Federal Acquisition Regulation; Submission to OMB for Review; Place of Performance, 68250-68251 [2014-26937]
Download as PDF
68250
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 220 / Friday, November 14, 2014 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
B. Discussion and Analysis
The analysis of the public comment is
summarized as follows:
Both commenters support the
extension of this information collection.
In addition to supporting the extension,
both commenters suggested some
revisions/enhancements to the current
Standard Form 28.
Comments: One commenter stated
that SF 28 does not achieve its intended
purpose in assisting contracting officers
in determining whether individuals
proposed as sureties are financially
sound with the resources to support the
obligations pledged for a Federal
construction contract. The commenter
states that the SF 28 has not prevented
individual sureties from pledging the
same assets for multiple bonds and
recommends that the SF 28 be enhanced
to ensure that the assets pledged to the
Federal government can be accessed if
needed. The Federal government should
require any assets pledge other than real
estate be placed in escrow only in a
Federal insured financial institution and
that a copy of the escrow agreement be
filed with the SF 28 that shows the
Federal government would have
unrestricted access if needed. In
addition, SF 28 should include
questions relating to the criminal
background, debarments and cease and
desist orders from the state insurance
departments. The SF 28 should also
specify documentation to demonstrate
the value of the assets, verify that it has
been pledged to the United States and
is free of tax liens or other
encumbrances.
The other commenter acknowledges
that changes have been made in the past
to strengthen the form but points out
that the current SF 28 would benefit
from greater specificity on the
information required of individual
sureties relating to the pledging of
assets, especially information relating to
assets other than real estate. Also,
additional information should be
provided on the SF 28 to assist
contracting officers in their efforts to
select an acceptable individual surety
(such as disclosure of Federal tax liens
against the individual surety and
disclosure of personal insolvency
proceedings).
Response: As in the past, these
suggestions will be taken into
consideration and if deemed warranted
a FAR case will be opened to revise the
standard form. At that time, the
estimated total annual public hour and
cost burden will be adjusted if
necessary.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:37 Nov 13, 2014
Jkt 235001
C. Annual Reporting Burden
Based on a comprehensive
reassessment performed, this
information collection resulted in no
change in the total burden hours from
the previous information collection that
was published in the Federal Register at
76 FR 60050 on September 28, 2011.
The previous assessment performed
resulted in a change to the ‘‘Response
per Respondent’’ and ‘‘Hours per
Response’’ categories. The 1.43,
responses per respondent, was lowered
to 1. to adequately reflect this category.
A respondent has to respond completely
not partially when submitting this form.
The ‘‘Hours per Response’’ category was
decreased to .3 (18 minutes) from .4 (24
minutes) to reflect the benefits of being
able to submit the required information
electronically, as respondents no longer
have to print and physically mail forms.
Respondents: 500.
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Total Responses: 500.
Hours per Response: 0.3.
Total Burden Hours: 150.
Obtaining Copies Of Proposals:
Requesters may obtain a copy of the
information collection documents from
the General Services Administration,
Regulatory Secretariat Division (MVCB),
1800 F Street NW., Washington, DC
20405, telephone 202–501–4755. Please
cite OMB Control No. 9000–0001, SF 28,
Affidavit of Individual Surety, in all
correspondence.
Dated: November 7, 2014.
Edward Loeb,
Acting Director, Federal Acquisition Policy
Division, Office of Government-wide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition
Policy, Office of Government-wide Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014–26936 Filed 11–13–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[OMB Control No. 9000–0047; Docket No.
2014–0055; Sequence 14]
Federal Acquisition Regulation;
Submission to OMB for Review; Place
of Performance
Department of Defense (DOD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of request for public
comments regarding an extension to an
existing OMB clearance.
AGENCIES:
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35), the Regulatory Secretariat
Division (MVCB) will be submitting to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) a request to review and approve
an extension of a currently approved
information collection requirement
concerning place of performance. A
notice was published in the Federal
Register at 79 FR 41286 on July 15,
2014. There were two comments
received.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
December 15, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
identified by Information Collection
9000–0047, Place of Performance by any
of the following methods:
• Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by
searching the OMB Control number
9000–0047. Select the link ‘‘Comment
Now’’ that corresponds with
‘‘Information Collection 9000–0047,
Place of Performance’’. Follow the
instructions provided on the screen.
Please include your name, company
name (if any), and ‘‘Information
Collection 9000–0047 Place of
Performance’’ on your attached
document.
• Fax: 202–501–4067.
• Mail: General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat
Division (MVCB) 1800 F Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20405. ATTN: Ms.
Hada Flowers/IC 9000–0047, Place of
Performance.
Instructions: Please submit comments
only and cite Information Collection
9000–0047 Place of Performance, in all
correspondence related to this
collection. All comments received will
be posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal and/or business confidential
information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Michael O. Jackson, Procurement
Analyst, Acquisition Policy Division at
202–208–4949 or email
michaelo.jackson@gsa.gov.
SUMMARY:
A. Purpose
The information relative to the place
of performance and owner of plant or
facility, if other than the prospective
contractor, is a basic requirement when
contracting for supplies or services
(including construction). A prospective
contractor must affirmatively
demonstrate its responsibility. Hence,
the Government must be apprised of
this information prior to award. The
contracting officer must know the place
of performance and the owner of the
E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM
14NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 220 / Friday, November 14, 2014 / Notices
plant or facility to (1) determine bidder
responsibility; (2) determine price
reasonableness; (3) conduct plant or
source inspections; and (4) determine
whether the prospective contractor is a
manufacturer or a regular dealer. The
information is used to determine the
prospective contractor’s eligibility for
awards and to assure proper preparation
of the contract. Prospective contractors
are only required to submit place of
performance information on an
exceptional basis; that is, whenever the
place of performance for a specific
solicitation is different from the address
of the prospective contractor as
indicated in the proposal.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
B. Discussion and Analysis
One respondent submitted public
comments on the extension of the
previously approved information
collection. The analysis of the public
comments is summarized as follows:
Comment: The respondent
commented that ‘‘place of performance’’
information is competitive data. The
respondent expressed concern that the
manufacturer of its supplies would be
revealed to competitors if the
information was provided to the
contracting officer.
Response: The information relative to
the place of performance and owner of
plant or facility is instrumental in
determining bidder responsibility,
responsiveness, and price
reasonableness. The information is used
to determine the firm’s eligibility for
awards and to assure proper preparation
of the contract.
Comment: The respondent stated that
the ‘‘place of performance’’ field on the
DD Form 1155 is mandatory throughout
the Department of Defense (DoD) and
recommended that it be required
throughout the Federal government.
Response: This comment is outside
the parameters of this information
collection. The DD Form 1155 was
developed by DoD for use by DoD
contracting activities.
C. Annual Reporting Burden
Time required to read, prepare, and
record information is estimated at 2.73
minutes per completion. The Federal
Procurement Data System (FPDS) shows
that for fiscal year 2013, there were
2,090,428 new actions (including
contracts and orders, excluding
modifications) for manufacturing in the
United States. The 2,090,428 actions
will be used as the new basis for total
annual responses.
Respondents: 149,316.
Responses per Respondent: 14.
Total Responses: 2,090,428.
Hours per Response: .0455.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:37 Nov 13, 2014
Jkt 235001
Total Burden Hours: 95,114.
D. Public Comments
Public comments are particularly
invited on: Whether this collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of functions of the FAR,
and whether it will have practical
utility; whether our estimate of the
public burden of this collection of
information is accurate, and based on
valid assumptions and methodology;
and ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected.
Obtaining Copies Of Proposals:
Requesters may obtain a copy of the
information collection documents from
the General Services Administration,
Regulatory Secretariat Division (MVCB),
1800 F Street NW., Washington, DC
20405 telephone 202–501–4755. Please
cite OMB Control No. 9000–0047, Place
of Performance, in all correspondence.
Dated: November 3, 2014.
Edward Loeb,
Acting Director, Federal Acquisition Policy
Division, Office of Government-wide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition
Policy, Office of Government-wide Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014–26937 Filed 11–13–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
[Notice CPL–2014–02; Docket No. 2014–
0002; Sequence 35]
GSA Labor-Management Relations
Council Meeting
General Services
Administration.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
The GSA Labor-Management
Relations Council (GLMRC) plans to
meet on Tuesday, December 2, 2014 and
Wednesday, December 3, 2014. The
meeting will start at 9:30 a.m. Eastern
Standard Time on both days and will be
held in Room 1034 of the GSA National
Capitol Region Building, 301 7th Street
SW., Washington, DC 20407. Interested
parties should contact the GLMRC at
glmrc@gsa.gov with any questions and
to check for any meeting changes.
The Council is an advisory body
composed of representatives of the
Federal employee unions representing
General Services Administration (GSA)
employees and senior GSA officials. The
Council was established consistent with
Executive Order 13522, entitled,
‘‘Creating Labor-Management Forums to
Improve Delivery of Government
Services’’ which instructs Federal
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
68251
agencies to establish department or
agency-level labor-management forums
to help identify problems and propose
solutions to better serve the public and
Federal agency missions.
The Council is co-chaired by GSA’s
Chief Human Capitol Officer, together
with two senior union officials from
each of the two Federal employees’
unions representing GSA employees.
At its meetings, the GLMRC works
toward promoting cooperative and
productive relationships between labor
and management, providing employees
through their union representatives with
pre-decisional involvement in all
workplace matters to the fullest extent
practicable. As a part of this, the
GLMRC advises the GSA administrator
on innovative ways to improve delivery
of services and products to the public
while cutting costs and advancing
employee interests. The meeting is
expected to include discussion of the
GLMRC’s priorities for the coming year,
performance management policy, and
workforce mobility and telework.
The meetings are open to the public.
In order to gain entry into the Federal
building where the meeting is being
held, public attendees who are Federal
employees should bring their Federal
employee identification cards, and
members of the general public should
bring their driver’s license or a
government-issued photo identification
card. The manner and time prescribed
for public comment at the meeting is
limited, with such comment taking
place at the end of the meeting.
Extended public comment may be
submitted to the GLMRC at glmrc@
gsa.gov for its consideration prior to the
meeting.
Mrs.
Temple L. Wilson, GLMRC Designated
Federal Officer (DFO), at the General
Services Administration, OHRM, 1800 F
Street NW., Washington, DC 20405;
phone at 202–969–7110, or email at
glmrc@gsa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dated: November 10, 2014.
Temple L. Wilson,
GSA Labor-Management Relations Council,
Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014–27031 Filed 11–13–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–34–P
E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM
14NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 220 (Friday, November 14, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68250-68251]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26937]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[OMB Control No. 9000-0047; Docket No. 2014-0055; Sequence 14]
Federal Acquisition Regulation; Submission to OMB for Review;
Place of Performance
AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DOD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of request for public comments regarding an extension to
an existing OMB clearance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35), the Regulatory Secretariat Division (MVCB) will be
submitting to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request to
review and approve an extension of a currently approved information
collection requirement concerning place of performance. A notice was
published in the Federal Register at 79 FR 41286 on July 15, 2014.
There were two comments received.
DATES: Submit comments on or before December 15, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by Information Collection 9000-
0047, Place of Performance by any of the following methods:
Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
comments via the Federal eRulemaking portal by searching the OMB
Control number 9000-0047. Select the link ``Comment Now'' that
corresponds with ``Information Collection 9000-0047, Place of
Performance''. Follow the instructions provided on the screen. Please
include your name, company name (if any), and ``Information Collection
9000-0047 Place of Performance'' on your attached document.
Fax: 202-501-4067.
Mail: General Services Administration, Regulatory
Secretariat Division (MVCB) 1800 F Street NW., Washington, DC 20405.
ATTN: Ms. Hada Flowers/IC 9000-0047, Place of Performance.
Instructions: Please submit comments only and cite Information
Collection 9000-0047 Place of Performance, in all correspondence
related to this collection. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
and/or business confidential information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Michael O. Jackson, Procurement
Analyst, Acquisition Policy Division at 202-208-4949 or email
michaelo.jackson@gsa.gov.
A. Purpose
The information relative to the place of performance and owner of
plant or facility, if other than the prospective contractor, is a basic
requirement when contracting for supplies or services (including
construction). A prospective contractor must affirmatively demonstrate
its responsibility. Hence, the Government must be apprised of this
information prior to award. The contracting officer must know the place
of performance and the owner of the
[[Page 68251]]
plant or facility to (1) determine bidder responsibility; (2) determine
price reasonableness; (3) conduct plant or source inspections; and (4)
determine whether the prospective contractor is a manufacturer or a
regular dealer. The information is used to determine the prospective
contractor's eligibility for awards and to assure proper preparation of
the contract. Prospective contractors are only required to submit place
of performance information on an exceptional basis; that is, whenever
the place of performance for a specific solicitation is different from
the address of the prospective contractor as indicated in the proposal.
B. Discussion and Analysis
One respondent submitted public comments on the extension of the
previously approved information collection. The analysis of the public
comments is summarized as follows:
Comment: The respondent commented that ``place of performance''
information is competitive data. The respondent expressed concern that
the manufacturer of its supplies would be revealed to competitors if
the information was provided to the contracting officer.
Response: The information relative to the place of performance and
owner of plant or facility is instrumental in determining bidder
responsibility, responsiveness, and price reasonableness. The
information is used to determine the firm's eligibility for awards and
to assure proper preparation of the contract.
Comment: The respondent stated that the ``place of performance''
field on the DD Form 1155 is mandatory throughout the Department of
Defense (DoD) and recommended that it be required throughout the
Federal government.
Response: This comment is outside the parameters of this
information collection. The DD Form 1155 was developed by DoD for use
by DoD contracting activities.
C. Annual Reporting Burden
Time required to read, prepare, and record information is estimated
at 2.73 minutes per completion. The Federal Procurement Data System
(FPDS) shows that for fiscal year 2013, there were 2,090,428 new
actions (including contracts and orders, excluding modifications) for
manufacturing in the United States. The 2,090,428 actions will be used
as the new basis for total annual responses.
Respondents: 149,316.
Responses per Respondent: 14.
Total Responses: 2,090,428.
Hours per Response: .0455.
Total Burden Hours: 95,114.
D. Public Comments
Public comments are particularly invited on: Whether this
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
functions of the FAR, and whether it will have practical utility;
whether our estimate of the public burden of this collection of
information is accurate, and based on valid assumptions and
methodology; and ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected.
Obtaining Copies Of Proposals: Requesters may obtain a copy of the
information collection documents from the General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat Division (MVCB), 1800 F Street
NW., Washington, DC 20405 telephone 202-501-4755. Please cite OMB
Control No. 9000-0047, Place of Performance, in all correspondence.
Dated: November 3, 2014.
Edward Loeb,
Acting Director, Federal Acquisition Policy Division, Office of
Government-wide Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition Policy,
Office of Government-wide Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-26937 Filed 11-13-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P