Record of Decision for the Fishery Management Plan, Biscayne National Park, FL, 64212-64213 [2014-25583]
Download as PDF
64212
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 28, 2014 / Notices
to the Public Room from 7:30 a.m. to 8
a.m., and has determined that this
change of Public Room hours of
operation to 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
would have little to no impact to the
public.
Timothy Z. Smith,
District Manager, Southern Nevada District
Office.
[FR Doc. 2014–25468 Filed 10–27–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–HC–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS–WASO–NRSS–EQD–SSB–16970;
PPWONRADA0, PPMRSNR1Y.NA0000]
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request: Visibility Valuation
Survey
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
We (National Park Service)
will ask the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) to approve the
Information Collection Request (ICR)
described below. The National Park
Service (NPS) is requesting approval for
a new collection that will be used to
provide data that will be used to
estimate the value of visibility changes
in national parks and wilderness areas.
To comply with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 and as a part of
our continuing efforts to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden, we
invite the general public and other
Federal agencies to comment on this
ICR. A Federal agency may not conduct
or sponsor and a person is not required
to respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
DATES: To ensure that your comments
on this ICR are considered, OMB must
receive them on or before November 28,
2014.
ADDRESSES: Please submit written
comments on this information
collection directly to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attention: Desk Officer for the
Department of the Interior, via email to
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov or fax
at 202–395–5806; and identify your
submission as 1024–0255. Please also
send a copy of your comments to
Phadrea Ponds, Information Collection
Coordinator, National Park Service,
1201 Oakridge Drive, Fort Collins, CO
80525 (mail); or phadrea_ponds@
nps.gov (email). Please reference
asabaliauskas on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:06 Oct 27, 2014
Jkt 235001
Information Collection Request 1024–
0255 in the subject line.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan Johnson, National Park Service
Air Resources Division, U.S. National
Park Service, 12795 W. Alameda
Parkway, P.O. Box 25287, Denver,
Colorado 80225 (mail); Susan_Johnson@
nps.gov (email). You may also access
this ICR at www.reginfo.gov.
I. Abstract
On June 19, 2012, the Office of
Management and Budget approved a
pilot study of visibility improvement
valuation in non-urban national parks
and wilderness areas. The goal was to
test and refine the survey instruments to
be able to provide practical utility and
generalizability of the final survey. The
National Park Service (NPS) is
requesting approval of this Information
Collection Request (ICR) that will be
used to administer a national visibility
valuation mail survey. The collection
will be used to provide the NPS
information needed to evaluate the
benefits of programs that may improve
visibility conditions in non-urban
National Parks and wilderness areas.
II. Data
OMB Control Number: 1024–0255.
Title: Visibility Valuation Survey.
Type of Request: Reinstatement of
OMB Control Number 1024–0255.
Affected Public: General Public;
Individual Households.
Respondent Obligation: Voluntary.
Frequency of Collection: One time.
Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 9,760.
Estimated Annual Burden Hours:
3,803 hours.
Estimated Annual Reporting and
Recordkeeping ‘‘Non-Hour Cost’’: None.
III. Request for Comments
On November 13, 2013, we published
a Federal Register notice (78 FR 68089)
announcing that we would submit this
ICR to OMB for approval. Public
comments were solicited for 60 days
ending January 13, 2014. We received
one request for additional information
concerning the survey. In response to
this request, we provided a summary of
the study purpose and design. No other
public comments were received.
We again invite comments concerning
this ICR on: (1) Whether or not the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the agency to perform its
duties, including whether or not the
information will have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of our estimate of the
burden for this collection of
information; (3) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
information to be collected; and (4)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Please note that the comments
submitted in response to this notice are
a matter of public record. Before
including your address, phone number,
email address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment, including your
personal identifying information, may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask OMB in your
comment to withhold your personal
identifying information from public
review, we cannot guarantee that it will
be done.
Dated: October 16, 2014.
Madonna L. Baucum,
Information Collection Clearance Officer,
National Park Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–25580 Filed 10–27–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–EH–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS–SERO–BISC–16338; PPSESEROC3,
PMP00UP05.YP0000]
Record of Decision for the Fishery
Management Plan, Biscayne National
Park, FL
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The National Park Service
(NPS) announces the availability of the
Record of Decision (ROD) for the Final
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS)
for the Fishery Management Plan (FMP)
for Biscayne National Park (Park). On
July 10, 2014, the Regional Director,
Southeast Region, approved the ROD for
the project.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Superintendent Brian Carlstrom,
Biscayne National Park, 9700 SW 328th
St, Homestead, FL 33033; telephone
(305) 230–1144.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Increases
in South Florida’s boating and fishing
population combined with improved
fishing and boating technology pose a
threat to the long-term sustainability of
fishery-related resources and numerous
scientific studies suggest that many of
the Park’s fisheries resources are in
decline. An FMP was therefore deemed
necessary to guide sustainable use of the
Park’s fishery-related resources. The
Park’s FMP will guide fishery
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
28OCN1
asabaliauskas on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 28, 2014 / Notices
management decisions in the park for
the next five to ten years.
Biscayne National Park’s FMP is the
result of a cooperative effort between
the Park and the Florida Fish and
Wildlife Conservation Commission
(FWC). This partnership is a necessary
part of fishery management because the
Park’s enabling legislation states that
fishing within the Park must be in
accordance with the laws of the State of
Florida.
The FMP FEIS presented a range of
five alternatives. The development of
the alternatives and the identification of
the preferred alternative were based on
a combination of public input (derived
from three public comment periods and
three series of public meetings, and the
input of the FMP Working Group), interagency meetings, and environmental
and socioeconomic analyses. The NPS,
in coordination with the FWC, has
decided to implement Alternative 4,
Rebuild and Conserve Park Fisheries
Resources for its Fishery Management
Plan. The NPS and FWC determined
that Alternative 4 best balances resource
protection and visitor use. Factors
considered during the decision-making
process included: (A) Assessment of the
direction and degree of environmental
impacts to the Park’s fisheries resources,
given their current status, (B) the ability
of an alternative to equitably balance
conservation, enjoyment and extractive
uses of the Park’s fisheries resources, (C)
impacts on recreational and commercial
fishing, (D) feasibility of successfully
implementing regulations to achieve
alternative goals, and (E) socioeconomic
impacts. Factors A and B were weighted
more heavily than the remaining factors.
Under Alternative 4, a considerable
change from current management
strategies would be required to achieve
a substantial improvement in Park
fisheries resources status and a
reduction in fishing-related habitat
impacts. Specific regulatory changes
proposed under this alternative include:
• Developing park-specific fishing
regulations (in conjunction with the
FWC) to increase the abundance and
average size of targeted fish and
invertebrate species within the Park by
at least 20% over current conditions and
over conditions in similar habitat
outside the park.
• Elimination of the two-day lobster
sport season.
• Prohibition of the use of an air
supply or gear with a trigger mechanism
while spearfishing.
• Phasing out of commercial fishing
via the requirement that all commercial
fishers must purchase a limited-entry,
Special Use Permit from the park
Superintendent. The permit would be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:06 Oct 27, 2014
Jkt 235001
permanently non-transferable, would
require annual renewal, and would be
‘‘use or lose’’ such that a permit could
not be renewed if (1) it was not renewed
the previous year, or (2) no catch was
reported in the previous year.
• Establishment (by FWC) of coral
reef protection areas (CRPAs) to
delineate coral reef habitat on which
lobster and crab traps could not be
deployed. Traps within the CRPAs
could be moved outside CRPA
boundaries by authorized FWC or Park
staff, or other authorized personnel.
Additionally, the trap number from
traps observed within CRPAs would be
recorded, and traps with three or more
recorded violations could be confiscated
from Park waters.
• Proposal of a no-trawl zone within
the Bay, in which commercial shrimp
trawling would be prohibited. This zone
would serve to protect juvenile fish and
invertebrates commonly caught as
bycatch in trawls, as well as protect
essential fish habitat.
New regulations will be implemented
through the federal rulemaking process
(for federal rules) and through the
FWC’s rulemaking process (for parkspecific state rules). The public will
have the opportunity to comment on all
proposed regulatory changes. Regulatory
changes that would be implemented are
expected to improve fisheries and
habitat resources. The FEIS and
National Marine Fishery Service
Biological Opinion can be obtained in
its entirety by (1) downloading the
report from the Planning, Environment,
and Public Comment (PEPC) Web site at
https://parkplanning.nps.gov/bisc, (2)
Visiting Biscayne National Park at 9700
SW 328th St, Homestead, FL 33033 to
request a copy, or (3) Calling Biscayne
National Park at 305–230–1144 to
request a copy.
Dated: October 1, 2014.
Stan Austin,
Regional Director, Southeast Region.
[FR Doc. 2014–25583 Filed 10–27–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–JD–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS–SERO–CANA–16428; PPSESEROC3,
PMP00UP05.YP0000]
Record of Decision for the General
Management Plan, Canaveral National
Seashore
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice of Availability.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64213
Section 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C), the
National Park Service (NPS) announces
the availability of the Record of
Decision (ROD) for the General
Management Plan (GMP) for Canaveral
National Seashore (Seashore). On
August 12, 2014 the Regional Director,
Southeast Region, approved the ROD for
the project.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Superintendent Myrna Palfrey,
Canaveral National Seashore, 212 S.
Washington Avenue, Titusville, FL
32796; telephone (321) 267–1110.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FEIS/
GMP evaluated four alternatives for
managing use and development of the
Seashore:
• Alternative A was the No-Action
Alternative and is the continuation of
current management.
• The NPS preferred alternative was
Alternative B. Under this alternative,
emphasis would be placed on retaining
the Seashore’s relatively undeveloped
character and providing uncrowded
experiences by dispersing visitors via a
shuttle service or canoe, kayak, hiking
and walking trails, and bicycle trails.
Elements of this alternative would
support the resilience of the Seashore to
climate change concerns, such as sea
level rise, coastal erosion, and higher
storm surges, all of which may affect
cultural and natural resources as well as
visitor experience at the Seashore.
• Under Alternative C the Seashore
would be managed as a place where
visitors would explore and experience a
wide range of opportunities that would
be designed to provide an in-depth
understanding of the natural and
cultural history of eastern coastal
Florida. When visitors enter the
Seashore, they would be presented with
choices for alternative modes of access
to land- and water-based natural and
cultural features, appropriate
recreational opportunities, and
educational pursuits. Enhanced
development related to recreational
opportunities and educational pursuits
would be pursued.
• Under Alternative D the Seashore
would be managed to focus on
enhancing the existing lands, resources,
and facilities. Limited facility
development would provide more
efficient NPS administration and
operations and enhanced visitor
amenities. Coordination with partners
would be increased to provide
additional educational opportunities
and programs for visitors and enhanced
monitoring of Mosquito Lagoon
resources.
The ROD selected Alternative B, which
the NPS intends to implement as soon
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
28OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 208 (Tuesday, October 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64212-64213]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25583]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS-SERO-BISC-16338; PPSESEROC3, PMP00UP05.YP0000]
Record of Decision for the Fishery Management Plan, Biscayne
National Park, FL
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Park Service (NPS) announces the availability of
the Record of Decision (ROD) for the Final Environmental Impact
Statement (FEIS) for the Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for Biscayne
National Park (Park). On July 10, 2014, the Regional Director,
Southeast Region, approved the ROD for the project.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Superintendent Brian Carlstrom,
Biscayne National Park, 9700 SW 328th St, Homestead, FL 33033;
telephone (305) 230-1144.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Increases in South Florida's boating and
fishing population combined with improved fishing and boating
technology pose a threat to the long-term sustainability of fishery-
related resources and numerous scientific studies suggest that many of
the Park's fisheries resources are in decline. An FMP was therefore
deemed necessary to guide sustainable use of the Park's fishery-related
resources. The Park's FMP will guide fishery
[[Page 64213]]
management decisions in the park for the next five to ten years.
Biscayne National Park's FMP is the result of a cooperative effort
between the Park and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission (FWC). This partnership is a necessary part of fishery
management because the Park's enabling legislation states that fishing
within the Park must be in accordance with the laws of the State of
Florida.
The FMP FEIS presented a range of five alternatives. The
development of the alternatives and the identification of the preferred
alternative were based on a combination of public input (derived from
three public comment periods and three series of public meetings, and
the input of the FMP Working Group), inter-agency meetings, and
environmental and socioeconomic analyses. The NPS, in coordination with
the FWC, has decided to implement Alternative 4, Rebuild and Conserve
Park Fisheries Resources for its Fishery Management Plan. The NPS and
FWC determined that Alternative 4 best balances resource protection and
visitor use. Factors considered during the decision-making process
included: (A) Assessment of the direction and degree of environmental
impacts to the Park's fisheries resources, given their current status,
(B) the ability of an alternative to equitably balance conservation,
enjoyment and extractive uses of the Park's fisheries resources, (C)
impacts on recreational and commercial fishing, (D) feasibility of
successfully implementing regulations to achieve alternative goals, and
(E) socioeconomic impacts. Factors A and B were weighted more heavily
than the remaining factors.
Under Alternative 4, a considerable change from current management
strategies would be required to achieve a substantial improvement in
Park fisheries resources status and a reduction in fishing-related
habitat impacts. Specific regulatory changes proposed under this
alternative include:
Developing park-specific fishing regulations (in
conjunction with the FWC) to increase the abundance and average size of
targeted fish and invertebrate species within the Park by at least 20%
over current conditions and over conditions in similar habitat outside
the park.
Elimination of the two-day lobster sport season.
Prohibition of the use of an air supply or gear with a
trigger mechanism while spearfishing.
Phasing out of commercial fishing via the requirement that
all commercial fishers must purchase a limited-entry, Special Use
Permit from the park Superintendent. The permit would be permanently
non-transferable, would require annual renewal, and would be ``use or
lose'' such that a permit could not be renewed if (1) it was not
renewed the previous year, or (2) no catch was reported in the previous
year.
Establishment (by FWC) of coral reef protection areas
(CRPAs) to delineate coral reef habitat on which lobster and crab traps
could not be deployed. Traps within the CRPAs could be moved outside
CRPA boundaries by authorized FWC or Park staff, or other authorized
personnel. Additionally, the trap number from traps observed within
CRPAs would be recorded, and traps with three or more recorded
violations could be confiscated from Park waters.
Proposal of a no-trawl zone within the Bay, in which
commercial shrimp trawling would be prohibited. This zone would serve
to protect juvenile fish and invertebrates commonly caught as bycatch
in trawls, as well as protect essential fish habitat.
New regulations will be implemented through the federal rulemaking
process (for federal rules) and through the FWC's rulemaking process
(for park-specific state rules). The public will have the opportunity
to comment on all proposed regulatory changes. Regulatory changes that
would be implemented are expected to improve fisheries and habitat
resources. The FEIS and National Marine Fishery Service Biological
Opinion can be obtained in its entirety by (1) downloading the report
from the Planning, Environment, and Public Comment (PEPC) Web site at
https://parkplanning.nps.gov/bisc, (2) Visiting Biscayne National Park
at 9700 SW 328th St, Homestead, FL 33033 to request a copy, or (3)
Calling Biscayne National Park at 305-230-1144 to request a copy.
Dated: October 1, 2014.
Stan Austin,
Regional Director, Southeast Region.
[FR Doc. 2014-25583 Filed 10-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JD-P