Energy Conservation Program for Certain Industrial Equipment: Energy Conservation Standards for Commercial Water Heating Equipment, 62899-62910 [2014-24983]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 203 / Tuesday, October 21, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Where: Input power is determined in
accordance with section 2.5.1.6, input
voltage is determined in accordance
with section 2.5.1.7, and input current
is determined in accordance with
section 2.5.1.8.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2014–24985 Filed 10–20–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 431
[Docket No. EERE–2014–BT–STD–0027]
RIN 1904–AD31
Energy Conservation Program for
Certain Commercial Industrial
Equipment: Conservation Standards
for Commercial Pre-Rinse Spray
Valves
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Extension of public comment
period.
AGENCY:
This document announces an
extension of the time period for
submitting comments, data, and
information on the framework
document for commercial pre-rinse
spray valves, published on September
11, 2014. The comment period is
extended to November 12, 2014.
DATES: The comment period for the
framework document for commercial
pre-rinse spray valves, published on
September 11, 2014 (79 FR 54213) is
extended to November 12, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons may
submit comments by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Email:
SprayValves20104STD0027@ee.doe.gov.
Include EERE–2014–BT–STD–0027 and/
or regulation identifier number (RIN)
1904–AD31 in the subject line of the
message. All comments should clearly
identify the name, address, and, if
appropriate, organization of the
commenter. Submit electronic
comments in WordPerfect, Microsoft
Word, portable data format (PDF), or
American Standard Code for
Information Interchange (ASCII) file
format, and avoid the use of special
characters or any form of encryption.
• Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S.
Department of Energy, Building
Technologies Office, Mailstop EE–5B,
Notice of Availability of Framework
Document for Commercial Pre-rinse
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Oct 20, 2014
Jkt 235001
Spray Valves, EERE–2014–BT–STD–
0027 and/or RIN 1904–AD31, 1000
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121. Phone:
(202) 586–2945. If possible, please
submit all items on a compact disc (CD),
in which case it is not necessary to
include printed copies. (Please note that
comments sent by mail are often
delayed and may be damaged by mail
screening processes.)
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda
Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy,
Building Technologies Office, 6th Floor,
950 L’Enfant Plaza SW., Washington,
DC 20024. Phone: (202) 586–2945. If
possible, please submit all items on a
CD, in which case it is not necessary to
include printed copies.
All submissions received must
include docket number EERE–2014–BT–
STD–0027 and/or regulatory
identification number (RIN) 1904–
AD31.
Docket: The docket is available for
review at https://www.regulations.gov,
and will include Federal Register
notices, framework document, notice of
proposed rulemaking, public meeting
attendee lists and transcripts,
comments, and other supporting
documents/materials throughout the
rulemaking process. The regulations.gov
Web page contains simple instructions
on how to access all documents,
including public comments, in the
docket. The docket can be accessed by
searching for docket number EERE–
2014–BT–STD–0027 on the
regulations.gov Web site. All documents
in the docket are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. However,
not all documents listed in the index
may be publicly available, such as
information that is exempt from public
disclosure.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
James Raba, U.S. Department of Energy,
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Building
Technologies Office, EE–5B, 1000
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 586–8654. Email:
jim.raba@ee.doe.gov.
In the Office of General Counsel,
contact Ms. Celia Sher, U.S. Department
of Energy, Office of the General Counsel,
GC–71, 1000 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 287–6122. Email:
Celia.Sher@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
September 11, 2014, the U.S.
Department of Energy (DOE) published
a document in the Federal Register
initiating a rulemaking and data
collection process to consider
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
62899
establishing energy conservation
standards for commercial pre-rinse
spray valves. 79 FR 54213. In that
document, DOE announced the
availability of a framework document.
The document provided for the
submission of written comments by
October 27, 2014, and oral comments
were also accepted at a public meeting
held on September 30, 2014. The
Plumbing Manufacturers International
requested, by letter dated October 9,
2014, an extension of the public
comment period for the framework
document, in view of the breadth,
technical nature, and amount of data
requested, and to ensure that key
domestic and international industry
representatives have adequate time to
review and provide comments.
DOE has determined that an extension
of the public comment period for the
framework document is appropriate to
allow interested parties additional time
to submit comments for DOE’s
consideration. Thus, DOE is extending
the comment period by 15 days. DOE
will consider any comments received by
November 12, 2014 to be timely
submitted.
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 10,
2014.
Kathleen B. Hogan,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy
Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and Renewable
Energy.
[FR Doc. 2014–24982 Filed 10–20–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 431
[Docket Number EERE–2014–BT–STD–
0042]
RIN 1904–AD34
Energy Conservation Program for
Certain Industrial Equipment: Energy
Conservation Standards for
Commercial Water Heating Equipment
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Request for information (RFI).
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE) is initiating a rulemaking
to consider amended energy
conservation standards for commercial
water heaters, hot water supply boilers,
and unfired hot water storage tanks
(commercial water heating equipment).
Once completed, this rulemaking will
fulfill DOE’s statutory obligation to
either propose amended energy
conservation standards for commercial
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21OCP1.SGM
21OCP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
62900
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 203 / Tuesday, October 21, 2014 / Proposed Rules
water heating equipment or to
determine that the existing standards do
not need to be amended. This notice
seeks to solicit information to help DOE
determine whether national standards
more stringent than those currently in
place would result in a significant
amount of additional energy savings and
whether such amended national
standards would be technologically
feasible and economically justified. In
overview, this document presents a brief
description of the analysis DOE plans to
perform for this rulemaking and
requests comment on various issues
relating to each of the analyses (e.g.,
market assessment, engineering
analysis, energy use analysis, life-cycle
cost and payback period analysis, and
national impact analysis). Although this
document contains several specific
topics on which DOE is particularly
interested in receiving written
comment, DOE welcomes suggestions
and information from the public on any
subject within the scope of this
rulemaking, including topics not raised
in this RFI.
DATES: Written comments and
information are requested on or before
November 20, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties are
encouraged to submit comments
electronically. However, interested
persons may submit comments,
identified by docket number EERE–
2014–BT–STD–0042 and/or regulatory
identification number (RIN) 1904–AD34
by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Email:
ComWaterHeating2014STD0042@
ee.doe.gov. Include docket number
EERE–2014–BT–STD–0042 and/or RIN
1904–AD34 in the subject line of the
message. Submit electronic comments
in WordPerfect, Microsoft Word, PDF,
or ASCII file format, and avoid the use
of special characters or any form of
encryption.
• Postal Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards,
U.S. Department of Energy, Building
Technologies Program, Mailstop EE–5B,
1000 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121. If
possible, please submit all items on a
compact disc (CD), in which case it is
not necessary to include printed copies.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda
Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy,
Building Technologies Program, 6th
Floor, 950 L’Enfant Plaza SW.,
Washington, DC 20024. Telephone:
(202) 586–2945. If possible, please
submit all items on a CD, in which case
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Oct 20, 2014
Jkt 235001
it is not necessary to include printed
copies.
For detailed instructions on
submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see section Public Participation of this
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information may
be sent to Mr. Ron Majette, U.S.
Department of Energy, Office of Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy,
Building Technologies Program, EE–5B,
1000 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 586–7935. Email:
Ronald.Majette@ee.doe.gov.
Ms. Sarah Butler, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of the General Counsel,
GC–71, 1000 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 586–1777. Email:
Sarah.Butler@hq.doe.gov.
For information on how to submit or
review public comments, contact Ms.
Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Building
Technologies Program, Mailstop EE–2J,
1000 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 586–2945. Email:
Brenda.Edwards@ee.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
A. Authority
B. Background
C. Rulemaking Process
II. Planned Rulemaking Analyses
A. Test Procedure
B. Market Assessment
C. Technology Options for Consideration
D. Engineering Analysis
E. Markups Analysis
F. Energy Use Analysis
G. Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period
Analysis
H. Shipments Analysis
I. National Impact Analysis
III. Submission of Comments
I. Introduction
A. Authority
Title III, Part C 1 of the Energy Policy
and Conservation Act of 1975 (EPCA or
the Act), Public Law 94–163 (42 U.S.C.
6311–6317, as codified), added by
Public Law 95–619, Title IV, § 441(a),
established the Energy Conservation
Program for Certain Industrial
Equipment, which includes provisions
covering the commercial water heating
equipment that are the subject of this
1 For editorial reasons, upon codification in the
U.S. Code, Part C was re-designated Part A–1.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
notice.2 In general, this program
addresses the energy efficiency of
certain types of commercial and
industrial equipment. Relevant
provisions of the Act include definitions
(42 U.S.C. 6311), energy conservation
standards (42 U.S.C. 6313), test
procedures (42 U.S.C. 6314), labeling
provisions (42 U.S.C. 6315), and the
authority to require information and
reports from manufacturers (42 U.S.C.
6316).
The initial Federal energy
conservation standards and test
procedures for commercial water
heating equipment were added to EPCA
as an amendment made by the Energy
Policy Act of 1992 (EPACT). (42 U.S.C.
6313(a)(5)) These initial energy
conservation standards corresponded to
the efficiency levels contained in the
American Society of Heating,
Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning
Engineers (ASHRAE) Standard 90.1
(ASHRAE Standard 90.1) in effect on
October 24, 1992. The statute provided
that if the efficiency levels in ASHRAE
Standard 90.1 were amended after
October 24, 1992, the Secretary must
establish an amended uniform national
standard at new minimum levels for
each equipment type specified in
ASHRAE Standard 90.1, unless DOE
determines, through a rulemaking
supported by clear and convincing
evidence, that national standards more
stringent than the new minimum levels
would result in significant additional
energy savings and be technologically
feasible and economically justified. (42
U.S.C. 6313(a)(6)(A)(ii)(II)) In deciding
whether a proposed amended standard
is economically justified, DOE must,
after receiving comments on the
proposed standard, determine whether
the benefits of the proposed standard
exceed its burdens by, to the greatest
extent practicable, considering the
following seven factors:
1. The economic impact of the
standard on manufacturers and
consumers of the equipment subject to
the standard;
2. The savings in operating costs
throughout the estimated average life of
the covered equipment in the type (or
class) compared to any increase in the
price, initial charges, or maintenance
expenses for the covered products that
are likely to result from the standard;
3. The total projected amount of
energy savings, or as applicable, water
savings, likely to result directly from the
standard;
2 All references to EPCA in this document refer
to the statute as amended through the American
Energy Manufacturing Technical Corrections Act of
2012, Public Law 112–210 (Dec. 18, 2012).
E:\FR\FM\21OCP1.SGM
21OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 203 / Tuesday, October 21, 2014 / Proposed Rules
4. Any lessening of the utility or the
performance of the covered equipment
likely to result from the standard;
5. The impact of any lessening of
competition, as determined in writing
by the Attorney General, that is likely to
result from the standard;
6. The need for national energy and
water conservation; and
7. Other factors the Secretary of
Energy (Secretary) considers relevant.
(42 U.S.C. 6313(a)(6)(B)(ii))
Section 5(b) of the American Energy
Manufacturing Technical Corrections
Act (AEMTCA), Public Law 112–210
(Dec. 18, 2012), amended EPCA to
include a requirement for DOE to
conduct an evaluation of whether to
amend the standards for certain types of
commercial and industrial equipment 3
every six years. (42 U.S.C.
6313(a)(6)(C)(i)) AEMTCA also
mandated that DOE must publish the
first document of an expedited
rulemaking within 1 year of the date of
AEMTCA’s enactment (i.e., December
18, 2012) to consider amended energy
conservation standards for any covered
equipment of those types as to which
more than six years had elapsed since
the issuance of the most recent final rule
establishing or amending a standard for
the equipment. (42 U.S.C. 6313(a)(6)(C)
(vi)) 4
DOE issued the most recent final rule
for commercial water heating equipment
on January 12, 2001 (hereinafter, the
‘‘January 2001 final rule’’), which
adopted the amended energy
conservation standards at levels
equivalent to efficiency levels in
ASHRAE Standard 90.1, as it was
revised in October 1999. 66 FR 3336.
Because more than six years has passed
since issuance of the last final rule for
commercial water heating equipment,
DOE is required to publish either a
notice of determination that the current
standards for these equipment types do
not need to be amended, or a notice of
proposed rulemaking proposing
amended energy conservation standards
for these equipment types. In addition,
the energy conservation standards for
commercial oil-fired storage water
heaters were increased to a level beyond
the current federal standards in
ASHRAE Standard 90.1–2013. Therefore
DOE is required to adopt these new
standards unless there is clear evidence
that adopting stricter standards would
produce significant additional energy
savings while being both
technologically feasible and
economically justified.
To meet the requirements under
AEMTCA, DOE is reviewing its existing
energy conservation standards for the
equipment types listed in 42 U.S.C.
6313(a) for which at least six years have
elapsed since the issuance of the most
recent final rule, including the
commercial water heating equipment
that is the subject of this notice. This
62901
notice represents the initiation of the
mandatory review process required by
AEMTCA. DOE seeks input from the
public to assist with its determination
on whether to amend the current
standards for commercial water heating
equipment.
B. Background
On October 29, 1999, ASHRAE
released an updated Standard 90.1–
1999, which included amended
efficiency levels for numerous
categories of commercial water heaters,
hot water supply boilers, and unfired
hot water storage tanks. DOE evaluated
these efficiency levels and subsequently
adopted energy conservation standards
affecting eight different water heating
equipment categories in a final rule
published in the January 2001 final rule.
66 FR 3336. However, DOE did not
adopt the efficiency level contained in
ASHRAE Standard 90.1–1999 for
commercial electric storage water
heaters, since the ASHRAE Standard
90.1–1999 level was less stringent than
the standard in EPCA and would have
increased energy consumption, and
under those circumstances, DOE could
not adopt the new efficiency level. 66
FR at 3350. The current Federal energy
conservation standards for this
equipment including those adopted in
the January 2001 final rule are shown in
Table 1.
TABLE 1—MINIMUM EFFICIENCY LEVELS FOR COMMERCIAL WATER HEATING EQUIPMENT
Energy conservation standard a b
Equipment
Minimum
thermal
efficiency
(percent)
Size
Electric storage water heaters ........................................................
Gas-fired storage water heaters .....................................................
Oil-fired storage water heaters .......................................................
Gas-fired instantaneous water heaters and hot water supply boilers.
Oil-fired instantaneous water heaters and hot water supply boilers.
Maximum standby loss c
All .................................
≤155,000 Btu/hr ............
>155,000 Btu/hr ...........
≤155,000 Btu/hr ............
>155,000 Btu/hr ...........
<10 gal .........................
N/A
80
80
78
78
80
0.30 + 27/Vm (%/hr).
Q/800 + 110(Vr)1⁄2 (Btu/hr).
Q/800 + 110(Vr)1⁄2 (Btu/hr).
Q/800 + 110(Vr)1⁄2 (Btu/hr).
Q/800 + 110(Vr)1⁄2 (Btu/hr).
N/A.
≥10 gal .........................
<10 gal .........................
80
80
Q/800 + 110(Vr)1⁄2 (Btu/hr).
N/A.
≥10 gal .........................
78
Q/800 + 110(Vr)1⁄2 (Btu/hr).
Size
Minimum thermal insulation
Unfired hot water storage tank .......................................................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Equipment
All .................................
R–12.5
a V is the measured storage
m
b For hot water supply boilers
volume and Vr is the rated volume, both in gallons. Q is the nameplate input rate in Btu/hr.
with a capacity of less than 10 gallons: (1) The standards are mandatory for products manufactured on and after
October 21, 2005, and (2) products manufactured prior to that date, and on or after October 23, 2003, must meet either the standards listed in
this table or the applicable standards in subpart E of this part for a ‘‘commercial packaged boiler.’’
c Water heaters and hot water supply boilers having more than 140 gallons of storage capacity need not meet the standby loss requirement if
(1) the tank surface area is thermally insulated to R–12.5 or more, (2) a standing pilot light is not used and (3) for gas or oil-fired storage water
heaters, they have a fire damper or fan assisted combustion.
3 This equipment includes small, large, and very
large commercial package air conditioning and
heating equipment, packaged terminal air
conditioners and heat pumps, warm-air furnaces,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Oct 20, 2014
Jkt 235001
packaged boilers, storage water heaters,
instantaneous water heaters, and unfired hot water
storage tanks. (42 U.S.C. 6313(a)(6))
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4 It is noted that AEMTCA inadvertently assigned
two separate provisions to 42 U.S.C.
6313(a)(6)(C)(vi). The provision cited above is the
one most relevant to this RFI.
E:\FR\FM\21OCP1.SGM
21OCP1
62902
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 203 / Tuesday, October 21, 2014 / Proposed Rules
DOE reviewed and adopted amended
test procedures for commercial water
heating equipment in a direct final rule
published on October 21, 2004. 69 FR
61974. These test procedure
amendments incorporated by reference
certain sections of the American
National Standards Institute Standard
(ANSI) Z21.10.3–1998 (ANSI Z21.10.3–
1998), ‘‘Gas Water Heaters Volume III
Storage Water Heaters, with Input
Ratings Above 75,000 Btu per Hour,
Circulating and Instantaneous.’’ Id. On
May 16, 2012, DOE published a final
rule in the Federal Register to update
the test procedures for certain
commercial water heating equipment by
adopting and incorporating by reference
the most recent version of the relevant
industry test procedure, ANSI Z21.10.3–
2011. 77 FR 28928. These updates did
not materially alter the procedure.
The divisions between residential and
commercial water heaters were first
established in EPCA. The current
specifications for residential water
heaters are shown below in Table 2, as
specified in 10 CFR 430.2. A water
heater exceeding any of the limits
expressed below for input, volume,
input/volume, or max temperature is
classified as commercial water heating
equipment.
TABLE 2—CLASSIFICATION OF RESIDENTIAL WATER HEATING EQUIPMENT
Type
Input
Volume
(gal)
Input/volume
(BTU/(h*gal))
Gas Storage ....................................................
Oil Storage ......................................................
Electric Storage ...............................................
Gas Instantaneous ..........................................
Oil Instantaneous ............................................
Electric Instantaneous .....................................
Heat Pump a ....................................................
<75,000 BTU/h ...............................................
<105,000 BTU/h .............................................
<12 kW ...........................................................
50,000–200,000 BTU/h ..................................
<210,000 BTU/h .............................................
<12 kW ...........................................................
<12 kW ...........................................................
20–100
<50
20–120
<2
........................
........................
<120
<4,000
<4,000
<4,000
≥4,000
≥4,000
≥4,000
........................
a To
<180
<180
<180
<180
<180
<180
<180
be classified as residential, heat pump water heaters must also not exceed a current rating 24 A or 250 V.
C. Rulemaking Process
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Max temp
(°F)
In addition to the specific statutory
criteria discussed in section I.A that
DOE must follow in prescribing
amended standards for covered
equipment, DOE uses a specific process
to assess the appropriateness of
amending the standards that are
currently in place for a given type of
equipment. For commercial water
heating equipment, DOE plans to
conduct its analyses in stages, with a
positive result leading to a subsequent
stage of the analysis. Under this
approach, DOE will first evaluate
whether more-stringent standards are
technologically feasible and whether
such standards would result in
significant additional energy savings. If
either of these criteria is not met, DOE
will conduct no further analysis,
because the statutory criteria for
adoption of the more-stringent standard
could not be met. However, if this initial
assessment is positive, DOE will
conduct in-depth technical analyses of
the costs and benefits of the potential
amended standards to determine
whether such amended standards would
be economically justified. The analyses
undertaken at this stage would include:
(1) Engineering analysis; (2) energy use
analysis; (3) markups analysis; (4) lifecycle cost and payback period analysis;
and (5) national impacts analysis. If,
after conducting those analyses, DOE
determines that there is a high
likelihood that more-stringent standards
would be economically justified, DOE
will conduct downstream analyses
including: (1) Manufacturer impacts
analysis; (2) emission impacts analysis;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Oct 20, 2014
Jkt 235001
(3) utility impacts analysis; (4)
employment impacts analysis; and (5)
regulatory impacts analysis. DOE will
also conduct several other analyses that
support those previously listed,
including the market and technology
assessment, the screening analysis
(which contributes to the engineering
analysis), and the shipments analysis
(which contributes to the national
impact analysis). As detailed throughout
this RFI, DOE is publishing this notice
as the first step in the analytical process
and is requesting input and data from
interested parties to aid in the
development of the technical analyses.
DOE anticipates moving from this RFI
directly to publication of either a
determination that the commercial
water heating equipment standards do
not need to be amended or a notice of
proposed rulemaking for amended
standards.
II. Planned Rulemaking Analyses
In this section, DOE summarizes the
rulemaking analyses and identifies a
number of issues on which it seeks
input and data in order to aid in the
development of the technical and
economic analyses to determine
whether amended energy conservation
standards may be warranted. In
addition, DOE welcomes comments on
other issues relevant to the conduct of
this rulemaking that may not
specifically be identified in this notice.
A. Test Procedures
DOE’s existing test procedures for
commercial water heating equipment
are specified at 10 CFR 431.106, and
reference ANSI Z21.10.3–2011. The test
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
procedures provide methods for
determining the thermal efficiency and
standby loss of gas-fired, oil-fired, and
electric storage and instantaneous water
heaters. AEMTCA amended EPCA to
require that DOE publish a final rule
establishing a uniform efficiency
descriptor and accompanying test
methods for covered residential water
heaters and commercial water heating
equipment by December 18, 2013 (i.e.,
within one year of the enactment of
AEMTCA). (42 U.S.C. 6295(e)(5)(B)) The
final rule must replace the current
energy factor (for residential water
heaters) and thermal efficiency and
standby loss (for commercial water
heaters) metrics with a uniform
efficiency descriptor. (42 U.S.C.
6295(e)(5)(C)) AEMTCA allowed DOE to
provide an exclusion from the uniform
efficiency descriptor for specific
categories of otherwise covered water
heaters that do not have residential
uses, that can be clearly described, and
that are effectively rated using the
current thermal efficiency and standby
loss descriptors. (42 U.S.C.
6295(e)(5)(F))
DOE published a final rule for test
procedures for residential water heaters
and certain commercial water heaters on
July 11, 2014 that, among other things,
established the Uniform Energy Factor
(UEF), a revised version of the current
residential Energy Factor metric, as the
uniform efficiency descriptor required
by AEMTCA. 79 FR 40542. The uniform
efficiency descriptor only applies to
commercial water heaters that meet the
definition of ‘‘residential-duty
commercial water heater,’’ which is
E:\FR\FM\21OCP1.SGM
21OCP1
62903
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 203 / Tuesday, October 21, 2014 / Proposed Rules
defined as any gas-fired, electric, or oil
storage or instantaneous commercial
water heater that meets the following
conditions:
(1) For models requiring electricity,
uses single-phase external power
supply;
(2) Is not designed to provide outlet
hot water at temperatures greater than
180 °F; and
(3) Is not excluded by any of the
specified limitations regarding rated
input and storage volume established in
Table 3 (below). Id. at 40546
The input and volume limitations for
the definition of a residential-duty
commercial water heater are shown
below by equipment class.
TABLE 3—CLASSIFICATION OF RESIDENTIAL-DUTY COMMERCIAL WATER HEATING EQUIPMENT
Water heater type
Indicator of non-residential application
Gas-fired Storage .....................................................................
Oil-fired Storage .......................................................................
Electric Storage ........................................................................
Heat Pump with Storage ..........................................................
Gas-fired Instantaneous ...........................................................
Electric Instantaneous ..............................................................
Oil-fired Instantaneous .............................................................
Commercial water heaters not meeting
the definition of residential-duty
commercial water heater were deemed
to be sufficiently characterized by the
current thermal efficiency and standby
loss metrics.
This rulemaking, therefore, includes
commercial water heating equipment
covered by the uniform efficiency
descriptor, as well as water heaters that
will continue to be covered by the
existing thermal efficiency and standby
loss metrics. DOE plans to conduct
analyses for this rulemaking using the
UEF for residential-duty commercial
water heaters. For residential-duty
commercial water heaters, DOE will
develop a conversion factor (as required
by AEMTCA) that will be used to
translate the existing thermal efficiency
and standby loss ratings into UEF for its
analyses. The conversion factor will be
developed as part of a separate
rulemaking. DOE plans to conduct
analyses for all other types of
commercial water heaters (i.e., other
than the residential-duty commercial
water heaters) using the existing thermal
efficiency and standby loss metrics.
DOE notes that for unfired storage
tanks, the Federal energy conservation
standard is expressed as an R-value
requirement for the tank thermal
insulation. In an RFI published on
February 27, 2014 that addresses
commercial water heater test procedures
Rated
Rated
Rated
Rated
250
Rated
Rated
Rated
input >105 kBtu/h; Rated storage volume >120 gallons.
input >140 kBtu/h; Rated storage volume >120 gallons.
input >12 kW; Rated storage volume >120 gallons.
input >12 kW; Rated current >24 A at a rated voltage of not greater than
V; Rated storage volume >120 gallons.
input >200 kBtu/h; Rated storage volume >2 gallons.
input >58.6 kW; Rated storage volume >2 gallons.
input >210 kBtu/h; Rated storage volume >2 gallons.
(February 2014 RFI), DOE sought
comment on whether a single test
method for R-value should be used (and
if so, which industry method is most
appropriate), or whether replacing Rvalue with standby loss or some other
metric as the energy efficiency metric
for unfired storage tanks would be
appropriate. 79 FR 10999. Any amended
standards for unfired storage tanks for
this rulemaking will be established in
the metric chosen in the noted test
procedure rulemaking.
Lastly, DOE may consider including
commercial heat pump water heaters
within the scope of coverage of this
rulemaking, as discussed below in
Section II.B. DOE does not currently
have a test procedure for determining
the energy efficiency of commercial heat
pump water heaters, but may develop a
procedure as described in the February
2014 RFI. If DOE ultimately adopts a
test method for commercial heat pump
water heaters, then DOE would consider
those products in the analyses for this
rulemaking.
B. Market Assessment
The market and technology
assessment provides information about
the commercial water heating
equipment industry that will be used
throughout the rulemaking process. For
example, this information will be used
to determine whether the existing
equipment class structure requires
modification based on the statutory
criteria for setting such classes and to
explore the potential for technological
improvements in the design and
manufacturing of such equipment. DOE
uses qualitative and quantitative
information to assess the past and
present industry structure and market
characteristics. DOE will use existing
market materials and literature from a
variety of sources, including industry
publications, trade journals, government
agencies, and trade organizations. DOE
will also consider conducting
interviews with manufacturers to assess
the overall market for commercial water
heating equipment.
The current equipment classes as
established in the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) for commercial water
heaters are characterized by energy
source, equipment type (i.e., storage vs.
instantaneous and hot water supply
boilers), and size (i.e., input capacity
rating and rated storage volume).
Unfired hot water storage tanks are also
included in a separate equipment class.
As a starting point, DOE plans to use the
existing equipment class structure
which divides commercial water
heating equipment into the equipment
classes as shown in the table in 10 CFR
431.110 and summarized below in
Table 4.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
TABLE 4—EQUIPMENT CLASSES FOR COMMERCIAL WATER HEATING EQUIPMENT
Equipment
Size
Electric storage water heaters ....................................................................................................................................................
Gas-fired storage water heaters .................................................................................................................................................
Oil-fired storage water heaters ....................................................................................................................................................
Gas-fired instantaneous water heaters and hot water supply boilers ........................................................................................
Oil-fired instantaneous water heaters and hot water supply boilers ..........................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Oct 20, 2014
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\21OCP1.SGM
21OCP1
All.
≤155,000 Btu/h.
>155,000 Btu/h.
≤155,000 Btu/h.
>155,000 Btu/h.
<10 gal.
≥10 gal.
<10 gal.
62904
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 203 / Tuesday, October 21, 2014 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 4—EQUIPMENT CLASSES FOR COMMERCIAL WATER HEATING EQUIPMENT—Continued
Equipment
Size
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Unfired hot water storage tank ....................................................................................................................................................
DOE plans to create separate
equipment classes for residential-duty
commercial water heaters, as
residential-duty commercial water
heaters will use a different metric for
energy conservation standards (see
section II.A). DOE will consider
additional equipment classes for
capacities or other performance-related
features which inherently affect
efficiency and justify the establishment
of a different energy conservation
standard. DOE will also consider
consolidating equipment classes, if
warranted. DOE notes that both gas-fired
and oil-fired storage water heaters are
divided into equipment classes for
equipment with an input capacity at or
below 155,000 Btu/h and equipment
with an input capacity above 155,000
Btu/h. However, as shown in Table 1,
the current energy conservation
standard levels are identical for both
equipment classes. DOE may consider
consolidating these equipment classes
to remove the input capacity
designations, if appropriate.
DOE may also expand the scope of
this rulemaking to include covered
equipment that is not currently
regulated, such as electric instantaneous
water heaters or commercial heat pump
water heaters, and may consider
separate product classes for such
equipment. DOE notes that EPCA
defines ‘‘commercial instantaneous
water heaters’’ as water heaters with an
input rating of at least 4,000 Btu/h per
gallon of stored water. (42 U.S.C.
6311(12)(B)) DOE believes this
definition could include both
commercial electric instantaneous water
heaters and commercial electric add-on
heat pump water heaters. Commercial
electric heat pump water heaters may
include both units that do not contain
any storage volume and can be
externally connected to a storage tank or
tank water heater (i.e., add-on type) and
units that contain an integrated heat
pump and storage tank (i.e., integrated
type). DOE is not aware of any
integrated type commercial heat pump
water heaters currently on the market
but may consider their inclusion due to
their possible development in the
future.5 However, any such units would
be classified as commercial electric
storage water heaters. Commercial addon electric heat pump water heaters may
also extract heat for water heating from
either air (air-source) or water (watersource), both of which DOE could
consider for new efficiency standards.
If appropriate, DOE may also consider
establishing efficiency standards
separately for electric instantaneous
water heaters using electric resistance
heat. However, DOE notes that the
thermal efficiency of electric
instantaneous water heaters is already
nearly 100 percent due to the high
efficiency of electric resistance heating
elements, and that a thermal efficiency
standard may be unnecessary.
Issue 1: DOE requests feedback on the
current equipment classes and seeks
information regarding other equipment
classes it should consider for inclusion
in its analysis.
Issue 2: DOE requests comment on
whether the 155,000 Btu/h input
capacity divisions in the current
equipment classes for gas-fired and oilfired storage water heaters are
necessary.
Issue 3: DOE seeks comment on
whether to include commercial electric
instantaneous water heaters and/or
commercial heat pump water heaters in
the scope of this rulemaking.
Issue 4: DOE seeks comment on
whether to include both add-on and
integrated commercial heat pump water
heater types in the scope of this
rulemaking.
Issue 5: DOE seeks comment on
whether to include both air-source and
water-source commercial heat pump
water heater types in the scope of this
rulemaking.
5 A commercial integrated heat pump water
heater is an integrated heat pump water heater that
surpasses any of the limitations for heat pump
water heaters expressed in Table 2.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Oct 20, 2014
Jkt 235001
C. Technology Options for
Consideration
DOE uses information about existing
and past technology options and
prototype designs to help identify
technologies that manufacturers could
use to meet and/or exceed energy
conservation standards. In consultation
with interested parties, DOE intends to
develop a list of technologies to
consider in its analysis. Initially, this
list will include all those technologies
considered to be technologically feasible
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
≥10 gal.
All.
and will serve to establish the maximum
technologically feasible design. DOE is
currently considering the specific
technologies and design options listed
below.
• Heat traps
• Improved insulation 6
• Power and direct venting
• Fully condensing technology 7
• Improved flue design 8
• Sidearm heating and two-phase
thermosiphon technology
• Electronic ignition systems
• Improved heat pump water heaters 9
• Thermophotovoltaic and
thermoelectric generators
• Improved controls 10
• Self-cleaning
• Improved burners 11
Issue 6: DOE seeks information
related to these or other efficiencyimproving technologies. Specifically,
DOE is interested in comments
regarding their applicability to the
current market and how these
technologies improve efficiency of
commercial water heating equipment.
D. Engineering Analysis
The engineering analysis estimates
the cost-efficiency relationship of
equipment at different levels of
increased energy efficiency. This
relationship serves as the basis for the
cost-benefit calculations for commercial
customers, manufacturers, and the
nation. In determining the costefficiency relationship, DOE will
estimate the increase in manufacturer
cost associated with increasing the
efficiency of equipment above the
baseline to the maximum
technologically feasible (‘‘max-tech’’)
efficiency level for each equipment
6 This includes increasing jacket insulation,
insulating the tank bottom or using a plastic tank
(electric only), advanced insulation types, foam
insulation, and pipe and fitting insulation.
7 This includes storage, instantaneous, and hybrid
heaters, as well as pulse combustion.
8 This includes using high-efficiency flue baffles,
multiple flues, submerged combustion chambers,
and optimized flue geometry.
9 This includes absorption heat pump water
heaters, carbon dioxide heat pump water heaters,
advanced compressors, and using centrifugal fans.
10 This includes incorporating timer controls,
modulating controls, and intelligent and wireless
controls and communication.
11 This includes incorporating variable firing-rate
burners, low-stage firing burners, and modulating
burners.
E:\FR\FM\21OCP1.SGM
21OCP1
class. The baseline model is used as a
reference point for each equipment class
in the engineering analysis and the lifecycle cost and payback-period analyses.
DOE considers equipment that just
meets the current minimum energy
conservation standard as baseline
equipment. For equipment that does not
have an existing minimum energy
conservation standard, DOE considers
the least efficient equipment on the
market as baseline equipment. DOE will
establish a baseline for each equipment
class using the applicable metric(s):
Thermal Efficiency and Standby Loss, or
Uniform Energy Factor.
Issue 7: DOE requests comment on
approaches that it should consider
when determining a baseline for
equipment classes being transitioned to
the uniform descriptor, including
information regarding the merits and/or
deficiencies of such approaches.
Issue 8: DOE requests information on
max-tech efficiency levels achievable in
the current market and associated
technologies.
In order to create the cost-efficiency
relationship, DOE anticipates that it will
structure its engineering analysis using
both a reverse-engineering (or costassessment) and catalog teardown
approach. A reverse-engineering or costassessment approach relies on a
teardown analysis of representative
units at the baseline efficiency level and
higher efficiency levels up to the
maximum technologically feasible
designs. A teardown analysis (or
physical teardown) determines the
production cost of a piece of equipment
by disassembling the equipment ‘‘pieceby-piece’’ and estimating the material
and labor cost of each component. A
catalog teardown approach uses
published manufacturer catalogs and
supplementary component data to
estimate the major physical differences
between a piece of equipment that has
been physically disassembled and
another piece of similar equipment.
These two methods would be used
together to help DOE estimate the
manufacturer production cost of
equipment at various efficiency levels.
Issue 9: DOE requests feedback on the
planned approach for the engineering
analysis and on the appropriate
representative capacities and
characteristics for each equipment class.
1. Analyzing Standby Loss Standards
For each equipment class examined,
the baseline, or current standard is
determined, and then several
intermediate efficiency levels are
analyzed incrementally up to the maxtech level, which corresponds to the
most efficient unit on the market. For
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Oct 20, 2014
Jkt 235001
the analysis of amended thermal
efficiency standards and uniform
efficiency descriptor standards, DOE
expects this will be a straightforward
process. However, selecting efficiency
levels for analysis of amended standby
loss (SL) standards for gas and oil
storage heaters is more complex for
several reasons.
First, the standard for standby loss
(BTU/hr) oil and gas storage water
heaters is a multivariable equation
depending upon both rated input (Q,
BTU/hr) and volume (V, gal), as shown
below.
As discussed later in this section, DOE
plans to analyze representative units for
the engineering analysis that have the
most common attributes of a given
equipment class. As a result, DOE will
select equipment for analysis with
storage volumes and input ratings at
discrete representative values within the
range of products available on the
market. DOE will then need to expand
its analysis of efficiency levels at the
representative volume(s) and input(s)
for the market, and these levels must be
extrapolated to apply to the range of
volumes and inputs covered by the
standard. Because the current standard
depends on both volume and input
without an intercept, it is only possible
to change the slopes for each variable
when modifying the standard to fit the
analyzed efficiency levels. This could be
undesirable if shifting the standard up
or down (maintaining the slopes) would
better fit the distribution of units
outside the representative input and
volume. Analysis performed thus far by
DOE using an approach of varying the
volume slope to change the relationship
between SL and input for units at the
representative volume appears to yield
viable results.
One method to avoid issues stemming
from adjusting a multi-variable standard
is to remove one of the variables from
the equation and establish discrete bins
for that variable. Within each of these
bins, the SL standard would be a singlevariable equation, allowing for
manipulation of either the slope or
intercept. While bins could be created
for input or volume, preliminary
analysis indicates that creating bins for
volume with standards based on input
within each bin would yield better
trends for establishing new standard
levels.
Issue 10: DOE requests comment on
approaches to selecting efficiency levels
for its analysis of amended SL energy
conservation standards for gas and oil
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
62905
storage heaters, including the possibility
of establishing discrete bins for one of
the variables and establishing SL
standards based on one instead of two
variables.
The second issue is that the SL is
calculated using the amount of fuel
consumed over a given time period, and
therefore the heat loss as measured in
the SL is partially dependent on the
thermal efficiency (TE) of the water
heater. Because TE for commercial gas
storage heaters can vary from 80–99%,
TE can account for a difference of up to
19% of SL values (only 4% for oil
storage heaters). Removing this
dependency on TE would allow more
accurate and representative standards
for non-condensing and condensing
water heaters. DOE notes that
preliminary analysis has shown a large
discrepancy in SL range for noncondensing and condensing water
heaters; condensing water heater have
units with values in a similar range to
non-condensing models, but the range
also extends to much lower SL values.
Further analysis is required to
determine to what degree the
technologies that allow these
significantly lower values are inherent
to condensing heaters (i.e. less heat lost
in flue due to condensation), as
otherwise these technologies could be
considered for non-condensing units as
well. One possible way to mitigate the
impact of TE on SL would be to
incorporate the thermal efficiency into
the standby loss standard, as a third
variable. Another approach would be to
analyze SL levels for condensing (92–
99% TE) and non-condensing (80–84%
TE) gas storage models separately, so
that non-condensing models have a
proportionately less strict standard,
accounting for the lower average TE.
Issue 11: DOE requests comment
whether to account for the impact of
thermal efficiency on standby loss and
on approaches to separate the effect of
thermal efficiency from standby loss for
gas storage heaters. This includes the
possibility of separate standards for
non-condensing and condensing units,
as well as adding thermal efficiency to
the current SL standard.
E. Markups Analysis
To carry out the life-cycle cost (LCC)
and payback period (PBP) calculations,
DOE needs to determine the cost to the
commercial customer of baseline
equipment that satisfies the currently
applicable standards, and the cost of the
more-efficient unit the customer would
purchase under potential amended
standards. This is done by applying a
markup multiplier to the manufacturer’s
E:\FR\FM\21OCP1.SGM
21OCP1
EP21OC14.001
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 203 / Tuesday, October 21, 2014 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
62906
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 203 / Tuesday, October 21, 2014 / Proposed Rules
selling price to estimate the commercial
customer’s price.
Markups depends on the distribution
channels for a product (i.e., how the
equipment passes from the
manufacturer to the customer). For
commercial water heating equipment,
various distribution channels are
characterized.
Two different markets exist for
commercial water heating systems: (1)
New construction and (2) replacements.
DOE plans to characterize the
replacement distribution channels for
commercial water heating systems as
follows:
Manufacturer → Wholesaler →
Mechanical contractor → Customer
In the case of new construction, DOE
plans to characterize the distribution
channel as follows:
Manufacturer → Wholesaler →
Mechanical contractor → General
contractor → Customer
In addition, DOE plans to consider
distribution channels where the
manufacturer sells the equipment
directly to a commercial consumer
through a national account or the
commercial consumer purchases the
equipment directly through a
wholesaler as follows:
Manufacturer → Wholesaler →
Customer
or
Manufacturer → Customer
The latter channels reflect those cases
where the installation can be
accomplished by site personnel.
DOE also plans to consider cases
when the contractor’s sale of the
equipment includes a start-up/check-out
contract, in which cases the equipment
markup is included in the contract
costs.
Issue 12: DOE seeks input from
stakeholders on whether the
distribution channels described above
are appropriate for commercial water
heaters and are sufficient to describe the
distribution market.
Issue 13: DOE seeks input on the
percentage of equipment being
distributed through the different
distribution channels, and whether the
share of equipment through each
channel varies based on equipment
capacity or water heater class.
To develop markups for the parties
involved in the distribution of the
equipment, DOE would utilize several
sources including: (1) The Heating, AirConditioning & Refrigeration
Distributors International (HARDI) 2013
Profit Report 12 to develop wholesaler
12 Heating, Air Conditioning & Refrigeration
Distributors International 2013 Profit Report,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Oct 20, 2014
Jkt 235001
markups, (2) the 2005 Air Conditioning
Contractors of America’s (ACCA)
financial analysis for the heating,
ventilation, air-conditioning, and
refrigeration (HVACR) contracting
industry 13 to develop mechanical
contractor markups, and (3) U.S. Census
Bureau’s 2007 Economic Census data 14
for the commercial and institutional
building construction industry to
develop general contractor markups.
Issue 14: DOE seeks recent data and
recommendations regarding data
sources to establish the markups for the
parties involved with the distribution of
the equipment.
F. Energy Use Analysis
The purpose of the energy use
analysis is to assess the energy
requirements of commercial water
heating products described in the
engineering analysis for a representative
sample of building types that utilize the
product, and to assess the energysavings potential of increased product
efficiencies. DOE uses the annual energy
consumption and energy-savings
potential in the LCC and PBP analysis
to establish the operating costs savings
at various product efficiency levels.
DOE will estimate the annual energy
consumption of commercial water
heaters at specified energy efficiency
levels across a range of applications,
building types, and climate zones. The
annual energy consumption includes
use of natural gas, liquefied petroleum
gas (LPG), oil, or electricity for hot water
production, as well as use of electricity
for the auxiliary components.
DOE intends to base the energy use
analysis on building characteristics from
the Energy Information Administration’s
(EIA) 2003 Commercial Building Energy
Consumption Survey (CBECS) 15 for the
subset of building types that use the
type of commercial water heating
equipment covered by the standards.
DOE also plans to look at the use of
commercial water heaters in residential
applications, such as multi-family
(Available at: https://www.hardinet.org/ProfitReport) (Last accessed July 8, 2014).
13 Air Conditioning Contractors of America
(ACCA), Financial Analysis for the HVACR
Contracting Industry: 2005, (Available at: https://
https://www.acca.org/store/product.php?pid=142)
(Last accessed April 10, 2013).
14 U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 Economic Census
Data. (2007) (Available at: https://www.census.gov/
econ/) (Last accessed April 10, 2013).
15 Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2003
Commercial Building Energy Consumption Survey
(CBECS). (Available at: https://www.eia.gov/
consumption/commercial/) (Last accessed April 10,
2013). Note CBECS 2012 building characteristics
have been released in preliminary form by EIA and
will be reviewed for possible incorporation into this
analysis, however, the full release of CBECS 2012
data is not expected until winter 2015.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
buildings. Therefore, DOE plans to
include characteristics from EIA’s 2009
Residential Energy Consumption Survey
(RECS) 16 for the subset of building
types in RECS that use commercial
water heating equipment covered by
this standard.
Both CBECS and RECS survey data
include information on the physical
characteristics of building units, water
heating equipment used, fuels used,
energy consumption and expenditures,
and other building characteristics.17
DOE will also consult the American
Society of Heating, Refrigerating and
Air-Conditioning Engineers
(ASHRAE) 18 and Electric Power
Research Institute (EPRI) 19 handbooks,
which contain data on the typical types
and sizes (both input capacity and rated
volume) of commercial water heaters
used for different building types and
applications, and can be used to
compare to, supplement, and
corroborate the CBECS and RECS data.
Based on these data, DOE will develop
a representative population of buildings
for each commercial water heater
equipment class.
Based on the data in the ASHRAE and
EPRI Handbooks, as well as data from
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
(NREL),20 and Lawrence Berkeley
National Laboratory (LBNL) 21 regarding
typical energy use profiles and other
commercial building usage
characteristics, DOE will develop
representative hot water usage, water
heating usage profile, water volumetric
loads, and hot water usage temperatures
for various applications for each
16 Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2009
Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS).
(Available at: https://www.eia.gov/consumption/
residential/) (Last accessed April 10, 2013).
17 Neither CBECS nor RECS provide data on
whether the water heater used in the building is a
commercial water heater covered in this rulemaking
(i.e., water heating could also be provided by a
commercial boiler, residential boiler, or residential
water heater). Therefore, DOE intends to develop a
methodology for adjusting its building sample to
reflect buildings that use a commercial water heater
covered in this rulemaking.
18 American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and
Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc. (ASHRAE).
ASHRAE Handbook of HVAC Applications: Chapter
50 (Service Water Heating) (2011) pgs. 50.1 to 50.32.
19 Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI).
Commercial Water Heating Applications Handbook.
(1992) CU–6666.
20 National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL).
U.S. Department of Energy Commercial Reference
Building Models of the National Building Stock.
February 2011. (Available at: https://www.nrel.gov/
docs/fy11osti/46861.pdf) (Last accessed April 10,
2013).
21 Huang, J., Akbari, H., Rainer, L, Ritschard, R.
481 Prototypical Commercial Buildings for 20
Urban Market Areas, LBL–29798, April 1991
(Available at: https://publications.lbl.gov/islandora/
object/ir%3A94368) (Last accessed October 03,
2014).
E:\FR\FM\21OCP1.SGM
21OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 203 / Tuesday, October 21, 2014 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
commercial water heater and building
type combination being analyzed. This
approach will capture the variability in
water heating use due to factors such as
building activity, schedule, occupancy,
water supply temperature, tank losses,
cycling losses, and distribution system
piping losses.
DOE plans to consider market changes
or future efficiency standards in
equipment technologies that reduce
water heating loads in commercial
applications, such as more efficient
commercial dishwashers and
commercial clothes washers. In
addition, DOE intends to review other
data sets (e.g., the technology
penetration curves used in the National
Energy Modeling System (NEMS),22
data from the End-Use Load and
Consumer Assessment Program
(ELCAP),23 and 2009 Commercial
Building Stock Assessment for the
Northwest),24 to determine whether a
significant fraction of the current
building population is not represented
by CBECS 2003.
Issue 15: DOE requests comment on
the overall method to determine water
heating energy use and if other factors
should be considered in developing the
energy use or energy use methodology.
Issue 16: DOE seeks input on the
current distribution of equipment
efficiencies in the building population
for different equipment classes.
Issue 17: DOE seeks input on typical
types and sizes (including fuel type,
input capacity and rated volume) of
commercial water heaters, including gas
condensing and heat pump water
heaters, used for different building types
and applications.
Issue 18: DOE seeks input on
representative hot water usage, water
heating usage profile, water volumetric
load profiles or aggregate loads, and
representative hot water usage
temperatures for various commercial
water heater applications.
Issue 19: DOE seeks input and sources
of data or recommendations for tools to
22 For more information on NEMS, refer to the
U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information
Administration (EIA) documentation. A useful
summary is National Energy Modeling System: An
Overview 2003, DOE/EIA–0581 (2003). Each year,
EIA uses NEMS to produce an energy forecast for
the United States, the Annual Energy Outlook
(AEO). For this analysis, DOE intends to use the
version of NEMS based on AEO 2013. (Available at:
https://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/).
23 Bonneville Power Administration. End-Use
Load and Consumer Assessment Program (ELCAP)
Data from 1986 to 1989. 2012. (Available at:
https://rtf.nwcouncil.org/ELCAP/) (Last accessed
April 10, 2013).
24 Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance (NEEA).
Commercial Building Stock Assessment. 2009.
(Available at: https://neea.org/resource-center/
regional-data-resources/commercial-building-stockassessment) (Last accessed April 10, 2013).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Oct 20, 2014
Jkt 235001
support sizing of water heater typical
commercial water heater and
multifamily residential applications.
Issue 20: DOE seeks input on the
fraction and types of buildings that use
recirculation loops associated with
commercial water heaters and the
impact of recirculation loops on water
heater performance.
Issue 21: DOE requests comment on
the fraction of commercial or residential
boilers used in commercial water
heating applications.
Issue 22: DOE requests comment on
the fraction and classes of commercial
water heaters which are used in
residential-duty applications as well as
other commercial water heaters that
may serve residential multi-family
buildings. DOE also requests input on
the fraction of residential water heaters
that are used for commercial
applications.
G. Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period
Analysis
The purpose of the LCC and PBP
analysis is to analyze the effects of
potential amended energy conservation
standards on customers of commercial
water heater equipment by determining
how a potential amended standard
affects their operating expenses (usually
decreased) and their total installed costs
(usually increased).
DOE intends to analyze the potential
for variability by performing the LCC
and PBP calculations on a
representative sample of individual
commercial buildings. DOE plans to
utilize the sample of buildings
developed for the energy use analysis
and the corresponding simulations
results.25 Within a given building, one
or more commercial water heater units
may serve the building’s water heating
needs, depending on the hot water
requirements of the building. As a
result, DOE intends to express the LCC
and PBP results for each of the
individual commercial water heaters
installed in the building. DOE plans to
model uncertainty in many of the inputs
to the LCC and PBP analysis using
Monte Carlo simulation and probability
distributions. As a result, the LCC and
PBP results will be displayed as
distributions of impacts compared to the
base case (without amended standards)
conditions.
Issue 23: DOE requests comment on
the overall method that it intends to use
25 DOE
plans to utilize the building types defined
in CBECS 2003 as well as residential buildings that
use commercial water heaters such as multi-family
buildings. Definitions of CBECS building types can
be found at https://www.eia.gov/emeu/cbecs/
building_types.html.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
62907
to conduct the LCC and PBP analysis for
commercial water heaters.
Inputs to the LCC and PBP analysis
are categorized as: (1) Inputs for
establishing the purchase expense,
otherwise known as the total installed
cost, and (2) inputs for calculating the
operating expense.
The primary inputs for establishing
the total installed cost are the baseline
customer price, standard-level customer
price increases, and installation costs.
Baseline customer prices and standardlevel customer price increases will be
determined by applying markups to
manufacturer selling price estimates.
The installation cost is added to the
customer price to arrive at a total
installed cost. DOE intends to develop
installation costs using the most recent
RS Means data available.
Issue 24: DOE seeks input on the
approach and data sources it intends to
use to develop installation costs,
specifically, its intention to use the most
recent RS Means Mechanical Cost
Data.26
The primary inputs for calculating the
operating costs are equipment energy
consumption and demand, equipment
efficiency, energy prices and forecasts,
maintenance and repair costs,
equipment lifetime, and discount rates.
Both equipment lifetime and discount
rates are used to calculate the present
value of future operating expenses.
The equipment energy consumption
is the site energy use associated with
providing water heating to the building.
DOE intends to utilize the energy use
calculation methodology described in
Section II.F to establish equipment
energy use.
DOE will identify an approach to
account for the gas, propane, oil and
electricity prices paid by consumers for
the purposes of calculating operating
costs, savings, net present value, and
payback period. DOE intends to
consider determining gas, oil, and
electricity prices based on
geographically available fuel cost data
such as state level data, with
consideration for the variation in energy
costs paid by different building types.
This approach calculates energy
expenses based on actual energy prices
that customers are paying in different
geographical areas of the country. As a
potential additional source, DOE may
consider data to compare provided in
EIA’s Form 861 data 27 to calculate
26 RS Means. 2014 Mechanical Cost Data.
(Available at: https://
rsmeans.reedconstructiondata.com/60023.aspx)
(Last accessed April 10, 2014).
27 Energy Information Administration (EIA),
Survey form EIA–861—Annual Electric Power
E:\FR\FM\21OCP1.SGM
Continued
21OCP1
62908
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 203 / Tuesday, October 21, 2014 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
commercial electricity prices, EIA’s
Natural Gas Navigator 28 to calculate
commercial natural gas prices, and
EIA’s State Energy Data Systems
(SEDS) 29 to calculate liquefied
petroleum gas (LPG) and fuel oil prices.
Future energy prices will likely be
projected using trends from the EIA’s
2013 Annual Energy Outlook (AEO).30
Issue 25: DOE seeks comment and
sources on its approach for developing
gas, oil, and electricity prices.
Maintenance costs are expenses
associated with ensuring continued
operation of the covered equipment over
time. DOE intends to develop
maintenance costs for its analysis using
the most recent RS Means data
available.31 DOE plans also to consider
the cases when the equipment is
covered by service and/or maintenance
agreements.
Issue 26: DOE seeks input on the
approach and data sources it intends to
use to develop maintenance costs,
specifically, its intention to use the most
recent RS Means Facilities Maintenance
& Repair Cost Data, as well as to
consider the cost of service and/or
maintenance agreements.
Repair costs are expenses associated
with repairing or replacing components
of the covered equipment that have
failed. DOE intends to assess whether
repair costs vary with equipment
efficiency as part of its analysis.
Issue 27: DOE seeks comment as to
whether repair costs vary as a function
of equipment efficiency. DOE also
requests any data or information on
developing repair costs.
Equipment lifetime is the age at
which a unit of covered equipment is
retired from service. The average
equipment lifetime for commercial
water heaters is estimated by various
sources to be between 7 and 25 years
based on application and equipment
type.32 33 34 35 36 37 38 Based on these data,
Industry Report. (Available at: https://www.eia.gov/
electricity/data/eia861/) (Last accessed
April 15, 2013).
28 Energy Information Administration (EIA),
Natural Gas Navigator. (Available at: https://
tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/ng/ng_pri_sum_dcu_nus_
m.htm) (Last accessed April 15, 2013).
29 Energy Information Administration (EIA), State
Energy Data System (SEDS). (Available at: https://
www.eia.gov/state/seds/) (Last accessed April 15,
2013).
30 Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2013
Annual Energy Outlook (AEO) Full Version.
(Available at: https://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/).
(Last accessed April 15, 2013).
31 RS Means. 2013 Facilities Maintenance &
Repair Cost Data. (Available at: https://
rsmeans.reedconstructiondata.com/60303.aspx)
(Last accessed April 10, 2013).
32 National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL).
U.S. Department of Energy Commercial Reference
Building Models of the National Building Stock.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Oct 20, 2014
Jkt 235001
DOE plans to determine average lifetime
for each commercial water heater
product class as the primary input for
developing a Weibull probability
distribution to characterize commercial
water heater lifetime.39
Issue 28: DOE seeks comment on its
approach of using a Weibull probability
distribution to characterize equipment
lifetime. DOE also requests equipment
lifetime data and information on
whether equipment lifetime varies
based on equipment characteristics,
equipment application, or efficiency
level considerations.
The discount rate is the rate at which
future expenditures are discounted to
establish their present value. DOE
intends to derive the discount rates by
estimating the cost of capital of
companies that purchase commercial
water heater equipment.
DOE’s analysis includes measures of
LCC and PBP impacts of potential
standard levels relative to a base case
that reflects the likely market in the
absence of amended standards. DOE
February 2011. (Available at: https://www.nrel.gov/
docs/fy11osti/46861.pdf) (Last accessed April 10,
2013). Pg. 38.
33 RS Means. 2013 Facilities Maintenance &
Repair Cost Data. (Available at: https://
rsmeans.reedconstructiondata.com/60303.aspx)
(Last accessed April 10, 2013). pgs. 184–188.
34 Mark Ellis & Associates. ‘‘National Appliance
and Equipment Energy Efficiency Program,
Analysis of Potential for Minimum Energy
Performance Standards for Miscellaneous Water
Heaters. Prepared for the Australian Greenhouse
Office. (2001) (Available at:
www.energyrating.com.au/library/pubs/techewhmisc2001.pdf) (Last accessed April 18, 2013).
35 Ryan Firestone and Danielle Gidding. ‘‘Energy
Savings from Electric Water Heaters in Commercial
Applications.’’ Prepared for Bonneville Power
Administration. Prepared by Navigant Consulting
and Bonneville Power Administration. (Presented
June 1, 2010) (Available at: rtf.nwcouncil.org/
meetings/2010/0601/
WaterHeatersinCommercialApplications_v05.ppt)
(Last accessed: April 18. 2013). Slide 31.
36 Gas Foodservice Equipment Network. ‘‘Straight
Talk About Tankless Water Heaters, Can They
Really Keep You in Hot Water?’’ Cooking for Profit.
(December 15, 2007) (Available at: https://
www.crescentcity-fl.com/Gas%20Documents/
Dec%2007%20GFEN%20%20final_Tankless.pdf)
(Last accessed: April 18, 2013).
37 Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP).
FEMP Designated Product: Commercial Gas Water
Heaters. 2012. (Available at: https://
www1.eere.energy.gov/femp/technologies/eep_com_
gaswaterheaters.html) (Last accessed: April 18,
2013).
38 Note that for some commercial water heaters
the usage and application would be similar to a
residential water heater. For these situations the
Weibull distribution derived for DOE’s 2010
residential water heater standards rulemaking could
be applicable. (More information about the
derivation the residential water heater lifetime is
available at: https://www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=EERE-2006-STD-0129).
39 If the data is available, DOE also plans to take
into account differences in commercial water heater
lifetime based on usage and application of the water
heater.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
plans to develop market-share efficiency
data (i.e., the distribution of equipment
shipments by efficiency) for the
equipment classes DOE is considering,
for the year in which compliance with
any amended standards would be
required.
DOE also plans to assess the
applicability of the ‘‘rebound effect’’ in
the energy consumption for commercial
water heaters. A rebound effect occurs
when a piece of equipment that is made
more efficient is used more intensively,
so that the expected energy savings from
the efficiency improvement may not
fully materialize. However, at this time,
DOE is not aware of any information
about the rebound effect for this
equipment type.
Issue 29: DOE requests data on
current efficiency market shares (of
shipments) by equipment class, and also
input on similar historic data.
Issue 30: DOE also requests
information on expected future trends
in efficiency for commercial water
heaters classes, including the relative
market share of condensing versus noncondensing equipment in the market in
the absence of new efficiency standards.
Issue 31: DOE seeks comments and
data on any rebound effect that may be
associated with more efficient
commercial water heaters.
H. Shipment Analysis
DOE uses shipment projections by
equipment class to calculate the
national impacts of standards on energy
consumption, net present value (NPV)
of customer benefits, and future
manufacturer cash flows.
DOE intends to develop a shipments
model for commercial water heater
equipment based on historical AHRI
shipments data for commercial gas and
electric storage water heaters.40 DOE
currently does not have any historical
shipments information for other product
classes described in the engineering
analysis.
Issue 32: DOE seeks historical
shipments data for commercial water
heaters by product class, particularly for
product classes other than commercial
gas and electric storage water heaters.
The shipments model will consider
three market segments: (1) New
commercial buildings acquiring
equipment; (2) existing buildings
replacing old equipment; and (3)
existing buildings acquiring new
equipment for the first time. Two stock
40 Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration
Institute (AHRI). Commercial Storage Water Heaters
Historical Data: 1992–2011. (Available at: https://
www.ahrinet.org/site/494/Resources/Statistics/
Historical-Data/Commercial-Storage-Water-HeatersHistorical-Data) (Last accessed July 3, 2014).
E:\FR\FM\21OCP1.SGM
21OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 203 / Tuesday, October 21, 2014 / Proposed Rules
categories are also considered: (1)
Equipment that has received only
normal maintenance repairs; and (2)
equipment that has had its useful life
extended through additional repairs. To
determine whether a customer would
choose to repair rather than replace
their commercial water heater
equipment, the shipments model
explicitly accounts for the combined
effects of changes in purchase price,
annual operating cost, and the value of
commercial floor space on the purchase
versus repair decision. Changes to the
purchase price and operating costs due
to amended energy conservation
standards are the drivers for shipment
estimates for the standards cases relative
to the base case (i.e., the case without
amended standards).
DOE intends to utilize the U.S.
Census Bureau data 41 to establish
historical new construction floor space,
as well as historical stock floor space.
The Annual Energy Outlook will be
used to forecast both new construction
and stock floor space. Using these and
historical equipment saturation data
from CBECS, DOE will estimate
shipments to the three market segments
identified above. The utility function to
estimate the repair versus replacement
decision will be based on income per
square foot data from the Building
Owners and Managers Association
(BOMA) Commercial Building Survey
reports,42 equipment purchase price
index (PPI) data estimated from the
Bureau of Labor Statistics,43 and
operating cost data derived from the
LCC and PBP analysis.
Issue 33: DOE seeks input on the
approach and data sources it intends to
use in developing the shipments model
and shipments forecasts for this
analysis.
I. National Impact Analysis
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
The purpose of the national impact
analysis (NIA) is to estimate aggregate
impacts of potential energy conservation
standards at the national level. Impacts
that DOE reports include the national
energy savings (NES) from potential
41 U.S. Census Bureau. Statistical Abstract of the
United States: 2011, Table No 933—Construction
Contracts—Value of Construction and Floor Space
of Buildings by Class of Construction. (Available at:
https://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2011/
cats/construction_housing/construction_indices_
and_value.html) (Last accessed April 10, 2013).
42 Building Owners and Managers Association
International (BOMA). Experience Exchange Report
(2013) (Available at: https://www.bomaeer.com/)
(Last accessed April 10, 2013).
43 U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor
Statistics. Producers Price Index: Industry:
Refrigeration and Heating Equipment (Available at:
https://www.bls.gov/ppi/home.htm) (Last accessed
April 10, 2013).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Oct 20, 2014
Jkt 235001
standards and the net present value
(NPV) of the total customer benefits.
To develop the NES, DOE calculates
annual energy consumption for the base
case and the standards cases. DOE
calculates the annual energy
consumption using per-unit annual
energy use data multiplied by projected
shipments.
To develop the NPV of customer
benefits from potential energy
conservation standards, DOE calculates
annual energy expenditures and annual
equipment expenditures for the base
case and the standards cases. DOE
calculates annual energy expenditures
from annual energy consumption by
incorporating projected energy prices.
DOE calculates annual equipment
expenditures by multiplying the price
per unit times the projected shipments.
The difference each year between
energy bill savings, increased
maintenance and repair costs, and
increased equipment expenditures is the
net savings or net costs.
A key component of DOE’s estimates
of NES and NPV are the equipment
energy efficiencies forecasted over time
for the base case and for each of the
standards cases. For the base case trend,
DOE will consider whether historical
data show any trend and whether any
trend can be reasonably extrapolated
beyond current efficiency levels. In
particular, DOE is interested in
historical and future shipments of
equipment with step changes in
efficiency, such as condensing gas
equipment or HPWHs.
Issue 34: DOE requests comment and
any available data on historical, current,
and future market share of equipment
with step changes in efficiency, such as
gas condensing equipment and HPWHs,
as compared to less efficient equipment,
such as non-condensing gas water
heaters and electric water heaters,
respectively, for each equipment class.
For the various standards cases, to
estimate the impact that amended
energy conservation standards may have
in the year compliance becomes
required, DOE would likely use a ‘‘rollup’’ scenario. Under the ‘‘roll-up’’
scenario, DOE assumes: (1) Equipment
efficiencies in the base case that do not
meet the new or amended standard level
under consideration would ‘‘roll up’’ to
meet that standard level; and (2)
equipment shipments at efficiencies
above the standard level under
consideration would not be affected.
After DOE establishes the efficiency
distribution for the assumed compliance
date of a standard, it may consider
future projected efficiency growth using
available trend data.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
62909
DOE intends to determine whether
there is a rebound effect associated with
more efficient commercial water
heaters. If data indicate that there is a
rebound effect, DOE will account for the
rebound effect in its calculation of NES.
III. Public Participation
DOE will accept comments, data, and
information regarding this RFI and other
matters relevant to DOE’s consideration
of amended energy conservations
standard for commercial water heating
equipment no later than the date
provided in the DATES section at the
beginning of this RFI. Interested parties
may submit comments using any of the
methods described in the ADDRESSES
section at the beginning of this RFI.
After the close of the comment period,
DOE will begin collecting data,
conducting the analyses, and reviewing
the public comments. These actions will
be taken to aid in the development of a
NOPR for commercial water heating
equipment if DOE decides to amend the
standards for commercial water heaters.
Instructions: All submissions received
must be identified by docket number
EERE–2014–BT–STD–0042 and/or
regulatory identification number (RIN)
1904–AD34. No telefacsimilies (faxes)
will be accepted.
Docket: The docket is available for
review at www.regulations.gov,
including Federal Register notices,
public meeting attendees’ lists and
transcripts, comments, and other
supporting documents/materials. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov index.
However, not all documents listed in
the index may be publicly available,
such as information that is exempt from
public disclosure.
A link to the docket Web page can be
found at: https://www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=EERE-2014-BT-STD0042. This Web page contains a link to
the docket for this notice on the
www.regulations.gov Web site. The
www.regulations.gov Web page contains
simple instructions on how to access all
documents, including public comments,
in the docket.
For information on how to submit a
comment, review other public
comments and the docket, or participate
in the public meeting, contact Ms.
Brenda Edwards at (202) 586–2945 or by
email: Brenda.Edwards@ee.doe.gov.
DOE considers public participation to
be a very important part of the process
for developing test procedures. DOE
actively encourages the participation
and interaction of the public during the
comment period in each stage of the
rulemaking process. Interactions with
and between members of the public
E:\FR\FM\21OCP1.SGM
21OCP1
62910
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 203 / Tuesday, October 21, 2014 / Proposed Rules
provide a balanced discussion of the
issues and assist DOE in the rulemaking
process. Anyone who wishes to be
added to the DOE mailing list to receive
future notices and information about
this rulemaking should contact Ms.
Brenda Edwards at (202) 586–2945, or
via email at Brenda.Edwards@
ee.doe.gov.
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 10,
2014.
Kathleen B. Hogan,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy
Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and Renewable
Energy.
[FR Doc. 2014–24983 Filed 10–20–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 431
[Docket Number EERE–2010–BT–STD–
0043]
RIN 1904–AC36
Energy Conservation Program: Energy
Conservation Standards for HighIntensity Discharge Lamps
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notice of proposed
determination (NOPD).
AGENCY:
The Energy Policy and
Conservation Act of 1975 (EPCA), as
amended, requires DOE to prescribe test
procedures and energy conservation
standards for high-intensity discharge
(HID) lamps for which it has determined
that standards would be technologically
feasible and economically justified, and
would result in significant energy
savings. In this notice, DOE proposes to
determine that energy conservation
standards for high-intensity discharge
(HID) lamps do not meet these criteria.
DATES: DOE will accept comments, data,
and information regarding this NOPD no
later than December 22, 2014. Interested
parties may further request, no later
than November 5, 2014, a public
meeting to discuss this NOPD. See
section VII Public Participation for
details.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
Any comments submitted
must identify the NOPD for Energy
Conservation Standards for HighIntensity Discharge Lamps and provide
docket number EE–2010–BT–STD–0043
and/or regulatory information number
(RIN) 1904–AC36. Comments may be
submitted using any of the following
methods:
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Oct 20, 2014
Jkt 235001
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
2. Email: HIDLamps-2010-STD0043@ee.doe.gov. Include the docket
number and/or RIN in the subject line
of the message.
3. Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S.
Department of Energy, Building
Technologies Program, Mailstop EE–2J,
1000 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121. If
possible, please submit all items on a
CD. It is not necessary to include
printed copies.
4. Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda
Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy,
Building Technologies Program, 950
L’Enfant Plaza SW., Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20024. Telephone:
(202) 586–2945. If possible, please
submit all items on a CD, in which case
it is not necessary to include printed
copies.
For detailed instructions on
submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see section VII of this document (Public
Participation).
Docket: The docket is available for
review at www.regulations.gov,
including Federal Register notices,
framework documents, public meeting
attendee lists and transcripts,
comments, and other supporting
documents/materials. All documents in
the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. However,
not all documents listed in the index
may be publicly available, such as
information that is exempt from public
disclosure.
The docket Web page can be found at:
https://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/
appliance_standards/rulemaking.aspx/
ruleid/23. This Web page contains a link
to the docket for this notice on the
regulations.gov site. The regulations.gov
Web page contains simple instructions
on how to access all documents,
including public comments, in the
docket. See section VII for further
information on how to submit
comments through
www.regulations.gov.
For further information on how to
submit a comment or review other
public comments and the docket,
contact Ms. Brenda Edwards at (202)
586–2945 or by email: Brenda.
Edwards@ee.doe.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Lucy deButts, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency
and Renewable Energy, Building
Technologies Program, EE–2J, 1000
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Telephone: (202) 287–1604. Email:
high_intensity_discharge_lamps@ee.
doe.gov.
Ms. Elizabeth Kohl, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of the General Counsel,
GC–71, 1000 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 586–7796. Email:
elizabeth.kohl@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Summary of the Proposed Determination
A. Legal Authority
B. Background
1. Current Standards
2. History of Standards Rulemaking for
High-Intensity Discharge Lamps
3. Changes From the 2010 Determination
a. Color
b. Replacement Options
c. Shipments
d. Summary of Changes
II. Issues Affecting the Lamps Analyzed by
This Determination
A. Lamps Analyzed by This Determination
B. Standby/Off Mode
C. Metric
D. Coordination of the Metal Halide Lamp
Fixture and HID Lamp Rulemakings
III. General Discussion
A. Test Procedures
B. Technological Feasibility
1. General
2. Maximum Technologically Feasible
Levels
C. Energy Savings
1. Determination of Savings
2. Significance of Savings
D. Economic Justification
IV. Methodology and Discussion
A. Market and Technology Assessment
1. General
2. Equipment Classes
3. Technology Options
a. Mercury Vapor
b. High-Pressure Sodium Lamps
c. Metal Halide
d. Summary
B. Screening Analysis
C. Engineering Analysis
1. Representative Equipment Classes
2. Baseline Lamps and Representative
Lamp Types
3. More Efficacious Substitutes
4. Determine Efficacy Levels
5. Scaling to Equipment Classes Not
Directly Analyzed
6. HID Systems
D. Equipment Price Determination
E. Markups Analysis
F. Energy Use Analysis
G. Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period
Analysis
H. Shipments Analysis
I. National Impact Analysis
J. Manufacturer Impact Analysis
V. Analytical Results
A. Economic Impacts on Individual
Customers
B. Economic Impacts on Manufacturers
1. Industry Cash-Flow Analysis Results
2. Impacts on Employment
3. Impacts on Manufacturing Capacity
4. Impacts on Subgroups of Manufacturers
E:\FR\FM\21OCP1.SGM
21OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 203 (Tuesday, October 21, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 62899-62910]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24983]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 431
[Docket Number EERE-2014-BT-STD-0042]
RIN 1904-AD34
Energy Conservation Program for Certain Industrial Equipment:
Energy Conservation Standards for Commercial Water Heating Equipment
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Request for information (RFI).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is initiating a rulemaking
to consider amended energy conservation standards for commercial water
heaters, hot water supply boilers, and unfired hot water storage tanks
(commercial water heating equipment). Once completed, this rulemaking
will fulfill DOE's statutory obligation to either propose amended
energy conservation standards for commercial
[[Page 62900]]
water heating equipment or to determine that the existing standards do
not need to be amended. This notice seeks to solicit information to
help DOE determine whether national standards more stringent than those
currently in place would result in a significant amount of additional
energy savings and whether such amended national standards would be
technologically feasible and economically justified. In overview, this
document presents a brief description of the analysis DOE plans to
perform for this rulemaking and requests comment on various issues
relating to each of the analyses (e.g., market assessment, engineering
analysis, energy use analysis, life-cycle cost and payback period
analysis, and national impact analysis). Although this document
contains several specific topics on which DOE is particularly
interested in receiving written comment, DOE welcomes suggestions and
information from the public on any subject within the scope of this
rulemaking, including topics not raised in this RFI.
DATES: Written comments and information are requested on or before
November 20, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties are encouraged to submit comments
electronically. However, interested persons may submit comments,
identified by docket number EERE-2014-BT-STD-0042 and/or regulatory
identification number (RIN) 1904-AD34 by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions for submitting comments.
Email: ComWaterHeating2014STD0042@ee.doe.gov. Include
docket number EERE-2014-BT-STD-0042 and/or RIN 1904-AD34 in the subject
line of the message. Submit electronic comments in WordPerfect,
Microsoft Word, PDF, or ASCII file format, and avoid the use of special
characters or any form of encryption.
Postal Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department of
Energy, Building Technologies Program, Mailstop EE-5B, 1000
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585-0121. If possible, please
submit all items on a compact disc (CD), in which case it is not
necessary to include printed copies.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department
of Energy, Building Technologies Program, 6th Floor, 950 L'Enfant Plaza
SW., Washington, DC 20024. Telephone: (202) 586-2945. If possible,
please submit all items on a CD, in which case it is not necessary to
include printed copies.
For detailed instructions on submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process, see section Public Participation
of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information
may be sent to Mr. Ron Majette, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Technologies Program,
EE-5B, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585-0121.
Telephone: (202) 586-7935. Email: Ronald.Majette@ee.doe.gov.
Ms. Sarah Butler, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the General
Counsel, GC-71, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585-
0121. Telephone: (202) 586-1777. Email: Sarah.Butler@hq.doe.gov.
For information on how to submit or review public comments, contact
Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Technologies Program,
Mailstop EE-2J, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585-
0121. Telephone: (202) 586-2945. Email: Brenda.Edwards@ee.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
A. Authority
B. Background
C. Rulemaking Process
II. Planned Rulemaking Analyses
A. Test Procedure
B. Market Assessment
C. Technology Options for Consideration
D. Engineering Analysis
E. Markups Analysis
F. Energy Use Analysis
G. Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analysis
H. Shipments Analysis
I. National Impact Analysis
III. Submission of Comments
I. Introduction
A. Authority
Title III, Part C \1\ of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of
1975 (EPCA or the Act), Public Law 94-163 (42 U.S.C. 6311-6317, as
codified), added by Public Law 95-619, Title IV, Sec. 441(a),
established the Energy Conservation Program for Certain Industrial
Equipment, which includes provisions covering the commercial water
heating equipment that are the subject of this notice.\2\ In general,
this program addresses the energy efficiency of certain types of
commercial and industrial equipment. Relevant provisions of the Act
include definitions (42 U.S.C. 6311), energy conservation standards (42
U.S.C. 6313), test procedures (42 U.S.C. 6314), labeling provisions (42
U.S.C. 6315), and the authority to require information and reports from
manufacturers (42 U.S.C. 6316).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For editorial reasons, upon codification in the U.S. Code,
Part C was re-designated Part A-1.
\2\ All references to EPCA in this document refer to the statute
as amended through the American Energy Manufacturing Technical
Corrections Act of 2012, Public Law 112-210 (Dec. 18, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The initial Federal energy conservation standards and test
procedures for commercial water heating equipment were added to EPCA as
an amendment made by the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPACT). (42 U.S.C.
6313(a)(5)) These initial energy conservation standards corresponded to
the efficiency levels contained in the American Society of Heating,
Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) Standard 90.1
(ASHRAE Standard 90.1) in effect on October 24, 1992. The statute
provided that if the efficiency levels in ASHRAE Standard 90.1 were
amended after October 24, 1992, the Secretary must establish an amended
uniform national standard at new minimum levels for each equipment type
specified in ASHRAE Standard 90.1, unless DOE determines, through a
rulemaking supported by clear and convincing evidence, that national
standards more stringent than the new minimum levels would result in
significant additional energy savings and be technologically feasible
and economically justified. (42 U.S.C. 6313(a)(6)(A)(ii)(II)) In
deciding whether a proposed amended standard is economically justified,
DOE must, after receiving comments on the proposed standard, determine
whether the benefits of the proposed standard exceed its burdens by, to
the greatest extent practicable, considering the following seven
factors:
1. The economic impact of the standard on manufacturers and
consumers of the equipment subject to the standard;
2. The savings in operating costs throughout the estimated average
life of the covered equipment in the type (or class) compared to any
increase in the price, initial charges, or maintenance expenses for the
covered products that are likely to result from the standard;
3. The total projected amount of energy savings, or as applicable,
water savings, likely to result directly from the standard;
[[Page 62901]]
4. Any lessening of the utility or the performance of the covered
equipment likely to result from the standard;
5. The impact of any lessening of competition, as determined in
writing by the Attorney General, that is likely to result from the
standard;
6. The need for national energy and water conservation; and
7. Other factors the Secretary of Energy (Secretary) considers
relevant. (42 U.S.C. 6313(a)(6)(B)(ii))
Section 5(b) of the American Energy Manufacturing Technical
Corrections Act (AEMTCA), Public Law 112-210 (Dec. 18, 2012), amended
EPCA to include a requirement for DOE to conduct an evaluation of
whether to amend the standards for certain types of commercial and
industrial equipment \3\ every six years. (42 U.S.C. 6313(a)(6)(C)(i))
AEMTCA also mandated that DOE must publish the first document of an
expedited rulemaking within 1 year of the date of AEMTCA's enactment
(i.e., December 18, 2012) to consider amended energy conservation
standards for any covered equipment of those types as to which more
than six years had elapsed since the issuance of the most recent final
rule establishing or amending a standard for the equipment. (42 U.S.C.
6313(a)(6)(C) (vi)) \4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ This equipment includes small, large, and very large
commercial package air conditioning and heating equipment, packaged
terminal air conditioners and heat pumps, warm-air furnaces,
packaged boilers, storage water heaters, instantaneous water
heaters, and unfired hot water storage tanks. (42 U.S.C. 6313(a)(6))
\4\ It is noted that AEMTCA inadvertently assigned two separate
provisions to 42 U.S.C. 6313(a)(6)(C)(vi). The provision cited above
is the one most relevant to this RFI.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE issued the most recent final rule for commercial water heating
equipment on January 12, 2001 (hereinafter, the ``January 2001 final
rule''), which adopted the amended energy conservation standards at
levels equivalent to efficiency levels in ASHRAE Standard 90.1, as it
was revised in October 1999. 66 FR 3336. Because more than six years
has passed since issuance of the last final rule for commercial water
heating equipment, DOE is required to publish either a notice of
determination that the current standards for these equipment types do
not need to be amended, or a notice of proposed rulemaking proposing
amended energy conservation standards for these equipment types. In
addition, the energy conservation standards for commercial oil-fired
storage water heaters were increased to a level beyond the current
federal standards in ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2013. Therefore DOE is
required to adopt these new standards unless there is clear evidence
that adopting stricter standards would produce significant additional
energy savings while being both technologically feasible and
economically justified.
To meet the requirements under AEMTCA, DOE is reviewing its
existing energy conservation standards for the equipment types listed
in 42 U.S.C. 6313(a) for which at least six years have elapsed since
the issuance of the most recent final rule, including the commercial
water heating equipment that is the subject of this notice. This notice
represents the initiation of the mandatory review process required by
AEMTCA. DOE seeks input from the public to assist with its
determination on whether to amend the current standards for commercial
water heating equipment.
B. Background
On October 29, 1999, ASHRAE released an updated Standard 90.1-1999,
which included amended efficiency levels for numerous categories of
commercial water heaters, hot water supply boilers, and unfired hot
water storage tanks. DOE evaluated these efficiency levels and
subsequently adopted energy conservation standards affecting eight
different water heating equipment categories in a final rule published
in the January 2001 final rule. 66 FR 3336. However, DOE did not adopt
the efficiency level contained in ASHRAE Standard 90.1-1999 for
commercial electric storage water heaters, since the ASHRAE Standard
90.1-1999 level was less stringent than the standard in EPCA and would
have increased energy consumption, and under those circumstances, DOE
could not adopt the new efficiency level. 66 FR at 3350. The current
Federal energy conservation standards for this equipment including
those adopted in the January 2001 final rule are shown in Table 1.
Table 1--Minimum Efficiency Levels for Commercial Water Heating Equipment
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Energy conservation standard \a\ \b\
------------------------------------------
Minimum
Equipment Size thermal
efficiency Maximum standby loss \c\
(percent)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Electric storage water heaters.......... All........................ N/A 0.30 + 27/Vm (%/hr).
Gas-fired storage water heaters......... <=155,000 Btu/hr........... 80 Q/800 + 110(Vr)\1/2\ (Btu/
hr).
>155,000 Btu/hr............ 80 Q/800 + 110(Vr)\1/2\ (Btu/
hr).
Oil-fired storage water heaters......... <=155,000 Btu/hr........... 78 Q/800 + 110(Vr)\1/2\ (Btu/
hr).
>155,000 Btu/hr............ 78 Q/800 + 110(Vr)\1/2\ (Btu/
hr).
Gas-fired instantaneous water heaters <10 gal.................... 80 N/A.
and hot water supply boilers.
>=10 gal................... 80 Q/800 + 110(Vr)\1/2\ (Btu/
hr).
Oil-fired instantaneous water heaters <10 gal.................... 80 N/A.
and hot water supply boilers.
>=10 gal................... 78 Q/800 + 110(Vr)\1/2\ (Btu/
hr).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Equipment Size Minimum thermal insulation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unfired hot water storage tank.......... All........................ R-12.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Vm is the measured storage volume and Vr is the rated volume, both in gallons. Q is the nameplate input rate
in Btu/hr.
\b\ For hot water supply boilers with a capacity of less than 10 gallons: (1) The standards are mandatory for
products manufactured on and after October 21, 2005, and (2) products manufactured prior to that date, and on
or after October 23, 2003, must meet either the standards listed in this table or the applicable standards in
subpart E of this part for a ``commercial packaged boiler.''
\c\ Water heaters and hot water supply boilers having more than 140 gallons of storage capacity need not meet
the standby loss requirement if (1) the tank surface area is thermally insulated to R-12.5 or more, (2) a
standing pilot light is not used and (3) for gas or oil-fired storage water heaters, they have a fire damper
or fan assisted combustion.
[[Page 62902]]
DOE reviewed and adopted amended test procedures for commercial
water heating equipment in a direct final rule published on October 21,
2004. 69 FR 61974. These test procedure amendments incorporated by
reference certain sections of the American National Standards Institute
Standard (ANSI) Z21.10.3-1998 (ANSI Z21.10.3-1998), ``Gas Water Heaters
Volume III Storage Water Heaters, with Input Ratings Above 75,000 Btu
per Hour, Circulating and Instantaneous.'' Id. On May 16, 2012, DOE
published a final rule in the Federal Register to update the test
procedures for certain commercial water heating equipment by adopting
and incorporating by reference the most recent version of the relevant
industry test procedure, ANSI Z21.10.3-2011. 77 FR 28928. These updates
did not materially alter the procedure.
The divisions between residential and commercial water heaters were
first established in EPCA. The current specifications for residential
water heaters are shown below in Table 2, as specified in 10 CFR 430.2.
A water heater exceeding any of the limits expressed below for input,
volume, input/volume, or max temperature is classified as commercial
water heating equipment.
Table 2--Classification of Residential Water Heating Equipment
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Input/volume Max temp
Type Input Volume (gal) (BTU/(h*gal)) ([deg]F)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gas Storage........................... <75,000 BTU/h........... 20-100 <4,000 <180
Oil Storage........................... <105,000 BTU/h.......... <50 <4,000 <180
Electric Storage...................... <12 kW.................. 20-120 <4,000 <180
Gas Instantaneous..................... 50,000-200,000 BTU/h.... <2 >=4,000 <180
Oil Instantaneous..................... <210,000 BTU/h.......... .............. >=4,000 <180
Electric Instantaneous................ <12 kW.................. .............. >=4,000 <180
Heat Pump \a\......................... <12 kW.................. <120 .............. <180
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ To be classified as residential, heat pump water heaters must also not exceed a current rating 24 A or 250
V.
C. Rulemaking Process
In addition to the specific statutory criteria discussed in section
I.A that DOE must follow in prescribing amended standards for covered
equipment, DOE uses a specific process to assess the appropriateness of
amending the standards that are currently in place for a given type of
equipment. For commercial water heating equipment, DOE plans to conduct
its analyses in stages, with a positive result leading to a subsequent
stage of the analysis. Under this approach, DOE will first evaluate
whether more-stringent standards are technologically feasible and
whether such standards would result in significant additional energy
savings. If either of these criteria is not met, DOE will conduct no
further analysis, because the statutory criteria for adoption of the
more-stringent standard could not be met. However, if this initial
assessment is positive, DOE will conduct in-depth technical analyses of
the costs and benefits of the potential amended standards to determine
whether such amended standards would be economically justified. The
analyses undertaken at this stage would include: (1) Engineering
analysis; (2) energy use analysis; (3) markups analysis; (4) life-cycle
cost and payback period analysis; and (5) national impacts analysis.
If, after conducting those analyses, DOE determines that there is a
high likelihood that more-stringent standards would be economically
justified, DOE will conduct downstream analyses including: (1)
Manufacturer impacts analysis; (2) emission impacts analysis; (3)
utility impacts analysis; (4) employment impacts analysis; and (5)
regulatory impacts analysis. DOE will also conduct several other
analyses that support those previously listed, including the market and
technology assessment, the screening analysis (which contributes to the
engineering analysis), and the shipments analysis (which contributes to
the national impact analysis). As detailed throughout this RFI, DOE is
publishing this notice as the first step in the analytical process and
is requesting input and data from interested parties to aid in the
development of the technical analyses.
DOE anticipates moving from this RFI directly to publication of
either a determination that the commercial water heating equipment
standards do not need to be amended or a notice of proposed rulemaking
for amended standards.
II. Planned Rulemaking Analyses
In this section, DOE summarizes the rulemaking analyses and
identifies a number of issues on which it seeks input and data in order
to aid in the development of the technical and economic analyses to
determine whether amended energy conservation standards may be
warranted. In addition, DOE welcomes comments on other issues relevant
to the conduct of this rulemaking that may not specifically be
identified in this notice.
A. Test Procedures
DOE's existing test procedures for commercial water heating
equipment are specified at 10 CFR 431.106, and reference ANSI Z21.10.3-
2011. The test procedures provide methods for determining the thermal
efficiency and standby loss of gas-fired, oil-fired, and electric
storage and instantaneous water heaters. AEMTCA amended EPCA to require
that DOE publish a final rule establishing a uniform efficiency
descriptor and accompanying test methods for covered residential water
heaters and commercial water heating equipment by December 18, 2013
(i.e., within one year of the enactment of AEMTCA). (42 U.S.C.
6295(e)(5)(B)) The final rule must replace the current energy factor
(for residential water heaters) and thermal efficiency and standby loss
(for commercial water heaters) metrics with a uniform efficiency
descriptor. (42 U.S.C. 6295(e)(5)(C)) AEMTCA allowed DOE to provide an
exclusion from the uniform efficiency descriptor for specific
categories of otherwise covered water heaters that do not have
residential uses, that can be clearly described, and that are
effectively rated using the current thermal efficiency and standby loss
descriptors. (42 U.S.C. 6295(e)(5)(F))
DOE published a final rule for test procedures for residential
water heaters and certain commercial water heaters on July 11, 2014
that, among other things, established the Uniform Energy Factor (UEF),
a revised version of the current residential Energy Factor metric, as
the uniform efficiency descriptor required by AEMTCA. 79 FR 40542. The
uniform efficiency descriptor only applies to commercial water heaters
that meet the definition of ``residential-duty commercial water
heater,'' which is
[[Page 62903]]
defined as any gas-fired, electric, or oil storage or instantaneous
commercial water heater that meets the following conditions:
(1) For models requiring electricity, uses single-phase external
power supply;
(2) Is not designed to provide outlet hot water at temperatures
greater than 180[emsp14][deg]F; and
(3) Is not excluded by any of the specified limitations regarding
rated input and storage volume established in Table 3 (below). Id. at
40546
The input and volume limitations for the definition of a
residential-duty commercial water heater are shown below by equipment
class.
Table 3--Classification of Residential-Duty Commercial Water Heating
Equipment
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicator of non-residential
Water heater type application
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gas-fired Storage...................... Rated input >105 kBtu/h; Rated
storage volume >120 gallons.
Oil-fired Storage...................... Rated input >140 kBtu/h; Rated
storage volume >120 gallons.
Electric Storage....................... Rated input >12 kW; Rated
storage volume >120 gallons.
Heat Pump with Storage................. Rated input >12 kW; Rated
current >24 A at a rated
voltage of not greater than
250 V; Rated storage volume
>120 gallons.
Gas-fired Instantaneous................ Rated input >200 kBtu/h; Rated
storage volume >2 gallons.
Electric Instantaneous................. Rated input >58.6 kW; Rated
storage volume >2 gallons.
Oil-fired Instantaneous................ Rated input >210 kBtu/h; Rated
storage volume >2 gallons.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commercial water heaters not meeting the definition of residential-
duty commercial water heater were deemed to be sufficiently
characterized by the current thermal efficiency and standby loss
metrics.
This rulemaking, therefore, includes commercial water heating
equipment covered by the uniform efficiency descriptor, as well as
water heaters that will continue to be covered by the existing thermal
efficiency and standby loss metrics. DOE plans to conduct analyses for
this rulemaking using the UEF for residential-duty commercial water
heaters. For residential-duty commercial water heaters, DOE will
develop a conversion factor (as required by AEMTCA) that will be used
to translate the existing thermal efficiency and standby loss ratings
into UEF for its analyses. The conversion factor will be developed as
part of a separate rulemaking. DOE plans to conduct analyses for all
other types of commercial water heaters (i.e., other than the
residential-duty commercial water heaters) using the existing thermal
efficiency and standby loss metrics.
DOE notes that for unfired storage tanks, the Federal energy
conservation standard is expressed as an R-value requirement for the
tank thermal insulation. In an RFI published on February 27, 2014 that
addresses commercial water heater test procedures (February 2014 RFI),
DOE sought comment on whether a single test method for R-value should
be used (and if so, which industry method is most appropriate), or
whether replacing R-value with standby loss or some other metric as the
energy efficiency metric for unfired storage tanks would be
appropriate. 79 FR 10999. Any amended standards for unfired storage
tanks for this rulemaking will be established in the metric chosen in
the noted test procedure rulemaking.
Lastly, DOE may consider including commercial heat pump water
heaters within the scope of coverage of this rulemaking, as discussed
below in Section II.B. DOE does not currently have a test procedure for
determining the energy efficiency of commercial heat pump water
heaters, but may develop a procedure as described in the February 2014
RFI. If DOE ultimately adopts a test method for commercial heat pump
water heaters, then DOE would consider those products in the analyses
for this rulemaking.
B. Market Assessment
The market and technology assessment provides information about the
commercial water heating equipment industry that will be used
throughout the rulemaking process. For example, this information will
be used to determine whether the existing equipment class structure
requires modification based on the statutory criteria for setting such
classes and to explore the potential for technological improvements in
the design and manufacturing of such equipment. DOE uses qualitative
and quantitative information to assess the past and present industry
structure and market characteristics. DOE will use existing market
materials and literature from a variety of sources, including industry
publications, trade journals, government agencies, and trade
organizations. DOE will also consider conducting interviews with
manufacturers to assess the overall market for commercial water heating
equipment.
The current equipment classes as established in the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) for commercial water heaters are characterized by
energy source, equipment type (i.e., storage vs. instantaneous and hot
water supply boilers), and size (i.e., input capacity rating and rated
storage volume). Unfired hot water storage tanks are also included in a
separate equipment class. As a starting point, DOE plans to use the
existing equipment class structure which divides commercial water
heating equipment into the equipment classes as shown in the table in
10 CFR 431.110 and summarized below in Table 4.
Table 4--Equipment Classes for Commercial Water Heating Equipment
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Equipment Size
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Electric storage water heaters....... All.
Gas-fired storage water heaters...... <=155,000 Btu/h.
>155,000 Btu/h.
Oil-fired storage water heaters...... <=155,000 Btu/h.
>155,000 Btu/h.
Gas-fired instantaneous water heaters <10 gal.
and hot water supply boilers.
>=10 gal.
Oil-fired instantaneous water heaters <10 gal.
and hot water supply boilers.
[[Page 62904]]
>=10 gal.
Unfired hot water storage tank....... All.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE plans to create separate equipment classes for residential-duty
commercial water heaters, as residential-duty commercial water heaters
will use a different metric for energy conservation standards (see
section II.A). DOE will consider additional equipment classes for
capacities or other performance-related features which inherently
affect efficiency and justify the establishment of a different energy
conservation standard. DOE will also consider consolidating equipment
classes, if warranted. DOE notes that both gas-fired and oil-fired
storage water heaters are divided into equipment classes for equipment
with an input capacity at or below 155,000 Btu/h and equipment with an
input capacity above 155,000 Btu/h. However, as shown in Table 1, the
current energy conservation standard levels are identical for both
equipment classes. DOE may consider consolidating these equipment
classes to remove the input capacity designations, if appropriate.
DOE may also expand the scope of this rulemaking to include covered
equipment that is not currently regulated, such as electric
instantaneous water heaters or commercial heat pump water heaters, and
may consider separate product classes for such equipment. DOE notes
that EPCA defines ``commercial instantaneous water heaters'' as water
heaters with an input rating of at least 4,000 Btu/h per gallon of
stored water. (42 U.S.C. 6311(12)(B)) DOE believes this definition
could include both commercial electric instantaneous water heaters and
commercial electric add-on heat pump water heaters. Commercial electric
heat pump water heaters may include both units that do not contain any
storage volume and can be externally connected to a storage tank or
tank water heater (i.e., add-on type) and units that contain an
integrated heat pump and storage tank (i.e., integrated type). DOE is
not aware of any integrated type commercial heat pump water heaters
currently on the market but may consider their inclusion due to their
possible development in the future.\5\ However, any such units would be
classified as commercial electric storage water heaters. Commercial
add-on electric heat pump water heaters may also extract heat for water
heating from either air (air-source) or water (water-source), both of
which DOE could consider for new efficiency standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ A commercial integrated heat pump water heater is an
integrated heat pump water heater that surpasses any of the
limitations for heat pump water heaters expressed in Table 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If appropriate, DOE may also consider establishing efficiency
standards separately for electric instantaneous water heaters using
electric resistance heat. However, DOE notes that the thermal
efficiency of electric instantaneous water heaters is already nearly
100 percent due to the high efficiency of electric resistance heating
elements, and that a thermal efficiency standard may be unnecessary.
Issue 1: DOE requests feedback on the current equipment classes and
seeks information regarding other equipment classes it should consider
for inclusion in its analysis.
Issue 2: DOE requests comment on whether the 155,000 Btu/h input
capacity divisions in the current equipment classes for gas-fired and
oil-fired storage water heaters are necessary.
Issue 3: DOE seeks comment on whether to include commercial
electric instantaneous water heaters and/or commercial heat pump water
heaters in the scope of this rulemaking.
Issue 4: DOE seeks comment on whether to include both add-on and
integrated commercial heat pump water heater types in the scope of this
rulemaking.
Issue 5: DOE seeks comment on whether to include both air-source
and water-source commercial heat pump water heater types in the scope
of this rulemaking.
C. Technology Options for Consideration
DOE uses information about existing and past technology options and
prototype designs to help identify technologies that manufacturers
could use to meet and/or exceed energy conservation standards. In
consultation with interested parties, DOE intends to develop a list of
technologies to consider in its analysis. Initially, this list will
include all those technologies considered to be technologically
feasible and will serve to establish the maximum technologically
feasible design. DOE is currently considering the specific technologies
and design options listed below.
Heat traps
Improved insulation \6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ This includes increasing jacket insulation, insulating the
tank bottom or using a plastic tank (electric only), advanced
insulation types, foam insulation, and pipe and fitting insulation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Power and direct venting
Fully condensing technology \7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ This includes storage, instantaneous, and hybrid heaters, as
well as pulse combustion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Improved flue design \8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ This includes using high-efficiency flue baffles, multiple
flues, submerged combustion chambers, and optimized flue geometry.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sidearm heating and two-phase thermosiphon technology
Electronic ignition systems
Improved heat pump water heaters \9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ This includes absorption heat pump water heaters, carbon
dioxide heat pump water heaters, advanced compressors, and using
centrifugal fans.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thermophotovoltaic and thermoelectric generators
Improved controls \10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ This includes incorporating timer controls, modulating
controls, and intelligent and wireless controls and communication.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Self-cleaning
Improved burners \11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ This includes incorporating variable firing-rate burners,
low-stage firing burners, and modulating burners.
Issue 6: DOE seeks information related to these or other
efficiency-improving technologies. Specifically, DOE is interested in
comments regarding their applicability to the current market and how
these technologies improve efficiency of commercial water heating
equipment.
D. Engineering Analysis
The engineering analysis estimates the cost-efficiency relationship
of equipment at different levels of increased energy efficiency. This
relationship serves as the basis for the cost-benefit calculations for
commercial customers, manufacturers, and the nation. In determining the
cost-efficiency relationship, DOE will estimate the increase in
manufacturer cost associated with increasing the efficiency of
equipment above the baseline to the maximum technologically feasible
(``max-tech'') efficiency level for each equipment
[[Page 62905]]
class. The baseline model is used as a reference point for each
equipment class in the engineering analysis and the life-cycle cost and
payback-period analyses. DOE considers equipment that just meets the
current minimum energy conservation standard as baseline equipment. For
equipment that does not have an existing minimum energy conservation
standard, DOE considers the least efficient equipment on the market as
baseline equipment. DOE will establish a baseline for each equipment
class using the applicable metric(s): Thermal Efficiency and Standby
Loss, or Uniform Energy Factor.
Issue 7: DOE requests comment on approaches that it should consider
when determining a baseline for equipment classes being transitioned to
the uniform descriptor, including information regarding the merits and/
or deficiencies of such approaches.
Issue 8: DOE requests information on max-tech efficiency levels
achievable in the current market and associated technologies.
In order to create the cost-efficiency relationship, DOE
anticipates that it will structure its engineering analysis using both
a reverse-engineering (or cost-assessment) and catalog teardown
approach. A reverse-engineering or cost-assessment approach relies on a
teardown analysis of representative units at the baseline efficiency
level and higher efficiency levels up to the maximum technologically
feasible designs. A teardown analysis (or physical teardown) determines
the production cost of a piece of equipment by disassembling the
equipment ``piece-by-piece'' and estimating the material and labor cost
of each component. A catalog teardown approach uses published
manufacturer catalogs and supplementary component data to estimate the
major physical differences between a piece of equipment that has been
physically disassembled and another piece of similar equipment. These
two methods would be used together to help DOE estimate the
manufacturer production cost of equipment at various efficiency levels.
Issue 9: DOE requests feedback on the planned approach for the
engineering analysis and on the appropriate representative capacities
and characteristics for each equipment class.
1. Analyzing Standby Loss Standards
For each equipment class examined, the baseline, or current
standard is determined, and then several intermediate efficiency levels
are analyzed incrementally up to the max-tech level, which corresponds
to the most efficient unit on the market. For the analysis of amended
thermal efficiency standards and uniform efficiency descriptor
standards, DOE expects this will be a straightforward process. However,
selecting efficiency levels for analysis of amended standby loss (SL)
standards for gas and oil storage heaters is more complex for several
reasons.
First, the standard for standby loss (BTU/hr) oil and gas storage
water heaters is a multivariable equation depending upon both rated
input (Q, BTU/hr) and volume (V, gal), as shown below.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP21OC14.001
As discussed later in this section, DOE plans to analyze representative
units for the engineering analysis that have the most common attributes
of a given equipment class. As a result, DOE will select equipment for
analysis with storage volumes and input ratings at discrete
representative values within the range of products available on the
market. DOE will then need to expand its analysis of efficiency levels
at the representative volume(s) and input(s) for the market, and these
levels must be extrapolated to apply to the range of volumes and inputs
covered by the standard. Because the current standard depends on both
volume and input without an intercept, it is only possible to change
the slopes for each variable when modifying the standard to fit the
analyzed efficiency levels. This could be undesirable if shifting the
standard up or down (maintaining the slopes) would better fit the
distribution of units outside the representative input and volume.
Analysis performed thus far by DOE using an approach of varying the
volume slope to change the relationship between SL and input for units
at the representative volume appears to yield viable results.
One method to avoid issues stemming from adjusting a multi-variable
standard is to remove one of the variables from the equation and
establish discrete bins for that variable. Within each of these bins,
the SL standard would be a single-variable equation, allowing for
manipulation of either the slope or intercept. While bins could be
created for input or volume, preliminary analysis indicates that
creating bins for volume with standards based on input within each bin
would yield better trends for establishing new standard levels.
Issue 10: DOE requests comment on approaches to selecting
efficiency levels for its analysis of amended SL energy conservation
standards for gas and oil storage heaters, including the possibility of
establishing discrete bins for one of the variables and establishing SL
standards based on one instead of two variables.
The second issue is that the SL is calculated using the amount of
fuel consumed over a given time period, and therefore the heat loss as
measured in the SL is partially dependent on the thermal efficiency
(TE) of the water heater. Because TE for commercial gas storage heaters
can vary from 80-99%, TE can account for a difference of up to 19% of
SL values (only 4% for oil storage heaters). Removing this dependency
on TE would allow more accurate and representative standards for non-
condensing and condensing water heaters. DOE notes that preliminary
analysis has shown a large discrepancy in SL range for non-condensing
and condensing water heaters; condensing water heater have units with
values in a similar range to non-condensing models, but the range also
extends to much lower SL values. Further analysis is required to
determine to what degree the technologies that allow these
significantly lower values are inherent to condensing heaters (i.e.
less heat lost in flue due to condensation), as otherwise these
technologies could be considered for non-condensing units as well. One
possible way to mitigate the impact of TE on SL would be to incorporate
the thermal efficiency into the standby loss standard, as a third
variable. Another approach would be to analyze SL levels for condensing
(92-99% TE) and non-condensing (80-84% TE) gas storage models
separately, so that non-condensing models have a proportionately less
strict standard, accounting for the lower average TE.
Issue 11: DOE requests comment whether to account for the impact of
thermal efficiency on standby loss and on approaches to separate the
effect of thermal efficiency from standby loss for gas storage heaters.
This includes the possibility of separate standards for non-condensing
and condensing units, as well as adding thermal efficiency to the
current SL standard.
E. Markups Analysis
To carry out the life-cycle cost (LCC) and payback period (PBP)
calculations, DOE needs to determine the cost to the commercial
customer of baseline equipment that satisfies the currently applicable
standards, and the cost of the more-efficient unit the customer would
purchase under potential amended standards. This is done by applying a
markup multiplier to the manufacturer's
[[Page 62906]]
selling price to estimate the commercial customer's price.
Markups depends on the distribution channels for a product (i.e.,
how the equipment passes from the manufacturer to the customer). For
commercial water heating equipment, various distribution channels are
characterized.
Two different markets exist for commercial water heating systems:
(1) New construction and (2) replacements. DOE plans to characterize
the replacement distribution channels for commercial water heating
systems as follows:
Manufacturer [rarr] Wholesaler [rarr] Mechanical contractor [rarr]
Customer
In the case of new construction, DOE plans to characterize the
distribution channel as follows:
Manufacturer [rarr] Wholesaler [rarr] Mechanical contractor [rarr]
General contractor [rarr] Customer
In addition, DOE plans to consider distribution channels where the
manufacturer sells the equipment directly to a commercial consumer
through a national account or the commercial consumer purchases the
equipment directly through a wholesaler as follows:
Manufacturer [rarr] Wholesaler [rarr] Customer
or
Manufacturer [rarr] Customer
The latter channels reflect those cases where the installation can
be accomplished by site personnel.
DOE also plans to consider cases when the contractor's sale of the
equipment includes a start-up/check-out contract, in which cases the
equipment markup is included in the contract costs.
Issue 12: DOE seeks input from stakeholders on whether the
distribution channels described above are appropriate for commercial
water heaters and are sufficient to describe the distribution market.
Issue 13: DOE seeks input on the percentage of equipment being
distributed through the different distribution channels, and whether
the share of equipment through each channel varies based on equipment
capacity or water heater class.
To develop markups for the parties involved in the distribution of
the equipment, DOE would utilize several sources including: (1) The
Heating, Air-Conditioning & Refrigeration Distributors International
(HARDI) 2013 Profit Report \12\ to develop wholesaler markups, (2) the
2005 Air Conditioning Contractors of America's (ACCA) financial
analysis for the heating, ventilation, air-conditioning, and
refrigeration (HVACR) contracting industry \13\ to develop mechanical
contractor markups, and (3) U.S. Census Bureau's 2007 Economic Census
data \14\ for the commercial and institutional building construction
industry to develop general contractor markups.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Heating, Air Conditioning & Refrigeration Distributors
International 2013 Profit Report, (Available at: https://www.hardinet.org/Profit-Report) (Last accessed July 8, 2014).
\13\ Air Conditioning Contractors of America (ACCA), Financial
Analysis for the HVACR Contracting Industry: 2005, (Available at:
https://https://www.acca.org/store/product.php?pid=142) (Last
accessed April 10, 2013).
\14\ U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 Economic Census Data. (2007)
(Available at: https://www.census.gov/econ/) (Last accessed April 10,
2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issue 14: DOE seeks recent data and recommendations regarding data
sources to establish the markups for the parties involved with the
distribution of the equipment.
F. Energy Use Analysis
The purpose of the energy use analysis is to assess the energy
requirements of commercial water heating products described in the
engineering analysis for a representative sample of building types that
utilize the product, and to assess the energy-savings potential of
increased product efficiencies. DOE uses the annual energy consumption
and energy-savings potential in the LCC and PBP analysis to establish
the operating costs savings at various product efficiency levels. DOE
will estimate the annual energy consumption of commercial water heaters
at specified energy efficiency levels across a range of applications,
building types, and climate zones. The annual energy consumption
includes use of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), oil, or
electricity for hot water production, as well as use of electricity for
the auxiliary components.
DOE intends to base the energy use analysis on building
characteristics from the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) 2003
Commercial Building Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS) \15\ for the
subset of building types that use the type of commercial water heating
equipment covered by the standards. DOE also plans to look at the use
of commercial water heaters in residential applications, such as multi-
family buildings. Therefore, DOE plans to include characteristics from
EIA's 2009 Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS) \16\ for the
subset of building types in RECS that use commercial water heating
equipment covered by this standard.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2003 Commercial
Building Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS). (Available at: https://www.eia.gov/consumption/commercial/) (Last accessed April 10, 2013).
Note CBECS 2012 building characteristics have been released in
preliminary form by EIA and will be reviewed for possible
incorporation into this analysis, however, the full release of CBECS
2012 data is not expected until winter 2015.
\16\ Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2009 Residential
Energy Consumption Survey (RECS). (Available at: https://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/) (Last accessed April 10, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Both CBECS and RECS survey data include information on the physical
characteristics of building units, water heating equipment used, fuels
used, energy consumption and expenditures, and other building
characteristics.\17\ DOE will also consult the American Society of
Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) \18\ and
Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) \19\ handbooks, which contain
data on the typical types and sizes (both input capacity and rated
volume) of commercial water heaters used for different building types
and applications, and can be used to compare to, supplement, and
corroborate the CBECS and RECS data. Based on these data, DOE will
develop a representative population of buildings for each commercial
water heater equipment class.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ Neither CBECS nor RECS provide data on whether the water
heater used in the building is a commercial water heater covered in
this rulemaking (i.e., water heating could also be provided by a
commercial boiler, residential boiler, or residential water heater).
Therefore, DOE intends to develop a methodology for adjusting its
building sample to reflect buildings that use a commercial water
heater covered in this rulemaking.
\18\ American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-
Conditioning Engineers, Inc. (ASHRAE). ASHRAE Handbook of HVAC
Applications: Chapter 50 (Service Water Heating) (2011) pgs. 50.1 to
50.32.
\19\ Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). Commercial Water
Heating Applications Handbook. (1992) CU-6666.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on the data in the ASHRAE and EPRI Handbooks, as well as data
from National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL),\20\ and Lawrence
Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) \21\ regarding typical energy use
profiles and other commercial building usage characteristics, DOE will
develop representative hot water usage, water heating usage profile,
water volumetric loads, and hot water usage temperatures for various
applications for each
[[Page 62907]]
commercial water heater and building type combination being analyzed.
This approach will capture the variability in water heating use due to
factors such as building activity, schedule, occupancy, water supply
temperature, tank losses, cycling losses, and distribution system
piping losses.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). U.S.
Department of Energy Commercial Reference Building Models of the
National Building Stock. February 2011. (Available at: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy11osti/46861.pdf) (Last accessed April 10,
2013).
\21\ Huang, J., Akbari, H., Rainer, L, Ritschard, R. 481
Prototypical Commercial Buildings for 20 Urban Market Areas, LBL-
29798, April 1991 (Available at: https://publications.lbl.gov/islandora/object/ir%3A94368) (Last accessed October 03, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE plans to consider market changes or future efficiency standards
in equipment technologies that reduce water heating loads in commercial
applications, such as more efficient commercial dishwashers and
commercial clothes washers. In addition, DOE intends to review other
data sets (e.g., the technology penetration curves used in the National
Energy Modeling System (NEMS),\22\ data from the End-Use Load and
Consumer Assessment Program (ELCAP),\23\ and 2009 Commercial Building
Stock Assessment for the Northwest),\24\ to determine whether a
significant fraction of the current building population is not
represented by CBECS 2003.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ For more information on NEMS, refer to the U.S. Department
of Energy, Energy Information Administration (EIA) documentation. A
useful summary is National Energy Modeling System: An Overview 2003,
DOE/EIA-0581 (2003). Each year, EIA uses NEMS to produce an energy
forecast for the United States, the Annual Energy Outlook (AEO). For
this analysis, DOE intends to use the version of NEMS based on AEO
2013. (Available at: https://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/).
\23\ Bonneville Power Administration. End-Use Load and Consumer
Assessment Program (ELCAP) Data from 1986 to 1989. 2012. (Available
at: https://rtf.nwcouncil.org/ELCAP/) (Last accessed April 10, 2013).
\24\ Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance (NEEA). Commercial
Building Stock Assessment. 2009. (Available at: https://neea.org/resource-center/regional-data-resources/commercial-building-stock-assessment) (Last accessed April 10, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issue 15: DOE requests comment on the overall method to determine
water heating energy use and if other factors should be considered in
developing the energy use or energy use methodology.
Issue 16: DOE seeks input on the current distribution of equipment
efficiencies in the building population for different equipment
classes.
Issue 17: DOE seeks input on typical types and sizes (including
fuel type, input capacity and rated volume) of commercial water
heaters, including gas condensing and heat pump water heaters, used for
different building types and applications.
Issue 18: DOE seeks input on representative hot water usage, water
heating usage profile, water volumetric load profiles or aggregate
loads, and representative hot water usage temperatures for various
commercial water heater applications.
Issue 19: DOE seeks input and sources of data or recommendations
for tools to support sizing of water heater typical commercial water
heater and multifamily residential applications.
Issue 20: DOE seeks input on the fraction and types of buildings
that use recirculation loops associated with commercial water heaters
and the impact of recirculation loops on water heater performance.
Issue 21: DOE requests comment on the fraction of commercial or
residential boilers used in commercial water heating applications.
Issue 22: DOE requests comment on the fraction and classes of
commercial water heaters which are used in residential-duty
applications as well as other commercial water heaters that may serve
residential multi-family buildings. DOE also requests input on the
fraction of residential water heaters that are used for commercial
applications.
G. Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analysis
The purpose of the LCC and PBP analysis is to analyze the effects
of potential amended energy conservation standards on customers of
commercial water heater equipment by determining how a potential
amended standard affects their operating expenses (usually decreased)
and their total installed costs (usually increased).
DOE intends to analyze the potential for variability by performing
the LCC and PBP calculations on a representative sample of individual
commercial buildings. DOE plans to utilize the sample of buildings
developed for the energy use analysis and the corresponding simulations
results.\25\ Within a given building, one or more commercial water
heater units may serve the building's water heating needs, depending on
the hot water requirements of the building. As a result, DOE intends to
express the LCC and PBP results for each of the individual commercial
water heaters installed in the building. DOE plans to model uncertainty
in many of the inputs to the LCC and PBP analysis using Monte Carlo
simulation and probability distributions. As a result, the LCC and PBP
results will be displayed as distributions of impacts compared to the
base case (without amended standards) conditions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ DOE plans to utilize the building types defined in CBECS
2003 as well as residential buildings that use commercial water
heaters such as multi-family buildings. Definitions of CBECS
building types can be found at https://www.eia.gov/emeu/cbecs/building_types.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issue 23: DOE requests comment on the overall method that it
intends to use to conduct the LCC and PBP analysis for commercial water
heaters.
Inputs to the LCC and PBP analysis are categorized as: (1) Inputs
for establishing the purchase expense, otherwise known as the total
installed cost, and (2) inputs for calculating the operating expense.
The primary inputs for establishing the total installed cost are
the baseline customer price, standard-level customer price increases,
and installation costs. Baseline customer prices and standard-level
customer price increases will be determined by applying markups to
manufacturer selling price estimates. The installation cost is added to
the customer price to arrive at a total installed cost. DOE intends to
develop installation costs using the most recent RS Means data
available.
Issue 24: DOE seeks input on the approach and data sources it
intends to use to develop installation costs, specifically, its
intention to use the most recent RS Means Mechanical Cost Data.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ RS Means. 2014 Mechanical Cost Data. (Available at: https://rsmeans.reedconstructiondata.com/60023.aspx) (Last accessed April
10, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The primary inputs for calculating the operating costs are
equipment energy consumption and demand, equipment efficiency, energy
prices and forecasts, maintenance and repair costs, equipment lifetime,
and discount rates. Both equipment lifetime and discount rates are used
to calculate the present value of future operating expenses.
The equipment energy consumption is the site energy use associated
with providing water heating to the building. DOE intends to utilize
the energy use calculation methodology described in Section II.F to
establish equipment energy use.
DOE will identify an approach to account for the gas, propane, oil
and electricity prices paid by consumers for the purposes of
calculating operating costs, savings, net present value, and payback
period. DOE intends to consider determining gas, oil, and electricity
prices based on geographically available fuel cost data such as state
level data, with consideration for the variation in energy costs paid
by different building types. This approach calculates energy expenses
based on actual energy prices that customers are paying in different
geographical areas of the country. As a potential additional source,
DOE may consider data to compare provided in EIA's Form 861 data \27\
to calculate
[[Page 62908]]
commercial electricity prices, EIA's Natural Gas Navigator \28\ to
calculate commercial natural gas prices, and EIA's State Energy Data
Systems (SEDS) \29\ to calculate liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and fuel
oil prices. Future energy prices will likely be projected using trends
from the EIA's 2013 Annual Energy Outlook (AEO).\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ Energy Information Administration (EIA), Survey form EIA-
861--Annual Electric Power Industry Report. (Available at: https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/eia861/) (Last accessed April
15, 2013).
\28\ Energy Information Administration (EIA), Natural Gas
Navigator. (Available at: https://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/ng/ng_pri_sum_dcu_nus_m.htm) (Last accessed April 15, 2013).
\29\ Energy Information Administration (EIA), State Energy Data
System (SEDS). (Available at: https://www.eia.gov/state/seds/) (Last
accessed April 15, 2013).
\30\ Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2013 Annual Energy
Outlook (AEO) Full Version. (Available at: https://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/). (Last accessed April 15, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issue 25: DOE seeks comment and sources on its approach for
developing gas, oil, and electricity prices.
Maintenance costs are expenses associated with ensuring continued
operation of the covered equipment over time. DOE intends to develop
maintenance costs for its analysis using the most recent RS Means data
available.\31\ DOE plans also to consider the cases when the equipment
is covered by service and/or maintenance agreements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ RS Means. 2013 Facilities Maintenance & Repair Cost Data.
(Available at: https://rsmeans.reedconstructiondata.com/60303.aspx)
(Last accessed April 10, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issue 26: DOE seeks input on the approach and data sources it
intends to use to develop maintenance costs, specifically, its
intention to use the most recent RS Means Facilities Maintenance &
Repair Cost Data, as well as to consider the cost of service and/or
maintenance agreements.
Repair costs are expenses associated with repairing or replacing
components of the covered equipment that have failed. DOE intends to
assess whether repair costs vary with equipment efficiency as part of
its analysis.
Issue 27: DOE seeks comment as to whether repair costs vary as a
function of equipment efficiency. DOE also requests any data or
information on developing repair costs.
Equipment lifetime is the age at which a unit of covered equipment
is retired from service. The average equipment lifetime for commercial
water heaters is estimated by various sources to be between 7 and 25
years based on application and equipment
type.32 33 34 35 36 37 38 Based on these data, DOE plans to
determine average lifetime for each commercial water heater product
class as the primary input for developing a Weibull probability
distribution to characterize commercial water heater lifetime.\39\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). U.S.
Department of Energy Commercial Reference Building Models of the
National Building Stock. February 2011. (Available at: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy11osti/46861.pdf) (Last accessed April 10,
2013). Pg. 38.
\33\ RS Means. 2013 Facilities Maintenance & Repair Cost Data.
(Available at: https://rsmeans.reedconstructiondata.com/60303.aspx)
(Last accessed April 10, 2013). pgs. 184-188.
\34\ Mark Ellis & Associates. ``National Appliance and Equipment
Energy Efficiency Program, Analysis of Potential for Minimum Energy
Performance Standards for Miscellaneous Water Heaters. Prepared for
the Australian Greenhouse Office. (2001) (Available at:
www.energyrating.com.au/library/pubs/tech-ewhmisc2001.pdf) (Last
accessed April 18, 2013).
\35\ Ryan Firestone and Danielle Gidding. ``Energy Savings from
Electric Water Heaters in Commercial Applications.'' Prepared for
Bonneville Power Administration. Prepared by Navigant Consulting and
Bonneville Power Administration. (Presented June 1, 2010) (Available
at: rtf.nwcouncil.org/meetings/2010/0601/WaterHeatersinCommercialApplications_v05.ppt) (Last accessed: April
18. 2013). Slide 31.
\36\ Gas Foodservice Equipment Network. ``Straight Talk About
Tankless Water Heaters, Can They Really Keep You in Hot Water?''
Cooking for Profit. (December 15, 2007) (Available at: https://www.crescentcity-fl.com/Gas%20Documents/Dec%2007%20GFEN%20%20final_Tankless.pdf) (Last accessed: April 18,
2013).
\37\ Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP). FEMP Designated
Product: Commercial Gas Water Heaters. 2012. (Available at: https://www1.eere.energy.gov/femp/technologies/eep_com_gaswaterheaters.html)
(Last accessed: April 18, 2013).
\38\ Note that for some commercial water heaters the usage and
application would be similar to a residential water heater. For
these situations the Weibull distribution derived for DOE's 2010
residential water heater standards rulemaking could be applicable.
(More information about the derivation the residential water heater
lifetime is available at: https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=EERE-2006-STD-0129).
\39\ If the data is available, DOE also plans to take into
account differences in commercial water heater lifetime based on
usage and application of the water heater.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issue 28: DOE seeks comment on its approach of using a Weibull
probability distribution to characterize equipment lifetime. DOE also
requests equipment lifetime data and information on whether equipment
lifetime varies based on equipment characteristics, equipment
application, or efficiency level considerations.
The discount rate is the rate at which future expenditures are
discounted to establish their present value. DOE intends to derive the
discount rates by estimating the cost of capital of companies that
purchase commercial water heater equipment.
DOE's analysis includes measures of LCC and PBP impacts of
potential standard levels relative to a base case that reflects the
likely market in the absence of amended standards. DOE plans to develop
market-share efficiency data (i.e., the distribution of equipment
shipments by efficiency) for the equipment classes DOE is considering,
for the year in which compliance with any amended standards would be
required.
DOE also plans to assess the applicability of the ``rebound
effect'' in the energy consumption for commercial water heaters. A
rebound effect occurs when a piece of equipment that is made more
efficient is used more intensively, so that the expected energy savings
from the efficiency improvement may not fully materialize. However, at
this time, DOE is not aware of any information about the rebound effect
for this equipment type.
Issue 29: DOE requests data on current efficiency market shares (of
shipments) by equipment class, and also input on similar historic data.
Issue 30: DOE also requests information on expected future trends
in efficiency for commercial water heaters classes, including the
relative market share of condensing versus non-condensing equipment in
the market in the absence of new efficiency standards.
Issue 31: DOE seeks comments and data on any rebound effect that
may be associated with more efficient commercial water heaters.
H. Shipment Analysis
DOE uses shipment projections by equipment class to calculate the
national impacts of standards on energy consumption, net present value
(NPV) of customer benefits, and future manufacturer cash flows.
DOE intends to develop a shipments model for commercial water
heater equipment based on historical AHRI shipments data for commercial
gas and electric storage water heaters.\40\ DOE currently does not have
any historical shipments information for other product classes
described in the engineering analysis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\40\ Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute
(AHRI). Commercial Storage Water Heaters Historical Data: 1992-2011.
(Available at: https://www.ahrinet.org/site/494/Resources/Statistics/Historical-Data/Commercial-Storage-Water-Heaters-Historical-Data)
(Last accessed July 3, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issue 32: DOE seeks historical shipments data for commercial water
heaters by product class, particularly for product classes other than
commercial gas and electric storage water heaters.
The shipments model will consider three market segments: (1) New
commercial buildings acquiring equipment; (2) existing buildings
replacing old equipment; and (3) existing buildings acquiring new
equipment for the first time. Two stock
[[Page 62909]]
categories are also considered: (1) Equipment that has received only
normal maintenance repairs; and (2) equipment that has had its useful
life extended through additional repairs. To determine whether a
customer would choose to repair rather than replace their commercial
water heater equipment, the shipments model explicitly accounts for the
combined effects of changes in purchase price, annual operating cost,
and the value of commercial floor space on the purchase versus repair
decision. Changes to the purchase price and operating costs due to
amended energy conservation standards are the drivers for shipment
estimates for the standards cases relative to the base case (i.e., the
case without amended standards).
DOE intends to utilize the U.S. Census Bureau data \41\ to
establish historical new construction floor space, as well as
historical stock floor space. The Annual Energy Outlook will be used to
forecast both new construction and stock floor space. Using these and
historical equipment saturation data from CBECS, DOE will estimate
shipments to the three market segments identified above. The utility
function to estimate the repair versus replacement decision will be
based on income per square foot data from the Building Owners and
Managers Association (BOMA) Commercial Building Survey reports,\42\
equipment purchase price index (PPI) data estimated from the Bureau of
Labor Statistics,\43\ and operating cost data derived from the LCC and
PBP analysis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\41\ U.S. Census Bureau. Statistical Abstract of the United
States: 2011, Table No 933--Construction Contracts--Value of
Construction and Floor Space of Buildings by Class of Construction.
(Available at: https://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2011/cats/construction_housing/construction_indices_and_value.html) (Last
accessed April 10, 2013).
\42\ Building Owners and Managers Association International
(BOMA). Experience Exchange Report (2013) (Available at: https://www.bomaeer.com/) (Last accessed April 10, 2013).
\43\ U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Producers Price Index: Industry: Refrigeration and Heating Equipment
(Available at: https://www.bls.gov/ppi/home.htm) (Last accessed April
10, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issue 33: DOE seeks input on the approach and data sources it
intends to use in developing the shipments model and shipments
forecasts for this analysis.
I. National Impact Analysis
The purpose of the national impact analysis (NIA) is to estimate
aggregate impacts of potential energy conservation standards at the
national level. Impacts that DOE reports include the national energy
savings (NES) from potential standards and the net present value (NPV)
of the total customer benefits.
To develop the NES, DOE calculates annual energy consumption for
the base case and the standards cases. DOE calculates the annual energy
consumption using per-unit annual energy use data multiplied by
projected shipments.
To develop the NPV of customer benefits from potential energy
conservation standards, DOE calculates annual energy expenditures and
annual equipment expenditures for the base case and the standards
cases. DOE calculates annual energy expenditures from annual energy
consumption by incorporating projected energy prices. DOE calculates
annual equipment expenditures by multiplying the price per unit times
the projected shipments. The difference each year between energy bill
savings, increased maintenance and repair costs, and increased
equipment expenditures is the net savings or net costs.
A key component of DOE's estimates of NES and NPV are the equipment
energy efficiencies forecasted over time for the base case and for each
of the standards cases. For the base case trend, DOE will consider
whether historical data show any trend and whether any trend can be
reasonably extrapolated beyond current efficiency levels. In
particular, DOE is interested in historical and future shipments of
equipment with step changes in efficiency, such as condensing gas
equipment or HPWHs.
Issue 34: DOE requests comment and any available data on
historical, current, and future market share of equipment with step
changes in efficiency, such as gas condensing equipment and HPWHs, as
compared to less efficient equipment, such as non-condensing gas water
heaters and electric water heaters, respectively, for each equipment
class.
For the various standards cases, to estimate the impact that
amended energy conservation standards may have in the year compliance
becomes required, DOE would likely use a ``roll-up'' scenario. Under
the ``roll-up'' scenario, DOE assumes: (1) Equipment efficiencies in
the base case that do not meet the new or amended standard level under
consideration would ``roll up'' to meet that standard level; and (2)
equipment shipments at efficiencies above the standard level under
consideration would not be affected. After DOE establishes the
efficiency distribution for the assumed compliance date of a standard,
it may consider future projected efficiency growth using available
trend data.
DOE intends to determine whether there is a rebound effect
associated with more efficient commercial water heaters. If data
indicate that there is a rebound effect, DOE will account for the
rebound effect in its calculation of NES.
III. Public Participation
DOE will accept comments, data, and information regarding this RFI
and other matters relevant to DOE's consideration of amended energy
conservations standard for commercial water heating equipment no later
than the date provided in the DATES section at the beginning of this
RFI. Interested parties may submit comments using any of the methods
described in the ADDRESSES section at the beginning of this RFI. After
the close of the comment period, DOE will begin collecting data,
conducting the analyses, and reviewing the public comments. These
actions will be taken to aid in the development of a NOPR for
commercial water heating equipment if DOE decides to amend the
standards for commercial water heaters.
Instructions: All submissions received must be identified by docket
number EERE-2014-BT-STD-0042 and/or regulatory identification number
(RIN) 1904-AD34. No telefacsimilies (faxes) will be accepted.
Docket: The docket is available for review at www.regulations.gov,
including Federal Register notices, public meeting attendees' lists and
transcripts, comments, and other supporting documents/materials. All
documents in the docket are listed in the www.regulations.gov index.
However, not all documents listed in the index may be publicly
available, such as information that is exempt from public disclosure.
A link to the docket Web page can be found at: https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=EERE-2014-BT-STD-0042. This Web
page contains a link to the docket for this notice on the
www.regulations.gov Web site. The www.regulations.gov Web page contains
simple instructions on how to access all documents, including public
comments, in the docket.
For information on how to submit a comment, review other public
comments and the docket, or participate in the public meeting, contact
Ms. Brenda Edwards at (202) 586-2945 or by email:
Brenda.Edwards@ee.doe.gov.
DOE considers public participation to be a very important part of
the process for developing test procedures. DOE actively encourages the
participation and interaction of the public during the comment period
in each stage of the rulemaking process. Interactions with and between
members of the public
[[Page 62910]]
provide a balanced discussion of the issues and assist DOE in the
rulemaking process. Anyone who wishes to be added to the DOE mailing
list to receive future notices and information about this rulemaking
should contact Ms. Brenda Edwards at (202) 586-2945, or via email at
Brenda.Edwards@ee.doe.gov.
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 10, 2014.
Kathleen B. Hogan,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy.
[FR Doc. 2014-24983 Filed 10-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P