Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 72164-72165 [2014-28552]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
72164
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 79, No. 234
Friday, December 5, 2014
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
December 1, 2014.
The Department of Agriculture has
submitted the following information
collection requirement(s) to OMB for
review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13. Comments
regarding (a) whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of burden including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques and other forms of
information technology.
Comments regarding this information
collection received by January 5, 2015
will be considered. Written comments
should be addressed to: Desk Officer for
Agriculture, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), New
Executive Office Building, 725 17th
Street NW., Washington, DC 20503.
Commentors are encouraged to submit
their comments to OMB via email to:
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov or fax
(202) 395–5806 and to Departmental
Clearance Office, USDA, OCIO, Mail
Stop 7602, Washington, DC 20250–
7602. Copies of the submission(s) may
be obtained by calling (202) 720–8681.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor a collection of information
unless the collection of information
displays a currently valid OMB control
number and the agency informs
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:07 Dec 04, 2014
Jkt 235001
potential persons who are to respond to
the collection of information that such
persons are not required to respond to
the collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Forest Service
Title: Generic Clearance for Large
Scale Collaborative Project Socioeconomic Monitoring.
OMB Control Number: 0596—NEW.
Summary of Collection: The Forest
Landscape Restoration Act of 2009 (16
U.S.C. 7303) requires the Forest Service
to monitor socio-economic impacts of
collaborative restoration activities
within the project site. In addition, the
2012 Planning Rule (36 CFR part 219)
requires a transparent, collaborative and
informed planning process. Large scale
collaborative projects involve interested
parties, such as neighboring land
owners, state, local and tribal
government representatives, businesses,
interest groups and nonprofit
organizations working with a federal
government agency to find common
ground pertaining to geographically
extensive land management, often
across multiple jurisdictions. Bureau of
Land Management (BLM) and U.S.
Forest Service (FS) collaboration on
large scale projects also extends beyond
Collaborative Forest Landscape
Restoration and Management Plans.
Need and Use of the Information:
Data will be collected through a variety
of methods, including: A census survey
of partners/participants of a
collaborative project; mail-survey of
residents in the large scale collaborative
project or planning areas; survey of
spending habits of restoration workers;
and key informant interviews with
business, community, stakeholder
leaders in collaborative project and
planning areas. Results will assist
program managers in evaluating the
positive and negative social and
economic effects of collaborative project
implementation and assist FS and BLM
forest planners in meeting collaborative
and public input requirement of the
2012 Forest Planning Rule.
Description of Respondents:
Individuals; Business or other for-profit;
Not-for-profit institutions; State, Local
or Tribal Governments.
Number of Respondents: 48,800.
Frequency of Responses: Reporting:
Annually.
Total Burden Hours: 38,800.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Forest Service
Title: Generic Clearance for the
Stewardship Mapping and Assessment
Project (STEW–MAP).
OMB Control Number: 0596—NEW.
Summary of Collection: The
Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of
1978 (Pub. L. 113–79) Section 9(a);
(b)(8); (c) and (d); The Forest and
Rangeland Renewable Resources
Research Act of 1978 and the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
authorize the Forest Service to expand
and strengthen existing research,
education, technical assistance and
public information and participation in
tree planting and maintenance programs
through stewardship. Civic
environmental stewards are involved in
a range of activities like planting trees,
organizing community gardens, offering
environment-themed classes, leading
local conservation efforts, monitoring
plants and animals, and cleaning up
nearby parks or natural areas. These
stewards may be nonprofit
organizations, formal or informal
community groups, faith-based
organizations, or academic institutions.
STEW–MAP will create a publicly
available database and map of
stewardship groups, their activities, and
where they work.
Need and Use of the Information:
Information will be gathered on civic
stewardship groups and their efforts
such as where they work, the types of
projects they focus on, and how they are
organized. There are three phases to a
STEW–MAP project: (1) A census to put
together a master list of known
stewardship groups and their contact
information in the target city or region;
(2) a survey distributed to all of the
organizations identified in phase one to
collect information about what they
work on, structure of the group and
what other groups they collaborate with;
and (3) follow-up interviews with key
longstanding organizations identified
during phase two, to collect more
detailed information about
organizational histories.
Description of Respondents: Business
or other for-profit; Not-for-profit
institutions; State, Local or Tribal
Governments.
Number of Respondents: 15,900.
Frequency of Responses: Reporting:
Annually.
E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM
05DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 234 / Friday, December 5, 2014 / Notices
Total Burden Hours: 7,925.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Charlene Parker,
Departmental Information Collection
Clearance Officer.
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[FR Doc. 2014–28552 Filed 12–4–14; 8:45 am]
Foreign-Trade Zone 221—Mesa,
Arizona; Authorization of Production
Activity; Apple Inc./GTAT Corp.
(Components for Consumer
Electronics); Mesa, Arizona
[B–55–2014]
BILLING CODE 3411–15–P
COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS
Sunshine Act Meeting
United States Commission on
Civil Rights.
AGENCY:
Notice of Commission Business
Meeting.
ACTION:
Date and Time: Friday,
December 12, 2014; 9:30 a.m. EST.
DATES:
Place: 1331 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Suite 1150, Washington, DC.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, Public
Affairs Unit (202) 376–8591.
Hearing-impaired persons who will
attend the briefing and require the
services of a sign language interpreter
should contact Pamela Dunston at (202)
376–8105 or at signlanguage@usccr.gov
at least seven business days before the
scheduled date of the meeting.
On July 31, 2014, the City of Mesa,
grantee of FTZ 221, submitted a
notification of proposed production
activity to the Foreign-Trade Zones
(FTZ) Board on behalf of Apple Inc./
GTAT Corp., within Subzone 221A, in
Mesa, Arizona.
The notification was processed in
accordance with the regulations of the
FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including
notice in the Federal Register inviting
public comment (79 FR 47088–47089,
8–12–2014). The FTZ Board has
determined that no further review of the
activity is warranted at this time. The
production activity described in the
notification is authorized, subject to the
FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations,
including Section 400.14.
Dated: November 28, 2014.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–28582 Filed 12–4–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Meeting Agenda
International Trade Administration
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
This meeting is open to the public.
I. Approval of Agenda
II. Program Planning
• Review and Vote of the 2015
Statutory Enforcement Report
Discovery Plan
• Discussion and Vote on Updating
Select Commission Reports
III. Management and Operations
• Presentations from the Illinois and
Georgia SAC Chairs on their
Immigration Projects
• Staff Director’s Report
IV. State Advisory Committee (SAC)
Appointments
• Indiana
V. Adjourn Meeting
Dated: December 2, 2014.
Marlene Sallo,
Staff Director.
[FR Doc. 2014–28649 Filed 12–3–14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6335–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:07 Dec 04, 2014
Jkt 235001
[A–570–904]
72165
weighted-average dumping margin for
Calgon Carbon (Tianjin) Co., Ltd.’s
(‘‘Calgon Tianjin’’) using revised
surrogate values for coal and fine byproducts.2 The Department also
recalculated in the Remand the
dumping margin for three respondents
not selected for individual examination
(i.e., the separate rate)—Ningxia
Guanghua Cherishmet Activated Carbon
Co., Ltd. (‘‘Ningxia Guanghua’’) and its
affiliate Beijing Pacific Activated Carbon
Products Co., Ltd. (‘‘Beijing Pacific’’)
(together, ‘‘Cherishmet’’),3 as well as
Shanxi DMD Corporation (‘‘Shanxi
DMD’’).4
Consistent with the decision of the
United States Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit (‘‘CAFC’’) in Timken Co.
v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir.
1990) (‘‘Timken’’), as clarified by
Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v.
United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir.
2010), the Department is notifying the
public that the final judgment in this
case is not in harmony with the
Department’s final results of the
antidumping duty administrative review
of the antidumping duty order on
certain activated carbon from the
People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’)
covering the period of review (‘‘POR’’)
April 1, 2009, through March 31, 2010,
and is amending the final results with
respect to the weighted-average
dumping margins assigned to Ningxia
Guanghua, Beijing Pacific, and Shanxi
DMD.5
DATES:
Effective Date: December 4,
2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Certain Activated Carbon From the
People’s Republic of China: Notice of
Court Decision Not in Harmony With
Final Results of Administrative Review
and Notice of Amended Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2009–2010
Robert Palmer, AD/CVD Operations
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–9068.
AGENCY:
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On November 24, 2014, the
United States Court of International
Trade (‘‘the Court’’) issued final
judgment in Albemarle Corp. et al. v.
United States, Consol. Court No. 11–
00451, sustaining the Department of
Commerce’s (‘‘the Department’’) final
results of redetermination pursuant to
remand (‘‘Remand’’).1 In the Remand,
the Department recalculated the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1 See Final Results Of Redetermination Pursuant
To Court Remand, Consol. Court No. 11–00451, Slip
Op. 13–106 (CIT August 15, 2013), dated January
9, 2014, available at https://enforcement.trade.gov/
remands/13-106.pdf.
2 Id. at 8–10. As we explain below, the
Department’s recalculation of these surrogate values
continued to yield a de minimis weighted-average
dumping margin for Calgon Tianjin. Thus,
consistent with our practice, the Department has
not amended the final results with respect to Calgon
Tianjin.
3 The Department found Ningxia Guanghua and
Beijing Pacific to be affiliated and a single entity in
First Administrative Review of Certain Activated
Carbon From the People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 74 FR 57995, 57998 (November 10, 2009).
4 See Remand at 10–13.
5 See Certain Activated Carbon From the People’s
Republic of China: Final Results and Partial
Rescission of Third Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 76 FR 67142 (October 31,
2011) (‘‘AR3 Final Results’’) and the accompanying
Issues and Decision Memorandum.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM
05DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 234 (Friday, December 5, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72164-72165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28552]
========================================================================
Notices
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings,
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents
appearing in this section.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 234 / Friday, December 5, 2014 /
Notices
[[Page 72164]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
December 1, 2014.
The Department of Agriculture has submitted the following
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Comments
regarding (a) whether the collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy
of the agency's estimate of burden including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility and clarity of the information to be collected; (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques
and other forms of information technology.
Comments regarding this information collection received by January
5, 2015 will be considered. Written comments should be addressed to:
Desk Officer for Agriculture, Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), New Executive Office
Building, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503. Commentors are
encouraged to submit their comments to OMB via email to:
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov or fax (202) 395-5806 and to Departmental
Clearance Office, USDA, OCIO, Mail Stop 7602, Washington, DC 20250-
7602. Copies of the submission(s) may be obtained by calling (202) 720-
8681.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information
unless the collection of information displays a currently valid OMB
control number and the agency informs potential persons who are to
respond to the collection of information that such persons are not
required to respond to the collection of information unless it displays
a currently valid OMB control number.
Forest Service
Title: Generic Clearance for Large Scale Collaborative Project
Socio-economic Monitoring.
OMB Control Number: 0596--NEW.
Summary of Collection: The Forest Landscape Restoration Act of 2009
(16 U.S.C. 7303) requires the Forest Service to monitor socio-economic
impacts of collaborative restoration activities within the project
site. In addition, the 2012 Planning Rule (36 CFR part 219) requires a
transparent, collaborative and informed planning process. Large scale
collaborative projects involve interested parties, such as neighboring
land owners, state, local and tribal government representatives,
businesses, interest groups and nonprofit organizations working with a
federal government agency to find common ground pertaining to
geographically extensive land management, often across multiple
jurisdictions. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and U.S. Forest Service
(FS) collaboration on large scale projects also extends beyond
Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration and Management Plans.
Need and Use of the Information: Data will be collected through a
variety of methods, including: A census survey of partners/participants
of a collaborative project; mail-survey of residents in the large scale
collaborative project or planning areas; survey of spending habits of
restoration workers; and key informant interviews with business,
community, stakeholder leaders in collaborative project and planning
areas. Results will assist program managers in evaluating the positive
and negative social and economic effects of collaborative project
implementation and assist FS and BLM forest planners in meeting
collaborative and public input requirement of the 2012 Forest Planning
Rule.
Description of Respondents: Individuals; Business or other for-
profit; Not-for-profit institutions; State, Local or Tribal
Governments.
Number of Respondents: 48,800.
Frequency of Responses: Reporting: Annually.
Total Burden Hours: 38,800.
Forest Service
Title: Generic Clearance for the Stewardship Mapping and Assessment
Project (STEW-MAP).
OMB Control Number: 0596--NEW.
Summary of Collection: The Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of
1978 (Pub. L. 113-79) Section 9(a); (b)(8); (c) and (d); The Forest and
Rangeland Renewable Resources Research Act of 1978 and the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 authorize the Forest Service to expand
and strengthen existing research, education, technical assistance and
public information and participation in tree planting and maintenance
programs through stewardship. Civic environmental stewards are involved
in a range of activities like planting trees, organizing community
gardens, offering environment-themed classes, leading local
conservation efforts, monitoring plants and animals, and cleaning up
nearby parks or natural areas. These stewards may be nonprofit
organizations, formal or informal community groups, faith-based
organizations, or academic institutions. STEW-MAP will create a
publicly available database and map of stewardship groups, their
activities, and where they work.
Need and Use of the Information: Information will be gathered on
civic stewardship groups and their efforts such as where they work, the
types of projects they focus on, and how they are organized. There are
three phases to a STEW-MAP project: (1) A census to put together a
master list of known stewardship groups and their contact information
in the target city or region; (2) a survey distributed to all of the
organizations identified in phase one to collect information about what
they work on, structure of the group and what other groups they
collaborate with; and (3) follow-up interviews with key longstanding
organizations identified during phase two, to collect more detailed
information about organizational histories.
Description of Respondents: Business or other for-profit; Not-for-
profit institutions; State, Local or Tribal Governments.
Number of Respondents: 15,900.
Frequency of Responses: Reporting: Annually.
[[Page 72165]]
Total Burden Hours: 7,925.
Charlene Parker,
Departmental Information Collection Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-28552 Filed 12-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411-15-P
