Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; North Carolina; Approval of Revisions to Inspection and Maintenance (I/M) Regulations Within the North Carolina State Implementation Plan; Correcting Amendment, 66654-66655 [2014-26521]
Download as PDF
66654
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 217 / Monday, November 10, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2014–0765; FRL–9918–94–
Region 4]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; North Carolina;
Approval of Revisions to Inspection
and Maintenance (I/M) Regulations
Within the North Carolina State
Implementation Plan; Correcting
Amendment
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Direct final rule; correcting
amendment.
AGENCY:
On October 30, 2002, the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
published a direct final rule in the
Federal Register approving North
Carolina State Implementation Plan
(SIP) revisions, submitted through the
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (NC
DENR), Division of Air Quality (DAQ),
regarding the State’s enhanced
inspection and maintenance (I/M)
program. This correcting amendment
corrects inadvertent errors for two rule
titles in the regulatory text of EPA’s
October 30, 2002, direct final rule.
DATES: This action is effective
November 10, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the
documentation used in the action being
corrected are available for inspection
during normal business hours at the
following location: U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–
8960. The Regional Office’s official
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nacosta C. Ward, Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. The
telephone number is (404) 562–9140.
Ms. Ward can also be reached via
electronic mail at ward.nacosta@
epa.gov.
SUMMARY:
This
action corrects the titles for two North
Carolina regulations that appear in
North Carolina’s Identification of Plan at
section 40 CFR 52.1770(c) under Table
1, at Subchapter 2D Air Pollution
Control Requirements, Section .1000
Motor Vehicle Emissions Control
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:14 Nov 07, 2014
Jkt 235001
Standard. The two titles that appear in
Table 1 as approved in EPA’s direct
final rulemaking on October 30, 2002
(67 FR 66056), are Sect .1004
‘‘Emissions Standards’’ and Sect .1005
‘‘Measurement and Enforcement.’’
However, the rule titles should read
Sect .1004 ‘‘Tailpipe Emission
Standards for CO and HC’’ and Sect
.1005 ‘‘On-Board Diagnostic Standards’’
as provided in the red-line/
strikethrough portion of NC DENR’s
August 7, 2002, SIP revision. EPA is
correcting these inadvertent errors by
replacing the current titles for Sect
.1004 and Sect .1005 with the correct
titles into North Carolina’s
Identification of Plan section of the
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 40
CFR 52.1770(c).
EPA has determined that this action
falls under the ‘‘good cause’’ exemption
in section 553(b)(3)(B) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
which, upon finding ‘‘good cause,’’
authorizes agencies to dispense with
public participation where public notice
and comment procedures are
impracticable, unnecessary or contrary
to the public interest. Public notice and
comment for this action are unnecessary
because this action to insert the correct
titles in the CFR for Sect .1004 and Sect
.1005 for North Carolina’s regulations
has no substantive impact on EPA’s
October 30, 2002, approval. The use of
incorrect titles as printed for the two
regulations in the regulatory text section
of EPA’s direct final rule published on
October 30, 2002, makes no substantive
difference to EPA’s analysis as set out in
the rule. In addition, EPA can identify
no particular reason why the public
would be interested in having the
opportunity to comment on the
corrections prior to this action being
finalized, since this correcting
amendment does not change the
meaning of the regulations at issue or
otherwise change EPA’s analysis of
North Carolina’s enhanced I/M SIP
revision. See 67 FR 66056.
EPA also finds that there is good
cause under APA section 553(d)(3) for
these corrections to become effective on
the date of publication of this action.
Section 553(d)(3) of the APA allows an
effective date less than 30 days after
publication ‘‘as otherwise provided by
the agency for good cause found and
published with the rule.’’ 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3). The purpose of the 30-day
waiting period prescribed in APA
section 553(d)(3) is to give affected
parties a reasonable time to adjust their
behavior and prepare before the final
rule takes effect. This rule, however,
does not create any new regulatory
requirements such that affected parties
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
would need time to prepare before the
rule takes effect. Rather, this rule merely
corrects inadvertent errors for the two
aforementioned rule titles contained in
the North Carolina regulations which
EPA approved on October 30, 2002. For
these reasons, EPA finds good cause
under APA section 553(d)(3) for this
correction to become effective on the
date of publication of this action.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely corrects
inadvertent errors for the two
aforementioned rule titles contained in
the North Carolina regulations which
EPA approved on October 30, 2002, and
it imposes no additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies
that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.). Because this rule merely
corrects inadvertent errors for the two
aforementioned rule titles contained in
the North Carolina regulations which
EPA approved on October 30, 2002, and
does not impose any additional
enforceable duty beyond that required
by state law, it does not contain any
unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as
described in the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), nor will it impose substantial
direct costs on tribal governments or
preempt tribal law.
This rule also does not have
Federalism implications because it does
not have substantial direct effects on the
states, on the relationship between the
national government and the states, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
E:\FR\FM\10NOR1.SGM
10NOR1
66655
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 217 / Monday, November 10, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This rule merely
corrects inadvertent errors for the two
aforementioned rule titles contained in
the North Carolina regulations which
EPA approved on October 30, 2002, and
does not alter the relationship or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act (CAA). This rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because it is not economically
significant. In addition, this rule does
not involve technical standards, thus
the requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This rule also
does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as added by
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule
may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a
rule report, which includes a copy of
the rule, to each House of the Congress
and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: October 23, 2014.
V. Anne Heard,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart II—North Carolina
2. Section 52.1770(c) is amended in
Table 1, under ‘‘Subchapter 2D Air
Pollution Control Requirements’’,
‘‘Section .1000 Motor Vehicle Emissions
Control Standard’’ by revising the
entries for ‘‘Sect .1004’’ and ‘‘Sect
.1005’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 52.1770
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
TABLE 1—EPA-APPROVED NORTH CAROLINA REGULATIONS
State citation
State effective
date
Title/Subject
EPA Approval date
Explanation
Subchapter 2D Air Pollution Control Requirements
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Section .1000 Motor Vehicle Emissions Control Standard
*
*
Sect .1004 ........................................
Sect .1005 ........................................
*
*
*
*
*
Tailpipe Emission Standards for
CO and HC.
On-Board Diagnostic Standards .....
*
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 711
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2014–0347; FRL–9918–23]
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
RIN 2070–AK01
Partial Exemption of Certain Chemical
Substances From Reporting Additional
Chemical Data
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
14:43 Nov 07, 2014
*
EPA is amending the list of
chemical substances that are partially
exempt from reporting additional
information under the Chemical Data
Reporting (CDR) rule. EPA has
determined that, based on the totality of
information on the chemical substances
listed in this document, the Agency has
low current interest in their CDR
processing and use information. EPA
reached this conclusion after
considering a number of factors,
including: The risk of adverse human
health or environmental effects,
information needs for CDR processing
and use information, and the
availability of other sources of
comparable processing and use
information.
SUMMARY:
[FR Doc. 2014–26521 Filed 11–7–14; 8:45 am]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
Jkt 235001
*
*
11/10/2014 [Insert Federal Register
citation].
7/1/2002 11/10/2014 [Insert Federal Register
citation].
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
7/1/2002
*
*
This direct final rule is effective
January 9, 2015 without further notice,
unless EPA receives adverse comment
on or before December 10, 2014. If EPA
receives written adverse comments, EPA
will withdraw the applicable partial
exemption in this direct final rule before
its effective date. See also Unit II. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
DATES:
Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2014–0347 by
one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\10NOR1.SGM
10NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 217 (Monday, November 10, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 66654-66655]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26521]
[[Page 66654]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R04-OAR-2014-0765; FRL-9918-94-Region 4]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; North
Carolina; Approval of Revisions to Inspection and Maintenance (I/M)
Regulations Within the North Carolina State Implementation Plan;
Correcting Amendment
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Direct final rule; correcting amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On October 30, 2002, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
published a direct final rule in the Federal Register approving North
Carolina State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions, submitted through
the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NC
DENR), Division of Air Quality (DAQ), regarding the State's enhanced
inspection and maintenance (I/M) program. This correcting amendment
corrects inadvertent errors for two rule titles in the regulatory text
of EPA's October 30, 2002, direct final rule.
DATES: This action is effective November 10, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the documentation used in the action being
corrected are available for inspection during normal business hours at
the following location: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4,
61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The Regional
Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to
4:30, excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nacosta C. Ward, Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61
Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number
is (404) 562-9140. Ms. Ward can also be reached via electronic mail at
ward.nacosta@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action corrects the titles for two
North Carolina regulations that appear in North Carolina's
Identification of Plan at section 40 CFR 52.1770(c) under Table 1, at
Subchapter 2D Air Pollution Control Requirements, Section .1000 Motor
Vehicle Emissions Control Standard. The two titles that appear in Table
1 as approved in EPA's direct final rulemaking on October 30, 2002 (67
FR 66056), are Sect .1004 ``Emissions Standards'' and Sect .1005
``Measurement and Enforcement.'' However, the rule titles should read
Sect .1004 ``Tailpipe Emission Standards for CO and HC'' and Sect .1005
``On-Board Diagnostic Standards'' as provided in the red-line/
strikethrough portion of NC DENR's August 7, 2002, SIP revision. EPA is
correcting these inadvertent errors by replacing the current titles for
Sect .1004 and Sect .1005 with the correct titles into North Carolina's
Identification of Plan section of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
at 40 CFR 52.1770(c).
EPA has determined that this action falls under the ``good cause''
exemption in section 553(b)(3)(B) of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) which, upon finding ``good cause,'' authorizes agencies to
dispense with public participation where public notice and comment
procedures are impracticable, unnecessary or contrary to the public
interest. Public notice and comment for this action are unnecessary
because this action to insert the correct titles in the CFR for Sect
.1004 and Sect .1005 for North Carolina's regulations has no
substantive impact on EPA's October 30, 2002, approval. The use of
incorrect titles as printed for the two regulations in the regulatory
text section of EPA's direct final rule published on October 30, 2002,
makes no substantive difference to EPA's analysis as set out in the
rule. In addition, EPA can identify no particular reason why the public
would be interested in having the opportunity to comment on the
corrections prior to this action being finalized, since this correcting
amendment does not change the meaning of the regulations at issue or
otherwise change EPA's analysis of North Carolina's enhanced I/M SIP
revision. See 67 FR 66056.
EPA also finds that there is good cause under APA section 553(d)(3)
for these corrections to become effective on the date of publication of
this action. Section 553(d)(3) of the APA allows an effective date less
than 30 days after publication ``as otherwise provided by the agency
for good cause found and published with the rule.'' 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3).
The purpose of the 30-day waiting period prescribed in APA section
553(d)(3) is to give affected parties a reasonable time to adjust their
behavior and prepare before the final rule takes effect. This rule,
however, does not create any new regulatory requirements such that
affected parties would need time to prepare before the rule takes
effect. Rather, this rule merely corrects inadvertent errors for the
two aforementioned rule titles contained in the North Carolina
regulations which EPA approved on October 30, 2002. For these reasons,
EPA finds good cause under APA section 553(d)(3) for this correction to
become effective on the date of publication of this action.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely corrects inadvertent errors for the two aforementioned rule
titles contained in the North Carolina regulations which EPA approved
on October 30, 2002, and it imposes no additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies
that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule merely corrects
inadvertent errors for the two aforementioned rule titles contained in
the North Carolina regulations which EPA approved on October 30, 2002,
and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that
required by state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
This rule also does not have Federalism implications because it
does not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the national government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government, as specified in
[[Page 66655]]
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This rule merely
corrects inadvertent errors for the two aforementioned rule titles
contained in the North Carolina regulations which EPA approved on
October 30, 2002, and does not alter the relationship or the
distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air
Act (CAA). This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically
significant. In addition, this rule does not involve technical
standards, thus the requirements of section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do
not apply. This rule also does not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as
added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this
rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House
of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States
prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: October 23, 2014.
V. Anne Heard,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart II--North Carolina
0
2. Section 52.1770(c) is amended in Table 1, under ``Subchapter 2D Air
Pollution Control Requirements'', ``Section .1000 Motor Vehicle
Emissions Control Standard'' by revising the entries for ``Sect .1004''
and ``Sect .1005'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1770 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
Table 1--EPA-Approved North Carolina Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
State citation Title/Subject effective date EPA Approval date Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subchapter 2D Air Pollution Control Requirements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section .1000 Motor Vehicle Emissions Control Standard
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Sect .1004...................... Tailpipe Emission 7/1/2002 11/10/2014 [Insert ....................
Standards for CO Federal Register
and HC. citation].
Sect .1005...................... On-Board Diagnostic 7/1/2002 11/10/2014 [Insert ....................
Standards. Federal Register
citation].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2014-26521 Filed 11-7-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P