Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Rhode Island; Decommissioning of Stage II Vapor Recovery Systems, 63591-63594 [2014-25354]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 206 / Friday, October 24, 2014 / Proposed Rules
section 210(a)(16)(D) of the Dodd-Frank
Act and this section includes, without
limitation:
(i) Duplicate copies, reference
materials, drafts of documents that are
superseded by later drafts or revisions,
documentary material provided to the
Corporation by other parties in
concluded litigation for which all
appeals have expired, and transitory
information including personal notes,
routine system messages or systemgenerated log files or other documentary
material not routinely maintained under
the standard record retention policies
and procedures of the Corporation;
(ii) Documentary material generated
or maintained by a bridge financial
company, or by a subsidiary or affiliate
of a covered financial company that was
not provided to the financial company
or to the Corporation as receiver; and
(iii) Non-publicly available
confidential supervisory information,
operating, or condition reports prepared
by, on behalf of, or at the requirement
of any agency responsible for the
regulation or supervision of financial
companies or their subsidiaries.
(3) Policies and procedures. The
Corporation may establish policies and
procedures with respect to the retention
and destruction of records that are
consistent with this section.
Dated at Washington, DC, this 21st day of
October, 2014.
By Order of the Board of Directors, Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–25338 Filed 10–23–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R01–OAR–2013–0818; A–1–FRL–
9916–17–Region–1]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Rhode
Island; Decommissioning of Stage II
Vapor Recovery Systems
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the State of Rhode
Island Department of Environmental
Management. This revision includes
regulatory amendments that allow
gasoline dispensing facilities (GDFs) to
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:28 Oct 23, 2014
Jkt 235001
decommission their Stage II vapor
recovery systems as of December 25,
2013, and a demonstration that such
removal is consistent with the Clean Air
Act and EPA guidance. This revision
also includes regulatory amendments
that strengthen Rhode Island’s
requirements for Stage I vapor recovery
systems at GDFs. The intended effect of
this action is to propose approval of
Rhode Island’s revised vapor recovery
regulations.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before November 24,
2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R01–OAR–2013–0818 by one of the
following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-Mail: arnold.anne@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (617) 918–0047.
4. Mail: ‘‘Docket Identification
Number EPA–R01–OAR–2013–0818,’’
Anne Arnold, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA New England
Regional Office, Office of Ecosystem
Protection, Air Quality Planning Unit, 5
Post Office Square—Suite 100, (Mail
code OEP05–2), Boston, MA 02109–
3912.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver
your comments to: Anne Arnold,
Manager, Air Quality Planning Unit,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
EPA New England Regional Office,
Office of Ecosystem Protection, Air
Quality Planning Unit, 5 Post Office
Square—Suite 100, (Mail code OEP05–
2), Boston, MA 02109–3912. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Regional Office’s normal hours of
operation. The Regional Office’s official
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
legal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R01–OAR–2013–
0818. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit through
www.regulations.gov, or email,
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
63591
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an email comment directly
to EPA without going through
www.regulations.gov your email address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made
available on the Internet. If you submit
an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at Office of Ecosystem
Protection, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA New England
Regional Office, Office of Ecosystem
Protection, Air Quality Planning Unit, 5
Post Office Square—Suite 100, Boston,
MA. EPA requests that if at all possible,
you contact the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., excluding legal holidays.
In addition, copies of the state
submittal are also available for public
inspection during normal business
hours, by appointment at the State Air
Agency: Office of Air Resources,
Department of Environmental
Management, 235 Promenade Street,
Providence, RI 02908–5767.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ariel Garcia, Air Quality Planning Unit,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
EPA New England Regional Office, 5
Post Office Square, Suite 100 (Mail
code: OEP05–2), Boston, MA 02109–
3912, telephone number (617) 918–
1660, fax number (617) 918–0660, email
garcia.ariel@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA.
E:\FR\FM\24OCP1.SGM
24OCP1
63592
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 206 / Friday, October 24, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Organization of this document. The
following outline is provided to aid in
locating information in this preamble.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
I. Background and Purpose
II. Summary of Rhode Island’s SIP Revision
III. EPA’s Evaluation of Rhode Island’s SIP
Revision
IV. Proposed Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background and Purpose
On December 13, 2013, the Rhode
Island Department of Environmental
Management submitted a revision to its
State Implementation Plan (SIP). The
SIP revision consists of Rhode Island’s
revised Air Pollution Control Regulation
No. 11, Petroleum Liquids Marketing
and Storage, which has been revised to
allow the decommissioning of Stage II
vapor recovery systems and to
strengthen Stage I vapor recovery
requirements. The SIP submittal also
includes a demonstration that removal
of Stage II vapor recovery systems in
Rhode Island is consistent with the
Clean Air Act and EPA guidance.
Stage II and onboard refueling vapor
recovery (ORVR) systems are two types
of emission control systems that capture
fuel vapors from vehicle gas tanks
during refueling. Stage II vapor recovery
systems are installed at gasoline
dispensing facilities (GDFs) and capture
the refueling fuel vapors at the gasoline
pump. The system carries the vapors
back to the underground storage tank at
the GDF to prevent the vapors from
escaping to the atmosphere. ORVR
systems are carbon canisters installed
directly on automobiles to capture the
fuel vapors evacuated from the gasoline
tank before they reach the nozzle. The
fuel vapors captured in the carbon
canisters are then combusted in the
engine when the automobile is in
operation.
Stage II vapor recovery systems and
vehicle ORVR systems were initially
both required by the 1990 Amendments
to the Clean Air Act (CAA). Section
182(b)(3) of the CAA requires moderate
and above ozone nonattainment areas to
implement Stage II vapor recovery
programs. Also, under CAA section
184(b)(2), states in the Ozone Transport
Region (OTR) are required to implement
Stage II or comparable measures. CAA
section 202(a)(6) required EPA to
promulgate regulations for ORVR for
light-duty vehicles (passenger cars).
EPA adopted these requirements in
1994, at which point moderate ozone
nonattainment areas were no longer
subject to the CAA section 182(b)(3)
Stage II vapor recovery requirements.
ORVR equipment has been phased in for
new passenger vehicles beginning with
model year 1998, and starting with
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:28 Oct 23, 2014
Jkt 235001
model year 2001 for light-duty trucks
and most heavy-duty gasoline powered
vehicles. ORVR equipment has been
installed on nearly all new gasolinepowered light-duty vehicles, light-duty
trucks, and heavy-duty vehicles since
2006.
During the phase-in of ORVR controls,
Stage II has provided volatile organic
compound (VOC) reductions in ozone
nonattainment areas and certain
attainment areas of the OTR. Congress
recognized that ORVR systems and
Stage II vapor recovery systems would
eventually become largely redundant
technologies, and provided authority to
EPA to allow states to remove Stage II
vapor recovery programs from their SIPs
after EPA finds that ORVR is in
‘‘widespread use.’’ Effective May 16,
2012, the date the final rule was
published in the Federal Register (see
77 FR 28772), EPA determined that
ORVR systems are in widespread use
nationwide for control of gasoline
emissions during refueling of vehicles at
GDFs. Currently, more than 75 percent
of gasoline refueling nationwide occurs
with ORVR-equipped vehicles, so Stage
II vapor recovery programs have become
largely redundant control systems and
Stage II vapor recovery systems achieve
an ever declining emissions benefit as
more ORVR-equipped vehicles continue
to enter the on-road motor vehicle fleet.1
In its May 16, 2012 rulemaking, EPA
also exercised its authority under CAA
section 202(a)(6) to waive certain federal
statutory requirements for Stage II vapor
recovery systems at GDFs. This decision
exempts all new ozone nonattainment
areas classified serious or above from
the requirement to adopt Stage II vapor
recovery programs. Finally, EPA’s May
16, 2012 rulemaking also noted that any
state currently implementing Stage II
vapor recovery programs may submit
SIP revisions that would allow for the
phase-out of Stage II vapor recovery
systems.
Stage I vapor recovery systems are
systems that capture vapors displaced
from storage tanks at GDFs during
gasoline tank truck deliveries. When
gasoline is delivered into an
aboveground or underground storage
tank, vapors that were taking up space
in the storage tank are displaced by the
gasoline entering the storage tank. The
Stage I vapor recovery systems route
1 In areas where certain types of vacuum-assist
Stage II vapor recovery systems are used, the
differences in operational design characteristics
between ORVR and some configurations of these
Stage II vapor recovery systems result in the
reduction of overall control system efficiency
compared to what could have been achieved
relative to the individual control efficiencies of
either ORVR or stage II emissions from the vehicle
fuel tank.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
these displaced vapors into the delivery
truck’s tank. Some vapors are vented
when the storage tank exceeds a
specified pressure threshold, however
the Stage I vapor recovery systems
greatly reduce the possibility of these
displaced vapors being released into the
atmosphere.
Stage I vapor recovery systems have
been in place since the 1970s. EPA has
issued the following guidance regarding
Stage I systems: ‘‘Design Criteria for
Stage I Vapor Control Systems—
Gasoline Service Stations’’ (November
1975, EPA Online Publication
450R75102), which is regarded as the
control techniques guideline (CTG) for
the control of VOC emissions from this
source category; and the EPA document
‘‘Model Volatile Organic Compound
Rules for Reasonably Available Control
Technology’’ (Staff Working Draft, June
1992) contains a model Stage I
regulation.
In more recent years, the California
Air Resources Board (CARB) has
required Stage I vapor recovery systems
capable of achieving vapor control
efficiencies higher than those achieved
by traditional systems. These systems
are commonly referred to as Enhanced
Vapor Recovery (EVR) systems.
II. Summary of Rhode Island’s SIP
Revision
Rhode Island adopted its Stage II
Vapor Recovery Program in 1992 in
order to satisfy the requirements of
sections 182(b)(3) and 184(b)(2) of the
CAA. The Rhode Island Stage II vapor
recovery program requirements were
codified in Rhode Island Air Pollution
Control Regulation No. 11, Petroleum
Liquids Marketing and Storage, and EPA
approved the program into the Rhode
Island SIP on December 17, 1993 (58 FR
65930). Rhode Island’s rule required
gasoline dispensing facilities throughout
the state to install Stage II vapor
recovery systems.
On December 13, 2013, Rhode Island
submitted a SIP revision consisting of
its revised Air Pollution Control
Regulation No. 11, Petroleum Liquids
Marketing and Storage. This SIP
revision includes regulatory
amendments that allow GDFs to
decommission their Stage II vapor
recovery systems as of December 25,
2013 and requires that all GDFs
equipped with Stage II vapor recovery
systems that are not compatible with
ORVR, decommission their Stage II
vapor recovery systems by December 22,
2017.
A GDF equipped with a Stage II vapor
recovery system that is not ORVRcompatible can apply for an exemption
to the Stage II removal requirement if
E:\FR\FM\24OCP1.SGM
24OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 206 / Friday, October 24, 2014 / Proposed Rules
such GDF will install, by December 22,
2017, air pollution control systems to
control tank excess vent emissions
resulting from that incompatibility.
These GDFs are then required to
continue to operate and maintain their
Stage II vapor recovery systems in
accordance with Rhode Island’s
regulations, until the time when such
Stage II vapor recovery system is ever
decommissioned. Also, GDFs with
ORVR-compatible Stage II vapor
recovery systems may choose not to
decommission as long as such systems
continue to be operated and maintained
in accordance with Rhode Island’s
regulations, until the time when such
Stage II vapor recovery system is ever
decommissioned.
In addition, the regulatory
amendments in the SIP revision also
include requirements for GDFs to
upgrade their Stage I vapor recovery
systems to CARB-certified Stage I EVR
systems or a Stage I vapor recovery
system composed of EVR system
components (Stage I EVR component
systems). As of December 25, 2013, the
upgrade to Stage I EVR systems or a
Stage I system composed of EVR
components is required upon facility
start-up for facilities beginning
operation or installing a fuel storage
tank. Also as of December 25, 2013, any
component of a pre-existing Stage I
vapor recovery system that is replaced,
is required to be replaced with a CARBcertified Stage I EVR component. The
Rhode Island regulation further requires
that all Stage I systems be CARBcertified Stage I EVR systems or Stage I
EVR component systems by December
25, 2020.
The December 13, 2013 SIP revision
also includes a narrative demonstration
supporting the discontinuation of the
Rhode Island Stage II vapor recovery
program. This demonstration consists of
an analysis that the Stage II vapor
recovery controls provide only de
minimis emission reductions due to the
prevalence of ORVR-equipped vehicles.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
III. EPA’s Evaluation of Rhode Island’s
SIP Revision
EPA has reviewed Rhode Island’s
revised Air Pollution Control Regulation
No. 11, Petroleum Liquids Marketing
and Storage, and accompanying SIP
narrative and has concluded that Rhode
Island’s December 13, 2013 SIP revision
is consistent with EPA’s widespread use
rule (77 FR 28772, May 16, 2012) and
EPA’s ‘‘Guidance on Removing Stage II
Gasoline Vapor Control Programs from
State Implementation Plans and
Assessing Comparable Measures’’ (EPA–
457/B–12–001; August 7, 2012),
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:28 Oct 23, 2014
Jkt 235001
hereafter referred to as EPA’s Guidance
Document.
Rhode Island’s December 13, 2013 SIP
revision includes a CAA section 110(l)
anti-back sliding demonstration based
on equations in EPA’s Guidance
Document. According to these
calculations, the potential loss of
refueling emission reductions from
removing Stage II vapor recovery
systems in 2013 (the effective date of the
regulation amendments) is 7.2 percent,
thus meeting the 10 percent de minimis
recommendation in EPA’s Guidance
Document.
In addition, Rhode Island’s December
13, 2013 SIP revision also includes
calculations illustrating that the overall
emissions effect of removing the Stage II
vapor recovery program would be an
increase of 69 tons in 2013. EPA’s 2011
National Emissions Inventory database,
Version 1, illustrates that Rhode Island’s
statewide anthropogenic VOC emissions
were about 22,248 tons (see
www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/
2011inventory.html), therefore the 69
annual tons of VOC emissions increase
calculated by Rhode Island are only
about 0.3 percent of the total
anthropogenic VOC emissions in Rhode
Island. Also, these foregone emissions
reductions in the near term continue to
diminish rapidly over time as ORVR
phase-in continues. Therefore, EPA
believes that the resulting temporary
increases in VOC emissions will not
interfere with attainment or
maintenance of the ozone NAAQS.
With respect to Stage I vapor recovery
requirements, Rhode Island’s revised
Regulation No. 11 is more stringent than
the previously approved version of the
rule, thus meeting the CAA section
110(l) anti-back sliding requirements.
As noted above, the revised rule
requires upgrades to a CARB-certified
EVR Stage I system or a Stage I system
made up of EVR components by
December 25, 2020, with an earlier
December 25, 2013 compliance date in
the case of a new facility or when
system components are being replaced.
CARB-certified Stage I EVR systems
have been certified to achieve a 98
percent reduction in VOC emissions, as
compared to 95 percent for pre-EVR
Stage I systems.
IV. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve Rhode
Island’s December 13, 2013 SIP revision.
Specifically, EPA is proposing to
approve Rhode Island’s revised Air
Pollution Control Regulation No. 11,
Petroleum Liquids Marketing and
Storage, and incorporate it into the
Rhode Island SIP. EPA is proposing to
approve this SIP revision because it
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
63593
meets all applicable requirements of the
Clean Air Act and EPA guidance, and it
will not interfere with attainment or
maintenance of the ozone NAAQS.
EPA is soliciting public comments on
the issues discussed in this notice or on
other relevant matters. These comments
will be considered before taking final
action. Interested parties may
participate in the Federal rulemaking
procedure by submitting written
comments to the EPA New England
Regional Office listed in the ADDRESSES
section of this Federal Register.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this proposed action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
E:\FR\FM\24OCP1.SGM
24OCP1
63594
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 206 / Friday, October 24, 2014 / Proposed Rules
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: September 11, 2014.
H. Curtis Spalding,
Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
[FR Doc. 2014–25354 Filed 10–23–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of
Engineers
33 CFR Part 328
40 CFR Parts 110, 112 116, 117, 122,
230, 232, 300, 302, and 401
[EPA–HQ–OW–2011–0880; FRL–9918–34–
OW]
RIN 2040–AF30
Definition of ‘‘Waters of the United
States’’ Under the Clean Water Act
Proposed Rule; Notice of Availability
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(Corps), Department of the Army,
Department of Defense; and
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of
availability.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCIES:
This document announces the
availability of the Science Advisory
Board’s (SAB) final peer review of the
EPA’s draft report Connectivity of
Streams and Wetlands to Downstream
16:28 Oct 23, 2014
Jkt 235001
Ms.
Donna Downing, Office of Water (4502–
T), Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone
number 202–566–2428; email address:
CWAwaters@epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
On April
21, 2014, EPA and the Corps published
the proposed rule ‘‘Definition of ‘Waters
of the United States’ Under the Clean
Water Act’’ in the Federal Register (79
FR 22188). The public comment for the
proposed rule closes on November 14,
2014. The independent SAB has
completed a peer review of the
proposed rule’s primary supporting
document, EPA’s draft report
Connectivity of Streams and Wetlands
to Downstream Waters: A Review and
Synthesis. The peer review was drafted
by the SAB’s Panel for the Review of the
EPA Water Body Connectivity Report
and approved by the chartered SAB.
The final peer review has been placed
as a supporting document in the docket
for this proposed rulemaking and is
available on the SAB’s Web site,
https://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/
sabpeople.nsf/WebCommittees/BOARD.
How can I get copies of this document
and other related information?
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
VerDate Sep<11>2014
The public comment for the
proposed rule closes on November 14,
2014.
DATES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
SUMMARY:
Waters: A Review and Synthesis. This
document has been placed in the docket
for the EPA and the Corps proposed rule
‘‘Definition of ‘Waters of the United
States’ Under the Clean Water Act.’’
1. Docket. EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–HQ–OW–2011–0880; FRL–
9901–47–OW. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Docket in the EPA Docket Center,
(EPA/DC) EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington,
DC. The EPA Docket Center Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Public Reading Room is
(202) 566–1744, and the telephone
number for the Water Docket is (202)
566–2426.
2. Electronic Access. You may access
this Federal Register document
electronically from the Government
Printing Office under the ‘‘Federal
Register’’ listings at FDSys (https://
www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/
collection.action?collectionCode=FR).
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Dated: October 14, 2014.
Benita Best-Wong,
Director, Office of Wetlands, Oceans and
Watersheds, Environmental Protection
Agency.
Dated: October 14, 2014.
James Hannon,
Chief, Operations and Regulatory Division,
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
[FR Doc. 2014–25138 Filed 10–23–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 174 and 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0008; FRL–9916–03]
Receipt of Several Pesticide Petitions
Filed for Residues of Pesticide
Chemicals In or On Various
Commodities
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of filing of petitions and
request for comment.
AGENCY:
This document announces the
Agency’s receipt of several initial filings
of pesticide petitions requesting the
establishment or modification of
regulations for residues of pesticide
chemicals in or on various commodities.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before November 24, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number and the pesticide petition
number (PP) of interest as shown in the
body of this document, by one of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert McNally, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (BPPD)
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\24OCP1.SGM
24OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 206 (Friday, October 24, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 63591-63594]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25354]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R01-OAR-2013-0818; A-1-FRL-9916-17-Region-1]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Rhode Island; Decommissioning of Stage II Vapor Recovery Systems
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the
State of Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management. This
revision includes regulatory amendments that allow gasoline dispensing
facilities (GDFs) to decommission their Stage II vapor recovery systems
as of December 25, 2013, and a demonstration that such removal is
consistent with the Clean Air Act and EPA guidance. This revision also
includes regulatory amendments that strengthen Rhode Island's
requirements for Stage I vapor recovery systems at GDFs. The intended
effect of this action is to propose approval of Rhode Island's revised
vapor recovery regulations.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before November 24,
2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-
R01-OAR-2013-0818 by one of the following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
2. E-Mail: arnold.anne@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (617) 918-0047.
4. Mail: ``Docket Identification Number EPA-R01-OAR-2013-0818,''
Anne Arnold, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England
Regional Office, Office of Ecosystem Protection, Air Quality Planning
Unit, 5 Post Office Square--Suite 100, (Mail code OEP05-2), Boston, MA
02109-3912.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver your comments to: Anne Arnold,
Manager, Air Quality Planning Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, Office of Ecosystem
Protection, Air Quality Planning Unit, 5 Post Office Square--Suite 100,
(Mail code OEP05-2), Boston, MA 02109-3912. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours of operation. The
Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday,
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding legal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R01-OAR-
2013-0818. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit through www.regulations.gov, or
email, information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected.
The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov your
email address will be automatically captured and included as part of
the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on
the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that
you include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at Office of Ecosystem Protection, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, Office of Ecosystem
Protection, Air Quality Planning Unit, 5 Post Office Square--Suite 100,
Boston, MA. EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the
contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official hours of
business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
legal holidays.
In addition, copies of the state submittal are also available for
public inspection during normal business hours, by appointment at the
State Air Agency: Office of Air Resources, Department of Environmental
Management, 235 Promenade Street, Providence, RI 02908-5767.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ariel Garcia, Air Quality Planning
Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional
Office, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 (Mail code: OEP05-2), Boston,
MA 02109-3912, telephone number (617) 918-1660, fax number (617) 918-
0660, email garcia.ariel@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever ``we,'' ``us,'' or ``our'' is
used, we mean EPA.
[[Page 63592]]
Organization of this document. The following outline is provided to
aid in locating information in this preamble.
I. Background and Purpose
II. Summary of Rhode Island's SIP Revision
III. EPA's Evaluation of Rhode Island's SIP Revision
IV. Proposed Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background and Purpose
On December 13, 2013, the Rhode Island Department of Environmental
Management submitted a revision to its State Implementation Plan (SIP).
The SIP revision consists of Rhode Island's revised Air Pollution
Control Regulation No. 11, Petroleum Liquids Marketing and Storage,
which has been revised to allow the decommissioning of Stage II vapor
recovery systems and to strengthen Stage I vapor recovery requirements.
The SIP submittal also includes a demonstration that removal of Stage
II vapor recovery systems in Rhode Island is consistent with the Clean
Air Act and EPA guidance.
Stage II and onboard refueling vapor recovery (ORVR) systems are
two types of emission control systems that capture fuel vapors from
vehicle gas tanks during refueling. Stage II vapor recovery systems are
installed at gasoline dispensing facilities (GDFs) and capture the
refueling fuel vapors at the gasoline pump. The system carries the
vapors back to the underground storage tank at the GDF to prevent the
vapors from escaping to the atmosphere. ORVR systems are carbon
canisters installed directly on automobiles to capture the fuel vapors
evacuated from the gasoline tank before they reach the nozzle. The fuel
vapors captured in the carbon canisters are then combusted in the
engine when the automobile is in operation.
Stage II vapor recovery systems and vehicle ORVR systems were
initially both required by the 1990 Amendments to the Clean Air Act
(CAA). Section 182(b)(3) of the CAA requires moderate and above ozone
nonattainment areas to implement Stage II vapor recovery programs.
Also, under CAA section 184(b)(2), states in the Ozone Transport Region
(OTR) are required to implement Stage II or comparable measures. CAA
section 202(a)(6) required EPA to promulgate regulations for ORVR for
light-duty vehicles (passenger cars). EPA adopted these requirements in
1994, at which point moderate ozone nonattainment areas were no longer
subject to the CAA section 182(b)(3) Stage II vapor recovery
requirements. ORVR equipment has been phased in for new passenger
vehicles beginning with model year 1998, and starting with model year
2001 for light-duty trucks and most heavy-duty gasoline powered
vehicles. ORVR equipment has been installed on nearly all new gasoline-
powered light-duty vehicles, light-duty trucks, and heavy-duty vehicles
since 2006.
During the phase-in of ORVR controls, Stage II has provided
volatile organic compound (VOC) reductions in ozone nonattainment areas
and certain attainment areas of the OTR. Congress recognized that ORVR
systems and Stage II vapor recovery systems would eventually become
largely redundant technologies, and provided authority to EPA to allow
states to remove Stage II vapor recovery programs from their SIPs after
EPA finds that ORVR is in ``widespread use.'' Effective May 16, 2012,
the date the final rule was published in the Federal Register (see 77
FR 28772), EPA determined that ORVR systems are in widespread use
nationwide for control of gasoline emissions during refueling of
vehicles at GDFs. Currently, more than 75 percent of gasoline refueling
nationwide occurs with ORVR-equipped vehicles, so Stage II vapor
recovery programs have become largely redundant control systems and
Stage II vapor recovery systems achieve an ever declining emissions
benefit as more ORVR-equipped vehicles continue to enter the on-road
motor vehicle fleet.\1\ In its May 16, 2012 rulemaking, EPA also
exercised its authority under CAA section 202(a)(6) to waive certain
federal statutory requirements for Stage II vapor recovery systems at
GDFs. This decision exempts all new ozone nonattainment areas
classified serious or above from the requirement to adopt Stage II
vapor recovery programs. Finally, EPA's May 16, 2012 rulemaking also
noted that any state currently implementing Stage II vapor recovery
programs may submit SIP revisions that would allow for the phase-out of
Stage II vapor recovery systems.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ In areas where certain types of vacuum-assist Stage II vapor
recovery systems are used, the differences in operational design
characteristics between ORVR and some configurations of these Stage
II vapor recovery systems result in the reduction of overall control
system efficiency compared to what could have been achieved relative
to the individual control efficiencies of either ORVR or stage II
emissions from the vehicle fuel tank.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stage I vapor recovery systems are systems that capture vapors
displaced from storage tanks at GDFs during gasoline tank truck
deliveries. When gasoline is delivered into an aboveground or
underground storage tank, vapors that were taking up space in the
storage tank are displaced by the gasoline entering the storage tank.
The Stage I vapor recovery systems route these displaced vapors into
the delivery truck's tank. Some vapors are vented when the storage tank
exceeds a specified pressure threshold, however the Stage I vapor
recovery systems greatly reduce the possibility of these displaced
vapors being released into the atmosphere.
Stage I vapor recovery systems have been in place since the 1970s.
EPA has issued the following guidance regarding Stage I systems:
``Design Criteria for Stage I Vapor Control Systems--Gasoline Service
Stations'' (November 1975, EPA Online Publication 450R75102), which is
regarded as the control techniques guideline (CTG) for the control of
VOC emissions from this source category; and the EPA document ``Model
Volatile Organic Compound Rules for Reasonably Available Control
Technology'' (Staff Working Draft, June 1992) contains a model Stage I
regulation.
In more recent years, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) has
required Stage I vapor recovery systems capable of achieving vapor
control efficiencies higher than those achieved by traditional systems.
These systems are commonly referred to as Enhanced Vapor Recovery (EVR)
systems.
II. Summary of Rhode Island's SIP Revision
Rhode Island adopted its Stage II Vapor Recovery Program in 1992 in
order to satisfy the requirements of sections 182(b)(3) and 184(b)(2)
of the CAA. The Rhode Island Stage II vapor recovery program
requirements were codified in Rhode Island Air Pollution Control
Regulation No. 11, Petroleum Liquids Marketing and Storage, and EPA
approved the program into the Rhode Island SIP on December 17, 1993 (58
FR 65930). Rhode Island's rule required gasoline dispensing facilities
throughout the state to install Stage II vapor recovery systems.
On December 13, 2013, Rhode Island submitted a SIP revision
consisting of its revised Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 11,
Petroleum Liquids Marketing and Storage. This SIP revision includes
regulatory amendments that allow GDFs to decommission their Stage II
vapor recovery systems as of December 25, 2013 and requires that all
GDFs equipped with Stage II vapor recovery systems that are not
compatible with ORVR, decommission their Stage II vapor recovery
systems by December 22, 2017.
A GDF equipped with a Stage II vapor recovery system that is not
ORVR-compatible can apply for an exemption to the Stage II removal
requirement if
[[Page 63593]]
such GDF will install, by December 22, 2017, air pollution control
systems to control tank excess vent emissions resulting from that
incompatibility. These GDFs are then required to continue to operate
and maintain their Stage II vapor recovery systems in accordance with
Rhode Island's regulations, until the time when such Stage II vapor
recovery system is ever decommissioned. Also, GDFs with ORVR-compatible
Stage II vapor recovery systems may choose not to decommission as long
as such systems continue to be operated and maintained in accordance
with Rhode Island's regulations, until the time when such Stage II
vapor recovery system is ever decommissioned.
In addition, the regulatory amendments in the SIP revision also
include requirements for GDFs to upgrade their Stage I vapor recovery
systems to CARB-certified Stage I EVR systems or a Stage I vapor
recovery system composed of EVR system components (Stage I EVR
component systems). As of December 25, 2013, the upgrade to Stage I EVR
systems or a Stage I system composed of EVR components is required upon
facility start-up for facilities beginning operation or installing a
fuel storage tank. Also as of December 25, 2013, any component of a
pre-existing Stage I vapor recovery system that is replaced, is
required to be replaced with a CARB-certified Stage I EVR component.
The Rhode Island regulation further requires that all Stage I systems
be CARB-certified Stage I EVR systems or Stage I EVR component systems
by December 25, 2020.
The December 13, 2013 SIP revision also includes a narrative
demonstration supporting the discontinuation of the Rhode Island Stage
II vapor recovery program. This demonstration consists of an analysis
that the Stage II vapor recovery controls provide only de minimis
emission reductions due to the prevalence of ORVR-equipped vehicles.
III. EPA's Evaluation of Rhode Island's SIP Revision
EPA has reviewed Rhode Island's revised Air Pollution Control
Regulation No. 11, Petroleum Liquids Marketing and Storage, and
accompanying SIP narrative and has concluded that Rhode Island's
December 13, 2013 SIP revision is consistent with EPA's widespread use
rule (77 FR 28772, May 16, 2012) and EPA's ``Guidance on Removing Stage
II Gasoline Vapor Control Programs from State Implementation Plans and
Assessing Comparable Measures'' (EPA-457/B-12-001; August 7, 2012),
hereafter referred to as EPA's Guidance Document.
Rhode Island's December 13, 2013 SIP revision includes a CAA
section 110(l) anti-back sliding demonstration based on equations in
EPA's Guidance Document. According to these calculations, the potential
loss of refueling emission reductions from removing Stage II vapor
recovery systems in 2013 (the effective date of the regulation
amendments) is 7.2 percent, thus meeting the 10 percent de minimis
recommendation in EPA's Guidance Document.
In addition, Rhode Island's December 13, 2013 SIP revision also
includes calculations illustrating that the overall emissions effect of
removing the Stage II vapor recovery program would be an increase of 69
tons in 2013. EPA's 2011 National Emissions Inventory database, Version
1, illustrates that Rhode Island's statewide anthropogenic VOC
emissions were about 22,248 tons (see www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2011inventory.html), therefore the 69 annual tons of VOC emissions
increase calculated by Rhode Island are only about 0.3 percent of the
total anthropogenic VOC emissions in Rhode Island. Also, these foregone
emissions reductions in the near term continue to diminish rapidly over
time as ORVR phase-in continues. Therefore, EPA believes that the
resulting temporary increases in VOC emissions will not interfere with
attainment or maintenance of the ozone NAAQS.
With respect to Stage I vapor recovery requirements, Rhode Island's
revised Regulation No. 11 is more stringent than the previously
approved version of the rule, thus meeting the CAA section 110(l) anti-
back sliding requirements. As noted above, the revised rule requires
upgrades to a CARB-certified EVR Stage I system or a Stage I system
made up of EVR components by December 25, 2020, with an earlier
December 25, 2013 compliance date in the case of a new facility or when
system components are being replaced. CARB-certified Stage I EVR
systems have been certified to achieve a 98 percent reduction in VOC
emissions, as compared to 95 percent for pre-EVR Stage I systems.
IV. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve Rhode Island's December 13, 2013 SIP
revision. Specifically, EPA is proposing to approve Rhode Island's
revised Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 11, Petroleum Liquids
Marketing and Storage, and incorporate it into the Rhode Island SIP.
EPA is proposing to approve this SIP revision because it meets all
applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act and EPA guidance, and it
will not interfere with attainment or maintenance of the ozone NAAQS.
EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in this
notice or on other relevant matters. These comments will be considered
before taking final action. Interested parties may participate in the
Federal rulemaking procedure by submitting written comments to the EPA
New England Regional Office listed in the ADDRESSES section of this
Federal Register.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this proposed action merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
[[Page 63594]]
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the
SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state,
and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on
tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: September 11, 2014.
H. Curtis Spalding,
Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
[FR Doc. 2014-25354 Filed 10-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P