Radio Broadcasting Services; Corona de Tucson, Sierra Vista, Tanque Verde, Vail, Arizona; Animus, Lordsburg, and Virden, New Mexico, 64682 [2014-25952]

Download as PDF 64682 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 211 / Friday, October 31, 2014 / Rules and Regulations provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this document and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This action will be effective December 30, 2014. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271 Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business information, Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste transportation, Indian lands, Intergovernmental relations, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Authority: This action is issued under the authority of sections 2002(a), 3006, and 7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as amended 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, 6974(b). Dated: August 22, 2014. Samuel Coleman, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6. [FR Doc. 2014–25724 Filed 10–30–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Part 73 [MB Docket No. 05–245, RM–11264, RM– 11357; FCC 14–156] Radio Broadcasting Services; Corona de Tucson, Sierra Vista, Tanque Verde, Vail, Arizona; Animus, Lordsburg, and Virden, New Mexico Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Final rule; application for review. rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES AGENCY: The Federal Communications Commission (‘‘Commission’’) dismisses in part and otherwise denies the Application for Review filed by CCRSierra Vista IV, LLC (‘‘CCR-Sierra’’) of the Media Bureau (‘‘Bureau’’)’s rejection SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:37 Oct 30, 2014 Jkt 235001 of CCR-Sierra’s proposal to change the community of license of its Station KZMK(FM) from Sierra Vista to Tanque Verde, Arizona, and grant of a conflicting Counterproposal filed by Cochise Broadcasting, LLC and Desert West Air Ranchers (‘‘Joint Parties’’). See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, supra. DATES: Effective October 31, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew J. Rhodes, Media Bureau, (202) 418–2700. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission’s Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 14–156, adopted October 14, 2014, and released October 15, 2014. The full text of this document is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Reference Information Center (Room CY–A257), 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554. The complete text of this document may also be purchased from the Commission’s copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street SW., Room CY–B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1– 800–378–3160 or http:// www.bcpiweb.com. In the Report and Order in this proceeding, the Bureau compared the mutually exclusive proposals under the FM Allotment Priorities and granted the Joint Parties Counterproposal because it would provide greater public interest benefits. The Bureau also rejected CCRSierra’s arguments that the Joint Parties Counterproposal was defective because: (1) There would not be city-grade coverage at two communities, (2) Federal Aviation Administration approval could not be obtained for one of the allotments; (3) there would be difficulty in obtaining Mexican concurrence for one allotment; (4) Animus, New Mexico, is not a community for allotment purposes; and (5) for one of the change of community proposals, there was no mutual exclusivity between the move-out and move-in communities. See 72 FR 53688, September 20, 2007. CCR-Sierra sought reconsideration on the same five grounds, and the Bureau denied these objections. In its Application for Review, CCRSierra reiterates these five arguments. The Commission finds that these issues were properly decided and upholds the Bureau’s decision for the stated reasons. The Commission also dismisses a sixth argument on procedural grounds because the Bureau had no opportunity to pass on it in violation of § 1.115(c) of the Commission’s rules. This document does not contain information collection requirements PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13. This document is not subject to the Congressional Review Act. (The Commission, is, therefore, not required to submit a copy of the Memorandum Opinion and Order to GAO, pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) because the Application for Review was denied.) Federal Communications Commission. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Office of Managing Director. [FR Doc. 2014–25952 Filed 10–30–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 50 CFR Part 679 [Docket No. 131021878–4158–02] RIN 0648–XD588 Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Reallocation of Pacific Cod in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Temporary rule; reallocation. AGENCY: NMFS is reallocating the projected unused amounts of Pacific cod from catcher vessels greater than 60 feet (18.3 meters) length overall (LOA) using pot gear, catcher vessels using trawl gear, and American Fisheries Act (AFA) catcher/processors (C/Ps) to Amendment 80 (A80) C/Ps, C/Ps using hook-and-line gear, and C/Ps using pot gear in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands management area. This action is necessary to allow the 2014 total allowable catch of Pacific cod to be harvested. SUMMARY: Effective October 27, 2014, through 2400 hrs, Alaska local time (A.l.t.), December 31, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Whitney, 907–586–7269. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS manages the groundfish fishery in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands management area (BSAI) according to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area (FMP) prepared by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council under authority of the Magnuson-Stevens DATES: E:\FR\FM\31OCR1.SGM 31OCR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 211 (Friday, October 31, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 64682]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25952]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MB Docket No. 05-245, RM-11264, RM-11357; FCC 14-156]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Corona de Tucson, Sierra Vista, 
Tanque Verde, Vail, Arizona; Animus, Lordsburg, and Virden, New Mexico

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; application for review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission (``Commission'') 
dismisses in part and otherwise denies the Application for Review filed 
by CCR-Sierra Vista IV, LLC (``CCR-Sierra'') of the Media Bureau 
(``Bureau'')'s rejection of CCR-Sierra's proposal to change the 
community of license of its Station KZMK(FM) from Sierra Vista to 
Tanque Verde, Arizona, and grant of a conflicting Counterproposal filed 
by Cochise Broadcasting, LLC and Desert West Air Ranchers (``Joint 
Parties''). See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, supra.

DATES: Effective October 31, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew J. Rhodes, Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2700.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 14-156, adopted October 14, 2014, and 
released October 15, 2014. The full text of this document is available 
for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC 
Reference Information Center (Room CY-A257), 445 12th Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20554. The complete text of this document may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and 
Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street SW., Room CY-B402, 
Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1-800-378-3160 or http://www.bcpiweb.com.
    In the Report and Order in this proceeding, the Bureau compared the 
mutually exclusive proposals under the FM Allotment Priorities and 
granted the Joint Parties Counterproposal because it would provide 
greater public interest benefits. The Bureau also rejected CCR-Sierra's 
arguments that the Joint Parties Counterproposal was defective because: 
(1) There would not be city-grade coverage at two communities, (2) 
Federal Aviation Administration approval could not be obtained for one 
of the allotments; (3) there would be difficulty in obtaining Mexican 
concurrence for one allotment; (4) Animus, New Mexico, is not a 
community for allotment purposes; and (5) for one of the change of 
community proposals, there was no mutual exclusivity between the move-
out and move-in communities. See 72 FR 53688, September 20, 2007. CCR-
Sierra sought reconsideration on the same five grounds, and the Bureau 
denied these objections.
    In its Application for Review, CCR-Sierra reiterates these five 
arguments. The Commission finds that these issues were properly decided 
and upholds the Bureau's decision for the stated reasons. The 
Commission also dismisses a sixth argument on procedural grounds 
because the Bureau had no opportunity to pass on it in violation of 
Sec.  1.115(c) of the Commission's rules.
    This document does not contain information collection requirements 
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. This 
document is not subject to the Congressional Review Act. (The 
Commission, is, therefore, not required to submit a copy of the 
Memorandum Opinion and Order to GAO, pursuant to the Congressional 
Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) because the Application for 
Review was denied.)

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Office of Managing Director.
[FR Doc. 2014-25952 Filed 10-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P