2015 Annual Determination To Implement the Sea Turtle Observer Requirement, 63066-63077 [2014-25154]
Download as PDF
63066
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 204 / Wednesday, October 22, 2014 / Proposed Rules
B. Adding, in alphabetical order, the
definition of What Works Clearinghouse
Evidence Standards.
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
■
§ 77.1 Definitions that apply to all
Department programs.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
*
*
*
Evidence of promise means there is
empirical evidence to support the
theoretical linkage(s) between at least
one critical component and at least one
relevant outcome presented in the logic
model for the proposed process,
product, strategy, or practice.
Specifically, evidence of promise means
the conditions in paragraphs (a) and (b)
of this section are met:
(a) There is at least one study that is
a—
(1) Correlational study with statistical
controls for selection bias;
(2) Quasi-experimental design study
that meets the What Works
Clearinghouse Evidence Standards with
reservations; or
(3) Randomized controlled trial that
meets the What Works Clearinghouse
Evidence Standards with or without
reservations.
(b) The study referenced in paragraph
(a) found a statistically significant or
substantively important (defined as a
difference of 0.25 standard deviations or
larger) favorable association between at
least one critical component and one
relevant outcome presented in the logic
model for the proposed process,
product, strategy, or practice.
*
*
*
*
*
Large sample means an analytic
sample of 350 or more students (or other
single analysis units), or 50 or more
groups (such as classrooms or schools)
that contain 10 or more students (or
other single analysis units).
*
*
*
*
*
Moderate evidence of effectiveness
means one of the following conditions
is met:
(a) There is at least one study of the
effectiveness of the process, product,
strategy, or practice being proposed that
meets the What Works Clearinghouse
Evidence Standards without
reservations, found a statistically
significant favorable impact on a
relevant outcome (with no statistically
significant and overriding unfavorable
impacts on that outcome for relevant
populations in the study or in other
studies of the intervention reviewed by
and reported on by the What Works
Clearinghouse), and includes a sample
that overlaps with the populations or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 Oct 21, 2014
Jkt 235001
settings proposed to receive the process,
product, strategy, or practice.
(b) There is at least one study of the
effectiveness of the process, product,
strategy, or practice being proposed that
meets the What Works Clearinghouse
Evidence Standards with reservations,
found a statistically significant favorable
impact on a relevant outcome (with no
statistically significant and overriding
unfavorable impacts on that outcome for
relevant populations in the study or in
other studies of the intervention
reviewed by and reported on by the
What Works Clearinghouse), includes a
sample that overlaps with the
populations or settings proposed to
receive the process, product, strategy, or
practice, and includes a large sample
and a multi-site sample. (Note: multiple
studies can cumulatively meet the large
and multi-site sample requirements as
long as each study meets the other
requirements in this paragraph.)
*
*
*
*
*
Quasi-experimental design study
means a study using a design that
attempts to approximate an
experimental design by identifying a
comparison group that is similar to the
treatment group in important respects.
These studies, depending on design and
implementation, can meet What Works
Clearinghouse Evidence Standards with
reservations (but not What Works
Clearinghouse Evidence Standards
without reservations).
*
*
*
*
*
Randomized controlled trial means a
study that employs random assignment
of, for example, students, teachers,
classrooms, schools, or districts to
receive the intervention being evaluated
(the treatment group) or not to receive
the intervention (the control group). The
estimated effectiveness of the
intervention is the difference between
the average outcomes for the treatment
group and for the control group. These
studies, depending on design and
implementation, can meet What Works
Clearinghouse Evidence Standards
without reservations.
*
*
*
*
*
Strong evidence of effectiveness
means one of the following conditions
is met:
(a) There is at least one study of the
effectiveness of the process, product,
strategy, or practice being proposed that
meets the What Works Clearinghouse
Evidence Standards without
reservations, found a statistically
significant favorable impact on a
relevant outcome (with no statistically
significant and overriding unfavorable
impacts on that outcome for relevant
populations in the study or in other
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
studies of the intervention reviewed by
and reported on by the What Works
Clearinghouse), includes a sample that
overlaps with the populations and
settings proposed to receive the process,
product, strategy, or practice, and
includes a large sample and a multi-site
sample. (Note: multiple studies can
cumulatively meet the large and multisite sample requirements as long as each
study meets the other requirements in
this paragraph.)
(b) There are at least two studies of
the effectiveness of the process, product,
strategy, or practice being proposed,
each of which: Meets the What Works
Clearinghouse Evidence Standards with
reservations, found a statistically
significant favorable impact on a
relevant outcome (with no statistically
significant and overriding unfavorable
impacts on that outcome for relevant
populations in the studies or in other
studies of the intervention reviewed by
and reported on by the What Works
Clearinghouse), includes a sample that
overlaps with the populations and
settings proposed to receive the process,
product, strategy, or practice, and
includes a large sample and a multi-site
sample.
*
*
*
*
*
What Works Clearinghouse Evidence
Standards means the standards set forth
in the What Works Clearinghouse
Procedures and Standards Handbook
(Version 3.0, March 2014), which can be
found at the following link: https://
ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/
DocumentSum.aspx?sid=19.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2014–24929 Filed 10–21–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 222
[Docket No. 140829733–4733–01]
RIN 0648–BE35
2015 Annual Determination To
Implement the Sea Turtle Observer
Requirement
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) publishes a
proposed Annual Determination (AD)
for 2015, pursuant to its authority under
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 204 / Wednesday, October 22, 2014 / Proposed Rules
the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
Through the AD, NMFS identifies U.S.
fisheries operating in the Atlantic
Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and Pacific
Ocean that will be required to take
observers upon NMFS’ request. The
purpose of observing identified fisheries
is to learn more about sea turtle
interactions in a given fishery, evaluate
measures to prevent or reduce sea turtle
takes and to implement the prohibition
against sea turtle takes. Fisheries
identified on the 2015 AD (see Table 1)
will be eligible to carry observers as of
January 1, 2015 and will remain on the
AD for a five year period. The fisheries
listed on the final determination will be
required to carry observers upon NMFS’
request until December 31, 2019.
DATES: Comments must be received by
November 21, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on the proposed rule, identified by
‘‘NOAA–NMFS–2014–0108’’ by any of
the following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic comments through the
Federal eRulemaking portal: https://
www.regulations.gov (follow
instructions for submitting comments).
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Chief, Marine Mammal and Sea Turtle
Conservation Division, Attn: Sea Turtle
Annual Determination, Office of
Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910.
Comments regarding the burden-hour
estimates, or any other aspect of the
collection of information requirements
contained in this rule, should be
submitted in writing to Chief, Marine
Mammal and Sea Turtle Conservation
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver
Spring, MD 20910, and to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs at
OIRA_submissions@omb.eop.gov.
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://
www.regulations.gov without change.
All Personal Identifying Information
(e.g., name, address, etc.) voluntarily
submitted by the commenter may be
publicly accessible. Do not submit
Confidential Business Information or
otherwise sensitive or protected
information. NMFS will accept
anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in
the required fields, if you wish to
remain anonymous). Attachments to
electronic comments will be accepted in
Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or
Adobe PDF file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara
McNulty, Office of Protected Resources,
301–427–8402; Ellen Keane, Greater
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 Oct 21, 2014
Jkt 235001
Atlantic Region, 978–282–8476; Dennis
Klemm, Southeast Region, 727–824–
5312; Dan Lawson, West Coast Region,
562–980–3209; Irene Kelly, Pacific
Islands Region, 808–725–5141.
Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the
hearing impaired may call the Federal
Information Relay Service at 1–800–
877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
Eastern time, Monday through Friday,
excluding Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Availability of Published Materials
Information regarding the Marine
Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) List of
Fisheries (LOF) may be obtained at
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/
interactions/lof/ and information
regarding Marine Mammal Stock
Assessment Reports may be obtained at
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/sars/ or
from any NMFS Regional Office at the
addresses listed below:
• NMFS, Greater Atlantic Region, 55
Great Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA
01930;
• NMFS, Southeast Region, 263 13th
Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701;
• NMFS, West Coast Region, 501 W.
Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach,
CA 90802;
• NMFS, Pacific Islands Region,
Protected Resources, 1845 Wasp Blvd.,
Building 176. Honolulu, HI 96818.
Purpose of the Sea Turtle Observer
Requirement
Under the ESA, 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.,
NMFS has the responsibility to
implement programs to conserve marine
life listed as endangered or threatened.
All sea turtles found in U.S. waters are
listed as either endangered or
threatened under the ESA. Kemp’s
ridley (Lepidochelys kempii),
loggerhead (Caretta caretta; North
Pacific distinct population segment),
leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea), and
hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata) sea
turtles are listed as endangered.
Loggerhead (Caretta caretta; Northwest
Atlantic distinct population segment),
green (Chelonia mydas), and olive
ridley (Lepidochelys olivacea) sea
turtles are listed as threatened, except
for breeding colony populations of green
turtles in Florida and on the Pacific
coast of Mexico, and breeding colony
populations of olive ridleys on the
Pacific coast of Mexico, which are listed
as endangered. Due to the inability to
distinguish between populations of
green and olive ridley turtles away from
the nesting beach, NMFS considers
these turtles endangered wherever they
occur in U.S. waters. While some sea
turtle populations have shown signs of
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
63067
recovery, many populations continue to
decline.
Incidental take, or bycatch, in fishing
gear is the primary anthropogenic
source of sea turtle injury and mortality
in U.S. waters. Section 9 of the ESA
prohibits the take (including harassing,
harming, pursuing, hunting, shooting,
wounding, killing, trapping, capturing,
or collecting or attempting to engage in
any such conduct), including incidental
take, of endangered sea turtles. Pursuant
to section 4(d) of the ESA, NMFS has
issued regulations extending the
prohibition of take, with exceptions, to
threatened sea turtles (50 CFR 223.205
and 223.206). Section 11 of the ESA
provides for civil and criminal penalties
for anyone who violates a regulation
issued to implement the prohibition of
take and the issuance of regulations to
enforce the take prohibitions. NMFS
may grant exceptions to the take
prohibitions with an incidental take
statement or an incidental take permit
issued pursuant to ESA section 7 or 10,
respectively. To do so, NMFS must
determine the activity that will result in
incidental take is not likely to
jeopardize the continued existence of
the affected listed species. For some
Federal fisheries and most state
fisheries, NMFS has not granted an
exception for incidental takes of sea
turtles primarily because we lack
information about fishery-sea turtle
interactions.
The most effective way for NMFS to
learn more about sea turtle-fishery
interactions in order to implement the
take prohibitions and prevent or
minimize take is to place observers
aboard fishing vessels. In 2007, NMFS
issued a regulation (50 CFR 222.402)
establishing procedures to annually
identify, pursuant to specified criteria
and after notice and opportunity for
comment, those fisheries in which the
agency intends to place observers (72 FR
43176, August 3, 2007). These
regulations specify that NMFS may
place observers on U.S. fishing vessels,
commercial or recreational, operating in
U.S. territorial waters, the U.S.
exclusive economic zone (EEZ), or on
the high seas, or on vessels that are
otherwise subject to the jurisdiction of
the United States. Failure to comply
with the requirements under this rule
may result in civil or criminal penalties
under the ESA.
NMFS will pay the direct costs for
vessels to carry observers. These include
observer salary and insurance costs.
NMFS may also evaluate other potential
direct costs, should they arise. Once
selected, a fishery will be eligible to be
observed for a period of five years
without further action by NMFS. This
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
63068
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 204 / Wednesday, October 22, 2014 / Proposed Rules
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
will enable NMFS to develop an
appropriate sampling protocol to
investigate whether, how, when, where,
and under what conditions incidental
takes are occurring; to evaluate whether
existing measures are minimizing or
preventing takes; and to implement ESA
take prohibitions and conserve turtles.
Process for Developing an Annual
Determination
Pursuant to 50 CFR 222.402, NOAA’s
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries
(AA), in consultation with Regional
Administrators and Fisheries Science
Center Directors, develops a proposed
AD identifying which fisheries are
required to carry observers, if requested,
to monitor potential interactions with
sea turtles. NMFS provides an
opportunity for public comment on any
proposed determination. The
determination is based on the best
available scientific, commercial, or
other information regarding sea turtlefishery interactions; sea turtle
distribution; sea turtle strandings;
fishing techniques, gears used, target
species, seasons and areas fished; and/
or qualitative data from logbooks or
fisher reports. Specifically, this
determination is based on the extent to
which:
(1) The fishery operates in the same
waters and at the same time as sea
turtles are present;
(2) The fishery operates at the same
time or prior to elevated sea turtle
strandings; or
(3) The fishery uses a gear or
technique that is known or likely to
result in incidental take of sea turtles
based on documented or reported takes
in the same or similar fisheries; and
(4) NMFS intends to monitor the
fishery and anticipates that it will have
the funds to do so.
The AA uses the most recent version
of the annually published MMPA List of
Fisheries (LOF) as the comprehensive
list of commercial fisheries for
consideration. The LOF includes all
known state and Federal commercial
fisheries that occur in U.S. waters and
on the high seas. However, in preparing
an AD we do not rely on the three-part
MMPA classification scheme used for
fisheries on the LOF. In addition, unlike
the LOF, an AD may include
recreational fisheries likely to interact
with sea turtles on the basis of the best
available information.
NMFS consulted with appropriate
state and Federal fisheries officials to
identify which fisheries, both
commercial and recreational, should be
considered in the AD.
Recommendations were received from
six state agencies. Gear types
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 Oct 21, 2014
Jkt 235001
recommended for consideration
included gillnet, trawl, trap/pot, pound
net, seine, and hook-and line. NMFS
considered all recommendations
carefully in developing the proposed list
of fisheries to be included. Although the
comments and recommendations
provided to NMFS by states were based
upon the best available information on
their fisheries, NMFS received more
recommendations for fisheries to
include on the 2015 AD than is feasible
to propose at this time based on the four
previously noted criteria (50 CFR
222.402(a)). The proposed AD is not an
exhaustive or comprehensive list of all
fisheries with documented or suspected
takes of sea turtles. For other fisheries,
NMFS may already be addressing
incidental take through another
mechanism (e.g., rulemaking to
implement modifications to fishing gear
and/or practices), may be observing the
fishery under a separate statutory
authority, or will consider including
them in future ADs based on the four
previously noted criteria (50 CFR
222.402(a)). Note also that fisheries not
included on the 2015 AD may still be
observed under a different authority
than the ESA (e.g., MMPA, MSA).
Notice of the final determination will
be published in the Federal Register
and made in writing to individuals
permitted for each fishery identified on
the AD. NMFS will also notify state
agencies and provide notification
through publication in local
newspapers, radio broadcasts, and other
means, as appropriate. Once included in
the final determination, a fishery will
remain eligible for observer coverage for
a period of five years to enable the
design of an appropriate sampling
program and to ensure collection of
sufficient scientific data for analysis. If
NMFS determines that more than five
years are needed to obtain sufficient
scientific data, NMFS will include the
fishery in the proposed AD again prior
to the end of the fifth year.
In the 2010 AD, NMFS identified 19
fisheries that were required to carry
observers for a period of five years,
through December 31, 2014, if requested
by NMFS. Because of a lack of resources
to implement new observer programs or
expand existing programs, NMFS has
not identified any additional fisheries in
the AD since 2010.
Review of Fisheries Listed on the 2010
AD
Eleven of the 19 fisheries listed on the
2010 AD are proposed for inclusion in
the 2015 AD and are described further
below. These fisheries include: The
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of
Mexico shrimp trawl fishery, California
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Halibut, White Seabass and Other
Species Set Gillnet Fishery (>3.5 in
mesh), California Yellowtail, Barracuda,
and White Seabass Drift Gillnet Fishery
(mesh size >3.5 in. and <14 in.),
Chesapeake Bay Inshore Gillnet Fishery,
Long Island Inshore Gillnet Fishery,
North Carolina Inshore Gillnet Fishery,
Atlantic blue crab trap/pot, Atlantic
Mixed Species Trap/Pot Fishery,
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American
lobster trap/pot, Mid-Atlantic Haul/
Beach Seine Fishery, and the MidAtlantic menhaden purse seine.
There were eight fisheries included
on 2010 AD that are not proposed for
inclusion in the 2015 AD. However,
NMFS may determine that any of these
fisheries should be included in a
subsequent AD. A summary of these
eight fisheries is provided below.
Atlantic Shellfish Bottom Trawl Fishery
The Atlantic shellfish bottom trawl
fishery (estimated >58 vessels/persons)
encompasses the calico scallop trawl,
crab trawl, Georgia/South Carolina/
Maryland whelk trawl, Gulf of Maine/
Mid-Atlantic sea scallop trawl, and Gulf
of Maine northern shrimp trawl (71 FR
2006, January 4, 2006). This fishery
extends from Maine through Florida.
The fishery is managed through Federal
and interstate fishery management plans
(FMPs).
This fishery is classified as Category
III on the MMPA LOF; however,
portions of the fishery have been
observed at low levels under the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(MSA) authority and by the Georgia
Department of Natural Resources (GA
DNR). Since 2010, under the authority
of the MSA, and the AD, NMFS has
observed trips in this fishery, including
33 trips in 2010, 10 trips in 2011, 12
trips in 2012, and 20 trips in 2013.
Bottom trawl gear is known to interact
with sea turtles. However, as noted
above, this fishery is currently observed
under MSA authority. In accordance
with the criteria for listing a fishery on
the AD, described above, NMFS is not
proposing this fishery for inclusion in
the 2015 AD because NMFS does not
intend to monitor the fishery beyond the
existing coverage.
Mid-Atlantic Bottom Trawl Fishery
Bottom otter trawl nets include a
variety of net types, including flynets,
which are high profile trawls. The MidAtlantic bottom trawl fishery includes
both the Mid-Atlantic bottom trawl
fishery and the Mid-Atlantic flynet
fishery as defined on the LOF.
The Mid-Atlantic bottom trawl fishery
(631 vessels/persons), uses bottom trawl
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 204 / Wednesday, October 22, 2014 / Proposed Rules
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
gear to target species including, but not
limited to, bluefish, croaker, monkfish,
summer flounder (fluke), winter
flounder, silver hake (whiting), spiny
dogfish, smooth dogfish, scup, and
black sea bass. The fishery occurs yearround from Cape Cod, Massachusetts, to
Cape Hatteras, North Carolina, in waters
west of 72°30′ W. long. and north of a
line extending due east from the North
Carolina/South Carolina border. The
gear is managed by several state and
Federal FMPs.
The Mid-Atlantic bottom trawl fishery
and the Mid-Atlantic flynet fishery are
currently classified as Category II on the
MMPA LOF, which authorizes NMFS to
observe these fisheries for marine
mammal interactions, and to collect
information on sea turtles should a take
occur on an observed trip. These
fisheries are also observed through MSA
authority. Between 2007–2011,
estimated observer coverage year-round
in this fishery was 3%, 3%, 5%, 6%,
and 8%, respectively, as reported in
NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS–
NE–228, the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf of
Mexico Marine Mammal Stock
Assessments—2013.
Bottom trawl gear is known to interact
with sea turtles. However, as noted
above, components of this fishery are
currently observed under MSA and
MMPA authority. In accordance with
the criteria for listing a fishery on the
AD, described above, NMFS is not
proposing this fishery for inclusion in
the 2015 AD because NMFS does not
intend to monitor the fishery beyond the
existing coverage.
Mid-Atlantic Mid-Water Trawl
(Including Pair Trawl) Fishery
The Mid-Atlantic mid-water trawl
fishery (estimated 322 vessels/persons)
primarily targets Atlantic mackerel,
chub mackerel, and miscellaneous other
pelagic species. This fishery consists of
both single and pair trawls, which are
designed, capable, or used to fish for
pelagic species with no portion of the
gear designed to be operated in contact
with the bottom. The fishery for Atlantic
mackerel occurs primarily from
southern New England through the MidAtlantic from January to March and in
the Gulf of Maine during the summer
and fall (May to December).
The Mid-Atlantic mid-water trawl
fishery is currently classified as
Category II on the MMPA LOF, which
authorizes NMFS to observe this fishery
for marine mammal interactions, and to
collect information on sea turtles should
a take occur on an observed trip. During
2007–2011, estimated observer coverage
year-round in this fishery was 3.9%,
13%, 13%, 25%, and 41% respectively,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 Oct 21, 2014
Jkt 235001
as reported in NOAA Technical
Memorandum NMFS–NE–228, the U.S.
Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Marine
Mammal Stock Assessments—2013.
Trawl gear is known to interact with sea
turtles. However, as noted above, this
fishery is currently observed under
MSA and MMPA authority. In
accordance with the criteria for listing a
fishery on the AD, described above,
NMFS is not proposing this fishery for
inclusion in the 2015 AD because NMFS
does not intend to monitor the fishery
beyond the existing coverage.
Mid-Atlantic Gillnet Fishery
The Mid-Atlantic gillnet fishery
(estimated 5,509 vessels/persons) targets
monkfish, spiny dogfish, smooth
dogfish, bluefish, weakfish, menhaden,
spot, croaker, striped bass, large and
small coastal sharks, Spanish mackerel,
king mackerel, American shad, black
drum, skate spp., yellow perch, white
perch, herring, scup, kingfish, spotted
seatrout, and butterfish. The fishery
uses drift and sink gillnets, including
nets set in a sink, stab, set, strike, or
drift fashion, with some unanchored
drift or sink nets used to target specific
species. The dominant material is
monofilament twine with stretched
mesh sizes from 2.5–12 in. (6.4–30.5
cm), and string lengths from 150–8,400
ft. (46–2,560 m). This fishery operates
year-round west of a line drawn at
72°30′ W. long. south to 36°33.03′ N. lat.
and east to the eastern edge of the EEZ
and north of the North Carolina/South
Carolina border, not including waters
where inshore gillnet fisheries (i.e.,
Chesapeake Bay, North Carolina, Long
Island Sound inshore gillnet fisheries)
operate in bays, estuaries, and rivers.
This fishery includes any residual large
pelagic driftnet effort in the MidAtlantic and any shark and dogfish
gillnet effort in the Mid-Atlantic zone
described. The fishing occurs right off
the beach (6 ft. [1.8 m]) or in nearshore
coastal waters to offshore waters (250 ft.
[76 m]).
Gear in this fishery is managed by
several Federal FMPs and Interstate
FMPs managed by the Atlantic States
Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC).
These fisheries are primarily managed
by total allowable catch (TAC);
individual trip limits (quotas); effort
caps (limited number of days at sea per
vessel); time and area closures; and gear
restrictions and modifications.
This fishery is classified as Category
I on the MMPA LOF, which authorizes
NMFS to observe this fishery in state
and Federal waters for marine mammal
interactions and to collect information
on sea turtles should a take occur on an
observed trip. During 2007–2011,
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
63069
estimated observer coverage year-round
in this fishery was 6%, 3%, 3%, 4%,
and 2% respectively, as reported in
NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS–
NE–228, the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf of
Mexico Marine Mammal Stock
Assessments—2013.
Gillnet gear is known to interact with
sea turtles. However, as noted above,
this fishery is currently observed under
MSA and MMPA authority. In
accordance with the criteria for listing a
fishery on the AD, described above,
NMFS is not proposing this fishery for
inclusion in the 2015 AD because NMFS
does not intend to monitor the fishery
beyond the existing coverage.
Northeast Sink Gillnet Fishery
The Northeast sink gillnet fishery
(estimated 4,375 vessels/persons) targets
Atlantic cod, haddock, pollock,
yellowtail flounder, winter flounder,
witch flounder, American plaice,
windowpane flounder, spiny dogfish,
monkfish, silver hake, red hake, white
hake, ocean pout, skate spp, mackerel,
redfish, and shad. This fishery uses sink
gillnet gear, which is anchored gillnet
(bottom-tending net) gear fished in the
lower one-third of the water column.
The dominant material is monofilament
twine with stretched mesh sizes from 6–
12 in (15–30.5 cm) and string lengths
from 600–10,500 ft. (183–3,200 m),
depending on the target species. Large
mesh (10–14 in [25–35.6 cm]) sink
gillnets, either tied down or set upright
without floats using a polyfoam core
floatline, are used when targeting
monkfish. The fishery operates from the
U.S.-Canada border to Long Island, New
York, at 72°30′ W. long. south to
36°33.03′ N. lat. (corresponding with the
Virginia/North Carolina border) and east
to the eastern edge of the EEZ, including
the Gulf of Maine, Georges Bank, and
Southern New England, and excluding
Long Island Sound or other waters
where gillnet fisheries are classified as
Category III on the MMPA LOF. Fishing
effort occurs year-round, peaking from
May to July primarily on continental
shelf regions in depths from 30–750 ft.
(9–228.6 m), with some nets deeper than
800 ft. (244 m).
Several interstate and Federal FMPs
manage this fishery. In addition, the
Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction
Plan and the Harbor Porpoise Take
Reduction Plan manage the fishery to
reduce the risk of entanglement of right,
humpback, and fin whales, and harbor
porpoises, respectively. The fishery is
primarily managed through TAC limits;
individual trip limits (quotas); effort
caps (limited number of days at sea per
vessel); time and area closures; and gear
restrictions.
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
63070
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 204 / Wednesday, October 22, 2014 / Proposed Rules
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
This fishery is classified as Category
I on the MMPA LOF, which authorizes
NMFS to observe this fishery in state
and Federal waters for marine mammal
interactions and to collect information
on sea turtles should a take occur on an
observed trip. During 2007–2011,
estimated observer coverage year-round
in this fishery was 7%, 5%, 4%, 17%,
and 19% respectively, as reported in
NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS–
NE–228, the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf of
Mexico Marine Mammal Stock
Assessments—2013.
Gillnet gear is known to interact with
sea turtles. However, as noted above,
this fishery is currently observed under
MSA and MMPA authority. In
accordance with the criteria for listing a
fishery on the AD, described above,
NMFS is not proposing this fishery for
inclusion in the 2015 AD because NMFS
does not intend to monitor the fishery
beyond the existing coverage.
Southeast Atlantic Gillnet Fishery
The Southeast Atlantic gillnet fishery
(estimated 357 vessels/persons) targets
finfish, including king mackerel,
Spanish mackerel, whiting, bluefish,
pompano, spot, croaker, little tunny,
bonita, jack crevalle, cobia, and striped
mullet. This fishery does not include
gillnet effort targeting sharks as part of
the Southeastern U.S. Atlantic shark
gillnet fishery. This fishery uses gillnets
set in sink, stab, set, or strike fashion.
The fishery operates in waters south of
a line extending due east from the North
Carolina-South Carolina border and
south and east of the fishery
management council demarcation line
between the Atlantic Ocean and the
Gulf of Mexico. The majority of fishing
effort occurs in Federal waters since
South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida
prohibit the use of gillnets, with limited
exceptions, in state waters.
Fishing for king mackerel, Spanish
mackerel, cobia, cero, and little tunny in
Federal waters is managed under the
Coastal Migratory Pelagic Resources
FMP. None of the other target species
are Federally-managed under the MSA.
In state waters, state and ASMFC
Interstate FMPs apply.
This fishery is classified as Category
II on the MMPA LOF, which authorizes
NMFS to observe this fishery in state
and federal waters for marine mammal
interactions, and to collect information
on sea turtles should a take occur on an
observed trip. NMFS has previously
observed this fishery at moderate levels,
primarily focused on target catch and
bycatch species other than sea turtles.
No observer coverage has been achieved
since this fishery was listed on the 2010
AD. NMFS is not proposing this fishery
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 Oct 21, 2014
Jkt 235001
for inclusion in the 2015 AD as NMFS
does not intend to monitor this fishery
specifically for sea turtles at this time.
Virginia Pound Net Fishery
The Virginia pound net fishery
(estimated 67 vessels/persons) targets
species, including croaker, menhaden,
striped bass, and spot, using stationary
gear in nearshore Virginia waters,
primarily in the Chesapeake Bay and its
tributaries. Pound net gear includes a
leader posted perpendicular to the
shoreline and extending outward, which
funnels the fish into the pound, where
the catch accumulates. This fishery
includes all pound net effort in Virginia
State waters, including waters inside the
Chesapeake Bay. The fishery is managed
under Interstate FMPs for Atlantic
croaker and spot.
The Virginia pound net fishery is
currently classified as Category II on the
MMPA LOF, which authorizes NMFS to
observe this fishery for marine mammal
interactions, and to collect information
on sea turtles should a take occur on an
observed trip. Loggerhead, Kemp’s
ridley, leatherback, and green turtles
have been observed taken in this
fishery. The Northeast Fisheries
Observer Program conducted
monitoring in this fishery in 2009 from
August 23 to October 4 and in 2010
from mid-May to early August.
NMFS currently requires the use of a
modified pound net leader in certain
areas of the Chesapeake Bay to reduce
entanglements of sea turtles in this gear
type (71 FR 36024, June 23, 2006). This
fishery operates at the same time as
historically elevated sea turtle
strandings.
On April 17, 2014, NMFS published
a proposed rule (79 FR 21695) to amend
the Bottlenose Dolphin Take Reduction
Plan (BDTRP) and its implementing
regulations under the Marine Mammal
Protection Act (MMPA). The BDTRP
rule proposes the year-round use of
modified pound net leaders for offshore
Virginia pound nets in specified waters
of the lower mainstem Chesapeake Bay
and coastal state waters. Virginia pound
net-related definitions, gear
prohibitions, and non-regulatory
measures are also proposed. Both
regulatory and non-regulatory measures
proposed in that rule are based on the
Bottlenose Dolphin Take Reduction
Team’s consensus recommendations.
The implementation of this final
regulation would benefit sea turtles.
While the Virginia pound net fishery
remains a concern for sea turtle
incidental take, NMFS is not proposing
its inclusion on the 2015 AD because
NMFS does not intend to monitor the
fishery at this time. Existing regulations
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
to address sea turtle mortality in the
pound net leaders and proposed
regulations to address bottlenose
dolphin mortality in pound net leaders
provide benefit to sea turtles. Further,
most of the takes that occur in the
pound are live turtles that are released
uninjured and, when observed, an
alternative platform is used.
U.S. Mid-Atlantic Mixed Species Stop
Seine/Weir/Pound Net (Except the
North Carolina Roe Mullet Stop Net)
Fishery
The Mid-Atlantic mixed species stop
seine/weir/pound net fishery (unknown
number of vessels/persons) targets
several species, including, but not
limited to, weakfish, striped bass, shark,
catfish, menhaden, flounder, gizzard
shad, and white perch. The fishery uses
fixed or staked net gear (pound net,
weir, staked trap) from Nantucket
Sound to Chesapeake Bay (60 FR 31681,
June 16, 1995); the Virginia pound net
and the North Carolina roe mullet stop
net fisheries are not included as part of
this fishery.
This fishery is classified as Category
III on the MMPA LOF and was listed on
the 2010 AD, but it has never been
observed. As discussed above, this gear
type is known to interact with sea
turtles, however, NMFS does not intend
to monitor the fishery at this time and
is not proposing this fishery for
inclusion in the 2015 AD.
Implementation of Observer Coverage
in a Fishery Listed in the 2015 AD
As part of the proposed 2015 AD,
NMFS has included, to the extent
practicable, information on the fisheries
or gear types to be observed, geographic
and seasonal scope of coverage, and any
other relevant information. For each of
these fisheries or gear types, NMFS
intends to monitor the fishery and
anticipates that it will have the funds to
do so. After publication of a final AD,
a 30-day delay in effective date for
implementing observer coverage will
follow, except for those fisheries where
the AA has determined that there is
good cause pursuant to the
Administrative Procedure Act to make
the rule effective without a 30-day
delay.
The design of any observer program
for fisheries identified through the AD
process, including how observers would
be allocated to individual vessels, will
vary among fisheries, fishing sectors,
gear types, and geographic regions and
will ultimately be determined by the
individual NMFS Regional Office,
Science Center, and/or observer
program. During the program design,
NMFS will be guided by the following
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 204 / Wednesday, October 22, 2014 / Proposed Rules
standards for distributing and placing
observers among fisheries identified in
the AD and among vessels in those
fisheries:
(1) The requirement to obtain the best
available scientific information;
(2) The requirement that observers be
assigned fairly and equitably among
fisheries and among vessels in a fishery;
(3) The requirement that no
individual person or vessel, or group of
persons or vessels, be subject to
inappropriate, excessive observer
coverage; and
(4) The need to minimize costs and
avoid duplication, where practicable.
Vessels subject to observer coverage
under the AD must comply with
observer safety requirements specified
at 50 CFR 600.725 and 50 CFR 600.746.
Specifically, 50 CFR 600.746(c) requires
vessels to provide adequate and safe
conditions for carrying an observer and
conditions that allow for operation of
normal observer functions. To provide
such conditions, a vessel must comply
with the applicable regulations
regarding observer accommodations (see
50 CFR parts 229, 300, 600, 622, 635,
648, 660, and 679) and possess a current
United States Coast Guard Commercial
Fishing Vessel Safety Examination decal
or a USCG certificate of examination. A
vessel that fails to meet these
requirements at the time an observer is
to be deployed on the vessel is
prohibited from fishing (50 CFR
600.746(f)) unless NMFS determines
that an alternative platform (e.g., a
second vessel) may be used, or
determines that a vessel with
inadequate or unsafe facilities is not
required to take an observer under 50
CFR 222.404. In any case, all fishermen
on a vessel must cooperate in the
operation of observer functions.
Observer programs designed or carried
out in accordance with 50 CFR 222.404
would be required to be consistent with
existing observer-related NOAA policies
and regulations, such as those under the
Fair Labor and Standards Act (29 U.S.C.
201 et seq.), the Service Contract Act (41
U.S.C. 351 et seq.), Observer Health and
Safety regulations (50 CFR part 600),
and other relevant policies.
Again, note that fisheries not included
on the 2015 AD may still be observed
under a different authority than the ESA
(e.g., MMPA, MSA). Additional
information on observer programs in
commercial fisheries can be found on
the NMFS National Observer Program’s
Web site: https://www.st.nmfs.noaa.gov/
observer-home/; links to individual
regional observer programs may also be
found on this Web site.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 Oct 21, 2014
Jkt 235001
Sea Turtle Distribution
Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico
Sea turtle species found in waters of
the Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico
include green, hawksbill, Kemp’s ridley,
leatherback, and loggerhead turtles. The
waters off the U.S. east coast and Gulf
of Mexico provide important foraging,
breeding, and migrating habitat for these
species. Further, the southeastern
United States, from North Carolina
through the Florida Gulf coast, is a
major sea turtle nesting area for
loggerhead, leatherback, and green
turtles, and, to a lesser extent, Kemp’s
ridley and hawksbill turtles.
Four species—green, Kemp’s ridley,
leatherback, and loggerhead turtles—
occur seasonally in New England and
Mid-Atlantic continental shelf waters
north of Cape Hatteras, North Carolina.
The occurrence of these species in these
waters is largely temperature
dependent. In general, some turtles
move up the coast from southern
wintering areas as water temperatures
warm in the spring. The trend is
reversed in the fall as water
temperatures decrease. By December,
turtles that migrated northward have
returned to more southern waters for the
winter. Hard-shelled species are most
commonly found south of Cape Cod,
Massachusetts. Leatherbacks are
regularly found as far north in U.S.
waters as the Gulf of Maine in the
summer and fall.
Green turtles are found in inshore and
nearshore waters from Texas to
Massachusetts, the U.S. Virgin Islands,
and Puerto Rico. While foraging and
developmental habitats also occur in the
wider Caribbean, important feeding
areas in Florida include the Indian River
Lagoon, the Florida Keys, Florida Bay,
Homosassa, Crystal River, Cedar Key,
and St. Joseph Bay. The bays and
sounds of North Carolina also provide
important foraging habitat for green
turtles.
In the Atlantic, hawksbills are most
common in Puerto Rico and its
associated islands and in the U.S. Virgin
Islands. In the continental United
States, the species is primarily recorded
from south Texas and south Florida and
infrequently from the remaining Gulf
states and north of Florida. Kemp’s
ridleys are distributed throughout
waters of the Gulf of Mexico and U.S.
Atlantic coast from Florida to New
England. The major nesting area for
Kemp’s ridleys is in Tamaulipas,
Mexico, with limited nesting extending
to the Texas coast.
Loggerheads occur throughout the
Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico, ranging
from inshore shallow water habitats to
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
63071
deeper oceanic waters. The largest
nesting assemblage of loggerheads in the
world is found in the southeastern
United States.
Adult leatherbacks are capable of
tolerating a wide range of water
temperature, and have been sighted
along the entire continental coast of the
United States as far north as the Gulf of
Maine and south to Puerto Rico, the
U.S. Virgin Islands, and into the Gulf of
Mexico. The southeast coast of Florida
represents a small, but growing, nesting
area for leatherbacks in the western
North Atlantic.
U.S. Pacific Ocean
Leatherback sea turtles are found
consistently off the U.S. west coast,
usually north of Point Conception,
California. They are known to migrate to
central and northern California from
their natal beaches in the Western
Pacific to feed on jellyfish during
summer and fall. Leatherback turtles
usually appear in Monterey Bay and
California coastal waters during August
and September and move offshore in
October and November. Other observed
areas of summer leatherback
concentration include northern
California and the waters off
Washington through northern Oregon,
offshore from the Columbia River
plume.
Green, loggerhead, and olive ridley
sea turtles are rarely observed in the
west coast EEZ, but records show that
all species have stranded in California
and the Pacific Northwest. Two small
resident populations of green turtles
have been identified in the southern
California Bight, associated historically
with the warm water outflows from
power plants in San Diego Bay and the
San Gabriel River in Long Beach,
California. In the eastern Pacific,
loggerheads have been reported as far
north as Alaska and as far south as
Chile. Occasional sightings are reported
from the coasts of Washington and
Oregon, but most records are of
juveniles off the coast of California.
Based upon limited observer records,
loggerheads travel into the southern
˜
California Bight during El Nino events
(or warm water conditions similar to an
˜
El Nino). The majority of fishery
interactions with loggerheads during El
˜
Nino conditions have occurred during
the summer. Olive ridleys have been
recorded stranded all along the U.S.
west coast. Olive ridleys are believed to
use warm water currents along the west
coast for foraging. The specific
distribution of olive ridleys along the
U.S. west coast is unknown at this time.
Sea turtles occur throughout the
Pacific Islands Region including the
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
63072
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 204 / Wednesday, October 22, 2014 / Proposed Rules
State of Hawaii and the U.S. territories
of Guam, American Samoa, and the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands (CNMI). Green and hawksbill
turtles are most common in nearshore
waters while leatherbacks, loggerheads,
and olive ridleys occur in offshore
pelagic waters. Stock structure and
population dynamics for some species
in this region are poorly understood.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Sea Turtle Strandings
NMFS reviewed data collected by the
Sea Turtle Stranding and Salvage
Network (STSSN) to identify stranding
trends and inform development of this
proposed rule. The STSSN along the
U.S. Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico coasts
has documented strandings of six
species: Loggerhead, Kemp’s ridley,
green, leatherback, hawksbill, and olive
ridley turtles, with loggerheads
consistently representing the highest
number of strandings. The Southeast
United States consistently records the
highest level of strandings during any
given month, each year. Loggerhead sea
turtles represent the highest number of
annual strandings, followed by Kemp’s
ridley. Since 2010, the number of sea
turtle strandings reported in the
Northern Gulf of Mexico has increased,
with Kemp’s ridley strandings occurring
in the highest numbers.
Based on the data reviewed,
strandings have occurred in each month
of the year, in the Northeast Atlantic,
the Southeast Atlantic and the Gulf of
Mexico; however, distinct trends are
notable within each of these regions. In
the Gulf and Southeast U.S. Atlantic
regions, strandings consistently occur in
every month of the year. In the Gulf
region, the highest concentration of
strandings occurs from March to July,
with a notable peak in April and May.
In the Southeast Atlantic region, the
highest concentration of strandings
occurs from March to November, with a
notable peak in May and June. In the
Northeast Atlantic region, strandings
predominately occur between May and
November of each year, with the highest
concentration of strandings between
June and September; strandings are
uncommon in the winter and early
spring.
On the U.S. west coast, strandings are
infrequent compared to the Atlantic and
Gulf of Mexico coasts. This is primarily
due to species abundance and
distribution. The STSSN in California
has documented strandings of five
species: Green, leatherback, loggerhead,
hawksbill, and olive ridley turtles.
Strandings were documented in all
months; data indicate a peak in
strandings between July and October.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 Oct 21, 2014
Jkt 235001
Green turtles represent the highest
number of strandings.
In the Pacific Islands region,
strandings occur throughout the year,
primarily green turtles and secondarily
hawksbills in Hawaii, Guam, American
Samoa, and CNMI. In Oregon and
Washington, very few strandings are
reported. Historical records include a
few green, loggerhead, and olive ridley
strandings.
Fisheries Proposed for Inclusion on the
2015 Annual Determination
NMFS is proposing to include 14
fisheries (12 in the Atlantic Ocean/Gulf
of Mexico and 2 in the Pacific Ocean)
on the 2015 AD. The 14 fisheries,
described below and listed in Table 1,
represent several gear types, including
trawl, gillnet, trap/pot, and weir/seine.
The 2014 LOF (78 FR 73477) was
used as the comprehensive list of
commercial fisheries to evaluate for
inclusion on the AD. The fishery name,
definition, and number of vessels/
persons for fisheries listed on the AD
are taken from the most recent LOF.
Additionally, the fishery descriptions
below include a particular fishery’s
current classification on the MMPA LOF
(i.e., Category I, II, or III); Category I and
II fisheries are required to carry
observers under the MMPA if requested
by NMFS. As noted previously, NMFS
also has authority to observe fisheries in
Federal waters under the MSA and
collect sea turtle bycatch information.
Trawl Fisheries
Interactions with trawl fisheries are of
particular concern for sea turtles,
because forced submergence in any type
of restrictive gear can lead to lack of
oxygen and subsequent death by
drowning. Metabolic changes that can
impair a sea turtle’s ability to function
can occur within minutes of forced
submergence (Lutcavage et al., 1997).
Trawls that are not outfitted with
turtle excluder devices (TEDs) may
result in forced submergence. Currently,
only otter trawl fisheries capable of
catching shrimp and operating south of
Cape Charles, Virginia, and in the Gulf
of Mexico as well as trawl fisheries
targeting summer flounder south of
Cape Charles, Virginia, in the summer
flounder fishery-sea turtle protection
area (50 CFR 222.102) are required to
use TEDs.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of
Mexico Shrimp Trawl Fishery
The Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf
of Mexico shrimp trawl fishery
(estimated 4950 vessels/persons) targets
shrimp using various types of trawls;
NMFS will focus on the component of
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the fishery that uses skimmer trawls for
the 2015 AD. Skimmer trawls are used
primarily in inshore/inland shallow
waters (typically less than 20 ft. (6.1 m))
to target shrimp. The skimmer trawl has
a rigid ‘‘L’’-shaped or triangular metal
frame with the inboard portion of the
frame attached to the vessel and the
outboard portion attached to a skid that
runs along the seabed.
Skimmer trawl use increased in
response to TED requirements for
shrimp bottom otter trawls. Skimmer
trawls currently have no TED
requirement but are subject to tow time
limits of 55 minutes from April 1 to
October 31 and 75 minutes from
November 1 to March 31. Skimmer
trawls are used in North Carolina,
Florida (Gulf Coast), Alabama,
Mississippi, and Louisiana. There are
documented takes of sea turtles in
skimmer trawls in North Carolina and
the Gulf of Mexico. All Gulf of Mexico
states, except Texas, include skimmer
trawls as an allowable gear. In recent
years, the skimmer trawl has become a
major gear in the inshore shrimp fishery
in the Northern Gulf and also has some
use in inshore North Carolina. Louisiana
hosts the vast majority of skimmer
boats, with 2,248 skimmer and butterfly
net trawlers reporting landings in 2008.
In 2008, Mississippi had approximately
62 active skimmer, butterfly, and
chopstick boats, Alabama had 60 active
skimmer boats, and North Carolina had
97 skimmer vessels (NMFS 2014).
However, skimmer vessels in North
Carolina have declined in recent years
to 64 active vessels in 2010.
Skimmer trawl effort overlaps with
sea turtle distribution, and as noted
above, takes have been reported.
Although subject to tow times, the
magnitude of sea turtle takes in this
fishery are not well understood. In
response to high numbers of sea turtle
strandings since 2010, fishery observer
effort was shifted from otter trawls to
the inshore skimmer trawl fishery in the
northern Gulf of Mexico during the
summers of 2012, 2013, and 2014. In
2012, 119 sea days were observed in the
skimmer fishery resulting in 24 sea
turtles observations. In 2013, 145 sea
days were observed, resulting in 8 sea
turtle observations. To date in 2014, 10
sea turtles have been observed in the
skimmer trawl fishery.
Continued observer coverage to
understand the scope and impact of
turtle takes in this fishery is needed to
implement the prohibitions of take,
inform management decisions on what
actions may be necessary to minimize
and prevent sea turtle takes, and further
sea turtle conservation and recovery.
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 204 / Wednesday, October 22, 2014 / Proposed Rules
The Southeastern U.S. Atlantic/Gulf
of Mexico shrimp trawl fishery is
classified as Category II on the MMPA
LOF, and mandatory observer coverage
in Federal waters began in 2007 under
the MSA. The fishery is currently
observed at approximately 1% of total
fishery effort. The fishery was
previously included in the 2010 AD,
which allowed for observer coverage to
be shifted to skimmer trawls to
specifically investigate bycatch of sea
turtles. NMFS proposes to again include
this fishery pursuant to the criteria
identified at 50 CFR 222.402(a)(1) for
including a fishery in the AD, because
sea turtles are known to occur in the
same areas where the fishery operates,
takes have been previously documented
in this fishery, and NMFS intends to
continue to focus observer coverage in
the component of the fishery that uses
skimmer trawls.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Gulf of Mexico Mixed Species Trawl
Fishery
The Gulf of Mexico Mixed Species
Trawl Fishery (estimated 20 vessels/
persons) targets fish using various types
of trawl gear, including bottom otter
trawl gear targeting sheepshead. This
fishery is located in state waters, and is
classified as Category III on the MMPA
LOF. NMFS has not previously required
vessels operating in this fishery to carry
an observer under MMPA authority, and
this fishery was not included in the
2010 AD. NMFS proposes to include
this fishery in the 2015 AD pursuant to
the criteria identified at 50 CFR
222.402(a)(1) for including a fishery in
the AD, because sea turtles are known
to occur in the same areas where the
fishery operates, takes have been
documented in similar gear types,
mainly the shrimp trawl fishery, and
NMFS intends to monitor this fishery.
Gillnet Fisheries
Sea turtles are vulnerable to
entanglement and drowning in gillnets,
especially when the gear is left
unattended. The main risk to sea turtles
from capture in gillnet gear is forced
submergence. Sea turtle entanglement in
gillnets can also result in severe
constriction wounds and/or abrasions.
Large mesh gillnets (e.g., 10–12 in.
[25.4–30.5 cm] stretched mesh or
greater) have been documented as
particularly effective at capturing sea
turtles. Additionally, sea turtles have
been documented entangled in smaller
mesh gillnets.
Given known interactions between
sea turtles and this gear type, and the
need to obtain more coverage on state
inshore fisheries, NMFS proposes to
include the California Halibut, White
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 Oct 21, 2014
Jkt 235001
Seabass and Other Species Set Gillnet
Fishery; California Yellowtail,
Barracuda, and White Seabass Drift
Gillnet Fishery; Chesapeake Bay Inshore
Gillnet Fishery; Long Island Inshore
Gillnet Fishery; North Carolina Inshore
Gillnet Fishery; and Gulf of Mexico
Gillnet Fishery in the 2015 AD. Each of
these fisheries, with the exception of the
Gulf of Mexico Gillnet Fishery, was
listed on the 2010 AD.
California Halibut, White Seabass and
Other Species Set Gillnet Fishery (>3.5
in Mesh)
The California halibut, white seabass,
and other species set gillnet fishery
(estimated 50 vessels/persons) targets
halibut, white seabass, and other species
from the U.S.-Mexico border north to
Monterey Bay using 200 fathom (1,200
ft.; 366 m) gillnets with a stretch mesh
size of 8.5 in (31.6 cm). Net soak
duration is typically 8–10, 19–24, or 44–
49 hours at a depth ranging from 15–50
fathoms (90–300 ft.; 27–91 m), with
most sets from 15–35 fathoms (90–210
ft.; 27–64 m). No more than 1500
fathoms (9,000 ft.; 2,743 m) of gill or
trammel net may be fished in
combination for California halibut and
angel shark. Fishing occurs year-round,
with effort generally increasing during
summer months and declining during
the last three months of the year. The
central California portion of the fishery
from Point Arguello to Point Reyes has
been closed since September 2002,
following a state ban on gillnets inshore
of 60 fathoms (360 ft.; 110 m). Since
1990, set gill nets have been prohibited
in state waters south of Point Arguello
and within 70 fathoms (420 ft.; 128 m)
or one mile (1.6 km), whichever is less,
around the Channel Islands. The
California Department of Fish and Game
(CDFG) manages the fishery as a limited
entry fishery with gear restrictions and
area closures.
This fishery is classified as Category
II on the MMPA LOF, which authorizes
NMFS to observe this fishery in state
waters for marine mammal interactions
and to collect information on sea turtles
should a take occur on an observed trip.
This fishery was included in the 2010
AD. This fishery was observed at 13%
of all trips in 2010, 8% in 2011, and 6%
in 2012. During that time, no sea turtle
bycatch was observed in the fishery.
NMFS proposes to again include this
fishery pursuant to the criteria
identified at 50 CFR 222.402(a)(1) for
including a fishery in the AD, because
it operates in the same waters that
turtles are known to occur, this gear
type is known to result in the incidental
take of sea turtles based on documented
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
63073
takes, and NMFS intends to monitor this
fishery.
California Yellowtail, Barracuda, and
White Seabass Drift Gillnet Fishery
(Mesh Size >3.5 in. and <14 in.)
The California yellowtail, barracuda,
and white seabass drift gillnet fishery
(30 vessels/persons) targets primarily
yellowtail and white seabass, and
secondarily barracuda, with target
species typically determined by market
demand on a short-term basis. Drift
gillnets are up to 6,000 ft. (1,829 m) long
and are set at the surface. The mesh size
depends on target species and is
typically 6.0–6.5 in (15–16.5 cm). When
targeting yellowtail and barracuda, the
mesh size must be ≥3.5 in (9 cm); when
targeting white seabass, the mesh size
must be ≥6 in (15.2 cm). From June 16
to March 14 not more than 20 percent,
by number, of a load of fish may be
white seabass with a total length of 28
in (71 cm). A maximum of ten white
seabass per load may be taken if taken
in gillnet or trammel nets with meshes
from 3.5–6.0 in (9–15 cm) in length. The
fishery operates year-round, primarily
south of Point Conception with some
effort around San Clemente Island and
San Nicolas Island. This fishery is a
limited entry fishery with various gear
restrictions and area closures managed
by the CDFG.
This fishery is classified as Category
II on the MMPA LOF, which authorizes
NMFS to observe this fishery in state
waters for marine mammal interactions
and to collect information on sea turtles
should a take occur on an observed trip.
This fishery was included in the 2010
AD. This fishery was observed at 5% of
all trips in 2010, 3% in 2011, and 1%
in 2012. During that time, no sea turtle
bycatch was observed in the fishery.
NMFS proposes to again include this
fishery pursuant to the criteria
identified at 50 CFR 222.402(a)(1) for
including a fishery in the AD because it
operates in the same waters that turtles
are known to occur, this gear type is
known to result in the incidental take of
sea turtles based on documented takes,
and NMFS intends to monitor this
fishery.
Chesapeake Bay Inshore Gillnet Fishery
The Chesapeake Bay inshore gillnet
fishery (estimated 1,126 vessels/
persons) targets menhaden and croaker
using gillnet gear with mesh sizes
ranging from 2.875–5 in (7.3–12.7 cm),
depending on the target species. The
fishery operates between the
Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel and the
mainland. The fishery is managed under
the Interstate FMPs for Atlantic
menhaden and Atlantic croaker. Gillnets
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
63074
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 204 / Wednesday, October 22, 2014 / Proposed Rules
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
in Chesapeake Bay also target striped
bass and spot.
This fishery is classified as Category
II on the MMPA LOF and was included
in the 2010 AD. There has been limited
observer coverage in this fishery since
2010, with 12 observed trips in 2010, 1
observed trip in 2011, and 3 observed
trips in 2013. To date, observer coverage
in gillnet fisheries has focused on
Federally-managed fisheries. There is a
need to better understand the gear
fished in state waters and the extent to
which this gear interacts with sea
turtles. Given the risk of interaction and
the limited data currently available on
interactions, NMFS proposes to again
include this fishery pursuant to the
criteria identified at 50 CFR
222.402(a)(1) for listing a fishery on the
AD because sea turtles are known to
occur in the same areas where the
fishery operates, takes have been
previously documented in similar gear,
the fishery operates during a period of
high sea turtle strandings, and NMFS
intends to monitor this fishery.
Long Island Inshore Gillnet Fishery
The Long Island Sound inshore gillnet
fishery (estimated 20 vessels/persons)
includes all gillnet fisheries operating
west of a line from the north fork of the
eastern end of Long Island, New York
(Orient Point to Plum Island to Fishers
Island) to Watch Hill, Rhode Island (59
FR 43703, August 25, 1994). Target
species include bluefish, striped bass,
weakfish, and summer flounder.
This fishery is classified as Category
II on the MMPA LOF and was included
in the 2010 AD. There has been limited
observer coverage in this fishery since
2010. To date, observer coverage in
gillnet fisheries has focused on
Federally-managed fisheries. However,
the NMFS Northeast Fisheries Observer
Program has worked with the state of
New York to develop a plan to achieve
observer coverage in New York state
waters between 2014 and 2017, which
includes approximately 250 gillnet trips
annually. There is a need to better
understand the gear fished in state
waters and the extent to which this gear
interacts with sea turtles. Given the risk
of interaction and the limited data
currently available on interactions, and
the new partnership with the State of
New York, NMFS proposes to again
include this fishery pursuant to the
criteria identified at 50 CFR
222.402(a)(1) for listing a fishery on the
AD. NMFS also makes this proposal
because sea turtles are known to occur
in the same areas where the fishery
operates, takes have been previously
documented in similar gear, the fishery
operates during a period of high sea
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 Oct 21, 2014
Jkt 235001
turtle strandings, and NMFS intends to
monitor this fishery.
North Carolina Inshore Gillnet Fishery
The North Carolina inshore gillnet
fishery (approximately 1,323 vessels/
persons) targets species including
southern flounder, weakfish, bluefish,
Atlantic croaker, striped mullet, spotted
seatrout, Spanish mackerel, striped bass,
spot, red drum, black drum, and shad.
This fishery includes any fishing effort
using any type of gillnet gear, including
set (float and sink), drift, and runaround
gillnet for any target species inshore of
the COLREGS lines in North Carolina.
This fishery is managed under state and
ASMFC interstate FMPs, applying net
and mesh size regulations, and seasonal
area closures in the Pamlico Sound
Gillnet Restricted Area.
NMFS issued two ESA section
10(a)(1)(B) permits for the North
Carolina state-wide inshore gillnet
fishery to incidentally take sea turtles in
2013, and to incidentally take Atlantic
sturgeon in 2014, which include all
inshore, estuarine waters, including
Core Sound and Pamlico Sound. The
permits require the State of North
Carolina to maintain a minimum of 7%
observer coverage for large mesh gillnet
in each state management area for the
spring, summer, and fall seasons. It also
requires a minimum of 2% observer
coverage for small mesh gillnets. Since
issuance of the sea turtle incidental take
permit in September 2013, it is
estimated that 216 green sea turtles (173
alive, 88 dead) and 15 Kemp’s ridley sea
turtles (all alive), have been incidentally
taken in the inshore large mesh gillnet
fishery. Additionally, 1 live green sea
turtle was observed in the small mesh
gillnet fishery.
This fishery is classified as Category
II on the MMPA LOF and was included
in the 2010 AD. NMFS has observed this
fishery with limited coverage since
2010, observing 42 trips in 2010, 18
trips in 2011, 22 trips in 2012, and 28
trips in 2013. Although the state is
currently required to maintain observer
coverage in inshore waters, NMFS
proposes to again include this fishery
pursuant to the criteria identified at 50
CFR 222.402(a)(1) for listing a fishery on
the AD because sea turtles are known to
occur in the same areas where the
fishery operates, takes have been
previously documented in this fishery,
the fishery operates during a period of
high sea turtle strandings, and NMFS
intends to monitor this fishery.
Gulf of Mexico Gillnet Fishery
The Gulf of Mexico Gillnet Fishery
(estimated 724 vessels/persons) operates
in state inshore waters, targeting finfish,
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
including Spanish mackerel, king
mackerel, striped mullet, Florida
pompano, and southern flounder using
sink gillnets and strike gillnets.
This fishery is classified as Category
II on the MMPA LOF, which authorizes
NMFS to observe this fishery for marine
mammal interactions and to collect
information on sea turtles should a take
occur on an observed trip. To better
characterize fishing effort and bycatch,
the NMFS Southeast Gillnet Observer
Program began placing observers on
state commercial gillnet vessels in
coastal Louisiana, Mississippi, and
Alabama in 2012. NMFS proposes to
include this fishery in the 2015 AD
because sea turtles are known to occur
in the same areas where the fishery
operates and takes have been
documented in similar other fisheries
using gillnet gear, and NMFS intends to
monitor this fishery.
Trap/Pot Fisheries
Sea turtles are known to become
entangled in the buoy lines (also called
vertical lines) of trap/pot gear, and there
have been anecdotal reports that sea
turtles may interact with the trap/pot
itself. Turtles entangled in trap/pot gear
may drown or suffer injuries (and
potential subsequent mortality) due to
constriction by the rope or line. Takes
of both leatherback and hard-shelled sea
turtles have been documented in this
gear type. NMFS Greater Atlantic
Region (GAR), formerly the Northeast
Region, established the Northeast
Atlantic Sea Turtle Disentanglement
Network (STDN) in 2002 to respond to
entanglements in vertical lines
associated with trap/pot gear. Reports of
entangled sea turtles come from
fishermen, boaters, and the general
public. Since 2002, entanglements in
vertical lines have averaged 20.4
annually. Takes in 2012 and 2013
increased significantly with 41 and 56
takes documented in each year,
respectively. These numbers include all
vertical line interactions, the vast
majority of which were identified as
trap/pot gear (as opposed to gillnet
gear). A more systematic data collection
on these interactions is needed to begin
understanding the extent to which
interactions occur in order to implement
the prohibitions against takes and how
to prevent or mitigate takes.
Three pot/trap fisheries were
included in the 2010 AD; Atlantic Blue
Crab Trap/Pot Fishery, Atlantic Mixed
Species Trap/Pot Fishery, and the
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American
Lobster Trap/Pot Fishery. However,
limited or no observer coverage has
been achieved in these fisheries since
listing on the 2010 AD. While some pot/
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 204 / Wednesday, October 22, 2014 / Proposed Rules
trap vessels can be observed through
traditional methods, other vessels
participating in these fisheries,
especially in state waters, may be too
small to carry observers, which create
challenges for observer programs.
Further discussions regarding the most
appropriate and effective methodologies
for observing the pot/trap fisheries will
be beneficial. Therefore, as funds allow,
the GAR is planning to convene, within
the next year, subject matter experts to
discuss new technologies that may
apply to observing and mitigating sea
turtle interactions in trap/pot fisheries,
including the potential to observe
through an alternative platform (i.e. a
second vessel) program. New methods
to more effectively monitor these
fisheries may be developed and
implemented as an outcome of this
meeting.
Based on the input from the states,
NMFS proposes to again include relist
all three pot/trap fisheries in the 2015
AD.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Atlantic Blue Crab Trap/Pot Fishery
The Atlantic blue crab trap/pot
fishery (estimated 8,557 vessels/
persons) targets blue crab using pots
baited with fish or poultry typically set
in rows in shallow water. The pot
position is marked by either a floating
or sinking buoy line attached to a
surface buoy. The fishery occurs yearround from the south shore of Long
Island at 72°30′ W. long. in the Atlantic
and east of the fishery management
demarcation line between the Atlantic
Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico (50 CFR
600.105), including state waters. The
fishery is managed under state FMPs.
This fishery is classified as Category
II on the MMPA LOF and was included
in the 2010 AD. However, since NMFS
included this fishery in the 2010 AD,
NMFS has been unable to observe the
fishery, as discussed above.
Accordingly, NMFS proposes to again
include this fishery pursuant to the
criteria identified at 50 CFR
222.402(a)(1) for listing a fishery on the
AD because sea turtles are known to
occur in the same areas where the
fishery operates, takes have been
documented in similar gear types (i.e.
lobster pot fishery), and NMFS intends
to monitor this fishery.
Atlantic Mixed Species Trap/Pot Fishery
The Atlantic mixed species trap/pot
fishery (estimated 3,467 vessels/
persons) targets species including
hagfish, shrimp, conch/whelk, red crab,
Jonah crab, rock crab, black sea bass,
scup, tautog, cod, haddock, pollock,
redfish (ocean perch), white hake, spot,
skate, catfish, and stone crab. The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 Oct 21, 2014
Jkt 235001
fishery includes all trap/pot operations
from the Maine-Canada border south
through the waters east of the fishery
management demarcation line between
the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of
Mexico (50 CFR 600.105), but does not
include the following trap/pot fisheries
(as defined on the MMPA LOF):
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American
lobster trap/pot; Atlantic blue crab trap/
pot; Florida spiny lobster trap/pot;
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of
Mexico stone crab trap/pot; U.S. MidAtlantic eel trap/pot fisheries; and the
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of
Mexico golden crab fishery (68 FR 1421,
January 10, 2003). The fishery is
managed under various Interstate and
Federal FMPs.
This fishery is classified as Category
II on the MMPA LOF and was included
in the 2010 AD. However, since listing
this fishery on the 2010 AD, NMFS has
been unable to observe the fishery, as
discussed above. Accordingly, NMFS
proposes to again include this fishery
pursuant to the criteria identified at 50
CFR 222.402(a)(1) for listing a fishery on
the AD because sea turtles are known to
occur in the same areas where the
fishery operates, takes have been
documented in similar gear types (i.e.
lobster pot fishery), and NMFS intends
to monitor this fishery.
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American
Lobster Trap/Pot Fishery
The Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American
lobster trap/pot fishery (estimated
11,693 vessels/persons) targets
American lobster primarily with traps,
while 2–3 percent of the target species
is taken by mobile gear (trawls and
dredges). The fishery operates in
inshore and offshore waters from Maine
to New Jersey and may extend as far
south as Cape Hatteras, North Carolina.
Approximately 80 percent of American
lobster is harvested from state waters;
therefore, the ASMFC has the primary
regulatory role. The fishery is managed
in state waters under the ASMFC
Interstate FMP and in Federal waters
under the Atlantic Coastal Fisheries
Cooperative Management Act.
This fishery is classified as Category
I on the MMPA LOF and was included
in the 2010 AD. Since that time, NMFS
observed 22 lobster trips in 2013 and 32
trips in 2014, with 216 observation days
planned for the 2014–2015 schedule.
NMFS STDN has documented 83
leatherback entanglements in lobster
trap gear operating in Maine,
Massachusetts, Rhode Island,
Connecticut, New York, and New Jersey
since 2002. These entanglements have
occurred between May and October
(STDN, unpublished data), which is the
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
63075
time period when observer coverage for
this fishery will be focused.
NMFS proposes to again include this
fishery pursuant to the criteria
identified at 50 CFR 222.402(a)(1) for
listing a fishery on the AD because sea
turtles are known to occur in the same
areas where the fishery operates, takes
have been documented in this fishery,
and NMFS intends to monitor this
fishery.
Weir/Seine/Floating Trap Fisheries
Pound net, weir, seine and floating
trap fisheries may use mesh similar to
that used in gillnets, but the gear is
prosecuted differently from traditional
gillnets. For example, pound net leaders
have a mesh component similar to a
gillnet; sea turtles have been
documented entangled in pound net
leaders. Pound net leaders in the
Virginia portion of the Chesapeake Bay
are subject to requirements designed to
reduce sea turtle bycatch. Purse seines,
weirs and floating traps also have the
potential to entangle and drown sea
turtles as they are set similarly to pound
nets. Turtles have been documented in
the pounds of pound net gear and/or
weirs in Massachusetts, New York,
Maryland, North Carolina, and Virginia.
The turtles observed in these pounds
have generally been alive and
uninjured. In Virginia, sea turtles have
been documented becoming entangled
with the leader, which often results in
mortality.
Four pound net/weir/seine fisheries
were included on the 2010 AD: The
Mid-Atlantic haul/beach seine, the MidAtlantic menhaden purse seine, the
Mid-Atlantic mixed species stop seine/
weir/pound net, and the Virginia pound
net fishery. Based on the information
provided by states and the best available
scientific information, NMFS proposes
to include again two of these fisheries:
The Mid-Atlantic Haul/Beach Seine
Fishery, Mid-Atlantic Menhaden Purse
Seine Fishery, and add the Rhode Island
Floating Trap Fishery on the 2015 AD.
Mid-Atlantic Haul/Beach Seine Fishery
The Mid-Atlantic haul/beach seine
fishery (estimated 565 vessels/persons)
targets striped bass, mullet, spot,
weakfish, sea trout, bluefish, kingfish,
and harvest fish using seines with one
end secured (e.g., swipe nets and long
seines) and seines secured at both ends
or those anchored to the beach and
hauled up on the beach. The beach
seine system also uses a bunt and a
wash net that are attached to the beach
and extend into the surf. The beach
seines soak for less than 2 hours. The
fishery occurs in waters west of 72°30′
W. long. and north of a line extending
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
63076
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 204 / Wednesday, October 22, 2014 / Proposed Rules
due east from the North Carolina-South
Carolina border. Fishing on the Outer
Banks, North Carolina occurs primarily
in the spring (April to June) and fall
(October to December). In the
Chesapeake Bay, this gear has been
historically fished in the southwest
portion of the Bay with some effort in
the northwest portion. Effort begins to
increase in early May, peaks in early/
mid-June, and continues into July.
During this time, based on historical
data from Virginia, approximately 100
haul seine trips occur. Beach haul
seines have been documented to interact
with sea turtles.
The fishery is managed under the
Interstate FMPs for Bluefish and for
Atlantic Striped Bass of the Atlantic
Coast from Maine through North
Carolina, and is subject to BDTRP
implementing regulations.
This fishery is classified as Category
II on the MMPA LOF and was included
in the 2010 AD. NMFS observed this
fishery at low levels prior to 2008, but
it has not been observed since then.
NMFS proposes to again include this
fishery pursuant to the criteria
identified at 50 CFR 222.402(a)(1) for
listing a fishery on the AD based on
suspected interactions with sea turtles
given the nature of the gear and fishing
methodology in addition to effort
overlapping with sea turtle distribution.
In the Chesapeake Bay, the fishery
operates at the same time as historically
elevated sea turtle strandings, and
NMFS intends to monitor this fishery.
Mid-Atlantic Menhaden Purse Seine
Fishery
The Mid-Atlantic menhaden purse
seine fishery (estimated 5 vessels/
persons) targets menhaden and thread
herring using purse seine gear. Most sets
occur within 3 mi (4.8 km) of shore with
the majority of the effort occurring off
North Carolina from November to
January, and moving northward during
warmer months to southern New
England. The fishery is managed under
the Interstate FMP for Atlantic
Menhaden. In the Chesapeake Bay, this
fishery operates to a limited extent
during a period of high sea turtle
strandings (May and June). This fishery
is classified as Category II on the MMPA
LOF and was listed on the 2010 AD.
NMFS has observed this fishery at low
levels, with 9 trips observed in 2010,
and 3 trips observed in 2012. NMFS
proposes to again include this fishery
pursuant to the criteria identified at 50
CFR 222.402(a)(1) for listing a fishery on
the AD, given the nature of the gear and
fishing methodology in addition to
effort overlapping with sea turtle
distribution, and NMFS intends to
monitor this fishery.
Rhode Island Floating Trap Fishery
The Rhode Island Floating Trap
Fishery (estimated 9 vessels/persons) is
a small fishery that sets traps similar to
a weir/pound net seasonally (May–
October) targeting scup, striped sea bass,
and squid.
This fishery is classified as Category
III on the MMPA LOF, and NMFS has
not previously required vessels
operating in this fishery to carry an
observer under MMPA authority. This
fishery was not included in the 2010
AD. Turtles have been documented in
the pounds of pound net gear and/or
weirs in Massachusetts, New York,
Maryland, and Virginia, which operates
similarly to the Rhode Island Floating
Trap Fishery. There have also been
anecdotal reports of sea turtle
interactions in this fishery, but bycatch
levels are unknown. NMFS proposes to
include this fishery pursuant to the
criteria identified at 50 CFR
222.402(a)(1) for listing a fishery on the
AD because sea turtles are known to
occur in the same areas where the
fishery operates, takes have been
documented in similar gear types, such
as the Virginia and Maryland pound
nets, and NMFS intends to monitor this
fishery.
TABLE 1—STATE AND FEDERAL COMMERCIAL FISHERIES INCLUDED ON THE 2015 ANNUAL DETERMINATION
Years eligible
to carry
observers
Fishery
Trawl Fisheries
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl ....................................................................................................................
Gulf of Mexico mixed species fish trawl ..............................................................................................................................................
2015–2019
2015–2019
Gillnet Fisheries
California halibut, white seabass and other species set gillnet (>3.5 in mesh) .................................................................................
California yellowtail, barracuda, and white seabass drift gillnet (mesh size >3.5 in. and <14 in.) .....................................................
Chesapeake Bay inshore gillnet ..........................................................................................................................................................
Long Island inshore gillnet ...................................................................................................................................................................
North Carolina inshore gillnet ..............................................................................................................................................................
Gulf of Mexico gillnet ...........................................................................................................................................................................
2015–2019
2015–2019
2015–2019
2015–2019
2015–2019
2015–2019
Trap/Pot Fisheries
Atlantic blue crab trap/pot ....................................................................................................................................................................
Atlantic mixed species trap/pot ............................................................................................................................................................
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American lobster trap/pot ................................................................................................................................
2015–2019
2015–2019
2015–2019
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Pound Net/Weir/Seine Fisheries
Mid-Atlantic haul/beach seine ..............................................................................................................................................................
Mid-Atlantic menhaden purse seine ....................................................................................................................................................
Rhode Island floating trap ...................................................................................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 Oct 21, 2014
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
2015–2019
2015–2019
2015–2019
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 204 / Wednesday, October 22, 2014 / Proposed Rules
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Classification
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration that this
rule would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The factual
basis leading to the certification is set
forth below.
NMFS has estimated that
approximately 32,540 vessels
participating in the 14 fisheries listed in
Table 1 would be eligible to carry an
observer if requested. However, NMFS
would only request a fraction of the
total number of participants to carry an
observer based on the sampling protocol
identified for each fishery by regional
observer programs. As noted throughout
this proposed rule, NMFS would select
vessels and focus coverage in times and
areas where fishing effort overlaps with
sea turtle distribution. Due to the
unpredictability of fishing effort, NMFS
cannot determine the specific number of
vessels that would be requested to carry
an observer.
If a vessel is requested to carry an
observer, fishers will not incur any
direct economic costs associated with
carrying that observer. Potential indirect
costs to individual fishers required to
take observers may include: Lost space
on deck for catch, lost bunk space, and
lost fishing time due to time needed to
process bycatch data. For effective
monitoring, however, observers will
rotate among a limited number of
vessels in a fishery at any given time,
and each vessel within an observed
fishery has an equal probability of being
requested to accommodate an observer.
Therefore, the potential indirect costs to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 Oct 21, 2014
Jkt 235001
individual fishers are expected to be
minimal because observer coverage
would only be required for a small
percentage of an individual’s total
annual fishing time. In addition, 50 CFR
222.404(b) states that an observer will
not be placed on a vessel if the facilities
for quartering an observer or performing
observer functions are inadequate or
unsafe, thereby exempting vessels too
small to accommodate an observer from
this requirement. As a result of this
certification, an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required and
was not prepared.
The information collection for the AD
is approved under Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
OMB control number 0648–0593.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid
OMB Control Number.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
An environmental assessment (EA)
was prepared under the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) on
the issuance of the regulations to
implement this observer requirement in
50 CFR part 222, subpart D. The EA
concluded that implementing these
regulations would not have a significant
impact on the human environment. This
proposed rule would not make any
significant change in the management of
fisheries included on the AD, and
therefore, this proposed rule would not
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
63077
change the analysis or conclusion of the
EA. If NMFS takes a management action
for a specific fishery, for example,
requiring fishing gear modifications,
NMFS would first prepare any
environmental document required
under NEPA and specific to that action.
This proposed rule would not affect
species listed as threatened or
endangered under the ESA or their
associated critical habitat. The impacts
of numerous fisheries have been
analyzed in various biological opinions,
and this proposed rule would not affect
the conclusions of those opinions. The
inclusion of fisheries on the AD is not
considered to be a management action
that would adversely affect threatened
or endangered species. If NMFS takes a
management action, for example,
requiring modifications to fishing gear
and/or practices, NMFS would review
the action for potential adverse effects to
listed species under the ESA.
This proposed rule would have no
adverse impacts on sea turtles and may
have a positive impact on sea turtles by
improving knowledge of sea turtles and
the fisheries interacting with sea turtles
through information collected from
observer programs.
This proposed rule would not affect
the land or water uses or natural
resources of the coastal zone, as
specified under section 307 of the
Coastal Zone Management Act.
Dated: October 16, 2014.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–25154 Filed 10–21–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\22OCP1.SGM
22OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 204 (Wednesday, October 22, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 63066-63077]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25154]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 222
[Docket No. 140829733-4733-01]
RIN 0648-BE35
2015 Annual Determination To Implement the Sea Turtle Observer
Requirement
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) publishes a
proposed Annual Determination (AD) for 2015, pursuant to its authority
under
[[Page 63067]]
the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Through the AD, NMFS identifies U.S.
fisheries operating in the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and Pacific
Ocean that will be required to take observers upon NMFS' request. The
purpose of observing identified fisheries is to learn more about sea
turtle interactions in a given fishery, evaluate measures to prevent or
reduce sea turtle takes and to implement the prohibition against sea
turtle takes. Fisheries identified on the 2015 AD (see Table 1) will be
eligible to carry observers as of January 1, 2015 and will remain on
the AD for a five year period. The fisheries listed on the final
determination will be required to carry observers upon NMFS' request
until December 31, 2019.
DATES: Comments must be received by November 21, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on the proposed rule, identified by
``NOAA-NMFS-2014-0108'' by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic comments
through the Federal eRulemaking portal: https://www.regulations.gov
(follow instructions for submitting comments).
Mail: Submit written comments to Chief, Marine Mammal and
Sea Turtle Conservation Division, Attn: Sea Turtle Annual
Determination, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-West
Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
Comments regarding the burden-hour estimates, or any other aspect
of the collection of information requirements contained in this rule,
should be submitted in writing to Chief, Marine Mammal and Sea Turtle
Conservation Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-
West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910, and to the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs at OIRA_submissions@omb.eop.gov.
Instructions: All comments received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted to https://www.regulations.gov without
change. All Personal Identifying Information (e.g., name, address,
etc.) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly
accessible. Do not submit Confidential Business Information or
otherwise sensitive or protected information. NMFS will accept
anonymous comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields, if you wish
to remain anonymous). Attachments to electronic comments will be
accepted in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF file
formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara McNulty, Office of Protected
Resources, 301-427-8402; Ellen Keane, Greater Atlantic Region, 978-282-
8476; Dennis Klemm, Southeast Region, 727-824-5312; Dan Lawson, West
Coast Region, 562-980-3209; Irene Kelly, Pacific Islands Region, 808-
725-5141. Individuals who use a telecommunications device for the
hearing impaired may call the Federal Information Relay Service at 1-
800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. Eastern time, Monday through
Friday, excluding Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Availability of Published Materials
Information regarding the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) List
of Fisheries (LOF) may be obtained at https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/interactions/lof/ and information regarding Marine Mammal Stock
Assessment Reports may be obtained at https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/sars/
or from any NMFS Regional Office at the addresses listed below:
NMFS, Greater Atlantic Region, 55 Great Republic Drive,
Gloucester, MA 01930;
NMFS, Southeast Region, 263 13th Avenue South, St.
Petersburg, FL 33701;
NMFS, West Coast Region, 501 W. Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200,
Long Beach, CA 90802;
NMFS, Pacific Islands Region, Protected Resources, 1845
Wasp Blvd., Building 176. Honolulu, HI 96818.
Purpose of the Sea Turtle Observer Requirement
Under the ESA, 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq., NMFS has the responsibility
to implement programs to conserve marine life listed as endangered or
threatened. All sea turtles found in U.S. waters are listed as either
endangered or threatened under the ESA. Kemp's ridley (Lepidochelys
kempii), loggerhead (Caretta caretta; North Pacific distinct population
segment), leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea), and hawksbill
(Eretmochelys imbricata) sea turtles are listed as endangered.
Loggerhead (Caretta caretta; Northwest Atlantic distinct population
segment), green (Chelonia mydas), and olive ridley (Lepidochelys
olivacea) sea turtles are listed as threatened, except for breeding
colony populations of green turtles in Florida and on the Pacific coast
of Mexico, and breeding colony populations of olive ridleys on the
Pacific coast of Mexico, which are listed as endangered. Due to the
inability to distinguish between populations of green and olive ridley
turtles away from the nesting beach, NMFS considers these turtles
endangered wherever they occur in U.S. waters. While some sea turtle
populations have shown signs of recovery, many populations continue to
decline.
Incidental take, or bycatch, in fishing gear is the primary
anthropogenic source of sea turtle injury and mortality in U.S. waters.
Section 9 of the ESA prohibits the take (including harassing, harming,
pursuing, hunting, shooting, wounding, killing, trapping, capturing, or
collecting or attempting to engage in any such conduct), including
incidental take, of endangered sea turtles. Pursuant to section 4(d) of
the ESA, NMFS has issued regulations extending the prohibition of take,
with exceptions, to threatened sea turtles (50 CFR 223.205 and
223.206). Section 11 of the ESA provides for civil and criminal
penalties for anyone who violates a regulation issued to implement the
prohibition of take and the issuance of regulations to enforce the take
prohibitions. NMFS may grant exceptions to the take prohibitions with
an incidental take statement or an incidental take permit issued
pursuant to ESA section 7 or 10, respectively. To do so, NMFS must
determine the activity that will result in incidental take is not
likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the affected listed
species. For some Federal fisheries and most state fisheries, NMFS has
not granted an exception for incidental takes of sea turtles primarily
because we lack information about fishery-sea turtle interactions.
The most effective way for NMFS to learn more about sea turtle-
fishery interactions in order to implement the take prohibitions and
prevent or minimize take is to place observers aboard fishing vessels.
In 2007, NMFS issued a regulation (50 CFR 222.402) establishing
procedures to annually identify, pursuant to specified criteria and
after notice and opportunity for comment, those fisheries in which the
agency intends to place observers (72 FR 43176, August 3, 2007). These
regulations specify that NMFS may place observers on U.S. fishing
vessels, commercial or recreational, operating in U.S. territorial
waters, the U.S. exclusive economic zone (EEZ), or on the high seas, or
on vessels that are otherwise subject to the jurisdiction of the United
States. Failure to comply with the requirements under this rule may
result in civil or criminal penalties under the ESA.
NMFS will pay the direct costs for vessels to carry observers.
These include observer salary and insurance costs. NMFS may also
evaluate other potential direct costs, should they arise. Once
selected, a fishery will be eligible to be observed for a period of
five years without further action by NMFS. This
[[Page 63068]]
will enable NMFS to develop an appropriate sampling protocol to
investigate whether, how, when, where, and under what conditions
incidental takes are occurring; to evaluate whether existing measures
are minimizing or preventing takes; and to implement ESA take
prohibitions and conserve turtles.
Process for Developing an Annual Determination
Pursuant to 50 CFR 222.402, NOAA's Assistant Administrator for
Fisheries (AA), in consultation with Regional Administrators and
Fisheries Science Center Directors, develops a proposed AD identifying
which fisheries are required to carry observers, if requested, to
monitor potential interactions with sea turtles. NMFS provides an
opportunity for public comment on any proposed determination. The
determination is based on the best available scientific, commercial, or
other information regarding sea turtle-fishery interactions; sea turtle
distribution; sea turtle strandings; fishing techniques, gears used,
target species, seasons and areas fished; and/or qualitative data from
logbooks or fisher reports. Specifically, this determination is based
on the extent to which:
(1) The fishery operates in the same waters and at the same time as
sea turtles are present;
(2) The fishery operates at the same time or prior to elevated sea
turtle strandings; or
(3) The fishery uses a gear or technique that is known or likely to
result in incidental take of sea turtles based on documented or
reported takes in the same or similar fisheries; and
(4) NMFS intends to monitor the fishery and anticipates that it
will have the funds to do so.
The AA uses the most recent version of the annually published MMPA
List of Fisheries (LOF) as the comprehensive list of commercial
fisheries for consideration. The LOF includes all known state and
Federal commercial fisheries that occur in U.S. waters and on the high
seas. However, in preparing an AD we do not rely on the three-part MMPA
classification scheme used for fisheries on the LOF. In addition,
unlike the LOF, an AD may include recreational fisheries likely to
interact with sea turtles on the basis of the best available
information.
NMFS consulted with appropriate state and Federal fisheries
officials to identify which fisheries, both commercial and
recreational, should be considered in the AD. Recommendations were
received from six state agencies. Gear types recommended for
consideration included gillnet, trawl, trap/pot, pound net, seine, and
hook-and line. NMFS considered all recommendations carefully in
developing the proposed list of fisheries to be included. Although the
comments and recommendations provided to NMFS by states were based upon
the best available information on their fisheries, NMFS received more
recommendations for fisheries to include on the 2015 AD than is
feasible to propose at this time based on the four previously noted
criteria (50 CFR 222.402(a)). The proposed AD is not an exhaustive or
comprehensive list of all fisheries with documented or suspected takes
of sea turtles. For other fisheries, NMFS may already be addressing
incidental take through another mechanism (e.g., rulemaking to
implement modifications to fishing gear and/or practices), may be
observing the fishery under a separate statutory authority, or will
consider including them in future ADs based on the four previously
noted criteria (50 CFR 222.402(a)). Note also that fisheries not
included on the 2015 AD may still be observed under a different
authority than the ESA (e.g., MMPA, MSA).
Notice of the final determination will be published in the Federal
Register and made in writing to individuals permitted for each fishery
identified on the AD. NMFS will also notify state agencies and provide
notification through publication in local newspapers, radio broadcasts,
and other means, as appropriate. Once included in the final
determination, a fishery will remain eligible for observer coverage for
a period of five years to enable the design of an appropriate sampling
program and to ensure collection of sufficient scientific data for
analysis. If NMFS determines that more than five years are needed to
obtain sufficient scientific data, NMFS will include the fishery in the
proposed AD again prior to the end of the fifth year.
In the 2010 AD, NMFS identified 19 fisheries that were required to
carry observers for a period of five years, through December 31, 2014,
if requested by NMFS. Because of a lack of resources to implement new
observer programs or expand existing programs, NMFS has not identified
any additional fisheries in the AD since 2010.
Review of Fisheries Listed on the 2010 AD
Eleven of the 19 fisheries listed on the 2010 AD are proposed for
inclusion in the 2015 AD and are described further below. These
fisheries include: The Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico
shrimp trawl fishery, California Halibut, White Seabass and Other
Species Set Gillnet Fishery (>3.5 in mesh), California Yellowtail,
Barracuda, and White Seabass Drift Gillnet Fishery (mesh size >3.5 in.
and <14 in.), Chesapeake Bay Inshore Gillnet Fishery, Long Island
Inshore Gillnet Fishery, North Carolina Inshore Gillnet Fishery,
Atlantic blue crab trap/pot, Atlantic Mixed Species Trap/Pot Fishery,
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American lobster trap/pot, Mid-Atlantic Haul/
Beach Seine Fishery, and the Mid-Atlantic menhaden purse seine.
There were eight fisheries included on 2010 AD that are not
proposed for inclusion in the 2015 AD. However, NMFS may determine that
any of these fisheries should be included in a subsequent AD. A summary
of these eight fisheries is provided below.
Atlantic Shellfish Bottom Trawl Fishery
The Atlantic shellfish bottom trawl fishery (estimated >58 vessels/
persons) encompasses the calico scallop trawl, crab trawl, Georgia/
South Carolina/Maryland whelk trawl, Gulf of Maine/Mid-Atlantic sea
scallop trawl, and Gulf of Maine northern shrimp trawl (71 FR 2006,
January 4, 2006). This fishery extends from Maine through Florida. The
fishery is managed through Federal and interstate fishery management
plans (FMPs).
This fishery is classified as Category III on the MMPA LOF;
however, portions of the fishery have been observed at low levels under
the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA)
authority and by the Georgia Department of Natural Resources (GA DNR).
Since 2010, under the authority of the MSA, and the AD, NMFS has
observed trips in this fishery, including 33 trips in 2010, 10 trips in
2011, 12 trips in 2012, and 20 trips in 2013.
Bottom trawl gear is known to interact with sea turtles. However,
as noted above, this fishery is currently observed under MSA authority.
In accordance with the criteria for listing a fishery on the AD,
described above, NMFS is not proposing this fishery for inclusion in
the 2015 AD because NMFS does not intend to monitor the fishery beyond
the existing coverage.
Mid-Atlantic Bottom Trawl Fishery
Bottom otter trawl nets include a variety of net types, including
flynets, which are high profile trawls. The Mid-Atlantic bottom trawl
fishery includes both the Mid-Atlantic bottom trawl fishery and the
Mid-Atlantic flynet fishery as defined on the LOF.
The Mid-Atlantic bottom trawl fishery (631 vessels/persons), uses
bottom trawl
[[Page 63069]]
gear to target species including, but not limited to, bluefish,
croaker, monkfish, summer flounder (fluke), winter flounder, silver
hake (whiting), spiny dogfish, smooth dogfish, scup, and black sea
bass. The fishery occurs year-round from Cape Cod, Massachusetts, to
Cape Hatteras, North Carolina, in waters west of 72[deg]30' W. long.
and north of a line extending due east from the North Carolina/South
Carolina border. The gear is managed by several state and Federal FMPs.
The Mid-Atlantic bottom trawl fishery and the Mid-Atlantic flynet
fishery are currently classified as Category II on the MMPA LOF, which
authorizes NMFS to observe these fisheries for marine mammal
interactions, and to collect information on sea turtles should a take
occur on an observed trip. These fisheries are also observed through
MSA authority. Between 2007-2011, estimated observer coverage year-
round in this fishery was 3%, 3%, 5%, 6%, and 8%, respectively, as
reported in NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NE-228, the U.S. Atlantic
and Gulf of Mexico Marine Mammal Stock Assessments--2013.
Bottom trawl gear is known to interact with sea turtles. However,
as noted above, components of this fishery are currently observed under
MSA and MMPA authority. In accordance with the criteria for listing a
fishery on the AD, described above, NMFS is not proposing this fishery
for inclusion in the 2015 AD because NMFS does not intend to monitor
the fishery beyond the existing coverage.
Mid-Atlantic Mid-Water Trawl (Including Pair Trawl) Fishery
The Mid-Atlantic mid-water trawl fishery (estimated 322 vessels/
persons) primarily targets Atlantic mackerel, chub mackerel, and
miscellaneous other pelagic species. This fishery consists of both
single and pair trawls, which are designed, capable, or used to fish
for pelagic species with no portion of the gear designed to be operated
in contact with the bottom. The fishery for Atlantic mackerel occurs
primarily from southern New England through the Mid-Atlantic from
January to March and in the Gulf of Maine during the summer and fall
(May to December).
The Mid-Atlantic mid-water trawl fishery is currently classified as
Category II on the MMPA LOF, which authorizes NMFS to observe this
fishery for marine mammal interactions, and to collect information on
sea turtles should a take occur on an observed trip. During 2007-2011,
estimated observer coverage year-round in this fishery was 3.9%, 13%,
13%, 25%, and 41% respectively, as reported in NOAA Technical
Memorandum NMFS-NE-228, the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Marine
Mammal Stock Assessments--2013. Trawl gear is known to interact with
sea turtles. However, as noted above, this fishery is currently
observed under MSA and MMPA authority. In accordance with the criteria
for listing a fishery on the AD, described above, NMFS is not proposing
this fishery for inclusion in the 2015 AD because NMFS does not intend
to monitor the fishery beyond the existing coverage.
Mid-Atlantic Gillnet Fishery
The Mid-Atlantic gillnet fishery (estimated 5,509 vessels/persons)
targets monkfish, spiny dogfish, smooth dogfish, bluefish, weakfish,
menhaden, spot, croaker, striped bass, large and small coastal sharks,
Spanish mackerel, king mackerel, American shad, black drum, skate spp.,
yellow perch, white perch, herring, scup, kingfish, spotted seatrout,
and butterfish. The fishery uses drift and sink gillnets, including
nets set in a sink, stab, set, strike, or drift fashion, with some
unanchored drift or sink nets used to target specific species. The
dominant material is monofilament twine with stretched mesh sizes from
2.5-12 in. (6.4-30.5 cm), and string lengths from 150-8,400 ft. (46-
2,560 m). This fishery operates year-round west of a line drawn at
72[deg]30' W. long. south to 36[deg]33.03' N. lat. and east to the
eastern edge of the EEZ and north of the North Carolina/South Carolina
border, not including waters where inshore gillnet fisheries (i.e.,
Chesapeake Bay, North Carolina, Long Island Sound inshore gillnet
fisheries) operate in bays, estuaries, and rivers. This fishery
includes any residual large pelagic driftnet effort in the Mid-Atlantic
and any shark and dogfish gillnet effort in the Mid-Atlantic zone
described. The fishing occurs right off the beach (6 ft. [1.8 m]) or in
nearshore coastal waters to offshore waters (250 ft. [76 m]).
Gear in this fishery is managed by several Federal FMPs and
Interstate FMPs managed by the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries
Commission (ASMFC). These fisheries are primarily managed by total
allowable catch (TAC); individual trip limits (quotas); effort caps
(limited number of days at sea per vessel); time and area closures; and
gear restrictions and modifications.
This fishery is classified as Category I on the MMPA LOF, which
authorizes NMFS to observe this fishery in state and Federal waters for
marine mammal interactions and to collect information on sea turtles
should a take occur on an observed trip. During 2007-2011, estimated
observer coverage year-round in this fishery was 6%, 3%, 3%, 4%, and 2%
respectively, as reported in NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NE-228, the
U.S. Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Marine Mammal Stock Assessments--2013.
Gillnet gear is known to interact with sea turtles. However, as
noted above, this fishery is currently observed under MSA and MMPA
authority. In accordance with the criteria for listing a fishery on the
AD, described above, NMFS is not proposing this fishery for inclusion
in the 2015 AD because NMFS does not intend to monitor the fishery
beyond the existing coverage.
Northeast Sink Gillnet Fishery
The Northeast sink gillnet fishery (estimated 4,375 vessels/
persons) targets Atlantic cod, haddock, pollock, yellowtail flounder,
winter flounder, witch flounder, American plaice, windowpane flounder,
spiny dogfish, monkfish, silver hake, red hake, white hake, ocean pout,
skate spp, mackerel, redfish, and shad. This fishery uses sink gillnet
gear, which is anchored gillnet (bottom-tending net) gear fished in the
lower one-third of the water column. The dominant material is
monofilament twine with stretched mesh sizes from 6-12 in (15-30.5 cm)
and string lengths from 600-10,500 ft. (183-3,200 m), depending on the
target species. Large mesh (10-14 in [25-35.6 cm]) sink gillnets,
either tied down or set upright without floats using a polyfoam core
floatline, are used when targeting monkfish. The fishery operates from
the U.S.-Canada border to Long Island, New York, at 72[deg]30' W. long.
south to 36[deg]33.03' N. lat. (corresponding with the Virginia/North
Carolina border) and east to the eastern edge of the EEZ, including the
Gulf of Maine, Georges Bank, and Southern New England, and excluding
Long Island Sound or other waters where gillnet fisheries are
classified as Category III on the MMPA LOF. Fishing effort occurs year-
round, peaking from May to July primarily on continental shelf regions
in depths from 30-750 ft. (9-228.6 m), with some nets deeper than 800
ft. (244 m).
Several interstate and Federal FMPs manage this fishery. In
addition, the Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction Plan and the Harbor
Porpoise Take Reduction Plan manage the fishery to reduce the risk of
entanglement of right, humpback, and fin whales, and harbor porpoises,
respectively. The fishery is primarily managed through TAC limits;
individual trip limits (quotas); effort caps (limited number of days at
sea per vessel); time and area closures; and gear restrictions.
[[Page 63070]]
This fishery is classified as Category I on the MMPA LOF, which
authorizes NMFS to observe this fishery in state and Federal waters for
marine mammal interactions and to collect information on sea turtles
should a take occur on an observed trip. During 2007-2011, estimated
observer coverage year-round in this fishery was 7%, 5%, 4%, 17%, and
19% respectively, as reported in NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NE-228,
the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Marine Mammal Stock Assessments--
2013.
Gillnet gear is known to interact with sea turtles. However, as
noted above, this fishery is currently observed under MSA and MMPA
authority. In accordance with the criteria for listing a fishery on the
AD, described above, NMFS is not proposing this fishery for inclusion
in the 2015 AD because NMFS does not intend to monitor the fishery
beyond the existing coverage.
Southeast Atlantic Gillnet Fishery
The Southeast Atlantic gillnet fishery (estimated 357 vessels/
persons) targets finfish, including king mackerel, Spanish mackerel,
whiting, bluefish, pompano, spot, croaker, little tunny, bonita, jack
crevalle, cobia, and striped mullet. This fishery does not include
gillnet effort targeting sharks as part of the Southeastern U.S.
Atlantic shark gillnet fishery. This fishery uses gillnets set in sink,
stab, set, or strike fashion. The fishery operates in waters south of a
line extending due east from the North Carolina-South Carolina border
and south and east of the fishery management council demarcation line
between the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico. The majority of
fishing effort occurs in Federal waters since South Carolina, Georgia,
and Florida prohibit the use of gillnets, with limited exceptions, in
state waters.
Fishing for king mackerel, Spanish mackerel, cobia, cero, and
little tunny in Federal waters is managed under the Coastal Migratory
Pelagic Resources FMP. None of the other target species are Federally-
managed under the MSA. In state waters, state and ASMFC Interstate FMPs
apply.
This fishery is classified as Category II on the MMPA LOF, which
authorizes NMFS to observe this fishery in state and federal waters for
marine mammal interactions, and to collect information on sea turtles
should a take occur on an observed trip. NMFS has previously observed
this fishery at moderate levels, primarily focused on target catch and
bycatch species other than sea turtles. No observer coverage has been
achieved since this fishery was listed on the 2010 AD. NMFS is not
proposing this fishery for inclusion in the 2015 AD as NMFS does not
intend to monitor this fishery specifically for sea turtles at this
time.
Virginia Pound Net Fishery
The Virginia pound net fishery (estimated 67 vessels/persons)
targets species, including croaker, menhaden, striped bass, and spot,
using stationary gear in nearshore Virginia waters, primarily in the
Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries. Pound net gear includes a leader
posted perpendicular to the shoreline and extending outward, which
funnels the fish into the pound, where the catch accumulates. This
fishery includes all pound net effort in Virginia State waters,
including waters inside the Chesapeake Bay. The fishery is managed
under Interstate FMPs for Atlantic croaker and spot.
The Virginia pound net fishery is currently classified as Category
II on the MMPA LOF, which authorizes NMFS to observe this fishery for
marine mammal interactions, and to collect information on sea turtles
should a take occur on an observed trip. Loggerhead, Kemp's ridley,
leatherback, and green turtles have been observed taken in this
fishery. The Northeast Fisheries Observer Program conducted monitoring
in this fishery in 2009 from August 23 to October 4 and in 2010 from
mid-May to early August.
NMFS currently requires the use of a modified pound net leader in
certain areas of the Chesapeake Bay to reduce entanglements of sea
turtles in this gear type (71 FR 36024, June 23, 2006). This fishery
operates at the same time as historically elevated sea turtle
strandings.
On April 17, 2014, NMFS published a proposed rule (79 FR 21695) to
amend the Bottlenose Dolphin Take Reduction Plan (BDTRP) and its
implementing regulations under the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA).
The BDTRP rule proposes the year-round use of modified pound net
leaders for offshore Virginia pound nets in specified waters of the
lower mainstem Chesapeake Bay and coastal state waters. Virginia pound
net-related definitions, gear prohibitions, and non-regulatory measures
are also proposed. Both regulatory and non-regulatory measures proposed
in that rule are based on the Bottlenose Dolphin Take Reduction Team's
consensus recommendations. The implementation of this final regulation
would benefit sea turtles.
While the Virginia pound net fishery remains a concern for sea
turtle incidental take, NMFS is not proposing its inclusion on the 2015
AD because NMFS does not intend to monitor the fishery at this time.
Existing regulations to address sea turtle mortality in the pound net
leaders and proposed regulations to address bottlenose dolphin
mortality in pound net leaders provide benefit to sea turtles. Further,
most of the takes that occur in the pound are live turtles that are
released uninjured and, when observed, an alternative platform is used.
U.S. Mid-Atlantic Mixed Species Stop Seine/Weir/Pound Net (Except the
North Carolina Roe Mullet Stop Net) Fishery
The Mid-Atlantic mixed species stop seine/weir/pound net fishery
(unknown number of vessels/persons) targets several species, including,
but not limited to, weakfish, striped bass, shark, catfish, menhaden,
flounder, gizzard shad, and white perch. The fishery uses fixed or
staked net gear (pound net, weir, staked trap) from Nantucket Sound to
Chesapeake Bay (60 FR 31681, June 16, 1995); the Virginia pound net and
the North Carolina roe mullet stop net fisheries are not included as
part of this fishery.
This fishery is classified as Category III on the MMPA LOF and was
listed on the 2010 AD, but it has never been observed. As discussed
above, this gear type is known to interact with sea turtles, however,
NMFS does not intend to monitor the fishery at this time and is not
proposing this fishery for inclusion in the 2015 AD.
Implementation of Observer Coverage in a Fishery Listed in the 2015 AD
As part of the proposed 2015 AD, NMFS has included, to the extent
practicable, information on the fisheries or gear types to be observed,
geographic and seasonal scope of coverage, and any other relevant
information. For each of these fisheries or gear types, NMFS intends to
monitor the fishery and anticipates that it will have the funds to do
so. After publication of a final AD, a 30-day delay in effective date
for implementing observer coverage will follow, except for those
fisheries where the AA has determined that there is good cause pursuant
to the Administrative Procedure Act to make the rule effective without
a 30-day delay.
The design of any observer program for fisheries identified through
the AD process, including how observers would be allocated to
individual vessels, will vary among fisheries, fishing sectors, gear
types, and geographic regions and will ultimately be determined by the
individual NMFS Regional Office, Science Center, and/or observer
program. During the program design, NMFS will be guided by the
following
[[Page 63071]]
standards for distributing and placing observers among fisheries
identified in the AD and among vessels in those fisheries:
(1) The requirement to obtain the best available scientific
information;
(2) The requirement that observers be assigned fairly and equitably
among fisheries and among vessels in a fishery;
(3) The requirement that no individual person or vessel, or group
of persons or vessels, be subject to inappropriate, excessive observer
coverage; and
(4) The need to minimize costs and avoid duplication, where
practicable.
Vessels subject to observer coverage under the AD must comply with
observer safety requirements specified at 50 CFR 600.725 and 50 CFR
600.746. Specifically, 50 CFR 600.746(c) requires vessels to provide
adequate and safe conditions for carrying an observer and conditions
that allow for operation of normal observer functions. To provide such
conditions, a vessel must comply with the applicable regulations
regarding observer accommodations (see 50 CFR parts 229, 300, 600, 622,
635, 648, 660, and 679) and possess a current United States Coast Guard
Commercial Fishing Vessel Safety Examination decal or a USCG
certificate of examination. A vessel that fails to meet these
requirements at the time an observer is to be deployed on the vessel is
prohibited from fishing (50 CFR 600.746(f)) unless NMFS determines that
an alternative platform (e.g., a second vessel) may be used, or
determines that a vessel with inadequate or unsafe facilities is not
required to take an observer under 50 CFR 222.404. In any case, all
fishermen on a vessel must cooperate in the operation of observer
functions. Observer programs designed or carried out in accordance with
50 CFR 222.404 would be required to be consistent with existing
observer-related NOAA policies and regulations, such as those under the
Fair Labor and Standards Act (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.), the Service
Contract Act (41 U.S.C. 351 et seq.), Observer Health and Safety
regulations (50 CFR part 600), and other relevant policies.
Again, note that fisheries not included on the 2015 AD may still be
observed under a different authority than the ESA (e.g., MMPA, MSA).
Additional information on observer programs in commercial fisheries can
be found on the NMFS National Observer Program's Web site: https://www.st.nmfs.noaa.gov/observer-home/; links to individual regional
observer programs may also be found on this Web site.
Sea Turtle Distribution
Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico
Sea turtle species found in waters of the Atlantic Ocean and Gulf
of Mexico include green, hawksbill, Kemp's ridley, leatherback, and
loggerhead turtles. The waters off the U.S. east coast and Gulf of
Mexico provide important foraging, breeding, and migrating habitat for
these species. Further, the southeastern United States, from North
Carolina through the Florida Gulf coast, is a major sea turtle nesting
area for loggerhead, leatherback, and green turtles, and, to a lesser
extent, Kemp's ridley and hawksbill turtles.
Four species--green, Kemp's ridley, leatherback, and loggerhead
turtles--occur seasonally in New England and Mid-Atlantic continental
shelf waters north of Cape Hatteras, North Carolina. The occurrence of
these species in these waters is largely temperature dependent. In
general, some turtles move up the coast from southern wintering areas
as water temperatures warm in the spring. The trend is reversed in the
fall as water temperatures decrease. By December, turtles that migrated
northward have returned to more southern waters for the winter. Hard-
shelled species are most commonly found south of Cape Cod,
Massachusetts. Leatherbacks are regularly found as far north in U.S.
waters as the Gulf of Maine in the summer and fall.
Green turtles are found in inshore and nearshore waters from Texas
to Massachusetts, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico. While
foraging and developmental habitats also occur in the wider Caribbean,
important feeding areas in Florida include the Indian River Lagoon, the
Florida Keys, Florida Bay, Homosassa, Crystal River, Cedar Key, and St.
Joseph Bay. The bays and sounds of North Carolina also provide
important foraging habitat for green turtles.
In the Atlantic, hawksbills are most common in Puerto Rico and its
associated islands and in the U.S. Virgin Islands. In the continental
United States, the species is primarily recorded from south Texas and
south Florida and infrequently from the remaining Gulf states and north
of Florida. Kemp's ridleys are distributed throughout waters of the
Gulf of Mexico and U.S. Atlantic coast from Florida to New England. The
major nesting area for Kemp's ridleys is in Tamaulipas, Mexico, with
limited nesting extending to the Texas coast.
Loggerheads occur throughout the Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico,
ranging from inshore shallow water habitats to deeper oceanic waters.
The largest nesting assemblage of loggerheads in the world is found in
the southeastern United States.
Adult leatherbacks are capable of tolerating a wide range of water
temperature, and have been sighted along the entire continental coast
of the United States as far north as the Gulf of Maine and south to
Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and into the Gulf of Mexico. The
southeast coast of Florida represents a small, but growing, nesting
area for leatherbacks in the western North Atlantic.
U.S. Pacific Ocean
Leatherback sea turtles are found consistently off the U.S. west
coast, usually north of Point Conception, California. They are known to
migrate to central and northern California from their natal beaches in
the Western Pacific to feed on jellyfish during summer and fall.
Leatherback turtles usually appear in Monterey Bay and California
coastal waters during August and September and move offshore in October
and November. Other observed areas of summer leatherback concentration
include northern California and the waters off Washington through
northern Oregon, offshore from the Columbia River plume.
Green, loggerhead, and olive ridley sea turtles are rarely observed
in the west coast EEZ, but records show that all species have stranded
in California and the Pacific Northwest. Two small resident populations
of green turtles have been identified in the southern California Bight,
associated historically with the warm water outflows from power plants
in San Diego Bay and the San Gabriel River in Long Beach, California.
In the eastern Pacific, loggerheads have been reported as far north as
Alaska and as far south as Chile. Occasional sightings are reported
from the coasts of Washington and Oregon, but most records are of
juveniles off the coast of California. Based upon limited observer
records, loggerheads travel into the southern California Bight during
El Ni[ntilde]o events (or warm water conditions similar to an El
Ni[ntilde]o). The majority of fishery interactions with loggerheads
during El Ni[ntilde]o conditions have occurred during the summer. Olive
ridleys have been recorded stranded all along the U.S. west coast.
Olive ridleys are believed to use warm water currents along the west
coast for foraging. The specific distribution of olive ridleys along
the U.S. west coast is unknown at this time.
Sea turtles occur throughout the Pacific Islands Region including
the
[[Page 63072]]
State of Hawaii and the U.S. territories of Guam, American Samoa, and
the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI). Green and
hawksbill turtles are most common in nearshore waters while
leatherbacks, loggerheads, and olive ridleys occur in offshore pelagic
waters. Stock structure and population dynamics for some species in
this region are poorly understood.
Sea Turtle Strandings
NMFS reviewed data collected by the Sea Turtle Stranding and
Salvage Network (STSSN) to identify stranding trends and inform
development of this proposed rule. The STSSN along the U.S. Atlantic
and Gulf of Mexico coasts has documented strandings of six species:
Loggerhead, Kemp's ridley, green, leatherback, hawksbill, and olive
ridley turtles, with loggerheads consistently representing the highest
number of strandings. The Southeast United States consistently records
the highest level of strandings during any given month, each year.
Loggerhead sea turtles represent the highest number of annual
strandings, followed by Kemp's ridley. Since 2010, the number of sea
turtle strandings reported in the Northern Gulf of Mexico has
increased, with Kemp's ridley strandings occurring in the highest
numbers.
Based on the data reviewed, strandings have occurred in each month
of the year, in the Northeast Atlantic, the Southeast Atlantic and the
Gulf of Mexico; however, distinct trends are notable within each of
these regions. In the Gulf and Southeast U.S. Atlantic regions,
strandings consistently occur in every month of the year. In the Gulf
region, the highest concentration of strandings occurs from March to
July, with a notable peak in April and May. In the Southeast Atlantic
region, the highest concentration of strandings occurs from March to
November, with a notable peak in May and June. In the Northeast
Atlantic region, strandings predominately occur between May and
November of each year, with the highest concentration of strandings
between June and September; strandings are uncommon in the winter and
early spring.
On the U.S. west coast, strandings are infrequent compared to the
Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico coasts. This is primarily due to species
abundance and distribution. The STSSN in California has documented
strandings of five species: Green, leatherback, loggerhead, hawksbill,
and olive ridley turtles. Strandings were documented in all months;
data indicate a peak in strandings between July and October. Green
turtles represent the highest number of strandings.
In the Pacific Islands region, strandings occur throughout the
year, primarily green turtles and secondarily hawksbills in Hawaii,
Guam, American Samoa, and CNMI. In Oregon and Washington, very few
strandings are reported. Historical records include a few green,
loggerhead, and olive ridley strandings.
Fisheries Proposed for Inclusion on the 2015 Annual Determination
NMFS is proposing to include 14 fisheries (12 in the Atlantic
Ocean/Gulf of Mexico and 2 in the Pacific Ocean) on the 2015 AD. The 14
fisheries, described below and listed in Table 1, represent several
gear types, including trawl, gillnet, trap/pot, and weir/seine.
The 2014 LOF (78 FR 73477) was used as the comprehensive list of
commercial fisheries to evaluate for inclusion on the AD. The fishery
name, definition, and number of vessels/persons for fisheries listed on
the AD are taken from the most recent LOF. Additionally, the fishery
descriptions below include a particular fishery's current
classification on the MMPA LOF (i.e., Category I, II, or III); Category
I and II fisheries are required to carry observers under the MMPA if
requested by NMFS. As noted previously, NMFS also has authority to
observe fisheries in Federal waters under the MSA and collect sea
turtle bycatch information.
Trawl Fisheries
Interactions with trawl fisheries are of particular concern for sea
turtles, because forced submergence in any type of restrictive gear can
lead to lack of oxygen and subsequent death by drowning. Metabolic
changes that can impair a sea turtle's ability to function can occur
within minutes of forced submergence (Lutcavage et al., 1997).
Trawls that are not outfitted with turtle excluder devices (TEDs)
may result in forced submergence. Currently, only otter trawl fisheries
capable of catching shrimp and operating south of Cape Charles,
Virginia, and in the Gulf of Mexico as well as trawl fisheries
targeting summer flounder south of Cape Charles, Virginia, in the
summer flounder fishery-sea turtle protection area (50 CFR 222.102) are
required to use TEDs.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico Shrimp Trawl Fishery
The Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl fishery
(estimated 4950 vessels/persons) targets shrimp using various types of
trawls; NMFS will focus on the component of the fishery that uses
skimmer trawls for the 2015 AD. Skimmer trawls are used primarily in
inshore/inland shallow waters (typically less than 20 ft. (6.1 m)) to
target shrimp. The skimmer trawl has a rigid ``L''-shaped or triangular
metal frame with the inboard portion of the frame attached to the
vessel and the outboard portion attached to a skid that runs along the
seabed.
Skimmer trawl use increased in response to TED requirements for
shrimp bottom otter trawls. Skimmer trawls currently have no TED
requirement but are subject to tow time limits of 55 minutes from April
1 to October 31 and 75 minutes from November 1 to March 31. Skimmer
trawls are used in North Carolina, Florida (Gulf Coast), Alabama,
Mississippi, and Louisiana. There are documented takes of sea turtles
in skimmer trawls in North Carolina and the Gulf of Mexico. All Gulf of
Mexico states, except Texas, include skimmer trawls as an allowable
gear. In recent years, the skimmer trawl has become a major gear in the
inshore shrimp fishery in the Northern Gulf and also has some use in
inshore North Carolina. Louisiana hosts the vast majority of skimmer
boats, with 2,248 skimmer and butterfly net trawlers reporting landings
in 2008. In 2008, Mississippi had approximately 62 active skimmer,
butterfly, and chopstick boats, Alabama had 60 active skimmer boats,
and North Carolina had 97 skimmer vessels (NMFS 2014). However, skimmer
vessels in North Carolina have declined in recent years to 64 active
vessels in 2010.
Skimmer trawl effort overlaps with sea turtle distribution, and as
noted above, takes have been reported. Although subject to tow times,
the magnitude of sea turtle takes in this fishery are not well
understood. In response to high numbers of sea turtle strandings since
2010, fishery observer effort was shifted from otter trawls to the
inshore skimmer trawl fishery in the northern Gulf of Mexico during the
summers of 2012, 2013, and 2014. In 2012, 119 sea days were observed in
the skimmer fishery resulting in 24 sea turtles observations. In 2013,
145 sea days were observed, resulting in 8 sea turtle observations. To
date in 2014, 10 sea turtles have been observed in the skimmer trawl
fishery.
Continued observer coverage to understand the scope and impact of
turtle takes in this fishery is needed to implement the prohibitions of
take, inform management decisions on what actions may be necessary to
minimize and prevent sea turtle takes, and further sea turtle
conservation and recovery.
[[Page 63073]]
The Southeastern U.S. Atlantic/Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl fishery
is classified as Category II on the MMPA LOF, and mandatory observer
coverage in Federal waters began in 2007 under the MSA. The fishery is
currently observed at approximately 1% of total fishery effort. The
fishery was previously included in the 2010 AD, which allowed for
observer coverage to be shifted to skimmer trawls to specifically
investigate bycatch of sea turtles. NMFS proposes to again include this
fishery pursuant to the criteria identified at 50 CFR 222.402(a)(1) for
including a fishery in the AD, because sea turtles are known to occur
in the same areas where the fishery operates, takes have been
previously documented in this fishery, and NMFS intends to continue to
focus observer coverage in the component of the fishery that uses
skimmer trawls.
Gulf of Mexico Mixed Species Trawl Fishery
The Gulf of Mexico Mixed Species Trawl Fishery (estimated 20
vessels/persons) targets fish using various types of trawl gear,
including bottom otter trawl gear targeting sheepshead. This fishery is
located in state waters, and is classified as Category III on the MMPA
LOF. NMFS has not previously required vessels operating in this fishery
to carry an observer under MMPA authority, and this fishery was not
included in the 2010 AD. NMFS proposes to include this fishery in the
2015 AD pursuant to the criteria identified at 50 CFR 222.402(a)(1) for
including a fishery in the AD, because sea turtles are known to occur
in the same areas where the fishery operates, takes have been
documented in similar gear types, mainly the shrimp trawl fishery, and
NMFS intends to monitor this fishery.
Gillnet Fisheries
Sea turtles are vulnerable to entanglement and drowning in
gillnets, especially when the gear is left unattended. The main risk to
sea turtles from capture in gillnet gear is forced submergence. Sea
turtle entanglement in gillnets can also result in severe constriction
wounds and/or abrasions. Large mesh gillnets (e.g., 10-12 in. [25.4-
30.5 cm] stretched mesh or greater) have been documented as
particularly effective at capturing sea turtles. Additionally, sea
turtles have been documented entangled in smaller mesh gillnets.
Given known interactions between sea turtles and this gear type,
and the need to obtain more coverage on state inshore fisheries, NMFS
proposes to include the California Halibut, White Seabass and Other
Species Set Gillnet Fishery; California Yellowtail, Barracuda, and
White Seabass Drift Gillnet Fishery; Chesapeake Bay Inshore Gillnet
Fishery; Long Island Inshore Gillnet Fishery; North Carolina Inshore
Gillnet Fishery; and Gulf of Mexico Gillnet Fishery in the 2015 AD.
Each of these fisheries, with the exception of the Gulf of Mexico
Gillnet Fishery, was listed on the 2010 AD.
California Halibut, White Seabass and Other Species Set Gillnet Fishery
(>3.5 in Mesh)
The California halibut, white seabass, and other species set
gillnet fishery (estimated 50 vessels/persons) targets halibut, white
seabass, and other species from the U.S.-Mexico border north to
Monterey Bay using 200 fathom (1,200 ft.; 366 m) gillnets with a
stretch mesh size of 8.5 in (31.6 cm). Net soak duration is typically
8-10, 19-24, or 44-49 hours at a depth ranging from 15-50 fathoms (90-
300 ft.; 27-91 m), with most sets from 15-35 fathoms (90-210 ft.; 27-64
m). No more than 1500 fathoms (9,000 ft.; 2,743 m) of gill or trammel
net may be fished in combination for California halibut and angel
shark. Fishing occurs year-round, with effort generally increasing
during summer months and declining during the last three months of the
year. The central California portion of the fishery from Point Arguello
to Point Reyes has been closed since September 2002, following a state
ban on gillnets inshore of 60 fathoms (360 ft.; 110 m). Since 1990, set
gill nets have been prohibited in state waters south of Point Arguello
and within 70 fathoms (420 ft.; 128 m) or one mile (1.6 km), whichever
is less, around the Channel Islands. The California Department of Fish
and Game (CDFG) manages the fishery as a limited entry fishery with
gear restrictions and area closures.
This fishery is classified as Category II on the MMPA LOF, which
authorizes NMFS to observe this fishery in state waters for marine
mammal interactions and to collect information on sea turtles should a
take occur on an observed trip. This fishery was included in the 2010
AD. This fishery was observed at 13% of all trips in 2010, 8% in 2011,
and 6% in 2012. During that time, no sea turtle bycatch was observed in
the fishery. NMFS proposes to again include this fishery pursuant to
the criteria identified at 50 CFR 222.402(a)(1) for including a fishery
in the AD, because it operates in the same waters that turtles are
known to occur, this gear type is known to result in the incidental
take of sea turtles based on documented takes, and NMFS intends to
monitor this fishery.
California Yellowtail, Barracuda, and White Seabass Drift Gillnet
Fishery (Mesh Size >3.5 in. and <14 in.)
The California yellowtail, barracuda, and white seabass drift
gillnet fishery (30 vessels/persons) targets primarily yellowtail and
white seabass, and secondarily barracuda, with target species typically
determined by market demand on a short-term basis. Drift gillnets are
up to 6,000 ft. (1,829 m) long and are set at the surface. The mesh
size depends on target species and is typically 6.0-6.5 in (15-16.5
cm). When targeting yellowtail and barracuda, the mesh size must be
>=3.5 in (9 cm); when targeting white seabass, the mesh size must be
>=6 in (15.2 cm). From June 16 to March 14 not more than 20 percent, by
number, of a load of fish may be white seabass with a total length of
28 in (71 cm). A maximum of ten white seabass per load may be taken if
taken in gillnet or trammel nets with meshes from 3.5-6.0 in (9-15 cm)
in length. The fishery operates year-round, primarily south of Point
Conception with some effort around San Clemente Island and San Nicolas
Island. This fishery is a limited entry fishery with various gear
restrictions and area closures managed by the CDFG.
This fishery is classified as Category II on the MMPA LOF, which
authorizes NMFS to observe this fishery in state waters for marine
mammal interactions and to collect information on sea turtles should a
take occur on an observed trip. This fishery was included in the 2010
AD. This fishery was observed at 5% of all trips in 2010, 3% in 2011,
and 1% in 2012. During that time, no sea turtle bycatch was observed in
the fishery. NMFS proposes to again include this fishery pursuant to
the criteria identified at 50 CFR 222.402(a)(1) for including a fishery
in the AD because it operates in the same waters that turtles are known
to occur, this gear type is known to result in the incidental take of
sea turtles based on documented takes, and NMFS intends to monitor this
fishery.
Chesapeake Bay Inshore Gillnet Fishery
The Chesapeake Bay inshore gillnet fishery (estimated 1,126
vessels/persons) targets menhaden and croaker using gillnet gear with
mesh sizes ranging from 2.875-5 in (7.3-12.7 cm), depending on the
target species. The fishery operates between the Chesapeake Bay Bridge-
Tunnel and the mainland. The fishery is managed under the Interstate
FMPs for Atlantic menhaden and Atlantic croaker. Gillnets
[[Page 63074]]
in Chesapeake Bay also target striped bass and spot.
This fishery is classified as Category II on the MMPA LOF and was
included in the 2010 AD. There has been limited observer coverage in
this fishery since 2010, with 12 observed trips in 2010, 1 observed
trip in 2011, and 3 observed trips in 2013. To date, observer coverage
in gillnet fisheries has focused on Federally-managed fisheries. There
is a need to better understand the gear fished in state waters and the
extent to which this gear interacts with sea turtles. Given the risk of
interaction and the limited data currently available on interactions,
NMFS proposes to again include this fishery pursuant to the criteria
identified at 50 CFR 222.402(a)(1) for listing a fishery on the AD
because sea turtles are known to occur in the same areas where the
fishery operates, takes have been previously documented in similar
gear, the fishery operates during a period of high sea turtle
strandings, and NMFS intends to monitor this fishery.
Long Island Inshore Gillnet Fishery
The Long Island Sound inshore gillnet fishery (estimated 20
vessels/persons) includes all gillnet fisheries operating west of a
line from the north fork of the eastern end of Long Island, New York
(Orient Point to Plum Island to Fishers Island) to Watch Hill, Rhode
Island (59 FR 43703, August 25, 1994). Target species include bluefish,
striped bass, weakfish, and summer flounder.
This fishery is classified as Category II on the MMPA LOF and was
included in the 2010 AD. There has been limited observer coverage in
this fishery since 2010. To date, observer coverage in gillnet
fisheries has focused on Federally-managed fisheries. However, the NMFS
Northeast Fisheries Observer Program has worked with the state of New
York to develop a plan to achieve observer coverage in New York state
waters between 2014 and 2017, which includes approximately 250 gillnet
trips annually. There is a need to better understand the gear fished in
state waters and the extent to which this gear interacts with sea
turtles. Given the risk of interaction and the limited data currently
available on interactions, and the new partnership with the State of
New York, NMFS proposes to again include this fishery pursuant to the
criteria identified at 50 CFR 222.402(a)(1) for listing a fishery on
the AD. NMFS also makes this proposal because sea turtles are known to
occur in the same areas where the fishery operates, takes have been
previously documented in similar gear, the fishery operates during a
period of high sea turtle strandings, and NMFS intends to monitor this
fishery.
North Carolina Inshore Gillnet Fishery
The North Carolina inshore gillnet fishery (approximately 1,323
vessels/persons) targets species including southern flounder, weakfish,
bluefish, Atlantic croaker, striped mullet, spotted seatrout, Spanish
mackerel, striped bass, spot, red drum, black drum, and shad. This
fishery includes any fishing effort using any type of gillnet gear,
including set (float and sink), drift, and runaround gillnet for any
target species inshore of the COLREGS lines in North Carolina. This
fishery is managed under state and ASMFC interstate FMPs, applying net
and mesh size regulations, and seasonal area closures in the Pamlico
Sound Gillnet Restricted Area.
NMFS issued two ESA section 10(a)(1)(B) permits for the North
Carolina state-wide inshore gillnet fishery to incidentally take sea
turtles in 2013, and to incidentally take Atlantic sturgeon in 2014,
which include all inshore, estuarine waters, including Core Sound and
Pamlico Sound. The permits require the State of North Carolina to
maintain a minimum of 7% observer coverage for large mesh gillnet in
each state management area for the spring, summer, and fall seasons. It
also requires a minimum of 2% observer coverage for small mesh
gillnets. Since issuance of the sea turtle incidental take permit in
September 2013, it is estimated that 216 green sea turtles (173 alive,
88 dead) and 15 Kemp's ridley sea turtles (all alive), have been
incidentally taken in the inshore large mesh gillnet fishery.
Additionally, 1 live green sea turtle was observed in the small mesh
gillnet fishery.
This fishery is classified as Category II on the MMPA LOF and was
included in the 2010 AD. NMFS has observed this fishery with limited
coverage since 2010, observing 42 trips in 2010, 18 trips in 2011, 22
trips in 2012, and 28 trips in 2013. Although the state is currently
required to maintain observer coverage in inshore waters, NMFS proposes
to again include this fishery pursuant to the criteria identified at 50
CFR 222.402(a)(1) for listing a fishery on the AD because sea turtles
are known to occur in the same areas where the fishery operates, takes
have been previously documented in this fishery, the fishery operates
during a period of high sea turtle strandings, and NMFS intends to
monitor this fishery.
Gulf of Mexico Gillnet Fishery
The Gulf of Mexico Gillnet Fishery (estimated 724 vessels/persons)
operates in state inshore waters, targeting finfish, including Spanish
mackerel, king mackerel, striped mullet, Florida pompano, and southern
flounder using sink gillnets and strike gillnets.
This fishery is classified as Category II on the MMPA LOF, which
authorizes NMFS to observe this fishery for marine mammal interactions
and to collect information on sea turtles should a take occur on an
observed trip. To better characterize fishing effort and bycatch, the
NMFS Southeast Gillnet Observer Program began placing observers on
state commercial gillnet vessels in coastal Louisiana, Mississippi, and
Alabama in 2012. NMFS proposes to include this fishery in the 2015 AD
because sea turtles are known to occur in the same areas where the
fishery operates and takes have been documented in similar other
fisheries using gillnet gear, and NMFS intends to monitor this fishery.
Trap/Pot Fisheries
Sea turtles are known to become entangled in the buoy lines (also
called vertical lines) of trap/pot gear, and there have been anecdotal
reports that sea turtles may interact with the trap/pot itself. Turtles
entangled in trap/pot gear may drown or suffer injuries (and potential
subsequent mortality) due to constriction by the rope or line. Takes of
both leatherback and hard-shelled sea turtles have been documented in
this gear type. NMFS Greater Atlantic Region (GAR), formerly the
Northeast Region, established the Northeast Atlantic Sea Turtle
Disentanglement Network (STDN) in 2002 to respond to entanglements in
vertical lines associated with trap/pot gear. Reports of entangled sea
turtles come from fishermen, boaters, and the general public. Since
2002, entanglements in vertical lines have averaged 20.4 annually.
Takes in 2012 and 2013 increased significantly with 41 and 56 takes
documented in each year, respectively. These numbers include all
vertical line interactions, the vast majority of which were identified
as trap/pot gear (as opposed to gillnet gear). A more systematic data
collection on these interactions is needed to begin understanding the
extent to which interactions occur in order to implement the
prohibitions against takes and how to prevent or mitigate takes.
Three pot/trap fisheries were included in the 2010 AD; Atlantic
Blue Crab Trap/Pot Fishery, Atlantic Mixed Species Trap/Pot Fishery,
and the Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American Lobster Trap/Pot Fishery.
However, limited or no observer coverage has been achieved in these
fisheries since listing on the 2010 AD. While some pot/
[[Page 63075]]
trap vessels can be observed through traditional methods, other vessels
participating in these fisheries, especially in state waters, may be
too small to carry observers, which create challenges for observer
programs. Further discussions regarding the most appropriate and
effective methodologies for observing the pot/trap fisheries will be
beneficial. Therefore, as funds allow, the GAR is planning to convene,
within the next year, subject matter experts to discuss new
technologies that may apply to observing and mitigating sea turtle
interactions in trap/pot fisheries, including the potential to observe
through an alternative platform (i.e. a second vessel) program. New
methods to more effectively monitor these fisheries may be developed
and implemented as an outcome of this meeting.
Based on the input from the states, NMFS proposes to again include
relist all three pot/trap fisheries in the 2015 AD.
Atlantic Blue Crab Trap/Pot Fishery
The Atlantic blue crab trap/pot fishery (estimated 8,557 vessels/
persons) targets blue crab using pots baited with fish or poultry
typically set in rows in shallow water. The pot position is marked by
either a floating or sinking buoy line attached to a surface buoy. The
fishery occurs year-round from the south shore of Long Island at
72[deg]30' W. long. in the Atlantic and east of the fishery management
demarcation line between the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico (50
CFR 600.105), including state waters. The fishery is managed under
state FMPs.
This fishery is classified as Category II on the MMPA LOF and was
included in the 2010 AD. However, since NMFS included this fishery in
the 2010 AD, NMFS has been unable to observe the fishery, as discussed
above. Accordingly, NMFS proposes to again include this fishery
pursuant to the criteria identified at 50 CFR 222.402(a)(1) for listing
a fishery on the AD because sea turtles are known to occur in the same
areas where the fishery operates, takes have been documented in similar
gear types (i.e. lobster pot fishery), and NMFS intends to monitor this
fishery.
Atlantic Mixed Species Trap/Pot Fishery
The Atlantic mixed species trap/pot fishery (estimated 3,467
vessels/persons) targets species including hagfish, shrimp, conch/
whelk, red crab, Jonah crab, rock crab, black sea bass, scup, tautog,
cod, haddock, pollock, redfish (ocean perch), white hake, spot, skate,
catfish, and stone crab. The fishery includes all trap/pot operations
from the Maine-Canada border south through the waters east of the
fishery management demarcation line between the Atlantic Ocean and the
Gulf of Mexico (50 CFR 600.105), but does not include the following
trap/pot fisheries (as defined on the MMPA LOF): Northeast/Mid-Atlantic
American lobster trap/pot; Atlantic blue crab trap/pot; Florida spiny
lobster trap/pot; Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico stone crab
trap/pot; U.S. Mid-Atlantic eel trap/pot fisheries; and the
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico golden crab fishery (68 FR
1421, January 10, 2003). The fishery is managed under various
Interstate and Federal FMPs.
This fishery is classified as Category II on the MMPA LOF and was
included in the 2010 AD. However, since listing this fishery on the
2010 AD, NMFS has been unable to observe the fishery, as discussed
above. Accordingly, NMFS proposes to again include this fishery
pursuant to the criteria identified at 50 CFR 222.402(a)(1) for listing
a fishery on the AD because sea turtles are known to occur in the same
areas where the fishery operates, takes have been documented in similar
gear types (i.e. lobster pot fishery), and NMFS intends to monitor this
fishery.
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American Lobster Trap/Pot Fishery
The Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American lobster trap/pot fishery
(estimated 11,693 vessels/persons) targets American lobster primarily
with traps, while 2-3 percent of the target species is taken by mobile
gear (trawls and dredges). The fishery operates in inshore and offshore
waters from Maine to New Jersey and may extend as far south as Cape
Hatteras, North Carolina. Approximately 80 percent of American lobster
is harvested from state waters; therefore, the ASMFC has the primary
regulatory role. The fishery is managed in state waters under the ASMFC
Interstate FMP and in Federal waters under the Atlantic Coastal
Fisheries Cooperative Management Act.
This fishery is classified as Category I on the MMPA LOF and was
included in the 2010 AD. Since that time, NMFS observed 22 lobster
trips in 2013 and 32 trips in 2014, with 216 observation days planned
for the 2014-2015 schedule. NMFS STDN has documented 83 leatherback
entanglements in lobster trap gear operating in Maine, Massachusetts,
Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, and New Jersey since 2002. These
entanglements have occurred between May and October (STDN, unpublished
data), which is the time period when observer coverage for this fishery
will be focused.
NMFS proposes to again include this fishery pursuant to the
criteria identified at 50 CFR 222.402(a)(1) for listing a fishery on
the AD because sea turtles are known to occur in the same areas where
the fishery operates, takes have been documented in this fishery, and
NMFS intends to monitor this fishery.
Weir/Seine/Floating Trap Fisheries
Pound net, weir, seine and floating trap fisheries may use mesh
similar to that used in gillnets, but the gear is prosecuted
differently from traditional gillnets. For example, pound net leaders
have a mesh component similar to a gillnet; sea turtles have been
documented entangled in pound net leaders. Pound net leaders in the
Virginia portion of the Chesapeake Bay are subject to requirements
designed to reduce sea turtle bycatch. Purse seines, weirs and floating
traps also have the potential to entangle and drown sea turtles as they
are set similarly to pound nets. Turtles have been documented in the
pounds of pound net gear and/or weirs in Massachusetts, New York,
Maryland, North Carolina, and Virginia. The turtles observed in these
pounds have generally been alive and uninjured. In Virginia, sea
turtles have been documented becoming entangled with the leader, which
often results in mortality.
Four pound net/weir/seine fisheries were included on the 2010 AD:
The Mid-Atlantic haul/beach seine, the Mid-Atlantic menhaden purse
seine, the Mid-Atlantic mixed species stop seine/weir/pound net, and
the Virginia pound net fishery. Based on the information provided by
states and the best available scientific information, NMFS proposes to
include again two of these fisheries: The Mid-Atlantic Haul/Beach Seine
Fishery, Mid-Atlantic Menhaden Purse Seine Fishery, and add the Rhode
Island Floating Trap Fishery on the 2015 AD.
Mid-Atlantic Haul/Beach Seine Fishery
The Mid-Atlantic haul/beach seine fishery (estimated 565 vessels/
persons) targets striped bass, mullet, spot, weakfish, sea trout,
bluefish, kingfish, and harvest fish using seines with one end secured
(e.g., swipe nets and long seines) and seines secured at both ends or
those anchored to the beach and hauled up on the beach. The beach seine
system also uses a bunt and a wash net that are attached to the beach
and extend into the surf. The beach seines soak for less than 2 hours.
The fishery occurs in waters west of 72[deg]30' W. long. and north of a
line extending
[[Page 63076]]
due east from the North Carolina-South Carolina border. Fishing on the
Outer Banks, North Carolina occurs primarily in the spring (April to
June) and fall (October to December). In the Chesapeake Bay, this gear
has been historically fished in the southwest portion of the Bay with
some effort in the northwest portion. Effort begins to increase in
early May, peaks in early/mid-June, and continues into July. During
this time, based on historical data from Virginia, approximately 100
haul seine trips occur. Beach haul seines have been documented to
interact with sea turtles.
The fishery is managed under the Interstate FMPs for Bluefish and
for Atlantic Striped Bass of the Atlantic Coast from Maine through
North Carolina, and is subject to BDTRP implementing regulations.
This fishery is classified as Category II on the MMPA LOF and was
included in the 2010 AD. NMFS observed this fishery at low levels prior
to 2008, but it has not been observed since then. NMFS proposes to
again include this fishery pursuant to the criteria identified at 50
CFR 222.402(a)(1) for listing a fishery on the AD based on suspected
interactions with sea turtles given the nature of the gear and fishing
methodology in addition to effort overlapping with sea turtle
distribution. In the Chesapeake Bay, the fishery operates at the same
time as historically elevated sea turtle strandings, and NMFS intends
to monitor this fishery.
Mid-Atlantic Menhaden Purse Seine Fishery
The Mid-Atlantic menhaden purse seine fishery (estimated 5 vessels/
persons) targets menhaden and thread herring using purse seine gear.
Most sets occur within 3 mi (4.8 km) of shore with the majority of the
effort occurring off North Carolina from November to January, and
moving northward during warmer months to southern New England. The
fishery is managed under the Interstate FMP for Atlantic Menhaden. In
the Chesapeake Bay, this fishery operates to a limited extent during a
period of high sea turtle strandings (May and June). This fishery is
classified as Category II on the MMPA LOF and was listed on the 2010
AD. NMFS has observed this fishery at low levels, with 9 trips observed
in 2010, and 3 trips observed in 2012. NMFS proposes to again include
this fishery pursuant to the criteria identified at 50 CFR
222.402(a)(1) for listing a fishery on the AD, given the nature of the
gear and fishing methodology in addition to effort overlapping with sea
turtle distribution, and NMFS intends to monitor this fishery.
Rhode Island Floating Trap Fishery
The Rhode Island Floating Trap Fishery (estimated 9 vessels/
persons) is a small fishery that sets traps similar to a weir/pound net
seasonally (May-October) targeting scup, striped sea bass, and squid.
This fishery is classified as Category III on the MMPA LOF, and
NMFS has not previously required vessels operating in this fishery to
carry an observer under MMPA authority. This fishery was not included
in the 2010 AD. Turtles have been documented in the pounds of pound net
gear and/or weirs in Massachusetts, New York, Maryland, and Virginia,
which operates similarly to the Rhode Island Floating Trap Fishery.
There have also been anecdotal reports of sea turtle interactions in
this fishery, but bycatch levels are unknown. NMFS proposes to include
this fishery pursuant to the criteria identified at 50 CFR
222.402(a)(1) for listing a fishery on the AD because sea turtles are
known to occur in the same areas where the fishery operates, takes have
been documented in similar gear types, such as the Virginia and
Maryland pound nets, and NMFS intends to monitor this fishery.
Table 1--State and Federal Commercial Fisheries Included on the 2015
Annual Determination
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Years eligible
Fishery to carry
observers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trawl Fisheries
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl. 2015-2019
Gulf of Mexico mixed species fish trawl................. 2015-2019
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gillnet Fisheries
------------------------------------------------------------------------
California halibut, white seabass and other species set 2015-2019
gillnet (>3.5 in mesh).................................
California yellowtail, barracuda, and white seabass 2015-2019
drift gillnet (mesh size >3.5 in. and <14 in.).........
Chesapeake Bay inshore gillnet.......................... 2015-2019
Long Island inshore gillnet............................. 2015-2019
North Carolina inshore gillnet.......................... 2015-2019
Gulf of Mexico gillnet.................................. 2015-2019
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trap/Pot Fisheries
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Atlantic blue crab trap/pot............................. 2015-2019
Atlantic mixed species trap/pot......................... 2015-2019
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American lobster trap/pot........ 2015-2019
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pound Net/Weir/Seine Fisheries
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mid-Atlantic haul/beach seine........................... 2015-2019
Mid-Atlantic menhaden purse seine....................... 2015-2019
Rhode Island floating trap.............................. 2015-2019
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 63077]]
Classification
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration that this rule would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The factual basis
leading to the certification is set forth below.
NMFS has estimated that approximately 32,540 vessels participating
in the 14 fisheries listed in Table 1 would be eligible to carry an
observer if requested. However, NMFS would only request a fraction of
the total number of participants to carry an observer based on the
sampling protocol identified for each fishery by regional observer
programs. As noted throughout this proposed rule, NMFS would select
vessels and focus coverage in times and areas where fishing effort
overlaps with sea turtle distribution. Due to the unpredictability of
fishing effort, NMFS cannot determine the specific number of vessels
that would be requested to carry an observer.
If a vessel is requested to carry an observer, fishers will not
incur any direct economic costs associated with carrying that observer.
Potential indirect costs to individual fishers required to take
observers may include: Lost space on deck for catch, lost bunk space,
and lost fishing time due to time needed to process bycatch data. For
effective monitoring, however, observers will rotate among a limited
number of vessels in a fishery at any given time, and each vessel
within an observed fishery has an equal probability of being requested
to accommodate an observer. Therefore, the potential indirect costs to
individual fishers are expected to be minimal because observer coverage
would only be required for a small percentage of an individual's total
annual fishing time. In addition, 50 CFR 222.404(b) states that an
observer will not be placed on a vessel if the facilities for
quartering an observer or performing observer functions are inadequate
or unsafe, thereby exempting vessels too small to accommodate an
observer from this requirement. As a result of this certification, an
initial regulatory flexibility analysis is not required and was not
prepared.
The information collection for the AD is approved under Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under OMB control number 0648-0593.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act, unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid OMB Control Number.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
the purposes of Executive Order 12866.
An environmental assessment (EA) was prepared under the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) on the issuance of the regulations to
implement this observer requirement in 50 CFR part 222, subpart D. The
EA concluded that implementing these regulations would not have a
significant impact on the human environment. This proposed rule would
not make any significant change in the management of fisheries included
on the AD, and therefore, this proposed rule would not change the
analysis or conclusion of the EA. If NMFS takes a management action for
a specific fishery, for example, requiring fishing gear modifications,
NMFS would first prepare any environmental document required under NEPA
and specific to that action.
This proposed rule would not affect species listed as threatened or
endangered under the ESA or their associated critical habitat. The
impacts of numerous fisheries have been analyzed in various biological
opinions, and this proposed rule would not affect the conclusions of
those opinions. The inclusion of fisheries on the AD is not considered
to be a management action that would adversely affect threatened or
endangered species. If NMFS takes a management action, for example,
requiring modifications to fishing gear and/or practices, NMFS would
review the action for potential adverse effects to listed species under
the ESA.
This proposed rule would have no adverse impacts on sea turtles and
may have a positive impact on sea turtles by improving knowledge of sea
turtles and the fisheries interacting with sea turtles through
information collected from observer programs.
This proposed rule would not affect the land or water uses or
natural resources of the coastal zone, as specified under section 307
of the Coastal Zone Management Act.
Dated: October 16, 2014.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-25154 Filed 10-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P