Notice of Inquiry; Request for Comments on a New Beef Promotion, Research, and Information Order, 66684-66686 [2014-26552]
Download as PDF
66684
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 217 / Monday, November 10, 2014 / Notices
Smith, David W.; Suarez Oliva,
Carlos; Weller, Jason; Wilkes, Homer
L.
Audrey; Shahin, Jessica; Thornton,
Jane; Tribiano, Jeffrey
Rural Development (RD)
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
Research, Education and Economics
[Doc. No. AMS–LPS–14–0081]
Rural Business Service
Abebe, Yeshimebet, Bartuska, Ann;
Woteki, Catherine
Parker, Chadwick O.
Agricultural Research Service
Notice of Inquiry; Request for
Comments on a New Beef Promotion,
Research, and Information Order
Rural Housing Service
Ahuja, Lajpat R.; Allen, Lindsay;
Arnold, Jeffrey G.; Baldus, Lisa;
Brennan, Deborah; Bahar, Mojdeh;
Bretting, Peter K.; Chandler, Laurence;
Cleveland, Thomas; Erhan, Sevin;
Fayer, Ronald; Gay, Cyril G.; Gibson,
Paul; Gottwald, Timothy R.; Hackett,
Kevin J.; Hammond, Andrew;
Hatfield, Jerry L.; Hefferan, Colien;
Huber, Steven C.; Hunt, Patrick G.;
Jackson, Thomas J.; Jacobs-Young,
Chavonda; Jenkins, Johnie Norton;
Kappes, Steven; Kochian, Leon V.;
Kunickis, Sheryl; Lillehoj, Hyun S.;
Lindsay, James A.; Liu, Simon; Loper,
Joyce E.; Magill, Robert; Matteri,
Robert; Mattoo, Autar K.; McGuire,
Michael; McMurtry, John; Nackman,
Ronald J; Onwulata, Charles: Ort,
Donald R.; Pollak, Emil; Rango,
Albert; Riley, Ronald T.; Sebesta,
Paul; Shafer, Steven; Starke-Reed,
Pamela; Simmons, Mary W.; Smith,
Timothy P.; Spence, Joseph; Suarez,
David Lee; Swietlik, Dariusz;
Upchurch, Dan; Whalen, Maureen;
Willett, Julious L.; Zhang, Howard
Ferguson, Katherine; O’Brien, Doug;
Kunesh, Patrice
Allen, Joyce; Davis, Richard A.;
Glendenning, Roger; Hannah,
Thomas; Hooper, Bryan; Primrose,
Edna; Ross, Robert H.; Salguero,
Francisco; Atkins, Anita
Rural Utilities Service
Adams, Keith; Ackerman, Kenneth;
Bojes, Gary; Ponti-Lazaruk, Jacqueline
Natural Resources and Environment
Blazer, Arthur; Bonnie, Robert Farrell;
Harrell, Meryl; Mills, Ann C.
Forest Service
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Atkinson, Kathleen; Blount, Emilee;
Brown, Thomas C.; Bryant, Arthur;
Bytnerowicz, Andrzej; Christiansen,
Victoria; Cleaves, David A.; Cohen,
Warren Bruce; Coleman, Angela V.;
Cullen, Daniel; Dixon, Antoine;
Doudrick, Robert; Ferguson, Tony;
Ferrell, David L.; Foster, George S.;
Friend, Alexander L.; Grant, Gordon
E.; Guldin, Richard; Gutman,
Theodore H.; Hammel, Kenneth E.;
Harbour, Thomas C.; Hubbard, James
E.; Iverson, Louis R.; Jiron, Daniel J.;
Joyner, Calvin N.; Krueger, Faye L.;
Lago, Jacquelyn L.; Lemly, Dennis;
Lepore, Mary Beth; Lugo, Ariel E.;
Mangold, Robert D.; McGuire,
Jennifer; Meade, Joe L.; Meinzer,
Frederick C.; Mezainis, Valdis E.;
Moore, Randy; Myers, Jr., Charles L.;
Nash, Douglas R.; Pena, James M.;
Pendleton, Beth G.; Peterson, David
L.; Phipps, John E.; Rains, Michael T.;
Raphael, Martin G.; Rasure, Nora B.;
Reaves, Jimmy L.; Rodriguez-Franco,
Carlos; Ross, Robert J.; Sears, George
A.; Shortle, Walter C.; Smith, Gregory
C.; Spies, Thomas A.; Stanturf, John
A.; Strong, Thelma J.; Thompson III,
Frank R.; Tidwell, Thomas; Tooke,
Tony; Vose, James M.; Wagner, Mary
A.; Wear, David; Weldon, Leslie;
West, Cynthia
Natural Resources Conservation
Service
Barry, Gayle N.; Boozer, Astor F.;
Christensen, Thomas; Coleman, RayDeleon J.; Erickson, Terrell; Gelburd,
Diane; Herbert, Noller; Honeycutt, C.
Wayne; Jordan, Leonard; Kramer,
Anthony; Kunze, Stephen; Perry,
Janet; Reed, Lesia; Salinas, Salvador;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:25 Nov 07, 2014
Jkt 235001
Economic Research Service
Bianchi, Ronald; Bohman, Mary;
Munisamy, Gopinath; Pompelli,
Gregory K.; Variyam, Jayachandran
N.; Weinberg, Marca J.
National Agricultural Statistics Service
Barnes, Kevin L.; Hamer, Jr., Hubert;
Harris, James Mark; Parsons, Joseph
L.; Picanso, Robin; Reilly, Joseph;
Valivullah, Michael
National Institute of Food and
Agriculture
Broussard, Meryl; Desbois, Michel;
Holland, Robert E.; Montgomery,
Cynthia R.; Qureshi, Muquarrab A.;
Ramaswamy, Sonny
Dated: November 5, 2014.
Thomas J. Vilsack,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–26613 Filed 11–7–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Notice of Inquiry, request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS) of the Department of
Agriculture (USDA) requests public
comments to inform its development of
a beef promotion, research, and
information order under the Commodity
Promotion, Research, and Consumer
Information Act of 1996 (1996 Act). This
request for comments offers the
opportunity for interested individuals
and organizations to provide views
concerning provisions that would be
included in an industry-funded
promotion, research, and information
program for beef and beef products. The
proposed order would be in addition to
the existing beef promotion and
research program established under the
Beef Promotion and Research Act of
1985 (1985 Act). A referendum on an
order established under the 1996 Act
would be conducted 3 years after
assessments begin to determine whether
beef producers favor the program and if
it should continue. A second
referendum would be held within 7
years of the start of the program.
DATES: Written comments must be
received by December 10, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons and
organizations are invited to submit
written comments by any of the
following methods:
Federal eRulemaking: At
www.regulations.gov, follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Comments may be sent to Beef
Promotion, Research, and Information
Order; Research and Promotion
Division; Livestock, Poultry, and Seed
Program; Agricultural Marketing
Service, USDA, Room 2096–S, STOP
0249, 1400 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–0249.
Instructions: All comments should
reference the docket number, the date,
and the page number of this issue of the
Federal Register. In providing
responsive comments concerning
provisions of this program, please
reference the heading below under
which you are contributing information.
Please be advised that all comments
submitted in response to this notice will
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10NON1.SGM
10NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 217 / Monday, November 10, 2014 / Notices
be included in the record and will be
made available to the public on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information.
Also, the identity of the individuals or
entities submitting the comments will
be made public.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Angie Snyder, Research and Promotion
Division, by email at angie.snyder@
ams.usda.gov, by fax at 202/720–1125,
or by phone on 202/720–5705.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Background
1985 Act Program
The current beef promotion and
research program (commonly called the
Beef Checkoff Program) was authorized
by the Beef Promotion and Research Act
of 1985 (1985 Act), 7 U.S.C. 2901–2918,
and became effective on July 18, 1986,
when the Beef Promotion and Research
Order, 7 CFR Part 1260, was issued.
Assessments began on October 1, 1986.
The Beef Checkoff Program’s goal is to
strengthen the position of beef in the
marketplace and to maintain and
expand domestic and foreign markets
and uses for beef and beef products. The
program is funded by a mandatory
assessment of $1 per head collected
each time cattle are sold. All producers
owning and marketing cattle, regardless
of the size of their operation or the value
of their cattle, must pay the assessment.
A comparable assessment is collected
on all imported cattle, beef, and beef
products. Assessments under this
program, which total about $80 million
annually, are used to fund programs of
promotion, research, and information
that are carried out under federal
oversight
This program is administered by the
Cattlemen’s Beef Promotion and
Research Board (CBB) comprising
approximately 100 domestic producer
and importer members. Each year, the
Secretary of Agriculture appoints about
one-third of all CBB members to 3-year
terms from cattle producers and
importers nominated by eligible
industry organizations.
Annually, CBB elects 10 members to
a Beef Promotion Operating Committee
(Operating Committee). The other 10
members of the Operating Committee
are members of the Federation of State
Beef Councils, which is a division of the
National Cattlemen’s Beef Association.
The Operating Committee is responsible
for developing budgets; approving
projects of promotion, research, and
information; and awarding contracts on
behalf of the Beef Checkoff Program.
CBB employs a staff with offices in
Centennial, Colorado.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:25 Nov 07, 2014
Jkt 235001
Working Group Meetings
For more than 3 years, a CrossIndustry Working Group (CIWG, also
known as the Beef Checkoff Working
Group and the Beef Checkoff
Enhancement Working Group) made up
of a number of cattle industry and
agricultural organizations met to
identify ways to come to agreement on
how to bring additional resources to the
Beef Checkoff Program, including
whether to amend the existing program
under the 1985 Act, to create a new
program under the Commodity
Promotion, Research, and Information
Act of 1996 (1996 Act), 7 U.S.C. 7411–
7425, or some other action. While
producer attitude surveys show that
support for the current program is high
and indications are that most support an
increase in the assessment rate,
concerns have nevertheless been
expressed about the structure of the
program as contemplated by the 1985
Act and a desire by some that the Beef
Checkoff Program structure be amended
as a prerequisite for support for an
increase in assessments.
CIWG members agreed that the
current Beef Checkoff Program was
underfunded to meet its long-range
plan, but they did not settle on any
governance changes. They did, however,
request for USDA to amend the Beef
Promotion and Research Order to allow
organizations created since 1985 to
contract with the Beef Checkoff
Program. USDA completed this
regulatory action in August 2012.
Since the initial meeting, the CIWG
met several times, and unable to come
to a recommendation, disbanded in June
2013. After disbanding, some
organizations that were a part of the
CIWG supported a proposal to develop
a new beef program under the 1996 Act
to limit any one organization’s control
over the direction of checkoff dollars.
Other organizations that were a part of
the CIWG supported keeping the
program under the 1985 Act or
establishing new beef-specific
legislation.
At the direction of Secretary Thomas
Vilsack, the CIWG reconvened in early
2014 and appointed a facilitator. The
group last met in July 2014 in
Washington, DC, and identified a
number of ways to enhance the current
Beef Checkoff Program, including
changing the nominating process to
allow associations a greater say in who
serves on the Beef Promotion Operating
Committee, which directs the projects
under the Beef Checkoff Program;
increasing the $1.00-per-head
assessment by an additional, refundable
$1.00; holding periodic requests for a
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66685
referendum on the Beef Checkoff
Program at local Farm Service Agency
county offices; and having CBB staff
take the lead in running Beef Checkoff
committee meetings, which are jointly
populated by both CBB members and
members of the Federation of State Beef
Councils (Federation), to address
concerns about any one organization
running the meetings.
Shortly thereafter, one organization
withdrew from the CIWG, expressing
belief that the actions were unlikely to
result in the desired reform. The
organization that withdrew from the
CIWG further recommended that USDA
create a new beef checkoff program
under the 1996 Act.
At a meeting of most of the members
of the CIWG on September 30, 2014,
Secretary Vilsack announced his
intention to bring more resources to beef
industry research and promotion efforts
by promulgating an order for a new
program under the authority of the 1996
Act. The new program would operate
concurrently with the Beef Checkoff
Program already in place under the
authority of the 1985 Act and would
seek to address the beef industry’s
concerns about the structure of the
current Beef Checkoff Program. A new
checkoff program would serve as the
basis of support for increased
assessments.
Thus far, the CIWG has not made a
recommendation on a path to enhance
the Beef Checkoff Program through
amendment of the 1985 Act, which
would require Congressional action.
Questions & Answers
Why is this action being taken?
To address general industry
recognition of a need to increase
funding for beef promotion and research
but having no discretion to enhance
assessments under the 1985 Act, USDA
is developing a new Beef Promotion,
Research, and Information Program
authorized under its existing authorities
granted by the 1996 Act. The program
would enhance available resources,
which would help the beef industry
address important issues such as
exports, beef demand, nutrition, and
consumer information. As a result,
additional resources could help increase
demand for beef both domestically and
internationally, thus benefitting cattle
producers and the domestic beef
industry.
Does the beef industry have a say?
Yes. First, USDA is seeking comments
before drafting a proposed order under
the 1996 Act. Second, USDA will seek
comments on a proposed order.
E:\FR\FM\10NON1.SGM
10NON1
66686
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 217 / Monday, November 10, 2014 / Notices
Would this new program be subject to
referendum?
Yes. Within 3 years following USDA’s
issuance of a final order, a referendum
would be conducted among eligible beef
industry entities to determine whether
they favor continuation, termination, or
suspension of the program. If the
referendum passes, the new program
would continue, with a second
referendum held within 7 years of the
start of the program. If the initial
referendum fails, the program would be
terminated.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
What happens to the Beef Checkoff
Program that was established under the
1985 Act?
Nothing; the current Beef Checkoff
Program would continue. This action is
separate from the Beef Promotion and
Research Order (7 CFR Part 1260)
established under the 1985 Act. The
1985 Act program would continue to
run until beef producers and importers
vote in a referendum to terminate the
program. As provided by the 1985 Act,
USDA would conduct a referendum on
the request of a representative group
comprising 10 per cent or more of cattle
producers to determine whether cattle
producers favor the termination or
suspension of the program. More
information regarding the referendum
process authorized by the Act of 1985 is
available here: https://
www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/
getfile?dDocName=STELPRDC5108482.
The proposed program to be
implemented under the 1996 Act would
run in addition to the current Beef
Checkoff Program, and assessments
collected under the new program would
be handled under separate authority.
Projects and funding would be
determined by provisions established
under the new order.
Comment Procedures
In your comments, please reference
the heading(s) under which you are
contributing information. USDA is
specifically seeking comments
addressing the questions listed below.
1. Who should be assessed?
2. What should be the board
structure?
• Who is eligible to serve?
• Should there be a relatively large
delegate body appointed by the
Secretary that would elect and
recommend from within itself a smaller
board?
• What should be the size of the
board?
• What should be the term of office?
3. How should the board be selected?
• Who may nominate eligible
candidates to serve?
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:25 Nov 07, 2014
Jkt 235001
• What should be the nomination and
selection process?
4. What should be the powers and
duties of the board?
5. Who has decision-making
authority?
• Should funding decisions be made
by the full board or a smaller body
elected from within this board?
• Should funding decisions be made
in conjunction with other organizations
such as the Federation of State Beef
Councils or the current Cattlemen’s Beef
Promotion and Research Board?
6. How should the assessment rate be
determined?
• Should the assessment be a
specified amount, a percent of value, or
an amount determined by board?
• If a specified amount or a percent
of value, should there be provisions for
adjustments to the rate by the board,
and without subsequent producer
referendum?
• Should there be a de minimis
exemption for certain size operations or
classes of cattle or beef?
• Should there be temporary or
permanent provisions for refunds of
assessments?
7. How should assessments be
collected?
• Should the States or the national
board collect the assessment?
• Should the assessment be levied at
all points of sale, at slaughter, or at
some other time?
8. When should the referenda be
conducted?
Comments that do not address these
topics or topics closely associated with
the structure of a new beef research and
promotion order under the authority of
the 1996 Act may be deemed
unresponsive or beyond the scope of
this notice.
USDA will consider written
comments in developing a Beef
Promotion, Research and Information
Order that provides for a promotion,
research, and information program for
beef and beef products under the 1996
Act. The new program would operate
concurrently with the Beef Checkoff
Program authorized under the authority
of the 1985 Act.
Dated: November 4, 2014.
Rex A. Barnes,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–26552 Filed 11–7–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
[Docket No. APHIS–2013–0013]
Monsanto Company and Forage
Genetics International; Determination
of Nonregulatory Status of Genetically
Engineered Alfalfa
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
We are advising the public of
our determination that an alfalfa event
developed by the Monsanto Company
and Forage Genetics International,
designated as event KK179, which has
been genetically engineered to express
reduced levels of guaiacyl lignin, is no
longer considered a regulated article
under our regulations governing the
introduction of certain genetically
engineered organisms. Our
determination is based on our
evaluation of data submitted by the
Monsanto Company and Forage
Genetics International in its petition for
a determination of nonregulatory status,
our analysis of available scientific data,
and comments received from the public
in response to our previous notices
announcing the availability of the
petition for nonregulated status and its
associated environmental assessment
and plant pest risk assessment. This
notice also announces the availability of
our written determination and finding
of no significant impact.
DATES: Effective November 10, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may read the
documents referenced in this notice and
the comments we received at https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2013-0013 or
in our reading room, which is located in
Room 1141 of the USDA South
Building, 14th Street and Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC. Normal
reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 799–7039
before coming.
Supporting documents are also
available on the APHIS Web site at
https://www.aphis.usda.gov/
biotechnology/petitions_table_
pending.shtml under APHIS Petition
Number 12–321–01p.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
John Turner, Director, Environmental
Risk Analysis Programs, Biotechnology
Regulatory Services, APHIS, 4700 River
Road Unit 147, Riverdale, MD 20737–
1236; (301) 851–3954, email:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10NON1.SGM
10NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 217 (Monday, November 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66684-66686]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26552]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
[Doc. No. AMS-LPS-14-0081]
Notice of Inquiry; Request for Comments on a New Beef Promotion,
Research, and Information Order
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of Inquiry, request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) of the Department of
Agriculture (USDA) requests public comments to inform its development
of a beef promotion, research, and information order under the
Commodity Promotion, Research, and Consumer Information Act of 1996
(1996 Act). This request for comments offers the opportunity for
interested individuals and organizations to provide views concerning
provisions that would be included in an industry-funded promotion,
research, and information program for beef and beef products. The
proposed order would be in addition to the existing beef promotion and
research program established under the Beef Promotion and Research Act
of 1985 (1985 Act). A referendum on an order established under the 1996
Act would be conducted 3 years after assessments begin to determine
whether beef producers favor the program and if it should continue. A
second referendum would be held within 7 years of the start of the
program.
DATES: Written comments must be received by December 10, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons and organizations are invited to submit
written comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking: At www.regulations.gov, follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Comments may be sent to Beef Promotion, Research, and
Information Order; Research and Promotion Division; Livestock, Poultry,
and Seed Program; Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA, Room 2096-S,
STOP 0249, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250-0249.
Instructions: All comments should reference the docket number, the
date, and the page number of this issue of the Federal Register. In
providing responsive comments concerning provisions of this program,
please reference the heading below under which you are contributing
information.
Please be advised that all comments submitted in response to this
notice will
[[Page 66685]]
be included in the record and will be made available to the public on
the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information. Also, the identity of the individuals or entities
submitting the comments will be made public.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angie Snyder, Research and Promotion
Division, by email at angie.snyder@ams.usda.gov, by fax at 202/720-
1125, or by phone on 202/720-5705.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
1985 Act Program
The current beef promotion and research program (commonly called
the Beef Checkoff Program) was authorized by the Beef Promotion and
Research Act of 1985 (1985 Act), 7 U.S.C. 2901-2918, and became
effective on July 18, 1986, when the Beef Promotion and Research Order,
7 CFR Part 1260, was issued. Assessments began on October 1, 1986.
The Beef Checkoff Program's goal is to strengthen the position of
beef in the marketplace and to maintain and expand domestic and foreign
markets and uses for beef and beef products. The program is funded by a
mandatory assessment of $1 per head collected each time cattle are
sold. All producers owning and marketing cattle, regardless of the size
of their operation or the value of their cattle, must pay the
assessment. A comparable assessment is collected on all imported
cattle, beef, and beef products. Assessments under this program, which
total about $80 million annually, are used to fund programs of
promotion, research, and information that are carried out under federal
oversight
This program is administered by the Cattlemen's Beef Promotion and
Research Board (CBB) comprising approximately 100 domestic producer and
importer members. Each year, the Secretary of Agriculture appoints
about one-third of all CBB members to 3-year terms from cattle
producers and importers nominated by eligible industry organizations.
Annually, CBB elects 10 members to a Beef Promotion Operating
Committee (Operating Committee). The other 10 members of the Operating
Committee are members of the Federation of State Beef Councils, which
is a division of the National Cattlemen's Beef Association. The
Operating Committee is responsible for developing budgets; approving
projects of promotion, research, and information; and awarding
contracts on behalf of the Beef Checkoff Program.
CBB employs a staff with offices in Centennial, Colorado.
Working Group Meetings
For more than 3 years, a Cross-Industry Working Group (CIWG, also
known as the Beef Checkoff Working Group and the Beef Checkoff
Enhancement Working Group) made up of a number of cattle industry and
agricultural organizations met to identify ways to come to agreement on
how to bring additional resources to the Beef Checkoff Program,
including whether to amend the existing program under the 1985 Act, to
create a new program under the Commodity Promotion, Research, and
Information Act of 1996 (1996 Act), 7 U.S.C. 7411-7425, or some other
action. While producer attitude surveys show that support for the
current program is high and indications are that most support an
increase in the assessment rate, concerns have nevertheless been
expressed about the structure of the program as contemplated by the
1985 Act and a desire by some that the Beef Checkoff Program structure
be amended as a prerequisite for support for an increase in
assessments.
CIWG members agreed that the current Beef Checkoff Program was
underfunded to meet its long-range plan, but they did not settle on any
governance changes. They did, however, request for USDA to amend the
Beef Promotion and Research Order to allow organizations created since
1985 to contract with the Beef Checkoff Program. USDA completed this
regulatory action in August 2012.
Since the initial meeting, the CIWG met several times, and unable
to come to a recommendation, disbanded in June 2013. After disbanding,
some organizations that were a part of the CIWG supported a proposal to
develop a new beef program under the 1996 Act to limit any one
organization's control over the direction of checkoff dollars. Other
organizations that were a part of the CIWG supported keeping the
program under the 1985 Act or establishing new beef-specific
legislation.
At the direction of Secretary Thomas Vilsack, the CIWG reconvened
in early 2014 and appointed a facilitator. The group last met in July
2014 in Washington, DC, and identified a number of ways to enhance the
current Beef Checkoff Program, including changing the nominating
process to allow associations a greater say in who serves on the Beef
Promotion Operating Committee, which directs the projects under the
Beef Checkoff Program; increasing the $1.00-per-head assessment by an
additional, refundable $1.00; holding periodic requests for a
referendum on the Beef Checkoff Program at local Farm Service Agency
county offices; and having CBB staff take the lead in running Beef
Checkoff committee meetings, which are jointly populated by both CBB
members and members of the Federation of State Beef Councils
(Federation), to address concerns about any one organization running
the meetings.
Shortly thereafter, one organization withdrew from the CIWG,
expressing belief that the actions were unlikely to result in the
desired reform. The organization that withdrew from the CIWG further
recommended that USDA create a new beef checkoff program under the 1996
Act.
At a meeting of most of the members of the CIWG on September 30,
2014, Secretary Vilsack announced his intention to bring more resources
to beef industry research and promotion efforts by promulgating an
order for a new program under the authority of the 1996 Act. The new
program would operate concurrently with the Beef Checkoff Program
already in place under the authority of the 1985 Act and would seek to
address the beef industry's concerns about the structure of the current
Beef Checkoff Program. A new checkoff program would serve as the basis
of support for increased assessments.
Thus far, the CIWG has not made a recommendation on a path to
enhance the Beef Checkoff Program through amendment of the 1985 Act,
which would require Congressional action.
Questions & Answers
Why is this action being taken?
To address general industry recognition of a need to increase
funding for beef promotion and research but having no discretion to
enhance assessments under the 1985 Act, USDA is developing a new Beef
Promotion, Research, and Information Program authorized under its
existing authorities granted by the 1996 Act. The program would enhance
available resources, which would help the beef industry address
important issues such as exports, beef demand, nutrition, and consumer
information. As a result, additional resources could help increase
demand for beef both domestically and internationally, thus benefitting
cattle producers and the domestic beef industry.
Does the beef industry have a say?
Yes. First, USDA is seeking comments before drafting a proposed
order under the 1996 Act. Second, USDA will seek comments on a proposed
order.
[[Page 66686]]
Would this new program be subject to referendum?
Yes. Within 3 years following USDA's issuance of a final order, a
referendum would be conducted among eligible beef industry entities to
determine whether they favor continuation, termination, or suspension
of the program. If the referendum passes, the new program would
continue, with a second referendum held within 7 years of the start of
the program. If the initial referendum fails, the program would be
terminated.
What happens to the Beef Checkoff Program that was established under
the 1985 Act?
Nothing; the current Beef Checkoff Program would continue. This
action is separate from the Beef Promotion and Research Order (7 CFR
Part 1260) established under the 1985 Act. The 1985 Act program would
continue to run until beef producers and importers vote in a referendum
to terminate the program. As provided by the 1985 Act, USDA would
conduct a referendum on the request of a representative group
comprising 10 per cent or more of cattle producers to determine whether
cattle producers favor the termination or suspension of the program.
More information regarding the referendum process authorized by the Act
of 1985 is available here: https://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/getfile?dDocName=STELPRDC5108482.
The proposed program to be implemented under the 1996 Act would run
in addition to the current Beef Checkoff Program, and assessments
collected under the new program would be handled under separate
authority. Projects and funding would be determined by provisions
established under the new order.
Comment Procedures
In your comments, please reference the heading(s) under which you
are contributing information. USDA is specifically seeking comments
addressing the questions listed below.
1. Who should be assessed?
2. What should be the board structure?
Who is eligible to serve?
Should there be a relatively large delegate body appointed
by the Secretary that would elect and recommend from within itself a
smaller board?
What should be the size of the board?
What should be the term of office?
3. How should the board be selected?
Who may nominate eligible candidates to serve?
What should be the nomination and selection process?
4. What should be the powers and duties of the board?
5. Who has decision-making authority?
Should funding decisions be made by the full board or a
smaller body elected from within this board?
Should funding decisions be made in conjunction with other
organizations such as the Federation of State Beef Councils or the
current Cattlemen's Beef Promotion and Research Board?
6. How should the assessment rate be determined?
Should the assessment be a specified amount, a percent of
value, or an amount determined by board?
If a specified amount or a percent of value, should there
be provisions for adjustments to the rate by the board, and without
subsequent producer referendum?
Should there be a de minimis exemption for certain size
operations or classes of cattle or beef?
Should there be temporary or permanent provisions for
refunds of assessments?
7. How should assessments be collected?
Should the States or the national board collect the
assessment?
Should the assessment be levied at all points of sale, at
slaughter, or at some other time?
8. When should the referenda be conducted?
Comments that do not address these topics or topics closely
associated with the structure of a new beef research and promotion
order under the authority of the 1996 Act may be deemed unresponsive or
beyond the scope of this notice.
USDA will consider written comments in developing a Beef Promotion,
Research and Information Order that provides for a promotion, research,
and information program for beef and beef products under the 1996 Act.
The new program would operate concurrently with the Beef Checkoff
Program authorized under the authority of the 1985 Act.
Dated: November 4, 2014.
Rex A. Barnes,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-26552 Filed 11-7-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P