Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Arkansas; Revisions for the Regulation and Permitting of Fine Particulate Matter, 66663-66670 [2014-26627]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 217 / Monday, November 10, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Bankruptcy Code,’’ as amended, when
applicable, which was issued by the
American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants on November 19, 1990.
(i) Certification of Periodic Reports’
accuracy. The Periodic Reports must be
certified under penalty of perjury that
they are true and accurate by an
individual who is authorized under
applicable law to certify on behalf of the
debtor or trustee. The debtor’s or
trustee’s attorney must maintain
possession of the Periodic Reports with
original signatures for five years, unless
otherwise provided in local court rules.
A pro se debtor must submit the
Periodic Reports with original
signatures to the Office of United States
Trustee that is responsible for
supervising the case.
(j) Mandatory usage of Periodic
Reports. The Periodic Reports must be
utilized by debtors and trustees when
completing their monthly operating
reports or post-confirmation reports. All
debtors and chapter 11 trustees serving
in districts where a United States
Trustee is serving must use the Periodic
Reports in the administration of their
cases, in the same manner and with the
same content, as set forth in this Rule.
(1) All Periodic Reports may be
electronically or mechanically
reproduced so long as the content and
the form remain consistent with the
Periodic Reports as they are posted on
EOUST’s Web site; and
(2) The Periodic Reports shall be filed
via the United States Bankruptcy
Courts’ Case Management/Electronic
Case Filing System (CM/ECF) as a
‘‘smart form,’’ meaning the reports are
data-enabled.
Dated: October 24, 2014.
Clifford J. White III
Director, Executive Office for United States
Trustees.
[FR Doc. 2014–25975 Filed 11–7–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–40–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
[EPA–R06–OAR–2014–0700; FRL–9919–12–
Region 6]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Arkansas;
Revisions for the Regulation and
Permitting of Fine Particulate Matter
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:44 Nov 07, 2014
Jkt 235001
portions of three revisions to the
Arkansas State Implementation Plan
(SIP) submitted by the Arkansas
Department of Environmental Quality
on July 26, 2010; November 6, 2012; and
September 10, 2014. Together, these
three submittals update the Arkansas
SIP such that the ADEQ has the
authority to implement the current
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) and regulate and permit
emissions of fine particulate matter
(particulate matter with diameters less
than or equal to 2.5 micrometers (PM2.5))
and its precursors through the Arkansas
PSD program. The September 10, 2014,
submittal is a request for parallel
processing of revisions proposed by the
ADEQ on August 22, 2014. The EPA is
proposing to find that the Arkansas
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
(PSD) New Source Review (NSR) SIP
meets all Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act)
requirements for PM2.5 PSD. EPA is also
proposing to approve a portion of the
December 17, 2007 SIP submittal for the
PM2.5 NAAQS pertaining to interstate
transport of air pollution and PSD. EPA
is proposing these actions under section
110 and part C of the CAA.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before December 10, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R06–
OAR–2014–0700, by one of the
following methods:
• www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Email: Ms. Adina Wiley at
wiley.adina@epa.gov.
• Mail or Delivery: Ms. Adina Wiley,
Air Permits Section (6PD–R),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1445
Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas
75202–2733.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R06–OAR–2014–
0700. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
the disclosure of which is restricted by
statute. Do not submit information
through https://www.regulations.gov or
email, if you believe that it is CBI or
otherwise protected from disclosure.
The https://www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means that EPA will not know
your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an email
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
66663
comment directly to EPA without going
through https://www.regulations.gov,
your email address will be
automatically captured and included as
part of the comment that is placed in the
public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment along with any disk or CD–
ROM submitted. If EPA cannot read
your comment due to technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to
consider your comment. Electronic files
should avoid the use of special
characters and any form of encryption
and should be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket, visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: The index to the docket for
this action is available electronically at
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas. While all
documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available at
either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment with the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
paragraph below or Mr. Bill Deese at
214–665–7253.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Adina Wiley (6PD–R), Air Permits
Section, Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue
(6PD–R), Suite 1200, Dallas, TX 75202–
2733. The telephone number is (214)
665–2115. Ms. Wiley can also be
reached via electronic mail at
wiley.adina@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background for Our Proposed Action
A. General Information on SIPs
B. Preconstruction Review and Permitting
Programs
C. Summary of State Submittals
1. The July 26, 2010 Submittal
2. The November 6, 2012 Submittal
3. The September 10, 2014 Submittal
4. What is the EPA not addressing?
II. The EPA’s Analysis of the State Submittals
A. Revisions to the Arkansas PSD Program
To Address PM2.5 Permitting
1. The NSR PM2.5 Implementation Rule
2. The PM2.5 PSD Increment—SILs—SMC
Rule
E:\FR\FM\10NOP1.SGM
10NOP1
66664
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 217 / Monday, November 10, 2014 / Proposed Rules
3. Interstate Transport of Air Pollution and
PSD
B. Impacts on Existing Federal
Implementation Plan Clocks
C. General Updates to the Arkansas SIP
III. Proposed Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background for Our Proposed Action
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
A. General Information on SIPs
Section 110 of the CAA requires states
to develop air pollution regulations and
control strategies to ensure that air
quality meets the National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS) established
by the EPA. The NAAQS are established
under section 109 of the CAA and
currently address six criteria pollutants:
Carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide,
ozone, lead, particulate matter, and
sulfur dioxide. A SIP is a set of air
pollution regulations, control strategies,
other means or techniques, and
technical analyses developed by the
state, to ensure that air quality in the
state meets the NAAQS. It is required by
section 110 and other provisions of the
CAA. A SIP protects air quality
primarily by addressing air pollution at
its point of origin. SIPs can be extensive,
containing state regulations or other
enforceable documents, and supporting
information such as emissions
inventories, monitoring networks, and
modeling demonstrations. Each state
must submit regulations and control
strategies to the EPA for approval and
incorporation into the federallyenforceable SIP.
B. Preconstruction Review and
Permitting Programs
The Act at section 110(a)(2)(C)
requires SIPs to include preconstruction
review and permitting programs
applicable to certain new and modified
stationary sources of air pollutants.
These requirements apply in attainment
and nonattainment areas and cover both
major and minor new sources and
modifications. Collectively, these SIP
requirements are referred to as the New
Source Review (NSR) SIP. The CAA
NSR SIP program is composed of three
separate programs: Prevention of
significant deterioration (PSD),
nonattainment new source review
(NNSR), and Minor NSR. PSD is
established in part C of title I of the
CAA and applies in areas that meet the
NAAQS—‘‘attainment areas’’—as well
as areas where there is insufficient
information to determine if the area
meets the NAAQS—‘‘unclassifiable
areas.’’ The NNSR SIP program is
established in part D of title I of the
CAA and applies in areas that are
designated as ‘‘nonattainment areas’’
because they are not in attainment of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:44 Nov 07, 2014
Jkt 235001
NAAQS. The Minor NSR SIP program
addresses construction or modification
activities for sources that will not emit,
or have the potential to emit, above
certain thresholds and thus do not
qualify as ‘‘major.’’ Minor NSR applies
regardless of the designation of the area
in which a source is located. EPA
regulations governing the criteria that
states must satisfy for EPA approval of
the NSR programs as part of the SIP are
contained in 40 CFR sections 51.160–
51.166.
C. Summary of State Submittals
The ADEQ submitted a collection of
revisions to the Arkansas SIP on July 26,
2010; November 6, 2012; and September
10, 2014. Together, these revisions
update the Arkansas SIP to implement
the requirements of the 1997 and 2006
PM2.5 NAAQS, regulate emissions of
PM2.5 and its precursors through the
Arkansas PSD program, and make
general updates throughout the entirety
of the Arkansas SIP to address grammar,
formatting, and updates to incorporation
by reference dates. Additionally, on
December 17, 2007, Arkansas submitted
a letter certifying that its SIP addressed
the CAA requirements for interstate
transport of air pollution (CAA
110(a)(2)(D)(i)) for the 1997 PM2.5
NAAQS. These SIP submittals are
available in the electronic docket found
in the www.regulations.gov Web site
(Docket number EPA–R06–OAR–2014–
0700).
1. The July 26, 2010 Submittal
On December 5, 2008, the Arkansas
Pollution Control and Ecology
Commission (APC&EC) adopted
revisions to the Regulation 19—
Regulations of the Arkansas Plan of
Implementation for Air Pollution
Control. Governor Beebe submitted
these regulations as a revision to the
Arkansas SIP in a letter dated July 26,
2010. On November 23, 2010, Teresa
Marks, Director of Arkansas Department
of Environmental Quality (ADEQ),
provided a clarification letter regarding
the July 26, 2010 submittal. This
clarification letter was a resubmission of
the SIP revision resulting from the
previous submittal containing one
incorrect hardcopy and electronic copy
of the SIP revision. As part of this
action, the EPA is addressing the
following revisions contained in the
July 26, 2010 submittal that were
adopted on December 5, 2008, effective
January 25, 2009:
• Non-substantive revisions to
Regulation 19, Chapter 1 to correct
formatting, clarify the incorporation by
reference dates, and clarify acronyms.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
• Substantive revisions to Regulation
19, Chapter 2 to add new definition for
‘‘PM2.5’’ and ‘‘Title I modification’’ and
to revise the definition of ‘‘Volatile
organic compounds’’. Non-substantive
revisions to correct formatting, clarify
the incorporation by reference dates,
and clarify acronyms.
• Non-substantive revisions to
Regulation 19, Chapter 3 to correct
formatting.
• Non-substantive revisions to
Regulation 19, Chapter 5 to correct
formatting and clarify acronyms.
• Non-substantive revisions to
Regulation 19, Chapter 6 to correct
formatting and clarify acronyms.
• Non-substantive revisions to
Regulation 19, Chapter 7 to clarify
incorporation by reference dates.
• Non-substantive revisions to
Regulation 19, Chapter 10 to correct
formatting and clarify acronyms.
• Non-substantive revisions to
Regulation 19, Chapter 11 to correct
formatting.
• Non-substantive revisions to
Regulation 19, Chapter 13 to correct
formatting and clarify acronyms.
2. The November 6, 2012 Submittal
On June 22, 2012, the APC&EC
adopted revisions to Regulation 9—
Permit Fee Regulations, Regulation 19—
Regulations of the Arkansas Plan of
Implementation for Air Pollution
Control, and Regulation 26—
Regulations of the Arkansas Operating
Air Permit Program. On October 26,
2012, APC&EC adopted additional
revisions to Regulation 19. Governor
Beebe submitted these regulations as a
revision to the Arkansas SIP in a letter
dated November 6, 2012. As part of this
action, the EPA is addressing the
following revisions contained in the
November 6, 2012 submittal that were
adopted on June 22, 2012, and October
26, 2012, effective July 9, 2012, and
November 18, 2012, respectively:
• Substantive revision to Regulation
19, Chapter 1 to address greenhouse
gases (GHGs).
• Substantive revisions to Regulation
19, Chapter 2 to add new definition for
‘‘CO2 equivalent emissions’’ and revise
the definition of ‘‘Federally regulated
pollutant’’.
3. The September 10, 2014 Submittal
On September 10, 2014, Teresa Marks,
Director of the ADEQ, submitted a
request for parallel processing of
proposed AR SIP revisions to Regulation
19—Regulations of the Arkansas Plan of
Implementation for Air Pollution
Control. As part of this action, the EPA
is addressing the following revisions
E:\FR\FM\10NOP1.SGM
10NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 217 / Monday, November 10, 2014 / Proposed Rules
contained in the September 10, 2014,
request for parallel processing:
• Substantive revisions to Regulation
19, Chapter 2 to add a new definition for
‘‘PM2.5 emissions’’ and to revise existing
definitions for ‘‘NAAQS,’’ ‘‘particulate
matter emissions,’’ ‘‘PM2.5,’’ and ‘‘VOC’’
as well as other non-substantive
revisions throughout the Definitions to
correct formatting and grammar.
• Substantive revisions to Regulation
19, Chapter 5 to specify that no person
shall cause or permit the construction or
modification of equipment which would
cause or allow any ambient air
increment in the PSD program to be
exceeded.
• Substantive revisions to Regulation
19, Chapter 9 to provide for the
authority to regulate PM2.5 and its
precursors through the Arkansas PSD
program.
• New Regulation 19, Appendix B to
provide the National Ambient Air
Quality Standards List.
4. What is the EPA not addressing?
States have the obligation to adopt
and submit regulations for the EPA’s
review and approval into the federally
enforceable SIP. The EPA has an
obligation under the CAA to address
each submittal from the state. However,
we are not obligated to address all
portions of a submittal at once. Where
the EPA determines that a provision is
independent of another, we have the
discretion to address the submitted
provisions separately. Accordingly, the
EPA is taking no action at this time on
the following revisions submitted by the
ADEQ. As indicated below, we have
determined that each of the submitted
provisions is separate from the PSD
program and not necessary for PSD
implementation.
• The EPA is taking no action at this
time on the Substantive revisions to
Regulation 19, Chapter 4 to revise the
Minor NSR permitting thresholds that
were submitted on July 26, 2010. The
action we are taking today will
substantively revise the Arkansas PSD
program to provide for regulation and
permitting of PM2.5 and its precursors.
We are also making non-substantive
updates to the remainder of the
Arkansas SIP. Our analysis today is not
relevant to the Arkansas Minor NSR
permitting program and the provisions
on which we are reviewing and acting
can operate separately from the
Arkansas Minor NSR Program.
Therefore, the EPA is taking no action
on the substantive revisions to add
provisions under the following new
Sections: Reg. 19.414—Operational
Flexibility-Applicant’s Duty to Apply
for Alternative Scenarios; Reg. 19.415—
Changes Resulting in No Emissions
Increases; Reg. 19.416—Permit
Flexibility; and Reg. 19.417—
Registration; and the non-substantive
revisions to correct formatting, clarify
the incorporation by reference dates,
and clarify acronyms. We note that the
revisions to the Arkansas Minor NSR
Program at Regulation 19, Chapter 4
submitted on July 26, 2010, will be
addressed separately by the EPA in a
later action.
• The EPA is taking no action at this
time on the revisions to the Insignificant
Activities List in Regulation 19,
Appendix A that were submitted on July
26, 2010 and November 6, 2012.
Regulation 19, Appendix A is part of the
Arkansas Minor NSR program and will
be addressed with the pending revisions
to Regulation 19, Chapter 4.
• The EPA is taking no action at this
time on the Fee Regulation provisions at
Regulation 9, Chapter 5 submitted on
November 6, 2012. The EPA will
address the fee provisions in a separate
action at a later time. The provisions on
which we are reviewing and acting can
operate independent of the fee
provisions. Therefore, the EPA is taking
no action on the substantive revisions to
Regulation 9, Chapter 5 to replace the
66665
current Fee Regulation contained in the
Arkansas SIP, which include
substantive revisions to address fee
requirements for carbon dioxide and
methane, as well as, non-substantive
revisions to correct formatting.
• The EPA is taking no action at this
time on the November 6, 2012,
substantive revisions to Regulation 19,
Chapter 4 to address GHGs in the
Arkansas Minor NSR program. These
revisions will be addressed with the
remainder of the pending revisions to
the Arkansas Minor NSR program at a
later date.
• The EPA is taking no action at this
time on the November 6, 2012,
substantive revisions to Regulation 26,
Chapter 3 to address GHG permitting
and the non-substantive revisions to
Regulation 26, Chapter 4 to correct
formatting and clarify the incorporation
by reference dates. Regulation 26 is the
Arkansas Title V program.
• The EPA is taking no action at this
time on the revisions to the Arkansas
PSD Program to provide for GHG PSD
PAL permitting adopted by the state on
June 28, 2013, effective on July 27, 2013.
These revisions were submitted to EPA
on January 7, 2014. The submittal
included revisions to the Arkansas
Regulation 19, Chapter 9, sections
19.904(A)(1), 19.904(E)(3), and
19.904(G)(1). These revisions were
solely to implement the GHG PSD PAL
revisions. Since the Supreme Court of
the United States rendered its decision
on June 23, 2014, in Utility Air
Regulatory Group (UARG) v. EPA (No.
12–1146), the EPA does not find it
appropriate to take action on provisions
implementing permitting provisions for
GHG PSD PALs at this time. The EPA
will address this submittal from the
state in a separate action at a later date.
The following table summarizes
which regulatory provisions the EPA is
taking action on in today’s proposed
approval.
TABLE 1—SUMMARY OF THE INDIVIDUAL REVISIONS TO EACH SECTION EVALUATED
Title
Date submitted to
EPA
Adopted by State
Regulation 9, Chapter 5 ...........
Air Permit Fees ........................
November 6, 2012 ..
June 22, 2012 and
October 26, 2012.
No action at this time.
Regulation 19, Chapter 1 .........
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Section
Title, Intent, and Purpose ........
July 26, 2010 ..........
December 5, 2008 ..
Evaluated in this action.
November 6, 2012 ..
June 22, 2012 and
October 26, 2012.
Evaluated in this action.
July 26, 2010 ..........
December 5, 2008 ..
Evaluated in this action.
November 6, 2012 ..
June 22, 2012 and
October 26, 2012.
Evaluated in this action.
Regulation 19, Chapter 2 .........
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:44 Nov 07, 2014
Definitions ................................
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\10NOP1.SGM
10NOP1
Comments
66666
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 217 / Monday, November 10, 2014 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1—SUMMARY OF THE INDIVIDUAL REVISIONS TO EACH SECTION EVALUATED—Continued
Minor Source Review ..............
General Emissions Limitations
Applicable to Equipment.
Evaluated in this action.
July 26, 2010 ..........
December 5, 2008 ..
Evaluated in this action.
August 22, 2014 .....
Evaluated in this action.
July 26, 2010 ..........
December 5, 2008 ..
No action at this time.
June 22, 2012 and
October 26, 2012.
No action at this time.
July 26, 2010 ..........
December 5, 2008 ..
Evaluated in this action.
September 10, 2014
request for parallel processing.
Regulation 19, Chapter 5 .........
Protection of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards.
August 22, 2014 .....
November 6, 2012 ..
Regulation 19, Chapter 4 .........
Title
Adopted by State
September 10, 2014
request for parallel processing.
Regulation 19, Chapter 3 .........
Date submitted to
EPA
September 10, 2014
request for parallel processing.
Section
August 22, 2014 .....
Evaluated in this action.
Comments
Regulation 19, Chapter 6 .........
Upset and Emergency Conditions.
July 26, 2010 ..........
December 5, 2008 ..
Evaluated in this action.
Regulation 19, Chapter 7 .........
Sampling, Monitoring, and Reporting Requirements.
July 26, 2010 ..........
December 5, 2008 ..
Evaluated in this action.
Regulation 19, Chapter 8 .........
111(D) Designated Facilities ...
Regulation 19, Chapter 9 .........
Prevention of Significant Deterioration.
Not part of the Arkansas SIP.
July 26, 2010 ..........
December 5, 2008 ..
Approved by EPA on April 2,
2013, at 78 FR 19596.
November 6, 2012 ..
June 22, 2012 and
October 26, 2012.
Approved by EPA on April 2,
2013, at 78 FR 19596.
January 7, 2014 ......
June 28, 2014 .........
No action at this time.
September 10, 2014
request for parallel processing.
August 22, 2014 .....
Evaluated in this action.
Regulations for the Control of
Volatile Organic Compounds
in Pulaski County.
July 26, 2010 ..........
December 5, 2008 ..
Evaluated in this action.
Regulation 19, Chapter 11 .......
Major Source Permitting Procedures.
July 26, 2010 ..........
December 5, 2008 ..
Evaluated in this action.
Regulation 19, Chapter 13 .......
Stage I Vapor Recovery ..........
July 26, 2010 ..........
December 5, 2008 ..
Evaluated in this action.
Regulation 19, Chapter 14 .......
CAIR NOX Ozone Season
Trading Program General
Provisions.
July 26, 2010 ..........
December 5, 2008 ..
Approved by EPA on April 17,
2014, at 78 FR 21631.
Regulation 19, Chapter 15 .......
Regional Haze .........................
July 26, 2010 ..........
December 5, 2008 ..
Approved by EPA on March
12, 2012, at 77 FR 14604.
Regulation 19, Appendix A .......
Insignificant Activities List ........
July 26, 2010 ..........
December 5, 2008 ..
No action at this time.
November 6, 2012 ..
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulation 19, Chapter 10 .......
June 22, 2012 and
October 26, 2012.
Regulation 19, Appendix B .......
National Ambient Air Quality
Standards List.
September 10, 2014
request for parallel processing.
August 22, 2014 .....
Evaluated in this action.
Regulation 26, Chapter 3 .........
Requirements for a Permit, Applicability.
November 6, 2012 ..
June 22, 2012 and
October 26, 2012.
No action at this time.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:44 Nov 07, 2014
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\10NOP1.SGM
10NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 217 / Monday, November 10, 2014 / Proposed Rules
66667
TABLE 1—SUMMARY OF THE INDIVIDUAL REVISIONS TO EACH SECTION EVALUATED—Continued
Section
Title
Date submitted to
EPA
Adopted by State
Regulation 26, Chapter 4 .........
Applications for Permits ...........
November 6, 2012 ..
June 22, 2012 and
October 26, 2012.
We have evaluated the July 26, 2010,
November 6, 2012, and September 10,
2014, SIP submissions for whether they
meet the CAA and 40 CFR Part 51, and
are consistent with the EPA’s
interpretation of the relevant provisions.
Today’s proposed action and the
accompanying Technical Support
Document (TSD) present our rational for
proposing approval of these regulations
as meeting the minimum federal
requirements for the adoption and
implementation of the NAAQS and
required PSD permitting elements. The
EPA is parallel processing the revisions
proposed on August 22, 2014, based on
the request submitted on September 10,
2014. This means that the EPA is
proposing approval at the same time
that the ADEQ is completing the public
comment and rulemaking process at the
state level. The September 10, 2014, SIP
revision request will not be complete
and will not meet all the adequacy
criteria until the state public process is
complete and the SIP revision is
submitted as a final adoption with a
letter from the Governor or Governor’s
designee. The EPA is proposing to
approve the SIP revision request after
completion of the state public process
and final submittal.
II. The EPA’s Analysis of the State
Submittals
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
A. Revisions to the Arkansas PSD
Program To Address PM2.5 Permitting
The ADEQ adopted revisions to the
Arkansas SIP and the Arkansas PSD
Program on August 22, 2014. The ADEQ
submitted these adopted revisions to the
EPA for parallel processing on
September 10, 2014. These ADEQ
revisions address the regulatory
requirements of the EPA’s
implementation rules for the 1997 and
2006 PM2.5 NAAQS as applicable to the
State’s general regulatory program and
its PSD permitting program.
Specifically, the EPA promulgated two
rules establishing both required and
optional implementation regulations for
PM2.5: The May 16, 2008 final rule for
Implementation of the New Source
Review (NSR) Program for Particulate
Matter Less than 2.5 Micrometers
(PM2.5) (referred to as the NSR PM2.5
Implementation Rule), 73 FR 28321, and
the October 20, 2010 final rule for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:44 Nov 07, 2014
Jkt 235001
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
(PSD) for Particulate Matter Less than
2.5 Micrometers (PM2.5)—Increments,
Significant Impact Levels (SILs) and
Significant Monitoring Concentration
(SMC) (referred to as the PM2.5 PSD
Increments—SILs—SMC Rule), 75 FR
64864. Today’s proposed action and the
accompanying Technical Support
Document (TSD) present our rationale
for proposing approval of this
submission as part of the Arkansas PSD
SIP by finding that the Arkansas PSD
SIP includes the requirements to
address these two rulemakings
concerning the PM2.5 NAAQS.1
Comments
No action at this time.
(3) Condensable PM10/PM2.5
Emissions: The Arkansas PSD program
includes condensable emissions of PM10
and PM2.5 for purposes of PSD
permitting at Regulation 19.903(B)(6).
The language submitted on September
10, 2014, is consistent with the federal
requirements promulgated on May 16,
2008 at 40 CFR 51.166(b)(49)(vi) and
corrected by EPA on October 25, 2012
at 40 CFR 51.166(b)(49)(i)(a).
b. Litigation on the May 16, 2008 PM2.5
NSR Implementation Rule
On January 4, 2013, the U.S. Court of
Appeals, in Natural Resources Defense
Council v. EPA, 706 F.3d 428 (D.C. Cir.),
1. The NSR PM2.5 Implementation Rule
issued a judgment that remanded the
a. How does the September 10, 2014,
EPA’s 2007 and 2008 rules
revision to the Arkansas PSD program
implementing the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS,
address the requirements of the NSR
including the NSR PM2.5
PM2.5 Implementation Rule?
Implementation Rule. The court ordered
The EPA’s final NSR PM2.5
the EPA to ‘‘repromulgate these rules
Implementation Rule required states to
pursuant to Subpart 4 consistent with
submit applicable SIP revisions to the
this opinion.’’ Id. at 437. Subpart 4 of
EPA no later than May 16, 2011, to
Part D, Title 1 of the CAA establishes
address this Rule’s PSD and NNSR SIP
additional provisions for particulate
requirements. Based on the analysis
matter nonattainment areas.
presented below and in our
The 2008 NSR PM2.5 Implementation
accompanying TSD, the EPA is
proposing to find that the September 10, Rule addressed by the court decision
described above, promulgated NSR
2014, revision to the Arkansas PSD SIP
requirements for implementation of
includes all of the PSD requirements of
PM2.5 in both nonattainment areas
the 2008 final NSR PM2.5
(NNSR) and attainment/unclassifiable
Implementation Rule for the following
areas (PSD). As the requirements of
reasons:
Subpart 4 only pertain to nonattainment
(1) Regulation of Direct PM2.5 and
areas, the EPA does not consider the
Precursors: The Arkansas SIP at
Regulation 19, Chapter 3 and Appendix portions of the 2008 rule that address
B gives the ADEQ the authority to
requirements for PM2.5 in attainment
implement the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS for
and unclassifiable areas to be affected
purposes of PSD. Further, the
by the court’s opinion. Moreover, the
September 10, 2014, revisions to the
EPA does not anticipate the need to
definition of ‘‘Regulated NSR pollutant’’ revise any PSD requirements
at Regulation 19.903(B) identify that
promulgated in the 2008 NSR PM2.5
direct emissions of PM2.5 and its
Rule in order to comply with the court’s
precursors, NOX and SO2, are regulated
decision. Accordingly, the EPA’s
under the Arkansas PSD program.
proposed approval of Arkansas’s SIP
(2) Establish SERs: The Arkansas PSD revisions with respect to the PSD
program at Regulation 19.904(A)(2)
requirements promulgated by the 2008
incorporates by reference the significant NSR PM2.5 Rule does not conflict with
emission rates for direct PM2.5 emissions the court’s opinion.
and precursors of PM2.5 as promulgated
The Court’s decision with respect to
by EPA at 40 CFR 52.21(b)(23) on May
the NNSR requirements promulgated by
16, 2008.
the 2008 NSR PM2.5 Rule also does not
affect the EPA’s action on the present
1 There are no PM
2.5 nonattainment areas in
proposed approval, as this proposed
Arkansas; therefore ADEQ is not required to adopt
approval does not address any of the
or submit a NNSR program for PM2.5
implementation as part of the Arkansas SIP.
PM2.5 nonattainment NSR requirements.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\10NOP1.SGM
10NOP1
66668
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 217 / Monday, November 10, 2014 / Proposed Rules
a. How does the September 10, 2014
revision to the Arkansas PSD program
satisfy the Required Increment
Component of the PM2.5 Increment—
SILs—SMC Rule?
The EPA finalized the PM2.5 PSD
Increment—SILs—SMC Rule to provide
additional regulatory requirements
under the PSD SIP program regarding
the implementation of the PM2.5
NAAQS. See 75 FR 64864. The PM2.5
PSD Increment—SILs—SMC Rule
required states to submit SIP revisions
to the EPA by July 20, 2012, adopting
provisions equivalent to or at least as
stringent as the PSD increments and
associated implementing regulations.
Specifically, the SIP rule requires a
state’s submitted PSD SIP revision to
adopt and submit for EPA approval the
PM2.5 increments pursuant to section
166(a) of the CAA to prevent significant
deterioration of air quality in areas
meeting the NAAQS and associated
implementing regulations. More detail
on the PM2.5 PSD Increment—SILs—
SMC Rule can be found in the EPA’s
October 20, 2010 final rule. See 75 FR
64864.
With respect to the required
increment component of the PM2.5
Increment—SILs—SMC Rule, the ADEQ
incorporated by reference the federal
requirements for PM2.5 increment at 40
CFR 52.21(c) as promulgated by EPA on
October 20, 2011. The ADEQ also
incorporated by reference the required
definitions to implement the PM2.5
increment promulgated by the EPA on
October 20, 2011, such as baseline area
at 40 CFR 52.21(b)(15)(i), major source
baseline date at 40 CFR 52.21(b)(14)(i),
minor source baseline date at 40 CFR
52.21(b)(14)(ii) and (iii), source impact
analysis requirements at 40 CFR
52.21(k)(1) and requirements for sources
impacting Federal Class I areas at 40
CFR 52.21(p). The EPA is proposing to
find that the Arkansas PSD NSR SIP
now includes the PM2.5 increments and
associated implementing regulations,
and these increments and implementing
regulations are applicable requirements
for sources and modifications that are
major for PM2.5 and/or the identified
precursors of SO2 and NOX.
submit for EPA approval SILs used as a
screening tool to evaluate the impact a
proposed new major source or major
modification may have on the NAAQS
or PSD increment, and a SMC (also a
screening tool) to determine the
subsequent level of ambient air
monitoring data gathering required for a
PSD permit application for emissions of
PM2.5.
On January 22, 2013, the U.S. Court
of Appeals granted a request from the
EPA to vacate and remand to the EPA
portions of the federal PSD regulations
(40 CFR 51.166(k)(2) and 52.21(k)(2))
setting forth provisions for
implementing SILs for PM2.5 so that the
EPA could reconcile the inconsistency
between the regulatory text and certain
statements in the preamble to the 2010
final rule. Sierra Club v. EPA, 705 F.3d
458, 463–64 (D.C. Cir. 2013). The court
declined to vacate the different portion
of the federal PSD regulations (40 CFR
51.165(b)(2)) for implementing SILs for
PM2.5 that did not contain the same
inconsistency in the regulatory text. Id.
at 465–66. The court further vacated the
portions of the PSD regulations (40 CFR
51.166(i)(5)(i)(c) and 52.21(i)(5)(i)(c))
implementing a PM2.5 SMC, finding that
the EPA lacked legal authority to adopt
and use the PM2.5 SMC to exempt
permit applicants from the statutory
requirement to compile and submit
ambient monitoring data. Id. at 468–69.
On December 9, 2013, the EPA issued a
good cause final rule formally removing
the affected SILs and SMC provisions
from the CFR. See 78 FR 73698.
The September 10, 2014 revision to
the Arkansas PSD program does not
include the optional PM2.5 SMC and SIL
provisions. Unless explicitly identified
in Regulation 19.904(A), the Arkansas
PSD SIP only incorporates by reference
the federal PSD requirements at 40 CFR
52.21(a)(2) through (bb) as in effect on
November 29, 2005. Because Regulation
19.904(A) does not explicitly identify 40
CFR 52.21(k)(2) or 52.21(i)(5)(i)(c) as
promulgated by the EPA on October 20,
2011 as being part of the Arkansas PSD
program, the EPA proposes to find that
the Arkansas PSD program does not
include the PM2.5 SIL and SMC
provisions that have been vacated by the
Courts and removed by the EPA on
December 9, 2013.
b. How does the September 10, 2014,
revision to the Arkansas PSD program
address the Optional SILs and SMC
Components of the PM2.5 Increment—
SILs—SMC Rule?
EPA’s October 20, 2010, PM2.5
Increment—SILs—SMC Rule also
provided that States could
discretionarily choose to adopt and
3. Interstate Transport of Air Pollution
and PSD
CAA 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) calls for the SIP
to prohibit emissions to other states
which will (1) contribute significantly to
nonattainment of the NAAQS or (2)
interfere with maintenance of the
NAAQS. CAA 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) calls for
the SIP to prohibit emissions to other
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
2. The PM2.5 PSD Increment—SILs—
SMC Rule
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:44 Nov 07, 2014
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
states which will (1) interfere with
measures required to prevent significant
deterioration or (2) interfere with
measures to protect visibility. The
December 17, 2007 SIP submittal
addressed CAA 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) and (II)
for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. We
previously acted on (1) the contribution
to nonattainment and interference with
maintenance portion (August 29, 2013,
78 FR 53269) and (2) the visibility
protection portion (March 12, 2012, 77
FR 14604). We neglected to act on the
portion pertaining to interstate transport
of air pollution and PSD.
The CAA 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) interstate
transport requirement for PSD is met
when new major sources and major
modifications in a state are subject to a
comprehensive EPA-approved PSD
permitting program that (1) applies to
all regulated NSR pollutants and (2)
satisfies the requirements of EPA’s PSD
implementation rules. This is because a
fully approved PSD program necessarily
needs to fully consider source impacts
on other States. Because these criteria
will be met with our approval of the
Arkansas PSD SIP revision, we are
proposing to approve the portion of the
December 17, 2007 SIP submittal that
addresses interstate transport of air
pollution and PSD for the 1997 PM2.5
NAAQS (CAA 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)).
B. Impacts on Existing Federal
Implementation Plan Clocks
The EPA previously promulgated a
partial approval and partial disapproval
of the Arkansas infrastructure SIP for
the 1997 ozone NAAQS and the 1997
and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS on August 20,
2012 (77 FR 50033, August 20, 2012).
The partial disapproval was based on
the State’s failure to submit the required
PSD SIP revisions from the May 16,
2008 PM2.5 NSR Implementation Rule.
The EPA’s partial disapproval of
required elements of the Act started a
federal implementation plan (FIP) clock
for the required 2008 NSR PM2.5
Implementation Rule revisions, which
expired on September 19, 2014.
The EPA on May 22, 2014, made a
separate finding of failure to submit for
the State of Arkansas based on the
State’s failure to submit revisions to the
SIP incorporating the required
component of the October 20, 2010
PM2.5 PSD Increment—SILs—SMC Rule.
See 79 FR 29354. The EPA’s finding of
failure to submit established a 24-month
deadline by which time the EPA must
promulgate a FIP for Arkansas to
address the PM2.5 PSD requirements for
increment and the associated
implementing regulations, unless the
State submits and the EPA approves a
SIP revision that corrects the deficiency
E:\FR\FM\10NOP1.SGM
10NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 217 / Monday, November 10, 2014 / Proposed Rules
before the EPA promulgates a FIP for the
State, in accordance with section
110(c)(1).
The EPA’s proposed action today
preliminarily finds that the September
10, 2014, submittal for parallel
processing satisfies all required
elements for PM2.5 PSD implementation
as required through EPA’s May 16,
2008, and October 20, 2010, final rules.
Accordingly, finalization of today’s
proposal will stop the two FIP clocks on
the lack of these elements in the
Arkansas PSD program and remove any
FIP obligation from EPA for the PM2.5
PSD implementation.
C. General Updates to the Arkansas SIP
The July 26, 2010 and November 6,
2012 submittals, included numerous
updates throughout the Arkansas SIP at
Regulation 19 to update incorporation
by reference dates, and correct grammar
and formatting. The accompanying TSD
provides a line-item analysis of each of
these revisions. Our analysis
demonstrates that these revisions are
non-substantive in nature. Thus EPA is
proposing approval.
The September 10, 2014 submittal
contains new Appendix B to Regulation
19 that is intended to establish the
specific NAAQS that are implemented
through the Arkansas SIP and the
Arkansas PSD program. Appendix B
captures the ambient air quality
standards promulgated in 40 CFR Part
50 as of July 27, 2012. Although
Appendix B as submitted is approvable,
this incorporation by reference date
does not capture the 2012 particulate
matter primary NAAQS revision (78 FR
3086). Under CAA 110(a)(1), the State is
allowed 3 years from the date of
promulgation of national ambient air
quality primary standard to submit a
plan which provides for
implementation, maintenance, and
enforcement of such primary standard
in each air quality control region (or
portion thereof) within such State.
Therefore, Arkansas is required to
submit revisions to address the 2012
particulate matter primary NAAQS
revision by December 14, 2015.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
III. Proposed Action
The EPA proposes to approve the
revisions to the Arkansas SIP submitted
on July 26, 2010, November 6, 2012, and
September 10, 2014, because we have
made the preliminary determination
that these SIP packages were adopted
and submitted in accordance with the
CAA and EPA regulations regarding
implementation of the PM2.5 NAAQS.
Therefore, under section 110 and part C
of the Act and for the reasons stated
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:44 Nov 07, 2014
Jkt 235001
above, the EPA proposes to approve the
following revisions to the Arkansas SIP:
• Revisions to Regulation 19, Chapter
1 submitted on July 26, 2010 and
November 6, 2012;
• Revisions to Regulation 19, Chapter
2 submitted on July 26, 2010, November
6, 2012, and September 10, 2014, with
the exception of the GHG Biomass
Deferral provision submitted as part of
the definition of CO2e on November 6,
2012;
• Revision to Regulation 19, Chapter
3 submitted on July 26, 2010 and
September 10, 2014;
• Revisions to Regulation 19, Chapter
5 submitted on July 26, 2010 and
September 10, 2014;
• Revisions to Regulation 19, Chapter
6 submitted on July 26, 2010;
• Revisions to Regulation 19, Chapter
7 submitted on July 26, 2010;
• Revisions to Regulation 19, Chapter
9 submitted on September 10, 2014;
• Revisions to Regulation 19, Chapter
10 submitted on July 26, 2010;
• Revisions to Regulation 19, Chapter
11 submitted on July 26, 2010;
• Revisions to Regulation 19, Chapter
13 submitted on July 26, 2010
• New Regulation 19, Appendix B
submitted on September 10, 2014; and
• A portion of a December 17, 2007
SIP submittal addressing interstate
transport of air pollution and PSD for
the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS (CAA
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)).
The EPA is also proposing to find that
the Arkansas PSD NSR SIP meets all the
CAA PSD requirements for
implementing the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5
NAAQS, including the PM2.5 PSD
requirements contained in the federal
regulations as of December 9, 2013,
including regulation of NOX and SO2 as
PM2.5 PSD precursors, regulation of
condensables, and PM2.5 increments. As
such, upon finalization of today’s
proposed rulemaking, the EPA will stop
the two FIP clocks that are currently
running on the Arkansas PSD program
pertaining to PM2.5 PSD
implementation.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Clean Air Act and applicable Federal
regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR
52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
proposes to approve state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
66669
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this action:
• is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, this proposed rule does
not have tribal implications as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), nor will it impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen Oxides, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, and
Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
E:\FR\FM\10NOP1.SGM
10NOP1
66670
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 217 / Monday, November 10, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Dated: October 29, 2014.
Samuel Coleman,
Acting Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2014–26627 Filed 11–7–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R08–OAR–2014–0370; FRL–9918–98Region 8]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; State of
Utah; Motor Vehicle Inspection and
Maintenance and Associated
Revisions
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing approval of
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revisions submitted by the State of Utah.
The revisions involve amendments to
Section X, Part A, Vehicle Inspection
and Maintenance Program, General
Requirements and Applicability; the
addition of Section X, Part F, Cache
County Vehicle Inspection and
Maintenance Program; and revisions to
Utah Administrative Rules R307–110–1,
R307–110–31, and R307–110–36. EPA is
proposing approval of these SIP
revisions in accordance with the
requirements of section 110 of the Clean
Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before December 10, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R08–
OAR–2014–0370, by one of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• Email: russ.tim@epa.gov.
• Fax: (303) 312–6064 (please alert
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT if you are faxing
comments).
• Mail: Carl Daly, Director, Air
Program, EPA, Region 8, Mailcode 8P–
AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,
Colorado 80202–1129.
• Hand Delivery: Carl Daly, Director,
Air Program, EPA, Region 8, Mailcode
8P–AR, 1595 Wynkoop, Denver,
Colorado 80202–1129. Such deliveries
are only accepted Monday through
Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
federal holidays. Special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:44 Nov 07, 2014
Jkt 235001
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R08–OAR–2014–
0370. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or email. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an email comment directly
to EPA, without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional instructions on
submitting comments, go to Section I,
General Information of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly-available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Program, EPA, Region 8,
Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595 Wynkoop,
Denver, Colorado 80202–1129. EPA
requests that if at all possible, you
contact the individual listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
view the hard copy of the docket. You
may view the hard copy of the docket
Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to
4:00 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Tim
Russ, Air Program, EPA, Region 8,
Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595 Wynkoop,
Denver, Colorado 80202–1129, (303)
312–6479, russ.tim@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Definitions
For the purpose of this document, we
are giving meaning to certain words or
initials as follows:
(i) The words or initials Act or CAA mean
or refer to the Clean Air Act, unless the
context indicates otherwise.
(ii) The initials BRHD mean Bear River
Health Department.
(iii) The words EPA, we, us or our mean
or refer to the United States Environmental
Protection Agency.
(iv) The initials DMV mean Department of
Motor Vehicles.
(v) The initials I/M mean inspection and
maintenance.
(vi) The initials NAAQS mean national
ambient air quality standard.
(vii) The initials NOx mean nitrogen
oxides.
(viii) The initials OBD mean On-Board
Diagnostics.
(ix) The initials PM2.5 mean Particulate
Matter equal to or less than 2.5 microns in
diameter.
(x) The initials RPM mean revolutions per
minute.
(xi) The initials SIP mean or refer to State
Implementation Plan.
(xii) The initials TSI mean Two Speed Idle.
(xiii) The initials UAQB mean Utah Air
Quality Board.
(xiv) The initials UDAQ mean Utah
Division of Air Quality.
(xv) The words Utah and State mean the
State of Utah.
(xvi) The initials VOC mean volatile
organic compound.
Table of Contents
I. General Information
II. Background
III. What was the State’s process?
IV. EPA’s Evaluation of the State’s Revisions
to Section X, Part A, Vehicle Inspection
and Maintenance Program, General
Requirements and Applicability
V. EPA’s Evaluation of the State’s Revisions
to Section X, Part F, Cache County Motor
Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance
Program
VI. EPA’s Evaluation of the State’s Associated
Revisions to Utah Rules R307–110–1,
R307–110–31, and R307–110–36
VII. Consideration of Section 110(1) of the
Clean Air Act
VIII. Proposed Action
IX. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. General Information
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit CBI
to EPA through https://
www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly
mark the part or all of the information
that you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD ROM that
E:\FR\FM\10NOP1.SGM
10NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 217 (Monday, November 10, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 66663-66670]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26627]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R06-OAR-2014-0700; FRL-9919-12-Region 6]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Arkansas;
Revisions for the Regulation and Permitting of Fine Particulate Matter
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve portions of three revisions to the Arkansas State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Arkansas Department of
Environmental Quality on July 26, 2010; November 6, 2012; and September
10, 2014. Together, these three submittals update the Arkansas SIP such
that the ADEQ has the authority to implement the current National
Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and regulate and permit emissions
of fine particulate matter (particulate matter with diameters less than
or equal to 2.5 micrometers (PM2.5)) and its precursors
through the Arkansas PSD program. The September 10, 2014, submittal is
a request for parallel processing of revisions proposed by the ADEQ on
August 22, 2014. The EPA is proposing to find that the Arkansas
Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) New Source Review (NSR)
SIP meets all Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act) requirements for
PM2.5 PSD. EPA is also proposing to approve a portion of the
December 17, 2007 SIP submittal for the PM2.5 NAAQS
pertaining to interstate transport of air pollution and PSD. EPA is
proposing these actions under section 110 and part C of the CAA.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 10, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R06-
OAR-2014-0700, by one of the following methods:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for
submitting comments.
Email: Ms. Adina Wiley at wiley.adina@epa.gov.
Mail or Delivery: Ms. Adina Wiley, Air Permits Section
(6PD-R), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200,
Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R06-OAR-
2014-0700. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information the
disclosure of which is restricted by statute. Do not submit information
through https://www.regulations.gov or email, if you believe that it is
CBI or otherwise protected from disclosure. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means that EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going through https://www.regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket
and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact
information in the body of your comment along with any disk or CD-ROM
submitted. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters and any form of encryption and should be free of any
defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket, visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at https://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available
electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region 6,
1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas. While all documents in the
docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly
available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material),
and some may not be publicly available at either location (e.g., CBI).
To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment with
the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT paragraph
below or Mr. Bill Deese at 214-665-7253.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Adina Wiley (6PD-R), Air Permits
Section, Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue
(6PD-R), Suite 1200, Dallas, TX 75202-2733. The telephone number is
(214) 665-2115. Ms. Wiley can also be reached via electronic mail at
wiley.adina@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background for Our Proposed Action
A. General Information on SIPs
B. Preconstruction Review and Permitting Programs
C. Summary of State Submittals
1. The July 26, 2010 Submittal
2. The November 6, 2012 Submittal
3. The September 10, 2014 Submittal
4. What is the EPA not addressing?
II. The EPA's Analysis of the State Submittals
A. Revisions to the Arkansas PSD Program To Address
PM2.5 Permitting
1. The NSR PM2.5 Implementation Rule
2. The PM2.5 PSD Increment--SILs--SMC Rule
[[Page 66664]]
3. Interstate Transport of Air Pollution and PSD
B. Impacts on Existing Federal Implementation Plan Clocks
C. General Updates to the Arkansas SIP
III. Proposed Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background for Our Proposed Action
A. General Information on SIPs
Section 110 of the CAA requires states to develop air pollution
regulations and control strategies to ensure that air quality meets the
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) established by the EPA.
The NAAQS are established under section 109 of the CAA and currently
address six criteria pollutants: Carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide,
ozone, lead, particulate matter, and sulfur dioxide. A SIP is a set of
air pollution regulations, control strategies, other means or
techniques, and technical analyses developed by the state, to ensure
that air quality in the state meets the NAAQS. It is required by
section 110 and other provisions of the CAA. A SIP protects air quality
primarily by addressing air pollution at its point of origin. SIPs can
be extensive, containing state regulations or other enforceable
documents, and supporting information such as emissions inventories,
monitoring networks, and modeling demonstrations. Each state must
submit regulations and control strategies to the EPA for approval and
incorporation into the federally-enforceable SIP.
B. Preconstruction Review and Permitting Programs
The Act at section 110(a)(2)(C) requires SIPs to include
preconstruction review and permitting programs applicable to certain
new and modified stationary sources of air pollutants. These
requirements apply in attainment and nonattainment areas and cover both
major and minor new sources and modifications. Collectively, these SIP
requirements are referred to as the New Source Review (NSR) SIP. The
CAA NSR SIP program is composed of three separate programs: Prevention
of significant deterioration (PSD), nonattainment new source review
(NNSR), and Minor NSR. PSD is established in part C of title I of the
CAA and applies in areas that meet the NAAQS--``attainment areas''--as
well as areas where there is insufficient information to determine if
the area meets the NAAQS--``unclassifiable areas.'' The NNSR SIP
program is established in part D of title I of the CAA and applies in
areas that are designated as ``nonattainment areas'' because they are
not in attainment of the NAAQS. The Minor NSR SIP program addresses
construction or modification activities for sources that will not emit,
or have the potential to emit, above certain thresholds and thus do not
qualify as ``major.'' Minor NSR applies regardless of the designation
of the area in which a source is located. EPA regulations governing the
criteria that states must satisfy for EPA approval of the NSR programs
as part of the SIP are contained in 40 CFR sections 51.160-51.166.
C. Summary of State Submittals
The ADEQ submitted a collection of revisions to the Arkansas SIP on
July 26, 2010; November 6, 2012; and September 10, 2014. Together,
these revisions update the Arkansas SIP to implement the requirements
of the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS, regulate emissions of
PM2.5 and its precursors through the Arkansas PSD program,
and make general updates throughout the entirety of the Arkansas SIP to
address grammar, formatting, and updates to incorporation by reference
dates. Additionally, on December 17, 2007, Arkansas submitted a letter
certifying that its SIP addressed the CAA requirements for interstate
transport of air pollution (CAA 110(a)(2)(D)(i)) for the 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS. These SIP submittals are available in the
electronic docket found in the www.regulations.gov Web site (Docket
number EPA-R06-OAR-2014-0700).
1. The July 26, 2010 Submittal
On December 5, 2008, the Arkansas Pollution Control and Ecology
Commission (APC&EC) adopted revisions to the Regulation 19--Regulations
of the Arkansas Plan of Implementation for Air Pollution Control.
Governor Beebe submitted these regulations as a revision to the
Arkansas SIP in a letter dated July 26, 2010. On November 23, 2010,
Teresa Marks, Director of Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality
(ADEQ), provided a clarification letter regarding the July 26, 2010
submittal. This clarification letter was a resubmission of the SIP
revision resulting from the previous submittal containing one incorrect
hardcopy and electronic copy of the SIP revision. As part of this
action, the EPA is addressing the following revisions contained in the
July 26, 2010 submittal that were adopted on December 5, 2008,
effective January 25, 2009:
Non-substantive revisions to Regulation 19, Chapter 1 to
correct formatting, clarify the incorporation by reference dates, and
clarify acronyms.
Substantive revisions to Regulation 19, Chapter 2 to add
new definition for ``PM2.5'' and ``Title I modification''
and to revise the definition of ``Volatile organic compounds''. Non-
substantive revisions to correct formatting, clarify the incorporation
by reference dates, and clarify acronyms.
Non-substantive revisions to Regulation 19, Chapter 3 to
correct formatting.
Non-substantive revisions to Regulation 19, Chapter 5 to
correct formatting and clarify acronyms.
Non-substantive revisions to Regulation 19, Chapter 6 to
correct formatting and clarify acronyms.
Non-substantive revisions to Regulation 19, Chapter 7 to
clarify incorporation by reference dates.
Non-substantive revisions to Regulation 19, Chapter 10 to
correct formatting and clarify acronyms.
Non-substantive revisions to Regulation 19, Chapter 11 to
correct formatting.
Non-substantive revisions to Regulation 19, Chapter 13 to
correct formatting and clarify acronyms.
2. The November 6, 2012 Submittal
On June 22, 2012, the APC&EC adopted revisions to Regulation 9--
Permit Fee Regulations, Regulation 19--Regulations of the Arkansas Plan
of Implementation for Air Pollution Control, and Regulation 26--
Regulations of the Arkansas Operating Air Permit Program. On October
26, 2012, APC&EC adopted additional revisions to Regulation 19.
Governor Beebe submitted these regulations as a revision to the
Arkansas SIP in a letter dated November 6, 2012. As part of this
action, the EPA is addressing the following revisions contained in the
November 6, 2012 submittal that were adopted on June 22, 2012, and
October 26, 2012, effective July 9, 2012, and November 18, 2012,
respectively:
Substantive revision to Regulation 19, Chapter 1 to
address greenhouse gases (GHGs).
Substantive revisions to Regulation 19, Chapter 2 to add
new definition for ``CO2 equivalent emissions'' and revise
the definition of ``Federally regulated pollutant''.
3. The September 10, 2014 Submittal
On September 10, 2014, Teresa Marks, Director of the ADEQ,
submitted a request for parallel processing of proposed AR SIP
revisions to Regulation 19--Regulations of the Arkansas Plan of
Implementation for Air Pollution Control. As part of this action, the
EPA is addressing the following revisions
[[Page 66665]]
contained in the September 10, 2014, request for parallel processing:
Substantive revisions to Regulation 19, Chapter 2 to add a
new definition for ``PM2.5 emissions'' and to revise
existing definitions for ``NAAQS,'' ``particulate matter emissions,''
``PM2.5,'' and ``VOC'' as well as other non-substantive
revisions throughout the Definitions to correct formatting and grammar.
Substantive revisions to Regulation 19, Chapter 5 to
specify that no person shall cause or permit the construction or
modification of equipment which would cause or allow any ambient air
increment in the PSD program to be exceeded.
Substantive revisions to Regulation 19, Chapter 9 to
provide for the authority to regulate PM2.5 and its
precursors through the Arkansas PSD program.
New Regulation 19, Appendix B to provide the National
Ambient Air Quality Standards List.
4. What is the EPA not addressing?
States have the obligation to adopt and submit regulations for the
EPA's review and approval into the federally enforceable SIP. The EPA
has an obligation under the CAA to address each submittal from the
state. However, we are not obligated to address all portions of a
submittal at once. Where the EPA determines that a provision is
independent of another, we have the discretion to address the submitted
provisions separately. Accordingly, the EPA is taking no action at this
time on the following revisions submitted by the ADEQ. As indicated
below, we have determined that each of the submitted provisions is
separate from the PSD program and not necessary for PSD implementation.
The EPA is taking no action at this time on the
Substantive revisions to Regulation 19, Chapter 4 to revise the Minor
NSR permitting thresholds that were submitted on July 26, 2010. The
action we are taking today will substantively revise the Arkansas PSD
program to provide for regulation and permitting of PM2.5
and its precursors. We are also making non-substantive updates to the
remainder of the Arkansas SIP. Our analysis today is not relevant to
the Arkansas Minor NSR permitting program and the provisions on which
we are reviewing and acting can operate separately from the Arkansas
Minor NSR Program. Therefore, the EPA is taking no action on the
substantive revisions to add provisions under the following new
Sections: Reg. 19.414--Operational Flexibility-Applicant's Duty to
Apply for Alternative Scenarios; Reg. 19.415--Changes Resulting in No
Emissions Increases; Reg. 19.416--Permit Flexibility; and Reg. 19.417--
Registration; and the non-substantive revisions to correct formatting,
clarify the incorporation by reference dates, and clarify acronyms. We
note that the revisions to the Arkansas Minor NSR Program at Regulation
19, Chapter 4 submitted on July 26, 2010, will be addressed separately
by the EPA in a later action.
The EPA is taking no action at this time on the revisions
to the Insignificant Activities List in Regulation 19, Appendix A that
were submitted on July 26, 2010 and November 6, 2012. Regulation 19,
Appendix A is part of the Arkansas Minor NSR program and will be
addressed with the pending revisions to Regulation 19, Chapter 4.
The EPA is taking no action at this time on the Fee
Regulation provisions at Regulation 9, Chapter 5 submitted on November
6, 2012. The EPA will address the fee provisions in a separate action
at a later time. The provisions on which we are reviewing and acting
can operate independent of the fee provisions. Therefore, the EPA is
taking no action on the substantive revisions to Regulation 9, Chapter
5 to replace the current Fee Regulation contained in the Arkansas SIP,
which include substantive revisions to address fee requirements for
carbon dioxide and methane, as well as, non-substantive revisions to
correct formatting.
The EPA is taking no action at this time on the November
6, 2012, substantive revisions to Regulation 19, Chapter 4 to address
GHGs in the Arkansas Minor NSR program. These revisions will be
addressed with the remainder of the pending revisions to the Arkansas
Minor NSR program at a later date.
The EPA is taking no action at this time on the November
6, 2012, substantive revisions to Regulation 26, Chapter 3 to address
GHG permitting and the non-substantive revisions to Regulation 26,
Chapter 4 to correct formatting and clarify the incorporation by
reference dates. Regulation 26 is the Arkansas Title V program.
The EPA is taking no action at this time on the revisions
to the Arkansas PSD Program to provide for GHG PSD PAL permitting
adopted by the state on June 28, 2013, effective on July 27, 2013.
These revisions were submitted to EPA on January 7, 2014. The submittal
included revisions to the Arkansas Regulation 19, Chapter 9, sections
19.904(A)(1), 19.904(E)(3), and 19.904(G)(1). These revisions were
solely to implement the GHG PSD PAL revisions. Since the Supreme Court
of the United States rendered its decision on June 23, 2014, in Utility
Air Regulatory Group (UARG) v. EPA (No. 12-1146), the EPA does not find
it appropriate to take action on provisions implementing permitting
provisions for GHG PSD PALs at this time. The EPA will address this
submittal from the state in a separate action at a later date.
The following table summarizes which regulatory provisions the EPA
is taking action on in today's proposed approval.
Table 1--Summary of the Individual Revisions to Each Section Evaluated
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section Title Date submitted to EPA Adopted by State Comments
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation 9, Chapter 5............. Air Permit Fees........ November 6, 2012................ June 22, 2012 and October 26, No action at this
2012. time.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation 19, Chapter 1............ Title, Intent, and July 26, 2010................... December 5, 2008............... Evaluated in this
Purpose. action.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
November 6, 2012................ June 22, 2012 and October 26, Evaluated in this
2012. action.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation 19, Chapter 2............ Definitions............ July 26, 2010................... December 5, 2008............... Evaluated in this
action.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
November 6, 2012................ June 22, 2012 and October 26, Evaluated in this
2012. action.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 66666]]
September 10, 2014 request for August 22, 2014................ Evaluated in this
parallel processing. action.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation 19, Chapter 3............ Protection of the July 26, 2010................... December 5, 2008............... Evaluated in this
National Ambient Air action.
Quality Standards.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
September 10, 2014 request for August 22, 2014................ Evaluated in this
parallel processing. action.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation 19, Chapter 4............ Minor Source Review.... July 26, 2010................... December 5, 2008............... No action at this
time.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
November 6, 2012................ June 22, 2012 and October 26, No action at this
2012. time.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation 19, Chapter 5............ General Emissions July 26, 2010................... December 5, 2008............... Evaluated in this
Limitations Applicable action.
to Equipment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
September 10, 2014 request for August 22, 2014................ Evaluated in this
parallel processing. action.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation 19, Chapter 6............ Upset and Emergency July 26, 2010................... December 5, 2008............... Evaluated in this
Conditions. action.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation 19, Chapter 7............ Sampling, Monitoring, July 26, 2010................... December 5, 2008............... Evaluated in this
and Reporting action.
Requirements.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation 19, Chapter 8............ 111(D) Designated Not part of the Arkansas SIP.
Facilities.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation 19, Chapter 9............ Prevention of July 26, 2010................... December 5, 2008............... Approved by EPA on
Significant April 2, 2013, at 78
Deterioration. FR 19596.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
November 6, 2012................ June 22, 2012 and October 26, Approved by EPA on
2012. April 2, 2013, at 78
FR 19596.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
January 7, 2014................. June 28, 2014.................. No action at this
time.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
September 10, 2014 request for August 22, 2014................ Evaluated in this
parallel processing. action.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation 19, Chapter 10........... Regulations for the July 26, 2010................... December 5, 2008............... Evaluated in this
Control of Volatile action.
Organic Compounds in
Pulaski County.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation 19, Chapter 11........... Major Source Permitting July 26, 2010................... December 5, 2008............... Evaluated in this
Procedures. action.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation 19, Chapter 13........... Stage I Vapor Recovery. July 26, 2010................... December 5, 2008............... Evaluated in this
action.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation 19, Chapter 14........... CAIR NOX Ozone Season July 26, 2010................... December 5, 2008............... Approved by EPA on
Trading Program April 17, 2014, at 78
General Provisions. FR 21631.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation 19, Chapter 15........... Regional Haze.......... July 26, 2010................... December 5, 2008............... Approved by EPA on
March 12, 2012, at 77
FR 14604.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation 19, Appendix A........... Insignificant July 26, 2010................... December 5, 2008............... No action at this
Activities List. time.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
November 6, 2012................ June 22, 2012 and October 26,
2012.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation 19, Appendix B........... National Ambient Air September 10, 2014 request for August 22, 2014................ Evaluated in this
Quality Standards List. parallel processing. action.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation 26, Chapter 3............ Requirements for a November 6, 2012................ June 22, 2012 and October 26, No action at this
Permit, Applicability. 2012. time.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 66667]]
Regulation 26, Chapter 4............ Applications for November 6, 2012................ June 22, 2012 and October 26, No action at this
Permits. 2012. time.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have evaluated the July 26, 2010, November 6, 2012, and
September 10, 2014, SIP submissions for whether they meet the CAA and
40 CFR Part 51, and are consistent with the EPA's interpretation of the
relevant provisions. Today's proposed action and the accompanying
Technical Support Document (TSD) present our rational for proposing
approval of these regulations as meeting the minimum federal
requirements for the adoption and implementation of the NAAQS and
required PSD permitting elements. The EPA is parallel processing the
revisions proposed on August 22, 2014, based on the request submitted
on September 10, 2014. This means that the EPA is proposing approval at
the same time that the ADEQ is completing the public comment and
rulemaking process at the state level. The September 10, 2014, SIP
revision request will not be complete and will not meet all the
adequacy criteria until the state public process is complete and the
SIP revision is submitted as a final adoption with a letter from the
Governor or Governor's designee. The EPA is proposing to approve the
SIP revision request after completion of the state public process and
final submittal.
II. The EPA's Analysis of the State Submittals
A. Revisions to the Arkansas PSD Program To Address PM2.5
Permitting
The ADEQ adopted revisions to the Arkansas SIP and the Arkansas PSD
Program on August 22, 2014. The ADEQ submitted these adopted revisions
to the EPA for parallel processing on September 10, 2014. These ADEQ
revisions address the regulatory requirements of the EPA's
implementation rules for the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS as
applicable to the State's general regulatory program and its PSD
permitting program. Specifically, the EPA promulgated two rules
establishing both required and optional implementation regulations for
PM2.5: The May 16, 2008 final rule for Implementation of the
New Source Review (NSR) Program for Particulate Matter Less than 2.5
Micrometers (PM2.5) (referred to as the NSR PM2.5
Implementation Rule), 73 FR 28321, and the October 20, 2010 final rule
for Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) for Particulate
Matter Less than 2.5 Micrometers (PM2.5)--Increments,
Significant Impact Levels (SILs) and Significant Monitoring
Concentration (SMC) (referred to as the PM2.5 PSD
Increments--SILs--SMC Rule), 75 FR 64864. Today's proposed action and
the accompanying Technical Support Document (TSD) present our rationale
for proposing approval of this submission as part of the Arkansas PSD
SIP by finding that the Arkansas PSD SIP includes the requirements to
address these two rulemakings concerning the PM2.5 NAAQS.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no PM2.5 nonattainment areas in
Arkansas; therefore ADEQ is not required to adopt or submit a NNSR
program for PM2.5 implementation as part of the Arkansas
SIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. The NSR PM2.5 Implementation Rule
a. How does the September 10, 2014, revision to the Arkansas PSD
program address the requirements of the NSR PM2.5
Implementation Rule?
The EPA's final NSR PM2.5 Implementation Rule required
states to submit applicable SIP revisions to the EPA no later than May
16, 2011, to address this Rule's PSD and NNSR SIP requirements. Based
on the analysis presented below and in our accompanying TSD, the EPA is
proposing to find that the September 10, 2014, revision to the Arkansas
PSD SIP includes all of the PSD requirements of the 2008 final NSR
PM2.5 Implementation Rule for the following reasons:
(1) Regulation of Direct PM2.5 and Precursors: The
Arkansas SIP at Regulation 19, Chapter 3 and Appendix B gives the ADEQ
the authority to implement the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS for purposes
of PSD. Further, the September 10, 2014, revisions to the definition of
``Regulated NSR pollutant'' at Regulation 19.903(B) identify that
direct emissions of PM2.5 and its precursors, NOX
and SO2, are regulated under the Arkansas PSD program.
(2) Establish SERs: The Arkansas PSD program at Regulation
19.904(A)(2) incorporates by reference the significant emission rates
for direct PM2.5 emissions and precursors of
PM2.5 as promulgated by EPA at 40 CFR 52.21(b)(23) on May
16, 2008.
(3) Condensable PM10/PM2.5 Emissions: The
Arkansas PSD program includes condensable emissions of PM10
and PM2.5 for purposes of PSD permitting at Regulation
19.903(B)(6). The language submitted on September 10, 2014, is
consistent with the federal requirements promulgated on May 16, 2008 at
40 CFR 51.166(b)(49)(vi) and corrected by EPA on October 25, 2012 at 40
CFR 51.166(b)(49)(i)(a).
b. Litigation on the May 16, 2008 PM2.5 NSR Implementation
Rule
On January 4, 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals, in Natural Resources
Defense Council v. EPA, 706 F.3d 428 (D.C. Cir.), issued a judgment
that remanded the EPA's 2007 and 2008 rules implementing the 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS, including the NSR PM2.5
Implementation Rule. The court ordered the EPA to ``repromulgate these
rules pursuant to Subpart 4 consistent with this opinion.'' Id. at 437.
Subpart 4 of Part D, Title 1 of the CAA establishes additional
provisions for particulate matter nonattainment areas.
The 2008 NSR PM2.5 Implementation Rule addressed by the
court decision described above, promulgated NSR requirements for
implementation of PM2.5 in both nonattainment areas (NNSR)
and attainment/unclassifiable areas (PSD). As the requirements of
Subpart 4 only pertain to nonattainment areas, the EPA does not
consider the portions of the 2008 rule that address requirements for
PM2.5 in attainment and unclassifiable areas to be affected
by the court's opinion. Moreover, the EPA does not anticipate the need
to revise any PSD requirements promulgated in the 2008 NSR
PM2.5 Rule in order to comply with the court's decision.
Accordingly, the EPA's proposed approval of Arkansas's SIP revisions
with respect to the PSD requirements promulgated by the 2008 NSR
PM2.5 Rule does not conflict with the court's opinion.
The Court's decision with respect to the NNSR requirements
promulgated by the 2008 NSR PM2.5 Rule also does not affect
the EPA's action on the present proposed approval, as this proposed
approval does not address any of the PM2.5 nonattainment NSR
requirements.
[[Page 66668]]
2. The PM2.5 PSD Increment--SILs--SMC Rule
a. How does the September 10, 2014 revision to the Arkansas PSD program
satisfy the Required Increment Component of the PM2.5
Increment--SILs--SMC Rule?
The EPA finalized the PM2.5 PSD Increment--SILs--SMC
Rule to provide additional regulatory requirements under the PSD SIP
program regarding the implementation of the PM2.5 NAAQS. See
75 FR 64864. The PM2.5 PSD Increment--SILs--SMC Rule
required states to submit SIP revisions to the EPA by July 20, 2012,
adopting provisions equivalent to or at least as stringent as the PSD
increments and associated implementing regulations. Specifically, the
SIP rule requires a state's submitted PSD SIP revision to adopt and
submit for EPA approval the PM2.5 increments pursuant to
section 166(a) of the CAA to prevent significant deterioration of air
quality in areas meeting the NAAQS and associated implementing
regulations. More detail on the PM2.5 PSD Increment--SILs--
SMC Rule can be found in the EPA's October 20, 2010 final rule. See 75
FR 64864.
With respect to the required increment component of the
PM2.5 Increment--SILs--SMC Rule, the ADEQ incorporated by
reference the federal requirements for PM2.5 increment at 40
CFR 52.21(c) as promulgated by EPA on October 20, 2011. The ADEQ also
incorporated by reference the required definitions to implement the
PM2.5 increment promulgated by the EPA on October 20, 2011,
such as baseline area at 40 CFR 52.21(b)(15)(i), major source baseline
date at 40 CFR 52.21(b)(14)(i), minor source baseline date at 40 CFR
52.21(b)(14)(ii) and (iii), source impact analysis requirements at 40
CFR 52.21(k)(1) and requirements for sources impacting Federal Class I
areas at 40 CFR 52.21(p). The EPA is proposing to find that the
Arkansas PSD NSR SIP now includes the PM2.5 increments and
associated implementing regulations, and these increments and
implementing regulations are applicable requirements for sources and
modifications that are major for PM2.5 and/or the identified
precursors of SO2 and NOX.
b. How does the September 10, 2014, revision to the Arkansas PSD
program address the Optional SILs and SMC Components of the
PM2.5 Increment--SILs--SMC Rule?
EPA's October 20, 2010, PM2.5 Increment--SILs--SMC Rule
also provided that States could discretionarily choose to adopt and
submit for EPA approval SILs used as a screening tool to evaluate the
impact a proposed new major source or major modification may have on
the NAAQS or PSD increment, and a SMC (also a screening tool) to
determine the subsequent level of ambient air monitoring data gathering
required for a PSD permit application for emissions of
PM2.5.
On January 22, 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals granted a request
from the EPA to vacate and remand to the EPA portions of the federal
PSD regulations (40 CFR 51.166(k)(2) and 52.21(k)(2)) setting forth
provisions for implementing SILs for PM2.5 so that the EPA
could reconcile the inconsistency between the regulatory text and
certain statements in the preamble to the 2010 final rule. Sierra Club
v. EPA, 705 F.3d 458, 463-64 (D.C. Cir. 2013). The court declined to
vacate the different portion of the federal PSD regulations (40 CFR
51.165(b)(2)) for implementing SILs for PM2.5 that did not
contain the same inconsistency in the regulatory text. Id. at 465-66.
The court further vacated the portions of the PSD regulations (40 CFR
51.166(i)(5)(i)(c) and 52.21(i)(5)(i)(c)) implementing a
PM2.5 SMC, finding that the EPA lacked legal authority to
adopt and use the PM2.5 SMC to exempt permit applicants from
the statutory requirement to compile and submit ambient monitoring
data. Id. at 468-69. On December 9, 2013, the EPA issued a good cause
final rule formally removing the affected SILs and SMC provisions from
the CFR. See 78 FR 73698.
The September 10, 2014 revision to the Arkansas PSD program does
not include the optional PM2.5 SMC and SIL provisions.
Unless explicitly identified in Regulation 19.904(A), the Arkansas PSD
SIP only incorporates by reference the federal PSD requirements at 40
CFR 52.21(a)(2) through (bb) as in effect on November 29, 2005. Because
Regulation 19.904(A) does not explicitly identify 40 CFR 52.21(k)(2) or
52.21(i)(5)(i)(c) as promulgated by the EPA on October 20, 2011 as
being part of the Arkansas PSD program, the EPA proposes to find that
the Arkansas PSD program does not include the PM2.5 SIL and
SMC provisions that have been vacated by the Courts and removed by the
EPA on December 9, 2013.
3. Interstate Transport of Air Pollution and PSD
CAA 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) calls for the SIP to prohibit emissions to
other states which will (1) contribute significantly to nonattainment
of the NAAQS or (2) interfere with maintenance of the NAAQS. CAA
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) calls for the SIP to prohibit emissions to other
states which will (1) interfere with measures required to prevent
significant deterioration or (2) interfere with measures to protect
visibility. The December 17, 2007 SIP submittal addressed CAA
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) and (II) for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. We
previously acted on (1) the contribution to nonattainment and
interference with maintenance portion (August 29, 2013, 78 FR 53269)
and (2) the visibility protection portion (March 12, 2012, 77 FR
14604). We neglected to act on the portion pertaining to interstate
transport of air pollution and PSD.
The CAA 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) interstate transport requirement for
PSD is met when new major sources and major modifications in a state
are subject to a comprehensive EPA-approved PSD permitting program that
(1) applies to all regulated NSR pollutants and (2) satisfies the
requirements of EPA's PSD implementation rules. This is because a fully
approved PSD program necessarily needs to fully consider source impacts
on other States. Because these criteria will be met with our approval
of the Arkansas PSD SIP revision, we are proposing to approve the
portion of the December 17, 2007 SIP submittal that addresses
interstate transport of air pollution and PSD for the 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS (CAA 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)).
B. Impacts on Existing Federal Implementation Plan Clocks
The EPA previously promulgated a partial approval and partial
disapproval of the Arkansas infrastructure SIP for the 1997 ozone NAAQS
and the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS on August 20, 2012 (77 FR
50033, August 20, 2012). The partial disapproval was based on the
State's failure to submit the required PSD SIP revisions from the May
16, 2008 PM2.5 NSR Implementation Rule. The EPA's partial
disapproval of required elements of the Act started a federal
implementation plan (FIP) clock for the required 2008 NSR
PM2.5 Implementation Rule revisions, which expired on
September 19, 2014.
The EPA on May 22, 2014, made a separate finding of failure to
submit for the State of Arkansas based on the State's failure to submit
revisions to the SIP incorporating the required component of the
October 20, 2010 PM2.5 PSD Increment--SILs--SMC Rule. See 79
FR 29354. The EPA's finding of failure to submit established a 24-month
deadline by which time the EPA must promulgate a FIP for Arkansas to
address the PM2.5 PSD requirements for increment and the
associated implementing regulations, unless the State submits and the
EPA approves a SIP revision that corrects the deficiency
[[Page 66669]]
before the EPA promulgates a FIP for the State, in accordance with
section 110(c)(1).
The EPA's proposed action today preliminarily finds that the
September 10, 2014, submittal for parallel processing satisfies all
required elements for PM2.5 PSD implementation as required
through EPA's May 16, 2008, and October 20, 2010, final rules.
Accordingly, finalization of today's proposal will stop the two FIP
clocks on the lack of these elements in the Arkansas PSD program and
remove any FIP obligation from EPA for the PM2.5 PSD
implementation.
C. General Updates to the Arkansas SIP
The July 26, 2010 and November 6, 2012 submittals, included
numerous updates throughout the Arkansas SIP at Regulation 19 to update
incorporation by reference dates, and correct grammar and formatting.
The accompanying TSD provides a line-item analysis of each of these
revisions. Our analysis demonstrates that these revisions are non-
substantive in nature. Thus EPA is proposing approval.
The September 10, 2014 submittal contains new Appendix B to
Regulation 19 that is intended to establish the specific NAAQS that are
implemented through the Arkansas SIP and the Arkansas PSD program.
Appendix B captures the ambient air quality standards promulgated in 40
CFR Part 50 as of July 27, 2012. Although Appendix B as submitted is
approvable, this incorporation by reference date does not capture the
2012 particulate matter primary NAAQS revision (78 FR 3086). Under CAA
110(a)(1), the State is allowed 3 years from the date of promulgation
of national ambient air quality primary standard to submit a plan which
provides for implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of such
primary standard in each air quality control region (or portion
thereof) within such State. Therefore, Arkansas is required to submit
revisions to address the 2012 particulate matter primary NAAQS revision
by December 14, 2015.
III. Proposed Action
The EPA proposes to approve the revisions to the Arkansas SIP
submitted on July 26, 2010, November 6, 2012, and September 10, 2014,
because we have made the preliminary determination that these SIP
packages were adopted and submitted in accordance with the CAA and EPA
regulations regarding implementation of the PM2.5 NAAQS.
Therefore, under section 110 and part C of the Act and for the reasons
stated above, the EPA proposes to approve the following revisions to
the Arkansas SIP:
Revisions to Regulation 19, Chapter 1 submitted on July
26, 2010 and November 6, 2012;
Revisions to Regulation 19, Chapter 2 submitted on July
26, 2010, November 6, 2012, and September 10, 2014, with the exception
of the GHG Biomass Deferral provision submitted as part of the
definition of CO2e on November 6, 2012;
Revision to Regulation 19, Chapter 3 submitted on July 26,
2010 and September 10, 2014;
Revisions to Regulation 19, Chapter 5 submitted on July
26, 2010 and September 10, 2014;
Revisions to Regulation 19, Chapter 6 submitted on July
26, 2010;
Revisions to Regulation 19, Chapter 7 submitted on July
26, 2010;
Revisions to Regulation 19, Chapter 9 submitted on
September 10, 2014;
Revisions to Regulation 19, Chapter 10 submitted on July
26, 2010;
Revisions to Regulation 19, Chapter 11 submitted on July
26, 2010;
Revisions to Regulation 19, Chapter 13 submitted on July
26, 2010
New Regulation 19, Appendix B submitted on September 10,
2014; and
A portion of a December 17, 2007 SIP submittal addressing
interstate transport of air pollution and PSD for the 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS (CAA 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)).
The EPA is also proposing to find that the Arkansas PSD NSR SIP
meets all the CAA PSD requirements for implementing the 1997 and 2006
PM2.5 NAAQS, including the PM2.5 PSD requirements
contained in the federal regulations as of December 9, 2013, including
regulation of NOX and SO2 as PM2.5 PSD
precursors, regulation of condensables, and PM2.5
increments. As such, upon finalization of today's proposed rulemaking,
the EPA will stop the two FIP clocks that are currently running on the
Arkansas PSD program pertaining to PM2.5 PSD implementation.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely proposes to approve state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this
action:
is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor
will it impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or
preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen Oxides, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, and
Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
[[Page 66670]]
Dated: October 29, 2014.
Samuel Coleman,
Acting Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2014-26627 Filed 11-7-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P