Hazardous Waste Management System; Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste; Final Exclusion, 70108-70113 [2014-27780]
Download as PDF
70108
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 25, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
DELEGATION STATUS FOR PART 63 STANDARDS—STATE OF TEXAS 1—Continued
Subpart
Source category
TCEQ 2
CCCCCC ..................................................
DDDDDD ..................................................
EEEEEE ....................................................
FFFFFF .....................................................
GGGGGG .................................................
HHHHHH ..................................................
IIIIII ............................................................
JJJJJJ .......................................................
KKKKKK ....................................................
LLLLLL ......................................................
MMMMMM ................................................
NNNNNN ..................................................
OOOOOO .................................................
PPPPPP ....................................................
QQQQQQ .................................................
RRRRRR ..................................................
SSSSSS ....................................................
TTTTTT .....................................................
UUUUUU ..................................................
VVVVVV ....................................................
WWWWWW ..............................................
XXXXXX ....................................................
YYYYYY ....................................................
ZZZZZZ .....................................................
AAAAAAA .................................................
BBBBBBB .................................................
CCCCCCC ................................................
DDDDDDD ................................................
EEEEEEE .................................................
FFFFFFF–GGGGGGG .............................
HHHHHHH ................................................
Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Area Sources ..............................................................
Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers Production Area Sources ...................................
Primary Copper Smelting Area Sources ......................................................................
Secondary Copper Smelting Area Sources .................................................................
Primary Nonferrous Metals Area Sources: Zinc, Cadmium, and Beryllium ................
Paint Stripping and Miscellaneous Surface Coating Operations at Area Sources .....
(Reserved) ....................................................................................................................
Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers Area Sources ..................................
(Reserved) ....................................................................................................................
Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers Production Area Sources ............................................
Carbon Black Production Area Sources ......................................................................
Chemical Manufacturing Area Sources: Chromium Compounds ................................
Flexible Polyurethane Foam Production and Fabrication Area Sources ....................
Lead Acid Battery Manufacturing Area Sources .........................................................
Wood Preserving Area Sources ..................................................................................
Clay Ceramics Manufacturing Area Sources ...............................................................
Glass Manufacturing Area Sources .............................................................................
Secondary Nonferrous Metals Processing Area Sources ...........................................
(Reserved) ....................................................................................................................
Chemical Manufacturing Area Sources .......................................................................
Plating and Polishing Operations Area Sources .........................................................
Metal Fabrication and Finishing Area Sources ............................................................
Ferroalloys Production Facilities Area Sources ...........................................................
Aluminum, Copper, and Other Nonferrous Foundries Area Sources ..........................
Asphalt Processing and Asphalt Roofing Manufacturing Area Sources .....................
Chemical Preparations Industry Area Sources ............................................................
Paints and Allied Products Manufacturing Area Sources ............................................
Prepared Feeds Manufacturing Area Sources ............................................................
Gold Mine Ore Processing and Production Area Sources ..........................................
(Reserved) ....................................................................................................................
Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers Production Major Sources ..................................
X
X
X
X
X
X
........................
X
........................
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
........................
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
........................
........................
X
1 Program
delegated to Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ).
which may not be delegated include: § 63.6(g), Approval of Alternative Non-Opacity Emission Standards; § 63.6(h)(9), Approval of
Alternative Opacity Standards; § 63.7(e)(2)(ii) and (f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Test Methods; § 63.8(f), Approval of Major Alternatives to
Monitoring; § 63.10(f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Recordkeeping and Reporting; and all authorities identified in the subparts (e.g., under
‘‘Delegation of Authority’’) that cannot be delegated.
3 The TCEQ was previously delegated this subpart on May 17, 2005 (70 FR 13018). The subpart was vacated and remanded to EPA by the
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. See, Mossville Environmental Action Network v. EPA, 370 F. 3d 1232 (D.C.
Cir. 2004). Because of the D.C. Court’s holding, this subpart is not delegated to TCEQ at this time.
4 This subpart was issued a partial vacatur on October 29, 2007 (72 FR 61060) by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
5 Final rule. See 78 FR 7138 (January 31, 2013).
6 TCEQ was previously delegated this subpart on May 2, 2006 (71 FR 25753). This subpart was vacated and remanded to EPA by the United
States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. See, Sierra Club v. EPA, 479 F. 3d 875 (D.C. Cir. 2007). Because of the D.C.
Court’s holding, this subpart is not delegated to TCEQ at this time.
7 Initial Final Rule. See 77 FR 9304 (February 16, 2012). Final on reconsideration of certain new source issues. See 78 FR 24073 (April 24,
2013). Portions of this subpart are in proposed reconsideration pending final action. See 78 FR 38001 (June 25, 2013).
2 Authorities
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2014–27909 Filed 11–24–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 261
wreier-aviles on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
[EPA–R07–RCRA–2014–0452; FRL–9919–
72–Region–7]
Hazardous Waste Management
System; Identification and Listing of
Hazardous Waste; Final Exclusion
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is granting the petition
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:24 Nov 24, 2014
Jkt 235001
submitted by John Deere Des Moines
Works (John Deere) of Deere &
Company, in Ankeny, Iowa to exclude
or ‘‘delist’’ up to 600 tons per calendar
year of F006/F019 wastewater treatment
sludge filter cake generated by John
Deere’s wastewater treatment system
from the list of hazardous wastes. This
final rule responds to a petition
submitted by John Deere to delist up to
600 tons per calendar year of F006/F019
wastewater treatment sludge filter cake
generated by John Deere’s wastewater
treatment system from the list of
hazardous wastes.
After careful analysis and use of the
Delisting Risk Assessment Software
(DRAS), EPA has concluded the
petitioned waste is not hazardous waste.
The F006/F019 exclusion is a
conditional exclusion for 600 cubic
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
yards per year of the F006/F019
wastewater treatment sludge.
Accordingly, this final rule excludes
the petitioned waste from the
requirements of hazardous waste
regulations under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
DATES: This final rule is effective on
November 25, 2014.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R07–RCRA–2014–0452. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 25, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy by
contacting the further information
contact below. The public may copy
material from any regulatory docket at
no cost for the first 100 pages and at a
cost of $0.15 per page for additional
copies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kenneth Herstowski, Waste
Remediation and Permits Branch, Air
and Waste Management Division, EPA
Region 7, 11201 Renner Blvd., Lenexa,
KS 66219; telephone number (913) 551–
7631; email address: herstowski.ken@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
information in this section is organized
as follows:
I. Overview Information
A. What action is EPA finalizing?
B. Why is EPA approving this action?
C. What are the limits of this exclusion?
D. How will John Deere manage the waste,
when delisted?
E. When is the final delisting exclusion
effective?
F. How Does this final rule affect States?
II. Background
A. What is a delisting petition?
B. What regulations allow facilities to
delist a waste?
C. What information must the generator
supply?
III. EPA’s Evaluation of the Waste
Information and Data
A. What waste did John Deere petition EPA
to delist?
B. How much waste did John Deere
propose to delist?
C. How did John Deere sample and analyze
the waste data in this petition?
IV. Public Comments Received on the
Proposed Exclusions
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Overview Information
wreier-aviles on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
A. What action is EPA finalizing?
After evaluating the petition for John
Deere, EPA proposed, on August 20,
2014 (79 FR 49252), to exclude the
waste from the lists of hazardous waste
under section 261.31. EPA is finalizing
the decision to grant John Deere’s
delisting petition to have its F006/F019
wastewater treatment sludge excluded,
or delisted, from the definition of a
hazardous waste, once it is disposed in
a Subtitle D landfill.
B. Why is EPA approving this action?
John Deere’s petition requests a
delisting from the F006/F019 waste
listing under 40 CFR 260.20 and 260.22.
John Deere does not believe that the
petitioned waste meets the criteria for
which EPA listed it. John Deere also
believes no additional constituents or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:24 Nov 24, 2014
Jkt 235001
factors could cause the waste to be
hazardous. EPA’s review of this petition
included consideration of the original
listing criteria, and the additional
factors required by the Hazardous and
Solid Waste Amendments of 1984
(HSWA). See Section 3001(f) of RCRA,
42 U.S.C. 6921(f), and 40 CFR
260.22(d)(1)–(4) (hereinafter all
sectional references are to 40 CFR
unless otherwise indicated). In making
the final delisting determination, EPA
evaluated the petitioned waste against
the listing criteria and factors cited in
Sec. 261.11(a)(2) and (a)(3). Based on
this review, EPA agrees with the
petitioner that the waste is
nonhazardous with respect to the
original listing criteria. (If EPA had
found, based on this review, that the
waste remained hazardous based on the
factors for which the waste was
originally listed, EPA would have
proposed to deny the petition.) EPA
evaluated the waste with respect to
other factors or criteria to assess
whether there is a reasonable basis to
believe that such additional factors
could cause the wastes to be hazardous.
EPA considered whether the waste is
acutely toxic, the concentrations of the
constituents in the waste, their tendency
to migrate and to bioaccumulate, their
persistence in the environment once
released from the waste, plausible and
specific types of management of the
petitioned waste, the quantities of waste
generated, and waste variability. EPA
believes that the petitioned waste does
not meet the listing criteria and thus
should not be a listed waste. EPA’s final
decision to delist the waste from John
Deere’s facility is based on the
information submitted in support of this
rule, including a description of the
waste and analytical data from the John
Deere Des Moines, Ankeny, Iowa,
facility.
C. What are the limits of this exclusion?
This exclusion applies to the waste
described in John Deere’s petition only
if the requirements described in 40 CFR
part 261, appendix IX, table 1 and the
conditions contained herein are
satisfied.
D. How will John Deere manage the
waste, when delisted?
The delisted F006/F019 wastewater
treatment sludge will be disposed of in
a Subtitle D landfill which is permitted,
licensed or otherwise authorized by a
state to manage industrial waste.
E. When is the final delisting exclusion
effective?
This rule is effective November 25,
2014. The Hazardous and Solid Waste
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70109
Amendments of 1984 amended Section
3010 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6930(b)(1),
allows rules to become effective in less
than six months after the rule is
published when the regulated
community does not need the six-month
period to come into compliance. That is
the case here because this rule reduces,
rather than increases, the existing
requirements for persons generating
hazardous waste. This reduction in
existing requirements also provides a
basis for making this rule effective
immediately, upon publication, under
the Administrative Procedure Act,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d).
F. How does this final rule affect States?
EPA is issuing this exclusion under
the Federal RCRA delisting program.
Thus, upon the exclusion being
finalized, the wastes covered will be
removed from Subtitle C control under
the Federal RCRA program. This will
mean, first, that the wastes will be
delisted in any State or territory where
the EPA is directly administering the
RCRA program (e.g., Iowa, Indian
Country). However, whether the wastes
will be delisted in states which have
been authorized to administer the RCRA
program will vary depending upon the
authorization status of the States and
the particular requirements regarding
delisted wastes in the various states.
Some other generally authorized
states have not received authorization
for delisting. Thus, the EPA makes
delisting determinations for such states.
However, RCRA allows states to impose
their own regulatory requirements that
are more stringent than EPA’s, under
Section 3009 of RCRA. These more
stringent requirements may include a
provision that prohibits a Federally
issued exclusion from taking effect in
the state, or that requires a state
concurrence before the Federal
exclusion takes effect, or that allows the
state to add conditions to any Federal
exclusion. We urge the petitioner to
contact the state regulatory authority in
each state to or through which it may
wish to ship its wastes to establish the
status of its wastes under the state’s
laws.
EPA has also authorized some states
to administer a delisting program in
place of the Federal program, that is, to
make state delisting decisions. In such
states, the state delisting requirements
operate in lieu of the Federal delisting
requirements. Therefore, this exclusion
does not apply in those authorized
states unless the state makes the rule
part of its authorized program. If John
Deere transports the federally excluded
waste to or manages the waste in any
state with delisting authorization, John
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
70110
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 25, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Deere must obtain a delisting
authorization from that state before it
can manage the waste as non-hazardous
in that state.
C. How did John Deere sample and
analyze the waste data in this petition?
Under Sec. 260.20 and 260.22,
facilities may petition EPA to remove
their wastes from hazardous waste
regulation by excluding them from the
lists of hazardous wastes contained in
Sec. 261.31 and 261.32. Specifically,
Sec. 260.20 allows any person to
petition the Administrator to modify or
revoke any provision of 40 CFR parts
260 through 265 and 268. Section
260.22 provides generators the
opportunity to petition the
Administrator to exclude a waste from
a particular generating facility from the
hazardous waste lists.
To support its petition, John Deere
submitted: (1) Facility information on
production processes and waste
generation processes; (2) initial Filter
Cake composite sample analytical
results to determine constituents of
concern (COC); and (3) Analytical
results from six composite samples of
Filter Cake for the COC. The initial
sample was analyzed for EPA’s list of
hazardous constituents in 40 CFR part
261, Appendix VIII, pesticides, PCBs.
The COC selected from the initial
composite sample results are barium,
chromium, hexavalent chromium,
copper, lead, mercury, nickel,
vanadium, zinc, cyanide, acetone and
methyl ethyl ketone. Both total and
leachable concentrations of the COC in
the Filter Cake were determined.
John Deere generated the sampling
data used in the Delisting Risk
Assessment Software (DRAS) under a
Sampling Plan and Quality Assurance
Project Plan (June 2012 Revision). EPA
believes that the sampling procedures
used by John Deere satisfy EPA’s criteria
for collecting representative samples of
the F006/F019 waste.
C. What information must the generator
supply?
IV. Public Comments Received on the
Proposed Exclusions
Petitioners must provide sufficient
information to EPA to allow EPA to
determine that the waste to be excluded
does not meet any of the criteria under
which the waste was listed as a
hazardous waste. In addition, the
Administrator must determine, where
he/she has a reasonable basis to believe
that factors (including additional
constituents) other than those for which
the waste was listed could cause the
waste to be a hazardous waste and that
such factors do not warrant retaining the
waste as a hazardous waste.
No comments were received during
the comment period.
II. Background
A. What is a delisting petition?
A delisting petition is a request from
a generator to EPA or to an authorized
state to exclude or delist, from the
RCRA list of hazardous wastes, waste
the generator believes should not be
considered hazardous under RCRA.
B. What regulations allow facilities to
delist a waste?
III. EPA’s Evaluation of the Waste
Information and Data
wreier-aviles on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
A. What waste did John Deere petition
EPA to delist?
On January 28, 2014, John Deere
(through its consultant) petitioned EPA
to exclude from the lists of hazardous
waste contained in Section 261.31 and
261.32, F006/F019 wastewater treatment
sludge, generated from its John Deere
Des Moines facility in Ankeny, Iowa.
B. How much waste did John Deere
propose to delist?
John Deere requested that EPA grant
an exclusion for 600 cubic yards per
year of F006/F019 wastewater treatment
sludge.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:24 Nov 24, 2014
Jkt 235001
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866,
‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review’’ (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this rule is
not of general applicability and
therefore is not a regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). This
rule does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) because it
applies to a particular facility only.
Because this rule is of particular
applicability relating to a particular
facility, it is not subject to the regulatory
flexibility provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), or
to Sections 202, 204, and 205 of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(UMRA) (Pub. L. 104–4). Because this
rule will affect only a particular facility,
it will not significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as specified in
Section 203 of UMRA. Because this rule
will affect only a particular facility, this
final rule does not have Federalism
implications. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism,’’
(64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). Thus,
Executive Order 13132 does not apply
to this rule. Similarly, because this rule
will affect only a particular facility, this
final rule does not have tribal
implications, as specified in Executive
Order 13175, ‘‘Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments’’ (65 FR 67249, November
9, 2000). Thus, Executive Order 13175
does not apply to this rule. This rule
also is not subject to Executive Order
13045, ‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because it is not economically
significant as defined in Executive
Order 12866, and because the Agency
does not have reason to believe the
environmental health or safety risks
addressed by this action present a
disproportionate risk to children. The
basis for this belief is that the Agency
used the DRAS program, which
considers health and safety risks to
children, to calculate the maximum
allowable concentrations for this rule.
This rule is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001), because it is
not a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866. This rule does
not involve technical standards; thus,
the requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. As required by
Section 3 of Executive Order 12988,
‘‘Civil Justice Reform,’’ (61 FR 4729,
February 7, 1996), in issuing this rule,
EPA has taken the necessary steps to
eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity,
minimize potential litigation, and
provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.
C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report which includes a
copy of the rule to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. Section 804
exempts from Section 801 the following
types of rules (1) Rules of particular
applicability; (2) rules relating to agency
management or personnel; and (3) rules
of agency organization, procedure, or
practice that do not substantially affect
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 25, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
the rights or obligations of non-agency
parties (5 U.S.C. 804(3)). EPA is not
required to submit a rule report
regarding today’s action under Section
801 because this is a rule of particular
applicability. Executive Order (EO)
12898 (59 FR 7629 (Feb. 16, 1994))
establishes Federal executive policy on
environmental justice. Its main
provision directs Federal agencies, to
the greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law, to make
environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
EPA has determined that this final
rule will not have disproportionately
high and adverse human health or
environmental effects on minority or
low-income populations because it does
not affect the level of protection
provided to human health or the
environment. The Agency’s risk
assessment did not identify risks from
management of this material in a
Subtitle D landfill. Therefore, EPA
believes that any populations in
proximity of the landfills used by this
facility should not be adversely affected
by common waste management
practices for this delisted waste.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 261
70111
Dated: November 11, 2014.
Karl Brooks,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, EPA amends 40 CFR part 261
as follows:
PART 261—IDENTIFICATION AND
LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
1. The authority citation for part 261
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S. C. 6905, 6912(a), 6921,
6922, and 6938.
Environmental protection, Hazardous
waste, Recycling, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
2. In Table 1 of Appendix IX to part
261 add the following waste stream in
alphabetical order by facility to read as
follows:
Authority: Sec. 3001(f), RCRA, 42 U.S.C.
6921(f).
Appendix IX to Part 261—Wastes
Excluded Under §§ 260.20 and 260.22
■
TABLE 1—WASTES EXCLUDED FROM NON-SPECIFIC SOURCES
Address
Waste description
*
John Deere Des Moines
Works of Deere &
Company.
wreier-aviles on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Facility
*
Ankeny, IA ........
*
*
*
*
*
Wastewater Treatment Sludge Filter Cake (WWTS Filter Cake) (Hazardous Waste No. F006/F019)
generated from combined onsite wastewater treatment at the Ankeny, IA, facility wastewater
treatment plant at a maximum annual rate of 600 tons per calendar year and disposed of in a
Subtitle D Landfill which is licensed, permitted, or otherwise authorized by a state to accept the
delisted WWTS Filter Cake.
John Deere must implement a testing program that meets the following conditions for the exclusion to be valid:
1. Delisting Levels: (A) The WWTS Filter Cake shall not exhibit any of the ‘‘Characteristics of Hazardous Waste in 40 CFR 261, Subpart C. (B) All TCLP leachable concentrations (40 CFR
261.24(a)) for the following constituents must not exceed the following levels (mg/L for TCLP):
Arsenic—5.0; Barium—100.0; Cadmium—1.0; Chromium—5.0; Lead—5.0; Mercury 0.2; and
Nickel—32.4. (C) EPA SW—846 Method 1313 Extraction at pH 2.88, 7 and 13 concentration of
Chromium (hexavalent) must not exceed (mg/l) 0.087. (D) All total concentrations for the following constituents must not exceed the following levels (mg/kg): Antimony—103; Arsenic—52;
Barium—965; Beryllium—21; Cadmium—10; Chromium (total)—22,500; Cobalt—11; Copper—
1439; Lead—437; Nickel—1,515; Selenium—52; Silver—26; Thallium—52; Tin—68; Vanadium—380; Zinc—5,085; Mercury—1; Chromium (hexavalent)—20; Cyanide—3, Oil and
Grease—32,250; Acetone—8; Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)—0.3.
2. Waste Handling and Holding: (A) John Deere must manage as hazardous all WWTS Filter
Cake generated until it has completed initial verification testing described in paragraph (3)(A)
and valid analyses show that paragraph (1) is satisfied and written approval is received from
EPA. (B) Levels of constituents measured in the samples of the WWTS Filter Cake that do not
(1) exceed the levels set forth in paragraph (1) for two consecutive quarterly sampling events
are non-hazardous. After approval is received from EPA, John Deere can manage and dispose
of the non-hazardous WWTS Filter Cake according to all applicable solid waste regulations. (C)
Not withstanding having received the initial approval from EPA, if constituent levels in a later
sample exceed any of the Delisting Levels set in paragraph (1), from that point forward, John
Deere must treat all the waste covered by this exclusion as hazardous until it is demonstrated
that the waste again meets the levels in paragraph (1). John Deere must manage and dispose
of the waste generated under Subtitle C of RCRA from the time that it becomes aware of any
exceedance.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:24 Nov 24, 2014
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
70112
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 25, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—WASTES EXCLUDED FROM NON-SPECIFIC SOURCES—Continued
Facility
Address
Waste description
wreier-aviles on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
3. Verification Testing Requirements: John Deere must perform sample collection and analyses in
accordance with the Quality Assurance Project Plan submitted with the ‘‘John Deere Des
Moines, Iowa, Sampling and Analysis Plan for Delisting of F006 and F019 Filter Cake, June
2012.’’ All samples shall be representative composite samples according to appropriate methods. As applicable to the method-defined parameters of concern, analyses requiring the use of
SW–846 methods incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 260.11 must be used without substitution. As applicable, the SW–846 methods might include Methods 0010, 0011, 0020, 0023A,
0030, 0031, 0040, 0050, 0051, 0060, 0061, 1010A, 1020B,1110A, 1310B, 1311, 1312, 1313,
1320, 1330A, 9010C, 9012B, 9040C, 9045D, 9060A, 9070A (uses EPA Method 1664, Rev. A),
9071B, and 9095B. Methods must meet Performance Based Measurement System Criteria in
which the Data Quality Objectives are to demonstrate that samples of the John Deere sludge
are representative for all constituents listed in paragraph (1). To verify that the waste does not
exceed the specified delisting concentrations, for one year after the final exclusion is granted,
John Deere must perform quarterly analytical testing by sampling and analyzing the WWTP
sludge as follows: (A) Quarterly Testing: (i) Collect two representative composite samples of the
WWTS Filter Cake at quarterly intervals after EPA grants the final exclusion. The first composite
samples must be taken within 30 days after EPA grants the final approval. The second set of
samples must be taken at least 30 days after the first set. (ii) Analyze the samples for all constituents listed in paragraph (1). Any waste regarding which a composite sample is taken that
exceeds the delisting levels listed in paragraph (1) for the sludge must be disposed as hazardous waste in accordance with the applicable hazardous waste requirements from the time
that John Deere becomes aware of any exceedance. (iii) Within thirty (30) days after taking
each quarterly sample, John Deere will report its analytical test data to EPA. If levels of constituents measured in the samples of the sludge do not exceed the levels set forth in paragraph
(1) of this exclusion for two consecutive quarters, and EPA concurs with those findings, John
Deere can manage and dispose the non-hazardous sludge according to all applicable solid
waste regulations. (B) Annual Testing: (i) If John Deere completes the quarterly testing specified
in paragraph (3) above and no sample contains a constituent at a level which exceeds the limits
set forth in paragraph (1), John Deere may begin annual testing as follows: John Deere must
test two representative composite samples of the WWTS Filter Cake (following the same protocols as specified for quarterly sampling, above) for all constituents listed in paragraph (1) at
least once per calendar year. (ii) The samples for the annual testing taken for the second and
subsequent annual testing events shall be taken within the same calendar month as the first annual sample taken. (iii) John Deere shall submit an annual testing report to EPA with its annual
test results, within thirty (30) days after taking each annual sample. The annual testing report
also shall include the total amount of waste in tons disposed during the calendar year.
4. Changes in Operating Conditions: If John Deere significantly changes the manufacturing or
treatment process described in the petition, or the chemicals used in the manufacturing or treatment process, it must notify the EPA in writing and may no longer handle the WWTS Filter
Cake generated from the new process as non-hazardous unless and until the WWTS Filter
Cake is shown to meet the delisting levels set in paragraph(1), John Deere demonstrates that
no new hazardous constituents listed in appendix VIII of part 261 have been introduced, and
John Deere has received written approval from EPA to manage the wastes from the new process under this exclusion. While the EPA may provide written approval of certain changes, if
there are changes that the EPA determines are highly significant, the EPA may instead require
John Deere to file a new delisting petition.
5. Data Submittals and Recordkeeping: John Deere must submit the information described below.
If John Deere fails to submit the required data within the specified time or maintain the required
records on-site for the specified time, EPA, at its discretion, will consider this sufficient basis to
reopen the exclusion as described in paragraph (6). John Deere must: (A) Submit the data obtained through paragraph (3) to the Chief, Waste Remediation and Permits Branch, U.S. EPA
Region 7, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa KS 66219, within the time specified. All supporting
data can be submitted on CD–ROM or some comparable electronic media; (B) Compile, summarize, and maintain on site for a minimum of five years and make available for inspection
records of operating conditions, including monthly and annual volumes of WWTS Filter Cake
generated, analytical data, including quality control information and, copies of the notification(s)
required in paragraph (7); (C) Submit with all data a signed copy of the certification statement in
40 CFR 260.22(i)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:24 Nov 24, 2014
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
70113
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 25, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—WASTES EXCLUDED FROM NON-SPECIFIC SOURCES—Continued
Facility
Address
Waste description
6. Reopener: (A) If, any time after disposal of the delisted waste, John Deere possesses or is otherwise made aware of any environmental data (including but not limited to leachate data or
groundwater monitoring data) or any other relevant data to the delisted waste indicating that any
constituent is at a concentration in the leachate higher than the specified delisting concentration,
then John Deere must report such data, in writing, to the Chief, Waste Remediation and Permits
Branch, U.S. EPA Region 7, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa KS 66219 within 10 days of first
possessing or being made aware of that data. (B) Based on the information described in paragraph (A) and any other information received from any source, the Regional Administrator, EPA
Region 7, will make a preliminary determination as to whether the reported information requires
Agency action to protect human health or the environment. Further action may include suspending, or revoking the exclusion, or other appropriate response necessary to protect human
health and the environment. (C) If the Regional Administrator determines that the reported information does require Agency action, the Regional Administrator will notify John Deere in writing
of the actions the Regional Administrator believes are necessary to protect human health and
the environment. The notice shall include a statement of the proposed action and a statement
providing John Deere with an opportunity to present information as to why the proposed Agency
action is not necessary or to suggest an alternative action. John Deere shall have 30 days from
the date of the Regional Administrator’s notice to present the information. (D) If after 30 days
John Deere presents no further information or after a review of any submitted information, the
Regional Administrator will issue a final written determination describing the Agency actions that
are necessary to protect human health or the environment. Any required action described in the
Regional Administrator’s determination shall become effective immediately, unless the Regional
Administrator provides otherwise.
7. Notification Requirements: John Deere must do the following before transporting the delisted
waste: (A) Provide a one-time written notification to any state Regulatory Agency to which or
through which it will transport the delisted waste described above for disposal, 60 days before
beginning such activities (B) Update the one-time written notification if it ships the delisted waste
into a different disposal facility. Failure to provide this notification will result in a violation of the
delisting petition and a possible revocation of the decision.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Chapter I
[WC Docket No. 10–90; DA 14–1569]
Connect America Fund
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
In this document, the
Wireline Competition Bureau adopts a
specific methodology for calculating
reasonable comparability benchmarks
for fixed broadband services. The
methodology the Commission adopts
today establishes reasonable
comparability broadband benchmarks
that vary, depending on the supported
service’s download and upload
bandwidths and usage allowance.
DATES: Effective December 26, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Suzanne Yelen, Telecommunications
Access Policy Division, Wireline
Competition Bureau at (202) 418–0626
or TTY (202) 418–0484.
wreier-aviles on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
14:24 Nov 24, 2014
*
*
Jkt 235001
*
carriers (ETCs) must offer voice and
broadband services in supported areas
at rates that are reasonably comparable
to rates for similar services in urban
areas. The methodology we adopt today
establishes reasonable comparability
broadband benchmarks that vary,
depending on the supported service’s
download and upload bandwidths and
usage allowance. This approach
recognizes that ETCs may choose to
meet their broadband performance
obligation with a service offering that
exceeds the minimum requirements in
one or more respects. The approach also
is sufficiently flexible to account for any
changes that the Commission may adopt
regarding the required minimum
performance characteristics.
2. The Bureau notes that because they
are announcing the methodology late in
the calendar year, the results for 2014
are illustrative and to inform parties that
I. Introduction
are potentially interested in bidding on
Connect America funding for rural
1. In this Report and Order (Order),
broadband experiments in the weeks
the Wireline Competition Bureau
ahead. The Bureau also will take into
(Bureau) adopts a specific methodology
for calculating reasonable comparability account the benchmarks published
below when adjudicating Connect
benchmarks for fixed broadband
services. In the USF/ICC Transformation America Phase II challenges. The
Order, 76 FR 73830, November 29, 2011, Bureau plans to announce the 2015
reasonable comparability benchmarks
the Commission required that as a
for fixed broadband services when the
condition of receiving high-cost
Bureau completes our analysis of the
support, eligible telecommunications
This is a
synopsis of the Wireline Competition
Bureau’s Report and Order in WC
Docket No. 10–90; DA 14–1569, released
October 29, 2014. The complete text of
this document is available for
inspection and copying during normal
business hours in the FCC Reference
Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th
Street SW., Room CY–A257,
Washington, DC 20554. The document
may also be purchased from the
Commission’s duplicating contractor,
Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI), 445
12th Street SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554, telephone (800)
378–3160 or (202) 863–2893, facsimile
(202) 863–2898, or via the Internet at
https://www.bcpiweb.com. It is also
available on the Commission’s Web site
at https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/
attachmatch/DA-14-1569A1.pdf.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2014–27780 Filed 11–24–14; 8:45 am]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 25, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 70108-70113]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27780]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 261
[EPA-R07-RCRA-2014-0452; FRL-9919-72-Region-7]
Hazardous Waste Management System; Identification and Listing of
Hazardous Waste; Final Exclusion
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is granting the
petition submitted by John Deere Des Moines Works (John Deere) of Deere
& Company, in Ankeny, Iowa to exclude or ``delist'' up to 600 tons per
calendar year of F006/F019 wastewater treatment sludge filter cake
generated by John Deere's wastewater treatment system from the list of
hazardous wastes. This final rule responds to a petition submitted by
John Deere to delist up to 600 tons per calendar year of F006/F019
wastewater treatment sludge filter cake generated by John Deere's
wastewater treatment system from the list of hazardous wastes.
After careful analysis and use of the Delisting Risk Assessment
Software (DRAS), EPA has concluded the petitioned waste is not
hazardous waste. The F006/F019 exclusion is a conditional exclusion for
600 cubic yards per year of the F006/F019 wastewater treatment sludge.
Accordingly, this final rule excludes the petitioned waste from the
requirements of hazardous waste regulations under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
DATES: This final rule is effective on November 25, 2014.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R07-RCRA-2014-0452. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly
[[Page 70109]]
available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials
are available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in
hard copy by contacting the further information contact below. The
public may copy material from any regulatory docket at no cost for the
first 100 pages and at a cost of $0.15 per page for additional copies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenneth Herstowski, Waste Remediation
and Permits Branch, Air and Waste Management Division, EPA Region 7,
11201 Renner Blvd., Lenexa, KS 66219; telephone number (913) 551-7631;
email address: herstowski.ken@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The information in this section is organized
as follows:
I. Overview Information
A. What action is EPA finalizing?
B. Why is EPA approving this action?
C. What are the limits of this exclusion?
D. How will John Deere manage the waste, when delisted?
E. When is the final delisting exclusion effective?
F. How Does this final rule affect States?
II. Background
A. What is a delisting petition?
B. What regulations allow facilities to delist a waste?
C. What information must the generator supply?
III. EPA's Evaluation of the Waste Information and Data
A. What waste did John Deere petition EPA to delist?
B. How much waste did John Deere propose to delist?
C. How did John Deere sample and analyze the waste data in this
petition?
IV. Public Comments Received on the Proposed Exclusions
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Overview Information
A. What action is EPA finalizing?
After evaluating the petition for John Deere, EPA proposed, on
August 20, 2014 (79 FR 49252), to exclude the waste from the lists of
hazardous waste under section 261.31. EPA is finalizing the decision to
grant John Deere's delisting petition to have its F006/F019 wastewater
treatment sludge excluded, or delisted, from the definition of a
hazardous waste, once it is disposed in a Subtitle D landfill.
B. Why is EPA approving this action?
John Deere's petition requests a delisting from the F006/F019 waste
listing under 40 CFR 260.20 and 260.22. John Deere does not believe
that the petitioned waste meets the criteria for which EPA listed it.
John Deere also believes no additional constituents or factors could
cause the waste to be hazardous. EPA's review of this petition included
consideration of the original listing criteria, and the additional
factors required by the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984
(HSWA). See Section 3001(f) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6921(f), and 40 CFR
260.22(d)(1)-(4) (hereinafter all sectional references are to 40 CFR
unless otherwise indicated). In making the final delisting
determination, EPA evaluated the petitioned waste against the listing
criteria and factors cited in Sec. 261.11(a)(2) and (a)(3). Based on
this review, EPA agrees with the petitioner that the waste is
nonhazardous with respect to the original listing criteria. (If EPA had
found, based on this review, that the waste remained hazardous based on
the factors for which the waste was originally listed, EPA would have
proposed to deny the petition.) EPA evaluated the waste with respect to
other factors or criteria to assess whether there is a reasonable basis
to believe that such additional factors could cause the wastes to be
hazardous. EPA considered whether the waste is acutely toxic, the
concentrations of the constituents in the waste, their tendency to
migrate and to bioaccumulate, their persistence in the environment once
released from the waste, plausible and specific types of management of
the petitioned waste, the quantities of waste generated, and waste
variability. EPA believes that the petitioned waste does not meet the
listing criteria and thus should not be a listed waste. EPA's final
decision to delist the waste from John Deere's facility is based on the
information submitted in support of this rule, including a description
of the waste and analytical data from the John Deere Des Moines,
Ankeny, Iowa, facility.
C. What are the limits of this exclusion?
This exclusion applies to the waste described in John Deere's
petition only if the requirements described in 40 CFR part 261,
appendix IX, table 1 and the conditions contained herein are satisfied.
D. How will John Deere manage the waste, when delisted?
The delisted F006/F019 wastewater treatment sludge will be disposed
of in a Subtitle D landfill which is permitted, licensed or otherwise
authorized by a state to manage industrial waste.
E. When is the final delisting exclusion effective?
This rule is effective November 25, 2014. The Hazardous and Solid
Waste Amendments of 1984 amended Section 3010 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C.
6930(b)(1), allows rules to become effective in less than six months
after the rule is published when the regulated community does not need
the six-month period to come into compliance. That is the case here
because this rule reduces, rather than increases, the existing
requirements for persons generating hazardous waste. This reduction in
existing requirements also provides a basis for making this rule
effective immediately, upon publication, under the Administrative
Procedure Act, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d).
F. How does this final rule affect States?
EPA is issuing this exclusion under the Federal RCRA delisting
program. Thus, upon the exclusion being finalized, the wastes covered
will be removed from Subtitle C control under the Federal RCRA program.
This will mean, first, that the wastes will be delisted in any State or
territory where the EPA is directly administering the RCRA program
(e.g., Iowa, Indian Country). However, whether the wastes will be
delisted in states which have been authorized to administer the RCRA
program will vary depending upon the authorization status of the States
and the particular requirements regarding delisted wastes in the
various states.
Some other generally authorized states have not received
authorization for delisting. Thus, the EPA makes delisting
determinations for such states. However, RCRA allows states to impose
their own regulatory requirements that are more stringent than EPA's,
under Section 3009 of RCRA. These more stringent requirements may
include a provision that prohibits a Federally issued exclusion from
taking effect in the state, or that requires a state concurrence before
the Federal exclusion takes effect, or that allows the state to add
conditions to any Federal exclusion. We urge the petitioner to contact
the state regulatory authority in each state to or through which it may
wish to ship its wastes to establish the status of its wastes under the
state's laws.
EPA has also authorized some states to administer a delisting
program in place of the Federal program, that is, to make state
delisting decisions. In such states, the state delisting requirements
operate in lieu of the Federal delisting requirements. Therefore, this
exclusion does not apply in those authorized states unless the state
makes the rule part of its authorized program. If John Deere transports
the federally excluded waste to or manages the waste in any state with
delisting authorization, John
[[Page 70110]]
Deere must obtain a delisting authorization from that state before it
can manage the waste as non-hazardous in that state.
II. Background
A. What is a delisting petition?
A delisting petition is a request from a generator to EPA or to an
authorized state to exclude or delist, from the RCRA list of hazardous
wastes, waste the generator believes should not be considered hazardous
under RCRA.
B. What regulations allow facilities to delist a waste?
Under Sec. 260.20 and 260.22, facilities may petition EPA to remove
their wastes from hazardous waste regulation by excluding them from the
lists of hazardous wastes contained in Sec. 261.31 and 261.32.
Specifically, Sec. 260.20 allows any person to petition the
Administrator to modify or revoke any provision of 40 CFR parts 260
through 265 and 268. Section 260.22 provides generators the opportunity
to petition the Administrator to exclude a waste from a particular
generating facility from the hazardous waste lists.
C. What information must the generator supply?
Petitioners must provide sufficient information to EPA to allow EPA
to determine that the waste to be excluded does not meet any of the
criteria under which the waste was listed as a hazardous waste. In
addition, the Administrator must determine, where he/she has a
reasonable basis to believe that factors (including additional
constituents) other than those for which the waste was listed could
cause the waste to be a hazardous waste and that such factors do not
warrant retaining the waste as a hazardous waste.
III. EPA's Evaluation of the Waste Information and Data
A. What waste did John Deere petition EPA to delist?
On January 28, 2014, John Deere (through its consultant) petitioned
EPA to exclude from the lists of hazardous waste contained in Section
261.31 and 261.32, F006/F019 wastewater treatment sludge, generated
from its John Deere Des Moines facility in Ankeny, Iowa.
B. How much waste did John Deere propose to delist?
John Deere requested that EPA grant an exclusion for 600 cubic
yards per year of F006/F019 wastewater treatment sludge.
C. How did John Deere sample and analyze the waste data in this
petition?
To support its petition, John Deere submitted: (1) Facility
information on production processes and waste generation processes; (2)
initial Filter Cake composite sample analytical results to determine
constituents of concern (COC); and (3) Analytical results from six
composite samples of Filter Cake for the COC. The initial sample was
analyzed for EPA's list of hazardous constituents in 40 CFR part 261,
Appendix VIII, pesticides, PCBs. The COC selected from the initial
composite sample results are barium, chromium, hexavalent chromium,
copper, lead, mercury, nickel, vanadium, zinc, cyanide, acetone and
methyl ethyl ketone. Both total and leachable concentrations of the COC
in the Filter Cake were determined.
John Deere generated the sampling data used in the Delisting Risk
Assessment Software (DRAS) under a Sampling Plan and Quality Assurance
Project Plan (June 2012 Revision). EPA believes that the sampling
procedures used by John Deere satisfy EPA's criteria for collecting
representative samples of the F006/F019 waste.
IV. Public Comments Received on the Proposed Exclusions
No comments were received during the comment period.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this rule is not of general applicability
and therefore is not a regulatory action subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB). This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) because it applies to a
particular facility only. Because this rule is of particular
applicability relating to a particular facility, it is not subject to
the regulatory flexibility provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), or to Sections 202, 204, and 205 of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4). Because
this rule will affect only a particular facility, it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as specified in
Section 203 of UMRA. Because this rule will affect only a particular
facility, this final rule does not have Federalism implications. It
will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government, as specified in Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism,'' (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). Thus, Executive Order 13132 does not apply
to this rule. Similarly, because this rule will affect only a
particular facility, this final rule does not have tribal implications,
as specified in Executive Order 13175, ``Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). Thus,
Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this rule. This rule also is
not subject to Executive Order 13045, ``Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997), because it is not economically significant as defined in
Executive Order 12866, and because the Agency does not have reason to
believe the environmental health or safety risks addressed by this
action present a disproportionate risk to children. The basis for this
belief is that the Agency used the DRAS program, which considers health
and safety risks to children, to calculate the maximum allowable
concentrations for this rule. This rule is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001),
because it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order
12866. This rule does not involve technical standards; thus, the
requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. As required
by Section 3 of Executive Order 12988, ``Civil Justice Reform,'' (61 FR
4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing this rule, EPA has taken the
necessary steps to eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize
potential litigation, and provide a clear legal standard for affected
conduct.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S. C. 801 et seq., as added by
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report which includes a copy
of the rule to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. Section 804 exempts from Section 801 the
following types of rules (1) Rules of particular applicability; (2)
rules relating to agency management or personnel; and (3) rules of
agency organization, procedure, or practice that do not substantially
affect
[[Page 70111]]
the rights or obligations of non-agency parties (5 U.S.C. 804(3)). EPA
is not required to submit a rule report regarding today's action under
Section 801 because this is a rule of particular applicability.
Executive Order (EO) 12898 (59 FR 7629 (Feb. 16, 1994)) establishes
Federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision
directs Federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission
by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
EPA has determined that this final rule will not have
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority or low-income populations because it does not
affect the level of protection provided to human health or the
environment. The Agency's risk assessment did not identify risks from
management of this material in a Subtitle D landfill. Therefore, EPA
believes that any populations in proximity of the landfills used by
this facility should not be adversely affected by common waste
management practices for this delisted waste.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 261
Environmental protection, Hazardous waste, Recycling, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: Sec. 3001(f), RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6921(f).
Dated: November 11, 2014.
Karl Brooks,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, EPA amends 40 CFR part 261
as follows:
PART 261--IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
0
1. The authority citation for part 261 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S. C. 6905, 6912(a), 6921, 6922, and 6938.
0
2. In Table 1 of Appendix IX to part 261 add the following waste stream
in alphabetical order by facility to read as follows:
Appendix IX to Part 261--Wastes Excluded Under Sec. Sec. 260.20 and
260.22
Table 1--Wastes Excluded From Non-Specific Sources
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Facility Address Waste description
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
John Deere Des Moines Works Ankeny, IA.......... Wastewater Treatment
of Deere & Company. Sludge Filter Cake
(WWTS Filter Cake)
(Hazardous Waste
No. F006/F019)
generated from
combined onsite
wastewater
treatment at the
Ankeny, IA,
facility wastewater
treatment plant at
a maximum annual
rate of 600 tons
per calendar year
and disposed of in
a Subtitle D
Landfill which is
licensed,
permitted, or
otherwise
authorized by a
state to accept the
delisted WWTS
Filter Cake.
John Deere must
implement a testing
program that meets
the following
conditions for the
exclusion to be
valid:
1. Delisting Levels:
(A) The WWTS Filter
Cake shall not
exhibit any of the
``Characteristics
of Hazardous Waste
in 40 CFR 261,
Subpart C. (B) All
TCLP leachable
concentrations (40
CFR 261.24(a)) for
the following
constituents must
not exceed the
following levels
(mg/L for TCLP):
Arsenic--5.0;
Barium--100.0;
Cadmium--1.0;
Chromium--5.0;
Lead--5.0; Mercury
0.2; and Nickel--
32.4. (C) EPA SW--
846 Method 1313
Extraction at pH
2.88, 7 and 13
concentration of
Chromium
(hexavalent) must
not exceed (mg/l)
0.087. (D) All
total
concentrations for
the following
constituents must
not exceed the
following levels
(mg/kg): Antimony--
103; Arsenic--52;
Barium--965;
Beryllium--21;
Cadmium--10;
Chromium (total)--
22,500; Cobalt--11;
Copper--1439; Lead--
437; Nickel--1,515;
Selenium--52;
Silver--26;
Thallium--52; Tin--
68; Vanadium--380;
Zinc--5,085;
Mercury--1;
Chromium
(hexavalent)--20;
Cyanide--3, Oil and
Grease--32,250;
Acetone--8; Methyl
Ethyl Ketone (MEK)--
0.3.
2. Waste Handling
and Holding: (A)
John Deere must
manage as hazardous
all WWTS Filter
Cake generated
until it has
completed initial
verification
testing described
in paragraph (3)(A)
and valid analyses
show that paragraph
(1) is satisfied
and written
approval is
received from EPA.
(B) Levels of
constituents
measured in the
samples of the WWTS
Filter Cake that do
not (1) exceed the
levels set forth in
paragraph (1) for
two consecutive
quarterly sampling
events are non-
hazardous. After
approval is
received from EPA,
John Deere can
manage and dispose
of the non-
hazardous WWTS
Filter Cake
according to all
applicable solid
waste regulations.
(C) Not
withstanding having
received the
initial approval
from EPA, if
constituent levels
in a later sample
exceed any of the
Delisting Levels
set in paragraph
(1), from that
point forward, John
Deere must treat
all the waste
covered by this
exclusion as
hazardous until it
is demonstrated
that the waste
again meets the
levels in paragraph
(1). John Deere
must manage and
dispose of the
waste generated
under Subtitle C of
RCRA from the time
that it becomes
aware of any
exceedance.
[[Page 70112]]
3. Verification
Testing
Requirements: John
Deere must perform
sample collection
and analyses in
accordance with the
Quality Assurance
Project Plan
submitted with the
``John Deere Des
Moines, Iowa,
Sampling and
Analysis Plan for
Delisting of F006
and F019 Filter
Cake, June 2012.''
All samples shall
be representative
composite samples
according to
appropriate
methods. As
applicable to the
method-defined
parameters of
concern, analyses
requiring the use
of SW-846 methods
incorporated by
reference in 40 CFR
260.11 must be used
without
substitution. As
applicable, the SW-
846 methods might
include Methods
0010, 0011, 0020,
0023A, 0030, 0031,
0040, 0050, 0051,
0060, 0061, 1010A,
1020B,1110A, 1310B,
1311, 1312, 1313,
1320, 1330A, 9010C,
9012B, 9040C,
9045D, 9060A, 9070A
(uses EPA Method
1664, Rev. A),
9071B, and 9095B.
Methods must meet
Performance Based
Measurement System
Criteria in which
the Data Quality
Objectives are to
demonstrate that
samples of the John
Deere sludge are
representative for
all constituents
listed in paragraph
(1). To verify that
the waste does not
exceed the
specified delisting
concentrations, for
one year after the
final exclusion is
granted, John Deere
must perform
quarterly
analytical testing
by sampling and
analyzing the WWTP
sludge as follows:
(A) Quarterly
Testing: (i)
Collect two
representative
composite samples
of the WWTS Filter
Cake at quarterly
intervals after EPA
grants the final
exclusion. The
first composite
samples must be
taken within 30
days after EPA
grants the final
approval. The
second set of
samples must be
taken at least 30
days after the
first set. (ii)
Analyze the samples
for all
constituents listed
in paragraph (1).
Any waste regarding
which a composite
sample is taken
that exceeds the
delisting levels
listed in paragraph
(1) for the sludge
must be disposed as
hazardous waste in
accordance with the
applicable
hazardous waste
requirements from
the time that John
Deere becomes aware
of any exceedance.
(iii) Within thirty
(30) days after
taking each
quarterly sample,
John Deere will
report its
analytical test
data to EPA. If
levels of
constituents
measured in the
samples of the
sludge do not
exceed the levels
set forth in
paragraph (1) of
this exclusion for
two consecutive
quarters, and EPA
concurs with those
findings, John
Deere can manage
and dispose the non-
hazardous sludge
according to all
applicable solid
waste regulations.
(B) Annual Testing:
(i) If John Deere
completes the
quarterly testing
specified in
paragraph (3) above
and no sample
contains a
constituent at a
level which exceeds
the limits set
forth in paragraph
(1), John Deere may
begin annual
testing as follows:
John Deere must
test two
representative
composite samples
of the WWTS Filter
Cake (following the
same protocols as
specified for
quarterly sampling,
above) for all
constituents listed
in paragraph (1) at
least once per
calendar year. (ii)
The samples for the
annual testing
taken for the
second and
subsequent annual
testing events
shall be taken
within the same
calendar month as
the first annual
sample taken. (iii)
John Deere shall
submit an annual
testing report to
EPA with its annual
test results,
within thirty (30)
days after taking
each annual sample.
The annual testing
report also shall
include the total
amount of waste in
tons disposed
during the calendar
year.
4. Changes in
Operating
Conditions: If John
Deere significantly
changes the
manufacturing or
treatment process
described in the
petition, or the
chemicals used in
the manufacturing
or treatment
process, it must
notify the EPA in
writing and may no
longer handle the
WWTS Filter Cake
generated from the
new process as non-
hazardous unless
and until the WWTS
Filter Cake is
shown to meet the
delisting levels
set in
paragraph(1), John
Deere demonstrates
that no new
hazardous
constituents listed
in appendix VIII of
part 261 have been
introduced, and
John Deere has
received written
approval from EPA
to manage the
wastes from the new
process under this
exclusion. While
the EPA may provide
written approval of
certain changes, if
there are changes
that the EPA
determines are
highly significant,
the EPA may instead
require John Deere
to file a new
delisting petition.
5. Data Submittals
and Recordkeeping:
John Deere must
submit the
information
described below. If
John Deere fails to
submit the required
data within the
specified time or
maintain the
required records on-
site for the
specified time,
EPA, at its
discretion, will
consider this
sufficient basis to
reopen the
exclusion as
described in
paragraph (6). John
Deere must: (A)
Submit the data
obtained through
paragraph (3) to
the Chief, Waste
Remediation and
Permits Branch,
U.S. EPA Region 7,
11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa
KS 66219, within
the time specified.
All supporting data
can be submitted on
CD-ROM or some
comparable
electronic media;
(B) Compile,
summarize, and
maintain on site
for a minimum of
five years and make
available for
inspection records
of operating
conditions,
including monthly
and annual volumes
of WWTS Filter Cake
generated,
analytical data,
including quality
control information
and, copies of the
notification(s)
required in
paragraph (7); (C)
Submit with all
data a signed copy
of the
certification
statement in 40 CFR
260.22(i)(12).
[[Page 70113]]
6. Reopener: (A) If,
any time after
disposal of the
delisted waste,
John Deere
possesses or is
otherwise made
aware of any
environmental data
(including but not
limited to leachate
data or groundwater
monitoring data) or
any other relevant
data to the
delisted waste
indicating that any
constituent is at a
concentration in
the leachate higher
than the specified
delisting
concentration, then
John Deere must
report such data,
in writing, to the
Chief, Waste
Remediation and
Permits Branch,
U.S. EPA Region 7,
11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa
KS 66219 within 10
days of first
possessing or being
made aware of that
data. (B) Based on
the information
described in
paragraph (A) and
any other
information
received from any
source, the
Regional
Administrator, EPA
Region 7, will make
a preliminary
determination as to
whether the
reported
information
requires Agency
action to protect
human health or the
environment.
Further action may
include suspending,
or revoking the
exclusion, or other
appropriate
response necessary
to protect human
health and the
environment. (C) If
the Regional
Administrator
determines that the
reported
information does
require Agency
action, the
Regional
Administrator will
notify John Deere
in writing of the
actions the
Regional
Administrator
believes are
necessary to
protect human
health and the
environment. The
notice shall
include a statement
of the proposed
action and a
statement providing
John Deere with an
opportunity to
present information
as to why the
proposed Agency
action is not
necessary or to
suggest an
alternative action.
John Deere shall
have 30 days from
the date of the
Regional
Administrator's
notice to present
the information.
(D) If after 30
days John Deere
presents no further
information or
after a review of
any submitted
information, the
Regional
Administrator will
issue a final
written
determination
describing the
Agency actions that
are necessary to
protect human
health or the
environment. Any
required action
described in the
Regional
Administrator's
determination shall
become effective
immediately, unless
the Regional
Administrator
provides otherwise.
7. Notification
Requirements: John
Deere must do the
following before
transporting the
delisted waste: (A)
Provide a one-time
written
notification to any
state Regulatory
Agency to which or
through which it
will transport the
delisted waste
described above for
disposal, 60 days
before beginning
such activities (B)
Update the one-time
written
notification if it
ships the delisted
waste into a
different disposal
facility. Failure
to provide this
notification will
result in a
violation of the
delisting petition
and a possible
revocation of the
decision.
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2014-27780 Filed 11-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P