Regulated Navigation Area; Sarah Mildred Long Bridge Replacement, Portsmouth, NH, 1338-1341 [2015-00182]
Download as PDF
1338
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 6 / Friday, January 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
§ 165.1401
zones.
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
11. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
12. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
13. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
consolidation and rationalization of
existing Apra Harbor navigation
regulations. This rule is categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the
Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Revise § 165.1401 to read as
follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:52 Jan 08, 2015
Jkt 235001
(a) Location. (1) The following is
designated Safety Zone A: The waters of
Apra Outer Harbor encompassed within
an arc of 1,000 yards radius centered at
the center of Naval Wharf Kilo, located
at 13 degrees 26′44.5″ N and 144 degrees
37′50.7″ E. (Based on World Geodetic
System 1984 Datum).
(2) The following is designated Safety
Zone B: The waters of Apra Outer
Harbor encompassed within an arc of
1,400 yards radius centered at the center
of Naval Wharf Kilo, located at 13
degrees 26′44.5″ N and 144 degrees
37′50.7″ E. (Based on World Geodetic
System 1984 Datum).
(b) Special regulations. (1) Safety
Zone A, described in paragraph (a) of
this section, will only be enforced when
Naval Wharf Kilo, or a vessel berthed at
Naval Wharf Kilo, is displaying a red
(BRAVO) flag by day or a red light by
night, accompanied by a ‘‘SAFETY
ZONE A’’ sign.
(2) Safety Zone B, described in
paragraph (a) of this section, will only
be enforced when Naval Wharf Kilo, or
a vessel berthed at Naval Wharf Kilo, is
displaying a red (BRAVO) flag by day or
a red light by night, accompanied by a
‘‘SAFETY ZONE B’’ sign.
(3) Under general regulations in
§ 165.23, entry into the zones described
in paragraph (a) of this section is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Guam.
§ 165.1402
■
[Removed]
3. Remove § 165.1402.
4. In § 165.1405, revise the section
heading and paragraph (a)(2) and
remove paragraph (a)(4) to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.1405 Regulated Navigation Areas
and Security Zones: Designated Escorted
Vessels-Philippine Sea and Apra Harbor
Guam, and Tanapag Harbor, Saipan,
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands (CNMI).
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
■
Apra Harbor, Guam—safety
(a) * * *
(2) Apra Outer Harbor, Guam—All
waters from surface to bottom of Apra
Outer Harbor, Guam, shoreward of the
COLREGS Demarcation line as
described in 33 CFR part 80.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: December 19, 2014.
C. B. Thomas,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Fourteenth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2015–00181 Filed 1–8–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2014–0554]
RIN 1625–AA11
Regulated Navigation Area; Sarah
Mildred Long Bridge Replacement,
Portsmouth, NH
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The United States Coast
Guard is establishing a Regulated
Navigation Area (RNA) on the navigable
waters of the Piscataqua River under
and surrounding the Sarah Mildred
Long Bridge between Portsmouth, NH
and Kittery, ME. This RNA will allow
the United States Coast Guard to enforce
speed and wake restrictions and limit
vessel traffic through the RNA during
bridge replacement operations, both
planned and unforeseen, which could
pose an imminent hazard to persons and
vessels operating in the area. This rule
is necessary to provide for the safety of
life on the navigable waters during
bridge structural repair operations.
DATES: This rule is effective from
January 9, 2015 until May 31, 2019. This
rule has been enforced with actual
notice since December 31, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2014–
0554. To view documents mentioned in
this preamble as being available in the
docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call
Lieutenant Commander Myles
Greenway, Waterways Management at
First Coast Guard District at 617–223–
8385 or email at Myles.J.Greenway@
uscg.mil; or call Lieutenant Junior Grade
David T. Bourbeau, Waterways
Management Division at Coast Guard
Sector Northern New England, at 207–
347–5015 or email at
David.T.Bourbeau@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\09JAR1.SGM
09JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 6 / Friday, January 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
material to the docket, call Cheryl
Collins, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
MEDOT Maine Department of
Transportation
NHDOT New Hampshire Department of
Transportation
NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
NAD 83 North American Datum of 1983
RNA Regulated Navigation Area
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
A. Regulatory History and Information
The MEDOT applied for a bridge
construction permit with the Coast
Guard on August 15, 2013. The United
States Coast Guard issued Public Notice
1–137 on February 10, 2014, which was
published on the United States Coast
Guard Navigation Center Web site and
the First Coast Guard District—Bridge
Branch Web site, and solicited
comments through March 12, 2014.
Three comments were received in
response to the public notice: one
comment was a statement of no
objection and two comments were in
favor of the project.
On August 25, 2014, we published a
NPRM entitled Regulated Navigation
Area; Sarah Mildred Long Bridge
Replacement, Portsmouth, NH in the
Federal Register (79 FR 50565). We
received 2 comments on the proposed
rule. Those comments are discussed
below.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. The comment period for the
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking ended
on September 24, 2014. There was
insufficient time to prepare and publish
this Final Rule by November 30, 2014,
which was thirty days before the start of
bridge construction and the need for the
rule. Changing the bridge construction
schedule to accommodate the regulation
is impractical and unnecessary because
the impact of this regulation on the
waterway will be minimal.
B. Basis and Purpose
Under the Ports and Waterways Safety
Act, the Coast Guard has the authority
to establish RNAs in defined water areas
that are determined to have hazardous
conditions and in which vessel traffic
can be regulated in the interest of safety.
See 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter
701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33
CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:52 Jan 08, 2015
Jkt 235001
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; and
Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
MEDOT will replace the existing
vertical lift bridge over the Piscataqua
River, which carries the U.S. Route 1
Bypass from Portsmouth, NH, to Kittery,
ME, with a hybrid vertical lift bridge on
an upstream alignment. The project is
necessary to replace a structurally and
operationally deficient bridge that has
exceeded its useful life. In the normal
vehicle use mode, the new vertical lift
bridge will provide a vertical clearance
through the main channel of 56 feet
above mean high water (MHW) in the
closed position and 135 feet above
MHW in the open position, and a
horizontal clearance of 250 feet
measured normal to the axis of the
channel. When closed to normal vehicle
use (i.e. in rail use mode), the new
bridge will provide a vertical clearance
through the main channel of 16 feet
MHW.
The construction of the new Sarah
Mildred Long Bridge will involve large
machinery and construction vessel
operations above and in the navigable
waters of the Piscataqua River. These
operations, by their nature, are
hazardous and pose risks both to
recreational and commercial traffic as
well as the construction crew. In order
to mitigate the inherent risks involved
in the construction, it is necessary to
control vessel movement through the
area.
The purpose of this rule is to ensure
the safe transit of vessels in the area,
and to protect all persons, vessels,
construction crews, and the marine
environment during bridge construction
operations on the Piscataqua River
between Portsmouth, NH and Kittery,
ME.
C. Discussion of Comments, Changes
and the Final Rule
Two comments were received on
Docket No. USCG–2014–0554. The first
comment questioned whether the
waterway is ‘‘navigable’’. As per 33 CFR
2.36, the Piscataqua River is a U.S.
navigable waterway. The second
comment questioned the specified
latitude and longitude in the NPRM and
whether the coordinates are based on
North American Datum of 1983 (NAD
83) horizontal datum. The comment
suggested that if the latitude and
longitude coordinates are NAD 83 then
it should be stated in the final rule.
Upon confirming this with NOAA,
‘‘(NAD 83)’’ was added to the regulatory
text.
Construction operations are sensitive
to water movement, and wake from
passing vessels could pose significant
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1339
risk of injury or death to construction
workers. In order to minimize such
unexpected or uncontrolled movement
of water, the RNA will limit vessel
speed and wake of all vessels operating
in the vicinity of the bridge construction
zone. This will be achieved by
implementing a five (5) knot speed limit
and ‘‘NO WAKE’’ zone in the vicinity of
the construction as well as providing a
means to suspend all vessel traffic for
emergent situations that pose imminent
threat to waterway users in the area. The
RNA will also protect vessels desiring to
transit the area by ensuring that vessels
are only permitted to transit when it is
safe to do so.
The Coast Guard has discussed this
project at length with the NHDOT and
MEDOT to identify if the project can be
completed without channel closures
and, if possible, what impact that would
have on the project timeline. Through
these discussions, it became clear that
while the majority of construction
activities during the span of this project
will not require waterway closures,
there are certain tasks that can only be
completed in the channel and will
require closing the waterway.
The Coast Guard may close the RNA
described in this rule to all vessel traffic
during any circumstance that poses an
imminent threat to waterway users
operating in the area. Complete
waterway closures will be made with as
much advanced notice as possible.
Further, the speed limit of five (5)
knots will be in effect at all times within
the RNA and all vessels must proceed
through the area with caution and
operate in such a manner as to produce
no wake unless a higher minimum
speed is necessary to maintain bare
steerage. The Coast Guard will rely on
the methods described in 33 CFR 165.7
to notify the public of the time and
duration of any closure of the RNA.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive
orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
E:\FR\FM\09JAR1.SGM
09JAR1
1340
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 6 / Friday, January 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders.
We expect the economic impact of
this rule to be minimal because this
regulated navigation area requires
vessels to reduce speed through 600
yards of the Piscataqua River, causing
only a minimal delay to a vessel’s
transit. In addition, periods when the
regulated navigation area is closed to all
traffic are expected to be short in
duration, and we will provide advance
notice of such closures so that the
boating public can plan transits
accordingly. Such notifications will be
made to local mariners through
appropriate means, such as Local Notice
to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to
Mariners.
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule would affect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: the owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
the regulated navigation area while it is
being enforced. This rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
all of the reasons discussed in the
Regulatory Planning and Review
section.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:52 Jan 08, 2015
Jkt 235001
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b) (2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
will not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it will not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This rule is not a ‘‘significant energy
action’’ under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a determination that this
action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
establishment of an RNA and thus, is
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure
2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
E:\FR\FM\09JAR1.SGM
09JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 6 / Friday, January 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T01–0554 to read as
follows:
■
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 165.T01–0554 Regulated Navigation
Area; Sarah Mildred Long Bridge
Replacement, Portsmouth, NH.
(a) Location. The following area is a
Regulated Navigation Area (RNA): All
navigable waters of the Piscataqua River
between Portsmouth, NH and Kittery,
ME, from surface to bottom, within a
300 yard radius of position 43°05′10″ N,
070°45′38″ W (NAD 83), center point of
the existing Sarah Mildred Long Bridge.
(b) Regulations. (1) The general
regulations contained in §§ 165.10,
165.11, and 165.13 apply within the
RNA.
(2) Any vessel transiting through the
RNA must make a direct passage. No
vessel may stop, moor, anchor or loiter
within the RNA at any time unless they
are working on the bridge construction.
Movement within the RNA is subject to
a ‘‘Slow-No Wake’’ speed limit. All
vessels may not produce a wake and
may not attain speeds greater than five
(5) knots unless a higher minimum
speed is necessary to maintain bare
steerageway.
(3) There may be times that the First
District Commander or the Captain of
the Port (COTP) finds it necessary to
close the RNA to vessel traffic. All
closures will be limited to specific
hours of the day. Mariners will be
advised of all closure dates and times
via Local Notice to Mariners and
Broadcast Notice to Mariners in advance
of closure times. During times of limited
closure, persons and vessels may
request permission to enter the RNA by
contacting the COTP or the COTP’s onscene representative on VHF–16 or via
phone at 207–767–0303.
(4) Any vessels transiting in the RNA
must comply with all directions given to
them by the COTP or the COTP’s onscene representative. The ‘‘on-scene
representative’’ of the COTP is any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or
petty officer who has been designated
by the COTP to act on the COTP’s
behalf. The on-scene representative may
be on a Coast Guard vessel; or other
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:52 Jan 08, 2015
Jkt 235001
designated craft; or on shore and
communicating with vessels via VHF–
FM radio or loudhailer. Members of the
Coast Guard Auxiliary may be present to
inform vessel operators of this
regulation.
(5) All other relevant regulations,
including but not limited to the Rules of
the Road, as codified in 33 CFR
subchapter E, Inland Navigational
Rules, remain in effect within the RNA
and must be strictly followed at all
times.
(c) Enforcement period. This
regulation is enforceable 24 hours a day
from 12:01 a.m. on December 31, 2014
until 11:59 p.m. on May 31, 2019.
(d) Notification. The Coast Guard will
rely on the methods described in § 165.7
to notify the public of the time and
duration of any closure of the RNA.
Violations of this RNA may be reported
to the COTP at 207–767–0303 or on
VHF-Channel 16.
Dated: December 22, 2014.
L.L. Fagan,
Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First
Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2015–00182 Filed 1–8–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2014–0990]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Blue Water Resort and
Casino Southwest Showdown 4;
Parker, AZ
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone
within the Lake Moolvalya region of the
navigable waters of the Colorado River
in Parker, Arizona in support of the
Arizona Drag Boat Association
sponsored race event, the Blue Water
Resort and Casino Southwest
Showdown. This safety zone is
established to ensure the safety of
participants, crew, spectators,
participating vessels, and other vessels
and users of the waterway.
Unauthorized persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering into, transiting
through, or anchoring within this safety
zone unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port, or their designated
representative. The Coast Guard
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1341
requests public comments on the
temporary safety zone.
DATES: This rule is effective from 9 a.m.
on February 20, 2015 through 6 p.m.
February 22, 2015. This rule will be
enforced from 9 a.m. until 6 p.m.
February 20, 2015, February 21, 2015,
and February 22, 2015. Public
comments must be received by February
9, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments using one
of the listed methods, and see
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for more
information on public comments.
• Online—https://www.regulations.gov
following Web site instructions.
• Fax—202–493–2251.
• Mail or hand deliver—Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Hand
delivery hours: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays
(telephone 202–366–9329).
Documents mentioned in this
preamble are part of docket [USCG–
2014–0990]. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Petty Officer Nick Bateman,
Waterways Management, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector San Diego, Coast Guard;
telephone 619–278–7656, email
d11marineeventssandiego@uscg.mil If
you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call
Cheryl Collins, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
TFR Temporary Final Rule
A. Public Participation and Comments
We encourage you to submit
comments (or related material) on this
temporary final rule. We will consider
all submissions and may adjust our final
E:\FR\FM\09JAR1.SGM
09JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 6 (Friday, January 9, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1338-1341]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00182]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2014-0554]
RIN 1625-AA11
Regulated Navigation Area; Sarah Mildred Long Bridge Replacement,
Portsmouth, NH
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Coast Guard is establishing a Regulated
Navigation Area (RNA) on the navigable waters of the Piscataqua River
under and surrounding the Sarah Mildred Long Bridge between Portsmouth,
NH and Kittery, ME. This RNA will allow the United States Coast Guard
to enforce speed and wake restrictions and limit vessel traffic through
the RNA during bridge replacement operations, both planned and
unforeseen, which could pose an imminent hazard to persons and vessels
operating in the area. This rule is necessary to provide for the safety
of life on the navigable waters during bridge structural repair
operations.
DATES: This rule is effective from January 9, 2015 until May 31, 2019.
This rule has been enforced with actual notice since December 31, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2014-0554. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the docket number in the ``SEARCH''
box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line
associated with this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call Lieutenant Commander Myles Greenway, Waterways Management at First
Coast Guard District at 617-223-8385 or email at
Myles.J.Greenway@uscg.mil; or call Lieutenant Junior Grade David T.
Bourbeau, Waterways Management Division at Coast Guard Sector Northern
New England, at 207-347-5015 or email at David.T.Bourbeau@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing or submitting
[[Page 1339]]
material to the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
MEDOT Maine Department of Transportation
NHDOT New Hampshire Department of Transportation
NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
NAD 83 North American Datum of 1983
RNA Regulated Navigation Area
A. Regulatory History and Information
The MEDOT applied for a bridge construction permit with the Coast
Guard on August 15, 2013. The United States Coast Guard issued Public
Notice 1-137 on February 10, 2014, which was published on the United
States Coast Guard Navigation Center Web site and the First Coast Guard
District--Bridge Branch Web site, and solicited comments through March
12, 2014. Three comments were received in response to the public
notice: one comment was a statement of no objection and two comments
were in favor of the project.
On August 25, 2014, we published a NPRM entitled Regulated
Navigation Area; Sarah Mildred Long Bridge Replacement, Portsmouth, NH
in the Federal Register (79 FR 50565). We received 2 comments on the
proposed rule. Those comments are discussed below.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. The comment period for the Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking ended on September 24, 2014. There was
insufficient time to prepare and publish this Final Rule by November
30, 2014, which was thirty days before the start of bridge construction
and the need for the rule. Changing the bridge construction schedule to
accommodate the regulation is impractical and unnecessary because the
impact of this regulation on the waterway will be minimal.
B. Basis and Purpose
Under the Ports and Waterways Safety Act, the Coast Guard has the
authority to establish RNAs in defined water areas that are determined
to have hazardous conditions and in which vessel traffic can be
regulated in the interest of safety. See 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; and Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
MEDOT will replace the existing vertical lift bridge over the
Piscataqua River, which carries the U.S. Route 1 Bypass from
Portsmouth, NH, to Kittery, ME, with a hybrid vertical lift bridge on
an upstream alignment. The project is necessary to replace a
structurally and operationally deficient bridge that has exceeded its
useful life. In the normal vehicle use mode, the new vertical lift
bridge will provide a vertical clearance through the main channel of 56
feet above mean high water (MHW) in the closed position and 135 feet
above MHW in the open position, and a horizontal clearance of 250 feet
measured normal to the axis of the channel. When closed to normal
vehicle use (i.e. in rail use mode), the new bridge will provide a
vertical clearance through the main channel of 16 feet MHW.
The construction of the new Sarah Mildred Long Bridge will involve
large machinery and construction vessel operations above and in the
navigable waters of the Piscataqua River. These operations, by their
nature, are hazardous and pose risks both to recreational and
commercial traffic as well as the construction crew. In order to
mitigate the inherent risks involved in the construction, it is
necessary to control vessel movement through the area.
The purpose of this rule is to ensure the safe transit of vessels
in the area, and to protect all persons, vessels, construction crews,
and the marine environment during bridge construction operations on the
Piscataqua River between Portsmouth, NH and Kittery, ME.
C. Discussion of Comments, Changes and the Final Rule
Two comments were received on Docket No. USCG-2014-0554. The first
comment questioned whether the waterway is ``navigable''. As per 33 CFR
2.36, the Piscataqua River is a U.S. navigable waterway. The second
comment questioned the specified latitude and longitude in the NPRM and
whether the coordinates are based on North American Datum of 1983 (NAD
83) horizontal datum. The comment suggested that if the latitude and
longitude coordinates are NAD 83 then it should be stated in the final
rule. Upon confirming this with NOAA, ``(NAD 83)'' was added to the
regulatory text.
Construction operations are sensitive to water movement, and wake
from passing vessels could pose significant risk of injury or death to
construction workers. In order to minimize such unexpected or
uncontrolled movement of water, the RNA will limit vessel speed and
wake of all vessels operating in the vicinity of the bridge
construction zone. This will be achieved by implementing a five (5)
knot speed limit and ``NO WAKE'' zone in the vicinity of the
construction as well as providing a means to suspend all vessel traffic
for emergent situations that pose imminent threat to waterway users in
the area. The RNA will also protect vessels desiring to transit the
area by ensuring that vessels are only permitted to transit when it is
safe to do so.
The Coast Guard has discussed this project at length with the NHDOT
and MEDOT to identify if the project can be completed without channel
closures and, if possible, what impact that would have on the project
timeline. Through these discussions, it became clear that while the
majority of construction activities during the span of this project
will not require waterway closures, there are certain tasks that can
only be completed in the channel and will require closing the waterway.
The Coast Guard may close the RNA described in this rule to all
vessel traffic during any circumstance that poses an imminent threat to
waterway users operating in the area. Complete waterway closures will
be made with as much advanced notice as possible.
Further, the speed limit of five (5) knots will be in effect at all
times within the RNA and all vessels must proceed through the area with
caution and operate in such a manner as to produce no wake unless a
higher minimum speed is necessary to maintain bare steerage. The Coast
Guard will rely on the methods described in 33 CFR 165.7 to notify the
public of the time and duration of any closure of the RNA.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
[[Page 1340]]
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be minimal because
this regulated navigation area requires vessels to reduce speed through
600 yards of the Piscataqua River, causing only a minimal delay to a
vessel's transit. In addition, periods when the regulated navigation
area is closed to all traffic are expected to be short in duration, and
we will provide advance notice of such closures so that the boating
public can plan transits accordingly. Such notifications will be made
to local mariners through appropriate means, such as Local Notice to
Mariners and Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
This rule would affect the following entities, some of which might
be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in the regulated navigation area while it is being
enforced. This rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for all of the reasons discussed
in the Regulatory Planning and Review section.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in
this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b) (2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and will not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a
determination that this action is one of a category of actions that do
not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the establishment of an RNA and thus,
is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
[[Page 1341]]
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T01-0554 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T01-0554 Regulated Navigation Area; Sarah Mildred Long
Bridge Replacement, Portsmouth, NH.
(a) Location. The following area is a Regulated Navigation Area
(RNA): All navigable waters of the Piscataqua River between Portsmouth,
NH and Kittery, ME, from surface to bottom, within a 300 yard radius of
position 43[deg]05'10'' N, 070[deg]45'38'' W (NAD 83), center point of
the existing Sarah Mildred Long Bridge.
(b) Regulations. (1) The general regulations contained in
Sec. Sec. 165.10, 165.11, and 165.13 apply within the RNA.
(2) Any vessel transiting through the RNA must make a direct
passage. No vessel may stop, moor, anchor or loiter within the RNA at
any time unless they are working on the bridge construction. Movement
within the RNA is subject to a ``Slow-No Wake'' speed limit. All
vessels may not produce a wake and may not attain speeds greater than
five (5) knots unless a higher minimum speed is necessary to maintain
bare steerageway.
(3) There may be times that the First District Commander or the
Captain of the Port (COTP) finds it necessary to close the RNA to
vessel traffic. All closures will be limited to specific hours of the
day. Mariners will be advised of all closure dates and times via Local
Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to Mariners in advance of
closure times. During times of limited closure, persons and vessels may
request permission to enter the RNA by contacting the COTP or the
COTP's on-scene representative on VHF-16 or via phone at 207-767-0303.
(4) Any vessels transiting in the RNA must comply with all
directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP's on-scene
representative. The ``on-scene representative'' of the COTP is any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who has been
designated by the COTP to act on the COTP's behalf. The on-scene
representative may be on a Coast Guard vessel; or other designated
craft; or on shore and communicating with vessels via VHF-FM radio or
loudhailer. Members of the Coast Guard Auxiliary may be present to
inform vessel operators of this regulation.
(5) All other relevant regulations, including but not limited to
the Rules of the Road, as codified in 33 CFR subchapter E, Inland
Navigational Rules, remain in effect within the RNA and must be
strictly followed at all times.
(c) Enforcement period. This regulation is enforceable 24 hours a
day from 12:01 a.m. on December 31, 2014 until 11:59 p.m. on May 31,
2019.
(d) Notification. The Coast Guard will rely on the methods
described in Sec. 165.7 to notify the public of the time and duration
of any closure of the RNA. Violations of this RNA may be reported to
the COTP at 207-767-0303 or on VHF-Channel 16.
Dated: December 22, 2014.
L.L. Fagan,
Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2015-00182 Filed 1-8-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P