Subsistence Management Regulations for Public Lands in Alaska-2016-17 and 2017-18 Subsistence Taking of Wildlife Regulations, 1868-1872 [2015-00425]
Download as PDF
1868
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 9 / Wednesday, January 14, 2015 / Proposed Rules
§ 891.650 Conditions for receipt of
vacancy payments for assisted units.
§ 891.790 Conditions for receipt of
vacancy payments for assisted units.
ACTION:
*
*
This proposed rule would
establish regulations for hunting and
trapping seasons, harvest limits, and
methods and means related to taking of
wildlife for subsistence uses during the
2016–17 and 2017–18 regulatory years.
The Federal Subsistence Board is on a
schedule of completing the process of
revising subsistence taking of wildlife
regulations in even-numbered years and
subsistence taking of fish and shellfish
regulations in odd-numbered years;
public proposal and review processes
take place during the preceding year.
The Board also addresses customary and
traditional use determinations during
the applicable cycle. When final, the
resulting rulemaking will replace the
existing subsistence wildlife taking
regulations. This rule would also amend
the general regulations on subsistence
taking of fish and wildlife.
DATES: Public meetings: The Federal
Subsistence Regional Advisory Councils
will hold public meetings to receive
comments and make proposals to
change this proposed rule on several
dates between February 10 and March
19, 2015, and then hold another round
of public meetings to discuss and
receive comments on the proposals, and
make recommendations on the
proposals to the Federal Subsistence
Board, on several dates between August
17 and November 4, 2015. The Board
will discuss and evaluate proposed
regulatory changes during a public
meeting in Anchorage, AK, in April
2016. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
for specific information on dates and
locations of the public meetings.
Public comments: Comments and
proposals to change this proposed rule
must be received or postmarked by
March 25, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Public meetings: The
Federal Subsistence Board and the
Federal Subsistence Regional Advisory
Councils’ public meetings will be held
at various locations in Alaska. See
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for specific
information on dates and locations of
the public meetings.
Public comments: You may submit
comments by one of the following
methods:
• Electronically: Go to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov and search for
FWS–R7–SM–2014–0062, which is the
docket number for this rulemaking.
• By hard copy: U.S. mail or handdelivery to: USFWS, Office of
Subsistence Management, 1011 East
Tudor Road, MS 121, Attn: Theo
Matuskowitz, Anchorage, AK 99503–
6199, or hand delivery to the Designated
*
*
*
*
(b) Vacancies during rent-up. For each
unit that is not leased as of the effective
date of the HAP contract, the owner is
entitled to vacancy payments in the
amount of 80 percent of the contract
rent for the first 30 days of a vacancy,
if the owner:
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Vacancies after rent-up. If an
eligible family vacates a unit, the owner
is entitled to vacancy payments in the
amount of 80 percent of the contract
rent for the first 30 days of a vacancy,
if the owner:
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Debt-service vacancy payments. If
a unit continues to be vacant after the
vacancy period specified in paragraph
(b) or (c) of this section, the owner may
apply to receive additional vacancy
payments in an amount equal to the
principal and interest payments
required to amortize that portion of the
debt service attributable to the vacant
unit for up to 12 additional months for
the unit if:
*
*
*
*
*
■ 25. In § 891.655, revise the definition
of ‘‘Vacancy payment’’ to read as
follows:
§ 891.655
projects.
Definitions applicable to 202/162
*
*
*
*
*
Vacancy payment means the housing
assistance payment made to the owner
by HUD for a vacant assisted unit if
certain conditions are fulfilled.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 26. In § 891.705, remove the word
‘‘Borrower’’ and add in its place the
word ‘‘Owner’’ wherever it appears, and
revise paragraph (c)(2) to read as
follows:
§ 891.705
Project assistance contract.
*
*
*
*
(b) Vacancies during rent-up. For each
unit (or residential space in a group
home) that is not leased as of the
effective date of the PAC, the owner is
entitled to vacancy payments in the
amount of 80 percent of the contract
rent (or pro rata share of the contract
rent for a group home) for the first 30
days of a vacancy, if the owner:
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Vacancies after rent-up. If an
eligible family vacates an assisted unit
(or residential space in a group home)
the owner is entitled to vacancy
payments in the amount of 80 percent
of the contract rent (or pro rata share of
the contract rent for a group home) for
the first 30 days of a vacancy, if the
owner:
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Debt-service vacancy payments. If
an assisted unit (or residential space in
a group home) continues to be vacant
after the vacancy period specified in
paragraph (b) or (c) of this section, the
owner may apply to receive additional
vacancy payments in an amount equal
to the principal and interest payments
required to amortize that portion of the
debt service attributable to the vacant
unit (or, in the case of group homes, the
residential space) for up to 12 additional
months for the unit, if:
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: December 11, 2014.
Biniam Gebre,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Housing—
Federal Housing Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 2015–00357 Filed 1–13–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
wreier-aviles on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) Payments to the owner for vacant
assisted units (vacancy payments). The
amount of and conditions for vacancy
payments are described in § 891.790.
HUD makes the project assistance
payments monthly upon proper
requisition by the owner, except
payments for vacancies under
§ 891.790(d), which HUD makes
semiannually upon requisition by the
owner.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 27. In § 891.790, remove the word
‘‘Borrower’’ and add in its place the
word ‘‘Owner’’ wherever it appears, and
revise the introductory text of
paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) to read as
follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
12:23 Jan 13, 2015
Jkt 235001
36 CFR Part 242
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. FWS–R7–SM–2014–0062;
FXFR13350700640–156–FF07J00000;
FBMS#4500074738]
RIN 1018–BA39
Subsistence Management Regulations
for Public Lands in Alaska—2016–17
and 2017–18 Subsistence Taking of
Wildlife Regulations
Forest Service, Agriculture;
Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Proposed rule.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14JAP1.SGM
14JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 9 / Wednesday, January 14, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Federal Official attending any of the
Federal Subsistence Regional Advisory
Council public meetings. See
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for
additional information on locations of
the public meetings.
We will post all comments on https://
www.regulations.gov. This generally
means that we will post any personal
information you provide us (see the
Public Review Process section below for
more information).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chair, Federal Subsistence Board, c/o
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Attention: Eugene R. Peltola, Jr., Office
of Subsistence Management; (907) 786–
3888 or subsistence@fws.gov. For
questions specific to National Forest
System lands, contact Thomas Whitford,
Regional Subsistence Program Leader,
USDA, Forest Service, Alaska Region;
(907) 743–9461 or twhitford@fs.fed.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
wreier-aviles on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Background
Under Title VIII of the Alaska
National Interest Lands Conservation
Act (ANILCA) (16 U.S.C. 3111–3126),
the Secretary of the Interior and the
Secretary of Agriculture (Secretaries)
jointly implement the Federal
Subsistence Management Program. This
program provides a rural preference for
take of fish and wildlife resources for
subsistence uses on Federal public
lands and waters in Alaska. The
Secretaries published temporary
regulations to carry out this program in
the Federal Register on June 29, 1990
(55 FR 27114), and final regulations
were published in the Federal Register
on May 29, 1992 (57 FR 22940). The
Program has subsequently amended
these regulations a number of times.
Because this program is a joint effort
between Interior and Agriculture, these
regulations are located in two titles of
the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR):
Title 36, ‘‘Parks, Forests, and Public
Property,’’ and Title 50, ‘‘Wildlife and
Fisheries,’’ at 36 CFR 242.1–28 and 50
CFR 100.1–28, respectively. The
regulations contain subparts as follows:
Subpart A, General Provisions; Subpart
B, Program Structure; Subpart C, Board
Determinations; and Subpart D,
Subsistence Taking of Fish and Wildlife.
Consistent with subpart B of these
regulations, the Secretaries established a
Federal Subsistence Board to administer
the Federal Subsistence Management
Program. The Board comprises:
• A Chair appointed by the Secretary
of the Interior with concurrence of the
Secretary of Agriculture;
• The Alaska Regional Director, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
12:23 Jan 13, 2015
Jkt 235001
• The Alaska Regional Director, U.S.
National Park Service;
• The Alaska State Director, U.S.
Bureau of Land Management;
• The Alaska Regional Director, U.S.
Bureau of Indian Affairs;
• The Alaska Regional Forester, U.S.
Forest Service; and
• Two public members appointed by
the Secretary of the Interior with
concurrence of the Secretary of
Agriculture.
Through the Board, these agencies
and public members participate in the
development of regulations for subparts
C and D, which, among other things, set
forth program eligibility and specific
harvest seasons and limits.
In administering the program, the
Secretaries divided Alaska into 10
subsistence resource regions, each of
which is represented by a Regional
Advisory Council. The Regional
Advisory Councils provide a forum for
rural residents with personal knowledge
of local conditions and resource
requirements to have a meaningful role
in the subsistence management of fish
and wildlife on Federal public lands in
Alaska. The Regional Advisory Council
members represent varied geographical,
cultural, and user interests within each
region.
Public Review Process—Comments,
Proposals, and Public Meetings
The Federal Subsistence Regional
Advisory Councils have a substantial
role in reviewing this proposed rule and
making recommendations for the final
rule. The Federal Subsistence Board,
through the Federal Subsistence
Regional Advisory Councils, will hold
public meetings on this proposed rule at
the following locations in Alaska, on the
following dates:
Region 1—Southeast Regional Council,
Yakutat, March 17, 2015
Region 2—Southcentral Regional
Council, Anchorage, February 18,
2015
Region 3—Kodiak/Aleutians Regional
Council, Kodiak, February 10, 2015
Region 4—Bristol Bay Regional Council,
Naknek, February 24, 2015
Region 5—Yukon–Kuskokwim Delta
Regional Council, Bethel, February
25, 2015
Region 6—Western Interior Regional
Council, Fairbanks, March 3, 2015
Region 7—Seward Peninsula Regional
Council, Nome, February 18, 2015
Region 8—Northwest Arctic Regional
Council, Kotzebue, March 9, 2015
Region 9—Eastern Interior Regional
Council, Fairbanks, March 4, 2015
Region 10—North Slope Regional
Council, Barrow, March 17, 2015
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1869
During April 2015, the written
proposals to change the subpart D, take
of wildlife regulations, and subpart C,
customary and traditional use
determinations, will be compiled and
distributed for public review. During the
45-day public comment period, which is
presently scheduled to end on May 15,
2015, written public comments will be
accepted on the distributed proposals.
The Board, through the Regional
Advisory Councils, will hold a second
series of public meetings in August
through October 2015, to receive
comments on specific proposals and to
develop recommendations to the Board
at the following locations in Alaska, on
the following dates:
Region 1—Southeast Regional Council,
Petersburg, October 13, 2015
Region 2—Southcentral Regional
Council, Seldovia, October 20, 2015
Region 3—Kodiak/Aleutians Regional
Council, Adak, September 25, 2015
Region 4—Bristol Bay Regional Council,
Dillingham, October 27, 2015
Region 5—Yukon–Kuskokwim Delta
Regional Council, TBD, October 7,
2015
Region 6—Western Interior Regional
Council, Kaltag, November 3, 2015
Region 7—Seward Peninsula Regional
Council, Nome, October 14, 2015
Region 8—Northwest Arctic Regional
Council, Buckland, October 6, 2015
Region 9—Eastern Interior Regional
Council, Fairbanks, October 29, 2015
Region 10—North Slope Regional
Council, Kaktovik, November 3, 2015
A notice will be published of specific
dates, times, and meeting locations in
local and statewide newspapers prior to
both series of meetings. Locations and
dates may change based on weather or
local circumstances. The amount of
work on each Regional Advisory
Council’s agenda determines the length
of each Regional Advisory Council
meeting.
The Board will discuss and evaluate
proposed changes to the subsistence
management regulations during a public
meeting scheduled to be held in
Anchorage, Alaska, in April 2016. The
Federal Subsistence Regional Advisory
Council Chairs, or their designated
representatives, will present their
respective Councils’ recommendations
at the Board meeting. Additional oral
testimony may be provided on specific
proposals before the Board at that time.
At that public meeting, the Board will
deliberate and take final action on
proposals received that request changes
to this proposed rule.
Proposals to the Board to modify the
general fish and wildlife regulations,
wildlife harvest regulations, and
E:\FR\FM\14JAP1.SGM
14JAP1
wreier-aviles on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
1870
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 9 / Wednesday, January 14, 2015 / Proposed Rules
customary and traditional use
determinations must include the
following information:
a. Name, address, and telephone
number of the requestor;
b. Each section and/or paragraph
designation in this proposed rule for
which changes are suggested, if
applicable;
c. A description of the regulatory
change(s) desired;
d. A statement explaining why each
change is necessary;
e. Proposed wording changes; and
f. Any additional information that you
believe will help the Board in
evaluating the proposed change.
The Board immediately rejects
proposals that fail to include the above
information, or proposals that are
beyond the scope of authorities in
§ ll.24, subpart C (the regulations
governing customary and traditional use
determinations), and §§ ll.25 and
ll0;.26, subpart D (the general and
specific regulations governing the
subsistence take of wildlife). If a
proposal needs clarification, prior to
being distributed for public review, the
proponent may be contacted, and the
proposal could be revised based on their
input. Once distributed for public
review, no additional changes may be
made as part of the original submission.
During the April 2016 meeting, the
Board may defer review and action on
some proposals to allow time for
cooperative planning efforts, or to
acquire additional needed information.
The Board may elect to defer taking
action on any given proposal if the
workload of staff, Regional Advisory
Councils, or the Board becomes
excessive. These deferrals may be based
on recommendations by the affected
Regional Advisory Council(s) or staff
members, or on the basis of the Board’s
intention to do least harm to the
subsistence user and the resource
involved. A proponent of a proposal
may withdraw the proposal provided it
has not been considered, and a
recommendation has not been made, by
a Regional Advisory Council. The Board
may consider and act on alternatives
that address the intent of a proposal
while differing in approach.
You may submit written comments
and materials concerning this proposed
rule by one of the methods listed in
ADDRESSES. If you submit a comment via
https://www.regulations.gov, your entire
comment, including any personal
identifying information, will be posted
on the Web site. If you submit a
hardcopy comment that includes
personal identifying information, you
may request at the top of your document
that we withhold this information from
VerDate Sep<11>2014
12:23 Jan 13, 2015
Jkt 235001
public review. However, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
We will post all hardcopy comments on
https://www.regulations.gov.
Comments and materials we receive,
as well as supporting documentation we
used in preparing this proposed rule,
will be available for public inspection
on https://www.regulations.gov, or by
appointment, between 8 a.m. and 3
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays, at: USFWS, Office of
Subsistence Management, 1011 East
Tudor Road, Anchorage, AK 99503.
Reasonable Accommodations
The Federal Subsistence Board is
committed to providing access to these
meetings for all participants. Please
direct all requests for sign language
interpreting services, closed captioning,
or other accommodation needs to
Deborah Coble, 907–786–3880,
subsistence@fws.gov, or 800–877–8339
(TTY), seven business days prior to the
meeting you would like to attend.
Tribal Consultation and Comment
As expressed in Executive Order
13175, ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,’’ the
Federal officials that have been
delegated authority by the Secretaries
are committed to honoring the unique
government-to-government political
relationship that exists between the
Federal Government and Federally
Recognized Indian Tribes (Tribes) as
listed in 79 FR 4748 (January 29, 2014).
Consultation with Alaska Native
corporations is based on Public Law
108–199, div. H, Sec. 161, Jan. 23, 2004,
118 Stat. 452, as amended by Public
Law 108–447, div. H, title V, Sec. 518,
Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 3267, which
provides that: ‘‘The Director of the
Office of Management and Budget and
all Federal agencies shall hereafter
consult with Alaska Native corporations
on the same basis as Indian tribes under
Executive Order No. 13175.’’
ANILCA does not provide specific
rights to Tribes for the subsistence
taking of wildlife, fish, and shellfish.
However, because tribal members are
affected by subsistence fishing, hunting,
and trapping regulations, the
Secretaries, through the Board, will
provide Federally recognized Tribes and
Alaska Native corporations an
opportunity to consult on this rule.
The Board will engage in outreach
efforts for this rule, including a
notification letter, to ensure that Tribes
and Alaska Native corporations are
advised of the mechanisms by which
they can participate. The Board
provides a variety of opportunities for
consultation: proposing changes to the
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
existing rule; commenting on proposed
changes to the existing rule; engaging in
dialogue at the Regional Council
meetings; engaging in dialogue at the
Board’s meetings; and providing input
in person, by mail, email, or phone at
any time during the rulemaking process.
The Board commits to efficiently and
adequately providing an opportunity to
Tribes and Alaska Native corporations
for consultation in regard to subsistence
rulemaking.
The Board will consider Tribes’ and
Alaska Native corporations’
information, input, and
recommendations, and address their
concerns as much as practicable.
Developing the 2016–17 and 2017–18
Wildlife Seasons and Harvest Limit
Regulations
Subpart C and D regulations are
subject to periodic review and revision.
The Federal Subsistence Board
currently completes the process of
revising subsistence take of wildlife
regulations in even-numbered years and
fish and shellfish regulations in oddnumbered years; public proposal and
review processes take place during the
preceding year. The Board also
addresses customary and traditional use
determinations during the applicable
cycle.
Applicable portions of the regulations
in the final rules that published June 13,
2012 (77 FR 35482), and June 19, 2014
(79 FR 35232), for the 2012–2014 and
2014–16 subparts C and D regulations
constitute the text of the regulations in
this proposed rule. The June 2012 rule
sets forth the proposed text for § __.25,
and the June 2014 rule sets for the
proposed text for §§ __.24 and __.26.
These regulations will remain in effect
until subsequent Board action changes
elements as a result of the public review
process outlined above in this
document.
Compliance With Statutory and
Regulatory Authorities
National Environmental Policy Act
A Draft Environmental Impact
Statement that described four
alternatives for developing a Federal
Subsistence Management Program was
distributed for public comment on
October 7, 1991. The Final
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS)
was published on February 28, 1992.
The Record of Decision (ROD) on
Subsistence Management for Federal
Public Lands in Alaska was signed April
6, 1992. The selected alternative in the
FEIS (Alternative IV) defined the
administrative framework of an annual
E:\FR\FM\14JAP1.SGM
14JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 9 / Wednesday, January 14, 2015 / Proposed Rules
regulatory cycle for subsistence
regulations.
A 1997 environmental assessment
dealt with the expansion of Federal
jurisdiction over fisheries and is
available at the office listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. The
Secretary of the Interior, with
concurrence of the Secretary of
Agriculture, determined that expansion
of Federal jurisdiction does not
constitute a major Federal action
significantly affecting the human
environment and, therefore, signed a
Finding of No Significant Impact.
wreier-aviles on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Section 810 of ANILCA
An ANILCA § 810 analysis was
completed as part of the FEIS process on
the Federal Subsistence Management
Program. The intent of all Federal
subsistence regulations is to accord
subsistence uses of fish and wildlife on
public lands a priority over the taking
of fish and wildlife on such lands for
other purposes, unless restriction is
necessary to conserve healthy fish and
wildlife populations. The final § 810
analysis determination appeared in the
April 6, 1992, ROD and concluded that
the Federal Subsistence Management
Program, under Alternative IV with an
annual process for setting subsistence
regulations, may have some local
impacts on subsistence uses, but will
not likely restrict subsistence uses
significantly.
During the subsequent environmental
assessment process for extending
fisheries jurisdiction, an evaluation of
the effects of this rule was conducted in
accordance with § 810. That evaluation
also supported the Secretaries’
determination that the rule will not
reach the ‘‘may significantly restrict’’
threshold that would require notice and
hearings under ANILCA § 810(a).
Paperwork Reduction Act
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor and you are not required to
respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number. This proposed
rule does not contain any new
collections of information that require
OMB approval. OMB has reviewed and
approved the collections of information
associated with the subsistence
regulations at 36 CFR 242 and 50 CFR
100, and assigned OMB Control Number
1018–0075, which expires February 29,
2016.
Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that
the Office of Information and Regulatory
VerDate Sep<11>2014
12:23 Jan 13, 2015
Jkt 235001
Affairs (OIRA) in the Office of
Management and Budget will review all
significant rules. OIRA has reviewed
this rule and has determined that this
rule is not significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the
principles of E.O. 12866 while calling
for improvements in the nation’s
regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty,
and to use the best, most innovative,
and least burdensome tools for
achieving regulatory ends. The
executive order directs agencies to
consider regulatory approaches that
reduce burdens and maintain flexibility
and freedom of choice for the public
where these approaches are relevant,
feasible, and consistent with regulatory
objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes
further that regulations must be based
on the best available science and that
the rulemaking process must allow for
public participation and an open
exchange of ideas. We have developed
this rule in a manner consistent with
these requirements.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires
preparation of flexibility analyses for
rules that will have a significant effect
on a substantial number of small
entities, which include small
businesses, organizations, or
governmental jurisdictions. In general,
the resources to be harvested under this
rule are already being harvested and
consumed by the local harvester and do
not result in an additional dollar benefit
to the economy. However, we estimate
that two million pounds of meat are
harvested by subsistence users annually
and, if given an estimated dollar value
of $3.00 per pound, this amount would
equate to about $6 million in food value
statewide. Based upon the amounts and
values cited above, the Departments
certify that this rulemaking will not
have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
Under the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act (5 U.S.C. 801
et seq.), this rule is not a major rule. It
does not have an effect on the economy
of $100 million or more, will not cause
a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, and does not have
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of U.S.-based enterprises to compete
with foreign-based enterprises.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1871
Executive Order 12630
Title VIII of ANILCA requires the
Secretaries to administer a subsistence
priority on public lands. The scope of
this program is limited by definition to
certain public lands. Likewise, these
regulations have no potential takings of
private property implications as defined
by Executive Order 12630.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Secretaries have determined and
certify pursuant to the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act, 2 U.S.C. 1502 et
seq., that this rulemaking will not
impose a cost of $100 million or more
in any given year on local or State
governments or private entities. The
implementation of this rule is by
Federal agencies, and no cost will be
imposed on any State or local entities or
tribal governments.
Executive Order 12988
The Secretaries have determined that
these regulations meet the applicable
standards provided in §§ 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, regarding
civil justice reform.
Executive Order 13132
In accordance with Executive Order
13132, the proposed rule does not have
sufficient Federalism implications to
warrant the preparation of a Federalism
Assessment. Title VIII of ANILCA
precludes the State from exercising
subsistence management authority over
fish and wildlife resources on Federal
lands unless it meets certain
requirements.
Executive Order 13175
The Alaska National Interest Lands
Conservation Act, Title VIII, does not
provide specific rights to tribes for the
subsistence taking of wildlife, fish, and
shellfish. However, the Board will
provide Federally recognized Tribes and
Alaska Native corporations an
opportunity to consult on this rule.
Consultation with Alaska Native
corporations are based on Public Law
108–199, div. H, Sec. 161, Jan. 23, 2004,
118 Stat. 452, as amended by Public
Law 108–447, div. H, title V, Sec. 518,
Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 3267, which
provides that: ‘‘The Director of the
Office of Management and Budget and
all Federal agencies shall hereafter
consult with Alaska Native corporations
on the same basis as Indian tribes under
Executive Order No. 13175.’’
The Secretaries, through the Board,
will provide a variety of opportunities
for consultation: commenting on
proposed changes to the existing rule;
engaging in dialogue at the Regional
Council meetings; engaging in dialogue
E:\FR\FM\14JAP1.SGM
14JAP1
1872
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 9 / Wednesday, January 14, 2015 / Proposed Rules
at the Board’s meetings; and providing
input in person, by mail, email, or
phone at any time during the
rulemaking process.
Executive Order 13211
This Executive Order requires
agencies to prepare Statements of
Energy Effects when undertaking certain
actions. However, this proposed rule is
not a significant regulatory action under
E.O. 13211, affecting energy supply,
distribution, or use, and no Statement of
Energy Effects is required.
Dated: December 12, 2014.
Eugene R. Peltola, Jr.,
Assistant Regional Director, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Acting Chair, Federal
Subsistence Board.
Dated: December. 15, 2014.
Steve Kessler,
Subsistence Program Leader, USDA–Forest
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–00425 Filed 1–13–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P; 4310–55–P
POSTAL SERVICE
Drafting Information
39 CFR Part 111
Theo Matuskowitz drafted these
regulations under the guidance of
Eugene R. Peltola, Jr. of the Office of
Subsistence Management, Alaska
Regional Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Anchorage, Alaska. Additional
assistance was provided by:
• Daniel Sharp, Alaska State Office,
Bureau of Land Management;
• Mary McBurney, Alaska Regional
Office, National Park Service;
• Dr. Glenn Chen, Alaska Regional
Office, Bureau of Indian Affairs;
• Trevor T. Fox, Alaska Regional
Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service;
and
• Steve Kessler and Thomas
Whitford, Alaska Regional Office, U.S.
Forest Service.
Clarification of Content Eligibility for
Standard Mail Marketing Parcels
List of Subjects
36 CFR Part 242
Administrative practice and
procedure, Alaska, Fish, National
forests, Public lands, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Wildlife.
50 CFR Part 100
Administrative practice and
procedure, Alaska, Fish, National
forests, Public lands, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Wildlife.
wreier-aviles on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Proposed Regulation Promulgation
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, the Federal Subsistence
Board proposes to amend 36 CFR part
242 and 50 CFR part 100 for the 2016–
17 and 2017–18 regulatory years. The
text of the proposed amendments to 36
CFR 242.24 and 242.26 and 50 CFR
100.24 and 100.26 is the final rule for
the 2014–16 regulatory period (79 FR
35232; June 19, 2014). The text of the
proposed amendments to 36 CFR 242.25
and 50 CFR 100.25 is the final rule for
the 2012–2014 regulatory period (77 FR
35482; June 13, 2012).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
12:23 Jan 13, 2015
Jkt 235001
Postal Service.TM
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Postal Service proposes
to clarify Mailing Standards of the
United States Postal Service, Domestic
Mail Manual (DMM®) to reaffirm basic
eligibility standards for Standard Mail
Marketing Parcels.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
February 13, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Mail or deliver written
comments to the Manager, Product
Classification, U.S. Postal Service, 475
L’Enfant Plaza SW., Room 4446,
Washington, DC 20260–5015. You may
inspect and photocopy all written
comments at USPS Headquarters
Library, 475 L’Enfant Plaza SW., 11th
Floor North, Washington, DC, by
appointment only, between 9 a.m. and
4 p.m., Monday through Friday by
calling 202–268–2906 in advance. Email
comments, containing the name and
address of the commenter, may be sent
to: ProductClassification@usps.gov,
with a subject line of ‘‘Marketing
Parcels.’’ Faxed comments are not
accepted.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lizbeth Dobbins at 202–268–3789, John
F. Rosato at 202–268–8597, or Suzanne
Newman at 202–695–0550.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: To ensure
consistency and clarity about the
content eligibility of Standard Mail
Marketing Parcels, the Postal Service
recently published an article in Postal
Bulletin 22406 (January 8, 2015) to
remind customers about the basic
eligibility and address format standards
for this classification of mail.
Background
Standard Mail Marketing Parcels were
specifically designed for mailers to send
items or samples to potential customers.
Our original intent was to build a low
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
cost prospecting vehicle and we built in
a few factors to minimize handling
costs. One of those factors, the
alternative addressing format, was
required so that the current resident
became the recipient of the mailpiece if
the named addressee had moved. This
avoided extra delivery and forwarding
handling costs. Another was that these
pieces needed to be similar in shape and
weight if mailed in a single mailing.
Other types of size restrictions were also
a requirement.
Building upon our original intent, and
to keep this product a viable
promotional and cost-effective vehicle,
we are adding stronger language about
content eligibility and address format.
All Standard Marketing parcels (regular
and nonprofit) must bear an alternate
addressing format and cannot be used
for ‘‘fulfillment purposes’’ (i.e. the
sending of items specifically purchased
or requested by the customer of a
mailer). The one exception will be if a
customer selects samples as a result of
an ordering mechanism and the samples
are sent in a separate package and not
inside the same package as the
fulfillment item. Moreover, the alternate
address format must be on the same line
as the addressee’s name, or on the
address line directly above or below the
addressee’s name.
We look forward to feedback from the
mailing community to help maintain
Standard Mail Marketing Parcels as a
viable, cost-effective product.
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 111
Administrative practice and
procedure, Postal Service.
Although we are exempt from the
notice and comment requirements of the
Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
553(b), (c)) regarding proposed
rulemaking by 39 U.S.C. 410(a), we
invite public comments on the
following proposed revisions to Mailing
Standards of the United States Postal
Service, Domestic Mail Manual (DMM),
incorporated by reference in the Code of
Federal Regulations. See 39 CFR 111.1.
Accordingly, 39 CFR part 111 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 111—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 39 CFR
part 111 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 13 U.S.C. 301–
307; 18 U.S.C. 1692–1737; 39 U.S.C. 101,
401, 403, 404, 414, 416, 3001–3011, 3201–
3219, 3403–3406, 3621, 3622, 3626, 3632,
3633, and 5001.
2. Revise the following sections of
Mailing Standards of the United States
Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual
(DMM), as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\14JAP1.SGM
14JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 9 (Wednesday, January 14, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 1868-1872]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00425]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
36 CFR Part 242
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. FWS-R7-SM-2014-0062; FXFR13350700640-156-FF07J00000;
FBMS#4500074738]
RIN 1018-BA39
Subsistence Management Regulations for Public Lands in Alaska--
2016-17 and 2017-18 Subsistence Taking of Wildlife Regulations
AGENCY: Forest Service, Agriculture; Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would establish regulations for hunting and
trapping seasons, harvest limits, and methods and means related to
taking of wildlife for subsistence uses during the 2016-17 and 2017-18
regulatory years. The Federal Subsistence Board is on a schedule of
completing the process of revising subsistence taking of wildlife
regulations in even-numbered years and subsistence taking of fish and
shellfish regulations in odd-numbered years; public proposal and review
processes take place during the preceding year. The Board also
addresses customary and traditional use determinations during the
applicable cycle. When final, the resulting rulemaking will replace the
existing subsistence wildlife taking regulations. This rule would also
amend the general regulations on subsistence taking of fish and
wildlife.
DATES: Public meetings: The Federal Subsistence Regional Advisory
Councils will hold public meetings to receive comments and make
proposals to change this proposed rule on several dates between
February 10 and March 19, 2015, and then hold another round of public
meetings to discuss and receive comments on the proposals, and make
recommendations on the proposals to the Federal Subsistence Board, on
several dates between August 17 and November 4, 2015. The Board will
discuss and evaluate proposed regulatory changes during a public
meeting in Anchorage, AK, in April 2016. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
for specific information on dates and locations of the public meetings.
Public comments: Comments and proposals to change this proposed
rule must be received or postmarked by March 25, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Public meetings: The Federal Subsistence Board and the
Federal Subsistence Regional Advisory Councils' public meetings will be
held at various locations in Alaska. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for
specific information on dates and locations of the public meetings.
Public comments: You may submit comments by one of the following
methods:
Electronically: Go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov and search for FWS-R7-SM-2014-0062, which is
the docket number for this rulemaking.
By hard copy: U.S. mail or hand-delivery to: USFWS, Office
of Subsistence Management, 1011 East Tudor Road, MS 121, Attn: Theo
Matuskowitz, Anchorage, AK 99503-6199, or hand delivery to the
Designated
[[Page 1869]]
Federal Official attending any of the Federal Subsistence Regional
Advisory Council public meetings. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for
additional information on locations of the public meetings.
We will post all comments on https://www.regulations.gov. This generally
means that we will post any personal information you provide us (see
the Public Review Process section below for more information).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chair, Federal Subsistence Board, c/o
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Attention: Eugene R. Peltola, Jr.,
Office of Subsistence Management; (907) 786-3888 or
subsistence@fws.gov. For questions specific to National Forest System
lands, contact Thomas Whitford, Regional Subsistence Program Leader,
USDA, Forest Service, Alaska Region; (907) 743-9461 or
twhitford@fs.fed.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under Title VIII of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation
Act (ANILCA) (16 U.S.C. 3111-3126), the Secretary of the Interior and
the Secretary of Agriculture (Secretaries) jointly implement the
Federal Subsistence Management Program. This program provides a rural
preference for take of fish and wildlife resources for subsistence uses
on Federal public lands and waters in Alaska. The Secretaries published
temporary regulations to carry out this program in the Federal Register
on June 29, 1990 (55 FR 27114), and final regulations were published in
the Federal Register on May 29, 1992 (57 FR 22940). The Program has
subsequently amended these regulations a number of times. Because this
program is a joint effort between Interior and Agriculture, these
regulations are located in two titles of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR): Title 36, ``Parks, Forests, and Public Property,''
and Title 50, ``Wildlife and Fisheries,'' at 36 CFR 242.1-28 and 50 CFR
100.1-28, respectively. The regulations contain subparts as follows:
Subpart A, General Provisions; Subpart B, Program Structure; Subpart C,
Board Determinations; and Subpart D, Subsistence Taking of Fish and
Wildlife.
Consistent with subpart B of these regulations, the Secretaries
established a Federal Subsistence Board to administer the Federal
Subsistence Management Program. The Board comprises:
A Chair appointed by the Secretary of the Interior with
concurrence of the Secretary of Agriculture;
The Alaska Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service;
The Alaska Regional Director, U.S. National Park Service;
The Alaska State Director, U.S. Bureau of Land Management;
The Alaska Regional Director, U.S. Bureau of Indian
Affairs;
The Alaska Regional Forester, U.S. Forest Service; and
Two public members appointed by the Secretary of the
Interior with concurrence of the Secretary of Agriculture.
Through the Board, these agencies and public members participate in
the development of regulations for subparts C and D, which, among other
things, set forth program eligibility and specific harvest seasons and
limits.
In administering the program, the Secretaries divided Alaska into
10 subsistence resource regions, each of which is represented by a
Regional Advisory Council. The Regional Advisory Councils provide a
forum for rural residents with personal knowledge of local conditions
and resource requirements to have a meaningful role in the subsistence
management of fish and wildlife on Federal public lands in Alaska. The
Regional Advisory Council members represent varied geographical,
cultural, and user interests within each region.
Public Review Process--Comments, Proposals, and Public Meetings
The Federal Subsistence Regional Advisory Councils have a
substantial role in reviewing this proposed rule and making
recommendations for the final rule. The Federal Subsistence Board,
through the Federal Subsistence Regional Advisory Councils, will hold
public meetings on this proposed rule at the following locations in
Alaska, on the following dates:
Region 1--Southeast Regional Council, Yakutat, March 17, 2015
Region 2--Southcentral Regional Council, Anchorage, February 18, 2015
Region 3--Kodiak/Aleutians Regional Council, Kodiak, February 10, 2015
Region 4--Bristol Bay Regional Council, Naknek, February 24, 2015
Region 5--Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta Regional Council, Bethel, February 25,
2015
Region 6--Western Interior Regional Council, Fairbanks, March 3, 2015
Region 7--Seward Peninsula Regional Council, Nome, February 18, 2015
Region 8--Northwest Arctic Regional Council, Kotzebue, March 9, 2015
Region 9--Eastern Interior Regional Council, Fairbanks, March 4, 2015
Region 10--North Slope Regional Council, Barrow, March 17, 2015
During April 2015, the written proposals to change the subpart D,
take of wildlife regulations, and subpart C, customary and traditional
use determinations, will be compiled and distributed for public review.
During the 45-day public comment period, which is presently scheduled
to end on May 15, 2015, written public comments will be accepted on the
distributed proposals.
The Board, through the Regional Advisory Councils, will hold a
second series of public meetings in August through October 2015, to
receive comments on specific proposals and to develop recommendations
to the Board at the following locations in Alaska, on the following
dates:
Region 1--Southeast Regional Council, Petersburg, October 13, 2015
Region 2--Southcentral Regional Council, Seldovia, October 20, 2015
Region 3--Kodiak/Aleutians Regional Council, Adak, September 25, 2015
Region 4--Bristol Bay Regional Council, Dillingham, October 27, 2015
Region 5--Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta Regional Council, TBD, October 7, 2015
Region 6--Western Interior Regional Council, Kaltag, November 3, 2015
Region 7--Seward Peninsula Regional Council, Nome, October 14, 2015
Region 8--Northwest Arctic Regional Council, Buckland, October 6, 2015
Region 9--Eastern Interior Regional Council, Fairbanks, October 29,
2015
Region 10--North Slope Regional Council, Kaktovik, November 3, 2015
A notice will be published of specific dates, times, and meeting
locations in local and statewide newspapers prior to both series of
meetings. Locations and dates may change based on weather or local
circumstances. The amount of work on each Regional Advisory Council's
agenda determines the length of each Regional Advisory Council meeting.
The Board will discuss and evaluate proposed changes to the
subsistence management regulations during a public meeting scheduled to
be held in Anchorage, Alaska, in April 2016. The Federal Subsistence
Regional Advisory Council Chairs, or their designated representatives,
will present their respective Councils' recommendations at the Board
meeting. Additional oral testimony may be provided on specific
proposals before the Board at that time. At that public meeting, the
Board will deliberate and take final action on proposals received that
request changes to this proposed rule.
Proposals to the Board to modify the general fish and wildlife
regulations, wildlife harvest regulations, and
[[Page 1870]]
customary and traditional use determinations must include the following
information:
a. Name, address, and telephone number of the requestor;
b. Each section and/or paragraph designation in this proposed rule
for which changes are suggested, if applicable;
c. A description of the regulatory change(s) desired;
d. A statement explaining why each change is necessary;
e. Proposed wording changes; and
f. Any additional information that you believe will help the Board
in evaluating the proposed change.
The Board immediately rejects proposals that fail to include the
above information, or proposals that are beyond the scope of
authorities in Sec. __.24, subpart C (the regulations governing
customary and traditional use determinations), and Sec. Sec. __.25 and
__0;.26, subpart D (the general and specific regulations governing the
subsistence take of wildlife). If a proposal needs clarification, prior
to being distributed for public review, the proponent may be contacted,
and the proposal could be revised based on their input. Once
distributed for public review, no additional changes may be made as
part of the original submission. During the April 2016 meeting, the
Board may defer review and action on some proposals to allow time for
cooperative planning efforts, or to acquire additional needed
information. The Board may elect to defer taking action on any given
proposal if the workload of staff, Regional Advisory Councils, or the
Board becomes excessive. These deferrals may be based on
recommendations by the affected Regional Advisory Council(s) or staff
members, or on the basis of the Board's intention to do least harm to
the subsistence user and the resource involved. A proponent of a
proposal may withdraw the proposal provided it has not been considered,
and a recommendation has not been made, by a Regional Advisory Council.
The Board may consider and act on alternatives that address the intent
of a proposal while differing in approach.
You may submit written comments and materials concerning this
proposed rule by one of the methods listed in ADDRESSES. If you submit
a comment via https://www.regulations.gov, your entire comment,
including any personal identifying information, will be posted on the
Web site. If you submit a hardcopy comment that includes personal
identifying information, you may request at the top of your document
that we withhold this information from public review. However, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. We will post all
hardcopy comments on https://www.regulations.gov.
Comments and materials we receive, as well as supporting
documentation we used in preparing this proposed rule, will be
available for public inspection on https://www.regulations.gov, or by
appointment, between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays, at: USFWS, Office of Subsistence Management, 1011
East Tudor Road, Anchorage, AK 99503.
Reasonable Accommodations
The Federal Subsistence Board is committed to providing access to
these meetings for all participants. Please direct all requests for
sign language interpreting services, closed captioning, or other
accommodation needs to Deborah Coble, 907-786-3880,
subsistence@fws.gov, or 800-877-8339 (TTY), seven business days prior
to the meeting you would like to attend.
Tribal Consultation and Comment
As expressed in Executive Order 13175, ``Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,'' the Federal officials
that have been delegated authority by the Secretaries are committed to
honoring the unique government-to-government political relationship
that exists between the Federal Government and Federally Recognized
Indian Tribes (Tribes) as listed in 79 FR 4748 (January 29, 2014).
Consultation with Alaska Native corporations is based on Public Law
108-199, div. H, Sec. 161, Jan. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 452, as amended by
Public Law 108-447, div. H, title V, Sec. 518, Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat.
3267, which provides that: ``The Director of the Office of Management
and Budget and all Federal agencies shall hereafter consult with Alaska
Native corporations on the same basis as Indian tribes under Executive
Order No. 13175.''
ANILCA does not provide specific rights to Tribes for the
subsistence taking of wildlife, fish, and shellfish. However, because
tribal members are affected by subsistence fishing, hunting, and
trapping regulations, the Secretaries, through the Board, will provide
Federally recognized Tribes and Alaska Native corporations an
opportunity to consult on this rule.
The Board will engage in outreach efforts for this rule, including
a notification letter, to ensure that Tribes and Alaska Native
corporations are advised of the mechanisms by which they can
participate. The Board provides a variety of opportunities for
consultation: proposing changes to the existing rule; commenting on
proposed changes to the existing rule; engaging in dialogue at the
Regional Council meetings; engaging in dialogue at the Board's
meetings; and providing input in person, by mail, email, or phone at
any time during the rulemaking process. The Board commits to
efficiently and adequately providing an opportunity to Tribes and
Alaska Native corporations for consultation in regard to subsistence
rulemaking.
The Board will consider Tribes' and Alaska Native corporations'
information, input, and recommendations, and address their concerns as
much as practicable.
Developing the 2016-17 and 2017-18 Wildlife Seasons and Harvest Limit
Regulations
Subpart C and D regulations are subject to periodic review and
revision. The Federal Subsistence Board currently completes the process
of revising subsistence take of wildlife regulations in even-numbered
years and fish and shellfish regulations in odd-numbered years; public
proposal and review processes take place during the preceding year. The
Board also addresses customary and traditional use determinations
during the applicable cycle.
Applicable portions of the regulations in the final rules that
published June 13, 2012 (77 FR 35482), and June 19, 2014 (79 FR 35232),
for the 2012-2014 and 2014-16 subparts C and D regulations constitute
the text of the regulations in this proposed rule. The June 2012 rule
sets forth the proposed text for Sec. __.25, and the June 2014 rule
sets for the proposed text for Sec. Sec. __.24 and __.26. These
regulations will remain in effect until subsequent Board action changes
elements as a result of the public review process outlined above in
this document.
Compliance With Statutory and Regulatory Authorities
National Environmental Policy Act
A Draft Environmental Impact Statement that described four
alternatives for developing a Federal Subsistence Management Program
was distributed for public comment on October 7, 1991. The Final
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) was published on February 28,
1992. The Record of Decision (ROD) on Subsistence Management for
Federal Public Lands in Alaska was signed April 6, 1992. The selected
alternative in the FEIS (Alternative IV) defined the administrative
framework of an annual
[[Page 1871]]
regulatory cycle for subsistence regulations.
A 1997 environmental assessment dealt with the expansion of Federal
jurisdiction over fisheries and is available at the office listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. The Secretary of the Interior, with
concurrence of the Secretary of Agriculture, determined that expansion
of Federal jurisdiction does not constitute a major Federal action
significantly affecting the human environment and, therefore, signed a
Finding of No Significant Impact.
Section 810 of ANILCA
An ANILCA Sec. 810 analysis was completed as part of the FEIS
process on the Federal Subsistence Management Program. The intent of
all Federal subsistence regulations is to accord subsistence uses of
fish and wildlife on public lands a priority over the taking of fish
and wildlife on such lands for other purposes, unless restriction is
necessary to conserve healthy fish and wildlife populations. The final
Sec. 810 analysis determination appeared in the April 6, 1992, ROD and
concluded that the Federal Subsistence Management Program, under
Alternative IV with an annual process for setting subsistence
regulations, may have some local impacts on subsistence uses, but will
not likely restrict subsistence uses significantly.
During the subsequent environmental assessment process for
extending fisheries jurisdiction, an evaluation of the effects of this
rule was conducted in accordance with Sec. 810. That evaluation also
supported the Secretaries' determination that the rule will not reach
the ``may significantly restrict'' threshold that would require notice
and hearings under ANILCA Sec. 810(a).
Paperwork Reduction Act
An agency may not conduct or sponsor and you are not required to
respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. This
proposed rule does not contain any new collections of information that
require OMB approval. OMB has reviewed and approved the collections of
information associated with the subsistence regulations at 36 CFR 242
and 50 CFR 100, and assigned OMB Control Number 1018-0075, which
expires February 29, 2016.
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) in the Office of Management and Budget will
review all significant rules. OIRA has reviewed this rule and has
determined that this rule is not significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866 while
calling for improvements in the nation's regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best, most
innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory ends.
The executive order directs agencies to consider regulatory approaches
that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of choice for
the public where these approaches are relevant, feasible, and
consistent with regulatory objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes further
that regulations must be based on the best available science and that
the rulemaking process must allow for public participation and an open
exchange of ideas. We have developed this rule in a manner consistent
with these requirements.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
requires preparation of flexibility analyses for rules that will have a
significant effect on a substantial number of small entities, which
include small businesses, organizations, or governmental jurisdictions.
In general, the resources to be harvested under this rule are already
being harvested and consumed by the local harvester and do not result
in an additional dollar benefit to the economy. However, we estimate
that two million pounds of meat are harvested by subsistence users
annually and, if given an estimated dollar value of $3.00 per pound,
this amount would equate to about $6 million in food value statewide.
Based upon the amounts and values cited above, the Departments certify
that this rulemaking will not have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
Under the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (5
U.S.C. 801 et seq.), this rule is not a major rule. It does not have an
effect on the economy of $100 million or more, will not cause a major
increase in costs or prices for consumers, and does not have
significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
Executive Order 12630
Title VIII of ANILCA requires the Secretaries to administer a
subsistence priority on public lands. The scope of this program is
limited by definition to certain public lands. Likewise, these
regulations have no potential takings of private property implications
as defined by Executive Order 12630.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Secretaries have determined and certify pursuant to the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, 2 U.S.C. 1502 et seq., that this
rulemaking will not impose a cost of $100 million or more in any given
year on local or State governments or private entities. The
implementation of this rule is by Federal agencies, and no cost will be
imposed on any State or local entities or tribal governments.
Executive Order 12988
The Secretaries have determined that these regulations meet the
applicable standards provided in Sec. Sec. 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, regarding civil justice reform.
Executive Order 13132
In accordance with Executive Order 13132, the proposed rule does
not have sufficient Federalism implications to warrant the preparation
of a Federalism Assessment. Title VIII of ANILCA precludes the State
from exercising subsistence management authority over fish and wildlife
resources on Federal lands unless it meets certain requirements.
Executive Order 13175
The Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act, Title VIII,
does not provide specific rights to tribes for the subsistence taking
of wildlife, fish, and shellfish. However, the Board will provide
Federally recognized Tribes and Alaska Native corporations an
opportunity to consult on this rule. Consultation with Alaska Native
corporations are based on Public Law 108-199, div. H, Sec. 161, Jan.
23, 2004, 118 Stat. 452, as amended by Public Law 108-447, div. H,
title V, Sec. 518, Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 3267, which provides that:
``The Director of the Office of Management and Budget and all Federal
agencies shall hereafter consult with Alaska Native corporations on the
same basis as Indian tribes under Executive Order No. 13175.''
The Secretaries, through the Board, will provide a variety of
opportunities for consultation: commenting on proposed changes to the
existing rule; engaging in dialogue at the Regional Council meetings;
engaging in dialogue
[[Page 1872]]
at the Board's meetings; and providing input in person, by mail, email,
or phone at any time during the rulemaking process.
Executive Order 13211
This Executive Order requires agencies to prepare Statements of
Energy Effects when undertaking certain actions. However, this proposed
rule is not a significant regulatory action under E.O. 13211, affecting
energy supply, distribution, or use, and no Statement of Energy Effects
is required.
Drafting Information
Theo Matuskowitz drafted these regulations under the guidance of
Eugene R. Peltola, Jr. of the Office of Subsistence Management, Alaska
Regional Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska.
Additional assistance was provided by:
Daniel Sharp, Alaska State Office, Bureau of Land
Management;
Mary McBurney, Alaska Regional Office, National Park
Service;
Dr. Glenn Chen, Alaska Regional Office, Bureau of Indian
Affairs;
Trevor T. Fox, Alaska Regional Office, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service; and
Steve Kessler and Thomas Whitford, Alaska Regional Office,
U.S. Forest Service.
List of Subjects
36 CFR Part 242
Administrative practice and procedure, Alaska, Fish, National
forests, Public lands, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Wildlife.
50 CFR Part 100
Administrative practice and procedure, Alaska, Fish, National
forests, Public lands, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Wildlife.
Proposed Regulation Promulgation
For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Federal Subsistence
Board proposes to amend 36 CFR part 242 and 50 CFR part 100 for the
2016-17 and 2017-18 regulatory years. The text of the proposed
amendments to 36 CFR 242.24 and 242.26 and 50 CFR 100.24 and 100.26 is
the final rule for the 2014-16 regulatory period (79 FR 35232; June 19,
2014). The text of the proposed amendments to 36 CFR 242.25 and 50 CFR
100.25 is the final rule for the 2012-2014 regulatory period (77 FR
35482; June 13, 2012).
Dated: December 12, 2014.
Eugene R. Peltola, Jr.,
Assistant Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Acting
Chair, Federal Subsistence Board.
Dated: December. 15, 2014.
Steve Kessler,
Subsistence Program Leader, USDA-Forest Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-00425 Filed 1-13-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P; 4310-55-P