Notice of Agreements Filed, 63121 [2014-25149]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 204 / Wednesday, October 22, 2014 / Notices listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA? 1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit CBI information to EPA through regulations.gov or email. Contact Kerry Leifer, email address: leifer.kerry@ epa.gov, to discuss options for submitting CBI to the Agency. 2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting your comments, see the commenting tips at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/ comments.html. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES II. Discussion EPA maintains a list of chemical substances that have been approved for use as inert ingredients in pesticide products. Inert ingredients on this list do not need further approval prior to inclusion in a pesticide formulation for a non-food use. These individual formulations are subject to data requirements in 40 CFR part 158, regardless of whether the inert ingredient is on the approved list. If an application for registration of a pesticide product includes inert ingredients not on the approved list, the inert ingredient will need approval and require payment of a fee in accordance with section 33 of FIFRA, 7 U.S.C. 136w–8. EPA is considering removing from this list a set of 72 chemical substances that are no longer being used as an inert ingredient in a pesticide product. Some of the 72 chemical substances are a subset of a larger list of 371 inert ingredients that were the subject of two petitions submitted to EPA in 2006 (see docket) requesting that the Agency require that the identities of hazardous ingredients identified in the petitions be disclosed on pesticide products containing those ingredients. EPA is taking this action, fulfilling a commitment as described in an EPA May 22, 2014 amended response to the petitioners (see docket). EPA would remove from the approved list those inert ingredients listed in the petitions that are no longer being used in pesticide products. The list of 72 inert ingredients was generated by an Agency evaluation of pesticide product compositional information to determine which of those 371 chemical substances listed as inert ingredients on the EPA-approved list are in use or not in use in currently registered pesticide formulations. The list of chemical substances that are no longer being used as an inert ingredient is available in the docket for this action, under docket ID number EPA–HQ– VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:22 Oct 21, 2014 Jkt 235001 OPP–2014–0558 at http:// www.regulations.gov. Once an inert ingredient is removed from the list, any proposed future use of the inert ingredient would need to be supported by data provided to and reviewed by the EPA as part of a new inert ingredient submission request. The type of data needed to evaluate a new inert ingredient may include, among others, studies to evaluate potential carcinogenicity, adverse reproductive effects, developmental toxicity, genotoxicity as well as environmental effects associated with any chemical substance that is persistent or bioaccumulative. Information regarding the inert ingredient approval process may be found at http://www2.epa.gov/ pesticide-registration/guidancedocuments-inert-ingredients. EPA suggests that pesticide registrants review their records to ensure that the chemical substances, listed by chemical name and Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number, listed in the docket for this action are, in fact, no longer used as inert ingredients in their registered pesticide products. While EPA has endeavored to prepare an accurate list, if a pesticide registrant is aware of a registered product containing any of the 72 chemical substances, that registrant should contact the Agency directly, using the contact listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT (Chemical Listing Inquiries). Similarly, producers of proprietary mixtures currently approved for use as inert ingredients in pesticide products should also review their records to ensure that the chemical substances listed in the docket for this action are, in fact, not currently used in their proprietary mixtures. After the close of the comment period, EPA will consider all comments received and determine appropriate action. Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq. Dated: October 7, 2014. James Jones, Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention. [FR Doc. 2014–24586 Filed 10–21–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION Notice of Agreements Filed The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments on the agreements to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 63121 Washington, DC 20573, within twelve days of the date this notice appears in the Federal Register. Copies of the agreements are available through the Commission’s Web site (www.fmc.gov) or by contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523–5793 or tradeanalysis@fmc.gov. Agreement No.: 012064–004. Title: Hapag-Lloyd/NYK MexicoDominican Republic Slot Exchange Agreement. Parties: Hapag-Lloyd AG and Nippon Yusen Kaisha. Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Cozen O’Connor; 1627 I Street NW; Suite 1100; Washington, DC 20006. Synopsis: The amendment would convert the agreement from a slot exchange to a one-way slot charter from Hapag-Lloyd to NYK, change the name of the agreement to reflect this revision, make conforming changes throughout the agreement, and restate the agreement. Agreement No.: 201175–004. Title: Port of NY/NJ Sustainable Services Agreement. Parties: APM Terminals North America, Inc..; GCT Bayonne LP; GCT New York LP; Maher Terminals LLC; and Port Newark Container Terminal LLC. Filing Party: Carol N. Lambos, Esq.; The Lambos Firm, LLP; 303 South Broadway Suite 410; Tarrytown, NY 10591 Synopsis: The amendment changes the name of New York Container Terminal, LLC to GCT New York LP and Global Terminal and Container Services, LLC to GCT Bayonne LP. Agreement No.: 201210–001. Title: Port of NY/NJ Port Authority/ Marine Terminal Operators Agreement. Parties: APM Terminals North America, Inc..; GCT Bayonne LP; GCT New York LP; Maher Terminals LLC; and Port Newark Container Terminal LLC. Filing Party: Carol N. Lambos, Esq.; The Lambos Firm, LLP; 303 South Broadway Suite 410; Tarrytown, NY 10591 Synopsis: The amendment changes the name of New York Container Terminal, LLC to GCT New York LP and Global Terminal and Container Services, LLC to GCT Bayonne LP. Dated: October 17, 2014. By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission. Karen V. Gregory, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2014–25149 Filed 10–21–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6730–01–P E:\FR\FM\22OCN1.SGM 22OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 204 (Wednesday, October 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 63121]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25149]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreements Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may 
submit comments on the agreements to the Secretary, Federal Maritime 
Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within twelve days of the date this 
notice appears in the Federal Register. Copies of the agreements are 
available through the Commission's Web site (www.fmc.gov) or by 
contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or 
tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.
    Agreement No.: 012064-004.
    Title: Hapag-Lloyd/NYK Mexico-Dominican Republic Slot Exchange 
Agreement.
    Parties: Hapag-Lloyd AG and Nippon Yusen Kaisha.
    Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Cozen O'Connor; 1627 I Street 
NW; Suite 1100; Washington, DC 20006.
    Synopsis: The amendment would convert the agreement from a slot 
exchange to a one-way slot charter from Hapag-Lloyd to NYK, change the 
name of the agreement to reflect this revision, make conforming changes 
throughout the agreement, and restate the agreement.

    Agreement No.: 201175-004.
    Title: Port of NY/NJ Sustainable Services Agreement.
    Parties: APM Terminals North America, Inc..; GCT Bayonne LP; GCT 
New York LP; Maher Terminals LLC; and Port Newark Container Terminal 
LLC.
    Filing Party: Carol N. Lambos, Esq.; The Lambos Firm, LLP; 303 
South Broadway Suite 410; Tarrytown, NY 10591
    Synopsis: The amendment changes the name of New York Container 
Terminal, LLC to GCT New York LP and Global Terminal and Container 
Services, LLC to GCT Bayonne LP.

    Agreement No.: 201210-001.
    Title: Port of NY/NJ Port Authority/Marine Terminal Operators 
Agreement.
    Parties: APM Terminals North America, Inc..; GCT Bayonne LP; GCT 
New York LP; Maher Terminals LLC; and Port Newark Container Terminal 
LLC.
    Filing Party: Carol N. Lambos, Esq.; The Lambos Firm, LLP; 303 
South Broadway Suite 410; Tarrytown, NY 10591
    Synopsis: The amendment changes the name of New York Container 
Terminal, LLC to GCT New York LP and Global Terminal and Container 
Services, LLC to GCT Bayonne LP.

    Dated: October 17, 2014.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.
Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-25149 Filed 10-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P