Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Extension With Change, of a Previously Approved Collection FD-1000 Customer Satisfaction Assessment, 73102-73103 [2014-28784]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
73102
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 236 / Tuesday, December 9, 2014 / Notices
products and related marketing
materials by reason of infringement of
certain claims of U.S. Patent No.
RE38,096 (‘‘the ’096 patent’’); U.S.
Patent No. 6,978,775 (‘‘the ’775 patent’’);
U.S. Trademark Registration No.
2,501,255 (‘‘the ’255 mark’’); and U.S.
Trademark Registration No. 3,312,392
(‘‘the ’392 mark’’). Id. The complaint
further alleges the existence of a
domestic industry. Id. The
Commission’s notice of investigation
named Ningbo Topoint as the only
respondent, and indicated that the
Office of Unfair Import Investigations is
participating in this investigation. Id.
On September 2, 2014, the ALJ
ordered Ningbo Topoint to show cause
why it should not be found in default.
See Order No. 10. No response to Order
No. 10 was filed. On September 16,
2014, the ALJ issued an initial
determination finding Ningbo Topoint
in default under Commission Rule
210.16(a)(1) (19 CFR 210.16(a)(1)). See
Order No. 11. On October 16, 2014, the
Commission determined not to review
the initial determination.
The Commission requested briefing
from the parties and the public on the
issues of remedy, the public interest,
and bonding. The Commission received
responsive submissions from
Complainants and the Commission
Investigative Attorney (‘‘IA’’) on October
30, 2014, and a reply submission from
the IA on November 6, 2014. The
submissions agreed that the appropriate
remedy is the entry of a limited
exclusion order against Ningbo Topoint,
that the public interest factors do not
weigh against granting such a limited
exclusion order, and that bonding
should be set at 100 percent of the
entered value of the infringing products.
The Commission finds that the
statutory requirements of section
337(g)(1) (19 U.S.C. 1337(g)(1)) and
Commission Rule 210.16(a)(1) (19 CFR
210.16(a)(1)) are met with respect to
Ningbo Topoint. Accordingly, pursuant
to section 337(g)(1) (19 U.S.C.
1337(g)(1)) and Commission Rule
210.16(c) (19 CFR 210.16(c)), the
Commission presumes the facts alleged
in the complaint to be true and finds
that Ningbo Topoint is in violation of
section 337.
The Commission has determined that
the appropriate form of relief in this
investigation is a limited exclusion
order prohibiting the unlicensed entry
of archery products and related
marketing materials that are
manufactured abroad by or on behalf of,
or imported by or on behalf of, Ningbo
Topoint that infringe one or more of
claims 1–3, 6–12, and 15–38 of the ’096
patent and claims 1–3, 16–22, 24–26,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:48 Dec 08, 2014
Jkt 235001
29, 31, and 32 of the ’775 patent, or
infringe the ’255 or ’392 marks. The
Commission has further determined that
the public interest factors enumerated in
section 337(g)(1) (19 U.S.C. 1337(g)(1))
do not preclude the issuance of the
limited exclusion order. Finally, the
Commission has determined that the
bond for importation during the period
of Presidential review shall be in the
amount of 100 percent of the entered
value of the imported subject articles of
Ningbo Topoint. The Commission’s
order was delivered to the President and
the United States Trade Representative
on the day of its issuance.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Dated: December 3, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014–28765 Filed 12–8–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–509 and 731–
TA–1244 (Final)]
1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane From China
Determinations
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject investigations, the United
States International Trade Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant
to sections 705(b) and 735(b) of the
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b))
and (19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)) (‘‘the Act’’),
that an industry in the United States is
not materially injured or threatened
with material injury, and the
establishment of an industry in the
United States is not materially retarded,
by reason of imports of 1,1,1,2Tetrafluoroethane from China, provided
for in subheading 2903.39.20 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States, that have been found by
the Department of Commerce
(‘‘Commerce’’) to be sold in the United
States at less than fair value (‘‘LTFV’’)
and subsidized by the government of
China.2
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
2 Commissioners Irving A. Williamson and
Rhonda K. Schmidtlein dissenting.
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Background
The Commission instituted these
investigations effective October 22,
2013, following receipt of a petition
filed with the Commission and
Commerce by Mexichem Fluor Inc., St.
Gabriel, LA. The final phase of the
investigations was scheduled by the
Commission following notification of
preliminary determinations by
Commerce that imports of 1,1,1,2Tetrafluoroethane from China were
subsidized within the meaning of
section 703(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1671b(b)) and sold at LTFV within the
meaning of 733(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1673b(b)). Notice of the scheduling of
the final phase of the Commission’s
investigations and of a public hearing to
be held in connection therewith was
given by posting copies of the notice in
the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission,
Washington, DC, and by publishing the
notice in the Federal Register on June
24, 2014 (79 FR 35795). The hearing was
held in Washington, DC on October 15,
2014, and all persons who requested the
opportunity were permitted to appear in
person or by counsel.
The Commission transmitted its
determinations in these investigations to
the Secretary of Commerce on December
3, 2014. The views of the Commission
are contained in USITC Publication
4503 (December 2014), entitled 1,1,1,2Tetrafluoroethane from China:
Investigation Nos. 701–TA–509 and
731–TA–1244 (Final).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 4, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014–28790 Filed 12–8–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1110–0045]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed eCollection
eComments Requested; Extension
With Change, of a Previously
Approved Collection FD–1000
Customer Satisfaction Assessment
Bureau of Investigation,
Department of Justice.
ACTION: 60-Day notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Justice
(DOJ), FBI Laboratory, Federal Bureau of
Investigation, will be submitting the
following information collection request
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM
09DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 236 / Tuesday, December 9, 2014 / Notices
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted for 60 days until
February 9, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have additional comments
especially on the estimated public
burden or associated response time,
suggestions, or need a copy of the
proposed information collection
instrument with instructions or
additional information, please contact
Steven W. Perry, Statistician, Bureau of
Justice Statistics, 810 Seventh Street
NW., Washington, DC 20531 (phone:
202–307–0777).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written
comments and suggestions from the
public and affected agencies concerning
the proposed collection of information
are encouraged. Your comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Bureau of Justice
Statistics, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Evaluate whether and if so how the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected can be
enhanced; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Overview of This Information
Collection
1. Type of Information Collection:
Extension of a currently approved
collection.
2. The Title of the Form/Collection:
FBI Laboratory Customer Satisfaction
Assessment
3. The agency form number, if any,
and the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection:
The form number is FD–1000. The
applicable component within the
Department of Justice is the Federal
Bureau of Investigation, Laboratory
Division.
4. Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: This information collection is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:48 Dec 08, 2014
Jkt 235001
an assessment of the FBI Laboratory
services by law enforcement agencies
(federal, state, and local) that submit
evidence for examination. The
information collected is used by FBI
Laboratory management to evaluate the
quality of the forensic services provided
to law enforcement. Additionally, the
FBI Laboratory is accredited by the
American Society of Crime Laboratory
Directors/Laboratory Accreditation
Board (ASCLD/LAB) under the ASCLD/
LAB-International Accreditation
Program. A requirement for maintaining
accreditation is for the FBI Laboratory to
seek feedback, both positive and
negative, from its customers. This
feedback is evaluated to improve the
services of the FBI Laboratory. The
information gathered in the FD–1000
will meet this requirement.
5. An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: An estimated 3000
respondents will complete the
assessment with an estimated range of
burden for respondents to be 5 minutes
for completion.
6. An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: The estimated public burden
associated with this collection is 250
hours. It is estimated that respondents
will take 5 minutes to complete the
assessment. The burden hours for
collecting respondent data sum to 250
hours (3000 respondents × 5 minutes =
250 hours).
If additional information is required
contact: Jerri Murray, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Two Constitution
Square, 145 N Street NE., 3E.405B,
Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: December 4, 2014.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S.
Department of Justice.
73103
This proposed Consent Decree
concerns a complaint filed by ABB Inc.
against the United States, pursuant to
the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act, 42 U.S.C. 9601–75, in connection
with alleged releases of or threatened
releases of hazardous substances at a
facility located at 2000 Day Hill Road,
in Windsor, Connecticut, owned by
Combustion Engineering. The proposed
Consent Decree resolves these
allegations, as well as potential claims
by the United States Army Corps of
Engineers that could have been brought
against ABB if the matter had not
settled. The proposed Consent Decree
provides for the United States to pay
ABB $31,044,520 as soon as reasonably
practicable after the Effective Date of the
Consent Decree. It also provides for ABB
to pay the United States $3,148,322
within seventy five (75) days after the
Effective Date of the Consent Decree.
The Department of Justice will accept
written comments relating to this
proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30)
days from the date of publication of this
Notice. Please address comments to
Kate Bowers, Trial Attorney, United
States Department of Justice,
Environment and Natural Resources
Division, Environmental Defense
Section, Post Office Box 7611,
Washington, DC 20044 and refer to ABB
Inc. v. United States, DJ #90–11–6–
19963.
The proposed Consent Decree may be
examined at the Clerk’s Office, United
States District Court for the District of
Connecticut, 450 Main Street, Hartford,
CT 06103. In addition, the proposed
Consent Decree may be examined
electronically at https://www.justice.gov/
enrd/Consent_Decrees.html.
Cherie L. Rogers,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Defense Section, Environment and Natural
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2014–28735 Filed 12–8–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
[FR Doc. 2014–28784 Filed 12–8–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent
Decree
In accordance with Departmental
Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby
given that a proposed Consent Decree in
ABB Inc. v. United States, Civil Action
No. 3:13-cv-01265–CSH, was lodged
with the United States District Court for
the District of Connecticut on December
1, 2014.
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Advisory Council on Employee Welfare
and Pension Benefit Plans: Notice of
Charter Renewal
In accordance with section 512(a)(1)
of the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and the
provisions of the Federal Advisory
Committee Act and its implementing
regulations issued by the General
Services Administration (GSA), the
E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM
09DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 9, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73102-73103]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28784]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1110-0045]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection
eComments Requested; Extension With Change, of a Previously Approved
Collection FD-1000 Customer Satisfaction Assessment
AGENCY: Bureau of Investigation, Department of Justice.
ACTION: 60-Day notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Justice (DOJ), FBI Laboratory, Federal
Bureau of Investigation, will be submitting the following information
collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in
[[Page 73103]]
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for 60 days until
February 9, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have additional comments
especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time,
suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection
instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact
Steven W. Perry, Statistician, Bureau of Justice Statistics, 810
Seventh Street NW., Washington, DC 20531 (phone: 202-307-0777).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written comments and suggestions from the
public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of
the following four points:
--Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the functions of the Bureau of Justice
Statistics, including whether the information will have practical
utility;
--Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
--Evaluate whether and if so how the quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected can be enhanced; and
--Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
Overview of This Information Collection
1. Type of Information Collection: Extension of a currently
approved collection.
2. The Title of the Form/Collection: FBI Laboratory Customer
Satisfaction Assessment
3. The agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of
the Department sponsoring the collection: The form number is FD-1000.
The applicable component within the Department of Justice is the
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Laboratory Division.
4. Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as
well as a brief abstract: This information collection is an assessment
of the FBI Laboratory services by law enforcement agencies (federal,
state, and local) that submit evidence for examination. The information
collected is used by FBI Laboratory management to evaluate the quality
of the forensic services provided to law enforcement. Additionally, the
FBI Laboratory is accredited by the American Society of Crime
Laboratory Directors/Laboratory Accreditation Board (ASCLD/LAB) under
the ASCLD/LAB-International Accreditation Program. A requirement for
maintaining accreditation is for the FBI Laboratory to seek feedback,
both positive and negative, from its customers. This feedback is
evaluated to improve the services of the FBI Laboratory. The
information gathered in the FD-1000 will meet this requirement.
5. An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of
time estimated for an average respondent to respond: An estimated 3000
respondents will complete the assessment with an estimated range of
burden for respondents to be 5 minutes for completion.
6. An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated
with the collection: The estimated public burden associated with this
collection is 250 hours. It is estimated that respondents will take 5
minutes to complete the assessment. The burden hours for collecting
respondent data sum to 250 hours (3000 respondents x 5 minutes = 250
hours).
If additional information is required contact: Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice,
Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Two
Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE., 3E.405B, Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: December 4, 2014.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2014-28784 Filed 12-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-02-P
