Secretarial Election Procedures, 62587-62588 [2014-24906]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 202 / Monday, October 20, 2014 / Proposed Rules
activities and typically involves external
scientific peer review or demonstration
of comparable safety oversight by other
expert U.S. Federal agencies. The
biosafety review cannot be waived or
delegated.
(c) A biosafety review precludes the
use of a categorical exclusion for the
proposed activity. The EA or EIS for the
activity will include the results of the
biosafety review.
§ 237.9
Endangered species.
An EIS must be prepared if a
proposed project, program, or activity
may adversely affect a federally listed
threatened or endangered species, or
adversely modify its critical habitat. It is
USAID policy to conduct its Agency
operations in a manner that is sensitive
to the protection of endangered or
threatened species and their critical
habitats. The EIS for each project,
program or activity having an effect on
the environment shall specifically
determine whether the project, program
or activity will have an effect on
endangered or threatened species, or
critical habitat.
§ 237.10
Filing and publishing.
All Draft, Final and Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statements shall
be filed electronically with USEPA’s
Office of Federal Activities as required
in 40 CFR 1506.9. They must be filed no
earlier than they are transmitted to
Cooperating Agencies and made
available to the public. This assures that
the EIS is received by all interested
parties by the time the USEPA Notice of
Availability appears in the Federal
Register, and therefore allows for the
full minimum review periods prescribed
in 40 CFR 1506.10. Such filings will be
in collaboration with the relevant
Bureau Environmental Officer and the
Agency Environmental Coordinator.
§ 237.11
Public hearings.
rmajette on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(a) In most instances USAID will be
able to gain the benefit of public
participation in the process through
circulation of draft scoping documents,
draft final EAs and EISs and notice of
public availability as set out at 40 CFR
1506.6. However, in some cases the
Administrator may wish to hold
physical public hearings on a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS).
In deciding whether or not such a
public hearing is appropriate and
making a recommendation to the
Administrator, heads of Bureaus or
Independent Offices in conjunction
with the Agency Environmental
Coordinator should consider:
(1) The magnitude of the proposal in
terms of economic costs, the geographic
area involved, and the uniqueness or
size of commitment of the resources
involved;
(2) The degree of interest in the
proposal as evidenced by requests from
the public and from Federal, state and
local authorities, and private
organizations and individuals, that a
hearing be held;
(3) The complexity of the issue and
likelihood that information will be
presented at the hearing which will be
of assistance to the Agency; and
(4) The extent to which public
involvement already has been achieved
through other means, Such as earlier
public hearings, meetings with citizen
representatives, and/or written
comments on the proposed action.
(b) If public hearings are held, the
documents to be discussed should be
made available to the public at least
fifteen (15) days prior to the time of the
public hearings, and a notice will be
placed in the Federal Register giving
the subject, time and place of the
proposed hearings. To the extent
possible, such public hearings shall be
held in the local community or
jurisdiction where the action is
proposed.
§ 237.12
Records and reports.
Agency Bureaus and Independent
Offices will maintain copies of finalized
NEPA compliance documents and
approved decision documents as part of
the official project files, and make them
freely available to the public by posting
them on the Agency’s internet pages. To
the extent any national security
classified information or procurement
sensitive information is included, those
portions will be redacted before making
such documents available to the public.
Angelique M. Crumbly,
Agency Regulatory Official, U.S. Agency for
International Development.
[FR Doc. 2014–24828 Filed 10–17–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
62587
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
25 CFR Parts 81 and 82
[BIA–2014–0006; K00103 12/13 A3A10;
134D0102DR–DS5A300000–
DR.5A311.IA000113]
RIN 1076–AE93
Secretarial Election Procedures
AGENCY:
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
Notice of tribal consultation
meetings.
ACTION:
This document announces
tribal consultation meetings on the
proposed rule amending regulations
governing Secretarial elections and
petitioning procedures.
SUMMARY:
DATES: See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document
for dates of the tribal consultation
meetings.
ADDRESSES: See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document
for addresses of the tribal consultation
meetings.
Ms.
Laurel Iron Cloud, Chief, Division of
Tribal Government Services, Central
Office, Bureau of Indian Affairs at
telephone (202) 513–7641. Individuals
who use a telecommunications device
for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service at 1 (800)
877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
Monday through Friday, excluding
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
On
October 9, 2014, we published a
proposed rule amending 25 CFR parts
81 (Secretarial Elections) and 82
(Petitioning Procedures), combining
them into one Code of Federal
Regulations part at 25 CFR part 81. See
79 FR 61021. The proposed rule is
available at: https://www.bia.gov/
WhoWeAre/AS–IA/ORM/SecElections/
index.htm.
We will be hosting the following
tribal consultations sessions on this
proposed rule:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Date
Time
Location
Venue
Sunday, October 26, 2014 ..
1:00 p.m.–4:00 p.m. (Local
time).
Atlanta, GA ........................
Tuesday, November 18,
2014.
8:30 a.m.–12:00 p.m.
(Local time).
Oklahoma City, OK ...........
National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) Annual
Convention, Hyatt Regency Atlanta, 265 Peachtree
St. NE., Atlanta, GA 30303.
Embassy Suites Oklahoma City Airport, 1815 S. Meridian Ave., Oklahoma City, OK 73108.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:58 Oct 17, 2014
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\20OCP1.SGM
20OCP1
62588
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 202 / Monday, October 20, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Date
Thursday, November 20,
2014.
Time
8:30 a.m.–12:00 p.m.
(Local time).
Dated: October 15, 2014.
Lawrence Roberts,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian
Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2014–24906 Filed 10–17–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–4J–P
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
41 CFR Parts 300–3, 301–10, and 301–
70
[FTR Case 2014–302; Docket 2014–0014,
Sequence 1]
RIN 3090–AJ48
Federal Travel Regulation;
Enhancement of Privately Owned
Vehicle and Rental Vehicle Policy
Office of Government-wide
Policy (OGP), General Services
Administration (GSA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
GSA is proposing to amend
the Federal Travel Regulation (FTR) by
requiring agencies to have an internal
policy for determining whether to
authorize a privately owned vehicle
(POV), as opposed to a rental car, in
conjunction with temporary duty travel
(TDY). Further, GSA proposes to specify
that travelers, who have been authorized
to travel via common carrier or rental
car, and choose to use a POV instead,
will be reimbursed at the applicable
POV mileage rate. Also, this amendment
proposes to add specific provisions
addressing the type of rental vehicles
travelers must use, as well as pre-paid
refueling options and other rental car
surcharges. Finally, this amendment
proposes to make certain miscellaneous
corrections, where applicable.
DATES: Interested parties should submit
written comments to the Regulatory
Secretariat at one of the addresses
shown below on or before December 19,
2014 to be considered in the formation
of the final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
identified by FTR Case 2014–302 by any
of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portals:
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
comments via the Federal eRulemaking
portal by searching for ‘‘FTR Case 2014–
302.’’ Select the link ‘‘Comment Now’’
that corresponds with ‘‘FTR Case 2014–
rmajette on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:58 Oct 17, 2014
Location
Jkt 235001
Venue
Rocklin, CA ........................
Whitney Oaks Golf Club, 2305 Clubhouse Drive,
Rocklin, CA 95765.
302’’ and follow the instructions
provided at the screen. Please include
your name, company name (if any), and
‘‘FTR Case 2014–302’’ on your attached
document.
• Fax: 202–208–1398.
• Mail: General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat
(MVCB), Attn. Ms. Hada Flowers, 1800
F Street NW., Washington, DC 20405.
Instructions: Please submit comments
only and cite FTR Case 2014–302 in all
correspondence related to this case. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
clarification of content, contact Mr. Cy
Greenidge, Program Analyst, Office of
Government-wide Policy, at 202–219–
2349. Contact the Regulatory Secretariat
(MVCB), 1800 F Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20405, 202–501–4755,
for information pertaining to status or
publication schedules. Please cite FTR
case 2014–302.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
The FTR already provides for
determining when the use of a POV or
rental vehicle in conjunction with TDY
could be advantageous to the
Government (see FTR Part 301–10,
Subparts D and E, and Part 301–70,
Subpart B). The FTR also advises that
when using a rental vehicle, travelers
should consider renting a vehicle from
a vendor that participates in the Defense
Travel Management Office’s (DTMO)
U.S. Government Car Rental Agreement
to avail themselves of the Agreement’s
benefits (see FTR section 301–10.450). It
has been determined that more specific
guidance regarding the use of POVs and
rental cars will save agencies money
when authorizing employees to travel.
This proposed rule provides that
agencies must have an internal policy
for determining whether to authorize a
POV, as opposed to a rental car, in
conjunction with TDY. Additionally,
GSA proposes specifying that travelers
who have been authorized by their
agencies to travel via common carrier or
rental car, and choose to use a POV
instead, will be reimbursed at the
applicable POV mileage rate up to the
constructive cost of the authorized
mode of transportation plus per diem.
Further, this amendment proposes that
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
travelers who are authorized to use a
rental car in conjunction with TDY must
use the least expensive compact car
available. This amendment also
proposes that travelers will not be
reimbursed for pre-paid refueling
options for rental cars. Moreover, this
amendment proposes that agencies may
not reimburse travelers surcharges
involved when rental car companies
purchase miles from airlines and
provide those miles to their vehicle
customers. Finally, this amendment also
proposes to make certain miscellaneous
corrections, where applicable.
B. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives, and if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This proposed rule is not a
significant regulatory action, and
therefore, was not subject to review
under Section 6(b) of E.O. 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, dated
September 30, 1993.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. This
proposed rule is also exempt from the
Administrative Procedure Act pursuant
to 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2) because it applies
to agency management or personnel.
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does
not apply because the proposed changes
to the FTR do not impose recordkeeping
or information collection requirements,
or the collection of information from
offerors, contractors, or members of the
public that require the approval of the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
E. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act
This proposed rule is also exempt
from Congressional review prescribed
E:\FR\FM\20OCP1.SGM
20OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 202 (Monday, October 20, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 62587-62588]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24906]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
25 CFR Parts 81 and 82
[BIA-2014-0006; K00103 12/13 A3A10; 134D0102DR-DS5A300000-
DR.5A311.IA000113]
RIN 1076-AE93
Secretarial Election Procedures
AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of tribal consultation meetings.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document announces tribal consultation meetings on the
proposed rule amending regulations governing Secretarial elections and
petitioning procedures.
DATES: See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document for
dates of the tribal consultation meetings.
ADDRESSES: See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document
for addresses of the tribal consultation meetings.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Laurel Iron Cloud, Chief, Division
of Tribal Government Services, Central Office, Bureau of Indian Affairs
at telephone (202) 513-7641. Individuals who use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay
Service at 1 (800) 877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. Monday through
Friday, excluding Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 9, 2014, we published a proposed
rule amending 25 CFR parts 81 (Secretarial Elections) and 82
(Petitioning Procedures), combining them into one Code of Federal
Regulations part at 25 CFR part 81. See 79 FR 61021. The proposed rule
is available at: https://www.bia.gov/WhoWeAre/AS-IA/ORM/SecElections/index.htm.
We will be hosting the following tribal consultations sessions on
this proposed rule:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date Time Location Venue
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sunday, October 26, 2014........... 1:00 p.m.-4:00 p.m. Atlanta, GA........... National Congress of
(Local time). American Indians (NCAI)
Annual Convention, Hyatt
Regency Atlanta, 265
Peachtree St. NE.,
Atlanta, GA 30303.
Tuesday, November 18, 2014......... 8:30 a.m.-12:00 p.m. Oklahoma City, OK..... Embassy Suites Oklahoma
(Local time). City Airport, 1815 S.
Meridian Ave., Oklahoma
City, OK 73108.
[[Page 62588]]
Thursday, November 20, 2014........ 8:30 a.m.-12:00 p.m. Rocklin, CA........... Whitney Oaks Golf Club,
(Local time). 2305 Clubhouse Drive,
Rocklin, CA 95765.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: October 15, 2014.
Lawrence Roberts,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2014-24906 Filed 10-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-4J-P