Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations, 68447-68449 [2014-27018]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 221 / Monday, November 17, 2014 / Notices Leroy A. Richardson, Chief, Information Collection Review Office, Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of the Associate Director for Science, Office of the Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [FR Doc. 2014–27017 Filed 11–14–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4163–18–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; to train personnel and to be able to respond to a collection of information, to search data sources, to complete and review the collection of information; and to transmit or otherwise disclose the information. Written comments should be received within 60 days of this notice. Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations Proposed Project Improving Organizational Management and Worker Behavior through Worksite Communication— New—National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as part of its continuing effort to reduce public burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. To request more information on the below proposed project or to obtain a copy of the information collection plan and instruments, call 404–639–7570 or send comments to Leroy A. Richardson, 1600 Clifton Road, MS–D74, Atlanta, GA 30333 or send an email to omb@cdc.gov. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and (e) estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; to develop, acquire, install and utilize technology and systems for the purpose of collecting, validating and verifying Background and Brief Description NIOSH, under Public Law 91–596, Sections 20 and 22 (Section 20–22, Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1977) has the responsibility to conduct research relating to innovative methods, techniques, and approaches dealing with occupational safety and health problems. This research assesses best practices for communicating and employing a strategic health and safety management system (HSMS) to facilitate workers’ health and safety behaviors, including ways that lateral communication from management influences worker perceptions and behaviors. Currently, ambivalence exists about how to strategically communicate aspects of an HSMS top-down in the mining industry. Research indicates that, to answer questions about effectively using an HSMS to improve safety, research needs to follow a sample of workplaces over time, measuring the introduction or utilization of an HSMS and then measuring outcomes of interest at the workplace level and at the worker-level too. Therefore, analyzing workers’ perception of the organizational HSMS, leaders’ implementation of the organizational HSMS, and communication gaps between these two entities, may provide more insight into the best, most feasible practices and approaches to worker H&S performance within a system. This project is initiating such an approach by implementing a series of multilevel intervention (MLI) case studies that assess the utility of a safety system that includes aspects of both safety management on the organizational level and behavior-based safety on the worker level. By studying these levels separately and introducing an intervention to bridge these two groups Centers for Disease Control and Prevention asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES [60Day–15–15EC] VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:14 Nov 14, 2014 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 68447 together to enhance safety, the communication practices within an HSMS may be enhanced. NIOSH requests OMB approval for a 3-year for a project that involves information collection and that seeks to empirically understand what HSMS communication practices are important for mine worker H&S and how those practices can be developed, implemented, and maintained over time via desired communication from mine site leadership. The following questions guide this study: What impact does the MLI communication model that was designed and implemented have on: (1) Workers’ health/safety behaviors, including those that lower exposure to dust; (2) workers’ perceptions of their organizations’ values; and (3) changes in managers’ strategic HSMS communication and implementation with workers to facilitate health/safety performance, including those that lower exposure to dust. To answer the above questions, NIOSH researchers developed a multilevel intervention (MLI) that focuses on both management and workers’ communication about and subsequent actions taken to reduce respirable dust exposure over time. This MLI will inform how leadership communicates to their employees and what affect(s) this communication has on individual behavior such as corrective dust actions taken by workers. By assessing the ongoing safety/health interactions between individual workers and their organizational capacities (i.e. levels of leadership and management of safety), and how these interactions influence and shape personal H&S performance, we can better understand what aspects of both systems need attention in a merged, more balanced and comprehensive system of health and safety management (DeJoy, 2005). Specifically, this project is using mine technology, the Helmet-CAM, as a communication medium to help merge these two worksite systems. Previous research indicates that the use of information technology can enhance lateral and horizontal communication within organizations, showing support for using the Helmet-CAM in the current study (Hinds & Kiesler, 1995). NIOSH researchers can analyze what and how communication practices should be implemented to influence worker perceptions of their organizations’ H&S values and how this impacts their subsequent H&S behavior. Eventually, the practices used to influence behavior related to this dust issue can be extrapolated to inform ways to E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM 17NON1 68448 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 221 / Monday, November 17, 2014 / Notices communicate about and manage additional health/safety problems within the industry via an HSMS as implemented by site leaders. The Helmet-CAM incorporates video footage and real-time dust measurements of workers while performing their job duties and tasks in various locations throughout the workday. This technology has proven to be a very viable assessment tool to provide a comparison of where and when miners are being exposed to their highest respirable dust concentrations. As a result, Helmet-CAM technology is being employed at many mines as a way to identify dust exposures of workers and to help reduce dust hazards in the environment. However, we do not yet know how mine site management is using, if at all, this technology to communicate with workers about their personal health and safety barriers and behaviors. Discussions about the tasks workers perform when exposure levels are high and what actions they can take to reduce their dust exposure may be valuable to the industry in helping advance the way engineering-control technology is used from a behavioral vantage point as well. The MLI is designed to help mine workers and organizational leadership work together, using the Helmet-CAM to bridge their communication efforts, to lower exposure to respirable dust among other H/S behaviors. Previous research (Yorio et al. 2014) identified three distinct areas that influence the relationship between the strategic HSMS and its overall success in implementing and encouraging worker behavior change: Worksite leadership, organizational values, and worker ability to appropriately follow-up during the subsequent two visits. Data collection will take place with no more than 150 mine workers and 30 mine site leaders over three years. The respondents targeted for this study include any active mine worker and any active site leader at an industrial mineral metal/nonmetal mine site. It is estimated that a sample of up to 150 mine workers will participate in the intervention, which includes wearing the Helmet-CAM for a portion of their job tasks (no more than two hours total) during three time periods (when NIOSH is present during the field visit). In addition to wearing the Helmet-CAM, workers will be asked to complete a pre and post-test survey (∼15 minutes) and an interview during three time points throughout the study (∼ 30 minutes). The interviews also will debrief HelmetCAM footage with participants at various mining operations who have agreed to participate. It also is estimated that a sample of up to 30 mine site leaders will participate in interviews/ focus groups about HSMS practices at the same mining operations which have agreed to participate. The interviews/focus groups also will occur three times during each of the NIOSH field visits and will take no more than 45 minutes each. All participants will be between the ages of 18 and 75, currently employed, and living in the United States. Participation will require no more than 4.5 hours of workers’ time over the six-week intervention and no more than 2.5 hours of site leaders’ time over the six-week intervention period. There is no cost to respondents other than their time. perceptions and interpretations of management. Data on these three contingencies are collected from the management and worker levels during three time points throughout a six-week intervention to assess the ongoing communication via the Helmet-CAM and effects of the communication on behavior. Data collection and analysis pertaining to these three areas may occur via a pre/post survey with workers and pre/mid/post interviews/ focus groups with workers and mine site leaders, some of which include dialogue around Helmet-CAM footage as provided by the workers who choose to participate. NIOSH proposes this intervention design at a minimum of three and no more than five industrial mineral metal/ nonmetal mine sites. All of the data collection instruments have been used in previous studies to examine worker and leadership variables and factors. Therefore, NIOSH knows that the data collection instruments are valid and reliable to use in studying the worker and leader levels simultaneously, within the same mine. Industrial mineral sites will be recruited who have inquired interest in learning how to use the Helmet-CAM on their site and/or interest in improving their site wide communication efforts. Only a small sample of workers will participate at each mine site because of the time required for completion and to ensure the longitudinal data can be adequately collected over the six weeks. In other words, we would rather collect data multiple times with the same worker and have fewer participants than collect data from more workers but not have the ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS Number of respondents Average burden per response (in hours) Number of responses per respondent Total burden hours Form name Mine Site Leaders/Managers ............ Mine Recruitment Script ................... Initial/Mid/Post HSMS interview or focus group. Individual Miner Recruitment Script Pre/Post Org Perceptions Survey .... Wear Helmet-CAM during job cycle Pre/Mid/Post Behavior and HelmetCAM footage Interview. 10 10 1 3 5/60 45/60 1 23 Mine Worker ...................................... asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Type of respondent 50 50 50 50 1 2 3 3 5/60 15/60 1 30/60 4 25 150 75 Total ........................................... ........................................................... ........................ ........................ ........................ 278 VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:14 Nov 14, 2014 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM 17NON1 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 221 / Monday, November 17, 2014 / Notices Leroy A. Richardson, Chief, Information Collection Review Office, Office of Scientific Integrity,Office of the Associate Director for Science, Office of the Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [FR Doc. 2014–27018 Filed 11–14–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4163–18–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services [Document Identifier CMS–10530, CMS– 1880 and CMS–1882] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, HHS. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is announcing an opportunity for the public to comment on CMS’ intention to collect information from the public. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the PRA), federal agencies are required to publish notice in the Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information (including each proposed extension or reinstatement of an existing collection of information) and to allow 60 days for public comment on the proposed action. Interested persons are invited to send comments regarding our burden estimates or any other aspect of this collection of information, including any of the following subjects: (1) The necessity and utility of the proposed information collection for the proper performance of the agency’s functions; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology to minimize the information collection burden. DATES: Comments must be received by January 16, 2015. ADDRESSES: When commenting, please reference the document identifier or OMB control number (OCN). To be assured consideration, comments and recommendations must be submitted in any one of the following ways: 1. Electronically. You may send your comments electronically to http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for ‘‘Comment or Submission’’ or ‘‘More Search Options’’ to find the information collection asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:14 Nov 14, 2014 Jkt 235001 document(s) that are accepting comments. 2. By regular mail. You may mail written comments to the following address: CMS, Office of Strategic Operations and Regulatory Affairs, Division of Regulations Development, Attention: Document Identifier/OMB Control Number lllll, Room C4– 26–05, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21244–1850. To obtain copies of a supporting statement and any related forms for the proposed collection(s) summarized in this notice, you may make your request using one of following: 1. Access CMS’ Web site address at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/ PaperworkReductionActof1995. 2. Email your request, including your address, phone number, OMB number, and CMS document identifier, to Paperwork@cms.hhs.gov. 3. Call the Reports Clearance Office at (410) 786–1326. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reports Clearance Office at (410) 786– 1326. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Contents This notice sets out a summary of the use and burden associated with the following information collections. More detailed information can be found in each collection’s supporting statement and associated materials (see ADDRESSES). CMS–10530 Ambulatory Surgical Center Quality Reporting Program CMS–1880 and CMS–1882 Certification as a Supplier of Portable X-Ray and Portable X-Ray Survey Report Form and Supporting Regulations Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501– 3520), federal agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor. The term ‘‘collection of information’’ is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c) and includes agency requests or requirements that members of the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA requires federal agencies to publish a 60-day notice in the Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including each proposed extension or reinstatement of an existing collection of information, before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with this requirement, CMS is publishing this notice. PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 68449 Information Collection 1. Type of Information Collection Request: New collection (Request for a new OMB control number); Title of Information Collection: Ambulatory Surgical Center Quality Reporting Program; Use: Our quality reporting programs promote higher quality, more efficient health care for Medicare beneficiaries. We have implemented quality measure reporting programs for multiple settings, including for ambulatory surgical centers. Section 109(b) of the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006 (TRHCA) (Pub. L. 109–432) amended section 1833(i) of the Act by re-designating clause (iv) as clause (v) and adding new clause (iv) to paragraph (2)(D) and by adding new paragraph (7). Section 1833(i)(2)(D)(iv) of the Act authorizes, but does not require, the Secretary to implement the revised ASC payment system ‘‘in a manner so as to provide for a reduction in any annual update for failure to report on quality measures in accordance with paragraph (7).’’ Section 1833(i)(7)(A) of the Act states that the Secretary may provide that any ASC that does not submit quality measures to the Secretary in accordance with paragraph (7) will incur a 2.0 percentage point reduction to any annual increase provided under the revised ASC payment system for such year. Sections 1833(t)(17)(C)(i) and (ii) of the Act require the Secretary to develop measures appropriate for the measurement of the quality of care furnished in outpatient settings. Section 3014 of the Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA) modified section 1890(b) of the Social Security Act to require CMS to develop quality and efficiency measures through a ‘‘consensus-based entity’’. To fulfill this requirement, the Measure Applications Partnership (MAP) was formed to review measures consistent with these requirements. The MAP is convened by the National Quality Forum (NQF), a national consensus organization. In implementing this and other quality reporting programs, our overarching goal is to support the National Quality Strategy’s goals of better health for individuals, better health for populations, and lower costs for health care. This information is used to direct contractors, including Quality Improvement Organizations (QIOs), to focus on particular areas of improvement, and to develop quality improvement initiatives. The information is made available to ASCs for their use in internal quality improvement initiatives. Most importantly, this information is E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM 17NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 221 (Monday, November 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68447-68449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27018]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

[60Day-15-15EC]


Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and 
Recommendations

    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as part of 
its continuing effort to reduce public burden, invites the general 
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment 
on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. To request more information on the 
below proposed project or to obtain a copy of the information 
collection plan and instruments, call 404-639-7570 or send comments to 
Leroy A. Richardson, 1600 Clifton Road, MS-D74, Atlanta, GA 30333 or 
send an email to omb@cdc.gov.
    Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized 
and/or included in the request for Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) approval. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall 
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of 
the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to 
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be 
collected; (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of 
information on respondents, including through the use of automated 
collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and (e) 
estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, 
maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information. Burden 
means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by 
persons to generate, maintain, retain, disclose or provide information 
to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review 
instructions; to develop, acquire, install and utilize technology and 
systems for the purpose of collecting, validating and verifying 
information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and 
providing information; to train personnel and to be able to respond to 
a collection of information, to search data sources, to complete and 
review the collection of information; and to transmit or otherwise 
disclose the information. Written comments should be received within 60 
days of this notice.

Proposed Project

    Improving Organizational Management and Worker Behavior through 
Worksite Communication-- New--National Institute for Occupational 
Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
(CDC).

Background and Brief Description

    NIOSH, under Public Law 91-596, Sections 20 and 22 (Section 20-22, 
Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1977) has the responsibility to 
conduct research relating to innovative methods, techniques, and 
approaches dealing with occupational safety and health problems.
    This research assesses best practices for communicating and 
employing a strategic health and safety management system (HSMS) to 
facilitate workers' health and safety behaviors, including ways that 
lateral communication from management influences worker perceptions and 
behaviors. Currently, ambivalence exists about how to strategically 
communicate aspects of an HSMS top-down in the mining industry. 
Research indicates that, to answer questions about effectively using an 
HSMS to improve safety, research needs to follow a sample of workplaces 
over time, measuring the introduction or utilization of an HSMS and 
then measuring outcomes of interest at the workplace level and at the 
worker-level too.
    Therefore, analyzing workers' perception of the organizational 
HSMS, leaders' implementation of the organizational HSMS, and 
communication gaps between these two entities, may provide more insight 
into the best, most feasible practices and approaches to worker H&S 
performance within a system. This project is initiating such an 
approach by implementing a series of multilevel intervention (MLI) case 
studies that assess the utility of a safety system that includes 
aspects of both safety management on the organizational level and 
behavior-based safety on the worker level. By studying these levels 
separately and introducing an intervention to bridge these two groups 
together to enhance safety, the communication practices within an HSMS 
may be enhanced.
    NIOSH requests OMB approval for a 3-year for a project that 
involves information collection and that seeks to empirically 
understand what HSMS communication practices are important for mine 
worker H&S and how those practices can be developed, implemented, and 
maintained over time via desired communication from mine site 
leadership. The following questions guide this study:
    What impact does the MLI communication model that was designed and 
implemented have on: (1) Workers' health/safety behaviors, including 
those that lower exposure to dust; (2) workers' perceptions of their 
organizations' values; and (3) changes in managers' strategic HSMS 
communication and implementation with workers to facilitate health/
safety performance, including those that lower exposure to dust.
    To answer the above questions, NIOSH researchers developed a 
multilevel intervention (MLI) that focuses on both management and 
workers' communication about and subsequent actions taken to reduce 
respirable dust exposure over time. This MLI will inform how leadership 
communicates to their employees and what affect(s) this communication 
has on individual behavior such as corrective dust actions taken by 
workers. By assessing the ongoing safety/health interactions between 
individual workers and their organizational capacities (i.e. levels of 
leadership and management of safety), and how these interactions 
influence and shape personal H&S performance, we can better understand 
what aspects of both systems need attention in a merged, more balanced 
and comprehensive system of health and safety management (DeJoy, 2005).
    Specifically, this project is using mine technology, the Helmet-
CAM, as a communication medium to help merge these two worksite 
systems. Previous research indicates that the use of information 
technology can enhance lateral and horizontal communication within 
organizations, showing support for using the Helmet-CAM in the current 
study (Hinds & Kiesler, 1995). NIOSH researchers can analyze what and 
how communication practices should be implemented to influence worker 
perceptions of their organizations' H&S values and how this impacts 
their subsequent H&S behavior. Eventually, the practices used to 
influence behavior related to this dust issue can be extrapolated to 
inform ways to

[[Page 68448]]

communicate about and manage additional health/safety problems within 
the industry via an HSMS as implemented by site leaders.
    The Helmet-CAM incorporates video footage and real-time dust 
measurements of workers while performing their job duties and tasks in 
various locations throughout the workday. This technology has proven to 
be a very viable assessment tool to provide a comparison of where and 
when miners are being exposed to their highest respirable dust 
concentrations. As a result, Helmet-CAM technology is being employed at 
many mines as a way to identify dust exposures of workers and to help 
reduce dust hazards in the environment. However, we do not yet know how 
mine site management is using, if at all, this technology to 
communicate with workers about their personal health and safety 
barriers and behaviors. Discussions about the tasks workers perform 
when exposure levels are high and what actions they can take to reduce 
their dust exposure may be valuable to the industry in helping advance 
the way engineering-control technology is used from a behavioral 
vantage point as well.
    The MLI is designed to help mine workers and organizational 
leadership work together, using the Helmet-CAM to bridge their 
communication efforts, to lower exposure to respirable dust among other 
H/S behaviors. Previous research (Yorio et al. 2014) identified three 
distinct areas that influence the relationship between the strategic 
HSMS and its overall success in implementing and encouraging worker 
behavior change: Worksite leadership, organizational values, and worker 
perceptions and interpretations of management. Data on these three 
contingencies are collected from the management and worker levels 
during three time points throughout a six-week intervention to assess 
the ongoing communication via the Helmet-CAM and effects of the 
communication on behavior. Data collection and analysis pertaining to 
these three areas may occur via a pre/post survey with workers and pre/
mid/post interviews/focus groups with workers and mine site leaders, 
some of which include dialogue around Helmet-CAM footage as provided by 
the workers who choose to participate.
    NIOSH proposes this intervention design at a minimum of three and 
no more than five industrial mineral metal/nonmetal mine sites. All of 
the data collection instruments have been used in previous studies to 
examine worker and leadership variables and factors. Therefore, NIOSH 
knows that the data collection instruments are valid and reliable to 
use in studying the worker and leader levels simultaneously, within the 
same mine. Industrial mineral sites will be recruited who have inquired 
interest in learning how to use the Helmet-CAM on their site and/or 
interest in improving their site wide communication efforts. Only a 
small sample of workers will participate at each mine site because of 
the time required for completion and to ensure the longitudinal data 
can be adequately collected over the six weeks. In other words, we 
would rather collect data multiple times with the same worker and have 
fewer participants than collect data from more workers but not have the 
ability to appropriately follow-up during the subsequent two visits.
    Data collection will take place with no more than 150 mine workers 
and 30 mine site leaders over three years. The respondents targeted for 
this study include any active mine worker and any active site leader at 
an industrial mineral metal/nonmetal mine site. It is estimated that a 
sample of up to 150 mine workers will participate in the intervention, 
which includes wearing the Helmet-CAM for a portion of their job tasks 
(no more than two hours total) during three time periods (when NIOSH is 
present during the field visit). In addition to wearing the Helmet-CAM, 
workers will be asked to complete a pre and post-test survey (~15 
minutes) and an interview during three time points throughout the study 
(~ 30 minutes). The interviews also will debrief Helmet-CAM footage 
with participants at various mining operations who have agreed to 
participate. It also is estimated that a sample of up to 30 mine site 
leaders will participate in interviews/focus groups about HSMS 
practices at the same mining operations which have agreed to 
participate.
    The interviews/focus groups also will occur three times during each 
of the NIOSH field visits and will take no more than 45 minutes each. 
All participants will be between the ages of 18 and 75, currently 
employed, and living in the United States. Participation will require 
no more than 4.5 hours of workers' time over the six-week intervention 
and no more than 2.5 hours of site leaders' time over the six-week 
intervention period.
    There is no cost to respondents other than their time.

                                        Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                      Average
                                                     Number of       Number of      burden per     Total burden
      Type of respondent            Form name       respondents    responses per   response (in        hours
                                                                    respondent        hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mine Site Leaders/Managers....  Mine Recruitment              10               1            5/60               1
                                 Script.
                                Initial/Mid/Post              10               3           45/60              23
                                 HSMS interview
                                 or focus group.
Mine Worker...................  Individual Miner              50               1            5/60               4
                                 Recruitment
                                 Script.
                                Pre/Post Org                  50               2           15/60              25
                                 Perceptions
                                 Survey.
                                Wear Helmet-CAM               50               3               1             150
                                 during job
                                 cycle.
                                Pre/Mid/Post                  50               3           30/60              75
                                 Behavior and
                                 Helmet-CAM
                                 footage
                                 Interview.
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
    Total.....................  ................  ..............  ..............  ..............             278
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[[Page 68449]]

Leroy A. Richardson,
Chief, Information Collection Review Office, Office of Scientific 
Integrity,Office of the Associate Director for Science, Office of the 
Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2014-27018 Filed 11-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P