Final Strategic Growth Policy for the National Wildlife Refuge System, 2119-2120 [2015-00381]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 10 / Thursday, January 15, 2015 / Notices
marking techniques; release; obtain and
preserve blood, tissue, semen, ova, and
other samples that are considered parts
of wolves (scat is not considered a part
of a wolf and can be collected without
a permit); translocate; transport between
approved Mexican wolf captive
management facilities in the United
States and Mexico, to approved release
sites, and to and from the Vermejo Park
Ranch; purposeful lethal take (lethal
control is limited to Mexican wolves
within the MWEPA in Arizona and New
Mexico); hazing via less-than-lethal
projectiles; injurious harassment;
research; and any other USFWSapproved husbandry practice or
management action for Mexican wolves.
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
In compliance with NEPA (42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.), we have made an initial
determination that the proposed
activities in these permits are
categorically excluded from the
requirement to prepare an
environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement (516
DM 6 Appendix 1, 1.4C(1)).
Public Availability of Comments
All comments and materials we
receive in response to this request will
be available for public inspection, by
appointment, during normal business
hours at the address listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this notice.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Authority
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
We provide this notice under section
10 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)
Dated: January 8, 2015.
Joy E. Nicholopoulos,
Acting Regional Director, Southwest Region,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–00551 Filed 1–14–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–HQ–R–2014–N231;
FXRS12650900000–145–FF09R20000]
RIN 1018–AZ89
Final Strategic Growth Policy for the
National Wildlife Refuge System
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) has finalized a policy
to implement a strategic approach to the
growth of the National Wildlife Refuge
System (Refuge System, System). The
National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act (Administration
Act), as amended by the National
Wildlife Refuge System Improvement
Act, requires that we ‘‘plan and direct
the continued growth of the System in
a manner that is best designed to
accomplish the mission of the System.’’
This policy directs Refuge System
employees to focus their protection
measures on priority conservation
features to ensure that our limited
resources are used to make the greatest
contribution to the conservation of
species in a cost-effective and
transparent manner. It ensures that the
growth of the System reflects our vision
toward managing functional landscapes,
enhancing our scientific rigor,
improving our effectiveness, and
involving our partners and the
American people. The Strategic Growth
policy is found in ‘‘Refuge Planning,’’
chapter 5, part 602 in the Fish and
Wildlife Service Manual.
DATES: The policy was effective
September 4, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may read the final
policy online at https://www.fws.gov/
policy/602fw5.html. You may obtain a
summary of how we addressed
comments we received on the draft
policy at https://www.fws.gov/refuges/
planning/StrategicGrowth.html. You
may also request a copy of the policy by
U.S. mail from USFWS, Division of
Natural Resources and Conservation
Planning, 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls
Church, VA 22041–3803 (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). The
policy is also available for public
inspection, by appointment, during
normal business hours at the above
address.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Salem, at the address above, or by
telephone: (703) 358–2397.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:13 Jan 14, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2119
Introduction
The Service has established a final
Strategic Growth policy, which is
available at https://www.fws.gov/policy/
602fw5.html. The policy is chapter 5,
part 602, ‘‘Refuge Planning,’’ in the Fish
and Wildlife Service Manual. The
purpose of the policy is to implement a
strategic approach to the growth of the
National Wildlife Refuge System.
Background
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997 (Improvement
Act), which amended the
Administration Act (16 U.S.C. 668dd–
ee), states that the Refuge System
mission is to ‘‘administer a national
network of lands and waters for the
conservation, management, and where
appropriate, restoration of the fish,
wildlife, and plant resources and their
habitats for the benefit of present and
future generations of Americans.’’ The
Improvement Act requires us to ‘‘plan
and direct the continued growth of the
System in a manner that is best
designed to accomplish the mission of
the System,’’ ‘‘to fulfill the mission of
the System, as well as the specific
purposes for which [the] refuge was
established,’’ and to ‘‘ensure timely and
effective cooperation and collaboration
with Federal agencies and State fish and
wildlife agencies during the course of
acquiring and managing refuges.’’
Because we are facing unparalleled
challenges related to climate and nonclimate stressors, we must provide
consistent direction for adding lands
and waters to the System in a sciencebased, cost-effective, and transparent
manner. The Strategic Growth policy is
a result of this need for strategic and
consistent planning.
Final Policy
The policy prioritizes acquisitions
within existing refuge boundaries,
expansion of existing refuges, and
establishment of new refuges. It focuses
protection measures on priority
conservation features so that we can
make the most of our limited resources.
The policy is consistent with the
biological planning and conservation
design components of Strategic Habitat
Conservation, the Service’s sciencebased adaptive management framework
for determining where and how to
deliver conservation efficiently to
achieve specific biological outcomes.
The policy identifies threatened and
endangered species, migratory birds of
conservation concern, and waterfowl, or
the surrogate species that represent
them, as priority conservation features.
The policy requires application of the
best available science to incorporate
E:\FR\FM\15JAN1.SGM
15JAN1
2120
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 10 / Thursday, January 15, 2015 / Notices
elements of conservation design to help
us identify priority conservation areas
that will contribute to achieving
measurable conservation targets such as
population objectives. The policy
ensures that when employees propose
new refuges or expansions to existing
refuges, they analyze and describe: (1)
The project’s vulnerability to climate
change and other non-climate stressors
(e.g., habitat fragmentation, invasive
species), (2) how we will mitigate
stressors to ensure the project’s
resiliency, (3) how the project is
arranged in a geographically efficient
manner to safeguard ecological
processes across the landscape, and (4)
how the project complements the
resilience of other conservation areas.
The policy establishes the process for
sending project proposals to the Service
Director and the potential outcomes of
the Director’s review. It also describes
how designated representatives at the
local level—Refuge Managers—must
interact, coordinate, cooperate, and
collaborate with State fish and wildlife
agencies in the acquisition and
management of refuges.
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Summary of Comments and Changes to
the Final Policy
On January 30, 2014, we announced
the draft policy and requested public
comment via a Federal Register notice
(79 FR 4952). The comment period was
open from January 30, 2014, through
March 3, 2014. We received 35 detailed
comment letters and many individual
comments on the draft policy. In total,
we received 236 individual comments,
which were grouped into 71 comment
categories. The comments were from
nongovernmental organizations,
individuals, States, and industry. Most
of the comments expressed general
support, and many addressed specific
elements in the draft policy.
We considered all of the
recommendations for improvement and
clarification included in the comments
and made appropriate changes to the
draft policy. Many of the comments we
received were outside the scope of this
policy. We drafted this policy in a way
that gives us flexibility as funding levels
and resources change. The policy does
not supersede any piece of legislation,
regulation, or other policy.
Dated: December 11, 2014.
Dan Ashe,
Director, Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–00381 Filed 1–14–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:13 Jan 14, 2015
Jkt 235001
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
[AAK6006201 156A2100DD
AOR3030.999900]
Intent To Prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement for the Proposed
Coquille Indian Tribe Fee-to-Trust and
Casino Project, City of Medford,
Jackson County, Oregon
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice advises the public
that the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA)
as lead agency intends to gather
information necessary for preparing an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
pursuant to the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) in connection with
the Coquille Indian Tribe’s (Tribe)
application for a proposed 2.4-acre feeto-trust transfer and casino project to be
located in the City of Medford, Jackson
County, Oregon. This notice also
announces the beginning of the public
scoping process to solicit public
comments and identify issues.
DATES: Written comments on the scope
of the EIS must arrive by February 17,
2015. The date of a public scoping
meeting will be announced at least 15
days in advance through a notice to be
published in the local newspaper, the
Mail Tribune, and posted at
www.coquilleeis.com.
SUMMARY:
You may mail or handdeliver written comments to Mr. Stanley
Speaks, Northwest Regional Director,
Bureau of Indian Affairs, Northwest
Region, 911 Northeast 11th Avenue,
Portland, Oregon 97232–4165. Please
include your name, return address, and
‘‘DEIS Scoping Comments, Coquille
Indian Tribe Fee-to-Trust and Casino
Project’’ on the first page of your written
comments. The location of a public
scoping meeting will be announced at
least 15 days in advance through a
notice to be published in the local
newspaper, the Mail Tribune, and
posted at www.coquilleeis.com.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
BJ Howerton, Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Northwest Regional Office, 911
Northeast 11th Avenue, Portland,
Oregon 97232; fax (503) 231–2275;
phone (503) 231–6749.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Tribe
has submitted an application to the BIA
requesting that approximately 2.4 acres
of land be transferred from fee to trust
status (Proposed Action), upon which
the Tribe would renovate an existing
bowling alley to convert it into a gaming
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
facility. In order for the Department to
fully consider and either grant or deny
the Tribe’s application, the Department
must first comply with NEPA.
The proposed fee-to-trust property is
located within the incorporated
boundaries of the City of Medford,
Oregon, adjacent to the northeastern
boundary of Highway 99, between
Charlotte Ann Lane and Lowry Lane.
The Tribe’s stated purpose of the
Proposed Action is to improve the
economic status of the Tribe so it can
better provide housing, health care,
education, cultural programs, and other
services to its members. Adjacent fee
land would be used for parking.
The Proposed Action encompasses
the various federal approvals which
may be required to implement the
Tribe’s proposed economic
development project, including
approval of the Tribe’s fee-to-trust
application. The EIS will identify and
evaluate issues related to these
approvals.
Areas of environmental concern
identified for analysis in the EIS include
land resources; water resources; air
quality; noise; biological resources;
cultural/historical/archaeological
resources; resource use patterns; traffic
and transportation; public health and
safety; hazardous materials and
hazardous wastes; public services and
utilities; socioeconomics; environmental
justice; visual resources/aesthetics; and
cumulative, indirect, and growthinducing effects. The range of issues and
alternatives to be addressed in the EIS
may be expanded or reduced based on
comments received in response to this
notice and at the public scoping
meeting. Additional information,
including a map of the project site, is
available by contacting the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this notice.
Public Comment Availability:
Comments, including names and
addresses of respondents, will be
available for public review at the BIA
address shown in the ADDRESSES
section, during regular business hours, 8
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except holidays. Before
including your address, phone number,
email address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask in your comment that
your personal identifying information
be withheld from public review, the BIA
cannot guarantee that this will occur.
E:\FR\FM\15JAN1.SGM
15JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 10 (Thursday, January 15, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2119-2120]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00381]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-HQ-R-2014-N231; FXRS12650900000-145-FF09R20000]
RIN 1018-AZ89
Final Strategic Growth Policy for the National Wildlife Refuge
System
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has finalized a
policy to implement a strategic approach to the growth of the National
Wildlife Refuge System (Refuge System, System). The National Wildlife
Refuge System Administration Act (Administration Act), as amended by
the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act, requires that we
``plan and direct the continued growth of the System in a manner that
is best designed to accomplish the mission of the System.'' This policy
directs Refuge System employees to focus their protection measures on
priority conservation features to ensure that our limited resources are
used to make the greatest contribution to the conservation of species
in a cost-effective and transparent manner. It ensures that the growth
of the System reflects our vision toward managing functional
landscapes, enhancing our scientific rigor, improving our
effectiveness, and involving our partners and the American people. The
Strategic Growth policy is found in ``Refuge Planning,'' chapter 5,
part 602 in the Fish and Wildlife Service Manual.
DATES: The policy was effective September 4, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may read the final policy online at https://www.fws.gov/policy/602fw5.html. You may obtain a summary of how we addressed
comments we received on the draft policy at https://www.fws.gov/refuges/planning/StrategicGrowth.html. You may also request a copy of the
policy by U.S. mail from USFWS, Division of Natural Resources and
Conservation Planning, 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041-3803
(see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). The policy is also available for
public inspection, by appointment, during normal business hours at the
above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Salem, at the address above, or
by telephone: (703) 358-2397.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
The Service has established a final Strategic Growth policy, which
is available at https://www.fws.gov/policy/602fw5.html. The policy is
chapter 5, part 602, ``Refuge Planning,'' in the Fish and Wildlife
Service Manual. The purpose of the policy is to implement a strategic
approach to the growth of the National Wildlife Refuge System.
Background
The National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997
(Improvement Act), which amended the Administration Act (16 U.S.C.
668dd-ee), states that the Refuge System mission is to ``administer a
national network of lands and waters for the conservation, management,
and where appropriate, restoration of the fish, wildlife, and plant
resources and their habitats for the benefit of present and future
generations of Americans.'' The Improvement Act requires us to ``plan
and direct the continued growth of the System in a manner that is best
designed to accomplish the mission of the System,'' ``to fulfill the
mission of the System, as well as the specific purposes for which [the]
refuge was established,'' and to ``ensure timely and effective
cooperation and collaboration with Federal agencies and State fish and
wildlife agencies during the course of acquiring and managing
refuges.'' Because we are facing unparalleled challenges related to
climate and non-climate stressors, we must provide consistent direction
for adding lands and waters to the System in a science-based, cost-
effective, and transparent manner. The Strategic Growth policy is a
result of this need for strategic and consistent planning.
Final Policy
The policy prioritizes acquisitions within existing refuge
boundaries, expansion of existing refuges, and establishment of new
refuges. It focuses protection measures on priority conservation
features so that we can make the most of our limited resources.
The policy is consistent with the biological planning and
conservation design components of Strategic Habitat Conservation, the
Service's science-based adaptive management framework for determining
where and how to deliver conservation efficiently to achieve specific
biological outcomes. The policy identifies threatened and endangered
species, migratory birds of conservation concern, and waterfowl, or the
surrogate species that represent them, as priority conservation
features.
The policy requires application of the best available science to
incorporate
[[Page 2120]]
elements of conservation design to help us identify priority
conservation areas that will contribute to achieving measurable
conservation targets such as population objectives. The policy ensures
that when employees propose new refuges or expansions to existing
refuges, they analyze and describe: (1) The project's vulnerability to
climate change and other non-climate stressors (e.g., habitat
fragmentation, invasive species), (2) how we will mitigate stressors to
ensure the project's resiliency, (3) how the project is arranged in a
geographically efficient manner to safeguard ecological processes
across the landscape, and (4) how the project complements the
resilience of other conservation areas.
The policy establishes the process for sending project proposals to
the Service Director and the potential outcomes of the Director's
review. It also describes how designated representatives at the local
level--Refuge Managers--must interact, coordinate, cooperate, and
collaborate with State fish and wildlife agencies in the acquisition
and management of refuges.
Summary of Comments and Changes to the Final Policy
On January 30, 2014, we announced the draft policy and requested
public comment via a Federal Register notice (79 FR 4952). The comment
period was open from January 30, 2014, through March 3, 2014. We
received 35 detailed comment letters and many individual comments on
the draft policy. In total, we received 236 individual comments, which
were grouped into 71 comment categories. The comments were from
nongovernmental organizations, individuals, States, and industry. Most
of the comments expressed general support, and many addressed specific
elements in the draft policy.
We considered all of the recommendations for improvement and
clarification included in the comments and made appropriate changes to
the draft policy. Many of the comments we received were outside the
scope of this policy. We drafted this policy in a way that gives us
flexibility as funding levels and resources change. The policy does not
supersede any piece of legislation, regulation, or other policy.
Dated: December 11, 2014.
Dan Ashe,
Director, Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-00381 Filed 1-14-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P