Office of Commercial Space Transportation; Amended Waiver for Launch and Mission Risk, 72240-72241 [2014-28614]
Download as PDF
72240
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 234 / Friday, December 5, 2014 / Notices
resulting from the sale to fund
construction of a pilots lounge and
restrooms which are not presently
available at the airport.
Any person may inspect the request
in person at the FAA office listed above
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
In addition, any person may, upon
request, inspect the application, notice
and other documents germane to the
application in person at the Eufaula
Municipal Airport.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on November
18, 2014.
Byron K. Huffman,
Acting Manager, Airports Division.
[FR Doc. 2014–28611 Filed 12–4–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Office of Commercial Space
Transportation; Amended Waiver for
Launch and Mission Risk
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of amended waiver.
AGENCY:
This notice concerns an
amendment to a waiver related to the
launch and reentry of an Orion MultiPurpose Crew Vehicle. On March 10,
2014, the FAA issued United Launch
Alliance (ULA) and Lockheed Martin
(Lockheed) waivers to certain risk
requirements of the FAA’s regulations.
Since that time, changes to the mission’s
flight plan have increased its risk
profile. After analyzing this updated
risk profile, the FAA finds that the
analysis underlying the original waiver
decisions still applies. The FAA,
therefore, amends its original waiver to
permit launch risk from debris of 217 ×
10¥6 and total mission risk from debris
of up to 218 × 10¥6.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical questions concerning this
waiver, contact Charles P. Brinkman,
Aerospace Engineer, AST–200, Office of
Commercial Space Transportation
(AST), Federal Aviation Administration,
800 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202)
267–7715; email: phil.brinkman@
faa.gov. For legal questions concerning
this waiver, contact Benjamin Jacobs,
Attorney-Advisor, Regulations Division
(AGC–210), Office of the Chief Counsel,
Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202)
267–7240; email: benjamin.jacobs@
faa.gov.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:07 Dec 04, 2014
Jkt 235001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Lockheed and ULA are private
commercial space flight companies.
Lockheed entered into a contract with
the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA) to provide the
first orbital flight test for NASA’s Orion
Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle (Orion)
Program. Lockheed has contracted with
ULA to provide launch services for the
mission.
The FAA is responsible for licensing,
among other things, the launch of a
launch vehicle and the reentry of a
reentry vehicle, under authority granted
to the Secretary of Transportation by 51
U.S.C. Subtitle V, chapter 509 (Chapter
509), and delegated to the FAA’s
Administrator and Associate
Administrator for Commercial Space
Transportation.
The mission at issue in this notice is
Orion Exploration Flight Test 1, which
is scheduled to launch from Cape
Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida
in early December. The mission tests the
Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle in an
un-crewed, limited-capability
configuration, and serves as a stepping
stone towards a crew-capable vehicle
that would enable human exploration
missions beyond Earth orbit. The
mission is comprised of a launch, which
is conducted by ULA, and a reentry,
which is conducted by Lockheed. The
launch vehicle is ULA’s Delta IV Heavy
launch vehicle, which consists of a
Common Booster Core (CBC) as the first
stage with two additional strap-on CBCs
and a Delta IV Cryogenic Second Stage
(DCSS). The first burn of the DCSS
places the Orion and the DCSS in orbit,
and a second DCSS burn places the
Orion into a highly elliptical, negativeperigee trajectory, to simulate the
thermal conditions and high reentry
speeds the module would experience
returning from missions beyond Earth
orbit. After separating from the DCSS,
the Orion module reenters over the
eastern Pacific Ocean, splashing down
231 nautical miles west of Baja
California, Mexico.1
Section 417.107(b)(1) of Title 14 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
prohibits, in relevant part, the launch of
a launch vehicle if the expected casualty
(Ec) rate for the flight exceeds 30 × 10¥6
for impacting inert and explosive debris
(debris). Section 435.35 establishes
acceptable risk for reentry vehicles, and
requires operators to comply with
1 We note that, due to the unique characteristics
of this mission, FAA regulations require us to
account for risks that are typically not included in
our § 417.107 analysis—namely, the uncontrolled
reentry of an upper stage after orbital insertion.
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
§§ 431.35(a) and 431.35(b)(1)(i),2 which
in turn prohibit an Ec for debris in
excess of 30 × 10¥6 for both launch and
reentry combined.
On February 27, 2014, ULA petitioned
the FAA for waivers of these provisions
because the projected risk from debris
during launch was 164 × 10¥ 6, and the
projected risk from debris during
reentry was less than 1 × 10¥6—for a
total-mission debris risk of
approximately 165 × 10¥6. The FAA
issued a waiver and, on March 10, 2014,
gave notice in the Federal Register.
Notice of Waiver, Mar. 10, 2014 (79 FR
13375). This initial waiver allowed a
maximum-allowable Ec value for ULA
and Lockheed’s proposed mission of
165 × 10¥6,3 based on the risk increase
the launch operators requested.
On November 3, 2014, ULA and
Lockheed transmitted to the FAA the
mission’s final trajectory and an
updated risk analysis. Since that time,
ULA and Lockheed have continued to
submit updated risk information, as it
becomes available, to the FAA.
According to these documents, it is
necessary for ULA and Lockheed to
modify the mission’s launch trajectory,
for two reasons: To lower the mission’s
maximum heating temperature
constraint, and to adjust the flight
azimuth to be the same as what was
flown in previous missions. On
November 20, 2014, in light of the
changed mission trajectory, ULA
petitioned for an amendment to its
waiver to allow an Ec of 207 × 10¥6 for
debris from launch. On November 21,
2014, Lockheed petitioned for an
amendment to its waiver to allow total
mission risk of 208 × 10¥6.
Using ULA’s updated trajectory, the
FAA calculates the debris-related Ec for
failure during the de-orbit burn, after
the first 120 seconds, increases to 76 ×
10¥6 from 53 × 10¥6. In addition,
calculations by the FAA and the United
States Air Force indicate an increased
debris risk, from launch to orbital
insertion, of approximately 30 × 10¥6
above original estimates. As a result, the
FAA calculates that overall launch risk
increases from 164 × 10¥6 to 217 ×
10¥6, and total mission risk increases
from 165 × 10¥6 to 218 × 10¥6. The
FAA believes these risk figures best
2 Although the module is a reentry vehicle and
not a reusable launch vehicle, 14 CFR 435.33
incorporates and applies § 431.43 to all reentry
vehicles.
3 Our March 2014 Notice correctly identified the
total mission debris risk as 165 × 10¥6, but when
breaking down the sources of that risk, we listed
four risk factors adding up to a total of only 164
× 10¥6. 79 FR at 13376. This breakdown mistakenly
omitted the debris risk related from controlled
disposal of the upper stage, with an Ec of < 1 ×
10¥6.
E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM
05DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 234 / Friday, December 5, 2014 / Notices
capture the uncertainties due to weather
and the inability to perform significant
mitigation at the launch site on the day
of launch.
A. Analysis of the Updated Risk
Assessment
The FAA’s original waiver analyzed
ULA and Lockheed’s proposals using
the waiver criteria established by our
statutory and regulatory framework.
Section 50905(b)(3) allows the FAA to
waive a license requirement if the
waiver (1) will not jeopardize public
health and safety, and safety of
property; (2) is in the public interest;
and (3) will not jeopardize national
security and foreign policy interests of
the United States. See also 49 CFR
404.5(b). We reapply those same criteria
here.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1. Public Health and Safety, and Safety
of Property
The FAA’s initial waiver examined
ULA and Lockheed’s proposal in
comparison with the historically
acceptable launch risk levels at other
Federal agencies to determine whether
the mission would fall within those
parameters. The rationale for our
approval of ULA and Lockheed’s prior
waiver requests applies equally to their
revised risk assessment. Although the
FAA’s regulations prohibit debris risk in
excess of 30 × 10¥6, a waiver is
warranted in this case because the
United States Government’s experience
conducting other space missions with
risk in excess of 100 × 10¥6
demonstrates that the risks of this
mission are consistent with the public
health and safety, and the safety of
property. As we stated in our March 10,
2014, Notice of Waiver, the United
States Government has repeatedly
accepted risk for government launches
in excess of the FAA’s 30 × 10¥6,
without negative consequences for
safety. 79 FR at 13376. The Space
Shuttle, for example, used a debris risk
criterion of 200 × 10¥6 for launch risk
to the public. See NASA’s
Implementation Plan for Space Shuttle
Return to Flight and Beyond, Vol. 1
Final Edition, at 2–39 (May 15, 2007). In
addition, in 2005, the U.S. Air Force
accepted risk levels in a government
launch ranging from 145 to 317 × 10¥6.
Dept. of the Air Force Memorandum,
Overflight Risk Exceedance Waiver for
Titan IV B–30, Mission (Apr. 4, 2005).
ULA’s updated launch risk of 217 ×
10¥6 is still less than the risk levels
previously approved for a government
launch. Accordingly, granting a waiver
of §§ 417.107(b)(1) and 431.35(b)(1)(i) in
this case does not jeopardize the public
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:07 Dec 04, 2014
Jkt 235001
health and safety, or the safety of
property.
2. Public Interest
The FAA looks to its enabling statute
to determine how Congress has defined
the public interest. The FAA
implements the agency’s statutory
mandate to encourage the development
of commercial space capabilities and the
continuous improvement of the safety of
launch vehicles designed to carry
passengers. 51 U.S.C. 50901(b).
As with their initial petition, ULA
and Lockheed’s petition for an amended
waiver are consistent with the public
interest because the test flight is
necessary to the development of
NASA’s human-missions capability
beyond Earth orbit.
D. National Security and Foreign Policy
Interests
The FAA has not identified any
national security or foreign policy
implications associated with amending
this waiver.
Summary and Conclusion
The FAA determines that amending
the waivers associated with this mission
will not jeopardize public health and
safety or safety of property. In addition,
amending the waivers is in the public
interest because it accomplishes the
goals of Chapter 509 and does not
unduly increase risk to the public.
Finally, amending the waivers will not
jeopardize national security and foreign
policy interests of the United States.
The FAA therefore amends its prior
waivers of the requirements of 14 CFR
417.107(b)(1) and 431.35(b)(1)(i) for
launch and mission risk, respectively, to
allow launch risk of an Ec of 217 × 10¥6
and total mission risk of 218 × 10¥6.
Issued in Washington, DC, on November
26, 2014.
Kenneth Wong,
Licensing and Evaluation Division Manager.
[FR Doc. 2014–28614 Filed 12–4–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket No. FRA–2014–0011–N–22]
Proposed Agency Information
Collection Activities; Comment
Request
Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
72241
In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice announces that the renewal
Information Collection Requests (ICR)
abstracted below are being forwarded to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and comment. The
ICR describes the nature of the
information collection and its expected
burden. The Federal Register notice
with a 60-day comment period soliciting
comments on the following collection of
information was published on
September 5, 2014 (79 FR 56616).
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before January 5, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Robert Brogan, Office of Planning and
Evaluation Division, RRS–21, Federal
Railroad Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Ave. SE., Mail Stop 25,
Washington, DC 20590 (Telephone:
(202) 493–6292), or Ms. Kimberly
Toone, Office of Information
Technology, RAD–20, Federal Railroad
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave.
SE., Mail Stop 35, Washington, DC
20590 (Telephone: (202) 493–6132).
(These telephone numbers are not tollfree.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), Public Law 104–13, sec. 2, 109
Stat. 163 (1995) (codified as revised at
44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), and its
implementing regulations, 5 CFR part
1320, require Federal agencies to issue
two notices seeking public comment on
information collection activities before
OMB may approve paperwork packages.
44 U.S.C. 3506, 3507; 5 CFR 1320.5,
1320.8(d)(1), 1320.12. On September 5,
2014, FRA published a 60-day notice in
the Federal Register soliciting comment
on ICR that the agency is seeking OMB
approval. See 79 FR 56616. FRA
received no comments in response to
this notice.
Before OMB decides whether to
approve these proposed collections of
information, it must provide 30 days for
public comment. 44 U.S.C. 3507(b); 5
CFR 1320.12(d). Federal law requires
OMB to approve or disapprove
paperwork packages between 30 and 60
days after the 30 day notice is
published. 44 U.S.C. 3507 (b)-(c); 5 CFR
1320.12(d); see also 60 FR 44978, 44983,
Aug. 29, 1995. OMB believes that the 30
day notice informs the regulated
community to file relevant comments
and affords the agency adequate time to
digest public comments before it
renders a decision. 60 FR 44983, Aug.
29, 1995. Therefore, respondents should
submit their respective comments to
OMB within 30 days of publication to
best ensure having their full effect. 5
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM
05DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 234 (Friday, December 5, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72240-72241]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28614]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Office of Commercial Space Transportation; Amended Waiver for
Launch and Mission Risk
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of amended waiver.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice concerns an amendment to a waiver related to the
launch and reentry of an Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle. On March 10,
2014, the FAA issued United Launch Alliance (ULA) and Lockheed Martin
(Lockheed) waivers to certain risk requirements of the FAA's
regulations. Since that time, changes to the mission's flight plan have
increased its risk profile. After analyzing this updated risk profile,
the FAA finds that the analysis underlying the original waiver
decisions still applies. The FAA, therefore, amends its original waiver
to permit launch risk from debris of 217 x 10-6 and total
mission risk from debris of up to 218 x 10-6.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical questions concerning
this waiver, contact Charles P. Brinkman, Aerospace Engineer, AST-200,
Office of Commercial Space Transportation (AST), Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone (202) 267-7715; email: phil.brinkman@faa.gov. For legal
questions concerning this waiver, contact Benjamin Jacobs, Attorney-
Advisor, Regulations Division (AGC-210), Office of the Chief Counsel,
Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267-7240; email:
benjamin.jacobs@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Lockheed and ULA are private commercial space flight companies.
Lockheed entered into a contract with the National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA) to provide the first orbital flight test
for NASA's Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle (Orion) Program. Lockheed
has contracted with ULA to provide launch services for the mission.
The FAA is responsible for licensing, among other things, the
launch of a launch vehicle and the reentry of a reentry vehicle, under
authority granted to the Secretary of Transportation by 51 U.S.C.
Subtitle V, chapter 509 (Chapter 509), and delegated to the FAA's
Administrator and Associate Administrator for Commercial Space
Transportation.
The mission at issue in this notice is Orion Exploration Flight
Test 1, which is scheduled to launch from Cape Canaveral Air Force
Station in Florida in early December. The mission tests the Orion
Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle in an un-crewed, limited-capability
configuration, and serves as a stepping stone towards a crew-capable
vehicle that would enable human exploration missions beyond Earth
orbit. The mission is comprised of a launch, which is conducted by ULA,
and a reentry, which is conducted by Lockheed. The launch vehicle is
ULA's Delta IV Heavy launch vehicle, which consists of a Common Booster
Core (CBC) as the first stage with two additional strap-on CBCs and a
Delta IV Cryogenic Second Stage (DCSS). The first burn of the DCSS
places the Orion and the DCSS in orbit, and a second DCSS burn places
the Orion into a highly elliptical, negative-perigee trajectory, to
simulate the thermal conditions and high reentry speeds the module
would experience returning from missions beyond Earth orbit. After
separating from the DCSS, the Orion module reenters over the eastern
Pacific Ocean, splashing down 231 nautical miles west of Baja
California, Mexico.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ We note that, due to the unique characteristics of this
mission, FAA regulations require us to account for risks that are
typically not included in our Sec. 417.107 analysis--namely, the
uncontrolled reentry of an upper stage after orbital insertion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 417.107(b)(1) of Title 14 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) prohibits, in relevant part, the launch of a
launch vehicle if the expected casualty (Ec) rate for the
flight exceeds 30 x 10-6 for impacting inert and explosive
debris (debris). Section 435.35 establishes acceptable risk for reentry
vehicles, and requires operators to comply with Sec. Sec. 431.35(a)
and 431.35(b)(1)(i),\2\ which in turn prohibit an Ec for
debris in excess of 30 x 10-6 for both launch and reentry
combined.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Although the module is a reentry vehicle and not a reusable
launch vehicle, 14 CFR 435.33 incorporates and applies Sec. 431.43
to all reentry vehicles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On February 27, 2014, ULA petitioned the FAA for waivers of these
provisions because the projected risk from debris during launch was 164
x 10- 6, and the projected risk from debris during reentry
was less than 1 x 10-6--for a total-mission debris risk of
approximately 165 x 10-6. The FAA issued a waiver and, on
March 10, 2014, gave notice in the Federal Register. Notice of Waiver,
Mar. 10, 2014 (79 FR 13375). This initial waiver allowed a maximum-
allowable Ec value for ULA and Lockheed's proposed mission
of 165 x 10-6,\3\ based on the risk increase the launch
operators requested.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Our March 2014 Notice correctly identified the total mission
debris risk as 165 x 10-6, but when breaking down the
sources of that risk, we listed four risk factors adding up to a
total of only 164 x 10-6. 79 FR at 13376. This breakdown
mistakenly omitted the debris risk related from controlled disposal
of the upper stage, with an Ec of < 1 x 10-6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On November 3, 2014, ULA and Lockheed transmitted to the FAA the
mission's final trajectory and an updated risk analysis. Since that
time, ULA and Lockheed have continued to submit updated risk
information, as it becomes available, to the FAA. According to these
documents, it is necessary for ULA and Lockheed to modify the mission's
launch trajectory, for two reasons: To lower the mission's maximum
heating temperature constraint, and to adjust the flight azimuth to be
the same as what was flown in previous missions. On November 20, 2014,
in light of the changed mission trajectory, ULA petitioned for an
amendment to its waiver to allow an Ec of 207 x
10-6 for debris from launch. On November 21, 2014, Lockheed
petitioned for an amendment to its waiver to allow total mission risk
of 208 x 10-6.
Using ULA's updated trajectory, the FAA calculates the debris-
related Ec for failure during the de-orbit burn, after the
first 120 seconds, increases to 76 x 10-6 from 53 x
10-6. In addition, calculations by the FAA and the United
States Air Force indicate an increased debris risk, from launch to
orbital insertion, of approximately 30 x 10-6 above original
estimates. As a result, the FAA calculates that overall launch risk
increases from 164 x 10-6 to 217 x 10-6, and
total mission risk increases from 165 x 10-6 to 218 x
10-6. The FAA believes these risk figures best
[[Page 72241]]
capture the uncertainties due to weather and the inability to perform
significant mitigation at the launch site on the day of launch.
A. Analysis of the Updated Risk Assessment
The FAA's original waiver analyzed ULA and Lockheed's proposals
using the waiver criteria established by our statutory and regulatory
framework. Section 50905(b)(3) allows the FAA to waive a license
requirement if the waiver (1) will not jeopardize public health and
safety, and safety of property; (2) is in the public interest; and (3)
will not jeopardize national security and foreign policy interests of
the United States. See also 49 CFR 404.5(b). We reapply those same
criteria here.
1. Public Health and Safety, and Safety of Property
The FAA's initial waiver examined ULA and Lockheed's proposal in
comparison with the historically acceptable launch risk levels at other
Federal agencies to determine whether the mission would fall within
those parameters. The rationale for our approval of ULA and Lockheed's
prior waiver requests applies equally to their revised risk assessment.
Although the FAA's regulations prohibit debris risk in excess of 30 x
10-6, a waiver is warranted in this case because the United
States Government's experience conducting other space missions with
risk in excess of 100 x 10-6 demonstrates that the risks of
this mission are consistent with the public health and safety, and the
safety of property. As we stated in our March 10, 2014, Notice of
Waiver, the United States Government has repeatedly accepted risk for
government launches in excess of the FAA's 30 x 10-6,
without negative consequences for safety. 79 FR at 13376. The Space
Shuttle, for example, used a debris risk criterion of 200 x
10-6 for launch risk to the public. See NASA's
Implementation Plan for Space Shuttle Return to Flight and Beyond, Vol.
1 Final Edition, at 2-39 (May 15, 2007). In addition, in 2005, the U.S.
Air Force accepted risk levels in a government launch ranging from 145
to 317 x 10-6. Dept. of the Air Force Memorandum, Overflight
Risk Exceedance Waiver for Titan IV B-30, Mission (Apr. 4, 2005).
ULA's updated launch risk of 217 x 10-6 is still less
than the risk levels previously approved for a government launch.
Accordingly, granting a waiver of Sec. Sec. 417.107(b)(1) and
431.35(b)(1)(i) in this case does not jeopardize the public health and
safety, or the safety of property.
2. Public Interest
The FAA looks to its enabling statute to determine how Congress has
defined the public interest. The FAA implements the agency's statutory
mandate to encourage the development of commercial space capabilities
and the continuous improvement of the safety of launch vehicles
designed to carry passengers. 51 U.S.C. 50901(b).
As with their initial petition, ULA and Lockheed's petition for an
amended waiver are consistent with the public interest because the test
flight is necessary to the development of NASA's human-missions
capability beyond Earth orbit.
D. National Security and Foreign Policy Interests
The FAA has not identified any national security or foreign policy
implications associated with amending this waiver.
Summary and Conclusion
The FAA determines that amending the waivers associated with this
mission will not jeopardize public health and safety or safety of
property. In addition, amending the waivers is in the public interest
because it accomplishes the goals of Chapter 509 and does not unduly
increase risk to the public. Finally, amending the waivers will not
jeopardize national security and foreign policy interests of the United
States. The FAA therefore amends its prior waivers of the requirements
of 14 CFR 417.107(b)(1) and 431.35(b)(1)(i) for launch and mission
risk, respectively, to allow launch risk of an Ec of 217 x
10-6 and total mission risk of 218 x 10-6.
Issued in Washington, DC, on November 26, 2014.
Kenneth Wong,
Licensing and Evaluation Division Manager.
[FR Doc. 2014-28614 Filed 12-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P