Privacy Act; STATE-78, Risk Analysis and Management Records, 1847-1848 [2015-00375]
Download as PDF
1847
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 80, No. 9
Wednesday, January 14, 2015
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Commodity Credit Corporation
7 CFR Part 1494
RIN 0551–AA75
Export Bonus Programs
Foreign Agricultural Service
and Commodity Credit Corporation
(CCC), USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule removes
regulations for the Export Enhancement
Program (EEP) and the Dairy Export
Incentive Program (DEIP) from the Code
of Federal Regulations, because the
authorities for these programs were
repealed by Section 3103 of the Food,
Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008,
Public Law 110–246, and Section 1423
of the Agricultural Act of 2014, Public
Law 113–79, respectively.
DATES: This rule is effective January 14,
2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy Slusher, Deputy Director, Credit
Programs Division, Foreign Agricultural
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
1400 Independence Ave. SW., Stop
1025, Room 5509, Washington, DC
20250–1025; telephone (202) 720–6211.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
wreier-aviles on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Background
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1494
Agricultural commodities, Exports,
Dairy products.
Accordingly, under the authority of
Sec. 3103, Public Law 110–246, and
Sec. 1423, Public Law 113–79, and as
discussed in the preamble, CCC amends
7 CFR chapter XIV by removing and
reserving part 1494.
Dated: January 2, 2015.
Asif Chaudhry,
Acting Administrator, Foreign Agricultural
Service, and Vice President, Commodity
Credit Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2015–00504 Filed 1–13–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–10–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 171
[Public Notice: 8870]
The Export Enhancement Program
(EEP) was enacted through the Food,
Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade
Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101–624). Under
the EEP, CCC made available bonuses to
enable U.S. exporters to meet prevailing
world prices for targeted commodities
in targeted destinations. The last year of
operation of the EEP was 2001; since
that time, U.S. agricultural products
have been competitive in world markets
and EEP bonuses have not been needed
to facilitate sales.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
The Dairy Export Incentive Program
(DEIP) was enacted through the Food
Security Act of 1985 (Pub. L. 99–198).
Under the DEIP, CCC made available
bonuses to enable U.S. exporters to meet
prevailing world prices for certain dairy
products in targeted destinations. The
last year of operation of the DEIP was
2010; since that time, bonuses have not
been needed to facilitate sales.
The primary objective of the EEP and
DEIP was to encourage the commercial
sale of United States agricultural
commodities in world markets at
competitive prices. Both programs were
subject to annual commodity-specific
quantity and budgetary ceilings agreed
to by the United States in the World
Trade Organization. Congress repealed
the authority for the EEP in Section
3103 of the Food, Conservation, and
Energy Act of 2008, and subsequently
repealed the authority for the DEIP in
Section 1423 of the Agricultural Act of
2014.
12:11 Jan 13, 2015
Jkt 235001
RIN 1400–AD65
Privacy Act; STATE–78, Risk Analysis
and Management Records
Department of State.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of State is
issuing a final rule to amend its Privacy
Act regulation exempting portions of a
system of records from certain
provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Certain portions of the Risk Analysis
and Management (RAM) Records, State–
78, system of records contain criminal
investigation records, investigatory
material for law enforcement purposes,
confidential source information and are
proposed to be exempted under the
Privacy Act.
DATES: This final rule is effective
January 14, 2015
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Hackett, Acting Director; Office of
Information Programs and Services,
A/GIS/IPS; Department of State, SA–2;
515 22nd Street NW., Washington, DC
20522–8001, or at Privacy@state.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
system, Risk Analysis and Management
(RAM) Records, designated as State–78,
supports the vetting of directors,
officers, or other employees of
organizations who apply for Department
of State contracts, grants, cooperative
agreements, or other funding. The
information collected from these
organizations and individuals is
specifically used to conduct screening
to ensure that Department funds are not
used to provide support to entities or
individuals deemed to be a risk to U.S.
national security interests. The records
may contain criminal investigation
records, investigatory material for law
enforcement purposes, and confidential
source information. (The information
collection was approved under OMB
Control Number 1405–0204, expiration
April 30, 2015.)
The Department of State is issuing
this document to amend 22 CFR part
171 to exempt portions of the Risk
Analysis and Management Records
system of records from the Privacy Act
except sections (b), (c)(1) and (2),
(e)(4)(A) through (F), (e)(6), (7), (9), (10),
and (11), and (i), to the extent to which
they meet the criteria of section (j)(2);
and from subsections (c)(3);(d); (e)(1);
(e)(4)(G), (H), and (I); and (f) of the
Privacy Act pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a
(k)(1), (k)(2), and (k)(5). Consistent with
the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a(k)), 22
CFR 171.36(b)(1), (2), and (5) provide
concise general statements on the
reasoning behind taking exemptions
(k)(1), (k)(2), and (k)(5), respectively, for
the Department systems for which those
exemptions are taken. For ease of
reference, these statements of reasoning
are restated here: STATE–78 is
exempted under (k)(1) in order to
protect material required to be kept
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
1848
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 9 / Wednesday, January 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
secret in the interest of national defense
and foreign policy. STATE–78 is
exempted under (k)(2) in order to
prevent individuals that are the subject
of investigation from frustrating the
investigatory process, to ensure the
proper functioning and integrity of law
enforcement activities, to prevent
disclosure of investigative techniques,
to maintain the confidence of foreign
governments in the integrity of the
procedures under which privileged or
confidential information may be
provided, and to fulfill commitments
made to sources to protect their
identities and the confidentiality of
information and to avoid endangering
these sources and law enforcement
personnel. STATE–78 is exempted
under (k)(5) in order to ensure the
proper functioning of the investigatory
process, to ensure effective
determination of suitability, eligibility,
and qualification for employment and to
protect the confidentiality of sources of
information.
This action was previously published
in a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (76
FR 76103) and a Notice of Intent to
Create a System of Records (76 FR
76215). One comment was received by
a member of the public who voiced a
criticism of an analogous risk
assessment program run by USAID. The
commenter was advised that the
Department’s risk assessment program
operates separately from USAID’s
program. The commenter had nothing
further to add.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 171
Privacy.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, 22 CFR part 171 is amended
as follows:
PART 171—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 171
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552, 552a; 22 U.S.C.
2651a; Pub. L. 95–521, 92 Stat. 1824, as
amended; E.O. 13526, 75 FR 707; E.O. 12600,
52 FR 23781, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 235.
2. Section 171.36 is amended by:
a. Revising paragraph (a)(2); and
b. Adding an entry, in alphabetical
order, for ‘‘Risk Analysis and
Management Records. STATE–78.’’ to
the lists in paragraphs (b)(1), (2), and
(5).
The revision reads as follows:
wreier-aviles on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
■
■
■
§ 171.36
General (STATE–53), the Information
Access Program Records system
(STATE–35), and the Bureau of
Administration (STATE–78) are subject
to general exemption under 5 U.S.C.
552a(j)(2). All records contained in
record system STATE–36, Security
Records, and all records contained the
Risk Analysis and Management Records
system (STATE–78), are exempt from all
provisions of the Privacy Act except
sections (b), (c)(1) and (2), (e)(4)(A)
through (F), (e)(6), (7), (9), (10), and (11),
and (i) to the extent to which they meet
the criteria of section (j)(2). These
exemptions are necessary to ensure the
effectiveness of the investigative,
judicial, and protective processes. All
records contained in STATE–53, records
of the Inspector General and Automated
Individual Cross-Reference System, are
exempt from all of the provisions of the
Privacy Act except sections (b), (c)(1)
and (2), (e)(4)(A) through (F), (e)(6), (7),
(9), (10), and (11), and (i) to the extent
to which they meet the criteria of
section (j)(2). These exemptions are
necessary to ensure the proper functions
of the law enforcement activity, to
protect confidential sources of
information, to fulfill promises of
confidentiality, to prevent interference
with the enforcement of criminal laws,
to avoid the disclosure of investigative
techniques, to avoid the endangering of
the life and safety of any individual, to
avoid premature disclosure of the
knowledge of potential criminal activity
and the evidentiary bases of possible
enforcement actions, and to maintain
the integrity of the law enforcement
process. All records contained in the
Information Access Program Records
system (STATE–35) are exempt from all
of the provisions of the Privacy Act
except sections (b), (c)(1) and (2),
(e)(4)(A) through (F), (e)(6), (7), (9), (10),
and (11), and (i) to the extent to which
they meet the criteria of section (j)(2).
These exemptions are necessary to
ensure the protection of law
enforcement information retrieved from
various sources in response to
information access requests.
*
*
*
*
*
Joyce A. Barr,
Assistant Secretary for Administration, U.S.
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015–00375 Filed 1–13–15; 8:45 am]
Exemptions.
BILLING CODE 4710–24–P
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(2) The systems of records maintained
by the Bureau of Diplomatic Security
(STATE–36), the Office of the Inspector
VerDate Sep<11>2014
12:11 Jan 13, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Part 685
[Docket ID ED–2014–OPE–0082]
RIN 1840–AD17
William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan
Program
Office of Postsecondary
Education, Department of Education.
ACTION: Announcement of early
implementation date.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Education (Department) is establishing
the date for early implementation of the
William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan
(Direct Loan) Program regulations that
update the standard for determining if a
potential parent or student borrower has
an adverse credit history for purposes of
eligibility for a Direct PLUS Loan (PLUS
loan). These regulations also require
parents and students who have an
adverse credit history, but who are
approved for a PLUS loan on the basis
that extenuating circumstances exist or
by obtaining an endorser for the PLUS
loan, to receive loan counseling before
receiving the PLUS loan.
DATES: The early implementation date
for § 685.200(b)(5) and (c), published in
the Federal Register on October 23,
2014 (79 FR 63317), is March 29, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information about the Direct PLUS Loan
Program or how to apply for a Direct
PLUS Loan, call the Federal Student
Aid Information Center (FSAIC) at 1–
800–4FEDAID (1–800–433–3243). For
information regarding the establishment
of this early implementation date,
contact Sue O’Flaherty, U.S. Department
of Education, Federal Student Aid, 830
First Street NE., Union Center Plaza,
Room 64E1, Washington, DC 20202–
5345. Telephone: (202) 377–3393 or by
email at: sue.oflaherty@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877–
8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
Section 482(c) of the Higher
Education Act of 1965, as amended
(HEA), requires that regulations
affecting programs under title IV of the
HEA be published in final form by
November 1 prior to the start of the
award year (July 1) to which they apply.
However, that section of the HEA also
permits the Secretary to designate any
regulation as one that an entity subject
to the regulations may choose to
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 9 (Wednesday, January 14, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1847-1848]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00375]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 171
[Public Notice: 8870]
RIN 1400-AD65
Privacy Act; STATE-78, Risk Analysis and Management Records
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of State is issuing a final rule to amend its
Privacy Act regulation exempting portions of a system of records from
certain provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974. Certain portions of the
Risk Analysis and Management (RAM) Records, State-78, system of records
contain criminal investigation records, investigatory material for law
enforcement purposes, confidential source information and are proposed
to be exempted under the Privacy Act.
DATES: This final rule is effective January 14, 2015
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Hackett, Acting Director; Office
of Information Programs and Services, A/GIS/IPS; Department of State,
SA-2; 515 22nd Street NW., Washington, DC 20522-8001, or at
Privacy@state.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The system, Risk Analysis and Management
(RAM) Records, designated as State-78, supports the vetting of
directors, officers, or other employees of organizations who apply for
Department of State contracts, grants, cooperative agreements, or other
funding. The information collected from these organizations and
individuals is specifically used to conduct screening to ensure that
Department funds are not used to provide support to entities or
individuals deemed to be a risk to U.S. national security interests.
The records may contain criminal investigation records, investigatory
material for law enforcement purposes, and confidential source
information. (The information collection was approved under OMB Control
Number 1405-0204, expiration April 30, 2015.)
The Department of State is issuing this document to amend 22 CFR
part 171 to exempt portions of the Risk Analysis and Management Records
system of records from the Privacy Act except sections (b), (c)(1) and
(2), (e)(4)(A) through (F), (e)(6), (7), (9), (10), and (11), and (i),
to the extent to which they meet the criteria of section (j)(2); and
from subsections (c)(3);(d); (e)(1); (e)(4)(G), (H), and (I); and (f)
of the Privacy Act pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a (k)(1), (k)(2), and
(k)(5). Consistent with the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a(k)), 22 CFR
171.36(b)(1), (2), and (5) provide concise general statements on the
reasoning behind taking exemptions (k)(1), (k)(2), and (k)(5),
respectively, for the Department systems for which those exemptions are
taken. For ease of reference, these statements of reasoning are
restated here: STATE-78 is exempted under (k)(1) in order to protect
material required to be kept
[[Page 1848]]
secret in the interest of national defense and foreign policy. STATE-78
is exempted under (k)(2) in order to prevent individuals that are the
subject of investigation from frustrating the investigatory process, to
ensure the proper functioning and integrity of law enforcement
activities, to prevent disclosure of investigative techniques, to
maintain the confidence of foreign governments in the integrity of the
procedures under which privileged or confidential information may be
provided, and to fulfill commitments made to sources to protect their
identities and the confidentiality of information and to avoid
endangering these sources and law enforcement personnel. STATE-78 is
exempted under (k)(5) in order to ensure the proper functioning of the
investigatory process, to ensure effective determination of
suitability, eligibility, and qualification for employment and to
protect the confidentiality of sources of information.
This action was previously published in a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (76 FR 76103) and a Notice of Intent to Create a System of
Records (76 FR 76215). One comment was received by a member of the
public who voiced a criticism of an analogous risk assessment program
run by USAID. The commenter was advised that the Department's risk
assessment program operates separately from USAID's program. The
commenter had nothing further to add.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 171
Privacy.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, 22 CFR part 171 is amended
as follows:
PART 171--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 171 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552, 552a; 22 U.S.C. 2651a; Pub. L. 95-521,
92 Stat. 1824, as amended; E.O. 13526, 75 FR 707; E.O. 12600, 52 FR
23781, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 235.
0
2. Section 171.36 is amended by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (a)(2); and
0
b. Adding an entry, in alphabetical order, for ``Risk Analysis and
Management Records. STATE-78.'' to the lists in paragraphs (b)(1), (2),
and (5).
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 171.36 Exemptions.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(2) The systems of records maintained by the Bureau of Diplomatic
Security (STATE-36), the Office of the Inspector General (STATE-53),
the Information Access Program Records system (STATE-35), and the
Bureau of Administration (STATE-78) are subject to general exemption
under 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2). All records contained in record system
STATE-36, Security Records, and all records contained the Risk Analysis
and Management Records system (STATE-78), are exempt from all
provisions of the Privacy Act except sections (b), (c)(1) and (2),
(e)(4)(A) through (F), (e)(6), (7), (9), (10), and (11), and (i) to the
extent to which they meet the criteria of section (j)(2). These
exemptions are necessary to ensure the effectiveness of the
investigative, judicial, and protective processes. All records
contained in STATE-53, records of the Inspector General and Automated
Individual Cross-Reference System, are exempt from all of the
provisions of the Privacy Act except sections (b), (c)(1) and (2),
(e)(4)(A) through (F), (e)(6), (7), (9), (10), and (11), and (i) to the
extent to which they meet the criteria of section (j)(2). These
exemptions are necessary to ensure the proper functions of the law
enforcement activity, to protect confidential sources of information,
to fulfill promises of confidentiality, to prevent interference with
the enforcement of criminal laws, to avoid the disclosure of
investigative techniques, to avoid the endangering of the life and
safety of any individual, to avoid premature disclosure of the
knowledge of potential criminal activity and the evidentiary bases of
possible enforcement actions, and to maintain the integrity of the law
enforcement process. All records contained in the Information Access
Program Records system (STATE-35) are exempt from all of the provisions
of the Privacy Act except sections (b), (c)(1) and (2), (e)(4)(A)
through (F), (e)(6), (7), (9), (10), and (11), and (i) to the extent to
which they meet the criteria of section (j)(2). These exemptions are
necessary to ensure the protection of law enforcement information
retrieved from various sources in response to information access
requests.
* * * * *
Joyce A. Barr,
Assistant Secretary for Administration, U.S. Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-00375 Filed 1-13-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-24-P