Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Foreign Commercial Satellite Services (DFARS Case 2014-D010), 73490-73492 [2014-28813]
Download as PDF
73490
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 238 / Thursday, December 11, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
PART 252—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
11. Amend section 252.204–7007 by—
a. Removing the clause date ‘‘(AUG
2014)’’ and adding ‘‘(DEC 2014)’’ in its
place;
■ b. Removing paragraph (d)(1)(i);
■ c. Redesignating paragraphs (d)(1)(ii)
through (v) as (d)(1)(i) through (iv); and
■ d. Adding a new paragraph (d)(1)(v).
The addition reads as follows:
■
■
252.204–7007 Alternate A, Annual
Representations and Certifications.
*
*
*
*
*
(d)(1) * * *
(v) 252.225–7050, Disclosure of
Ownership or Control by the
Government of a Country that is a State
Sponsor of Terrorism. Applies to all
solicitations expected to result in
contracts of $150,000 or more.
*
*
*
*
*
252.209–7001
[Removed and Reserved]
12. Remove and reserve section
252.209–7001.
■
252.209–7002
[Amended]
13. Amend section 252.209–7002
introductory text by removing
‘‘209.104–70(b)’’ and adding ‘‘209.104–
70’’ in its place.
■ 14. Revise section 252.209–7004 to
read as follows:
■
252.209–7004 Subcontracting with Firms
that are Owned or Controlled by the
Government of a Country that is a State
Sponsor of Terrorism.
As prescribed in 209.409, use the
following clause:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUBCONTRACTING WITH FIRMS
THAT ARE OWNED OR CONTROLLED
BY THE GOVERNMENT OF A
COUNTRY THAT IS A STATE
SPONSOR OF TERRORISM (DEC 2014)
(a) Unless the Government determines that
there is a compelling reason to do so, the
Contractor shall not enter into any
subcontract in excess of $30,000 with a firm,
or a subsidiary of a firm, that is identified in
the Exclusions section of the System for
Award Management System (SAM
Exclusions) as being ineligible for the award
of Defense contracts or subcontracts because
it is owned or controlled by the government
of a country that is a state sponsor of
terrorism.
(b) A corporate officer or a designee of the
Contractor shall notify the Contracting
Officer, in writing, before entering into a
subcontract with a party that is identified, in
SAM Exclusions, as being ineligible for the
award of Defense contracts or subcontracts
because it is owned or controlled by the
government of a country that is a state
sponsor of terrorism. The notice must
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:05 Dec 10, 2014
Jkt 235001
include the name of the proposed
subcontractor and the compelling reason(s)
for doing business with the subcontractor
notwithstanding its inclusion in SAM
Exclusions.
(End of clause)
15. Add section 252.225–7050 to read
as follows:
■
252.225–7050 Disclosure of Ownership or
Control by the Government of a Country
that is a State Sponsor of Terrorism.
As prescribed in 225.771–5, use the
following provision:
DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP OR
CONTROL BY THE GOVERNMENT OF
A COUNTRY THAT IS A STATE
SPONSOR OF TERRORISM (DEC 2014)
(a) Definitions. As used in this provision—
Government of a country that is a state
sponsor of terrorism includes the state and
the government of a country that is a state
sponsor of terrorism, as well as any political
subdivision, agency, or instrumentality
thereof.
Significant interest means—
(i) Ownership of or beneficial interest in 5
percent or more of the firm’s or subsidiary’s
securities. Beneficial interest includes
holding 5 percent or more of any class of the
firm’s securities in ‘‘nominee shares,’’ ‘‘street
names,’’ or some other method of holding
securities that does not disclose the
beneficial owner;
(ii) Holding a management position in the
firm, such as a director or officer;
(iii) Ability to control or influence the
election, appointment, or tenure of directors
or officers in the firm;
(iv) Ownership of 10 percent or more of the
assets of a firm such as equipment, buildings,
real estate, or other tangible assets of the
firm; or
(v) Holding 50 percent or more of the
indebtedness of a firm.
State sponsor of terrorism means a country
determined by the Secretary of State, under
section 6(j)(1)(A) of the Export
Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App.
2405(j)(1)(A)), to be a country the government
of which has repeatedly provided support for
acts of international terrorism. As of the date
of this provision, state sponsors of terrorism
include: Cuba, Iran, Sudan, and Syria.
(b) Prohibition on award. In accordance
with 10 U.S.C. 2327, unless a waiver is
granted by the Secretary of Defense, no
contract may be awarded to a firm if the
government of a country that is a state
sponsor of terrorism owns or controls a
significant interest in—
(1) The firm;
(2) A subsidiary of the firm; or
(3) Any other firm that owns or controls
the firm.
(c) Representation. Unless the Offeror
submits with its offer the disclosure required
in paragraph (d) of this provision, the Offeror
represents, by submission of its offer, that the
government of a country that is a state
sponsor of terrorism does not own or control
a significant interest in—
(1) The Offeror;
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(2) A subsidiary of the Offeror; or
(3) Any other firm that owns or controls
the Offeror.
(d) Disclosure. (1) The Offeror shall
disclose in an attachment to its offer if the
government of a country that is a state
sponsor of terrorism owns or controls a
significant interest in the Offeror; a
subsidiary of the Offeror; or any other firm
that owns or controls the Offeror.
(2) The disclosure shall include—
(i) Identification of each government
holding a significant interest; and
(ii) A description of the significant interest
held by each government.
(End of provision)
[FR Doc. 2014–28819 Filed 12–10–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Parts 204, 212, 225, and 252
RIN 0750–AI32
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement: Foreign
Commercial Satellite Services (DFARS
Case 2014–D010)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
DoD has adopted as final,
with minor editorial changes, an interim
rule that amended the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement
(DFARS) to implement a section of the
National Defense Authorization Act
(NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 that
prohibits acquisition of commercial
satellite services from certain foreign
entities.
SUMMARY:
Effective December 11, 2014.
Ms.
Amy G. Williams, telephone 571–372–
6106.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD published an interim rule in the
Federal Register at 79 FR 45662 on
August 5, 2014, to implement section
1602 of the NDAA for FY 2014 (Pub. L.
113–66). Section 1602 prohibits award
of a contract for commercial satellite
services to a foreign entity if the
Secretary of Defense reasonably believes
that the foreign entity—
• Is an entity in which the
government of a covered foreign country
has an ownership interest that enables
the government to affect satellite
operations; or
E:\FR\FM\11DER1.SGM
11DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 238 / Thursday, December 11, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
• Plans to, or is expected to, provide
or use launch or other satellite services
under the contract from a covered
foreign country.
A covered foreign country means the
People’s Republic of China, North
Korea, or any country that is a state
sponsor of terrorism, as described in
section 1261(c)(2) of the NDAA for FY
2013 (Pub. L. 112–239). State sponsors
of terrorism, as determined by the
Secretary of State, currently include
Cuba, Iran, Sudan, and Syria.
No public comments were received in
response to the proposed rule.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
II. Discussion and Analysis
This rule converts the interim rule,
with only minor editorial changes, to a
final rule.
III. Applicability to Acquisitions Not
Greater Than the Simplified
Acquisition Threshold (SAT) and
Commercial Items
10 U.S.C. 2279 is silent on
applicability to contracts and
subcontracts in amounts not greater
than the SAT or for the acquisition of
commercial items. Also, the statute does
not provide for criminal or civil
penalties. Therefore, it does not apply to
the acquisition of contracts and
subcontracts in amounts not greater
than the SAT or the acquisition of
commercial items unless the Director,
DPAP, makes a written determination as
provided in 41 U.S.C. 1905.
There is a potential risk to national
security if DoD uses commercial
satellite services for DoD
communications and the government of
a covered foreign country has an
ownership interest that enables the
government to affect satellite operations,
regardless of the dollar value of the
contract or order. Likewise, if launch or
other satellite services under the
contract are occurring in a covered
country, the government of that country
could impact the ability of the foreign
entity to adequately provide those
services. Furthermore, although 10
U.S.C. 2279 does not specifically
reference 41 U.S.C. 1906, the statute
only applies to the acquisition of
commercial satellite services, so
exempting commercial items from
application of the statute would negate
the intended effect of the statute.
Therefore, consistent with 41 U.S.C.
1905 and 1906, the Director, Defense
Procurement and Acquisition Policy,
determined that it would not be in the
best interest of the United States to
exempt acquisitions not greater than the
SAT and acquisitions of commercial
items from the applicability of 10 U.S.C.
2279.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:05 Dec 10, 2014
Jkt 235001
IV. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
V. Regulatory Flexibility Act
This final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.
However, a final regulatory flexibility
analysis has been performed and is
summarized as follows:
DoD is converting to a final rule,
without change, an interim rule that
amended the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement
(DFARS) to implement section 1602 of
the National Defense Authorization Act
(NDAA) for FY 2014. Section 1602
added 10 U.S.C. 2279, which prohibits
acquisition of commercial satellite
services from certain foreign entities.
The objective of the rule is to
implement 10 U.S.C. 2279, which is the
legal basis for the rule. The statute
prohibits award of contracts for
commercial satellite services to a foreign
entity that—
• Is an entity in which the
government of a covered foreign country
(i.e., the People’s Republic of China,
North Korea, Cuba, Iran, Sudan, or
Syria) has an ownership interest that
enables the government to affect
satellite operations; or
• Plans to, or is expected to, provide
or use launch or other satellite services
under the contract from a covered
foreign country.
There were no public comments in
response to the initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
DoD estimates that this rule will
apply to less than 111 small entities.
According to Federal Procurement Data
System data for FY 2013, 111 small
entities were awarded contracts or
orders for services in PSC D304 (ADP
Telecommunications and Transmission
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
73491
Services), of which commercial satellite
services are a subset. Although the focus
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act is
protection of domestic small business
entities that are eligible for assistance
from the Small Business
Administration, there may be domestic
small business entities in the United
States that offer the satellite services of
a foreign entity that would be restricted
by this rule.
This rule requires an annual
representation as to whether the offeror
is, or is not, a foreign entity subject to
the prohibitions of the statute or is, or
is not, offering commercial satellite
services provided by such a foreign
entity. Further information is required if
the offeror provides an affirmative
response to any of the representations,
but such affirmative response and
further submission is expected to be
extremely rare.
This rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any small entities,
unless they are offering commercial
satellite services provided by a foreign
entity that is subject to the restrictions
of this rule. DoD was not able to identify
any alternatives that would reduce the
burden on small entities and meet the
objectives of the rule.
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule contains information
collection requirements that have been
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
This information collection requirement
has been assigned OMB Control Number
0704–0525, titled: Foreign Commercial
Satellite Services.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 204,
212, 225, and 252
Government procurement.
Manuel Quinones,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations
System.
Accordingly, the interim rule
amending 48 CFR parts 204, 212, 225,
and 252, which was published at 79 FR
45662 on August 5, 2014, is adopted as
a final rule with the following changes:
■ 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 212 and 252 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
PART 212—ACQUISITION OF
COMMERCIAL ITEMS
212.301
[Amended]
2. Amend section 212.301 in
paragraph (f)(xlviii) by removing
‘‘225.772–5’’ and adding ‘‘225.772–5, to
■
E:\FR\FM\11DER1.SGM
11DER1
73492
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 238 / Thursday, December 11, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
comply with 10 U.S.C. 2279’’ in its
place.
PART 252—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
252.225–7049
[Amended]
3. Amending section 252.225–7049
by—
■ a. Removing the clause date of ‘‘(AUG
2014)’’ and adding ‘‘(DEC 2014)’’ in its
place; and
■ b. In paragraph (b) introductory text,
removing ‘‘DFARS 225.71–4’’ and
adding ‘‘DFARS 225.772–4’’ in its place.
■
[FR Doc. 2014–28813 Filed 12–10–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Parts 204 and 252
RIN 0750–AI44
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement: Update
Contractor and Government Entity
(CAGE) Code Information (DFARS
Case 2014–D013)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
I. Background
DoD is amending the DFARS to
remove text that is duplicative as a
result of Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR) final rule 2012–024, ‘‘Commercial
and Government Entity Code’’. The FAR
rule, which was published in the
Federal Register at 79 FR 31187 on May
30, 2014, requires all offerors to obtain
a CAGE code, which was previously
only required for the DoD. The new FAR
CAGE code requirement took effect on
November 1, 2014, which made the
DFARS language at subpart 204.72 and
the clause at 252.204–7001 no longer
necessary.
The following changes are made by
this rule:
17:05 Dec 10, 2014
Jkt 235001
II. Publication of This Final Rule for
Public Comment Is Not Required by
Statute
‘‘Publication of proposed
regulations’’, 41 U.S.C. 1707, is the
statute which applies to the publication
of the Federal Acquisition Regulation.
Paragraph (a)(1) of the statute requires
that a procurement policy, regulation,
procedure or form (including an
amendment or modification thereof)
must be published for public comment
if it relates to the expenditure of
appropriated funds, and has either a
significant effect beyond the internal
operating procedures of the agency
issuing the policy, regulation, procedure
or form, or has a significant cost or
administrative impact on contractors or
offerors. This final rule is not required
to be published for public comment,
because the rule is removing
unnecessary text that is now covered in
the FAR. These requirements affect only
the internal operating procedures of the
Government.
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
DoD is issuing a final rule
amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement
(DFARS) to remove duplicative
Commercial and Government Entity
(CAGE) code instructions and an
associated clause.
DATES: Effective December 11, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Dustin Pitsch, telephone 571–372–6090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
• Add a reference at DFARS 204.18 to
DFARS Procedures, Guidance, and
Information text.
• Delete DFARS subpart 204.72.
• Delete the clause at DFARS
252.204–7001, Commercial and
Government Entity (CAGE) Code
Reporting.
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act does
not apply to this rule because this final
rule does not constitute a significant
DFARS revision within the meaning of
FAR 1.501–1, and 41 U.S.C. 1707 does
not require publication for public
comment.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule affects the information
collection requirements in the provision
at DFARS 252.204–7001, currently
approved under OMB Control Number
0704–0225, titled Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement Part
204, Administrative Matters, and related
clauses at 252.204, in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35). The impact is that the
burden related to DFARS clause
252.204–7001 will be decreased by
2,297 hours. OMB Form 83–C,
Paperwork Reduction Act Change
Worksheet, requesting removal of the
2,297 hours from the OMB Control
Number 0704–0225 information
collection has been approved by OMB.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 204 and
252
Government procurement.
Manuel Quinones,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations
System.
Therefore, 48 CFR parts 204 and 252
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
PART 204—ADMINISTRATIVE
MATTERS
2. Add subpart 204.18 to read as
follows:
■
SUBPART 204.18—COMMERCIAL AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITY CODE
Sec.
204.1870 Procedures.
SUBPART 204.18—COMMERCIAL AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITY CODE
204.1870
Procedures.
Follow the procedures and guidance
at PGI 204–1870 concerning
Commercial and Government Entity
(CAGE) codes and CAGE file
maintenance.
Subpart 204.72
[Removed]
3. Remove subpart 204.72, consisting
of sections 204.7200, 204.7201,
204.7202, 204.7202–1, 204.7202–2,
204.7202–3, 204.7203, 204.7204,
204.7205, 204.7206, and 204.7207.
■
PART 252—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
252.204–7001
■
[Removed and Reserved]
4. Remove and reserve 252.204–7001.
[FR Doc. 2014–28814 Filed 12–10–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
E:\FR\FM\11DER1.SGM
11DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 238 (Thursday, December 11, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 73490-73492]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28813]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations System
48 CFR Parts 204, 212, 225, and 252
RIN 0750-AI32
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Foreign
Commercial Satellite Services (DFARS Case 2014-D010)
AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense
(DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD has adopted as final, with minor editorial changes, an
interim rule that amended the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation
Supplement (DFARS) to implement a section of the National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 that prohibits
acquisition of commercial satellite services from certain foreign
entities.
DATES: Effective December 11, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Amy G. Williams, telephone 571-
372-6106.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD published an interim rule in the Federal Register at 79 FR
45662 on August 5, 2014, to implement section 1602 of the NDAA for FY
2014 (Pub. L. 113-66). Section 1602 prohibits award of a contract for
commercial satellite services to a foreign entity if the Secretary of
Defense reasonably believes that the foreign entity--
Is an entity in which the government of a covered foreign
country has an ownership interest that enables the government to affect
satellite operations; or
[[Page 73491]]
Plans to, or is expected to, provide or use launch or
other satellite services under the contract from a covered foreign
country.
A covered foreign country means the People's Republic of China,
North Korea, or any country that is a state sponsor of terrorism, as
described in section 1261(c)(2) of the NDAA for FY 2013 (Pub. L. 112-
239). State sponsors of terrorism, as determined by the Secretary of
State, currently include Cuba, Iran, Sudan, and Syria.
No public comments were received in response to the proposed rule.
II. Discussion and Analysis
This rule converts the interim rule, with only minor editorial
changes, to a final rule.
III. Applicability to Acquisitions Not Greater Than the Simplified
Acquisition Threshold (SAT) and Commercial Items
10 U.S.C. 2279 is silent on applicability to contracts and
subcontracts in amounts not greater than the SAT or for the acquisition
of commercial items. Also, the statute does not provide for criminal or
civil penalties. Therefore, it does not apply to the acquisition of
contracts and subcontracts in amounts not greater than the SAT or the
acquisition of commercial items unless the Director, DPAP, makes a
written determination as provided in 41 U.S.C. 1905.
There is a potential risk to national security if DoD uses
commercial satellite services for DoD communications and the government
of a covered foreign country has an ownership interest that enables the
government to affect satellite operations, regardless of the dollar
value of the contract or order. Likewise, if launch or other satellite
services under the contract are occurring in a covered country, the
government of that country could impact the ability of the foreign
entity to adequately provide those services. Furthermore, although 10
U.S.C. 2279 does not specifically reference 41 U.S.C. 1906, the statute
only applies to the acquisition of commercial satellite services, so
exempting commercial items from application of the statute would negate
the intended effect of the statute. Therefore, consistent with 41
U.S.C. 1905 and 1906, the Director, Defense Procurement and Acquisition
Policy, determined that it would not be in the best interest of the
United States to exempt acquisitions not greater than the SAT and
acquisitions of commercial items from the applicability of 10 U.S.C.
2279.
IV. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning
and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule
under 5 U.S.C. 804.
V. Regulatory Flexibility Act
This final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. However, a final
regulatory flexibility analysis has been performed and is summarized as
follows:
DoD is converting to a final rule, without change, an interim rule
that amended the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement
(DFARS) to implement section 1602 of the National Defense Authorization
Act (NDAA) for FY 2014. Section 1602 added 10 U.S.C. 2279, which
prohibits acquisition of commercial satellite services from certain
foreign entities.
The objective of the rule is to implement 10 U.S.C. 2279, which is
the legal basis for the rule. The statute prohibits award of contracts
for commercial satellite services to a foreign entity that--
Is an entity in which the government of a covered foreign
country (i.e., the People's Republic of China, North Korea, Cuba, Iran,
Sudan, or Syria) has an ownership interest that enables the government
to affect satellite operations; or
Plans to, or is expected to, provide or use launch or
other satellite services under the contract from a covered foreign
country.
There were no public comments in response to the initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
DoD estimates that this rule will apply to less than 111 small
entities. According to Federal Procurement Data System data for FY
2013, 111 small entities were awarded contracts or orders for services
in PSC D304 (ADP Telecommunications and Transmission Services), of
which commercial satellite services are a subset. Although the focus of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act is protection of domestic small business
entities that are eligible for assistance from the Small Business
Administration, there may be domestic small business entities in the
United States that offer the satellite services of a foreign entity
that would be restricted by this rule.
This rule requires an annual representation as to whether the
offeror is, or is not, a foreign entity subject to the prohibitions of
the statute or is, or is not, offering commercial satellite services
provided by such a foreign entity. Further information is required if
the offeror provides an affirmative response to any of the
representations, but such affirmative response and further submission
is expected to be extremely rare.
This rule will not have a significant economic impact on any small
entities, unless they are offering commercial satellite services
provided by a foreign entity that is subject to the restrictions of
this rule. DoD was not able to identify any alternatives that would
reduce the burden on small entities and meet the objectives of the
rule.
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule contains information collection requirements that have
been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). This information
collection requirement has been assigned OMB Control Number 0704-0525,
titled: Foreign Commercial Satellite Services.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 204, 212, 225, and 252
Government procurement.
Manuel Quinones,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
Accordingly, the interim rule amending 48 CFR parts 204, 212, 225,
and 252, which was published at 79 FR 45662 on August 5, 2014, is
adopted as a final rule with the following changes:
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 212 and 252 continues to
read as follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.
PART 212--ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS
212.301 [Amended]
0
2. Amend section 212.301 in paragraph (f)(xlviii) by removing
``225.772-5'' and adding ``225.772-5, to
[[Page 73492]]
comply with 10 U.S.C. 2279'' in its place.
PART 252--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
252.225-7049 [Amended]
0
3. Amending section 252.225-7049 by--
0
a. Removing the clause date of ``(AUG 2014)'' and adding ``(DEC 2014)''
in its place; and
0
b. In paragraph (b) introductory text, removing ``DFARS 225.71-4'' and
adding ``DFARS 225.772-4'' in its place.
[FR Doc. 2014-28813 Filed 12-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P