Curation of Federally-Owned and Administered Archeological Collections, 68640-68647 [2014-26839]
Download as PDF
68640
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 222 / Tuesday, November 18, 2014 / Proposed Rules
A 30-day comment period is provided
to allow interested persons to respond
to this proposal. Thirty days is deemed
appropriate because this action needs to
be in place as soon as possible so the
Board can begin to collect the additional
funds for research and promotional
activities designed to maintain and
expand the market for honey and honey
products in the United States and
abroad. All written comments received
in response to this proposed rule by the
date specified will be considered prior
to finalizing this action.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1212
Administrative practice and
procedure, Advertising, Consumer
information, Honey Packer and Importer
promotion, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, Part 1212, Chapter XI of Title
7 is proposed to be amended as follows:
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 1212 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7411–7425; 7 U.S.C.
7401.
2. In § 1212.52, paragraphs (a), (b), (c),
(d) and (e) are revised to read as follows:
■
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Assessments.
(a) The Board will cover its expenses
by levying in a manner prescribed by
the Secretary an assessment on first
handlers and importers. For the period
January 1 through December 31, 2015,
the assessment rate shall be $0.0125 per
pound of assessable honey and honey
products. On and after January 1, 2016,
the assessment rate shall be $0.015 per
pound of assessable honey and honey
products.
(b) Each first handler shall pay the
assessment to the Board on all
domestically produced honey or honey
products the first handler handles. A
producer shall pay the Board the
assessment on all honey or honey
products for which the producer is the
first handler.
(c) Each first handler responsible for
remitting assessments shall remit the
amounts due to the Board’s office on a
monthly basis no later than the fifteenth
day of the month following the month
in which the honey or honey products
were marketed.
(d) Each importer shall pay an
assessment to the Board on all honey or
honey products the importer imports
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 Nov 17, 2014
Jkt 235001
§ 1212.53
Exemption from assessment.
*
PART 1212—HONEY PACKERS AND
IMPORTERS RESEARCH,
PROMOTION, CONSUMER
EDUCATION AND INDUSTRY
INFORMATION ORDER
§ 1212.52
into the United States. An importer
shall pay the assessment to the Board
through the United States Customs and
Border Protection (Customs) when the
honey or honey products being assessed
enters the United States. If Customs
does not collect an assessment from an
importer, the importer is responsible for
paying the assessment to the Board.
(e) The import assessment
recommended by the Board and
approved by the Secretary shall be
uniformly applied to imported honey or
honey products that are identified as
HTS heading numbers 0409.00.00 and
2106.90.9988 by the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States or any
other numbers used to identify honey or
honey products.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In § 1212.53, paragraph (d) is
revised to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
(d) Upon receipt of an application, the
Board shall determine whether an
exemption may be granted. The Board
will then issue, if deemed appropriate,
a certificate of exemption to each person
who is eligible to receive one. The
exemption is effective when approved
by the Board. It is the responsibility of
these persons to retain a copy of the
certificate of exemption.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Section 1212.71 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 1212.71
Books and records.
Each first handler and importer,
including those who are exempt under
this subpart, must maintain any books
and records necessary to carry out the
provisions of this part, and any
regulations issued under this part,
including the books and records
necessary to verify any required reports.
Books and records must be made
available during normal business hours
for inspection by the Board’s or
Secretary’s employees or agents. A first
handler or importer must maintain the
books and records for three years
beyond the fiscal period to which they
apply.
Dated: November 13, 2014.
Rex A. Barnes,
Associate Administrator.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
National Park Service
36 CFR Part 79
[NPS–WASO–CR–16170; PPWOCRADI0,
PCU00RP14R50000]
RIN 1024–AE17
Curation of Federally-Owned and
Administered Archeological
Collections
National Park Service, Interior.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The National Park Service
proposes to amend the regulations for
the curation of federally-owned and
administered archeological collections
to establish definitions, standards, and
procedures to dispose of particular
material remains that are determined to
be of insufficient archaeological interest.
This rule would promote more efficient
and effective curation of these
archeological collections.
DATES: Comments must be received by
February 17, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Regulation Identifier
Number (RIN) 1024–AE17, by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail to: Stanley C. Bond,
Departmental Consulting Archeologist,
National Park Service, Docket No. 1024–
AE17, 1201 Eye Street NW., 7th Floor
(2275), Washington, DC 20005.
• Hand deliver to: Stanley C. Bond,
Departmental Consulting Archeologist,
1201 Eye Street NW., Room 760,
Washington, DC 20005.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or RIN for this
rulemaking.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Gadsby, Archeology Program,
National Park Service, 1201 Eye Street
NW., Washington, DC 20005, 202–354–
2101, email: david_gadsby@nps.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Statutory Authority and Jurisdiction
[FR Doc. 2014–27253 Filed 11–17–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
The Archaeological Resources
Protection Act (ARPA; 16 U.S.C. 470aa–
mm) authorizes the Secretary of the
Interior to promulgate regulations for
the disposition of archaeological
E:\FR\FM\18NOP1.SGM
18NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 222 / Tuesday, November 18, 2014 / Proposed Rules
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
resources and other resources recovered
under the authority of ARPA, the
Reservoir Salvage Act (RSA; 16 U.S. C.
469–469c–2), as amended, and the
Antiquities Act (16 U.S.C. 431–433). In
addition, the National Historic
Preservation Act (NHPA; 16 U.S.C.
470a(a)(7) and 470h–4(a)) authorizes the
Secretary of the Interior to promulgate
regulations for the proper curation of
archeological collections created under
NHPA, RSA, and ARPA. The
Department of the Interior’s
Departmental Consulting Archeologist
(DCA), located in the National Park
Service (NPS), is responsible for
developing regulations concerning the
preservation of prehistoric and historic
material remains of archaeological
interest under ARPA, under the
Department of the Interior’s
Departmental Manual ‘‘Protection of the
Cultural Environment’’ (519 DM 2.3D).
Disposal of Particular Material Remains
From Archeological Collections
The regulations at 36 CFR Part 79
establish definitions, standards,
procedures, and guidelines to be
followed by Federal agencies to preserve
collections of prehistoric and historic
material remains and associated records
that generally include those resulting
from a prehistoric or historic resource
survey, excavation, or other study
conducted in connection with a Federal
action, assistance, license, or permit.
As currently written, 36 CFR Part 79
does not provide a process for Federal
agencies to dispose of particular
material remains from archeological
collections that, after rigorous
evaluation, are determined to have
insufficient archaeological interest.
Prehistoric or historic material remains
improperly disposed of could later be
rediscovered and misinterpreted by
unwitting archeologists or others as
evidence of activity in the distant past,
so it is important to delineate
appropriate methods of disposal. A
proposed rule to establish procedures to
discard particular material remains from
Federal collections was published in the
Federal Register in 1990 (55 FR 37670,
September 12, 1990). The NPS received
less than 10 sets of comments about the
proposed rule, but these comments
raised a variety of issues, including the
following:
• Lack of defined terms.
• Potential for future development of
archeological methods and theories that
could be applied to disposed material
remains.
• Qualifications of persons involved
in the procedure to recommend the
appropriateness of the decision to
discard.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 Nov 17, 2014
Jkt 235001
• Need for more detail about
procedures to discard material remains.
• Need for procedures to determine a
‘‘representative’’ sample of bulky, nondiagnostic objects to be retained for
future research from material remains to
be discarded.
• Need for procedures to ensure that
the discard of material remains would
not create an artificial archeological site.
Due, in part, to the comments
received, a final rule for the 1990
proposed rule was never published.
Instead, the DCA decided to focus on
proper curation of federally-owned and
administered collections before the
option to dispose of any material
remains was introduced.
Proposed Rule
Based on renewed interest from
Federal agencies, the Department of the
Interior (DOI) now proposes new
sections 79.12 through 79.18, and
related amendments to sections 79.2
and 79.3 of 36 CFR Part 79, to establish
regulations to dispose of particular
material remains from federally-owned
and administered archeological
collections. This rule would establish
certain circumstances under which
specific procedures may be used to
dispose of material remains of
insufficient ‘‘archaeological interest,’’ as
this term is defined in 43 CFR 7.3(a)(1).
The term ‘‘material remains,’’ as defined
in section 79.4(1)(a) of this part, refers
to artifacts, objects, specimens, and
other physical evidence, including
human remains, of a historic or
prehistoric resource and of historic or
prehistoric cultures and lifeways. This
proposed rule would not affect any
material remains defined as ‘‘cultural
items’’ by the Native American Graves
Protection and Repatriation Act (25
U.S.C. 3001 et seq.), including human
remains, funerary objects, sacred
objects, or objects of cultural patrimony,
and subject to the provisions of that
statute. The Federal agency would be
responsible for ensuring that disposition
is conducted in accordance with the
proposed rule and 36 CFR 79.7,
‘‘Methods to fund curatorial services.’’
In addition to providing a mechanism
for appropriate and carefully considered
disposition, this rule would improve the
curation of federally-owned and
administered archeological collections,
including more effective space and cost
management. This proposed rule would
address many of the comments
submitted in 1990 by incorporating
independent advice and opinions
supplied by numerous experts that we
consulted while drafting the proposed
rule between 2005 and 2013.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
68641
This proposed rule was written with
the cooperation and consultation of the
following Federal agencies and bureaus:
Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), Bureau
of Land Management (BLM), Bureau of
Reclamation (BR), U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (FWS), U.S. Air Force
(USAF), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE), U.S. Navy (USN), and U.S.
Forest Service (USFS). Each agency and
bureau provided a specialist in the
curation of archeological collections to
participate in an informal interagency
working group to provide expert advice
during the drafting of this proposed
rule.
Section-by-Section Analysis
Section 79.2
Authority
Paragraph 79.2(a) identifies the
authorities under which the regulations
in Part 79 are promulgated. The
proposed rule would streamline the
language and citations to these statutory
authorities.
Section 79.3
Applicability
Section 79.3 explains the applicability
of the regulations in Part 79. The
proposed rule would clarify the
applicability of these regulations by
explaining what constitutes federallyowned and administered collections.
The proposed rule would clarify that
Part 79 applies to collections (i) that are
owned by the United States and for
which a Federal agency has practical
management authority, either directly or
indirectly, as a result of that ownership;
and (ii) that are not owned by the
United States but that are managed or
controlled by Federal agencies under
law.
This includes collections
administered directly by a Federal
agency or controlled by a Federal
agency through the terms of an
agreement, contract, or permit with a
non-Federal organization or entity that
is responsible for curation of a
collection. This also includes
collections for which a Federal agency
has administrative authority resulting
from authorized expenditures; and
situations in which the Federal
government has decision-making
authority over the collections granted to
it by law or regulation. For example, one
Federal agency might fund an
undertaking on land administered by
another Federal agency. In this case, any
material remains from such undertaking
would be administered by the agency
that recovered them.
Collections from Indian lands made
under ARPA are another example of
federally administered collections.
Federal agencies are not the owners of
E:\FR\FM\18NOP1.SGM
18NOP1
68642
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 222 / Tuesday, November 18, 2014 / Proposed Rules
such collections. ARPA and its
implementing regulations give BIA the
authority to issue Permits for
Archeological Investigation (PAIs) for
Indian lands and the responsibility for
custody of those collections (25 CFR
Part 262). For example, Section 5 of
ARPA and 43 CFR 7.13(c) apply to
resources from both public and Indian
lands and discuss the authority to
exchange and dispose of resources.
Material remains collected under a PAI
are subject to the consent of the tribe or
Indian before disposal or transfer to a
curatorial facility through the BIA
permitting process. The fact that these
resources may be owned by a tribal or
Indian owner does not remove them
from Federal administration under
ARPA.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Section 79.12 Determining Which
Particular Material Remains are Eligible
for Disposal
Paragraph 79.12(a) would identify
which material remains from collections
may be disposed of under the proposed
rule. The terms ‘‘material remains’’ and
‘‘collection,’’ as used in the proposed
rule, are defined in 36 CFR 79.4.
Paragraph 79.12(b) would identify
which material remains from collections
may not be disposed of under the
proposed rule. Paragraph 79.12(c)
would identify who may propose the
disposal of material remains from
collections. Individuals who propose
material remains for disposal should
have verifiable knowledge of those
particular material remains. The terms
‘‘qualified museum professional,’’
‘‘repository,’’ and ‘‘curatorial services,’’
as used in the proposed rule, are
defined in 36 CFR 79.4. Paragraph
79.12(d) would clarify that the Federal
Agency Official, also defined in 36 CFR
79.4, is responsible for the disposition
of material remains. Paragraph 79.12(e)
would specify criteria to determine
when particular material remains may
be eligible for disposal because they are
of insufficient archaeological interest.
As defined in 43 CFR 7.3(a)(1), the term
‘‘of archaeological interest’’ means
capable of providing scientific or
humanistic understandings of past
human behavior, cultural adaptation,
and related topics. The criteria in the
proposed rule to determine which
material remains may be eligible for
disposal would distinguish particular
material remains that no longer have
those capabilities. The criteria would be
narrowly defined to ensure that material
remains of archaeological interest are
not disposed of inadvertently or
casually.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 Nov 17, 2014
Jkt 235001
Section 79.13 Acceptable Methods for
Disposition of Particular Material
Remains
Section 79.13 would outline two
procedures by which Federal Agency
Officials may determine the methods of
disposing of particular material remains.
The first would apply to material
remains recovered from Indian lands,
while the second would apply to
material remains that are not from
Indian lands.
Paragraph (a) in § 79.13 would
identify appropriate methods of
disposing of particular material remains
determined to be of insufficient
archaeological interest that have been
excavated or removed from Indian lands
after October 31, 1979. As defined in
ARPA (16 U.S. C. 470 bb(4)), the term
‘‘Indian lands’’ means lands of Indian
tribes, or Indian individuals, which are
either held in trust by the United States
or are subject to a restriction against
alienation imposed by the United States,
except for any subsurface interests in
land not owned or controlled by an
Indian tribe or an Indian individual.
The proposed rule would require the
Federal Agency Official to offer to
return the material remains to the
Indian tribe or Indian individual from
whose lands the material remains were
excavated or removed under ARPA’s
custody regulations, 43 CFR 7.13(b), 36
CFR 296.13(b), 32 CFR 229.13(b), and 18
CFR 1312.13(b). The tribe or individual
may or may not choose to accept
custody of these material remains.
Determining the appropriate Indian
tribe or individual to be approached
about disposition would be made based
on existing documentation concerning
the location of the relevant archeology
site.
Paragraph (b) in § 79.13 would
identify appropriate methods of
disposing of particular material remains
determined to be of insufficient
archaeological interest that were not
excavated or removed from Indian
lands. These material remains may be
transferred within the Federal agency;
transferred to another Federal agency;
conveyed to a suitable repository;
conveyed to a federally recognized
Indian tribe; conveyed to another
institution, such as a school or historical
society; or—if all of the other methods
of disposition are unacceptable—
destroyed. These methods were listed in
priority order in a draft of the proposed
rule sent to leaders of federally
recognized tribes in 2009. Based on
outreach to tribes in 2013, the methods
of disposal in the proposed rule are no
longer listed in priority order.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Section 79.14 Restrictions on
Disposition of Particular Material
Remains
Paragraph (a) in § 79.14 would
prohibit Federal employees or their
relatives from acquiring disposed
material remains or benefiting in any
way from a disposition.
Paragraph (b) in § 79.14 would
prohibit disposed material remains from
being traded, sold, bought, or bartered
as commercial goods.
Section 79.15 Final Determination on
Disposition of Particular Material
Remains
Section 79.15 would describe the
process that the Federal Agency Official
must follow in order to reach a final
determination of disposition of
particular material remains. It would
also clarify that any determination made
under this section must in no way affect
the Federal land manager’s obligations
under other applicable laws and
regulations. This section would require
the Federal Agency Official to do the
following:
• Verify that material remains are
appropriately documented through a
professional procedure approved by the
Federal agency that is consistent with
curatorial services as defined in
§ 79.4(b).
• Establish a collections advisory
committee to review proposed
dispositions of material remains.
• Retain a representative sample of
those material remains determined to be
overly redundant and not useful for
research.
• Retain all associated records in the
archeological collection as defined in
§ 79.4(a)(2).
• Notify appropriate entities of the
proposed disposition and solicit
comments on the proposal. If the
material remains proposed to be
disposed of are from a site on public
lands that has religious or cultural
importance to an Indian tribe or tribes,
the proposed rule would require that
these Indian tribes be notified of the
proposed disposition.
• Publish a notice of determination of
disposition in the Federal Register with
specific information that the Federal
Agency Official must include in this
notice and in the determination itself.
Section 79.16 Objecting to a
Determination of Disposition of
Particular Material Remains
This section would describe the
process for objecting to a determination
of disposition by requesting a review
from the DCA, and the process for
reaching a final determination of
disposition.
E:\FR\FM\18NOP1.SGM
18NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 222 / Tuesday, November 18, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Section 79.17 Timing of Disposition
Section 79.17 would prevent the
disposition of material remains until 30
days after the notice of determination of
disposition is published in the Federal
Register. If the Federal agency receives
an objection to the determination,
however, disposal would occur after the
Federal Agency Official’s notice of
decision on the objection and any
amendments are published in the
Federal Register.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Section 79.18 Administrative Record
of Disposition
Paragraph (a) would identify the types
of activities that must be documented in
the administrative record supporting the
Federal Agency Official’s final
determination to dispose of particular
material remains. This paragraph would
require that the administrative record
for a disposition of material remains be
made public upon request and would
require that the Federal agency review
and update the catalog and inventory
documents related to the disposal.
Compliance With Other Laws,
Executive Orders and Department
Policy. Regulatory Planning and
Review (Executive Orders 12866 and
13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA) in the Office of
Management and Budget will review all
significant rules. OIRA has determined
that this rule is not significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the
principles of Executive Order 12866
while calling for improvements in the
nation’s regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty,
and to use the best, most innovative,
and least burdensome tools for
achieving regulatory ends. Executive
Order 13563 directs agencies to consider
regulatory approaches that reduce
burdens and maintain flexibility and
freedom of choice for the public where
these approaches are relevant, feasible,
and consistent with regulatory
objectives. Executive Order 13563
emphasizes further that regulations
must be based on the best available
science and that the rulemaking process
must allow for public participation and
an open exchange of ideas. We have
developed this rule in a manner
consistent with these requirements.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule will not have a significant
economic effect on a substantial number
of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
This certification is based on
information contained in the economic
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 Nov 17, 2014
Jkt 235001
analyses found in the report entitled
‘‘Cost-Benefit and Regulatory Flexibility
Analyses: Proposed Regulations on the
Curation of Federally-Owned and
Administered Archeological
Collections’’ that is available online at
https://www.nps.gov/archeology/tools/
laws/Regulatory_Analyses_36_CFR_
Part_79_12.pdf.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more.
(b) Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, federal, state, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions.
(c) Does not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
The rule relates to internal
administrative procedures and
management of government function. It
does not regulate external entities,
impose any costs on them, or eliminate
any procedures or functions that would
result in a loss of employment or
income on the part of the private sector.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an
unfunded mandate on state, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. This
rule does not have a significant or
unique effect on state, local or tribal
governments, or the private sector. A
statement containing the information
required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not
required. This rule produces no costs
outside of the Federal government and
does not create an additional burden on
state, local, or tribal governments, or the
private sector.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
This rule does not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630. A takings implication
assessment is not required.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of
Executive Order 13132, this rule does
not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation
of a federalism summary impact
statement. This rule does not regulate,
change, or otherwise affect the
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
68643
relationship between Federal and state
governments. A federalism summary
impact statement is not required.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order
12988)
This rule complies with the
requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a)
requiring that all regulations be
reviewed to eliminate errors and
ambiguity and be written to minimize
litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2)
requiring that all regulations be written
in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.)
This proposed rule does not contain
collections of information that require
approval by the Office of Management
and Budget under the Paperwork
Reduction Act. This rule would not
impose recordkeeping or reporting
requirements on state, tribal, or local
governments; individuals; businesses; or
organizations. We may not conduct or
sponsor and you are not required to
respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not constitute a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment. A
detailed statement under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) is not required because this rule
is covered by a categorical exclusion.
This rule is excluded from the
requirement to prepare a detailed
statement because it qualifies as a
regulation of an administrative and
procedural nature. (For further
information see 43 CFR 46.210(i)). This
rule does not involve any of the
extraordinary circumstances listed in 43
CFR 46.215 that would require further
analysis under NEPA.
Federal Advisory Committee Act
Intergovernmental consultation
recommended under this rule is exempt
from the Federal Advisory Committee
Act (FACA). This rule requires that
consultation with Indian tribes be
conducted between Federal officials and
elected tribal officers or their designated
employees acting in their official
capacities, who meet solely for the
purpose of exchanging views,
information, or advice related to the
management or implementation of this
rule. Consultation with tribes under this
rule thus meets the two-part test for an
E:\FR\FM\18NOP1.SGM
18NOP1
68644
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 222 / Tuesday, November 18, 2014 / Proposed Rules
exemption from the FACA set out in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995, Public Law 104–4.
Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O.
13175 and Departmental Policy)
The Department of the Interior strives
to strengthen its government-togovernment relationship with Indian
tribes through a commitment to consult
with Indian tribes and recognition of
their right to self-governance and tribal
sovereignty. We have evaluated this rule
under the Department’s consultation
policy and under the criteria in
Executive Order 13175 and have
identified direct effects on federally
recognized Indian tribes that will result
from this rule. We conducted outreach
to tribes and Native Hawaiian
Organizations, initiated consultation
through two letters to tribal leaders, and
conducted face-to-face consultation on
this proposed rule upon request.
Additional information regarding the
identified effects on Indian tribes and
these outreach and consultation efforts
is contained in a document entitled
‘‘Consultation with Indian Tribes (E.O.
13175) regarding the proposed 36 CFR
79.12,’’ which is available at the
following Web site: https://www.nps.gov/
archeology/tools/laws/Tribal_
Consultation_36_CFR_Part_79_12.pdf.
Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O.
13211)
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Clarity of This Regulation
We are required by Executive Orders
12866 (section 1(b)(12)), 12988 (section
3(b)(1)(B)), and 13563 (section 1(a)), and
by the Presidential Memorandum of
June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain
language. This means that each rule we
publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address
readers directly;
(c) Use common, everyday words and
clear language rather than jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and
sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever
possible.
If you feel that we have not met these
requirements, send us comments by one
of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES
section. To better help us revise the
rule, your comments should be as
specific as possible. For example, you
should tell us the numbers of the
sections or paragraphs that you find
unclear, which paragraphs or sentences
17:12 Nov 17, 2014
Jkt 235001
Public Participation
It is the policy of the Department of
the Interior, whenever practicable, to
afford the public an opportunity to
participate in the rulemaking process.
Accordingly, interested persons may
submit written comments regarding this
proposed rule by following the
instructions in the ADDRESSES section of
this document.
Public Availability of Comments
This rule is not a significant energy
action under the definition in Executive
Order 13211. A Statement of Energy
Effects is not required.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
are too long, the sections where you feel
lists or tables would be useful, etc.
Drafting Information. This proposed
rule was prepared by the office of the
Departmental Consulting Archeologist,
National Park Service, Washington, DC
with the able assistance of an informal
interagency working group. Terry Childs
(DOI) drafted the proposed rule and
served as chair of the group that
included Michael Hilton (USFS),
Thomas Lincoln (BR), Eugene Marino
(FWS), Kathleen McLaughlin (USN and
US Army), Emily Palus (BIA and BLM),
Christopher Pulliam (USACE), and
James Wilde (USAF). Marvin Keller and
Anna Pardo (BIA) and Rochelle Bennett
(BR) joined the working group in 2013.
David Gadsby (NPS) also joined the
group and provided administrative
oversight of the proposed rule. Carla
Mattix and Stephen Simpson of the
Department of the Interior’s Office of the
Solicitor provided legal guidance.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, be aware that your entire
comment—including your personally
identifiable information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask in your comment to
withhold your personal identifiable
information from public view, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
2. Sections 79.1 through 79.4 are
designated as subpart A under the
following heading:
■
Subpart A—Administrative Provisions
3. In § 79.2, revise paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
■
§ 79.2
Authority
(a) The regulations in this part are
promulgated under 16 U.S.C. 470a(7)
which requires that the Secretary of the
Interior issue regulations ensuring that
significant prehistoric and historic
artifacts and associated records are
deposited in an institution with
adequate long-term curatorial services.
This requirement applies to artifacts and
associated records subject to the
National Historic Preservation Act (16
U.S.C. 470 et seq.), the Reservoir
Salvage Act (16 U.S.C. 469–469c), and
the Archaeological Resources Protection
Act (16 U.S.C. 470aa–mm).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. In § 79.3, in paragraph (a)
introductory text, add two sentences at
the end to read as follows:
§ 79.3
Applicability.
(a) * * * Such collections also
include those that are owned by the
United States and for which a federal
agency has practical management
authority, either directly or indirectly,
as a result of that ownership; and those
collections that are not owned by the
United States but that are managed or
controlled by a federal agency pursuant
to law. The collections described in this
paragraph are considered federallyowned and administered for purposes of
this part.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. Sections 79.5 through 79.9 are
designated subpart B under the
following heading:
Subpart B—Archeological Collections
Management
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 79
■
Archives and records, Historic
preservation, Indians-lands, Museums,
Public lands.
Subpart C—Public Access to and Use
of Collections
In consideration of the foregoing, the
National Park Service proposes to
amend 36 CFR part 79 as set forth
below:
PART 79—CURATION OF FEDERALLYOWNED AND ADMINISTERED
ARCHAEOLOGICAL COLLECTIONS
1. The authority citation for part 79
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 470aa–mm, 16 U.S.C.
470 et seq.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6. Section 79.10 is designated subpart
C under the following heading:
7. Section 79.11 is designated subpart
D under the following heading:
■
Subpart D—Inspections and
Inventories of Collections
■
8. Add subpart E to read as follows:
Subpart E—Disposition of Particular
Material Remains
Sec.
79.12 Determining which particular
material remains are eligible for disposal.
E:\FR\FM\18NOP1.SGM
18NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 222 / Tuesday, November 18, 2014 / Proposed Rules
79.13 Acceptable methods for disposition of
particular material remains.
79.14 Restrictions on disposition of
particular material remains.
79.15 Final determination on disposition of
particular material remains.
79.16 Objecting to a determination of
disposition of particular material
remains.
79.17 Timing of disposition.
79.18 Administrative record of disposition.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 79.12 Determining which particular
material remains are eligible for disposal.
(a) Which material remains are
eligible for disposal? In order to be
eligible for disposal, material remains
from collections must be:
(1) Archaeological resources, as
defined in 16 U.S.C. 470bb(1), or other
resources excavated and removed under
the Reservoir Salvage Act (16 U.S.C.
469–469c) or the Antiquities Act (16
U.S.C. 431–433); and
(2) Considered to be of insufficient
archaeological interest under the criteria
in paragraph (e) of this section, based on
the definition of ‘‘of archaeological
interest’’ in 43 CFR 7.3(a)(1).
(b) Which material remains may not
be disposed of? The following material
remains from collections may not be
disposed of:
(1) Native American ‘‘cultural items’’
as defined in the Native American
Graves Protection and Repatriation Act
of 1990 (25 U.S.C. 3001(3)), since
disposition is governed by that Act and
its implementing regulations (43 CFR
10);
(2) Human remains;
(3) Material remains excavated and
removed from Indian lands on or before
October 31, 1979; and
(4) Material remains excavated and
removed from Indian lands under the
Antiquities Act (16 U.S.C. 431–433).
(c) Who may propose the disposal of
particular material remains? The
following individuals may propose the
disposal of particular material remains
from a collection:
(1) Agency staff members, including
archeologists, curators, and
conservators; and
(2) Qualified museum professionals
located in a repository that provides
curatorial services for a collection held
in that repository.
(d) Who is responsible for the disposal
of particular material remains? The
Federal Agency Official is responsible
for ensuring that particular material
remains are disposed of from collections
according to the requirements of this
part.
(e) When are particular material
remains considered to be of insufficient
archaeological interest? Particular
material remains are considered to be of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 Nov 17, 2014
Jkt 235001
insufficient archaeological interest
when, on a case-by-case basis, at least
one qualified archeological or museum
professional with experience in the type
of material remains being evaluated
determines and documents that:
(1) Disposition of the material remains
will not negatively impact the overall
integrity of the original collection
recovered during the survey, excavation,
or other study of a prehistoric or historic
resource; and
(2) At least one of the following three
requirements—lack of provenience
information; lack of physical integrity;
or overly redundant and not useful for
research—are met:
(i) Lack of provenience information.
Lack of provenience information may be
established by one or more of the
following circumstances:
(A) The labels on the material remains
or the labels on the containers that hold
the material remains do not provide
adequate information to reliably
establish meaningful archeological
context for the material remains;
(B) The labels on the material remains
or the labels on the containers that hold
the material remains have been lost or
destroyed over time and cannot be
reconstructed through the associated
records; or
(C) The associated records of the
material remains have been lost or
destroyed and cannot be recovered after
a concerted effort to find them is
performed and documented.
(ii) Lack of physical integrity. Material
remains lack physical integrity when,
subsequent to recovery during the
survey, excavation, or other study of a
prehistoric or historic resource, the
material remains were irreparably
damaged through decay or
decomposition over time, or as a result
of a human-caused incident or a natural
disaster.
(iii) Overly redundant and not useful
for research. A determination that
material remains are overly redundant
and not useful for research must be
carefully considered. Archeological
context, research questions, and
research potential may vary based on
geography, time and culture period,
scientific or cultural significance, prior
analysis, and other factors. It is difficult
to predict if future analytical methods
will yield useful information about the
material remains proposed for disposal.
As a result, a representative sample of
material remains that are determined to
be overly redundant and not useful for
research must be retained for curation,
as required by § 79.15(d).
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
68645
§ 79.13 Acceptable methods for
disposition of particular material remains.
(a) Material remains excavated or
removed from Indian lands after
October 31, 1979, that are archaeological
resources under the Archaeological
Resources Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
470aa–mm) remain the property of the
Indian individual or Indian tribe having
rights of ownership over the resources.
Under the authority of 16 U.S.C. 470dd,
disposition of these material remains
that are determined to be of insufficient
archaeological interest under the criteria
in § 79.12(e) are subject to the consent
of the Indian individual or Indian tribe.
The Federal Agency Official must use
the following methods of disposal for
these material remains in the following
order:
(1) Return them to the Indian
individual or Indian tribe having rights
of ownership under the Archaeological
Resources Protection Act’s custody
regulations, 43 CFR 7.13(b), 36 CFR
296.13(b), 32 CFR 229.13(b), and 18 CFR
1312.13(b).
(2) If the Indian individual or Indian
tribe having rights of ownership does
not wish to accept them, the Federal
Agency Official may otherwise dispose
of the material remains using the
disposition methods in § 79.13(b) after
receiving written consent from the
Indian individual or Indian tribe having
rights of ownership.
(b) This paragraph applies to material
remains that are determined to be of
insufficient archaeological interest
under § 79.12(e) and that were
excavated or removed from lands that
are not Indian lands. The Federal
Agency Official may use any of the
following methods for disposal of the
material remains.
(1) Transfer to another Federal
agency.
(2) Convey to a suitable public or
tribal scientific or professional
repository as defined in § 79.4(j) of this
part.
(3) Convey to a federally recognized
Indian tribe if the material remains were
excavated or removed from lands of
religious or cultural importance to that
tribe and were identified and
documented by a Federal land manager
under 43 CFR 7.7(b)(1).
(4) Convey to a federally recognized
Indian tribe from whose aboriginal
lands the material remains were
removed. Aboriginal occupation may be
documented by a final judgment of the
Indian Claims Commission or the
United States Court of Claims, or a
treaty, Act of Congress, or Executive
Order.
(5) Transfer within the Federal agency
for the purpose of education or
E:\FR\FM\18NOP1.SGM
18NOP1
68646
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 222 / Tuesday, November 18, 2014 / Proposed Rules
interpretation, or convey to a suitable
institution to be used for public benefit
and education including, but not
limited to, local historical societies,
university or college departments, and
schools.
(6) If the Federal Agency Official
considers each of these prior methods
carefully and is still unable to find an
acceptable method of disposition, then
destruction may be considered. The
Federal Agency Official or their
designee must witness and document
the destruction, including through
photography or video.
§ 79.14 Restrictions on disposition of
particular material remains.
(a) Can Federal employees and their
relatives acquire disposed material
remains? No. Federal employees or their
relatives cannot acquire disposed
material remains (or a financial interest
therein) and must not appear to benefit
personally in any way from an action to
deaccession or dispose of archeological
material remains.
(b) Can disposed material remains be
regarded as commercial goods? No.
Disposed material remains may not be
traded, sold, bought, or bartered as
commercial goods.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 79.15 Final determination on disposition
of particular material remains.
The Federal Agency Official is
responsible for ensuring that the agency
disposes of material remains according
to the requirements of this part. A
determination made under this part in
no way affects the Federal land
manager’s obligations under other
applicable laws or regulations. The
Federal Agency Official must carry out
all of the following steps before making
a final determination that it is
appropriate to dispose of material
remains.
(a) The Federal Agency Official must
determine that the material remains are
eligible for disposal under the criteria in
§ 79.12(a), including a written
verification that no Native American
‘‘cultural items’’ as defined in the
Native American Graves Protection and
Repatriation Act of 1990 (25 U.S.C.
3001(3)) are considered for disposal.
(b) The Federal Agency Official must
verify that the material remains are
appropriately documented through a
professional procedure approved by the
Federal agency that is consistent with
curatorial services, including
accessioning and cataloging, as defined
in § 79.4(b) of this part.
(c) The Federal Agency Official must
establish a collections advisory
committee of at least five members to
review proposed dispositions of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 Nov 17, 2014
Jkt 235001
material remains and make
recommendations to the Federal Agency
Official about proposed dispositions
based on the adequacy of the
documentation addressing the
requirements in § 79.15(a) and (b) and
the appropriateness of the proposed
disposition.
(1) The collections advisory
committee must consist of qualified
employees from Federal agencies who
meet appropriate Professional
Qualification Standards set by the
Secretary of the Interior, and must
include the principal archeologist and
curator of the Federal agency that owns
or administers the material remains if
either of these two positions exists.
(2) Committee members must include
Federal employees with subject matter
or technical expertise. These employees
may include archeologists,
anthropologists, curators, and
conservators with expertise in historic,
prehistoric, or underwater material
remains.
(3) Committee members may include
or one or more members of a federally
recognized Indian tribe regularly
consulted by the Federal agency who
are elected tribal officers or their
designated employees acting in their
official capacities.
(4) The committee must have written
procedures, including terms of member
appointments and duration of the
committee, approved by the Federal
Agency Official to ensure all
recommendations of disposal are fair,
open, timely, and in the best interests of
the public.
(5) Federal employees or qualified
members of federally recognized Indian
tribes may be temporarily added to the
committee if its current members
determine that specific expertise is
needed on a case-by-case basis.
(6) Committee members or their
family members may not benefit
financially or in any other way from a
disposition of material remains.
(d) The Federal Agency Official must
retain a representative sample of those
material remains determined to be
overly redundant and not useful for
research.
(1) The size of the representative
sample must be large enough to permit
future analysis for research purposes.
(2) The method for establishing a
representative sample, including sample
size and typology, must be determined
by a qualified museum or archeological
professional with expertise in the type
of prehistoric or historic material
remains being sampled.
(3) The sampling method must be
well documented and consistent with
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
professional prehistoric or historic
archeological practice.
(e) The Federal Agency Official must
retain all associated records in the
archeological collection as defined in
§ 79.4(a)(2) of this part. A copy of the
original associated records must be
given to the recipient of any transferred
or conveyed items subject to the
restrictions stipulated in the
Archaeological Resources Protection Act
(16 U.S.C. 470hh(a)).
(f) The Federal Agency Official must
notify the entities listed in this
paragraph of the proposed disposition
and solicit comments on the proposal.
Notifications must be made in writing,
and must include a deadline for
submitting comments, in accordance
with procedures established by the
Federal agency. All written comments
must be reviewed and responded to by
the Federal Agency Official and the
collections advisory committee. Notice
must be given to the following:
(1) The State Historic Preservation
Officer from the state(s) where the
particular objects to be disposed were
recovered.
(2) The Tribal Historic Preservation
Officer (or other designated tribal
representative) from the tribal land(s)
where the particular objects to be
disposed were recovered.
(3) Federal, state, tribal, or local
agencies that were involved in the
recovery of the objects to be disposed.
(4) Universities, museums, scientific
institutions, and educational
institutions with an active department
of or program in archaeology or
anthropology that have interest in the
archaeology of the region from which
the objects to be disposed of were
recovered.
(5) Indian tribes that consider the land
to have religious or cultural importance,
if the material remains are from a site on
public lands that has religious or
cultural importance to Indian tribes
under 43 CFR 7.7(b)(1).
(6) Indian tribes from whose
aboriginal lands the material remains
were removed, if aboriginal occupation
has been documented by a final
judgment of the Indian Claims
Commission or the United States Court
of Claims, treaty, Act of Congress, or
Executive Order.
(g) The Federal Agency Official must,
after the comment period described in
§ 79.15(f) has expired, publish a notice
of determination of disposition in the
Federal Register.
(1) The notice published in the
Federal Register must include the
following:
(i) A general description of the
material remains to be disposed.
E:\FR\FM\18NOP1.SGM
18NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 222 / Tuesday, November 18, 2014 / Proposed Rules
(ii) The criteria used to determine that
the material remains are of insufficient
archaeological interest under § 79.12(e).
(iii) The method of disposal.
(iv) The name of the Federal Agency
Official or their designee as a point of
contact.
(v) An explanation of a person’s right
to object to the determination of
disposition under § 79.16 and the name
and address of the Department of the
Interior’s Departmental Consulting
Archeologist.
(2) The determination referenced by
the notice must include the following:
(i) A detailed list of the material
remains to be disposed, including a
description of each object, or lot of
objects if there are multiples of a
particular type, and a photograph of the
objects when appropriate.
(ii) The criteria used to determine that
the material remains are of insufficient
archaeological interest under § 79.12(e).
(iii) Justification of the method to be
used to dispose of the material remains
under § 79.13.
(iv) Documentation that all of the
procedures in §§ 79.15 and 79.16 have
been met.
(v) The name of the recipient entity or
method of destruction, as appropriate.
(vi) The name of the Federal Agency
Official or their designee as a point of
contact.
(vii) Other conditions of transfer or
conveyance, as appropriate.
(viii) A statement that the
determination is a final agency action
under the Administrative Procedure Act
unless an objection is filed in
accordance with § 79.16.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 79.16 Objecting to a determination of
disposition of particular material remains.
Anyone may object to and request in
writing that the Departmental
Consulting Archeologist review a
Federal Agency Official’s determination
to dispose of material remains within 30
days of publication in the Federal
Register. The request must document
why the requester disagrees with the
Federal Agency Official’s determination
or the terms and conditions to be
applied to the disposal. The procedure
for objecting to a determination of
disposition is as follows:
(a) The request must be sent to the
Departmental Consulting Archeologist,
whose address must be published with
the notice of determination of
disposition in the Federal Register. The
Departmental Consulting Archeologist
must immediately forward a copy of the
request to the Federal Agency Official
who made the determination under
objection. The Federal Agency Official
must postpone the planned disposition
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 Nov 17, 2014
Jkt 235001
until the Departmental Consulting
Archeologist completes the requested
review.
(b) The Departmental Consulting
Archeologist must review the request,
the Federal Agency Official’s
determination, and its supporting
documentation.
(c) Within 60 days of receipt of the
request, the Departmental Consulting
Archeologist must transmit to the
Federal Agency Official a non-binding
recommendation for further
consideration.
(d) The Federal Agency Official must
consider the recommendation in making
a final determination. Within 60 days of
receipt of the recommendation, the
Federal Agency Official must respond to
the Departmental Consulting
Archeologist and the requester with a
final determination. The final
determination must include any
information on administrative appeal
rights required by internal agency
appeal procedures or a statement that
the final determination is a final agency
action under the Administrative
Procedure Act, as appropriate.
(e) The Federal Agency Official must
publish notice of the decision on the
objection and any amendments made to
the original determination of disposition
in the Federal Register.
§ 79.17
Timing of disposition.
Disposition will occur no sooner than
30 days after the notice of determination
of disposition is published in the
Federal Register under § 79.15(g). If the
Federal agency receives an objection
under § 79.16, however, disposal will
occur after the Federal Agency Official’s
notice of decision and any amendments
are published in the Federal Register
under § 79.16(e).
§ 79.18 Administrative record of
disposition.
(a) After the Federal Agency Official
has made a final determination of
disposition, he or she must document
the determination and retain the
administrative record as used in the
definition of associated records in
§ 79.4(a)(2), which must include:
(1) The professional evaluation of the
material remains, conducted under
§ 79.12(e) and § 79.15(b).
(2) The recommendations and
rationale of the collections advisory
committee provided in accordance with
§ 79.15(c).
(3) Notifications of the proposed
disposition under § 79.15(f); consent of
Indian individuals or tribes, if
applicable, under § 79.13(a); and
comments received from the parties
notified under § 79.15(f).
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
68647
(4) Requests for review received by
the Departmental Consulting
Archeologist, the non-binding
recommendation of the Departmental
Consulting Archeologist, and the
response by the Federal Agency Official
to the Departmental Consulting
Archeologist and the requester, as
appropriate, under § 79.16.
(5) The disposition action with
specific information, including a
description and evaluation of objects;
the method of disposition and the
reason for the method chosen; names
and titles of persons initiating and
approving the disposition; date of
disposition; relevant accession and
catalog numbers; evidence of the receipt
for the return, transfer, or conveyance of
the material remains by the recipient
tribe, agency, repository, or institution,
including the title to the received
material remains, as appropriate;
photographic documentation, as
appropriate; and the name and location
of the recipient institution or entity, as
appropriate.
(6) A detailed inventory of the
reasonable and representative sample of
material remains retained, when the
larger proportion is disposed of because
it is overly redundant and not useful for
research.
(7) Other activities and decisions
pertaining to the disposition of the
material remains, such as conditions of
use after the disposition is completed,
as appropriate.
(b) The administrative record must be
made available to the public upon
request, unless the information or a
portion of it must be withheld under the
terms of the Freedom of Information Act
(5 U.S.C. 552) or the Archaeological
Resources Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
470hh). The latter restricts the
government’s ability to make sensitive
information, such as archeological site
location data, available to the public.
(c) After disposition, the accession
and catalog records must be reviewed
and amended through a procedure
established by the Federal agency. The
amendments must identify the material
remains that were deaccessioned and
disposed of, the date of disposition, and
the manner in which they were
disposed. The documentation prepared
under §§ 79.15 through 79.16 and
79.18(a) must be retained.
Dated: November 5, 2014.
Michael Bean,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish
and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2014–26839 Filed 11–17–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–EJ–P
E:\FR\FM\18NOP1.SGM
18NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 222 (Tuesday, November 18, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 68640-68647]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26839]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
36 CFR Part 79
[NPS-WASO-CR-16170; PPWOCRADI0, PCU00RP14R50000]
RIN 1024-AE17
Curation of Federally-Owned and Administered Archeological
Collections
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Park Service proposes to amend the regulations
for the curation of federally-owned and administered archeological
collections to establish definitions, standards, and procedures to
dispose of particular material remains that are determined to be of
insufficient archaeological interest. This rule would promote more
efficient and effective curation of these archeological collections.
DATES: Comments must be received by February 17, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Regulation Identifier
Number (RIN) 1024-AE17, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow instructions for submitting comments.
Mail to: Stanley C. Bond, Departmental Consulting
Archeologist, National Park Service, Docket No. 1024-AE17, 1201 Eye
Street NW., 7th Floor (2275), Washington, DC 20005.
Hand deliver to: Stanley C. Bond, Departmental Consulting
Archeologist, 1201 Eye Street NW., Room 760, Washington, DC 20005.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number or RIN for this rulemaking.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David A. Gadsby, Archeology Program,
National Park Service, 1201 Eye Street NW., Washington, DC 20005, 202-
354-2101, email: david_gadsby@nps.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Statutory Authority and Jurisdiction
The Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA; 16 U.S.C. 470aa-
mm) authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to promulgate regulations
for the disposition of archaeological
[[Page 68641]]
resources and other resources recovered under the authority of ARPA,
the Reservoir Salvage Act (RSA; 16 U.S. C. 469-469c-2), as amended, and
the Antiquities Act (16 U.S.C. 431-433). In addition, the National
Historic Preservation Act (NHPA; 16 U.S.C. 470a(a)(7) and 470h-4(a))
authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to promulgate regulations for
the proper curation of archeological collections created under NHPA,
RSA, and ARPA. The Department of the Interior's Departmental Consulting
Archeologist (DCA), located in the National Park Service (NPS), is
responsible for developing regulations concerning the preservation of
prehistoric and historic material remains of archaeological interest
under ARPA, under the Department of the Interior's Departmental Manual
``Protection of the Cultural Environment'' (519 DM 2.3D).
Disposal of Particular Material Remains From Archeological Collections
The regulations at 36 CFR Part 79 establish definitions, standards,
procedures, and guidelines to be followed by Federal agencies to
preserve collections of prehistoric and historic material remains and
associated records that generally include those resulting from a
prehistoric or historic resource survey, excavation, or other study
conducted in connection with a Federal action, assistance, license, or
permit.
As currently written, 36 CFR Part 79 does not provide a process for
Federal agencies to dispose of particular material remains from
archeological collections that, after rigorous evaluation, are
determined to have insufficient archaeological interest. Prehistoric or
historic material remains improperly disposed of could later be
rediscovered and misinterpreted by unwitting archeologists or others as
evidence of activity in the distant past, so it is important to
delineate appropriate methods of disposal. A proposed rule to establish
procedures to discard particular material remains from Federal
collections was published in the Federal Register in 1990 (55 FR 37670,
September 12, 1990). The NPS received less than 10 sets of comments
about the proposed rule, but these comments raised a variety of issues,
including the following:
Lack of defined terms.
Potential for future development of archeological methods
and theories that could be applied to disposed material remains.
Qualifications of persons involved in the procedure to
recommend the appropriateness of the decision to discard.
Need for more detail about procedures to discard material
remains.
Need for procedures to determine a ``representative''
sample of bulky, non-diagnostic objects to be retained for future
research from material remains to be discarded.
Need for procedures to ensure that the discard of material
remains would not create an artificial archeological site.
Due, in part, to the comments received, a final rule for the 1990
proposed rule was never published. Instead, the DCA decided to focus on
proper curation of federally-owned and administered collections before
the option to dispose of any material remains was introduced.
Proposed Rule
Based on renewed interest from Federal agencies, the Department of
the Interior (DOI) now proposes new sections 79.12 through 79.18, and
related amendments to sections 79.2 and 79.3 of 36 CFR Part 79, to
establish regulations to dispose of particular material remains from
federally-owned and administered archeological collections. This rule
would establish certain circumstances under which specific procedures
may be used to dispose of material remains of insufficient
``archaeological interest,'' as this term is defined in 43 CFR
7.3(a)(1). The term ``material remains,'' as defined in section
79.4(1)(a) of this part, refers to artifacts, objects, specimens, and
other physical evidence, including human remains, of a historic or
prehistoric resource and of historic or prehistoric cultures and
lifeways. This proposed rule would not affect any material remains
defined as ``cultural items'' by the Native American Graves Protection
and Repatriation Act (25 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.), including human remains,
funerary objects, sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony, and
subject to the provisions of that statute. The Federal agency would be
responsible for ensuring that disposition is conducted in accordance
with the proposed rule and 36 CFR 79.7, ``Methods to fund curatorial
services.''
In addition to providing a mechanism for appropriate and carefully
considered disposition, this rule would improve the curation of
federally-owned and administered archeological collections, including
more effective space and cost management. This proposed rule would
address many of the comments submitted in 1990 by incorporating
independent advice and opinions supplied by numerous experts that we
consulted while drafting the proposed rule between 2005 and 2013.
This proposed rule was written with the cooperation and
consultation of the following Federal agencies and bureaus: Bureau of
Indian Affairs (BIA), Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Bureau of
Reclamation (BR), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), U.S. Air Force
(USAF), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), U.S. Navy (USN), and U.S.
Forest Service (USFS). Each agency and bureau provided a specialist in
the curation of archeological collections to participate in an informal
interagency working group to provide expert advice during the drafting
of this proposed rule.
Section-by-Section Analysis
Section 79.2 Authority
Paragraph 79.2(a) identifies the authorities under which the
regulations in Part 79 are promulgated. The proposed rule would
streamline the language and citations to these statutory authorities.
Section 79.3 Applicability
Section 79.3 explains the applicability of the regulations in Part
79. The proposed rule would clarify the applicability of these
regulations by explaining what constitutes federally-owned and
administered collections. The proposed rule would clarify that Part 79
applies to collections (i) that are owned by the United States and for
which a Federal agency has practical management authority, either
directly or indirectly, as a result of that ownership; and (ii) that
are not owned by the United States but that are managed or controlled
by Federal agencies under law.
This includes collections administered directly by a Federal agency
or controlled by a Federal agency through the terms of an agreement,
contract, or permit with a non-Federal organization or entity that is
responsible for curation of a collection. This also includes
collections for which a Federal agency has administrative authority
resulting from authorized expenditures; and situations in which the
Federal government has decision-making authority over the collections
granted to it by law or regulation. For example, one Federal agency
might fund an undertaking on land administered by another Federal
agency. In this case, any material remains from such undertaking would
be administered by the agency that recovered them.
Collections from Indian lands made under ARPA are another example
of federally administered collections. Federal agencies are not the
owners of
[[Page 68642]]
such collections. ARPA and its implementing regulations give BIA the
authority to issue Permits for Archeological Investigation (PAIs) for
Indian lands and the responsibility for custody of those collections
(25 CFR Part 262). For example, Section 5 of ARPA and 43 CFR 7.13(c)
apply to resources from both public and Indian lands and discuss the
authority to exchange and dispose of resources. Material remains
collected under a PAI are subject to the consent of the tribe or Indian
before disposal or transfer to a curatorial facility through the BIA
permitting process. The fact that these resources may be owned by a
tribal or Indian owner does not remove them from Federal administration
under ARPA.
Section 79.12 Determining Which Particular Material Remains are
Eligible for Disposal
Paragraph 79.12(a) would identify which material remains from
collections may be disposed of under the proposed rule. The terms
``material remains'' and ``collection,'' as used in the proposed rule,
are defined in 36 CFR 79.4. Paragraph 79.12(b) would identify which
material remains from collections may not be disposed of under the
proposed rule. Paragraph 79.12(c) would identify who may propose the
disposal of material remains from collections. Individuals who propose
material remains for disposal should have verifiable knowledge of those
particular material remains. The terms ``qualified museum
professional,'' ``repository,'' and ``curatorial services,'' as used in
the proposed rule, are defined in 36 CFR 79.4. Paragraph 79.12(d) would
clarify that the Federal Agency Official, also defined in 36 CFR 79.4,
is responsible for the disposition of material remains. Paragraph
79.12(e) would specify criteria to determine when particular material
remains may be eligible for disposal because they are of insufficient
archaeological interest. As defined in 43 CFR 7.3(a)(1), the term ``of
archaeological interest'' means capable of providing scientific or
humanistic understandings of past human behavior, cultural adaptation,
and related topics. The criteria in the proposed rule to determine
which material remains may be eligible for disposal would distinguish
particular material remains that no longer have those capabilities. The
criteria would be narrowly defined to ensure that material remains of
archaeological interest are not disposed of inadvertently or casually.
Section 79.13 Acceptable Methods for Disposition of Particular Material
Remains
Section 79.13 would outline two procedures by which Federal Agency
Officials may determine the methods of disposing of particular material
remains. The first would apply to material remains recovered from
Indian lands, while the second would apply to material remains that are
not from Indian lands.
Paragraph (a) in Sec. 79.13 would identify appropriate methods of
disposing of particular material remains determined to be of
insufficient archaeological interest that have been excavated or
removed from Indian lands after October 31, 1979. As defined in ARPA
(16 U.S. C. 470 bb(4)), the term ``Indian lands'' means lands of Indian
tribes, or Indian individuals, which are either held in trust by the
United States or are subject to a restriction against alienation
imposed by the United States, except for any subsurface interests in
land not owned or controlled by an Indian tribe or an Indian
individual. The proposed rule would require the Federal Agency Official
to offer to return the material remains to the Indian tribe or Indian
individual from whose lands the material remains were excavated or
removed under ARPA's custody regulations, 43 CFR 7.13(b), 36 CFR
296.13(b), 32 CFR 229.13(b), and 18 CFR 1312.13(b). The tribe or
individual may or may not choose to accept custody of these material
remains. Determining the appropriate Indian tribe or individual to be
approached about disposition would be made based on existing
documentation concerning the location of the relevant archeology site.
Paragraph (b) in Sec. 79.13 would identify appropriate methods of
disposing of particular material remains determined to be of
insufficient archaeological interest that were not excavated or removed
from Indian lands. These material remains may be transferred within the
Federal agency; transferred to another Federal agency; conveyed to a
suitable repository; conveyed to a federally recognized Indian tribe;
conveyed to another institution, such as a school or historical
society; or--if all of the other methods of disposition are
unacceptable--destroyed. These methods were listed in priority order in
a draft of the proposed rule sent to leaders of federally recognized
tribes in 2009. Based on outreach to tribes in 2013, the methods of
disposal in the proposed rule are no longer listed in priority order.
Section 79.14 Restrictions on Disposition of Particular Material
Remains
Paragraph (a) in Sec. 79.14 would prohibit Federal employees or
their relatives from acquiring disposed material remains or benefiting
in any way from a disposition.
Paragraph (b) in Sec. 79.14 would prohibit disposed material
remains from being traded, sold, bought, or bartered as commercial
goods.
Section 79.15 Final Determination on Disposition of Particular Material
Remains
Section 79.15 would describe the process that the Federal Agency
Official must follow in order to reach a final determination of
disposition of particular material remains. It would also clarify that
any determination made under this section must in no way affect the
Federal land manager's obligations under other applicable laws and
regulations. This section would require the Federal Agency Official to
do the following:
Verify that material remains are appropriately documented
through a professional procedure approved by the Federal agency that is
consistent with curatorial services as defined in Sec. 79.4(b).
Establish a collections advisory committee to review
proposed dispositions of material remains.
Retain a representative sample of those material remains
determined to be overly redundant and not useful for research.
Retain all associated records in the archeological
collection as defined in Sec. 79.4(a)(2).
Notify appropriate entities of the proposed disposition
and solicit comments on the proposal. If the material remains proposed
to be disposed of are from a site on public lands that has religious or
cultural importance to an Indian tribe or tribes, the proposed rule
would require that these Indian tribes be notified of the proposed
disposition.
Publish a notice of determination of disposition in the
Federal Register with specific information that the Federal Agency
Official must include in this notice and in the determination itself.
Section 79.16 Objecting to a Determination of Disposition of Particular
Material Remains
This section would describe the process for objecting to a
determination of disposition by requesting a review from the DCA, and
the process for reaching a final determination of disposition.
[[Page 68643]]
Section 79.17 Timing of Disposition
Section 79.17 would prevent the disposition of material remains
until 30 days after the notice of determination of disposition is
published in the Federal Register. If the Federal agency receives an
objection to the determination, however, disposal would occur after the
Federal Agency Official's notice of decision on the objection and any
amendments are published in the Federal Register.
Section 79.18 Administrative Record of Disposition
Paragraph (a) would identify the types of activities that must be
documented in the administrative record supporting the Federal Agency
Official's final determination to dispose of particular material
remains. This paragraph would require that the administrative record
for a disposition of material remains be made public upon request and
would require that the Federal agency review and update the catalog and
inventory documents related to the disposal.
Compliance With Other Laws, Executive Orders and Department Policy.
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) in the Office of Management and Budget will
review all significant rules. OIRA has determined that this rule is not
significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the principles of Executive Order
12866 while calling for improvements in the nation's regulatory system
to promote predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best,
most innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory
ends. Executive Order 13563 directs agencies to consider regulatory
approaches that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of
choice for the public where these approaches are relevant, feasible,
and consistent with regulatory objectives. Executive Order 13563
emphasizes further that regulations must be based on the best available
science and that the rulemaking process must allow for public
participation and an open exchange of ideas. We have developed this
rule in a manner consistent with these requirements.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule will not have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). This certification is based on information
contained in the economic analyses found in the report entitled ``Cost-
Benefit and Regulatory Flexibility Analyses: Proposed Regulations on
the Curation of Federally-Owned and Administered Archeological
Collections'' that is available online at https://www.nps.gov/archeology/tools/laws/Regulatory_Analyses_36_CFR_Part_79_12.pdf.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more.
(b) Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, federal, state, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions.
(c) Does not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
The rule relates to internal administrative procedures and
management of government function. It does not regulate external
entities, impose any costs on them, or eliminate any procedures or
functions that would result in a loss of employment or income on the
part of the private sector.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on state, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per
year. This rule does not have a significant or unique effect on state,
local or tribal governments, or the private sector. A statement
containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required. This rule produces no costs
outside of the Federal government and does not create an additional
burden on state, local, or tribal governments, or the private sector.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
This rule does not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630. A takings
implication assessment is not required.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of Executive Order 13132, this rule
does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. This rule does
not regulate, change, or otherwise affect the relationship between
Federal and state governments. A federalism summary impact statement is
not required.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order 12988)
This rule complies with the requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all
regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be
written to minimize litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all
regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
This proposed rule does not contain collections of information that
require approval by the Office of Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act. This rule would not impose recordkeeping or
reporting requirements on state, tribal, or local governments;
individuals; businesses; or organizations. We may not conduct or
sponsor and you are not required to respond to a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not constitute a major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human environment. A detailed statement
under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) is not
required because this rule is covered by a categorical exclusion. This
rule is excluded from the requirement to prepare a detailed statement
because it qualifies as a regulation of an administrative and
procedural nature. (For further information see 43 CFR 46.210(i)). This
rule does not involve any of the extraordinary circumstances listed in
43 CFR 46.215 that would require further analysis under NEPA.
Federal Advisory Committee Act
Intergovernmental consultation recommended under this rule is
exempt from the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). This rule
requires that consultation with Indian tribes be conducted between
Federal officials and elected tribal officers or their designated
employees acting in their official capacities, who meet solely for the
purpose of exchanging views, information, or advice related to the
management or implementation of this rule. Consultation with tribes
under this rule thus meets the two-part test for an
[[Page 68644]]
exemption from the FACA set out in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995, Public Law 104-4.
Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O. 13175 and Departmental Policy)
The Department of the Interior strives to strengthen its
government-to-government relationship with Indian tribes through a
commitment to consult with Indian tribes and recognition of their right
to self-governance and tribal sovereignty. We have evaluated this rule
under the Department's consultation policy and under the criteria in
Executive Order 13175 and have identified direct effects on federally
recognized Indian tribes that will result from this rule. We conducted
outreach to tribes and Native Hawaiian Organizations, initiated
consultation through two letters to tribal leaders, and conducted face-
to-face consultation on this proposed rule upon request. Additional
information regarding the identified effects on Indian tribes and these
outreach and consultation efforts is contained in a document entitled
``Consultation with Indian Tribes (E.O. 13175) regarding the proposed
36 CFR 79.12,'' which is available at the following Web site: https://www.nps.gov/archeology/tools/laws/Tribal_Consultation_36_CFR_Part_79_12.pdf.
Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O. 13211)
This rule is not a significant energy action under the definition
in Executive Order 13211. A Statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
Clarity of This Regulation
We are required by Executive Orders 12866 (section 1(b)(12)), 12988
(section 3(b)(1)(B)), and 13563 (section 1(a)), and by the Presidential
Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain language. This
means that each rule we publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address readers directly;
(c) Use common, everyday words and clear language rather than
jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever possible.
If you feel that we have not met these requirements, send us
comments by one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. To
better help us revise the rule, your comments should be as specific as
possible. For example, you should tell us the numbers of the sections
or paragraphs that you find unclear, which paragraphs or sentences are
too long, the sections where you feel lists or tables would be useful,
etc.
Drafting Information. This proposed rule was prepared by the office
of the Departmental Consulting Archeologist, National Park Service,
Washington, DC with the able assistance of an informal interagency
working group. Terry Childs (DOI) drafted the proposed rule and served
as chair of the group that included Michael Hilton (USFS), Thomas
Lincoln (BR), Eugene Marino (FWS), Kathleen McLaughlin (USN and US
Army), Emily Palus (BIA and BLM), Christopher Pulliam (USACE), and
James Wilde (USAF). Marvin Keller and Anna Pardo (BIA) and Rochelle
Bennett (BR) joined the working group in 2013. David Gadsby (NPS) also
joined the group and provided administrative oversight of the proposed
rule. Carla Mattix and Stephen Simpson of the Department of the
Interior's Office of the Solicitor provided legal guidance.
Public Participation
It is the policy of the Department of the Interior, whenever
practicable, to afford the public an opportunity to participate in the
rulemaking process. Accordingly, interested persons may submit written
comments regarding this proposed rule by following the instructions in
the ADDRESSES section of this document.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, be aware that
your entire comment--including your personally identifiable
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask in your comment to withhold your personal identifiable information
from public view, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 79
Archives and records, Historic preservation, Indians-lands,
Museums, Public lands.
In consideration of the foregoing, the National Park Service
proposes to amend 36 CFR part 79 as set forth below:
PART 79--CURATION OF FEDERALLY-OWNED AND ADMINISTERED
ARCHAEOLOGICAL COLLECTIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 79 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 470aa-mm, 16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.
0
2. Sections 79.1 through 79.4 are designated as subpart A under the
following heading:
Subpart A--Administrative Provisions
0
3. In Sec. 79.2, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 79.2 Authority
(a) The regulations in this part are promulgated under 16 U.S.C.
470a(7) which requires that the Secretary of the Interior issue
regulations ensuring that significant prehistoric and historic
artifacts and associated records are deposited in an institution with
adequate long-term curatorial services. This requirement applies to
artifacts and associated records subject to the National Historic
Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.), the Reservoir Salvage Act (16
U.S.C. 469-469c), and the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (16
U.S.C. 470aa-mm).
* * * * *
0
4. In Sec. 79.3, in paragraph (a) introductory text, add two sentences
at the end to read as follows:
Sec. 79.3 Applicability.
(a) * * * Such collections also include those that are owned by the
United States and for which a federal agency has practical management
authority, either directly or indirectly, as a result of that
ownership; and those collections that are not owned by the United
States but that are managed or controlled by a federal agency pursuant
to law. The collections described in this paragraph are considered
federally-owned and administered for purposes of this part.
* * * * *
0
5. Sections 79.5 through 79.9 are designated subpart B under the
following heading:
Subpart B--Archeological Collections Management
0
6. Section 79.10 is designated subpart C under the following heading:
Subpart C--Public Access to and Use of Collections
0
7. Section 79.11 is designated subpart D under the following heading:
Subpart D--Inspections and Inventories of Collections
0
8. Add subpart E to read as follows:
Subpart E--Disposition of Particular Material Remains
Sec.
79.12 Determining which particular material remains are eligible for
disposal.
[[Page 68645]]
79.13 Acceptable methods for disposition of particular material
remains.
79.14 Restrictions on disposition of particular material remains.
79.15 Final determination on disposition of particular material
remains.
79.16 Objecting to a determination of disposition of particular
material remains.
79.17 Timing of disposition.
79.18 Administrative record of disposition.
Sec. 79.12 Determining which particular material remains are eligible
for disposal.
(a) Which material remains are eligible for disposal? In order to
be eligible for disposal, material remains from collections must be:
(1) Archaeological resources, as defined in 16 U.S.C. 470bb(1), or
other resources excavated and removed under the Reservoir Salvage Act
(16 U.S.C. 469-469c) or the Antiquities Act (16 U.S.C. 431-433); and
(2) Considered to be of insufficient archaeological interest under
the criteria in paragraph (e) of this section, based on the definition
of ``of archaeological interest'' in 43 CFR 7.3(a)(1).
(b) Which material remains may not be disposed of? The following
material remains from collections may not be disposed of:
(1) Native American ``cultural items'' as defined in the Native
American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990 (25 U.S.C.
3001(3)), since disposition is governed by that Act and its
implementing regulations (43 CFR 10);
(2) Human remains;
(3) Material remains excavated and removed from Indian lands on or
before October 31, 1979; and
(4) Material remains excavated and removed from Indian lands under
the Antiquities Act (16 U.S.C. 431-433).
(c) Who may propose the disposal of particular material remains?
The following individuals may propose the disposal of particular
material remains from a collection:
(1) Agency staff members, including archeologists, curators, and
conservators; and
(2) Qualified museum professionals located in a repository that
provides curatorial services for a collection held in that repository.
(d) Who is responsible for the disposal of particular material
remains? The Federal Agency Official is responsible for ensuring that
particular material remains are disposed of from collections according
to the requirements of this part.
(e) When are particular material remains considered to be of
insufficient archaeological interest? Particular material remains are
considered to be of insufficient archaeological interest when, on a
case-by-case basis, at least one qualified archeological or museum
professional with experience in the type of material remains being
evaluated determines and documents that:
(1) Disposition of the material remains will not negatively impact
the overall integrity of the original collection recovered during the
survey, excavation, or other study of a prehistoric or historic
resource; and
(2) At least one of the following three requirements--lack of
provenience information; lack of physical integrity; or overly
redundant and not useful for research--are met:
(i) Lack of provenience information. Lack of provenience
information may be established by one or more of the following
circumstances:
(A) The labels on the material remains or the labels on the
containers that hold the material remains do not provide adequate
information to reliably establish meaningful archeological context for
the material remains;
(B) The labels on the material remains or the labels on the
containers that hold the material remains have been lost or destroyed
over time and cannot be reconstructed through the associated records;
or
(C) The associated records of the material remains have been lost
or destroyed and cannot be recovered after a concerted effort to find
them is performed and documented.
(ii) Lack of physical integrity. Material remains lack physical
integrity when, subsequent to recovery during the survey, excavation,
or other study of a prehistoric or historic resource, the material
remains were irreparably damaged through decay or decomposition over
time, or as a result of a human-caused incident or a natural disaster.
(iii) Overly redundant and not useful for research. A determination
that material remains are overly redundant and not useful for research
must be carefully considered. Archeological context, research
questions, and research potential may vary based on geography, time and
culture period, scientific or cultural significance, prior analysis,
and other factors. It is difficult to predict if future analytical
methods will yield useful information about the material remains
proposed for disposal. As a result, a representative sample of material
remains that are determined to be overly redundant and not useful for
research must be retained for curation, as required by Sec. 79.15(d).
Sec. 79.13 Acceptable methods for disposition of particular material
remains.
(a) Material remains excavated or removed from Indian lands after
October 31, 1979, that are archaeological resources under the
Archaeological Resources Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 470aa-mm) remain the
property of the Indian individual or Indian tribe having rights of
ownership over the resources. Under the authority of 16 U.S.C. 470dd,
disposition of these material remains that are determined to be of
insufficient archaeological interest under the criteria in Sec.
79.12(e) are subject to the consent of the Indian individual or Indian
tribe. The Federal Agency Official must use the following methods of
disposal for these material remains in the following order:
(1) Return them to the Indian individual or Indian tribe having
rights of ownership under the Archaeological Resources Protection Act's
custody regulations, 43 CFR 7.13(b), 36 CFR 296.13(b), 32 CFR
229.13(b), and 18 CFR 1312.13(b).
(2) If the Indian individual or Indian tribe having rights of
ownership does not wish to accept them, the Federal Agency Official may
otherwise dispose of the material remains using the disposition methods
in Sec. 79.13(b) after receiving written consent from the Indian
individual or Indian tribe having rights of ownership.
(b) This paragraph applies to material remains that are determined
to be of insufficient archaeological interest under Sec. 79.12(e) and
that were excavated or removed from lands that are not Indian lands.
The Federal Agency Official may use any of the following methods for
disposal of the material remains.
(1) Transfer to another Federal agency.
(2) Convey to a suitable public or tribal scientific or
professional repository as defined in Sec. 79.4(j) of this part.
(3) Convey to a federally recognized Indian tribe if the material
remains were excavated or removed from lands of religious or cultural
importance to that tribe and were identified and documented by a
Federal land manager under 43 CFR 7.7(b)(1).
(4) Convey to a federally recognized Indian tribe from whose
aboriginal lands the material remains were removed. Aboriginal
occupation may be documented by a final judgment of the Indian Claims
Commission or the United States Court of Claims, or a treaty, Act of
Congress, or Executive Order.
(5) Transfer within the Federal agency for the purpose of education
or
[[Page 68646]]
interpretation, or convey to a suitable institution to be used for
public benefit and education including, but not limited to, local
historical societies, university or college departments, and schools.
(6) If the Federal Agency Official considers each of these prior
methods carefully and is still unable to find an acceptable method of
disposition, then destruction may be considered. The Federal Agency
Official or their designee must witness and document the destruction,
including through photography or video.
Sec. 79.14 Restrictions on disposition of particular material
remains.
(a) Can Federal employees and their relatives acquire disposed
material remains? No. Federal employees or their relatives cannot
acquire disposed material remains (or a financial interest therein) and
must not appear to benefit personally in any way from an action to
deaccession or dispose of archeological material remains.
(b) Can disposed material remains be regarded as commercial goods?
No. Disposed material remains may not be traded, sold, bought, or
bartered as commercial goods.
Sec. 79.15 Final determination on disposition of particular material
remains.
The Federal Agency Official is responsible for ensuring that the
agency disposes of material remains according to the requirements of
this part. A determination made under this part in no way affects the
Federal land manager's obligations under other applicable laws or
regulations. The Federal Agency Official must carry out all of the
following steps before making a final determination that it is
appropriate to dispose of material remains.
(a) The Federal Agency Official must determine that the material
remains are eligible for disposal under the criteria in Sec. 79.12(a),
including a written verification that no Native American ``cultural
items'' as defined in the Native American Graves Protection and
Repatriation Act of 1990 (25 U.S.C. 3001(3)) are considered for
disposal.
(b) The Federal Agency Official must verify that the material
remains are appropriately documented through a professional procedure
approved by the Federal agency that is consistent with curatorial
services, including accessioning and cataloging, as defined in Sec.
79.4(b) of this part.
(c) The Federal Agency Official must establish a collections
advisory committee of at least five members to review proposed
dispositions of material remains and make recommendations to the
Federal Agency Official about proposed dispositions based on the
adequacy of the documentation addressing the requirements in Sec.
79.15(a) and (b) and the appropriateness of the proposed disposition.
(1) The collections advisory committee must consist of qualified
employees from Federal agencies who meet appropriate Professional
Qualification Standards set by the Secretary of the Interior, and must
include the principal archeologist and curator of the Federal agency
that owns or administers the material remains if either of these two
positions exists.
(2) Committee members must include Federal employees with subject
matter or technical expertise. These employees may include
archeologists, anthropologists, curators, and conservators with
expertise in historic, prehistoric, or underwater material remains.
(3) Committee members may include or one or more members of a
federally recognized Indian tribe regularly consulted by the Federal
agency who are elected tribal officers or their designated employees
acting in their official capacities.
(4) The committee must have written procedures, including terms of
member appointments and duration of the committee, approved by the
Federal Agency Official to ensure all recommendations of disposal are
fair, open, timely, and in the best interests of the public.
(5) Federal employees or qualified members of federally recognized
Indian tribes may be temporarily added to the committee if its current
members determine that specific expertise is needed on a case-by-case
basis.
(6) Committee members or their family members may not benefit
financially or in any other way from a disposition of material remains.
(d) The Federal Agency Official must retain a representative sample
of those material remains determined to be overly redundant and not
useful for research.
(1) The size of the representative sample must be large enough to
permit future analysis for research purposes.
(2) The method for establishing a representative sample, including
sample size and typology, must be determined by a qualified museum or
archeological professional with expertise in the type of prehistoric or
historic material remains being sampled.
(3) The sampling method must be well documented and consistent with
professional prehistoric or historic archeological practice.
(e) The Federal Agency Official must retain all associated records
in the archeological collection as defined in Sec. 79.4(a)(2) of this
part. A copy of the original associated records must be given to the
recipient of any transferred or conveyed items subject to the
restrictions stipulated in the Archaeological Resources Protection Act
(16 U.S.C. 470hh(a)).
(f) The Federal Agency Official must notify the entities listed in
this paragraph of the proposed disposition and solicit comments on the
proposal. Notifications must be made in writing, and must include a
deadline for submitting comments, in accordance with procedures
established by the Federal agency. All written comments must be
reviewed and responded to by the Federal Agency Official and the
collections advisory committee. Notice must be given to the following:
(1) The State Historic Preservation Officer from the state(s) where
the particular objects to be disposed were recovered.
(2) The Tribal Historic Preservation Officer (or other designated
tribal representative) from the tribal land(s) where the particular
objects to be disposed were recovered.
(3) Federal, state, tribal, or local agencies that were involved in
the recovery of the objects to be disposed.
(4) Universities, museums, scientific institutions, and educational
institutions with an active department of or program in archaeology or
anthropology that have interest in the archaeology of the region from
which the objects to be disposed of were recovered.
(5) Indian tribes that consider the land to have religious or
cultural importance, if the material remains are from a site on public
lands that has religious or cultural importance to Indian tribes under
43 CFR 7.7(b)(1).
(6) Indian tribes from whose aboriginal lands the material remains
were removed, if aboriginal occupation has been documented by a final
judgment of the Indian Claims Commission or the United States Court of
Claims, treaty, Act of Congress, or Executive Order.
(g) The Federal Agency Official must, after the comment period
described in Sec. 79.15(f) has expired, publish a notice of
determination of disposition in the Federal Register.
(1) The notice published in the Federal Register must include the
following:
(i) A general description of the material remains to be disposed.
[[Page 68647]]
(ii) The criteria used to determine that the material remains are
of insufficient archaeological interest under Sec. 79.12(e).
(iii) The method of disposal.
(iv) The name of the Federal Agency Official or their designee as a
point of contact.
(v) An explanation of a person's right to object to the
determination of disposition under Sec. 79.16 and the name and address
of the Department of the Interior's Departmental Consulting
Archeologist.
(2) The determination referenced by the notice must include the
following:
(i) A detailed list of the material remains to be disposed,
including a description of each object, or lot of objects if there are
multiples of a particular type, and a photograph of the objects when
appropriate.
(ii) The criteria used to determine that the material remains are
of insufficient archaeological interest under Sec. 79.12(e).
(iii) Justification of the method to be used to dispose of the
material remains under Sec. 79.13.
(iv) Documentation that all of the procedures in Sec. Sec. 79.15
and 79.16 have been met.
(v) The name of the recipient entity or method of destruction, as
appropriate.
(vi) The name of the Federal Agency Official or their designee as a
point of contact.
(vii) Other conditions of transfer or conveyance, as appropriate.
(viii) A statement that the determination is a final agency action
under the Administrative Procedure Act unless an objection is filed in
accordance with Sec. 79.16.
Sec. 79.16 Objecting to a determination of disposition of particular
material remains.
Anyone may object to and request in writing that the Departmental
Consulting Archeologist review a Federal Agency Official's
determination to dispose of material remains within 30 days of
publication in the Federal Register. The request must document why the
requester disagrees with the Federal Agency Official's determination or
the terms and conditions to be applied to the disposal. The procedure
for objecting to a determination of disposition is as follows:
(a) The request must be sent to the Departmental Consulting
Archeologist, whose address must be published with the notice of
determination of disposition in the Federal Register. The Departmental
Consulting Archeologist must immediately forward a copy of the request
to the Federal Agency Official who made the determination under
objection. The Federal Agency Official must postpone the planned
disposition until the Departmental Consulting Archeologist completes
the requested review.
(b) The Departmental Consulting Archeologist must review the
request, the Federal Agency Official's determination, and its
supporting documentation.
(c) Within 60 days of receipt of the request, the Departmental
Consulting Archeologist must transmit to the Federal Agency Official a
non-binding recommendation for further consideration.
(d) The Federal Agency Official must consider the recommendation in
making a final determination. Within 60 days of receipt of the
recommendation, the Federal Agency Official must respond to the
Departmental Consulting Archeologist and the requester with a final
determination. The final determination must include any information on
administrative appeal rights required by internal agency appeal
procedures or a statement that the final determination is a final
agency action under the Administrative Procedure Act, as appropriate.
(e) The Federal Agency Official must publish notice of the decision
on the objection and any amendments made to the original determination
of disposition in the Federal Register.
Sec. 79.17 Timing of disposition.
Disposition will occur no sooner than 30 days after the notice of
determination of disposition is published in the Federal Register under
Sec. 79.15(g). If the Federal agency receives an objection under Sec.
79.16, however, disposal will occur after the Federal Agency Official's
notice of decision and any amendments are published in the Federal
Register under Sec. 79.16(e).
Sec. 79.18 Administrative record of disposition.
(a) After the Federal Agency Official has made a final
determination of disposition, he or she must document the determination
and retain the administrative record as used in the definition of
associated records in Sec. 79.4(a)(2), which must include:
(1) The professional evaluation of the material remains, conducted
under Sec. 79.12(e) and Sec. 79.15(b).
(2) The recommendations and rationale of the collections advisory
committee provided in accordance with Sec. 79.15(c).
(3) Notifications of the proposed disposition under Sec. 79.15(f);
consent of Indian individuals or tribes, if applicable, under Sec.
79.13(a); and comments received from the parties notified under Sec.
79.15(f).
(4) Requests for review received by the Departmental Consulting
Archeologist, the non-binding recommendation of the Departmental
Consulting Archeologist, and the response by the Federal Agency
Official to the Departmental Consulting Archeologist and the requester,
as appropriate, under Sec. 79.16.
(5) The disposition action with specific information, including a
description and evaluation of objects; the method of disposition and
the reason for the method chosen; names and titles of persons
initiating and approving the disposition; date of disposition; relevant
accession and catalog numbers; evidence of the receipt for the return,
transfer, or conveyance of the material remains by the recipient tribe,
agency, repository, or institution, including the title to the received
material remains, as appropriate; photographic documentation, as
appropriate; and the name and location of the recipient institution or
entity, as appropriate.
(6) A detailed inventory of the reasonable and representative
sample of material remains retained, when the larger proportion is
disposed of because it is overly redundant and not useful for research.
(7) Other activities and decisions pertaining to the disposition of
the material remains, such as conditions of use after the disposition
is completed, as appropriate.
(b) The administrative record must be made available to the public
upon request, unless the information or a portion of it must be
withheld under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C.
552) or the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 470hh).
The latter restricts the government's ability to make sensitive
information, such as archeological site location data, available to the
public.
(c) After disposition, the accession and catalog records must be
reviewed and amended through a procedure established by the Federal
agency. The amendments must identify the material remains that were
deaccessioned and disposed of, the date of disposition, and the manner
in which they were disposed. The documentation prepared under
Sec. Sec. 79.15 through 79.16 and 79.18(a) must be retained.
Dated: November 5, 2014.
Michael Bean,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2014-26839 Filed 11-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-EJ-P