Dominion Energy Kewaunee, Inc.; Kewaunee Power Station, 904-906 [2015-00027]
Download as PDF
904
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 4 / Wednesday, January 7, 2015 / Notices
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50–305 and 72–64; NRC–2014–
0280]
Dominion Energy Kewaunee, Inc.;
Kewaunee Power Station
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Exemption; issuance.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is issuing an
exemption in response to a June 10,
2013, request from Dominion Energy
Kewaunee, Inc. (DEK or the licensee),
from certain power reactor security
requirements. The exemption would
remove the requirement that continuous
communication be maintained between
the security alarm stations and the
control room at Kewaunee Power
Station (KPS). The licensee has
committed to modify its Physical
Security Plan to require continuous
communication between the security
alarm stations and the shift manager.
DATES: January 7, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2014–0280 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may obtain publicly-available
information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2014–0280. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–287–3422;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced in this document
(if that document is available in
ADAMS) is provided the first time that
a document is referenced.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:01 Jan 06, 2015
Jkt 235001
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William Huffman, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington DC
20555–0001; telephone: 301–415–2046;
email: William.Huffman@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The licensee, DEK, is the holder of
Renewed Facility License No. DPR–43.
The license provides, among other
things, that the facility is subject to all
rules, regulations, and orders of the NRC
now or hereafter in effect.
The facility consists of a permanently
shutdown and defueled pressurized
water reactor and a general licensed
independent spent fuel storage
installation (ISFSI) located in Kewaunee
County, Wisconsin.
By letter dated February 25, 2013
(ADAMS Accession No. ML13058A065),
and in accordance with § 50.82(a)(1)(i)
of Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR), DEK submitted to
the NRC a certification indicating it
would permanently cease power
operations at KPS on May 7, 2013. On
May 7, 2013, DEK permanently ceased
power operation at KPS. By letter dated
May 14, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML13135A209), and in accordance with
10 CFR 50.82(a)(1)(ii), DEK submitted to
the NRC a certification that the reactor
vessel at KPS was permanently
defueled.
II. Request/Action
In accordance with 10 CFR 73.5,
‘‘Specific exemptions,’’ the licensee has,
by letter dated June 10, 2013 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML13165A343),
requested an exemption from 10 CFR
73.55(j)(4)(ii), which otherwise requires
continuous communications between
security alarm stations and the control
room. Portions of the letter dated June
10, 2013, contain safeguards
information and, accordingly, have been
withheld from public disclosure. The
licensee is requesting exemption from
the continuous communications
requirements between the control room
and the security alarm stations.
The exemption request relates solely
to removing the control room from the
requirements specified in the
regulations that direct the licensee to
establish a system for continuous
communications between the control
room and the security alarm stations.
The licensee will have a system for
continuous communications between
the shift manager and the alarm stations.
As specified in its June 10, 2013,
application, DEK will implement
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
changes to its Physical Security Plan
that would require a system of
continuous communications between
the alarm stations and the shift
manager/Certified Fuel Handler (CFH)
instead of the control room.
III. Discussion
The intent of 10 CFR 73.55(j)(4)(ii) is
to maintain continuous effective
communication capability between
security alarm stations and operations
staff with shift command function
responsibility to ensure any necessary
coordination during security events or
other emergencies can be accomplished
at all times. The regulation requires
maintaining a system for continuous
communications between the security
alarm stations and the control room for
an operating reactor based on the
presumption that the shift command
function resides in the control room.
The control room at an operating reactor
contains the controls and
instrumentation necessary for complete
supervision and response needed to
ensure safe operation of the reactor and
support systems during normal, offnormal, and accident conditions and,
therefore, is the location of the shift
command function. Following
certification of permanent shutdown
and removal of fuel from the reactor,
operation of the reactor is no longer
permitted. The control room at a
permanently shutdown and defueled
reactor does not perform the same
function as required for an operating
reactor. There are no longer any safety
related systems or processes that are
controlled from the control room. The
primary functions of the control room at
a permanently shutdown plant is to
provide a central location from where
the shift command function can be
conveniently performed due to existing
communication equipment, office
computer equipment, and ready access
to reference material. The control room
also provides a central location from
which emergency response activities are
coordinated. However, the control room
does not always need to be the location
of the shift command function since
most remaining system processes at a
permanently shutdown and defueled
reactor are controlled locally. At KPS,
the shift manager/CFH has
responsibility for the shift command
function. The shift manager/CFH is the
senior on-shift licensee representative
and decision-maker and is responsible
for the overall safety of the permanently
shutdown and defueled facility and for
directing the response to abnormal
situations and emergencies. The
requested exemption would provide the
KPS shift manager/CFH the flexibility to
E:\FR\FM\07JAN1.SGM
07JAN1
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 4 / Wednesday, January 7, 2015 / Notices
leave the control room to perform
managerial and supervisory activities
throughout the plant while retaining the
command function responsibility. While
the shift command function is normally
accomplished from the control room in
accordance with applicable KPS
procedures, it can also be accomplished
anywhere in the facility provided an
effective means of continuous
communication with the shift manager/
CFH is maintained. Because KPS is
permanently shutdown and defueled,
the ability to leave the control room may
benefit the shift manager/CFH’s
understanding of facility conditions as
well as enhance his assessment and
response to any abnormal situation or
emergency conditions. Although the
control room will remain the physical
command center, the exemption will
allow the location of the KPS command
function to be wherever the shift
manager/CFH is located. Being absent
from the control room will not relieve
the shift manager/CFH of the
responsibility for the shift command
function. The exemption will allow DEK
to establish and maintain continuous
communication capability with the shift
manager/CFH, regardless of his location.
The NRC staff assessed the method
proposed by the licensee to maintain
continuous communications with the
shift manager/CFH in a safety
evaluation report dated April 14, 2014
(the NRC staff’s safety evaluation report
contains safeguards information and is,
therefore, not publicly available). The
NRC staff determined that the proposed
method of maintaining continuous
communication with the shift manager/
CFH is consistent with the functional
requirement of the regulation for
maintaining communication with the
control room. The NRC staff has
concluded that upon implementing a
system for continuous communications
between the alarm stations and the shift
manager/CFH, as documented in the
licensee’s Physical Security Plan, the
requested exemption to 10 CFR
73.55(j)(4)(ii) will meet the intent of the
regulation, regardless of the location of
the shift manager/CFH.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 73.5, the
Commission may, upon application of
any interested person or upon its own
initiative, grant such exemptions from
the requirements of 10 CFR part 73 as
it determines are authorized by law and
will not endanger life or property or the
common defense and security, and are
otherwise in the public interest.
A. Authorized by Law
In accordance with 10 CFR 73.5, the
Commission may grant exemptions from
the regulations in 10 CFR part 73 as the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:01 Jan 06, 2015
Jkt 235001
Commission determines are authorized
by law. The NRC staff has determined
that granting of the licensee’s proposed
exemption will not result in a violation
of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
amended, or other laws. Therefore, the
exemption is authorized by law.
B. Will Not Endanger Life or Property or
the Common Defense and Security
Removing the requirement to have a
continuous communication system
between the security alarm stations and
the control room will not endanger life
or property or the common defense and
security for the reasons discussed
below.
The shift manager/CFH is the senior
on-shift licensee representative, is
responsible for the shift command
function, and directs the action of the
operations staff during both normal and
emergency conditions. Therefore, the
shift manager/CFH is the appropriate
individual to have continuous
communication capability with the
alarm stations. The exemption would
not reduce the measures in place to
protect against radiological sabotage. In
addition, the NRC staff has determined
that the exemption will not reduce the
overall effectiveness of the KPS Physical
Security Plan, Training and
Qualification Plan, or Safeguards
Contingency Plan. Maintaining a system
of continuous communication between
the alarm stations and the shift
manager/CFH rather than the control
room will provide the shift manager
with the flexibility to leave the control
room and respond to other locations
onsite, as necessary, to conduct
appropriate management oversight. The
NRC staff has determined that
maintaining continuous communication
capability with the shift manager/CFH,
whether in the control room or
elsewhere, does not significantly change
the current process that ensures that any
necessary coordination during security
events or other emergencies can be
accomplished at all times. Continuous
communication capability is essentially
unchanged (other than the location of
the shift manager/CFH when the
communications are initiated).
Therefore, the underlying purpose of
10 CFR 73.55(j)(4)(ii) will continue to be
met. The exemption does not reduce the
overall effectiveness of the Physical
Security Plan and has no adverse impact
on DEK’s ability to physically secure the
site or protect special nuclear material
at KPS, and therefore would not have an
effect on the common defense and
security. The NRC staff has concluded
that the exemption would not reduce
the effectiveness of security measures
currently in place to protect against
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
905
radiological sabotage. Therefore,
removing the requirement to have
continuous communication between the
security alarm stations and the control
room will not endanger life or property
or the common defense and security.
C. Is Otherwise in the Public Interest
The licensee is implementing changes
to its Physical Security Plan to establish
a system of continuous communication
between the security alarm stations and
the shift manager/CFH that is not
dependent on the shift manager’s
location. By granting DEK’s proposed
exemption to remove the requirement
for a continuous communication system
between the security alarm stations and
the control room, the shift manager/CFH
can roam around the facility in an
oversight role and obtain first-hand
information of facility conditions and
status while still maintaining
continuous communication with the
alarm stations. The NRC staff has
concluded that there would be no
decrease in the level of safety by
granting this exemption and that the
capability to observe conditions directly
serves the public interest by assuring
that the shift manager/CFH has the best
possible information needed to make
decisions or to communicate to the
alarm stations or to offsite entities.
Accordingly, the NRC staff concludes
that exempting DEK from the
requirement for a continuous
communication system between the
security alarm stations and the control
room is in the public interest, provided
the licensee maintains continuous
communication capability between the
alarm stations and the shift manager/
CFH.
D. Environmental Considerations
The NRC’s approval of the exemption
to security requirements belongs to a
category of actions that the Commission,
by rule or regulation, has declared to be
a categorical exclusion, after first
finding that the category of actions does
not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. Specifically the
exemption is categorically excluded
from further analysis under 10 CFR
51.22(c)(25).
Under 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25), granting
of an exemption from the requirements
of any regulation of Chapter I to 10 CFR
is a categorical exclusion provided that
(i) there is no significant hazards
consideration; (ii) there is no significant
change in the types or significant
increase in the amounts of any effluents
that may be released offsite; (iii) there is
no significant increase in individual or
cumulative public or occupational
E:\FR\FM\07JAN1.SGM
07JAN1
906
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 4 / Wednesday, January 7, 2015 / Notices
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
radiation exposure; (iv) there is no
significant construction impact; (v)
there is no significant increase in the
potential for or consequences from
radiological accidents; and (vi) the
requirements from which an exemption
is sought involve: safeguard plans, and
materials control and accounting
inventory scheduling requirements; or
involve other requirements of an
administrative, managerial, or
organizational nature.
The Director, Division of Operating
Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, has determined that
approval of the exemption request
involves no significant hazards
consideration because removing the
requirement for a continuous
communications system between the
security alarm stations and the control
room at KPS does not (1) involve a
significant increase in the probability or
consequences of an accident previously
evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of
a new or different kind of accident from
any accident previously evaluated; or
(3) involve a significant reduction in a
margin of safety. The exempted security
regulation is unrelated to the operation
of KPS. Accordingly, there is no
significant change in the types or
significant increase in the amounts of
any effluents that may be released
offsite; and no significant increase in
individual or cumulative public or
occupational radiation exposure. The
exempted regulation is not associated
with construction, so there is no
significant construction impact. The
exempted regulation does not concern
the source term (i.e., potential amount
of radiation in an accident), nor
mitigation. Therefore, there is no
significant increase in the potential for,
or consequences of, a radiological
accident. The requirement for a
continuous communication system
between the security alarm stations and
the control room may be viewed as
involving either safeguards or
managerial matters.
Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR
51.22(b) and 51.22(c)(25), no
environmental impact statement or
environmental assessment need be
prepared in connection with the
approval of this exemption request.
IV. Conclusions
Accordingly, the Commission has
determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR
73.5, the exemption is authorized by
law and will not endanger life or
property or the common defense and
security, and is otherwise in the public
interest. Therefore, the Commission
hereby grants DEK exemption from the
requirement of 10 CFR 73.55(j)(4)(ii) for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:01 Jan 06, 2015
Jkt 235001
a system of continuous communication
capability with the control room,
provided that DEK maintains a system
for continuous communication
capability with the shift manager/CFH
consistent with the method described in
its submittal dated June 10, 2013. This
exemption is effective when the system
for continuous communication between
the alarm stations and the shift
manager/CFH is documented in DEK’s
Physical Security Plan and functionally
implemented.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 29th day
of December 2014.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
George A. Wilson Jr.,
Acting Director, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2015–00027 Filed 1–6–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. ACR2014; Order No. 2313]
FY 2014 Annual Compliance Report
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Postal Service has filed
an Annual Compliance Report on the
costs, revenues, rates, and quality of
service associated with its products in
fiscal year 2014. Within 90 days, the
Commission must evaluate that
information and issue its determination
as to whether rates were in compliance
with title 39, chapter 36, and whether
service standards in effect were met. To
assist in this, the Commission seeks
public comments on the Postal Service’s
Annual Compliance Report.
DATES: Comments are due: February 2,
2015. Reply Comments are due:
February 13, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Overview of the Postal Service’s FY2014
ACR
III. Procedural Steps
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
I. Introduction
On December 29, 2014, the United
States Postal Service (Postal Service)
filed with the Commission, pursuant to
39 U.S.C. 3652, its Annual Compliance
Report (ACR) for fiscal year (FY) 2014.1
Section 3652 requires submission of
data and information on the costs,
revenues, rates, and quality of service
associated with postal products within
90 days of the closing of each fiscal
year. In conformance with other
statutory provisions and Commission
rules, the ACR includes the Postal
Service’s FY 2014 Comprehensive
Statement, its FY 2014 annual report to
the Secretary of the Treasury on the
Competitive Products Fund, and certain
related Competitive Products Fund
material. See respectively, 39 U.S.C.
3652(g), 39 U.S.C. 2011(i), and 39 CFR
3060.20–23. In line with past practice,
some of the material in the FY 2014
ACR appears in non-public annexes.
The filing begins a review process that
results in an Annual Compliance
Determination (ACD) issued by the
Commission to determine whether
Postal Service products offered during
FY 2014 are in compliance with
applicable title 39 requirements.
II. Overview of the Postal Service’s FY
2014 ACR
Contents of the filing. The Postal
Service’s FY 2014 ACR consists of a 51page narrative; extensive additional
material appended as separate folders
and identified in Attachment One; and
an application for non-public treatment
of certain materials, along with
supporting rationale, filed as
Attachment Two. The filing also
includes the Comprehensive
Statement,2 Report to the Secretary of
the Treasury, and information on the
Competitive Products Fund filed in
response to Commission rules. This
material has been filed electronically
with the Commission, and some also
has been filed in hard-copy form.
Scope of filing. The material
appended to the narrative consists of:
(1) Domestic product costing material
filed on an annual basis summarized in
the Cost and Revenue Analysis (CRA);
(2) comparable international costing
material summarized in the
1 United States Postal Service FY 2014 Annual
Compliance Report, December 29, 2014 (FY 2014
ACR). Public portions of the Postal Service’s filing
are available on the Commission’s Web site at
https://www.prc.gov.
2 In years prior to 2013, the Commission reviewed
the Postal Service’s reports prepared pursuant to 39
U.S.C. 2803 and 39 U.S.C. 2804 (filed as the
Comprehensive Statement by the Postal Service) in
its Annual Compliance Determination. However, as
it did last year, the Commission intends to review
these reports separately.
E:\FR\FM\07JAN1.SGM
07JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 4 (Wednesday, January 7, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 904-906]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00027]
[[Page 904]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50-305 and 72-64; NRC-2014-0280]
Dominion Energy Kewaunee, Inc.; Kewaunee Power Station
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Exemption; issuance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing an
exemption in response to a June 10, 2013, request from Dominion Energy
Kewaunee, Inc. (DEK or the licensee), from certain power reactor
security requirements. The exemption would remove the requirement that
continuous communication be maintained between the security alarm
stations and the control room at Kewaunee Power Station (KPS). The
licensee has committed to modify its Physical Security Plan to require
continuous communication between the security alarm stations and the
shift manager.
DATES: January 7, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2014-0280 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You
may obtain publicly-available information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2014-0280. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-287-
3422; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this document.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each document referenced in this document
(if that document is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time
that a document is referenced.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Huffman, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC
20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-2046; email: William.Huffman@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The licensee, DEK, is the holder of Renewed Facility License No.
DPR-43. The license provides, among other things, that the facility is
subject to all rules, regulations, and orders of the NRC now or
hereafter in effect.
The facility consists of a permanently shutdown and defueled
pressurized water reactor and a general licensed independent spent fuel
storage installation (ISFSI) located in Kewaunee County, Wisconsin.
By letter dated February 25, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML13058A065), and in accordance with Sec. 50.82(a)(1)(i) of Title 10
of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), DEK submitted to the NRC a
certification indicating it would permanently cease power operations at
KPS on May 7, 2013. On May 7, 2013, DEK permanently ceased power
operation at KPS. By letter dated May 14, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML13135A209), and in accordance with 10 CFR 50.82(a)(1)(ii), DEK
submitted to the NRC a certification that the reactor vessel at KPS was
permanently defueled.
II. Request/Action
In accordance with 10 CFR 73.5, ``Specific exemptions,'' the
licensee has, by letter dated June 10, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML13165A343), requested an exemption from 10 CFR 73.55(j)(4)(ii), which
otherwise requires continuous communications between security alarm
stations and the control room. Portions of the letter dated June 10,
2013, contain safeguards information and, accordingly, have been
withheld from public disclosure. The licensee is requesting exemption
from the continuous communications requirements between the control
room and the security alarm stations.
The exemption request relates solely to removing the control room
from the requirements specified in the regulations that direct the
licensee to establish a system for continuous communications between
the control room and the security alarm stations. The licensee will
have a system for continuous communications between the shift manager
and the alarm stations.
As specified in its June 10, 2013, application, DEK will implement
changes to its Physical Security Plan that would require a system of
continuous communications between the alarm stations and the shift
manager/Certified Fuel Handler (CFH) instead of the control room.
III. Discussion
The intent of 10 CFR 73.55(j)(4)(ii) is to maintain continuous
effective communication capability between security alarm stations and
operations staff with shift command function responsibility to ensure
any necessary coordination during security events or other emergencies
can be accomplished at all times. The regulation requires maintaining a
system for continuous communications between the security alarm
stations and the control room for an operating reactor based on the
presumption that the shift command function resides in the control
room. The control room at an operating reactor contains the controls
and instrumentation necessary for complete supervision and response
needed to ensure safe operation of the reactor and support systems
during normal, off-normal, and accident conditions and, therefore, is
the location of the shift command function. Following certification of
permanent shutdown and removal of fuel from the reactor, operation of
the reactor is no longer permitted. The control room at a permanently
shutdown and defueled reactor does not perform the same function as
required for an operating reactor. There are no longer any safety
related systems or processes that are controlled from the control room.
The primary functions of the control room at a permanently shutdown
plant is to provide a central location from where the shift command
function can be conveniently performed due to existing communication
equipment, office computer equipment, and ready access to reference
material. The control room also provides a central location from which
emergency response activities are coordinated. However, the control
room does not always need to be the location of the shift command
function since most remaining system processes at a permanently
shutdown and defueled reactor are controlled locally. At KPS, the shift
manager/CFH has responsibility for the shift command function. The
shift manager/CFH is the senior on-shift licensee representative and
decision-maker and is responsible for the overall safety of the
permanently shutdown and defueled facility and for directing the
response to abnormal situations and emergencies. The requested
exemption would provide the KPS shift manager/CFH the flexibility to
[[Page 905]]
leave the control room to perform managerial and supervisory activities
throughout the plant while retaining the command function
responsibility. While the shift command function is normally
accomplished from the control room in accordance with applicable KPS
procedures, it can also be accomplished anywhere in the facility
provided an effective means of continuous communication with the shift
manager/CFH is maintained. Because KPS is permanently shutdown and
defueled, the ability to leave the control room may benefit the shift
manager/CFH's understanding of facility conditions as well as enhance
his assessment and response to any abnormal situation or emergency
conditions. Although the control room will remain the physical command
center, the exemption will allow the location of the KPS command
function to be wherever the shift manager/CFH is located. Being absent
from the control room will not relieve the shift manager/CFH of the
responsibility for the shift command function. The exemption will allow
DEK to establish and maintain continuous communication capability with
the shift manager/CFH, regardless of his location.
The NRC staff assessed the method proposed by the licensee to
maintain continuous communications with the shift manager/CFH in a
safety evaluation report dated April 14, 2014 (the NRC staff's safety
evaluation report contains safeguards information and is, therefore,
not publicly available). The NRC staff determined that the proposed
method of maintaining continuous communication with the shift manager/
CFH is consistent with the functional requirement of the regulation for
maintaining communication with the control room. The NRC staff has
concluded that upon implementing a system for continuous communications
between the alarm stations and the shift manager/CFH, as documented in
the licensee's Physical Security Plan, the requested exemption to 10
CFR 73.55(j)(4)(ii) will meet the intent of the regulation, regardless
of the location of the shift manager/CFH.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 73.5, the Commission may, upon application of
any interested person or upon its own initiative, grant such exemptions
from the requirements of 10 CFR part 73 as it determines are authorized
by law and will not endanger life or property or the common defense and
security, and are otherwise in the public interest.
A. Authorized by Law
In accordance with 10 CFR 73.5, the Commission may grant exemptions
from the regulations in 10 CFR part 73 as the Commission determines are
authorized by law. The NRC staff has determined that granting of the
licensee's proposed exemption will not result in a violation of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, or other laws. Therefore, the
exemption is authorized by law.
B. Will Not Endanger Life or Property or the Common Defense and
Security
Removing the requirement to have a continuous communication system
between the security alarm stations and the control room will not
endanger life or property or the common defense and security for the
reasons discussed below.
The shift manager/CFH is the senior on-shift licensee
representative, is responsible for the shift command function, and
directs the action of the operations staff during both normal and
emergency conditions. Therefore, the shift manager/CFH is the
appropriate individual to have continuous communication capability with
the alarm stations. The exemption would not reduce the measures in
place to protect against radiological sabotage. In addition, the NRC
staff has determined that the exemption will not reduce the overall
effectiveness of the KPS Physical Security Plan, Training and
Qualification Plan, or Safeguards Contingency Plan. Maintaining a
system of continuous communication between the alarm stations and the
shift manager/CFH rather than the control room will provide the shift
manager with the flexibility to leave the control room and respond to
other locations onsite, as necessary, to conduct appropriate management
oversight. The NRC staff has determined that maintaining continuous
communication capability with the shift manager/CFH, whether in the
control room or elsewhere, does not significantly change the current
process that ensures that any necessary coordination during security
events or other emergencies can be accomplished at all times.
Continuous communication capability is essentially unchanged (other
than the location of the shift manager/CFH when the communications are
initiated).
Therefore, the underlying purpose of 10 CFR 73.55(j)(4)(ii) will
continue to be met. The exemption does not reduce the overall
effectiveness of the Physical Security Plan and has no adverse impact
on DEK's ability to physically secure the site or protect special
nuclear material at KPS, and therefore would not have an effect on the
common defense and security. The NRC staff has concluded that the
exemption would not reduce the effectiveness of security measures
currently in place to protect against radiological sabotage. Therefore,
removing the requirement to have continuous communication between the
security alarm stations and the control room will not endanger life or
property or the common defense and security.
C. Is Otherwise in the Public Interest
The licensee is implementing changes to its Physical Security Plan
to establish a system of continuous communication between the security
alarm stations and the shift manager/CFH that is not dependent on the
shift manager's location. By granting DEK's proposed exemption to
remove the requirement for a continuous communication system between
the security alarm stations and the control room, the shift manager/CFH
can roam around the facility in an oversight role and obtain first-hand
information of facility conditions and status while still maintaining
continuous communication with the alarm stations. The NRC staff has
concluded that there would be no decrease in the level of safety by
granting this exemption and that the capability to observe conditions
directly serves the public interest by assuring that the shift manager/
CFH has the best possible information needed to make decisions or to
communicate to the alarm stations or to offsite entities. Accordingly,
the NRC staff concludes that exempting DEK from the requirement for a
continuous communication system between the security alarm stations and
the control room is in the public interest, provided the licensee
maintains continuous communication capability between the alarm
stations and the shift manager/CFH.
D. Environmental Considerations
The NRC's approval of the exemption to security requirements
belongs to a category of actions that the Commission, by rule or
regulation, has declared to be a categorical exclusion, after first
finding that the category of actions does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
Specifically the exemption is categorically excluded from further
analysis under 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25).
Under 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25), granting of an exemption from the
requirements of any regulation of Chapter I to 10 CFR is a categorical
exclusion provided that (i) there is no significant hazards
consideration; (ii) there is no significant change in the types or
significant increase in the amounts of any effluents that may be
released offsite; (iii) there is no significant increase in individual
or cumulative public or occupational
[[Page 906]]
radiation exposure; (iv) there is no significant construction impact;
(v) there is no significant increase in the potential for or
consequences from radiological accidents; and (vi) the requirements
from which an exemption is sought involve: safeguard plans, and
materials control and accounting inventory scheduling requirements; or
involve other requirements of an administrative, managerial, or
organizational nature.
The Director, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of
Nuclear Reactor Regulation, has determined that approval of the
exemption request involves no significant hazards consideration because
removing the requirement for a continuous communications system between
the security alarm stations and the control room at KPS does not (1)
involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an
accident previously evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of a new
or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated;
or (3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. The
exempted security regulation is unrelated to the operation of KPS.
Accordingly, there is no significant change in the types or significant
increase in the amounts of any effluents that may be released offsite;
and no significant increase in individual or cumulative public or
occupational radiation exposure. The exempted regulation is not
associated with construction, so there is no significant construction
impact. The exempted regulation does not concern the source term (i.e.,
potential amount of radiation in an accident), nor mitigation.
Therefore, there is no significant increase in the potential for, or
consequences of, a radiological accident. The requirement for a
continuous communication system between the security alarm stations and
the control room may be viewed as involving either safeguards or
managerial matters.
Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) and 51.22(c)(25), no
environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be
prepared in connection with the approval of this exemption request.
IV. Conclusions
Accordingly, the Commission has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR
73.5, the exemption is authorized by law and will not endanger life or
property or the common defense and security, and is otherwise in the
public interest. Therefore, the Commission hereby grants DEK exemption
from the requirement of 10 CFR 73.55(j)(4)(ii) for a system of
continuous communication capability with the control room, provided
that DEK maintains a system for continuous communication capability
with the shift manager/CFH consistent with the method described in its
submittal dated June 10, 2013. This exemption is effective when the
system for continuous communication between the alarm stations and the
shift manager/CFH is documented in DEK's Physical Security Plan and
functionally implemented.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 29th day of December 2014.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
George A. Wilson Jr.,
Acting Director, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of
Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2015-00027 Filed 1-6-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P