Agricultural Pesticide Spray Drift Reduction Technologies Voluntary Program, 61865-61867 [2014-24525]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 199 / Wednesday, October 15, 2014 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
www.regulations.gov. You may use
www.regulations.gov to submit or view
public comments, access the index
listing of the contents of the official
public docket, and access those
documents in the public docket that are
available electronically. Once in the
system, key in the appropriate docket
identification number then select
‘‘search’’.
It is important to note that EPA’s
policy is that public comments, whether
submitted electronically or in paper,
will be made available for public
viewing online at www.regulations.gov
without change, unless the comment
contains copyrighted material,
confidential business information (CBI),
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information
claimed as CBI and other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute
is not included in the official public
docket or in the electronic public
docket. EPA’s policy is that copyrighted
material, including copyrighted material
contained in a public comment, will not
be placed in EPA’s electronic public
docket but will be available only in
printed, paper form in the official public
docket. Although not all docket
materials may be available
electronically, you may still access any
of the publicly available docket
materials through the EPA Docket
Center.
B. How and to whom do I submit
comments?
You may submit comments as
provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Please ensure that your comments are
submitted within the specified comment
period. Comments received after the
close of the comment period will be
marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not required to
consider these late comments.
If you submit an electronic comment,
EPA recommends that you include your
name, mailing address, and an email
address or other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD ROM you submit. This
ensures that you can be identified as the
submitter of the comment and allows
EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot
read your comment due to technical
difficulties or needs further information
on the substance of your comment. Any
identifying or contact information
provided in the body of a comment will
be included as part of the comment that
is placed in the official public docket,
and made available in EPA’s electronic
public docket. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:00 Oct 14, 2014
Jkt 235001
Use of the www.regulations.gov Web
site to submit comments to EPA
electronically is EPA’s preferred method
for receiving comments. The electronic
public docket system is an ‘‘anonymous
access’’ system, which means EPA will
not know your identity, email address,
or other contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
In contrast to EPA’s electronic public
docket, EPA’s electronic mail (email)
system is not an ‘‘anonymous access’’
system. If you send an email comment
directly to the Docket without going
through www.regulations.gov, your
email address is automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the official public
docket, and made available in EPA’s
electronic public docket.
Dated: October 2, 2014.
Lorie J. Schmidt,
Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2014–24472 Filed 10–14–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0748; FRL–9917–58]
Agricultural Pesticide Spray Drift
Reduction Technologies Voluntary
Program
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
EPA’s Office of Pesticides
Programs (OPP) is announcing a
voluntary program to document the
effectiveness of agricultural pesticide
spray application technologies on
reducing pesticide spray drift. Under
the Drift Reduction Technology (DRT)
Program, agricultural equipment
manufacturers would conduct (or make
arrangements for a testing facility to
conduct) studies to determine the
percent drift reduction according to a
verification protocol. Once completed,
the manufacturer would submit the
study to EPA for review and evaluation.
As verified, these reductions could then
be quantitatively credited in the
environmental risk assessments used to
develop the drift reduction measures
appearing on the label of the pesticide
product.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jay
Ellenberger, Field and External Affairs
Division (7506P), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (703) 305–7099; email address:
ellenberger.jay@epa.gov.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61865
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are a pesticide
application equipment manufacturer,
chemical manufacturer, pesticide
registrant, university researcher, or have
an interest in reducing spray drift. The
following list of North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
to help readers determine whether this
document applies to them. Potentially
affected entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Producers of pesticide products
(NAICS code 32532).
• Research and development in the
physical, engineering, and life sciences
(NAICS code 541710).
• Colleges, universities, and
professional schools (NAICS code
611310).
B. How can I get copies of this document
and other related information?
The docket for this action, identified
by docket identification (ID) number
EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0748, is available
at https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the
Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Background
A. What is the Drift Reduction
Technology Program?
Since 2006, EPA has worked
collaboratively with other government
agencies, industry, and academia to
develop a verification protocol for
quantitating the percent drift reduction
for a particular application technology.
With this notice, EPA is announcing a
voluntary program based on this
verification protocol to promote the use
of technologies that have demonstrated
their effectiveness in reducing the drift
of agricultural pesticide spray
application technologies. The benefits of
this voluntary program include reduced
loss of pesticide from site of application,
E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM
15OCN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
61866
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 199 / Wednesday, October 15, 2014 / Notices
more deposition of the applied pesticide
on the crop, improved pesticide product
efficacy, reduced costs to applicators
and growers, and reductions in overall
risks.
EPA believes there are application
technologies that have the potential to
significantly reduce the amount of spray
drift. Studies conducted to measure
spray drift reduction would verify the
percent reduction achieved, and thus
identify these technologies. As
manufacturers become aware of the DRT
Program and begin to complete
verification studies of their technologies
(in accordance with the verification
protocol), the manufacturer would
submit the test data to OPP for
evaluation. OPP will evaluate each data
submission and, as appropriate, assign a
DRT rating to the specific technology
(e.g., a nozzle) based on the technology’s
spray drift characteristics as compared
to those of a standard set of nozzles.
OPP will then post on its Web site
(https://www2.epa.gov/reducingpesticide-drift) the identification of the
manufacturer, its validated technology,
and the EPA-assigned DRT rating.
Using the information on the OPP’s
Web site, pesticide registrants then have
the option of submitting a draft label for
review which would include draft
application instructions using DRTrated technology on their product labels.
As part of the label approval process,
EPA would consider the rating category,
(along with the appropriate drift
reduction factor), in its risk assessment
and risk management decisions. As
appropriate, the approved label would
contain application instructions for use
of non-DRT-rated equipment as well as
one or more categories of DRT-rated
equipment. The applicator would read
the label and also refer to OPP’s Web
site to identify verified DRTs whose use
could be compatible with their
application and then follow the label
directions for the DRT-rated technology
selected for use.
Use of DRT technologies offers the
potential for fewer/reduced application
restrictions needed to mitigate spray
drift from the intended application
site(s); application of more of the spray
on the target site or crop which can
improve efficacy; a potential reduction
in the associated potential risks from
spray drift; and a reduction in costs to
the applicator and grower (reduced
potential for insurance claims and
enforcement penalties). Thus,
applicators and growers will have
incentives to use these drift reduction
technologies. As applicators and
growers use DRTs on a more routine
basis, benefits will accrue. Less
pesticide loss to non-target sites means
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:00 Oct 14, 2014
Jkt 235001
more of the applied pesticides are
deposited on the intended sites. This
may result in improved pesticide
application efficacy, reduced costs to
applicators and growers, and reductions
in overall risks.
This is a voluntary program: No one
is required to participate. Detailed
information about the voluntary DRT
Program, including approval by the
Office of Management and Budget to
collect this information, is available on
OPP’s Web site. EPA will accept DRT
studies for review and evaluation
immediately.
B. What is Pesticide Drift and why is
DRT important?
For the purpose of this notice
pesticide spray drift is defined as the
physical movement of a pesticide
through the air at the time of application
or soon thereafter from the target site to
any non- or off-target site. This does not
include pesticide movements by
erosion, migration, volatility, or
windblown soil particles after
application. Spray drift is dependent on
the design of application equipment,
size of spray droplets, weather
conditions, and other factors.
Today, there is increased sensitivity
to spray drift due to increased suburban
development in agricultural areas, and
protection of endangered species. Spray
drift management is of interest to
pesticide and other chemical
manufacturers, application equipment
manufacturers, pesticide applicators,
government agencies, advocacy groups,
and the public. Generally, applications
of most if not all sprays result in some
amount of drift. It is not possible to
completely eliminate drift.
C. Description of the DRT Program
The following is an outline of the DRT
Program:
• Agricultural equipment
manufacturers contract with a testing
facility (or use their own facility) to test
their technology using the verification
protocol.
• Manufacturers then submit studies
to OPP for review and evaluation.
• OPP verifies the adequacy of the
study and determines the potential for
the technology to reduce drift compared
to a reference.
• OPP assigns a ‘star’ rating to the
technology.
• Rating is posted on OPP’s Web site.
• Pesticide registrant submits a
proposed label that offers an alternative
application process that specifies the
use of a DRT with ‘star’ rating.
• OPP evaluates the proposed label
and conducts the environmental risk
assessment using assumptions
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
appropriate for the ‘star’ rating/
application technology.
• If appropriate, OPP may also
approve the label with two sets of
application restrictions: One set of
restrictions if the product is applied
without DRT and another set of
restrictions if the product is applied
with a DRT.
D. What is a ‘Star’ rating?
As appropriate, each verified
technology is assigned to one of four
drift reduction categories represented by
stars:
• Less than 25% reduction = No DRT
rating.
• 25 to 49% reduction = DRT* rating.
• 50 to 74% reduction = DRT**
rating.
• 75 to 89% reduction = DRT***
rating.
• Equal to or greater than 90%
reduction = DRT**** rating.
E. Benefits of the Voluntary DRT
Program
Use of verified DRTs in the
application of pesticides has the
potential for significant benefits.
1. Benefits to growers and applicators
would include:
• Substantiated, accepted
performance claims of the verified
technologies.
• Greater deposition of applied
pesticides on the target sites/crops
which may result in improved efficacy
of pest or weed control.
• With greater on-target deposition,
potential reductions in application rates
with a commensurate reduction in
application costs.
• Reduction of the currently
estimated application restrictions for
preventing adverse effects (e.g., smaller
or no buffer zones).
• Applications can be made with
increased flexibility in application
timing and options potentially saving
applicators time and costs: This means
applications under a wider range of
environmental and application method
conditions.
• Reduced spray drift resulting in
fewer incidents of adverse effects: This
means fewer claims of violations of
pesticide labeling requirements that
need to be investigated by enforcement
authorities, reduction in enforcement
violation penalties, and less litigation
and associated costs, including
insurance claim costs.
2. Benefits to manufacturers and
pesticide registrants would include:
• Increased demand for DRT-rated
equipment and pesticide products
offering the option of DRT application
methods on the label as applicators and
E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM
15OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 199 / Wednesday, October 15, 2014 / Notices
growers use DRTs on a more routine
basis.
3. Benefits to the public and the
environment would include:
• Fewer incidents of adverse effects
from spray drift to humans, and
terrestrial and aquatic organisms and
ecosystems, including threatened or
endangered species.
F. Next Steps
Once the submitted DRT studies have
been reviewed and evaluated by OPP,
and the results are posted on the
Agency’s Web site, then pesticide
registrants have the option of amending
their label to include DRT-rated
application methods. This requires the
submission of a complete application
including a Pesticide Registration
Improvement Act (PRIA) fee, or request
for waiver or reduction. OPP will
complete its review of the amendment
according to the PRIA timeframe.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.
Dated: October 8, 2014.
Jack E. Housenger,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2014–24525 Filed 10–14–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
COMMISSION
PRB Chair:
Mr. Dexter R. Brooks, Director,
Federal Sector Programs, Office of
Federal Operations, Equal
Employment Opportunity
Commission.
Members:
Mr. Kevin J. Berry, Director, New
York District Office, Equal
Employment Opportunity
Commission;
Ms. Katherine E. Bissell, Deputy
Solicitor for Regional Enforcement,
Department of Labor;
Ms. Kathryn A. Ellis, Assistant
General Counsel, Division of
Educational Equity and Research,
and Agency Dispute Resolution
Specialist, Department of
Education;
Ms. Gwendolyn Y. Reams, Associate
General Counsel, Equal
Employment Opportunity
Commission;
Alternate:
Ms. Delner Franklin-Thomas,
Director, Birmingham District
Office, Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission.
By the direction of the Commission.
Dated: October 3, 2014.
Jenny R. Yang,
Chair.
[FR Doc. 2014–24448 Filed 10–14–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6570–01–P
SES Performance Review Board—
Appointment of Members
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
[3060–1200]
Notice is hereby given of the
appointment of members to the
Performance Review Board of the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa
M. Williams, Chief Human Capital
Officer, U.S. Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission, 131 M Street
NE., Washington, DC 20507, (202) 663–
4306.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Publication of the Performance Review
Board (PRB) membership is required by
5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). The PRB reviews
and evaluates the initial appraisal of a
senior executive’s performance by the
supervisor, and makes
recommendations to the Chair, EEOC,
with respect to performance ratings, pay
level adjustments and performance
awards.
The following are the names and titles
of executives appointed to serve as
members of the SES PRB. Members will
serve a 12-month term, which begins on
November 19, 2014.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:00 Oct 14, 2014
Jkt 235001
Information Collection Approved by
the Office of the Management and
Budget (OMB)
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Federal Communications
Commission has received Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
emergency approval, for a period of six
months, of the information collection
requirements under control number
3060–1200, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). An agency may
not conduct or sponsor a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number,
and no person is required to respond to
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. Comments concerning the
accuracy of the burden estimates and
any suggestions for reducing the burden
should be directed to the person listed
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61867
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section below.
For
additional information contact, Mikelle
Bonan, Telecommunications Access
Policy Division, Wireline Competition
Bureau, Federal Communications
Commission, at (202) 418–7151 or via
Internet at Mikelle.Bonan@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060–1200.
OMB Approval Date: September 18,
2014.
OMB Expiration Date: March 31,
2015.
Title: Application to Participate in
Rural Broadband Experiments and PostSelection Review of Rural Broadband
Experiment Winning Bidders.
Form Numbers: FCC Forms 5610 and
5620.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit, and not-for-profit institutions.
Number of Respondents and
Responses: 500 respondents; 520
responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 5–10
hours.
Frequency of Response: One time and
on occasion reporting requirements.
Total Annual Burden: 2,700 hours.
Total Annual Cost: No cost(s).
Obligation to Respond: Required to
obtain or retain benefits. Statutory
authority for this information collection
is contained in 47 U.S.C. 151–154 and
254.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: No
impact(s).
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
Information collected in FCC Form 5610
will be confidential until winning
applicants are announced. At that time,
the proposals submitted by winning
applicants will be made publicly
available. All other proposals submitted
will remain confidential. Information
collected in FCC Form 5620 will be
confidential.
Needs and Uses: Under this
information collection, the Commission
proposes to collect information to
determine applicants that will be
selected to participate in the rural
broadband experiments and whether
winning bidders are technically and
financially capable of receiving funding
for rural broadband experiment projects.
To aid in collecting this information
regarding the rural broadband
experiments, the Commission has
created FCC Form 5610 and FCC Form
5620, which applicants use to submit
the most-cost effective proposals in each
funding category and winning bidders
use to demonstrate that they have the
technical and financial qualifications to
successfully complete the proposed
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM
15OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 199 (Wednesday, October 15, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61865-61867]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24525]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0748; FRL-9917-58]
Agricultural Pesticide Spray Drift Reduction Technologies
Voluntary Program
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA's Office of Pesticides Programs (OPP) is announcing a
voluntary program to document the effectiveness of agricultural
pesticide spray application technologies on reducing pesticide spray
drift. Under the Drift Reduction Technology (DRT) Program, agricultural
equipment manufacturers would conduct (or make arrangements for a
testing facility to conduct) studies to determine the percent drift
reduction according to a verification protocol. Once completed, the
manufacturer would submit the study to EPA for review and evaluation.
As verified, these reductions could then be quantitatively credited in
the environmental risk assessments used to develop the drift reduction
measures appearing on the label of the pesticide product.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jay Ellenberger, Field and External
Affairs Division (7506P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number: (703) 305-7099; email address:
ellenberger.jay@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are a
pesticide application equipment manufacturer, chemical manufacturer,
pesticide registrant, university researcher, or have an interest in
reducing spray drift. The following list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive,
but rather provides a guide to help readers determine whether this
document applies to them. Potentially affected entities may include:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Producers of pesticide products (NAICS code 32532).
Research and development in the physical, engineering, and
life sciences (NAICS code 541710).
Colleges, universities, and professional schools (NAICS
code 611310).
B. How can I get copies of this document and other related information?
The docket for this action, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0748, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305-5805. Please review the visitor instructions and
additional information about the docket available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Background
A. What is the Drift Reduction Technology Program?
Since 2006, EPA has worked collaboratively with other government
agencies, industry, and academia to develop a verification protocol for
quantitating the percent drift reduction for a particular application
technology. With this notice, EPA is announcing a voluntary program
based on this verification protocol to promote the use of technologies
that have demonstrated their effectiveness in reducing the drift of
agricultural pesticide spray application technologies. The benefits of
this voluntary program include reduced loss of pesticide from site of
application,
[[Page 61866]]
more deposition of the applied pesticide on the crop, improved
pesticide product efficacy, reduced costs to applicators and growers,
and reductions in overall risks.
EPA believes there are application technologies that have the
potential to significantly reduce the amount of spray drift. Studies
conducted to measure spray drift reduction would verify the percent
reduction achieved, and thus identify these technologies. As
manufacturers become aware of the DRT Program and begin to complete
verification studies of their technologies (in accordance with the
verification protocol), the manufacturer would submit the test data to
OPP for evaluation. OPP will evaluate each data submission and, as
appropriate, assign a DRT rating to the specific technology (e.g., a
nozzle) based on the technology's spray drift characteristics as
compared to those of a standard set of nozzles. OPP will then post on
its Web site (https://www2.epa.gov/reducing-pesticide-drift) the
identification of the manufacturer, its validated technology, and the
EPA-assigned DRT rating.
Using the information on the OPP's Web site, pesticide registrants
then have the option of submitting a draft label for review which would
include draft application instructions using DRT-rated technology on
their product labels. As part of the label approval process, EPA would
consider the rating category, (along with the appropriate drift
reduction factor), in its risk assessment and risk management
decisions. As appropriate, the approved label would contain application
instructions for use of non-DRT-rated equipment as well as one or more
categories of DRT-rated equipment. The applicator would read the label
and also refer to OPP's Web site to identify verified DRTs whose use
could be compatible with their application and then follow the label
directions for the DRT-rated technology selected for use.
Use of DRT technologies offers the potential for fewer/reduced
application restrictions needed to mitigate spray drift from the
intended application site(s); application of more of the spray on the
target site or crop which can improve efficacy; a potential reduction
in the associated potential risks from spray drift; and a reduction in
costs to the applicator and grower (reduced potential for insurance
claims and enforcement penalties). Thus, applicators and growers will
have incentives to use these drift reduction technologies. As
applicators and growers use DRTs on a more routine basis, benefits will
accrue. Less pesticide loss to non-target sites means more of the
applied pesticides are deposited on the intended sites. This may result
in improved pesticide application efficacy, reduced costs to
applicators and growers, and reductions in overall risks.
This is a voluntary program: No one is required to participate.
Detailed information about the voluntary DRT Program, including
approval by the Office of Management and Budget to collect this
information, is available on OPP's Web site. EPA will accept DRT
studies for review and evaluation immediately.
B. What is Pesticide Drift and why is DRT important?
For the purpose of this notice pesticide spray drift is defined as
the physical movement of a pesticide through the air at the time of
application or soon thereafter from the target site to any non- or off-
target site. This does not include pesticide movements by erosion,
migration, volatility, or windblown soil particles after application.
Spray drift is dependent on the design of application equipment, size
of spray droplets, weather conditions, and other factors.
Today, there is increased sensitivity to spray drift due to
increased suburban development in agricultural areas, and protection of
endangered species. Spray drift management is of interest to pesticide
and other chemical manufacturers, application equipment manufacturers,
pesticide applicators, government agencies, advocacy groups, and the
public. Generally, applications of most if not all sprays result in
some amount of drift. It is not possible to completely eliminate drift.
C. Description of the DRT Program
The following is an outline of the DRT Program:
Agricultural equipment manufacturers contract with a
testing facility (or use their own facility) to test their technology
using the verification protocol.
Manufacturers then submit studies to OPP for review and
evaluation.
OPP verifies the adequacy of the study and determines the
potential for the technology to reduce drift compared to a reference.
OPP assigns a `star' rating to the technology.
Rating is posted on OPP's Web site.
Pesticide registrant submits a proposed label that offers
an alternative application process that specifies the use of a DRT with
`star' rating.
OPP evaluates the proposed label and conducts the
environmental risk assessment using assumptions appropriate for the
`star' rating/application technology.
If appropriate, OPP may also approve the label with two
sets of application restrictions: One set of restrictions if the
product is applied without DRT and another set of restrictions if the
product is applied with a DRT.
D. What is a `Star' rating?
As appropriate, each verified technology is assigned to one of four
drift reduction categories represented by stars:
Less than 25% reduction = No DRT rating.
25 to 49% reduction = DRT* rating.
50 to 74% reduction = DRT** rating.
75 to 89% reduction = DRT*** rating.
Equal to or greater than 90% reduction = DRT**** rating.
E. Benefits of the Voluntary DRT Program
Use of verified DRTs in the application of pesticides has the
potential for significant benefits.
1. Benefits to growers and applicators would include:
Substantiated, accepted performance claims of the verified
technologies.
Greater deposition of applied pesticides on the target
sites/crops which may result in improved efficacy of pest or weed
control.
With greater on-target deposition, potential reductions in
application rates with a commensurate reduction in application costs.
Reduction of the currently estimated application
restrictions for preventing adverse effects (e.g., smaller or no buffer
zones).
Applications can be made with increased flexibility in
application timing and options potentially saving applicators time and
costs: This means applications under a wider range of environmental and
application method conditions.
Reduced spray drift resulting in fewer incidents of
adverse effects: This means fewer claims of violations of pesticide
labeling requirements that need to be investigated by enforcement
authorities, reduction in enforcement violation penalties, and less
litigation and associated costs, including insurance claim costs.
2. Benefits to manufacturers and pesticide registrants would
include:
Increased demand for DRT-rated equipment and pesticide
products offering the option of DRT application methods on the label as
applicators and
[[Page 61867]]
growers use DRTs on a more routine basis.
3. Benefits to the public and the environment would include:
Fewer incidents of adverse effects from spray drift to
humans, and terrestrial and aquatic organisms and ecosystems, including
threatened or endangered species.
F. Next Steps
Once the submitted DRT studies have been reviewed and evaluated by
OPP, and the results are posted on the Agency's Web site, then
pesticide registrants have the option of amending their label to
include DRT-rated application methods. This requires the submission of
a complete application including a Pesticide Registration Improvement
Act (PRIA) fee, or request for waiver or reduction. OPP will complete
its review of the amendment according to the PRIA timeframe.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.
Dated: October 8, 2014.
Jack E. Housenger,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2014-24525 Filed 10-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P