Safety Zone: Semisubmersible Loading Operation Safety Zone, South San Francisco Bay, San Francisco, CA, 63534-63536 [2014-25383]
Download as PDF
63534
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 206 / Friday, October 24, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
AIRAC date
State
City
Airport
FDC No.
FDC date
16-Oct-14 ...........
VA
Danville ............................
Danville Rgnl ....................
4/7244
09/03/14
16-Oct-14 ...........
KS
Independence ..................
Independence Muni .........
4/7880
08/28/14
16-Oct-14 ...........
WA
Pullman/Moscow,ID .........
Pullman/Moscow Rgnl .....
4/9288
09/03/14
16-Oct-14 ...........
WA
Pullman/Moscow,ID .........
Pullman/Moscow Rgnl .....
4/9292
09/03/14
16-Oct-14 ...........
WA
Pullman/Moscow,ID .........
Pullman/Moscow Rgnl .....
4/9294
09/03/14
16-Oct-14 ...........
WA
Pullman/Moscow,ID .........
Pullman/Moscow Rgnl .....
4/9299
09/03/14
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
[FR Doc. 2014–25021 Filed 10–23–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2014–0922]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone: Semisubmersible
Loading Operation Safety Zone, South
San Francisco Bay, San Francisco, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone in
the navigable waters of South San
Francisco Bay in support of the
Semisubmersible Loading Operation
taking place between October 14 and 23,
2014 for a 24-hour period. This safety
zone is established to ensure the safety
of workers, mariners, and other vessels
transiting the area from the dangers
associated with the loading operations.
Unauthorized persons or vessels are
prohibited from entering into, transiting
through, or remaining in the safety zone
without permission of the Captain of the
Port or their designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective without
actual notice from 12:01 a.m. to 11:59
p.m. on October 24, 2014. For the
purposes of enforcement, actual notice
will be used from October 14, 2014,
until October 24, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket USCG–
2014–0922. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Lieutenant Junior Grade Joshua V.
Dykman, U.S. Coast Guard Sector San
Francisco; telephone (415) 399–3585 or
email at D11–PF-MarineEvents@
uscg.mil. If you have questions on
viewing or submitting material to the
docket, call the Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Coast Guard
14:09 Oct 23, 2014
Jkt 235001
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
PATCOM U.S. Coast Guard Patrol
Commander
ULCV Ultra Large Container Vessel
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Notice and
comment procedures would be
impracticable as the Coast Guard
received the final information about the
date and time of the Semisubmersible
Loading Operation on October 1, 2014,
and the operation would occur before
the rulemaking process would be
completed. Because of the dangers
posed by this operation, the safety zone
is necessary to provide for the safety of
the workers, mariners, and other vessels
transiting the area.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Subject
RNAV (GPS) RWY 2,
Orig.
ILS OR LOC RWY 35,
Amdt 1B.
RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 6,
Amdt 2B.
RNAV (GPS) RWY 24,
Amdt 1A.
RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 6,
Orig.
VOR RWY 6, Amdt 9.
For similar reasons, under 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for making this rule
effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. For
the safety concerns noted, it is in the
public interest to have these regulations
in effect during the event.
B. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the rule is 33 U.S.C
1231; 46 U.S.C Chapter 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05–1,
6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Public Law 107–
295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1, which collectively authorize the
Coast Guard to establish safety zones.
The Port of San Francisco will
sponsor the Semisubmersible Loading
Operation Safety Zone taking place
between October 14 and 23, 2014, for a
24-hour period, in South San Francisco
Bay, CA as depicted in National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA) Charts 18649 and 18651. This
safety zone establishes a temporary
restricted area on the waters within 500
feet of the anchored semisubmersible
and all support vessels engaged in the
loading operation at Anchorage 9 in
approximate position 37°46′09″ N,
122°21′31″ W (NAD83). This restricted
area around the vessels engaged in the
loading operation is necessary to
provide for the safety of workers,
mariners, and other vessels transiting
the area from the hazards associated
with the loading operation.
C. Discussion of the Final Rule
The Coast Guard will enforce a safety
zone in navigable waters around and
under the semisubmersible and all
support vessels within 500 feet in South
San Francisco Bay during the loading
operation taking place between October
14 and 23, 2014 for a 24-hour period.
Upon the conclusion of the loading
operation the safety zone shall
terminate.
The effect of the temporary safety
zone will be to restrict navigation in the
vicinity of the loading operation until
the conclusion of the operation. Except
E:\FR\FM\24OCR1.SGM
24OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 206 / Friday, October 24, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
for persons or vessels authorized by the
Coast Guard Patrol Commander, no
person or vessel may enter or remain in
the restricted area. These regulations are
needed to keep vessels away from the
vessels engaged in the loading operation
to ensure the freedom of movement of
workers and ensure the safety of
mariners transiting the area.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive
orders.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders.
We expect the economic impact of
this rule will not rise to the level of
necessitating a full Regulatory
Evaluation. The safety zone is limited in
duration, and is limited to a narrowly
tailored geographic area. In addition,
although this rule restricts access to the
waters encompassed by the safety zone,
the effect of this rule will not be
significant because the local waterway
users will be notified via public
Broadcast Notice to Mariners to ensure
the safety zone will result in minimum
impact. The entities most likely to be
affected are waterfront facilities,
commercial vessels, and pleasure craft
engaged in recreational activities.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
This rule may affect owners and
operators of waterfront facilities,
commercial vessels, and pleasure craft
engaged in recreational activities and
sightseeing. This safety zone would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:09 Oct 23, 2014
Jkt 235001
for the following reasons. This safety
zone would be activated, and thus
subject to enforcement, for a limited
duration. When the safety zone is
activated, vessel traffic may coordinate
movements around the safety zone by
contacting PATCOM on VHF channel
16. The maritime public will be advised
in advance of this safety zone via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
63535
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
E:\FR\FM\24OCR1.SGM
24OCR1
63536
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 206 / Friday, October 24, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety
zone of limited size and duration. This
rule is categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination
and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures, and
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR Part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3707; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T11–670 to read as
follows:
■
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
(a) Location. This temporary safety
zone is established in the navigable
waters of South San Francisco Bay
within 500 feet of the anchored
semisubmersible and all support vessels
engaged in the loading operation at
Anchorage 9 in approximate position
37°46′09″ N, 122°21′31″ W (NAD83).
(b) Enforcement Period. The zone
described in paragraph (a) of this
section will be enforced for a 24-hour
period between October 14 and 23,
2014. The Captain of the Port San
Francisco (COTP) will notify the
maritime community of periods during
14:09 Oct 23, 2014
Jkt 235001
Dated: October 9, 2014.
Gregory G. Stump,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2014–25383 Filed 10–23–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
§ 165.T11–670 Safety zone;
Semisubmersible Loading Operation Safety
Zone, South San Francisco Bay, San
Francisco, CA.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
which this zone will be enforced via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners in
accordance with 33 CFR 165.7.
(c) Definitions. As used in this
section, ‘‘designated representative’’
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
on a Coast Guard vessel or a Federal,
State, or local officer designated by or
assisting the COTP pursuant to a
Memorandum of Understanding with
that agency, to assist in the enforcement
of the safety zone.
(d) Regulations. (1) Under the general
regulations in 33 CFR Part 165, Subpart
C, entry into, transiting or anchoring
within this safety zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the COTP or a
designated representative.
(2) The safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the COTP or a designated
representative.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone must
contact the COTP or a designated
representative to obtain permission to
do so. Vessel operators given permission
to enter or operate in the safety zone
must comply with all directions given to
them by the COTP or a designated
representative. Persons and vessels may
request permission to enter the safety
zone by contacting the Coast Guard
Patrol Commander on VHF channel
23A.
Findings of Failure To Submit State
Implementation Plan; California;
Interstate Transport Requirements for
2006 24-Hour Fine Particulate Matter
(PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality
Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) is making a
finding that California has not
submitted a State Implementation Plan
(SIP) revision for the Clean Air Act
SUMMARY:
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Effective Date: This final rule is
effective on November 24, 2014.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action, identified by
Docket ID Number EPA–R09–OAR–
2014–0646. The index to the docket for
this action is available electronically at
https://www.regulations.gov and in hard
copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne
Street, San Francisco, California. While
all documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available in
either location (e.g., confidential
business information (CBI)). To inspect
the hard copy materials, please schedule
an appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed directly
below.
DATES:
Rory
Mays, Air Planning Office (AIR–2), EPA
Region IX, (415) 972–3227, mays.rory@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, the terms
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
Section 553 of the Administrative
Procedures Act, 5 United States Code
(U.S.C.) 553(b)(B), provides that, when
an agency for good cause finds that
notice and public procedure are
impracticable, unnecessary or contrary
to the public interest, the agency may
issue a rule without providing notice
and an opportunity for public comment.
EPA has determined that there is good
cause for making this rule final without
prior proposal and opportunity for
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[EPA–R09–OAR–2014–0646; FRL–9918–38–
Region 9]
PO 00000
(CAA or Act) provisions that require the
SIP to contain adequate provisions to
address the transport of air pollution to
other states. Specifically, these
requirements pertain to significant
contribution to nonattainment, or
interference with maintenance, of the
2006 24-hour fine particulate matter
(PM2.5) national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS) in any other state.
EPA refers to such submittals as
‘‘interstate transport’’ SIPs and often
refers to the specific requirements
addressed in this final rule as ‘‘prongs
1 and 2’’ since they address the first two
of several interstate transport
requirements. This finding of failure to
submit establishes a deadline of 24
months after the effective date of this
final rule for EPA to promulgate a
Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) to
address these two interstate transport
requirements for California for the 2006
24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS unless, prior to
that time, the state submits, and EPA
approves, a submittal that meets these
requirements.
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\24OCR1.SGM
24OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 206 (Friday, October 24, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 63534-63536]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25383]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2014-0922]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone: Semisubmersible Loading Operation Safety Zone, South
San Francisco Bay, San Francisco, CA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone in the
navigable waters of South San Francisco Bay in support of the
Semisubmersible Loading Operation taking place between October 14 and
23, 2014 for a 24-hour period. This safety zone is established to
ensure the safety of workers, mariners, and other vessels transiting
the area from the dangers associated with the loading operations.
Unauthorized persons or vessels are prohibited from entering into,
transiting through, or remaining in the safety zone without permission
of the Captain of the Port or their designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from 12:01 a.m. to
11:59 p.m. on October 24, 2014. For the purposes of enforcement, actual
notice will be used from October 14, 2014, until October 24, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
USCG-2014-0922. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Lieutenant Junior Grade Joshua V. Dykman, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector San Francisco; telephone (415) 399-3585 or email at D11-PF-MarineEvents@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call the Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
PATCOM U.S. Coast Guard Patrol Commander
ULCV Ultra Large Container Vessel
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Notice and comment procedures would be impracticable as the
Coast Guard received the final information about the date and time of
the Semisubmersible Loading Operation on October 1, 2014, and the
operation would occur before the rulemaking process would be completed.
Because of the dangers posed by this operation, the safety zone is
necessary to provide for the safety of the workers, mariners, and other
vessels transiting the area.
For similar reasons, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard
finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than
30 days after publication in the Federal Register. For the safety
concerns noted, it is in the public interest to have these regulations
in effect during the event.
B. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the rule is 33 U.S.C 1231; 46 U.S.C Chapter
701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6,
160.5; Public Law 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1, which collectively authorize the Coast
Guard to establish safety zones.
The Port of San Francisco will sponsor the Semisubmersible Loading
Operation Safety Zone taking place between October 14 and 23, 2014, for
a 24-hour period, in South San Francisco Bay, CA as depicted in
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Charts 18649 and
18651. This safety zone establishes a temporary restricted area on the
waters within 500 feet of the anchored semisubmersible and all support
vessels engaged in the loading operation at Anchorage 9 in approximate
position 37[deg]46'09'' N, 122[deg]21'31'' W (NAD83). This restricted
area around the vessels engaged in the loading operation is necessary
to provide for the safety of workers, mariners, and other vessels
transiting the area from the hazards associated with the loading
operation.
C. Discussion of the Final Rule
The Coast Guard will enforce a safety zone in navigable waters
around and under the semisubmersible and all support vessels within 500
feet in South San Francisco Bay during the loading operation taking
place between October 14 and 23, 2014 for a 24-hour period. Upon the
conclusion of the loading operation the safety zone shall terminate.
The effect of the temporary safety zone will be to restrict
navigation in the vicinity of the loading operation until the
conclusion of the operation. Except
[[Page 63535]]
for persons or vessels authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
no person or vessel may enter or remain in the restricted area. These
regulations are needed to keep vessels away from the vessels engaged in
the loading operation to ensure the freedom of movement of workers and
ensure the safety of mariners transiting the area.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.
We expect the economic impact of this rule will not rise to the
level of necessitating a full Regulatory Evaluation. The safety zone is
limited in duration, and is limited to a narrowly tailored geographic
area. In addition, although this rule restricts access to the waters
encompassed by the safety zone, the effect of this rule will not be
significant because the local waterway users will be notified via
public Broadcast Notice to Mariners to ensure the safety zone will
result in minimum impact. The entities most likely to be affected are
waterfront facilities, commercial vessels, and pleasure craft engaged
in recreational activities.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
This rule may affect owners and operators of waterfront facilities,
commercial vessels, and pleasure craft engaged in recreational
activities and sightseeing. This safety zone would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
for the following reasons. This safety zone would be activated, and
thus subject to enforcement, for a limited duration. When the safety
zone is activated, vessel traffic may coordinate movements around the
safety zone by contacting PATCOM on VHF channel 16. The maritime public
will be advised in advance of this safety zone via Broadcast Notice to
Mariners.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
[[Page 63536]]
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety zone of limited size and
duration. This rule is categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this
rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR Part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3707; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L. 107-
295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T11-670 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T11-670 Safety zone; Semisubmersible Loading Operation
Safety Zone, South San Francisco Bay, San Francisco, CA.
(a) Location. This temporary safety zone is established in the
navigable waters of South San Francisco Bay within 500 feet of the
anchored semisubmersible and all support vessels engaged in the loading
operation at Anchorage 9 in approximate position 37[deg]46'09'' N,
122[deg]21'31'' W (NAD83).
(b) Enforcement Period. The zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section will be enforced for a 24-hour period between October 14 and
23, 2014. The Captain of the Port San Francisco (COTP) will notify the
maritime community of periods during which this zone will be enforced
via Broadcast Notice to Mariners in accordance with 33 CFR 165.7.
(c) Definitions. As used in this section, ``designated
representative'' means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a
Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer on a Coast Guard
vessel or a Federal, State, or local officer designated by or assisting
the COTP pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding with that agency, to
assist in the enforcement of the safety zone.
(d) Regulations. (1) Under the general regulations in 33 CFR Part
165, Subpart C, entry into, transiting or anchoring within this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the COTP or a designated
representative.
(2) The safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the COTP or a designated representative.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone must contact the COTP or a designated representative to obtain
permission to do so. Vessel operators given permission to enter or
operate in the safety zone must comply with all directions given to
them by the COTP or a designated representative. Persons and vessels
may request permission to enter the safety zone by contacting the Coast
Guard Patrol Commander on VHF channel 23A.
Dated: October 9, 2014.
Gregory G. Stump,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2014-25383 Filed 10-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P