Big Bar Ranger District; California; Burnt Ranch Fire Resilient Community Project, 77449-77453 [2014-30182]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 247 / Wednesday, December 24, 2014 / Notices
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Big Bar Ranger District; California;
Burnt Ranch Fire Resilient Community
Project
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Shasta-Trinity National
Forest (STNF) will prepare an
environmental impact statement (EIS) to
document and publicly disclose the
environmental effects of implementing a
hazardous fuels reduction project on
approximately 5,327 acres of National
Forest System lands. Activities are
proposed within the wildland urban
interface or WUI (the zone where
structures and other human
developments meet, or intermingle
with, undeveloped wild lands) of the
community of Burnt Ranch, California
as well as the Corral Late Successional
Reserve (LSR). The proposed project
would provide the Burnt Ranch
community and the LSR with enhanced
protection from catastrophic wildfire
and increased fire fighter and public
safety. The proposal includes thinning
trees from below in overcrowded stands,
plantations and along roadsides. Some
thinning would be accomplished
through commercial timber harvest of
sawtimber and/or biomass as well as
from prescribed burning. The Burnt
Ranch Fire Resilient Community Project
is located in sections 5, 4, 3, 2, 8, 9, 10,
11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 33, 34, and 35 in T. 5 N., R. 6
E.; sections 19 and 30 in T. 5 N., R. 7
E., sections 1, 2, 3, 11 and 12 in T. 4
N., R. 6 E. Humboldt Meridian.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received by
January 26, 2015. The draft
environmental impact statement is
expected May 2015 and the final
environmental impact statement is
expected February 2016.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Weaverville Ranger Station, P.O. Box
1190 Weaverville CA 96093. Comments
may also be sent via email to commentspacificsw-shasta-trinity-bigbarweaverville@fs.fed.us, or via facsimile to
(530) 623–6010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephanie Riess, Environmental
Coordinator at, (530) 623–1755, or
stephaniesriess@fs.fed.us.
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Dec 23, 2014
Jkt 235001
Purpose and Need for Action
The overarching goals of the current
planning effort is to move Burnt Ranch
towards becoming a ‘‘fire resilient’’
community and to promote and
maintain late successional conditions
within the Corral Late Successional
Reserve in the maximum amounts
sustainable through time. For this
project a ‘‘fire resilient’’ community is
defined as ‘‘communities that
experience minimum disruption to life
and economy after a hazard event has
passed’’. Community wildfire protection
focuses on increasing fire resilience by
managing vegetation proximate to
homes and other community values at
risk. Fire-safe planning can lead to
decreased property, infrastructure, and
habitat losses from fires within the
Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) and can
result in lower fire suppression costs.
The strategy focuses on implementing
complementary fuel and fire hazard
reduction actions on National Forest
System (NFS) lands of the ShastaTrinity National Forest (STNF) and on
adjacent private lands. These actions are
designed to implement the all lands
approach articulated by Agriculture
Secretary Tom Vilsack in a 2009 speech.
‘‘The threats facing our Forests don’t
recognize property boundaries. So in
developing a shared vision around
forest, we must also be willing to look
across property boundaries. In other
words, we must operate at a landscapescale by taking an all-lands approach’’.
Currently, partners engaged in the
planning effort on both private and
Forest Service lands include the Natural
Resource Conservation Service (NRCS),
Trinity County Resource Conservation
District (TCRCD), Willow Creek Fire
Safe Council, Trinity County Fire Safe
Council, Trinity County, Hawkins Bar
Volunteer Fire Department, and local
landowners.
The TCRCD and NRCS are currently
engaged in planning fuels reduction
treatments on private lands within the
Burnt Ranch community that will
contribute to the reduction of the
likelihood of adverse wildfire impacts
on the Burnt Ranch community and the
Corral LSR.
The Burnt Ranch Fire Resilient
Community Project actions are proposed
entirely on NFS lands of the ShastaTrinity National Forest. This decision
will not authorize any treatment on
lands not managed by the Forest
Service.
The Burnt Ranch Fire Resilient
Community project planning area is
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
77449
approximately 8,347 acres in size. It is
located in Trinity County, California.
Portions or all of the following Sections
fall within the planning area: Humboldt
Meridian, T. 4 N., R. 6 E., Section 1, 2,
3, 11, and 12. T. 5 N., R. 6 E., Section
5, 4, 3, 2, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17,
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 33, 34, and
35. T. 5 N., R. 7 E., Section 19, and 30.
The project area is within the Trinity
River Management Area (Management
Area #15) of the Shasta-Trinity Land
and Resource Management Plan
(LRMP).
The project area is entirely within the
WUI of the Burnt Ranch community as
identified in the Trinity County
Community Wildfire Protection Plan
Update 2010 (CWPP). In addition, the
majority of the planning area falls
within the Corral LSR.
Management objectives within LSRs
include protecting and enhancing
conditions of late-successional forest
ecosystems, which serve as habitat for
late-successional and old-growth related
species including the northern spotted
owl. There are approximately 5,912
acres of critical habitat for the
threatened Northern spotted owl within
the planning area.
Objectives for LSRs include reducing
the risk of large-scale disturbance,
including stand-replacing fire, insect
and disease epidemic, and major human
caused impacts. The Corral LSR has
been identified as being in an area of
elevated risk to large-scale disturbance
due to changes in the characteristics and
distribution of the mixed-conifer forests
resulting from past fire suppression.
There are approximately 5,912 acres
of critical habitat for the threatened
Northern spotted owl within the
planning area. In management within
designated Critical Habitat, and based
on the intent expressed by Forest
Service Chief Tom Tidwell and US Fish
and Wildlife Service Director Dan Ashe
April 24, 2013, our intent is to not be
so conservative that, to avoid risks, we
forego actions necessary to conserve
forest ecosystems necessary for the longterm conservation of the northern
spotted owl. At the same time, our
intent is also not to be so aggressive that
we subject spotted owls and their
habitat to treatments where the longterm benefits do not clearly outweigh
the short-term risks. Balance will be the
key to our success. In its rule on Critical
Habitat USFWS expressed: ‘‘The Service
encourages land managers to consider
the conservation of existing high-quality
northern spotted owl habitat, the
restoration of forest ecosystem health,
and the ecological forestry management
practices recommended in the Revised
Recovery Plan that are compatible with
E:\FR\FM\24DEN1.SGM
24DEN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
77450
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 247 / Wednesday, December 24, 2014 / Notices
both the goals of northern spotted owl
recovery and Standards and Guidelines
of the Northwest Forest Plan.’’
The 2011 Revised Recovery Plan has
the following Recovery Actions that
apply to the project area:
Recovery Action 10: Conserve spotted
owl sites and high value spotted owl
habitat to provide additional
demographic support to the spotted owl
population.
Recovery Action 32: Maintain
substantially all of the older and more
structurally complex multi-layered
conifer forests on Federal lands outside
of MOCAs in the Olympic Peninsula,
Western Washington Cascades, Western
Oregon Cascades, Oregon Coast Range,
Oregon and California Klamath, and
California Coast Provinces, allowing for
other threats, such as fire and insects, to
be addressed by restoration management
actions. These forests are characterized
as having large diameter trees, high
amounts of canopy cover, and
decadence components such as broken
topped live trees, mistletoe, cavities,
large snags, and fallen trees.
The proposed treatment areas are
derived from the WUI boundary, which
is divided into four zones. These WUI
zones are strategically employed by
Trinity County in their CWPP as well as
in the Shasta-Trinity National Forest
Fire Management Plan (FMP). The WUI
zones are situated by proximity to a
residence or structure. Treatments
within the zones are developed to move
that WUI zone towards specific fire
behavior goals. Zone one, the
Improvement Zone, is the residence or
structure itself and has a goal of being
a fire resistant structure or
improvement. Zone two, the Reduced
Fuel Zone, is the 100 foot area
surrounding a structure and has the fire
behavior goal of flame lengths less than
two feet with no crown fire potential.
Zone three, the Defense Zone, is 0.25
miles around a structure and has the fire
behavior goal of flame lengths less than
four feet and limited crown fire
potential. Zone four, the Threat Zone, is
1.5 miles around a structure and has fire
behavior goals of flame lengths less than
eight feet and bringing crown fire to the
ground (to a surface fire). No treatments
are proposed for Zone 1 or 2
(Improvement Zone and Reduced Fuel
Zone respectively), as these zones are
generally located on lands not
administered by the Forest Service.
In general, a need for action is
identified by comparing the existing
conditions in an area to desired future
conditions as defined by direction in the
Land and Resource Management Plan
and requirements of other applicable
laws and public policies.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Dec 23, 2014
Jkt 235001
In summary, the existing condition is
as follows:
• The existing fuel condition poses a
substantial hazard (measured by
potential fire behavior) to wildland
urban interface areas, including public
and firefighter safety during access and
egress; and the ability of firefighters to
safely and effectively suppress wildfire.
• The existing fuel condition poses a
substantial hazard (measured by
potential fire behavior) of a large-scale
disturbance that could result in the loss
of key late-successional structure within
the Corral LSR.
• Current overstocked conditions
within plantations limit the ability of
the plantations to develop late
successional characteristics.
Vegetation
In general, vegetation in the planning
area is mixed conifer type dominated by
Douglas-fir. Ponderosa pine, sugar pine,
and incense cedar are also common.
Several hardwoods, including Pacific
madrone, canyon live oak, tanoak,
California black oak, and Oregon white
oak, comprise a large component of
some stands. In these hardwood stands,
younger Douglas-fir are shading out the
hardwoods, simplifying stand structure.
Based on available information as
summarized in the Forest Wide Late
Successional Reserve Assessment
(USDA, 1999), historically, vegetation
was probably different in terms of
structure and species composition. In
general, forested stands tended to be
more open than currently found. There
was a lot of stand or patch size
diversity, with most of the patches
containing trees of the same age and size
class. The relatively denser stands were
most likely found on the lower one-half
of the north facing slopes, in riparian
areas, and areas of deep, productive
soils. More open stands occurred on
south facing and the upper one-half of
north facing slopes.
Currently, some stands within the
planning area contain from
approximately 400 to over 2,000 trees
per acre (TPA). Average canopy cover
ranges from approximately 80 to 96
percent in stands outside of plantations.
Given the vertical continuity of the
understory, canopy base height (CBH)
ranges from 3 to 26 feet. The majority
of the stands outside of plantations
measured an average CBH less than 13
feet.
Fuels Condition
Prior to European settlement,
naturally occurring levels of dead
woody material (snags and down logs)
were likely lower than present day due
to the frequency of fires. Fuel loadings
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
within small fuel size classes were
likely significantly less than they are
today, with the greatest proportion of
large down logs found in mesic areas,
north slopes, and higher elevations.
The historic fire regime has changed
from a short interval, low intensity
regime to a moderate to high intensity
fire regime with infrequent intervals.
Historically fires occurred at a 3 to 7
year interval, creating stands with open
canopies and keeping woody debris
levels low. It is reasonable to conclude
that historically, fuel loadings would
have, on average, ranged between 5–10
tons per acre.
Currently, dead and downed fuel
levels within the planning area are
variable; with fuel loadings ranging
between 5–40 tons per acre. The lowest
loadings are located in brush fields and
mixed hardwood stands that are
situated on dry, rocky south aspects.
Fuel loadings within conifer stands,
located on north aspects, tend to have
the highest fuel loadings. Ladder fuels
exist in a variety of settings within the
planning area, with the highest
concentration in canopy gaps adjacent
to conifer stands, and within
plantations.
Fire Hazard
Hazard describes potential fire
behavior, which has implications for
resource damage as well as suppression
capability. Currently approximately
85% of the planning area is classified as
having high to extreme fire hazard with
the potential for flame lengths over 8
feet in length. Resistance to control is
high under these conditions because
flame lengths are too intense for
firefighters to work near. It prevents
firefighters from directly attacking a
fire’s edge and requires specialized
equipment such as fire engines, air
tankers, dozers, and helicopters.
Additionally, 85% of the planning
area is classified as having the potential
for passive or active crown fire. These
conditions can allow for wildfire events
that threaten resources and property,
jeopardize public and firefighter safety,
create hazardous air conditions and
have very high suppression costs.
Plantations
Plantations within the planning area
currently range in age from 20 to 56
years. Trees per acre currently range
from approximately 140 to 720. Early
seral plantations (approximately 20
years old) are highly diverse in shrub
and herbaceous species, with the
dominant conifer trees measuring 5 to 8
inches diameter at breast height (DBH).
Some of the oldest plantations have
trees that are over 10 inches DBH. In
E:\FR\FM\24DEN1.SGM
24DEN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 247 / Wednesday, December 24, 2014 / Notices
these older plantations, the competition
between trees is greater and the
mortality rate is increasing as some trees
are being shaded out. Brush species are
also being shaded out, and these
plantations tend to be very dense with
contiguous vertical fuels from the soil
surface to the crown. In some cases,
plantations were planted heavily with
ponderosa pine. While this species does
occur in the project area, Douglas-fir is
better suited to many habitats and the
pine is being out-competed by the
Douglas-fir.
Plantations are particularly
susceptible to active crown fire due to
their low canopy base heights and
interlocking crowns. Plantations are
typically intermixed with brush and
grass ingrowth and these light flashy
fuels burn quickly with high intensities,
which can cause rapid rates of spread.
Wildfire moving through a plantation
located adjacent to a natural stand with
larger trees can provide a path for fire
to easily get into the upper canopy.
Because of this, and the proximity of
plantations to the Burnt Ranch
community, fire behavior goals for all
plantations with the WUI are designed
to reduce the fire behavior to flame
lengths less than four feet with limited
crown fire potential. Additionally,
mitigating the fire effects in a
plantation, if a fire should burn in the
project area, will improve the likelihood
that these young forests will continue
the development to become mature
forests. If a stand replacing fire occurs,
then forest development is restarted.
Overgrown plantations provide no
habitat or only poor to marginal habitat
for the majority of Forest Service
Sensitive or Federally-listed species
within the project area. Wildlife species
that may occur in these plantations tend
to be habitat generalists, such as deer
and rodents. However, the positioning
and occurrence of plantations relative to
older stands can offer a mosaic of
habitat types that is beneficial to many
species including those dependent on
late-successional habitat for nesting. A
mosaic of habitat types can be of
particular importance to species such as
Pacific fisher and spotted owl whose
prey will utilize these younger stands
for foraging and nesting. Thinned
plantations can also provide foraging
habitat for a wide variety of bird
species, such as owls, raptors and
passerines. There is a need to improve
the health and vigor of existing
plantations so that they can be retained
on the landscape and allowed to
develop into late-successional habitat.
The plantations in the Burnt Ranch
Project area are not developing the
structure and complexity that is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Dec 23, 2014
Jkt 235001
desirable for wildlife species dependent
on late-successional forests.
Reforestation strategy has evolved as the
management of the forest has evolved.
Trees were planted densely with an
assumption that these planted areas
would be actively managed until they
were ready to harvest again. This
strategy has generated the need for
treatments designed to support the
growth and development of latesuccessional forest structure.
Desired Future Conditions
Desired future conditions for the
planning area are described in the
LRMP, as well as in the Burnt Ranch
and Soldier Creek Watershed Analysis
(WA), the Trinity County CWPP update,
and the Forest Wide Late Successional
Reserve Assessment (LSRA). In
summary, these desired future
conditions are as follows:
• Forest Goal: Achieve a balance of
fire suppression capability and fuels
management investments that are cost
effective and able to meet ecosystem
objectives and protection
responsibilities (LRMP, page 4–4).
• Forest Standard and Guidelines:
Activity fuels that remain after meeting
wildlife, riparian, soil, and other
environmental needs will be considered
surplus and a potential fire hazard. The
amount and method of disposal will be
determined in the ecosystem analysis
(LRMP, page 4–17). Consider fuelbreak
construction investments when they
complement Forest health/biomass
reduction needs, very high and
extensive resource values are at risk and
to protect Forest communities. Design
fire prevention efforts to minimize
human-caused wildfires commensurate
with the resource values-at-risk. Natural
fuels will be treated in the following
order of priority: (1) Public safety; (2)
high investment situations; (3) known
high fire occurrence areas; (4)
coordinated resource benefits i.e.
ecosystem maintenance for natural fire
regimes (LRMP, page 4–18).
• Management Area Direction: Latesuccessional reserve stands are managed
to maintain health and diversity
components through the use of
prescribed fire and thinning from below
(LRMP, page 4–142).
• Burnt Ranch and Soldier Creek
Watershed Analysis: Develop fuel
breaks, thin wild stands and
plantations, and create roadside buffers
to reduce fuel loading and enhance fire
protection capability (WA page, 61).
• Trinity County CWPP update:
Consider proactive thinning and fuels
reduction of plantations during their
period of greatest vulnerability to fire
(CWPP update, page 79). Implementing
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
77451
a system of strategic fuel breaks along
ridges and roadsides is suggested as an
extremely productive and agreed upon
strategy for creating a more fire-safe
community (CWPP update, page 80).
• Forest Wide Late Successional
Reserve Assessment: Large stand
replacing, high intensity fires are not
desirable within LSRs. Throughout the
LSRs, fuel conditions should generally
range from low to moderate fire
behavior (LSRA, page 163).
The goals of the current planning
effort are to move Burnt Ranch towards
becoming a ‘‘fire resilient’’ community
and to promote and maintain late
successional conditions within the
Corral LSR in the maximum amounts
sustainable through time. This proposal
would change the current potential fire
behavior within the Burnt Ranch WUI to
fire behavior similar to the goals given
for each WUI zone. In addition, the
following needs will help reduce the
risk of fire spreading from NFS lands to
private lands while also reducing the
risk of fire spreading from private lands
to NFS lands.
1. There is a need to reduce the
potential fire behavior in the WUI
Defense Zone to low intensity
(measured by flame lengths averaging 4
feet or less and with limited crown fire
potential) during 90th percentile
weather conditions.
2. There is a need to reduce the
potential fire behavior in the WUI
Threat Zone to moderate intensity
(measured by flame lengths averaging 8
feet or less and bringing crown fire to
the ground) during 90th percentile
weather conditions.
3. There is a need to reduce the
potential fire behavior along roadsides
within the planning area to establish an
environment where fire fighters can
safely and effectively suppress
wildfires, and allow for safer access and
egress routes for the public.
4. There is a need to reduce the
potential for high to extreme fire
behavior within the Corral LSR to low
to moderate fire behavior (measured by
flame lengths and crown fire potential)
during 90th percentile weather
conditions.
Proposed Action
The proposed action was developed
based on the purpose and need using
fire modeling, research, professional
and local knowledge, and vegetation
and fuel loading data collected for the
project area. A total of 5,327 acres are
proposed for one or more treatment
types. As part of the proposed action,
resource protection measures will be
included that assure consistency with
environmental laws such as the
E:\FR\FM\24DEN1.SGM
24DEN1
77452
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 247 / Wednesday, December 24, 2014 / Notices
Endangered Species Act, the Clean Air
Act, the Clean Water Act, the National
Historic Preservation Act and the
National Forest Management Act.
spreading from private lands to NFS
lands.
Authorization for Road Use
As part of the proposed action, the
Forest will authorize the temporary
administrative use of Forest System
roads 5N15, 5N10, 5N09B, 5N27B and
5N60B. These roads are currently
classified as Maintenance Level 1,
closed to vehicular traffic, considered
intermittent service roads, until needed
for future management activities. These
roads would be opened (existing berms
would be removed and routine
maintenance such as brushing or
grading of the road could take place to
make them safe for use) as needed to
access treatment units. All level 1 roads
utilized for project implementation
would be closed (berms rebuilt, etc.)
after initial thinning treatments are
completed.
Roads 5N30, 5N60BA and 5N27C are
private roads under Special Use
Authorizations. The STNF will seek
input from the permittees on dual use
of these roads under FSM 7700 and
FSM 2700.
Plantations
There are approximately 942 acres of
plantations within the planning area
that were planted between 1958 and
1993. Treatments in plantations will
focus on increasing the spacing between
trees, thinning around hardwoods and
multiple sprouting hardwoods, and, in
general, breaking up the continuity of
surface, ladder, and crown fuels.
Treatments would be applied where
trees per acre (TPA), canopy base height
or fuel loading do not meet desired
conditions All plantation acres are
proposed for utilization of forest
products (sawlog and/or biomass
utilization) where feasible. The slope of
the area, the ability to operate groundbased equipment, and hydrological
features can all impact the feasibility of
utilization of forest products.
In plantations with a high percentage
of ponderosa pine, thinning will remove
many of the trees that have been outcompeted by the natural regeneration
(Douglas-fir and incense cedar), creating
an open stand. These treatments will
accelerate the development of late
successional characteristics by creating
a forest that is complex vertically and
horizontally. When there are a variety of
tree ages, tree species, and spacing
distances between individual trees
(including openings and dense pockets)
the forest can support a diversity of
wildlife species that may not all have
the same requirements. Treatments are
designed to reduce the fire behavior in
the plantations to flame lengths less
than four feet with limited crown fire
potential.
Defense Zone Treatments
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Defense Zone Units
Approximately 1,514 acres located
within the WUI Defense Zone are
proposed for treatment. Of those,
approximately 420 acres will have
understory treatments only with no
material proposed for removal. The
remaining Defense Zone Units
(approximately 1,094 acres) are
proposed to have understory treatments
as well as thin-from-below treatments
which would involve mechanical
removal (sawlog and/or biomass
utilization). Treatments would be
applied where trees per acre (TPA),
canopy base height or fuel loading do
not meet desired conditions. Treatments
will reduce the TPA, especially in the
smaller size classes and increase the
canopy base height (CBH), leaving
smaller trees singly and/or in a clumped
distribution spaced from the largest
trees. In general, trees to be removed
consist of understory trees (i.e.
suppressed and intermediate) that act as
ladder fuels, and some co-dominant
trees that currently create a uniformly
dense canopy. Treatments are designed
to reduce the fire behavior in the
Defense Zone Units to flame lengths of
less than four feet with limited crown
fire potential. These lower flame lengths
will help reduce the risk of fire
spreading from NFS lands to private
lands while also reducing the risk of fire
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Dec 23, 2014
Jkt 235001
Defense Zone and Threat Zone
Treatments
Roadside Fuel Breaks
Approximately 1,975 acres are
proposed for roadside fuel breaks in the
planning area. These treatments extend
600 feet from either side of identified
roads. Fuel breaks are further delineated
into three different profiles. Profile one
extends from the road edge out 100 feet,
profile two from 100 to 300 feet, and
profile three from 300 to 600 feet.
Treatment prescriptions will be most
intense closer to the road, and reduce in
intensity the farther away from the road
with the objectives of establishing an
environment where fire fighters can
suppress fire safely and effectively.
Treatments would be applied where
trees per acre (TPA), canopy base height
or fuel loading do not meet desired
conditions. Roadside fuel breaks will
allow for safer access and egress routes
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
for the public, while also reducing the
risk that fires started near roads will
spread to the rest of the forest.
Profiles one and two (approximately
1,140 acres) are proposed for understory
treatments as well as thin-from-below
treatments which could involve
mechanical removal (sawlog and/or
biomass utilization). Understory
treatments with no removal are
proposed for profile three
(approximately 836 acres). Treatments
will reduce the TPA (especially in the
smaller size classes) and increase the
canopy base height. The treatment will
also leave smaller trees singly and in a
clumped distribution spaced from the
largest trees in the fuel break.
Activities Common to Defense Zone
Units, Plantations, and Roadside Fuel
Breaks
These actions may occur at the same
time or at a later date as the primary
actions, and may occur where there is
no removal proposed. These activities
would only occur within defense zone
units, treated plantations, and roadside
fuel breaks. Treatments would reduce
and/or rearrange activity and surface
fuels in excess of desired conditions.
Treatments would be applied where
trees per acre (TPA), canopy base height
or fuel loading do not meet desired
conditions. Activities will promote
long-term late successional conditions
by creating heterogeneity and increased
resilience to large high-severity fires.
• Pruning to raise CBH—
approximately 4,431 acres. This
treatment could occur within all
Defense Zone Units, Plantations and
Roadside Fuel Breaks.
• Activity fuels and natural surface
fuels in excess of desired conditions
that are not proposed for removal will
be treated solely by or a combination of
the following:
Æ Lopped and scattered—
approximately 672 acres. This treatment
could occur intermittently within
Defense Zone Units, Roadside Fuel
Breaks, and Plantations depending on
fuel loading conditions after initial
treatments and slope steepness.
Æ Masticated or chipped (on slopes
<35%)—approximately 2,942 acres.
This treatment could occur
intermittently across Defense Zone
Units, Roadside Fuel Breaks, and
Plantations depending on slope
steepness, accessibility and fuel loading.
Æ Machine piled and burned (slopes
<35%)—approximately 150 acres. This
treatment could occur intermittently
across Defense Zone Units, Roadside
Fuel Breaks, and Plantations where
mechanical removal (sawlog and/or
biomass utilization) is proposed.
E:\FR\FM\24DEN1.SGM
24DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 247 / Wednesday, December 24, 2014 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Æ Hand piled and burned—
approximately 4,431 acres. This
treatment could occur intermittently
across Defense Zone Units, Roadside
Fuel Breaks, and Plantations depending
on slope steepness, proximity to homes
and air quality concerns.
Æ Jackpot burned—approximately
4,431 acres. This treatment could occur
intermittently across Defense Zone
Units, Roadside Fuel Breaks, and
Plantations depending on slope,
proximity to homes and air quality
concerns.
Æ Public Fuelwood Utilization—
approximately 2,520 acres. This
treatment would leave material suitable
for public fuel wood use onsite in areas
that are accessible, or decked along the
roadside where safe to do so. This
treatment could occur intermittently
across Defense Zone Units, Roadside
Fuel Breaks, and Plantations.
Æ Understory Maintenance Burning—
Approximately 4,431 acres. This
treatment could occur within
approximately two to ten years after
initial treatment, or as the surface fuel
conditions require for maintaining the
desired fire behavior. This treatment
could occur within all Defense Zone
Units, Plantations, and Roadside Fuel
Breaks. Multiple burn entries may be
needed to maintain desired vegetation
and fuel loadings.
Prescribed Fire Understory Units
Approximately 896 acres are
proposed for prescribed understory fire
treatment. No thinning will occur in
these units. Treatments are intended to
move these areas toward historic fire
regime and fuel loading conditions and
to allow fire personnel to make use of
roads, natural barriers, and topography
(such as ridge tops and drainages) for
control lines during prescribed burning
activities in other units (see previous
section). The Prescribed Fire Understory
Units will help reduce the overall
amount of control lines needed within
the planning area, allowing for more
cost effective and safer understory
burning, and reducing the potential for
resource damage. Multiple burn entries
of primarily low to moderate intensity
fire may be needed to maintain desired
vegetation and fuel loadings. Natural
boundaries would be used whenever
possible; however, control line
construction will still be needed in
some areas. Desired outcomes are a
mosaic-burn severity pattern primarily
from low to moderate intensity surface
fire across 70–80% of the treatment
area. Treatments would be applied
where trees per acre (TPA), canopy base
height or fuel loading do not meet
desired conditions. This treatment
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Dec 23, 2014
Jkt 235001
would create mosaic forest conditions
that contribute to late successional
characteristics while providing a more
fire-resilient landscape.
Responsible Official
Forest Supervisor, Shasta-Trinity
National Forest.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Forest Supervisor will decide
whether to implement the proposed
action, take an alternative action that
meets the purpose and need or take no
action.
Scoping Process
The project is included in the ShastaTrinity National Forest’s quarterly
schedule of proposed actions (SOPA).
Detailed information on the proposed
action, including maps, that will aid in
the informing comments will be
available on the Forest Web site at:
https://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/nepa_
project_exp.php?project=38444.
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process, which guides the
development of the environmental
impact statement.
It is important that reviewers provide
their comments at such times and in
such manner that they are useful to the
agency’s preparation of the
environmental impact statement.
Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the
comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer’s concerns and
contentions.
Comments received in response to
this solicitation, including names and
addresses of those who comment, will
be part of the public record for this
proposed action. Comments submitted
anonymously will be accepted and
considered, however.
Dated: December 17, 2014.
David R. Myers,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2014–30182 Filed 12–23–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
The Department of Commerce will
submit to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for clearance the
following proposal for collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35).
Agency: National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
77453
Title: The Ocean Enterprise: A study
of U.S. business activity in ocean
measurement, observation and
forecasting.
OMB Control Number: 0648–xxxx.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Request: Regular (request for
a new information collection).
Number of Respondents: 300.
Average Hours per Response: 25
minutes.
Burden Hours: 125.
Needs and Uses: This request is for a
new information collection supported
by Section 12302(3) of the Integrated
Coastal and Ocean Observation System
Act (ICOOS Act) part of the Omnibus
Public Land Management Act of 2009
(Pub. L. 111–11). The survey is
voluntary.
NOAA’s National Ocean Service is
requesting approval of a Web-based
survey of employers who provide either
services or infrastructure to the
Integrated Ocean Observing System
(IOOS) or organizations that add value
to the IOOS data and other outputs by
tailoring them for specific end uses. The
purpose of the survey and overall
project is to gather data to articulate the
collective and derived value of the IOOS
enterprise, and to create a profile of
businesses and organizations who are
involved with providing services or
utilizing the data for other specific end
uses. This is the first survey of its kind
on a national scale. The project is
funded by NOAA and is being
conducted on its behalf by the
contractor, ERISS Corporation. The
project contract spans three years with
the first portion of the contract mainly
involved with researching and selecting
appropriate businesses to include in the
study database. The Web survey will be
the main data collection piece of the
project and is necessary in order to
collect demographic, financial, and
functional information for each
organization with regards to their
involvement with IOOS. The final
deliverable of this project is an analytic
report detailing the findings of the web
survey and the analysis of the employer
database.
The marine technology industry is an
important partner and stakeholder
within IOOS; however, without the
baseline that this study will provide,
IOOS is unable to articulate its
collective and derived value. The results
will demonstrate the size and economic
impact of IOOS data to the United States
marine ocean sector. That information
can be used to understand the value of
export sales and the identification of
potential growth and/or new
international markets which would
further the Department of Commerce
E:\FR\FM\24DEN1.SGM
24DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77449-77453]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30182]
[[Page 77449]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Big Bar Ranger District; California; Burnt Ranch Fire Resilient
Community Project
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Shasta-Trinity National Forest (STNF) will prepare an
environmental impact statement (EIS) to document and publicly disclose
the environmental effects of implementing a hazardous fuels reduction
project on approximately 5,327 acres of National Forest System lands.
Activities are proposed within the wildland urban interface or WUI (the
zone where structures and other human developments meet, or intermingle
with, undeveloped wild lands) of the community of Burnt Ranch,
California as well as the Corral Late Successional Reserve (LSR). The
proposed project would provide the Burnt Ranch community and the LSR
with enhanced protection from catastrophic wildfire and increased fire
fighter and public safety. The proposal includes thinning trees from
below in overcrowded stands, plantations and along roadsides. Some
thinning would be accomplished through commercial timber harvest of
sawtimber and/or biomass as well as from prescribed burning. The Burnt
Ranch Fire Resilient Community Project is located in sections 5, 4, 3,
2, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 33,
34, and 35 in T. 5 N., R. 6 E.; sections 19 and 30 in T. 5 N., R. 7 E.,
sections 1, 2, 3, 11 and 12 in T. 4 N., R. 6 E. Humboldt Meridian.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received
by January 26, 2015. The draft environmental impact statement is
expected May 2015 and the final environmental impact statement is
expected February 2016.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Weaverville Ranger Station, P.O.
Box 1190 Weaverville CA 96093. Comments may also be sent via email to
comments-pacificsw-shasta-trinity-bigbar-weaverville@fs.fed.us, or via
facsimile to (530) 623-6010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephanie Riess, Environmental
Coordinator at, (530) 623-1755, or stephaniesriess@fs.fed.us.
Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD)
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
The overarching goals of the current planning effort is to move
Burnt Ranch towards becoming a ``fire resilient'' community and to
promote and maintain late successional conditions within the Corral
Late Successional Reserve in the maximum amounts sustainable through
time. For this project a ``fire resilient'' community is defined as
``communities that experience minimum disruption to life and economy
after a hazard event has passed''. Community wildfire protection
focuses on increasing fire resilience by managing vegetation proximate
to homes and other community values at risk. Fire-safe planning can
lead to decreased property, infrastructure, and habitat losses from
fires within the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) and can result in lower
fire suppression costs.
The strategy focuses on implementing complementary fuel and fire
hazard reduction actions on National Forest System (NFS) lands of the
Shasta-Trinity National Forest (STNF) and on adjacent private lands.
These actions are designed to implement the all lands approach
articulated by Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack in a 2009 speech.
``The threats facing our Forests don't recognize property boundaries.
So in developing a shared vision around forest, we must also be willing
to look across property boundaries. In other words, we must operate at
a landscape-scale by taking an all-lands approach''.
Currently, partners engaged in the planning effort on both private
and Forest Service lands include the Natural Resource Conservation
Service (NRCS), Trinity County Resource Conservation District (TCRCD),
Willow Creek Fire Safe Council, Trinity County Fire Safe Council,
Trinity County, Hawkins Bar Volunteer Fire Department, and local
landowners.
The TCRCD and NRCS are currently engaged in planning fuels
reduction treatments on private lands within the Burnt Ranch community
that will contribute to the reduction of the likelihood of adverse
wildfire impacts on the Burnt Ranch community and the Corral LSR.
The Burnt Ranch Fire Resilient Community Project actions are
proposed entirely on NFS lands of the Shasta-Trinity National Forest.
This decision will not authorize any treatment on lands not managed by
the Forest Service.
The Burnt Ranch Fire Resilient Community project planning area is
approximately 8,347 acres in size. It is located in Trinity County,
California. Portions or all of the following Sections fall within the
planning area: Humboldt Meridian, T. 4 N., R. 6 E., Section 1, 2, 3,
11, and 12. T. 5 N., R. 6 E., Section 5, 4, 3, 2, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15,
16, 17, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 33, 34, and 35. T. 5 N., R. 7
E., Section 19, and 30.
The project area is within the Trinity River Management Area
(Management Area #15) of the Shasta-Trinity Land and Resource
Management Plan (LRMP).
The project area is entirely within the WUI of the Burnt Ranch
community as identified in the Trinity County Community Wildfire
Protection Plan Update 2010 (CWPP). In addition, the majority of the
planning area falls within the Corral LSR.
Management objectives within LSRs include protecting and enhancing
conditions of late-successional forest ecosystems, which serve as
habitat for late-successional and old-growth related species including
the northern spotted owl. There are approximately 5,912 acres of
critical habitat for the threatened Northern spotted owl within the
planning area.
Objectives for LSRs include reducing the risk of large-scale
disturbance, including stand-replacing fire, insect and disease
epidemic, and major human caused impacts. The Corral LSR has been
identified as being in an area of elevated risk to large-scale
disturbance due to changes in the characteristics and distribution of
the mixed-conifer forests resulting from past fire suppression.
There are approximately 5,912 acres of critical habitat for the
threatened Northern spotted owl within the planning area. In management
within designated Critical Habitat, and based on the intent expressed
by Forest Service Chief Tom Tidwell and US Fish and Wildlife Service
Director Dan Ashe April 24, 2013, our intent is to not be so
conservative that, to avoid risks, we forego actions necessary to
conserve forest ecosystems necessary for the long-term conservation of
the northern spotted owl. At the same time, our intent is also not to
be so aggressive that we subject spotted owls and their habitat to
treatments where the long-term benefits do not clearly outweigh the
short-term risks. Balance will be the key to our success. In its rule
on Critical Habitat USFWS expressed: ``The Service encourages land
managers to consider the conservation of existing high-quality northern
spotted owl habitat, the restoration of forest ecosystem health, and
the ecological forestry management practices recommended in the Revised
Recovery Plan that are compatible with
[[Page 77450]]
both the goals of northern spotted owl recovery and Standards and
Guidelines of the Northwest Forest Plan.''
The 2011 Revised Recovery Plan has the following Recovery Actions
that apply to the project area:
Recovery Action 10: Conserve spotted owl sites and high value
spotted owl habitat to provide additional demographic support to the
spotted owl population.
Recovery Action 32: Maintain substantially all of the older and
more structurally complex multi-layered conifer forests on Federal
lands outside of MOCAs in the Olympic Peninsula, Western Washington
Cascades, Western Oregon Cascades, Oregon Coast Range, Oregon and
California Klamath, and California Coast Provinces, allowing for other
threats, such as fire and insects, to be addressed by restoration
management actions. These forests are characterized as having large
diameter trees, high amounts of canopy cover, and decadence components
such as broken topped live trees, mistletoe, cavities, large snags, and
fallen trees.
The proposed treatment areas are derived from the WUI boundary,
which is divided into four zones. These WUI zones are strategically
employed by Trinity County in their CWPP as well as in the Shasta-
Trinity National Forest Fire Management Plan (FMP). The WUI zones are
situated by proximity to a residence or structure. Treatments within
the zones are developed to move that WUI zone towards specific fire
behavior goals. Zone one, the Improvement Zone, is the residence or
structure itself and has a goal of being a fire resistant structure or
improvement. Zone two, the Reduced Fuel Zone, is the 100 foot area
surrounding a structure and has the fire behavior goal of flame lengths
less than two feet with no crown fire potential. Zone three, the
Defense Zone, is 0.25 miles around a structure and has the fire
behavior goal of flame lengths less than four feet and limited crown
fire potential. Zone four, the Threat Zone, is 1.5 miles around a
structure and has fire behavior goals of flame lengths less than eight
feet and bringing crown fire to the ground (to a surface fire). No
treatments are proposed for Zone 1 or 2 (Improvement Zone and Reduced
Fuel Zone respectively), as these zones are generally located on lands
not administered by the Forest Service.
In general, a need for action is identified by comparing the
existing conditions in an area to desired future conditions as defined
by direction in the Land and Resource Management Plan and requirements
of other applicable laws and public policies.
In summary, the existing condition is as follows:
The existing fuel condition poses a substantial hazard
(measured by potential fire behavior) to wildland urban interface
areas, including public and firefighter safety during access and
egress; and the ability of firefighters to safely and effectively
suppress wildfire.
The existing fuel condition poses a substantial hazard
(measured by potential fire behavior) of a large-scale disturbance that
could result in the loss of key late-successional structure within the
Corral LSR.
Current overstocked conditions within plantations limit
the ability of the plantations to develop late successional
characteristics.
Vegetation
In general, vegetation in the planning area is mixed conifer type
dominated by Douglas-fir. Ponderosa pine, sugar pine, and incense cedar
are also common. Several hardwoods, including Pacific madrone, canyon
live oak, tanoak, California black oak, and Oregon white oak, comprise
a large component of some stands. In these hardwood stands, younger
Douglas-fir are shading out the hardwoods, simplifying stand structure.
Based on available information as summarized in the Forest Wide
Late Successional Reserve Assessment (USDA, 1999), historically,
vegetation was probably different in terms of structure and species
composition. In general, forested stands tended to be more open than
currently found. There was a lot of stand or patch size diversity, with
most of the patches containing trees of the same age and size class.
The relatively denser stands were most likely found on the lower one-
half of the north facing slopes, in riparian areas, and areas of deep,
productive soils. More open stands occurred on south facing and the
upper one-half of north facing slopes.
Currently, some stands within the planning area contain from
approximately 400 to over 2,000 trees per acre (TPA). Average canopy
cover ranges from approximately 80 to 96 percent in stands outside of
plantations. Given the vertical continuity of the understory, canopy
base height (CBH) ranges from 3 to 26 feet. The majority of the stands
outside of plantations measured an average CBH less than 13 feet.
Fuels Condition
Prior to European settlement, naturally occurring levels of dead
woody material (snags and down logs) were likely lower than present day
due to the frequency of fires. Fuel loadings within small fuel size
classes were likely significantly less than they are today, with the
greatest proportion of large down logs found in mesic areas, north
slopes, and higher elevations.
The historic fire regime has changed from a short interval, low
intensity regime to a moderate to high intensity fire regime with
infrequent intervals. Historically fires occurred at a 3 to 7 year
interval, creating stands with open canopies and keeping woody debris
levels low. It is reasonable to conclude that historically, fuel
loadings would have, on average, ranged between 5-10 tons per acre.
Currently, dead and downed fuel levels within the planning area are
variable; with fuel loadings ranging between 5-40 tons per acre. The
lowest loadings are located in brush fields and mixed hardwood stands
that are situated on dry, rocky south aspects. Fuel loadings within
conifer stands, located on north aspects, tend to have the highest fuel
loadings. Ladder fuels exist in a variety of settings within the
planning area, with the highest concentration in canopy gaps adjacent
to conifer stands, and within plantations.
Fire Hazard
Hazard describes potential fire behavior, which has implications
for resource damage as well as suppression capability. Currently
approximately 85% of the planning area is classified as having high to
extreme fire hazard with the potential for flame lengths over 8 feet in
length. Resistance to control is high under these conditions because
flame lengths are too intense for firefighters to work near. It
prevents firefighters from directly attacking a fire's edge and
requires specialized equipment such as fire engines, air tankers,
dozers, and helicopters.
Additionally, 85% of the planning area is classified as having the
potential for passive or active crown fire. These conditions can allow
for wildfire events that threaten resources and property, jeopardize
public and firefighter safety, create hazardous air conditions and have
very high suppression costs.
Plantations
Plantations within the planning area currently range in age from 20
to 56 years. Trees per acre currently range from approximately 140 to
720. Early seral plantations (approximately 20 years old) are highly
diverse in shrub and herbaceous species, with the dominant conifer
trees measuring 5 to 8 inches diameter at breast height (DBH). Some of
the oldest plantations have trees that are over 10 inches DBH. In
[[Page 77451]]
these older plantations, the competition between trees is greater and
the mortality rate is increasing as some trees are being shaded out.
Brush species are also being shaded out, and these plantations tend to
be very dense with contiguous vertical fuels from the soil surface to
the crown. In some cases, plantations were planted heavily with
ponderosa pine. While this species does occur in the project area,
Douglas-fir is better suited to many habitats and the pine is being
out-competed by the Douglas-fir.
Plantations are particularly susceptible to active crown fire due
to their low canopy base heights and interlocking crowns. Plantations
are typically intermixed with brush and grass ingrowth and these light
flashy fuels burn quickly with high intensities, which can cause rapid
rates of spread. Wildfire moving through a plantation located adjacent
to a natural stand with larger trees can provide a path for fire to
easily get into the upper canopy. Because of this, and the proximity of
plantations to the Burnt Ranch community, fire behavior goals for all
plantations with the WUI are designed to reduce the fire behavior to
flame lengths less than four feet with limited crown fire potential.
Additionally, mitigating the fire effects in a plantation, if a fire
should burn in the project area, will improve the likelihood that these
young forests will continue the development to become mature forests.
If a stand replacing fire occurs, then forest development is restarted.
Overgrown plantations provide no habitat or only poor to marginal
habitat for the majority of Forest Service Sensitive or Federally-
listed species within the project area. Wildlife species that may occur
in these plantations tend to be habitat generalists, such as deer and
rodents. However, the positioning and occurrence of plantations
relative to older stands can offer a mosaic of habitat types that is
beneficial to many species including those dependent on late-
successional habitat for nesting. A mosaic of habitat types can be of
particular importance to species such as Pacific fisher and spotted owl
whose prey will utilize these younger stands for foraging and nesting.
Thinned plantations can also provide foraging habitat for a wide
variety of bird species, such as owls, raptors and passerines. There is
a need to improve the health and vigor of existing plantations so that
they can be retained on the landscape and allowed to develop into late-
successional habitat.
The plantations in the Burnt Ranch Project area are not developing
the structure and complexity that is desirable for wildlife species
dependent on late-successional forests. Reforestation strategy has
evolved as the management of the forest has evolved. Trees were planted
densely with an assumption that these planted areas would be actively
managed until they were ready to harvest again. This strategy has
generated the need for treatments designed to support the growth and
development of late-successional forest structure.
Desired Future Conditions
Desired future conditions for the planning area are described in
the LRMP, as well as in the Burnt Ranch and Soldier Creek Watershed
Analysis (WA), the Trinity County CWPP update, and the Forest Wide Late
Successional Reserve Assessment (LSRA). In summary, these desired
future conditions are as follows:
Forest Goal: Achieve a balance of fire suppression
capability and fuels management investments that are cost effective and
able to meet ecosystem objectives and protection responsibilities
(LRMP, page 4-4).
Forest Standard and Guidelines: Activity fuels that remain
after meeting wildlife, riparian, soil, and other environmental needs
will be considered surplus and a potential fire hazard. The amount and
method of disposal will be determined in the ecosystem analysis (LRMP,
page 4-17). Consider fuelbreak construction investments when they
complement Forest health/biomass reduction needs, very high and
extensive resource values are at risk and to protect Forest
communities. Design fire prevention efforts to minimize human-caused
wildfires commensurate with the resource values-at-risk. Natural fuels
will be treated in the following order of priority: (1) Public safety;
(2) high investment situations; (3) known high fire occurrence areas;
(4) coordinated resource benefits i.e. ecosystem maintenance for
natural fire regimes (LRMP, page 4-18).
Management Area Direction: Late-successional reserve
stands are managed to maintain health and diversity components through
the use of prescribed fire and thinning from below (LRMP, page 4-142).
Burnt Ranch and Soldier Creek Watershed Analysis: Develop
fuel breaks, thin wild stands and plantations, and create roadside
buffers to reduce fuel loading and enhance fire protection capability
(WA page, 61).
Trinity County CWPP update: Consider proactive thinning
and fuels reduction of plantations during their period of greatest
vulnerability to fire (CWPP update, page 79). Implementing a system of
strategic fuel breaks along ridges and roadsides is suggested as an
extremely productive and agreed upon strategy for creating a more fire-
safe community (CWPP update, page 80).
Forest Wide Late Successional Reserve Assessment: Large
stand replacing, high intensity fires are not desirable within LSRs.
Throughout the LSRs, fuel conditions should generally range from low to
moderate fire behavior (LSRA, page 163).
The goals of the current planning effort are to move Burnt Ranch
towards becoming a ``fire resilient'' community and to promote and
maintain late successional conditions within the Corral LSR in the
maximum amounts sustainable through time. This proposal would change
the current potential fire behavior within the Burnt Ranch WUI to fire
behavior similar to the goals given for each WUI zone. In addition, the
following needs will help reduce the risk of fire spreading from NFS
lands to private lands while also reducing the risk of fire spreading
from private lands to NFS lands.
1. There is a need to reduce the potential fire behavior in the WUI
Defense Zone to low intensity (measured by flame lengths averaging 4
feet or less and with limited crown fire potential) during 90th
percentile weather conditions.
2. There is a need to reduce the potential fire behavior in the WUI
Threat Zone to moderate intensity (measured by flame lengths averaging
8 feet or less and bringing crown fire to the ground) during 90th
percentile weather conditions.
3. There is a need to reduce the potential fire behavior along
roadsides within the planning area to establish an environment where
fire fighters can safely and effectively suppress wildfires, and allow
for safer access and egress routes for the public.
4. There is a need to reduce the potential for high to extreme fire
behavior within the Corral LSR to low to moderate fire behavior
(measured by flame lengths and crown fire potential) during 90th
percentile weather conditions.
Proposed Action
The proposed action was developed based on the purpose and need
using fire modeling, research, professional and local knowledge, and
vegetation and fuel loading data collected for the project area. A
total of 5,327 acres are proposed for one or more treatment types. As
part of the proposed action, resource protection measures will be
included that assure consistency with environmental laws such as the
[[Page 77452]]
Endangered Species Act, the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the
National Historic Preservation Act and the National Forest Management
Act.
Authorization for Road Use
As part of the proposed action, the Forest will authorize the
temporary administrative use of Forest System roads 5N15, 5N10, 5N09B,
5N27B and 5N60B. These roads are currently classified as Maintenance
Level 1, closed to vehicular traffic, considered intermittent service
roads, until needed for future management activities. These roads would
be opened (existing berms would be removed and routine maintenance such
as brushing or grading of the road could take place to make them safe
for use) as needed to access treatment units. All level 1 roads
utilized for project implementation would be closed (berms rebuilt,
etc.) after initial thinning treatments are completed.
Roads 5N30, 5N60BA and 5N27C are private roads under Special Use
Authorizations. The STNF will seek input from the permittees on dual
use of these roads under FSM 7700 and FSM 2700.
Defense Zone Treatments
Defense Zone Units
Approximately 1,514 acres located within the WUI Defense Zone are
proposed for treatment. Of those, approximately 420 acres will have
understory treatments only with no material proposed for removal. The
remaining Defense Zone Units (approximately 1,094 acres) are proposed
to have understory treatments as well as thin-from-below treatments
which would involve mechanical removal (sawlog and/or biomass
utilization). Treatments would be applied where trees per acre (TPA),
canopy base height or fuel loading do not meet desired conditions.
Treatments will reduce the TPA, especially in the smaller size classes
and increase the canopy base height (CBH), leaving smaller trees singly
and/or in a clumped distribution spaced from the largest trees. In
general, trees to be removed consist of understory trees (i.e.
suppressed and intermediate) that act as ladder fuels, and some co-
dominant trees that currently create a uniformly dense canopy.
Treatments are designed to reduce the fire behavior in the Defense Zone
Units to flame lengths of less than four feet with limited crown fire
potential. These lower flame lengths will help reduce the risk of fire
spreading from NFS lands to private lands while also reducing the risk
of fire spreading from private lands to NFS lands.
Defense Zone and Threat Zone Treatments
Plantations
There are approximately 942 acres of plantations within the
planning area that were planted between 1958 and 1993. Treatments in
plantations will focus on increasing the spacing between trees,
thinning around hardwoods and multiple sprouting hardwoods, and, in
general, breaking up the continuity of surface, ladder, and crown
fuels. Treatments would be applied where trees per acre (TPA), canopy
base height or fuel loading do not meet desired conditions All
plantation acres are proposed for utilization of forest products
(sawlog and/or biomass utilization) where feasible. The slope of the
area, the ability to operate ground-based equipment, and hydrological
features can all impact the feasibility of utilization of forest
products.
In plantations with a high percentage of ponderosa pine, thinning
will remove many of the trees that have been out-competed by the
natural regeneration (Douglas-fir and incense cedar), creating an open
stand. These treatments will accelerate the development of late
successional characteristics by creating a forest that is complex
vertically and horizontally. When there are a variety of tree ages,
tree species, and spacing distances between individual trees (including
openings and dense pockets) the forest can support a diversity of
wildlife species that may not all have the same requirements.
Treatments are designed to reduce the fire behavior in the plantations
to flame lengths less than four feet with limited crown fire potential.
Roadside Fuel Breaks
Approximately 1,975 acres are proposed for roadside fuel breaks in
the planning area. These treatments extend 600 feet from either side of
identified roads. Fuel breaks are further delineated into three
different profiles. Profile one extends from the road edge out 100
feet, profile two from 100 to 300 feet, and profile three from 300 to
600 feet. Treatment prescriptions will be most intense closer to the
road, and reduce in intensity the farther away from the road with the
objectives of establishing an environment where fire fighters can
suppress fire safely and effectively. Treatments would be applied where
trees per acre (TPA), canopy base height or fuel loading do not meet
desired conditions. Roadside fuel breaks will allow for safer access
and egress routes for the public, while also reducing the risk that
fires started near roads will spread to the rest of the forest.
Profiles one and two (approximately 1,140 acres) are proposed for
understory treatments as well as thin-from-below treatments which could
involve mechanical removal (sawlog and/or biomass utilization).
Understory treatments with no removal are proposed for profile three
(approximately 836 acres). Treatments will reduce the TPA (especially
in the smaller size classes) and increase the canopy base height. The
treatment will also leave smaller trees singly and in a clumped
distribution spaced from the largest trees in the fuel break.
Activities Common to Defense Zone Units, Plantations, and Roadside Fuel
Breaks
These actions may occur at the same time or at a later date as the
primary actions, and may occur where there is no removal proposed.
These activities would only occur within defense zone units, treated
plantations, and roadside fuel breaks. Treatments would reduce and/or
rearrange activity and surface fuels in excess of desired conditions.
Treatments would be applied where trees per acre (TPA), canopy base
height or fuel loading do not meet desired conditions. Activities will
promote long-term late successional conditions by creating
heterogeneity and increased resilience to large high-severity fires.
Pruning to raise CBH--approximately 4,431 acres. This
treatment could occur within all Defense Zone Units, Plantations and
Roadside Fuel Breaks.
Activity fuels and natural surface fuels in excess of
desired conditions that are not proposed for removal will be treated
solely by or a combination of the following:
[cir] Lopped and scattered--approximately 672 acres. This treatment
could occur intermittently within Defense Zone Units, Roadside Fuel
Breaks, and Plantations depending on fuel loading conditions after
initial treatments and slope steepness.
[cir] Masticated or chipped (on slopes <35%)--approximately 2,942
acres. This treatment could occur intermittently across Defense Zone
Units, Roadside Fuel Breaks, and Plantations depending on slope
steepness, accessibility and fuel loading.
[cir] Machine piled and burned (slopes <35%)--approximately 150
acres. This treatment could occur intermittently across Defense Zone
Units, Roadside Fuel Breaks, and Plantations where mechanical removal
(sawlog and/or biomass utilization) is proposed.
[[Page 77453]]
[cir] Hand piled and burned--approximately 4,431 acres. This
treatment could occur intermittently across Defense Zone Units,
Roadside Fuel Breaks, and Plantations depending on slope steepness,
proximity to homes and air quality concerns.
[cir] Jackpot burned--approximately 4,431 acres. This treatment
could occur intermittently across Defense Zone Units, Roadside Fuel
Breaks, and Plantations depending on slope, proximity to homes and air
quality concerns.
[cir] Public Fuelwood Utilization--approximately 2,520 acres. This
treatment would leave material suitable for public fuel wood use onsite
in areas that are accessible, or decked along the roadside where safe
to do so. This treatment could occur intermittently across Defense Zone
Units, Roadside Fuel Breaks, and Plantations.
[cir] Understory Maintenance Burning--Approximately 4,431 acres.
This treatment could occur within approximately two to ten years after
initial treatment, or as the surface fuel conditions require for
maintaining the desired fire behavior. This treatment could occur
within all Defense Zone Units, Plantations, and Roadside Fuel Breaks.
Multiple burn entries may be needed to maintain desired vegetation and
fuel loadings.
Prescribed Fire Understory Units
Approximately 896 acres are proposed for prescribed understory fire
treatment. No thinning will occur in these units. Treatments are
intended to move these areas toward historic fire regime and fuel
loading conditions and to allow fire personnel to make use of roads,
natural barriers, and topography (such as ridge tops and drainages) for
control lines during prescribed burning activities in other units (see
previous section). The Prescribed Fire Understory Units will help
reduce the overall amount of control lines needed within the planning
area, allowing for more cost effective and safer understory burning,
and reducing the potential for resource damage. Multiple burn entries
of primarily low to moderate intensity fire may be needed to maintain
desired vegetation and fuel loadings. Natural boundaries would be used
whenever possible; however, control line construction will still be
needed in some areas. Desired outcomes are a mosaic-burn severity
pattern primarily from low to moderate intensity surface fire across
70-80% of the treatment area. Treatments would be applied where trees
per acre (TPA), canopy base height or fuel loading do not meet desired
conditions. This treatment would create mosaic forest conditions that
contribute to late successional characteristics while providing a more
fire-resilient landscape.
Responsible Official
Forest Supervisor, Shasta-Trinity National Forest.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Forest Supervisor will decide whether to implement the proposed
action, take an alternative action that meets the purpose and need or
take no action.
Scoping Process
The project is included in the Shasta-Trinity National Forest's
quarterly schedule of proposed actions (SOPA). Detailed information on
the proposed action, including maps, that will aid in the informing
comments will be available on the Forest Web site at: https://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/nepa_project_exp.php?project=38444.
This notice of intent initiates the scoping process, which guides
the development of the environmental impact statement.
It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times
and in such manner that they are useful to the agency's preparation of
the environmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer's concerns and contentions.
Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names
and addresses of those who comment, will be part of the public record
for this proposed action. Comments submitted anonymously will be
accepted and considered, however.
Dated: December 17, 2014.
David R. Myers,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2014-30182 Filed 12-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P