Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Hoquiam River, Hoquiam, WA, 21-24 [2014-30784]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 1 / Friday, January 2, 2015 / Proposed Rules
§ 256.22 How are construction contractors
or companies selected and paid?
(a) A tribe that operates the HIP under
an Indian Self-Determination and
Education Assistance Act agreement
may renovate or replace your house. In
that case, the tribe will not select or pay
another vendor for the repairs or
construction.
(b) If a tribe that operates the HIP
decides not to renovate or replace your
house itself, your servicing housing
office must follow approved
procurement regulations, Federal
procurement or other Bureau-approved
tribal procurement policy.
(1) Your servicing housing office will:
(i) Develop a scope of work or
statement of work that identifies the
work to be performed;
(ii) Have the BIA or tribal
procurement office use a bid
specification to invite bids on the
project from interested parties; and
(iii) Approve the winning bidder after:
(A) Technical review of the bids by
and written recommendation from BIA
or the tribal procurement office; and
(B) Determination that the bidder is
qualified and capable of completing the
project as advertised.
(2) [Reserved]
(c) Payments to the winning bidder
are negotiated in the contract and based
on specified delivery of services.
(1) Partial payments to independent
contractors will not exceed 80 percent
of the value of the completed and
acceptable work.
(2) Recommendation for final
payment will be made after final
inspection and after all provisions of the
contract have been met and all work has
been completed.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 256.23 Do I have to move out while work
is done?
(a) You will be notified by your
servicing housing office that you must
vacate your house only if:
(1) It is scheduled for major
renovations requiring that all occupants
vacate the house for safety reasons; or
(2) It is scheduled for replacement,
which requires demolition of your
current house.
(b) If you are required to vacate the
premises during construction, you are
responsible for:
(1) Locating other lodging;
(2) Paying all costs associated with
vacating and living away from the
house; and
(3) Removing all your belongings and
furnishings before the scheduled
beginning work date.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Dec 31, 2014
Jkt 235001
21
§ 256.24 How can I be sure that
construction work meets minimum
standards?
§ 256.3(d)) to increase the number of
HIP recipients.
(a) At various stages of construction,
a trained and qualified representative of
your servicing housing office or a
building inspector will review the work
to ensure that it meets construction
standards and building codes. Upon
completion of each stage, further
construction can begin only after the
inspection occurs and approval is
granted.
(b) Inspections of construction and
renovation will occur, at a minimum, at
the following stages:
(1) Upon completion of inspection
footings and foundations;
(2) Upon completeion of inspection
rough-in, roughwiring, and plumbing;
and
(3) At final completion.
§ 256.30 Can I appeal actions taken under
this part?
§ 256.25 How will I find out that the work
is done?
[Docket No. USCG–2014–1029]
Your servicing housing office will
advise you, in writing, that the work has
been completed in compliance with the
project contract. Also, you will have a
final walk-through of the house with a
representative of your servicing housing
office. You will be requested to verify
that you received the notice of
completion of the work by signing a
copy of the notice and returning it to
your servicing housing office.
§ 256.26
Will I need flood insurance?
You will need flood insurance if your
house is located in an area identified as
having special flood hazards under the
Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973
(Pub. L. 93–234, 87 Stat. 977). Your
servicing housing office will advise you.
§ 256.27 Is my Federal governmentassisted house eligible for services?
No. The intention of this program is
to assist the neediest of the needy, who
have never received services from any
other Federal entity.
§ 256.28 I have a mobile home; am I
eligible for help?
Yes. If you meet the eligibility criteria
in § 256.6 and funding is available, you
can receive any of the HIP services
identified in § 256.7. If you request
Category B services and your mobile
home has exterior walls less than three
inches thick, you must be considered for
Category C services.
§ 256.29 Can HIP resources be combined
with other available resources?
Yes. HIP resources may be
supplemented with other available
resources (e.g., in-kind assistance; tribal
or housing authority; and any other
leveraging mechanism identified in
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
You may appeal action or inaction by
a BIA official, in accordance with 25
CFR part 2.
Dated: December 21, 2014.
Kevin K. Washburn,
Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2014–30692 Filed 12–31–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–4J–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Hoquiam River, Hoquiam, WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
temporarily change the operating
schedule that governs the Simpson
Avenue Bridge on the Hoquiam River,
mile 0.5, at Hoquiam, Washington. The
proposed rule change is necessary to
accommodate Washington State
Department of Transportation’s
(WSDOT) extensive maintenance and
restoration efforts on that bridge. The
bridge is currently scheduled to open on
signal if at least one hour of notice is
given. From April 1, 2015 to November
30, 2015, the Coast Guard proposes to
only open half of the bascule, a single
leaf, of the bridge when at least two
hours of notice is given.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
February 2, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2014–1029 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. The telephone number is 202–
366–9329.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02JAP1.SGM
02JAP1
22
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 1 / Friday, January 2, 2015 / Proposed Rules
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments. To avoid duplication, please
use only one of three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule change, call or email Steven M.
Fischer, Bridge Administrator,
Thirteenth Coast Guard District Bridge
Program Office, telephone 206–220–
7282; email d13-pf-d13bridges@
uscg.mil. If you have questions on
viewing or submitting material to the
docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
§ Section Symbol
U.S.C. United States Code
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this proposed rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted,
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
proposed rulemaking (USCG–2014–
1029), indicate the specific section of
this document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (https://
www.regulations.gov), or by fax, mail or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an email address,
or a phone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Dec 31, 2014
Jkt 235001
docket number [USCG–2014–1029] in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ on the line associated with
this rulemaking. If you submit your
comments by mail or hand delivery,
submit them in an unbound format, no
larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you
submit them by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period, and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number (USCG–2014–1029) in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting, but you may submit a request
for a meeting that reaches the Coast
Guard on or before January 20, 2015
using one of the three methods specified
under ADDRESSES. Please explain why
one would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
B. Basis and Purpose
The Washington State Department of
Transportation (WSDOT), who owns
and operates the Simpson Avenue
Bridge on the Hoquiam River in
Hoquiam, Washington, has requested a
temporary change to the bridge’s
existing operating regulations in order
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
to facilitate the maintenance and
restoration of it. The restoration project
will entail painting, rust removal, and
steel repairs which require a full
containment system to keep paint and
debris out of the Hoquiam River.
In an effort to accommodate both the
needs of the waterway and highway
users, WSDOT has requested a
temporary rule change in order to
eliminate the need to repeatedly
uninstall and reinstall the containment
system. As such, the Coast Guard is
proposing to change the bridge’s current
operating regulation from April 1, 2015
to November 30, 2015. During that time
the drawbridge would be maintained in
the closed position except that, upon at
least two hours advance notice, half of
the bascule (a single leaf) would be
opened.
Vessels that are able to transit under
the bridge without an opening will be
free to do so. However, the existing
navigation clearance of the bridge will
be reduced from approximately 35 feet
to approximately 25 feet at mean high
tide due to the required containment
system.
Vessel traffic along this part of the
Hoquiam River consists of vessels
ranging from commercial tug and barge
to small pleasure craft. WSDOT has
examined bridge opening logs and
contacted all waterway users that have
requested bridge openings throughout
the last year. The input WSDOT
received from waterway users indicated
that the proposed change will have no
impact on users.
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard would temporarily
revise the operating regulations at 33
CFR 117.1047. The regulation currently
states that the Simpson Avenue Bridge
shall open on signal if at least one hour
notice is given. The Coast Guard
proposes to temporarily change the
regulation such that from 7 a.m. on
April 1, 2015 to 6 p.m. on November 30,
2015, the draw of the Simpson Avenue
Bridge, on the Hoquiam River at mile
0.5, at Hoquiam, Washington, shall open
half of the bascule (single leaf) when at
least two hours of advance notice is
given. No alternate routes are available
for this waterway. Vessels that can
transit under the bridge without an
opening may do so at any time although
the existing navigation clearance of the
bridge will be reduced from
approximately 35 feet to approximately
25 feet at mean high tide.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
E:\FR\FM\02JAP1.SGM
02JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 1 / Friday, January 2, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes or executive
orders.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order
13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require
an assessment of potential costs and
benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Order
12866 or under section 1 of Executive
Order 13563. The Office of Management
and Budget has not reviewed it under
those Orders. The Coast Guard has made
this finding based on the fact that all
requested bridge openings will be
granted with advance notification and
vessels that can safely transit under the
bridge may do so at any time.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This proposed rule would affect the
following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels needing to transit
the bridge at any time of day. This
rulemaking will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the
following reasons: The bridge will still
be able to open upon advance
notification. Additionally, three
commercial maritime businesses use
this waterway and bridge. All three have
stated to WSDOT a single leaf operation
will not impact their business.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Dec 31, 2014
Jkt 235001
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it does
not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule will not result in such
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rulemaking elsewhere in this
preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
23
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This proposed rule is not an
economically significant rulemaking
and would not create an environmental
risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rulemaking
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule simply promulgates the operating
regulations or procedures for
drawbridges. This rulemaking is
categorically excluded, under figure
2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of the
Instruction.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of
the Instruction, an environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
E:\FR\FM\02JAP1.SGM
02JAP1
24
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 1 / Friday, January 2, 2015 / Proposed Rules
exclusion determination are not
required for this rulemaking. We seek
any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
■
Hoquiam, WA, shall open on signal if at
least a two hour notice is given by
telephone or VHF radio to the
Washington State Department of
Transportation. The opening signal is
two prolonged blasts followed by one
short blast.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 117.T1047
Dated: December 16, 2014.
R.T. Gromlich,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Thirteenth Coast Guard District.
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Effective 7 a.m. on April 1, 2015
until 6 p.m. on November 30, 2015,
suspend § 117.1047(c) and add
§ 117.T1047(c) to read as follows:
Hoquiam River
*
*
*
*
(c) Half of the draw (single leaf) of the
Simpson Avenue Bridge, mile 0.5, at
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Dec 31, 2014
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
[FR Doc. 2014–30784 Filed 12–31–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
E:\FR\FM\02JAP1.SGM
02JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 1 (Friday, January 2, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 21-24]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30784]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2014-1029]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Hoquiam River, Hoquiam, WA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to temporarily change the operating
schedule that governs the Simpson Avenue Bridge on the Hoquiam River,
mile 0.5, at Hoquiam, Washington. The proposed rule change is necessary
to accommodate Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT)
extensive maintenance and restoration efforts on that bridge. The
bridge is currently scheduled to open on signal if at least one hour of
notice is given. From April 1, 2015 to November 30, 2015, the Coast
Guard proposes to only open half of the bascule, a single leaf, of the
bridge when at least two hours of notice is given.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before February 2, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2014-1029 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329.
[[Page 22]]
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of three
methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule change, call or email Steven M. Fischer, Bridge
Administrator, Thirteenth Coast Guard District Bridge Program Office,
telephone 206-220-7282; email d13-pf-d13bridges@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl
Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Sec. Section Symbol
U.S.C. United States Code
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this proposed rulemaking by
submitting comments and related materials. All comments received will
be posted, without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will
include any personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
proposed rulemaking (USCG-2014-1029), indicate the specific section of
this document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for
each suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and
material online (https://www.regulations.gov), or by fax, mail or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment.
If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered
as having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an email address, or a phone number in the body of
your document so that we can contact you if we have questions regarding
your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number [USCG-2014-1029] in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery,
submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail
and would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during the comment period, and may
change the rule based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2014-1029) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting, but you may submit a
request for a meeting that reaches the Coast Guard on or before January
20, 2015 using one of the three methods specified under ADDRESSES.
Please explain why one would be beneficial. If we determine that one
would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place
announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
B. Basis and Purpose
The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), who owns
and operates the Simpson Avenue Bridge on the Hoquiam River in Hoquiam,
Washington, has requested a temporary change to the bridge's existing
operating regulations in order to facilitate the maintenance and
restoration of it. The restoration project will entail painting, rust
removal, and steel repairs which require a full containment system to
keep paint and debris out of the Hoquiam River.
In an effort to accommodate both the needs of the waterway and
highway users, WSDOT has requested a temporary rule change in order to
eliminate the need to repeatedly uninstall and reinstall the
containment system. As such, the Coast Guard is proposing to change the
bridge's current operating regulation from April 1, 2015 to November
30, 2015. During that time the drawbridge would be maintained in the
closed position except that, upon at least two hours advance notice,
half of the bascule (a single leaf) would be opened.
Vessels that are able to transit under the bridge without an
opening will be free to do so. However, the existing navigation
clearance of the bridge will be reduced from approximately 35 feet to
approximately 25 feet at mean high tide due to the required containment
system.
Vessel traffic along this part of the Hoquiam River consists of
vessels ranging from commercial tug and barge to small pleasure craft.
WSDOT has examined bridge opening logs and contacted all waterway users
that have requested bridge openings throughout the last year. The input
WSDOT received from waterway users indicated that the proposed change
will have no impact on users.
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard would temporarily revise the operating regulations
at 33 CFR 117.1047. The regulation currently states that the Simpson
Avenue Bridge shall open on signal if at least one hour notice is
given. The Coast Guard proposes to temporarily change the regulation
such that from 7 a.m. on April 1, 2015 to 6 p.m. on November 30, 2015,
the draw of the Simpson Avenue Bridge, on the Hoquiam River at mile
0.5, at Hoquiam, Washington, shall open half of the bascule (single
leaf) when at least two hours of advance notice is given. No alternate
routes are available for this waterway. Vessels that can transit under
the bridge without an opening may do so at any time although the
existing navigation clearance of the bridge will be reduced from
approximately 35 feet to approximately 25 feet at mean high tide.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking.
[[Page 23]]
Below we summarize our analyses based on these statutes or executive
orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Order 12866 or under
section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and Budget
has not reviewed it under those Orders. The Coast Guard has made this
finding based on the fact that all requested bridge openings will be
granted with advance notification and vessels that can safely transit
under the bridge may do so at any time.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. This proposed rule would affect
the following entities, some of which might be small entities: The
owners or operators of vessels needing to transit the bridge at any
time of day. This rulemaking will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities for the following
reasons: The bridge will still be able to open upon advance
notification. Additionally, three commercial maritime businesses use
this waterway and bridge. All three have stated to WSDOT a single leaf
operation will not impact their business.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule will not
result in such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this
rulemaking elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This proposed rule is not an economically significant rulemaking
and would not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety
that might disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rulemaking under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule simply
promulgates the operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges.
This rulemaking is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(32)(e), of the Instruction.
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, an
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical
[[Page 24]]
exclusion determination are not required for this rulemaking. We seek
any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Effective 7 a.m. on April 1, 2015 until 6 p.m. on November 30, 2015,
suspend Sec. 117.1047(c) and add Sec. 117.T1047(c) to read as
follows:
Sec. 117.T1047 Hoquiam River
* * * * *
(c) Half of the draw (single leaf) of the Simpson Avenue Bridge,
mile 0.5, at Hoquiam, WA, shall open on signal if at least a two hour
notice is given by telephone or VHF radio to the Washington State
Department of Transportation. The opening signal is two prolonged
blasts followed by one short blast.
* * * * *
Dated: December 16, 2014.
R.T. Gromlich,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Thirteenth Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2014-30784 Filed 12-31-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P