Safety Zone; Salvage Operations, Chicago River, Chicago, IL, 64511-64513 [2014-25856]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 210 / Thursday, October 30, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
This notice is issued under authority
of 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 33 CFR 100.1101.
In addition to this notice in the Federal
Register, the Coast Guard will provide
the maritime community with advance
notification of this enforcement period
via the Local Notice to Mariners and
local advertising by the event sponsor.
If the Captain of the Port Sector San
Diego or his designated representative
determines that the regulated area need
not be enforced for the full duration
stated on this notice, he or she may use
a Broadcast Notice to Mariners or other
communications coordinated with the
event sponsor to grant general
permission to enter the regulated area.
Dated: October 14, 2014.
J.S. Spaner,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Diego.
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
If
you have questions on this rule, contact
or email MST2 Stacy Smith, U.S. Coast
Guard Marine Safety Unit Chicago, at
(630) 986–2155 or Stacy.D.Smith@
uscg.mil. If you have questions on
viewing the docket, call Cheryl Collins,
Program Manager, Docket Operations,
telephone (202) 366–9826.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
[FR Doc. 2014–25850 Filed 10–29–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
A. Regulatory History and Information
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2014–0951]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Salvage Operations,
Chicago River, Chicago, IL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the Chicago River between the Lake
Street Bridge and the Randolph Street
Bridge, Chicago, IL. This safety zone is
intended to restrict vessels from a
designated portion of the Chicago River
for a sunken barge and related salvage
operations. This temporary safety zone
is necessary to protect the surrounding
public and vessels from the hazards
associated with salvage operations.
DATES: This rule is effective without
actual notice from October 30, 2014
until November 14, 2014. For the
purposes of enforcement, actual notice
will be used from the date the rule was
signed, October 17, 2014 until October
30, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket USCG–
2014–0951. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Oct 29, 2014
Jkt 235001
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking with
respect to this rule because doing so
would be impracticable and contrary to
the public interest. The final details for
this event were not known to the Coast
Guard until there was insufficient time
remaining before the event to publish an
NPRM. Specifically, this safety zone is
needed for salvage operations for a barge
that unexpectedly sank on the Chicago
River on October 17, 2014. Thus,
delaying the effective date of this rule to
wait for a comment period to run would
be both impracticable and contrary to
the public interest because it would
inhibit the Coast Guard’s ability to
protect the public and vessels from the
hazards associated with the salvage
operations discussed below.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), The Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this temporary rule effective less
than 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register. For the same reasons
discussed in the preceding paragraph,
waiting for a 30 day notice period to run
would be impracticable and contrary to
the public interest.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64511
B. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the rule is the
Coast Guard’s authority to establish
safety zones: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 160.5; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
From October 17 through November
14, 2014, salvage operations will take
place on the Chicago River in response
to a sunken barge on the south branch
of the Chicago River. The Captain of the
Port Lake Michigan has determined that
the salvage operations will pose a
significant risk to public safety and
property. This safety zone is necessary
to protect emergency responders and
transiting mariners from associated
hazards, which potentially include
vessel collisions in a narrow congested
channel.
C. Discussion of the Final Rule
With the aforementioned hazards in
mind, the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan has determined that this
temporary safety zone is necessary to
ensure the safety of vessels during
salvage operations on the Chicago River.
This safety zone will be in effect from
October 17 through November 14, 2014.
It will be enforced intermittently during
this time with actual notice.
Additionally, advanced notice of
enforcement times will be provided
through Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
This zone will encompass all waters on
the south branch of the Chicago River
between the Lake Street Bridge and the
Randolph Street Bridge, Chicago, IL.
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within the safety zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Lake Michigan or a designated onscene representative. The Captain of the
Port or a designated on-scene
representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive
orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
E:\FR\FM\30OCR1.SGM
30OCR1
64512
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 210 / Thursday, October 30, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
9. Civil Justice Reform
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
the impact of this temporary rule on
small entities. This rule will affect the
following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit
the south branch of the Chicago River
between the Lake Street Bridge and the
Randolph Street Bridge from October 17
through November 14, 2014.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the reasons cited in the Regulatory
Planning and Review section.
Additionally, before the enforcement of
the zone, we will issue local Broadcast
Notice to Mariners so vessel owners and
operators can plan accordingly.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders.
We conclude that this rule is not a
significant regulatory action because we
anticipate that it will have minimal
impact on the economy, will not
interfere with other agencies, will not
adversely alter the budget of any grant
or loan recipients, and will not raise any
novel legal or policy issues. The safety
zone created by this rule will be
relatively small and enforced on an as
needed basis. Under certain conditions,
moreover, vessels may still transit
through the safety zone when permitted
by the Captain of the Port.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
11. Indian Tribal Governments
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Oct 29, 2014
Jkt 235001
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
establishment of a safety zone and,
therefore it is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph
34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination
and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
E:\FR\FM\30OCR1.SGM
30OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 210 / Thursday, October 30, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this rule.
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or an
on-scene representative.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and record keeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
Dated: October 17, 2014.
A.B. Cocanour,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2014–25856 Filed 10–29–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapters 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T09–0951 to read as
follows:
■
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
(a) Location. All waters on the south
branch of the Chicago River between the
Lake Street Bridge and the Randolph
Street Bridge, Chicago, IL.
(b) Effective and enforcement period.
This rule is effective without actual
notice from October 30, 2014 until
November 14, 2014. For the purposes of
enforcement, actual notice will be used
from the date the rule was signed,
October 17, 2014 until October 30, 2014.
This rule will be enforced intermittently
with actual notice.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or a
designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan or a designated on-scene
representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan
is any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant or petty officer who has been
designated by the Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan to act on her behalf.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan or an on-scene representative
to obtain permission to do so. The
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or her
on-scene representative may be
contacted via VHF Channel 16. Vessel
operators given permission to enter or
operate in the safety zone must comply
with all directions given to them by the
16:53 Oct 29, 2014
Jkt 235001
41 CFR Part 102–37
[FMR Change–2014–05; FMR Case 2012–
102–2; Docket No. 2012–0007; Sequence
No. 1]
RIN 3090–AJ26
Federal Management Regulation;
Donation of Surplus Personal Property
Office of Governmentwide
Policy, General Services Administration
(GSA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
§ 165.T09–0951 Safety Zone; Salvage
Operations, Chicago River, Chicago, IL.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
The General Services
Administration is amending the Federal
Management Regulation (FMR) by
changing its personal property policy.
The changes include the addition of
certain veterans organizations as eligible
donation recipients, updating and
clarifying language regarding the use of
Standard Form 97, The United States
Government Certificate to Obtain Title
to a Vehicle (SF 97), instructing
agencies to ensure against unauthorized
use of blank copies of SF 97, making
minor clarifying edits to existing
policies, and removing and reserving
certain regulations that are no longer
required.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Effective: October 30, 2014.
Mr.
Robert Holcombe, Office of
Governmentwide Policy, Office of Asset
and Transportation Management (MT),
at 202–501–3828 or by email at
Robert.Holcombe@gsa.gov for
clarification of content. For information
pertaining to status or publication
schedules contact the Regulatory
Secretariat at 202–501–4755. Please cite
FMR Case 2012–102–2.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
A. Background
GSA published a proposed rule in the
Federal Register at 77 FR 50447 on
August 21, 2012. As a result, two
comments were received that suggested
revisions or clarifications to Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) section
31.205–8 concerning whether contractor
contributions or donations of contractor-
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64513
owned property to veterans
organizations are allowable costs under
a contract. Because that issue is outside
the scope of this final rule, both
submitters were provided with the
procedures for suggesting changes to the
FAR. Additionally GSA informed the
submitters that Federal property used by
contractors is screened for use and
donation under the plant clearance
processes contained in FAR part 45.
Specifically, Federal property is made
available for screening by other Federal
agencies and eligible donees under FAR
section 45.602–3. The proposed new
subpart J, ‘‘Insuring Donated Property,’’
published in the proposed rule has been
removed from this final rule because
GSA determined that, as a general
matter, the decision to acquire
insurance rests with the recipient of the
property. No other substantive changes
have been made to that which was
published as the proposed rule.
B. Changes
The changes in this final rule include
(1) the addition of certain veterans
organizations as eligible donation
recipients as authorized by 40 U.S.C.
549(c)(3)(C); (2) updating and clarifying
language regarding the use of Standard
Form 97, The United States Government
Certificate to Obtain Title to a Vehicle
(SF 97), and instructing agencies to
ensure against unauthorized use of
blank copies of SF 97; (3) making minor
clarifying edits to existing policies; and
(4) removing and reserving current FMR
sections 102–37.180 and 102–37.185 as
screener identification cards are no
longer required.
C. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This final rule is not a
significant regulatory action, and
therefore, was not subject to review
under Section 6(b) of E.O. 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, dated
September 30, 1993. This final rule is
not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act
This final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
E:\FR\FM\30OCR1.SGM
30OCR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 210 (Thursday, October 30, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64511-64513]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25856]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2014-0951]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Salvage Operations, Chicago River, Chicago, IL
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the
Chicago River between the Lake Street Bridge and the Randolph Street
Bridge, Chicago, IL. This safety zone is intended to restrict vessels
from a designated portion of the Chicago River for a sunken barge and
related salvage operations. This temporary safety zone is necessary to
protect the surrounding public and vessels from the hazards associated
with salvage operations.
DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from October 30,
2014 until November 14, 2014. For the purposes of enforcement, actual
notice will be used from the date the rule was signed, October 17, 2014
until October 30, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
USCG-2014-0951. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
contact or email MST2 Stacy Smith, U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Unit
Chicago, at (630) 986-2155 or Stacy.D.Smith@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking with
respect to this rule because doing so would be impracticable and
contrary to the public interest. The final details for this event were
not known to the Coast Guard until there was insufficient time
remaining before the event to publish an NPRM. Specifically, this
safety zone is needed for salvage operations for a barge that
unexpectedly sank on the Chicago River on October 17, 2014. Thus,
delaying the effective date of this rule to wait for a comment period
to run would be both impracticable and contrary to the public interest
because it would inhibit the Coast Guard's ability to protect the
public and vessels from the hazards associated with the salvage
operations discussed below.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), The Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this temporary rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. For the same reasons discussed in
the preceding paragraph, waiting for a 30 day notice period to run
would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest.
B. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the rule is the Coast Guard's authority to
establish safety zones: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
From October 17 through November 14, 2014, salvage operations will
take place on the Chicago River in response to a sunken barge on the
south branch of the Chicago River. The Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan has determined that the salvage operations will pose a
significant risk to public safety and property. This safety zone is
necessary to protect emergency responders and transiting mariners from
associated hazards, which potentially include vessel collisions in a
narrow congested channel.
C. Discussion of the Final Rule
With the aforementioned hazards in mind, the Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan has determined that this temporary safety zone is
necessary to ensure the safety of vessels during salvage operations on
the Chicago River. This safety zone will be in effect from October 17
through November 14, 2014. It will be enforced intermittently during
this time with actual notice. Additionally, advanced notice of
enforcement times will be provided through Broadcast Notice to
Mariners. This zone will encompass all waters on the south branch of
the Chicago River between the Lake Street Bridge and the Randolph
Street Bridge, Chicago, IL.
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan
or a designated on-scene representative. The Captain of the Port or a
designated on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
[[Page 64512]]
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.
We conclude that this rule is not a significant regulatory action
because we anticipate that it will have minimal impact on the economy,
will not interfere with other agencies, will not adversely alter the
budget of any grant or loan recipients, and will not raise any novel
legal or policy issues. The safety zone created by this rule will be
relatively small and enforced on an as needed basis. Under certain
conditions, moreover, vessels may still transit through the safety zone
when permitted by the Captain of the Port.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered the impact of this temporary rule on small entities. This
rule will affect the following entities, some of which might be small
entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
south branch of the Chicago River between the Lake Street Bridge and
the Randolph Street Bridge from October 17 through November 14, 2014.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the reasons cited in the
Regulatory Planning and Review section. Additionally, before the
enforcement of the zone, we will issue local Broadcast Notice to
Mariners so vessel owners and operators can plan accordingly.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the establishment of a safety zone and,
therefore it is categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may
lead to the
[[Page 64513]]
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record
keeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapters 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T09-0951 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-0951 Safety Zone; Salvage Operations, Chicago River,
Chicago, IL.
(a) Location. All waters on the south branch of the Chicago River
between the Lake Street Bridge and the Randolph Street Bridge, Chicago,
IL.
(b) Effective and enforcement period. This rule is effective
without actual notice from October 30, 2014 until November 14, 2014.
For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice will be used from the
date the rule was signed, October 17, 2014 until October 30, 2014. This
rule will be enforced intermittently with actual notice.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec. 165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within
this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Lake Michigan or a designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or a designated
on-scene representative.
(3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who
has been designated by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan to act on
her behalf.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone shall contact the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or an on-scene
representative to obtain permission to do so. The Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan or her on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF
Channel 16. Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in
the safety zone must comply with all directions given to them by the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or an on-scene representative.
Dated: October 17, 2014.
A.B. Cocanour,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2014-25856 Filed 10-29-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
