Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 72164-72165 [2014-28552]

Download as PDF 72164 Notices Federal Register Vol. 79, No. 234 Friday, December 5, 2014 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency statements of organization and functions are examples of documents appearing in this section. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES December 1, 2014. The Department of Agriculture has submitted the following information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13. Comments regarding (a) whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of burden including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected; (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques and other forms of information technology. Comments regarding this information collection received by January 5, 2015 will be considered. Written comments should be addressed to: Desk Officer for Agriculture, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), New Executive Office Building, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503. Commentors are encouraged to submit their comments to OMB via email to: OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov or fax (202) 395–5806 and to Departmental Clearance Office, USDA, OCIO, Mail Stop 7602, Washington, DC 20250– 7602. Copies of the submission(s) may be obtained by calling (202) 720–8681. An agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a currently valid OMB control number and the agency informs VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:07 Dec 04, 2014 Jkt 235001 potential persons who are to respond to the collection of information that such persons are not required to respond to the collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Forest Service Title: Generic Clearance for Large Scale Collaborative Project Socioeconomic Monitoring. OMB Control Number: 0596—NEW. Summary of Collection: The Forest Landscape Restoration Act of 2009 (16 U.S.C. 7303) requires the Forest Service to monitor socio-economic impacts of collaborative restoration activities within the project site. In addition, the 2012 Planning Rule (36 CFR part 219) requires a transparent, collaborative and informed planning process. Large scale collaborative projects involve interested parties, such as neighboring land owners, state, local and tribal government representatives, businesses, interest groups and nonprofit organizations working with a federal government agency to find common ground pertaining to geographically extensive land management, often across multiple jurisdictions. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and U.S. Forest Service (FS) collaboration on large scale projects also extends beyond Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration and Management Plans. Need and Use of the Information: Data will be collected through a variety of methods, including: A census survey of partners/participants of a collaborative project; mail-survey of residents in the large scale collaborative project or planning areas; survey of spending habits of restoration workers; and key informant interviews with business, community, stakeholder leaders in collaborative project and planning areas. Results will assist program managers in evaluating the positive and negative social and economic effects of collaborative project implementation and assist FS and BLM forest planners in meeting collaborative and public input requirement of the 2012 Forest Planning Rule. Description of Respondents: Individuals; Business or other for-profit; Not-for-profit institutions; State, Local or Tribal Governments. Number of Respondents: 48,800. Frequency of Responses: Reporting: Annually. Total Burden Hours: 38,800. PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Forest Service Title: Generic Clearance for the Stewardship Mapping and Assessment Project (STEW–MAP). OMB Control Number: 0596—NEW. Summary of Collection: The Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 113–79) Section 9(a); (b)(8); (c) and (d); The Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Research Act of 1978 and the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 authorize the Forest Service to expand and strengthen existing research, education, technical assistance and public information and participation in tree planting and maintenance programs through stewardship. Civic environmental stewards are involved in a range of activities like planting trees, organizing community gardens, offering environment-themed classes, leading local conservation efforts, monitoring plants and animals, and cleaning up nearby parks or natural areas. These stewards may be nonprofit organizations, formal or informal community groups, faith-based organizations, or academic institutions. STEW–MAP will create a publicly available database and map of stewardship groups, their activities, and where they work. Need and Use of the Information: Information will be gathered on civic stewardship groups and their efforts such as where they work, the types of projects they focus on, and how they are organized. There are three phases to a STEW–MAP project: (1) A census to put together a master list of known stewardship groups and their contact information in the target city or region; (2) a survey distributed to all of the organizations identified in phase one to collect information about what they work on, structure of the group and what other groups they collaborate with; and (3) follow-up interviews with key longstanding organizations identified during phase two, to collect more detailed information about organizational histories. Description of Respondents: Business or other for-profit; Not-for-profit institutions; State, Local or Tribal Governments. Number of Respondents: 15,900. Frequency of Responses: Reporting: Annually. E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM 05DEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 234 / Friday, December 5, 2014 / Notices Total Burden Hours: 7,925. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Charlene Parker, Departmental Information Collection Clearance Officer. Foreign-Trade Zones Board [FR Doc. 2014–28552 Filed 12–4–14; 8:45 am] Foreign-Trade Zone 221—Mesa, Arizona; Authorization of Production Activity; Apple Inc./GTAT Corp. (Components for Consumer Electronics); Mesa, Arizona [B–55–2014] BILLING CODE 3411–15–P COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS Sunshine Act Meeting United States Commission on Civil Rights. AGENCY: Notice of Commission Business Meeting. ACTION: Date and Time: Friday, December 12, 2014; 9:30 a.m. EST. DATES: Place: 1331 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Suite 1150, Washington, DC. ADDRESSES: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, Public Affairs Unit (202) 376–8591. Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the briefing and require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact Pamela Dunston at (202) 376–8105 or at signlanguage@usccr.gov at least seven business days before the scheduled date of the meeting. On July 31, 2014, the City of Mesa, grantee of FTZ 221, submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board on behalf of Apple Inc./ GTAT Corp., within Subzone 221A, in Mesa, Arizona. The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal Register inviting public comment (79 FR 47088–47089, 8–12–2014). The FTZ Board has determined that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification is authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, including Section 400.14. Dated: November 28, 2014. Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2014–28582 Filed 12–4–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Meeting Agenda International Trade Administration wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES This meeting is open to the public. I. Approval of Agenda II. Program Planning • Review and Vote of the 2015 Statutory Enforcement Report Discovery Plan • Discussion and Vote on Updating Select Commission Reports III. Management and Operations • Presentations from the Illinois and Georgia SAC Chairs on their Immigration Projects • Staff Director’s Report IV. State Advisory Committee (SAC) Appointments • Indiana V. Adjourn Meeting Dated: December 2, 2014. Marlene Sallo, Staff Director. [FR Doc. 2014–28649 Filed 12–3–14; 11:15 am] BILLING CODE 6335–01–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:07 Dec 04, 2014 Jkt 235001 [A–570–904] 72165 weighted-average dumping margin for Calgon Carbon (Tianjin) Co., Ltd.’s (‘‘Calgon Tianjin’’) using revised surrogate values for coal and fine byproducts.2 The Department also recalculated in the Remand the dumping margin for three respondents not selected for individual examination (i.e., the separate rate)—Ningxia Guanghua Cherishmet Activated Carbon Co., Ltd. (‘‘Ningxia Guanghua’’) and its affiliate Beijing Pacific Activated Carbon Products Co., Ltd. (‘‘Beijing Pacific’’) (together, ‘‘Cherishmet’’),3 as well as Shanxi DMD Corporation (‘‘Shanxi DMD’’).4 Consistent with the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (‘‘CAFC’’) in Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (‘‘Timken’’), as clarified by Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010), the Department is notifying the public that the final judgment in this case is not in harmony with the Department’s final results of the antidumping duty administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain activated carbon from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) covering the period of review (‘‘POR’’) April 1, 2009, through March 31, 2010, and is amending the final results with respect to the weighted-average dumping margins assigned to Ningxia Guanghua, Beijing Pacific, and Shanxi DMD.5 DATES: Effective Date: December 4, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Certain Activated Carbon From the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Results of Administrative Review and Notice of Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2009–2010 Robert Palmer, AD/CVD Operations Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–9068. AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On November 24, 2014, the United States Court of International Trade (‘‘the Court’’) issued final judgment in Albemarle Corp. et al. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 11– 00451, sustaining the Department of Commerce’s (‘‘the Department’’) final results of redetermination pursuant to remand (‘‘Remand’’).1 In the Remand, the Department recalculated the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 1 See Final Results Of Redetermination Pursuant To Court Remand, Consol. Court No. 11–00451, Slip Op. 13–106 (CIT August 15, 2013), dated January 9, 2014, available at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ remands/13-106.pdf. 2 Id. at 8–10. As we explain below, the Department’s recalculation of these surrogate values continued to yield a de minimis weighted-average dumping margin for Calgon Tianjin. Thus, consistent with our practice, the Department has not amended the final results with respect to Calgon Tianjin. 3 The Department found Ningxia Guanghua and Beijing Pacific to be affiliated and a single entity in First Administrative Review of Certain Activated Carbon From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 74 FR 57995, 57998 (November 10, 2009). 4 See Remand at 10–13. 5 See Certain Activated Carbon From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results and Partial Rescission of Third Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 67142 (October 31, 2011) (‘‘AR3 Final Results’’) and the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum. PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM 05DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 234 (Friday, December 5, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72164-72165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28552]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 234 / Friday, December 5, 2014 / 
Notices

[[Page 72164]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

December 1, 2014.
    The Department of Agriculture has submitted the following 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Comments 
regarding (a) whether the collection of information is necessary for 
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including 
whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy 
of the agency's estimate of burden including the validity of the 
methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, 
utility and clarity of the information to be collected; (d) ways to 
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are 
to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, 
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques 
and other forms of information technology.
    Comments regarding this information collection received by January 
5, 2015 will be considered. Written comments should be addressed to: 
Desk Officer for Agriculture, Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), New Executive Office 
Building, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503. Commentors are 
encouraged to submit their comments to OMB via email to: 
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov or fax (202) 395-5806 and to Departmental 
Clearance Office, USDA, OCIO, Mail Stop 7602, Washington, DC 20250-
7602. Copies of the submission(s) may be obtained by calling (202) 720-
8681.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information 
unless the collection of information displays a currently valid OMB 
control number and the agency informs potential persons who are to 
respond to the collection of information that such persons are not 
required to respond to the collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number.

Forest Service

    Title: Generic Clearance for Large Scale Collaborative Project 
Socio-economic Monitoring.
    OMB Control Number: 0596--NEW.
    Summary of Collection: The Forest Landscape Restoration Act of 2009 
(16 U.S.C. 7303) requires the Forest Service to monitor socio-economic 
impacts of collaborative restoration activities within the project 
site. In addition, the 2012 Planning Rule (36 CFR part 219) requires a 
transparent, collaborative and informed planning process. Large scale 
collaborative projects involve interested parties, such as neighboring 
land owners, state, local and tribal government representatives, 
businesses, interest groups and nonprofit organizations working with a 
federal government agency to find common ground pertaining to 
geographically extensive land management, often across multiple 
jurisdictions. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and U.S. Forest Service 
(FS) collaboration on large scale projects also extends beyond 
Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration and Management Plans.
    Need and Use of the Information: Data will be collected through a 
variety of methods, including: A census survey of partners/participants 
of a collaborative project; mail-survey of residents in the large scale 
collaborative project or planning areas; survey of spending habits of 
restoration workers; and key informant interviews with business, 
community, stakeholder leaders in collaborative project and planning 
areas. Results will assist program managers in evaluating the positive 
and negative social and economic effects of collaborative project 
implementation and assist FS and BLM forest planners in meeting 
collaborative and public input requirement of the 2012 Forest Planning 
Rule.
    Description of Respondents: Individuals; Business or other for-
profit; Not-for-profit institutions; State, Local or Tribal 
Governments.
    Number of Respondents: 48,800.
    Frequency of Responses: Reporting: Annually.
    Total Burden Hours: 38,800.

Forest Service

    Title: Generic Clearance for the Stewardship Mapping and Assessment 
Project (STEW-MAP).
    OMB Control Number: 0596--NEW.
    Summary of Collection: The Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 
1978 (Pub. L. 113-79) Section 9(a); (b)(8); (c) and (d); The Forest and 
Rangeland Renewable Resources Research Act of 1978 and the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 authorize the Forest Service to expand 
and strengthen existing research, education, technical assistance and 
public information and participation in tree planting and maintenance 
programs through stewardship. Civic environmental stewards are involved 
in a range of activities like planting trees, organizing community 
gardens, offering environment-themed classes, leading local 
conservation efforts, monitoring plants and animals, and cleaning up 
nearby parks or natural areas. These stewards may be nonprofit 
organizations, formal or informal community groups, faith-based 
organizations, or academic institutions. STEW-MAP will create a 
publicly available database and map of stewardship groups, their 
activities, and where they work.
    Need and Use of the Information: Information will be gathered on 
civic stewardship groups and their efforts such as where they work, the 
types of projects they focus on, and how they are organized. There are 
three phases to a STEW-MAP project: (1) A census to put together a 
master list of known stewardship groups and their contact information 
in the target city or region; (2) a survey distributed to all of the 
organizations identified in phase one to collect information about what 
they work on, structure of the group and what other groups they 
collaborate with; and (3) follow-up interviews with key longstanding 
organizations identified during phase two, to collect more detailed 
information about organizational histories.
    Description of Respondents: Business or other for-profit; Not-for-
profit institutions; State, Local or Tribal Governments.
    Number of Respondents: 15,900.
    Frequency of Responses: Reporting: Annually.

[[Page 72165]]

    Total Burden Hours: 7,925.

Charlene Parker,
Departmental Information Collection Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-28552 Filed 12-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411-15-P