RESTORE Act Spill Impact Component Planning Allocation, 1584-1586 [2014-30675]
Download as PDF
1584
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 8 / Tuesday, January 13, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
14 CFR Parts 5 and 119
received are part of the public record
and subject to public disclosure.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Roberson at 202–482–1315.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[Docket No. FAA–2009–0671; Amendment
Nos. 5–1 and 119–17]
I. Background
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
RIN 2120–AJ86
Safety Management Systems for
Domestic, Flag, and Supplemental
Operations Certificate Holders
Correction
In rule document 2015–00143
appearing on pages 1307–1328 in the
issue of January 8, 2015, make the
following correction:
§ 5.1
[Corrected]
On page 1326, in § 5.1, in the second
column, in the second line from the top,
‘‘January 8, 2018’’ should read ‘‘March
9, 2018’’.
[FR Doc. C1–2015–00143 Filed 1–12–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
GULF COAST ECOSYSTEM
RESTORATION COUNCIL
40 CFR Part 1800
[Docket Number: 110142014–1111–02]
RIN 3600–AA00
RESTORE Act Spill Impact Component
Planning Allocation
Gulf Coast Ecosystem
Restoration Council.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Gulf Coast Ecosystem
Restoration Council (Council) is issuing
a final rule authorizing the Gulf Coast
State members of the Council, or their
administrative agents, and the Gulf
Consortium of Florida counties to apply
for grants to fund planning activities to
develop individual State Expenditure
Plans (SEP) using amounts up to the
statutory minimum that each Gulf Coast
State must receive under the Spill
Impact Component of the Resources and
Ecosystems Sustainability, Tourist
Opportunities, and Revived Economies
of the Gulf Coast States Act of 2012
(RESTORE Act).
DATES: This final rule becomes effective
on January 13, 2015.
ADDRESSES: The Council posted all
comments to the interim rule on its Web
site, https://www.restorethegulf.gov/,
without change, including any business
or personal information provided, such
as names, addresses, email addresses, or
telephone numbers. All comments
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Jan 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
The RESTORE Act, Public Law 112–
141 (July 6, 2012), codified at 33 U.S.C.
1321(t) and note, makes funds available
for the restoration and protection of the
Gulf Coast Region through a new trust
fund in the Treasury of the United
States, known as the Gulf Coast
Restoration Trust Fund (Trust Fund).
The Trust Fund will contain 80 percent
of the administrative and civil penalties
paid by the responsible parties after July
6, 2012, under the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act in connection
with the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.
These funds will be invested and made
available through five components of
the RESTORE Act. On August 15, 2014,
the Department of Treasury (Treasury)
issued regulations (79 FR 48039)
applicable to all five components, and
which generally describe the
responsibilities of the Federal and State
entities that administer RESTORE Act
programs and carry out restoration
activities in the Gulf Coast Region.
Two of the five components, the
Comprehensive Plan and Spill Impact
Components, are administered by the
Council, an independent federal entity
created by the RESTORE Act. Under the
Spill Impact Component (33 U.S.C.
1321(t)(3)), the subject of this final rule,
30 percent of funds in the Trust Fund
will be disbursed to the five Gulf Coast
States (Alabama, Florida, Louisiana,
Mississippi, and Texas) or their
administrative agents based on an
allocation formula established by the
Council by regulation based on criteria
in the RESTORE Act. The RESTORE Act
establishes a statutory minimum under
which each of the five Gulf Coast States
is guaranteed five percent of the funds
made available under this component.
In order for funds to be disbursed to a
Gulf Coast State, the RESTORE Act
requires each Gulf Coast State to
develop a SEP and submit it to the
Council for approval. The RESTORE Act
specifies the particular entity within
each Gulf Coast State that will prepare
the individual SEPs: In Alabama, the
Alabama Gulf Coast Recovery Council;
in Florida, a consortium of local
political subdivisions that includes a
minimum of one representative of each
affected county (officially named the
‘‘Gulf Consortium’’ as organized under
Florida law); in Louisiana, the Coastal
Protection and Restoration Authority of
Louisiana; in Mississippi, the Office of
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the Governor or an appointee of the
Office of the Governor; and in Texas, the
Office of the Governor or an appointee
of the Office of the Governor. 33 U.S.C.
1321(t)(3)(B)(iii).
On August 22, 2014, the Council
issued an interim final rule to permit
the five eligible entities responsible for
drafting SEPs to have access to amounts
up to the statutory minimum to help
draft a SEP that meets all statutory
requirements.1 79 FR 49690. The
Council opened this interim final rule
up for public comment for 30 days. The
Council received substantive comments
from three separate commenters.
After considering public comments,
the Council now issues the regulations
as a final rule. The rule will take effect
on January 13, 2015. The Council will
separately make available a guidance
document that details the content and
process requirements of both the
planning SEP that is required to get
access to the planning grants authorized
under this rule and the full SEP that is
required to get access to the entire
amount of funds made available to each
Gulf Coast State under the Spill Impact
Component of the RESTORE Act. The
Council is also currently developing
another set of regulations to more fully
implement the Spill Impact Component
of the RESTORE Act. These regulations
will be published in the Federal
Register at a later date and will establish
how funds made available from the
Trust Fund will be allocated between
the five Gulf Coast States based on the
allocation formula.
II. Public Comments and Summary of
Final Rule
Each of the five Gulf Coast States,
Alabama, Florida, Louisiana,
Mississippi, and Texas, are statutorily
guaranteed a minimum of five percent
of amounts made available from the
Trust Fund under the Spill Impact
Component.2 33 U.S.C.
1 SEPs must meet the statutory requirements of
the RESTORE Act, including: (1) All projects,
programs and activities included in the SEP are
eligible activities as defined by the RESTORE Act;
(2) all projects, programs and activities included in
the SEP contribute to the overall economic and
ecological recovery of the Gulf Coast; (3) the SEP
takes the Council’s Comprehensive Plan into
consideration and is consistent with the goals and
objectives of the Comprehensive Plan; and (4) no
more than 25 percent of the allotted funds are used
for infrastructure projects unless the SEP contains
certain certifications from the Gulf Coast State
submitting the SEP.
2 A Gulf Coast State may receive more than the
statutory minimum depending on the calculation of
each Gulf Coast State’s share under an allocation
formula established by the Council by regulation
based on criteria specified in the Act. 33 U.S.C.
1321(t)(3)(A)(ii). The Council is developing a
regulation to be published in the Federal Register
at a later date establishing this allocation formula.
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 8 / Tuesday, January 13, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
1321(t)(3)(A)(iii). The Council originally
issued this regulation as an interim final
rule in order to facilitate expeditious
development of full SEPs by the five
entities required by the RESTORE Act to
draft the SEPs and thus speed delivery
of projects, programs and activities
authorized under the Spill Impact
Component to help restore and protect
the Gulf Coast Region. The Council is
now finalizing the rule without
substantive change. Instead, minor
clarifications have been made to the rule
and preamble text to make the intent
clearer.
Under this final rule, an amount of
funds less than or equal to the statutory
minimum allocation (five percent of
funds available under the Spill Impact
Component) are available to the five
eligible entities for development of a
planning SEP that funds planning
activities only, an eligible activity under
the Spill Impact Component. 33 U.S.C.
1321(t)(1)(B)(i)(VIII); 33 U.S.C.
1321(t)(3)(B)(i)(I). Eligible entities
include the States of Mississippi and
Texas, the Coastal Protection and
Restoration Authority of Louisiana, the
Alabama Gulf Coast Recovery Council,
and the Gulf Consortium of Florida
counties.
The preamble to the interim final rule
discussed in broad terms the grant
submission process. Commenters
requested clarification on that process
because they felt the interim final rule
was unclear on whether an SEP was
required for the planning grant
authorized by this Rule in addition to a
grant application. Commenters also
requested that if an SEP is required, that
the Council remove that requirement.
The Council did not make any changes
to the text of the final rule because this
issue is not implicated in the text itself.
Rather, the Council is clarifying in the
preamble that the process for receiving
grant funds under the final rule involves
two steps. First, the Council’s
interpretation of the sections of the
RESTORE Act that authorize funds
under the Spill Impact Component
require an SEP prior to any distribution
of funds. 33 U.S.C. 1321(t)(3)(B). As
such, the Council has no discretion to
do away with this requirement.
However, the Council feels it is within
its discretion to permit a much simpler
SEP than would be required in order to
receive a full distribution of funds
under the Spill Impact Component once
the allocation formula is complete.
While the Treasury regulations (31 CFR
34.203(a)) state that that eligible entities
may apply to the Council for a grant for
planning purposes, the Council does not
believe these regulations authorize to
the Council to distribute such funds
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Jan 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
without an approved SEP, nor would it
be appropriate for the Treasury
regulations to do so, since it would be
outside the scope of the Act to distribute
funds without an SEP. The Council
intends to release guidance materials
separately from this final rule that will
clarify the content requirements
associated with a ‘‘planning SEP’’ under
this final rule, and differentiating those
requirements from those of a ‘‘full SEP’’
that would be required to get a full share
of funds pursuant to the Council’s
allocation formula regulation that is in
the process of being drafted. Second, an
eligible entity that has submitted a
planning SEP and had it approved by
the Council would have to complete a
standard grant application.
Commenters also pointed out that in
Florida, the process for submitting an
SEP to the Council involves the
administrative step of submitting the
SEP to the Executive Office of the
Governor of Florida. The Act requires
that all SEPs be submitted to the
Council by the Gulf Coast State. 33
U.S.C. 1321(t)(3)(B)(i).
The final rule describes the eligible
uses for the amounts made available
under the final rule as including
planning activities related solely to the
development of a full SEP, including
conceptual design and feasibility
studies related to specific projects. It
does not include engineering and
environmental studies related to
specific projects. Commenters pointed
out that this definition of planning
activities is narrower in scope than the
definition provided by Treasury in its
regulations (31 CFR 34.2) and asked that
the Council modify its definition to
match the Treasury definition. This
narrower construction was intentional.
The purpose of this rule is to permit an
eligible entity access to a limited pool
of funds in order to draft a full SEP. As
such, the definition of planning
assistance used in the Treasury
regulations is too broad in scope, and
would permit engineering and
environmental studies related to
specific projects or procurement of grant
processing systems, activities that the
Council does not intend to fund under
this final rule. Those sorts of activities
will be eligible uses once the full
amount of funds is available under the
Spill Impact Component pursuant to the
forthcoming allocation formula. At this
time, however, those sorts of activities
are beyond the narrowly tailored
purpose of this final rule, which is to
fund the drafting of a full SEP only.
Similarly, the final rule does not
permit any pre-award costs incurred
prior to the date of publication of the
interim final rule on August 22, 2014,
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1585
and provides that any pre-award costs
incurred after that publication will be
evaluated pursuant to 2 CFR part 200.
Commenters requested that the Council
remove this time limitation on when
pre-award costs were incurred. The final
rule retains this time limitation because
of the narrow purpose of the rule, to
fund the drafting of a full SEP. Under 2
CFR 200.458, pre-award costs must be
directly linked to a particular grant and
until the announcement of the interim
final rule on August 22, 2014, eligible
entities did not know that the Council
would award grants for the purpose of
drafting a full SEP. As such, the Council
does not feel it is unreasonably
constraining pre-award costs by
imposing a limitation that it will
consider pre-award costs only if they
were awarded after August 22, 2014.
Further, to the extent that an eligible
entity incurred costs prior to August 22,
2014, that the entity thinks would
qualify as legitimate pre-award costs
under 2 CFR 200.458, the entity is free
to request funding for such costs under
the awards issued when a full SEP is
submitted in order to access the full
allocation under the Spill Impact
Component.
Commenters also advocated for
changing the Rule to provide for a clear
path for funding the Gulf Consortium of
Florida. Given the narrow purpose of
this Rule, to fund the drafting of a full
SEP, the Council feels that this request
goes beyond the scope of this Rule.
Whether Spill Impact Component funds
are available for this purpose is best
addressed in the entity’s application for
pre-award costs associated with the full
SEP required to access the full
allocation under the Spill Impact
Component or under the Council’s
broader forthcoming regulation
establishing the allocation formula. The
Council will keep this comment in mind
as it drafts that future regulation.
Finally, commenters requested that all
forthcoming guidance and rulemakings
from the Council be promulgated in a
manner that will allow for comments
prior to them being finalized, consistent
with the Administrative Procedure Act,
5 U.S.C. 553. As is its custom, the
Council intends to comply with the
requirements of the Administrative
Procedure Act.
Minor clarifying edits were made to
sections 1800.1 and 1800.20 to remove
confusing, superfluous references to the
fiscal year. The minimum allocation
amount available to each Gulf Coast
State will be at least equal to 5% of the
total amount available in the Trust Fund
for the Spill Impact Component over the
life of the Trust Fund.
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
1586
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 8 / Tuesday, January 13, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
III. Procedural Requirements
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
A. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) generally requires
agencies to prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking
requirements under the Administrative
Procedure Act or any other statute,
unless the agency certifies that this final
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The Council
hereby certifies that this final rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities, for the following reasons.
This final rule only affects those Gulf
Coast States that are eligible recipients
of these funds, and States are not
considered ‘‘small entities’’ under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act. For two Gulf
Coast States, Alabama and Florida, the
Act mandates that entities not officially
part of the Executive Office of the
State’s government develop the SEPs.
The Alabama Gulf Coast Recovery
Council, in the context of the Act, serves
as an administrative agent of the State
of Alabama, so the effects of this rule are
still directed solely at the State. For the
State of Florida, while the Gulf
Consortium of counties is tasked with
developing the SEP, it is a consortium
of 23 counties with a total population of
greater than 50,000. As such, neither
entity is considered ‘‘small entities’’
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Additionally, while this final rule
describes procedures concerning the
allocation and expenditure of amounts
from the Trust Fund under the Spill
Impact Component, most of these
requirements come from the RESTORE
Act itself or other Federal law. The
RESTORE Act determines the statutory
minimum percentage of funds available
to the Gulf Coast States under the Spill
Impact Component.
Because no small entities will be
impacted by this final rule, no initial
regulatory flexibility analysis is
required, and none has been prepared.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
The collections of information
contained in this final rule would at
most require submissions of grant
paperwork from five entities (four of the
Gulf Coast States, or their administrative
agents, and the Gulf Consortium) below
the threshold requirement for
application of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)). As
such, any request for information under
this final rule is not considered a
‘‘collection of information’’ subject to
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Jan 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
C. Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
As an independent federal entity that
is composed of, in part, six federal
agencies, including the Departments of
Agriculture, the Army, Commerce, and
the Interior, the Department in which
the Coast Guard is operating, and the
Environmental Protection Agency, the
requirements of Executive Orders 12866
and 13563 are inapplicable to this final
rule.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 1800
Coastal zone, Fisheries, Grant
programs, Grants administration, Gulf
Coast Restoration Trust Fund, Gulf
RESTORE Program, Intergovernmental
relations, Marine resources, Natural
resources, Oil pollution, Research,
Science and technology, Trusts,
Wildlife.
Dated: December 8, 2014.
Justin R. Ehrenwerth,
Executive Director, Gulf Coast Ecosystem
Restoration Council.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Gulf Coast Ecosystem
Restoration Council amends 40 CFR
chapter VIII, by revising part 1800 to
read as follows:
PART 1800—SPILL IMPACT
COMPONENT
Subpart A—Definitions
Sec.
1800.1 Definitions.
Subpart B—Minimum Allocation Available
for Planning Purposes
Sec.
1800.10 Purpose.
1800.20 Minimum allocation available for
planning purposes.
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(t).
Subpart A—Definitions
§ 1800.1
Definitions.
As used in this part:
Gulf Coast State means any of the
States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana,
Mississippi, and Texas.
Gulf Consortium means the
consortium of Florida counties formed
to develop the Florida State Expenditure
Plan pursuant to 33 U.S.C.
1321(t)(3)(B)(iii)(II).
Minimum allocation means the
amount made available to each Gulf
Coast State which totals at least five
percent of the total allocation made
available under the Spill Impact
Component.
RESTORE Act means the Resources
and Ecosystems Sustainability, Tourist
Opportunities, and Revived Economies
of the Gulf Coast States Act of 2012.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Spill Impact Component means the
component of the Gulf RESTORE
program authorized by section 311(t)(3)
of the Federal Water Pollution Control
Act (33 U.S.C. 1321(t)(3)), as added by
section 1603 of the Act, in which Gulf
Coast States are provided funds by the
Council according to a formula that the
Council establishes by regulation, using
criteria listed in the Act.
State Expenditure Plan means the
plan for expenditure of amounts
disbursed under the Spill Impact
Component that each Gulf Coast State
must submit to the Council for approval.
Subpart B—Minimum Allocation
Available for Planning Purposes
§ 1800.10
Purpose.
This subpart establishes that up to the
statutory minimum allocation (five
percent) is available under the Spill
Impact Component of the Resources and
Ecosystems Sustainability, Tourist
Opportunities, and Revived Economies
of the Gulf Coast States Act of 2012
(RESTORE Act) (Pub. L. 112–141, 126
Stat. 405, 588–607) for planning
purposes associated with development
of a State Expenditure Plan.
§ 1800.20 Minimum allocation available for
planning purposes.
A Gulf Coast State or its
administrative agent, or the Gulf
Consortium, may apply to the Council
for a grant to use the minimum
allocation available under the Spill
Impact Component of the RESTORE Act
for planning purposes. These planning
purposes are limited to development of
a State Expenditure Plan, and includes
conceptual design and feasibility
studies related to specific projects. It
does not include engineering and
environmental studies related to
specific projects. It also does not
include any pre-award costs incurred
prior to August 22, 2014.
[FR Doc. 2014–30675 Filed 1–12–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–EA–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 1, 51 and 63
[GC Docket No. 10–44; FCC 14–183]
Amendment of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure;
Electronic Filing of Domestic Section
214 Applications and Notices of
Network Changes
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
Agencies
- GULF COAST ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION COUNCIL
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 8 (Tuesday, January 13, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1584-1586]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30675]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
GULF COAST ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION COUNCIL
40 CFR Part 1800
[Docket Number: 110142014-1111-02]
RIN 3600-AA00
RESTORE Act Spill Impact Component Planning Allocation
AGENCY: Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council (Council) is
issuing a final rule authorizing the Gulf Coast State members of the
Council, or their administrative agents, and the Gulf Consortium of
Florida counties to apply for grants to fund planning activities to
develop individual State Expenditure Plans (SEP) using amounts up to
the statutory minimum that each Gulf Coast State must receive under the
Spill Impact Component of the Resources and Ecosystems Sustainability,
Tourist Opportunities, and Revived Economies of the Gulf Coast States
Act of 2012 (RESTORE Act).
DATES: This final rule becomes effective on January 13, 2015.
ADDRESSES: The Council posted all comments to the interim rule on its
Web site, https://www.restorethegulf.gov/, without change, including any
business or personal information provided, such as names, addresses,
email addresses, or telephone numbers. All comments received are part
of the public record and subject to public disclosure.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Roberson at 202-482-1315.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The RESTORE Act, Public Law 112-141 (July 6, 2012), codified at 33
U.S.C. 1321(t) and note, makes funds available for the restoration and
protection of the Gulf Coast Region through a new trust fund in the
Treasury of the United States, known as the Gulf Coast Restoration
Trust Fund (Trust Fund). The Trust Fund will contain 80 percent of the
administrative and civil penalties paid by the responsible parties
after July 6, 2012, under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act in
connection with the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. These funds will be
invested and made available through five components of the RESTORE Act.
On August 15, 2014, the Department of Treasury (Treasury) issued
regulations (79 FR 48039) applicable to all five components, and which
generally describe the responsibilities of the Federal and State
entities that administer RESTORE Act programs and carry out restoration
activities in the Gulf Coast Region.
Two of the five components, the Comprehensive Plan and Spill Impact
Components, are administered by the Council, an independent federal
entity created by the RESTORE Act. Under the Spill Impact Component (33
U.S.C. 1321(t)(3)), the subject of this final rule, 30 percent of funds
in the Trust Fund will be disbursed to the five Gulf Coast States
(Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas) or their
administrative agents based on an allocation formula established by the
Council by regulation based on criteria in the RESTORE Act. The RESTORE
Act establishes a statutory minimum under which each of the five Gulf
Coast States is guaranteed five percent of the funds made available
under this component. In order for funds to be disbursed to a Gulf
Coast State, the RESTORE Act requires each Gulf Coast State to develop
a SEP and submit it to the Council for approval. The RESTORE Act
specifies the particular entity within each Gulf Coast State that will
prepare the individual SEPs: In Alabama, the Alabama Gulf Coast
Recovery Council; in Florida, a consortium of local political
subdivisions that includes a minimum of one representative of each
affected county (officially named the ``Gulf Consortium'' as organized
under Florida law); in Louisiana, the Coastal Protection and
Restoration Authority of Louisiana; in Mississippi, the Office of the
Governor or an appointee of the Office of the Governor; and in Texas,
the Office of the Governor or an appointee of the Office of the
Governor. 33 U.S.C. 1321(t)(3)(B)(iii).
On August 22, 2014, the Council issued an interim final rule to
permit the five eligible entities responsible for drafting SEPs to have
access to amounts up to the statutory minimum to help draft a SEP that
meets all statutory requirements.\1\ 79 FR 49690. The Council opened
this interim final rule up for public comment for 30 days. The Council
received substantive comments from three separate commenters.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ SEPs must meet the statutory requirements of the RESTORE
Act, including: (1) All projects, programs and activities included
in the SEP are eligible activities as defined by the RESTORE Act;
(2) all projects, programs and activities included in the SEP
contribute to the overall economic and ecological recovery of the
Gulf Coast; (3) the SEP takes the Council's Comprehensive Plan into
consideration and is consistent with the goals and objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan; and (4) no more than 25 percent of the allotted
funds are used for infrastructure projects unless the SEP contains
certain certifications from the Gulf Coast State submitting the SEP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
After considering public comments, the Council now issues the
regulations as a final rule. The rule will take effect on January 13,
2015. The Council will separately make available a guidance document
that details the content and process requirements of both the planning
SEP that is required to get access to the planning grants authorized
under this rule and the full SEP that is required to get access to the
entire amount of funds made available to each Gulf Coast State under
the Spill Impact Component of the RESTORE Act. The Council is also
currently developing another set of regulations to more fully implement
the Spill Impact Component of the RESTORE Act. These regulations will
be published in the Federal Register at a later date and will establish
how funds made available from the Trust Fund will be allocated between
the five Gulf Coast States based on the allocation formula.
II. Public Comments and Summary of Final Rule
Each of the five Gulf Coast States, Alabama, Florida, Louisiana,
Mississippi, and Texas, are statutorily guaranteed a minimum of five
percent of amounts made available from the Trust Fund under the Spill
Impact Component.\2\ 33 U.S.C.
[[Page 1585]]
1321(t)(3)(A)(iii). The Council originally issued this regulation as an
interim final rule in order to facilitate expeditious development of
full SEPs by the five entities required by the RESTORE Act to draft the
SEPs and thus speed delivery of projects, programs and activities
authorized under the Spill Impact Component to help restore and protect
the Gulf Coast Region. The Council is now finalizing the rule without
substantive change. Instead, minor clarifications have been made to the
rule and preamble text to make the intent clearer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ A Gulf Coast State may receive more than the statutory
minimum depending on the calculation of each Gulf Coast State's
share under an allocation formula established by the Council by
regulation based on criteria specified in the Act. 33 U.S.C.
1321(t)(3)(A)(ii). The Council is developing a regulation to be
published in the Federal Register at a later date establishing this
allocation formula.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under this final rule, an amount of funds less than or equal to the
statutory minimum allocation (five percent of funds available under the
Spill Impact Component) are available to the five eligible entities for
development of a planning SEP that funds planning activities only, an
eligible activity under the Spill Impact Component. 33 U.S.C.
1321(t)(1)(B)(i)(VIII); 33 U.S.C. 1321(t)(3)(B)(i)(I). Eligible
entities include the States of Mississippi and Texas, the Coastal
Protection and Restoration Authority of Louisiana, the Alabama Gulf
Coast Recovery Council, and the Gulf Consortium of Florida counties.
The preamble to the interim final rule discussed in broad terms the
grant submission process. Commenters requested clarification on that
process because they felt the interim final rule was unclear on whether
an SEP was required for the planning grant authorized by this Rule in
addition to a grant application. Commenters also requested that if an
SEP is required, that the Council remove that requirement. The Council
did not make any changes to the text of the final rule because this
issue is not implicated in the text itself. Rather, the Council is
clarifying in the preamble that the process for receiving grant funds
under the final rule involves two steps. First, the Council's
interpretation of the sections of the RESTORE Act that authorize funds
under the Spill Impact Component require an SEP prior to any
distribution of funds. 33 U.S.C. 1321(t)(3)(B). As such, the Council
has no discretion to do away with this requirement. However, the
Council feels it is within its discretion to permit a much simpler SEP
than would be required in order to receive a full distribution of funds
under the Spill Impact Component once the allocation formula is
complete. While the Treasury regulations (31 CFR 34.203(a)) state that
that eligible entities may apply to the Council for a grant for
planning purposes, the Council does not believe these regulations
authorize to the Council to distribute such funds without an approved
SEP, nor would it be appropriate for the Treasury regulations to do so,
since it would be outside the scope of the Act to distribute funds
without an SEP. The Council intends to release guidance materials
separately from this final rule that will clarify the content
requirements associated with a ``planning SEP'' under this final rule,
and differentiating those requirements from those of a ``full SEP''
that would be required to get a full share of funds pursuant to the
Council's allocation formula regulation that is in the process of being
drafted. Second, an eligible entity that has submitted a planning SEP
and had it approved by the Council would have to complete a standard
grant application.
Commenters also pointed out that in Florida, the process for
submitting an SEP to the Council involves the administrative step of
submitting the SEP to the Executive Office of the Governor of Florida.
The Act requires that all SEPs be submitted to the Council by the Gulf
Coast State. 33 U.S.C. 1321(t)(3)(B)(i).
The final rule describes the eligible uses for the amounts made
available under the final rule as including planning activities related
solely to the development of a full SEP, including conceptual design
and feasibility studies related to specific projects. It does not
include engineering and environmental studies related to specific
projects. Commenters pointed out that this definition of planning
activities is narrower in scope than the definition provided by
Treasury in its regulations (31 CFR 34.2) and asked that the Council
modify its definition to match the Treasury definition. This narrower
construction was intentional. The purpose of this rule is to permit an
eligible entity access to a limited pool of funds in order to draft a
full SEP. As such, the definition of planning assistance used in the
Treasury regulations is too broad in scope, and would permit
engineering and environmental studies related to specific projects or
procurement of grant processing systems, activities that the Council
does not intend to fund under this final rule. Those sorts of
activities will be eligible uses once the full amount of funds is
available under the Spill Impact Component pursuant to the forthcoming
allocation formula. At this time, however, those sorts of activities
are beyond the narrowly tailored purpose of this final rule, which is
to fund the drafting of a full SEP only.
Similarly, the final rule does not permit any pre-award costs
incurred prior to the date of publication of the interim final rule on
August 22, 2014, and provides that any pre-award costs incurred after
that publication will be evaluated pursuant to 2 CFR part 200.
Commenters requested that the Council remove this time limitation on
when pre-award costs were incurred. The final rule retains this time
limitation because of the narrow purpose of the rule, to fund the
drafting of a full SEP. Under 2 CFR 200.458, pre-award costs must be
directly linked to a particular grant and until the announcement of the
interim final rule on August 22, 2014, eligible entities did not know
that the Council would award grants for the purpose of drafting a full
SEP. As such, the Council does not feel it is unreasonably constraining
pre-award costs by imposing a limitation that it will consider pre-
award costs only if they were awarded after August 22, 2014. Further,
to the extent that an eligible entity incurred costs prior to August
22, 2014, that the entity thinks would qualify as legitimate pre-award
costs under 2 CFR 200.458, the entity is free to request funding for
such costs under the awards issued when a full SEP is submitted in
order to access the full allocation under the Spill Impact Component.
Commenters also advocated for changing the Rule to provide for a
clear path for funding the Gulf Consortium of Florida. Given the narrow
purpose of this Rule, to fund the drafting of a full SEP, the Council
feels that this request goes beyond the scope of this Rule. Whether
Spill Impact Component funds are available for this purpose is best
addressed in the entity's application for pre-award costs associated
with the full SEP required to access the full allocation under the
Spill Impact Component or under the Council's broader forthcoming
regulation establishing the allocation formula. The Council will keep
this comment in mind as it drafts that future regulation.
Finally, commenters requested that all forthcoming guidance and
rulemakings from the Council be promulgated in a manner that will allow
for comments prior to them being finalized, consistent with the
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553. As is its custom, the
Council intends to comply with the requirements of the Administrative
Procedure Act.
Minor clarifying edits were made to sections 1800.1 and 1800.20 to
remove confusing, superfluous references to the fiscal year. The
minimum allocation amount available to each Gulf Coast State will be at
least equal to 5% of the total amount available in the Trust Fund for
the Spill Impact Component over the life of the Trust Fund.
[[Page 1586]]
III. Procedural Requirements
A. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) generally
requires agencies to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis of any
rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements under the
Administrative Procedure Act or any other statute, unless the agency
certifies that this final rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The Council hereby
certifies that this final rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities, for the following
reasons.
This final rule only affects those Gulf Coast States that are
eligible recipients of these funds, and States are not considered
``small entities'' under the Regulatory Flexibility Act. For two Gulf
Coast States, Alabama and Florida, the Act mandates that entities not
officially part of the Executive Office of the State's government
develop the SEPs. The Alabama Gulf Coast Recovery Council, in the
context of the Act, serves as an administrative agent of the State of
Alabama, so the effects of this rule are still directed solely at the
State. For the State of Florida, while the Gulf Consortium of counties
is tasked with developing the SEP, it is a consortium of 23 counties
with a total population of greater than 50,000. As such, neither entity
is considered ``small entities'' under the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Additionally, while this final rule describes procedures concerning
the allocation and expenditure of amounts from the Trust Fund under the
Spill Impact Component, most of these requirements come from the
RESTORE Act itself or other Federal law. The RESTORE Act determines the
statutory minimum percentage of funds available to the Gulf Coast
States under the Spill Impact Component.
Because no small entities will be impacted by this final rule, no
initial regulatory flexibility analysis is required, and none has been
prepared.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
The collections of information contained in this final rule would
at most require submissions of grant paperwork from five entities (four
of the Gulf Coast States, or their administrative agents, and the Gulf
Consortium) below the threshold requirement for application of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)). As such, any
request for information under this final rule is not considered a
``collection of information'' subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995.
C. Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
As an independent federal entity that is composed of, in part, six
federal agencies, including the Departments of Agriculture, the Army,
Commerce, and the Interior, the Department in which the Coast Guard is
operating, and the Environmental Protection Agency, the requirements of
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 are inapplicable to this final rule.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 1800
Coastal zone, Fisheries, Grant programs, Grants administration,
Gulf Coast Restoration Trust Fund, Gulf RESTORE Program,
Intergovernmental relations, Marine resources, Natural resources, Oil
pollution, Research, Science and technology, Trusts, Wildlife.
Dated: December 8, 2014.
Justin R. Ehrenwerth,
Executive Director, Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Gulf Coast Ecosystem
Restoration Council amends 40 CFR chapter VIII, by revising part 1800
to read as follows:
PART 1800--SPILL IMPACT COMPONENT
Subpart A--Definitions
Sec.
1800.1 Definitions.
Subpart B--Minimum Allocation Available for Planning Purposes
Sec.
1800.10 Purpose.
1800.20 Minimum allocation available for planning purposes.
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(t).
Subpart A--Definitions
Sec. 1800.1 Definitions.
As used in this part:
Gulf Coast State means any of the States of Alabama, Florida,
Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas.
Gulf Consortium means the consortium of Florida counties formed to
develop the Florida State Expenditure Plan pursuant to 33 U.S.C.
1321(t)(3)(B)(iii)(II).
Minimum allocation means the amount made available to each Gulf
Coast State which totals at least five percent of the total allocation
made available under the Spill Impact Component.
RESTORE Act means the Resources and Ecosystems Sustainability,
Tourist Opportunities, and Revived Economies of the Gulf Coast States
Act of 2012.
Spill Impact Component means the component of the Gulf RESTORE
program authorized by section 311(t)(3) of the Federal Water Pollution
Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1321(t)(3)), as added by section 1603 of the
Act, in which Gulf Coast States are provided funds by the Council
according to a formula that the Council establishes by regulation,
using criteria listed in the Act.
State Expenditure Plan means the plan for expenditure of amounts
disbursed under the Spill Impact Component that each Gulf Coast State
must submit to the Council for approval.
Subpart B--Minimum Allocation Available for Planning Purposes
Sec. 1800.10 Purpose.
This subpart establishes that up to the statutory minimum
allocation (five percent) is available under the Spill Impact Component
of the Resources and Ecosystems Sustainability, Tourist Opportunities,
and Revived Economies of the Gulf Coast States Act of 2012 (RESTORE
Act) (Pub. L. 112-141, 126 Stat. 405, 588-607) for planning purposes
associated with development of a State Expenditure Plan.
Sec. 1800.20 Minimum allocation available for planning purposes.
A Gulf Coast State or its administrative agent, or the Gulf
Consortium, may apply to the Council for a grant to use the minimum
allocation available under the Spill Impact Component of the RESTORE
Act for planning purposes. These planning purposes are limited to
development of a State Expenditure Plan, and includes conceptual design
and feasibility studies related to specific projects. It does not
include engineering and environmental studies related to specific
projects. It also does not include any pre-award costs incurred prior
to August 22, 2014.
[FR Doc. 2014-30675 Filed 1-12-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-EA-P