H2 Refuel H-Prize Final Guidelines, 64179-64185 [2014-25596]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 28, 2014 / Notices
Prize contest: Emanuel Wagner, Contest
Manager, Hydrogen Education
Foundation, at 202–457–0868 x360 or
by email at EWAGNER@ttcorp.com.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy
H2 Refuel H-Prize Final Guidelines
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy (DOE).
ACTION: Notice of the H2 Refuel H-Prize
Competition.
AGENCY:
As authorized in Section 654
of the Energy Independence and
Security Act of 2007, the Department of
Energy (DOE) is announcing the $1
million H2 Refuel H-Prize competition,
allowing teams from across the United
States to compete and develop systems
that generate and dispense hydrogen
from resources commonly available to
residences (electricity or natural gas),
for use in homes, community centers,
businesses or similar locations, to
supplement the current infrastructure
roll-out and reduce barriers to using
hydrogen fuel cell vehicles.
DATES:
—Competition opens—October 29,
2014.
—Competition ends—October 31, 2016:
Data will be analyzed to determine
winner Award of $1 million prize, if
the Panel of Judges determines that
there is a winning entry.
For more information regarding the
dates relating to this competition, see,
section III., Competition requirements
and process, Key Dates, in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this notice.
ADDRESSES: The H-Prize Web site is
https://hydrogenprize.org, where updates
and announcements will be posted
throughout the competition.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions may be directed to—
Technical information: Reginald Tyler
at 720–356–1805 or by email at
HPrize@ee.doe.gov
SUMMARY:
I. Introduction
Fuel cells powered by hydrogen from
renewable or low-carbon resources can
lead to substantial energy savings and
reductions in imported petroleum and
carbon emissions. Fuel Cell Electric
Vehicles (FCEVs) are much more
efficient than today’s gasoline vehicles,
and when fueled with hydrogen,
produce only water vapor at the
tailpipe. The hydrogen fuel can be
generated from a range of domestic
sources. While the commercial sale of
FCEVs is rapidly approaching,
infrastructure remains a major
challenge, with only approximately 50
fueling stations in the United States,
only 10 of which are operating as public
stations. The H-Prize was authorized
under section 654 of the Energy
Independence and Security Act of 2007
(Pub. L. 110–140). As efforts to build a
hydrogen fueling station infrastructure
are getting underway, the H2 Refuel HPrize is intended to incentivize the
development of small-scale systems for
non-commercial fueling to supplement
the larger-scale infrastructure
development.
The H2 Refuel H-Prize anticipates
award of a $1 million prize to the top
refueler system entry that can produce
hydrogen using electricity and/or
natural gas, energy sources commonly
available to residential locations, and
dispense the hydrogen to a vehicle,
providing at least 1 kg per refueling.
Systems considered would be at the
home scale and able to generate and
dispense 1–5 kg H2/day for use at
residences, or the medium scale,
generating and dispensing 5–50 kg H2/
day. Medium scale systems would serve
a larger community with multiple users
daily, such as a large apartment
64179
complex or retail centers to fuel small
fleets of vehicles (e.g., light duty
automobiles, forklifts or tractors).
Interested parties can register and find
more information, updates and pages
where teams can discuss the prize at the
H-Prize Web site: https://
hydrogenprize.org. The Hydrogen
Education Foundation (HEF) is
currently administering the prize for the
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), and
DOE will coordinate prize activities
with HEF.
Teams will have a year to design a
system that generates and dispenses
hydrogen fuel that meets the criteria and
identify a location where it can be
installed and used. Twelve months after
the competition opens, teams will be
required to complete registration and
submit system designs and blue prints,
plans for installation, and preliminary
data to demonstrate that the system
satisfies the minimum criteria (see
Criteria section). Teams will also need
to provide documented evidence of
cooperation from the installation site. Of
the teams that meet all of the minimum
criteria, the top entries will be selected
as finalists to enter the testing phase.
The selected teams will then have seven
months to install and begin operating
their systems. The systems must be
compatible with remote monitoring
equipment to allow remote monitoring
for the testing period; compatibility
requirements will be posted on the HPrize Web site. Starting 21 months after
the competition opens, the finalist
systems will be remotely monitored and
tested, and approximately two months
of data will be collected. At least one
on-site visit will be performed to verify
data and perform tests that cannot be
done remotely. Teams must also provide
requested information to a DOE
designated entity for independent
verification of the cost of the system and
the cost of the generated hydrogen. The
scoring criteria will be ranked and
weighted.
PROPOSED TIMELINE
Activity
March 2014 .....................................
April 2014 ........................................
October 2014 ..................................
asabaliauskas on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Current tentative date
Draft Guidelines posted for public comment.
Comment period closes.
Competition opens.
H-Prize Website opens, including an online system to facilitate teaming and partnerships.
Teams design systems, collect data, identify installation location, and registers for the prize ahead of data
submission deadline.
Preliminary data submission deadline.
Teams will submit data, provide designs and blueprints and information about installation site, to indicate
that the system is capable of meeting the base criteria.
Finalist teams are announced—go to testing stage.
Finalist Teams install systems and get them up and running.
Before the testing period begins, remote monitoring equipment will be installed by the designated data
analysis team.
System testing begins.
October 2015 ..................................
December 2015 ..............................
July 2016 .........................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:06 Oct 27, 2014
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
28OCN1
64180
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 28, 2014 / Notices
PROPOSED TIMELINE—Continued
Current tentative date
Activity
October 2016 ..................................
December 2016 (tentative) .............
Competition ends—data is analyzed to determine winner.
Anticipated winner announcement.
II. Prize Criteria and Testing
Finalist Selection Phase
Twelve months after the competition
opens, teams interested in competing
must have completed registering for the
competition and submit all required
information. To be considered, an entry
must meet the initial selection criteria
defined below. Teams will be required
to submit data that demonstrates the
system’s ability to meet the indicated
criteria. The top teams to provide
convincing evidence that the entry
could satisfy the minimum criteria will
be selected for testing. Specific
instructions will be posted on the HPrize Web site detailing the required
information. In addition to the required
technical criteria data, teams will
submit system descriptions and
preliminary designs and installation
concepts which will be evaluated by an
expert panel to determine if the entries
are likely to meet reasonable usability,
cost and safety criteria. Usability refers
to the ability of the system to be
installed and used at the intended
locations (e.g., considering footprint and
noise), and to be easily operated by the
average user (e.g., with minimum
training and time). Because a goal of the
H-Prize is to advance commercial
applications of hydrogen energy
technologies, the potential of the
systems to ultimately be
commercialized will also be evaluated,
and a description of a pathway to
commercial production of the systems,
including manufacturing, will be
requested. To evaluate the potential
safety of the system, certain information
will be requested, including a safety
plan and a hazard analysis; specific
instructions will be available at the HPrize Web site. A safety page on the HPrize Web site will provide updated
information on safety issues and
requirements for the safety plan and
hazard analysis. To be selected as a
finalist, contestant designs, installation
details and safety plans must be judged
adequately safe by a panel of safety
professionals.
MINIMUM/MAXIMUM CRITERIA TABLE
Criteria
Home
Minimum dispensing pressure ...........................
Maximum dispensing time (standard fill) ...........
Min. hydrogen dispensed per day .....................
Community
350 bar.
10 hours ...........................................................
1 kg ..................................................................
60 minutes.
5 kg.
Meets SAE J2719 (Hydrogen Fuel Quality for Fuel Cell Vehicles).
Fill method .........................................................
Compliant with relevant codes (for automobiles, SAE J2601 Fueling Protocols for Light Duty
Gaseous Hydrogen Surface Vehicles) and ensures that delivered hydrogen does not exceed
the pressure and temperature limits of the vehicle storage tank.
Safety .................................................................
asabaliauskas on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Hydrogen purity ..................................................
Meets relevant safety codes and standards for installation in target location.
Finalist Competition
The finalist teams will have seven
months to install their systems at a
location of their choosing before testing
begins. Among other considerations,
entries must meet the safety codes and
standards in effect at the installation
location appropriate to the system.
Further, all required permits and
approvals must be received prior to
system operations.
Each entry will be scored in six
different technical and cost criteria:
—Dispensing pressure
—Dispensing time
—Number of standard fills per day
—Tested availability
—Total installed system cost
—Direct user cost per kg
The criteria and scoring ranges are listed
in more detail below.
Testing for the technical criteria will
be performed remotely over a period of
2 to 3 months, with at least one on-site
inspection to verify data and perform
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:06 Oct 27, 2014
Jkt 235001
testing that cannot be done remotely.
Summary level testing results will be
published. The base criteria listed in
Minimum/Maximum Criteria Table will
be tested to ensure that all entries meet
those requirements. A standard fill is
defined as the delivery of 1 kg of
hydrogen to a vehicle tank.
The cost criteria will be evaluated by
an independent auditing entity. Teams
will be required to submit cost
information, such as the bill of materials
for the system installation and system
operating costs during the testing
period. Specific details on required
information will be provided to finalist
teams after selection.
Entries will receive scores for the
tested criteria as described below, with
different multipliers for each of the
criteria. When testing is complete, the
data will be analyzed to determine
scores. Once all results have been
analyzed, judges will evaluate the
results and determine the scores based
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
on the published scoring criteria, and
confirm entry eligibility based on the
base criteria and eligibility
requirements. After resolving any ties
(see tie resolution process below), the
eligible team with the highest score will
be the winner.
Installation Site Criteria
Any site in the 50 United States and
the District of Columbia can be used for
the installation of the refueler, as long
as there is access for installing
equipment for remote monitoring, at
least one on-site visit for in-depth
testing, and at least one visit by the
press and public.
To meet testing requirements, the
fueling system should be used at an
average of at least 50% planned capacity
per week (e.g., for a home system
designed to dispense 1 kg/day, at least
four 1-kg ‘‘fills’’ per week; for a
community system designed to produce
20 kg/day, it should dispense at least 70
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
28OCN1
64181
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 28, 2014 / Notices
1-kg ‘‘fills’’ per week). If on-site use is
below this level, simulated fills can be
used for testing. Simulated fill protocols
will be posted on the H-Prize Web site
before testing begins.
Entries must meet the safety codes
and standards in effect at the
installation location. Teams are
encouraged to consider the relevant
SAE, ASME and NFPA codes and
standards.1
Prize Criteria
The criteria were developed through
discussion with experts in the field,
including members of Hydrogen and
Fuel Cell Technical Advisory
Committee, other DOE offices, and
federal agencies, and from responses to
a Request for Information (DE–FOA–
0000907: RFI—Home Hydrogen Refueler
H-Prize Topic, https://
www1.eere.energy.gov/financing/
solicitations_detail.html?sol_id=600)
and public comments on the draft
criteria (79 FR 15737).
Each of the criteria is assigned a 1–5
point scale connected to different
ranges. To be eligible, entries must
receive at least the minimum score for
each category. For some criteria, the
ranges for home and community
systems may be different. A score
multiplying factor will be used to
weight the different criteria.
Dispensing pressure
Score
Home
1
2
3
4
5
350 bar or higher.
400 bar or higher.
500 bar or higher.
600 bar or higher.
700 bar or higher (ultimate goal).
........
........
........
........
........
Community
Dispensing Pressure refers to the
pressure of the hydrogen dispensed to
the vehicle. Intermediate pressures are
listed to incentivize advancements
towards low-cost systems that can meet
the ultimate target of 700 bar.
Dispensing time
Score
1
2
3
4
5
Home
........
........
........
........
........
10 hours/kg or less ...........................................................................
8 hours/kg or less .............................................................................
5 hours/kg or less .............................................................................
2 hours/kg or less .............................................................................
30 minutes/g or less .........................................................................
Dispensing time is the time required
to dispense a standard fill of hydrogen
to a vehicle, including time required to
connect the system to the vehicle and
begin the hydrogen flow. Home systems
may have longer fueling times, up to
overnight, while multi-user system are
expected to have shorter fueling times.
Number of standard fills per day
Score
1
2
3
4
........
........
........
........
Community
Home
1
2
3
4
or
or
or
or
more
more
more
more
...........
...........
...........
...........
Number of standard fills per day
Score
Home
5 ........
5 or more ...........
Community
50 or more.
The standard fills per day will be
based on the highest number of actual
or simulated fills completed in a 24
hour period.
Tested availability
Community
Score
5 or more.
10 or more.
20 or more.
40 or more.
60 minutes/kg or less.
30 minutes/kg or less.
15 minutes/kg or less.
10 minutes/kg or less.
3 minutes/kg or less.
1 ........
2 ........
3 ........
Home
Community
80% or higher.
85% or higher.
90% or higher.
Tested availability
Score
Home
4 ........
5 ........
Community
95% or higher.
98% or higher.
Availability will be tested over a
period of two to three months, during
which time system usage will need to be
at least 50% of the planned capacity per
week. Any time spent on repairs or nonroutine maintenance during the testing
period will count as non-available, even
if compensated for (e.g., repairs done
during scheduled down-time, or using
stored hydrogen).
Total installed system cost (capital + installation)
Score
asabaliauskas on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1
2
3
4
5
........
........
........
........
........
Home
Community
$25k/kg/day or less ..........................................................................
$20k/kg/day or less ..........................................................................
$15k/kg/day or less ..........................................................................
$10k/kg/day or less ..........................................................................
$5k/kg/day or less ............................................................................
$15k/kg/day or less.
$12.5k/kg/day or less.
$10k/kg/day or less.
$7.5k/kg/day or less.
$5k/kg/day or less.
Total Installed System Costs will be
based on the actual cost for the system
equipment (including balance of plant
to the nozzle interface) as well as the
actual installation costs. The total cost
for scoring will be based on the amount
of hydrogen dispensed per day—for
example, a home system designed and
demonstrated to dispense 1 kg/day with
a system installed cost of $24,000 would
score 1 point, while a system designed
to dispense 2 kg/day at the same cost
would receive a score of 3. Teams will
be expected to provide information such
as the bill of materials for all
components. Details of the specific
information requested will be provided
to the teams selected for testing. If the
system proposed provides heat and/or
power in addition to hydrogen for
refueling, the cost of the entire system
will be considered when scoring this
criterion. Integrated systems that
provide heat and/or power in addition
to hydrogen for refueling will be
awarded bonus points (see bonus points
below).
1 Codes and standards to consider include but are
not limited to SAE J2719, ASME B31–12, ASME
B31–3, ASME BPV Code, NFPA 2 and NFPA 70.
Depending on the system, some codes and
standards may not apply.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:06 Oct 27, 2014
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
28OCN1
64182
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 28, 2014 / Notices
Direct user cost per kg
Score
1
2
3
4
5
........
........
........
........
........
Home
Community
$20 or less.
$17 or less.
$14 or less.
$11 or less.
$8 or less.
Direct user cost per kg will be based
on feedstock inputs and actual
operations and maintenance costs
during the testing period, divided by the
amount of hydrogen that is produced
and used. The direct user cost per kg
excludes the capital and installation
costs, which are included in the total
installed system cost category.
Feedstock cost inputs will be based on
actual usage, using a single price for all
entries for each input to eliminate
regional variation, based on the EIA
2014 projections for average price to all
users: $0.098/kWh for electricity and
$6.60/million BTU for natural gas. All
generated and used hydrogen is counted
in determining the $/kg—for example, a
system that generates 10 kg/day, where
4 kg is used for fuel vehicles and 5 is
used in a fuel cell to produce power
would divide the daily user costs by 9.
A bonus score of up to 3 points will
be awarded for integrated systems in
order to offset the additional costs
associated with adding heat and/or
power, based on how much heat or
power is provided.
Points
Heat or power supplied
Scoring
1 .......
Supply at least 35 gallons of hot
water per day.
Supply at least 25,000 BTU/hr of
space heating.
Supply at least 10 kWh electricity per
day.
1 .......
Score
multiplier
Criteria category
Dispensing pressure .................
Dispensing time ........................
Standard fills per day ...............
Tested Availability .....................
System installation cost ............
Direct user cost per kg .............
Bonus points
3
1
1
2
2
1
1 .......
Scoring Example
Example A: Makes all the lowest
scores
Category
score
Score
multiplier
Criteria category
Result
Total scores
Dispensing pressure .......................................................................
Dispensing time ...............................................................................
Standard fills per day ......................................................................
Tested Availability ...........................................................................
System installation cost ..................................................................
Direct user cost per kg ....................................................................
Bonus categories ............................................................................
360 bar .......................................
8 hours .......................................
1 .................................................
81% ............................................
$23k/kg .......................................
$19/kg ........................................
None ...........................................
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
3
1
1
2
2
1
0
3
1
1
2
2
1
0
Total .........................................................................................
....................................................
....................
....................
10
Criteria category
Result
Category
score
Score
multiplier
Dispensing pressure .......................................................................
Dispensing time ...............................................................................
Standard fills per day ......................................................................
Tested Availability ...........................................................................
System installation cost ..................................................................
Direct user cost per kg ....................................................................
Bonus categories ............................................................................
475 bar .......................................
3 hours .......................................
3 .................................................
88% ............................................
$18k/kg .......................................
$11/kg ........................................
Supplies hot water .....................
2
3
3
2
2
4
1
3
1
1
2
2
1
....................
6
3
3
4
4
4
1
Total .........................................................................................
....................................................
....................
....................
25
Example B: Mixture of scoring levels
asabaliauskas on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Judging and Testing
A panel of independent judges will be
assembled from experts in relevant
fields, selected by DOE in consultation
with HEF. Judges may be selected from
organizations such as the Hydrogen
Safety Panel, the Hydrogen and Fuel
Cells Technical Advisory Committee,
National Labs, and relevant federal
agencies. An independent testing entity
will be selected to perform remote and
on-site technical data collection, and an
independent auditing oversight entity
will collect and analyze the cost data.
Tie Resolution Process
If the results for any of the technical
criteria for different entries differ by less
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:06 Oct 27, 2014
Jkt 235001
than the measurement error range, then
those systems will be considered tied
for that category and given the higher of
the two scores (for example, if the
pressure measurement error range is
5%, and Entry A has a dispensing
pressure of 499 bar and Entry B has a
pressure of 500 bar, both will be given
3 points for the category).
If the top entries’ total scores are tied,
the entry with the highest measured
pressure will win; if the pressure
measurements are within the
measurement error, the entry with the
highest measured availability will be
selected as the winner. Otherwise, the
entry with the highest score will win.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Total scores
III. Competition Requirements and
Process
Eligibility
This H-Prize Competition is open to
contestants, defined as individuals,
entities, or teams that meet the
following requirements:
1. Comply with all Registration and
H-Prize Competition Rules and
Requirements as listed in this document
and in any updates posted on the HPrize Web site and/or the Federal
Register;
2. In the case of an entity: Be
organized or incorporated in the United
States, and maintain for the duration of
the H-Prize Competition a primary place
of business in the United States;
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
28OCN1
asabaliauskas on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 28, 2014 / Notices
3. In the case of all individuals
(whether participating singly or as part
of an entity or team): be a citizen of, or
an alien lawfully admitted for
permanent residence into, the United
States as of the date of Registration in
the H-Prize Competition and maintain
that status for the duration of the HPrize Competition;
4. A team may consist of two or more
individuals, entities, or any
combination of both. All team members
listed on the contestant roster must meet
the requirements of individuals or
entities.
5. Provide the following
documentation:
a. In the case of U.S. Citizens: Provide
proof of U.S. Citizenship with
Registration, as follows:
i. Notarized copy of U.S. Passport, or
ii. Notarized copies of both a current
state-issued photo ID issued from one of
the 50 States or a U.S. Territory and a
birth certificate;
b. In the case of aliens lawfully
admitted for permanent residence in the
United States: Provide notarized copy of
Permanent Resident Card (Form 1–
551)(green card) with Registration;
c. In the case of entities: Provide a
copy of the entity formation
documentation (e.g. Articles of
Incorporation) showing the place of
formation, as well as a self-certification
of the primary place of business;
6. The contestant, or any member of
a contestant, shall not be a Federal
entity, a Federal employee acting within
the scope of his or her employment, or
an employee of a National Laboratory
acting within the scope of his or her
employment;
7. Sign a waiver of claims against the
Federal Government and the HEF. See
42 U.S.C. 16396(f)(5)(A);
8. Obtain liability insurance, or
satisfactorily demonstrate financial
responsibility, during the period of the
H-Prize Competition. See 42 U.S.C.
16396(f)(5)(B)(i);
9. Name the Federal Government as
an additional insured under the
registered participants’ insurance policy
and agree to indemnify the Federal
Government against third party claims.
See 42 U.S.C. 16396(f)(5)(B)(ii);
10. Teams and Entities:
a. Each team or entity will designate
a team leader as the sole point of contact
with H-Prize Competition officials.
b. Team or entity members will be
identified at the time of Registration on
the contestant roster. Members
participating on multiple teams will be
required to disclose participation to
each team.
c. Changes to contestant rosters will
be allowed up to 72 hours prior to the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:06 Oct 27, 2014
Jkt 235001
award presentation, provided
citizenship and immigration
requirements are met.
Registration Process
After announcement in the Federal
Register, registration and all required
eligibility documentation must be
completed through the Web site https://
hydrogenprize.org no later than one
week before the initial data submission
deadline. Early registration is
encouraged.
H-Prize Competition Schedule
Once registered, teams will receive all
notices and rules updates, including
answers to questions asked by the
contestants. The public Web site,
https://hydrogenprize.org, will also post
this same information, including
publicity about various teams and
sponsors. Contestants are encouraged to
utilize the Web site as a means of
highlighting any information they
would like to convey to the public or
potential sponsors. There are no entry
fees.
On October 29, 2015, contestants will
be required to submit initial data
(including information on how the data
was gathered and measured) and
requested financial information for
evaluation by a designated panel of
judges. Instructions for the initial data
submission will be posted on the Web
site and sent electronically to the
designated contact person for each
contestant.
Testing and evaluations are planned
to be completed in October 2016. The
winner will be determined after all
testing data has been analyzed to
determine scoring and any ties resolved
as described above. DOE plans select
and announce a winner within three
months after the close of the
competition.
Intellectual Property
Intellectual property rights developed
by the contestant for H-Prize technology
are set forth in 42 U.S.C. 16396(f)(4). No
parties managing the contest, including
the U.S. Government, their testing
laboratories, judges or H-Prize
administrators will claim rights to the
intellectual property derived by a
registered contestant as a consequence
of, or in direct relation to, their
participation in this H-Prize
Competition. The Government and the
contestant may negotiate a license for
the Government to use the intellectual
property developed by the contestant.
Cancellation and Team Disqualification
A contestant may be disqualified for
the following reasons:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64183
• At the request of the registered
individual or team leader;
• Failure to meet or maintain
eligibility requirements (note that at the
time of the prize award, if it is
determined that a contestant has not
met or maintained all eligibility
requirements, they shall be disqualified
without regard to H-Prize Competition
performance);
• Failure to submit required
documents or materials on time;
• Fraudulent acts, statements or
misrepresentations involving any HPrize participation or documentation;
or,
• Violation of any federal, state or
local law or regulation.
DOE reserves the right to cancel this
prize program at any time prior to the
completion of system testing.
Liability and Competition Costs
The Department of Energy, H-Prize,
the Hydrogen Education Foundation
and any sponsoring or supporting
organization assume no liability or
responsibility for accidents or injury
related to the Prize.
The entrants are responsible for costs
associated with participating in the
competition including but not limited to
designing, installing and operating their
systems.
Key Dates
—October 29, 2014: Competition opens
—October 29, 2015: Preliminary data
submission date
—July, 2016: Finalist system testing
begins
—October 31, 2016: Competition ends,
data will be analyzed to determine
winner Award of $1 million prize, if
the Panel of Judges determines that
there is a winning entry
—December, 2016: Anticipated award of
$1 million prize, if the Panel of Judges
determines that there is a winning
entry.
IV. Draft Guideline Public Comments
and Responses
Draft guidelines for the H2 Refuel
competition were posted online March
21, 2014, as announced in the Federal
Register at 79 FR 15737. Responses
were submitted from 14 sources,
representing industry, consultants,
safety groups, competition experts and
individuals, and some responses
covered multiple topics.
Comments on Criteria
There were four comments that
addressed the contest scoring criteria
and their targets. One stated the opinion
that economy of scale is the only way
to overcome fueling costs and suggested
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
28OCN1
asabaliauskas on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
64184
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 28, 2014 / Notices
raising the minimum required fueling
capacity. In response, DOE notes that
the criteria for fueling capacity in the
draft guidelines for the small, ‘‘Home’’
category, 1–5 kg H2/day and for the
medium ‘‘Community’’ category, 5–50
kg H2/day were identified with several
goals and issues in mind. The
requirements for the minimum daily
amount of hydrogen dispensed were
designed to fit with the intended
applications in the immediate nearterm, which is either home or smallscale, non-commercial multi-use sites
such as a community. These
applications would serve a small
number of vehicles, for which DOE
determined the minimum capacity for
hydrogen dispensed. The minimum is
only a lower limit, though, and entries
would be allowed to design systems
capable of higher fueling capacities,
within the range of the ‘‘Home’’ and
‘‘Community’’ category definitions.
Therefore, the minimum requirement
for hydrogen dispensed daily will not be
changed.
A second response noted that capital
cost should be expressed in terms of
capacity, and stated that there was
confusion in having a separate scoring
of refuels per day. In response, DOE
changed the text and tables to clarify
that the capital cost is in units of ‘‘$/kg
hydrogen dispensed per day.’’ The
refuels per day criteria allows testing
that the entire system can actually
produce and deliver the targeted
amount of hydrogen per day. While the
upper limit of this would be determined
by the fueling time, which is a separate
criteria, it would also be affected by
other issues. For example, a system may
be able to rapidly fuel a vehicle in 10
minutes, but not be able to produce
more than 5 kg/day; this also tests that
the system can handle repeated fuelings
in a day.
Another response noted that refueling
time was heavily weighted in the draft
scoring criteria, given that two
categories relate to it, one with a 2 ×
score multiplier. The commenter
suggested that this went against the
concept of a home refueler, where the
idea is to refuel overnight to a full tank,
and takes emphasis away from more
important issues like direct user costs.
DOE notes that the comment reflects
some confusion over the refueling time
criteria—the refueling time is for a
single kg of hydrogen; and fill a car tank
overnight would likely require more
than one kg of hydrogen, so such a
system would actually score in the midto high-range under the draft guidelines.
In response to the comment, the
difference between the refueling time
and refuelings per day criteria was
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:06 Oct 27, 2014
Jkt 235001
clarified in the final guidelines, and the
weight for the dispensing time score
was reduced.
One response stated that the home
refueler systems should be at 700 bar,
which has been adopted as the standard
onboard storage pressure by car
manufacturers. DOE notes that the
dispensing pressure criteria were given
considerable thought, and some
responses to an earlier Request for
Information addressed the selection of a
700 bar or 350 bar system. The ultimate
target is a 700 bar system, but given the
current state of the technology in
combination with the other criteria,
limiting the dispensing pressure to 700
bar could severely restrict potential
entrants. The scoring for dispensing
pressure is designed to incentivize the
design of systems that improve upon the
350 bar dispensing pressure, and the
dispensing pressure requirements will
not be changed. While a 350 bar system
cannot fully fill a 700 bar tank, it can
still partially fuel a tank, providing at
least enough hydrogen for an average
day’s commute. The intent of the
competition is to supplement the
fueling infrastructure, not replace it.
Comments on System and Entrant
Eligibility
Four comments included questions
about whether certain systems would be
qualified as entries for the competition.
One asked about systems that produce
but do not dispense hydrogen. The DOE
notes that because the goal of the
competition is to develop onsite
refueling systems, the guidelines require
systems to both produce and dispense
hydrogen onsite. Another asked about
systems that have already been built and
installed. DOE notes that as the
competition is intended to stimulate
improvements over the currently
available technology, and that the
targets have been set, based on available
information, such that no current
system meets all criteria
simultaneously. Nothing in the
guidelines, however, excludes such a
system. All requirements would still
apply to existing systems, including
providing the relevant financial
information such as bill of materials. A
third comment provided some
information about a hydrogen
production system, and asked if
configurations other than electrolysis or
steam reforming of natural gas would be
accepted. The final competition
guidelines do not specify the technology
for hydrogen production and are not
limited to the use of electrolysis or
steam methane reforming. However, any
system must meet the requirements laid
out in the guidelines, including that the
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
feedstocks and major consumables used
be those commonly delivered to
residences (electricity, natural gas), and
dispense the hydrogen in addition to
generating the fuel. The fourth comment
asked if a system that fuels vehicles
with hydrogen internal combustion
engines, rather than fuel cells, would be
allowed. DOE notes that the guidelines
do not specify the type of vehicle used,
however, the testing stage must use a
tank that is compatible with the
minimum system criteria (e.g., can
receive at least 1 kg of hydrogen in a
fueling, is compatible with hydrogen
delivered at 350 bar). It is expected that
questions about whether certain systems
would qualify will continue to be
relevant, and while the guidelines were
not altered, general questions will be
addressed in the FAQ page of the HPrize Web site.
Two comments requested clarification
of who is eligible to compete. One asked
if educational institutions would be
allowed to be part of a team, and
another noted that the eligibility criteria
was unclear in some sections,
particularly with reference to teams. In
response, DOE has refined and modified
the eligibility criteria to clarify many of
the issues that were identified in
comments, with more consistent use of
the terms ‘‘entity,’’ ‘‘team,’’ and
‘‘participant.’’ The reference to ‘‘private
entity’’ was changed to ‘‘entity.’’ An
educational institution would be
considered an entity, and would be
eligible if it met the other eligibly
requirements (e.g., organized or
incorporated in the United States). DOE
expects that questions of eligibility will
continue to be common. While some of
the questions may need to be addressed
on a case-by-case basis, more common
questions will be addressed on the FAQ
page of the H-Prize Web site.
Information on Hydrogen Production
Systems
Three responses provided information
on hydrogen production systems,
without commenting directly on the
draft guidelines. DOE used the
information provided about relevant
systems to further evaluate the criteria
to ensure that they were achievable but
represent an improvement over the
current state of the technology. The
responses suggested that the criteria
identified were, in fact, achievable but
not yet attained.
Competition Plans
Several responses addressed the plans
for the competition. One noted that the
testing period was not well described
and should reflect real-world
conditions, specifically fueling into
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
28OCN1
asabaliauskas on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 28, 2014 / Notices
tanks that are not empty. DOE notes that
as stated in the guidelines, further
details of the testing protocol will be
provided to contestants by the prize
administrator. DOE had considered
more complicated testing procedures,
however, given the potential diversity of
system designs (for example, they may
have different dispensing pressures),
and the added cost and time associated
with implementing more complicated
protocols and verifying that they are
performed, lead to the selection of the
current protocols. Another response
commented on the general plans,
suggesting that to engage a robust set of
entries, the eligibility requirements for
insurance and waivers be waived until
after the selection of finalists. DOE notes
that insurance and liability waivers are
required by the Energy Independence
and Security Act of 2007, Public Law
110–140 (42 U.S.C. 16396(f)), and those
requirements for registration will
remain in the guidelines. The same
response also recommended the use of
modern engagement methods, such as
involvement with social media in
addition to the Web site. Both DOE and
HEF have plans to ensure that the
competition is widely advertised,
including the use of social media and
other engagement activities.
One comment asked when a forum to
help teams find partners would be
available. DOE notes that the H-Prize
Web site will provide opportunities for
those interested in joining a team to
reach others. For example, interested
parties will be able to submit
information to HEF, which will post the
lists of those with interest in teaming,
with no implied endorsements or
guarantees, on the Web site or in
newsletters. Though an online forum
was initially considered and noted in
the draft guidelines, other methods of
communication have since been
determined to be more effective and the
guideline language was changed
accordingly.
One response asked if funding is
available to design and/or build the
entries. DOE notes that, as stated in both
the draft and final guidelines, ‘‘The
entrants are responsible for costs
associated with participating in the
competition including but not limited to
designing, installing and operating their
systems.’’ The H-Prize is a competition,
and no up-front funding is provided
through the competition itself. It is
expected that this will be a common
question, and will be addressed in an
FAQ page on the H-Prize Web site.
One response asked about when final
guidelines would be posted. DOE notes
that the final guidelines are posted in
this Federal Register notice. Further
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:06 Oct 27, 2014
Jkt 235001
details can be found in this notice and
on the H-Prize Web site.
Three responses suggested changes to
the competition that are not compatible
with the Energy Independence and
Security Act of 2007, Public Law 110–
140 (42 U.S.C. 16396(f)). One suggested
allowing synthetic methane as an
alternative to the hydrogen fueling;
however, DOE notes that the H-Prize
statutory authority states that the prize
is intended to advance the research,
development, demonstration, and
commercial application of hydrogen
energy technologies. Fueling with
methane would not qualify as a
hydrogen energy technology, and
therefore the guidelines will not be
changed to include methane or other
fuels besides hydrogen. Two other
responses suggested having separate
awards for different categories, either
the ‘‘home’’ or ‘‘community’’ or a set of
three categories based on scale and
application. The combination of singlehome and community scale systems
provides entrants with the flexibility to
match their solution to the general topic
of small-scale, non-commercial fueling
while the parallel target ranges for
certain criteria allows the two scales
(single user vs. multiple user) to be
more evenly compared based on their
expected application.
Safety
One comment was also submitted on
issues related to safety, codes and
standards. In response, DOE engaged in
discussions with safety experts,
including the respondents. The
comments and discussions lead to
several modifications of the competition
guidelines and plans. These include the
addition of a safety plan and hazard
analysis to the documents required at
the preliminary design and data
deadline, which will be judged by a
panel of safety professionals; plans for
a safety information page that will be on
the H-Prize Web site; and plans to hold
a webinar on safety, codes and
standards that will be open to all
interested parties and posted on the HPrize Web site. In addition to the
eligibly requirement included in both
the draft and final guidelines that
participants would be disqualified for
any ‘‘violation of any federal, state or
local law or regulation’’ which includes
safety codes and standards, the final
guidelines require that ‘‘entries must
meet the safety codes and standards in
effect at the installation location
appropriate to the system.’’ Because the
relevant safety codes and standards will
depend on both the system design and
the installation location, a single,
comprehensive list of required
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64185
standards cannot be provided. Some
suggestions by respondents were more
appropriate for projects where DOE was
providing direct funding for a contract
or financial assistance award. Unlike
traditional funding scenarios, the HPrize competition does not create a
direct contractual relationship with
potential H-Prize contestants.
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 16,
2014.
Sunita Satyapal,
Fuel Cell Technology Office Director.
[FR Doc. 2014–25596 Filed 10–27–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. EL15–8–000]
Golden Spread Electric Cooperative,
Central Valley Electric Cooperative,
Inc., Farmers’ Electric Cooperative,
Inc., Lea County Electric Cooperative,
Inc., Roosevelt County Electric
Cooperative, Inc., West Texas
Municipal Power Agency
(Complainants) v. Southwestern Public
Service Company (Respondent);
Notice of Complaint
Take notice that on October 20, 2014,
pursuant to Rule 206 of the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission’s
(Commission) Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 18 CFR 385.206 and sections
201, 206, and 306 of the Federal Power
Act, 16 U.S.C. 824, 824(e), and 825(e),
Golden Spread Electric Cooperative,
Central Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc.,
Farmers’ Electric Cooperative, Inc., Lea
County Electric Cooperative, Inc.,
Roosevelt County Electric Cooperative,
Inc., and West Texas Municipal Power
Agency (collectively, Complainants)
filed a formal complaint against
Southwestern Public Service Company
(SPS or Respondent), alleging that the
production formula rate of each of their
respective Replacement Power Sales
Agreements with SPC and that the open
access transmission tariff formula rate
applicable to pricing of transmission
service over the facilities of SPS contain
an unjust and unreasonable rate of
return of common equity. In addition,
the Complainants request that this
proceeding be consolidated with Docket
Nos. EL13–78–000 and EL12–59–000.
The Complainants certifies that copies
of the complaint were served on the
contacts for SPS as listed on the
Commission’s list of Corporate Officials.
Any person desiring to intervene or to
protest this filing must file in
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
28OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 208 (Tuesday, October 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64179-64185]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25596]
[[Page 64179]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
H2 Refuel H-Prize Final Guidelines
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy (DOE).
ACTION: Notice of the H2 Refuel H-Prize Competition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: As authorized in Section 654 of the Energy Independence and
Security Act of 2007, the Department of Energy (DOE) is announcing the
$1 million H2 Refuel H-Prize competition, allowing teams from across
the United States to compete and develop systems that generate and
dispense hydrogen from resources commonly available to residences
(electricity or natural gas), for use in homes, community centers,
businesses or similar locations, to supplement the current
infrastructure roll-out and reduce barriers to using hydrogen fuel cell
vehicles.
DATES:
--Competition opens--October 29, 2014.
--Competition ends--October 31, 2016: Data will be analyzed to
determine winner Award of $1 million prize, if the Panel of Judges
determines that there is a winning entry.
For more information regarding the dates relating to this
competition, see, section III., Competition requirements and process,
Key Dates, in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this notice.
ADDRESSES: The H-Prize Web site is https://hydrogenprize.org, where
updates and announcements will be posted throughout the competition.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions may be directed to--
Technical information: Reginald Tyler at 720-356-1805 or by email at
HPrize@ee.doe.gov
Prize contest: Emanuel Wagner, Contest Manager, Hydrogen Education
Foundation, at 202-457-0868 x360 or by email at EWAGNER@ttcorp.com.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
Fuel cells powered by hydrogen from renewable or low-carbon
resources can lead to substantial energy savings and reductions in
imported petroleum and carbon emissions. Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles
(FCEVs) are much more efficient than today's gasoline vehicles, and
when fueled with hydrogen, produce only water vapor at the tailpipe.
The hydrogen fuel can be generated from a range of domestic sources.
While the commercial sale of FCEVs is rapidly approaching,
infrastructure remains a major challenge, with only approximately 50
fueling stations in the United States, only 10 of which are operating
as public stations. The H-Prize was authorized under section 654 of the
Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (Pub. L. 110-140). As
efforts to build a hydrogen fueling station infrastructure are getting
underway, the H2 Refuel H-Prize is intended to incentivize the
development of small-scale systems for non-commercial fueling to
supplement the larger-scale infrastructure development.
The H2 Refuel H-Prize anticipates award of a $1 million prize to
the top refueler system entry that can produce hydrogen using
electricity and/or natural gas, energy sources commonly available to
residential locations, and dispense the hydrogen to a vehicle,
providing at least 1 kg per refueling. Systems considered would be at
the home scale and able to generate and dispense 1-5 kg H2/
day for use at residences, or the medium scale, generating and
dispensing 5-50 kg H2/day. Medium scale systems would serve
a larger community with multiple users daily, such as a large apartment
complex or retail centers to fuel small fleets of vehicles (e.g., light
duty automobiles, forklifts or tractors).
Interested parties can register and find more information, updates
and pages where teams can discuss the prize at the H-Prize Web site:
https://hydrogenprize.org. The Hydrogen Education Foundation (HEF) is
currently administering the prize for the U.S. Department of Energy
(DOE), and DOE will coordinate prize activities with HEF.
Teams will have a year to design a system that generates and
dispenses hydrogen fuel that meets the criteria and identify a location
where it can be installed and used. Twelve months after the competition
opens, teams will be required to complete registration and submit
system designs and blue prints, plans for installation, and preliminary
data to demonstrate that the system satisfies the minimum criteria (see
Criteria section). Teams will also need to provide documented evidence
of cooperation from the installation site. Of the teams that meet all
of the minimum criteria, the top entries will be selected as finalists
to enter the testing phase. The selected teams will then have seven
months to install and begin operating their systems. The systems must
be compatible with remote monitoring equipment to allow remote
monitoring for the testing period; compatibility requirements will be
posted on the H-Prize Web site. Starting 21 months after the
competition opens, the finalist systems will be remotely monitored and
tested, and approximately two months of data will be collected. At
least one on-site visit will be performed to verify data and perform
tests that cannot be done remotely. Teams must also provide requested
information to a DOE designated entity for independent verification of
the cost of the system and the cost of the generated hydrogen. The
scoring criteria will be ranked and weighted.
Proposed Timeline
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current tentative date Activity
------------------------------------------------------------------------
March 2014........................ Draft Guidelines posted for public
comment.
April 2014........................ Comment period closes.
October 2014...................... Competition opens.
H-Prize Website opens, including an
online system to facilitate teaming
and partnerships.
Teams design systems, collect data,
identify installation location, and
registers for the prize ahead of
data submission deadline.
October 2015...................... Preliminary data submission
deadline.
Teams will submit data, provide
designs and blueprints and
information about installation
site, to indicate that the system
is capable of meeting the base
criteria.
December 2015..................... Finalist teams are announced--go to
testing stage.
Finalist Teams install systems and
get them up and running.
Before the testing period begins,
remote monitoring equipment will be
installed by the designated data
analysis team.
July 2016......................... System testing begins.
[[Page 64180]]
October 2016...................... Competition ends--data is analyzed
to determine winner.
December 2016 (tentative)......... Anticipated winner announcement.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Prize Criteria and Testing
Finalist Selection Phase
Twelve months after the competition opens, teams interested in
competing must have completed registering for the competition and
submit all required information. To be considered, an entry must meet
the initial selection criteria defined below. Teams will be required to
submit data that demonstrates the system's ability to meet the
indicated criteria. The top teams to provide convincing evidence that
the entry could satisfy the minimum criteria will be selected for
testing. Specific instructions will be posted on the H-Prize Web site
detailing the required information. In addition to the required
technical criteria data, teams will submit system descriptions and
preliminary designs and installation concepts which will be evaluated
by an expert panel to determine if the entries are likely to meet
reasonable usability, cost and safety criteria. Usability refers to the
ability of the system to be installed and used at the intended
locations (e.g., considering footprint and noise), and to be easily
operated by the average user (e.g., with minimum training and time).
Because a goal of the H-Prize is to advance commercial applications of
hydrogen energy technologies, the potential of the systems to
ultimately be commercialized will also be evaluated, and a description
of a pathway to commercial production of the systems, including
manufacturing, will be requested. To evaluate the potential safety of
the system, certain information will be requested, including a safety
plan and a hazard analysis; specific instructions will be available at
the H-Prize Web site. A safety page on the H-Prize Web site will
provide updated information on safety issues and requirements for the
safety plan and hazard analysis. To be selected as a finalist,
contestant designs, installation details and safety plans must be
judged adequately safe by a panel of safety professionals.
Minimum/Maximum Criteria Table
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Criteria Home Community
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minimum dispensing pressure..... 350 bar.
---------------------------------------
Maximum dispensing time 10 hours.......... 60 minutes.
(standard fill).
Min. hydrogen dispensed per day. 1 kg.............. 5 kg.
---------------------------------------
Hydrogen purity................. Meets SAE J2719 (Hydrogen Fuel Quality
for Fuel Cell Vehicles).
---------------------------------------
Fill method..................... Compliant with relevant codes (for
automobiles, SAE J2601 Fueling
Protocols for Light Duty Gaseous
Hydrogen Surface Vehicles) and
ensures that delivered hydrogen does
not exceed the pressure and
temperature limits of the vehicle
storage tank.
---------------------------------------
Safety.......................... Meets relevant safety codes and
standards for installation in target
location.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finalist Competition
The finalist teams will have seven months to install their systems
at a location of their choosing before testing begins. Among other
considerations, entries must meet the safety codes and standards in
effect at the installation location appropriate to the system. Further,
all required permits and approvals must be received prior to system
operations.
Each entry will be scored in six different technical and cost
criteria:
--Dispensing pressure
--Dispensing time
--Number of standard fills per day
--Tested availability
--Total installed system cost
--Direct user cost per kg
The criteria and scoring ranges are listed in more detail below.
Testing for the technical criteria will be performed remotely over
a period of 2 to 3 months, with at least one on-site inspection to
verify data and perform testing that cannot be done remotely. Summary
level testing results will be published. The base criteria listed in
Minimum/Maximum Criteria Table will be tested to ensure that all
entries meet those requirements. A standard fill is defined as the
delivery of 1 kg of hydrogen to a vehicle tank.
The cost criteria will be evaluated by an independent auditing
entity. Teams will be required to submit cost information, such as the
bill of materials for the system installation and system operating
costs during the testing period. Specific details on required
information will be provided to finalist teams after selection.
Entries will receive scores for the tested criteria as described
below, with different multipliers for each of the criteria. When
testing is complete, the data will be analyzed to determine scores.
Once all results have been analyzed, judges will evaluate the results
and determine the scores based on the published scoring criteria, and
confirm entry eligibility based on the base criteria and eligibility
requirements. After resolving any ties (see tie resolution process
below), the eligible team with the highest score will be the winner.
Installation Site Criteria
Any site in the 50 United States and the District of Columbia can
be used for the installation of the refueler, as long as there is
access for installing equipment for remote monitoring, at least one on-
site visit for in-depth testing, and at least one visit by the press
and public.
To meet testing requirements, the fueling system should be used at
an average of at least 50% planned capacity per week (e.g., for a home
system designed to dispense 1 kg/day, at least four 1-kg ``fills'' per
week; for a community system designed to produce 20 kg/day, it should
dispense at least 70
[[Page 64181]]
1-kg ``fills'' per week). If on-site use is below this level, simulated
fills can be used for testing. Simulated fill protocols will be posted
on the H-Prize Web site before testing begins.
Entries must meet the safety codes and standards in effect at the
installation location. Teams are encouraged to consider the relevant
SAE, ASME and NFPA codes and standards.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Codes and standards to consider include but are not limited
to SAE J2719, ASME B31-12, ASME B31-3, ASME BPV Code, NFPA 2 and
NFPA 70. Depending on the system, some codes and standards may not
apply.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prize Criteria
The criteria were developed through discussion with experts in the
field, including members of Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technical Advisory
Committee, other DOE offices, and federal agencies, and from responses
to a Request for Information (DE-FOA-0000907: RFI--Home Hydrogen
Refueler H-Prize Topic, https://www1.eere.energy.gov/financing/solicitations_detail.html?sol_id=600) and public comments on the draft
criteria (79 FR 15737).
Each of the criteria is assigned a 1-5 point scale connected to
different ranges. To be eligible, entries must receive at least the
minimum score for each category. For some criteria, the ranges for home
and community systems may be different. A score multiplying factor will
be used to weight the different criteria.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dispensing pressure
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Score Home Community
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1...................... 350 bar or higher.
2...................... 400 bar or higher.
3...................... 500 bar or higher.
4...................... 600 bar or higher.
5...................... 700 bar or higher (ultimate goal).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dispensing Pressure refers to the pressure of the hydrogen
dispensed to the vehicle. Intermediate pressures are listed to
incentivize advancements towards low-cost systems that can meet the
ultimate target of 700 bar.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dispensing time
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Score Home Community
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1................. 10 hours/kg or less...... 60 minutes/kg or less.
2................. 8 hours/kg or less....... 30 minutes/kg or less.
3................. 5 hours/kg or less....... 15 minutes/kg or less.
4................. 2 hours/kg or less....... 10 minutes/kg or less.
5................. 30 minutes/g or less..... 3 minutes/kg or less.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dispensing time is the time required to dispense a standard fill of
hydrogen to a vehicle, including time required to connect the system to
the vehicle and begin the hydrogen flow. Home systems may have longer
fueling times, up to overnight, while multi-user system are expected to
have shorter fueling times.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of standard fills per day
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Score Home Community
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1................. 1 or more................ 5 or more.
2................. 2 or more................ 10 or more.
3................. 3 or more................ 20 or more.
4................. 4 or more................ 40 or more.
5................. 5 or more................ 50 or more.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The standard fills per day will be based on the highest number of
actual or simulated fills completed in a 24 hour period.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tested availability
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Score Home Community
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1................. 80% or higher.
2................. 85% or higher.
3................. 90% or higher.
4................. 95% or higher.
5................. 98% or higher.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Availability will be tested over a period of two to three months,
during which time system usage will need to be at least 50% of the
planned capacity per week. Any time spent on repairs or non-routine
maintenance during the testing period will count as non-available, even
if compensated for (e.g., repairs done during scheduled down-time, or
using stored hydrogen).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total installed system cost (capital + installation)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Score Home Community
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1................. $25k/kg/day or less...... $15k/kg/day or less.
2................. $20k/kg/day or less...... $12.5k/kg/day or less.
3................. $15k/kg/day or less...... $10k/kg/day or less.
4................. $10k/kg/day or less...... $7.5k/kg/day or less.
5................. $5k/kg/day or less....... $5k/kg/day or less.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Installed System Costs will be based on the actual cost for
the system equipment (including balance of plant to the nozzle
interface) as well as the actual installation costs. The total cost for
scoring will be based on the amount of hydrogen dispensed per day--for
example, a home system designed and demonstrated to dispense 1 kg/day
with a system installed cost of $24,000 would score 1 point, while a
system designed to dispense 2 kg/day at the same cost would receive a
score of 3. Teams will be expected to provide information such as the
bill of materials for all components. Details of the specific
information requested will be provided to the teams selected for
testing. If the system proposed provides heat and/or power in addition
to hydrogen for refueling, the cost of the entire system will be
considered when scoring this criterion. Integrated systems that provide
heat and/or power in addition to hydrogen for refueling will be awarded
bonus points (see bonus points below).
[[Page 64182]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Direct user cost per kg
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Score Home Community
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1................. $20 or less.
2................. $17 or less.
3................. $14 or less.
4................. $11 or less.
5................. $8 or less.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Direct user cost per kg will be based on feedstock inputs and
actual operations and maintenance costs during the testing period,
divided by the amount of hydrogen that is produced and used. The direct
user cost per kg excludes the capital and installation costs, which are
included in the total installed system cost category. Feedstock cost
inputs will be based on actual usage, using a single price for all
entries for each input to eliminate regional variation, based on the
EIA 2014 projections for average price to all users: $0.098/kWh for
electricity and $6.60/million BTU for natural gas. All generated and
used hydrogen is counted in determining the $/kg--for example, a system
that generates 10 kg/day, where 4 kg is used for fuel vehicles and 5 is
used in a fuel cell to produce power would divide the daily user costs
by 9.
Scoring
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Score
Criteria category multiplier
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dispensing pressure........................................ 3
Dispensing time............................................ 1
Standard fills per day..................................... 1
Tested Availability........................................ 2
System installation cost................................... 2
Direct user cost per kg.................................... 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A bonus score of up to 3 points will be awarded for integrated
systems in order to offset the additional costs associated with adding
heat and/or power, based on how much heat or power is provided.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bonus points
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Points Heat or power supplied
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1............................... Supply at least 35 gallons of hot
water per day.
1............................... Supply at least 25,000 BTU/hr of space
heating.
1............................... Supply at least 10 kWh electricity per
day.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scoring Example
Example A: Makes all the lowest scores
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category Score Total
Criteria category Result score multiplier scores
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dispensing pressure....................... 360 bar...................... 1 3 3
Dispensing time........................... 8 hours...................... 1 1 1
Standard fills per day.................... 1............................ 1 1 1
Tested Availability....................... 81%.......................... 1 2 2
System installation cost.................. $23k/kg...................... 1 2 2
Direct user cost per kg................... $19/kg....................... 1 1 1
Bonus categories.......................... None......................... 0 0 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Total................................. ............................. ........... ........... 10
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Example B: Mixture of scoring levels
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category Score Total
Criteria category Result score multiplier scores
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dispensing pressure....................... 475 bar...................... 2 3 6
Dispensing time........................... 3 hours...................... 3 1 3
Standard fills per day.................... 3............................ 3 1 3
Tested Availability....................... 88%.......................... 2 2 4
System installation cost.................. $18k/kg...................... 2 2 4
Direct user cost per kg................... $11/kg....................... 4 1 4
Bonus categories.......................... Supplies hot water........... 1 ........... 1
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Total................................. ............................. ........... ........... 25
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Judging and Testing
A panel of independent judges will be assembled from experts in
relevant fields, selected by DOE in consultation with HEF. Judges may
be selected from organizations such as the Hydrogen Safety Panel, the
Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Technical Advisory Committee, National Labs,
and relevant federal agencies. An independent testing entity will be
selected to perform remote and on-site technical data collection, and
an independent auditing oversight entity will collect and analyze the
cost data.
Tie Resolution Process
If the results for any of the technical criteria for different
entries differ by less than the measurement error range, then those
systems will be considered tied for that category and given the higher
of the two scores (for example, if the pressure measurement error range
is 5%, and Entry A has a dispensing pressure of 499 bar and Entry B has
a pressure of 500 bar, both will be given 3 points for the category).
If the top entries' total scores are tied, the entry with the
highest measured pressure will win; if the pressure measurements are
within the measurement error, the entry with the highest measured
availability will be selected as the winner. Otherwise, the entry with
the highest score will win.
III. Competition Requirements and Process
Eligibility
This H-Prize Competition is open to contestants, defined as
individuals, entities, or teams that meet the following requirements:
1. Comply with all Registration and H-Prize Competition Rules and
Requirements as listed in this document and in any updates posted on
the H-Prize Web site and/or the Federal Register;
2. In the case of an entity: Be organized or incorporated in the
United States, and maintain for the duration of the H-Prize Competition
a primary place of business in the United States;
[[Page 64183]]
3. In the case of all individuals (whether participating singly or
as part of an entity or team): be a citizen of, or an alien lawfully
admitted for permanent residence into, the United States as of the date
of Registration in the H-Prize Competition and maintain that status for
the duration of the H-Prize Competition;
4. A team may consist of two or more individuals, entities, or any
combination of both. All team members listed on the contestant roster
must meet the requirements of individuals or entities.
5. Provide the following documentation:
a. In the case of U.S. Citizens: Provide proof of U.S. Citizenship
with Registration, as follows:
i. Notarized copy of U.S. Passport, or
ii. Notarized copies of both a current state-issued photo ID issued
from one of the 50 States or a U.S. Territory and a birth certificate;
b. In the case of aliens lawfully admitted for permanent residence
in the United States: Provide notarized copy of Permanent Resident Card
(Form 1-551)(green card) with Registration;
c. In the case of entities: Provide a copy of the entity formation
documentation (e.g. Articles of Incorporation) showing the place of
formation, as well as a self-certification of the primary place of
business;
6. The contestant, or any member of a contestant, shall not be a
Federal entity, a Federal employee acting within the scope of his or
her employment, or an employee of a National Laboratory acting within
the scope of his or her employment;
7. Sign a waiver of claims against the Federal Government and the
HEF. See 42 U.S.C. 16396(f)(5)(A);
8. Obtain liability insurance, or satisfactorily demonstrate
financial responsibility, during the period of the H-Prize Competition.
See 42 U.S.C. 16396(f)(5)(B)(i);
9. Name the Federal Government as an additional insured under the
registered participants' insurance policy and agree to indemnify the
Federal Government against third party claims. See 42 U.S.C.
16396(f)(5)(B)(ii);
10. Teams and Entities:
a. Each team or entity will designate a team leader as the sole
point of contact with H-Prize Competition officials.
b. Team or entity members will be identified at the time of
Registration on the contestant roster. Members participating on
multiple teams will be required to disclose participation to each team.
c. Changes to contestant rosters will be allowed up to 72 hours
prior to the award presentation, provided citizenship and immigration
requirements are met.
Registration Process
After announcement in the Federal Register, registration and all
required eligibility documentation must be completed through the Web
site https://hydrogenprize.org no later than one week before the initial
data submission deadline. Early registration is encouraged.
H-Prize Competition Schedule
Once registered, teams will receive all notices and rules updates,
including answers to questions asked by the contestants. The public Web
site, https://hydrogenprize.org, will also post this same information,
including publicity about various teams and sponsors. Contestants are
encouraged to utilize the Web site as a means of highlighting any
information they would like to convey to the public or potential
sponsors. There are no entry fees.
On October 29, 2015, contestants will be required to submit initial
data (including information on how the data was gathered and measured)
and requested financial information for evaluation by a designated
panel of judges. Instructions for the initial data submission will be
posted on the Web site and sent electronically to the designated
contact person for each contestant.
Testing and evaluations are planned to be completed in October
2016. The winner will be determined after all testing data has been
analyzed to determine scoring and any ties resolved as described above.
DOE plans select and announce a winner within three months after the
close of the competition.
Intellectual Property
Intellectual property rights developed by the contestant for H-
Prize technology are set forth in 42 U.S.C. 16396(f)(4). No parties
managing the contest, including the U.S. Government, their testing
laboratories, judges or H-Prize administrators will claim rights to the
intellectual property derived by a registered contestant as a
consequence of, or in direct relation to, their participation in this
H-Prize Competition. The Government and the contestant may negotiate a
license for the Government to use the intellectual property developed
by the contestant.
Cancellation and Team Disqualification
A contestant may be disqualified for the following reasons:
At the request of the registered individual or team
leader;
Failure to meet or maintain eligibility requirements (note
that at the time of the prize award, if it is determined that a
contestant has not met or maintained all eligibility requirements, they
shall be disqualified without regard to H-Prize Competition
performance);
Failure to submit required documents or materials on time;
Fraudulent acts, statements or misrepresentations
involving any H-Prize participation or documentation; or,
Violation of any federal, state or local law or
regulation.
DOE reserves the right to cancel this prize program at any time prior
to the completion of system testing.
Liability and Competition Costs
The Department of Energy, H-Prize, the Hydrogen Education
Foundation and any sponsoring or supporting organization assume no
liability or responsibility for accidents or injury related to the
Prize.
The entrants are responsible for costs associated with
participating in the competition including but not limited to
designing, installing and operating their systems.
Key Dates
--October 29, 2014: Competition opens
--October 29, 2015: Preliminary data submission date
--July, 2016: Finalist system testing begins
--October 31, 2016: Competition ends, data will be analyzed to
determine winner Award of $1 million prize, if the Panel of Judges
determines that there is a winning entry
--December, 2016: Anticipated award of $1 million prize, if the Panel
of Judges determines that there is a winning entry.
IV. Draft Guideline Public Comments and Responses
Draft guidelines for the H2 Refuel competition were posted online
March 21, 2014, as announced in the Federal Register at 79 FR 15737.
Responses were submitted from 14 sources, representing industry,
consultants, safety groups, competition experts and individuals, and
some responses covered multiple topics.
Comments on Criteria
There were four comments that addressed the contest scoring
criteria and their targets. One stated the opinion that economy of
scale is the only way to overcome fueling costs and suggested
[[Page 64184]]
raising the minimum required fueling capacity. In response, DOE notes
that the criteria for fueling capacity in the draft guidelines for the
small, ``Home'' category, 1-5 kg H2/day and for the medium
``Community'' category, 5-50 kg H2/day were identified with
several goals and issues in mind. The requirements for the minimum
daily amount of hydrogen dispensed were designed to fit with the
intended applications in the immediate near-term, which is either home
or small-scale, non-commercial multi-use sites such as a community.
These applications would serve a small number of vehicles, for which
DOE determined the minimum capacity for hydrogen dispensed. The minimum
is only a lower limit, though, and entries would be allowed to design
systems capable of higher fueling capacities, within the range of the
``Home'' and ``Community'' category definitions. Therefore, the minimum
requirement for hydrogen dispensed daily will not be changed.
A second response noted that capital cost should be expressed in
terms of capacity, and stated that there was confusion in having a
separate scoring of refuels per day. In response, DOE changed the text
and tables to clarify that the capital cost is in units of ``$/kg
hydrogen dispensed per day.'' The refuels per day criteria allows
testing that the entire system can actually produce and deliver the
targeted amount of hydrogen per day. While the upper limit of this
would be determined by the fueling time, which is a separate criteria,
it would also be affected by other issues. For example, a system may be
able to rapidly fuel a vehicle in 10 minutes, but not be able to
produce more than 5 kg/day; this also tests that the system can handle
repeated fuelings in a day.
Another response noted that refueling time was heavily weighted in
the draft scoring criteria, given that two categories relate to it, one
with a 2 x score multiplier. The commenter suggested that this went
against the concept of a home refueler, where the idea is to refuel
overnight to a full tank, and takes emphasis away from more important
issues like direct user costs. DOE notes that the comment reflects some
confusion over the refueling time criteria--the refueling time is for a
single kg of hydrogen; and fill a car tank overnight would likely
require more than one kg of hydrogen, so such a system would actually
score in the mid- to high-range under the draft guidelines. In response
to the comment, the difference between the refueling time and
refuelings per day criteria was clarified in the final guidelines, and
the weight for the dispensing time score was reduced.
One response stated that the home refueler systems should be at 700
bar, which has been adopted as the standard onboard storage pressure by
car manufacturers. DOE notes that the dispensing pressure criteria were
given considerable thought, and some responses to an earlier Request
for Information addressed the selection of a 700 bar or 350 bar system.
The ultimate target is a 700 bar system, but given the current state of
the technology in combination with the other criteria, limiting the
dispensing pressure to 700 bar could severely restrict potential
entrants. The scoring for dispensing pressure is designed to
incentivize the design of systems that improve upon the 350 bar
dispensing pressure, and the dispensing pressure requirements will not
be changed. While a 350 bar system cannot fully fill a 700 bar tank, it
can still partially fuel a tank, providing at least enough hydrogen for
an average day's commute. The intent of the competition is to
supplement the fueling infrastructure, not replace it.
Comments on System and Entrant Eligibility
Four comments included questions about whether certain systems
would be qualified as entries for the competition. One asked about
systems that produce but do not dispense hydrogen. The DOE notes that
because the goal of the competition is to develop onsite refueling
systems, the guidelines require systems to both produce and dispense
hydrogen onsite. Another asked about systems that have already been
built and installed. DOE notes that as the competition is intended to
stimulate improvements over the currently available technology, and
that the targets have been set, based on available information, such
that no current system meets all criteria simultaneously. Nothing in
the guidelines, however, excludes such a system. All requirements would
still apply to existing systems, including providing the relevant
financial information such as bill of materials. A third comment
provided some information about a hydrogen production system, and asked
if configurations other than electrolysis or steam reforming of natural
gas would be accepted. The final competition guidelines do not specify
the technology for hydrogen production and are not limited to the use
of electrolysis or steam methane reforming. However, any system must
meet the requirements laid out in the guidelines, including that the
feedstocks and major consumables used be those commonly delivered to
residences (electricity, natural gas), and dispense the hydrogen in
addition to generating the fuel. The fourth comment asked if a system
that fuels vehicles with hydrogen internal combustion engines, rather
than fuel cells, would be allowed. DOE notes that the guidelines do not
specify the type of vehicle used, however, the testing stage must use a
tank that is compatible with the minimum system criteria (e.g., can
receive at least 1 kg of hydrogen in a fueling, is compatible with
hydrogen delivered at 350 bar). It is expected that questions about
whether certain systems would qualify will continue to be relevant, and
while the guidelines were not altered, general questions will be
addressed in the FAQ page of the H-Prize Web site.
Two comments requested clarification of who is eligible to compete.
One asked if educational institutions would be allowed to be part of a
team, and another noted that the eligibility criteria was unclear in
some sections, particularly with reference to teams. In response, DOE
has refined and modified the eligibility criteria to clarify many of
the issues that were identified in comments, with more consistent use
of the terms ``entity,'' ``team,'' and ``participant.'' The reference
to ``private entity'' was changed to ``entity.'' An educational
institution would be considered an entity, and would be eligible if it
met the other eligibly requirements (e.g., organized or incorporated in
the United States). DOE expects that questions of eligibility will
continue to be common. While some of the questions may need to be
addressed on a case-by-case basis, more common questions will be
addressed on the FAQ page of the H-Prize Web site.
Information on Hydrogen Production Systems
Three responses provided information on hydrogen production
systems, without commenting directly on the draft guidelines. DOE used
the information provided about relevant systems to further evaluate the
criteria to ensure that they were achievable but represent an
improvement over the current state of the technology. The responses
suggested that the criteria identified were, in fact, achievable but
not yet attained.
Competition Plans
Several responses addressed the plans for the competition. One
noted that the testing period was not well described and should reflect
real-world conditions, specifically fueling into
[[Page 64185]]
tanks that are not empty. DOE notes that as stated in the guidelines,
further details of the testing protocol will be provided to contestants
by the prize administrator. DOE had considered more complicated testing
procedures, however, given the potential diversity of system designs
(for example, they may have different dispensing pressures), and the
added cost and time associated with implementing more complicated
protocols and verifying that they are performed, lead to the selection
of the current protocols. Another response commented on the general
plans, suggesting that to engage a robust set of entries, the
eligibility requirements for insurance and waivers be waived until
after the selection of finalists. DOE notes that insurance and
liability waivers are required by the Energy Independence and Security
Act of 2007, Public Law 110-140 (42 U.S.C. 16396(f)), and those
requirements for registration will remain in the guidelines. The same
response also recommended the use of modern engagement methods, such as
involvement with social media in addition to the Web site. Both DOE and
HEF have plans to ensure that the competition is widely advertised,
including the use of social media and other engagement activities.
One comment asked when a forum to help teams find partners would be
available. DOE notes that the H-Prize Web site will provide
opportunities for those interested in joining a team to reach others.
For example, interested parties will be able to submit information to
HEF, which will post the lists of those with interest in teaming, with
no implied endorsements or guarantees, on the Web site or in
newsletters. Though an online forum was initially considered and noted
in the draft guidelines, other methods of communication have since been
determined to be more effective and the guideline language was changed
accordingly.
One response asked if funding is available to design and/or build
the entries. DOE notes that, as stated in both the draft and final
guidelines, ``The entrants are responsible for costs associated with
participating in the competition including but not limited to
designing, installing and operating their systems.'' The H-Prize is a
competition, and no up-front funding is provided through the
competition itself. It is expected that this will be a common question,
and will be addressed in an FAQ page on the H-Prize Web site.
One response asked about when final guidelines would be posted. DOE
notes that the final guidelines are posted in this Federal Register
notice. Further details can be found in this notice and on the H-Prize
Web site.
Three responses suggested changes to the competition that are not
compatible with the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007,
Public Law 110-140 (42 U.S.C. 16396(f)). One suggested allowing
synthetic methane as an alternative to the hydrogen fueling; however,
DOE notes that the H-Prize statutory authority states that the prize is
intended to advance the research, development, demonstration, and
commercial application of hydrogen energy technologies. Fueling with
methane would not qualify as a hydrogen energy technology, and
therefore the guidelines will not be changed to include methane or
other fuels besides hydrogen. Two other responses suggested having
separate awards for different categories, either the ``home'' or
``community'' or a set of three categories based on scale and
application. The combination of single-home and community scale systems
provides entrants with the flexibility to match their solution to the
general topic of small-scale, non-commercial fueling while the parallel
target ranges for certain criteria allows the two scales (single user
vs. multiple user) to be more evenly compared based on their expected
application.
Safety
One comment was also submitted on issues related to safety, codes
and standards. In response, DOE engaged in discussions with safety
experts, including the respondents. The comments and discussions lead
to several modifications of the competition guidelines and plans. These
include the addition of a safety plan and hazard analysis to the
documents required at the preliminary design and data deadline, which
will be judged by a panel of safety professionals; plans for a safety
information page that will be on the H-Prize Web site; and plans to
hold a webinar on safety, codes and standards that will be open to all
interested parties and posted on the H-Prize Web site. In addition to
the eligibly requirement included in both the draft and final
guidelines that participants would be disqualified for any ``violation
of any federal, state or local law or regulation'' which includes
safety codes and standards, the final guidelines require that ``entries
must meet the safety codes and standards in effect at the installation
location appropriate to the system.'' Because the relevant safety codes
and standards will depend on both the system design and the
installation location, a single, comprehensive list of required
standards cannot be provided. Some suggestions by respondents were more
appropriate for projects where DOE was providing direct funding for a
contract or financial assistance award. Unlike traditional funding
scenarios, the H-Prize competition does not create a direct contractual
relationship with potential H-Prize contestants.
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 16, 2014.
Sunita Satyapal,
Fuel Cell Technology Office Director.
[FR Doc. 2014-25596 Filed 10-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P