ET-Plus Guardrail End Terminal, 77595-77596 [2014-30081]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 247 / Wednesday, December 24, 2014 / Notices
Background
The National Parks Air Tour
Management Act of 2000 (the Act) was
enacted on April 5, 2000, as Public Law
106–181. The Act required the
establishment of the advisory group
within 1 year after its enactment. The
NPOAG was established in March 2001.
The advisory group is comprised of a
balanced group of representatives of
general aviation, commercial air tour
operations, environmental concerns,
and Native American tribes. The
Administrator of the FAA and the
Director of NPS (or their designees)
serve as ex officio members of the
group. Representatives of the
Administrator and Director serve
alternating 1-year terms as chairman of
the advisory group.
In accordance with the Act, the
advisory group provides ‘‘advice,
information, and recommendations to
the Administrator and the Director(1) On the implementation of this title
[the Act] and the amendments made by
this title;
(2) On commonly accepted quiet
aircraft technology for use in
commercial air tour operations over a
national park or tribal lands, which will
receive preferential treatment in a given
air tour management plan;
(3) On other measures that might be
taken to accommodate the interests of
visitors to national parks; and
(4) At the request of the Administrator
and the Director, safety, environmental,
and other issues related to commercial
air tour operations over a national park
or tribal lands.’’
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Membership
The NPOAG ARC is made up of one
member representing general aviation,
three members representing the
commercial air tour industry, four
members representing environmental
concerns, and two members
representing Native American interests.
Current members of the NPOAG ARC
are as follows:
The current NPOAG consists of Heidi
Williams representing general aviation;
Alan Stephen, Mark Francis, and
Matthew Zuccaro representing
commercial air tour operators; Michael
Sutton and Dick Hingson representing
environmental interests with two open
seats; and Rory Majenty and Martin
Begaye representing Native American
interests. Mr. Majenty’s 3-year
membership expires on April 2, 2015.
Selection
In order to retain balance within the
NPOAG ARC, the FAA and NPS are
seeking candidates interested in filling
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Dec 23, 2014
Jkt 235001
the two current open seats and Mr.
Majenty’s soon to be expiring seat. The
two open seats to be filled will represent
environmental concerns and the one
upcoming opening will represent Native
American interests. The FAA and NPS
invite persons interested in representing
environmental concerns or Native
American interests on the ARC to
contact Mr. Keith Lusk (contact
information is written above in FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Requests to serve on the ARC must be
made to Mr. Lusk in writing and
postmarked or emailed on or before
January 30, 2015. The request should
indicate whether or not you are a
member of an association or group
related to environmental issues or a
Native American tribe or have another
affiliation with issues relating to aircraft
flights over national parks. The request
should also state what expertise you
would bring to the NPOAG ARC as
related to these issues and concerns.
The term of service for NPOAG ARC
members is 3 years. Current members
may re-apply for another term.
On June 18, 2010, President Obama
signed a Presidential Memorandum
directing agencies in the Executive
Branch not to appoint or re-appoint
federally registered lobbyists to advisory
committees and other boards and
commissions. Therefore, before
appointing an applicant to serve on the
NPOAG, the FAA and NPS will require
the prospective candidate to certify that
they are not a federally registered
lobbyist.
Issued in Hawthorne, CA on December 16,
2014.
Keith Lusk,
Program Manager, Special Programs Staff,
Western-Pacific Region.
[FR Doc. 2014–30263 Filed 12–23–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
[Docket No. FHWA–2014–0039]
ET-Plus Guardrail End Terminal
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice; Request for Information.
AGENCY:
The purpose of this notice is
to request data and information
regarding the ET-Plus guardrail end
terminal (ET-Plus) manufactured by
Trinity Industries, Inc. (Trinity). In
2005, the FHWA determined that ETPlus guardrail end terminal met the
relevant crash test criteria and therefore
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00155
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
77595
was eligible for Federal-aid highway
funding. This fall, a jury issued a verdict
that Trinity made a false or fraudulent
claim to FHWA when it sought the
eligibility determination for the ET-Plus.
Additionally, a number of parties have
raised concerns about the in-service
performance of the ET-Plus and the
potential variability in the dimensions
of installed units of the ET-Plus. As a
result, FHWA is undertaking a number
of efforts to assess these issues. The
FHWA is seeking technical information
and data to assist in this work.
DATES: Data and information must be
submitted to FHWA on or before
February 9, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Mail or hand deliver data
and information to the U.S. Department
of Transportation, Dockets Management
Facility, Room W12–140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC
20590, or fax comments to (202) 493–
2251. Alternatively, data or information
may be submitted to the Federal
eRulemaking portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. Please note that
the Federal eRulemaking portal is
unable to receive videos or any
document larger than 10MB. If you
would like to submit a video or a
document that is 10MB or larger, please
directly contact one of the individuals
identified in this notice. All data and
information must include the docket
number that appears in the heading of
this document. All data and information
received will be available for
examination and copying at the above
address from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., e.t.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. Those desiring notification of
receipt of data and information must
include a self-addressed, stamped
postcard or you may print the
acknowledgment page that appears after
submitting comments electronically.
Anyone is able to search the electronic
form of all information in any one of our
dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the information (or signing
the information, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, or labor
union). The DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its
activities. The DOT posts these
comments, without edit, including any
personal information the commenter
provides, to www.regulations.gov, as
described in the system of records
notice (DOT/ALL–14 FDMS), which can
be reviewed at www.dot.gov/privacy.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mike Griffith, Office of Safety, 202–366–
9469, mike.griffith@dot.gov, Federal
Highway Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC
20590. For legal questions, please
E:\FR\FM\24DEN1.SGM
24DEN1
77596
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 247 / Wednesday, December 24, 2014 / Notices
contact Jennifer Mayo, Assistant Chief
Counsel, FHWA Office of the Chief
Counsel, (202) 366–1523, or via email at
jennifer.mayo@dot.gov, Federal
Highway Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC
20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access and Filing
You may submit or retrieve
information online through the Federal
eRulemaking portal at:
www.regulations.gov. The Web site is
available 24 hours each day, 365 days
each year. Electronic submission and
retrieval help and guidelines are
available under the help section of the
Web site.
An electronic copy of this document
may also be downloaded from Office of
the Federal Register’s Web site at: https://
www.archives.gov/federal_register and
the Government Printing Office’s Web
site at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Background
As a national leader in highway
safety, FHWA is responsible for
ensuring that America’s roads continue
to remain among the safest in the world.
This commitment to safety is the
principle that guides all our efforts, and
FHWA is acting on multiple fronts to
ensure the safety of roadside safety
hardware and, specifically, the ET-Plus
guardrail end terminal.
The FHWA’s strategy includes a datadriven determination regarding the
performance of the ET-Plus and
reviewing our existing processes for
assessing the safety of roadside safety
hardware to determine whether we need
to change them.
Most immediately, we need to reach
a conclusion about the performance of
the ET-Plus based on the data we are
collecting and reviewing. Our first step
is to review all previous crash tests of
the device and to obtain new testing to
ensure that the ET-Plus meets the
National Cooperative Highway Research
Program test criteria (NCHRP 350) test
criteria applicable to this device. These
tests, along with field measurements of
installed devices, will help confirm that
the at least 200,000 ET-Plus devices on
the system met the same criteria as all
other guardrail end treatments. We
expect to receive, review, and make the
crash test results public in early 2015,
after the completion of the testing and
our review of the data. If the ET-Plus
end terminal fails the crash tests or
FHWA otherwise determines that the
ET-Plus poses safety concerns to the
traveling public, FHWA will revoke the
eligibility letter for the device.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Dec 23, 2014
Jkt 235001
More broadly, FHWA is reviewing
multiple sources of information we have
collected to assess whether the ET-Plus
has vulnerabilities outside of the
NCHRP 350 testing now being
conducted. The review of this
information will help FHWA determine
whether to require additional testing of
the ET-Plus or other devices in the same
class.
Another key component of FHWA’s
ongoing efforts is to evaluate the inservice performance of the ET-Plus. We
are collecting a broad array of data to
support this assessment. The FHWA
asked all State DOTs to send us
information regarding the performance
of the ET-Plus on their roadways.
Additionally, we have obtained
information about the ET-Plus that was
presented in the recent trial in Texas, as
well as data received from parties
involved in the trial. We have analyzed
our own safety data and data from our
Federal safety partners, including the
Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Study,
the Highway Safety Information System,
and the Fatality Analysis Reporting
System. We will objectively and
thoroughly assess all of this information
to reach a data-driven conclusion about
the real-world performance of the ETPlus.
Purpose of This Notice
As part of our information gathering
about crashes involving the ET-Plus
guardrail end terminal, FHWA is
seeking data and information regarding
the in-service performance of the ETPlus. In particular, we are seeking two
sets of data and information. First, we
are asking for any data and information
concerning vehicle crashes involving
the ET-Plus. Second, we are asking for
any data and information about the
dimensions of the ET-Plus as installed
along roadways.
1. ET-Plus Crash Data and
Information. The FHWA is seeking data
and information concerning vehicle
crashes involving the ET-Plus. We are
seeking crash reports, photographs of
damaged ET-Plus devices at crash
scenes, photographs of vehicles at crash
scenes that impacted ET-Plus devices,
and crash reconstruction reports with
corresponding data. The type of data
and information we are requesting
includes, but is not limited to the
following:
• Crash narratives;
• Crash diagrams;
• Severity of the crash as noted in the
crash report (Killed, A injury, B injury,
etc.);
• The approximate mass, speed, and
angle of impact of the vehicle;
PO 00000
Frm 00156
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
• The orientation of the vehicle as it
impacted the terminal (head-on, sideimpact, front corner, etc.);
• The location of the crash (State,
route, county, mile marker);
• The type of road on which the crash
occurred;
• The weather at the time of the
crash;
• The condition of the shoulder and/
or roadside at the time of the crash;
• The installation and maintenance
history of the terminal; and
• The condition of the terminal prior
to the impact.
2. ET-Plus Dimensions as Installed.
The FHWA is seeking data concerning
the dimensions of the ET-Plus devices
installed on highways. In particular, we
are interested in a few key dimensions:
Channel width, exit gap, guide chute
exit height, and outside guide channel
length. We also are interested in any
other dimensions that could be useful in
determining the in-service performance
of the ET-Plus. We are asking for
existing data and information that the
public may have and are not asking the
public to undertake any activities that
may risk the safety of themselves or
others.
The FHWA plans to objectively and
thoroughly assess all data and
information provide to us. We ask that
any data or information be provided on
or before February 9, 2015.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.),
Federal agencies must obtain approval
from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for each collection of
information they conduct, sponsor, or
require through regulations. This action
contains a collection of information
requirement under the PRA. This
information collection requirement has
been previously submitted to OMB for
approval, pursuant to the provisions of
the PRA. The requirement has been
approved through May 31, 2017; OMB
Control No. 2125–0025.
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 148 and 315.
Issued on: December 18, 2014.
Gregory G. Nadeau,
Acting Administrator, Federal Highway
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014–30081 Filed 12–23–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
E:\FR\FM\24DEN1.SGM
24DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77595-77596]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30081]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
[Docket No. FHWA-2014-0039]
ET-Plus Guardrail End Terminal
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice; Request for Information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The purpose of this notice is to request data and information
regarding the ET-Plus guardrail end terminal (ET-Plus) manufactured by
Trinity Industries, Inc. (Trinity). In 2005, the FHWA determined that
ET-Plus guardrail end terminal met the relevant crash test criteria and
therefore was eligible for Federal-aid highway funding. This fall, a
jury issued a verdict that Trinity made a false or fraudulent claim to
FHWA when it sought the eligibility determination for the ET-Plus.
Additionally, a number of parties have raised concerns about the in-
service performance of the ET-Plus and the potential variability in the
dimensions of installed units of the ET-Plus. As a result, FHWA is
undertaking a number of efforts to assess these issues. The FHWA is
seeking technical information and data to assist in this work.
DATES: Data and information must be submitted to FHWA on or before
February 9, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Mail or hand deliver data and information to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Dockets Management Facility, Room W12-
140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, or fax comments
to (202) 493-2251. Alternatively, data or information may be submitted
to the Federal eRulemaking portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Please
note that the Federal eRulemaking portal is unable to receive videos or
any document larger than 10MB. If you would like to submit a video or a
document that is 10MB or larger, please directly contact one of the
individuals identified in this notice. All data and information must
include the docket number that appears in the heading of this document.
All data and information received will be available for examination and
copying at the above address from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., e.t., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays. Those desiring notification of
receipt of data and information must include a self-addressed, stamped
postcard or you may print the acknowledgment page that appears after
submitting comments electronically. Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all information in any one of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the information (or signing the
information, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, or
labor union). The DOT solicits comments from the public to better
inform its activities. The DOT posts these comments, without edit,
including any personal information the commenter provides, to
www.regulations.gov, as described in the system of records notice (DOT/
ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at www.dot.gov/privacy.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Griffith, Office of Safety, 202-
366-9469, mike.griffith@dot.gov, Federal Highway Administration, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. For legal questions,
please
[[Page 77596]]
contact Jennifer Mayo, Assistant Chief Counsel, FHWA Office of the
Chief Counsel, (202) 366-1523, or via email at jennifer.mayo@dot.gov,
Federal Highway Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access and Filing
You may submit or retrieve information online through the Federal
eRulemaking portal at: www.regulations.gov. The Web site is available
24 hours each day, 365 days each year. Electronic submission and
retrieval help and guidelines are available under the help section of
the Web site.
An electronic copy of this document may also be downloaded from
Office of the Federal Register's Web site at: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register and the Government Printing Office's Web site at:
https://www.gpoaccess.gov.
Background
As a national leader in highway safety, FHWA is responsible for
ensuring that America's roads continue to remain among the safest in
the world. This commitment to safety is the principle that guides all
our efforts, and FHWA is acting on multiple fronts to ensure the safety
of roadside safety hardware and, specifically, the ET-Plus guardrail
end terminal.
The FHWA's strategy includes a data-driven determination regarding
the performance of the ET-Plus and reviewing our existing processes for
assessing the safety of roadside safety hardware to determine whether
we need to change them.
Most immediately, we need to reach a conclusion about the
performance of the ET-Plus based on the data we are collecting and
reviewing. Our first step is to review all previous crash tests of the
device and to obtain new testing to ensure that the ET-Plus meets the
National Cooperative Highway Research Program test criteria (NCHRP 350)
test criteria applicable to this device. These tests, along with field
measurements of installed devices, will help confirm that the at least
200,000 ET-Plus devices on the system met the same criteria as all
other guardrail end treatments. We expect to receive, review, and make
the crash test results public in early 2015, after the completion of
the testing and our review of the data. If the ET-Plus end terminal
fails the crash tests or FHWA otherwise determines that the ET-Plus
poses safety concerns to the traveling public, FHWA will revoke the
eligibility letter for the device.
More broadly, FHWA is reviewing multiple sources of information we
have collected to assess whether the ET-Plus has vulnerabilities
outside of the NCHRP 350 testing now being conducted. The review of
this information will help FHWA determine whether to require additional
testing of the ET-Plus or other devices in the same class.
Another key component of FHWA's ongoing efforts is to evaluate the
in-service performance of the ET-Plus. We are collecting a broad array
of data to support this assessment. The FHWA asked all State DOTs to
send us information regarding the performance of the ET-Plus on their
roadways. Additionally, we have obtained information about the ET-Plus
that was presented in the recent trial in Texas, as well as data
received from parties involved in the trial. We have analyzed our own
safety data and data from our Federal safety partners, including the
Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Study, the Highway Safety Information
System, and the Fatality Analysis Reporting System. We will objectively
and thoroughly assess all of this information to reach a data-driven
conclusion about the real-world performance of the ET-Plus.
Purpose of This Notice
As part of our information gathering about crashes involving the
ET-Plus guardrail end terminal, FHWA is seeking data and information
regarding the in-service performance of the ET-Plus. In particular, we
are seeking two sets of data and information. First, we are asking for
any data and information concerning vehicle crashes involving the ET-
Plus. Second, we are asking for any data and information about the
dimensions of the ET-Plus as installed along roadways.
1. ET-Plus Crash Data and Information. The FHWA is seeking data and
information concerning vehicle crashes involving the ET-Plus. We are
seeking crash reports, photographs of damaged ET-Plus devices at crash
scenes, photographs of vehicles at crash scenes that impacted ET-Plus
devices, and crash reconstruction reports with corresponding data. The
type of data and information we are requesting includes, but is not
limited to the following:
Crash narratives;
Crash diagrams;
Severity of the crash as noted in the crash report
(Killed, A injury, B injury, etc.);
The approximate mass, speed, and angle of impact of the
vehicle;
The orientation of the vehicle as it impacted the terminal
(head-on, side-impact, front corner, etc.);
The location of the crash (State, route, county, mile
marker);
The type of road on which the crash occurred;
The weather at the time of the crash;
The condition of the shoulder and/or roadside at the time
of the crash;
The installation and maintenance history of the terminal;
and
The condition of the terminal prior to the impact.
2. ET-Plus Dimensions as Installed. The FHWA is seeking data
concerning the dimensions of the ET-Plus devices installed on highways.
In particular, we are interested in a few key dimensions: Channel
width, exit gap, guide chute exit height, and outside guide channel
length. We also are interested in any other dimensions that could be
useful in determining the in-service performance of the ET-Plus. We are
asking for existing data and information that the public may have and
are not asking the public to undertake any activities that may risk the
safety of themselves or others.
The FHWA plans to objectively and thoroughly assess all data and
information provide to us. We ask that any data or information be
provided on or before February 9, 2015.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501, et
seq.), Federal agencies must obtain approval from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of information they
conduct, sponsor, or require through regulations. This action contains
a collection of information requirement under the PRA. This information
collection requirement has been previously submitted to OMB for
approval, pursuant to the provisions of the PRA. The requirement has
been approved through May 31, 2017; OMB Control No. 2125-0025.
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 148 and 315.
Issued on: December 18, 2014.
Gregory G. Nadeau,
Acting Administrator, Federal Highway Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014-30081 Filed 12-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P