Taking of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Vashon Seismic Retrofit Project, 78821-78837 [2014-30540]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Notices
Gateway will not be creating increased
sound levels in the marine environment
for prolonged periods of time.
Of the 14 marine mammal species
likely to occur in the area, four are listed
as endangered under the ESA: North
Atlantic right, humpback, and fin
whales. All of these species are also
considered depleted under the MMPA.
There is currently no designated critical
habitat or known reproductive areas for
any of these species in or near the
proposed project area. However, there
are several well-known North Atlantic
right whale feeding grounds in the Cape
Cod Bay and Great South Channel. No
mortality or injury is expected to occur,
and due to the nature, degree, and
context of the Level B harassment
anticipated, the activity is not expected
to impact rates of recruitment or
survival. There is no critical habitat or
biologically important areas for marine
mammals within the proposed project
area.
The population estimates for the
species that may be taken by Level B
behavioral harassment contained in the
most recent U.S. Atlantic Stock
Assessment Reports were provided
earlier in this document. From the most
protective estimates of both marine
mammal densities in the project area
and the size of the 120-dB ZOI, the
maximum calculated number of
individual marine mammals for each
species that could potentially be
harassed annually is small relative to
the overall population sizes.
Based on the analysis contained
herein of the likely effects of the
specified activity on marine mammals
and their habitat, and taking into
consideration the implementation of the
mitigation and monitoring measures,
NMFS finds that the proposed Northeast
Gateway LNG Port and Algonquin
Pipeline Lateral operations and
maintenance and repair activities would
result in the incidental take of small
numbers of marine mammals, by Level
B harassment only, and that the total
taking from Northeast Gateway and
Algonquin’s proposed activities will
have a negligible impact on the affected
species or stocks.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Impact on Availability of Affected
Species or Stock for Taking for
Subsistence Uses
There are no relevant subsistence uses
of marine mammals implicated by this
action. Therefore, NMFS has
determined that the total taking of
affected species or stocks would not
have an unmitigable adverse impact on
the availability of such species or stocks
for taking for subsistence purposes.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:02 Dec 30, 2014
Jkt 235001
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
Our November 18, 2013, Federal
Register notice of proposed IHA
described the history and status of
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
compliance for the NE Gateway LNG
facility. As explained in that notice, the
biological opinions for construction and
operation of the facility only analyzed
impacts on ESA-listed species from
activities under the initial construction
period and during operations, and did
not take into consideration potential
impacts to marine mammals that could
result from the subsequent LNG Port
and Pipeline Lateral maintenance and
repair activities. In addition, NEG also
revealed that significantly more water
usage and vessel operating air emissions
are needed from what was originally
evaluated for the LNG Port operation.
NMFS PR1 initiated consultation with
NMFS Greater Atlantic Region Fisheries
Office under section 7 of the ESA on the
proposed issuance of an IHA to NEG
under section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA
for the proposed activities that include
increased NEG Port and Algonquin
Pipeline Lateral maintenance and repair
and water usage for the LNG Port
operations this activity. A Biological
Opinion was issued on November 21,
2014, and concluded that the proposed
action may adversely affect but is not
likely to jeopardize the continued
existence of ESA-listed right,
humpback, fin, and sei whales.
National Environmental Policy Act
MARAD and the USCG released a
Final EIS/Environmental Impact Report
(EIR) for the proposed Northeast
Gateway Port and Pipeline Lateral. A
notice of availability was published by
MARAD on October 26, 2006 (71 FR
62657). The Final EIS/EIR provides
detailed information on the proposed
project facilities, construction methods
and analysis of potential impacts on
marine mammals.
NMFS was a cooperating agency (as
defined by the Council on
Environmental Quality (40 CFR 1501.6))
in the preparation of the Draft and Final
EISs. NMFS reviewed the Final EIS and
adopted it on May 4, 2007. NMFS
issued a separate Record of Decision for
issuance of authorizations pursuant to
section 101(a)(5) of the MMPA for the
construction and operation of the
Northeast Gateway’s LNG Port Facility
in Massachusetts Bay. A 2010
environmental assessment/
environmental impact assessment
conducted by TetraTech analyzed the
increased water usage and other
operational changes. We reviewed that
document to determine whether there is
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
78821
a need for supplemental NEPA analysis
based on any substantial changes
between the current proposed action
and the proposed action analyzed for
the FEIS/EIR or any significant new
circumstances or information relevant to
environmental concerns and bearing on
the proposed action or its impacts.
Based on our review of that analysis, we
have determined that supplementation
was not required.
Authorization
NMFS has issued an IHA to Northeast
Gateway for conducting LNG Port
facility and Pipeline Lateral operations
and maintenance and repair activities in
Massachusetts Bay, provided the
previously mentioned mitigation,
monitoring, and reporting requirements
are incorporated.
Dated: December 23, 2014.
Donna S. Wieting,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–30539 Filed 12–30–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XD644
Taking of Marine Mammals Incidental
to Specified Activities; Vashon Seismic
Retrofit Project
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; proposed incidental
harassment authorization; request for
comments and information.
AGENCY:
NMFS has received a request
from the Washington State Department
of Transportation (WSDOT) Ferries
Division (WSF) for an authorization to
take small numbers of nine species of
marine mammals, by Level B
harassment, incidental to proposed
construction activities for Vashon
Seismic Retrofit Project in Vashon
Island, Washington State. Pursuant to
the Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA), NMFS is requesting comments
on its proposal to issue an authorization
to WDOT to incidentally take, by
harassment, small numbers of marine
mammals for a period of 1 year.
DATES: Comments and information must
be received no later than January 30,
2015.
SUMMARY:
Comments on the
application should be addressed to Jolie
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM
31DEN1
78822
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Notices
Harrison, Chief, Permits and
Conservation Division, Office of
Protected Resources, National Marine
Fisheries Service, 1315 East-West
Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910. The
mailbox address for providing email
comments is itp.guan@noaa.gov. NMFS
is not responsible for email comments
sent to addresses other than the one
provided here. Comments sent via
email, including all attachments, must
not exceed a 25-megabyte file size.
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental.htm without change. All
Personal Identifying Information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit Confidential Business
Information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
A copy of the application may be
obtained by writing to the address
specified above or visiting the internet
at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/
permits/incidental.htm. Documents
cited in this notice may also be viewed,
by appointment, during regular business
hours, at the aforementioned address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shane Guan, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, (301) 427–8401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct
the Secretary of Commerce to allow,
upon request, the incidental, but not
intentional, taking of small numbers of
marine mammals by U.S. citizens who
engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region if certain findings
are made and either regulations are
issued or, if the taking is limited to
harassment, a notice of a proposed
authorization is provided to the public
for review.
An authorization for incidental
takings shall be granted if NMFS finds
that the taking will have a negligible
impact on the species or stock(s), will
not have an unmitigable adverse impact
on the availability of the species or
stock(s) for subsistence uses (where
relevant), and if the permissible
methods of taking and requirements
pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring
and reporting of such takings are set
forth. NMFS has defined ‘‘negligible
impact’’ in 50 CFR 216.103 as ‘‘. . . an
impact resulting from the specified
activity that cannot be reasonably
expected to, and is not reasonably likely
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:02 Dec 30, 2014
Jkt 235001
to, adversely affect the species or stock
through effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival.’’
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA
established an expedited process by
which citizens of the U.S. can apply for
a one-year authorization to incidentally
take small numbers of marine mammals
by harassment, provided that there is no
potential for serious injury or mortality
to result from the activity. Section
101(a)(5)(D) establishes a 45-day time
limit for NMFS review of an application
followed by a 30-day public notice and
comment period on any proposed
authorizations for the incidental
harassment of marine mammals. Within
45 days of the close of the comment
period, NMFS must either issue or deny
the authorization.
Summary of Request
On June 20, 2014, WSDOT submitted
a request to NOAA requesting an IHA
for the possible harassment of small
numbers of nine marine mammal
species incidental to construction
associated with the Vashon Seismic
Retrofit Project at the Vashon Ferry
Terminal in Vashon Island, Washington
between August 1, 2015, and February
15, 2016. On December 15, 2014,
WSDOT added a test pile drive and
removal program to the Vashon Seismic
Retrofit Project and submitted a revised
IHA application. The information
provided here is based on WSDOT’s
December 15, 2014, IHA application.
NMFS is proposing to authorize the
Level B harassment of the following
marine mammal species/stocks: harbor
seal, California sea lion, Steller sea lion,
killer whale (transient and Southern
Resident stocks), gray whale, humpback
whale, minke whale, harbor porpoise,
and Dall’s porpoise.
Description of the Specified Activity
Overview
WSDOT proposes to conduct Vashon
Seismic Retrofit Project at the WSF
Terminal in Vashon Island, Washington,
to ensure the safe and reliable function
of the Vashon Terminal in case of a
significant earthquake.
Approximately 210-linear feet of the
existing trestle in the nearshore will be
replaced. Existing decking, 67 13-inch
diameter creosote-treated timber piles
and 39 30-inch diameter concretejacketed creosote-treated timber piles
will be removed with a vibratory
hammer. Fifty-three 24-inch diameter
permanent hollow steel piles will be
installed with a vibratory hammer for
approximately the first 40 feet, and
driven with an impact hammer for
(approximately) the final 10 feet.
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Approximately 44 13-inch diameter
temporary untreated timber piles will be
installed with an impact hammer to
support the weight of a crane that will
sit on the trestle to drive the permanent
steel piles.
Seismic bracing will be installed at up
to 11 locations and will consist of a
maximum of 66 24-inch diameter
hollow steel piles installed with an
impact hammer. Seismic bracing piles
will be connected with concrete caps
that tie each cluster of piles together.
Approximately 52 temporary 24-inch
diameter hollow steel piles will be
required to support temporary falsework and work trestles necessary to
install the seismic braces concrete caps.
Each work trestle will consist of
approximately 6 piles. These piles will
be driven with a vibratory hammer and
then proofed with an impact hammer to
ensure they will bear the weight of the
false-work and concrete caps.
In addition, one double walled, one
Mandrel and one control pile (three
total) will be driven to the east of the
Vashon trestle during the Seismic
Retrofit project in 2015 or 2016 as part
of the test pile program. The goal is to
test the drivability of these piles in
harder soils, and to test the rate of noise
attenuation.
Dates and Duration
WSDOT plans to conduct all in-water
construction work activities during the
period from August 1, 2015, to February
15, 2016.
The number of days it will take to
complete the partial trestle replacement
and install the seismic bracings depends
on the difficulty in penetrating the
substrate during pile installation. It is
assumed that only one vibratory or
impact hammer will be in operation at
a time. Durations are conservative, and
the actual amount of time to install and
remove piles will likely be less.
Duration estimates of each of the pile
driving/removal elements follow:
• For the partial trestle replacement:
Æ Impact driving of temporary timber
piles will take approximately 30
minutes per pile, with 3 piles installed
per day over 17 days.
Æ Vibratory driving of each
permanent 24-inch steel pile will take
approximately 60 minutes, followed by
approximately 30 minutes of impact
driving (approximately 600 strikes per
pile), with 2–5 piles installed per day
over 27 days.
o Vibratory removal of temporary
timber piles, and existing timber and
concrete-jacketed timber piles will take
approximately 30 minutes per pile, with
5–10 piles removed per day over 30
days.
E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM
31DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Notices
• For the seismic braces:
Æ Vibratory driving of each temporary
24-inch steel pile will take
approximately 20 minutes, followed by
approximately 10 minutes of impact
proofing (approximately 60 strikes per
pile), with 2–4 piles installed per day
over 28 days.
Æ Impact driving of permanent 24inch steel piles will take approximately
two hours per pile, requiring
approximately 3,000 strikes per pile,
with approximately 2–4 piles installed
per day over 28 days.
Æ Vibratory removal of temporary 24inch steel piles will take approximately
30 minutes pile, with up to 3–10 piles
removed per day over 20 days.
• For the test pile:
Æ Impact driving of each 30-inch steel
pile will take approximately 40 minutes,
(approximately 3,000 strikes per pile),
with 3 piles installed over 1–2 days.
Æ Vibratory removal of each pile will
take approximately 40 minutes per pile,
over 1–2 days.
The maximum anticipated number of
days for pile driving is 100. The
maximum anticipated number of days
for pile removal is 50. The worst-case
time for pile installation and removal is
311 hours over 150 days.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Specified Geographic Region
The proposed activities will occur at
the Vashon Ferry Terminal located in
Vashon, Washington (Figure 1–2 of the
IHA application). The Vashon Ferry
Terminal, serving State Route 160, is
located at the north end of Vashon
Island, in King County, Washington.
The terminal is part of what is known
as the Triangle Route between West
Seattle (Fauntleroy terminal), Vashon
Island and the Kitsap Peninsula
(Southworth terminal). The Vashon
terminal is located in Section 6,
Township 23 North, Range 3 East, and
is adjacent to Colvos Passage to the west
and south, and the East Passage to the
east, both tributary to Puget Sound
(Figure 1–2 of the IHA application).
Land use in the area is a mix of
residential, business, small scale
agriculture, Blake Island State Park, and
local parks.
Detailed Description of Vashon Seismic
Retrofit Project
The following construction sequence
is anticipated:
• For the nearshore partial trestle
replacement, work will proceed in
stages as the crane advances away from
the shore:
Æ impact drive temporary timber
piles,
Æ vibratory/impact drive permanent
24-inch diameter hollow steel piles,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:02 Dec 30, 2014
Jkt 235001
Æ advance to next section,
• Temporary timber piles, and
existing timber and concrete-jacketed
timber piles will either be removed with
a vibratory hammer as the crane
advances away from shore, or will be
removed after all permanent steel piles
are installed, as the crane retreats
towards the shore.
• When the partial trestle
replacement is complete:
Æ 67 13-inch diameter existing timber
piles and 39 30-inch diameter existing
concrete-jacketed timber piles will have
been removed with a vibratory hammer.
Æ 44 temporary 13-inch diameter
timber piles will have been installed
with an impact hammer, and removed
with a vibratory hammer.
Æ 53 permanent 24-inch hollow steel
piles will have been installed with a
vibratory and impact hammer.
• The seismic braces will be installed
sequentially:
Æ Vibratory drive/impact proof
temporary 24-inch diameter hollow
steel piles,
Æ impact drive permanent 24-inch
diameter hollow steel piles,
Æ construct temporary false-work and
concrete cap,
Æ remove false-work,
Æ remove temporary 24-inch diameter
hollow steel piles with a vibratory
hammer,
Æ advance to next brace location.
• When the seismic braces are
complete:
Æ 52 temporary 24-inch diameter
hollow steel piles will have been
installed using a vibratory hammer/
proofed with an impact hammer and
removed with a vibratory hammer.
Æ 66 permanent 24-inch diameter
hollow steel piles will have been
installed with an impact hammer.
Detailed descriptions of these
activities are provided below.
1. Vibratory Hammer Pile Driving and
Removal
Vibratory hammers are commonly
used in steel pile driving where
sediments allow and involve the same
vibratory hammer used in pile removal.
The pile is placed into position using a
choker and crane and then vibrated
between 1,200 and 2,400 vibrations per
minute. The vibrations liquefy the
sediment surrounding the pile allowing
it to penetrate to the required seating
depth, or to be removed. The type of
vibratory hammer that will be used for
the project will likely be an APE 400
King Kong (or equivalent) with a drive
force of 361 tons.
2. Impact Hammer Pile Installation
Impact hammers are used to install
plastic/steel core, wood, concrete, or
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
78823
steel piles. An impact hammer is a steel
device that works like a piston. Impact
hammers are usually large, though small
impact hammers are used to install
small diameter plastic/steel core piles.
Impact hammers have guides (called a
lead) that hold the hammer in alignment
with the pile while a heavy piston
moves up and down, striking the top of
the pile, and drives it into the substrate
from the downward force of the hammer
on the top of the pile.
To drive the pile, the pile is first
moved into position and set in the
proper location using a choker cable or
vibratory hammer. Once the pile is set
in place, pile installation with an
impact hammer can take less than 15
minutes under good conditions to over
an hour under poor conditions (such as
glacial till and bedrock, or exceptionally
loose material in which the pile
repeatedly moves out of position).
Detailed Description of Test Pile
Program
One double walled, one Mandrel and
one control pile (three total) will be
driven to the east of the Vashon trestle
during the Seismic Retrofit project in
2015 or 2016. The location shown on
the sheet is approximate, as
construction staging may require that it
be moved. All test piles are 30’’ hollow
steel. The control pile will use a bubble
curtain for attenuation. No unattenuated
strikes will be allowed. The test will
take place in water –10 to –25 ft (¥3 to
¥8 m) mean lower low water (MLLW).
Piles will be driven approximately 40 ft
(13 m) into the sediment. The test
should be complete in one day, though
two days are proposed in case of
complications.
Piles will be impact driven and
removed with a vibratory hammer. It is
possible that some or all of the piles will
not be able to be removed. In that case,
the pile(s) will be cut below the
mudline, and filled with sand to the
natural grade.
Description of Marine Mammals in the
Area of the Specified Activity
The marine mammal species under
NMFS jurisdiction most likely to occur
in the proposed construction area
include Pacific harbor seal (Phoca
vitulina richardsi), California sea lion
(Zalophus californianus), Steller sea
lion (Eumetopias jubatus), killer whale
(Orcinus orca) (transient and Southern
Resident stocks), gray whale
(Eschrichtius robustus), humpback
whale (Megaptera novaeangliae), minke
whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata),
harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena),
and Dall’s porpoise (P. dali).
E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM
31DEN1
78824
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Notices
General information on the marine
mammal species found in California
waters can be found in Caretta et al.
(2014), which is available at the
following URL: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/sars/pdf/
po2013.pdf. Refer to that document for
information on these species. Specific
information concerning these species in
the vicinity of the proposed action area
is provided below.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Harbor Seal
Harbor seals are members of the true
seal family (Phocidae). There are three
distinct west coast stocks: (1) Inland
waters of Washington State (including
Hood Canal, Puget Sound, Georgia Basin
and the Strait of Juan de Fuca out to
Cape Flattery), (2) outer coast of Oregon
and Washington, and (3) California
(Carretta et al. 2007).
Pupping seasons vary by geographic
region. For the southern Puget Sound
region, pups are born from late June
through September (WDFW 2012a).
After October 1 all pups in the inland
waters of Washington are weaned.
Harbor seals are the most numerous
pinniped in the inland marine waters of
Washington (Calambokidis and Baird
1994). Jeffries et al. (2003) recorded a
mean count of 9,550 harbor seals in
Washington’s inland marine waters and
estimated the total population to be
approximately 14,612 animals
(including the Strait of Juan de Fuca).
The population across Washington
increased at an average annual rate of 10
percent between 1991 and 1996 (Jeffries
et al. 1997) and is thought to be stable
(Jeffries et al. 2003).
The nearest documented harbor seal
haulout site to the Vashon ferry terminal
is 9.7 km northwest. The number of
harbor seals using the haulout is less
than 100 (WDFW 2000).
Harbor seals have been observed
hauled-out on a boat ramp to the east of
the Vashon Ferry Terminal trestle and
on a beach to the west of the trestle
(Stateler 2013, WSF 2009).
In 2009 WSDOT replaced several
dolphin structures (structure used to
reduce wave action) at the Vashon
terminal. Marine mammal monitoring
was implemented during this project.
Over 7 days of monitoring in November
of 2009, four harbor seals were observed
near the terminal, three swimming and
one hauled-out on the beach to the west
of the trestle (WSF 2009).
According to the NMFS National
Stranding Database, there were 38
confirmed harbor seal strandings in the
Vashon area in 2010–2013 in the
September-February work window
scheduled for this project (NMFS 2014).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:02 Dec 30, 2014
Jkt 235001
Harbor seals are not ‘‘depleted’’ under
the MMPA or listed as ‘‘threatened’’ or
‘‘endangered’’ under the ESA. The
Washington Inland Waters stock of
harbor seals is not classified as a
‘‘strategic’’ stock. The stock is also
considered within its Optimum
Sustainable Population level (Jeffries et
al. 2003).
Harbor seals are the most numerous
marine mammal species in Puget
Sound. Harbor seals are non-migratory;
their local movements are associated
with such factors as tides, weather,
season, food availability and
reproduction (Scheffer and Slipp 1948;
Fisher 1952; Bigg 1969, 1981). They are
not known to make extensive pelagic
migrations, although some long-distance
movements of tagged animals in Alaska
(174 km) and along the U.S. west coast
(up to 550 km) have been recorded
(Pitcher and McAllister 1981; Brown
and Mate 1983; Herder 1983).
Harbor seals haul out on rocks, reefs
and beaches, and feed in marine,
estuarine and occasionally fresh waters.
Harbor seals display strong fidelity for
haulout sites (Pitcher and Calkins 1979;
Pitcher and McAllister 1981).
The nearest documented harbor seal
haulout site to the Vashon ferry terminal
is 9.7 km northwest. The level of use of
this haulout during the fall and winter
is unknown but is expected to be much
less as air temperatures become colder
than water temperatures resulting in
seals in general hauling out less. Harbor
seals may also use other undocumented
haulout sites in the area.
Transient killer whales often forage to
the east of Allen Bank for harbor seals
(Sears 2013), which is within the project
zone of influence (ZOI). NW Blake
Island, just north of Vashon Island is a
‘hot-spot’ for seals that are prey for
Transients (Stateler 2013).
California Sea Lion
The U.S. stock of California sea lion
was estimated at 296,750 in the 2011
SAR (NMFS 2011) and may be at
carrying capacity, although more data
are needed to verify that determination
(Carretta et al. 2007). Some 3,000 to
5,000 animals are estimated to move
into northwest waters (both Washington
and British Columbia) during the fall
(September) and remain until the late
spring (May) when most return to
breeding rookeries in California and
Mexico (Jeffries et al. 2000). Peak counts
of over 1,000 animals have been made
in Puget Sound (Jeffries et al. 2000).
In 2009 WSDOT replaced several
dolphin structures at the Vashon
terminal. Marine mammal monitoring
was implemented during this project.
Over 7 days of monitoring in November
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of 2009, four California sea lions
swimming near the terminal (WSF
2009).
From November of 2012 to February
of 2014, the U.S. Navy collected
sightings data of California sea lions
hauled-out on the Rich Passage float and
buoy. In the September to February
timeframe scheduled for this project, the
Navy reported a total of 646 California
sea lions over 14 days of observation,
with a high of 110 on January 14, 2014
(U.S. Navy 2014).
According to the NMFS National
Stranding Database, there were four
confirmed California sea lion strandings
in the Vashon area in 2010–2013, in the
September-February work window
scheduled for this project.
California sea lions are not listed as
endangered or threatened under the
ESA or as depleted under the MMPA.
They are not considered a strategic stock
under the MMPA, because total humancaused mortality, although unknown, is
likely to be well less than the PBR
(9,200) (NMFS 2011).
California sea lions breed on islands
off Baja Mexico and southern California
with primarily males migrating north to
feed in the northern waters (Everitt et al.
1980). Females remain in the waters
near their breeding rookeries off
California and Mexico. All age classes of
males are seasonally present in
Washington waters (WDFW 2000).
California sea lions were unknown in
Puget Sound until approximately 1979
(Steiger and Calambokidis 1986). Everitt
et al. (1980) reported the initial
occurrence of large numbers at Port
Gardner, Everett (northern Puget Sound)
in the spring of 1979. The number of
California sea lions using the Everett
haulout numbered around 1,000. This
haulout remains the largest in the state
for sea lions in general and for
California sea lions specifically. Similar
sightings and increases in numbers were
documented throughout the region after
the initial sighting in 1979 (Steiger and
Calambokidis 1986), including
urbanized areas such as Elliott Bay near
Seattle and heavily used areas of central
Puget Sound (Gearin et al. 1986). In
Washington, California sea lions use
haulout sites within all inland water
regions (WDFW 2000). The movement
of California sea lions into Puget Sound
could be an expansion in range of a
growing population (Steiger and
Calambokidis 1986).
California sea lions do not avoid areas
with heavy or frequent human activity
but rather may approach certain areas to
investigate. This species typically does
not flush from a buoy or haulout if
approached.
E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM
31DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Notices
The nearest documented California
sea lion haulout site to the Vashon ferry
terminal is 7.8 km NW (WDFW 2000).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Steller Sea Lion
Steller sea lions comprise two
recognized management stocks (eastern
and western), separated at 144ßW
longitude (Loughlin 1997). Only the
eastern stock is considered here because
the western stock occurs outside of the
geographic area of the proposed activity.
Breeding rookeries for the eastern stock
are located along the California, Oregon,
British Columbia, and southeast Alaska
coasts but not along the Washington
coast or in inland Washington waters
(Angliss and Outlaw 2007). Steller sea
lions primarily use haulout sites on the
outer coast of Washington and in the
Strait of Juan de Fuca along Vancouver
Island in British Columbia. Only subadults or non-breeding adults may be
found in the inland waters of
Washington (Pitcher et al. 2007).
The eastern stock was estimated at
52,847 individuals in the 2012 SAR, and
the most recent estimate for Washington
state (including the outer coast) is 516
individuals (non-pups only) (NMFS
2012a). However, there are estimates
that 1,000 to 2,000 individuals enter the
Strait of Juan de Fuca during the fall
and winter months.
Steller sea lion numbers in
Washington State decline during the
summer months, which correspond to
the breeding season at Oregon and
British Columbia rookeries
(approximately late May to early June)
and peak during the fall and winter
months (WDFW 2000). A few Steller sea
lions can be observed year-round in
Puget Sound although most of the
breeding age animals return to rookeries
in the spring and summer.
Steller sea lions were listed as
threatened range-wide under the ESA
on November 26, 1990 (55 FR 49204).
After division into two stocks, the
western stock was listed as endangered
under the ESA on May 4, 1997 and the
eastern stock remained classified as
threatened (62 FR 24345). In 2006 the
NMFS Steller sea lion recovery team
proposed removal of the eastern stock
from listing under the ESA based on its
annual rate of increase of approximately
3% since the mid-1970s. The eastern
stock was delisted in November 2013.
On August 27, 1993, NMFS published
a final rule designating critical habitat
for the Steller sea lion. No critical
habitat was designated in Washington.
Critical habitat is associated with
breeding and haulout areas in Alaska,
California, and Oregon (NMFS 1993).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:02 Dec 30, 2014
Jkt 235001
Steller sea lions are listed as depleted
under the MMPA. Both stocks are
classified as strategic.
Adult Steller sea lions congregate at
rookeries in Oregon, California, and
British Columbia for pupping and
breeding from late May to early June
(Gisiner 1985). Rookeries are usually
located on beaches of relatively remote
islands, often in areas exposed to wind
and waves, where access by humans
and other mammalian predators is
difficult (WDFW 1993).
For Washington inland waters, Steller
sea lion abundances vary seasonally
with a minimum estimate of 1,000 to
2,000 individuals present or passing
through the Strait of Juan de Fuca in fall
and winter months. The number of
haulout sites has increased in recent
years.
In 2009 WSDOT replaced several
dolphin structures at the Vashon
terminal. Marine mammal monitoring
was implemented during this project.
Over 7 days of monitoring in November
of 2009, no Steller sea lions were
observed (WSF 2009).
From November of 2012 to February
of 2014, the U.S. Navy collected
sightings data of Steller sea lions
hauled-out on the Rich Passage float and
buoy. In the September to February
timeframe scheduled for this project, the
Navy reported a total of 48 Steller sea
lions over 14 days of observation, with
a high of 9 in January 14, 2014 (U.S.
Navy 2014).
According to the NMFS National
Stranding Database, there were no
Steller sea lion strandings in the Vashon
area in 2010–13.
Killer Whale
Two sympatric ecotypes of killer
whales are found within the proposed
activity area: transient and resident.
These types vary in diet, distribution,
acoustic calls, behavior, morphology,
and coloration (Baird 2000; Ford et al.
2000). The ranges of transient and
resident killer whales overlap; however,
little interaction and high reproductive
isolation occurs among the two ecotypes
(Barrett-Lennard 2000; Barrett-Lennard
and Ellis 2001; Hoelzel et al. 2002.
Resident killer whales are primarily
piscivorous, whereas transients
primarily feed on marine mammals,
especially harbor seals (Baird and Dill
1996). Resident killer whales also tend
to occur in larger (10 to 60 individuals),
stable family groups known as pods,
whereas transients occur in smaller (less
than 10 individuals), less structured
pods.
Two stocks of resident killer whales
occur in Washington State: The
Southern Resident and Northern
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
78825
Resident stocks. Southern Residents
occur within the activity area, in the
Strait of Juan de Fuca, Strait of Georgia,
and in coastal waters off Washington
and Vancouver Island, British
Columbia. Northern Residents occur
primarily in inland and coastal British
Columbia and Southeast Alaska waters
and rarely venture into Washington
State waters. Little interaction (Ford et
al. 2000) or gene flow (Barrett-Lennard
2000; Barrett-Lennard and Ellis 2001) is
known to occur between the two
resident stocks.
The Southern Residents live in three
family groups known as the J, K and L
pods. The entire Southern Resident
population has been annually recorded
since 1973 (Krahn et al. 2004).
Individual whales are identified through
photographs of unique saddle patch and
dorsal fin markings. Each Southern
Resident pod has a distinctive dialect of
vocalizations (Ford 1989) and calls can
travel 10 miles or more underwater.
Southern Resident killer whale forage
primarily on salmon, with Chinook
salmon considered the major prey in the
Puget Sound region in late spring
through the fall. Other identified prey
included chum salmon, other
salmonids, herring, and rockfish (NMFS
2008).
Small population numbers make
Southern Residents vulnerable to
inbreeding depression and catastrophic
events such as disease or a major oil
spill. Ongoing threats to Southern
Residents include declining prey
resources, environmental contaminants,
noise and physical disturbance (Krahn
et al. 2004; Wiles 2004). In
Washington’s inland waters, high levels
of noise disturbance and potential
behavior disruption are due to
recreational boating traffic, private and
commercial whale watching boats and
commercial vessel traffic (Wiles 2004).
Other potential noise disturbance
includes high output military sonar
equipment and marine construction.
Noise effects may include altered prey
movements and foraging efficiency,
masking of whale calls, and temporary
hearing impairment (Krahn et al. 2004).
The Southern Resident stock was first
recorded in a 1974 census, at which
time the population comprised 71
whales. This population peaked at 97
animals in 1996, declined to 79 by 2001
(Center for Whale Research 2011), and
then increased to 89 animals by 2006
(Carretta et al. 2007). As of December
2013, the population collectively
numbers 80 individuals: J pod has 25
members, K pod has 19 members, and
L pod has 36 members (Center for
Whale Research 2013).
E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM
31DEN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
78826
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Notices
The Southern Resident stock has
declined from 97 individuals is due to
a decrease in birth rates and an increase
in mortalities, especially among the L
pod (Krahn et al. 2004). There are a
limited number of reproductive-age
Southern Resident males, and several
females of reproductive age are not
having calves. Three major threats were
identified in the ESA listing: Reduced
quantity and quality of prey; persistent
pollutants that could cause immune or
reproductive system dysfunction; and
effects from vessels and sound (NMFS
2008). Other threats identified were
demographics, small population size,
and vulnerability to oil spills.
Previously, declines in the Southern
Resident population were due to
shooting by fishermen, whalers, sealers
and sportsmen largely due to their
interference with fisheries (Wiles 2004)
and the aquarium trade, which is
estimated to have taken a significant
number of animals from 1967 to 1973
(Ford et al. 1995). According to the 2012
SAR, the PBR is 0.14 animals (NMFS
2012).
The Southern Resident stock was
declared depleted under the MMPA in
May 2003. At that time, NMFS
announced preparation of a
conservation plan to restore the stock to
its optimal sustainable population. On
November 18, 2005, the Southern
Resident killer whale stock was listed as
an endangered distinct population
segment (DPS) under the ESA. On
November 29, 2006, NMFS published a
final rule designating critical habitat for
the Southern Resident killer whale DPS.
Both Puget Sound and the San Juan
Islands are designated as core areas of
critical habitat under the ESA,
excluding areas less than 20 feet deep
relative to extreme high water.
In Washington State, killer whales
were listed as a state candidate species
in 2000. In April 2004, the state
upgraded their status to a state
endangered species.
Southern Residents are documented
in coastal waters ranging from central
California to the Queen Charlotte
Islands, British Columbia (NMFS 2008).
They occur in all inland marine waters
within the activity area. While in the
activity area, resident killer whales
generally spend more time in deeper
water and only occasionally enter water
less than 15 feet deep (Baird 2000).
Distribution is strongly associated with
areas of greatest salmon abundance,
with heaviest foraging activity occurring
over deep open water and in areas
characterized by high-relief underwater
topography, such as subsurface canyons,
seamounts, ridges, and steep slopes
(Wiles 2004).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:02 Dec 30, 2014
Jkt 235001
Records from 1976 through 2006
document Southern Residents in the
inland waters of Washington during the
months of March through June and
October through December, with the
primary area of occurrence in inland
waters north of Admiralty Inlet, located
in north Puget Sound (The Whale
Museum 2008).
Beginning in May or June and through
the summer months, all three pods (J, K
and L) of Southern Residents are most
often located in the protected inshore
waters of Haro Strait (west of San Juan
Island), in the Strait of Juan de Fuca,
and Georgia Strait near the Fraser River.
Historically, the J pod also occurred
intermittently during this time in Puget
Sound; however, records from The
Whale Museum (2008) from 1997
through 2007 show that J pod did not
enter Puget Sound south of the Strait of
Juan de Fuca from approximately June
through August.
In fall, all three Southern Resident
killer whale pods occur in areas where
migrating salmon are concentrated such
as the mouth of the Fraser River. They
may also enter areas in Puget Sound
where migrating chum and Chinook
salmon are concentrated (Osborne
1999). In the winter months, the K and
L pods spend progressively less time in
inland marine waters and depart for
coastal waters in January or February.
The J pod is most likely to appear yearround near the San Juan Islands, and in
the fall/winter, in the lower Puget
Sound and in Georgia Strait at the
mouth of the Fraser River.
Southern Resident killer whales are
present in the Vashon Island area in
November–January, coinciding with
chum salmon runs, with peak sightings
in November/December. Southern
Resident killer whales commonly forage
for salmon on the east side of Vashon
Island. They tend to pass through the
Vashon area, traveling at approximately
4 mph, rather than staying in the area
(Sears 2013).
Ann Stateler of the Vashon
Hydrophone Project (and a Vashon
Island resident) has been observing
whales in the area since 1994. Her
observations since 2005 show that the
broad window for Southern Resident
killer whale presence in the Vashon area
has been from October to March, with
most encounters occurring between
November and January. Prey samples
collected by Mark Sears and NOAA
researchers in local waters indicate that
the Southern Resident killer whales are
targeting Chum and Chinook salmon.
Southern Resident killer whales use
all of the waterways surrounding
Vashon/Maury Island: East Passage,
Colvos Pass, Dalco Pass, waters off the
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
north end between Blake and Vashon
Islands. Sometimes the Southern
Resident killer whales circumnavigate
the island. Southern Resident killer
whale visits to the Vashon area have
been highly variable. Typically,
members of all three pods are observed
over a year, with the exception of 2006
when J Pod was not present for the first
time since observations have been
recorded.
In 2009 WSDOT replaced several
dolphin structures at the Vashon
terminal. Marine mammal monitoring
was implemented during this project.
Over 7 days of monitoring in November
of 2009, no killer whales were observed
(WSF 2009).
According to the NMFS National
Stranding Database, there were no killer
whale strandings in the Vashon area in
2010–13 (NMFS 2014).
The West Coast Transient stock
occurs in Washington State. This stock
ranges from southern California to
southeast Alaska and is distinguished
from two other Eastern North Pacific
transient stocks that occur further north,
the AT1 and the ‘‘Gulf of Alaska
transient stocks. This separation was
based on variations in acoustic calls and
genetic distinctness (Angliss and
Outlaw 2007). West Coast transients
primarily forage on harbor seals (Ford
and Ellis 1999), but other species such
as porpoises and sea lions are also taken
(NMFS 2008).
The West Coast Transient stock,
which includes individuals from
California to southeastern Alaska, was
estimated to have a minimum number of
354 in the 2010 SAR (NMFS 2010).
Trends in abundance for the West
Coast Transients were unavailable in the
most recent stock assessment report
(Angliss and Outlaw 2007). Humancaused mortality and serious injury are
estimated to be zero animals per year
and do not exceed the PBR, which is
estimated at 3.5 animals (NMFS 2010).
The West Coast Transient stock is not
designated as depleted under the
MMPA or listed as ‘‘threatened’’ or
‘‘endangered’’ under the ESA.
Within the inland waters, Transients
may frequent areas near seal rookeries
when pups are weaned (Baird and Dill
1995). West Coast Transients are
documented intermittently year-round
in Washington inland waters.
Transient sightings have become more
common since the mid-2000s. Unlike
the Southern Resident killer whale
pods, Transients may be present in the
area for hours as they hunt pinnipeds.
Transients often forage to the east of
Allen Bank, which is within the project
ZOI. NW Blake Island, just north of
Vashon Island is a ‘hot-spot’ for seals
E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM
31DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
that are prey for Transients. Transients
may be more present during September/
October harbor seal pup weaning.
Gray Whale
The North Pacific gray whale stock is
divided into two distinct geographically
isolated stocks: Eastern and western
‘‘Korean.’’ Individuals in this region are
part of the Eastern North Pacific stock.
The majority of the Eastern North
Pacific population spends summers
feeding in the Bering and Chukchi Seas,
but some individuals have been
reported summering in waters off the
coast of British Columbia, Southeast
Alaska, Washington, Oregon and
California (Rice et al. 1984; Angliss and
Outlaw 2007). Gray whales migrate in
the fall, south along the coast of North
America to Baja California, Mexico to
calve (Rice et al. 1981.) Gray whales are
recorded in Washington waters during
feeding migrations between late spring
and autumn with occasional sightings
during winter months (Calambokidis et
al. 1994, 2002).
Early in the 20th century, it is
believed that commercial hunting for
gray whales reduced population
numbers to below 2,000 individuals
(Calambokidis and Baird 1994).
Population surveys since the delisting
estimate that the population fluctuates
at or just below the carrying capacity of
the species (∼26,000 individuals) (Rugh
et al. 1999; Calambokidis et al. 1994;
Angliss and Outlaw 2007).
According to the 2013 SAR, the
minimum population estimate of the
Eastern North Pacific stock is 18,017
(NMFS 2011c). Within Washington
waters, gray whale sightings reported to
Cascadia Research and the Whale
Museum between 1990 and 1993 totaled
over 1,100 (Calambokidis et al. 1994).
Abundance estimates calculated for the
small regional area between Oregon and
southern Vancouver Island, including
the San Juan Area and Puget Sound,
suggest there were 137 to 153 individual
gray whales from 2001 through 2003
(Calambokidis et al. 2004). Forty-eight
individual gray whales were observed in
Puget Sound and Hood Canal in 2004
and 2005 (Calambokidis 2007).
After listing of the species under the
ESA in 1970, the number of gray whales
increased dramatically resulting in their
delisting in 1994. In 2001 NOAA
Fisheries received a petition to relist the
stock under the ESA, but it was
determined that there was not sufficient
information to warrant the petition
(Angliss and Outlaw 2007). Since
delisting under the ESA, the stock has
not been reclassified under the MMPA.
The PBR for this stock is 360 animals
per year (NMFS 2011).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:02 Dec 30, 2014
Jkt 235001
Gray whales migrate within 5 to 43
km of the coast of Washington during
their annual north/south migrations
(Green et al. 1995). Gray whales migrate
south to Baja California where they
calve in November and December, and
then migrate north to Alaska from
March through May (Rice et al. 1984;
Rugh et al. 2001) to summer and feed.
A few gray whales are observed in
Washington inland waters between the
months of September and January, with
peak numbers of individuals from
March through May. Peak months of
gray whale observations in the area of
activity occur outside the proposed
work window of September through
February. The average tenure within
Washington inland waters is 47 days
and the longest stay was 112 days.
Although typically seen during their
annual migrations on the outer coast, a
regular group of gray whales annually
comes into the inland waters at Saratoga
Passage and Port Susan from March
through May to feed on ghost shrimp
(Weitkamp et al. 1992). During this time
frame they are also seen in the Strait of
Juan de Fuca, the San Juan Islands, and
areas of Puget Sound, although the
observations in Puget Sound are highly
variable between years (Calambokidis et
al. 1994).
In 2009 WSDOT replaced several
dolphin structures at the Vashon
terminal. Marine mammal monitoring
was implemented during this project.
Over 7 days of monitoring in November
of 2009, no gray whales were observed
(WSF 2009).
According to the NMFS National
Stranding Database, there were no gray
whale strandings in the Vashon area in
2010–13 (NMFS 2014).
Humpback Whale
Humpback whales are wide-ranging
baleen whales that can be found
virtually worldwide. Recent studies
have indicated that there are three
distinct stocks of humpback whale in
the North Pacific: California-OregonWashington (formerly Eastern North
Pacific), Central North Pacific and
Western North Pacific (NMFS 2011).
The California-Oregon-Washington
(CA–OR–WA) stock may be found near
the project site. This stock calves and
mates in coastal Central America and
Mexico and migrates up the coast from
California to southern British Columbia
in the summer and fall to feed (NMFS
1991; Marine Mammal Commission
2003; Carretta et al. 2007). Although
infrequent, interchange between the
other two stocks and the CA–OR–WA
stock occurs in breeding areas (Carretta
et al. 2007). Few CA–OR–WA stock
humpback whales are seen in Puget
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
78827
Sound, but more frequent sightings
occur in the Strait of Juan de Fuca and
near the San Juan Islands. Most
sightings are in spring and summer.
Humpback whales feed on krill, small
shrimp-like crustaceans and various
kinds of small fish.
According to the 2013 SAR, the 2007/
2008 estimate of 2,043 humpback
whales is the best estimate for
abundance for this stock, though it does
exclude some whales in Washington
(Calambokidis et al. 2009).
As a result of commercial whaling,
humpback whales were listed as
‘‘endangered’’ under the Endangered
Species Conservation Act of 1969. This
protection was transferred to the
Endangered Species Act (ESA) in 1973.
The species is still listed as
‘‘endangered’’, and consequently the
stock is automatically considered as a
‘‘depleted’’ and ‘‘strategic’’ stock under
the MMPA.
Historically, humpback whales were
common in inland waters of Puget
Sound and the San Juan Islands
(Calambokidis et al. 2002). In the early
part of this century, there was a
productive commercial hunt for
humpbacks in Georgia Strait that was
probably responsible for their long
disappearance from local waters
(Osborne et al. 1988). Since the mid1990s, sightings in Puget Sound have
increased. Between 1996 and 2001,
Calambokidis et al. (2002) recorded six
individuals south of Admiralty Inlet
(northern Puget Sound).
In 2009 WSDOT replaced several
dolphin structures at the Vashon
terminal. Marine mammal monitoring
was implemented during this project.
Over 7 days of monitoring in November
of 2009, no humpback whales were
observed (WSF 2009).
According to the NMFS National
Stranding Database, there were no
humpback whale strandings in the
Vashon area in 2010–13 (NMFS 2014).
Minke Whales
The northern minke whale is part of
the Northern Pacific stock, which is
broken into three management stocks:
The Alaskan, California/Oregon/
Washington, and the Hawaiian stock
(NMFS 2008). The California/Oregon/
Washington management stock is
considered a resident stock, which is
unlike the other Northern Pacific stocks
(NMFS 2008). This stock includes
minke whales within the inland
Washington waters of Puget Sound and
the San Juan Islands (Dorsey et al. 1990;
Carretta et al. 2007), which may be
present in the project area.
Minke whales have small, dark sleek
bodies and a small dorsal fin. These
E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM
31DEN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
78828
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Notices
whales are often recognized by surfacing
snout first and a shallow but visible
‘‘bushy’’ blow. Minke whales feed by
side lunging into schools of prey and
gulping in large amounts of water. Food
sources typically consist of krill,
copepods, and small schooling fish,
such as anchovies, herring, mackerel,
and sand lance (NMFS 2008).
According to the 2013 SAR, the
minimum population estimate of the
CA/OR/WA stock is 202 and is likely no
more than 600 (NE Pacific Minke Project
2014). Information on minke whale
population and abundance is limited
due to difficulty in detection.
Conducting surveys for the minke whale
is difficult because of their low profiles,
indistinct blows, and tendency to occur
as single individuals (Green et al. 1992).
Over a 10-year period, 30 individuals
were photographically identified in the
U.S./Canada trans-boundary area
around the San Juan Islands and
demonstrated high site fidelity (Dorsey
et al. 1990; Calambokidis and Baird
1994). In a single year, up to 19
individuals were photographically
identified from around the San Juan
Islands (Dorsey et al. 1990).
Minke whales are not listed under the
ESA and are classified as non-depleted
under the MMPA. The annual mortality
due to fisheries and ship strikes is less
than the potential biological removal, so
they are not considered a strategic
management stock under the MMPA
(Carretta et al. 2007). The PBR for this
stock is two animals per year (NMFS
2011).
Minke whales are reported in
Washington inland waters year-round,
although few are reported in the winter
(Calambokidis and Baird 1994). Minke
whales are relatively common in the
San Juan Islands and Strait of Juan de
Fuca (especially around several of the
banks in both the central and eastern
Strait), but are relatively rare in Puget
Sound.
In the 1980s minke whales were
found in three main areas around the
San Juan Islands; west of Shaw Island
(Minke Lake), the San Juan Channel and
the Strait of San Juan de Fuca (Salmon
Bank). However, by the 1990s the first
two areas were abandoned, and minke
whales were only found in the Strait of
Juan de Fuca, despite continued search
efforts in the other areas. This coincided
with a general decline of herring in the
area, possibly associated with
disturbance of adjacent herring
spawning grounds. A qualitative change
in the number of sea birds was also
noted at this time. In more recent years
(2005–2011), minke whales were found
foraging in all three areas again, and
bird numbers were also higher. But
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:02 Dec 30, 2014
Jkt 235001
minke whales are still predominantly
found on the banks in the Strait of Juan
de Fuca (NE Pacific Minke Whale
Project 2014).
In 2009 WSDOT replaced several
dolphin structures at the Vashon
terminal. Marine mammal monitoring
was implemented during this project.
Over 7 days of monitoring in November
of 2009, no Minke whales were
observed (WSF 2009).
According to the NMFS National
Stranding Database, there were no
Minke whale strandings in the Vashon
area in 2010–13 (NMFS 2014).
Harbor Porpoises
The Washington Inland Waters Stock
of harbor porpoise may be found near
the project site. The Washington Inland
Waters Stock occurs in waters east of
Cape Flattery (Strait of Juan de Fuca,
San Juan Island Region, and Puget
Sound).
According to the 2013 SAR, the
Washington Inland Waters Stock mean
abundance estimate based on 2002 and
2003 aerial surveys conducted in the
Strait of Juan de Fuca, San Juan Islands,
Gulf Islands, and Strait of Georgia is
10,682 harbor porpoises (NMFS 2011).
No harbor porpoises were observed
within Puget Sound proper during
comprehensive harbor porpoise surveys
(Osmek et al. 1994) or Puget Sound
Ambient Monitoring Program (PSAMP)
surveys conducted in the 1990s (WDFW
2008). Declines were attributed to gillnet fishing, increased vessel activity,
contaminants, and competition with
Dall’s porpoise.
However, populations appear to be
rebounding with increased sightings in
central Puget Sound (Carretta et al.
2007) and southern Puget Sound
(WDFW 2008). Recent systematic boat
surveys of the main basin indicate that
at least several hundred and possibly as
many as low thousands of harbor
porpoise are now present. While the
reasons for this recolonization are
unclear, it is possible that changing
conditions outside of Puget Sound, as
evidenced by a tripling of the
population in the adjacent waters of the
Strait of Juan de Fuca and San Juan
Islands since the early 1990s, and the
recent higher number of harbor porpoise
mortalities in coastal waters of Oregon
and Washington, may have played a role
in encouraging harbor porpoise to
explore and shift into areas like Puget
Sound (Hanson et. al. 2011).
The Washington Inland Waters Stock
of harbor porpoise is ‘‘non-depleted’’
under MMPA and ‘‘unlisted’’ under the
ESA. Because there is no current
estimate of minimum abundance, a PBR
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
cannot be calculated for this stock
(NMFS 2011).
Harbor porpoises are common in the
Strait of Juan de Fuca and south into
Admiralty Inlet, especially during the
winter, and are becoming more common
south of Admiralty Inlet. Little
information exists on harbor porpoise
movements and stock structure near the
Vashon area, although it is suspected
that in some areas harbor porpoises
migrate (based on seasonal shifts in
distribution). Washington Department of
Fish and Wildlife’s (WDFW) Puget
Sound Ambient Monitoring Program
(PSAMP) data show peaks in
Washington waters to occur during the
winter.
Hall (2004) found that the frequency
of sighting of harbor porpoises
decreased with increasing depth beyond
150 m with the highest numbers
observed at water depths ranging from
61 to 100 m. Although harbor porpoises
have been spotted in deep water, they
tend to remain in shallower shelf waters
(<150 m) where they are most often
observed in small groups of one to eight
animals (Baird 2003). Water depths
within the Vashon ZOIs range from 0 to
246 m, with roughly 2/3 of the area
within the ZOI falling within the 61–
100 m depth where the highest number
of harbor porpoises may be observed.
According to Vashon Island area
whale specialist Mark Sears, harbor
porpoise are seen in groups of 2–3, and
occasionally in groups of 6–12, and
numbers in the area peak in May/June
(Sears 2013).
In 2009 WSDOT replaced several
dolphin structures at the Vashon
terminal. Marine mammal monitoring
was implemented during this project.
Over 7 days of monitoring in November
of 2009, one harbor porpoise was
observed (WSF 2009).
According to the NMFS National
Stranding Database, there was one
harbor porpoise stranding in the Vashon
area in 2010–13, in the SeptemberFebruary work window scheduled for
this project (NMFS 2013).
Dall’s Porpoises
The California, Oregon, and
Washington Stock of Dall’s porpoise
may be found near the project site. The
most recent estimate of Dall’s porpoise
stock abundance is 42,000, based on
2005 and 2008 summer/autumn vesselbased line transect surveys of California,
Oregon, and Washington waters (NMFS
2011). Within the inland waters of
Washington and British Columbia, this
species is most abundant in the Strait of
Juan de Fuca east to the San Juan
Islands. The most recent Washington’s
inland waters estimate is 900 animals
E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM
31DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
(Calambokidis et al. 1997). Prior to the
1940s, Dall’s porpoises were not
reported in Puget Sound.
The California, Oregon, and
Washington Stock of Dall’s porpoise is
‘‘non-depleted’’ under the MMPA, and
‘‘unlisted’’ under the ESA. The PBR for
this stock is 257 Dall’s porpoises per
year (NMFS 2011).
Dall’s porpoises are migratory and
appear to have predictable seasonal
movements driven by changes in
oceanographic conditions (Green et al.
1992, 1993) and are most abundant in
Puget Sound during the winter
(Nysewander et al. 2005; WDFW 2008).
Despite their migrations, Dall’s
porpoises occur in all areas of inland
Washington at all times of year, but with
different distributions throughout Puget
Sound from winter to summer. The
Washington State Department of Fish
and Wildlife’s (WDFW) Puget Sound
Ambient Monitoring Program (PSAMP)
data show peaks in Washington waters
to occur during the winter. The average
winter group size is three animals
(WDFW 2008).
In 2009 WSDOT replaced several
dolphin structures at the Vashon
terminal. Marine mammal monitoring
was implemented during this project.
Over 7 days of monitoring in November
of 2009, no Dall’s porpoise were
observed (WSF 2009).
Dall’s porpoise used to be more
common that harbor porpoise in the
Vashon area, though harbor porpoise is
now more common. The usual
observation in the Vashon area is a
single Dall’s porpoise, or a pair (Sears
2013).
According to the NMFS National
Stranding Database, there were no Dall’s
porpoise strandings in the Vashon area
in 2010–13 (NMFS 2013).
Potential Effects of the Specified
Activity on Marine Mammals
When considering the influence of
various kinds of sound on the marine
environment, it is necessary to
understand that different kinds of
marine life are sensitive to different
frequencies of sound. Based on available
behavioral data, audiograms have been
derived using auditory evoked
potentials, anatomical modeling, and
other data, Southall et al. (2007)
designate ‘‘functional hearing groups’’
for marine mammals and estimate the
lower and upper frequencies of
functional hearing of the groups. The
functional groups and the associated
frequencies are indicated below (though
animals are less sensitive to sounds at
the outer edge of their functional range
and most sensitive to sounds of
frequencies within a smaller range
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:02 Dec 30, 2014
Jkt 235001
somewhere in the middle of their
functional hearing range):
• Low frequency cetaceans (13
species of mysticetes): functional
hearing is estimated to occur between
approximately 7 Hz and 22 kHz
(however, a study by Au et al., (2006)
of humpback whale songs indicate that
the range may extend to at least 24 kHz);
• Mid-frequency cetaceans (32
species of dolphins, six species of larger
toothed whales, and 19 species of
beaked and bottlenose whales):
functional hearing is estimated to occur
between approximately 150 Hz and 160
kHz;
• High frequency cetaceans (eight
species of true porpoises, six species of
river dolphins, Kogia, the franciscana,
and four species of cephalorhynchids):
functional hearing is estimated to occur
between approximately 200 Hz and 180
kHz; and
• Pinnipeds in Water: functional
hearing is estimated to occur between
approximately 75 Hz and 75 kHz, with
the greatest sensitivity between
approximately 700 Hz and 20 kHz.
As mentioned previously in this
document, marine mammal species/
stocks are likely to occur in the
proposed seismic survey area. WSDOT
and NMFS determined that in-water
pile removal and pile driving during the
Vashon Seismic Retrofit Project has the
potential to result in behavioral
harassment of the marine mammal
species and stocks in the vicinity of the
proposed activity.
Marine mammals exposed to highintensity sound repeatedly or for
prolonged periods can experience
hearing threshold shift (TS), which is
the loss of hearing sensitivity at certain
frequency ranges (Kastak et al. 1999;
Schlundt et al. 2000; Finneran et al.
2002; 2005). TS can be permanent
(PTS), in which case the loss of hearing
sensitivity is unrecoverable, or
temporary (TTS), in which case the
animal’s hearing threshold will recover
over time (Southall et al. 2007). Since
marine mammals depend on acoustic
cues for vital biological functions, such
as orientation, communication, finding
prey, and avoiding predators, hearing
impairment could result in the reduced
ability of marine mammals to detect or
interpret important sounds. Repeated
noise exposure that causes TTS could
lead to PTS.
Experiments on a bottlenose dolphin
(Tursiops truncates) and beluga whale
(Delphinapterus leucas) showed that
exposure to a single watergun impulse
at a received level of 207 kPa (or 30 psi)
peak-to-peak (p-p), which is equivalent
to 228 dB (p-p) re 1 mPa, resulted in a
7 and 6 dB TTS in the beluga whale at
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
78829
0.4 and 30 kHz, respectively.
Thresholds returned to within 2 dB of
the pre-exposure level within 4 minutes
of the exposure (Finneran et al. 2002).
No TTS was observed in the bottlenose
dolphin. Although the source level of
one hammer strike for pile driving is
expected to be much lower than the
single watergun impulse cited here,
animals being exposed for a prolonged
period to repeated hammer strikes could
receive more noise exposure in terms of
sound exposure level (SEL) than from
the single watergun impulse (estimated
at 188 dB re 1 mPa2-s) in the
aforementioned experiment (Finneran et
al. 2002).
Chronic exposure to excessive, though
not high-intensity, noise could cause
masking at particular frequencies for
marine mammals that utilize sound for
vital biological functions (Clark et al.
2009). Masking is the obscuring of
sounds of interest by other sounds, often
at similar frequencies. Masking
generally occurs when sounds in the
environment are louder than, and of a
similar frequency as, auditory signals an
animal is trying to receive. Masking can
interfere with detection of acoustic
signals, such as communication calls,
echolocation sounds, and
environmental sounds important to
marine mammals. Therefore, under
certain circumstances, marine mammals
whose acoustical sensors or
environment are being severely masked
could also be impaired.
Masking occurs at the frequency band
which the animals utilize. Since noise
generated from in-water vibratory pile
removal and driving is mostly
concentrated at low frequency ranges, it
may have little effect on high-frequency
echolocation sounds by odontocetes
(toothed whales), which may hunt
California sea lion and harbor seal.
However, the lower frequency manmade noises are more likely to affect the
detection of communication calls and
other potentially important natural
sounds, such as surf and prey noise. The
noises may also affect communication
signals when those signals occur near
the noise band, and thus reduce the
communication space of animals (e.g.,
Clark et al. 2009) and cause increased
stress levels (e.g., Foote et al. 2004; Holt
et al. 2009).
Unlike TS, masking can potentially
impact the species at community,
population, or even ecosystem levels, as
well as individual levels. Masking
affects both senders and receivers of the
signals and could have long-term
chronic effects on marine mammal
species and populations. Recent science
suggests that low frequency ambient
sound levels in the world’s oceans have
E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM
31DEN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
78830
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Notices
increased by as much as 20 dB (more
than 3 times, in terms of SPL) from preindustrial periods, and most of these
increases are from distant shipping
(Hildebrand 2009). All anthropogenic
noise sources, such as those from vessel
traffic and pile removal and driving,
contribute to the elevated ambient noise
levels, thus intensifying masking.
Nevertheless, the sum of noise from
WSDOT’s proposed Vashon Seismic
Retrofit Project construction activities is
confined to a limited area by
surrounding landmasses; therefore, the
noise generated is not expected to
contribute to increased ocean ambient
noise. In addition, due to shallow water
depths in the project area, underwater
sound propagation of low-frequency
sound (which is the major noise source
from pile driving) is expected to be
poor.
Finally, in addition to TS and
masking, exposure of marine mammals
to certain sounds could lead to
behavioral disturbance (Richardson et
al. 1995), such as: changing durations of
surfacing and dives, number of blows
per surfacing, or moving direction and/
or speed; reduced/increased vocal
activities; changing/cessation of certain
behavioral activities, such as socializing
or feeding; visible startle response or
aggressive behavior, such as tail/fluke
slapping or jaw clapping; avoidance of
areas where noise sources are located;
and/or flight responses (e.g., pinnipeds
flushing into water from haulouts or
rookeries).
The biological significance of many of
these behavioral disturbances is difficult
to predict, especially if the detected
disturbances appear minor. However,
the consequences of behavioral
modification could be expected to be
biologically significant if the change
affects growth, survival, or
reproduction. Some of these types of
significant behavioral modifications
include:
Drastic change in diving/surfacing
patterns (such as those thought to be
causing beaked whale strandings due to
exposure to military mid-frequency
tactical sonar); habitat abandonment
due to loss of desirable acoustic
environment; and cessation of feeding
or social interaction.
The onset of behavioral disturbance
from anthropogenic noise depends on
both external factors (characteristics of
noise sources and their paths) and the
receiving animals (hearing, motivation,
experience, demography), and is
therefore difficult to predict (Southall et
al. 2007).
The proposed project area is not a
prime habitat for marine mammals, nor
is it considered an area frequented by
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:02 Dec 30, 2014
Jkt 235001
marine mammals. Therefore, behavioral
disturbances that could result from
anthropogenic noise associated with
WSDOT’s construction activities are
expected to affect only a small number
of marine mammals on an infrequent
and limited basis.
Potential Effects on Marine Mammal
Habitat
The primary potential impacts to
marine mammal habitat are associated
with elevated sound levels produced by
vibratory pile removal and pile driving
in the area. However, other potential
impacts to the surrounding habitat from
physical disturbance are also possible.
Potential Impacts on Prey Species
With regard to fish as a prey source
for cetaceans and pinnipeds, fish are
known to hear and react to sounds and
to use sound to communicate (Tavolga
et al. 1981) and possibly avoid predators
(Wilson and Dill 2002). Experiments
have shown that fish can sense both the
strength and direction of sound
(Hawkins 1981). Primary factors
determining whether a fish can sense a
sound signal, and potentially react to it,
are the frequency of the signal and the
strength of the signal in relation to the
natural background noise level.
The level of sound at which a fish
will react or alter its behavior is usually
well above the detection level. Fish
have been found to react to sounds
when the sound level increased to about
20 dB above the detection level of 120
dB (Ona 1988); however, the response
threshold can depend on the time of
year and the fish’s physiological
condition (Engas et al. 1993). In general,
fish react more strongly to pulses of
sound rather than non-pulse signals
(such as noise from vessels) (Blaxter et
al. 1981), and a quicker alarm response
is elicited when the sound signal
intensity rises rapidly compared to
sound rising more slowly to the same
level.
Further, during the coastal
construction only a small fraction of the
available habitat would be ensonified at
any given time. Disturbance to fish
species would be short-term and fish
would return to their pre-disturbance
behavior once the pile driving activity
ceases. Thus, the proposed construction
would have little, if any, impact on the
abilities of marine mammals to feed in
the area where construction work is
planned.
Finally, the time of the proposed
construction activity would avoid the
spawning season of the ESA-listed
salmonid species.
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Water and Sediment Quality
Short-term turbidity is a water quality
effect of most in-water work, pile
removal and driving. WSDOT must
comply with state water quality
standards during these operations by
limiting the extent of turbidity to the
immediate project area.
Roni and Weitkamp (1996) monitored
water quality parameters during a pier
replacement project in Manchester,
Washington. The study measured water
quality before, during and after pile
removal and driving. The study found
that construction activity at the site had
‘‘little or no effect on dissolved oxygen,
water temperature and salinity,’’ and
turbidity (measured in nephelometric
turbidity units [NTU]) at all depths
nearest the construction activity was
typically less than 1 NTU higher than
stations farther from the project area
throughout construction.
Similar results were recorded during
pile removal operations at two WSF
ferry facilities. At the Friday Harbor
terminal, localized turbidity levels (from
three timber pile removal events) were
generally less than 0.5 NTU higher than
background levels and never exceeded 1
NTU. At the Eagle Harbor maintenance
facility, local turbidity levels (from
removal of timber and steel piles) did
not exceed 0.2 NTU above background
levels. In general, turbidity associated
with pile installation is localized to
about a 25-foot radius around the pile
(Everitt et al. 1980).
Cetaceans are not expected to be close
enough to the Vashon ferry terminal to
experience effects of turbidity, and any
pinnipeds will be transiting the terminal
area and could avoid localized areas of
turbidity. Therefore, the impact from
increased turbidity levels is expected to
be discountable to marine mammals.
Pile driving and removal at the
Vashon ferry terminal will not obstruct
movements of marine mammals. Pile
work at Vashon will occur within 70 m/
230 ft of the shoreline leaving 2 km/1.2
miles of Puget Sound for marine
mammals to pass.
Potential Impacts on Availability of
Affected Species or Stock for Taking for
Subsistence Uses
No subsistence harvest of marine
mammals occur in the proposed action
area.
Proposed Mitigation Measures
In order to issue an incidental take
authorization under section 101(a)(5)(D)
of the MMPA, NMFS must set forth the
permissible methods of taking pursuant
to such activity, and other means of
effecting the least practicable adverse
E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM
31DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Notices
impact on such species or stock and its
habitat, paying particular attention to
rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of
similar significance, and on the
availability of such species or stock for
taking for certain subsistence uses.
For WSDOT’s proposed Vashon
Seismic Retrofit Project, WSDOT
worked with NMFS and proposed the
following mitigation measures to
minimize the potential impacts to
marine mammals in the Project vicinity.
The primary purposes of these
mitigation measures are to minimize
sound levels from the activities, to
monitor marine mammals within
designated ZOI corresponding to NMFS’
current Level B harassment thresholds
and, if marine mammals with the ZOI
appear disturbed by the work activity, to
initiate immediate shutdown or power
down of the piling hammer, making it
very unlikely potential injury or TTS to
marine mammals would occur and
ensuring that Level B behavioral
harassment of marine mammals would
be reduced to the lowest level
practicable.
Use of Noise Attenuation Devices
Noise attenuation systems (i.e., bubble
curtains) will be used during all impact
pile driving of steel piles to dampen the
acoustic pressure and reduce the impact
on marine mammals. By reducing
underwater sound pressure levels at the
source, bubble curtains would reduce
the area over which Level B harassment
would occur, thereby potentially
reducing the numbers of marine
mammals affected. In addition, the
bubble curtain system would reduce
sound levels below the threshold for
injury (Level A harassment) and thus
eliminate the need for an exclusion zone
for Level A harassment.
Time Restriction
Work would occur only during
daylight hours, when visual monitoring
of marine mammals can be conducted.
In addition, all in-water construction
will be limited to the period between
August 1, 2015, and February 15, 2016.
78831
Establishment of Exclusion Zone and
Level B Harassment Zones of Influence
Before the commencement of in-water
pile driving activities, WSDOT shall
establish Level B behavioral harassment
ZOIs where received underwater sound
pressure levels (SPLs) are higher than
160 dB (rms) and 120 dB (rms) re 1 mPa
for impulse noise sources (impact pile
driving) and non-impulses noise sources
(vibratory pile driving and mechanic
dismantling), respectively.
For the test pile program, because
glacial till soils will be harder to drive
through, the assumed attenuation will
be 8–10 dB, the same bubble-curtain
attenuation used in the current
consultation. Based on the 2009 Vashon
Test Pile, source levels for impact
driving of 30’’ piles are 210 dB (peak),
181 dB (SEL), and 189 dB (rms)
measured at 16 m (Pile P–8
Unmitigated) (WSDOT 2010).
The exclusion zones for Level A
harassment and ZOIs for Level B
harassment are modeled based on inwater measurements during the WSF
Bainbridge Island Ferry Terminal and
presented in Table 2 below.
TABLE 2—MODELED MAXIMUM LEVEL A AND LEVEL B HARASSMENT ZONES FOR VARIOUS PILE DRIVING ACTIVITIES
Distance to 190
dB re 1 μPa (rms)
(m)
Pile driving methods
Distance to 180
dB re 1 μPa (rms)
(m)
Distance to 160
dB re 1 μPa (rms)
(m)
Distance to 121*
dB re 1 μPa (rms)
(m)
3.0
12
251
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
5,000
2,000
21,500
4.0
19
402
NA
Impact pile driving ....................................................................
Vibratory pile driving & removal (24-in steel concrete-jacketed pile) ..............................................................................
Vibratory pile driving & removal (13-in timber pile) .................
Vibratory pile removal (30-in steel pile) ...................................
Test pile impact pile driving (assume 8 dB reduction using
attenuation devices) .............................................................
the median ambient noise level at the Project area is 121 dB re 1 μPa (rms), this level will be used as the threshold for vibratory pile
driving and removal.
* Since
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Soft Start
A ‘‘soft-start’’ technique is intended to
allow marine mammals to vacate the
area before the pile driver reaches full
power. Whenever there has been
downtime of 30 minutes or more
without pile driving, the contractor will
initiate the driving with ramp-up
procedures described below.
Soft start for vibratory hammers
requires contractors to initiate hammer
noise for 15 seconds at reduced energy
followed by a 1-minute waiting period.
The procedure will be repeated two
additional times. Soft start for impact
hammers requires contractors to provide
an initial set of three strikes from the
impact hammer at 40 percent energy,
followed by a 1-minute waiting period,
then two subsequent three-strike sets.
Each day, WSDOT will use the soft-start
technique at the beginning of pile
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:02 Dec 30, 2014
Jkt 235001
driving or removal, or if pile driving or
removal has ceased for more than one
hour.
Shutdown Measures
WSDOT shall implement shutdown
measures if a marine mammal is sighted
approaching the Level A exclusion
zone. In-water construction activities
shall be suspended until the marine
mammal is sighted moving away from
the exclusion zone, or if the animal is
not sighted for 30 minutes after the
shutdown.
In addition, WSDOT shall implement
shutdown measures if southern resident
killer whales are sighted within the
vicinity of the project area and are
approaching the Level B harassment
zone (zone of influence, or ZOI) during
in-water construction activities.
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
If a killer whale approaches the ZOI
during pile driving or removal, and it is
unknown whether it is a Southern
Resident killer whale or a transient
killer whale, it shall be assumed to be
a Southern Resident killer whale and
WSDOT shall implement the shutdown
measure.
If a Southern Resident killer whale or
an unidentified killer whale enters the
ZOI undetected, in-water pile driving or
pile removal shall be suspended until
the whale exits the ZOI to avoid further
level B harassment.
Further, WSDOT shall implement
shutdown measures if the number of
any allotted marine mammal takes
reaches the limit under the IHA, if such
marine mammals are sighted within the
vicinity of the project area and are
approaching the Level B harassment
E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM
31DEN1
78832
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
zone during in-water construction
activities.
Mitigation Conclusions
NMFS has carefully evaluated the
applicant’s proposed mitigation
measures and considered a range of
other measures in the context of
ensuring that NMFS prescribes the
means of effecting the least practicable
impact on the affected marine mammal
species and stocks and their habitat. Our
evaluation of potential measures
included consideration of the following
factors in relation to one another:
• The manner in which, and the
degree to which, the successful
implementation of the measure is
expected to minimize adverse impacts
to marine mammals
• The proven or likely efficacy of the
specific measure to minimize adverse
impacts as planned
• The practicability of the measure
for applicant implementation.
Any mitigation measure(s) prescribed
by NMFS should be able to accomplish,
have a reasonable likelihood of
accomplishing (based on current
science), or contribute to the
accomplishment of one or more of the
general goals listed below:
(1) Avoidance or minimization of
injury or death of marine mammals
wherever possible (goals 2, 3, and 4 may
contribute to this goal).
(2) A reduction in the numbers of
marine mammals (total number or
number at biologically important time
or location) exposed to received levels
of pile driving and pile removal or other
activities expected to result in the take
of marine mammals (this goal may
contribute to 1, above, or to reducing
harassment takes only).
(3) A reduction in the number of
times (total number or number at
biologically important time or location)
individuals would be exposed to
received levels of pile driving and pile
removal, or other activities expected to
result in the take of marine mammals
(this goal may contribute to 1, above, or
to reducing harassment takes only).
(4) A reduction in the intensity of
exposures (either total number or
number at biologically important time
or location) to received levels of pile
driving, or other activities expected to
result in the take of marine mammals
(this goal may contribute to a, above, or
to reducing the severity of harassment
takes only).
(5) Avoidance or minimization of
adverse effects to marine mammal
habitat, paying special attention to the
food base, activities that block or limit
passage to or from biologically
important areas, permanent destruction
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:02 Dec 30, 2014
Jkt 235001
of habitat, or temporary destruction/
disturbance of habitat during a
biologically important time.
(6) For monitoring directly related to
mitigation—an increase in the
probability of detecting marine
mammals, thus allowing for more
effective implementation of the
mitigation.
Based on our evaluation of the
applicant’s proposed measures, as well
as other measures considered by NMFS,
NMFS has preliminarily determined
that the proposed mitigation measures
provide the means of effecting the least
practicable impact on marine mammals
species or stocks and their habitat,
paying particular attention to rookeries,
mating grounds, and areas of similar
significance.
Proposed Monitoring and Reporting
In order to issue an incidental take
authorization (ITA) for an activity,
section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA states
that NMFS must set forth,
‘‘requirements pertaining to the
monitoring and reporting of such
taking.’’ The MMPA implementing
regulations at 50 CFR 216.104(a)(13)
indicate that requests for ITAs must
include the suggested means of
accomplishing the necessary monitoring
and reporting that will result in
increased knowledge of the species and
of the level of taking or impacts on
populations of marine mammals that are
expected to be present in the proposed
action area. WSDOT submitted a marine
mammal monitoring plan as part of the
IHA application. It can be found at
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental.htm. The plan may be
modified or supplemented based on
comments or new information received
from the public during the public
comment period.
Monitoring measures prescribed by
NMFS should accomplish one or more
of the following general goals:
(1) An increase in the probability of
detecting marine mammals, both within
the mitigation zone (thus allowing for
more effective implementation of the
mitigation) and in general to generate
more data to contribute to the analyses
mentioned below;
(2) An increase in our understanding
of how many marine mammals are
likely to be exposed to levels of pile
driving that we associate with specific
adverse effects, such as behavioral
harassment, TTS, or PTS;
(3) An increase in our understanding
of how marine mammals respond to
stimuli expected to result in take and
how anticipated adverse effects on
individuals (in different ways and to
varying degrees) may impact the
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
population, species, or stock
(specifically through effects on annual
rates of recruitment or survival) through
any of the following methods:
D Behavioral observations in the
presence of stimuli compared to
observations in the absence of stimuli
(need to be able to accurately predict
received level, distance from source,
and other pertinent information);
D Physiological measurements in the
presence of stimuli compared to
observations in the absence of stimuli
(need to be able to accurately predict
received level, distance from source,
and other pertinent information);
D Distribution and/or abundance
comparisons in times or areas with
concentrated stimuli versus times or
areas without stimuli;
(4) An increased knowledge of the
affected species; and
(5) An increase in our understanding
of the effectiveness of certain mitigation
and monitoring measures.
Proposed Monitoring Measures
WSDOT shall employee NMFSapproved protected species observers
(PSOs) to conduct marine mammal
monitoring for its Vashon Seismic
Retrofit Project. The PSOs will observe
and collect data on marine mammals in
and around the project area for 30
minutes before, during, and for 30
minutes after all pile removal and pile
installation work. If a PSO observes a
marine mammal within a ZOI that
appears to be disturbed by the work
activity, the PSO will notify the work
crew to initiate shutdown measures.
Monitoring of marine mammals
around the construction site shall be
conducted using high-quality binoculars
(e.g., Zeiss, 10 x 42 power). Marine
mammal visual monitoring will be
conducted by land-based biologists at
the terminal work sites, and boat-based
biologist(s) travel through the
monitoring area.
Data collection during marine
mammal monitoring will consist of a
count of all marine mammals by
species, a description of behavior (if
possible), location, direction of
movement, type of construction that is
occurring, time that pile replacement
work begins and ends, any acoustic or
visual disturbance, and time of the
observation. Environmental conditions
such as weather, visibility, temperature,
tide level, current, and sea state would
also be recorded.
Proposed Reporting Measures
WSDOT would be required to submit
weekly monitoring reports to NMFS that
summarize the monitoring results,
E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM
31DEN1
78833
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Notices
construction activities, and
environmental conditions.
A final monitoring report would be
submitted to NMFS within 90 days after
completion of the construction work.
This report would detail the monitoring
protocol, summarize the data recorded
during monitoring, and estimate the
number of marine mammals that may
have been harassed. NMFS would have
an opportunity to provide comments on
the report, and if NMFS has comments,
WSDOT would address the comments
and submit a final report to NMFS
within 30 days.
In addition, NMFS would require
WSDOT to notify NMFS’ Office of
Protected Resources and NMFS’
Stranding Network within 48 hours of
sighting an injured or dead marine
mammal in the vicinity of the
construction site. WSDOT shall provide
NMFS with the species or description of
the animal(s), the condition of the
animal(s) (including carcass condition,
if the animal is dead), location, time of
first discovery, observed behaviors (if
alive), and photo or video (if available).
In the event that WSDOT finds an
injured or dead marine mammal that is
not in the vicinity of the construction
area, WSDOT would report the same
information as listed above to NMFS as
soon as operationally feasible.
Estimated Take by Incidental
Harassment
Except with respect to certain
activities not pertinent here, the MMPA
defines ‘‘harassment’’ as: any act of
pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i)
has the potential to injure a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild [Level A harassment]; or (ii) has
the potential to disturb a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild by causing disruption of behavioral
patterns, including, but not limited to,
migration, breathing, nursing, breeding,
feeding, or sheltering [Level B
harassment].
As discussed above, in-water pile
removal and pile driving (vibratory and
impact) generate loud noises that could
potentially harass marine mammals in
the vicinity of WSDOT’s proposed
Vashon Seismic Retrofit Project.
Currently, NMFS uses 120 dB re 1 mPa
and 160 dB re 1 mPa at the received
levels for the onset of Level B
harassment from non-impulse (vibratory
pile driving and removal) and impulse
sources (impact pile driving)
underwater, respectively. Table 3
summarizes the current NMFS marine
mammal take criteria.
TABLE 3—CURRENT ACOUSTIC EXPOSURE CRITERIA FOR NON-EXPLOSIVE SOUND UNDERWATER
Criterion
Criterion definition
Threshold
Level A Harassment (Injury) ..............
Permanent Threshold Shift (PTS) (Any level above that which is known to
cause TTS).
Level B Harassment ...........................
Level B Harassment ...........................
Behavioral Disruption (for impulse noises) ....................................................
Behavioral Disruption (for non-impulse noise) ..............................................
180 dB re 1 μPa
(cetaceans), 190 dB re 1
μPa (pinnipeds), root
mean square (rms).
160 dB re 1 μPa (rms).
120 dB re 1 μPa (rms).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
As explained above, ZOIs will be
established that encompass the areas
where received underwater sound
pressure levels (SPLs) exceed the
applicable thresholds for Level B
harassment. There will not be a zone for
Level A harassment in this case, because
the bubble curtain system will keep all
underwater noise below the threshold
for Level A harassment.
Sound Levels From Proposed
Construction Activity
As mentioned earlier, the project
includes impact driving and proofing of
24-inch hollow steel piling, impact
driving of 13-inch timber piling, and
impact driving of 30-inch steel test
piles.
Based on in-water measurements
during the WSF Bainbridge Island Ferry
Terminal, impact pile driving of a 24inch steel pile generated 170 dB RMS
(overall average), with the highest
measured at 189 dB RMS measured at
10 meters (Laughlin 2005). A bubble
curtain will be used to attenuate steel
pile impact driving noise.
For the test pile program, the more
conservative cetacean injury zone (19
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:02 Dec 30, 2014
Jkt 235001
m/62 ft) will be used to set the 30-inch
steel test pile exclusion zone.
In-water measurements for impact
driving of 13-inch timber piling are not
available. Impact driving of 12-inch
timber piling generated 170 dB RMS
(WSF 2014). The source level for 13inch timber piles shall be assumed to be
the same as 12-inch timber piles. A
bubble curtain will not be used during
impact driving of timber piles.
Using practical spreading model to
calculate sound propagation loss, Table
2 provides the estimated maximum
distances for a variety of harassment
zones.
As explained above, exclusion zones
and ZOIs will be established that
encompass the areas where received
underwater SPLs exceed the applicable
thresholds for Level A and Level B
harassment, respectively.
Incidental take for each species is
estimated by determining the likelihood
of a marine mammal being present
within a ZOI during pile removal and
pile driving. Expected marine mammal
presence is determined by past
observations and general abundance
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
near the Vashon Ferry Terminal during
the construction window. Typically,
potential take is estimated by
multiplying the area of the ZOI by the
local animal density. This provides an
estimate of the number of animals that
might occupy the ZOI at any given
moment. However, there are no density
estimates for any Puget Sound
population of marine mammals. As a
result, the take requests were estimated
using local marine mammal data sets
(e.g., Orca Network, state and federal
agencies), opinions from state and
federal agencies, and observations from
Navy biologists.
Based on the estimates, approximately
1,919 Pacific harbor seals, 1,919
California sea lions, 644 Steller sea
lions, 438 harbor porpoises, 136 Dall’s
porpoises, 54 killer whales (50 transient,
4 Southern Resident killer whales), 71
gray whales, 36 humpback whales, and
36 minke whales could be exposed to
received sound levels that could result
in takes from the proposed Vashon
Seismic Retrofit Project. A summary of
the estimated takes is presented in Table
4.
E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM
31DEN1
78834
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Notices
TABLE 4—ESTIMATED NUMBERS OF MARINE MAMMALS THAT MAY BE EXPOSED TO RECEIVED PILE REMOVAL LEVELS
ABOVE 121 DB RE 1 μPA (RMS)
Estimated
marine
mammal takes
Species
Pacific harbor seal ...............................................................................................................
California sea lion ................................................................................................................
Steller sea lion .....................................................................................................................
Harbor porpoise ...................................................................................................................
Dall’s porpoise .....................................................................................................................
Killer whale, transient ..........................................................................................................
Killer whale, Southern Resident ..........................................................................................
Gray whale ...........................................................................................................................
Humpback whale .................................................................................................................
Minke whale .........................................................................................................................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Analysis and Preliminary
Determinations
Negligible Impact
Negligible impact is ‘‘an impact
resulting from the specified activity that
cannot be reasonably expected to, and is
not reasonably likely to, adversely affect
the species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival’’
(50 CFR 216.103). A negligible impact
finding is based on the lack of likely
adverse effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival (i.e., populationlevel effects). An estimate of the number
of Level B harassment takes, alone, is
not enough information on which to
base an impact determination. In
addition to considering estimates of the
number of marine mammals that might
be ‘‘taken’’ through behavioral
harassment, NMFS must consider other
factors, such as the likely nature of any
responses (their intensity, duration,
etc.), the context of any responses
(critical reproductive time or location,
migration, etc.), as well as the number
and nature of estimated Level A
harassment takes, the number of
estimated mortalities, and effects on
habitat.
WSDOT’s proposed Vashon Seismic
Retrofit Project would involve pile
removal and pile driving activities.
Elevated underwater noises are
expected to be generated as a result of
these activities; however, these noises
are expected to result in no mortality or
Level A harassment and limited, if any,
Level B harassment of marine mammals.
WSDOT would use noise attenuation
devices (i.e., bubble curtains) during the
impact pile driving of steel piles, thus
eliminating the potential for injury
(including PTS) and TTS from impact
driving. For vibratory pile removal and
pile driving and impact pile driving of
timber piles, noise levels are not
expected to reach the level that may
cause TTS, injury (including PTS), or
mortality to marine mammals.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:02 Dec 30, 2014
Jkt 235001
Therefore, NMFS does not expect that
any animals would experience Level A
harassment (including injury or PTS) or
Level B harassment in the form of TTS
from being exposed to in-water pile
removal and pile driving associated
with WSDOT’s construction project.
In addition, WSDOT’s proposed
activities are localized and of short
duration. The entire project area is
limited to WSDOT’s Vashon ferry
terminal in Vashon Island. The entire
project would involve the removal of
106 existing timber piles and
installation of 119 steel piles. In
addition, 96 temporary piles will be
installed and then removed during the
project. The duration for pile driving
and removal lasts for about 10 to 120
minutes per pile, depending on the type
and dimension of the pile. These lowintensity, localized, and short-term
noise exposures may cause brief startle
reactions or short-term behavioral
modification by the animals. These
reactions and behavioral changes are
expected to subside quickly when the
exposures cease. Moreover, the
proposed mitigation and monitoring
measures are expected to reduce
potential exposures and behavioral
modifications even further.
Additionally, no important feeding and/
or reproductive areas for marine
mammals are known to be near the
proposed action area. Therefore, the
take resulting from the proposed Vashon
Seismic Retrofit Project is not
reasonably expected to, and is not
reasonably likely to, adversely affect the
marine mammal species or stocks
through effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival.
The project also is not expected to
have significant adverse effects on
affected marine mammals’ habitat, as
analyzed in detail in the ‘‘Anticipated
Effects on Marine Mammal Habitat’’
section. The project activities would not
modify existing marine mammal habitat.
The activities may cause some fish to
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1,919
1,919
644
438
136
50
4
71
36
36
Abundance
14,612
296,750
63,160
10,682
42,000
521
85
19,126
1,918
478
Percentage
13
0.7
1.0
4.0
0.3
9.6
4.7
0.4
1.9
7.5
leave the area of disturbance, thus
temporarily impacting marine
mammals’ foraging opportunities in a
limited portion of the foraging range;
but, because of the short duration of the
activities and the relatively small area of
the habitat that may be affected, the
impacts to marine mammal habitat are
not expected to cause significant or
long-term negative consequences.
Based on the analysis contained
herein of the likely effects of the
specified activity on marine mammals
and their habitat, and taking into
consideration the implementation of the
proposed monitoring and mitigation
measures, NMFS preliminarily finds
that the total marine mammal take from
WSDOT’s Vashon Seismic Retrofit
Project will have a negligible impact on
the affected marine mammal species or
stocks.
Small Number
Based on analyses provided above, it
is estimated that approximately 1,919
harbor seals, 1,919 California sea lions,
644 Steller sea lions, 438 harbor
porpoises, 136 Dall’s porpoises, 50
transient killer whales, 4 Southern
Resident killer whales, 71 gray whales,
36 humpback whales, and 36 minke
whales could be exposed to received
noise levels that could cause Level B
behavioral harassment from the
proposed construction work at the
Vashon ferry terminal in Washington
State. These numbers represent
approximately 0.3% to 14% of the
populations of these species that could
be affected by Level B behavioral
harassment, respectively (see Table 2
above), which are small percentages
relative to the total populations of the
affected species or stocks.
Based on the analysis contained
herein of the likely effects of the
specified activity on marine mammals
and their habitat, and taking into
consideration the implementation of the
mitigation and monitoring measures,
E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM
31DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Notices
which are expected to reduce the
number of marine mammals potentially
affected by the proposed action, NMFS
preliminarily finds that small numbers
of marine mammals will be taken
relative to the populations of the
affected species or stocks.
Impact on Availability of Affected
Species for Taking for Subsistence Uses
There are no subsistence uses of
marine mammals in the proposed
project area; and, thus, no subsistence
uses impacted by this action. Therefore,
NMFS has determined that the total
taking of affected species or stocks
would not have an unmitigable adverse
impact on the availability of such
species or stocks for taking for
subsistence purposes.
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
The humpback whale and the
Southern Resident stock of killer whale
are the only marine mammal species
currently listed under the ESA that
could occur in the vicinity of WSDOT’s
proposed construction projects. NMFS’
Permits and Conservation Division has
initiated consultation with NMFS’
Protected Resources Division under
section 7 of the ESA on the issuance of
an IHA to WSDOT under section
101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA for this
activity. Consultation will be concluded
prior to a determination on the issuance
of an IHA.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
NMFS prepared a draft Environmental
Assessment (EA) for the proposed
issuance of an IHA, pursuant to NEPA,
to determine whether or not this
proposed activity may have a significant
effect on the human environment. This
analysis will be completed prior to the
issuance or denial of this proposed IHA.
Proposed Authorization
As a result of these preliminary
determinations, NMFS proposes to issue
an IHA to WSDOT for conducting the
Vashon Seismic Retrofit Project,
provided the previously mentioned
mitigation, monitoring, and reporting
requirements are incorporated. The
proposed IHA language is provided
next.
1. This Authorization is valid from
August 1, 2015, through July 31, 2016.
2. This Authorization is valid only for
activities associated in-water
construction work at the Vashon
Seismic Retrofit Project in the State of
Washington.
3. (a) The species authorized for
incidental harassment takings, Level B
harassment only, are: Pacific harbor seal
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:02 Dec 30, 2014
Jkt 235001
(Phoca vitulina richardsi), California sea
lion (Zalophus californianus), Steller
sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus), transient
and Southern Resident killer whales
(Orcinus orca), gray whale (Eschrichtius
robustus), humpback whale (Megaptera
novaeangliae), harbor porpoise
(Phocoena phocoena), and Dall’s
porpoise (Phocoena dali).
(b) The authorization for taking by
harassment is limited to the following
acoustic sources and from the following
activities:
• Impact and vibratory pile driving;
• Pile removal; and
• Work associated with above piling
activities.
(c) The taking of any marine mammal
in a manner prohibited under this
Authorization must be reported within
24 hours of the taking to the West Coast
Administrator (206–526–6150), National
Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and
the Chief of the Permits and
Conservation Division, Office of
Protected Resources, NMFS, at (301)
427–8401, or her designee (301–427–
8418).
4. The holder of this Authorization
must notify the Chief of the Permits and
Conservation Division, Office of
Protected Resources, at least 48 hours
prior to the start of activities identified
in 3(b) (unless constrained by the date
of issuance of this Authorization in
which case notification shall be made as
soon as possible).
5. Prohibitions
(a) The taking, by incidental
harassment only, is limited to the
species listed under condition 3(a)
above and by the numbers listed in
Table 4. The taking by Level A
harassment, injury or death of these
species or the taking by harassment,
injury or death of any other species of
marine mammal is prohibited and may
result in the modification, suspension,
or revocation of this Authorization.
(b) The taking of any marine mammal
is prohibited whenever the required
protected species observers (PSOs),
required by condition 7(a), are not
present in conformance with condition
7(a) of this Authorization.
6. Mitigation
(a) Use of Noise Attenuation Devices
A pile driving energy attenuator (such
as an air bubble curtain system) shall be
used for all impact pile driving.
(b) Time Restriction
In-water construction work shall
occur only during daylight hours, when
visual monitoring of marine mammals
can be conducted.
(c) Establishment of Level B
Harassment Zones of Influence
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
78835
(i) Before the commencement of inwater pile driving activities, WSDOT
shall establish Level B behavioral
harassment zones of influence (ZOIs)
where received underwater sound
pressure levels (SPLs) are higher than
160 dB (rms) and 120 dB (rms) re 1 mPa
for impulse noise sources (impact pile
driving) and non-impulses noise sources
(vibratory pile driving and mechanic
dismantling), respectively. The modeled
isopleths for ZOIs are listed in Table 2.
(ii) Once the underwater acoustic
measurements are conducted during
initial test pile driving, WSDOT shall
adjust the sizes of the ZOIs, and monitor
these zones as described under the
Proposed Monitoring section below.
(d) Monitoring of marine mammals
shall take place starting 30 minutes
before pile driving begins until 30
minutes after pile driving ends.
(e) Soft Start
(i) When there has been downtime of
30 minutes or more without pile
driving, the contractor will initiate the
driving with ramp-up procedures
described below.
(ii) For vibratory hammers, the
contractor shall initiate the driving for
15 seconds at reduced energy, followed
by a 1 minute waiting period. This
procedure shall be repeated two
additional times before continuous
driving is started. This procedure shall
also apply to vibratory pile extraction.
(iii) For impact driving, an initial set
of three strikes would be made by the
hammer at 40-percent energy, followed
by a 1-minute waiting period, then two
subsequent three-strike sets at 40percent energy, with 1-minute waiting
periods, before initiating continuous
driving.
(f) Power Down and Shutdown
Measures
(i) WSDOT shall implement
shutdown measures if southern resident
killer whales (SRKWs) are sighted
within the vicinity of the project area
and are approaching the Level B
harassment zone (zone of influence, or
ZOI) during in-water construction
activities.
(ii) If a killer whale approaches the
ZOI during pile driving or removal, and
it is unknown whether it is a SRKW or
a transient killer whale, it shall be
assumed to be a SRKW and WSDOT
shall implement the shutdown measure
identified in 6(f)(i).
(iii) If a SRKW enters the ZOI
undetected, in-water pile driving or pile
removal shall be suspended until the
SRKW exits the ZOI to avoid further
level B harassment.
(iv) WSDOT shall implement
shutdown measures if the number of
any allotted marine mammal takes
E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM
31DEN1
78836
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
reaches the limit under the IHA, if such
marine mammals are sighted within the
vicinity of the project area and are
approaching the Level B harassment
zone during pile removal activities.
7. Monitoring
(a) Protected Species Observers
WSDOT shall employee NMFSapproved PSOs to conduct marine
mammal monitoring for its construction
project.
(i) Visual acuity in both eyes
(correction is permissible) sufficient for
discernment of moving targets at the
water’s surface with ability to estimate
target size and distance. Use of
binoculars will be required to correctly
identify the target.
(ii) Experience or training in the field
identification of marine mammals
(cetaceans and pinnipeds).
(iii) Sufficient training, orientation or
experience with the construction
operation to provide for personal safety
during observations.
(iv) Ability to communicate orally, by
radio or in person, with project
personnel to provide real time
information on marine mammals
observed in the area as necessary.
(v) Experience and ability to conduct
field observations and collect data
according to assigned protocols (this
may include academic experience).
(vi) Writing skills sufficient to prepare
a report of observations that would
include such information as the number
and type of marine mammals observed;
the behavior of marine mammals in the
project area during construction, dates
and times when observations were
conducted; dates and times when inwater construction activities were
conducted; and dates and times when
marine mammals were present at or
within the defined ZOI.
(b) Monitoring Protocols: PSOs shall
be present on site at all times during
pile removal and driving.
(i) A range finder or hand-held global
positioning system device will be used
to ensure that the 120 dBrms re 1 mPa
Level B behavioral harassment ZOI is
monitored.
(ii) A 30-minute pre-construction
marine mammal monitoring will be
required before the first pile driving or
pile removal of the day. A 30-minute
post-construction marine mammal
monitoring will be required after the last
pile driving or pile removal of the day.
If the constructors take a break between
subsequent pile driving or pile removal
for more than 30 minutes, then
additional pre-construction marine
mammal monitoring will be required
before the next start-up of pile driving
or pile removal.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:02 Dec 30, 2014
Jkt 235001
(iii) Marine mammal visual
monitoring will be conducted by landbased biologists at the terminal work
sites, and boat-based biologist(s) travel
through the monitoring area.
(iv) If marine mammals are observed,
the following information will be
documented:
(A) Species of observed marine
mammals;
(B) Number of observed marine
mammal individuals;
(C) Behavioral of observed marine
mammals;
(D) Location within the ZOI; and
(E) Animals’ reaction (if any) to piledriving activities
(v) During vibratory pile removal and
driving, one land-based biologist would
monitor the area from the terminal work
site, and one monitor will move among
a number of access points along the
southern Sinclair Inlet shore. Binoculars
shall be used during marine mammal
monitoring.
(vi) WSDOT shall contact the Orca
Network and/or Center for Whale
Research to find out the location of the
nearest marine mammal sightings.
(vii) WSDOT shall also utilize marine
mammal occurrence information
collected by the Orca Network using
hydrophone systems to maximize
marine mammal detection in the project
vicinity.
8. Reporting
(a) WSDOT shall provide NMFS with
a draft monitoring report within 90 days
of the conclusion of the construction
work. This report shall detail the
monitoring protocol, summarize the
data recorded during monitoring, and
estimate the number of marine
mammals that may have been harassed.
(b) If comments are received from the
NMFS West Coast Regional
Administrator or NMFS Office of
Protected Resources on the draft report,
a final report shall be submitted to
NMFS within 30 days thereafter. If no
comments are received from NMFS, the
draft report will be considered to be the
final report.
(c) In the unanticipated event that the
construction activities clearly cause the
take of a marine mammal in a manner
prohibited by this Authorization (if
issued), such as an injury, serious
injury, or mortality, WSDOT shall
immediately cease all operations and
immediately report the incident to the
Chief, Permits and Conservation
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
NMFS, and the West Coast Regional
Stranding Coordinators. The report must
include the following information:
(i) time, date, and location (latitude/
longitude) of the incident;
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(ii) description of the incident;
(iii) status of all sound source use in
the 24 hours preceding the incident;
(iv) environmental conditions (e.g.,
wind speed and direction, sea state,
cloud cover, visibility, and water
depth);
(v) description of marine mammal
observations in the 24 hours preceding
the incident;
(vi) species identification or
description of the animal(s) involved;
(vii) the fate of the animal(s); and
(viii) photographs or video footage of
the animal (if equipment is available).
Activities shall not resume until
NMFS is able to review the
circumstances of the prohibited take.
NMFS shall work with WSDOT to
determine what is necessary to
minimize the likelihood of further
prohibited take and ensure MMPA
compliance. WSDOT may not resume
their activities until notified by NMFS
via letter, email, or telephone.
(E) In the event that WSDOT
discovers an injured or dead marine
mammal, and the lead PSO determines
that the cause of the injury or death is
unknown and the death is relatively
recent (i.e., in less than a moderate state
of decomposition as described in the
next paragraph), WSDOT will
immediately report the incident to the
Chief, Permits and Conservation
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
NMFS, and the West Coast Regional
Stranding Coordinators. The report must
include the same information identified
above. Activities may continue while
NMFS reviews the circumstances of the
incident. NMFS will work with WSDOT
to determine whether modifications in
the activities are appropriate.
(F) In the event that WSDOT
discovers an injured or dead marine
mammal, and the lead PSO determines
that the injury or death is not associated
with or related to the activities
authorized in the IHA (e.g., previously
wounded animal, carcass with moderate
to advanced decomposition, or
scavenger damage), WSDOT shall report
the incident to the Chief, Permits and
Conservation Division, Office of
Protected Resources, NMFS, and the
West Coast Regional Stranding
Coordinators, within 24 hours of the
discovery. WSDOT shall provide
photographs or video footage (if
available) or other documentation of the
stranded animal sighting to NMFS and
the Marine Mammal Stranding Network.
WSDOT can continue its operations
under such a case.
9. This Authorization may be
modified, suspended or withdrawn if
the holder fails to abide by the
conditions prescribed herein or if the
E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM
31DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Notices
authorized taking is having more than a
negligible impact on the species or stock
of affected marine mammals, or if there
is an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of such species or stocks for
subsistence uses.
10. A copy of this Authorization and
the Incidental Take Statement must be
in the possession of each contractor who
performs the construction work at the
Bremerton Ferry Terminals.
11. WSDOT is required to comply
with the Terms and Conditions of the
Incidental Take Statement
corresponding to NMFS’ Biological
Opinion.
Dated: December 23, 2014.
Donna S. Wieting,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–30540 Filed 12–30–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
THE BUREAU OF CONSUMER
FINANCIAL PROTECTION
[Docket No: CFPB–2014–0038]
Privacy Act of 1974, as Amended
Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection.
ACTION: Notice of a Revised Privacy Act
System of Records.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, the
Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection, hereinto referred to as the
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
(‘‘CFPB’’ or ‘‘Bureau’’), gives notice of
the establishment of a revised Privacy
Act System of Records.
DATES: Comments must be received no
later than January 30, 2015. The new
system of records will be effective
February 9, 2015, unless the comments
received result in a contrary
determination.
SUMMARY:
You may submit comments,
identified by the title and docket
number (see above), by any of the
following methods:
• Electronic: privacy@cfpb.gov or
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Claire Stapleton, Chief
Privacy Officer, Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau, 1700 G Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20552.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Claire
Stapleton, Chief Privacy Officer,
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau,
1275 1st St. NE., Washington, DC 20002.
Comments will be available for public
inspection and copying at 1275 1st St.
NE., Washington, DC 20002 on official
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:02 Dec 30, 2014
Jkt 235001
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 5 p.m. Eastern Time. You can
make an appointment to inspect
comments by telephoning (202) 435–
7220. All comments, including
attachments and other supporting
materials, will become part of the public
record and subject to public disclosure.
You should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Claire Stapleton, Chief Privacy Officer,
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau,
1275 1st St. NE., Washington, DC 20002,
(202) 435–7220.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CFPB
revises its Privacy Act System of
Records Notice (SORN) ‘‘CFPB.001—
CFPB Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA)/Privacy Act (PA) System.’’ In
revising this SORN, the CFPB is adding
a new routine use to add that records
may be provided to the National
Archives and the Records
Administration, Office of Government
Information Services (OGIS), for all
purposes set forth in 5 U.S.C.
552(h)(2)(A–B) and (3). It also revises
the Categories of Records section to
indicate that the system also includes
information related to requests for OGIS
assistance.
The report of the revised system of
records has been submitted to the
Committee on Oversight and
Government Reform of the House of
Representatives, the Committee on
Homeland Security and Governmental
Affairs of the Senate, and the Office of
Management and Budget, pursuant to
Appendix I to OMB Circular A–130,
‘‘Federal Agency Responsibilities for
Maintaining Records About
Individuals,’’ dated November 30,
2000,1 and the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C.
552a(r).
The revised system of records entitled
‘‘CFPB.001–CFPB Freedom of
Information Act/Privacy Act System’’ is
published in its entirety below.
Date: December 23, 2014.
Claire Stapleton,
Chief Privacy Officer, Bureau of Consumer
Financial Protection.
CFPB.001
SYSTEM NAME:
CFPB Freedom of Information Act/
Privacy Act System.
1 Although pursuant to Section 1017(a)(4)E, of the
Consumer Financial Protection Act, Public Law
111–203, the CFPB is not required to comply with
OMB-issued guidance, it voluntarily follows OMB
privacy-related guidance as a best practice and to
facilitate cooperation and collaboration with other
agencies.
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
78837
SYSTEM LOCATION:
Consumer Financial Protection
Bureau, 1275 1st St. NE., Washington,
DC 20002.
CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE
SYSTEM:
Individuals covered by this system are
persons who cite the Freedom of
Information Act or Privacy Act to
request access to records or whose
information requests are treated as FOIA
requests. Other individuals covered
include CFPB staff assigned to process
such requests, and employees who may
have responsive records or are
mentioned in such records. FOIA
requests are subject to the PA only to
the extent that they concern individuals;
information pertaining to corporations
and other business entities and
organizations are not subject to the PA.
CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:
Records in the system may contain:
(1) Correspondence with the requester
including initial requests and appeals;
(2) documents generated or compiled
during the search and processing of the
request; (3) fee schedules, cost
calculations, and assessed cost for
disclosed FOIA records; (4) documents
and memoranda supporting the decision
made in response to the request,
referrals, and copies of records provided
or withheld; (5) CFPB staff assigned to
process, consider, and respond to
requests and, where a request has been
referred to another agency with equities
in a responsive document, information
about the individual handling the
request on behalf of that agency; (6)
information identifying the entity that is
subject to the requests or appeals; (7)
requester information, including name,
address, phone number, email address;
FOIA tracking number, phone number,
fax number, or some combination
thereof; and (8) for access requests
under the Privacy Act, identifying
information regarding both the party
who is making the written request or
appeal, and the individual on whose
behalf such written requests or appeals
are made, including name, Social
Security number (SSNs may be
submitted with documentation or as
proof of identification), address, phone
number, email address, FOIA number,
phone number, fax number, or some
combination thereof. This system also
consists of records related to requests
for OGIS assistance.
AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM:
Pub. L. 111–203, Title X, Sections
1011, 1012, 1021, codified at 12 U.S.C.
5491, 5492, 5511; The Freedom of
Information Act of 1996, as amended 5
E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM
31DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 31, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78821-78837]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30540]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XD644
Taking of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities;
Vashon Seismic Retrofit Project
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; proposed incidental harassment authorization; request
for comments and information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS has received a request from the Washington State
Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Ferries Division (WSF) for an
authorization to take small numbers of nine species of marine mammals,
by Level B harassment, incidental to proposed construction activities
for Vashon Seismic Retrofit Project in Vashon Island, Washington State.
Pursuant to the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), NMFS is requesting
comments on its proposal to issue an authorization to WDOT to
incidentally take, by harassment, small numbers of marine mammals for a
period of 1 year.
DATES: Comments and information must be received no later than January
30, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the application should be addressed to Jolie
[[Page 78822]]
Harrison, Chief, Permits and Conservation Division, Office of Protected
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 East-West Highway,
Silver Spring, MD 20910. The mailbox address for providing email
comments is itp.guan@noaa.gov. NMFS is not responsible for email
comments sent to addresses other than the one provided here. Comments
sent via email, including all attachments, must not exceed a 25-
megabyte file size.
Instructions: All comments received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted to https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm without change. All Personal Identifying Information
(for example, name, address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by the
commenter may be publicly accessible. Do not submit Confidential
Business Information or otherwise sensitive or protected information.
A copy of the application may be obtained by writing to the address
specified above or visiting the internet at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm. Documents cited in this notice may also be
viewed, by appointment, during regular business hours, at the
aforementioned address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shane Guan, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, (301) 427-8401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.)
direct the Secretary of Commerce to allow, upon request, the
incidental, but not intentional, taking of small numbers of marine
mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified geographical region if certain
findings are made and either regulations are issued or, if the taking
is limited to harassment, a notice of a proposed authorization is
provided to the public for review.
An authorization for incidental takings shall be granted if NMFS
finds that the taking will have a negligible impact on the species or
stock(s), will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for subsistence uses (where
relevant), and if the permissible methods of taking and requirements
pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring and reporting of such takings
are set forth. NMFS has defined ``negligible impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103
as ``. . . an impact resulting from the specified activity that cannot
be reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely
affect the species or stock through effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival.''
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA established an expedited process
by which citizens of the U.S. can apply for a one-year authorization to
incidentally take small numbers of marine mammals by harassment,
provided that there is no potential for serious injury or mortality to
result from the activity. Section 101(a)(5)(D) establishes a 45-day
time limit for NMFS review of an application followed by a 30-day
public notice and comment period on any proposed authorizations for the
incidental harassment of marine mammals. Within 45 days of the close of
the comment period, NMFS must either issue or deny the authorization.
Summary of Request
On June 20, 2014, WSDOT submitted a request to NOAA requesting an
IHA for the possible harassment of small numbers of nine marine mammal
species incidental to construction associated with the Vashon Seismic
Retrofit Project at the Vashon Ferry Terminal in Vashon Island,
Washington between August 1, 2015, and February 15, 2016. On December
15, 2014, WSDOT added a test pile drive and removal program to the
Vashon Seismic Retrofit Project and submitted a revised IHA
application. The information provided here is based on WSDOT's December
15, 2014, IHA application. NMFS is proposing to authorize the Level B
harassment of the following marine mammal species/stocks: harbor seal,
California sea lion, Steller sea lion, killer whale (transient and
Southern Resident stocks), gray whale, humpback whale, minke whale,
harbor porpoise, and Dall's porpoise.
Description of the Specified Activity
Overview
WSDOT proposes to conduct Vashon Seismic Retrofit Project at the
WSF Terminal in Vashon Island, Washington, to ensure the safe and
reliable function of the Vashon Terminal in case of a significant
earthquake.
Approximately 210-linear feet of the existing trestle in the
nearshore will be replaced. Existing decking, 67 13-inch diameter
creosote-treated timber piles and 39 30-inch diameter concrete-jacketed
creosote-treated timber piles will be removed with a vibratory hammer.
Fifty-three 24-inch diameter permanent hollow steel piles will be
installed with a vibratory hammer for approximately the first 40 feet,
and driven with an impact hammer for (approximately) the final 10 feet.
Approximately 44 13-inch diameter temporary untreated timber piles will
be installed with an impact hammer to support the weight of a crane
that will sit on the trestle to drive the permanent steel piles.
Seismic bracing will be installed at up to 11 locations and will
consist of a maximum of 66 24-inch diameter hollow steel piles
installed with an impact hammer. Seismic bracing piles will be
connected with concrete caps that tie each cluster of piles together.
Approximately 52 temporary 24-inch diameter hollow steel piles will
be required to support temporary false-work and work trestles necessary
to install the seismic braces concrete caps. Each work trestle will
consist of approximately 6 piles. These piles will be driven with a
vibratory hammer and then proofed with an impact hammer to ensure they
will bear the weight of the false-work and concrete caps.
In addition, one double walled, one Mandrel and one control pile
(three total) will be driven to the east of the Vashon trestle during
the Seismic Retrofit project in 2015 or 2016 as part of the test pile
program. The goal is to test the drivability of these piles in harder
soils, and to test the rate of noise attenuation.
Dates and Duration
WSDOT plans to conduct all in-water construction work activities
during the period from August 1, 2015, to February 15, 2016.
The number of days it will take to complete the partial trestle
replacement and install the seismic bracings depends on the difficulty
in penetrating the substrate during pile installation. It is assumed
that only one vibratory or impact hammer will be in operation at a
time. Durations are conservative, and the actual amount of time to
install and remove piles will likely be less. Duration estimates of
each of the pile driving/removal elements follow:
For the partial trestle replacement:
[cir] Impact driving of temporary timber piles will take
approximately 30 minutes per pile, with 3 piles installed per day over
17 days.
[cir] Vibratory driving of each permanent 24-inch steel pile will
take approximately 60 minutes, followed by approximately 30 minutes of
impact driving (approximately 600 strikes per pile), with 2-5 piles
installed per day over 27 days.
o Vibratory removal of temporary timber piles, and existing timber
and concrete-jacketed timber piles will take approximately 30 minutes
per pile, with 5-10 piles removed per day over 30 days.
[[Page 78823]]
For the seismic braces:
[cir] Vibratory driving of each temporary 24-inch steel pile will
take approximately 20 minutes, followed by approximately 10 minutes of
impact proofing (approximately 60 strikes per pile), with 2-4 piles
installed per day over 28 days.
[cir] Impact driving of permanent 24-inch steel piles will take
approximately two hours per pile, requiring approximately 3,000 strikes
per pile, with approximately 2-4 piles installed per day over 28 days.
[cir] Vibratory removal of temporary 24-inch steel piles will take
approximately 30 minutes pile, with up to 3-10 piles removed per day
over 20 days.
For the test pile:
[cir] Impact driving of each 30-inch steel pile will take
approximately 40 minutes, (approximately 3,000 strikes per pile), with
3 piles installed over 1-2 days.
[cir] Vibratory removal of each pile will take approximately 40
minutes per pile, over 1-2 days.
The maximum anticipated number of days for pile driving is 100. The
maximum anticipated number of days for pile removal is 50. The worst-
case time for pile installation and removal is 311 hours over 150 days.
Specified Geographic Region
The proposed activities will occur at the Vashon Ferry Terminal
located in Vashon, Washington (Figure 1-2 of the IHA application). The
Vashon Ferry Terminal, serving State Route 160, is located at the north
end of Vashon Island, in King County, Washington. The terminal is part
of what is known as the Triangle Route between West Seattle (Fauntleroy
terminal), Vashon Island and the Kitsap Peninsula (Southworth
terminal). The Vashon terminal is located in Section 6, Township 23
North, Range 3 East, and is adjacent to Colvos Passage to the west and
south, and the East Passage to the east, both tributary to Puget Sound
(Figure 1-2 of the IHA application). Land use in the area is a mix of
residential, business, small scale agriculture, Blake Island State
Park, and local parks.
Detailed Description of Vashon Seismic Retrofit Project
The following construction sequence is anticipated:
For the nearshore partial trestle replacement, work will
proceed in stages as the crane advances away from the shore:
[cir] impact drive temporary timber piles,
[cir] vibratory/impact drive permanent 24-inch diameter hollow
steel piles,
[cir] advance to next section,
Temporary timber piles, and existing timber and concrete-
jacketed timber piles will either be removed with a vibratory hammer as
the crane advances away from shore, or will be removed after all
permanent steel piles are installed, as the crane retreats towards the
shore.
When the partial trestle replacement is complete:
[cir] 67 13-inch diameter existing timber piles and 39 30-inch
diameter existing concrete-jacketed timber piles will have been removed
with a vibratory hammer.
[cir] 44 temporary 13-inch diameter timber piles will have been
installed with an impact hammer, and removed with a vibratory hammer.
[cir] 53 permanent 24-inch hollow steel piles will have been
installed with a vibratory and impact hammer.
The seismic braces will be installed sequentially:
[cir] Vibratory drive/impact proof temporary 24-inch diameter
hollow steel piles,
[cir] impact drive permanent 24-inch diameter hollow steel piles,
[cir] construct temporary false-work and concrete cap,
[cir] remove false-work,
[cir] remove temporary 24-inch diameter hollow steel piles with a
vibratory hammer,
[cir] advance to next brace location.
When the seismic braces are complete:
[cir] 52 temporary 24-inch diameter hollow steel piles will have
been installed using a vibratory hammer/proofed with an impact hammer
and removed with a vibratory hammer.
[cir] 66 permanent 24-inch diameter hollow steel piles will have
been installed with an impact hammer.
Detailed descriptions of these activities are provided below.
1. Vibratory Hammer Pile Driving and Removal
Vibratory hammers are commonly used in steel pile driving where
sediments allow and involve the same vibratory hammer used in pile
removal. The pile is placed into position using a choker and crane and
then vibrated between 1,200 and 2,400 vibrations per minute. The
vibrations liquefy the sediment surrounding the pile allowing it to
penetrate to the required seating depth, or to be removed. The type of
vibratory hammer that will be used for the project will likely be an
APE 400 King Kong (or equivalent) with a drive force of 361 tons.
2. Impact Hammer Pile Installation
Impact hammers are used to install plastic/steel core, wood,
concrete, or steel piles. An impact hammer is a steel device that works
like a piston. Impact hammers are usually large, though small impact
hammers are used to install small diameter plastic/steel core piles.
Impact hammers have guides (called a lead) that hold the hammer in
alignment with the pile while a heavy piston moves up and down,
striking the top of the pile, and drives it into the substrate from the
downward force of the hammer on the top of the pile.
To drive the pile, the pile is first moved into position and set in
the proper location using a choker cable or vibratory hammer. Once the
pile is set in place, pile installation with an impact hammer can take
less than 15 minutes under good conditions to over an hour under poor
conditions (such as glacial till and bedrock, or exceptionally loose
material in which the pile repeatedly moves out of position).
Detailed Description of Test Pile Program
One double walled, one Mandrel and one control pile (three total)
will be driven to the east of the Vashon trestle during the Seismic
Retrofit project in 2015 or 2016. The location shown on the sheet is
approximate, as construction staging may require that it be moved. All
test piles are 30'' hollow steel. The control pile will use a bubble
curtain for attenuation. No unattenuated strikes will be allowed. The
test will take place in water -10 to -25 ft (-3 to -8 m) mean lower low
water (MLLW). Piles will be driven approximately 40 ft (13 m) into the
sediment. The test should be complete in one day, though two days are
proposed in case of complications.
Piles will be impact driven and removed with a vibratory hammer. It
is possible that some or all of the piles will not be able to be
removed. In that case, the pile(s) will be cut below the mudline, and
filled with sand to the natural grade.
Description of Marine Mammals in the Area of the Specified Activity
The marine mammal species under NMFS jurisdiction most likely to
occur in the proposed construction area include Pacific harbor seal
(Phoca vitulina richardsi), California sea lion (Zalophus
californianus), Steller sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus), killer whale
(Orcinus orca) (transient and Southern Resident stocks), gray whale
(Eschrichtius robustus), humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae), minke
whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata), harbor porpoise (Phocoena
phocoena), and Dall's porpoise (P. dali).
[[Page 78824]]
General information on the marine mammal species found in
California waters can be found in Caretta et al. (2014), which is
available at the following URL: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/sars/pdf/po2013.pdf. Refer to that document for information on these species.
Specific information concerning these species in the vicinity of the
proposed action area is provided below.
Harbor Seal
Harbor seals are members of the true seal family (Phocidae). There
are three distinct west coast stocks: (1) Inland waters of Washington
State (including Hood Canal, Puget Sound, Georgia Basin and the Strait
of Juan de Fuca out to Cape Flattery), (2) outer coast of Oregon and
Washington, and (3) California (Carretta et al. 2007).
Pupping seasons vary by geographic region. For the southern Puget
Sound region, pups are born from late June through September (WDFW
2012a). After October 1 all pups in the inland waters of Washington are
weaned.
Harbor seals are the most numerous pinniped in the inland marine
waters of Washington (Calambokidis and Baird 1994). Jeffries et al.
(2003) recorded a mean count of 9,550 harbor seals in Washington's
inland marine waters and estimated the total population to be
approximately 14,612 animals (including the Strait of Juan de Fuca).
The population across Washington increased at an average annual rate of
10 percent between 1991 and 1996 (Jeffries et al. 1997) and is thought
to be stable (Jeffries et al. 2003).
The nearest documented harbor seal haulout site to the Vashon ferry
terminal is 9.7 km northwest. The number of harbor seals using the
haulout is less than 100 (WDFW 2000).
Harbor seals have been observed hauled-out on a boat ramp to the
east of the Vashon Ferry Terminal trestle and on a beach to the west of
the trestle (Stateler 2013, WSF 2009).
In 2009 WSDOT replaced several dolphin structures (structure used
to reduce wave action) at the Vashon terminal. Marine mammal monitoring
was implemented during this project. Over 7 days of monitoring in
November of 2009, four harbor seals were observed near the terminal,
three swimming and one hauled-out on the beach to the west of the
trestle (WSF 2009).
According to the NMFS National Stranding Database, there were 38
confirmed harbor seal strandings in the Vashon area in 2010-2013 in the
September-February work window scheduled for this project (NMFS 2014).
Harbor seals are not ``depleted'' under the MMPA or listed as
``threatened'' or ``endangered'' under the ESA. The Washington Inland
Waters stock of harbor seals is not classified as a ``strategic''
stock. The stock is also considered within its Optimum Sustainable
Population level (Jeffries et al. 2003).
Harbor seals are the most numerous marine mammal species in Puget
Sound. Harbor seals are non-migratory; their local movements are
associated with such factors as tides, weather, season, food
availability and reproduction (Scheffer and Slipp 1948; Fisher 1952;
Bigg 1969, 1981). They are not known to make extensive pelagic
migrations, although some long-distance movements of tagged animals in
Alaska (174 km) and along the U.S. west coast (up to 550 km) have been
recorded (Pitcher and McAllister 1981; Brown and Mate 1983; Herder
1983).
Harbor seals haul out on rocks, reefs and beaches, and feed in
marine, estuarine and occasionally fresh waters. Harbor seals display
strong fidelity for haulout sites (Pitcher and Calkins 1979; Pitcher
and McAllister 1981).
The nearest documented harbor seal haulout site to the Vashon ferry
terminal is 9.7 km northwest. The level of use of this haulout during
the fall and winter is unknown but is expected to be much less as air
temperatures become colder than water temperatures resulting in seals
in general hauling out less. Harbor seals may also use other
undocumented haulout sites in the area.
Transient killer whales often forage to the east of Allen Bank for
harbor seals (Sears 2013), which is within the project zone of
influence (ZOI). NW Blake Island, just north of Vashon Island is a
`hot-spot' for seals that are prey for Transients (Stateler 2013).
California Sea Lion
The U.S. stock of California sea lion was estimated at 296,750 in
the 2011 SAR (NMFS 2011) and may be at carrying capacity, although more
data are needed to verify that determination (Carretta et al. 2007).
Some 3,000 to 5,000 animals are estimated to move into northwest waters
(both Washington and British Columbia) during the fall (September) and
remain until the late spring (May) when most return to breeding
rookeries in California and Mexico (Jeffries et al. 2000). Peak counts
of over 1,000 animals have been made in Puget Sound (Jeffries et al.
2000).
In 2009 WSDOT replaced several dolphin structures at the Vashon
terminal. Marine mammal monitoring was implemented during this project.
Over 7 days of monitoring in November of 2009, four California sea
lions swimming near the terminal (WSF 2009).
From November of 2012 to February of 2014, the U.S. Navy collected
sightings data of California sea lions hauled-out on the Rich Passage
float and buoy. In the September to February timeframe scheduled for
this project, the Navy reported a total of 646 California sea lions
over 14 days of observation, with a high of 110 on January 14, 2014
(U.S. Navy 2014).
According to the NMFS National Stranding Database, there were four
confirmed California sea lion strandings in the Vashon area in 2010-
2013, in the September-February work window scheduled for this project.
California sea lions are not listed as endangered or threatened
under the ESA or as depleted under the MMPA. They are not considered a
strategic stock under the MMPA, because total human-caused mortality,
although unknown, is likely to be well less than the PBR (9,200) (NMFS
2011).
California sea lions breed on islands off Baja Mexico and southern
California with primarily males migrating north to feed in the northern
waters (Everitt et al. 1980). Females remain in the waters near their
breeding rookeries off California and Mexico. All age classes of males
are seasonally present in Washington waters (WDFW 2000).
California sea lions were unknown in Puget Sound until
approximately 1979 (Steiger and Calambokidis 1986). Everitt et al.
(1980) reported the initial occurrence of large numbers at Port
Gardner, Everett (northern Puget Sound) in the spring of 1979. The
number of California sea lions using the Everett haulout numbered
around 1,000. This haulout remains the largest in the state for sea
lions in general and for California sea lions specifically. Similar
sightings and increases in numbers were documented throughout the
region after the initial sighting in 1979 (Steiger and Calambokidis
1986), including urbanized areas such as Elliott Bay near Seattle and
heavily used areas of central Puget Sound (Gearin et al. 1986). In
Washington, California sea lions use haulout sites within all inland
water regions (WDFW 2000). The movement of California sea lions into
Puget Sound could be an expansion in range of a growing population
(Steiger and Calambokidis 1986).
California sea lions do not avoid areas with heavy or frequent
human activity but rather may approach certain areas to investigate.
This species typically does not flush from a buoy or haulout if
approached.
[[Page 78825]]
The nearest documented California sea lion haulout site to the
Vashon ferry terminal is 7.8 km NW (WDFW 2000).
Steller Sea Lion
Steller sea lions comprise two recognized management stocks
(eastern and western), separated at 144[ordm] W longitude (Loughlin
1997). Only the eastern stock is considered here because the western
stock occurs outside of the geographic area of the proposed activity.
Breeding rookeries for the eastern stock are located along the
California, Oregon, British Columbia, and southeast Alaska coasts but
not along the Washington coast or in inland Washington waters (Angliss
and Outlaw 2007). Steller sea lions primarily use haulout sites on the
outer coast of Washington and in the Strait of Juan de Fuca along
Vancouver Island in British Columbia. Only sub-adults or non-breeding
adults may be found in the inland waters of Washington (Pitcher et al.
2007).
The eastern stock was estimated at 52,847 individuals in the 2012
SAR, and the most recent estimate for Washington state (including the
outer coast) is 516 individuals (non-pups only) (NMFS 2012a). However,
there are estimates that 1,000 to 2,000 individuals enter the Strait of
Juan de Fuca during the fall and winter months.
Steller sea lion numbers in Washington State decline during the
summer months, which correspond to the breeding season at Oregon and
British Columbia rookeries (approximately late May to early June) and
peak during the fall and winter months (WDFW 2000). A few Steller sea
lions can be observed year-round in Puget Sound although most of the
breeding age animals return to rookeries in the spring and summer.
Steller sea lions were listed as threatened range-wide under the
ESA on November 26, 1990 (55 FR 49204). After division into two stocks,
the western stock was listed as endangered under the ESA on May 4, 1997
and the eastern stock remained classified as threatened (62 FR 24345).
In 2006 the NMFS Steller sea lion recovery team proposed removal of the
eastern stock from listing under the ESA based on its annual rate of
increase of approximately 3% since the mid-1970s. The eastern stock was
delisted in November 2013.
On August 27, 1993, NMFS published a final rule designating
critical habitat for the Steller sea lion. No critical habitat was
designated in Washington. Critical habitat is associated with breeding
and haulout areas in Alaska, California, and Oregon (NMFS 1993).
Steller sea lions are listed as depleted under the MMPA. Both
stocks are classified as strategic.
Adult Steller sea lions congregate at rookeries in Oregon,
California, and British Columbia for pupping and breeding from late May
to early June (Gisiner 1985). Rookeries are usually located on beaches
of relatively remote islands, often in areas exposed to wind and waves,
where access by humans and other mammalian predators is difficult (WDFW
1993).
For Washington inland waters, Steller sea lion abundances vary
seasonally with a minimum estimate of 1,000 to 2,000 individuals
present or passing through the Strait of Juan de Fuca in fall and
winter months. The number of haulout sites has increased in recent
years.
In 2009 WSDOT replaced several dolphin structures at the Vashon
terminal. Marine mammal monitoring was implemented during this project.
Over 7 days of monitoring in November of 2009, no Steller sea lions
were observed (WSF 2009).
From November of 2012 to February of 2014, the U.S. Navy collected
sightings data of Steller sea lions hauled-out on the Rich Passage
float and buoy. In the September to February timeframe scheduled for
this project, the Navy reported a total of 48 Steller sea lions over 14
days of observation, with a high of 9 in January 14, 2014 (U.S. Navy
2014).
According to the NMFS National Stranding Database, there were no
Steller sea lion strandings in the Vashon area in 2010-13.
Killer Whale
Two sympatric ecotypes of killer whales are found within the
proposed activity area: transient and resident. These types vary in
diet, distribution, acoustic calls, behavior, morphology, and
coloration (Baird 2000; Ford et al. 2000). The ranges of transient and
resident killer whales overlap; however, little interaction and high
reproductive isolation occurs among the two ecotypes (Barrett-Lennard
2000; Barrett-Lennard and Ellis 2001; Hoelzel et al. 2002. Resident
killer whales are primarily piscivorous, whereas transients primarily
feed on marine mammals, especially harbor seals (Baird and Dill 1996).
Resident killer whales also tend to occur in larger (10 to 60
individuals), stable family groups known as pods, whereas transients
occur in smaller (less than 10 individuals), less structured pods.
Two stocks of resident killer whales occur in Washington State: The
Southern Resident and Northern Resident stocks. Southern Residents
occur within the activity area, in the Strait of Juan de Fuca, Strait
of Georgia, and in coastal waters off Washington and Vancouver Island,
British Columbia. Northern Residents occur primarily in inland and
coastal British Columbia and Southeast Alaska waters and rarely venture
into Washington State waters. Little interaction (Ford et al. 2000) or
gene flow (Barrett-Lennard 2000; Barrett-Lennard and Ellis 2001) is
known to occur between the two resident stocks.
The Southern Residents live in three family groups known as the J,
K and L pods. The entire Southern Resident population has been annually
recorded since 1973 (Krahn et al. 2004). Individual whales are
identified through photographs of unique saddle patch and dorsal fin
markings. Each Southern Resident pod has a distinctive dialect of
vocalizations (Ford 1989) and calls can travel 10 miles or more
underwater. Southern Resident killer whale forage primarily on salmon,
with Chinook salmon considered the major prey in the Puget Sound region
in late spring through the fall. Other identified prey included chum
salmon, other salmonids, herring, and rockfish (NMFS 2008).
Small population numbers make Southern Residents vulnerable to
inbreeding depression and catastrophic events such as disease or a
major oil spill. Ongoing threats to Southern Residents include
declining prey resources, environmental contaminants, noise and
physical disturbance (Krahn et al. 2004; Wiles 2004). In Washington's
inland waters, high levels of noise disturbance and potential behavior
disruption are due to recreational boating traffic, private and
commercial whale watching boats and commercial vessel traffic (Wiles
2004). Other potential noise disturbance includes high output military
sonar equipment and marine construction. Noise effects may include
altered prey movements and foraging efficiency, masking of whale calls,
and temporary hearing impairment (Krahn et al. 2004).
The Southern Resident stock was first recorded in a 1974 census, at
which time the population comprised 71 whales. This population peaked
at 97 animals in 1996, declined to 79 by 2001 (Center for Whale
Research 2011), and then increased to 89 animals by 2006 (Carretta et
al. 2007). As of December 2013, the population collectively numbers 80
individuals: J pod has 25 members, K pod has 19 members, and L pod has
36 members (Center for Whale Research 2013).
[[Page 78826]]
The Southern Resident stock has declined from 97 individuals is due
to a decrease in birth rates and an increase in mortalities, especially
among the L pod (Krahn et al. 2004). There are a limited number of
reproductive-age Southern Resident males, and several females of
reproductive age are not having calves. Three major threats were
identified in the ESA listing: Reduced quantity and quality of prey;
persistent pollutants that could cause immune or reproductive system
dysfunction; and effects from vessels and sound (NMFS 2008). Other
threats identified were demographics, small population size, and
vulnerability to oil spills. Previously, declines in the Southern
Resident population were due to shooting by fishermen, whalers, sealers
and sportsmen largely due to their interference with fisheries (Wiles
2004) and the aquarium trade, which is estimated to have taken a
significant number of animals from 1967 to 1973 (Ford et al. 1995).
According to the 2012 SAR, the PBR is 0.14 animals (NMFS 2012).
The Southern Resident stock was declared depleted under the MMPA in
May 2003. At that time, NMFS announced preparation of a conservation
plan to restore the stock to its optimal sustainable population. On
November 18, 2005, the Southern Resident killer whale stock was listed
as an endangered distinct population segment (DPS) under the ESA. On
November 29, 2006, NMFS published a final rule designating critical
habitat for the Southern Resident killer whale DPS. Both Puget Sound
and the San Juan Islands are designated as core areas of critical
habitat under the ESA, excluding areas less than 20 feet deep relative
to extreme high water.
In Washington State, killer whales were listed as a state candidate
species in 2000. In April 2004, the state upgraded their status to a
state endangered species.
Southern Residents are documented in coastal waters ranging from
central California to the Queen Charlotte Islands, British Columbia
(NMFS 2008). They occur in all inland marine waters within the activity
area. While in the activity area, resident killer whales generally
spend more time in deeper water and only occasionally enter water less
than 15 feet deep (Baird 2000). Distribution is strongly associated
with areas of greatest salmon abundance, with heaviest foraging
activity occurring over deep open water and in areas characterized by
high-relief underwater topography, such as subsurface canyons,
seamounts, ridges, and steep slopes (Wiles 2004).
Records from 1976 through 2006 document Southern Residents in the
inland waters of Washington during the months of March through June and
October through December, with the primary area of occurrence in inland
waters north of Admiralty Inlet, located in north Puget Sound (The
Whale Museum 2008).
Beginning in May or June and through the summer months, all three
pods (J, K and L) of Southern Residents are most often located in the
protected inshore waters of Haro Strait (west of San Juan Island), in
the Strait of Juan de Fuca, and Georgia Strait near the Fraser River.
Historically, the J pod also occurred intermittently during this time
in Puget Sound; however, records from The Whale Museum (2008) from 1997
through 2007 show that J pod did not enter Puget Sound south of the
Strait of Juan de Fuca from approximately June through August.
In fall, all three Southern Resident killer whale pods occur in
areas where migrating salmon are concentrated such as the mouth of the
Fraser River. They may also enter areas in Puget Sound where migrating
chum and Chinook salmon are concentrated (Osborne 1999). In the winter
months, the K and L pods spend progressively less time in inland marine
waters and depart for coastal waters in January or February. The J pod
is most likely to appear year-round near the San Juan Islands, and in
the fall/winter, in the lower Puget Sound and in Georgia Strait at the
mouth of the Fraser River.
Southern Resident killer whales are present in the Vashon Island
area in November-January, coinciding with chum salmon runs, with peak
sightings in November/December. Southern Resident killer whales
commonly forage for salmon on the east side of Vashon Island. They tend
to pass through the Vashon area, traveling at approximately 4 mph,
rather than staying in the area (Sears 2013).
Ann Stateler of the Vashon Hydrophone Project (and a Vashon Island
resident) has been observing whales in the area since 1994. Her
observations since 2005 show that the broad window for Southern
Resident killer whale presence in the Vashon area has been from October
to March, with most encounters occurring between November and January.
Prey samples collected by Mark Sears and NOAA researchers in local
waters indicate that the Southern Resident killer whales are targeting
Chum and Chinook salmon.
Southern Resident killer whales use all of the waterways
surrounding Vashon/Maury Island: East Passage, Colvos Pass, Dalco Pass,
waters off the north end between Blake and Vashon Islands. Sometimes
the Southern Resident killer whales circumnavigate the island. Southern
Resident killer whale visits to the Vashon area have been highly
variable. Typically, members of all three pods are observed over a
year, with the exception of 2006 when J Pod was not present for the
first time since observations have been recorded.
In 2009 WSDOT replaced several dolphin structures at the Vashon
terminal. Marine mammal monitoring was implemented during this project.
Over 7 days of monitoring in November of 2009, no killer whales were
observed (WSF 2009).
According to the NMFS National Stranding Database, there were no
killer whale strandings in the Vashon area in 2010-13 (NMFS 2014).
The West Coast Transient stock occurs in Washington State. This
stock ranges from southern California to southeast Alaska and is
distinguished from two other Eastern North Pacific transient stocks
that occur further north, the AT1 and the ``Gulf of Alaska transient
stocks. This separation was based on variations in acoustic calls and
genetic distinctness (Angliss and Outlaw 2007). West Coast transients
primarily forage on harbor seals (Ford and Ellis 1999), but other
species such as porpoises and sea lions are also taken (NMFS 2008).
The West Coast Transient stock, which includes individuals from
California to southeastern Alaska, was estimated to have a minimum
number of 354 in the 2010 SAR (NMFS 2010).
Trends in abundance for the West Coast Transients were unavailable
in the most recent stock assessment report (Angliss and Outlaw 2007).
Human-caused mortality and serious injury are estimated to be zero
animals per year and do not exceed the PBR, which is estimated at 3.5
animals (NMFS 2010).
The West Coast Transient stock is not designated as depleted under
the MMPA or listed as ``threatened'' or ``endangered'' under the ESA.
Within the inland waters, Transients may frequent areas near seal
rookeries when pups are weaned (Baird and Dill 1995). West Coast
Transients are documented intermittently year-round in Washington
inland waters.
Transient sightings have become more common since the mid-2000s.
Unlike the Southern Resident killer whale pods, Transients may be
present in the area for hours as they hunt pinnipeds. Transients often
forage to the east of Allen Bank, which is within the project ZOI. NW
Blake Island, just north of Vashon Island is a `hot-spot' for seals
[[Page 78827]]
that are prey for Transients. Transients may be more present during
September/October harbor seal pup weaning.
Gray Whale
The North Pacific gray whale stock is divided into two distinct
geographically isolated stocks: Eastern and western ``Korean.''
Individuals in this region are part of the Eastern North Pacific stock.
The majority of the Eastern North Pacific population spends summers
feeding in the Bering and Chukchi Seas, but some individuals have been
reported summering in waters off the coast of British Columbia,
Southeast Alaska, Washington, Oregon and California (Rice et al. 1984;
Angliss and Outlaw 2007). Gray whales migrate in the fall, south along
the coast of North America to Baja California, Mexico to calve (Rice et
al. 1981.) Gray whales are recorded in Washington waters during feeding
migrations between late spring and autumn with occasional sightings
during winter months (Calambokidis et al. 1994, 2002).
Early in the 20th century, it is believed that commercial hunting
for gray whales reduced population numbers to below 2,000 individuals
(Calambokidis and Baird 1994). Population surveys since the delisting
estimate that the population fluctuates at or just below the carrying
capacity of the species (~26,000 individuals) (Rugh et al. 1999;
Calambokidis et al. 1994; Angliss and Outlaw 2007).
According to the 2013 SAR, the minimum population estimate of the
Eastern North Pacific stock is 18,017 (NMFS 2011c). Within Washington
waters, gray whale sightings reported to Cascadia Research and the
Whale Museum between 1990 and 1993 totaled over 1,100 (Calambokidis et
al. 1994). Abundance estimates calculated for the small regional area
between Oregon and southern Vancouver Island, including the San Juan
Area and Puget Sound, suggest there were 137 to 153 individual gray
whales from 2001 through 2003 (Calambokidis et al. 2004). Forty-eight
individual gray whales were observed in Puget Sound and Hood Canal in
2004 and 2005 (Calambokidis 2007).
After listing of the species under the ESA in 1970, the number of
gray whales increased dramatically resulting in their delisting in
1994. In 2001 NOAA Fisheries received a petition to relist the stock
under the ESA, but it was determined that there was not sufficient
information to warrant the petition (Angliss and Outlaw 2007). Since
delisting under the ESA, the stock has not been reclassified under the
MMPA. The PBR for this stock is 360 animals per year (NMFS 2011).
Gray whales migrate within 5 to 43 km of the coast of Washington
during their annual north/south migrations (Green et al. 1995). Gray
whales migrate south to Baja California where they calve in November
and December, and then migrate north to Alaska from March through May
(Rice et al. 1984; Rugh et al. 2001) to summer and feed. A few gray
whales are observed in Washington inland waters between the months of
September and January, with peak numbers of individuals from March
through May. Peak months of gray whale observations in the area of
activity occur outside the proposed work window of September through
February. The average tenure within Washington inland waters is 47 days
and the longest stay was 112 days.
Although typically seen during their annual migrations on the outer
coast, a regular group of gray whales annually comes into the inland
waters at Saratoga Passage and Port Susan from March through May to
feed on ghost shrimp (Weitkamp et al. 1992). During this time frame
they are also seen in the Strait of Juan de Fuca, the San Juan Islands,
and areas of Puget Sound, although the observations in Puget Sound are
highly variable between years (Calambokidis et al. 1994).
In 2009 WSDOT replaced several dolphin structures at the Vashon
terminal. Marine mammal monitoring was implemented during this project.
Over 7 days of monitoring in November of 2009, no gray whales were
observed (WSF 2009).
According to the NMFS National Stranding Database, there were no
gray whale strandings in the Vashon area in 2010-13 (NMFS 2014).
Humpback Whale
Humpback whales are wide-ranging baleen whales that can be found
virtually worldwide. Recent studies have indicated that there are three
distinct stocks of humpback whale in the North Pacific: California-
Oregon-Washington (formerly Eastern North Pacific), Central North
Pacific and Western North Pacific (NMFS 2011).
The California-Oregon-Washington (CA-OR-WA) stock may be found near
the project site. This stock calves and mates in coastal Central
America and Mexico and migrates up the coast from California to
southern British Columbia in the summer and fall to feed (NMFS 1991;
Marine Mammal Commission 2003; Carretta et al. 2007). Although
infrequent, interchange between the other two stocks and the CA-OR-WA
stock occurs in breeding areas (Carretta et al. 2007). Few CA-OR-WA
stock humpback whales are seen in Puget Sound, but more frequent
sightings occur in the Strait of Juan de Fuca and near the San Juan
Islands. Most sightings are in spring and summer. Humpback whales feed
on krill, small shrimp-like crustaceans and various kinds of small
fish.
According to the 2013 SAR, the 2007/2008 estimate of 2,043 humpback
whales is the best estimate for abundance for this stock, though it
does exclude some whales in Washington (Calambokidis et al. 2009).
As a result of commercial whaling, humpback whales were listed as
``endangered'' under the Endangered Species Conservation Act of 1969.
This protection was transferred to the Endangered Species Act (ESA) in
1973. The species is still listed as ``endangered'', and consequently
the stock is automatically considered as a ``depleted'' and
``strategic'' stock under the MMPA.
Historically, humpback whales were common in inland waters of Puget
Sound and the San Juan Islands (Calambokidis et al. 2002). In the early
part of this century, there was a productive commercial hunt for
humpbacks in Georgia Strait that was probably responsible for their
long disappearance from local waters (Osborne et al. 1988). Since the
mid-1990s, sightings in Puget Sound have increased. Between 1996 and
2001, Calambokidis et al. (2002) recorded six individuals south of
Admiralty Inlet (northern Puget Sound).
In 2009 WSDOT replaced several dolphin structures at the Vashon
terminal. Marine mammal monitoring was implemented during this project.
Over 7 days of monitoring in November of 2009, no humpback whales were
observed (WSF 2009).
According to the NMFS National Stranding Database, there were no
humpback whale strandings in the Vashon area in 2010-13 (NMFS 2014).
Minke Whales
The northern minke whale is part of the Northern Pacific stock,
which is broken into three management stocks: The Alaskan, California/
Oregon/Washington, and the Hawaiian stock (NMFS 2008). The California/
Oregon/Washington management stock is considered a resident stock,
which is unlike the other Northern Pacific stocks (NMFS 2008). This
stock includes minke whales within the inland Washington waters of
Puget Sound and the San Juan Islands (Dorsey et al. 1990; Carretta et
al. 2007), which may be present in the project area.
Minke whales have small, dark sleek bodies and a small dorsal fin.
These
[[Page 78828]]
whales are often recognized by surfacing snout first and a shallow but
visible ``bushy'' blow. Minke whales feed by side lunging into schools
of prey and gulping in large amounts of water. Food sources typically
consist of krill, copepods, and small schooling fish, such as
anchovies, herring, mackerel, and sand lance (NMFS 2008).
According to the 2013 SAR, the minimum population estimate of the
CA/OR/WA stock is 202 and is likely no more than 600 (NE Pacific Minke
Project 2014). Information on minke whale population and abundance is
limited due to difficulty in detection. Conducting surveys for the
minke whale is difficult because of their low profiles, indistinct
blows, and tendency to occur as single individuals (Green et al. 1992).
Over a 10-year period, 30 individuals were photographically identified
in the U.S./Canada trans-boundary area around the San Juan Islands and
demonstrated high site fidelity (Dorsey et al. 1990; Calambokidis and
Baird 1994). In a single year, up to 19 individuals were
photographically identified from around the San Juan Islands (Dorsey et
al. 1990).
Minke whales are not listed under the ESA and are classified as
non-depleted under the MMPA. The annual mortality due to fisheries and
ship strikes is less than the potential biological removal, so they are
not considered a strategic management stock under the MMPA (Carretta et
al. 2007). The PBR for this stock is two animals per year (NMFS 2011).
Minke whales are reported in Washington inland waters year-round,
although few are reported in the winter (Calambokidis and Baird 1994).
Minke whales are relatively common in the San Juan Islands and Strait
of Juan de Fuca (especially around several of the banks in both the
central and eastern Strait), but are relatively rare in Puget Sound.
In the 1980s minke whales were found in three main areas around the
San Juan Islands; west of Shaw Island (Minke Lake), the San Juan
Channel and the Strait of San Juan de Fuca (Salmon Bank). However, by
the 1990s the first two areas were abandoned, and minke whales were
only found in the Strait of Juan de Fuca, despite continued search
efforts in the other areas. This coincided with a general decline of
herring in the area, possibly associated with disturbance of adjacent
herring spawning grounds. A qualitative change in the number of sea
birds was also noted at this time. In more recent years (2005-2011),
minke whales were found foraging in all three areas again, and bird
numbers were also higher. But minke whales are still predominantly
found on the banks in the Strait of Juan de Fuca (NE Pacific Minke
Whale Project 2014).
In 2009 WSDOT replaced several dolphin structures at the Vashon
terminal. Marine mammal monitoring was implemented during this project.
Over 7 days of monitoring in November of 2009, no Minke whales were
observed (WSF 2009).
According to the NMFS National Stranding Database, there were no
Minke whale strandings in the Vashon area in 2010-13 (NMFS 2014).
Harbor Porpoises
The Washington Inland Waters Stock of harbor porpoise may be found
near the project site. The Washington Inland Waters Stock occurs in
waters east of Cape Flattery (Strait of Juan de Fuca, San Juan Island
Region, and Puget Sound).
According to the 2013 SAR, the Washington Inland Waters Stock mean
abundance estimate based on 2002 and 2003 aerial surveys conducted in
the Strait of Juan de Fuca, San Juan Islands, Gulf Islands, and Strait
of Georgia is 10,682 harbor porpoises (NMFS 2011).
No harbor porpoises were observed within Puget Sound proper during
comprehensive harbor porpoise surveys (Osmek et al. 1994) or Puget
Sound Ambient Monitoring Program (PSAMP) surveys conducted in the 1990s
(WDFW 2008). Declines were attributed to gill-net fishing, increased
vessel activity, contaminants, and competition with Dall's porpoise.
However, populations appear to be rebounding with increased
sightings in central Puget Sound (Carretta et al. 2007) and southern
Puget Sound (WDFW 2008). Recent systematic boat surveys of the main
basin indicate that at least several hundred and possibly as many as
low thousands of harbor porpoise are now present. While the reasons for
this recolonization are unclear, it is possible that changing
conditions outside of Puget Sound, as evidenced by a tripling of the
population in the adjacent waters of the Strait of Juan de Fuca and San
Juan Islands since the early 1990s, and the recent higher number of
harbor porpoise mortalities in coastal waters of Oregon and Washington,
may have played a role in encouraging harbor porpoise to explore and
shift into areas like Puget Sound (Hanson et. al. 2011).
The Washington Inland Waters Stock of harbor porpoise is ``non-
depleted'' under MMPA and ``unlisted'' under the ESA. Because there is
no current estimate of minimum abundance, a PBR cannot be calculated
for this stock (NMFS 2011).
Harbor porpoises are common in the Strait of Juan de Fuca and south
into Admiralty Inlet, especially during the winter, and are becoming
more common south of Admiralty Inlet. Little information exists on
harbor porpoise movements and stock structure near the Vashon area,
although it is suspected that in some areas harbor porpoises migrate
(based on seasonal shifts in distribution). Washington Department of
Fish and Wildlife's (WDFW) Puget Sound Ambient Monitoring Program
(PSAMP) data show peaks in Washington waters to occur during the
winter.
Hall (2004) found that the frequency of sighting of harbor
porpoises decreased with increasing depth beyond 150 m with the highest
numbers observed at water depths ranging from 61 to 100 m. Although
harbor porpoises have been spotted in deep water, they tend to remain
in shallower shelf waters (<150 m) where they are most often observed
in small groups of one to eight animals (Baird 2003). Water depths
within the Vashon ZOIs range from 0 to 246 m, with roughly 2/3 of the
area within the ZOI falling within the 61-100 m depth where the highest
number of harbor porpoises may be observed.
According to Vashon Island area whale specialist Mark Sears, harbor
porpoise are seen in groups of 2-3, and occasionally in groups of 6-12,
and numbers in the area peak in May/June (Sears 2013).
In 2009 WSDOT replaced several dolphin structures at the Vashon
terminal. Marine mammal monitoring was implemented during this project.
Over 7 days of monitoring in November of 2009, one harbor porpoise was
observed (WSF 2009).
According to the NMFS National Stranding Database, there was one
harbor porpoise stranding in the Vashon area in 2010-13, in the
September-February work window scheduled for this project (NMFS 2013).
Dall's Porpoises
The California, Oregon, and Washington Stock of Dall's porpoise may
be found near the project site. The most recent estimate of Dall's
porpoise stock abundance is 42,000, based on 2005 and 2008 summer/
autumn vessel-based line transect surveys of California, Oregon, and
Washington waters (NMFS 2011). Within the inland waters of Washington
and British Columbia, this species is most abundant in the Strait of
Juan de Fuca east to the San Juan Islands. The most recent Washington's
inland waters estimate is 900 animals
[[Page 78829]]
(Calambokidis et al. 1997). Prior to the 1940s, Dall's porpoises were
not reported in Puget Sound.
The California, Oregon, and Washington Stock of Dall's porpoise is
``non-depleted'' under the MMPA, and ``unlisted'' under the ESA. The
PBR for this stock is 257 Dall's porpoises per year (NMFS 2011).
Dall's porpoises are migratory and appear to have predictable
seasonal movements driven by changes in oceanographic conditions (Green
et al. 1992, 1993) and are most abundant in Puget Sound during the
winter (Nysewander et al. 2005; WDFW 2008). Despite their migrations,
Dall's porpoises occur in all areas of inland Washington at all times
of year, but with different distributions throughout Puget Sound from
winter to summer. The Washington State Department of Fish and
Wildlife's (WDFW) Puget Sound Ambient Monitoring Program (PSAMP) data
show peaks in Washington waters to occur during the winter. The average
winter group size is three animals (WDFW 2008).
In 2009 WSDOT replaced several dolphin structures at the Vashon
terminal. Marine mammal monitoring was implemented during this project.
Over 7 days of monitoring in November of 2009, no Dall's porpoise were
observed (WSF 2009).
Dall's porpoise used to be more common that harbor porpoise in the
Vashon area, though harbor porpoise is now more common. The usual
observation in the Vashon area is a single Dall's porpoise, or a pair
(Sears 2013).
According to the NMFS National Stranding Database, there were no
Dall's porpoise strandings in the Vashon area in 2010-13 (NMFS 2013).
Potential Effects of the Specified Activity on Marine Mammals
When considering the influence of various kinds of sound on the
marine environment, it is necessary to understand that different kinds
of marine life are sensitive to different frequencies of sound. Based
on available behavioral data, audiograms have been derived using
auditory evoked potentials, anatomical modeling, and other data,
Southall et al. (2007) designate ``functional hearing groups'' for
marine mammals and estimate the lower and upper frequencies of
functional hearing of the groups. The functional groups and the
associated frequencies are indicated below (though animals are less
sensitive to sounds at the outer edge of their functional range and
most sensitive to sounds of frequencies within a smaller range
somewhere in the middle of their functional hearing range):
Low frequency cetaceans (13 species of mysticetes):
functional hearing is estimated to occur between approximately 7 Hz and
22 kHz (however, a study by Au et al., (2006) of humpback whale songs
indicate that the range may extend to at least 24 kHz);
Mid-frequency cetaceans (32 species of dolphins, six
species of larger toothed whales, and 19 species of beaked and
bottlenose whales): functional hearing is estimated to occur between
approximately 150 Hz and 160 kHz;
High frequency cetaceans (eight species of true porpoises,
six species of river dolphins, Kogia, the franciscana, and four species
of cephalorhynchids): functional hearing is estimated to occur between
approximately 200 Hz and 180 kHz; and
Pinnipeds in Water: functional hearing is estimated to
occur between approximately 75 Hz and 75 kHz, with the greatest
sensitivity between approximately 700 Hz and 20 kHz.
As mentioned previously in this document, marine mammal species/
stocks are likely to occur in the proposed seismic survey area. WSDOT
and NMFS determined that in-water pile removal and pile driving during
the Vashon Seismic Retrofit Project has the potential to result in
behavioral harassment of the marine mammal species and stocks in the
vicinity of the proposed activity.
Marine mammals exposed to high-intensity sound repeatedly or for
prolonged periods can experience hearing threshold shift (TS), which is
the loss of hearing sensitivity at certain frequency ranges (Kastak et
al. 1999; Schlundt et al. 2000; Finneran et al. 2002; 2005). TS can be
permanent (PTS), in which case the loss of hearing sensitivity is
unrecoverable, or temporary (TTS), in which case the animal's hearing
threshold will recover over time (Southall et al. 2007). Since marine
mammals depend on acoustic cues for vital biological functions, such as
orientation, communication, finding prey, and avoiding predators,
hearing impairment could result in the reduced ability of marine
mammals to detect or interpret important sounds. Repeated noise
exposure that causes TTS could lead to PTS.
Experiments on a bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncates) and beluga
whale (Delphinapterus leucas) showed that exposure to a single watergun
impulse at a received level of 207 kPa (or 30 psi) peak-to-peak (p-p),
which is equivalent to 228 dB (p-p) re 1 [mu]Pa, resulted in a 7 and 6
dB TTS in the beluga whale at 0.4 and 30 kHz, respectively. Thresholds
returned to within 2 dB of the pre-exposure level within 4 minutes of
the exposure (Finneran et al. 2002). No TTS was observed in the
bottlenose dolphin. Although the source level of one hammer strike for
pile driving is expected to be much lower than the single watergun
impulse cited here, animals being exposed for a prolonged period to
repeated hammer strikes could receive more noise exposure in terms of
sound exposure level (SEL) than from the single watergun impulse
(estimated at 188 dB re 1 [mu]Pa\2\-s) in the aforementioned experiment
(Finneran et al. 2002).
Chronic exposure to excessive, though not high-intensity, noise
could cause masking at particular frequencies for marine mammals that
utilize sound for vital biological functions (Clark et al. 2009).
Masking is the obscuring of sounds of interest by other sounds, often
at similar frequencies. Masking generally occurs when sounds in the
environment are louder than, and of a similar frequency as, auditory
signals an animal is trying to receive. Masking can interfere with
detection of acoustic signals, such as communication calls,
echolocation sounds, and environmental sounds important to marine
mammals. Therefore, under certain circumstances, marine mammals whose
acoustical sensors or environment are being severely masked could also
be impaired.
Masking occurs at the frequency band which the animals utilize.
Since noise generated from in-water vibratory pile removal and driving
is mostly concentrated at low frequency ranges, it may have little
effect on high-frequency echolocation sounds by odontocetes (toothed
whales), which may hunt California sea lion and harbor seal. However,
the lower frequency man-made noises are more likely to affect the
detection of communication calls and other potentially important
natural sounds, such as surf and prey noise. The noises may also affect
communication signals when those signals occur near the noise band, and
thus reduce the communication space of animals (e.g., Clark et al.
2009) and cause increased stress levels (e.g., Foote et al. 2004; Holt
et al. 2009).
Unlike TS, masking can potentially impact the species at community,
population, or even ecosystem levels, as well as individual levels.
Masking affects both senders and receivers of the signals and could
have long-term chronic effects on marine mammal species and
populations. Recent science suggests that low frequency ambient sound
levels in the world's oceans have
[[Page 78830]]
increased by as much as 20 dB (more than 3 times, in terms of SPL) from
pre-industrial periods, and most of these increases are from distant
shipping (Hildebrand 2009). All anthropogenic noise sources, such as
those from vessel traffic and pile removal and driving, contribute to
the elevated ambient noise levels, thus intensifying masking.
Nevertheless, the sum of noise from WSDOT's proposed Vashon Seismic
Retrofit Project construction activities is confined to a limited area
by surrounding landmasses; therefore, the noise generated is not
expected to contribute to increased ocean ambient noise. In addition,
due to shallow water depths in the project area, underwater sound
propagation of low-frequency sound (which is the major noise source
from pile driving) is expected to be poor.
Finally, in addition to TS and masking, exposure of marine mammals
to certain sounds could lead to behavioral disturbance (Richardson et
al. 1995), such as: changing durations of surfacing and dives, number
of blows per surfacing, or moving direction and/or speed; reduced/
increased vocal activities; changing/cessation of certain behavioral
activities, such as socializing or feeding; visible startle response or
aggressive behavior, such as tail/fluke slapping or jaw clapping;
avoidance of areas where noise sources are located; and/or flight
responses (e.g., pinnipeds flushing into water from haulouts or
rookeries).
The biological significance of many of these behavioral
disturbances is difficult to predict, especially if the detected
disturbances appear minor. However, the consequences of behavioral
modification could be expected to be biologically significant if the
change affects growth, survival, or reproduction. Some of these types
of significant behavioral modifications include:
Drastic change in diving/surfacing patterns (such as those thought
to be causing beaked whale strandings due to exposure to military mid-
frequency tactical sonar); habitat abandonment due to loss of desirable
acoustic environment; and cessation of feeding or social interaction.
The onset of behavioral disturbance from anthropogenic noise
depends on both external factors (characteristics of noise sources and
their paths) and the receiving animals (hearing, motivation,
experience, demography), and is therefore difficult to predict
(Southall et al. 2007).
The proposed project area is not a prime habitat for marine
mammals, nor is it considered an area frequented by marine mammals.
Therefore, behavioral disturbances that could result from anthropogenic
noise associated with WSDOT's construction activities are expected to
affect only a small number of marine mammals on an infrequent and
limited basis.
Potential Effects on Marine Mammal Habitat
The primary potential impacts to marine mammal habitat are
associated with elevated sound levels produced by vibratory pile
removal and pile driving in the area. However, other potential impacts
to the surrounding habitat from physical disturbance are also possible.
Potential Impacts on Prey Species
With regard to fish as a prey source for cetaceans and pinnipeds,
fish are known to hear and react to sounds and to use sound to
communicate (Tavolga et al. 1981) and possibly avoid predators (Wilson
and Dill 2002). Experiments have shown that fish can sense both the
strength and direction of sound (Hawkins 1981). Primary factors
determining whether a fish can sense a sound signal, and potentially
react to it, are the frequency of the signal and the strength of the
signal in relation to the natural background noise level.
The level of sound at which a fish will react or alter its behavior
is usually well above the detection level. Fish have been found to
react to sounds when the sound level increased to about 20 dB above the
detection level of 120 dB (Ona 1988); however, the response threshold
can depend on the time of year and the fish's physiological condition
(Engas et al. 1993). In general, fish react more strongly to pulses of
sound rather than non-pulse signals (such as noise from vessels)
(Blaxter et al. 1981), and a quicker alarm response is elicited when
the sound signal intensity rises rapidly compared to sound rising more
slowly to the same level.
Further, during the coastal construction only a small fraction of
the available habitat would be ensonified at any given time.
Disturbance to fish species would be short-term and fish would return
to their pre-disturbance behavior once the pile driving activity
ceases. Thus, the proposed construction would have little, if any,
impact on the abilities of marine mammals to feed in the area where
construction work is planned.
Finally, the time of the proposed construction activity would avoid
the spawning season of the ESA-listed salmonid species.
Water and Sediment Quality
Short-term turbidity is a water quality effect of most in-water
work, pile removal and driving. WSDOT must comply with state water
quality standards during these operations by limiting the extent of
turbidity to the immediate project area.
Roni and Weitkamp (1996) monitored water quality parameters during
a pier replacement project in Manchester, Washington. The study
measured water quality before, during and after pile removal and
driving. The study found that construction activity at the site had
``little or no effect on dissolved oxygen, water temperature and
salinity,'' and turbidity (measured in nephelometric turbidity units
[NTU]) at all depths nearest the construction activity was typically
less than 1 NTU higher than stations farther from the project area
throughout construction.
Similar results were recorded during pile removal operations at two
WSF ferry facilities. At the Friday Harbor terminal, localized
turbidity levels (from three timber pile removal events) were generally
less than 0.5 NTU higher than background levels and never exceeded 1
NTU. At the Eagle Harbor maintenance facility, local turbidity levels
(from removal of timber and steel piles) did not exceed 0.2 NTU above
background levels. In general, turbidity associated with pile
installation is localized to about a 25-foot radius around the pile
(Everitt et al. 1980).
Cetaceans are not expected to be close enough to the Vashon ferry
terminal to experience effects of turbidity, and any pinnipeds will be
transiting the terminal area and could avoid localized areas of
turbidity. Therefore, the impact from increased turbidity levels is
expected to be discountable to marine mammals.
Pile driving and removal at the Vashon ferry terminal will not
obstruct movements of marine mammals. Pile work at Vashon will occur
within 70 m/230 ft of the shoreline leaving 2 km/1.2 miles of Puget
Sound for marine mammals to pass.
Potential Impacts on Availability of Affected Species or Stock for
Taking for Subsistence Uses
No subsistence harvest of marine mammals occur in the proposed
action area.
Proposed Mitigation Measures
In order to issue an incidental take authorization under section
101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA, NMFS must set forth the permissible methods
of taking pursuant to such activity, and other means of effecting the
least practicable adverse
[[Page 78831]]
impact on such species or stock and its habitat, paying particular
attention to rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of similar
significance, and on the availability of such species or stock for
taking for certain subsistence uses.
For WSDOT's proposed Vashon Seismic Retrofit Project, WSDOT worked
with NMFS and proposed the following mitigation measures to minimize
the potential impacts to marine mammals in the Project vicinity. The
primary purposes of these mitigation measures are to minimize sound
levels from the activities, to monitor marine mammals within designated
ZOI corresponding to NMFS' current Level B harassment thresholds and,
if marine mammals with the ZOI appear disturbed by the work activity,
to initiate immediate shutdown or power down of the piling hammer,
making it very unlikely potential injury or TTS to marine mammals would
occur and ensuring that Level B behavioral harassment of marine mammals
would be reduced to the lowest level practicable.
Use of Noise Attenuation Devices
Noise attenuation systems (i.e., bubble curtains) will be used
during all impact pile driving of steel piles to dampen the acoustic
pressure and reduce the impact on marine mammals. By reducing
underwater sound pressure levels at the source, bubble curtains would
reduce the area over which Level B harassment would occur, thereby
potentially reducing the numbers of marine mammals affected. In
addition, the bubble curtain system would reduce sound levels below the
threshold for injury (Level A harassment) and thus eliminate the need
for an exclusion zone for Level A harassment.
Time Restriction
Work would occur only during daylight hours, when visual monitoring
of marine mammals can be conducted. In addition, all in-water
construction will be limited to the period between August 1, 2015, and
February 15, 2016.
Establishment of Exclusion Zone and Level B Harassment Zones of
Influence
Before the commencement of in-water pile driving activities, WSDOT
shall establish Level B behavioral harassment ZOIs where received
underwater sound pressure levels (SPLs) are higher than 160 dB (rms)
and 120 dB (rms) re 1 [micro]Pa for impulse noise sources (impact pile
driving) and non-impulses noise sources (vibratory pile driving and
mechanic dismantling), respectively.
For the test pile program, because glacial till soils will be
harder to drive through, the assumed attenuation will be 8-10 dB, the
same bubble-curtain attenuation used in the current consultation. Based
on the 2009 Vashon Test Pile, source levels for impact driving of 30''
piles are 210 dB (peak), 181 dB (SEL), and 189 dB (rms) measured at 16
m (Pile P-8 Unmitigated) (WSDOT 2010).
The exclusion zones for Level A harassment and ZOIs for Level B
harassment are modeled based on in-water measurements during the WSF
Bainbridge Island Ferry Terminal and presented in Table 2 below.
Table 2--Modeled Maximum Level A and Level B Harassment Zones for Various Pile Driving Activities
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Distance to 190 Distance to 180 Distance to 160 Distance to 121*
Pile driving methods dB re 1 [mu]Pa dB re 1 [mu]Pa dB re 1 [mu]Pa dB re 1 [mu]Pa
(rms) (m) (rms) (m) (rms) (m) (rms) (m)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Impact pile driving................. 3.0 12 251 NA
Vibratory pile driving & removal (24- NA NA NA 5,000
in steel concrete-jacketed pile)...
Vibratory pile driving & removal (13- NA NA NA 2,000
in timber pile)....................
Vibratory pile removal (30-in steel NA NA NA 21,500
pile)..............................
Test pile impact pile driving 4.0 19 402 NA
(assume 8 dB reduction using
attenuation devices)...............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\*\ Since the median ambient noise level at the Project area is 121 dB re 1 [micro]Pa (rms), this level will be
used as the threshold for vibratory pile driving and removal.
Soft Start
A ``soft-start'' technique is intended to allow marine mammals to
vacate the area before the pile driver reaches full power. Whenever
there has been downtime of 30 minutes or more without pile driving, the
contractor will initiate the driving with ramp-up procedures described
below.
Soft start for vibratory hammers requires contractors to initiate
hammer noise for 15 seconds at reduced energy followed by a 1-minute
waiting period. The procedure will be repeated two additional times.
Soft start for impact hammers requires contractors to provide an
initial set of three strikes from the impact hammer at 40 percent
energy, followed by a 1-minute waiting period, then two subsequent
three-strike sets. Each day, WSDOT will use the soft-start technique at
the beginning of pile driving or removal, or if pile driving or removal
has ceased for more than one hour.
Shutdown Measures
WSDOT shall implement shutdown measures if a marine mammal is
sighted approaching the Level A exclusion zone. In-water construction
activities shall be suspended until the marine mammal is sighted moving
away from the exclusion zone, or if the animal is not sighted for 30
minutes after the shutdown.
In addition, WSDOT shall implement shutdown measures if southern
resident killer whales are sighted within the vicinity of the project
area and are approaching the Level B harassment zone (zone of
influence, or ZOI) during in-water construction activities.
If a killer whale approaches the ZOI during pile driving or
removal, and it is unknown whether it is a Southern Resident killer
whale or a transient killer whale, it shall be assumed to be a Southern
Resident killer whale and WSDOT shall implement the shutdown measure.
If a Southern Resident killer whale or an unidentified killer whale
enters the ZOI undetected, in-water pile driving or pile removal shall
be suspended until the whale exits the ZOI to avoid further level B
harassment.
Further, WSDOT shall implement shutdown measures if the number of
any allotted marine mammal takes reaches the limit under the IHA, if
such marine mammals are sighted within the vicinity of the project area
and are approaching the Level B harassment
[[Page 78832]]
zone during in-water construction activities.
Mitigation Conclusions
NMFS has carefully evaluated the applicant's proposed mitigation
measures and considered a range of other measures in the context of
ensuring that NMFS prescribes the means of effecting the least
practicable impact on the affected marine mammal species and stocks and
their habitat. Our evaluation of potential measures included
consideration of the following factors in relation to one another:
The manner in which, and the degree to which, the
successful implementation of the measure is expected to minimize
adverse impacts to marine mammals
The proven or likely efficacy of the specific measure to
minimize adverse impacts as planned
The practicability of the measure for applicant
implementation.
Any mitigation measure(s) prescribed by NMFS should be able to
accomplish, have a reasonable likelihood of accomplishing (based on
current science), or contribute to the accomplishment of one or more of
the general goals listed below:
(1) Avoidance or minimization of injury or death of marine mammals
wherever possible (goals 2, 3, and 4 may contribute to this goal).
(2) A reduction in the numbers of marine mammals (total number or
number at biologically important time or location) exposed to received
levels of pile driving and pile removal or other activities expected to
result in the take of marine mammals (this goal may contribute to 1,
above, or to reducing harassment takes only).
(3) A reduction in the number of times (total number or number at
biologically important time or location) individuals would be exposed
to received levels of pile driving and pile removal, or other
activities expected to result in the take of marine mammals (this goal
may contribute to 1, above, or to reducing harassment takes only).
(4) A reduction in the intensity of exposures (either total number
or number at biologically important time or location) to received
levels of pile driving, or other activities expected to result in the
take of marine mammals (this goal may contribute to a, above, or to
reducing the severity of harassment takes only).
(5) Avoidance or minimization of adverse effects to marine mammal
habitat, paying special attention to the food base, activities that
block or limit passage to or from biologically important areas,
permanent destruction of habitat, or temporary destruction/disturbance
of habitat during a biologically important time.
(6) For monitoring directly related to mitigation--an increase in
the probability of detecting marine mammals, thus allowing for more
effective implementation of the mitigation.
Based on our evaluation of the applicant's proposed measures, as
well as other measures considered by NMFS, NMFS has preliminarily
determined that the proposed mitigation measures provide the means of
effecting the least practicable impact on marine mammals species or
stocks and their habitat, paying particular attention to rookeries,
mating grounds, and areas of similar significance.
Proposed Monitoring and Reporting
In order to issue an incidental take authorization (ITA) for an
activity, section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA states that NMFS must set
forth, ``requirements pertaining to the monitoring and reporting of
such taking.'' The MMPA implementing regulations at 50 CFR
216.104(a)(13) indicate that requests for ITAs must include the
suggested means of accomplishing the necessary monitoring and reporting
that will result in increased knowledge of the species and of the level
of taking or impacts on populations of marine mammals that are expected
to be present in the proposed action area. WSDOT submitted a marine
mammal monitoring plan as part of the IHA application. It can be found
at https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm. The plan may be
modified or supplemented based on comments or new information received
from the public during the public comment period.
Monitoring measures prescribed by NMFS should accomplish one or
more of the following general goals:
(1) An increase in the probability of detecting marine mammals,
both within the mitigation zone (thus allowing for more effective
implementation of the mitigation) and in general to generate more data
to contribute to the analyses mentioned below;
(2) An increase in our understanding of how many marine mammals are
likely to be exposed to levels of pile driving that we associate with
specific adverse effects, such as behavioral harassment, TTS, or PTS;
(3) An increase in our understanding of how marine mammals respond
to stimuli expected to result in take and how anticipated adverse
effects on individuals (in different ways and to varying degrees) may
impact the population, species, or stock (specifically through effects
on annual rates of recruitment or survival) through any of the
following methods:
[ssquf] Behavioral observations in the presence of stimuli compared
to observations in the absence of stimuli (need to be able to
accurately predict received level, distance from source, and other
pertinent information);
[ssquf] Physiological measurements in the presence of stimuli
compared to observations in the absence of stimuli (need to be able to
accurately predict received level, distance from source, and other
pertinent information);
[ssquf] Distribution and/or abundance comparisons in times or areas
with concentrated stimuli versus times or areas without stimuli;
(4) An increased knowledge of the affected species; and
(5) An increase in our understanding of the effectiveness of
certain mitigation and monitoring measures.
Proposed Monitoring Measures
WSDOT shall employee NMFS-approved protected species observers
(PSOs) to conduct marine mammal monitoring for its Vashon Seismic
Retrofit Project. The PSOs will observe and collect data on marine
mammals in and around the project area for 30 minutes before, during,
and for 30 minutes after all pile removal and pile installation work.
If a PSO observes a marine mammal within a ZOI that appears to be
disturbed by the work activity, the PSO will notify the work crew to
initiate shutdown measures.
Monitoring of marine mammals around the construction site shall be
conducted using high-quality binoculars (e.g., Zeiss, 10 x 42 power).
Marine mammal visual monitoring will be conducted by land-based
biologists at the terminal work sites, and boat-based biologist(s)
travel through the monitoring area.
Data collection during marine mammal monitoring will consist of a
count of all marine mammals by species, a description of behavior (if
possible), location, direction of movement, type of construction that
is occurring, time that pile replacement work begins and ends, any
acoustic or visual disturbance, and time of the observation.
Environmental conditions such as weather, visibility, temperature, tide
level, current, and sea state would also be recorded.
Proposed Reporting Measures
WSDOT would be required to submit weekly monitoring reports to NMFS
that summarize the monitoring results,
[[Page 78833]]
construction activities, and environmental conditions.
A final monitoring report would be submitted to NMFS within 90 days
after completion of the construction work. This report would detail the
monitoring protocol, summarize the data recorded during monitoring, and
estimate the number of marine mammals that may have been harassed. NMFS
would have an opportunity to provide comments on the report, and if
NMFS has comments, WSDOT would address the comments and submit a final
report to NMFS within 30 days.
In addition, NMFS would require WSDOT to notify NMFS' Office of
Protected Resources and NMFS' Stranding Network within 48 hours of
sighting an injured or dead marine mammal in the vicinity of the
construction site. WSDOT shall provide NMFS with the species or
description of the animal(s), the condition of the animal(s) (including
carcass condition, if the animal is dead), location, time of first
discovery, observed behaviors (if alive), and photo or video (if
available).
In the event that WSDOT finds an injured or dead marine mammal that
is not in the vicinity of the construction area, WSDOT would report the
same information as listed above to NMFS as soon as operationally
feasible.
Estimated Take by Incidental Harassment
Except with respect to certain activities not pertinent here, the
MMPA defines ``harassment'' as: any act of pursuit, torment, or
annoyance which (i) has the potential to injure a marine mammal or
marine mammal stock in the wild [Level A harassment]; or (ii) has the
potential to disturb a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild
by causing disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not
limited to, migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or
sheltering [Level B harassment].
As discussed above, in-water pile removal and pile driving
(vibratory and impact) generate loud noises that could potentially
harass marine mammals in the vicinity of WSDOT's proposed Vashon
Seismic Retrofit Project.
Currently, NMFS uses 120 dB re 1 [micro]Pa and 160 dB re 1
[micro]Pa at the received levels for the onset of Level B harassment
from non-impulse (vibratory pile driving and removal) and impulse
sources (impact pile driving) underwater, respectively. Table 3
summarizes the current NMFS marine mammal take criteria.
Table 3--Current Acoustic Exposure Criteria for Non-Explosive Sound Underwater
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Criterion Criterion definition Threshold
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level A Harassment (Injury).......... Permanent Threshold Shift 180 dB re 1 [micro]Pa (cetaceans), 190 dB
(PTS) (Any level above that re 1 [micro]Pa (pinnipeds), root mean
which is known to cause TTS). square (rms).
Level B Harassment................... Behavioral Disruption (for 160 dB re 1 [micro]Pa (rms).
impulse noises).
Level B Harassment................... Behavioral Disruption (for 120 dB re 1 [micro]Pa (rms).
non-impulse noise).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As explained above, ZOIs will be established that encompass the
areas where received underwater sound pressure levels (SPLs) exceed the
applicable thresholds for Level B harassment. There will not be a zone
for Level A harassment in this case, because the bubble curtain system
will keep all underwater noise below the threshold for Level A
harassment.
Sound Levels From Proposed Construction Activity
As mentioned earlier, the project includes impact driving and
proofing of 24-inch hollow steel piling, impact driving of 13-inch
timber piling, and impact driving of 30-inch steel test piles.
Based on in-water measurements during the WSF Bainbridge Island
Ferry Terminal, impact pile driving of a 24-inch steel pile generated
170 dB RMS (overall average), with the highest measured at 189 dB RMS
measured at 10 meters (Laughlin 2005). A bubble curtain will be used to
attenuate steel pile impact driving noise.
For the test pile program, the more conservative cetacean injury
zone (19 m/62 ft) will be used to set the 30-inch steel test pile
exclusion zone.
In-water measurements for impact driving of 13-inch timber piling
are not available. Impact driving of 12-inch timber piling generated
170 dB RMS (WSF 2014). The source level for 13-inch timber piles shall
be assumed to be the same as 12-inch timber piles. A bubble curtain
will not be used during impact driving of timber piles.
Using practical spreading model to calculate sound propagation
loss, Table 2 provides the estimated maximum distances for a variety of
harassment zones.
As explained above, exclusion zones and ZOIs will be established
that encompass the areas where received underwater SPLs exceed the
applicable thresholds for Level A and Level B harassment, respectively.
Incidental take for each species is estimated by determining the
likelihood of a marine mammal being present within a ZOI during pile
removal and pile driving. Expected marine mammal presence is determined
by past observations and general abundance near the Vashon Ferry
Terminal during the construction window. Typically, potential take is
estimated by multiplying the area of the ZOI by the local animal
density. This provides an estimate of the number of animals that might
occupy the ZOI at any given moment. However, there are no density
estimates for any Puget Sound population of marine mammals. As a
result, the take requests were estimated using local marine mammal data
sets (e.g., Orca Network, state and federal agencies), opinions from
state and federal agencies, and observations from Navy biologists.
Based on the estimates, approximately 1,919 Pacific harbor seals,
1,919 California sea lions, 644 Steller sea lions, 438 harbor
porpoises, 136 Dall's porpoises, 54 killer whales (50 transient, 4
Southern Resident killer whales), 71 gray whales, 36 humpback whales,
and 36 minke whales could be exposed to received sound levels that
could result in takes from the proposed Vashon Seismic Retrofit
Project. A summary of the estimated takes is presented in Table 4.
[[Page 78834]]
Table 4--Estimated Numbers of Marine Mammals That May Be Exposed to Received Pile Removal Levels Above 121 dB re
1 [mu]Pa (rms)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated marine
Species mammal takes Abundance Percentage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pacific harbor seal......................................... 1,919 14,612 13
California sea lion......................................... 1,919 296,750 0.7
Steller sea lion............................................ 644 63,160 1.0
Harbor porpoise............................................. 438 10,682 4.0
Dall's porpoise............................................. 136 42,000 0.3
Killer whale, transient..................................... 50 521 9.6
Killer whale, Southern Resident............................. 4 85 4.7
Gray whale.................................................. 71 19,126 0.4
Humpback whale.............................................. 36 1,918 1.9
Minke whale................................................. 36 478 7.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis and Preliminary Determinations
Negligible Impact
Negligible impact is ``an impact resulting from the specified
activity that cannot be reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably
likely to, adversely affect the species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival'' (50 CFR 216.103). A
negligible impact finding is based on the lack of likely adverse
effects on annual rates of recruitment or survival (i.e., population-
level effects). An estimate of the number of Level B harassment takes,
alone, is not enough information on which to base an impact
determination. In addition to considering estimates of the number of
marine mammals that might be ``taken'' through behavioral harassment,
NMFS must consider other factors, such as the likely nature of any
responses (their intensity, duration, etc.), the context of any
responses (critical reproductive time or location, migration, etc.), as
well as the number and nature of estimated Level A harassment takes,
the number of estimated mortalities, and effects on habitat.
WSDOT's proposed Vashon Seismic Retrofit Project would involve pile
removal and pile driving activities. Elevated underwater noises are
expected to be generated as a result of these activities; however,
these noises are expected to result in no mortality or Level A
harassment and limited, if any, Level B harassment of marine mammals.
WSDOT would use noise attenuation devices (i.e., bubble curtains)
during the impact pile driving of steel piles, thus eliminating the
potential for injury (including PTS) and TTS from impact driving. For
vibratory pile removal and pile driving and impact pile driving of
timber piles, noise levels are not expected to reach the level that may
cause TTS, injury (including PTS), or mortality to marine mammals.
Therefore, NMFS does not expect that any animals would experience Level
A harassment (including injury or PTS) or Level B harassment in the
form of TTS from being exposed to in-water pile removal and pile
driving associated with WSDOT's construction project.
In addition, WSDOT's proposed activities are localized and of short
duration. The entire project area is limited to WSDOT's Vashon ferry
terminal in Vashon Island. The entire project would involve the removal
of 106 existing timber piles and installation of 119 steel piles. In
addition, 96 temporary piles will be installed and then removed during
the project. The duration for pile driving and removal lasts for about
10 to 120 minutes per pile, depending on the type and dimension of the
pile. These low-intensity, localized, and short-term noise exposures
may cause brief startle reactions or short-term behavioral modification
by the animals. These reactions and behavioral changes are expected to
subside quickly when the exposures cease. Moreover, the proposed
mitigation and monitoring measures are expected to reduce potential
exposures and behavioral modifications even further. Additionally, no
important feeding and/or reproductive areas for marine mammals are
known to be near the proposed action area. Therefore, the take
resulting from the proposed Vashon Seismic Retrofit Project is not
reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely
affect the marine mammal species or stocks through effects on annual
rates of recruitment or survival.
The project also is not expected to have significant adverse
effects on affected marine mammals' habitat, as analyzed in detail in
the ``Anticipated Effects on Marine Mammal Habitat'' section. The
project activities would not modify existing marine mammal habitat. The
activities may cause some fish to leave the area of disturbance, thus
temporarily impacting marine mammals' foraging opportunities in a
limited portion of the foraging range; but, because of the short
duration of the activities and the relatively small area of the habitat
that may be affected, the impacts to marine mammal habitat are not
expected to cause significant or long-term negative consequences.
Based on the analysis contained herein of the likely effects of the
specified activity on marine mammals and their habitat, and taking into
consideration the implementation of the proposed monitoring and
mitigation measures, NMFS preliminarily finds that the total marine
mammal take from WSDOT's Vashon Seismic Retrofit Project will have a
negligible impact on the affected marine mammal species or stocks.
Small Number
Based on analyses provided above, it is estimated that
approximately 1,919 harbor seals, 1,919 California sea lions, 644
Steller sea lions, 438 harbor porpoises, 136 Dall's porpoises, 50
transient killer whales, 4 Southern Resident killer whales, 71 gray
whales, 36 humpback whales, and 36 minke whales could be exposed to
received noise levels that could cause Level B behavioral harassment
from the proposed construction work at the Vashon ferry terminal in
Washington State. These numbers represent approximately 0.3% to 14% of
the populations of these species that could be affected by Level B
behavioral harassment, respectively (see Table 2 above), which are
small percentages relative to the total populations of the affected
species or stocks.
Based on the analysis contained herein of the likely effects of the
specified activity on marine mammals and their habitat, and taking into
consideration the implementation of the mitigation and monitoring
measures,
[[Page 78835]]
which are expected to reduce the number of marine mammals potentially
affected by the proposed action, NMFS preliminarily finds that small
numbers of marine mammals will be taken relative to the populations of
the affected species or stocks.
Impact on Availability of Affected Species for Taking for Subsistence
Uses
There are no subsistence uses of marine mammals in the proposed
project area; and, thus, no subsistence uses impacted by this action.
Therefore, NMFS has determined that the total taking of affected
species or stocks would not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of such species or stocks for taking for subsistence
purposes.
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
The humpback whale and the Southern Resident stock of killer whale
are the only marine mammal species currently listed under the ESA that
could occur in the vicinity of WSDOT's proposed construction projects.
NMFS' Permits and Conservation Division has initiated consultation with
NMFS' Protected Resources Division under section 7 of the ESA on the
issuance of an IHA to WSDOT under section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA for
this activity. Consultation will be concluded prior to a determination
on the issuance of an IHA.
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
NMFS prepared a draft Environmental Assessment (EA) for the
proposed issuance of an IHA, pursuant to NEPA, to determine whether or
not this proposed activity may have a significant effect on the human
environment. This analysis will be completed prior to the issuance or
denial of this proposed IHA.
Proposed Authorization
As a result of these preliminary determinations, NMFS proposes to
issue an IHA to WSDOT for conducting the Vashon Seismic Retrofit
Project, provided the previously mentioned mitigation, monitoring, and
reporting requirements are incorporated. The proposed IHA language is
provided next.
1. This Authorization is valid from August 1, 2015, through July
31, 2016.
2. This Authorization is valid only for activities associated in-
water construction work at the Vashon Seismic Retrofit Project in the
State of Washington.
3. (a) The species authorized for incidental harassment takings,
Level B harassment only, are: Pacific harbor seal (Phoca vitulina
richardsi), California sea lion (Zalophus californianus), Steller sea
lion (Eumetopias jubatus), transient and Southern Resident killer
whales (Orcinus orca), gray whale (Eschrichtius robustus), humpback
whale (Megaptera novaeangliae), harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena),
and Dall's porpoise (Phocoena dali).
(b) The authorization for taking by harassment is limited to the
following acoustic sources and from the following activities:
Impact and vibratory pile driving;
Pile removal; and
Work associated with above piling activities.
(c) The taking of any marine mammal in a manner prohibited under
this Authorization must be reported within 24 hours of the taking to
the West Coast Administrator (206-526-6150), National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS) and the Chief of the Permits and Conservation Division,
Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, at (301) 427-8401, or her designee
(301-427-8418).
4. The holder of this Authorization must notify the Chief of the
Permits and Conservation Division, Office of Protected Resources, at
least 48 hours prior to the start of activities identified in 3(b)
(unless constrained by the date of issuance of this Authorization in
which case notification shall be made as soon as possible).
5. Prohibitions
(a) The taking, by incidental harassment only, is limited to the
species listed under condition 3(a) above and by the numbers listed in
Table 4. The taking by Level A harassment, injury or death of these
species or the taking by harassment, injury or death of any other
species of marine mammal is prohibited and may result in the
modification, suspension, or revocation of this Authorization.
(b) The taking of any marine mammal is prohibited whenever the
required protected species observers (PSOs), required by condition
7(a), are not present in conformance with condition 7(a) of this
Authorization.
6. Mitigation
(a) Use of Noise Attenuation Devices
A pile driving energy attenuator (such as an air bubble curtain
system) shall be used for all impact pile driving.
(b) Time Restriction
In-water construction work shall occur only during daylight hours,
when visual monitoring of marine mammals can be conducted.
(c) Establishment of Level B Harassment Zones of Influence
(i) Before the commencement of in-water pile driving activities,
WSDOT shall establish Level B behavioral harassment zones of influence
(ZOIs) where received underwater sound pressure levels (SPLs) are
higher than 160 dB (rms) and 120 dB (rms) re 1 [micro]Pa for impulse
noise sources (impact pile driving) and non-impulses noise sources
(vibratory pile driving and mechanic dismantling), respectively. The
modeled isopleths for ZOIs are listed in Table 2.
(ii) Once the underwater acoustic measurements are conducted during
initial test pile driving, WSDOT shall adjust the sizes of the ZOIs,
and monitor these zones as described under the Proposed Monitoring
section below.
(d) Monitoring of marine mammals shall take place starting 30
minutes before pile driving begins until 30 minutes after pile driving
ends.
(e) Soft Start
(i) When there has been downtime of 30 minutes or more without pile
driving, the contractor will initiate the driving with ramp-up
procedures described below.
(ii) For vibratory hammers, the contractor shall initiate the
driving for 15 seconds at reduced energy, followed by a 1 minute
waiting period. This procedure shall be repeated two additional times
before continuous driving is started. This procedure shall also apply
to vibratory pile extraction.
(iii) For impact driving, an initial set of three strikes would be
made by the hammer at 40-percent energy, followed by a 1-minute waiting
period, then two subsequent three-strike sets at 40-percent energy,
with 1-minute waiting periods, before initiating continuous driving.
(f) Power Down and Shutdown Measures
(i) WSDOT shall implement shutdown measures if southern resident
killer whales (SRKWs) are sighted within the vicinity of the project
area and are approaching the Level B harassment zone (zone of
influence, or ZOI) during in-water construction activities.
(ii) If a killer whale approaches the ZOI during pile driving or
removal, and it is unknown whether it is a SRKW or a transient killer
whale, it shall be assumed to be a SRKW and WSDOT shall implement the
shutdown measure identified in 6(f)(i).
(iii) If a SRKW enters the ZOI undetected, in-water pile driving or
pile removal shall be suspended until the SRKW exits the ZOI to avoid
further level B harassment.
(iv) WSDOT shall implement shutdown measures if the number of any
allotted marine mammal takes
[[Page 78836]]
reaches the limit under the IHA, if such marine mammals are sighted
within the vicinity of the project area and are approaching the Level B
harassment zone during pile removal activities.
7. Monitoring
(a) Protected Species Observers
WSDOT shall employee NMFS-approved PSOs to conduct marine mammal
monitoring for its construction project.
(i) Visual acuity in both eyes (correction is permissible)
sufficient for discernment of moving targets at the water's surface
with ability to estimate target size and distance. Use of binoculars
will be required to correctly identify the target.
(ii) Experience or training in the field identification of marine
mammals (cetaceans and pinnipeds).
(iii) Sufficient training, orientation or experience with the
construction operation to provide for personal safety during
observations.
(iv) Ability to communicate orally, by radio or in person, with
project personnel to provide real time information on marine mammals
observed in the area as necessary.
(v) Experience and ability to conduct field observations and
collect data according to assigned protocols (this may include academic
experience).
(vi) Writing skills sufficient to prepare a report of observations
that would include such information as the number and type of marine
mammals observed; the behavior of marine mammals in the project area
during construction, dates and times when observations were conducted;
dates and times when in-water construction activities were conducted;
and dates and times when marine mammals were present at or within the
defined ZOI.
(b) Monitoring Protocols: PSOs shall be present on site at all
times during pile removal and driving.
(i) A range finder or hand-held global positioning system device
will be used to ensure that the 120 dBrms re 1 [mu]Pa Level
B behavioral harassment ZOI is monitored.
(ii) A 30-minute pre-construction marine mammal monitoring will be
required before the first pile driving or pile removal of the day. A
30-minute post-construction marine mammal monitoring will be required
after the last pile driving or pile removal of the day. If the
constructors take a break between subsequent pile driving or pile
removal for more than 30 minutes, then additional pre-construction
marine mammal monitoring will be required before the next start-up of
pile driving or pile removal.
(iii) Marine mammal visual monitoring will be conducted by land-
based biologists at the terminal work sites, and boat-based
biologist(s) travel through the monitoring area.
(iv) If marine mammals are observed, the following information will
be documented:
(A) Species of observed marine mammals;
(B) Number of observed marine mammal individuals;
(C) Behavioral of observed marine mammals;
(D) Location within the ZOI; and
(E) Animals' reaction (if any) to pile-driving activities
(v) During vibratory pile removal and driving, one land-based
biologist would monitor the area from the terminal work site, and one
monitor will move among a number of access points along the southern
Sinclair Inlet shore. Binoculars shall be used during marine mammal
monitoring.
(vi) WSDOT shall contact the Orca Network and/or Center for Whale
Research to find out the location of the nearest marine mammal
sightings.
(vii) WSDOT shall also utilize marine mammal occurrence information
collected by the Orca Network using hydrophone systems to maximize
marine mammal detection in the project vicinity.
8. Reporting
(a) WSDOT shall provide NMFS with a draft monitoring report within
90 days of the conclusion of the construction work. This report shall
detail the monitoring protocol, summarize the data recorded during
monitoring, and estimate the number of marine mammals that may have
been harassed.
(b) If comments are received from the NMFS West Coast Regional
Administrator or NMFS Office of Protected Resources on the draft
report, a final report shall be submitted to NMFS within 30 days
thereafter. If no comments are received from NMFS, the draft report
will be considered to be the final report.
(c) In the unanticipated event that the construction activities
clearly cause the take of a marine mammal in a manner prohibited by
this Authorization (if issued), such as an injury, serious injury, or
mortality, WSDOT shall immediately cease all operations and immediately
report the incident to the Chief, Permits and Conservation Division,
Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, and the West Coast Regional
Stranding Coordinators. The report must include the following
information:
(i) time, date, and location (latitude/longitude) of the incident;
(ii) description of the incident;
(iii) status of all sound source use in the 24 hours preceding the
incident;
(iv) environmental conditions (e.g., wind speed and direction, sea
state, cloud cover, visibility, and water depth);
(v) description of marine mammal observations in the 24 hours
preceding the incident;
(vi) species identification or description of the animal(s)
involved;
(vii) the fate of the animal(s); and
(viii) photographs or video footage of the animal (if equipment is
available).
Activities shall not resume until NMFS is able to review the
circumstances of the prohibited take. NMFS shall work with WSDOT to
determine what is necessary to minimize the likelihood of further
prohibited take and ensure MMPA compliance. WSDOT may not resume their
activities until notified by NMFS via letter, email, or telephone.
(E) In the event that WSDOT discovers an injured or dead marine
mammal, and the lead PSO determines that the cause of the injury or
death is unknown and the death is relatively recent (i.e., in less than
a moderate state of decomposition as described in the next paragraph),
WSDOT will immediately report the incident to the Chief, Permits and
Conservation Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, and the
West Coast Regional Stranding Coordinators. The report must include the
same information identified above. Activities may continue while NMFS
reviews the circumstances of the incident. NMFS will work with WSDOT to
determine whether modifications in the activities are appropriate.
(F) In the event that WSDOT discovers an injured or dead marine
mammal, and the lead PSO determines that the injury or death is not
associated with or related to the activities authorized in the IHA
(e.g., previously wounded animal, carcass with moderate to advanced
decomposition, or scavenger damage), WSDOT shall report the incident to
the Chief, Permits and Conservation Division, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, and the West Coast Regional Stranding Coordinators,
within 24 hours of the discovery. WSDOT shall provide photographs or
video footage (if available) or other documentation of the stranded
animal sighting to NMFS and the Marine Mammal Stranding Network. WSDOT
can continue its operations under such a case.
9. This Authorization may be modified, suspended or withdrawn if
the holder fails to abide by the conditions prescribed herein or if the
[[Page 78837]]
authorized taking is having more than a negligible impact on the
species or stock of affected marine mammals, or if there is an
unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of such species or
stocks for subsistence uses.
10. A copy of this Authorization and the Incidental Take Statement
must be in the possession of each contractor who performs the
construction work at the Bremerton Ferry Terminals.
11. WSDOT is required to comply with the Terms and Conditions of
the Incidental Take Statement corresponding to NMFS' Biological
Opinion.
Dated: December 23, 2014.
Donna S. Wieting,
Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-30540 Filed 12-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P