same time as the Trap Transfer Program. The
commenters suggested that the trap reductions, without trap transfers,
could bring certain fishers to unsustainable allocation levels. Trap
transferability, however, gives industry the flexibility to adjust to
the trap reductions.
Response: We agree to implement the trap reductions
contemporaneously with the Trap Transfer Program. We analyzed the
impact of trap reductions in an EA, where we discussed that the impacts
of trap reductions are difficult to quantify because, although a
business's fishing power will increase with more traps, so too will the
costs associated with maintaining, baiting, and tending higher trap
levels. For those fishers who do not fish their entire allocation, the
pending trap reductions may simply remove latent traps that are not
being fished and might have little or no impact to the fishing
operation. Further, if active traps are cut from a lobster fisher's
allocation, fishers may attempt to recoup the loss in fishing power by
fishing the remaining traps more aggressively, i.e., baiting and
tending them more often. Nevertheless, for a certain unknown group of
fishers--particularly those fishing at maximum trap levels--the trap
reductions will involve active traps that will negatively impact the
profitability of the business. The Trap Transfer Program, however, will
allow impacted lobster fishers to replenish their allocations by
purchasing allocation from another lobster fisher. Further, the rule
will have trap transfers take effect immediately after the trap
reductions, thus allowing impacted fishers to quickly mitigate the
reduction without having to fish at a reduced level for an extended
period of time.
Comment 3: Both the Atlantic Offshore Lobstermen's Association and
the member of the lobster fishery hoped the rule could take effect in
2015, although neither wanted the rule to take effect until the Trap
Transfer Program was in place. The Atlantic Offshore Lobstermen's
Association thought the proposed rule needed more specificity on the
implementation timeline.
Response: We agree with the need to implement this rule
expeditiously, but not at the expense of the underlying program. For
those measures that can be implemented more speedily--e.g. broodstock
protection measures and area closures--this rule does so as of the
start of the next fishing year. As noted above, trap reductions should
be implemented in conjunction with the Trap Transfer Program, but the
associated LobsTAH Database has yet to be completed. Comments from the
ACCSP (the entity building the database) suggest that the database will
not be ready in time for the 2015 fishing year. Given the importance of
the Trap Transfer Program, we think it imprudent to rush things in the
first year of the program. The Lobster Board's plan is to test the
database in the spring of 2015, then begin the process of allowing trap
transfers in the summer and fall of 2015 to be effective at the start
of the 2016 fishing year, which is when the trap reductions would also
take effect.
Comment 4: The Atlantic Offshore Lobstermen's Association suggested
that if the trap reductions begin in 2016 instead of 2015, that we
double the reduction in the first year to make up for the delay.
Response: We will begin to implement the trap reductions set forth
in this rule at the start of the 2016 fishing year. Doing so does not
create a delay. Addendum XVIII did not set forth a specific date for
the trap reductions, but rather simply indicated that the states and
NMFS should implement trap transfers and trap reduction rules at the
same time. Further, the Lobster Board's implementation plan does not
contemplate doubling Area 3 trap reductions in Year 1 (according to a
September 19, 2014, memorandum from Lobster Board Chairman, Dan
McKiernan, to the Lobster Board) and the Board's Technical Committee
has advanced no scientific reason to do so. Consistency with the states
is crucial, particularly when traps are to be transferred (see our Trap
Transferability FEIS dated December 2013). As such, we will reduce
traps at the end of fishing year 2015, consistent with the states, as
set forth in this rule.
Changes From the Proposed Rule
We made one change from the proposed rule in this action. Instead
of implementing trap reductions for Areas 2 and 3 on April 30, 2015,
for the reasons described in the preamble and in response to Comment 3,
we are implementing trap reductions one year later, at 11:59 p.m. on
April 30, 2016, the last day of fishing year 2015.
Classification
This final rule has been determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Order (E.O.) 12866.
This final rule does not contain policies with federalism
implications as defined in E.O. 13132. The approved measures are based
upon the American Lobster ISFMP that was created by and is overseen by
the states. These measures are a result of Addenda XVII and XVIII,
which was approved by the states, recommended by the states through the
Commission for Federal adoption, and is in place at the state level.
Consequently, NMFS has consulted with the states in the creation of the
ISFMP, which makes recommendations for Federal action. Additionally,
these approved measures would not pre-empt state law and would do
nothing to directly regulate the states.
This final rule does not contain a collection of information
requirement subject to review and approval by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA).
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, requires
agencies to assess the economic impacts of their proposed regulations
on small entities. The objective of the RFA is to consider the impacts
of a rulemaking on small entities, and the capacity of those affected
by regulations to bear the direct and indirect costs of regulation. A
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) was prepared for this
final rule, as required by section 604 of the RFA. The FRFA consists of
the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA), the relevant
portions of the proposed rule describing the proposed management
measures, the corresponding analysis in the EA prepared for this
action, and the responses to public comments included in this final
rule. A copy of this analysis is available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
The Objectives and Legal Basis for the Action
The objective of this action is to reduce fishing exploitation and
reduce latent effort in the trap fishery to scale the fishery to the
size of the SNE lobster stock. The legal basis for the action is the
ISFMP for American lobster and our statutory authority to manage
coastal fisheries under the Atlantic Coastal Fisheries Cooperative
Management Act at 16 U.S.C. 5101, et seq.
Summary of Public Comments
No public comments were received pertaining directly to the
economic effects of this rule.
[[Page 2032]]
Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities To Which the
Rule Would Apply
The recent addition of vessel owner information to the permit data
allows us to better define fishing ``businesses.'' The vessel ownership
data identify all the individual people who own fishing vessels.
Vessels can be grouped together according to common owners, which can
then be treated as a fishing business for purposes of RFA analyses.
Revenues summed across all vessels in the group and the activities that
generate those revenues form the basis for determining whether the
entity is a large or small business. Ownership data are available for
those entities potentially impacted by the action from 2010 onward.
The RFA recognizes and defines three kinds of small entities: Small
businesses; small organizations; and small governmental jurisdictions.
The Small Business Administration (SBA) size standards define whether a
business entity is small and, thus, eligible for Government programs
and preferences reserved for ``small business'' concerns. Size
standards have been established (and recently modified) for all for-
profit economic activities or industries in the North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS). Designations of large and small entities
were attached based on each entity's 3-year average landings. When the
IRFA was completed, the threshold for ``large'' was $5.0 million for
entities landing a plurality of revenue in shellfish (NAICS 111412).
For entities landing a plurality of revenue in finfish (NAICS 111411),
the threshold for ``large'' was $19.0 million. On June 12, 2014, the
Small Business Administration (SBA) issued an interim final rule (79 FR
33467; June 12, 2014) revising the small business size standards for
several industries effective July 14, 2014. The rule increased the size
standard from $19.0 to $20.5 million for finfish fishing, from $5 to
$5.5 million for shellfish fishing, and from $7.0 million to $7.5
million for other marine fishing, for-hire businesses, and marinas.
The number of directly regulated entities for purposes of analyzing
the economic impacts and describing those that are small businesses is
selected based on permits held. Because these approved regulations
apply only to the businesses which fish in the four areas managed by
the conservation measures being amended, only those business entities
are evaluated. Business entities that do not own vessels with directly
regulated permits are not described. Based on this approach, NMFS
determined that there are 379 distinct entities identified that are
directly regulated entities under this action, those that fished in
Areas 2, 3, 4 or 5, or some combination between June 1, 2011, and May
31, 2012.
When the IRFA was prepared, 373 of the 379 entities were classified
as ``small,'' while the remaining 6 were classified as ``large.'' All
six of the large businesses were designated as shellfish. Under the
updated SBA size standard, 374 of the 379 entities are classified as
``small,'' while the remaining 5 are classified as ``large.'' We have
reviewed the analyses prepared for this action in light of the new size
standards and find that the number of small entities subject to this
action increased by one. Since this is not a significant increase, we
do not think that the new size standards affect the analyses, and
therefore are relying on the analysis previously conducted for the IRFA
in the FRFA. Until further guidance is provided, for RFA analyses,
business entities are classified into the SBA defined categories based
on which activity, in the most recent year, produced the greatest gross
revenue. An advantage of this approach is that entities are defined as
large or small one time for the duration of a year, maintaining action
to action consistency. As far as determining whether a business is
large or small, once its major activity is determined (based on 2012)
the average total revenue from all activities over the most recent 3
years (2010-2012) is applied against the appropriate threshold.
Of the 373 small entities determined to be small entities, 180 are
considered a shellfish business, 121 are considered a finfish business,
3 are considered a for-hire business, and 69 could not be identified as
either because even though they had a lobster permit (in Areas 2, 3, 4,
or 5), they had no earned revenue from fishing activity. Because they
had no revenue in the last 3 years, they would be considered small by
default, but would also be considered as latent effort.
Many of these ownership entities maintain diversified harvest
portfolios, obtaining gross sales from many fisheries and not dependent
on any one. However, not all are equally diversified. Those that depend
most heavily on sales from harvesting species impacted directly by the
action are most likely to be affected. By defining dependence as
deriving greater than 50-percent of gross sales from sales of lobster,
we are able to identify those ownership groups most likely to be
impacted by the approved regulations. Using this threshold, we find
that of the 373 small regulated entities under this rule, 180 of them
are lobster-dependent.
While considering the number of affected entities, it is also worth
noting that the vast majority of permit holders are either dually
permitted (i.e., issued both a Federal and state permit) or otherwise
subject to a state's lobster regulations. Accordingly, most all Federal
permit holders will be required to comply with the approved measures
even if we did not implement them. In other words, these Federal permit
holders will be obligated to comply with these measures and
responsibilities attendant to their state permit regardless of whether
these same measures are also required under their Federal permit.
Reporting, Recordkeeping and Other Compliance Requirements
This action contains no new collection-of-information, reporting,
or recordkeeping requirements.
Descriptions of Significant Alternatives Which Minimize any Significant
Economic Impact of Proposed Action on Small Entities
Due to the expected high rate of dual permitting and that the
states are already compliant with broodstock measures, the majority of
Federal vessels must already abide by these requirements, and therefore
have already been impacted. For those vessels not dually permitted,
broodstock measures are expected to have a limited economic impact to
permit holders. Because the approved regulations are consistent with
Commission recommendations and current state regulations, developing
alternative measures would likely create inconsistencies and regulatory
disconnects with the states and would, therefore, likely worsen
potential economic impacts. Therefore, no alternatives to broodstock
measures were considered.
Because the Trap Transfer Program may ease economic impacts of trap
reductions and provide added additional business flexibility, we are
implementing trap reductions at the same time as the Trap Transfer
Program, as recommended by the Commission. In other words, we have
timed the trap reductions so that fishers will be able to activate
their transferred traps moments after their allocation is reduced. In
this way, fishers will not have to fish with reduced traps while
waiting for their transferred traps to become allocated. This could
mitigate the impacts of the trap reductions because fishers would be
able to transfer traps based on their reduced allocation, prior to the
reductions becoming effective. They
[[Page 2033]]
could buy traps before the reductions take effect and minimize the
impacts to their businesses resulting from the trap reductions. To
further mitigate trap reductions, a permit holder could also choose to
tend his or her remaining traps more often in an attempt to harvest
more lobsters and recover income lost from the trap reductions. When
considered in conjunction with trap transferability, permit holders
remaining in the fishery may be able to transfer in traps up to their
original trap cap (i.e., transfer in traps to make up for traps lost
through trap reductions). Though this will require capital, the ability
to acquire additional traps may help another set of permit holders
compensate for trap reductions. Finally, the permit holders who elect
to leave the fishery and transfer out traps will be compensated
immediately by those fishers purchasing traps.
As discussed in greater detail in the EA, we considered but
rejected several other trap reduction alternatives for Lobster
Conservation Management Areas 2 and 3, the only Areas where trap
reductions were considered. For these management areas, we considered
the following approaches: (1) Where trap reductions are theoretically
approved 6 months before trap transfers, (2) where trap reductions are
theoretically approved 6 months after trap transfers, and (3) where
trap reductions and trap transferability during a given fishing year,
rather than at the start of a fishing year. Under either scenario where
trap reductions and trap transfers were approved out-of-sync by 6
months, some permit holders would be prevented from participating in
the Trap Transfer Program following trap reductions, resulting in
potential loss of economic opportunity, until additional traps could be
required. For permit holders whose business model is predicated on
fishing at the trap cap, they would be forced to fish at reduced and
presumably unprofitable levels for nearly half the fishing year. Under
the scenario where trap reductions and trap transfers were during a
given fishing year, a fisher's financial investment would be doubled,
as a second set of permits and trap tags would be required, in addition
to the set that was required to start the fishing year. Because these
alternatives may have increase economic impacts, they were rejected in
favor of the approved measures, which minimize any significant economic
impact.
Duplication, Overlap or Conflict With Other Federal Rules
This action does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any other
Federal Laws.
Small Entity Compliance Guide
Section 212 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness
Act of 1996 states that, for each rule or group of related rules for
which an agency is required to prepare a FRFA, the agency shall publish
one or more guides to assist small entities in complying with the rule,
and shall designate such publications as ``small entity compliance
guides.'' The agency shall explain the actions a small entity is
required to take to comply with a rule or group of rules. As part of
this rulemaking process, we will send a small entity compliance guide
to all Federal permit holders affected by this action. In addition,
copies of this final rule and guide (i.e., information bulletin) are
available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES) and at the following Web site:
https://www.nero.noaa.gov/sfd/sfdmulti.html.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 697
Fisheries, Fishing.
Dated: January 8, 2015.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 697 is amended
as follows:
PART 697--ATLANTIC COASTAL FISHERIES COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
0
1. The authority citation for part 697 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 5101 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 697.2, in paragraph (a), add the definitions of ``Federal
Area 1 Limited Access Program,'' ``Federal Area 2 Limited Access
Program,'' ``Federal Area 3 Limited Access Program,'' ``Federal Area 4
Limited Access Program,'' ``Federal Area 5 Limited Access Program,''
and ``Federal Outer Cape Area Limited Access Program'' in alphabetical
order to read as follows:
Sec. 697.2 Definitions.
(a) * * *
* * * * *
Federal Area 1 Limited Access Program means the limited access
program restricts trap fishing in Area 1 to those Federal lobster
permits with qualified and allocated Area 1 traps, as identified in
these regulations at Sec. 697.4(a)(7)(ii).
Federal Area 2 Limited Access Program means the limited access
program restricts trap fishing in Area 2 to those Federal lobster
permits with qualified and allocated Area 2 traps, as identified in
these regulations at Sec. 697.4(a)(7)(ii).
Federal Area 3 Limited Access Program means the limited access
program restricts trap fishing in Area 3 to those Federal lobster
permits with qualified and allocated Area 3 traps, as identified in
these regulations at Sec. 697.4(a)(7)(ii).
Federal Area 4 Limited Access Program means the limited access
program restricts trap fishing in Area 4 to those Federal lobster
permits with qualified and allocated Area 4 traps, as identified in
these regulations at Sec. 697.4(a)(7)(ii).
Federal Area 5 Limited Access Program means the limited access
program restricts trap fishing in Area 5 to those Federal lobster
permits with qualified and allocated Area 5 traps, as identified in
these regulations at Sec. 697.4(a)(7)(ii).
Federal Outer Cape Area Limited Access Program means the limited
access program restricts trap fishing in the Outer Cape Area to those
Federal lobster permits with qualified and allocated Outer Cape Area
traps, as identified in these regulations at Sec. 697.4(a)(7)(ii).
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 697.7, revise paragraphs (c)(1)(xxx) and (c)(3)(iii) to
read as follows:
Sec. 697.7 Prohibitions.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(xxx) Seasonal closures. The following areas are closed seasonally
to lobster fishing.
(A) Outer Cape Area seasonal closure. The Federal waters of the
Outer Cape Area shall be closed to lobster fishing with traps by
Federal lobster permit holders from February 1 through March 31.
(1) Lobster fishing with traps is prohibited in the Outer Cape Area
during this seasonal closure. Federal trap fishers are prohibited from
possessing or landing lobster taken from the Outer Cape Area during the
seasonal closure.
(2) All lobster traps must be removed from Outer Cape Area waters
before the start of the seasonal closure and may not be re-deployed
into Outer Cape Area waters until after the seasonal closure
[[Page 2034]]
ends. Federal trap fishers are prohibited from setting, hauling,
storing, abandoning, or in any way leaving their traps in Outer Cape
Area waters during this seasonal closure. Federal lobster permit
holders are prohibited from possessing or carrying lobster traps aboard
a vessel in Outer Cape Area waters during this seasonal closure unless
the vessel is transiting through the Outer Cape Area pursuant to
paragraph (c)(1)(xxx)(A)(4) of this section.
(3) The Outer Cape Area seasonal closure relates only to the Outer
Cape Area. The restrictive provisions of Sec. Sec. 697.3 and
697.4(a)(7)(v) do not apply to this closure. Federal lobster permit
holders with an Outer Cape Area designation and another Lobster
Management Area designation on their Federal lobster permits would not
have to similarly remove their lobster gear from the other designated
management areas.
(4) Transiting Outer Cape Area. Federal lobster permit holders may
possess lobster traps on their vessels in the Outer Cape Area during
the seasonal closure only if:
(i) The trap gear is stowed; and
(ii) The vessel is transiting the Outer Cape Area. For the purposes
of this section, transiting shall mean passing through the Outer Cape
Area without stopping to reach a destination outside the Outer Cape
Area.
(5) The Regional Administrator may authorize a permit holder or
vessel owner to haul ashore lobster traps from the Outer Cape Area
during the seasonal closure without having to engage in the exempted
fishing process in Sec. 697.22, if the permit holder or vessel owner
can establish the following:
(i) That the lobster traps were not able to be hauled ashore before
the seasonal closure due to incapacity, vessel/mechanical
inoperability, and/or poor weather; and
(ii) That all lobsters caught in the subject traps will be
immediately returned to the sea.
(iii) The Regional Administrator may condition this authorization
as appropriate in order to maintain the overall integrity of the
closure.
(B) Area 4 seasonal closure. The Federal waters of Area 4 shall be
closed to lobster fishing from February 1 through March 31.
(1) Lobster fishing is prohibited in Area 4 during this seasonal
closure. Federal lobster permit holders are prohibited from possessing
or landing lobster taken from Area 4 during the seasonal closure.
(2) All lobster traps must be removed from Area 4 waters before the
start of the seasonal closure and may not be re-deployed into Area 4
waters until after the seasonal closure ends. Federal trap fishers are
prohibited from setting, hauling, storing, abandoning, or in any way
leaving their traps in Area 4 waters during this seasonal closure. The
following exceptions apply to the Area 4 seasonal closure:
(i) Lobster fishers will have a 2-week grace period from February 1
to February 14 to remove all lobster gear from the closed area. During
this grace period, any hauled trap must not be re-set and must be
removed from the area. Any lobsters taken from traps during this grace
period must be returned to the sea immediately and any Federal lobster
permit holder retrieving Area 4 traps during this grace period is
prohibited from possessing on board any lobster regardless of the area
from which the lobster may have been harvested.
(ii) Lobster fishers have a 1-week grace period from March 24 to
March 31 to re-set gear in the closed area. During this grace period,
re-set traps may not be re-hauled and any Federal lobster permit holder
re-setting Area 4 traps during this grace period is prohibited from
possessing on board any lobster regardless of the area from which the
lobster may have been harvested.
(3) Federal lobster permit holders are prohibited from possessing
or carrying lobster traps aboard a vessel in Area 4 waters during this
seasonal closure unless the vessel is operating subject to the grace
period identified in paragraph (c)(1)(xxx)(B)(2)(ii) of this section or
is transiting through Area 4 pursuant to paragraph (c)(1)(xxx)(B)(5) of
this section.
(4) The Area 4 seasonal closure relates only to Area 4. The
restrictive provisions of Sec. Sec. 697.3 and 697.4(a)(7)(v) do not
apply to this closure. Federal lobster permit holders with an Area 4
designation and another Lobster Management Area designation on their
Federal lobster permits would not have to similarly remove their
lobster gear from the other designated management areas.
(5) Transiting Area 4. Federal lobster permit holders may possess
lobster traps on their vessels in Area 4 during the seasonal closure
only if:
(i) The trap gear is stowed; and
(ii) The vessel is transiting the Area 4. For the purposes of this
section, transiting shall mean passing through Area 4 without stopping,
to reach a destination outside Area 4.
(6) The Regional Administrator may authorize a permit holder or
vessel owner to haul ashore lobster traps from Area 4 during the
seasonal closure without having to engage in the exempted fishing
process in Sec. 697.22, if the permit holder or vessel owner can
establish the following:
(i) That the lobster traps were not able to be hauled ashore before
the seasonal closure due to incapacity, vessel/mechanical
inoperability, and/or poor weather; and
(ii) That all lobsters caught in the subject traps will be
immediately returned to the sea.
(iii) The Regional Administrator may condition this authorization
as appropriate in order to maintain the overall integrity of the
closure.
(C) Area 5 seasonal closure. The Federal waters of Area 5 shall be
closed to lobster fishing from February 1 through March 31.
(1) Lobster fishing is prohibited in Area 5 during this seasonal
closure. Federal lobster permit holders are prohibited from possessing
or landing lobster taken from Area 5 during the seasonal closure.
(2) All lobster traps must be removed from Area 5 waters before the
start of the seasonal closure and may not be re-deployed into Area 5
waters until after the seasonal closure ends. Federal trap fishers are
prohibited from setting, hauling, storing, abandoning, or in any way
leaving their traps in Area 5 waters during this seasonal closure. The
following exceptions apply to the Area 5 seasonal closure:
(i) Lobster fishers will have a 2-week grace period from February 1
to February 14 to remove all lobster gear from the closed area. During
this grace period, any hauled trap must not be re-set and must be
removed from the area. Any lobsters taken from traps during this grace
period must be returned to the sea immediately and any Federal lobster
permit holder retrieving Area 5 traps during this grace period is
prohibited from possessing on board any lobster regardless of the area
from which the lobster may have been harvested.
(ii) Lobster fishers have a 1-week grace period from March 24 to
March 31 to re-set gear in the closed area. During this grace period,
re-set traps may not be re-hauled and any Federal lobster permit holder
re-setting Area 5 traps during this grace period is prohibited from
possessing on board any lobster regardless of the area from which the
lobster may have been harvested.
(3) Federal lobster permit holders are prohibited from possessing
or carrying lobster traps aboard a vessel in Area 5 waters during this
seasonal closure unless the vessel operating subject to the grace
period identified in paragraph (c)(1)(xxx)(C)(2)(ii) of this section
(ii) or is transiting through Area 5 pursuant to
[[Page 2035]]
paragraph (c)(1)(xxx)(C)(5) of this section.
(4) The Area 5 seasonal closure relates only to Area 5. The
restrictive provisions of Sec. Sec. 697.3 and 697.4(a)(7)(v) do not
apply to this closure. Federal lobster permit holders with an Area 5
designation and another Lobster Management Area designation on their
Federal lobster permits would not have to similarly remove their
lobster gear from the other designated management areas.
(5) Transiting Area 5. Federal lobster permit holders may possess
lobster traps on their vessels in Area 5 during the seasonal closure
only if:
(i) The trap gear is stowed; and
(ii) The vessel is transiting the Area 5. For the purposes of this
section, transiting shall mean passing through Area 5 without stopping,
to reach a destination outside Area 5.
(6) The Regional Administrator may authorize a permit holder or
vessel owner to haul ashore lobster traps from Area 5 during the
seasonal closure without having to engage in the exempted fishing
process in Sec. 697.22, if the permit holder or vessel owner can
establish the following:
(i) That the lobster traps were not able to be hauled ashore before
the seasonal closure due to incapacity, vessel/mechanical
inoperability, and/or poor weather; and
(ii) That all lobsters caught in the subject traps will be
immediately returned to the sea.
(iii) The Regional Administrator may condition this authorization
as appropriate in order to maintain the overall integrity of the
closure.
* * * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) The possession of egg-bearing female lobsters in violation of
the requirements set forth in Sec. 697.20(d), v-notched female
American lobsters in violation of the v-notch requirements set forth in
Sec. 697.20(g), American lobsters that are smaller than the minimum
sizes set forth in Sec. 697.20(a), American lobsters that are larger
than the maximum carapace sizes set forth in Sec. 697.20(b), or
lobster parts, possessed at or prior to the time when the
aforementioned lobsters or parts are received by a dealer, will be
prima facie evidence that such American lobsters or parts were taken or
imported in violation of these regulations. A preponderance of all
submitted evidence that such American lobsters were harvested by a
vessel not holding a permit under this part and fishing exclusively
within state or foreign waters will be sufficient to rebut the
presumption.
* * * * *
0
4. In Sec. 697.19, revise paragraphs (b) through (k) and add paragraph
(l) to read as follows:
Sec. 697.19 Trap limits and trap tag requirements for vessels fishing
with lobster traps.
* * * * *
(b) Area 2 trap limits. The Area 2 trap limit is 800 traps.
Federally permitted lobster fishing vessels may only fish with traps
that have been previously qualified and allocated into Area 2 by the
Regional Administrator, as part of the Federal Area 2 Limited Access
Program. This allocation may be modified by trap cuts and/or trap
transfers, but in no case shall the allocation exceed the trap limit.
(c) Area 3 trap limits. The Area 3 trap limit is 1,945 traps.
Federally permitted lobster fishing vessels may only fish with traps
that have been previously qualified and allocated into Area 3 by the
Regional Administrator, as part of the Federal Area 3 Limited Access
Program. This allocation may be modified by trap cuts and/or trap
transfers, but in no case shall the allocation exceed the trap limit.
(d) Area 4 trap limits. The Area 4 trap limit is 1,440 traps.
Federally permitted lobster fishing vessels may only fish with traps
that have been previously qualified and allocated into Area 4 by the
Regional Administrator, as part of the Federal Area 4 Limited Access
Program. This allocation may be modified by trap cuts and/or trap
transfers, but in no case shall the allocation exceed the trap limit.
(e) Area 5 trap limits. The Area 5 trap limit is 1,440 traps,
unless the vessel is operating under an Area 5 Trap Waiver permit
issued under Sec. 697.26. Federally permitted lobster fishing vessels
may only fish with traps that have been previously qualified and
allocated into Area 5 by the Regional Administrator, as part of the
Federal Area 5 Limited Access Program. This allocation may be modified
by trap cuts and/or trap transfers, but in no case shall the allocation
exceed the trap limit.
(f) Outer Cape Area. The Outer Cape Area trap limit is 800 traps.
Federally permitted lobster fishing vessels may only fish with traps
that have been previously qualified and allocated into the Outer Cape
Area by the Regional Administrator, as part of the Federal Outer Cape
Cod Area Limited Access Program. This allocation may be modified by
trap cuts and/or trap transfers, but in no case shall the allocation
exceed the trap limit.
(g) Trap cuts. Trap allocations shall be reduced in the following
Areas as set forth below:
(1) Area 2 allocations shall be reduced according to the following
schedule:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Area 2
Effective year of trap reduction reductions
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
April 30, 2016, 11:59 p.m............................... 25
April 30, 2017, 11:59 p.m............................... 5
April 30, 2018, 11:59 p.m............................... 5
April 30, 2019, 11:59 p.m............................... 5
April 30, 2020, 11:59 p.m............................... 5
April 30, 2021, 11:59 p.m............................... 5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Area 3 allocations shall be reduced according to the following
schedule:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Area 3
Effective year of trap reduction reductions
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
April 30, 2016, 11:59 p.m............................... 5
April 30, 2017, 11:59 p.m............................... 5
April 30, 2018, 11:59 p.m............................... 5
April 30, 2019, 11:59 p.m............................... 5
April 30, 2020, 11:59 p.m............................... 5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(h) Lobster trap limits for vessels fishing or authorized to fish
in more than one EEZ management area. A vessel owner who elects to fish
in more than one EEZ Management Area is restricted to the lowest trap
cap and/or trap allocation of all the areas designated on the permit
and may not fish with, deploy in, possess in, or haul back from any of
those elected management areas more lobster traps than the lowest
number of lobster traps allocated to that vessel for any one elected
management area.
(i) Conservation equivalent trap limits in New Hampshire state
waters. Notwithstanding any other provision, any vessel with a Federal
lobster permit and a New Hampshire Full Commercial Lobster license may
fish up to a maximum of 1,200 lobster traps in New Hampshire state
waters, to the extent authorized by New Hampshire lobster fishery
regulations. However, such vessel may not fish, possess, deploy, or
haul back more than 800 lobster traps in the Federal waters of EEZ
Nearshore Management Area 1, and may not fish more than a combined
total of 1,200 lobster traps in the Federal and New Hampshire state
waters portions of EEZ Nearshore Management Area 1.
(j) Trap Tag Requirements for vessels fishing with lobster traps.
All lobster traps in Federal waters must have a valid Federal lobster
trap tag permanently attached to the trap bridge or central cross-
member. Federal lobster permit holders are eligible to receive Area 1
trap tags only if the Regional Administrator has qualified the permit
[[Page 2036]]
to fish in Area 1 as part of the Federal Area 1 Limited Entry Program.
Federal lobster permit holders are eligible to receive Area 2, 3, 4, 5,
and/or Outer Cape Area trap tags only if the Regional Administrator has
allocated those traps as part of the Federal Area 2, 3, 4, 5, and/or
Outer Cape Area Limited Access Program. Any vessel with a Federal
lobster permit may not possess, deploy, or haul back lobster traps in
any portion of any lobster management area that do not have a valid,
federally recognized trap tag permanently attached to the trap bridge
or central cross-member.
(k) Maximum lobster trap tags authorized for direct purchase. In
any fishing year, the maximum number of tags authorized for direct
purchase by each permit holder is the applicable trap limit specified
in paragraphs (a) through (f) of this section plus an additional 10
percent to cover trap loss.
(l) EEZ Management Area 5 trap waiver exemption. Any vessel issued
an Area 5 Trap Waiver permit under Sec. 697.4(p) is exempt from the
provisions of this section.
0
5. In Sec. 697.20, revise paragraphs (a)(5) through (8), (b)(5) and
(6), (d)(1) and (2), (g)(3) and (4) and remove paragraphs (b)(7) and
(8) and (g)(5) through (8) to read as follows:
Sec. 697.20 Size, harvesting and landing requirements.
(a) * * *
(5) Through April 30, 2015, the minimum carapace length for all
American lobsters harvested in or from the Offshore Management Area 3
is 3\1/2\ inches (8.89 cm).
(6) Through April 30, 2015, the minimum carapace length for all
American lobsters landed, harvested or possessed by vessels issued a
Federal limited access American lobster permit fishing in or electing
to fish in EEZ Offshore Management Area 3 is 3\1/2\ inches (8.89 cm).
(7) Effective May 1, 2015, the minimum carapace length for all
American lobsters harvested in or from the Offshore Management Area 3
is 3\17/32\ inches (8.97 cm).
(8) Effective May 1, 2015, the minimum carapace length for all
American lobsters landed, harvested, or possessed by vessels issued a
Federal limited access American lobster permit fishing in or electing
to fish in EEZ Offshore Management Area 3 is 3\17/32\ inches (8.97 cm).
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(5) The maximum carapace length for all American lobster harvested
in or from EEZ Offshore Management Area 3 or the Outer Cape Lobster
Management Area is 6\3/4\ inches (17.15 cm).
(6) The maximum carapace length for all American lobster landed,
harvested, or possessed by vessels issued a Federal limited access
American lobster permit fishing in or electing to fish in EEZ Offshore
Management Area 3 or the Outer Cape Lobster Management Area is 6\3/4\
inches (17.15 cm).
(d) * * *
(1) Any berried female lobster harvested in or from the EEZ must be
returned to the sea immediately. If any berried female lobster is
harvested in or from the EEZ Nearshore Management Areas 1, 2, 4, or 5,
or in or from the EEZ Offshore Management Area 3, north of 42[deg] 30'
North latitude, it must be v-notched before being returned to sea
immediately.
(2) Any berried female lobster harvested or possessed by a vessel
issued a Federal limited access lobster permit must be returned to the
sea immediately. If any berried female lobster is harvested in or from
the EEZ Nearshore Management Areas 1, 2, 4, or 5, or in or from the EEZ
Offshore Management Area 3, north of 42[deg] 30' North latitude, it
must be v-notched before being returned to sea immediately.
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(3) No person may possess any female lobster possessing a standard
v-shaped notch harvested in or from the EEZ Nearshore Management Area
2, 4, 5, 6, Outer Cape Area, or the EEZ Offshore Management Area 3.
(4) No vessel, owner, or operator issued a Federal limited access
American lobster permit fishing in or electing to fish in the EEZ
Nearshore Management Area 2, 4, 5, 6, Outer Cape Area, or the EEZ
Offshore Management Area 3 may land, harvest or possess any female
lobster possessing a standard v-shaped notch.
[FR Doc. 2015-00421 Filed 1-14-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P