Regulated Navigation Area, Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay; Bayonne, NJ, NY, 1382-1385 [2015-00178]
Download as PDF
1382
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 6 / Friday, January 9, 2015 / Proposed Rules
SUBCHAPTER C—INSTITUTIONAL
MANAGEMENT
PART 544—EDUCATION
SUBPART H—LITERACY PROGRAM
3. The authority citation for 28 CFR
part 544 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 18 U.S.C. 3621,
3622, 3624, 4001, 4042, 4081, 4082 (Repealed
in part as to offenses committed on or after
November 1, 1987), 5006–5024 (Repealed
October 12, 1984 as to offenses committed
after that date), 5039; 28 U.S.C. 509, 510; 28
CFR 0.95–0.99.
4. Amend § 544.71 by revising
paragraph (a) introductory text and
paragraph (a)(4) and adding paragraph
(a)(5) to read as follows:
■
§ 544.71 Exceptions to required literacy
program participation.
(a) The following inmates are not
required to attend the literacy program
under § 544.70:
*
*
*
*
*
(4) Inmates determined by staff to be
temporarily unable to participate in the
literacy program due to special
circumstances beyond their control (e.g.,
due to a medical condition, transfer on
writ, on a waiting list for initial
placement). Such inmates, however,
shall be required to participate when the
special circumstances are no longer
applicable; and
(5) Inmates who participate in
authorized alternative adult literacy
programs (programs other than the GED
program) due to special circumstances,
such as release destination or learning
ability.
[FR Doc. 2015–00144 Filed 1–8–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
RIN 1625–AA11
Regulated Navigation Area, Kill Van
Kull and Newark Bay; Bayonne, NJ, NY
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
The United States Coast
Guard proposes to establish a
permanent Regulated Navigation Area
(RNA) on the navigable waters of Kill
Van Kull and Newark Bay surrounding
the Bayonne Bridge. In response to a
planned Bayonne Bridge construction
SUMMARY:
14:54 Jan 08, 2015
Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before February 9, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number using any
one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. The telephone number is (202)
366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for further instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call
Lieutenant Commander Myles
Greenway, Waterways Management at
First Coast Guard District at 617–223–
8385 or email at Myles.J.Greenway@
uscg.mil; or call LT Hannah Eko,
Waterways Management Division at
Sector New York at 718–354–4114, or
email hannah.o.eko@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Cheryl
Collins, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Table of Acronyms
[Docket Number USCG–2014–0002]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
project, this proposed rule would
establish a speed restriction in the
waters surrounding the Bayonne Bridge.
Also, this proposed rule would allow
the Coast Guard to prohibit vessel traffic
through the RNA when necessary to
safeguard people and vessels from the
hazards associated with bridge
construction.
Jkt 235001
COTP NY Captain of the Port New York
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
RNA Regulated Navigation Area
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section
of this document to which each
comment applies, and provide a reason
for each suggestion or recommendation.
You may submit your comments and
material online at https://
www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you
successfully transmit the comment. If
you fax, hand deliver, or mail your
comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast
Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend
that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number [USCG–2014–0002] in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail
or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number (USCG–2014–0002) in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
E:\FR\FM\09JAP1.SGM
09JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 6 / Friday, January 9, 2015 / Proposed Rules
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one, using one of the methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
B. Regulatory History and Information
The Port Authority of New York and
New Jersey (PANYNJ) have received
approval to perform construction on the
Bayonne Bridge, and the Coast Guard
has published certain documents in the
Federal Register related to the bridge
construction permit. However, this
proposed rulemaking is the first
regulatory action that the Coast Guard
has taken related to regulating vessel
traffic along the affected waterway.
There is insufficient time before the
planned start of the construction project
to accommodate the notice and
comment process and have a thirty day
period before the effective date of the
regulation. The currently planned start
of the construction and the associated
regulated navigation area is February 1,
2015. This date is based on a number of
factors, including weather and the
availability of construction equipment
and other resources, and would be
difficult to change. However, the Coast
Guard is taking several steps to mitigate
the impact of this shortened period.
First, the Coast Guard has reached out
to waterway users to discuss the impact
of this regulated navigation area. In
addition, the Coast Guard has drafted a
rule designed to have minimum impact
on waterway traffic. Finally, if the
planned construction date remains
February 1, 2015, the Coast Guard
intends to continue to receive comments
in the first few months of the effective
period of the regulated navigation area,
and may change the regulation as a
result of those comments. A good cause
statement, if required, will be published
as part of the final rule.
C. Basis and Purpose
Under the Ports and Waterways Safety
Act, the Coast Guard has the authority
to establish Regulated Navigation Areas
in defined water areas that are
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:54 Jan 08, 2015
Jkt 235001
hazardous or in which hazardous
conditions are determined to exist. See
33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701,
3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; and
Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
The purpose of this proposed
rulemaking is to ensure the safety of
vessels and workers from hazards
associated with construction on the
Bayonne Bridge. The current Bayonne
Bridge was built in 1931 and carries the
NY/NJ Route 440. PANYNJ has
contracted Skanska-Koch Inc. and
Kiewit Infrastructure for this project.
Construction operations are sensitive
to water movement, and wake from
passing vessels could pose significant
risk of injury or death to construction
workers. In order to minimize such
unexpected or uncontrolled movement
of water, the RNA will limit vessel
speed and wake of all vessels operating
in the vicinity of the bridge construction
zone. This will be achieved by
implementing a five (5) knot speed limit
and ‘‘NO WAKE’’ zone in the vicinity of
the construction as well as providing a
means to suspend all vessel traffic for
emergent situations that pose imminent
threat to waterway users in the area.
After consulting with PANYNJ,
Skanska-Koch Inc, and Kiewit
Infrastructure, the Coast Guard has
determined that certain aspects of the
construction project can only be
completed in the channel and will
require closing the waterway. For
instance, barges are expected to be used
at times while portions of the bridge are
being raised and the barges’ presence
might limit maneuverability in the
waterway. Also, the Coast Guard
anticipates that crane and cutting
operations may create the potential for
falling debris into the waterway. It is
expected that the construction efforts
that might require waterway closures
will not take place until the fall of 2015.
D. Discussion of Proposed Rule
To address the aforementioned
hazards, this proposed rule would
establish speed and wake restrictions in
the vicinity of the Bayonne Bridge. Also,
this proposed rule would establish
intermittent closures of the waterway
along portions of Kill Van Kull and
Newark Bay when necessary for the
safety of vessels and workers during
construction work in the channel. This
proposed regulation will be effective at
8:00 a.m. on February 1, 2015. The
proposed speed restrictions of five (5)
knots will be in effect at all times within
the RNA and all vessels must proceed
through the area with caution and
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1383
operate in such a manner as to produce
no wake unless a higher minimum
speed is necessary to maintain bare
steerage. The Coast Guard will enforce
waterway closures, however, only when
necessary to protect people and vessels
from hazards associated with bridge
construction.
Whenever it is determined that a
waterway closure is necessary, the Coast
Guard will provide the public with as
much advanced notice as possible of the
closure times. Such notice will be
provided via https://homeport.uscg.mil/
newyorkvia, via Local Notice to
Mariners, via Broadcast Notice to
Mariners, and via other methods
described in 33 CFR 165.7.
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to the
rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on these statutes and
executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders.
The Coast Guard expects the
economic impact of this proposed rule
to be minimal as this proposed RNA
will not necessarily prohibit vessel
traffic in the affected waterways. Rather,
this proposed RNA will primarily
establish a speed and wake restriction
along the waters surrounding the
Bayonne Bridge. There may be times
that the Coast Guard will prohibit vessel
traffic through the RNA, but such
closures are expected to take place
during off peak hours. Moreover, even
when the Coast Guard generally
prohibits vessel traffic through the RNA,
specific vessels may still obtain
permission to transit through the RNA.
Additionally, the Coast Guard will
provide the public with advanced
notification of waterway closures so that
mariners may plan accordingly. Such
notifications will be made through
various means, including, but not
limited to, Local Notice to Mariners and
at https://homeport.uscg.mil/newyork.
For all of these reasons, the Coast Guard
has determined that this proposed
E:\FR\FM\09JAP1.SGM
09JAP1
1384
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 6 / Friday, January 9, 2015 / Proposed Rules
rulemaking would not be a significant
regulatory action.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
For all of the reasons discussed in the
REGULATORY PLANNING AND
REVIEW section, the Coast Guard
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–
121), we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and determined that this rule
does not have implications for
federalism.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:54 Jan 08, 2015
Jkt 235001
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
10. Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule involves the establishment of a
Regulated Navigation Area and thus, is
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure
2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. A
preliminary environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination
and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination will be available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and record keeping
requirements, Security measures and
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
■
2. Add § 165.168 to read as follows:
§ 165.168 Regulated Navigation Area; Kill
Van Kull and Newark Bay; Bayonne, NJ, NY
Regulated Area.
(a) Location. The following area is a
Regulated Navigation Area (RNA): all
E:\FR\FM\09JAP1.SGM
09JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 6 / Friday, January 9, 2015 / Proposed Rules
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
waters of Bergen Point East and West
Reaches in the Kill Van Kull, and all
waters of Newark Bay South Reach,
bound by the following approximate
positions: 40°38′51.93″ N, 074°06′47.90″
W; thence to 40°38′41.53″ N,
074°07′18.54″ W; thence to 40°38′38.20″
N, 074°07′41.30″ W; thence to
40°38′40.47″ N, 074°08′01.61″ W; thence
to 40°38′34.20″ N, 074°08′41.71″ W;
thence to 40°38′39.67″ N, 074°08′51.86″
W; thence to 40°38′50.20″ N,
074°08′55.19″ W; thence to 40°39′17.54″
N, 074°08′38.20″ W; thence to
40°39′19.00″ N, 074°08′53.09″ W; thence
to 40°39′07.94″ N, 074°08′59.04″ W;
thence to 40°38′46.87″ N, 074°09′23.03″
W; thence to 40°38′33.40″ N,
074°09′19.87″ W; thence to 40°38′24.86″
N, 074°09′02.71″ W; thence to
40°38′23.93″ N, 074°08′52.56″ W; thence
to 40°38′31.40″ N, 074°08′07.56″ W;
thence to 40°38′31.80″ N, 074°07′55.66″
W; thence to 40°38′30.06″ N,
074°07′41.13″ W; thence to 40°38′33.80″
N, 074°07′14.86″ W; thence to
40°38′43.93″ N, 074°06′45.45″ W; thence
to the point of origin (NAD 83).
(b) Regulations. (1) The general
regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.10,
165.11, and 165.13 apply within the
RNA.
(2) Any vessel transiting through the
RNA must make a direct passage. No
vessel may stop, moor, anchor or loiter
within the RNA at any time unless they
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:54 Jan 08, 2015
Jkt 235001
are working on the bridge construction.
Movement within the RNA is subject to
a ‘‘Slow-No Wake’’ speed limit. All
vessels may not produce a wake and
may not attain speeds greater than five
(5) knots unless a higher minimum
speed is necessary to maintain bare
steerageway.
(3) There may be times that the First
District Commander or the Captain of
the Port (COTP) New York finds it
necessary to close the RNA to vessel
traffic. All closures will be limited to
specific hours of the day. Mariners will
be advised of all closure dates and times
via Local Notice to Mariners and
Broadcast Notice to Mariners in advance
of closure times. During such closures,
persons and vessels may request
permission to enter the RNA by
contacting the COTP or the COTP’s onscene representative on VHF–16 or via
phone at 718–354–4353 (Sector New
York Command Center).
(4) Vessels in the RNA must comply
with directions given to them by the
COTP or the COTP’s on-scene
representative. The ‘‘on-scene
representative’’ of the COTP is any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or
petty officer who has been designated
by the COTP to act on the COTP’s
behalf. The on-scene representative may
be on a Coast Guard vessel; or other
designated craft; or on shore and
communicating with a Vessel Traffic
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
1385
Service New York Watchstander or
vessels via VHF–FM radio or loudhailer.
Members of the Coast Guard Auxiliary
may be present to inform vessel
operators of this regulation.
(5) All other relevant regulations,
including but not limited to the Rules of
the Road, as codified in 33 CFR
Subchapter E, Inland Navigational
Rules, remain in effect within the RNA
and must be strictly followed at all
times.
(c) Enforcement period. This
regulation will be in place from 8:00
a.m. on February 1, 2015 until
December 31, 2016. This RNA’s speed
restrictions are enforceable 24 hours a
day as long as this RNA is in place. The
Coast Guard will enforce waterway
closures only when necessary to protect
people and vessels from hazards
associated with bridge construction.
(d) Notification. The Coast Guard will
rely on the methods described in 33
CFR 165.7 to notify the public of the
time and duration of any closure of the
RNA. Violations of this RNA may be
reported to the COTP at 718–354–4353
or on VHF-Channel 16.
Dated: December 22, 2015.
L.L. Fagan,
Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First
Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2015–00178 Filed 1–8–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
E:\FR\FM\09JAP1.SGM
09JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 6 (Friday, January 9, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 1382-1385]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00178]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2014-0002]
RIN 1625-AA11
Regulated Navigation Area, Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay; Bayonne,
NJ, NY
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Coast Guard proposes to establish a
permanent Regulated Navigation Area (RNA) on the navigable waters of
Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay surrounding the Bayonne Bridge. In
response to a planned Bayonne Bridge construction project, this
proposed rule would establish a speed restriction in the waters
surrounding the Bayonne Bridge. Also, this proposed rule would allow
the Coast Guard to prohibit vessel traffic through the RNA when
necessary to safeguard people and vessels from the hazards associated
with bridge construction.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before February 9, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number using
any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is (202) 366-9329.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions
on submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call Lieutenant Commander Myles Greenway, Waterways Management at First
Coast Guard District at 617-223-8385 or email at
Myles.J.Greenway@uscg.mil; or call LT Hannah Eko, Waterways Management
Division at Sector New York at 718-354-4114, or email
hannah.o.eko@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
COTP NY Captain of the Port New York
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
RNA Regulated Navigation Area
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online at
https://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but
please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online, it
will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully
transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment,
it will be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when
it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number [USCG-2014-0002] in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2014-0002) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of
[[Page 1383]]
our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one, using one of the methods specified under ADDRESSES.
Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a
time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
B. Regulatory History and Information
The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ) have
received approval to perform construction on the Bayonne Bridge, and
the Coast Guard has published certain documents in the Federal Register
related to the bridge construction permit. However, this proposed
rulemaking is the first regulatory action that the Coast Guard has
taken related to regulating vessel traffic along the affected waterway.
There is insufficient time before the planned start of the
construction project to accommodate the notice and comment process and
have a thirty day period before the effective date of the regulation.
The currently planned start of the construction and the associated
regulated navigation area is February 1, 2015. This date is based on a
number of factors, including weather and the availability of
construction equipment and other resources, and would be difficult to
change. However, the Coast Guard is taking several steps to mitigate
the impact of this shortened period. First, the Coast Guard has reached
out to waterway users to discuss the impact of this regulated
navigation area. In addition, the Coast Guard has drafted a rule
designed to have minimum impact on waterway traffic. Finally, if the
planned construction date remains February 1, 2015, the Coast Guard
intends to continue to receive comments in the first few months of the
effective period of the regulated navigation area, and may change the
regulation as a result of those comments. A good cause statement, if
required, will be published as part of the final rule.
C. Basis and Purpose
Under the Ports and Waterways Safety Act, the Coast Guard has the
authority to establish Regulated Navigation Areas in defined water
areas that are hazardous or in which hazardous conditions are
determined to exist. See 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; and Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
The purpose of this proposed rulemaking is to ensure the safety of
vessels and workers from hazards associated with construction on the
Bayonne Bridge. The current Bayonne Bridge was built in 1931 and
carries the NY/NJ Route 440. PANYNJ has contracted Skanska-Koch Inc.
and Kiewit Infrastructure for this project.
Construction operations are sensitive to water movement, and wake
from passing vessels could pose significant risk of injury or death to
construction workers. In order to minimize such unexpected or
uncontrolled movement of water, the RNA will limit vessel speed and
wake of all vessels operating in the vicinity of the bridge
construction zone. This will be achieved by implementing a five (5)
knot speed limit and ``NO WAKE'' zone in the vicinity of the
construction as well as providing a means to suspend all vessel traffic
for emergent situations that pose imminent threat to waterway users in
the area.
After consulting with PANYNJ, Skanska-Koch Inc, and Kiewit
Infrastructure, the Coast Guard has determined that certain aspects of
the construction project can only be completed in the channel and will
require closing the waterway. For instance, barges are expected to be
used at times while portions of the bridge are being raised and the
barges' presence might limit maneuverability in the waterway. Also, the
Coast Guard anticipates that crane and cutting operations may create
the potential for falling debris into the waterway. It is expected that
the construction efforts that might require waterway closures will not
take place until the fall of 2015.
D. Discussion of Proposed Rule
To address the aforementioned hazards, this proposed rule would
establish speed and wake restrictions in the vicinity of the Bayonne
Bridge. Also, this proposed rule would establish intermittent closures
of the waterway along portions of Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay when
necessary for the safety of vessels and workers during construction
work in the channel. This proposed regulation will be effective at 8:00
a.m. on February 1, 2015. The proposed speed restrictions of five (5)
knots will be in effect at all times within the RNA and all vessels
must proceed through the area with caution and operate in such a manner
as to produce no wake unless a higher minimum speed is necessary to
maintain bare steerage. The Coast Guard will enforce waterway closures,
however, only when necessary to protect people and vessels from hazards
associated with bridge construction.
Whenever it is determined that a waterway closure is necessary, the
Coast Guard will provide the public with as much advanced notice as
possible of the closure times. Such notice will be provided via https://homeport.uscg.mil/newyorkvia, via Local Notice to Mariners, via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and via other methods described in 33 CFR
165.7.
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to the rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on these statutes and executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.
The Coast Guard expects the economic impact of this proposed rule
to be minimal as this proposed RNA will not necessarily prohibit vessel
traffic in the affected waterways. Rather, this proposed RNA will
primarily establish a speed and wake restriction along the waters
surrounding the Bayonne Bridge. There may be times that the Coast Guard
will prohibit vessel traffic through the RNA, but such closures are
expected to take place during off peak hours. Moreover, even when the
Coast Guard generally prohibits vessel traffic through the RNA,
specific vessels may still obtain permission to transit through the
RNA. Additionally, the Coast Guard will provide the public with
advanced notification of waterway closures so that mariners may plan
accordingly. Such notifications will be made through various means,
including, but not limited to, Local Notice to Mariners and at https://homeport.uscg.mil/newyork. For all of these reasons, the Coast Guard
has determined that this proposed
[[Page 1384]]
rulemaking would not be a significant regulatory action.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. For all of the reasons discussed in the REGULATORY PLANNING AND
REVIEW section, the Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that
this proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule
involves the establishment of a Regulated Navigation Area and thus, is
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. A preliminary environmental
analysis checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical
Exclusion Determination will be available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to
the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record
keeping requirements, Security measures and Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L. 107-
295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.168 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.168 Regulated Navigation Area; Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay;
Bayonne, NJ, NY Regulated Area.
(a) Location. The following area is a Regulated Navigation Area
(RNA): all
[[Page 1385]]
waters of Bergen Point East and West Reaches in the Kill Van Kull, and
all waters of Newark Bay South Reach, bound by the following
approximate positions: 40[deg]38'51.93'' N, 074[deg]06'47.90'' W;
thence to 40[deg]38'41.53'' N, 074[deg]07'18.54'' W; thence to
40[deg]38'38.20'' N, 074[deg]07'41.30'' W; thence to 40[deg]38'40.47''
N, 074[deg]08'01.61'' W; thence to 40[deg]38'34.20'' N,
074[deg]08'41.71'' W; thence to 40[deg]38'39.67'' N, 074[deg]08'51.86''
W; thence to 40[deg]38'50.20'' N, 074[deg]08'55.19'' W; thence to
40[deg]39'17.54'' N, 074[deg]08'38.20'' W; thence to 40[deg]39'19.00''
N, 074[deg]08'53.09'' W; thence to 40[deg]39'07.94'' N,
074[deg]08'59.04'' W; thence to 40[deg]38'46.87'' N, 074[deg]09'23.03''
W; thence to 40[deg]38'33.40'' N, 074[deg]09'19.87'' W; thence to
40[deg]38'24.86'' N, 074[deg]09'02.71'' W; thence to 40[deg]38'23.93''
N, 074[deg]08'52.56'' W; thence to 40[deg]38'31.40'' N,
074[deg]08'07.56'' W; thence to 40[deg]38'31.80'' N, 074[deg]07'55.66''
W; thence to 40[deg]38'30.06'' N, 074[deg]07'41.13'' W; thence to
40[deg]38'33.80'' N, 074[deg]07'14.86'' W; thence to 40[deg]38'43.93''
N, 074[deg]06'45.45'' W; thence to the point of origin (NAD 83).
(b) Regulations. (1) The general regulations contained in 33 CFR
165.10, 165.11, and 165.13 apply within the RNA.
(2) Any vessel transiting through the RNA must make a direct
passage. No vessel may stop, moor, anchor or loiter within the RNA at
any time unless they are working on the bridge construction. Movement
within the RNA is subject to a ``Slow-No Wake'' speed limit. All
vessels may not produce a wake and may not attain speeds greater than
five (5) knots unless a higher minimum speed is necessary to maintain
bare steerageway.
(3) There may be times that the First District Commander or the
Captain of the Port (COTP) New York finds it necessary to close the RNA
to vessel traffic. All closures will be limited to specific hours of
the day. Mariners will be advised of all closure dates and times via
Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to Mariners in advance of
closure times. During such closures, persons and vessels may request
permission to enter the RNA by contacting the COTP or the COTP's on-
scene representative on VHF-16 or via phone at 718-354-4353 (Sector New
York Command Center).
(4) Vessels in the RNA must comply with directions given to them by
the COTP or the COTP's on-scene representative. The ``on-scene
representative'' of the COTP is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant
or petty officer who has been designated by the COTP to act on the
COTP's behalf. The on-scene representative may be on a Coast Guard
vessel; or other designated craft; or on shore and communicating with a
Vessel Traffic Service New York Watchstander or vessels via VHF-FM
radio or loudhailer. Members of the Coast Guard Auxiliary may be
present to inform vessel operators of this regulation.
(5) All other relevant regulations, including but not limited to
the Rules of the Road, as codified in 33 CFR Subchapter E, Inland
Navigational Rules, remain in effect within the RNA and must be
strictly followed at all times.
(c) Enforcement period. This regulation will be in place from 8:00
a.m. on February 1, 2015 until December 31, 2016. This RNA's speed
restrictions are enforceable 24 hours a day as long as this RNA is in
place. The Coast Guard will enforce waterway closures only when
necessary to protect people and vessels from hazards associated with
bridge construction.
(d) Notification. The Coast Guard will rely on the methods
described in 33 CFR 165.7 to notify the public of the time and duration
of any closure of the RNA. Violations of this RNA may be reported to
the COTP at 718-354-4353 or on VHF-Channel 16.
Dated: December 22, 2015.
L.L. Fagan,
Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2015-00178 Filed 1-8-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P