Payment for Physician and Other Health Care Professional Services Purchased by Indian Health Programs and Medical Charges Associated With Non-Hospital-Based Care, 72160-72163 [2014-28508]
Download as PDF
72160
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 234 / Friday, December 5, 2014 / Proposed Rules
40 CFR Part 63
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2010–0895; FRL–9920–03–
OAR]
RIN 2060–AQ11
National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants: Ferroalloys
Production; Extension of Comment
Period
AGENCY:
Environmental Protection
Agency.
Supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking; extension of
public comment period.
ACTION:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is announcing that the
period for providing public comments
on the October 6, 2014, supplemental
proposed rule titled ‘‘National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants:
Ferroalloys Production’’ is being
extended an additional 11 days.
DATES: The public comment period for
the supplemental proposed rule
published October 6, 2014 (79 FR
60238), and initially extended by 18
days on November 14, 2014 (79 FR
68152), is being extended an additional
11 days to December 19, 2014, in order
to provide the public additional time to
submit comments and supporting
information. The EPA received a request
for an extension from ERAMET
Marietta, Incorporated to gather and
analyze data and formulate their
comments on the supplemental
proposed amendments.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on the
supplemental proposed rule may be
submitted to EPA electronically, by
mail, by facsimile or through hand
delivery/courier. Please refer to the
supplemental proposal (79 FR 60238)
for the addresses and detailed
instructions.
Docket. Publicly available documents
relevant to this action are available for
public inspection either electronically at
https://www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy at the EPA Docket Center, Room
3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC. The Public Reading
Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. A reasonable fee may be
charged for copying. The official public
docket for this rulemaking is Docket No.
EPA–HQ–OAR–2010–0895.
World Wide Web. The EPA Web site
for this rulemaking is at https://
www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/ferroa/
ferropg.html.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:07 Dec 04, 2014
Jkt 235001
Mr.
Phil Mulrine, Metals and Inorganic
Chemicals Group (D243–02), Sector
Policies and Programs Division, Office
of Air Quality Planning and Standards,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
27711; Telephone number: (919) 541–
5289; Fax number (919) 541–3207;
Email address: mulrine.phil@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Comment Period
After considering the request received
from ERAMET Marietta, Incorporated to
extend the public comment period, the
EPA has decided to extend the public
comment period for an additional 11
days. Therefore, the public comment
period will end on December 19, 2014,
rather than December 8, 2014.
Dated: November 25, 2014.
Mary E. Henigin,
Acting Director, Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards.
[FR Doc. 2014–28387 Filed 12–4–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Indian Health Service
42 CFR Part 136
RIN 0917–AA12
Payment for Physician and Other
Health Care Professional Services
Purchased by Indian Health Programs
and Medical Charges Associated With
Non-Hospital-Based Care
Indian Health Service, HHS.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This proposed rule would
amend Indian Health Service (IHS)
Purchased and Referred Care (PRC),
formally known as the Contract Health
Services (CHS), regulations to apply
Medicare payment methodologies to all
physician and other health care
professional services and non-hospitalbased services that are either authorized
under such regulations or purchased by
urban Indian organizations. Specifically,
it proposes that the health programs
operated by IHS, Tribe, Tribal
organization, or urban Indian
organization (collectively, I/T/U
programs) will pay the lowest of the
amount provided for under the
applicable Medicare fee schedule,
prospective payment system, or
Medicare waiver; the amount negotiated
by a repricing agent, if available; or the
usual and customary billing rate.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Repricing agents may be used to
determine whether IHS may benefit
from savings by utilizing negotiated
rates offered through commercial health
care networks. This proposed rule seeks
comment on how to establish
reimbursement that is consistent across
Federal health care programs, aligns
payment with inpatient services, and
enables the IHS to expand beneficiary
access to medical care.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 20, 2015.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer
to file code [Federal Register insert
No.]. Because of staff and resource
limitations, we cannot accept comments
by facsimile (FAX) transmission. You
may submit comments in one of four
ways (please choose only one of the
ways listed):
1. Electronically. You may submit
electronic comments on this regulation
to https://regulations.gov. Follow the
‘‘Submit a Comment’’ instructions.
2. By regular mail. You may mail
written comments to the following
address ONLY: Betty Gould, Regulations
Officer, Indian Health Service, 801
Thompson Avenue, TMP STE 450,
Rockville, Maryland 20852.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed
comments to be received before the
close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You
may send written comments to the
above address.
4. By hand or courier. If you prefer,
you may deliver (by hand or courier)
your written comments before the close
of the comment period to the address
above.
If you intend to deliver your
comments to the Rockville address,
please call telephone number (301) 443–
1116 in advance to schedule your
arrival with a staff member.
Comments will be made available for
public inspection at the Rockville
address from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.,
Monday–Friday, approximately three
weeks after publication of this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl
Harper, Director, Office of Resource
Access and Partnerships, Indian Health
Service, 801 Thompson Avenue,
Rockville, Maryland 20852. Telephone:
(301) 443–1553.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Consolidated Appropriation Act of 2014
signed by President Obama in January,
2014, adopted a new name, Purchased/
Referred Care (PRC), for the CHS
program. The name change was official
with passage of the FY 2014
appropriation. The new name better
describes the purpose of the program
funding, which is for both purchased
E:\FR\FM\05DEP1.SGM
05DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 234 / Friday, December 5, 2014 / Proposed Rules
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
care and referred care outside of IHS.
The name change does not change the
program, and all current policies,
practices, will continue and is not
intended to have any effect on the laws
that govern or apply to CHS. IHS will
administer PRC in accordance with all
laws applicable to CHS. This proposed
rule will use the term PRC. For the
purposes of this rule, the terms provider
of services (or ‘‘provider’’) and supplier
have the same meaning as the terms
defined at 42 U.S.C. 1395x.
I. Background
This proposed rule would amend the
IHS medical regulations at 42 CFR part
136 to apply Medicare payment
methodologies to all physician and
other health professional services and
non-hospital-based services provided
through Contract Health Services (CHS),
now Purchased Referred Care (PRC), or
purchased by urban Indian
organizations, and that are not
otherwise subject to Medicare payment
rates by law. Under 42 CFR 136.23,
when necessary health services are not
reasonably accessible or available to IHS
beneficiaries, the IHS and Tribes are
authorized to pay for medical care
provided to IHS beneficiaries by nonIHS or Tribal, public or private health
care providers, depending on the
availability of funds. Similarly, under
section 503 of the Indian Health Care
Improvement Act (IHCIA), 25 U.S.C.
1653, urban Indian organizations may
refer eligible urban Indians, as defined
under section 4 of the IHCIA, to non-I/
T/U public and private health care
providers and, depending on the
availability of funds, may also cover the
cost of care.
Sec. 506 of the Medicare Prescription
Drug, Improvement, and Modernization
Act of 2003 (MMA) (Pub. L. 108–173)
authorized the Secretary to establish a
payment methodology, payment rates,
and admissions practices for Medicareparticipating hospitals that furnish
inpatient services applicable when such
hospitals provide to an eligible
American Indian/Alaskan Native (AI/
AN) beneficiary medical care authorized
by an I/T/U. As implemented in 42 CFR
part 136 subpart D, Medicareparticipating hospitals, including
Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs), are
reimbursed by I/T/Us using ‘‘Medicarelike’’ rates that generally correspond to
the applicable Medicare payment
methodology for the medical service. In
instances where Medicare-participating
hospitals furnish inpatient services, but
are exempt from Medicare’s Prospective
Payment System (PPS) and receive
reimbursement based on reasonable
costs (for example, CAHs, children’s
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:07 Dec 04, 2014
Jkt 235001
72161
hospitals, cancer hospitals, and certain
other hospitals reimbursed by Medicare
under special arrangements), payment is
made per discharge based on the
reasonable cost methods established
under 42 CFR part 413, except that the
interim payment rate, under 42 CFR part
413 subpart E, constitutes payment in
full for authorized charges.
Notwithstanding, if an amount has been
negotiated with the hospital or its agent
by the I/T/U, the I/T/U will pay the
lesser of the amount determined under
the PPS or the amount negotiated with
the hospital or its agent.
The Medicare-like rate methodology
established by 42 CFR part 136 subpart
D does not apply to non-hospital
services, including physician and other
health professional services, services
provided by a comprehensive outpatient
rehabilitation facility, a home health
agency, or a hospice, or other nonhospital-based items and services.
Rather, I/T/Us reimburse for authorized
services at the rates provided by
contracts negotiated at the local level
with individual providers or according
to a provider’s billed charges. Given the
small market share of individual I/T/U
programs, I/T/Us historically have paid
rates in substantial excess of Medicare’s
allowable rates or rates paid by private
insurers for the same services. Despite
establishing medical priorities to cover
the most necessary care, IHS is still
unable to provide care to all of its
beneficiaries. The demand for PRC care
consistently exceeds available funding.
IHS recently reported to Congress that
IHS and tribal PRC programs denied an
estimated $760,855,000 for an estimated
146,928 contract care services needed
by eligible beneficiaries in FY 2013.1
Based on an audit of fiscal year 2012,
the Government Accountability Office
(GAO) estimated that, by implementing
a Medicare-like rate methodology, the
IHS PRC programs could have saved $32
million on physician services alone, not
including additional savings for other
non-hospital services, or savings
accrued to Tribal PRC programs.
Government Accountability Office,
Indian Health Service: Capping
Payment Rates for Non-Hospital
Services Could Save Millions of Dollars
for Contract Health Services (April
2013) (‘‘April 2013 Study’’). The GAO
concluded that by setting PRC physician
and other non-hospital payments at
rates consistent with Medicare and
other Federal agencies, the IHS could
expand IHS beneficiary access to care.
These findings and recommendations
are substantiated by a report from the
Department of Health and Human
Services’ Office of the Inspector
General. Department of Health and
Human Services, Office of Inspector
General, IHS Contract Health Services
Program: Overpayments and Potential
Savings (Sept. 2009).
1 See Congress FY 2015 Congressional
Justification Purchased/Referred Care Program
Description and Accomplishments page 92–95,
available online at: https://www.ihs.gov/
budgetformulation/congressionaljustifications/.
2 A repricing agent discounts rates charged by a
health care provider to rates that the agent may
have established with the health care provider as
a condition of participating in the agent’s provider
network.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
II. Provisions of the Proposed Rule
This proposed rule is promulgated
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 2001(b), which
provides that the Secretary ‘‘[i]n
carrying out [her] functions,
responsibilities, authorities, and duties
under [the Transfer Act] . . . is
authorized, with the consent of the
Indian people served, to contract with
private or other non-Federal health
agencies or organizations for the
provision of health services to such
people on a fee-for-service basis or on a
prepayment or other basis’’ and
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 2003, which
authorizes the Secretary to promulgate
regulations to carry out the Transfer Act.
It amends the IHS regulation at 42 CFR
part 136 by adding a new subpart I that
applies ‘‘Medicare-like’’ rate payment
methodologies to all physicians and
health care professional services and all
non-hospital-based services that are not
covered currently under 42 CFR part
136 subpart D. The proposed rule is
similar to payment methodologies
promulgated in other Federal health
care programs, including the
Department of Veterans Affairs, by
applying a consistent reimbursement
policy across Federal health care
programs. The proposed rule provides
that the I/T/U will pay the lowest of the
amount provided under the applicable
Medicare fee schedule, prospective
payment system, or Medicare waiver;
the amount negotiated by a repricing
agent,2 if available; or the usual and
customary billing rate. In the absence of
a Medicare rate or Medicare waiver, or
agreement, payment will be made at the
amount that the provider or supplier
bills the general public for the same
service. The rule specifies the
circumstances in which a non-hospital
health care provider or supplier will be
deemed to have accepted the rates
established herein.
The rule caps the rate that I/T/Us are
authorized to pay non-I/T/U health care
providers and suppliers for services and
leaves no discretion for the I/T/U and
the health care provider to negotiate
higher rates. The IHS recognizes this
E:\FR\FM\05DEP1.SGM
05DEP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
72162
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 234 / Friday, December 5, 2014 / Proposed Rules
constraint could impact the delivery of
patient care, particularly in
circumstances where the I/T/U cannot
find a health care provider or supplier
willing to accept the payment rates
established herein or the patient
receives emergency services from a
provider or supplier that refuses to
accept the rate. Under 25 U.S.C. 1621u,
a patient who receives authorized
contract care may not be held liable for
the payment of any charges. If the
medical provider or supplier does not
agree to accept the payment rate as
payment in full, the I/T/U is effectively
precluded from authorizing the care or
paying the health care provider or
supplier for services rendered to a
beneficiary. In such circumstances, the
I/T/U will not authorize payment and
the patient may be held financially
responsible by the provider or supplier
of care for the charges. The IHS also
notes that, while Medicare-participating
hospitals are required to accept payment
rates set forth in 42 CFR part 136
subpart D for facility services, subpart D
does not apply to the professional
service provided by a physician or
practitioner through the hospital. To the
extent the physician or practitioner does
not agree to accept the rates established
by this regulation, the I/T/U will not
authorize payment for the service. The
IHS seeks comment on whether
exceptions should be incorporated into
the rule to permit an I/T/U to pay in
excess of the calculated rate in
circumstances where it may be
appropriate for the I/T/U to retain more
flexibility over the payment rate. For
example, a specialist that does not
accept reduced rates and to access this
specialty at a reduced rate it is located
in another State. The travel costs and
burden on the patient is too great to
access the needed specialty care.
The proposed rule also specifies that
payments made in accordance with the
described methodology shall constitute
payment in full and that, in accordance
with 25 U.S.C. 1621u, the provider,
supplier or their agent, may not impose
additional charge on an individual for I/
T/U authorized items and services.
Consistent with IHS regulations, the
rule further provides that, if an I/T/U
has authorized payment for PRC
services provided to an individual who
is eligible for benefits under Medicare,
Medicaid, or another third party payer,
the I/T/U shall be the payer of last resort
in accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1623(b). If
there are any third party payers, the I/
T/U will pay the amount for which the
patient is being held responsible after
the provider or supplier of services has
coordinated benefits and all other
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:07 Dec 04, 2014
Jkt 235001
alternate resources have been
considered and paid, including
applicable co-payments, deductibles,
and coinsurance owed by the patient.
For purposes of the payment
methodology specified in § 136.30(a),
required co-payments, deductibles, and
coinsurance are those that would have
been owed by a Medicare beneficiary
under the proposed methodology.
Because the patient may not be held
liable for the payment of costs or
charges under 25 U.S.C. 1621u, the I/T/
U will assume these costs to the extent
all payments made by any payer, do not
in aggregate, exceed the maximum
payment rate set forth § 136.201(a).
III. Collection of Information
Requirements
These regulations do not impose any
new information collection
requirements. The requirements for
submitting a claim are currently
approved under Office and Management
and Budget approval number 0917–
0002, IHS Contract Health Services
Report (Expires: 02/28/2016). Providers
and suppliers will not be required to
update information technology systems
as a result of the provisions of this
proposed rule. Claims will be re-priced
by the IHS Fiscal Intermediary or the
appropriate Tribal administrator
according to the methodology adopted
herein.
IV. Regulatory Impact Statement
The IHS has examined the impact of
this final rule as required by Executive
Order 12866 (September 1993,
Regulatory Planning and Review), the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(September 19, 1980, Pub. L. 96–354),
section 1102(b) of the Social Security
Act, and the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4).
Executive Order 12866 directs
agencies to assess all costs and benefits
of available regulatory alternatives and,
if regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety effects, distributive impacts,
and equity). A regulatory impact
analysis (RIA) must be prepared for
major rules with economically
significant effects ($100 million or more
in any one year). The April 2013 Study
released by the GAO found that if
federal PRC programs had paid
Medicare rates for physicians services in
2010, they could have realized an
estimated $32 million in annual savings
to pay for additional services. Although
the analysis did not include other types
of non-hospital services or funding that
goes to tribal PRC programs, the
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
increase in purchasing power brought
about by this proposed rule would be
unlikely to exceed $100 million
annually. OMB has determined that this
is a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
The Secretary hereby proposes to
certify that this proposed rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities as
they are defined in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 through
612. The proposed rule will not cause
significant economic impact on health
care providers, suppliers, or entities
since only a small portion of the
business of such entities concerns IHS
beneficiaries. The April 2013 Study
released by the GAO found that of the
physicians sampled, the PRC program
represented a small portion of their
practice and was not a significant source
of revenue. Although the sampling of
physicians was small, all of the sampled
physicians were in the top 25% in terms
of volume of paid services covered by
PRC. IHS believes the sample to be
representative of higher volume
practitioners currently providing
services paid for by PRC. Accordingly,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the
proposed rule is exempt from the initial
and final regulatory flexibility analysis
requirements of sections 603 and 604.
In addition, section 1102(b) of the Act
requires IHS to prepare a RIA if a rule
may have a significant impact on the
operations of a substantial number of
small rural hospitals. This analysis must
conform to the provisions of section 603
of the RFA. For purposes of section
1102(b) of the Act, IHS defines a small
rural hospital as a hospital that is
located outside of a Metropolitan
Statistical Area and has fewer than 100
beds. For the reasons provided above,
IHS has determined that this rule will
not have a significant impact on the
operations of a substantial number of
small rural hospitals. Section 202 of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
also requires that agencies assess
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule whose requirements
mandate expenditure in any one year by
State, local, or Tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$141 million. This proposal would not
impose substantial Federal mandates on
State, local or Tribal governments or
private sector.
List of Subjects in 42 CFR Part 136
Alaska Natives, American Indian,
Health, Medicare.
E:\FR\FM\05DEP1.SGM
05DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 234 / Friday, December 5, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Dated: November 6, 2014 .
Yvette Roubideaux,
Acting Director, Indian Health Service.
Dated: November 18, 2014.
Sylvia M. Burwell,
Secretary, Health and Human Services.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Indian Health Service
proposes to amend 42 CFR chapter I as
set forth below:
PART 136—INDIAN HEALTH
1. The authority citation for part 136
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 25 U.S.C. 13; 42 U.S.C.
1395cc(a)(1)(U), 42 U.S.C. 2001 and 2003,
unless otherwise noted.
2. Add new subpart I consisting of
§§ 136.201 and 136.202, to read as
follows:
■
Subpart I—Limitation on Charges for
Health Care Professional Services and
Non-Hospital-Based Care
Sec.
136.201 Payment for physician and other
health care professional services
purchased by Indian health programs
and other medical charges associated
with non-hospital-based care.
136.202 Authorization by urban Indian
organizations.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 136.201 Payment for physician and other
health care professional services
purchased by Indian health programs and
other medical charges associated with nonhospital-based care.
(a) Payment to physicians and health
care professionals and all other nonhospital-based entities, for any level of
care authorized under part 136, subpart
C by a Purchased/Referred Care (PRC)
program of the Indian Health Service
(IHS); or authorized by a Tribe or Tribal
organization carrying out a PRC program
of the IHS under the Indian SelfDetermination and Education
Assistance Act, as amended, Public Law
93–638, 25 U.S.C. 450 et seq.; or
authorized for purchase under § 136.31
by an urban Indian organization (as that
term is defined in 25 U.S.C. 1603(h))
(hereafter ‘‘I/T/U’’), shall be determined
based on the applicable method in this
section: The I/T/U will pay the lowest
of the following amounts:
(1) The applicable Medicare payment
amount, including payment according
to a fee schedule, a prospective payment
system or based on reasonable cost
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:07 Dec 04, 2014
Jkt 235001
(‘‘Medicare rate’’) for the period in
which the service was provided), or in
the event of a Medicare waiver, the
payment amount will be calculated in
accordance with such waiver.
(2) An amount that has been
negotiated with a specific provider or its
agent, or supplier or its agent by the I/
T/U or the amount negotiated by a
repricing agent if the provider or
supplier is participating within the
repricing agent’s network and an I/T/U
has a pricing arrangement or contract
with that repricing agent. For the
purposes of this section, repricing agent
means an entity that seeks to connect I/
T/U with discounted rates from non-I/
T/U public and private providers as a
result of existing contracts that the nonI/T/U public or private provider may
have within the commercial health care
industry.
(3) The amount that the provider or
supplier bills the general public for the
same service.
(b) Coordination of benefits and
limitation on recovery: If an I/T/U has
authorized payment for items and
services provided to an individual who
is eligible for benefits under Medicare,
Medicaid, or another third party payer—
(1) The I/T/U is the payer of last resort
under 25 U.S.C. 1623(b);
(2) If there are any third party payers,
the I/T/U will pay the amount for which
the patient is being held responsible
after the provider or supplier of services
has coordinated benefits and all other
alternate resources have been
considered and paid, including
applicable co-payments, deductibles,
and coinsurance that are owed by the
patient; and
(3) The maximum payment by the I/
T/U will be only that portion of the
payment amount determined under this
section not covered by any other payer;
and
(4) The I/T/U payment will not
exceed the rate calculated in accordance
with paragraph (a) of this section (plus
applicable cost sharing); and
(5) When payment is made by
Medicaid it is considered payment in
full and there will be no additional
payment made by the I/T/U to the
amount paid by Medicaid.
(c) Authorized services: Payment shall
be made only for those items and
services authorized by an I/T/U
consistent with part 136 of this title or
section 503(a) of the Indian Health Care
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
72163
Improvement Act (IHCIA), Public Law
94–437, as amended, 25 U.S.C. 1653(a).
(d) No additional charges.
(1) The health care provider or
supplier shall be deemed to have
accepted the applicable Medicare
payment amount, including payment
according to a fee schedule, a
prospective payment system or based on
reasonable cost (‘‘Medicare rate’’) for the
period in which the service was
provided), as payment in full if:
(i) The services were provided based
on a PRC referral authorized for
payment; or,
(ii) The health care provider or
supplier submits a Notification of a
Claim for payment to the I/T/U; or
(iii) The health care provider or
supplier accepts payment for the
provision of services from the I/T/U.
(2) A payment made and accepted in
accordance with this section shall
constitute payment in full and the
provider or its agent, or supplier or its
agent, may not impose any additional
charge—
(i) On the individual for I/T/U
authorized items and services; or
(ii) For information requested by the
I/T/U or its agent or fiscal intermediary
for the purposes of payment
determinations or quality assurance.
(e) For physicians and health care
professionals and all other non-hospitalbased entities required by law to accept
the rates specified in this section, the
applicable rate shall be the lowest of
any amount calculated under paragraph
(a)(1) of this section, without regard to
paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
(f) No service shall be authorized and
no payment shall be issued in excess of
the rate authorized by this subpart.
§ 136.202 Authorization by an urban Indian
organization.
An urban Indian organization may
authorize for purchase items and
services for an eligible urban Indian (as
those terms are defined in 25 U.S.C.
1603(f) and (h)) according to section 503
of the IHCIA and applicable regulations.
Services and items furnished by
physicians and other health care
professionals and non-hospital-based
entities shall be subject to the payment
methodology set forth in § 136.30.
[FR Doc. 2014–28508 Filed 12–3–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165–16–P
E:\FR\FM\05DEP1.SGM
05DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 234 (Friday, December 5, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 72160-72163]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28508]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Indian Health Service
42 CFR Part 136
RIN 0917-AA12
Payment for Physician and Other Health Care Professional Services
Purchased by Indian Health Programs and Medical Charges Associated With
Non-Hospital-Based Care
AGENCY: Indian Health Service, HHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would amend Indian Health Service (IHS)
Purchased and Referred Care (PRC), formally known as the Contract
Health Services (CHS), regulations to apply Medicare payment
methodologies to all physician and other health care professional
services and non-hospital-based services that are either authorized
under such regulations or purchased by urban Indian organizations.
Specifically, it proposes that the health programs operated by IHS,
Tribe, Tribal organization, or urban Indian organization (collectively,
I/T/U programs) will pay the lowest of the amount provided for under
the applicable Medicare fee schedule, prospective payment system, or
Medicare waiver; the amount negotiated by a repricing agent, if
available; or the usual and customary billing rate. Repricing agents
may be used to determine whether IHS may benefit from savings by
utilizing negotiated rates offered through commercial health care
networks. This proposed rule seeks comment on how to establish
reimbursement that is consistent across Federal health care programs,
aligns payment with inpatient services, and enables the IHS to expand
beneficiary access to medical care.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 20, 2015.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer to file code [Federal Register
insert No.]. Because of staff and resource limitations, we cannot
accept comments by facsimile (FAX) transmission. You may submit
comments in one of four ways (please choose only one of the ways
listed):
1. Electronically. You may submit electronic comments on this
regulation to https://regulations.gov. Follow the ``Submit a Comment''
instructions.
2. By regular mail. You may mail written comments to the following
address ONLY: Betty Gould, Regulations Officer, Indian Health Service,
801 Thompson Avenue, TMP STE 450, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed comments to be received
before the close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You may send written comments to
the above address.
4. By hand or courier. If you prefer, you may deliver (by hand or
courier) your written comments before the close of the comment period
to the address above.
If you intend to deliver your comments to the Rockville address,
please call telephone number (301) 443-1116 in advance to schedule your
arrival with a staff member.
Comments will be made available for public inspection at the
Rockville address from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday-Friday,
approximately three weeks after publication of this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl Harper, Director, Office of
Resource Access and Partnerships, Indian Health Service, 801 Thompson
Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852. Telephone: (301) 443-1553.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Consolidated Appropriation Act of 2014
signed by President Obama in January, 2014, adopted a new name,
Purchased/Referred Care (PRC), for the CHS program. The name change was
official with passage of the FY 2014 appropriation. The new name better
describes the purpose of the program funding, which is for both
purchased
[[Page 72161]]
care and referred care outside of IHS. The name change does not change
the program, and all current policies, practices, will continue and is
not intended to have any effect on the laws that govern or apply to
CHS. IHS will administer PRC in accordance with all laws applicable to
CHS. This proposed rule will use the term PRC. For the purposes of this
rule, the terms provider of services (or ``provider'') and supplier
have the same meaning as the terms defined at 42 U.S.C. 1395x.
I. Background
This proposed rule would amend the IHS medical regulations at 42
CFR part 136 to apply Medicare payment methodologies to all physician
and other health professional services and non-hospital-based services
provided through Contract Health Services (CHS), now Purchased Referred
Care (PRC), or purchased by urban Indian organizations, and that are
not otherwise subject to Medicare payment rates by law. Under 42 CFR
136.23, when necessary health services are not reasonably accessible or
available to IHS beneficiaries, the IHS and Tribes are authorized to
pay for medical care provided to IHS beneficiaries by non-IHS or
Tribal, public or private health care providers, depending on the
availability of funds. Similarly, under section 503 of the Indian
Health Care Improvement Act (IHCIA), 25 U.S.C. 1653, urban Indian
organizations may refer eligible urban Indians, as defined under
section 4 of the IHCIA, to non-I/T/U public and private health care
providers and, depending on the availability of funds, may also cover
the cost of care.
Sec. 506 of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and
Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA) (Pub. L. 108-173) authorized the
Secretary to establish a payment methodology, payment rates, and
admissions practices for Medicare-participating hospitals that furnish
inpatient services applicable when such hospitals provide to an
eligible American Indian/Alaskan Native (AI/AN) beneficiary medical
care authorized by an I/T/U. As implemented in 42 CFR part 136 subpart
D, Medicare-participating hospitals, including Critical Access
Hospitals (CAHs), are reimbursed by I/T/Us using ``Medicare-like''
rates that generally correspond to the applicable Medicare payment
methodology for the medical service. In instances where Medicare-
participating hospitals furnish inpatient services, but are exempt from
Medicare's Prospective Payment System (PPS) and receive reimbursement
based on reasonable costs (for example, CAHs, children's hospitals,
cancer hospitals, and certain other hospitals reimbursed by Medicare
under special arrangements), payment is made per discharge based on the
reasonable cost methods established under 42 CFR part 413, except that
the interim payment rate, under 42 CFR part 413 subpart E, constitutes
payment in full for authorized charges. Notwithstanding, if an amount
has been negotiated with the hospital or its agent by the I/T/U, the I/
T/U will pay the lesser of the amount determined under the PPS or the
amount negotiated with the hospital or its agent.
The Medicare-like rate methodology established by 42 CFR part 136
subpart D does not apply to non-hospital services, including physician
and other health professional services, services provided by a
comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation facility, a home health agency,
or a hospice, or other non-hospital-based items and services. Rather,
I/T/Us reimburse for authorized services at the rates provided by
contracts negotiated at the local level with individual providers or
according to a provider's billed charges. Given the small market share
of individual I/T/U programs, I/T/Us historically have paid rates in
substantial excess of Medicare's allowable rates or rates paid by
private insurers for the same services. Despite establishing medical
priorities to cover the most necessary care, IHS is still unable to
provide care to all of its beneficiaries. The demand for PRC care
consistently exceeds available funding. IHS recently reported to
Congress that IHS and tribal PRC programs denied an estimated
$760,855,000 for an estimated 146,928 contract care services needed by
eligible beneficiaries in FY 2013.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Congress FY 2015 Congressional Justification Purchased/
Referred Care Program Description and Accomplishments page 92-95,
available online at: https://www.ihs.gov/budgetformulation/congressionaljustifications/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on an audit of fiscal year 2012, the Government
Accountability Office (GAO) estimated that, by implementing a Medicare-
like rate methodology, the IHS PRC programs could have saved $32
million on physician services alone, not including additional savings
for other non-hospital services, or savings accrued to Tribal PRC
programs. Government Accountability Office, Indian Health Service:
Capping Payment Rates for Non-Hospital Services Could Save Millions of
Dollars for Contract Health Services (April 2013) (``April 2013
Study''). The GAO concluded that by setting PRC physician and other
non-hospital payments at rates consistent with Medicare and other
Federal agencies, the IHS could expand IHS beneficiary access to care.
These findings and recommendations are substantiated by a report from
the Department of Health and Human Services' Office of the Inspector
General. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector
General, IHS Contract Health Services Program: Overpayments and
Potential Savings (Sept. 2009).
II. Provisions of the Proposed Rule
This proposed rule is promulgated pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 2001(b),
which provides that the Secretary ``[i]n carrying out [her] functions,
responsibilities, authorities, and duties under [the Transfer Act] . .
. is authorized, with the consent of the Indian people served, to
contract with private or other non-Federal health agencies or
organizations for the provision of health services to such people on a
fee-for-service basis or on a prepayment or other basis'' and pursuant
to 42 U.S.C. 2003, which authorizes the Secretary to promulgate
regulations to carry out the Transfer Act. It amends the IHS regulation
at 42 CFR part 136 by adding a new subpart I that applies ``Medicare-
like'' rate payment methodologies to all physicians and health care
professional services and all non-hospital-based services that are not
covered currently under 42 CFR part 136 subpart D. The proposed rule is
similar to payment methodologies promulgated in other Federal health
care programs, including the Department of Veterans Affairs, by
applying a consistent reimbursement policy across Federal health care
programs. The proposed rule provides that the I/T/U will pay the lowest
of the amount provided under the applicable Medicare fee schedule,
prospective payment system, or Medicare waiver; the amount negotiated
by a repricing agent,\2\ if available; or the usual and customary
billing rate. In the absence of a Medicare rate or Medicare waiver, or
agreement, payment will be made at the amount that the provider or
supplier bills the general public for the same service. The rule
specifies the circumstances in which a non-hospital health care
provider or supplier will be deemed to have accepted the rates
established herein.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ A repricing agent discounts rates charged by a health care
provider to rates that the agent may have established with the
health care provider as a condition of participating in the agent's
provider network.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The rule caps the rate that I/T/Us are authorized to pay non-I/T/U
health care providers and suppliers for services and leaves no
discretion for the I/T/U and the health care provider to negotiate
higher rates. The IHS recognizes this
[[Page 72162]]
constraint could impact the delivery of patient care, particularly in
circumstances where the I/T/U cannot find a health care provider or
supplier willing to accept the payment rates established herein or the
patient receives emergency services from a provider or supplier that
refuses to accept the rate. Under 25 U.S.C. 1621u, a patient who
receives authorized contract care may not be held liable for the
payment of any charges. If the medical provider or supplier does not
agree to accept the payment rate as payment in full, the I/T/U is
effectively precluded from authorizing the care or paying the health
care provider or supplier for services rendered to a beneficiary. In
such circumstances, the I/T/U will not authorize payment and the
patient may be held financially responsible by the provider or supplier
of care for the charges. The IHS also notes that, while Medicare-
participating hospitals are required to accept payment rates set forth
in 42 CFR part 136 subpart D for facility services, subpart D does not
apply to the professional service provided by a physician or
practitioner through the hospital. To the extent the physician or
practitioner does not agree to accept the rates established by this
regulation, the I/T/U will not authorize payment for the service. The
IHS seeks comment on whether exceptions should be incorporated into the
rule to permit an I/T/U to pay in excess of the calculated rate in
circumstances where it may be appropriate for the I/T/U to retain more
flexibility over the payment rate. For example, a specialist that does
not accept reduced rates and to access this specialty at a reduced rate
it is located in another State. The travel costs and burden on the
patient is too great to access the needed specialty care.
The proposed rule also specifies that payments made in accordance
with the described methodology shall constitute payment in full and
that, in accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1621u, the provider, supplier or
their agent, may not impose additional charge on an individual for I/T/
U authorized items and services. Consistent with IHS regulations, the
rule further provides that, if an I/T/U has authorized payment for PRC
services provided to an individual who is eligible for benefits under
Medicare, Medicaid, or another third party payer, the I/T/U shall be
the payer of last resort in accordance with 25 U.S.C. 1623(b). If there
are any third party payers, the I/T/U will pay the amount for which the
patient is being held responsible after the provider or supplier of
services has coordinated benefits and all other alternate resources
have been considered and paid, including applicable co-payments,
deductibles, and coinsurance owed by the patient. For purposes of the
payment methodology specified in Sec. 136.30(a), required co-payments,
deductibles, and coinsurance are those that would have been owed by a
Medicare beneficiary under the proposed methodology. Because the
patient may not be held liable for the payment of costs or charges
under 25 U.S.C. 1621u, the I/T/U will assume these costs to the extent
all payments made by any payer, do not in aggregate, exceed the maximum
payment rate set forth Sec. 136.201(a).
III. Collection of Information Requirements
These regulations do not impose any new information collection
requirements. The requirements for submitting a claim are currently
approved under Office and Management and Budget approval number 0917-
0002, IHS Contract Health Services Report (Expires: 02/28/2016).
Providers and suppliers will not be required to update information
technology systems as a result of the provisions of this proposed rule.
Claims will be re-priced by the IHS Fiscal Intermediary or the
appropriate Tribal administrator according to the methodology adopted
herein.
IV. Regulatory Impact Statement
The IHS has examined the impact of this final rule as required by
Executive Order 12866 (September 1993, Regulatory Planning and Review),
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (September 19, 1980, Pub. L. 96-
354), section 1102(b) of the Social Security Act, and the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and equity). A regulatory impact
analysis (RIA) must be prepared for major rules with economically
significant effects ($100 million or more in any one year). The April
2013 Study released by the GAO found that if federal PRC programs had
paid Medicare rates for physicians services in 2010, they could have
realized an estimated $32 million in annual savings to pay for
additional services. Although the analysis did not include other types
of non-hospital services or funding that goes to tribal PRC programs,
the increase in purchasing power brought about by this proposed rule
would be unlikely to exceed $100 million annually. OMB has determined
that this is a significant regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
The Secretary hereby proposes to certify that this proposed rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601 through 612. The proposed rule will not cause significant
economic impact on health care providers, suppliers, or entities since
only a small portion of the business of such entities concerns IHS
beneficiaries. The April 2013 Study released by the GAO found that of
the physicians sampled, the PRC program represented a small portion of
their practice and was not a significant source of revenue. Although
the sampling of physicians was small, all of the sampled physicians
were in the top 25% in terms of volume of paid services covered by PRC.
IHS believes the sample to be representative of higher volume
practitioners currently providing services paid for by PRC.
Accordingly, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the proposed rule is exempt
from the initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis requirements
of sections 603 and 604.
In addition, section 1102(b) of the Act requires IHS to prepare a
RIA if a rule may have a significant impact on the operations of a
substantial number of small rural hospitals. This analysis must conform
to the provisions of section 603 of the RFA. For purposes of section
1102(b) of the Act, IHS defines a small rural hospital as a hospital
that is located outside of a Metropolitan Statistical Area and has
fewer than 100 beds. For the reasons provided above, IHS has determined
that this rule will not have a significant impact on the operations of
a substantial number of small rural hospitals. Section 202 of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 also requires that agencies assess
anticipated costs and benefits before issuing any rule whose
requirements mandate expenditure in any one year by State, local, or
Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $141
million. This proposal would not impose substantial Federal mandates on
State, local or Tribal governments or private sector.
List of Subjects in 42 CFR Part 136
Alaska Natives, American Indian, Health, Medicare.
[[Page 72163]]
Dated: November 6, 2014 .
Yvette Roubideaux,
Acting Director, Indian Health Service.
Dated: November 18, 2014.
Sylvia M. Burwell,
Secretary, Health and Human Services.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Indian Health
Service proposes to amend 42 CFR chapter I as set forth below:
PART 136--INDIAN HEALTH
0
1. The authority citation for part 136 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 25 U.S.C. 13; 42 U.S.C. 1395cc(a)(1)(U), 42 U.S.C.
2001 and 2003, unless otherwise noted.
0
2. Add new subpart I consisting of Sec. Sec. 136.201 and 136.202, to
read as follows:
Subpart I--Limitation on Charges for Health Care Professional
Services and Non-Hospital-Based Care
Sec.
136.201 Payment for physician and other health care professional
services purchased by Indian health programs and other medical
charges associated with non-hospital-based care.
136.202 Authorization by urban Indian organizations.
Sec. 136.201 Payment for physician and other health care professional
services purchased by Indian health programs and other medical charges
associated with non-hospital-based care.
(a) Payment to physicians and health care professionals and all
other non-hospital-based entities, for any level of care authorized
under part 136, subpart C by a Purchased/Referred Care (PRC) program of
the Indian Health Service (IHS); or authorized by a Tribe or Tribal
organization carrying out a PRC program of the IHS under the Indian
Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, as amended, Public Law
93-638, 25 U.S.C. 450 et seq.; or authorized for purchase under Sec.
136.31 by an urban Indian organization (as that term is defined in 25
U.S.C. 1603(h)) (hereafter ``I/T/U''), shall be determined based on the
applicable method in this section: The I/T/U will pay the lowest of the
following amounts:
(1) The applicable Medicare payment amount, including payment
according to a fee schedule, a prospective payment system or based on
reasonable cost (``Medicare rate'') for the period in which the service
was provided), or in the event of a Medicare waiver, the payment amount
will be calculated in accordance with such waiver.
(2) An amount that has been negotiated with a specific provider or
its agent, or supplier or its agent by the I/T/U or the amount
negotiated by a repricing agent if the provider or supplier is
participating within the repricing agent's network and an I/T/U has a
pricing arrangement or contract with that repricing agent. For the
purposes of this section, repricing agent means an entity that seeks to
connect I/T/U with discounted rates from non-I/T/U public and private
providers as a result of existing contracts that the non-I/T/U public
or private provider may have within the commercial health care
industry.
(3) The amount that the provider or supplier bills the general
public for the same service.
(b) Coordination of benefits and limitation on recovery: If an I/T/
U has authorized payment for items and services provided to an
individual who is eligible for benefits under Medicare, Medicaid, or
another third party payer--
(1) The I/T/U is the payer of last resort under 25 U.S.C. 1623(b);
(2) If there are any third party payers, the I/T/U will pay the
amount for which the patient is being held responsible after the
provider or supplier of services has coordinated benefits and all other
alternate resources have been considered and paid, including applicable
co-payments, deductibles, and coinsurance that are owed by the patient;
and
(3) The maximum payment by the I/T/U will be only that portion of
the payment amount determined under this section not covered by any
other payer; and
(4) The I/T/U payment will not exceed the rate calculated in
accordance with paragraph (a) of this section (plus applicable cost
sharing); and
(5) When payment is made by Medicaid it is considered payment in
full and there will be no additional payment made by the I/T/U to the
amount paid by Medicaid.
(c) Authorized services: Payment shall be made only for those items
and services authorized by an I/T/U consistent with part 136 of this
title or section 503(a) of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act
(IHCIA), Public Law 94-437, as amended, 25 U.S.C. 1653(a).
(d) No additional charges.
(1) The health care provider or supplier shall be deemed to have
accepted the applicable Medicare payment amount, including payment
according to a fee schedule, a prospective payment system or based on
reasonable cost (``Medicare rate'') for the period in which the service
was provided), as payment in full if:
(i) The services were provided based on a PRC referral authorized
for payment; or,
(ii) The health care provider or supplier submits a Notification of
a Claim for payment to the I/T/U; or
(iii) The health care provider or supplier accepts payment for the
provision of services from the I/T/U.
(2) A payment made and accepted in accordance with this section
shall constitute payment in full and the provider or its agent, or
supplier or its agent, may not impose any additional charge--
(i) On the individual for I/T/U authorized items and services; or
(ii) For information requested by the I/T/U or its agent or fiscal
intermediary for the purposes of payment determinations or quality
assurance.
(e) For physicians and health care professionals and all other non-
hospital-based entities required by law to accept the rates specified
in this section, the applicable rate shall be the lowest of any amount
calculated under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, without regard to
paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
(f) No service shall be authorized and no payment shall be issued
in excess of the rate authorized by this subpart.
Sec. 136.202 Authorization by an urban Indian organization.
An urban Indian organization may authorize for purchase items and
services for an eligible urban Indian (as those terms are defined in 25
U.S.C. 1603(f) and (h)) according to section 503 of the IHCIA and
applicable regulations. Services and items furnished by physicians and
other health care professionals and non-hospital-based entities shall
be subject to the payment methodology set forth in Sec. 136.30.
[FR Doc. 2014-28508 Filed 12-3-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165-16-P