Approval of Subzone Status, 5.11, Inc., Modesto and Lathrop, California, 78784 [2014-30719]

Download as PDF 78784 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Notices Affected Public: Applicants for temporary jobs in office and field positions. Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory to apply for temporary positions. Legal Authority: Title 13, United States Code, Section 23 a and c. This information collection request may be viewed at www.reginfo.gov .Follow the instructions to view Department of Commerce collections currently under review by OMB. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice to OIRA_Submission@ omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806. Dated: December 24, 2014. Glenna Mickelson, Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2014–30627 Filed 12–30–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–07–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board [S–132–2014] mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Approval of Subzone Status, 5.11, Inc., Modesto and Lathrop, California On November 6, 2014, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the Port of Stockton, California, grantee of FTZ 231, requesting subzone status subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 231, on behalf of 5.11, Inc., in Modesto and Lathrop, California. The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and Regulations, including notice in the Federal Register inviting public comment (79 FR 67413, 11/13/2014). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board Executive Secretary (15 CFR Sec. 400.36(f)), the application to establish Subzone 231B is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, including Section 400.13, and further subject to FTZ 231’s 2,000-acre activation limit. Dated: December 23, 2014. Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2014–30719 Filed 12–30–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:02 Dec 30, 2014 Jkt 235001 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–967] Aluminum Extrusions From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–2013 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on aluminum extrusions from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is May 1, 2012, through April 30, 2013. These final results cover 52 companies for which an administrative review was initiated, and for which this administrative review was not rescinded in the Preliminary Results.1 For these final results, the Department examined two mandatory respondents and one voluntary respondent for which this review was initiated. The first mandatory respondent is Guangzhou Jangho Curtain Wall System Engineering Co., Ltd. and Jangho Curtain Wall Hong Kong Ltd. (collectively ‘‘Jangho’’); the second mandatory respondent is a single entity that the Department continues to find is comprised of Guang Ya Aluminum Industrial Co., Ltd. (‘‘Guang Ya’’), Foshan Guangcheng Aluminum Co., Ltd. (‘‘Guangcheng’’), Kong Ah International Co., Ltd. (‘‘Kong Ah’’), and Guang Ya Aluminum Industries (Hong Kong) Ltd. (‘‘Guang Ya HK’’) (collectively ‘‘Guang Ya Group’’), Guangdong Zhongya Aluminum Co., Ltd. (‘‘Zhongya’’), Zhongya Shaped Aluminum (HK) Holding Ltd. (‘‘Shaped Aluminum’’), and Karlton Aluminum Co., Ltd. (‘‘Karlton’’) (collectively ‘‘Zhongya’’), and Foshan Nanhai Xinya Aluminum & Stainless Steel Product Co., Ltd. (‘‘Xinya’’) (collectively ‘‘Guang Ya Group/Zhongya/Xinya’’). The Department finds for these final results that Jangho and the Guang Ya Group/Zhongya/Xinya entity failed to demonstrate that they were eligible for separate rates and thus are part of the PRC-wide entity. For Kromet International, Inc. (‘‘Kromet’’), a voluntary respondent in this review, the AGENCY: 1 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 78 FR 38924 (June 28, 2013) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’); see also Aluminum Extrusions From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission, in Part; 2012/2013, 79 FR 36003 (June 25, 2014) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Department finds that Kromet did not make sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the POR. Furthermore, the Department finds that 19 of the companies under review (including Kromet) have established their eligibility for a separate rate. Additionally, we determine that four companies, Hong Kong Gree Electric Appliances Sales Limited (‘‘Gree’’), Jiuyuan Co., Ltd. (‘‘Jiuyuan’’), Shenzhen Hudson Technology Development Co., Ltd. (‘‘Shenzhen Hudson’’), and Skyline Exhibit Systems (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (‘‘Skyline’’) had no shipments. The Department finds that the remaining companies under review either failed to establish their eligibility for a separate rate or were not responsive, and, therefore, these companies are part of the PRC-wide entity. DATES: Effective Date: December 31, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Terpstra or Paul Stolz, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3965 or (202) 482– 4474, respectively. Background On June 25, 2014, the Department published the Preliminary Results of this administrative review. At that time, we invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results.2 We granted parties an extension of time to submit case and rebuttal briefs.3 On August 8, 2014 we received case briefs from the Aluminum Extrusions Fair Trade Committee (‘‘Petitioner’’); 4 Zhongya; Skyline; Jangho; tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (‘‘tenKsolar’’); Permasteelisa South China Factory and Permasteelisa Hong Kong Ltd. (collectively, ‘‘Permasteelisa’’); Taishan City Kam Kiu Aluminium Extrusion Co. Ltd., and Kam Kiu Aluminium Products Sdn. Bhd. (collectively ‘‘Kam Kiu’’). On 2 See Preliminary Results, 79 FR at 36006. ‘‘Second Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Granting an Extension of Time for Parties to Provide Case Briefs and Rebuttal Case Briefs,’’ dated July 7, 2014 and ‘‘Second Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Granting an Extension of Time for Parties to Provide Rebuttal Briefs,’’ dated August 12, 2014. 4 The individual members of the Committee are Aerolite Extrusion Company; Alexandria Extrusion Company; Benada Aluminum of Florida, Inc.; William L. Bonnell Company, Inc.; Frontier Aluminum Corporation; Futural Industries Corporation; Hydro Aluminum North America, Inc.; Kaiser Aluminum Corporation; Profile Extrusion Company; Sapa Extrusions, Inc.; and Western Extrusions Corporation. 3 See E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM 31DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 31, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 78784]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30719]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[S-132-2014]


Approval of Subzone Status, 5.11, Inc., Modesto and Lathrop, 
California

    On November 6, 2014, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade 
Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the Port of 
Stockton, California, grantee of FTZ 231, requesting subzone status 
subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 231, on behalf of 5.11, 
Inc., in Modesto and Lathrop, California.
    The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and 
Regulations, including notice in the Federal Register inviting public 
comment (79 FR 67413, 11/13/2014). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the 
application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval. 
Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board Executive 
Secretary (15 CFR Sec. 400.36(f)), the application to establish Subzone 
231B is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, 
including Section 400.13, and further subject to FTZ 231's 2,000-acre 
activation limit.

    Dated: December 23, 2014.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-30719 Filed 12-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P