Safety Zone, Elizabeth River; Portsmouth, VA, 67063-67065 [2014-26670]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 218 / Wednesday, November 12, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
(ii) Analysis. Pursuant to § 1.368–2(l),
Corporation Y will be deemed to issue a
nominal share of Corporation Y stock to
Corporation T in addition to the $100 of cash
actually exchanged for the Corporation T
assets. Corporation T will be deemed to
distribute the nominal share of Corporation
Y stock to Corporation X in addition to the
$100 of cash actually distributed.
Corporation X will have a basis of $50 in the
nominal share of Corporation Y stock under
section 358(a). However, Corporation X is not
an actual shareholder of Corporation Y, the
issuing corporation. Therefore, Corporation X
cannot designate any share of Corporation Y
stock under paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(B) of this
section to which the basis of the nominal
share of Corporation Y stock will attach and
Corporation X will be deemed to distribute
the nominal share of Corporation Y stock to
Corporation P as required by § 1.368–2(l).
Corporation X does not recognize the loss on
the deemed distribution of the nominal share
to Corporation P under section 311(a).
Corporation P’s basis in the nominal share it
receives is zero, its fair market value, under
section 301(d). Under paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(B)
of this section, Corporation P must designate
a share of Corporation Y stock to which the
nominal share’s zero basis will attach.
(d) Effective/applicability date. This
section generally applies to exchanges
and distributions of stock and securities
occurring on or after January 23, 2006.
However, paragraph (a)(2)(iii) and
Examples 15 and 16 of paragraph (c) of
this section apply to exchanges and
distributions of stock and securities
occurring on or after November 12,
2014. See § 1.358–2T(a)(2)(iii) and
§ 1.358–2T(c), Examples 15 and 16, as
contained in 26 CFR part 1, revised
April 1, 2014, for exchanges and
distributions of stock and securities
occurring on or after November 21, 2011
and before November 12, 2014; see
§ 1.358–2(a)(2)(iii), as contained in 26
CFR part 1, revised as of April 1, 2011,
for exchanges and distributions of stock
and securities occurring on or after
January 23, 2006 and before November
21, 2011.
§ 1.358–2T
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
■
[Removed]
Par. 3. Section 1.358–2T is removed.
John Dalrymple,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
Approved: October 17, 2014.
Mark J. Mazur,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax
Policy).
[FR Doc. 2014–26780 Filed 11–10–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:57 Nov 10, 2014
Jkt 235001
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone, Elizabeth River;
Portsmouth, VA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a safety zone on the
navigable waters of the Elizabeth River
in Portsmouth, VA for 12 periods of 48
hours beginning at midnight on January
5, January 12, January 19, January 22,
January 27, February 9, March 2, March
5, March 10, March 23, March 30 and
April 6, 2015. This action will restrict
vessel traffic movement in the
designated area during construction of
the new Midtown Tunnel. This action is
necessary to protect the life and
property of the maritime public due to
the number of work vessels in the
designated area and their lack of
maneuverability while engaged in
construction operations.
DATES: This rule will be effective from
January 5, 2015, through April 6, 2015.
This rule will be enforced for 12 periods
of 48 hours in length, beginning at
midnight on January 5, January 12,
January 19, January 22, January 27,
February 9, March 2, March 5, March
10, March 23, March 30, and April 6,
2015.
SUMMARY:
Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket [USCG–
2014–0693]. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email LCDR Gregory Knoll, Waterways
Management Division Chief, Sector
Hampton Roads, Coast Guard; telephone
(757)-668–5580, email
HamptonRoadsWaterway@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing or
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
submitting material to the docket, call
Cheryl Collins, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)–
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
[Docket No. USCG–2014–0693]
ACTION:
67063
Sfmt 4700
A. Regulatory History and Information
SKW Constructors are building a
second span for the Midtown Tunnel
between Portsmouth and Norfolk, VA
and will be conducting operations that
require closures of the federal channel
beginning in January 2015. A Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) was
published on August 25, 2014 in the
Federal Register (79 FR 50571).
The Coast Guard received one
comment on the NPRM, which is
addressed below in Section C. No
request for a public meeting was
received, and no meeting was held.
B. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the rule is the
Coast Guard’s authority to establish
regulated navigation areas and other
limited access areas: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46
U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1,
6.04–6, 160.5; Public Law 107–295, 116
Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
Due to increased vehicle traffic in the
Hampton Roads area, SKW
Constructors, in concert with Elizabeth
River Crossings and the Virginia
Department of Transportation, is
constructing a second tunnel parallel to
the existing Midtown Tunnel between
Portsmouth and Norfolk, VA. The
construction will involve submerging
elements of the new Midtown Tunnel.
The presence of working vessels and the
inability to maneuver submerged
equipment necessitate closures of the
federal channel. The closures will be in
effect for 12 48-hour periods to allow
SKW Constructors to install the
segments of the tunnel that overlap the
federal channel.
The Coast Guard is establishing a
safety zone in the portion of the
Elizabeth River between Elizabeth River
Channel Buoy 31 (LLNR 9835) and
Elizabeth River Channel Buoy 34 (LLNR
9855). The first of the 12 scheduled
closures will begin at midnight on
January 5, 2015; the final scheduled
closure will begin at midnight on April
6, 2015. The dates and hours are subject
to change due to weather, scheduling
conflicts, equipment failure and other
unforeseen factors. Any changes to these
dates will be listed in the Federal
E:\FR\FM\12NOR1.SGM
12NOR1
67064
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 218 / Wednesday, November 12, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Register if time permits, and in all cases
will be communicated via marine
information broadcasts.
C. Discussion of Comments, Changes,
and the Final Rule
The Coast Guard received one
comment expressing concern about the
lengths of the closures and the
economic impact on business
operations. The comment also requested
a working group of industry members
and the Coast Guard to determine the
potential impact of the closures. No
formal working group was assigned, but
the Coast Guard and SKW participated
in extensive dialogues over several years
with a wide range of port partners and
interested parties including, but not
limited to, the Virginia Maritime
Association, Virginia Pilots Association,
Association of Virginia Docking Pilots,
Independent Docking Pilots, and U.S.
Navy. In addition to being discussed at
meetings exclusively pertaining to the
Midtown Tunnel, the topic has been on
the agenda at multiple Area Maritime
Security Committee and Maritime
Transportation System Planning
Subcommittee meetings, at which port
partners, including industry
representatives, were afforded the
opportunity to discuss the potential
impact of the closures.
The decision to close the channel for
12 periods of 48 hours in length comes
as a result of these extensive and
widespread discussions, which have
been occurring since the earliest
proposals for the project in 2007. Every
effort has been made to reduce the
length of time the channel is closed and
any adverse impacts resulting
therefrom. Based on these efforts, it was
determined that 12 closures of 48 hours
in length constitutes the best available
means to complete the project. Further,
12 separate closures, rather than one
extended closure, will enable SKW to
complete the work while enabling traffic
to flow between the closure periods,
making it the least burdensome and best
available plan.
The NPRM published on August 25,
2014 stated that the first channel closure
would begin on January 1, 2015. The
first closure will actually begin on
January 5, 2015 at midnight. This
change is reflected in the instant Final
Rule.
The Captain of the Port of Hampton
Roads is establishing a safety zone in
the portion of the Elizabeth River
between Elizabeth River Channel Buoy
31 (LLNR 9835) and Elizabeth River
Channel Buoy 34 (LLNR 9855). The
zone will be effective for 12 periods of
48 hours in length, with each respective
period beginning at midnight on January
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:57 Nov 10, 2014
Jkt 235001
5, January 12, January 19, January 22,
January 27, February 9, March 2, March
5, March 10, March 23, March 30 and
April 6, 2015. The dates and hours are
subject to change due to weather,
scheduling conflicts, equipment failure
and other unforeseen factors. Any
changes to these dates will be listed in
the Federal Register if time permits, and
in all cases will be communicated via
marine information broadcasts. No
person or vessel may enter or remain in
the regulated area unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port, Hampton Roads
or his designated Representative.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes or executive
orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
orders. Although this regulation restricts
access to the safety zone, the effect of
this rule will not be significant because:
(i) the safety zone will be in effect for
a limited duration; (ii) the zone is of
limited size; and (iii) the Coast Guard
will make notifications via maritime
advisories so mariners can adjust their
plans accordingly.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The rule may affect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: the owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
the specified portion of the Elizabeth
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
River during the specified dates and
times.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons: (i) The safety
zone will only be in place for a limited
duration; and (ii) before the enforcement
period, maritime advisories will be
issued allowing mariners to adjust their
plans accordingly.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. Small businesses may
send comments on the actions of
Federal employees who enforce, or
otherwise determine compliance with,
Federal regulations to the Small
Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the
Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman
evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency’s responsiveness to
small business. If you wish to comment
on actions by employees of the Coast
Guard, call 1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–
734–3247). The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this rule or
any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
E:\FR\FM\12NOR1.SGM
12NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 218 / Wednesday, November 12, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:57 Nov 10, 2014
Jkt 235001
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves
establishing a safety zone. This rule is
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph (34)(g) of Figure
2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures, and
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
67065
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Hampton Roads or
his designated Representative.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the
immediate vicinity of this safety zone
shall:
(i) Contact on scene contracting
vessels via VHF channel 13 and 16 for
passage instructions.
(ii) If on scene proceed as directed by
any commissioned, warrant or petty
officer on shore or on board a vessel that
is displaying a U.S. Coast Guard Ensign.
(3) The Captain of the Port, Hampton
Roads can be reached through the Sector
Duty Officer at Sector Hampton Roads
in Portsmouth, Virginia at telephone
number (757) 668–5555.
(4) The Coast Guard Representatives
enforcing the safety zone can be
contacted on VHF–FM marine band
radio channel 13 (165.65Mhz) and
channel 16 (156.8 Mhz).
(d) Enforcement Period. This section
will be enforced for 12 periods of 48
hours in length beginning at midnight
on January 5, January 12, January 19,
January 22, January 27, February 9,
March 2, March 5, March 10, March 23,
March 30 and April 6, 2015. Any
deviations from these times willbe
communicated via marine information
broadcasts.
Dated: October 17, 2014.
Christopher S. Keane,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Hampton Roads.
[FR Doc. 2014–26670 Filed 11–10–14; 8:45 am]
■
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6 and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
2. Add § 165.T05–0693 to read as
follows:
33 CFR Part 165
§ 165.T05–0693 Safety Zone, Elizabeth
River; Portsmouth, VA.
RIN 1625–AA00
■
(a) Definitions. For the purposes of
this section, Captain of the Port means
the Commander, Sector Hampton Roads.
Representative means any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
who has been authorized to act on the
behalf of the Captain of the Port.
(b) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: specified waters of the
Captain of the Port Sector Hampton
Roads zone, as defined in 33 CFR 3.25–
10: the marked channel of the Elizabeth
River between Elizabeth River Channel
Buoy 31 (LLNR 9835) and Elizabeth
River Channel Buoy 34 (LLNR 9855).
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, entry into this zone is
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Coast Guard
[Docket No. USCG–2014–0784]
Safety Zone; Natchez Specialties New
Year’s Eve Firework Display, Lower
Mississippi River, Mile Marker, (MM)
363.5 to 364.5
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary Safety Zone for
all waters of the Lower Mississippi
River, from MM 363.5 to MM 364.5.
This safety zone is needed to protect
persons and vessels from the potential
safety hazards associated with a
fireworks display. Entry into this zone
is prohibited to all vessels, mariners,
and persons unless specifically
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12NOR1.SGM
12NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 218 (Wednesday, November 12, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 67063-67065]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26670]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2014-0693]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone, Elizabeth River; Portsmouth, VA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone on the navigable
waters of the Elizabeth River in Portsmouth, VA for 12 periods of 48
hours beginning at midnight on January 5, January 12, January 19,
January 22, January 27, February 9, March 2, March 5, March 10, March
23, March 30 and April 6, 2015. This action will restrict vessel
traffic movement in the designated area during construction of the new
Midtown Tunnel. This action is necessary to protect the life and
property of the maritime public due to the number of work vessels in
the designated area and their lack of maneuverability while engaged in
construction operations.
DATES: This rule will be effective from January 5, 2015, through April
6, 2015. This rule will be enforced for 12 periods of 48 hours in
length, beginning at midnight on January 5, January 12, January 19,
January 22, January 27, February 9, March 2, March 5, March 10, March
23, March 30, and April 6, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
[USCG-2014-0693]. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email LCDR Gregory Knoll, Waterways Management Division Chief,
Sector Hampton Roads, Coast Guard; telephone (757)-668-5580, email
HamptonRoadsWaterway@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202)-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Regulatory History and Information
SKW Constructors are building a second span for the Midtown Tunnel
between Portsmouth and Norfolk, VA and will be conducting operations
that require closures of the federal channel beginning in January 2015.
A Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) was published on August 25, 2014
in the Federal Register (79 FR 50571).
The Coast Guard received one comment on the NPRM, which is
addressed below in Section C. No request for a public meeting was
received, and no meeting was held.
B. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the rule is the Coast Guard's authority to
establish regulated navigation areas and other limited access areas: 33
U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33
CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Public Law 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
Due to increased vehicle traffic in the Hampton Roads area, SKW
Constructors, in concert with Elizabeth River Crossings and the
Virginia Department of Transportation, is constructing a second tunnel
parallel to the existing Midtown Tunnel between Portsmouth and Norfolk,
VA. The construction will involve submerging elements of the new
Midtown Tunnel. The presence of working vessels and the inability to
maneuver submerged equipment necessitate closures of the federal
channel. The closures will be in effect for 12 48-hour periods to allow
SKW Constructors to install the segments of the tunnel that overlap the
federal channel.
The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone in the portion of the
Elizabeth River between Elizabeth River Channel Buoy 31 (LLNR 9835) and
Elizabeth River Channel Buoy 34 (LLNR 9855). The first of the 12
scheduled closures will begin at midnight on January 5, 2015; the final
scheduled closure will begin at midnight on April 6, 2015. The dates
and hours are subject to change due to weather, scheduling conflicts,
equipment failure and other unforeseen factors. Any changes to these
dates will be listed in the Federal
[[Page 67064]]
Register if time permits, and in all cases will be communicated via
marine information broadcasts.
C. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Final Rule
The Coast Guard received one comment expressing concern about the
lengths of the closures and the economic impact on business operations.
The comment also requested a working group of industry members and the
Coast Guard to determine the potential impact of the closures. No
formal working group was assigned, but the Coast Guard and SKW
participated in extensive dialogues over several years with a wide
range of port partners and interested parties including, but not
limited to, the Virginia Maritime Association, Virginia Pilots
Association, Association of Virginia Docking Pilots, Independent
Docking Pilots, and U.S. Navy. In addition to being discussed at
meetings exclusively pertaining to the Midtown Tunnel, the topic has
been on the agenda at multiple Area Maritime Security Committee and
Maritime Transportation System Planning Subcommittee meetings, at which
port partners, including industry representatives, were afforded the
opportunity to discuss the potential impact of the closures.
The decision to close the channel for 12 periods of 48 hours in
length comes as a result of these extensive and widespread discussions,
which have been occurring since the earliest proposals for the project
in 2007. Every effort has been made to reduce the length of time the
channel is closed and any adverse impacts resulting therefrom. Based on
these efforts, it was determined that 12 closures of 48 hours in length
constitutes the best available means to complete the project. Further,
12 separate closures, rather than one extended closure, will enable SKW
to complete the work while enabling traffic to flow between the closure
periods, making it the least burdensome and best available plan.
The NPRM published on August 25, 2014 stated that the first channel
closure would begin on January 1, 2015. The first closure will actually
begin on January 5, 2015 at midnight. This change is reflected in the
instant Final Rule.
The Captain of the Port of Hampton Roads is establishing a safety
zone in the portion of the Elizabeth River between Elizabeth River
Channel Buoy 31 (LLNR 9835) and Elizabeth River Channel Buoy 34 (LLNR
9855). The zone will be effective for 12 periods of 48 hours in length,
with each respective period beginning at midnight on January 5, January
12, January 19, January 22, January 27, February 9, March 2, March 5,
March 10, March 23, March 30 and April 6, 2015. The dates and hours are
subject to change due to weather, scheduling conflicts, equipment
failure and other unforeseen factors. Any changes to these dates will
be listed in the Federal Register if time permits, and in all cases
will be communicated via marine information broadcasts. No person or
vessel may enter or remain in the regulated area unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port, Hampton Roads or his designated
Representative.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those orders. Although this regulation
restricts access to the safety zone, the effect of this rule will not
be significant because: (i) the safety zone will be in effect for a
limited duration; (ii) the zone is of limited size; and (iii) the Coast
Guard will make notifications via maritime advisories so mariners can
adjust their plans accordingly.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. The rule may affect the following entities, some of
which might be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit or anchor in the specified portion of the
Elizabeth River during the specified dates and times.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: (i) The
safety zone will only be in place for a limited duration; and (ii)
before the enforcement period, maritime advisories will be issued
allowing mariners to adjust their plans accordingly.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above. Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without
[[Page 67065]]
jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule involves establishing a safety zone. This rule is
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph (34)(g) of
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6 and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T05-0693 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-0693 Safety Zone, Elizabeth River; Portsmouth, VA.
(a) Definitions. For the purposes of this section, Captain of the
Port means the Commander, Sector Hampton Roads. Representative means
any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who has been
authorized to act on the behalf of the Captain of the Port.
(b) Location. The following area is a safety zone: specified waters
of the Captain of the Port Sector Hampton Roads zone, as defined in 33
CFR 3.25-10: the marked channel of the Elizabeth River between
Elizabeth River Channel Buoy 31 (LLNR 9835) and Elizabeth River Channel
Buoy 34 (LLNR 9855).
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec. 165.23 of this part, entry into this zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, Hampton Roads or his designated
Representative.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the immediate vicinity of this
safety zone shall:
(i) Contact on scene contracting vessels via VHF channel 13 and 16
for passage instructions.
(ii) If on scene proceed as directed by any commissioned, warrant
or petty officer on shore or on board a vessel that is displaying a
U.S. Coast Guard Ensign.
(3) The Captain of the Port, Hampton Roads can be reached through
the Sector Duty Officer at Sector Hampton Roads in Portsmouth, Virginia
at telephone number (757) 668-5555.
(4) The Coast Guard Representatives enforcing the safety zone can
be contacted on VHF-FM marine band radio channel 13 (165.65Mhz) and
channel 16 (156.8 Mhz).
(d) Enforcement Period. This section will be enforced for 12
periods of 48 hours in length beginning at midnight on January 5,
January 12, January 19, January 22, January 27, February 9, March 2,
March 5, March 10, March 23, March 30 and April 6, 2015. Any deviations
from these times willbe communicated via marine information broadcasts.
Dated: October 17, 2014.
Christopher S. Keane,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Hampton Roads.
[FR Doc. 2014-26670 Filed 11-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P