Questions and Answers Regarding Food Facility Registration (Sixth Edition); Guidance for Industry; Availability, 68810-68812 [2014-27290]
Download as PDF
68810
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 223 / Wednesday, November 19, 2014 / Proposed Rules
comments will be considered before
taking action on the proposed rule. The
proposal contained in this action may
be changed in light of comments
received. All comments submitted will
be available for examination in the
public docket both before and after the
closing date for comments. A report
summarizing each substantive public
contact with FAA personnel concerned
with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.
Availability of NPRM’s
An electronic copy of this document
may be downloaded through the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through
the FAA’s Web page at https://
www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_
traffic/publications/airspace_
amendments/.
You may review the public docket
containing the proposal, any comments
received, and any final disposition in
person in the Dockets Office (see the
ADDRESSES section for the address and
phone number) between 9:00 a.m. and
5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except federal holidays. An informal
docket may also be examined during
normal business hours at the Northwest
Mountain Regional Office of the Federal
Aviation Administration, Air Traffic
Organization, Western Service Center,
Operations Support Group, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057.
Persons interested in being placed on
a mailing list for future NPRM’s should
contact the FAA’s Office of Rulemaking,
(202) 267–9677, for a copy of Advisory
Circular No. 11–2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which
describes the application procedure.
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
The Proposal
The FAA is proposing an amendment
to Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations
(14 CFR) Part 71 by establishing Class E
en route domestic airspace extending
upward from 1,200 feet above the
surface at Spokane, WA. This action
would contain aircraft while in IFR
conditions under control of Seattle
ARTCC by vectoring aircraft from en
route airspace to terminal areas,
therefore enhancing the safety and
management of IFR operations within
the NAS.
Class E airspace designations are
published in paragraph 6006, of FAA
Order 7400.9Y, dated August 6, 2014,
and effective September 15, 2014, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The Class E airspace designation
listed in this document will be
published subsequently in this Order.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:17 Nov 18, 2014
Jkt 235001
The FAA has determined this
proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical
regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to
keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this proposed regulation; (1)
Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not
a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. Since this is a
routine matter that will only affect air
traffic procedures and air navigation, it
is certified this proposed rule, when
promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1,
Section 106, describes the authority for
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the agency’s
authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of the airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This proposed regulation is
within the scope of that authority as it
would establish controlled airspace at
Spokane, WA.
This proposal will be subject to an
environmental analysis in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1E,
‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final
regulatory action.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9Y, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points,
dated August 6, 2014, and effective
September 15, 2014, is amended as
follows:
■
Paragraph 6006
Airspace Areas.
En Route Domestic
*
*
*
*
Issued in Seattle, Washington, on 11/06/
2014.
Christopher Ramirez,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group,
Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2014–27318 Filed 11–18–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 10
[Docket No. FDA–2012–D–1002]
Questions and Answers Regarding
Food Facility Registration (Sixth
Edition); Guidance for Industry;
Availability
Food and Drug Administration,
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
AGENCY:
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to
amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
SUMMARY:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
part 71 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
*
ANM WA E6 Spokane, WA [New]
Spokane, WA
That airspace extending upward from
1,200 feet above the surface within an area
bounded by a line beginning at lat. 45°49′52″
N., long. 118°02′34″ W.; to lat. 44°50′06″ N.,
long. 117°05′33″ W.; to lat. 45°50′00″ N.,
long. 115°45′00″ W.; to lat. 46°02′00″ N.,
long. 115°45′00″ W.; to lat. 48°24′00″ N.,
long. 115°44′57″ W.; to lat. 49°00′00″ N.,
long. 115°30′00″ W.; to lat. 49°00′00″ N.,
long. 120°00′00″ W.; to lat. 46°23′19″ N.,
long. 121°07′50″ W.; to lat. 45°09′13″ N.,
long. 119°01′43″ W.; thence to the point of
beginning.
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice of availability.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or we) is
announcing the availability of a
guidance for industry entitled
‘‘Questions and Answers Regarding
Food Facility Registration (Sixth
Edition).’’ The guidance includes one
additional question and answer
regarding FDA’s policy regarding food
facility registration for farms that also
pack or hold raw agricultural
commodities grown on a farm under
different ownership in light of other
ongoing FDA Food Safety
Modernization Act (FSMA)
rulemakings.
E:\FR\FM\19NOP1.SGM
19NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 223 / Wednesday, November 19, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Submit either electronic or
written comments on FDA guidances at
any time.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
comments on the guidance to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
written requests for single copies of the
guidance to the Office of Compliance,
Division of Field Programs and
Guidance, Center for Food Safety and
Applied Nutrition (HFS–615), Food and
Drug Administration, 5100 Paint Branch
Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740. Send
two self-addressed adhesive labels to
assist that office in processing your
request. See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the guidance document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy Barringer, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS–615), Food
and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint
Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740,
240–402–1988.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
I. Background
We are announcing the availability of
a guidance for industry entitled
‘‘Questions and Answers Regarding
Food Facility Registration (Sixth
Edition) available on FDA’s Web site at
https://www.fda.gov/Food/
GuidanceRegulation/
GuidanceDocumentsRegulatory
Information/ucm331959.htm.’’ We are
issuing this guidance consistent with
our good guidance practices (GGP)
regulation (§ 10.115 (21 CFR 10.115)). In
accordance with § 10.115(g)(2), we are
implementing this guidance without
prior public comment because we have
determined that prior public
participation is not feasible or
appropriate. The guidance represents a
less burdensome policy consistent with
the public health. Although this
guidance document is immediately in
effect, FDA will accept comments at any
time.
Section 102 of FSMA (Pub. L. 111–
353), signed into law on January 4,
2011, amends section 415 of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C.
350d) (the FD&C Act) regarding
requirements for food facility
registration. Further, section 102(a)(3) of
FSMA amends section 415 of the FD&C
Act to provide that food facilities
required to register with FDA must
renew their registrations with FDA
every 2 years, between October 1 and
December 31 of each even-numbered
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:17 Nov 18, 2014
Jkt 235001
year, by submitting registrations
renewals to FDA.
In addition to amending section 415
of the FD&C Act, FSMA also amended
the FD&C Act such that section 415
functions in connection with other food
safety provisions. For instance, FSMA
added section 418 of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 350g), which establishes certain
preventive control requirements for food
facilities that are required to register
under section 415 of the FD&C Act. In
general, section 418(a) of the FD&C Act
requires the owner, operator, or agent in
charge of a ‘‘facility’’ to evaluate the
hazards that could affect food
manufactured, processed, packed, or
held by such facility, identify and
implement preventive controls, monitor
the performance of those controls, and
maintain records of the monitoring. The
term ‘‘facility’’ is defined in section
418(o)(2) of the FD&C Act as ‘‘a
domestic facility or a foreign facility
that is required to register under section
415.’’
As part of the rulemaking to
implement section 418 of the FD&C Act,
on September 29, 2014 (79 FR 58524),
we published a supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register, ‘‘Current Good Manufacturing
Practice and Hazard Analysis and RiskBased Preventive Controls for Human
Food’’ (preventive controls for human
food). In that supplemental proposed
rule, we proposed, inter alia, certain
changes to the definition of the term
‘‘farm’’ in 21 CFR 1.227 (§ 1.227). If
implemented, these changes would
impact food facility registration because
the food facility registration
requirements of section 415 of the FD&C
Act do not apply to an establishment
that meets the definition of ‘‘farm.’’ The
current definition of a ‘‘farm’’ under
§ 1.227 describes a farm in relevant part
as a facility devoted to the growing and
harvesting of crops, the raising of
animals (including seafood), or both.
Although that definition of ‘‘farm’’ then
provides that farms also pack or hold
food, it limits facilities that fall within
the definition of ‘‘farm’’ to those that
pack or hold food grown, raised, or
consumed on that farm or another farm
under the same ownership. Thus, under
the current definition, an establishment
that is devoted to the growing and
harvesting of crops, but also packs and
holds food not grown or raised on that
farm or on another farm under the same
ownership, would fall outside the
definition of ‘‘farm’’ and be required to
register as a food facility. In the
supplemental notice of proposed
rulemaking for preventive controls for
human food, FDA proposed to revise the
‘‘farm’’ definition in relevant part so
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
68811
that it would no longer limit
establishments that fall within the
‘‘farm’’ definition to those that pack or
hold food grown, raised, or consumed
on that farm or another farm under the
same ownership. Under the revised
‘‘farm’’ definition, an establishment
devoted to the growing of crops, the
raising of animals, or both, would
remain within the ‘‘farm’’ definition
(and, thus, not be subject to the FD&C
Act section 415 registration regulations)
even if it packs and holds raw
agricultural commodities grown on
another farm.
In light of this ongoing rulemaking,
we are announcing our policy regarding
food facility registration for farms that
also pack or hold raw agricultural
commodities grown on a farm under
different ownership and that would no
longer be required to register if the
proposed amendments to the ‘‘farm’’
definition are finalized as proposed.
Under this policy, as discussed in the
guidance, FDA does not intend to
prioritize enforcing the registration
requirement for such establishments.
This policy is a less burdensome policy
consistent with the public health. FDA
intends to make further updates to this
guidance once certain FSMA
rulemakings are final in order to make
sure questions and answers, key terms,
and definitions are consistent and
accurate with regard to the registration
of food facility requirements.
The guidance represents our current
thinking on this topic. It does not create
or confer any rights for or on any person
and does not operate to bind FDA or the
public. An alternative approach may be
used if such approach satisfies the
requirements of the applicable statutes
and regulations.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This guidance refers to previously
approved collections of information
found in FDA regulations and section
415 of the FD&C Act. These collections
of information are subject to review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The
collections of information in §§ 1.230
through 1.235 and section 415 of the
FD&C Act have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0502.
III. Comments
Interested persons may submit either
electronic comments regarding this
guidance to https://www.regulations.gov
or written comments to the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It
is only necessary to send one set of
comments. Identify comments with the
docket number found in brackets in the
E:\FR\FM\19NOP1.SGM
19NOP1
68812
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 223 / Wednesday, November 19, 2014 / Proposed Rules
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, and
will be posted to the docket at https://
www.regulations.gov.
IV. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet
may obtain the document at either
https://www.fda.gov/Regulatory
Information/Guidances/default.htm or
https://www.regulations.gov. Always
access an FDA guidance document by
using FDA’s Web site listed in the
previous sentence to find the most
current version of the guidance.
Dated: November 13, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014–27290 Filed 11–18–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Chapter II
[Docket ID ED–2014–OII–0019; CFDA
Number: 84.282A]
Proposed Priorities, Requirements,
Definitions, and Selection Criteria—
Charter Schools Program Grants to
State Educational Agencies
Office of Innovation and
Improvement, Department of Education.
ACTION: Proposed priorities,
requirements, definitions, and selection
criteria.
AGENCY:
The Assistant Deputy
Secretary for Innovation and
Improvement proposes priorities,
requirements, definitions, and selection
criteria under the Charter Schools
Program (CSP) Grants to State
educational agencies (SEAs). The
Assistant Deputy Secretary may use one
or more of these priorities,
requirements, definitions, and selection
criteria for competitions in fiscal year
(FY) 2015 and later years. We take this
action in order to support the
development of high-quality charter
schools throughout the Nation by
strengthening several components of
this program, including grantee
accountability; accountability and
oversight for authorized public
chartering agencies; and support to
educationally disadvantaged students.
DATES: We must receive your comments
on or before January 5, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
or via postal mail, commercial delivery,
or hand delivery. We will not accept
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:17 Nov 18, 2014
Jkt 235001
comments submitted by fax or by email
or those submitted after the comment
period. To ensure that we do not receive
duplicate copies, please submit your
comments only once. In addition, please
include the Docket ID at the top of your
comments.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
www.regulations.gov to submit your
comments electronically. Information
on using Regulations.gov, including
instructions for accessing agency
documents, submitting comments, and
viewing the docket, is available on the
site under ‘‘Are you new to the site?’’
• Postal Mail, Commercial Delivery,
or Hand Delivery: If you mail or deliver
your comments, address them to Stefan
Huh, U.S. Department of Education, 400
Maryland Avenue SW., Room 4W230,
Washington, DC 20202–5970. Privacy
Note: The Department’s policy is to
make all comments received from
members of the public available for
public viewing in their entirety on the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. Therefore,
commenters should be careful to
include in their comments only
information that they wish to make
publicly available.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jonathan Bettis, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
Room 4W242, Washington, DC 20202–
5970. Telephone: (202) 453–6533 or by
email: charter.schools@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877–
8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Summary
Purpose of This Regulatory Action:
The Assistant Deputy Secretary for
Innovation and Improvement proposes
priorities, requirements, definitions, and
selection criteria for CSP Grants to
SEAs. The Assistant Deputy Secretary
may use one or more of these priorities,
requirements, definitions, and selection
criteria for competitions in FY 2015 and
later years. We take this action in order
to support the development of highquality charter schools throughout the
Nation by strengthening several
components of the program, including
grantee accountability, accountability
and oversight for authorized public
chartering agencies, and support to
educationally disadvantaged students.
Summary of the Major Provisions of
This Regulatory Action: As noted above,
the Assistant Deputy Secretary proposes
this regulatory action to achieve three
main goals.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The first goal is greater accountability
for SEAs’ use of CSP funds; the
proposed priorities, requirements,
definitions, and selection criteria would
increase the likelihood that CSP funds
are directed toward the creation of highquality charter schools. Specifically, in
order to address the proposed selection
criteria, the SEA would be asked to
explain how charter schools fit into the
State’s broader education reform
strategy. In addition, these proposed
selection criteria would clarify how the
SEA should manage and report on
project performance. Proposed selection
criteria (a) (‘‘State-Level Strategy’’) and
(b) (‘‘Policy Context for Charter
Schools’’) would address the SEA’s
strategy for incorporating charter
schools into the State’s broader effort to
improve student outcomes and how the
policy context supports this goal.
Proposed selection criterion (c) (‘‘Past
Performance’’) would assess the
performance of charter schools in the
applicant’s State over the past five
years. Proposed selection criterion (e)
(‘‘Vision for Growth and
Accountability’’) would address the
SEA’s vision for measuring and
reporting on charter school
performance, cultivating the growth of
new high-quality charter schools, and
promoting rigorous accountability for
charter school performance. Proposed
selection criterion (f) (‘‘Dissemination of
Information and Best Practices’’) would
help ensure that the SEA has a plan for
disseminating information about charter
schools and best practices in successful
charter schools. Proposed selection
criterion (h) (‘‘Management Plan and
Theory of Action’’) and the proposed
logic model application requirement
would require the SEA to provide a
logic model that describes how its CSP
funds would be linked to the
achievement of specific measurable
outcomes and performance measures
that allow the SEA to track and evaluate
its project’s performance. Proposed
selection criterion (i) (‘‘Project Design’’)
would solicit information on the
mechanics of the charter school
subgrant program the SEA plans to
implement with CSP funds. In addition
to the selection criteria discussed above,
proposed priority 4 (‘‘SEAs That Have
Never Received A CSP Grant’’) would
promote the first goal of greater
accountability by supporting the growth
of high-quality charter school sectors in
States that have not received CSP
funding in the past, thereby creating
new systems of supports and increasing
the funding available for high-quality
charter schools in new regions.
E:\FR\FM\19NOP1.SGM
19NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 223 (Wednesday, November 19, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 68810-68812]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27290]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 10
[Docket No. FDA-2012-D-1002]
Questions and Answers Regarding Food Facility Registration (Sixth
Edition); Guidance for Industry; Availability
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is announcing the
availability of a guidance for industry entitled ``Questions and
Answers Regarding Food Facility Registration (Sixth Edition).'' The
guidance includes one additional question and answer regarding FDA's
policy regarding food facility registration for farms that also pack or
hold raw agricultural commodities grown on a farm under different
ownership in light of other ongoing FDA Food Safety Modernization Act
(FSMA) rulemakings.
[[Page 68811]]
DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on FDA guidances at
any time.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments on the guidance to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit written requests for single
copies of the guidance to the Office of Compliance, Division of Field
Programs and Guidance, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition
(HFS-615), Food and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy.,
College Park, MD 20740. Send two self-addressed adhesive labels to
assist that office in processing your request. See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for electronic access to the guidance document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Barringer, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-615), Food and Drug Administration, 5100
Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740, 240-402-1988.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
We are announcing the availability of a guidance for industry
entitled ``Questions and Answers Regarding Food Facility Registration
(Sixth Edition) available on FDA's Web site at https://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/ucm331959.htm.'' We are issuing this guidance consistent with our good
guidance practices (GGP) regulation (Sec. 10.115 (21 CFR 10.115)). In
accordance with Sec. 10.115(g)(2), we are implementing this guidance
without prior public comment because we have determined that prior
public participation is not feasible or appropriate. The guidance
represents a less burdensome policy consistent with the public health.
Although this guidance document is immediately in effect, FDA will
accept comments at any time.
Section 102 of FSMA (Pub. L. 111-353), signed into law on January
4, 2011, amends section 415 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(21 U.S.C. 350d) (the FD&C Act) regarding requirements for food
facility registration. Further, section 102(a)(3) of FSMA amends
section 415 of the FD&C Act to provide that food facilities required to
register with FDA must renew their registrations with FDA every 2
years, between October 1 and December 31 of each even-numbered year, by
submitting registrations renewals to FDA.
In addition to amending section 415 of the FD&C Act, FSMA also
amended the FD&C Act such that section 415 functions in connection with
other food safety provisions. For instance, FSMA added section 418 of
the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 350g), which establishes certain preventive
control requirements for food facilities that are required to register
under section 415 of the FD&C Act. In general, section 418(a) of the
FD&C Act requires the owner, operator, or agent in charge of a
``facility'' to evaluate the hazards that could affect food
manufactured, processed, packed, or held by such facility, identify and
implement preventive controls, monitor the performance of those
controls, and maintain records of the monitoring. The term ``facility''
is defined in section 418(o)(2) of the FD&C Act as ``a domestic
facility or a foreign facility that is required to register under
section 415.''
As part of the rulemaking to implement section 418 of the FD&C Act,
on September 29, 2014 (79 FR 58524), we published a supplemental notice
of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register, ``Current Good
Manufacturing Practice and Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive
Controls for Human Food'' (preventive controls for human food). In that
supplemental proposed rule, we proposed, inter alia, certain changes to
the definition of the term ``farm'' in 21 CFR 1.227 (Sec. 1.227). If
implemented, these changes would impact food facility registration
because the food facility registration requirements of section 415 of
the FD&C Act do not apply to an establishment that meets the definition
of ``farm.'' The current definition of a ``farm'' under Sec. 1.227
describes a farm in relevant part as a facility devoted to the growing
and harvesting of crops, the raising of animals (including seafood), or
both. Although that definition of ``farm'' then provides that farms
also pack or hold food, it limits facilities that fall within the
definition of ``farm'' to those that pack or hold food grown, raised,
or consumed on that farm or another farm under the same ownership.
Thus, under the current definition, an establishment that is devoted to
the growing and harvesting of crops, but also packs and holds food not
grown or raised on that farm or on another farm under the same
ownership, would fall outside the definition of ``farm'' and be
required to register as a food facility. In the supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking for preventive controls for human food, FDA
proposed to revise the ``farm'' definition in relevant part so that it
would no longer limit establishments that fall within the ``farm''
definition to those that pack or hold food grown, raised, or consumed
on that farm or another farm under the same ownership. Under the
revised ``farm'' definition, an establishment devoted to the growing of
crops, the raising of animals, or both, would remain within the
``farm'' definition (and, thus, not be subject to the FD&C Act section
415 registration regulations) even if it packs and holds raw
agricultural commodities grown on another farm.
In light of this ongoing rulemaking, we are announcing our policy
regarding food facility registration for farms that also pack or hold
raw agricultural commodities grown on a farm under different ownership
and that would no longer be required to register if the proposed
amendments to the ``farm'' definition are finalized as proposed. Under
this policy, as discussed in the guidance, FDA does not intend to
prioritize enforcing the registration requirement for such
establishments. This policy is a less burdensome policy consistent with
the public health. FDA intends to make further updates to this guidance
once certain FSMA rulemakings are final in order to make sure questions
and answers, key terms, and definitions are consistent and accurate
with regard to the registration of food facility requirements.
The guidance represents our current thinking on this topic. It does
not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not
operate to bind FDA or the public. An alternative approach may be used
if such approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes
and regulations.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This guidance refers to previously approved collections of
information found in FDA regulations and section 415 of the FD&C Act.
These collections of information are subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The collections of information in Sec. Sec.
1.230 through 1.235 and section 415 of the FD&C Act have been approved
under OMB control number 0910-0502.
III. Comments
Interested persons may submit either electronic comments regarding
this guidance to https://www.regulations.gov or written comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It is only necessary to
send one set of comments. Identify comments with the docket number
found in brackets in the
[[Page 68812]]
heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
and will be posted to the docket at https://www.regulations.gov.
IV. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document at
either https://www.fda.gov/RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm
or https://www.regulations.gov. Always access an FDA guidance document
by using FDA's Web site listed in the previous sentence to find the
most current version of the guidance.
Dated: November 13, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-27290 Filed 11-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P