Physical Protection of Category 1 and Category 2 Quantities of Radioactive Material, 64149-64151 [2014-25540]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 28, 2014 / Proposed Rules
§ 22.3
Proposed codification.
§ 24.2
Preparation of agency statements.
Any part of a proposed rule document
that contains the full text of a proposed
regulation must conform to part 21 of
this subchapter, except for § 21.30.
■ 17. Add part 23 to read as follows:
In accordance with schedules
established under § 24.7 of this part,
each agency must submit an official
draft of the information required by
§ 9.2 of this chapter and this part.
PART 23—PREPARATION OF
NOTICES AND REGULATORY
NOTICES
§ 24.3
Sec.
23.1
Exception to required document
headings.
23.2 Authority citation.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 1506; sec. 6, E.O.
10530, 19 FR 2709; 3 CFR, 1954–1958 Comp.,
p. 189.
§ 23.1 Exception to required document
headings.
Documents are not required to have
numerical references to the title and
parts of the CFR affected.
§ 23.2
§ 24.4
Authority citation.
The authority under which an agency
issues a notice must be cited in
narrative form within text or in
parentheses on a separate line following
text.
■ 18. Add part 24 to read as follows:
Sec.
24.1
24.2
24.3
24.4
24.5
24.6
Liaison officers.
Preparation of agency statements.
Information about an organization.
Description of program activities.
Sources of information.
Form, style, arrangement and
apportionment of space.
24.7 Deadline dates.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 1506; sec. 6, E.O.
10530, 19 FR 2709; 3 CFR, 1954–1958 Comp.,
p. 189.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 24.1
Liaison officers.
(a) Each of the following must appoint
an officer to maintain liaison with the
OFR on matters relating to The United
States Government Manual:
(1) Agencies of the legislative and
judicial branches.
(2) Executive agencies that do not
have a liaison officer designated under
§ 16.1 of this chapter or who wish to
appoint a liaison officer for Manual
matters other than the one designated
under such § 16.1.
(3) Quasi-official agencies represented
in the Manual.
(4) Any other agency that the Director
believes should be included in the
Manual.
(b) Each liaison officer will ensure
agency compliance with part 9 of this
chapter, and this part.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:14 Oct 27, 2014
Jkt 235001
Description of program activities.
(a) Descriptions should clearly state
the public purposes that the agency
serves, and the programs that carry out
those purposes.
(b) Descriptions of the responsibilities
of individuals or of administrative units
common to most agencies will not be
accepted for publication in the Manual.
§ 24.5
PART 24—HANDLING OF THE UNITED
STATES GOVERNMENT MANUAL
STATEMENTS
Information about an organization.
(a) Information about lines of
authority and organization may be
reflected in a chart if the chart clearly
delineates the agency’s organizational
structure.
(b) Listings of heads of operating units
should be arranged whenever possible
to reflect relationships between units.
(c) Narrative descriptions of
organizational structure or hierarchy
that duplicate information conveyed by
charts or by lists of officials will not be
published in the Manual.
Sources of information.
Each agency statement should include
pertinent sources of information useful
to the public, covering areas such as
employment, consumer activities,
contracts, services to small business,
and other topics of public interest.
These sources of information must
plainly identify the places where the
public may obtain information or make
submittals or requests.
§ 24.6 Form, style, arrangement, and
apportionment of space.
(a) The Director determines the form,
style, arrangement, and space
apportionment of agency statements and
other materials included in the Manual.
(b) Agencies must use the U.S.
Government Printing Office Style
Manual to determine style.
§ 24.7
Deadline dates.
Agencies must promptly notify the
Director of major organizational changes
and comply with periodic deadlines set
by the OFR for agency statements,
charts, and other materials to be
included in the Manual. Failure to do so
may result in publication of an outdated
statement or the omission of important
material.
By Order of the Committee.
Charles A. Barth,
Secretary, Administrative Committee of the
Federal Register.
[FR Doc. 2014–25520 Filed 10–27–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–02–P
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
64149
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 37
[Docket No. PRM–37–1; NRC–2014–0172]
Physical Protection of Category 1 and
Category 2 Quantities of Radioactive
Material
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Petition for rulemaking; notice
of docketing and request for comment.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) has received a
petition for rulemaking from Anthony R.
Pietrangelo on behalf of the Nuclear
Energy Institute (NEI or the petitioner)
dated June 12, 2014, requesting that the
NRC amend its regulations to ‘‘remove
unnecessary and burdensome
requirements on licensees with
established physical security programs.’’
The petition was docketed by the NRC
on July 17, 2014, and has been assigned
Docket No. PRM–37–1. The NRC is
requesting public comments on this
petition for rulemaking.
DATES: Submit comments by January 12,
2015. Comments received after this date
will be considered if it is practical to do
so, but the NRC is able to assure
consideration only for comments
received on or before this date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Federal rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2014–0172. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–287–3422;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• Email comments to:
Rulemaking.Comments@nrc.gov. If you
do not receive an automatic email reply
confirming receipt, then contact us at
301–415–1677.
• Fax comments to: Secretary, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission at 301–
415–1101.
• Mail comments to: Secretary, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001, ATTN:
Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff.
• Hand deliver comments to: 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland
20852, between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m.
(Eastern Time) Federal workdays;
telephone: 301–415–1677.
For additional direction on obtaining
information and submitting comments,
see ‘‘Obtaining Information and
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28OCP1.SGM
28OCP1
64150
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 28, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Submitting Comments’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Merri L. Horn, Office of Nuclear
Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington DC 20555–0001; telephone:
301–415–7000, email: Merri.Horn@
nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2014–
0172 when contacting the NRC about
the availability of information for this
petition for rulemaking. You may obtain
publicly-available information related to
this petition by any of the following
methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2014–0172.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly
available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced in this document
(if that document is available in
ADAMS) is provided the first time that
a document is referenced.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
B. Submitting Comments
Please include Docket ID NRC–2014–
0172 in the subject line of your
comment submission, in order to ensure
that the NRC is able to make your
comment submission available to the
public in this docket.
The NRC cautions you not to include
identifying or contact information that
you do not want to be publicly
disclosed in your comment submission.
The NRC will post all comment
submissions at https://
www.regulations.gov as well as enter the
comment submissions into ADAMS.
The NRC does not routinely edit
comment submissions to remove
identifying or contact information.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:14 Oct 27, 2014
Jkt 235001
If you are requesting or aggregating
comments from other persons for
submission to the NRC, then you should
inform those persons not to include
identifying or contact information that
they do not want to be publicly
disclosed in their comment submission.
Your request should state that the NRC
does not routinely edit comment
submissions to remove such information
before making the comment
submissions available to the public or
entering the comment submissions into
ADAMS.
II. The Petitioner
The petition states that ‘‘NEI is the
organization responsible for establishing
unified nuclear industry policy on
matters affecting the nuclear energy
industry, including the regulatory
aspects of generic operational and
technical issues.’’ The petition further
states that ‘‘NEI’s members include all
entities licensed to operate commercial
nuclear power plants in the United
States, nuclear plant designers, major
architect/engineering firms, fuel
fabrication facilities, nuclear material
licensees, and other organizations and
individuals involved in the nuclear
energy industry. NEI asserts that it is
responsible for coordinating the
combined efforts of licensed facilities on
matters involving generic NRC
regulatory policy issues and generic
operational and technical regulatory
issues.’’
III. The Petition
Anthony R. Pietrangelo, Senior Vice
President and Chief Nuclear Officer,
NEI, submitted a PRM dated June 12,
2014 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML14199A570), requesting that the NRC
amend its regulations regarding
‘‘Physical Protection of Category 1 and
Category 2 Quantities of Radioactive
Material.’’ The NRC has determined that
the petition meets the threshold
sufficiency requirements for a petition
for rulemaking under § 2.802 of Title 10
of the Code of Federal Regulations (10
CFR), ‘‘Petition for rulemaking,’’ and the
petition has been docketed as PRM–37–
1. The NRC is requesting public
comment on the petition for rulemaking.
IV. Discussion of the Petition
The NRC’s regulations at 10 CFR part
37, ‘‘Physical Protection of Category 1
and Category 2 Quantities of
Radioactive Material,’’ require licensees
that possess Category 1 and Category 2
quantities of radioactive material to
secure and protect the materials from
theft or diversion. Part 37 contains a
provision, 10 CFR 37.11, which
provides for ‘‘Specific Exemptions.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The provision in 10 CFR 37.11(b), states
that ‘‘[a]ny licensee’s NRC-licensed
activities are exempt from the
requirements of subpart B [‘Background
Investigations and Access Authorization
Program’] and subpart C [‘Physical
Protection Requirements During Use’] of
this part to the extent that its activities
are included in a security plan required
by part 73 of this chapter.’’ The
provision in 10 CFR 37.11(c) allows for
certain waste material to be subject to a
different set of requirements as outlined
in 10 CFR 37.11(c)(1)–(4).
The petitioner is requesting that the
rule be amended to clarify and expand
the exemptions in 10 CFR 37.11 in
several ways. First, the petitioner is
requesting that the exemptions provide
for a more direct recognition of the
extent to which facilities with robust 10
CFR part 73 security programs already
meet the objectives set forth in part 37
and inherently protect byproduct
material. Additionally, the petitioner
requests NRC codify certain provisions
contained in an Enforcement Guidance
Memorandum (EGM) ‘‘Interim Guidance
for Dispositioning 10 CFR Part 37
Violations with Respect to Large
Components and Robust Structures
Containing Category 1 or Category 2
Quantities of Material at Power Reactor
Facilities Licensed Under 10 CFR Parts
50 and 52’’ issued by the NRC on March
13, 2014 (ML14056A151).
Specifically, the proposed
amendments to part 37 would include
adding definitions to 10 CFR 37.5 for
Large Component and Robust Structure.
The petitioner also proposes
amendments to 10 CFR 37.11(b) that the
petitioner claims will remove ‘‘undue
regulatory burden on licensees by
recognizing the extent to which
facilities with robust 10 CFR Part 73
security programs already meet the
objectives set forth in Part 37 and
inherently protect byproduct material.’’
The petitioner further recommends
revisions to 10 CFR 37.11(c) that the
petitioner claims would help ‘‘to
improve its clarity, provide greater
regulatory certainty, and ensure
licensees implement Part 37 consistent
with NRC’s intent and expressed
regulatory guidance.’’ Moreover, the
petitioner recommends adding a new
paragraph, 10 CFR 37.11(d), to codify
key elements of the EGM. Specifically,
the proposed 10 CFR 37.11(d) would
exempt large components and material
stored in robust structures from part
37’s requirements.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 21st day
of October 2014.
E:\FR\FM\28OCP1.SGM
28OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 28, 2014 / Proposed Rules
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Richard J. Laufer,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014–25540 Filed 10–27–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2014–0746; Airspace
Docket No. 14–AGL–2]
Proposed Establishment of Class E
Airspace; Cando, ND
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
This action proposes to
establish Class E airspace at Cando, ND.
Controlled airspace is necessary to
accommodate new Standard Instrument
Approach Procedures (SIAPs) at Cando
Municipal Airport. The FAA is taking
this action to enhance the safety and
management of Instrument Flight Rules
(IFR) operations for SIAPs at the airport.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before December 12, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this
proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. You must
identify the docket number FAA–2014–
0746/Airspace Docket No. 14–AGL–2, at
the beginning of your comments. You
may also submit comments through the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
You may review the public docket
containing the proposal, any comments
received, and any final disposition in
person in the Dockets Office between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The
Docket Office (telephone 1–800–647–
5527), is on the ground floor of the
building at the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rebecca Shelby, Central Service Center,
Operations Support Group, Federal
Aviation Administration, Southwest
Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort
Worth, TX 76137; telephone: 817–321–
7740.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
Comments Invited
Interested parties are invited to
participate in this proposed rulemaking
by submitting such written data, views,
or arguments, as they may desire.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:14 Oct 27, 2014
Jkt 235001
Comments that provide the factual basis
supporting the views and suggestions
presented are particularly helpful in
developing reasoned regulatory
decisions on the proposal. Comments
are specifically invited on the overall
regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related
aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both
docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above.
Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this notice must submit with those
comments a self-addressed, stamped
postcard on which the following
statement is made: ‘‘Comments to
Docket No. FAA–2014–0746/Airspace
Docket No. 14–AGL–2.’’ The postcard
will be date/time stamped and returned
to the commenter.
Availability of NPRMs
An electronic copy of this document
may be downloaded through the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through
the FAA’s Web page at https://
www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_
traffic/publications/airspace_
amendments/.
You may review the public docket
containing the proposal, any comments
received and any final disposition in
person in the Dockets Office (see
ADDRESSES section for address and
phone number) between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. An informal docket
may also be examined during normal
business hours at the office of the
Central Service Center, 2601 Meacham
Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137.
Persons interested in being placed on
a mailing list for future NPRMs should
contact the FAA’s Office of Rulemaking
(202) 267–9677, to request a copy of
Advisory Circular No. 11–2A, Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking Distribution
System, which describes the application
procedure.
The Proposal
This action proposes to amend Title
14, Code of Federal Regulations (14
CFR), Part 71 by establishing Class E
airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 6.5-mile
radius of Cando Municipal Airport,
Cando, ND, to accommodate new
standard instrument approach
procedures. Controlled airspace is
needed for the safety and management
of IFR operations at the airport.
Class E airspace areas are published
in Paragraph 6005 of FAA Order
7400.9Y, dated August 6, 2014 and
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
64151
effective September 15, 2014, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The Class E airspace designation
listed in this document will be
published subsequently in the Order.
The FAA has determined that this
proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical
regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to
keep them operationally current. It,
therefore, (1) is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant
rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February
26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant
preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that will
only affect air traffic procedures and air
navigation, it is certified that this rule,
when promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1,
Section 106 describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the agency’s
authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority as it would
establish controlled airspace at Cando
Municipal Airport, Cando, ND.
Environmental Review
This proposal will be subject to an
environmental analysis in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1E,
‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final
regulatory action.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as
follows:
E:\FR\FM\28OCP1.SGM
28OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 208 (Tuesday, October 28, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 64149-64151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25540]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 37
[Docket No. PRM-37-1; NRC-2014-0172]
Physical Protection of Category 1 and Category 2 Quantities of
Radioactive Material
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Petition for rulemaking; notice of docketing and request for
comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has received a
petition for rulemaking from Anthony R. Pietrangelo on behalf of the
Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI or the petitioner) dated June 12, 2014,
requesting that the NRC amend its regulations to ``remove unnecessary
and burdensome requirements on licensees with established physical
security programs.'' The petition was docketed by the NRC on July 17,
2014, and has been assigned Docket No. PRM-37-1. The NRC is requesting
public comments on this petition for rulemaking.
DATES: Submit comments by January 12, 2015. Comments received after
this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the NRC
is able to assure consideration only for comments received on or before
this date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
Federal rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2014-0172. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-287-
3422; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this document.
Email comments to: Rulemaking.Comments@nrc.gov. If you do
not receive an automatic email reply confirming receipt, then contact
us at 301-415-1677.
Fax comments to: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission at 301-415-1101.
Mail comments to: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, ATTN: Rulemakings and
Adjudications Staff.
Hand deliver comments to: 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland 20852, between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. (Eastern Time) Federal
workdays; telephone: 301-415-1677.
For additional direction on obtaining information and submitting
comments, see ``Obtaining Information and
[[Page 64150]]
Submitting Comments'' in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Merri L. Horn, Office of Nuclear
Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-7000, email:
Merri.Horn@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2014-0172 when contacting the NRC
about the availability of information for this petition for rulemaking.
You may obtain publicly-available information related to this petition
by any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2014-0172.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each document referenced in this document
(if that document is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time
that a document is referenced.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
B. Submitting Comments
Please include Docket ID NRC-2014-0172 in the subject line of your
comment submission, in order to ensure that the NRC is able to make
your comment submission available to the public in this docket.
The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact
information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your
comment submission. The NRC will post all comment submissions at https://www.regulations.gov as well as enter the comment submissions into
ADAMS. The NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove
identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons
for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to
include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be
publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should
state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to
remove such information before making the comment submissions available
to the public or entering the comment submissions into ADAMS.
II. The Petitioner
The petition states that ``NEI is the organization responsible for
establishing unified nuclear industry policy on matters affecting the
nuclear energy industry, including the regulatory aspects of generic
operational and technical issues.'' The petition further states that
``NEI's members include all entities licensed to operate commercial
nuclear power plants in the United States, nuclear plant designers,
major architect/engineering firms, fuel fabrication facilities, nuclear
material licensees, and other organizations and individuals involved in
the nuclear energy industry. NEI asserts that it is responsible for
coordinating the combined efforts of licensed facilities on matters
involving generic NRC regulatory policy issues and generic operational
and technical regulatory issues.''
III. The Petition
Anthony R. Pietrangelo, Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear
Officer, NEI, submitted a PRM dated June 12, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML14199A570), requesting that the NRC amend its regulations regarding
``Physical Protection of Category 1 and Category 2 Quantities of
Radioactive Material.'' The NRC has determined that the petition meets
the threshold sufficiency requirements for a petition for rulemaking
under Sec. 2.802 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10
CFR), ``Petition for rulemaking,'' and the petition has been docketed
as PRM-37-1. The NRC is requesting public comment on the petition for
rulemaking.
IV. Discussion of the Petition
The NRC's regulations at 10 CFR part 37, ``Physical Protection of
Category 1 and Category 2 Quantities of Radioactive Material,'' require
licensees that possess Category 1 and Category 2 quantities of
radioactive material to secure and protect the materials from theft or
diversion. Part 37 contains a provision, 10 CFR 37.11, which provides
for ``Specific Exemptions.'' The provision in 10 CFR 37.11(b), states
that ``[a]ny licensee's NRC-licensed activities are exempt from the
requirements of subpart B [`Background Investigations and Access
Authorization Program'] and subpart C [`Physical Protection
Requirements During Use'] of this part to the extent that its
activities are included in a security plan required by part 73 of this
chapter.'' The provision in 10 CFR 37.11(c) allows for certain waste
material to be subject to a different set of requirements as outlined
in 10 CFR 37.11(c)(1)-(4).
The petitioner is requesting that the rule be amended to clarify
and expand the exemptions in 10 CFR 37.11 in several ways. First, the
petitioner is requesting that the exemptions provide for a more direct
recognition of the extent to which facilities with robust 10 CFR part
73 security programs already meet the objectives set forth in part 37
and inherently protect byproduct material. Additionally, the petitioner
requests NRC codify certain provisions contained in an Enforcement
Guidance Memorandum (EGM) ``Interim Guidance for Dispositioning 10 CFR
Part 37 Violations with Respect to Large Components and Robust
Structures Containing Category 1 or Category 2 Quantities of Material
at Power Reactor Facilities Licensed Under 10 CFR Parts 50 and 52''
issued by the NRC on March 13, 2014 (ML14056A151).
Specifically, the proposed amendments to part 37 would include
adding definitions to 10 CFR 37.5 for Large Component and Robust
Structure. The petitioner also proposes amendments to 10 CFR 37.11(b)
that the petitioner claims will remove ``undue regulatory burden on
licensees by recognizing the extent to which facilities with robust 10
CFR Part 73 security programs already meet the objectives set forth in
Part 37 and inherently protect byproduct material.'' The petitioner
further recommends revisions to 10 CFR 37.11(c) that the petitioner
claims would help ``to improve its clarity, provide greater regulatory
certainty, and ensure licensees implement Part 37 consistent with NRC's
intent and expressed regulatory guidance.'' Moreover, the petitioner
recommends adding a new paragraph, 10 CFR 37.11(d), to codify key
elements of the EGM. Specifically, the proposed 10 CFR 37.11(d) would
exempt large components and material stored in robust structures from
part 37's requirements.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 21st day of October 2014.
[[Page 64151]]
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Richard J. Laufer,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014-25540 Filed 10-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P