Farm Loan Programs; Programs Changes, 78689-78694 [2014-30172]
Download as PDF
78689
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 79, No. 250
Wednesday, December 31, 2014
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Farm Service Agency
7 CFR Parts 761, 762, 764, and 765
RIN 0560–AI29
Farm Loan Programs; Programs
Changes
Farm Service Agency, USDA.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Farm Service Agency
(FSA) is amending Farm Loan Programs
(FLP) loan making and servicing
regulations to reflect several changes
required by the Agricultural Act of 2014
(2014 Farm Bill). The changes were
implemented administratively upon the
passage of the 2014 Farm Bill; this rule
makes conforming amendments in the
FSA regulations.
DATES: Effective: December 31, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bradley A. Johnson, telephone: (202)
720–5847. Persons with disabilities or
who require alternative means for
communications (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact the
USDA Target Center at (202) 720–2600
(voice).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Background
The FSA FLP direct loans and loan
guarantees provide credit to farmers
whose financial risk exceeds a level
acceptable to commercial lenders.
Through direct and guaranteed Farm
Ownership loans (FO), Operating Loans
(OL), and Conservation Loans (CL);
direct Microloans (ML), direct
Emergency Loans (EM) and Land
Contract (LC) guarantees, FSA assists
tens of thousands of farmers each year
in starting and maintaining profitable
farm businesses. FSA loan funds may be
used to pay normal operating or family
living expenses; make capital
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Dec 30, 2014
Jkt 235001
improvements; refinance certain debts;
and purchase farmland, livestock,
equipment, feed and other materials
essential to farm operations. FSA
services extend beyond the typical loan
by offering farmers ongoing consultation
and advice, to help to make their farm
successful. These loans are a temporary
source of credit. Farmers with direct
loans generally are required to graduate
to other credit when their financial
condition will allow them to do so.
In addition, the YL Program provides
operating loans of up to $5,000 to
eligible individual youths, ages 10 to 20,
to finance income producing,
agriculture related projects. The project
must be of modest size, educational and
initiated, developed and carried out by
youths participating in 4-H Clubs,
Future Farmers of America (FFA), or a
similar organization.
Throughout this rule, any reference to
‘‘farm’’ or ‘‘farmer’’ also includes
‘‘ranch’’ or ‘‘rancher’’, respectively.
This rule makes changes in the FSA
regulations required by several
provisions of the 2014 Farm Bill (Pub.
L. 113–79) regarding FSA’s loan making
and servicing programs. More
specifically, the changes:
• Increase the percent of guarantee for
CLs;
• Reduce the interest rate for direct
FOs made under a joint financing
arrangement;
• Eliminate the oil, gas, and mineral
appraisal requirement;
• Increase the maximum loan amount
for a direct FO made under the
downpayment program;
• Eliminate the rural residency
requirement for the YLs ;
• Allow a borrower who had YL debt
forgiveness to receive future
Government loans under certain
circumstances;
• Exclude MLs to beginning or
veteran farmers from the existing OL
term limitations, and add a special ML
interest rate available to beginning and
veteran farmers;
• Eliminate the term limit for
guaranteed OLs; and
• Amend the definition of a
beginning farmer, specifically the
maximum owned acreage requirement.
CL; Increase Percent of Guarantee
Guaranteed CLs promote conservation
practices on farms that help protect
natural resources, and provide credit for
farmers to implement these
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
conservation measures on their land.
Unlike FSA’s traditional FO and OL
Programs that are targeted toward family
and less financially established farmers,
eligibility requirements for the CL
Program permit FSA to provide
assistance to applicants who may not be
a family farmer or are financially strong.
Section 5002 of the 2014 Farm Bill
amended section 304(e) of the
Consolidated Farm and Rural
Development Act (CONACT) (7 U.S.C.
1924e) to increase the percent of
guarantee for CLs from 75 percent to 80
percent, and authorized a 90 percent
guarantee for a qualified beginning or
socially disadvantaged (SDA) farmer.
Lenders will now be able to have a
greater guarantee on CLs.
Previously, CL received a 75 percent
guarantee, which was less than the
typical 90 percent guarantee on an FO
or farm OL guarantee. Partially due to
this lower percentage of guarantee, the
use of CLs have been extremely limited
since guaranteed FO or OL funds may
also be used for conservation purposes.
This rule amends 7 CFR 762.129 and
762.130 to increase the percent of
guarantee for CL. The increase in CL
guarantee to 80 percent and the even
higher 90 percent guarantee to
beginning or SDA farmers will increase
the use of CL guarantees used to
implement conservation practices,
which benefit not only the farmer, but
the environment as well.
Direct FO as Part of Joint Financing
Arrangement; Interest Rate
Direct FOs made as part of a
participation (joint financing)
arrangement are eligible for a special
joint financing interest rate. These loans
require that a commercial lender or
private party provide a portion of the
financing, such that the FO does not
exceed 50 percent of the total amount
financed. FOs may be used to purchase
a farm, enlarge an existing farm,
construct or improve farm structures,
pay closing costs, and for soil and water
conservation and protection. Repayment
terms may be as long as 40 years and the
maximum FO indebtedness is limited to
$300,000.
Section 5003 of the 2014 Farm Bill
amended section 307(a)(3) of the
CONACT (7 U.S.C. 1927(a)(3)) to reduce
the interest rate for FOs that are part of
a joint financing arrangement. This joint
financing interest rate is the direct FO
E:\FR\FM\31DER1.SGM
31DER1
78690
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
lender, along with cash down payment
requirement of 5 percent.
Section 5005 of the 2014 Farm Bill
amended section 310E(b)(1)(C) of the
CONACT (7 U.S.C. 1935(b)(1)(C)) to
increase the maximum loan limit for
downpayment FOs to 45 percent of
$667,000. This amount is $300,150;
however, section 305 of the CONACT (7
U.S.C. 1925) limits the maximum loan
amount for each FO, including
downpayment FOs, to $300,000.
Previously, downpayment FOs were
limited to a maximum of $225,000 (45
percent of $500,000) and all other types
of direct FOs were limited to $300,000.
This difference in maximum loan
amounts was a limiting factor in many
loan transactions, particularly as loan
amounts have increased due to rising
farm real estate values. The rule amends
7 CFR 764.203 to increase the maximum
loan limit for downpayment FO loans to
$300,000.
Mineral Rights Appraisal; Eliminate
Requirement
FSA uses appraisals to determine the
value of real and personal property.
Appraisals ensure there is adequate
security to support FSA loan making
and servicing actions.
Section 5004 of the 2014 Farm Bill
eliminated the requirement that in order
for FSA to have the rights to oil, gas, or
other minerals as FO collateral, the
products’ value must be considered in
the appraised value of the real estate
securing the loan.
Section 307(d) of the CONACT (7
U.S.C. 1927(d)), previously required that
for FOs; the value of oil, gas, or other
minerals must be included in the
appraised value of the real estate
security in order for FSA to have a valid
lien on those products. This rule
removes this mineral appraisal
requirement in 7 CFR 761.7 and 765.252
for all future FLP loans. For all loans
made after February 7, 2014, the date of
the 2014 Farm Bill was enacted, FSA
will have a security interest in oil, gas,
or other minerals on or under the
property regardless of whether the value
of those products were included in the
appraisal value of the property. This
security interest is reflected in the FSA
mortgage forms.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
regular interest rate minus 2 percent,
with a floor of 2.5 percent.
Previously, the joint financing interest
rate for FOs was 5 percent and has been
since March 24, 1997. For several years,
the joint financing interest rate of 5
percent has been higher than the direct
FO interest rate. As a result, there has
been no financial incentive for the
farmer to finance a portion of the real
estate purchase with another lender,
unless she or he qualified as a beginning
or SDA farmer who was able to receive
a downpayment FO with a lower
interest rate.
This rule amends 7 CFR 764.154 to
change the interest rate for FOs that are
part of a joint financing arrangement.
This reduced interest rate for FOs made
under a joint financing agreement will
encourage farmers to seek commercial
lender financing, and therefore reduce
FSA financing of the farm to 50 percent
or less. FSA expects to be able to
leverage the use of our typically limited
direct FO funds, to assist an even greater
number of eligible family farmers.
FSA makes YL of up to $5,000 to
eligible individual youths, ages 10 to 20,
to finance income producing and
agricultural related projects. The project
must be modest in size, educational,
and initiated, developed and carried out
by youths participating in a 4-H Club,
FFA, or similar organization.
Section 5102 of the 2014 Farm Bill
amended section 311(b)(1) of the
CONACT (7 U.S.C. 1941(b)(1)) to
eliminate the rural residency
requirement for YL. Eligible youth in
suburban and urban areas will now be
eligible for YL.
Previously, to be eligible for a YL the
applicant had to reside in a rural area.
FSA regulations further defined this as
‘‘residing in a rural area, city, or town
with a population of 50,000 or fewer
people.’’ The rule amends 7 CFR
764.302 to eliminate the rural residency
requirement for YL. The removal of this
requirement now allows FSA to extend
YL assistance to youth residing in
suburban and urban areas to finance
eligible agricultural related projects.
Downpayment FOs; Increase Maximum
Loan Amount
FSA downpayment FOs are used to
assist beginning and SDA farmers in
purchasing a farm. The loans have a
lower interest rate than other FO loans
and require participation by another
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Dec 30, 2014
Jkt 235001
YL; Eliminate Rural Residency
Requirement
YL; Forgiveness of Debt
Forgiveness of YL debt, due to
circumstances beyond the borrower’s
control, will no longer preclude the
borrower from obtaining additional
loans from any U.S. Government
agency. Additionally, borrowers with
YL debt forgiveness, or who are
delinquent on a YL, will now be able to
receive student loans. The servicing and
collection of YLs is not affected by the
statute and will continue under the
present regulations.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Section 5103 of the 2014 Farm Bill
amended section 311(b) of the CONACT
(7 U.S.C. 1941(b)) to authorize the
Secretary of Agriculture to, on a case by
case basis, provide debt forgiveness of a
YL if the borrower was unable to repay
the loan due to circumstances beyond
the control of the borrower. The
Secretary may also determine that the
debt forgiveness was caused by national
disaster, act of terrorism, or other manmade disaster that resulted in an
inordinate level of damage severely
affecting the YL borrower. The debt
forgiveness provided by this section is
not to be used by other Federal agencies
in determining eligibility of the
borrower for any loan made or
guaranteed by that agency.
In no case will a borrower provided
debt forgiveness or a delinquent
borrower be denied a loan or loan
guarantee from the Federal government
to pay for educational expenses of the
borrower. As a practical matter, FSA has
always provided debt forgiveness, in the
form of debt settlement, to YL borrowers
on the same terms as any other
borrower. To determine if the
forgiveness is beyond the borrower’s
control, consideration of the
circumstances will be added to the
Agency Handbooks and this rule revises
the definition of ‘‘debt forgiveness’’ in 7
CFR 761.2. This will ensure that, if the
inability to pay giving rise to the debt
forgiveness was due to circumstances
beyond the borrower’s control, it will
not be used in consideration of a FSA
loan application. As this is a mandate
on the entire Federal Government with
particular emphasis on loans for
educational expenses, FSA will also
make information regarding this change
available to all YL borrowers who
receive debt forgiveness and any other
Federal agency that is considering a
loan application from the borrower after
debt forgiveness or while they are
delinquent.
With regard to YL debt servicing prior
to debt forgiveness, the Debt Collection
Improvement Act of 1996 (DCIA) (Pub.
L. 104–134, April 26, 1996) requires that
delinquent debts be reported to
Treasury so that centralized collection
can be pursued through the Treasury
Offset Program and outside collection
agencies. Section 373 of the CONACT (7
U.S.C. 2008h) also limits FSA direct
loan borrowers to only one debt
forgiveness from FSA. These
requirements were not changed by the
2014 Farm Bill.
E:\FR\FM\31DER1.SGM
31DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
ML; Exclude From OL Term Limit Rule
and Special Interest Rate for Beginning
or Veteran Farmers
FSA initiated the ML Program in 2013
to better serve the unique financial
operating needs of beginning, niche, or
the smallest of family farm operations.
ML offers more flexible access to credit
for these types of family farm
operations, who often face limited
financing options.
Section 5106 of the 2014 Farm Bill
amended section 311 of the CONACT (7
U.S.C. 1941) to exclude MLs made to
beginning or veteran farmers from the
direct OL term limit. Section 12201 of
the 2014 Farm Bill defines a ‘‘veteran
farmer or rancher’’ as someone who has
served in the Armed Forces of the
United States and who has not farmed,
or has farmed for 10 years or less. This
rule amends 7 CFR 761.2 to include the
definition of a veteran farmer.
As previously mentioned, the term
‘‘farm’’ or ‘‘farmer’’ also includes the
term ‘‘ranch’’ or ‘‘rancher,’’ respectively.
Therefore, all references to the term
‘‘farm’’ or ‘‘farmer’’ will also
respectively include ‘‘ranch’’ or
‘‘rancher,’’ including the definition of a
‘‘veteran farmer.’’ Once the farmer is no
longer a beginning farmer or once a
veteran has farmed more than 10 years,
any ML they receive will count toward
the OL term limit. Section 5106 of the
2014 Farm Bill also amended section
316 of the CONACT (7 U.S.C. 1946) to
make available a special interest rate on
ML equal to half the rate on 5-year
treasuries plus 1 percent, but never less
than 5 percent, to beginning or veteran
farmers.
Previously, only MLs made to
beginning farmers were excluded from
the OL term limit. This rule amends 7
CFR 764.252 to expand the exclusion to
include veteran farmers.
In addition, previously the ML
interest rate was either the regular OL
rate or a limited resource rate. This rule
amends 7 CFR 764.254 to add the 2014
Farm Bill special ML interest rate that
will be at the same rate as the limited
resource OL rate, but will not be subject
to special servicing reviews by FSA
since it will not be considered a limited
resource interest rate. For a beginning or
a veteran farmer applying for a ML, they
will now be able to choose between the
direct OL interest rate and the special
ML interest rate. These changes in the
ML program will benefit both beginning
and veteran farmers, who typically have
fewer financial resources and limited
options available to finance their
farming operation.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Dec 30, 2014
Jkt 235001
Guaranteed OL; Eliminate Term Limit
Section 5107 of the 2014 Farm Bill
amended section 319 of the CONACT (7
U.S.C. 1949) to eliminate all guaranteed
OL term limits. Family farmers will no
longer be restricted in the number of
years they can receive a guaranteed OL.
Guaranteed OLs are used to assist
family farmers to obtain credit for
normal operating expenses, machinery,
equipment, and livestock purchases,
minor real estate repairs or
improvement, and to refinance debt.
The repayment term may vary, but are
never longer than 7 years. OLs used to
pay for normal operating expenses are
set up as a line of credit and are
typically repaid within 12 months.
Previously, guaranteed OL borrowers
were limited to no more than 15 years
in which they could receive OLs. As a
result, many family farmers who
continued to have difficulty in meeting
lender credit standards and had
received 15 years of OL, were unable to
receive additional guaranteed OLs. The
rule amends 7 CFR 762.122 to eliminate
all guaranteed OL term limits. These
family farmers will now be able to
obtain additional guaranteed OLs,
which typically will provide them with
access to credit on better rates and
terms.
Beginning Farmer; Amending
Definition To Modify Acreage
Ownership Limitation
Section 5303 of the 2014 Farm Bill
amended section 343 of the CONACT (7
U.S.C. 1991) to change the owned real
farm property limit from 30 percent of
the median farm acreage to 30 percent
of the average farm acreage. FSA makes
and guarantees loans to beginning
farmers who are unable to obtain
financing from commercial lenders.
Each fiscal year, FSA targets a portion
of its direct and guaranteed FO and OL
funds to beginning farmers.
Previously, to meet FSA’s definition
of a beginning farmer, the loan applicant
must not have owned real farm property
that exceeded 30 percent of the median
farm acreage, except for an OL
applicant. According to the 2012 Census
of Agriculture, nationally the median
size farm is 80 acres, while the average
size farm is 434 acres. The farm acreage
limit, previously based on the median,
set a limit so low in many counties it
precluded applicants who owned small
acreages of real farm property from
qualifying as a beginning farmer. This
eliminated many otherwise qualified
applicants from accessing FSA farm
loan funds targeted to beginning
farmers. The rule amends 7 CFR 761.2
to change the owned real farm property
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
78691
limit. The farm acreage limit, now based
on the average, will now allow many
qualified applicants access to farm loan
funds targeted to beginning farmers,
which previously were not available to
them.
Notice and Comment
In general, the Administrative
Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553) requires
that a notice of proposed rulemaking be
published in the Federal Register and
interested persons be given an
opportunity to participate in the
rulemaking through submission of
written data, views, or arguments with
or without opportunity for oral
presentation, except when the rule
involves a matter relating to public
property, loans, grants, benefits, or
contracts. This rule involved matters
relating to loans and is therefore being
published as a final rule without the
opportunity for comments.
Effective Date
The Administrative Procedure Act
provides generally that before rules are
issued by Government agencies, the rule
is required to be published in the
Federal Register, and the required
publication of a substantive rule is to be
not less than 30 days before its effective
date. One of the exceptions is when the
agency finds good cause for not delaying
the effective date. As noted above, the
changes in this rule are conforming
changes because the 2014 Farm Bill
allowed no discretion in the changes
and thus were implemented
administratively after the enactment of
the 2014 Farm Bill. Using the
administrative procedure provisions in
5 U.S.C. 553, FSA finds that there is
good cause for making this rule effective
less than 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register. Therefore, this final
rule is effective when published in the
Federal Register.
Executive Order 12866 and 13563
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review,’’ and Executive
Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review,’’ direct agencies
to assess all costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety effects, distributive impacts,
and equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility.
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) designated this rule as not
E:\FR\FM\31DER1.SGM
31DER1
78692
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
significant under Executive Order
12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and
Review,’’ and, therefore, OMB was not
required to review this final rule.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Flexibility Act
In accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612), as
amended by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (SBREFA), generally require an
agency to prepare a regulatory flexibility
analysis of any rule subject to the notice
and comment rulemaking requirements
under APA or any other law, unless the
agency certifies that the rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
All FSA direct loan borrowers and all
farm entities affected by this rule are
small businesses according to the North
American Industry Classification
System and the U. S. Small Business
Administration. There is no diversity in
size of the entities affected by this rule,
and the costs to comply with it are the
same for all entities.
In this rule, FSA is revising
regulations that affect both loan making
and loan servicing. FSA does not expect
these changes to impose any additional
cost to the lenders or borrowers.
Therefore, FSA certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Environmental
The environmental impacts of this
rule have been considered in a manner
consistent with the provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321–4347), the
regulations of the Council on
Environmental Quality (40 CFR parts
1500–1508), and the FSA regulations for
compliance with NEPA (7 CFR part
1940, subpart G). The changes contained
in the rule are all mandatory changes
required by the 2014 Farm Bill and
involved no discretion by FSA, either in
whether to implement or how to
implement the changes; therefore, they
are not subject to review under NEPA.
FSA is making these changes through a
final rule to update the regulations to
match the changes previously
implemented administratively with an
agency directive in February 2014. As
such, FSA will not prepare an
environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement for this
regulatory action.
Executive Order 12372
Executive Order 12372,
‘‘Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs,’’ requires consultation with
State and local officials. The objectives
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Dec 30, 2014
Jkt 235001
of the Executive Order are to foster an
intergovernmental partnership and a
strengthened Federalism, by relying on
State and local processes for State and
local government coordination and
review of proposed Federal Financial
assistance and direct Federal
development. For reasons set forth in
the Notice to 7 CFR part 3015, subpart
V (48 FR 29115, June 24, 1983), the
programs and activities within this rule
are excluded from the scope of
Executive Order 12372.
Executive Order 12988
This final rule has been reviewed in
accordance with Executive Order 12988,
‘‘Civil Justice Reform.’’ This rule will
not preempt State and local laws and
regulations unless they represent an
irreconcilable conflict with this rule.
Before any judicial action may be
brought concerning the provisions of
this rule the administrative appeal
provisions of 7 CFR parts 11 and 780 are
to be exhausted.
Executive Order 13132
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism.’’
The policies contained in this rule do
not have any substantial direct effect on
States, the relationship between the
Federal government and the States, or
the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Nor does this rule
impose substantial direct compliance
costs on State and local governments.
Therefore, consultation with the States
is not required.
Executive Order 13175
This rule has been reviewed in
accordance with the requirements of
Executive Order 13175, ‘‘Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments.’’ Executive Order 13175
requires Federal agencies to consult and
coordinate with tribes on a governmentto-government basis on policies that
have tribal implications, including
regulations, legislative comments or
proposed legislation, and other policy
statements or actions that have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
FSA has assessed the impact of this
rule on Indian tribes and determined
that this rule does not, to our
knowledge, have tribal implications that
require tribal consultation under
Executive Order 13175. If a Tribe
requests consultation, FSA will work
with the USDA Office of Tribal
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Relations to ensure meaningful
consultation is provided where changes,
additions, and modifications identified
in this rule are not expressly mandated
by the 2014 Farm Bill.
Unfunded Mandates
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA, Pub. L.
104–4) requires Federal agencies to
assess the effects of their regulatory
actions on State, local, or Tribal
governments or the private sector.
Agencies generally must prepare a
written statement, including a cost
benefit analysis, for final rule with
Federal mandates that may result in
expenditures of $100 million or more in
any 1 year for State, local, or Tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or to the
private sector. UMRA generally requires
agencies to consider alternatives and
adopt the more cost effective or least
burdensome alternative that achieves
the objectives of the rule. This rule
contains no Federal mandates under the
regulatory provisions of Title II of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(UMRA, Pub. L. 104–4) for State, local,
or Tribal governments, or private sector.
Therefore, this rule is not subject to the
requirements of sections 202 and 205 of
UMRA.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This regulatory changes in this final
rule do not require any changes to the
currently information collection request
of OMB control numbers, 0560–0155,
0560–0233, 0560–0236, 0560–0237,
0560–0238 and 0560–0230.
E-Government Act Compliance
FSA is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services and other purposes.
Federal Assistance Programs
The title and number of the Federal
assistance programs, as found in the
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance,
to which this final rule would apply are:
10.099 Conservation Loans; 10.404
Emergency Loans; 10.406 Farm
Operating Loans; and10.407 Farm
Ownership Loans.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 761
Accounting, Loan programs—
agriculture, Rural areas.
E:\FR\FM\31DER1.SGM
31DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
7 CFR Part 762
Agriculture, Banks, Banking, Credit,
Loan programs—agriculture,
Agricultural commodities, Livestock.
7 CFR Part 764
Agriculture, Disaster assistance, Loan
programs—agriculture, Agricultural
commodities, Livestock.
7 CFR Part 765
Agriculture, Credit, Loan programs—
agriculture, Agricultural commodities,
Livestock.
For the reasons discussed above, FSA
amends 7 CFR chapter VII as follows:
PART 761—FARM LOAN PROGRAM;
GENERAL PROGRAM
ADMINISTRATION
The Agency will use the criteria in 7
CFR 766.104(a)(1) to determine if the
circumstances were beyond the
borrower’s control.
*
*
*
*
*
Veteran farmer is a farmer who has
served in the Armed Forces (as defined
in 38 U.S.C. 101(10)) and who—
(1) has not operated a farm; or
(2) has operated a farm for not more
than 10 years.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 761.7
■
[Amended]
3. The authority citation for part 762
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 7 U.S.C. 1989.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 7 U.S.C. 1989.
§ 762.122
[Amended]
4. In § 762.122, remove paragraph (b)
and redesignate paragraphs (c) through
(e) as (b) through (d).
■ 5. In § 762.129, revise paragraphs (a),
(b) and (c) to read as follows:
The revision reads as follows:
■
Subpart A—General Provisions
1. Amend § 761.2(b) as follows:
a. Amend the definition of ‘‘Beginning
farmer’’ in paragraph (5) by removing
the word ‘‘median’’ each time it appears
and adding the word ‘‘average’’ in its
place;
■ b. Revise the definition of ‘‘Debt
forgiveness’’; and
■ c. Add the definition of ‘‘Veteran
farmer’’ in alphabetical order.
The additions read as follows:
■
■
§ 761.2
Abbreviations and definitions.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
*
*
*
*
*
Debt forgiveness is a reduction or
termination of a debt under the Act in
a manner that results in a loss to the
Agency.
(1) Debt forgiveness may be through:
(i) Writing down or writing off a debt
pursuant to 7 U.S.C. 2001;
(ii) Compromising, adjusting,
reducing, or charging off a debt or claim
pursuant to 7 U.S.C. 1981; or
(iii) Paying a loss pursuant to 7 U.S.C.
2005 on a FLP loan guaranteed by the
Agency.
(2) Debt forgiveness does not include:
(i) Debt reduction through a
conservation contract;
(ii) Any writedown provided as part
of the resolution of a discrimination
complaint against the Agency;
(iii) Prior debt forgiveness that has
been repaid in its entirety;
(iv) Consolidation, rescheduling,
reamortization, or deferral of a loan; or
(v) Forgiveness of YL debt, due to
circumstances beyond the borrower’s
control.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Dec 30, 2014
Jkt 235001
§ 762.129 Percent of guarantee and
maximum loss.
(a) Percent of guarantee. The percent
of guarantee will not exceed 90 percent
based on the credit risk to the lender
and the Agency both before and after the
transaction. The Agency will determine
the percentage of guarantee. See
paragraph (b) of this section for
exceptions.
(b) Exceptions. The guarantee will be
determined by the Agency except:
(1) For OLs and FOs, the guarantee
will be issued at 95 percent if:
(i) The sole purpose of a guaranteed
FO or OL is to refinance an Agency
direct farm loan. When only a portion
of the loan is used to refinance a direct
Agency loan, a weighted percentage of
a guarantee will be provided; or
(ii) When the purpose of a guaranteed
FO is to participate in the downpayment
loan program; or
(iii) When a guaranteed OL is made to
a farmer who is participating in the
Agency’s down payment loan program.
The guaranteed OL must be made
during the period that a borrower has
the down payment loan outstanding; or
(iv) When a guaranteed OL is made to
a farmer whose farm land is subject to
the jurisdiction of an Indian tribe and
whose loan is secured by one or more
security instruments that are subject to
the jurisdiction of an Indian tribe.
(2) For CLs, the guarantee will be
issued at 80 percent; however, the
guarantee will be issued at 90 percent if:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
(i) The applicant is a qualified SDA
farmer; or
(ii) The applicant is a qualified
beginning farmer.
(c) CLP and PLP guarantees. All
guarantees issued to CLP or PLP lenders
will not be less than 80 percent.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 762.130
[Amended]
6. In § 762.130(a)(2)(ii) remove ‘‘75’’
and add ‘‘80 or 90’’ in its place.
■
PART 764—DIRECT LOAN MAKING
2. In § 761.7, remove paragraph (b)(3).
PART 762—GUARANTEED FARM
LOANS
The authority citation for part 761
continues to read as follows:
78693
Sfmt 4700
7. The authority citation for part 764
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 7 U.S.C. 1989.
Subpart E—Downpayment Loan
Program
8. Revise § 764.154(a)(3) to read as
follows:
■
§ 764.154
Rates and terms.
(a) * * *
(3) If the FO loan is part of a joint
financing arrangement and the amount
of the Agency’s loan does not exceed 50
percent of the total amount financed,
the interest rate charged will be the
greater of the following:
(i) The Agency’s Direct Farm
Ownership rate, available in each
Agency office, minus 2 percent; or
(ii) 2.5 percent.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. Revise § 764.203(b)(3) to read as
follows:
§ 764.203
Limitations.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) $667,000; subject to the direct FO
dollar limit specified in 7 CFR
761.8(a)(1)(i).
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart G—Operating Loan Program
10. Revise § 764.252 to read as
follows:
■
§ 764.252
Eligibility requirements.
(a) The applicant must comply with
the general eligibility requirements
established in § 764.101.
(b) The applicant and anyone who
will sign the promissory note, except as
provided in paragraph (c) of this
section, must not have received debt
forgiveness from the Agency on any
direct or guaranteed loan.
(c) The applicant and anyone who
will sign the promissory note, may
receive direct OL loans to pay annual
farm operating and family living
expenses, provided that the applicant
E:\FR\FM\31DER1.SGM
31DER1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
78694
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
meets all other applicable requirements
under this part, if the applicant:
(1) Received a write-down under
section 353 of the Act;
(2) Is current on payments under a
confirmed reorganization plan under
Chapter 11, 12, or 13 of Title 11 of the
United States Code; or
(3) Received debt forgiveness on not
more than one occasion after April 4,
1996, resulting directly and primarily
from a Presidentially-designated
emergency for the county or contiguous
county in which the applicant operates.
Only applicants who were current on all
existing direct and guaranteed FLP
loans prior to the beginning date of the
incidence period of a Presidentiallydesignated emergency and received debt
forgiveness on that debt within 3 years
after the designation of such emergency
meet this exception.
(d) In the case of an entity applicant,
the entity must be:
(1) Controlled by farmers engaged
primarily and directly in farming in the
United States; and
(2) Authorized to operate the farm in
the State in which the farm is located.
(e) The applicant and anyone who
will sign the promissory note, may close
an OL in no more than 7 calendar years,
either as an individual or as a member
of an entity, except as provided in
paragraphs (e)(1) through (4) of this
section. The years may be consecutive
or nonconsecutive, and there is no limit
on the number of OLs closed in a year.
Microloans made to a beginning farmer
or a veteran farmer are not counted
toward this limitation. Youth loans are
not counted toward this limitation. The
following exceptions apply:
(1) This limitation does not apply if
the applicant and anyone who will sign
the promissory note is a beginning
farmer.
(2) This limitation does not apply if
the applicant’s land is subject to the
jurisdiction of an Indian tribe, the loan
is secured by one or more security
instruments subject to the jurisdiction of
an Indian tribe, and commercial credit
is generally not available to such farm
operations.
(3) If the applicant, and anyone who
will sign the promissory note, has
closed direct OL loans in 4 or more
previous calendar years as of April 4,
1996, the applicant is eligible to close
OL loans in any 3 additional years after
that date.
(4) On a case-by-case basis, may be
granted a one-time waiver of OL term
limits for a period of 2 years, not subject
to administrative appeal, if the
applicant:
(i) Has a financially viable operation;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Dec 30, 2014
Jkt 235001
(ii) And in the case of an entity, the
members holding the majority interest,
applied for commercial credit from at
least two lenders and were unable to
obtain a commercial loan, including an
Agency-guaranteed loan; and
(iii) Has successfully completed, or
will complete within one year, borrower
training. Previous waivers to the
borrower training requirements are not
applicable under this paragraph.
11. Add § 764.254(a)(4) to read as
follows:
■
§ 764.254
Rates and terms.
(a) * * *
(4) The Agency’s Direct ML OL
interest rate on an ML to a beginning
farmer or veteran farmer is available in
each Agency office. ML borrowers in
these groups have the option of
choosing the ML OL interest rate or the
Direct OL interest rate in effect at the
time of approval, or if lower, the rate in
effect at the time of closing.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 764.302
[Amended]
12. In § 764.302, remove paragraph (d)
and redesignate paragraphs (e) through
(f) as paragraphs (d) through (e).
■
PART 765—DIRECT LOAN
SERVICING—REGULAR
13. The authority citation for part 765
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 7 U.S.C. 1989.
Subpart F—Required Use and
Operation of Agency Security
14. Revise § 765.252(b)(1) to read as
follows:
■
§ 765.252
Lease of security.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) For FO loans made from December
23, 1985, to February 7, 2014, and loans
other than FO loans secured by real
estate and made from December 23,
1985, to November 1, 2013, the value of
the mineral rights must have been
included in the original appraisal in
order for the Agency to obtain a security
interest in any oil, gas, and other
mineral associated with the real estate
security.
*
*
*
*
*
Signed on December 16, 2014.
Val Dolcini,
Administrator, Farm Service Agency.
[FR Doc. 2014–30172 Filed 12–30–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–05–P
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 29
[Docket No. FAA–2014–1090; Special
Conditions No. 29–037–SC]
Special Conditions: Airbus Helicopters
Deutschland GmbH Model MBB–
BK117D–2 Helicopters; Use of 30Minute Power Rating
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
These special conditions are
issued for the Airbus Helicopters
Deutschland GmbH Model MBB–BK117
D–2 helicopter. This model helicopter
will have the novel or unusual design
feature of a 30-minute power rating,
generally intended to be used for
hovering at increased power for search
and rescue missions. The applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for this design feature. These special
conditions contain the additional safety
standards that the Administrator
considers necessary to establish a level
of safety equivalent to that established
by the existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: This action is effective on Airbus
Helicopters Deutschland GmbH Model
MBB–BK117D–2 Helicopters on
December 19, 2014.
We must receive your comments by
March 2, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by docket number FAA–2014–1090
using any of the following methods:
D Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
D Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
D Hand Delivery of Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 8
a.m., and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
D Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all
comments it receives, without change,
to https://regulations.gov, including any
personal information the commenter
provides. Using the search function of
the docket Web site, anyone can find
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\31DER1.SGM
31DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 31, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 78689-78694]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30172]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 78689]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Farm Service Agency
7 CFR Parts 761, 762, 764, and 765
RIN 0560-AI29
Farm Loan Programs; Programs Changes
AGENCY: Farm Service Agency, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Farm Service Agency (FSA) is amending Farm Loan Programs
(FLP) loan making and servicing regulations to reflect several changes
required by the Agricultural Act of 2014 (2014 Farm Bill). The changes
were implemented administratively upon the passage of the 2014 Farm
Bill; this rule makes conforming amendments in the FSA regulations.
DATES: Effective: December 31, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bradley A. Johnson, telephone: (202)
720-5847. Persons with disabilities or who require alternative means
for communications (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should
contact the USDA Target Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The FSA FLP direct loans and loan guarantees provide credit to
farmers whose financial risk exceeds a level acceptable to commercial
lenders. Through direct and guaranteed Farm Ownership loans (FO),
Operating Loans (OL), and Conservation Loans (CL); direct Microloans
(ML), direct Emergency Loans (EM) and Land Contract (LC) guarantees,
FSA assists tens of thousands of farmers each year in starting and
maintaining profitable farm businesses. FSA loan funds may be used to
pay normal operating or family living expenses; make capital
improvements; refinance certain debts; and purchase farmland,
livestock, equipment, feed and other materials essential to farm
operations. FSA services extend beyond the typical loan by offering
farmers ongoing consultation and advice, to help to make their farm
successful. These loans are a temporary source of credit. Farmers with
direct loans generally are required to graduate to other credit when
their financial condition will allow them to do so.
In addition, the YL Program provides operating loans of up to
$5,000 to eligible individual youths, ages 10 to 20, to finance income
producing, agriculture related projects. The project must be of modest
size, educational and initiated, developed and carried out by youths
participating in 4-H Clubs, Future Farmers of America (FFA), or a
similar organization.
Throughout this rule, any reference to ``farm'' or ``farmer'' also
includes ``ranch'' or ``rancher'', respectively.
This rule makes changes in the FSA regulations required by several
provisions of the 2014 Farm Bill (Pub. L. 113-79) regarding FSA's loan
making and servicing programs. More specifically, the changes:
Increase the percent of guarantee for CLs;
Reduce the interest rate for direct FOs made under a joint
financing arrangement;
Eliminate the oil, gas, and mineral appraisal requirement;
Increase the maximum loan amount for a direct FO made
under the downpayment program;
Eliminate the rural residency requirement for the YLs ;
Allow a borrower who had YL debt forgiveness to receive
future Government loans under certain circumstances;
Exclude MLs to beginning or veteran farmers from the
existing OL term limitations, and add a special ML interest rate
available to beginning and veteran farmers;
Eliminate the term limit for guaranteed OLs; and
Amend the definition of a beginning farmer, specifically
the maximum owned acreage requirement.
CL; Increase Percent of Guarantee
Guaranteed CLs promote conservation practices on farms that help
protect natural resources, and provide credit for farmers to implement
these conservation measures on their land. Unlike FSA's traditional FO
and OL Programs that are targeted toward family and less financially
established farmers, eligibility requirements for the CL Program permit
FSA to provide assistance to applicants who may not be a family farmer
or are financially strong.
Section 5002 of the 2014 Farm Bill amended section 304(e) of the
Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (CONACT) (7 U.S.C. 1924e)
to increase the percent of guarantee for CLs from 75 percent to 80
percent, and authorized a 90 percent guarantee for a qualified
beginning or socially disadvantaged (SDA) farmer. Lenders will now be
able to have a greater guarantee on CLs.
Previously, CL received a 75 percent guarantee, which was less than
the typical 90 percent guarantee on an FO or farm OL guarantee.
Partially due to this lower percentage of guarantee, the use of CLs
have been extremely limited since guaranteed FO or OL funds may also be
used for conservation purposes.
This rule amends 7 CFR 762.129 and 762.130 to increase the percent
of guarantee for CL. The increase in CL guarantee to 80 percent and the
even higher 90 percent guarantee to beginning or SDA farmers will
increase the use of CL guarantees used to implement conservation
practices, which benefit not only the farmer, but the environment as
well.
Direct FO as Part of Joint Financing Arrangement; Interest Rate
Direct FOs made as part of a participation (joint financing)
arrangement are eligible for a special joint financing interest rate.
These loans require that a commercial lender or private party provide a
portion of the financing, such that the FO does not exceed 50 percent
of the total amount financed. FOs may be used to purchase a farm,
enlarge an existing farm, construct or improve farm structures, pay
closing costs, and for soil and water conservation and protection.
Repayment terms may be as long as 40 years and the maximum FO
indebtedness is limited to $300,000.
Section 5003 of the 2014 Farm Bill amended section 307(a)(3) of the
CONACT (7 U.S.C. 1927(a)(3)) to reduce the interest rate for FOs that
are part of a joint financing arrangement. This joint financing
interest rate is the direct FO
[[Page 78690]]
regular interest rate minus 2 percent, with a floor of 2.5 percent.
Previously, the joint financing interest rate for FOs was 5 percent
and has been since March 24, 1997. For several years, the joint
financing interest rate of 5 percent has been higher than the direct FO
interest rate. As a result, there has been no financial incentive for
the farmer to finance a portion of the real estate purchase with
another lender, unless she or he qualified as a beginning or SDA farmer
who was able to receive a downpayment FO with a lower interest rate.
This rule amends 7 CFR 764.154 to change the interest rate for FOs
that are part of a joint financing arrangement. This reduced interest
rate for FOs made under a joint financing agreement will encourage
farmers to seek commercial lender financing, and therefore reduce FSA
financing of the farm to 50 percent or less. FSA expects to be able to
leverage the use of our typically limited direct FO funds, to assist an
even greater number of eligible family farmers.
Mineral Rights Appraisal; Eliminate Requirement
FSA uses appraisals to determine the value of real and personal
property. Appraisals ensure there is adequate security to support FSA
loan making and servicing actions.
Section 5004 of the 2014 Farm Bill eliminated the requirement that
in order for FSA to have the rights to oil, gas, or other minerals as
FO collateral, the products' value must be considered in the appraised
value of the real estate securing the loan.
Section 307(d) of the CONACT (7 U.S.C. 1927(d)), previously
required that for FOs; the value of oil, gas, or other minerals must be
included in the appraised value of the real estate security in order
for FSA to have a valid lien on those products. This rule removes this
mineral appraisal requirement in 7 CFR 761.7 and 765.252 for all future
FLP loans. For all loans made after February 7, 2014, the date of the
2014 Farm Bill was enacted, FSA will have a security interest in oil,
gas, or other minerals on or under the property regardless of whether
the value of those products were included in the appraisal value of the
property. This security interest is reflected in the FSA mortgage
forms.
Downpayment FOs; Increase Maximum Loan Amount
FSA downpayment FOs are used to assist beginning and SDA farmers in
purchasing a farm. The loans have a lower interest rate than other FO
loans and require participation by another lender, along with cash down
payment requirement of 5 percent.
Section 5005 of the 2014 Farm Bill amended section 310E(b)(1)(C) of
the CONACT (7 U.S.C. 1935(b)(1)(C)) to increase the maximum loan limit
for downpayment FOs to 45 percent of $667,000. This amount is $300,150;
however, section 305 of the CONACT (7 U.S.C. 1925) limits the maximum
loan amount for each FO, including downpayment FOs, to $300,000.
Previously, downpayment FOs were limited to a maximum of $225,000
(45 percent of $500,000) and all other types of direct FOs were limited
to $300,000. This difference in maximum loan amounts was a limiting
factor in many loan transactions, particularly as loan amounts have
increased due to rising farm real estate values. The rule amends 7 CFR
764.203 to increase the maximum loan limit for downpayment FO loans to
$300,000.
YL; Eliminate Rural Residency Requirement
FSA makes YL of up to $5,000 to eligible individual youths, ages 10
to 20, to finance income producing and agricultural related projects.
The project must be modest in size, educational, and initiated,
developed and carried out by youths participating in a 4-H Club, FFA,
or similar organization.
Section 5102 of the 2014 Farm Bill amended section 311(b)(1) of the
CONACT (7 U.S.C. 1941(b)(1)) to eliminate the rural residency
requirement for YL. Eligible youth in suburban and urban areas will now
be eligible for YL.
Previously, to be eligible for a YL the applicant had to reside in
a rural area. FSA regulations further defined this as ``residing in a
rural area, city, or town with a population of 50,000 or fewer
people.'' The rule amends 7 CFR 764.302 to eliminate the rural
residency requirement for YL. The removal of this requirement now
allows FSA to extend YL assistance to youth residing in suburban and
urban areas to finance eligible agricultural related projects.
YL; Forgiveness of Debt
Forgiveness of YL debt, due to circumstances beyond the borrower's
control, will no longer preclude the borrower from obtaining additional
loans from any U.S. Government agency. Additionally, borrowers with YL
debt forgiveness, or who are delinquent on a YL, will now be able to
receive student loans. The servicing and collection of YLs is not
affected by the statute and will continue under the present
regulations.
Section 5103 of the 2014 Farm Bill amended section 311(b) of the
CONACT (7 U.S.C. 1941(b)) to authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to,
on a case by case basis, provide debt forgiveness of a YL if the
borrower was unable to repay the loan due to circumstances beyond the
control of the borrower. The Secretary may also determine that the debt
forgiveness was caused by national disaster, act of terrorism, or other
man-made disaster that resulted in an inordinate level of damage
severely affecting the YL borrower. The debt forgiveness provided by
this section is not to be used by other Federal agencies in determining
eligibility of the borrower for any loan made or guaranteed by that
agency.
In no case will a borrower provided debt forgiveness or a
delinquent borrower be denied a loan or loan guarantee from the Federal
government to pay for educational expenses of the borrower. As a
practical matter, FSA has always provided debt forgiveness, in the form
of debt settlement, to YL borrowers on the same terms as any other
borrower. To determine if the forgiveness is beyond the borrower's
control, consideration of the circumstances will be added to the Agency
Handbooks and this rule revises the definition of ``debt forgiveness''
in 7 CFR 761.2. This will ensure that, if the inability to pay giving
rise to the debt forgiveness was due to circumstances beyond the
borrower's control, it will not be used in consideration of a FSA loan
application. As this is a mandate on the entire Federal Government with
particular emphasis on loans for educational expenses, FSA will also
make information regarding this change available to all YL borrowers
who receive debt forgiveness and any other Federal agency that is
considering a loan application from the borrower after debt forgiveness
or while they are delinquent.
With regard to YL debt servicing prior to debt forgiveness, the
Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996 (DCIA) (Pub. L. 104-134, April
26, 1996) requires that delinquent debts be reported to Treasury so
that centralized collection can be pursued through the Treasury Offset
Program and outside collection agencies. Section 373 of the CONACT (7
U.S.C. 2008h) also limits FSA direct loan borrowers to only one debt
forgiveness from FSA. These requirements were not changed by the 2014
Farm Bill.
[[Page 78691]]
ML; Exclude From OL Term Limit Rule and Special Interest Rate for
Beginning or Veteran Farmers
FSA initiated the ML Program in 2013 to better serve the unique
financial operating needs of beginning, niche, or the smallest of
family farm operations. ML offers more flexible access to credit for
these types of family farm operations, who often face limited financing
options.
Section 5106 of the 2014 Farm Bill amended section 311 of the
CONACT (7 U.S.C. 1941) to exclude MLs made to beginning or veteran
farmers from the direct OL term limit. Section 12201 of the 2014 Farm
Bill defines a ``veteran farmer or rancher'' as someone who has served
in the Armed Forces of the United States and who has not farmed, or has
farmed for 10 years or less. This rule amends 7 CFR 761.2 to include
the definition of a veteran farmer.
As previously mentioned, the term ``farm'' or ``farmer'' also
includes the term ``ranch'' or ``rancher,'' respectively. Therefore,
all references to the term ``farm'' or ``farmer'' will also
respectively include ``ranch'' or ``rancher,'' including the definition
of a ``veteran farmer.'' Once the farmer is no longer a beginning
farmer or once a veteran has farmed more than 10 years, any ML they
receive will count toward the OL term limit. Section 5106 of the 2014
Farm Bill also amended section 316 of the CONACT (7 U.S.C. 1946) to
make available a special interest rate on ML equal to half the rate on
5-year treasuries plus 1 percent, but never less than 5 percent, to
beginning or veteran farmers.
Previously, only MLs made to beginning farmers were excluded from
the OL term limit. This rule amends 7 CFR 764.252 to expand the
exclusion to include veteran farmers.
In addition, previously the ML interest rate was either the regular
OL rate or a limited resource rate. This rule amends 7 CFR 764.254 to
add the 2014 Farm Bill special ML interest rate that will be at the
same rate as the limited resource OL rate, but will not be subject to
special servicing reviews by FSA since it will not be considered a
limited resource interest rate. For a beginning or a veteran farmer
applying for a ML, they will now be able to choose between the direct
OL interest rate and the special ML interest rate. These changes in the
ML program will benefit both beginning and veteran farmers, who
typically have fewer financial resources and limited options available
to finance their farming operation.
Guaranteed OL; Eliminate Term Limit
Section 5107 of the 2014 Farm Bill amended section 319 of the
CONACT (7 U.S.C. 1949) to eliminate all guaranteed OL term limits.
Family farmers will no longer be restricted in the number of years they
can receive a guaranteed OL.
Guaranteed OLs are used to assist family farmers to obtain credit
for normal operating expenses, machinery, equipment, and livestock
purchases, minor real estate repairs or improvement, and to refinance
debt. The repayment term may vary, but are never longer than 7 years.
OLs used to pay for normal operating expenses are set up as a line of
credit and are typically repaid within 12 months.
Previously, guaranteed OL borrowers were limited to no more than 15
years in which they could receive OLs. As a result, many family farmers
who continued to have difficulty in meeting lender credit standards and
had received 15 years of OL, were unable to receive additional
guaranteed OLs. The rule amends 7 CFR 762.122 to eliminate all
guaranteed OL term limits. These family farmers will now be able to
obtain additional guaranteed OLs, which typically will provide them
with access to credit on better rates and terms.
Beginning Farmer; Amending Definition To Modify Acreage Ownership
Limitation
Section 5303 of the 2014 Farm Bill amended section 343 of the
CONACT (7 U.S.C. 1991) to change the owned real farm property limit
from 30 percent of the median farm acreage to 30 percent of the average
farm acreage. FSA makes and guarantees loans to beginning farmers who
are unable to obtain financing from commercial lenders. Each fiscal
year, FSA targets a portion of its direct and guaranteed FO and OL
funds to beginning farmers.
Previously, to meet FSA's definition of a beginning farmer, the
loan applicant must not have owned real farm property that exceeded 30
percent of the median farm acreage, except for an OL applicant.
According to the 2012 Census of Agriculture, nationally the median size
farm is 80 acres, while the average size farm is 434 acres. The farm
acreage limit, previously based on the median, set a limit so low in
many counties it precluded applicants who owned small acreages of real
farm property from qualifying as a beginning farmer. This eliminated
many otherwise qualified applicants from accessing FSA farm loan funds
targeted to beginning farmers. The rule amends 7 CFR 761.2 to change
the owned real farm property limit. The farm acreage limit, now based
on the average, will now allow many qualified applicants access to farm
loan funds targeted to beginning farmers, which previously were not
available to them.
Notice and Comment
In general, the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553)
requires that a notice of proposed rulemaking be published in the
Federal Register and interested persons be given an opportunity to
participate in the rulemaking through submission of written data,
views, or arguments with or without opportunity for oral presentation,
except when the rule involves a matter relating to public property,
loans, grants, benefits, or contracts. This rule involved matters
relating to loans and is therefore being published as a final rule
without the opportunity for comments.
Effective Date
The Administrative Procedure Act provides generally that before
rules are issued by Government agencies, the rule is required to be
published in the Federal Register, and the required publication of a
substantive rule is to be not less than 30 days before its effective
date. One of the exceptions is when the agency finds good cause for not
delaying the effective date. As noted above, the changes in this rule
are conforming changes because the 2014 Farm Bill allowed no discretion
in the changes and thus were implemented administratively after the
enactment of the 2014 Farm Bill. Using the administrative procedure
provisions in 5 U.S.C. 553, FSA finds that there is good cause for
making this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register. Therefore, this final rule is effective when
published in the Federal Register.
Executive Order 12866 and 13563
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' and
Executive Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,''
direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available
regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive
impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance
of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) designated this rule as
not
[[Page 78692]]
significant under Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and
Review,'' and, therefore, OMB was not required to review this final
rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-
612), as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness
Act of 1996 (SBREFA), generally require an agency to prepare a
regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to the notice and
comment rulemaking requirements under APA or any other law, unless the
agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. All FSA direct loan
borrowers and all farm entities affected by this rule are small
businesses according to the North American Industry Classification
System and the U. S. Small Business Administration. There is no
diversity in size of the entities affected by this rule, and the costs
to comply with it are the same for all entities.
In this rule, FSA is revising regulations that affect both loan
making and loan servicing. FSA does not expect these changes to impose
any additional cost to the lenders or borrowers. Therefore, FSA
certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Environmental
The environmental impacts of this rule have been considered in a
manner consistent with the provisions of the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347), the regulations of the Council
on Environmental Quality (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), and the FSA
regulations for compliance with NEPA (7 CFR part 1940, subpart G). The
changes contained in the rule are all mandatory changes required by the
2014 Farm Bill and involved no discretion by FSA, either in whether to
implement or how to implement the changes; therefore, they are not
subject to review under NEPA. FSA is making these changes through a
final rule to update the regulations to match the changes previously
implemented administratively with an agency directive in February 2014.
As such, FSA will not prepare an environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement for this regulatory action.
Executive Order 12372
Executive Order 12372, ``Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs,'' requires consultation with State and local officials. The
objectives of the Executive Order are to foster an intergovernmental
partnership and a strengthened Federalism, by relying on State and
local processes for State and local government coordination and review
of proposed Federal Financial assistance and direct Federal
development. For reasons set forth in the Notice to 7 CFR part 3015,
subpart V (48 FR 29115, June 24, 1983), the programs and activities
within this rule are excluded from the scope of Executive Order 12372.
Executive Order 12988
This final rule has been reviewed in accordance with Executive
Order 12988, ``Civil Justice Reform.'' This rule will not preempt State
and local laws and regulations unless they represent an irreconcilable
conflict with this rule. Before any judicial action may be brought
concerning the provisions of this rule the administrative appeal
provisions of 7 CFR parts 11 and 780 are to be exhausted.
Executive Order 13132
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 13132,
``Federalism.'' The policies contained in this rule do not have any
substantial direct effect on States, the relationship between the
Federal government and the States, or the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Nor does this
rule impose substantial direct compliance costs on State and local
governments. Therefore, consultation with the States is not required.
Executive Order 13175
This rule has been reviewed in accordance with the requirements of
Executive Order 13175, ``Consultation and Coordination with Indian
Tribal Governments.'' Executive Order 13175 requires Federal agencies
to consult and coordinate with tribes on a government-to-government
basis on policies that have tribal implications, including regulations,
legislative comments or proposed legislation, and other policy
statements or actions that have substantial direct effects on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government
and Indian tribes or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
FSA has assessed the impact of this rule on Indian tribes and
determined that this rule does not, to our knowledge, have tribal
implications that require tribal consultation under Executive Order
13175. If a Tribe requests consultation, FSA will work with the USDA
Office of Tribal Relations to ensure meaningful consultation is
provided where changes, additions, and modifications identified in this
rule are not expressly mandated by the 2014 Farm Bill.
Unfunded Mandates
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA, Pub. L.
104-4) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their
regulatory actions on State, local, or Tribal governments or the
private sector. Agencies generally must prepare a written statement,
including a cost benefit analysis, for final rule with Federal mandates
that may result in expenditures of $100 million or more in any 1 year
for State, local, or Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or to the
private sector. UMRA generally requires agencies to consider
alternatives and adopt the more cost effective or least burdensome
alternative that achieves the objectives of the rule. This rule
contains no Federal mandates under the regulatory provisions of Title
II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA, Pub. L. 104-4)
for State, local, or Tribal governments, or private sector. Therefore,
this rule is not subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of
UMRA.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This regulatory changes in this final rule do not require any
changes to the currently information collection request of OMB control
numbers, 0560-0155, 0560-0233, 0560-0236, 0560-0237, 0560-0238 and
0560-0230.
E-Government Act Compliance
FSA is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services and other purposes.
Federal Assistance Programs
The title and number of the Federal assistance programs, as found
in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance, to which this final rule
would apply are: 10.099 Conservation Loans; 10.404 Emergency Loans;
10.406 Farm Operating Loans; and10.407 Farm Ownership Loans.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 761
Accounting, Loan programs--agriculture, Rural areas.
[[Page 78693]]
7 CFR Part 762
Agriculture, Banks, Banking, Credit, Loan programs--agriculture,
Agricultural commodities, Livestock.
7 CFR Part 764
Agriculture, Disaster assistance, Loan programs--agriculture,
Agricultural commodities, Livestock.
7 CFR Part 765
Agriculture, Credit, Loan programs--agriculture, Agricultural
commodities, Livestock.
For the reasons discussed above, FSA amends 7 CFR chapter VII as
follows:
PART 761--FARM LOAN PROGRAM; GENERAL PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION
The authority citation for part 761 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 7 U.S.C. 1989.
Subpart A--General Provisions
0
1. Amend Sec. 761.2(b) as follows:
0
a. Amend the definition of ``Beginning farmer'' in paragraph (5) by
removing the word ``median'' each time it appears and adding the word
``average'' in its place;
0
b. Revise the definition of ``Debt forgiveness''; and
0
c. Add the definition of ``Veteran farmer'' in alphabetical order.
The additions read as follows:
Sec. 761.2 Abbreviations and definitions.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
* * * * *
Debt forgiveness is a reduction or termination of a debt under the
Act in a manner that results in a loss to the Agency.
(1) Debt forgiveness may be through:
(i) Writing down or writing off a debt pursuant to 7 U.S.C. 2001;
(ii) Compromising, adjusting, reducing, or charging off a debt or
claim pursuant to 7 U.S.C. 1981; or
(iii) Paying a loss pursuant to 7 U.S.C. 2005 on a FLP loan
guaranteed by the Agency.
(2) Debt forgiveness does not include:
(i) Debt reduction through a conservation contract;
(ii) Any writedown provided as part of the resolution of a
discrimination complaint against the Agency;
(iii) Prior debt forgiveness that has been repaid in its entirety;
(iv) Consolidation, rescheduling, reamortization, or deferral of a
loan; or
(v) Forgiveness of YL debt, due to circumstances beyond the
borrower's control.
The Agency will use the criteria in 7 CFR 766.104(a)(1) to
determine if the circumstances were beyond the borrower's control.
* * * * *
Veteran farmer is a farmer who has served in the Armed Forces (as
defined in 38 U.S.C. 101(10)) and who--
(1) has not operated a farm; or
(2) has operated a farm for not more than 10 years.
* * * * *
Sec. 761.7 [Amended]
0
2. In Sec. 761.7, remove paragraph (b)(3).
PART 762--GUARANTEED FARM LOANS
0
3. The authority citation for part 762 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 7 U.S.C. 1989.
Sec. 762.122 [Amended]
0
4. In Sec. 762.122, remove paragraph (b) and redesignate paragraphs
(c) through (e) as (b) through (d).
0
5. In Sec. 762.129, revise paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) to read as
follows:
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 762.129 Percent of guarantee and maximum loss.
(a) Percent of guarantee. The percent of guarantee will not exceed
90 percent based on the credit risk to the lender and the Agency both
before and after the transaction. The Agency will determine the
percentage of guarantee. See paragraph (b) of this section for
exceptions.
(b) Exceptions. The guarantee will be determined by the Agency
except:
(1) For OLs and FOs, the guarantee will be issued at 95 percent if:
(i) The sole purpose of a guaranteed FO or OL is to refinance an
Agency direct farm loan. When only a portion of the loan is used to
refinance a direct Agency loan, a weighted percentage of a guarantee
will be provided; or
(ii) When the purpose of a guaranteed FO is to participate in the
downpayment loan program; or
(iii) When a guaranteed OL is made to a farmer who is participating
in the Agency's down payment loan program. The guaranteed OL must be
made during the period that a borrower has the down payment loan
outstanding; or
(iv) When a guaranteed OL is made to a farmer whose farm land is
subject to the jurisdiction of an Indian tribe and whose loan is
secured by one or more security instruments that are subject to the
jurisdiction of an Indian tribe.
(2) For CLs, the guarantee will be issued at 80 percent; however,
the guarantee will be issued at 90 percent if:
(i) The applicant is a qualified SDA farmer; or
(ii) The applicant is a qualified beginning farmer.
(c) CLP and PLP guarantees. All guarantees issued to CLP or PLP
lenders will not be less than 80 percent.
* * * * *
Sec. 762.130 [Amended]
0
6. In Sec. 762.130(a)(2)(ii) remove ``75'' and add ``80 or 90'' in its
place.
PART 764--DIRECT LOAN MAKING
0
7. The authority citation for part 764 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 7 U.S.C. 1989.
Subpart E--Downpayment Loan Program
0
8. Revise Sec. 764.154(a)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 764.154 Rates and terms.
(a) * * *
(3) If the FO loan is part of a joint financing arrangement and the
amount of the Agency's loan does not exceed 50 percent of the total
amount financed, the interest rate charged will be the greater of the
following:
(i) The Agency's Direct Farm Ownership rate, available in each
Agency office, minus 2 percent; or
(ii) 2.5 percent.
* * * * *
0
9. Revise Sec. 764.203(b)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 764.203 Limitations.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) $667,000; subject to the direct FO dollar limit specified in 7
CFR 761.8(a)(1)(i).
* * * * *
Subpart G--Operating Loan Program
0
10. Revise Sec. 764.252 to read as follows:
Sec. 764.252 Eligibility requirements.
(a) The applicant must comply with the general eligibility
requirements established in Sec. 764.101.
(b) The applicant and anyone who will sign the promissory note,
except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, must not have
received debt forgiveness from the Agency on any direct or guaranteed
loan.
(c) The applicant and anyone who will sign the promissory note, may
receive direct OL loans to pay annual farm operating and family living
expenses, provided that the applicant
[[Page 78694]]
meets all other applicable requirements under this part, if the
applicant:
(1) Received a write-down under section 353 of the Act;
(2) Is current on payments under a confirmed reorganization plan
under Chapter 11, 12, or 13 of Title 11 of the United States Code; or
(3) Received debt forgiveness on not more than one occasion after
April 4, 1996, resulting directly and primarily from a Presidentially-
designated emergency for the county or contiguous county in which the
applicant operates. Only applicants who were current on all existing
direct and guaranteed FLP loans prior to the beginning date of the
incidence period of a Presidentially-designated emergency and received
debt forgiveness on that debt within 3 years after the designation of
such emergency meet this exception.
(d) In the case of an entity applicant, the entity must be:
(1) Controlled by farmers engaged primarily and directly in farming
in the United States; and
(2) Authorized to operate the farm in the State in which the farm
is located.
(e) The applicant and anyone who will sign the promissory note, may
close an OL in no more than 7 calendar years, either as an individual
or as a member of an entity, except as provided in paragraphs (e)(1)
through (4) of this section. The years may be consecutive or
nonconsecutive, and there is no limit on the number of OLs closed in a
year. Microloans made to a beginning farmer or a veteran farmer are not
counted toward this limitation. Youth loans are not counted toward this
limitation. The following exceptions apply:
(1) This limitation does not apply if the applicant and anyone who
will sign the promissory note is a beginning farmer.
(2) This limitation does not apply if the applicant's land is
subject to the jurisdiction of an Indian tribe, the loan is secured by
one or more security instruments subject to the jurisdiction of an
Indian tribe, and commercial credit is generally not available to such
farm operations.
(3) If the applicant, and anyone who will sign the promissory note,
has closed direct OL loans in 4 or more previous calendar years as of
April 4, 1996, the applicant is eligible to close OL loans in any 3
additional years after that date.
(4) On a case-by-case basis, may be granted a one-time waiver of OL
term limits for a period of 2 years, not subject to administrative
appeal, if the applicant:
(i) Has a financially viable operation;
(ii) And in the case of an entity, the members holding the majority
interest, applied for commercial credit from at least two lenders and
were unable to obtain a commercial loan, including an Agency-guaranteed
loan; and
(iii) Has successfully completed, or will complete within one year,
borrower training. Previous waivers to the borrower training
requirements are not applicable under this paragraph.
0
11. Add Sec. 764.254(a)(4) to read as follows:
Sec. 764.254 Rates and terms.
(a) * * *
(4) The Agency's Direct ML OL interest rate on an ML to a beginning
farmer or veteran farmer is available in each Agency office. ML
borrowers in these groups have the option of choosing the ML OL
interest rate or the Direct OL interest rate in effect at the time of
approval, or if lower, the rate in effect at the time of closing.
* * * * *
Sec. 764.302 [Amended]
0
12. In Sec. 764.302, remove paragraph (d) and redesignate paragraphs
(e) through (f) as paragraphs (d) through (e).
PART 765--DIRECT LOAN SERVICING--REGULAR
0
13. The authority citation for part 765 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 7 U.S.C. 1989.
Subpart F--Required Use and Operation of Agency Security
0
14. Revise Sec. 765.252(b)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 765.252 Lease of security.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) For FO loans made from December 23, 1985, to February 7, 2014,
and loans other than FO loans secured by real estate and made from
December 23, 1985, to November 1, 2013, the value of the mineral rights
must have been included in the original appraisal in order for the
Agency to obtain a security interest in any oil, gas, and other mineral
associated with the real estate security.
* * * * *
Signed on December 16, 2014.
Val Dolcini,
Administrator, Farm Service Agency.
[FR Doc. 2014-30172 Filed 12-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-05-P