Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 64205-64207 [2014-25591]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 28, 2014 / Notices Time: 10:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications. Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, Suite 2C212, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call). Contact Person: Isis S. Mikhail, MPH, DRPH, National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–402–7702, Mikhaili@mail.nih.gov. (Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS) Dated: October 22, 2014. Melanie J. Gray, Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. [FR Doc. 2014–25506 Filed 10–27–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4140–01–P Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications. Place: National Institutes of Health, Room CC LD30B, 5601 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call). Contact Person: Dharmendar Rathore, Ph.D., Senior Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 5601 Fishers Lane, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–435–2766, rathored@ mail.nih.gov. (Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS) Dated: October 22, 2014. David Clary, Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. [FR Doc. 2014–25510 Filed 10–27–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4140–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of Closed Meetings asabaliauskas on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meetings. The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Prevention Innovation Program (PIP) R01. Date: November 14, 2014. Time: 9:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications. Place: National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call). Contact Person: Uday K. Shankar, Ph.D., MSC, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, DEAS/NIAID/NIH/DHHS, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892–7616, 301–594–3193, uday.shankar@nih.gov. Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Innovation for Vaccine Discovery (R01). Date: November 18, 2014. Time: 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:06 Oct 27, 2014 Jkt 235001 National Institutes of Health National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, NIAID Peer Review Meeting. Date: November 21, 2014. Time: 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals. Place: National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fisher Lane, Rockville, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call). Contact Person: Brenda Lange-Gustafson, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, NIAID/NIH/ DHHS, Scientific Review Program, Room 3122, 5601 Fisher Lane, Rockville, MD 20892 bgustafson@niaid.nih.gov. (Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS) PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 64205 Dated: October 22, 2014. David Clary, Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. [FR Doc. 2014–25511 Filed 10–27–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4140–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request In compliance with Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 concerning opportunity for public comment on proposed collections of information, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) will publish periodic summaries of proposed projects. To request more information on the proposed projects or to obtain a copy of the information collection plans, call the SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer at (240) 276– 1243. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collections of information are necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Proposed Project: Partnerships for Success Program Evaluation for Prevention Contract—New SAMHSA is conducting a cross-site evaluation of the Strategic Prevention Framework (SPF) Partnerships for Success (PFS) program, focusing on the PFS II cohort (first funded in 2012), PFS 2013 cohort (first funded in 2013), and PFS 2014 cohort (first funded in 2014) at both the grantee and community subrecipient levels. Grantees include states, jurisdictions, and tribal entities that subsequently fund community subrecipients to implement substance use prevention interventions. The overall goals of these SPF PFS cohorts is to prevent the onset and reduce the progression of substance abuse, prioritizing underage drinking (UAD) E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM 28OCN1 64206 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 28, 2014 / Notices among people age 12 to 20, prescription drug misuse and abuse (PDM) among people age 12 to 25, or both; reduce substance abuse-related problems; strengthen prevention capacity and infrastructure at the grantee and community levels; and leverage, redirect, and align statewide funding streams and resources for prevention. The SPF–PFS cross-site evaluation broadly aims to document and assess the factors that contribute to the effectiveness of the PFS approach to SAMHSA’s mission of reducing UAD and PDM, including costs, inputs, outputs, and contextual factors. Targeted evaluation outcomes include both grantee- and community-level substance use intervening variables (e.g., perceived risk of binge drinking), consumption (e.g., past year PDM), and consequences (e.g., alcohol or prescription drug overdoses), especially those related to UAD and PDM. The SPF–PFS cross-site evaluation will examine infrastructure, with a primary focus on monitoring grantees and community subrecipients to ensure they follow the SPF process, but will place a special emphasis on assessing capacity changes of the community subrecipients who all should be purposefully selected for their high need and low capacity. Another important aspect of the infrastructure evaluation for the SPF–PFS cross-site will be an examination of leveraged partner relationships. In addition, the SPF–PFS cross-site evaluation will collect detailed data about implemented evidence-based interventions, to provide a comprehensive typology of interventions and assess how various types and combinations impact outcomes. The SPF–PFS cross-site also will examine economic issues, including associations between funding and outcomes and the cost-effectiveness of various intervention types and combinations. The SPF–PFS cross site evaluation is expected to have numerous program and policy implications and outcomes at the national, state, and community levels. It will provide valuable information to the prevention field about best practices in real world settings, along with what types of adaptations community implementers make to evidence based interventions to better fit their targeted populations and settings. SPF–PFS cross-site findings will provide guidance to governmental entities and communities as to what types of interventions should be funded and implemented to reduce UAD and PDM. More specifically, this guidance will include information on what combinations or types of interventions work the best. Beyond intervention type and cost, the SPF–PFS cross-site evaluation also will provide a valuable assessment of the importance of leveraged funding as well as providing information about the process states, jurisdictions, tribes, and communities undergo to leverage funding. Information and guidance about leveraging that comes from the SPF–PFS cross site evaluation will allow the federal government, state, tribes, jurisdictions, and local communities to more effectively and efficiently use their resources and sustain future prevention efforts. Data collection efforts for the evaluation include a Grantee-Level Instrument—Revised (GLI–R), a Community-Level Instrument—Revised (CLI–R), and a Project Director (PD) Interview which will collect key programmatic components hypothesized to be associated with program effectiveness, such as leveraged funding, type of prevention intervention, costs, etc. The SPF–PFS cross-site instruments have been informed by current and previous crosssite evaluation efforts for SAMHSA, drawing heavily from lessons learned through prior and currently Office of Management and Budget (OMB)approved SPF-State Incentive Grant (SIG) evaluations (OMB No. 0930–0279). The GLI–R is a web-based instrument to be completed by the PFS II, 2013, and 2014 grantee project directors (n=52), once at baseline and once in the final grant year. Baseline data for the PFS II and 2013 cohorts will be collected retrospectively. The GLI–R will provide categorical, qualitative, and quantitative data related to coordination of state efforts, use of strategic plans, access to data sources, data management, workforce development, cultural competence, sharing of evaluation data, and sustainability. The CLI–R is a web-based instrument designed to be completed by the PFS II, 2013, and 2014 subrecipient community project directors (n=610) to assess subrecipients’ progress through the SPF steps, prevention capacity, intervention implementation, and related funding and cost measures. The instrument will provide process data related to leveraging of funding, in-kind services, organizational capacity, collaboration with community partners, data infrastructure, planned intervention targets, intervention implementation (categorization, costs, adaptation, timing, dosage, and reach), cultural competence, evaluation, contextual factors, training and technical assistance needs, and sustainability. The CLI–R will be collected semiannually; however, not all questions will be answered every time. For instance, subrecipients will respond to items related to organizational capacity only at baseline and final follow-up, whereas they will respond to intervention implementation items every six months. The PD Interview is a semi-structured telephone interview with grantee project directors designed to collect more indepth information on subrecipient selection, criteria for intervention selection, continuation of SPF–SIG activities, leveraging of funds, collaboration, evaluation activities, cultural competence policies, processes to impact health disparities, and challenges faced. The PD Interview will be collected at the beginning of the grant, in the third year of the grant, and in the final year of the grant. Baseline data for the PFS II and 2013 cohorts will be collected retrospectively and PFS II grantees will only participate in the interview at the beginning of their final year and at the close of their grant. ANNUALIZE BURDEN HOURS asabaliauskas on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Responses per respondent Number of respondents Instrument Total number of responses Hours per response Total burden hours GLI–RB .............................................................................. SLI–R ................................................................................. Grantee PD Interview ........................................................ 17 517 30 1 2 1 17 1,034 30 1 2.6 1.4 17 2,688 42 Annualized Total ......................................................... 564 ........................ 1,081 .......................... 2,47 VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:06 Oct 27, 2014 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM 28OCN1 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 28, 2014 / Notices Send comments to Summer King, SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer, Room 2–1057, One Choke Cherry Road, Rockville, MD 20857 OR email her a copy at summer.king@samhsa.hhs.gov. Written comments should be received by December 29, 2014. Summer King, Statistician. [FR Doc. 2014–25591 Filed 10–27–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4162–20–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY [Docket No. DHS–2014–0047] National Infrastructure Advisory Council National Protection and Programs Directorate, DHS. ACTION: Committee Management; Notice of an Open Federal Advisory Committee Meeting. AGENCY: The National Infrastructure Advisory Council will meet Friday, November 14, 2014, at the Navy League Building, 2300 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22201. The meeting will be open to the public. DATES: The National Infrastructure Advisory Council will meet on Friday, November 14, 2014, from 2:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. The meeting may close early if the committee has completed its business. For additional information, please consult the National Infrastructure Advisory Council Web site, www.dhs.gov/NIAC, or contact the National Infrastructure Advisory Council Secretariat by phone at (703) 235–2888 or by email at NIAC@ hq.dhs.gov. SUMMARY: Navy League Building, 2300 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22201. The meeting will be open to the public. Members of the public will register at the table at the door to the meeting room. For information on facilities or services for individuals with disabilities, or to request special assistance at the meeting, contact the person listed under ‘‘FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT’’ below as soon as possible. To facilitate public participation, we are inviting public comment on the issues to be considered by the Council as listed in the ‘‘Summary’’ section below. Comments must be submitted in writing no later than 12:00 p.m. on November 14, 2014, in order to be considered by the council in its meeting. The comments must be identified by ‘‘DHS–2014–0047,’’ and asabaliauskas on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES ADDRESSES: VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:06 Oct 27, 2014 Jkt 235001 may be submitted by any one of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting written comments. • Email: NIAC@hq.dhs.gov. Include the docket number in the subject line of the message. • Fax: (703)603–5098. • Mail: Nancy Wong, National Protection and Programs Directorate, Department of Homeland Security, 245 Murray Lane SW., Mail Stop 0607, Arlington, VA 20598–0607. Instructions: All written submissions received must include the words ‘‘Department of Homeland Security’’ and the docket number for this action. Written comments received will be posted without alteration at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received by the National Infrastructure Advisory Council, go to www.regulations.gov. Enter ‘‘NIAC’’ in the search line and the Web site will list all relevant documents for your review. Members of the public will have an opportunity to provide oral comments on the Transportation Resilience Working Group study, on the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Engagement Working Group study, and on the report on the National Plan for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience (CISR) Research and Development (R&D). We request that comments be limited to the issues and studies listed in the meeting agenda and previous National Infrastructure Advisory Council studies. All previous National Infrastructure Advisory Council studies can be located at www.dhs.gov/NIAC. Public comments may be submitted in writing or presented in person for the Council to consider. Comments received by Nancy Wong after 12:00 p.m. on November 14, 2014, will still be accepted and reviewed by the members, but not necessarily by the time of the meeting. In-person presentations will be limited to three minutes per speaker, with no more than 15 minutes for all speakers. Parties interested in making in-person comments should register on the Public Comment Registration list available at the meeting location no later than 15 minutes prior to the beginning of the meeting. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Wong, National Infrastructure Advisory Council Designated Federal Officer, Department of Homeland Security, (703) 235–2888. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 64207 Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. Appendix. The National Infrastructure Advisory Council shall provide the President, through the Secretary of Homeland Security, with advice on the security and resilience of the Nation’s critical infrastructure sectors. The NIAC will meet to discuss issues relevant to critical infrastructure security and resilience as directed by the President. At this meeting, the council will receive an update presentation from the Transportation Resilience Working Group documenting their work to date on a study reviewing the Transportation Sector’s resilience against potentially disruptive events. The council will also receive a Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Engagement Working Group update presentation on the development of recommendations for an Executive Summary of National Infrastructure Protection Plan (NIPP) 2013, targeted for use by Senior Executive Level/CEO critical infrastructure owners and operators and a communication strategy with this target community. Finally, the council will deliberate on its recommendations on priorities for the National Plan for CISR R&D. All three presentations will be posted no later than one week prior to the meeting on the council’s public Web page—www.dhs.gov/NIAC. Meeting Agenda I. Opening of Meeting II. Roll Call of Members III. Opening Remarks and Introductions IV. Approval of Meeting Minutes V. Working Group Update on Transportation Resilience Study VI. Working Group Update on CEO Engagement Study VII. Working Group Presentation on CISR R&D Plan Recommendations VIII. Public Comment: Topics Limited to Transportation Resilience Study; CEO Engagement Study; Recommendations for National Plan for CISR R&D; and Previously Issued National Infrastructure Advisory Council Studies and Recommendations IX. Discussion and Deliberation on Recommendations for the National Plan for CISR R&D X. Closing Remarks Dated: October 21, 2014. Nancy Wong, Designated Federal Officer for the National Infrastructure Advisory Council. [FR Doc. 2014–25404 Filed 10–27–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–9P–P E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM 28OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 208 (Tuesday, October 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64205-64207]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25591]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA)


Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; 
Comment Request

    In compliance with Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 concerning opportunity for public comment on proposed 
collections of information, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health 
Services Administration (SAMHSA) will publish periodic summaries of 
proposed projects. To request more information on the proposed projects 
or to obtain a copy of the information collection plans, call the 
SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer at (240) 276-1243.
    Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collections of 
information are necessary for the proper performance of the functions 
of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical 
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, 
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways 
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of information technology.

Proposed Project: Partnerships for Success Program Evaluation for 
Prevention Contract--New

    SAMHSA is conducting a cross-site evaluation of the Strategic 
Prevention Framework (SPF) Partnerships for Success (PFS) program, 
focusing on the PFS II cohort (first funded in 2012), PFS 2013 cohort 
(first funded in 2013), and PFS 2014 cohort (first funded in 2014) at 
both the grantee and community subrecipient levels. Grantees include 
states, jurisdictions, and tribal entities that subsequently fund 
community subrecipients to implement substance use prevention 
interventions. The overall goals of these SPF PFS cohorts is to prevent 
the onset and reduce the progression of substance abuse, prioritizing 
underage drinking (UAD)

[[Page 64206]]

among people age 12 to 20, prescription drug misuse and abuse (PDM) 
among people age 12 to 25, or both; reduce substance abuse-related 
problems; strengthen prevention capacity and infrastructure at the 
grantee and community levels; and leverage, redirect, and align 
statewide funding streams and resources for prevention.
    The SPF-PFS cross-site evaluation broadly aims to document and 
assess the factors that contribute to the effectiveness of the PFS 
approach to SAMHSA's mission of reducing UAD and PDM, including costs, 
inputs, outputs, and contextual factors. Targeted evaluation outcomes 
include both grantee- and community-level substance use intervening 
variables (e.g., perceived risk of binge drinking), consumption (e.g., 
past year PDM), and consequences (e.g., alcohol or prescription drug 
overdoses), especially those related to UAD and PDM.
    The SPF-PFS cross-site evaluation will examine infrastructure, with 
a primary focus on monitoring grantees and community subrecipients to 
ensure they follow the SPF process, but will place a special emphasis 
on assessing capacity changes of the community subrecipients who all 
should be purposefully selected for their high need and low capacity. 
Another important aspect of the infrastructure evaluation for the SPF-
PFS cross-site will be an examination of leveraged partner 
relationships. In addition, the SPF-PFS cross-site evaluation will 
collect detailed data about implemented evidence-based interventions, 
to provide a comprehensive typology of interventions and assess how 
various types and combinations impact outcomes. The SPF-PFS cross-site 
also will examine economic issues, including associations between 
funding and outcomes and the cost-effectiveness of various intervention 
types and combinations.
    The SPF-PFS cross site evaluation is expected to have numerous 
program and policy implications and outcomes at the national, state, 
and community levels. It will provide valuable information to the 
prevention field about best practices in real world settings, along 
with what types of adaptations community implementers make to evidence 
based interventions to better fit their targeted populations and 
settings. SPF-PFS cross-site findings will provide guidance to 
governmental entities and communities as to what types of interventions 
should be funded and implemented to reduce UAD and PDM. More 
specifically, this guidance will include information on what 
combinations or types of interventions work the best. Beyond 
intervention type and cost, the SPF-PFS cross-site evaluation also will 
provide a valuable assessment of the importance of leveraged funding as 
well as providing information about the process states, jurisdictions, 
tribes, and communities undergo to leverage funding. Information and 
guidance about leveraging that comes from the SPF-PFS cross site 
evaluation will allow the federal government, state, tribes, 
jurisdictions, and local communities to more effectively and 
efficiently use their resources and sustain future prevention efforts.
    Data collection efforts for the evaluation include a Grantee-Level 
Instrument--Revised (GLI-R), a Community-Level Instrument--Revised 
(CLI-R), and a Project Director (PD) Interview which will collect key 
programmatic components hypothesized to be associated with program 
effectiveness, such as leveraged funding, type of prevention 
intervention, costs, etc. The SPF-PFS cross-site instruments have been 
informed by current and previous cross-site evaluation efforts for 
SAMHSA, drawing heavily from lessons learned through prior and 
currently Office of Management and Budget (OMB)-approved SPF-State 
Incentive Grant (SIG) evaluations (OMB No. 0930-0279).
    The GLI-R is a web-based instrument to be completed by the PFS II, 
2013, and 2014 grantee project directors (n=52), once at baseline and 
once in the final grant year. Baseline data for the PFS II and 2013 
cohorts will be collected retrospectively. The GLI-R will provide 
categorical, qualitative, and quantitative data related to coordination 
of state efforts, use of strategic plans, access to data sources, data 
management, workforce development, cultural competence, sharing of 
evaluation data, and sustainability.
    The CLI-R is a web-based instrument designed to be completed by the 
PFS II, 2013, and 2014 subrecipient community project directors (n=610) 
to assess subrecipients' progress through the SPF steps, prevention 
capacity, intervention implementation, and related funding and cost 
measures. The instrument will provide process data related to 
leveraging of funding, in-kind services, organizational capacity, 
collaboration with community partners, data infrastructure, planned 
intervention targets, intervention implementation (categorization, 
costs, adaptation, timing, dosage, and reach), cultural competence, 
evaluation, contextual factors, training and technical assistance 
needs, and sustainability. The CLI-R will be collected semiannually; 
however, not all questions will be answered every time. For instance, 
subrecipients will respond to items related to organizational capacity 
only at baseline and final follow-up, whereas they will respond to 
intervention implementation items every six months.
    The PD Interview is a semi-structured telephone interview with 
grantee project directors designed to collect more in-depth information 
on subrecipient selection, criteria for intervention selection, 
continuation of SPF-SIG activities, leveraging of funds, collaboration, 
evaluation activities, cultural competence policies, processes to 
impact health disparities, and challenges faced. The PD Interview will 
be collected at the beginning of the grant, in the third year of the 
grant, and in the final year of the grant. Baseline data for the PFS II 
and 2013 cohorts will be collected retrospectively and PFS II grantees 
will only participate in the interview at the beginning of their final 
year and at the close of their grant.

                                             Annualize Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Number of     Responses per   Total number      Hours per      Total burden
           Instrument              respondents     respondent     of responses       response          hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GLI-RB.........................              17               1              17              1                17
SLI-R..........................             517               2           1,034              2.6           2,688
Grantee PD Interview...........              30               1              30              1.4              42
                                --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Annualized Total...........             564  ..............           1,081  ...............            2,47
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 64207]]

    Send comments to Summer King, SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer, 
Room 2-1057, One Choke Cherry Road, Rockville, MD 20857 OR email her a 
copy at summer.king@samhsa.hhs.gov. Written comments should be received 
by December 29, 2014.

Summer King,
Statistician.
[FR Doc. 2014-25591 Filed 10-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P